alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Reed                      Fisher      |   |   |        |
| Reed                      Fisher               |   |   |        |
| Chief                        Financial Officer |   |   |   |
|                                           |   |   |   |
| August                        4, 2006          |   |   |   |
MATTHEW, CARTER AND BOYCE, P.C.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS*	*
 	

	

Independent Accountants' Report

To the Board of Directors

Allied Capital Corporation

We have examined management's assertion about Allied Capital Corporation's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 including the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Allied Capital Corporation's compliance with those applicable minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Allied Capital Corporation's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We      believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our                    examination does not provide a legal determination on Allied Capital Corporation's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Allied Capital Corporation, in its capacity as Special Servicer, complied with the aforementioned applicable minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, is fairly stated, in all material respects, as set forth in the criteria attached.

 

 

.

 
*Matthews, Carter and Boyce

March 10, 2004

11320 Random Hills Road   Suite 600   Fairfax, Virginia 220307427   TEL: 703-218-3600   FAX 703-218-1808**
#### ZIPWALL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FASTCAP, LLC, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Nos. 2008-1249, 2008-1250.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2009.

Matthew B. Lowrie, Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi LLP, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Kevin M. Littman.

Michael J. Cronen, Zimmerman & Granen, LLP, of Oakland, CA, argued for defendant-cross appellant.

*601Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, PROST, Circuit Judge, GETTLEMAN, District Judge.*

*

 Honorable Robert W. Gettleman, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 11
                                   
                BT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   
                              (Unaudited)

                                      Three months ended      Six months ended
                                                 June 30               June 30
                                         1997       1996        1997      1996
                                  --------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except shares
and per share data)

Primary income per share:
     Net income                    $    4,194  $    2,978  $   8,276  $  6,743
     Preferred dividends                    0          26          0        54
                                  --------------------------------------------
     Net income applicable to
      common stock                 $    4,194  $    2,952  $   8,276  $  6,689
                                  --------------------------------------------
     Average common shares
      outstanding and common stock
      equivalents                   5,682,215   5,400,527  5,682,215 5,376,068
                                  ============================================

     Net income per share-primary  $      .74  $      .55  $    1.46 $    1.24

Fully diluted income per share:
     Net income                    $    4,194  $    2,978  $   8,276 $   6,743
                                 =============================================
     Average common shares
      outstanding and common stock
      equivalents                   5,682,215   5,400,527  5,682,215 5,376,068
     Additional common shares
      assuming:
           Conversion of preferred
            stock Series A                  0      92,052          0    94,729
                                ----------------------------------------------
     Average common shares
      outstanding and common stock
      equivalents                   5,682,215   5,492,579  5,682,215 5,470,797
                                ==============================================

     Net income per share-fully
      diluted                      $      .74  $      .54  $    1.46  $   1.23
                                ==============================================

 Note:  Share and per share data have been adjusted to reflect the 10%
        stock dividend distributed on October 22, 1996.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Advanced MedicalOptics, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 333-108719 and 333-118922) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-90950, 333-109058 and 333-116589) on Form S-8 of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of AdvancedMedical Optics, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and intangibles in 2002. 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 1, 2005
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research: University Park, PA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Software
                        Integrated Farming Systems Project
                                    Integrated Farm System Model
                                    Dairy Gas Emissions Model
                                    Beef Gas Emissions Model
                                    Projected Future Climate Data for IFSMSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area University Park, Pennsylvania Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Docs





- Dairy Gas Emissions Model
- DairyGEM Download and Installation Instructions
- Beef Gas Emissions Model
- BeefGEM Download and installation Instructions
- Integrated Farm System Model
- IFSM Download and Installation Instructions
- Projected Future Climate Data for IFSM

EEO/CRheadline bar Equal Employment Opportunity/Civil Rights  Meetings - Our meetings are held the first Wednesday of the Month at 9:00 a.m.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 376 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that persons having seriously 

delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2011 

Mr. COBURN (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that persons having seriously delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INELIGIBILITY OF PERSONS HAVING SERI4 OUSLY DELINQUENT TAX DEBTS FOR FED5 ERAL EMPLOYMENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 73 of title 5, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 376 IS

1 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER VIII—INELIGIBILITY OF PER2 SONS HAVING SERIOUSLY DELINQUENT 

3 TAX DEBTS FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT 

4 ‘‘§ 7381. Ineligibility of persons having seriously de5 linquent tax debts for Federal employ6 ment 

7 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

8 ‘‘(1) the term ‘seriously delinquent tax debt’ 

9 means an outstanding debt under the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 for which a notice of lien has 

11 been filed in public records pursuant to section 6323 

12 of such Code, except that such term does not in13 clude— 

14 ‘‘(A) a debt that is being paid in a timely 

15 manner pursuant to an agreement under sec16 tion 6159 or section 7122 of such Code; and 

17 ‘‘(B) a debt with respect to which a collec18 tion due process hearing under section 6330 of 

19 such Code, or relief under subsection (a), (b), 

20 or (f) of section 6015 of such Code, is re21 quested or pending; and 

22 ‘‘(2) the term ‘Federal employee’ means— 

23 ‘‘(A) an employee, as defined by section 

24 2105; and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 376 IS

1 ‘‘(B) an employee of the United States 

2 Postal Service or of the Postal Regulatory Com3 mission. 

4 ‘‘(b) INELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT.— 

5 An individual who has a seriously delinquent tax debt shall 

6 be ineligible to be appointed, or to continue serving, as 

7 a Federal employee. 

8 ‘‘(c) REGULATIONS.—The Office of Personnel Man9 agement shall, for purposes of carrying out this section 

10 with respect to the executive branch, prescribe any regula11 tions which the Office considers necessary.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap13 ter 73 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by add14 ing at the end the following: 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER VIII—INELIGIBILITY OF PERSONS HAVING SERIOUSLY

DELINQUENT TAX DEBTS FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT

‘‘7381. Ineligibility of persons having seriously delinquent tax debts for Federal 

employment.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
------------------

Tyrone Julius, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Judge Vince, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

OCT 1 7 :211 

Clerk, u.s. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the Dlstrltt of Columbia 

Ll lbi.!3 

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and 

application to proceed informa pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will 

be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the 

court to dismiss an action "at any time" it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting). 

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, purports to sue a judge of the Superior Court of 

the District of Columbia for monetary damages exceeding $999 million. The cryptic 

"Complaint," consisting mostly of nonsensical racial statements, presents "the sort of patently 

insubstantial claim[]" that is subject to dismissal for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Tooley 

v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Caldwell v. Kagan, 777 F. Supp.2d 

177, 178 (D.D.C. 2011) ("A district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction when the complaint 'is 

patently insubstantial, presenting no federal question suitable for decision.' ") (quoting Tooley, 

586 F.3d at 1009). A separate Order of dismissal acco p;ies this Mernzz ~ion. 

Date: October~, 2011 

3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2379 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2379

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Department of 
Veterans Affairs to fill prescriptions for drugs and medicines written 
                         by private physicians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2005

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Department of 
Veterans Affairs to fill prescriptions for drugs and medicines written 
                         by private physicians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vets Rx Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PHARMACIES TO DISPENSE 
              MEDICATIONS TO VETERANS ON PRESCRIPTIONS WRITTEN BY 
              PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS.

    Section 1712 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f)(1) The Secretary shall provide for Department health-care 
facilities to furnish to a veteran such drugs and medicines as may be 
ordered on prescription of a duly licensed physician in the treatment 
of any illness or injury of the veteran.
    ``(2) The furnishing of drugs and medicines under this subsection 
shall be subject to the copayment requirement in section 1722A of this 
title.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-14-2021]

On February 24, 2021, Merck & Co., Inc., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 24B, in Riverside, Pennsylvania.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 12907-12908, March 5, 2021). On June 24, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: June 24, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-13837 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer ofDakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended July 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| Date: October 30, 2006 |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   |                      |
|                   | /s/ Edward O. Irion       |   |
|                   |                      |
|                   | Edward O. Irion           |
|                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 37 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 37

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
  restriction that a clinical psychologist or clinical social worker 
provide services in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility 
            to a patient only under the care of a physician.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
  restriction that a clinical psychologist or clinical social worker 
provide services in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility 
            to a patient only under the care of a physician.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Autonomy for Psychologists and 
Social Workers Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION THAT A CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST OR CLINICAL 
              SOCIAL WORKER PROVIDE SERVICES IN A COMPREHENSIVE 
              OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION FACILITY TO A PATIENT ONLY 
              UNDER THE CARE OF A PHYSICIAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(cc)(2)(E) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395x(cc)(2)(E)) is amended by striking ``physician'' and 
inserting ``physician, except that a patient receiving qualified 
psychologist services (as defined in subsection (ii)) may be under the 
care of a clinical psychologist with respect to such services to the 
extent permitted under State law and except that a patient receiving 
clinical social worker services (as defined in subsection (hh)(2)) may 
be under the care of a clinical social worker with respect to such 
services to the extent permitted under State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to services provided on or after January 1, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 2 7 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01175
- CV STEVEN D. CATHCART, Appellant

V. DEWIGHT JONES, ET AL ., Appellee s On Appeal from the 422 nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 98750
- 422



### O RDER
On March 11, 2019, we informed appellant his brief failed to comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 and directed him to file an amended b rief within ten days

. By motions filed March 22, 2019, a ppellant now seeks an extension of time to file the amended brief or, alternatively, s uspension of the rules so that his deficient brief may be
considered on the merits. Appellant also asks a copy o f his brief be sent to him.
We have conducted a second review of appellant’s brief for compliance and OR DER as follows. We GR ANT appellant’s motions to the extent we DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send appellant a copy of his brief along with a copy o f the clerk’s record and ORDER appellant
to amend his brief to include citations to the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.1( d), (g), (i). The
amended brief shall be filed no later than May 3 , 2019

. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE