alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9057-2]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed June 21, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through June 28, 2021 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice 

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20210084, Final, NMFS, ME,*                     Regulatory Impact Review and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Amending the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan: Risk Reduction Rule,                     *Review Period Ends:*                     08/02/2021,                     *Contact:*                     Jennifer Anderson 978-281-9226.                

*EIS No. 20210085, Final, BLM, CO,*                     Blue Valley Ranch Land Exchange,                     *Review Period Ends:*                     08/02/2021,                     *Contact:*                     William Mills 970-724-3001.                

*EIS No. 20210086, Draft, FERC, LA,*                     East Lateral Xpress Project,                     *Comment Period Ends:*                     08/16/2021,                     *Contact:*                     Office of External Affairs 866-208-3372.                

## Amended Notice

*EIS No. 20210047, Draft Supplement, FHWA, KS,*                     South Lawrence Trafficway,                     *Comment Period Ends:*                     09/30/2021,                     *Contact:*                     Javier Ahumada 785-273-2649. Revision to FR Notice Published 05/07/2021; Extending the Comment Period from 06/21/2021 to 09/30/2021.                

Dated: June 28, 2021.

Cindy S. Barger, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2021-14172 Filed 7-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.5

                                  CERTIFICATION

                        Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust
                           Series 2002-A (the "Trust")

I, Keith W. Schuck, the chief financial officer of Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, the depositor of assets into the above-referenced Trust ,
certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale
         and servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in
         these reports;

4.       Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
         in this annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
         accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and
         except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
         obligations under the sale and servicing agreement; and

5.       This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to
         the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
         upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         sale and servicing agreement, that is included in this annual report.





Date:    March 30, 2004


         /s/ Keith W. Schuck
--------------------------------------------------------
Name:    Keith W. Schuck
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis J. Bush, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered September 20, 1983, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of grand larceny in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree.

Judgment affirmed *(see, People v Muzzy,*104 AD2d 708, *lv denied*64 NY2d 784). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
#### GRIBBEN v. GELLER et al. HESS et al. v. BUILDERS’ CONST. CO. LONG ISLAND SECURITY CO. v. HANOVER FIRE INS. CO. BIBAS & EISENSTAEDT v. KLINE. GOLDBERG et al. v. GOODMAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Actions by William Gribben against Alter Geller and others, by Edwin H. Hess and others against the Builders’ Construction Company, by the Long Island Security Company against the Hanover Fire Insurance Company, by Bibas & Eisenstaedt against B. Clifford Kline, and by Bernard Goldberg and others against Leon Goodman.

No opinions. Applications for leave to appeal from Appellate Term in each case denied, with $10 costs. Orders signed.
#### JOLLEY, Respondent, v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by George Jolley against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NOS. 2-05-058-CR

                                                  2-05-059-CR

PIER HILLERY                               					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Withdraw Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 									 								

										PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 5, 2005.
#### William L. Ford, Respondent, *v.*The Binghamton Hydraulic Power Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 14, 1890;

decided April 29, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made November 26, *6651889, which affirmed an order of Special Term, denying a motion to set aside a judgment against defendant.

*Mr. Conner*for appellant.

*George B. Curtiss*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion "below.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 595 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 595

 To amend title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
 1965 to require the Secretary of Education to complete payments under 
  such title to local educational agencies eligible for such payments 
                         within 3 fiscal years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2011

Mrs. Murray (for herself and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
 1965 to require the Secretary of Education to complete payments under 
  such title to local educational agencies eligible for such payments 
                         within 3 fiscal years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Impact Aid Timely Repayment Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. TIMELY PAYMENTS.

    Section 8010 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 7710) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Timely Payments.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 
        shall pay a local educational agency the full amount that the 
        agency is eligible to receive under this title for a fiscal 
        year not later than September 30 of the second fiscal year 
        following the fiscal year for which such amount has been 
        appropriated if, not later than 1 calendar year following the 
        fiscal year in which such amount has been appropriated, such 
        local educational agency submits to the Secretary all the data 
        and information necessary for the Secretary to pay the full 
        amount that the agency is eligible to receive under this title 
        for such fiscal year.
            ``(2) Payments with respect to fiscal years in which 
        insufficient funds are appropriated.--For a fiscal year in 
        which the amount appropriated under section 8014 is 
        insufficient to pay the full amount a local educational agency 
        is eligible to receive under this title, paragraph (1) shall be 
        applied by substituting `is available to pay the agency' for 
        `the agency is eligible to receive' each place it appears.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Officer Certification

 

I, Thomas P. Friezen,certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewedthis Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to Form 10-K of Dakota Growers PastaCompany, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:  December 30, 2004 |                               |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                     |                               |
|                     |   /s/  Thomas P. Friezen |   |
|                     | Thomas  P. Friezen                 |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer           |

 

----
#### In re UNION LIFE INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

In the matter of the Union Life Insurance Company. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. *1149Order filed. See, also, 146 App. Div. 942, 131 N. Y. Supp. 1148.
II 

Calendar No. 148 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 572 

[Report No. 112–68] 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on collective 

bargaining with respect to matters and questions regarding compensation 

of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs other than rates 

of basic pay, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2011 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio (for himself, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. MERKLEY, and Mr. BEGICH) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 

Reported by Mrs. MURRAY, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on collective bargaining with respect to matters and 

questions regarding compensation of employees of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs other than rates of basic 

pay, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 572 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON COLLECTIVE 

2 BARGAINING WITH RESPECT TO COMPENSA3 TION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS EMPLOYEES OTHER THAN RATES OF 

5 BASIC PAY. 

6 Subsections (b) and (d) of section 7422 of title 38, 

7 United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘compensa8 tion’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘rates of basic 

9 pay’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 148 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 572 

[Report No. 112–68] 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal 

and for other purposes. Veterans Affairs other than rates of basic pay, pensation of employees of the Department of spect to matters and questions regarding comthe prohibition on collective bargaining with reSEPTEMBER 6, 2011 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John Bender DAVIS, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-7582.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2009.

Decided: Jan. 16, 2009.

John Bender Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John Bender Davis, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution*833al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Dr.
      Ramesh Zacharias Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 14, 2005




By:Name:
                Dr. Ramesh ZachariasTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14452]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 6, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Bancorp of Taylorville, Inc., Taylorville, Illinois; to 
merge with Mackinaw Valley Financial Services, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Security Bank, both of Mackinaw, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. FirstSun Capital Bancorp, Denver, Colorado; to merge with 
Pioneer Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Pioneer Bank, 
SSB, both of Austin, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 1, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-14452 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Leroy Stewart, Appellant, v James B. Sullivan, as Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered February 10, 1984, which dismissed the petition.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner has been released from custody and therefore is not entitled to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus *(People ex rel. Julio v Walters,*58 NY2d 881; *People ex rel. Bovian v Johnson,*103 AD2d 813). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 700148

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### EDWARD W. CARULLO
Chief Navy Career Counselor (E

- 7 ), U.S. Navy

Appellant

______________________ ___ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander Jason L. Jones, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: C ommand er, Navy Region Southeast, Naval

Air Station, Jacksonville, FL

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Com mander George W. Lucier, JAGC, USN. For Appellant : Lieutenant C ommander Paul D. Jenkins, JAGC, USN

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 31 J uly 2017

_________________________ Before C AMPBELL , H UTCHISON , and S AYEGH , Appella te Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S .C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
# C_2008307EN.01000401.xml

| 2.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5352 — Omron/Ficosa/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 307/03)

On 21 November 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5352. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5352. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---