alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-16-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 185--Culpeper, Virginia, Authorization 
of Production Activity, Merck & Co., Inc. (Pharmaceutical Products), 
Elkton, Virginia

    On March 2, 2021, Merck & Co., Inc., submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
Subzone 185C, in Elkton Virginia.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 13524, March 9, 2021). On June 
30, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: June 30, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14299 Filed 7-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TREVOR PLACIDO BENJAMIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR96-217-DKC)

Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 11, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trevor Placido Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s orders are marked as “filed”

on March 15 & April 13, 1999, respectively, the district court’s

records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on March 17

& April 14, 1899. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the orders were

physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decisions. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Trevor Placido Benjamin appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion to extend the time in which to file a motion

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999), and his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.

Benjamin, No. CR-96-217-DKC (Mar. 17 & Apr. 14, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Den Europæiske Unions C 88A/24.

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 88A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 65. årgang24. februar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 88A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

65. årgang24. februar 2022

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Øvrige meddelelser |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER |
| | Europa-Kommissionen |
| 2022/C 88 A/01 | Meddelelse om ændring af meddelelse om fællesforetagendet for initiativet om innovativ sundhed (IHI JU) — Offentliggørelse af en ledig stilling som administrerende direktør for fællesforetagendet for initiativet om innovativ sundhed (IHI JU) (Midlertidig ansat — lønklasse AD 14) — COM/2022/20075 ( EUT C 48 A af 31.1.2022 ) | 1 |

Indhold

Side

V   Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Kommissionen

2022/C 88 A/01

Meddelelse om ændring af meddelelse om fællesforetagendet for initiativet om innovativ sundhed (IHI JU) — Offentliggørelse af en ledig stilling som administrerende direktør for fællesforetagendet for initiativet om innovativ sundhed (IHI JU) (Midlertidig ansat — lønklasse AD 14) — COM/2022/20075 ( EUT C 48 A af 31.1.2022 )

( EUT C 48 A af 31.1.2022 )

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

V Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Kommissionen

| 24.2.2022 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2022

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 88/1

---

Meddelelse om ændring af meddelelse om fællesforetagendet for initiativet om innovativ sundhed (IHI JU) — Offentliggørelse af en ledig stilling som administrerende direktør for fællesforetagendet for initiativet om innovativ sundhed (IHI JU) (Midlertidig ansat — lønklasse AD 14) — COM/2022/20075

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 48 A af 31.januar 2022
  )

(2022/C 88 A/01)

Side 5, under afsnittet »Ansøgningsfrist«, første punktum:

| I stedet for | »Ansøgningsfristen er den 28. februar 2022 kl. 12.00 (middag) lokal tid i Bruxelles, hvorefter det ikke længere vil være muligt at søge.« |
| --- | --- |

I stedet for

»Ansøgningsfristen er den 28. februar 2022 kl. 12.00 (middag) lokal tid i Bruxelles, hvorefter det ikke længere vil være muligt at søge.«

| læses | »Ansøgningsfristen er den 14. marts 2022 kl. 12.00 (middag) lokal tid i Bruxelles, hvorefter det ikke længere vil være muligt at søge.« |
| --- | --- |

læses

læses

»Ansøgningsfristen er den 14. marts 2022 kl. 12.00 (middag) lokal tid i Bruxelles, hvorefter det ikke længere vil være muligt at søge.«

---
#### VOGT, Appellant, v. NASSAU FERRY CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by William Vogt against the Nassau Ferry Company. No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Panda Ethanol, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Form 10-K), I, Todd W. Carter, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      | 
|Dated: March 30, 2007 |  | /s/     TODD W.
CARTER               
|                      |  | Todd W. Carter                       
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Panda Ethanol, Inc. and will be retained by Panda Ethanol, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-6-TLS 

 ) 

SHANNON MURPHY ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 29], filed on August 3, 2016. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 29] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

One (1) of the single Count Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty 

of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on August 19, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 8, 2021 No. 04-21-00067-CV Calvin HUMPHREY , Appellant
v. VECTOR AEROSPACE ENGINE SERVICES- ATLANTIC, INC. , Appellee From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-12246 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of appearance and states the court reporter's fees for preparing and filing the record have been paid. We therefore order Diana Guerrero to file the reporter's record by April 23, 2021.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
No. 76-6001.

#### Newman *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

1st AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE 

THIS 1st AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE (this “1st Amendment”) is entered into effective as of
December 18, 2014 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between WELLSPRING BIOSCIENCES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sublandlord”), and KURA ONCOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Subtenant”)

 WHEREAS, Sublandlord and Subtenant are parties to that certain Sublease dated August 29, 2014, (the “Sublease”), and desire to
amend the Sublease as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree
as follows: 
 1. Amend Section 4(a)(i). Section 4(a)(i) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“(i) Base Rent. Subtenant shall pay to Sublandlord: (A) for the Initial Initial Office Space during the period between
September 1, 2014 and October 1, 2014, the amount of $ 444.96; (B) For the Initial Office Space and the Additional Space during the Additional Space Term, $3.09 per rentable square foot per month, ($4,820.40 per month); ((A) and
(B) being collectively referred to as “Base Rent”), subject to the rental adjustment described below. Base Rent under this Sublease shall be adjusted on September 1, 2015, to equal the Base Rent, on a per rentable square foot
basis, then payable by Sublandlord under the Master Lease with respect to the Subleased Premises pursuant to Section 3(a), as adjusted by Section 4 of the Master Lease.” 

2. Except as amended as described above, all other terms and conditions of the Sublease will remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this 1st Amendment effective as of the Amendment Effective
Date. 
  

											
	WELLSPRING BIOSCIENCES LLC		KURA ONCOLOGY, INC.		
						
	By:		 /s/ Heidi Henson
				By:		 /s/ Troy Wilson
		
	Name:		Heidi Henson				Name:		Troy Wilson		
	Title:		CFO				Title:		President and CEO
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Aeropostale, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this
certificated in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
January 31, 2004 (the "Report").

     The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
     Act"); and

          2. The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 14th day of April, 2004.

                                               /s/ MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAM
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  Michael J. Cunningham
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, James P. Waters, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of The HillmanCompanies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: 3/26/04    /s/ James P. Waters   James P. Waters Chief Financial Officer
#### Steven Eric WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-15163.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 8, 2011.

Steven Eric Walker, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Andrew R. Woodrow, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Steven Eric Walker appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Walker contends that the Board’s 2004 and 2005 decisions to deny him parole were not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. *See Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam). Because Walker raises no procedural challenges, we affirm.

Walker’s request for additional briefing is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Earl Anderson

*Martin Zeldis,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Jacqueline J. Footman,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided January 11, 1990

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 271, is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 518 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 518

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2011

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
    Moran, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Roberts, Mrs. 
 Gillibrand, Mr. Barrasso, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Risch, Ms. Klobuchar, and 
 Mr. Isakson) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment 
Program Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN 
              VETERINARY STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``such Act,'',
            (2) by striking ``such State).'' and inserting ``such 
        State), under section 1415A of the National Agricultural 
        Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 
        3151a), or under any other State loan repayment or loan 
        forgiveness program that is intended to provide for increased 
        access to veterinary services in such State.'', and
            (3) by striking ``state'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``other''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:18-cr-00684 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/10/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1

A TRUE COPY-ATTEST

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK -

By: s/ LESLEY FAIRLEY

DEPUTY CLERK

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS -

October 17, 2018

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cr-00072-JTM-PRC document 52 filed 10/17/18 page 1 of 1
Order entered May 5, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01364 - CV EXCO RESOURCES, INC. , Appellant V. CUDD PRESSURE CONTRO L, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 13248 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s May 1, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief. We ORDER the reply brief tendered to this Court by appellant on May 1, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE