alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-2364

___________________________

LaRonda Phox

Petitioner

v.

Secretary, Department of Labor

Respondent

The Savoy at 21C

Intervenor

 ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Department of Labor (except OSHA)

 ____________

 Submitted: February 7, 2023

Filed: February 10, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
LaRonda Phox petitions for review following a final order of the United States

Department of Labor Administrative Review Board dismissing as untimely her

petition for administrative review. After careful review, we find no basis for relief. 

See 21 U.S.C. § 399d(b)(5)(A) (judicial review of administrative decision on

complaint under FDA Food Safety Modernization Act shall conform to

Administrative Procedure Act). Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________

-2-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tranquillino Castro, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Luis M. Ñeco, J.), rendered June 1, 1983, convicting defendant of attempted arson in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 150.15) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, to reduce the sentence to an indeterminate term of 3 to 9 years, and otherwise affirmed.

We find that it was an improvident exercise of discretion to impose the maximum sentence. Although we are aware of the serious nature of the crime, considering that the crime was committed following several heated exchanges, we conclude that the sentence should be reduced to an indeterminate term of 3 to 9 years and, accordingly, we modify the judgment only to that *674extent. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Fein, Milonas, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Town Sports International, Inc. (the
Company) on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard Pyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (Section Mark) 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Pyle
Town Sports International, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer
November 4, 2003

29
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), We, Robert B. Lees, President, and John A. Palmer, Jr., Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Dated: 12/28/2006                      /s/Robert B. Lees
      -----------                      -----------------
                                       Robert B. Lees
                                       President

Dated: 12/28/2006                      /s/John A. Palmer, Jr.
      -----------                      ----------------------
                                       John A. Palmer, Jr.
                                       Treasurer
                                       Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 of A123
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Vieau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

Date: March 11, 2011/s/ DAVID P. VIEAU David P. Vieau Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2150 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkazon AFS/LG. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkazon AFS/LG. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VULKAZON AFS/LG. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.04 Pentaerythritolbis(tetrahydrobenzaldehyde 

acetal) (CAS No. 6600–31– 

3) (provided for in subheading 2932.99.90) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2150 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### EXCELSIOR SAVINGS BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. RAMILENA REALTY CÓ. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by the Excelsior Savings Bank of the City of New York against the Ramilena Realty Company, impleaded with others. No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10' costs. Order filed.
#### PEOPLE v. KAUL.

(Supreme. Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Albertina Kaul. No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Order filed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

testheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### MOLLIE LIEBESKIND, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. METAL FRAME AQUARIUM COMPANY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 58 *N. J. Super.*504.

*Messrs.*Boyd, *Dodd, Keer & Booth*for the petitioner.

May 4, 1960.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

###### National Endowment for the Arts

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given that 1 meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference or videoconference.

# DATES:

                        See the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for individual meeting times and dates. All meetings are Eastern time and ending times are approximate.                    

# ADDRESSES:

National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Sherry P. Hale, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506;                         *hales@arts.gov,*                         or call 202/682-5696.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of September 10, 2019, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United States Code.

*The upcoming meeting is:*

*Artist Communities (review of applications):*                     This meeting will be closed.                

*Date and time:*                     July 19, 2021; 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.                

Dated: June 29, 2021.

Sherry P. Hale,

Staff Assistant, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 2021-14190 Filed 7-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
KPMG

401 South Tryon Street

Suite 2300

Charlotte, NC 28202 1911

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors

Wachovia Bank National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that Wachovia Bank              National Association (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the        Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as         being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum         servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the       Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American   Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence   about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material       respects.

KPMG LLP

March 10, 2003

KPMG LLP, KPMG LLP, a US limeted liability partnership, is

A member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
Exhibit
10.32





Supplemental
Agreement of Lease Agreement for Health Products Production
Workshops





This
Agreement is entered in Wuqing Tianjin on December 31, 2007.





Party A:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Co., Ltd.


Address:
No.6 Yuanquan Road, Wuqing New-tech Industry Park, Tianjin


Legal
Representative: Yiqun Wu





Party B:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.


Address:
No.6 Yuanquan Road, Wuqing New-tech Industry Park, Tianjin


Legal
Representative: Yiqun Wu





After
sufficient negotiations, Party A and Party B agree to make the following
amendments to the “Lease Agreement for Health Products production Workshops”
(the “Lease Agreement”) which was entered into by Party A and Party B in Wuqing
Tianjin on the 31st day of
October 2007.





1. The
Leased Workshops in the Article 1.1 of the Lease Agreement is amended to as
follows. The total size of the Leased Workshops which Party A and Party B
acknowledged and agreed is amended to as 1,769.70 square meters.





No.
            Floor
            Size
      (Square Meters)1
            The
      First Floor of Workshop 2, Mixing Materials
            130.502
            The
      Third Floor of Workshop 2, Tea Bags
            1,639.203
            Total
            1,769.70





2. The
Article 4.1 of the Lease Agreement is amended to as “The rents is RMB Twenty
Four Dollars Fifty Cents (RMB24.5) per square meter per month, RMB
Forty





Three
Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Seven Dollars Sixty Five Cents (RMB43, 357.65) per
month, and RMB One Million Forty Hundred Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Four
Dollars Sixty Cents (RBM1, 040,583.6) in total through the lease
term”.





Any
inconsistencies between this Supplemental Agreement and the Lease Agreement
shall, if any, be performed pursuant to this Supplemental Agreement. Any issue
not referred to in this Supplemental Agreement shall be performed in accordance
with the Lease Agreement.





This
Supplemental Agreement which acts as a supplement to the Lease Agreement has the
same legal effect as the Lease Agreement and will be terminated or rescinded
when the Lease Agreement is terminated or rescinded.





This
Supplemental Agreement will become effective as of the day on which this
Supplemental Agreement is signed and sealed by Party A and Party B.





This
Agreement executes in two copies and each party takes one, which shall be in the
same legal effect.





Party A:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Co., Ltd


By:  /s/ Yiqun
Wu


Name:  Yiqun
Wu


Title:  Legal
Representative





Party B:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Engineering Co., Ltd


By:  /s/ Yiqun
Wu


Name:  Yiqun
Wu


Title:  Legal
Representative
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8152

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RONALD STUART ROSE, a/k/a Rahking, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior 

District Judge. (3:03-cr-00444-RLW-1; 3:07-cv-198) 

Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 11, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ronald Stuart Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ronald Stuart Rose seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rose has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# L_2008160EN.01001601.xml

| 19.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 562/2008

of 18 June 2008

on the issuing of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of June 2008 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 for poultrymeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 of 15 May 2007 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for poultrymeat allocated to the United States of America (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 opened import tariff quotas for poultrymeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 opened import tariff quotas for poultrymeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of juin 2008 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2008 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of juin 2008 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2008 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications under quota 09.4169 have not been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 536/2007, to be added to the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2008, are 4 166 250 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 June 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 June 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 679/2006 (OJ L 119, 4.5.2006, p. 1). Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 July 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

2

---
#### James J. Sotire, Sr. *v.*City of Stamford et al.

*William F. Gallagher,*in support of the petition.

*Kathleen M. Byrne,*in opposition.

Decided November 9, 1989

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 505, is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-526 and 731-TA-1262 (Review)]


Melamine From China

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty 
orders on melamine from China would be likely to lead to continuation 
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on November 2, 2020 (85 FR 
69359) and determined on February 5, 2021 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (86 FR 29594, June 2, 2021).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on June 30, 2021. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5210 (June 2021), 
entitled Melamine from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-526 and 731-TA-
1262 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 30, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-14357 Filed 7-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P