Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 130 / Monday, July 12, 2021 / Notices 36523 

2See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and 

Cable from the People’s Republic of China: Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated December 31, 

2020. 

3See Repwire’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and 

Cable from the People’s Republic of China, C–570– 

096; Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

December 31, 2020. 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

8171 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice); see also, 

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 17135 (April 1, 

2021) (Revised Initiation Notice). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Results of U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection Data Query,’’ dated February 

10, 2021 (CBP Entry Data). 

6 Id. 

7See Encore’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and Cable 

from the People’s Republic of China: Comments on 

Customs Data and Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

February 18, 2021 (Encore’s Respondent Selection 

Comments). 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and Cable 

from the People’s Republic of China; No Shipment 

Inquiry for ICF Cable and Jin Tiong Electrical 

Materials Manufacturer PTE. Limited during the 

period 04/08/2019 through 12/31/2019,’’ dated 

April 13, 2021 (CBP’s Confirmation of No 

Shipments) at Attachment. 

9 Id. at 1. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadline for Rebuttal 

Factual Information,’’ dated April 14, 2021. 11See Encore’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and 

Cable from the People’s Republic of China: 

Comments on CBP No Shipments Response,’’ dated 

April 19, 2021 (Encore’s Rebuttal Comments). 12 Id. 13See Memorandum, ‘‘Rescission of the 2019 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice (Rescission 

Memorandum). 14See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 

82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017). 

15See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

16See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

(collectively, the petitioners),2 and 

separately, Repwire LLC (Repwire).3

On February 4, 2020, in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice initiating an administrative 

review of ICF Cable and Jin Tiong 

Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE. 

Limited (Jin Tiong) (collectively, the 

Companies Subject to the Review).4 On 

February 10, 2021, we notified 

interested parties that information from 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP)’s database, which is comprised of 

actual U.S. entries of subject 

merchandise, indicated that there were 

no POR entries of aluminum wire and 

cable from China that are subject to CVD 

duties with respect to the Companies 

Subject to the Review.5 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

CBP Entry Data.6 On February 18, 2021, 

Encore submitted comments in response 

to the CBP Entry Data, alleging that ICF 

Cable exported Chinese-origin subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR, and requested that Commerce 

select ICF Cable as a mandatory 

respondent in the instant review.7

On March 26, 2021, we requested that 

CBP confirm whether any shipments of 

aluminum wire and cable from China, 

produced and/or exported by ICF Cable 

or Jin Tiong entered the United States 

during the POR.8 On April 1, 2021, CBP 

confirmed that there were no shipments 

of subject merchandise produced and/or 

exported by ICF Cable or Jin Tiong 

during the POR.9 We invited interested 

parties to comment on CBP’s 

Confirmation of No Shipments.10 On 

April 19, 2021, Encore submitted timely 

comments in response to CBP’s 

Confirmation of No Shipments.11 In its 

comments, Encore reiterated its claim 

that ICF Cable made sales, shipments, 

and/or exports of aluminum wire and 

cable produced in China during the POR 

without paying applicable cash 

deposits, and requested that Commerce 

issue a quantity and value questionnaire 

to ICF Cable.12 Our analysis of the 

record leads us to conclude that there 

are no reviewable entries of aluminum 

wire and cable from China during the 

POR. For a full discussion of the 

comments raised by Encore and our 

analysis, see the Rescission 

Memorandum.13

Rescission of Review 

It is Commerce’s practice to rescind 

an administrative review of a CVD 

order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), 

when there are no reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which liquidation is suspended.14

Normally, upon completion of an 

administrative review, the suspended 

entries are liquidated at the CVD 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.15 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct CBP 

to liquidate at the CVD assessment rate 

calculated for the review period.16

Accordingly, in the absence of 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for either 

of the companies named in the 

Initiation Notice, we are hereby 

rescinding this administrative review in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce will instruct CBP to assess 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries. Because Commerce is 

rescinding this review in its entirety, the 

entries to which this administrative 

review pertained shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated countervailing duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the publication of this notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to the 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: July 6, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14748 Filed 7–9–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–504] 

Petroleum Wax Candles From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Fifth Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on petroleum 

wax candles (candles) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable July 12, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jasun Moy, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
36524 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 130 / Monday, July 12, 2021 / Notices 

1See Antidumping Duty Order: Petroleum Wax 

Candles from the People’s Republic of China, 51 FR 

30686 (August 28, 1986) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 16701 (March 31, 2021). 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated April 2, 2021. 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Substantive Response,’’ 

dated April 29, 2021. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

April 2021,’’ dated May 21, 2021. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Fifth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Petroleum Wax Candles from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

herby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 7 Id. at 8. 

1See Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts from the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 42683 (July 22, 

2010); see also Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts 

from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing 

Duty Order, 75 FR 42682 (July 22, 2010) 

(collectively, Orders). 

2See Potassium Phosphate Salts from China; 

Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 85 FR 69352 

(November 2, 2020). 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8194. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 28, 1986, Commerce 

published the antidumping duty order 

on candles from China.1 On March 31, 

2021, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the five-year sunset review 

of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act).2 On April 2, 2021, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in this sunset review from the National 

Candle Association (the petitioner) 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The petitioner claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act as the petitioner in 

the less-than-fair-value investigation 

whose members are manufacturers, 

producers, or wholesalers of the 

domestic like product. On April 29, 

2021, the petitioner provided a 

complete substantive response for this 

review within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4

We received no substantive responses 

from any other interested parties, nor 

was a hearing requested. On May 21, 

2021, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.5 As a result, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of this Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

include certain scented or unscented 

petroleum wax candles made from 

petroleum wax and having fiber or 

paper-cored wicks. For a full 

description of the scope, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the order 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on candles 

from China would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and that the magnitude of the margin of 

dumping likely to prevail would be 

weighted-average margins up to 104.33 

percent.7

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: July 2, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely To 

Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14710 Filed 7–9–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–962, C–570–963] 

Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Continuation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) 

orders on certain potassium phosphate 

salts (salts) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

countervailable subsidies, and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, Commerce is publishing a notice 

of continuation of these AD and CVD 

orders. 

APPLICABLE DATE: Applicable July 12, 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle (AD order) or Mark Hoadley 

(CVD order), AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0176 

and (202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 22, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published the 

AD and CVD orders on salts from 

China.1 On November 1, 2020, the ITC 

instituted,2 and on November 3, 2020, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES