alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 67 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 67

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT OF CERTAIN DISABLED FORMER 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1060b the following new section:
``Sec. 1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former 
              members of the armed forces
    ``The Secretary of Defense shall permit any former member of the 
armed forces who is entitled to compensation under the laws 
administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a service-
connected disability rated as total to travel, in the same manner and 
to the same extent as retired members of the armed forces, on 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command. The 
Secretary of Defense shall permit such travel on a space-available 
basis.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 1060b the following new item:

``1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former members 
                            of the armed forces.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### LYNTZ, Respondent, v. FLETCHER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 15, 1898.)

Action by Mary Lj-ntz against William P. Fletcher.

No opinion. Order modified so that the condition shall be on payment of $10 costs, and of fees of witnesses and other taxable disbursements, made or incurred, which were rendered ineffectual by the adjournment, on the authority of Kennedy v. Wood, 54 Hun, 14, 7 N. Y. Supp. 90.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tytray L. MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6494.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.

Tytray L. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

*970Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tytray L. Martin appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Martin,*No. 3:07-cr-00122-REPMHL-1, 2009 WL 2434598 (E.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2011). We also deny Martin’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### SCHWEND, INC., a Florida for-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manuel ZURITA, in his individual capacity, Clyde Lo Chin, in his individual capacity, Julia Diaz, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-10935

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 13, 2011.

Joseph Elton Blitch, Kevin C. Maxwell, Private Counsel, LLC, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michelle Thresher Taylor, Esq., David Paul Rhodes, Erik Kenneth Stegeby, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We conclude that the appellees are entitled to the defense of qualified immunity as a matter of law for the reasons stated in the district court’s February 18, 2011 order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
August 19, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JACOB ALFRED BLANKEN, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00496-CR, NO. 14-13-00497-CR

 V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 6, 2019.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-1941

Lower Tribunal No. 15-23155

________________

Willie Jones,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch,

Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public

Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

HENDON, J.
Willie Jones appeals from a final judgment of conviction and sentence on

the charges of trafficking in cocaine, possession of marijuana with intent to sell,

and possession of drug paraphernalia. Jones argues on appeal that certain of the

trial court’s comments shifted the burden of proof and prejudiced his defense at

trial. None of these comments were objected to at trial. Thus, we will reverse only

if the comment was fundamental error, i.e., “error that ‘reaches down into the

validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been

obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.’” Brooks v. State, 762 So. 2d

879, 899 (Fla. 2000); see also Jones v. State, 612 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 1992) (holding

that the contemporaneous objection rule applies to such comments and an appellate

court will not reverse in the absence of an objection unless the comment is so

prejudicial as to be fundamental error); Pope v. Wainwright, 496 So. 2d 798 (Fla.

1986) (concluding that errors other than those constituting fundamental error are

waived unless timely raised in the trial court). 

After a thorough examination of the record on appeal, we find no

fundamental error in the trial court’s comments. Indeed, not every act or comment

that might be interpreted as demonstrating less than neutrality on the part of the

judge will be deemed fundamental error. Mathew v. State, 837 So. 2d 1167 (Fla.

4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm Jones’ convictions. 

2
Finally, Jones asserts that there is a discrepancy between the oral

pronouncement of sentence and the written sentencing order. This error was not

preserved by a contemporaneous objection during the sentencing hearing or by

raising the issue under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), which

precludes Jones from raising the error on direct appeal. See Brannon v. State, 850

So. 2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003); Green v. State, 224 So. 3d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). 

As we find that Jones has neither properly preserved the trial court's alleged

sentencing error, nor demonstrated fundamental error on appeal, we affirm his

sentence without prejudice to Jones to raise this issue in an appropriately filed rule

3.800 motion with the trial court.

Affirmed. 

 

3
#### RYAN, Respondent, v. GRAHAM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 27, 1912.)

Action by Katherine Ryan against Gordon T. Graham. No opinion. Judgment and order •affirmed, with costs.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 26, 2014

s1119

Order 

Clerk

November 26, 2014

149453

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149453

COA: 320562

Kent CC: 12-009193-FC

FELIPE ROLANDO LOPEZ-VELASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2014 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs SH&E







Bloodborne Pathogen Standard Programsheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,707
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     43,025
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             200
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               201
<LOANS>                                        183,206
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,728
<DEPOSITS>                                     220,670
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,425
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,212
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 261,728
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,116
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   374
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,818
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,203
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,615
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      474
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (28)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,866
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,866
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.73
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,244
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    77
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,010
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       91
<RECOVERIES>                                        53
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,446
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,446
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Report onSchedule and Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.: 

 

The audits referred to in our report dated February 20, 2003, included therelated financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2002, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. This financial statement scheduleis the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basicconsolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-90950) on Form S-8 of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. of our reportsdated February 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, andcash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

 

Orange County, California 

March 14, 2003
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






NEA Outreach Pagesheadline bar NEA Outreach
               Bladensburg, MD MLK 2023
               Geneva, NY MLK 2023
               Warren County, TN MLK 2023


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar ARS Water Database
               Crop Condition and Yield Research
               Jornada Experiment
               Monsoon '90
               NicksRainfallData
               OPE3
               RSBasics
               Directions and Sign-in Procedures
               Awards
               Pesticide Volatilization
               Watershed Modeling
               Soil Moisture
               Drought and ET
               Climate Change
               Research Sites
               Millbrook Temporary Network
               South Fork Experimental Watershed
               SM
               Soil Moisture Experiments
               Alumni
               GRAPEX


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov