alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Abange ADONNI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDUCATION COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Association of American Medical Colleges, Defendant.

No. 10-1279.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 26, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 4, 2011.

Nathaniel D. Johnson, Waldorf, Maryland, for Appellant. Elisa P. McEnroe, Morgan, Lewis & Boekius LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abange Adonni appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment against him in his civil action alleging discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm *40for the reasons stated by the district court. *Adonni v. Educ. Comm’n for Foreign Med. Graduates,*No. RWT 08-cv2319, 2010 WL 610760 (D.Md. Feb. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1 XRG, INC.
SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
CODE OF ETHICS GENERAL PHILOSOPHY The chief executive officer and the chief financial officer (collectively Senior Financial
Officers) are responsible for the integrity of XRG, Inc. (XRG) financial reporting and system of
internal accounting and controls. The honesty, integrity and sound judgment of each Senior
Financial Officer is fundamental to the reputation and success of XRG. While all employees, officers, and directors are required to adhere to the XRG Code of Ethics, the
professional and ethical conduct of Senior Financial Officers is essential to the proper function
and success of XRG. SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS CODE OF ETHICS To the best of their knowledge and ability, each Senior Financial Officer of XRG must: (i) Act with honesty and integrity, avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal
and professional relationships. (ii) not put their personal interests ahead of the interests of XRG or its shareholders. (iii) Provide colleagues with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant,
timely and understandable. (iv) Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal, state, and local
governments (both United States and foreign) and other appropriate private and public regulatory
agencies. (v) Act in good faith, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting
material facts or allowing independent judgment to be subordinated. (vi) Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of employment. (vii) Share knowledge and maintain skills necessary and relevant to XRGs needs. (viii) Proactively promote ethical and honest behavior within the XRG environment. (ix) Assure responsible use of and control of all assets, resources and information of XRG. Each Senior Financial Officer is expected to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial
Officers at all times. The board of directors shall have the sole and absolute authority to
approve any deviation or waiver from the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. Any waiver
and the grounds for such waiver for a Senior Financial Officer shall be promptly disclosed through
a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K. Additionally, any change of this
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers shall be promptly disclosed to shareholders.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**I, Barry J. Susson, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of Deb Shops,Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedJuly 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: September 10, 2007         /s/ Barry J. Susson, CPA   Barry J. Susson, CPA   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Richard Kern, President, Director, President, Chief Executive and
Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of American Goldfields Inc. (the
“Company”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended January 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
April 29, 2009





By: /s/ Richard
Kern


Name:
Richard Kern


Title:
Director, President, Chief Executive Officer,


Chief
Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary


(Principal
Executive, Financial & Accounting Officer)








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Goldfields Inc. and will be retained by American Goldfields
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 23.1














CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-139417) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-143373 and 333-141576) of ULURU Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2010 relating to the financial statements for the two years ended December 31, 2009 which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ULURU Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2010.











/s/ Lane Gorman Trubitt, L.L.P.Lane Gorman Trubitt, L.L.P.

Dallas, Texas

March 24, 2010
**Exhibit
      10.20**


LOAN
      AGREEMENT






This
      Agreement is entered into by and between Tianshi
      International Holdings Group Limited (“Holdings”), a legal entity incorporated
      under the law of the British Virgin Islands, and Tianshi
      International Investment Group Co., Ltd. (“Investment”), a
      legal
      entity incorporated under the law of the British Virgin Islands, in
      Tianjin, China on this 14th day of January, 2008.




RECITALS




Whereas,
      Holdings and Investment have entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated
      December 20, 2007, pursuant to which Holdings will acquire 100% of the
      registered share capital of Tianjin Tiens Life Resources Co., Ltd. (“Life
      Resources”), a legal entity incorporated under the law of the People’s Republic
      of China China, from Investment; and




Whereas,
      the transfer of the share capital of Life Resources requires the government’s
      approval to become final; and




Whereas,
      Life Resource needs to increase its registered share capital; and




Whereas,
      Holdings desires to provide a loan to Investment to increase the registered
      share capital of Life Resources.




Now,
      therefore, the parties do hereby agree as follows.






AGREEMENT


1.
            Loan




Holdings
      agrees to loan Four Million One Hundred Thousand U.S. dollars (US$4,100,000)
      (the “Loan”) to Investment for the duration of the term of this Loan Agreement.
      The Loan shall be interest free.




2.
            Term




The
      Loan
      will begin on the effective date of this Agreement and shall be repaid by
      Investment on March 31, 2008, provided however, that if the government approves
      the transfer of the registered capital of Life Resources prior to March 31,
      2008, the Loan shall be cancelled and this Loan Agreement shall terminate as
      of
the
      date of such government approval and Investment shall not be required to repay
      the Loan to Holdings.




1




3.
            Purpose
                of the Loan




The
      Loan
      shall only be used by Investment to increase the registered capital of Life
      Resources, and Holdings has the right to accelerate the repayment of the Loan
      if
      this provision is breached by Investment.





4.
            Effective
                Date




This
      Agreement is effective as of the date first written above.








Party
      A:
      Tianshi International Holdings Group Limited




[COMPANY
      SEAL AFFIXED]




Address:
      29 th Floor
      No. 133 Wanzai Road HongKong


Legal
      Representative: Jinyuan Li





/s/
      Jinyuan Li _______________


By:
      Jinyuan Li





Party
      B: Tianshi
      International Investment Group Co., Ltd. (BVI)




[COMPANY
      SEAL AFFIXED]




Address:
      Room 2402-03, 24/F., New York Life Tower, Windsor House, 311 Gloucester Road,
      Causeway Bay, Hong Kong


Legal
      Representative: Jinyuan Li





/s/
      Jinyuan Li __________________


By:
      Jinyuan Li




2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHELDON HANNIBAL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 510 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EX-99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of TCI Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the twelve months ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Stephen P. DeSantis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to [name of issuer] and will be retained by [name of issuer] and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request."


Date:  March 28, 2003                    By:/s/ Stephen P. DeSantis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stephen P. DeSantis
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                       43
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Carmona, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered March 5,1981, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

There is nothing in the record on appeal to indicate that defendant, who is not fluent in the English language, was in any way misled as to the consequences of his plea. At the time of the plea, the court assigned defendant an interpreter and the answers defendant gave to the court were responsive to the questions propounded and belie his claim that he did not understand the terms of the plea bargain and the proceedings. Furthermore, the circumstances of the commission of the crime as told by defendant during the plea allocution spelled out the requisite elements of the crime and negated the prospects of a justification defense *(cf. People v Riley,*91 AD2d 671). Moreover, defendant did not seek to withdraw his plea prior to or at the time of sentencing, albeit at sentencing he had the assistance of counsel and a different interpreter. Nor did he move to vacate the judgment of conviction in the court of first instance. Consequently, defendant’s contention that he should be relieved of his guilty plea has not been preserved for review *(see, People v Bell,*47 NY2d 839; *see also, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
#### CASE, Respondent, v. DONNOCKER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 23, 1907.)

Action by Edward A. Case against Delbert G. Donnoeker.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order denying motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 435 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 

for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. JOHANNS, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child and Dependent 

5 Care FSA Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PRO7 VIDED DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

9 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

10 to dependent care assistance programs) is amended by 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 435 IS

1 striking ‘‘$5,000 ($2,500’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,500 (half 

2 such dollar amount’’. 

3 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec4 tion 129(a) of such Code is amended by redesignating sub5 paragraph (C) as subparagraph (D) and by inserting after 

6 subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

8 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

9 year after 2011, the $7,500 amount in subpara10 graph (A) shall be increased by an amount 

11 equal to— 

12 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

13 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de14 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal15 endar year in which the taxable year be16 gins, determined by substituting ‘calendar 

17 year 2010’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub18 paragraph (B) thereof. 

19 Any increase determined under the preceding 

20 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul21 tiple of $100.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(May 14, 1985)

#### In the Matter of Jay M. Rashbaum, Petitioner, v Gordon M. Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Cross motions to dismiss proceeding granted, without costs (see, *Matter of Johnson v New York State Retirement Sys.,*90 AD2d 573). Main, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
(55 Misc. Rep. 373.)

#### NELSON v. FORTY-SECOND ST., M. & ST. N. AVE. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County.

July, 1907.)

New Trial—Misconduct of Counsel.

Where, in an action against a street railway company for injuries to a passenger, plaintiff’s counsel in his argument stated that “a man got ■ $1,750 here yesterday for a shoulder,” and defendant’s counsel excepted, a verdict for plaintiff will be set aside, though his counsel stated that he was willing the jury should be instructed to disregard the remark.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 37, New Trial, §§• 43, 44; vol. 46, Trial, §§ 275-309.]

Action by Lillie Nelson against the Forty-Second Street, Manhattan-ville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Company. Verdict for plaintiff. Motion for new trial granted.

George B. Class, for plaintiff.

James L. Quackenbush, for defendant.

MacLEAN, J.

In a sudden start case, wherein the testimony of the plaintiff, corroborated 'by one witness, was contradicted by that of three seemingly disinterested persons, besides the motorman, conductor, and inspector, the plaintiff’s counsel, in summing up, said: *“A*man got $1,750 here yesterday for a shoulder.” Before he could go further the *553defendant’s counsel interposed: "I ask for the withdrawal of a juror on that.” To which plaintiff’s counsel returned: “The sentence was not completed, and I am entirely willing that the jury may be instructed to disregard it in the strongest terms.” Thereupon the court ruled: “The motion to withdraw a juror is denied. You may proceed.” Counsel for the defendant took an exception. Two other applications for the withdrawal of a juror were made for other and lesser extravasations of zeal for the plaintiff’s sake.

No allusion was made in the charge to these improprieties, the court, from observation had and inquiry made upon both sides of the bar, having no faith in retraction by others than those whose words should be withdrawn, and little trust in the efficacy of correction of statements by counsel or judge construable by.jurymen into furtherance of the wejudice commonly obtaining in favor of the person—this time a woan—bringing the action and the frequent feeling that one who has en hurt should get something from somebody. Effort would have en futile to eliminate by disparaging instruction the effect of the sugstion, apparently well driven home, that it but remained for the jury assess the damages, of which one item in the tariff was $1,750 for aoulder. The motion to set aside the verdict and accord a new trial 'ranted.

lotion granted.
#### VROOM, Respondent, v. NELLIS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by George W. Vroom against Arthur C. Nellis. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 530 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 530

   To modify certain subsidies for ethanol production, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2011

  Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Webb) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify certain subsidies for ethanol production, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHANOL ELIGIBLE FOR BLENDER INCOME TAX AND FUEL EXCISE TAX 
              CREDITS.

    (a) Income Tax Credit.--Section 40(h) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Ethanol eligible for credit.--In the case of any sale 
        or use for any period after June 30, 2011, this subsection 
        shall apply only to ethanol which qualifies as an advanced 
        biofuel (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(B) of the Clean Air 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)(B))).''.
    (b) Excise Tax Credit.--Section 6426(b) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(7) Ethanol eligible for credit.--In the case of any 
        sale, use, or removal for any period after June 30, 2011, no 
        credit shall be determined under this subsection with respect 
        to an alcohol fuel mixture in which any of the alcohol consists 
        of ethanol unless the ethanol qualifies as an advanced biofuel 
        (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 
        U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)(B))).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to any sale, use, or removal for any period after June 30, 2011.

SEC. 2. ETHANOL TARIFF-TAX PARITY.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and semiannually thereafter, the President shall reduce the temporary 
duty imposed on ethanol under subheading 9901.00.50 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States by an amount equal to the 
reduction in any Federal income or excise tax credit under section 
40(h), 6426(b), or 6427(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and 
take any other action necessary to ensure that the combined temporary 
duty imposed on ethanol under such subheading 9901.00.50 and any other 
duty imposed under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
is equal to, or lower than, any Federal income or excise tax credit 
applicable to ethanol under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bio-oils Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR Homepage
                    BOR-NCAUR pilot plant facilities
                        Seed pressing and refining equipment
                                    Oil synthesis equipment
                                    Other equipmentSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Bio-oils Research Docs







Roskamp 900 roller millheadline bar Roskamp 900 roller mill


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov