35060 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

1See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and 

Subassemblies Thereof from the People’s Republic 

of China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value 

Investigation, 86 FR 15922 (March 25, 2021). 

2The members of the Coalition of American 

Manufacturers of Mobile Access Equipment are: JLG 

Industries, Inc. and Terex Corporation. 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Mobile Access 

Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Request for 

Postponement of the Preliminary Determination,’’ 

dated June 24, 2021. 4 Id. 

1See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 7071 

(January 26, 2021) (Preliminary Results). 

2The petitioner is Nucor Tubular Products Inc. 

3See Petitioner’s Case Brief, ‘‘Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 

from the Republic of Korea: Case Brief,’’ dated 

March 19, 2021; DOSCO and HiSteel’s Joint Case 

Brief, ‘‘Case Brief of Dong-A-Steel Co., Ltd and 

HiSteel Co. Ltd.,’’ dated March 19, 2021; DOSCO’s 

Case Brief, ‘‘Case Brief of DOSCO,’’ dated March 19, 

2021; DOSCO’s Rebuttal Case Brief, ‘‘Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from 

Korea—Rebuttal Brief of DOSCO,’’ dated March 29, 

2021; HiSteel’s Rebuttal Case Brief, ‘‘Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Order Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from 

Korea—Rebuttal Brief of HiSteel Co. Ltd.,’’ dated 

March 29, 2021; Petitioner’s Rebuttal Case Brief, 

‘‘Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea: 

Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated March 29, 2021. We also 

received a letter in lieu of a rebuttal brief from 

Kukje Steel. See Kukje Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Heavy 

Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 

Tubes from the Republic of Korea—Letter in 

Support of Mandatory Respondents’ Briefs,’’ dated 

March 29, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– 

2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of 

Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, these results (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Heavy Walled Rectangular 

Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the 

Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final 

Results of the 2018–2019 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 14, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla at (202) 482–3477 and 

Andre Gziryan at (202) 482–2201; AD/ 

CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 18, 2021, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) initiated the 

less-than-fair-value investigation of 

certain mobile access equipment and 

subassemblies thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China.1 Currently, the 

preliminary determination is due no 

later than August 5, 2021. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

Commerce to issue the preliminary 

determination in an LTFV investigation 

within 140 days of the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation. 

However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act 

permits Commerce to postpone the 

preliminary determination until no later 

than 190 days after the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation if: 

(A) The petitioner makes a timely 

request for a postponement; or (B) 

Commerce concludes that the parties 

concerned are cooperating, that the 

investigation is extraordinarily 

complicated, and that additional time is 

necessary to make a preliminary 

determination. Under 19 CFR 

351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a 

request for postponement 25 days or 

more before the scheduled date of the 

preliminary determination and must 

state the reasons for the request. 

Commerce will grant the request unless 

it finds compelling reasons to deny the 

request. 

On June 24, 2021, the Coalition of 

American Manufacturers of Mobile 

Access Equipment 2 (the petitioners) 

submitted a timely request that 

Commerce postpone the preliminary 

determination in this LTFV 

investigation.3 The petitioners stated 

that they request postponement due to 

concerns that Commerce will need more 

time to issue supplemental 

questionnaires to address deficiencies in 

the respondents’ initial questionnaire 

responses. Under the current timeline, 

the petitioners believe that Commerce 

will not have complete responses and 

sufficient information to prepare and 

issue the preliminary determination.4

For the reasons stated above, and 

because there are no compelling reasons 

to deny the request, Commerce, in 

accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(e), is 

postponing the deadline for this 

preliminary determination by 50 days 

(i.e., 190 days after the date on which 

these investigations were initiated). As 

a result, Commerce will issue its 

preliminary determination no later than 

September 24, 2021. In accordance with 

section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final 

determination in this investigation will 

continue to be 75 days after the date of 

the preliminary determination, unless 

postponed at a later date. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: June 25, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14046 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–880] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

the Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review did not make 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR), September 1, 2018, 

through August 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alice Maldonado or Jacob Garten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4682 or (202) 482–3342, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers three producers 

and exporters of the subject 

merchandise. Commerce selected DongA Steel Co., Ltd., (DOSCO) and HiSteel 

Co., Ltd., (HiSteel) for individual 

examination. The producer and/or 

exporter not selected for individual 

examination, Kukje Steel Co., Ltd., 

(Kukje Steel) is listed in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

On January 26, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 In 

March 2021, the petitioner,2 DOSCO, 

and HiSteel submitted case and rebuttal 

briefs.3 For a description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4 On May 14, 2021, we 

extended the deadline for the final 

results until June 25, 2021.5

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35061 

6For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

7See Commerce’s Letters, In Lieu of Verification 

Questionnaires for HiSteel and DOSCO, dated 

February 16, 2021 and March 4, 2021, respectively; 

see also HiSteel’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from 

Korea—Response to the Department’s February 16 

In-Lieu of Verification Questionnaire,’’ dated 

February 25, 2021; and DOSCO’s Letter, ‘‘Heavy 

Walled Rectangular Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 

from Korea—Response to the Department’s March 

4 Questionnaire In-Lieu of Verification,’’ dated 

March 11, 2021. 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

9See Uruguay Round Agreements Act Statement 

of Administrative Action attached to H.R. Rep. No. 

103–316 vol. I at 873 (1994), reprinted in 1994 

U.S.C.C.A.N 3773, 4163 (SAA). 

10As discussed in the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce preliminarily determined to collapse 

Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd., with its affiliated producer 

SeAH Steel Corporation and treat these companies 

as a single entity, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.401(f). We received no comments on this issue 

and continue to determine that Dong-A Steel Co., 

Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation are a single entity. 

11See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

12See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

certain heavy walled rectangular welded 

steel pipes and tubes from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea). Products subject to the 

order are currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) item number 

7306.61.1000. Subject merchandise may 

also be classified under 7306.61.3000. 

Although the HTSUS numbers and 

ASTM specification are provided for 

convenience and for customs purposes, 

the written product description remains 

dispositive.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the 

Appendix to this notice and addressed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. 

Verification 

Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information 

relied upon for the final results of this 

review. However, we took additional 

steps in lieu of an on-site verification to 

verify this information, in accordance 

with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).7

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average margin 

calculations for DOSCO and HiSteel. 

For a discussion of these changes, see 

the Margin Calculations section of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.8

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act also provides 

that, where all rates are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available, we may use ‘‘any reasonable 

method’’ for assigning the rate to all 

other respondents. The SAA states that 

the ‘‘expected method’’ under ‘‘any 

reasonable method’’ is that we will 

weight-average the rates that are zero, de 

minimis, and based entirely on facts 

available.9

In this review, we have calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

DOSCO and HiSteel that are zero 

percent, and we have assigned this zero 

percent to the non-selected company in 

this review (i.e., Kukje Steel), pursuant 

to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

Final Results of the Review 

We continue to assign the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

September 1, 2018, through August 31, 

2019: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd 10 ............ 0.00 

HiSteel Co., Ltd .......................... 0.00 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Kukje Steel Co., Ltd ................... 0.00 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the 

respondent did not report entered value, 

we calculated the entered value in order 

to calculate the assessment rate. Where 

the respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. In accordance with Commerce’s 

practice, for entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for which 

the reviewed companies did not know 

that the merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no company-specific rate 

for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.11

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.12

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35062 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

13See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea, 

Mexico, and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 81 FR 62865, 62866 (September 13, 

2016). 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 

FR 69585 (November 3, 2020); and Cut-to-Length 

Carbon Steel Plate from China, Russia, and 

Ukraine; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 85 FR 

69362 (November 2, 2020). 

2See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate 

from the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Final 

Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

segment for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.24 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.13 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: June 25, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Margin Calculations 

V. Discussion of Issues 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Existence of a Particular 

Market Situation (PMS) 

Comment 2: PMS Adjustment 

Comment 3: Differential Pricing 

DOSCO-Specific Issues 

Comment 4: DOSCO’s Scrap Offset 

Comment 5: SeAH Steel Corporation 

(SeAH Steel)’s Scrap Offset 

Comment 6: Common Expenses—DOSCO’s 

General and Administrative (G&A) 

Expense Ratio 

Comment 7: Affiliated Services—DOSCO’s 

and SeAH Steel’s G&A Expense Ratios 

Comment 8: Inventory Valuation Losses— 

DOSCO’s G&A Expense Ratio 

Comment 9: Unassigned Material Costs 

Variance—SeAH Steel’s G&A Expense 

Ratio 

Comment 10: Packing Costs—DOSCO’s 

G&A Expense Ratio 

Comment 11: Collapsed G&A Expense 

Ratio 

Comment 12: Short Term Interest Income— 

Financial Expense Ratio 

Comment 13: Investment Related Gains 

and Losses—Financial Expense Ratio 

Comment 14: Packing Costs—Financial 

Expense Ratio 

HiSteel-Specific Issues 

Comment 15: HiSteel Transactions— 

Disregarded Rule 

Comment 16: Allocation of Common 

Expenses for HiSteel 

Comment 17: HiSteel’s Miscellaneous 

Income Items 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14109 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–808, A–823–808] 

Continuation of Suspended 

Antidumping Duty Investigations on 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel 

Plate From the Russian Federation and 

Ukraine 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the respective 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that the termination of the suspension 

agreements and the underlying 

antidumping duty investigations on 

certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate 

(CTL plate) from the Russian Federation 

(Russia) and Ukraine (collectively, 

Suspension Agreements), would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and material injury to an 

industry in the United States, 

Commerce is publishing this notice of 

continuation of the Suspension 

Agreements on CTL plate from Russia 

and Ukraine. 

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sally C. Gannon or Rebecca Lee, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–0162 or 

(202) 482–6188, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce initiated, and the ITC 

instituted, sunset reviews of the 

suspended antidumping duty 

investigations of certain CTL plate from 

Russia and Ukraine, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).1 Pursuant to 

sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act, 

Commerce determined that termination 

of the Suspension Agreements on CTL 

plate from Russia and Ukraine would 

likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and notified the 

ITC of the magnitude of the margins 

likely to prevail, should the Suspension 

Agreements be terminated.2


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES