alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Frange, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ryan, J.), rendered November 30,1981, convicting him of criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree and criminal sale of marihuana in the fourth degree, after a.nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the detective’s application for a search warrant provided sufficient information to support the issuing magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to believe marihuana would be found on the premises of the pizzeria where defendant was employed *(see, Illinois v Gates,*462 US 213; *People v Hanlon,*36 NY2d 549; *People v Marinetti,*100 AD2d 597). Moreover, assuming, arguendo, that the 13-day *803period, which elapsed between the date the search warrant was executed and the date it was returned to the court constituted “unnecessary delay” within the meaning of CPL 690.30 (1), the requirement that the warrant be returned in a timely manner is a ministerial duty, noncompliance with which cannot be used to invalidate an otherwise valid warrant (see, *People v Davis,*93 AD2d 970; *People v Ciccarelli,*104 Misc 2d 287). Thus, defendant’s motion to controvert the warrant which authorized a search of the pizzeria was properly denied.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 183 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 183

            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
Reconciliation Act of 2001 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``shall not apply--'' and 
        all that follows and inserting ``(other than title V) shall not 
        apply to taxable, plan, or limitation years beginning after 
        December 31, 2010.'', and
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``, estates, gifts, and 
        transfers''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in section 901 of the Economic Growth and 
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    AIP
                        Home
                                    About
                                    Publications
                                    Software
                                    People
                                    Collaborations
                                    Careers
                                    Centennial
                                    Contact
                                    Dairy industry links
                    DirectionsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

MTGSAMheadline bar MTGSAM home
               MTGSAM (threshold)
               MTGSAM manual
               MTGSAM utility programs
               GISAB-L subscription


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc.
(the  "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Jinyuan
Li, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the  Registrant as of and for the period covered
                  by the Report.

         Pursuant to the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

September 16, 2005                           /s/ Jinyuan Li
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jinyuan Li
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-57-TLS 

 ) 

MARIANNE MATCHETTE ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 21], filed on July 19, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 21] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Counts 

Seven (7) and Nine (9) of the Indictment are hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged 

guilty of such offenses. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on August 3, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[No. 38047-8-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### William L. Inman, D.V.M., *Appellant,*v. The Veterinary Board of Governors, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-32231-1, R. Joseph Wesley, J., entered February 8, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Kennedy, A.C.J., and Coleman, J.
# Službeni list C 87I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 087I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 65.23. veljače 2022. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 087I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 65.23. veljače 2022.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Europska komisija |
| 2022/C 87 I/01 | Obavijest uvoznicima – Uvoz proizvoda u Uniju na temelju Sporazuma o pridruživanju između EU-a i Ukrajine iz područja Donječke i Luganske oblasti u Ukrajini koja nisu pod državnom kontrolom | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

2022/C 87 I/01

Obavijest uvoznicima – Uvoz proizvoda u Uniju na temelju Sporazuma o pridruživanju između EU-a i Ukrajine iz područja Donječke i Luganske oblasti u Ukrajini koja nisu pod državnom kontrolom

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

| 23.2.2022 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2022

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 87/1

---

Obavijest uvoznicima

Uvoz proizvoda u Uniju na temelju Sporazuma o pridruživanju između EU-a i Ukrajine iz područja Donječke i Luganske oblasti u Ukrajini koja nisu pod državnom kontrolom

(2022/C 87 I/01)

Europska komisija obavješćuje uvoznike da ne postoje nužni uvjeti za carinska tijela Ukrajine za učinkovito upravljanje povlaštenim carinskim tretmanom i kontrolu takvog tretmana u skladu sa Sporazumom o pridruživanju između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Ukrajine, s druge strane, za robu koja je proizvedena u područjima Donječke i Luganske oblasti u Ukrajini koja nisu pod državnom kontrolom ili koja se izvozi iz tih područja.

Budući da carinska tijela Ukrajine ne mogu primjenjivati relevantne odredbe Sporazuma kako bi zajamčila da se na robu iz tih područja može primijeniti povlašteni carinski tretman i provjerila ispunjava li ta roba sve potrebne zahtjeve, kako je predviđeno posebno člankom 33. Protokola 1. Sporazuma o pridruživanju, nisu ispunjeni uvjeti da se na takvu robu primijeni povlašteni carinski tretman.

Stoga se gospodarskim subjektima iz Europske unije savjetuje da ne traže povlašteni tretman za uvoz u Uniju robe koja je proizvedena u područjima Donječke i Luganske oblasti u Ukrajini koja nisu pod državnom kontrolom ili koja se izvozi iz tih područja jer od datuma objave ove obavijesti puštanja te robe u slobodni promet dovodi do nastanka carinskog duga.

---
Opinion filed September 14, 2023

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-22-00246-CR

___________

MONTE DAWN MCGOWAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 29506-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Monte Dawn McGowan, Appellant, waived his right to a jury trial and entered 

an open plea of guilty to the offense of possession of methamphetamine, a thirddegree felony, enhanced with a prior felony conviction. See TEX. PENAL CODE. ANN.

§ 12.42(a) (West 2019); TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(a), (c) 

(West Supp. 2022). Appellant pled “true” to the State’s enhancement allegation. 

Appellant testified at sentencing. The trial court found Appellant guilty and assessed

his punishment at imprisonment for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We affirm.
2

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to 

withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and 

conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel has provided Appellant with a copy 

of the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, an explanatory letter, and a copy of 

both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record. Counsel advised Appellant of his

right to review the record and file a response and of his right to file a petition for 

discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking 

review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Court-appointed counsel has complied 

with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 

436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.

1

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the 

judgment of the trial court. 

W. STACY TROTTER

 JUSTICE

September 14, 2023

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

1

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the  undersigned's  best  knowledge  and
belief,  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the Dyco Oil and Gas  Program
1983-2  Limited  Partnership  ("Issuer")  for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 5th day of August, 2002.

                                    DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1983-2
                                    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s//Craig D. Loseke
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Town Sports International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(Section Mark)1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section Mark)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ ROBERT GIARDINA
Town Sports International, Inc.
Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2003
#### PEOPLE ex rel. HAIDUVEN, Appellant, v. FROTHINGHAM, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Edward S. Haiduven, against Edward V. Frothingham, as Commissioner, etc. A. J. Talley, for appellant. H. Crone, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Historical Perspectives







1940?s ?automatic fertilizer distributor?headline bar Chickens in moveable cagesThis "automatic fertilizer distributor" (movable chicken cage) was used by my father during the 1940's. Later he built a much bigger cage without netting on the bottom, for geese. We moved the goose pen every day or so and thus kept our lawn mowed!Submitted by Dale Ritchey, Raleigh Co., WV Historical Perspectives Picture index AFSRC Home


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30739

Summary Calendar

 

JUVENTINO MUNOZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN M. MAMOULIDES; 

LAWRENCE ALTERMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-MC-1088

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 The district court construed Juventino Munoz’s (Louisiana

prisoner # 352797) civil rights complaint as a petition for

habeas corpus. The court then dismissed the petition without

prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. Munoz

challenges the dismissal, arguing that the state waived the

exhaustion requirement.
No. 97-30739

-2-

 Because Munoz filed his complaint in May 1997, the

provisions of the AEDPA are applicable. See Green v. Johnson,

116 F.3d 1115, 1120 (5th Cir. 1997). Under the AEDPA, Munoz

cannot appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition unless the district court or this court grants

him a certificate of appealability (COA). § 2253 (c)(1)(A);

Muniz v. Johnson, 114 F.3d 43, 45 (5th Cir. 1997). 

 Although this court will construe Munoz’s notice of appeal

as a request for COA in this court, there was no request for or

ruling on a COA in the district court. This case is therefore

REMANDED to the district court according to Muniz for the limited

purpose of obtaining a ruling on a COA. 

REMANDED.
#### Triangle Contractors, Inc. *v.*Debra M. Young et al.

*Frank X. Lo Sacco,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*George M. Purtill,*in opposition.

Decided December 14, 1989

The defendant Frank X. Lo Sacco’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 218, is denied.