alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald VOLTAIRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-12631

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 9, 2011.

Pamela A. Moine, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Christopher P. Canova, Terry Flynn, Thomas F. Kirwin, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Augustus Harper, Jr., Attorney at Law, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Reginald Voltaire, Estill, SC, pro se.

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Augustus Harper, appointed counsel for Reginald Voltaire in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Voltaire’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Greene, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered June 4,1982, convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is criminally liable under Penal Law § 20.00 as an accomplice, for acting in concert with two other unapprehended perpetrators in the commission of robbery in the first degree.

In view of the jury verdict, we are required to review the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Di Garolamo,*107 AD2d 1092). Minor discrepancies in the testimony of witnesses are not sufficient to require that a witness’s testimony be deemed incredible as a matter of law *(People v Gruttola,*43 NY2d 116). By their verdict, it is apparent that the jury chose to discredit the testimony of defendant and conclude that he shared the intent of the other two armed perpetrators *873
      *(see, People v Barnes,*50 NY2d 375; *People v Pippins,*107 AD2d 826). Based upon the record, we find that the evidence was sufficient in both quality and quantity to prove the elements of the crime of robbery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert*denied_US_, 105 S Ct 327; *People v Barnes, supra,*at p 381). Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana

Hammond Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 2:16-CR-22 JVB

ELISSA SALAZAR

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate

Judge filed on August 24, 2016, on a plea of guilty by Defendant Elissa Salazar (DE 66). No

objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge Martin’s findings and recommendations. 

Accordingly, the Court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS the

guilty plea of Defendant Elissa Salazar, and FINDS the Defendant guilty of the offenses charged

in Count 1 of the indictment. 

SO ORDERED on September 19, 2016.

s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen 

Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

United States District Judge
**Exhibit31(i)**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ronald A. Walko, Chief Executive Officer, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 9, 2004 |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 |                    |
|                 | /s/ Ronald A. Walko     |   |
|                 | Ronald A. Walko         |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee *374United Transportation Union, Intervenor-Appellee v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10888.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 10, 2011.

Donald James Munro, Esq., Jones Day, Washington, DC, David Michael Pryor, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sanford R. Denison, Baab & Denison, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Intervenor-Appel-lee.

Margo Pave, Zwerdling, Paul, Kahn & Wolly, P.C., Washington, DC, Yona Rozen, Gillespie, Rozen & Watsky, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We AFFIRM the district court’s vacatur of the Public Law Board (“PLB”) decision. We hold that, under the record in this case, we have appellate jurisdiction. *See Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. United Transp. Union,*3 F.3d 255, 257-58 (8th Cir.1993) (holding that order rendering prior award a nullity and remanding was appealable); *United Steelworkers of Am. Local 1913 v. Union R.R. Co.,*648 F.2d 905, 909-11 (3d Cir.1981) (holding that order “effectively end[ing] all litigation concerning the conduct of the prior investigative and Board hearings” was appealable despite remand); *cf. Forsythe Int’l, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. of Tex.,*915 F.2d 1017, 1020 (5th Cir.1990) (holding, in Federal Arbitration Act case, that order was appealable because “[w]hile the district court’s order commanded further arbitration, it also nullified the decision of an arbitration panel”). We also agree that the district court did not err in vacating the PLB’s remedy. *See BNSF Ry. v. Bhd. of Maint. of Way Emps.,*550 F.3d 418, 425 (5th Cir.2008) (holding that district court may vacate arbitration award that ignored the terms of a CBA); *Bruce Hardwood Floors, Div. of Triangle Pac. Corp. v. UBC, Local Union No. 2713,*103 F.3d 449, 452 (5th Cir.1997) (“Although we accord an arbitrator’s decision considerable deference regarding the merits of the controversy, the CBA circumscribes his jurisdiction.”). We VACATE the district court’s order remanding to the National Railroad Adjustment Board and REMAND to the district court with instructions to remand back to PLB 6983.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Marvin Rounick, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deb Shops, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 8, 2006

 

|        |   |   | /s/ Marvin Rounick                                                          |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |  

 

 

Marvin RounickPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00776

- CR

Christopher BUSTOS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR13086

Honorable Christine Del Prado , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE VALENZUELA , AND JUSTICE

BRISSETTE

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED

.

SIGNED September 11, 2024.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
NO. 03-13-00080-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 

____________________________________________ 

APPELLANTS CENTRAL AUSTIN APARTMENTS, LLC, UP-32ND STREET, 

LLC, UP-32ND STREET HOSPITALITY, LLC // CROSS-APPELLANTS EAST 

AVENUE PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., UP AUSTIN 

HOLDINGS, LP and UP AUSTIN LAND HOLDINGS, LP 

v. 

APPELLEES EAST AVENUE PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., 

UP AUSTIN HOLDINGS, LP and UP AUSTIN LAND HOLDINGS, LP // 

CROSS-APPELLEES CENTRAL AUSTIN APARTMENTS, LLC, UP-32ND 

STREET, LLC, UP-32ND STREET HOSPITALITY, LLC 

______________________________________________ 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

______________________________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

COMES NOW Cross-Appellant East Avenue Property Owners’ Association, 

Inc. and files this Notice of Change of Address. 

Please take notice of the following change of address of Jane Webre and 

Sara Clark, counsel of record in this matter, effective February 23, 2015: 

Jane Webre 

State Bar No. 21050060 

jwebre@scottdoug.com 

Sara W. Clark 

State Bar No. 00794847 

sclark@scottdoug.com 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00080-CV

4341661

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/2/2015 6:33:26 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/2/2015 6:33:26 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2 

1189240 

Scott Douglass & McConnico LLP 

303 Colorado Street, Suite 2400 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Telephone: 512/495-6300 

Telecopier: 512/495-6399 

 This move will not affect the email addresses or telephone numbers of the 

attorneys at Scott Douglass & McConnico LLP. 

Respectfully submitted, 

SCOTT, DOUGLAS & MCCONNICO LLP 

By: /s/ Jane Webre_________

Jane Webre 

State Bar No. 21050060 

Sara W. Clark 

State Bar No. 00794847 

303 Colorado Street, Suite 2400 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Telephone: 512/495-6300 

Telecopier: 512/495-6399 

jwebre@scottdoug.com

sclark@scottdoug.com

ATTORNEYS FOR EAST AVENUE 

PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, 

INC. 

 
3 

1189240 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that I served the foregoing pleading on the following counsel of 

record through the electronic filing system and e-mail on March 2, 2015: 

Thomas S. Leatherbury 

Vinson & Elkins, LLP 

2001 Ross Ave., Suite 3700 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Jonathan Wilkerson 

Vinson & Elkins, LLP 

The Terrance 7 

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 

Austin, TX 78746 

Eric J. Taube 

Neal Meinzer 

Amanda Taylor 

HOHMANN, TAUBE & SUMMERS, L.L.P. 

100 Congress Ave., 18th Floor 

Austin, Texas 78701 

 /s/ Jane Webre____________ 

 Jane Webre
Order entered March 9, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01476
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF H .D.V., JR. AND B.V., CHILDR EN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10
- 04711 

### O RDER Before the Court is the March 3, 2015 motion of Elizabeth Neve Griffin, Official Court Reporter for the 302nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, joining in the appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file the record. On March 3, 2015, the Court granted appellant’s motion extending the deadline to file both the clerk’s record and reporter’s record to May 5, 2015. Accordingly, we DENY Ms. Griffin’s motion as moot.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this o rder by electronic transmission to Ms. Griffin and all counsel of record.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Grant Thornton LLP Under Contract No. GS-23F-8196H

OrderNo. HQ0423-14-F-0077 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60534

Alexander J. Brittin, Esq.

Brittin Law Group, PLLC McLean, VA Ellen Randel, Esq.

Associate General Counsel Anne Turner, Esq.

Deputy Assistant General Counsel Regina DelaRosa, Esq. Rob L. Smith, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Defense Finance & Accounting Service ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed withprejudice. Dated: 17 August 2016

# /J~/!_~

- MARK N. STEMPLER ' Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60534, Appeal ofGrant Thornton LLP, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 01139

- CV

PS ROYAL SERVICES GR OUP LP, GP ROYAL, LL C, STEPHEN F. PERKIN S, AND S.

PERKINS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant s

V.

SCOTT FISHER AND KRI STI FISHER, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 01665

- 2014



### O RDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submissio n on December

11, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 21.1  Subsidiaries
of Registrant  Entity
  
  Jurisdiction of OrganizationA123 Securities Corporation
  
  MassachusettsA123 Systems (China) Co., Ltd.
  
  ChinaA123 Systems (China) Materials Co., Ltd.
  
  ChinaA123 Systems GmbH
  
  GermanyA123 Systems (Zhenjiang) Co., Ltd.
  
  ChinaEnerland Co., Ltd.
  
  KoreaChangchun Farad Electric Co., Ltd.
  
  ChinaChangchun Guoji Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.*
  
  ChinaA123 Systems Hong Kong, Ltd.
  
  Hong Kong  
 *  45% owned by the Registrant.
*The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, United States District

Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by

designation.

 1The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, United States District Judge

for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 95-3255

___________

Instant Web, Inc.; Victory *

Envelope, Inc., *

*

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Minnesota.

*

U.S. Concord, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 13, 1996

 Filed: August 15, 1996 ___________

Before BOWMAN and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,* District

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a claim by plaintiffs Instant Web, Inc. and

Victory Envelope, Inc. that they were overcharged when they prepaid

certain loans made to them by defendant U.S. Concord, Inc. The

District Court1 granted summary judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiffs appeal. Having considered the issues that plaintiffs

have raised in this appeal, we conclude that the decision of the

District Court was correct. No error of law appears, and an

opinion by this Court would lack precedential value. Accordingly,

we affirm the judgment of the District Court without further
-2-

discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In re SNYDER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

In the matter of Henry B. Snyder.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. Order filed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Safety, Health and Environmental Training







Servicesheadline bar Sorry, all training courses are now done through AgLearn.Please contact Bonnie Disalvo at 215-233-6592 for further assistance.Thank you.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 12.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------


I, Klaus Nyborg, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 20-F of A/S Steamship Company Torm; and

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.



Date: March 25, 2005



/s/ Klaus Nyborg
----------------
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 447 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 447

For the relief of Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, 
                         and Adilene Martinez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2011

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, 
                         and Adilene Martinez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, and 
Adilene Martinez shall each be deemed to have been lawfully admitted 
to, and remained in, the United States, and shall be eligible for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing an application for such 
adjustment of status.
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the application for adjustment of status is filed with 
appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
permanent resident status to Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela 
Lopez Martinez, and Adilene Martinez, the Secretary of State shall 
instruct the proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or 
subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 
made available to natives of the country of the birth of Jose Alberto 
Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, and Adilene Martinez under 
section 202(e) or 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1152(e) and 1153(a)), as applicable.
    (d) PAYGO.--The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be 
determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary 
Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in 
the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget 
Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```