alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10567 Conference Calendar

BRUCE ARNOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus C.A. DILLAHA, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-190-C

- - - - - - - - - - February 9, 1999 Before BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Bruce Arnold, Texas prisoner no. 609239, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the defendant, C.A. Dillaha, M.D., and dismissing Arnold’s complaint as frivolous. Arnold argues that Dillaha was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by using an improper method to remove a foreign object embedded in Arnold’s eye and by failing or refusing to provide follow-up treatment with aNo. 98-10567 -2- ophthalmologist. We have reviewed Arnold’s arguments and the record on appeal and find that his claims are premised upon disagreement with the medical treatment he received which, standing alone, are insufficient to support a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Banuelos v. McFarland , 41 F.3d 232, 235 (5th Cir. 1995); Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). The district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Dillaha, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c), nor did it abuse its discretion in dismissing his claim as frivolous. See Martin
v. Scott , 156 F.3d 578, 580 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
Continuing Abatement Order filed April 18, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00741-CV

IN RE SCOTT M. CLEARMAN, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Probate Court No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 461,672

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On Friday, August 24, 2018, relator Scott M. Clearman filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel respondent, the 

Honorable Loyd Wright, presiding judge of Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County,

to vacate his orders of July 10, 2018, and August 2, 2018, regarding relator’s motion 

to quash.

Because respondent ceased to hold the office of Judge of Probate Court No. 1 

of Harris County, Texas, after the institution of this action, we abated this mandamus 
2

proceeding to permit respondent’s successor, the Honorable Jerry Simoneaux, to 

reconsider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 

7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) 

(orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former

one did.”). 

Judge Simoneaux advised this court by letter that he stood by Judge Wright’s 

decision not to vacate the July 10, 2018 and August 2, 2018 orders. However, Judge 

Simoneaux did not provide this court with a signed order reflecting his rulings

regarding the relators’ request for relief. Therefore, the abatement of this case is 

continued until May 3, 2019, by which time Judge Simoneaux shall file with this 

court a signed order reflecting his rulings concerning relator’s request. This court 

will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 530 

To modify certain subsidies for ethanol production, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. WEBB) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify certain subsidies for ethanol production, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHANOL ELIGIBLE FOR BLENDER INCOME 

4 TAX AND FUEL EXCISE TAX CREDITS. 

5 (a) INCOME TAX CREDIT.—Section 40(h) of the In6 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(4) ETHANOL ELIGIBLE FOR CREDIT.—In the 

9 case of any sale or use for any period after June 30, 

10 2011, this subsection shall apply only to ethanol 

11 which qualifies as an advanced biofuel (as defined in 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 530 IS

1 section 211(o)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 

2 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)(B))).’’. 

3 (b) EXCISE TAX CREDIT.—Section 6426(b) of the In4 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(7) ETHANOL ELIGIBLE FOR CREDIT.—In the 

7 case of any sale, use, or removal for any period after 

8 June 30, 2011, no credit shall be determined under 

9 this subsection with respect to an alcohol fuel mix10 ture in which any of the alcohol consists of ethanol 

11 unless the ethanol qualifies as an advanced biofuel 

12 (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(B) of the Clean Air 

13 Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)(B))).’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to any sale, use, or removal for 

16 any period after June 30, 2011. 

17 SEC. 2. ETHANOL TARIFF-TAX PARITY. 

18 Not later than 30 days after the date of the enact19 ment of this Act, and semiannually thereafter, the Presi20 dent shall reduce the temporary duty imposed on ethanol 

21 under subheading 9901.00.50 of the Harmonized Tariff 

22 Schedule of the United States by an amount equal to the 

23 reduction in any Federal income or excise tax credit under 

24 section 40(h), 6426(b), or 6427(e)(1) of the Internal Rev25 enue Code of 1986 and take any other action necessary 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 530 IS

1 to ensure that the combined temporary duty imposed on 

2 ethanol under such subheading 9901.00.50 and any other 

3 duty imposed under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

4 the United States is equal to, or lower than, any Federal 

5 income or excise tax credit applicable to ethanol under the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF LA W EXAMINERS : : : : : No. 664 SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 30 th day of March , 2015, David R. Fine, Esquire, Dauphin County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners for a term of three years commencing April 1, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 2, 15, 90 and 95

[ET Docket No 19-138; Report No. 3176; FRS 34533]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceeding by Sean T. Conway, on behalf of 
5G Automotive Association, Julian Gehman, on behalf of The Amateur 
Radio Emergency Data Network, and Hilary Cain, on behalf of The 
Alliance for Automotive Innovation.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before July 22, 
2021. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before August 2, 
2021.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Coleman, Office of Engineering 
and Technology, Policy and Rules Division, (202) 418-2705 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c666d616569226f636069616d624c6a6f6f226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711b101c18145f121e1d141c101f311712125f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3176, released June 16, 2021. The full text of the 
Petitions can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band, FCC 20-164, published at 
86 FR 23281, May 3, 2021, ET Docket No. 19-138. This document is being 
published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 
1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14494 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2008175EN.01000201.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5132 — Samsung Electronics/Samsung Techwin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 175/03)

On 14 May 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5132. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5132. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Eastern Regional Research Center: Wyndmoor, PA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About ERRC
                        Greetings from the Director
                                    Directions/Lodging
                                    History and Accomplishments
                    Our Work
                        Biomass Pyrolysis Research
                                    IPMP 2013
                                    IPMP Dynamic Prediction
                                    IPMP Global Fit
                                    Pathogen Modeling Program (PMP)
                                    Predictive Microbiology Information Portal (PMIP)
                                    PoultryFARMSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Poultryheadline bar Research
               PoultryFARM - Highlights
               PoultryFARM - Publications
               PoultryFARM - Presentation
               PoultryFARM - Models
               PoultryFARM - Data
               PoultryFARM - Lab Tour
               PoultryFARM - Contact


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 32 (i)**

CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Ronald A. Walko, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Ronald A. Walko     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Ronald A. Walko         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| May 10, 2007            |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2011234EN.01004601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/46 |

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 133 of 22 May 2008](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2008_133_R_TOC)
)

The Corrigendum which was published in the [Official Journal of the European Union L 199 of 31 July 2010, p. 40](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2010_199_R_TOC), shall be cancelled and replaced with regard to the following item:

On page 87, Annex II, heading 3 shall be replaced by the following:

‘3.   Costs of the credit

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| The borrowing rate or, if applicable, different borrowing rates which apply to the credit agreement | [ % | | | | --- | --- | | — | fixed, or | | | | | --- | --- | | — | variable (with the index or reference rate applicable to the initial borrowing rate), | | | | | --- | --- | | — | periods] | |
| Annual Percentage Rate of Charge (APR) This is the total cost expressed as an annual percentage of the total amount of credit. The APR is there to help you compare different offers. | [ % A representative example mentioning all the assumptions used for calculating the rate to be set out here] |
| Is it compulsory, in order to obtain the credit or to obtain it on the terms and conditions marketed, to take out | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | an insurance policy securing the credit, or | | Yes/no [if yes, specify the kind of insurance] |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | another ancillary service contract? | | Yes/no [if yes, specify the kind of ancillary service] |
| If the costs of these services are not known by the creditor they are not included in the APR. | |
| Related costs | |
|
| If applicable Maintaining one or more accounts is required for recording both payment transactions and drawdowns | |
| If applicable Amount of costs for using a specific means of payment (e.g. a credit card) | |
| If applicable Any other costs deriving from the credit agreement | |
| If applicable Conditions under which the abovementioned costs related to the credit agreement can be changed | |
| If applicable Obligation to pay notarial fees | |
| Costs in the case of late payments | You will be charged [... (applicable interest rate and arrangements for its adjustment and, where applicable, default charges)] for late payments.’ |
| Missing payments could have severe consequences for you (e.g. forced sale) and make obtaining credit more difficult. |

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernesto Poveda, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on April 5, 1984, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Fein, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
---

March 30, 2012

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|    |                                               
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    
|    |                                               
|    | Consent of Expert                             

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Doug Ramsey, R.P.Bio., hereby consent to the use of my name
in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the
following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Preliminary Assessment of the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska dated
  February 17, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

Original document signed by Doug Ramsey

|                    
|--------------------
|Doug Ramsey, R.P.Bio

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000701345
<NAME> US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         868,848
<SECURITIES>                                   595,408
<RECEIVABLES>                                  450,825<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    235,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,307,552
<PP&E>                                       6,376,859
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,517,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,470,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,691,663
<BONDS>                                      2,577,997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          758,719
<PREFERRED>                                    213,128
<COMMON>                                        64,567
<OTHER-SE>                                   (846,161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,470,923
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,101,078
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,925,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                165,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,716
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            152,658
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   152,658
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer ofDakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended July 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Date:  October 29, 2007

 
|   | /s/ Edward O. Irion       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |                      |
|   | Edward O. Irion           |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----