alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 1, 2021.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

     Dated: June 24, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-13845 Filed 6-24-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Southern Timber & Investment Co. *v.*Poe.

*Attachment.*

(Decided Dec. 19, 1907.

45 So. Rep. 205.)

*Judgment; Service of Process; Notice.*— No valid personal judgment can be rendered against a non resident, in a suit begun by attachment, in the absence of appearance or plea by defendant, or unless the judgment entry shows the levy and proof of notice to 'the defendant of the attachment and suit.

Appeal from Clarke Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. John T. Lackland.

Action by Frank Poe against the Southern Timber & Investment Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

*596Frank Poe sued out an attachment against the Southern Timber & Investment Company, a. nonresident, to enforce a money demand, which was levied on certain personal property and real estate described in the returns of the sheriff. What purports to be a nonresident publication, together with the affidavit of Isaac Grant that said notice was published in the Clarke County I >emocrat once a week for four successive weeks, beginning with the issue of, etc., appears in the record. The judgment entry is as follows: “This day came the plaintiff by his attorney, and defendant, having failed to file its plea in the time prescribed by law, wholly makes default. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant «$162 damages, together with the costs in this behalf expended, for which let execution, issue.” Then follows a condemnation of the property levied on.

William D. Dunn, for appellant.

The notice being-only constructive the facts constituting a compliance with the statute must be proven to and found by the court, and the record must show *it.*— Dome *v.*Whitman, 36 Ala. 604; *Diston, et al. v.*Hoocl, 83 Ala. 331; *Meyer & Go. v. Keith,*99 Ala. 519. There can be no personal judgment by default against a nonresident in an attachment suit on statutory *notice.*— Bank *v. Clement,*109 Ala. 270; *Wilmerding v. Corbin Banking Co.,*126 Ala. 268.

Gunn & Tucker, for appellee.

No brief came to the Reporter.

DENSON, J.

— This suit was commenced by original attachment for the enforcement of a money demand. The .affidavit for the attachment shows that the defendant is *597a nonresident of the State of Alabama. There ivas neither appearance nor plea for the defendant, but a personal judgment ivas rendered against it by default. There is no pretense that actual notice was given, nor does the judgment entry show any proof of constructive notice to the defendant of the issuance and levy of the attachment. There is in the transcript an affidavit by Isaac Grant as to .the publication of notice; but neither the order of the court, nor anything else found in the record, makes it a part of the record, so it cannot be looked to in aid of the judgment, nor for any purpose. On the authority of *Diston & Sons v. Hood,*83 Ala. 331, 3 South. 746, the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Eeversed and remanded.

Tyson, O. J., and Simpson and Anderson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Biogen, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 28, 2003                /s/ James C. Mullen
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       James C. Mullen
                                       Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                          and President
                                       [principal executive officer]

Dated:  October 28, 2003               /s/ Peter N. Kellogg
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Peter N. Kellogg
                                       Executive Vice President - Finance
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
                                       [principal financial officer]

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Forms F-3 No. 333-110495 and No. 333-111615, and Forms S-8 No. 333-104062 and No. 333-102860) of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited of our report dated March 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A. 

Athens, Greece

April 14, 2006.
Abatement Order filed December 23, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00483

- CV

____________ CLEVELAND IMAGING AN D SURGICAL HOSPITAL, LLC D/B/A

DOCTOR'S DIAGNOSTIC HOSPITAL , Appellant

V.

CENTRAL TEXAS PHYSIC IAN'S MANAGEMENT, LP , Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 24685



### ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on December 18, 201 4 that appellant is in bankruptc y. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on September 4, 2014, Cleveland Imaging & Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern Distri ct of Texas under case
number 1 4

- 34974 . A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal inaccordance with federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the

appeal abated.

When a case has bee n suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or terminated the stay, a certified copy of the or der must be attached to the motion. Id. A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).
For administrative purposes only, and without s urrendering jurisdiction, the appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00355-RL-SLC document 5 filed 09/29/15 page 1 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00355-RL-SLC document 5 filed 09/29/15 page 2 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00355-RL-SLC document 5 filed 09/29/15 page 3 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00355-RL-SLC document 5 filed 09/29/15 page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Massimiliano  Pozzoni,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual  Report  of  Falcon  Natural Gas Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended  December  31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in  such  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Falcon  Natural  Gas  Corp.

Date:  April 14, 2005

                                                  By: /s/ Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                                     Principal Financial Officer

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2153 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2153

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisic Aldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisic Aldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANISIC ALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.34       Anisic Aldehyde    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 123-11-                                                   31/2008
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2912.49.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 20562-9-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Wayne Anthony Murphy, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-1-04080-4, Arthur W. Yerharen, J., entered April 4, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridge-water, A.C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 483 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for treatment 

of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of furnishing clinical 

psychologist services under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2011 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for 

purposes of furnishing clinical psychologist services under 

the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mental 

5 Health Access Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 483 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS PHY2 SICIANS FOR PURPOSES OF FURNISHING 

3 CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

5 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ before ‘‘(5)’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

9 ‘‘, or (6) a clinical psychologist, but only with re10 spect to the furnishing of qualified psychologist serv11 ices described in subsection (ii) for which the psy12 chologist is legally authorized to perform by the 

13 State and who is acting within the scope of the psy14 chologist’s license (or other authorization under 

15 State law)’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

18 on or after January 1, 2012. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 

Summary of 2015 Executive Officer Compensation 

The following shows the 2015 annual salary for each of Mattersight’s current executive officers: 

 

					
	 Kelly D. Conway, President and Chief Executive Officer:
		$	350,000	  
		
	 Christopher J. Danson, Executive Vice President of Delivery:
		$	300,000	  
		
	 Richard M. Dresden, Executive Vice President of Sales:
		$	275,000	  
		
	 David R. Gustafson, Executive Vice President of Products and Customer Operations:
		$	300,000	  
		
	 Mark Iserloth, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
		$	280,000	  

 Each of these executive officers have target bonus percentages as set forth in their employment agreements with Mattersight
and modified with approval of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors from time to time. Additional information concerning the compensation of these executive officers is set forth in the Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed by Mattersight
Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-K of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the year ended January 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: April 22, 2010



/s/ Kenneth
HicksKenneth Hicks President and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 524 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 524

 To terminate certain hydropower reservations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2011

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate certain hydropower reservations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF HYDROPOWER RESERVATIONS.

    (a) Termination of Reservation Relating to Bureau of Land 
Management Patent Numbered CA 6313.--The reservation under section 24 
of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 818) of the Bureau of Land 
Management patent numbered CA 6313 and dated May 13, 1983, to the 
approximately 103.26 acres of land now owned by Donald L. Smith in 
Madera County, California, and more particularly described as a portion 
of secs. 25, 26, 35, and 36, T. 4 S., R. 24 E., Mount Diablo Meridian, 
is terminated.
    (b) Termination of Reservation Relating to Bureau of Land 
Management Patent Numbered CA 19394.--To the extent that any 
reservation of use for hydropower could be determined to have been 
omitted under section 24 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 818) from 
the Bureau of Land Management patent numbered CA 19394 and dated 
September 25, 1987, to the approximately 41.323 acres of land conveyed 
to Lindsay Smith, Peggy L. Birchim, Donald L. Smith, and Keith Smith, 
and more particularly described as comprising a portion of secs. 25 and 
36, unsurveyed T. 4 S., R. 24 E., Mount Diablo Meridian, Jackass Mining 
District, Madera County, California, the reservation is terminated.
                                 <all>
```
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 02

- 1237 V

(Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

COLLEEN BOSTON MADARIAGA *

and JAMES ALLEN

, parents and *

guardian s of A.A. , a minor, *

*

Petitioner s

, *

* Filed: March 22 , 2016

v. *

* Autism; Decision on Attorneys’

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Fees and Costs

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DECISION (ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 1 a D ecision issued

on September 26 , 2015

. On March 7, 2016, Petitioners filed an Application for Attorneys’ Fees

and Costs, reques ting a total payment of $10,606.55

, representing attorn eys’ fees and costs of

$10, 050.80 , and $555.75 of costs expended by Petitioners. On March 18, 2016, Respondent

filed a statement indicating that Respondent has no objection to this requ est.

I find that this Petition was filed and pursued in good faith and with a reasonable basis.

Thus, a n award for fees and costs is appropriate at this time, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b)

and (e)(1). Further, the proposed am ounts seem reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I

hereby award the following attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b) and

(e)(1):

• a l ump sum of $10,050.80 , in the form of a che ck payable jointly to P etitioner s

and P etiti on er s’ counsel, Ronald C. Homer , on account of services performed by

counsel’s law firm.

1 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10 et seq . (2012 ).• a lump sum of $555.75 , in the form of a che ck pay able to P etitioner s

, which represents P etitioner s’ own litigation expenses in this case.

In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the

Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in

accordance herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

/s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing the

right to seek review.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3295

___________________________

William J. Bush

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Risk Management Agency, USDA/RMA; United States Department of Agriculture

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City

____________

 Submitted: June 21, 2018

Filed: June 26, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
William J. Bush appeals after the district court adversely granted summary 1

judgment to the United States Department of Agriculture and its Risk Management

Agency in his pro se Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action seeking information

on soybean and corn yields, aggregated by section, for four Iowa townships;

declaratory relief; and an award of attorney fees and litigation costs. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the

district court did not err in its decision. See Miller v. U.S. Dep’t of State, 779 F.2d

1378, 1382 (8th Cir. 1985) (in FOIA cases, grant ofsummary judgment is appropriate

where “the agency proves that is has fully discharged its obligations under FOIA,

after the underlying facts and inferences to be drawn from them are construed in the

light most favorable to the FOIA requester”). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. 

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The HonorableC.J. Williams, United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern 1

District of Iowa, to whom the case wasreferred for final disposition by consent of the

parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-