alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                                                  Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              STATE OR OTHER
                                              JURISDICTION OF          NAMES UNDER WHICH
                                               INCORPORATION            SUCH SUBSIDIARY
         SUBSIDIARY                           OR ORGANIZATION            DOES BUSINESS
         ----------                           ---------------            -------------
<S>                                           <C>                      <C>
         Luscar Coal Income Fund.......           Alberta                     n/a

         Luscar Coal Ltd. .............           Alberta                     n/a

         Luscar Ltd....................           Alberta                     n/a

         3718492 Canada Inc............           Canada                      n/a
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

WRITTEN STATEMENTPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, James V.Mazzo and Richard A. Meier, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (the “Company”),pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.§1350, hereby certify to the best of their knowledge that:

(i)            the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofthe Company for the quarterly and annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 28, 2007
|        | /s/ JAMES V. MAZZO                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | James V. Mazzo,                      |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President and |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer             |
|   |                                 |
|   |                                 |
|   | /s/ RICHARD A. MEIER                 |
|   | Richard A. Meier,                    |
|   | Chief Operating Officer and          |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer             |

 

**A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAdvanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.**

----
Exhibit
32.2




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, , to the best of
such officer’s knowledge, that:


1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:
May 12, 2008







By:
            /s/
      William DanisName:
      William DanisTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Cause No. 2:16-cr-63 

 ) 

CESAR ORTIZ IZAGUIRRE, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY 

TO: THE HONORABLE PHILIP P. SIMON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 Upon defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11, this matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Andrew P. Rodovich, United 

States Magistrate Judge, on November 16, 2016, with the written consents of the defendant, 

counsel for the defendant, and counsel for the United States of America. 

 The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, before the 

Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record. 

 In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on 

the record, and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of Assistant United States Attorney 

Thomas M. McGrath, and of Attorney Visvaldis P. Kupsis, counsel for the defendant, 

 I FIND as follows: 

1. that the defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the 

plea is offered; 
2 

2. that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not 

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse 

witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination; 

3. that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including 

the effect of the supervised release term, and the defendant understands that the 

Probation Department will prepare a presentence report based upon the sentencing 

guidelines but that the court may depart from those guidelines under some 

circumstances; 

4. that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made 

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises; 

5. that the defendant is competent to plead guilty; 

6. that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a 

prosecution for perjury or false statement; 

7. that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further, 

 I RECOMMEND that the court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Count One of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A presentence report has 

been ordered. 

 ENTERED this 16th day of November, 2016. 

 /s/ Andrew P. Rodovich 

 United States Magistrate Judge
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0719

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GREGORY M. SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including November 28, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 21 2020

10/21/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0719
GTE - 2014.12.31 - EX 10.25





        Exhibit 10.25
December 18, 2014




Shane O’Leary 
4007 – 5th Street SW  
Calgary, Alberta  T2S 2C9


Attention:    Shane O’Leary


Re:  Consulting Services Agreement between Gran Tierra Energy Canada ULC and Shane O’Leary Contract No. CSA 14-547 dated September 11, 2014(the “Contract”)




Dear Shane:


Further to our discussions, this is to confirm that it has been agreed, effective as of December 18, 2014, the “Initial Term” of the Contract is extended such that the “Initial Term” shall terminate on March 31, 2015, instead of December 31, 2014.
 
Except for the above-noted amendment, the Contract continues in full force and effect, unamended.


Please acknowledge your agreement to the amendment by signing below.    


Yours truly, 


“Dana Coffield”


Dana Coffield
President & CEO




Acknowledged and agreed this “18” day of “December”, 2014




“Shane O’Leary”
Shane O’Leary







300, 625 11th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada          (403) 265-3221 Fax (403) 265-3242          www.grantierra.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 6, 2013

jam 

# Order

March 6, 2013

1 46161

DARRYL MCGORE

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 46161

CoA: 312208

ROBERT SANDERS DEPUTY WARDEN,

OFFICER DELTOUR and MS. MCDONALD,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff

- appellant having failed to comply

with the order of November 14 , 20 12 , the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close

this file.
**EXHIBIT 10.33**

 

**Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements**

 

We currently pay each member of our Board of Directors who is not employed by us or any of our affiliates an annual retainerof $18,000 and $1,000 for each board or committee meeting attended.****Directors who are employed by us or any of our affiliates are not paid any additional compensation for their service on our Board of Directors. We reimburse each of ourdirectors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that they incur in connection with their service on our Board of Directors. We have entered into indemnification agreements, a form of which is attached as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Reporton Form 10-K, with each of our directors. 

 

Additionally, ourdirectors are eligible to participate in our 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, which is administered by our Compensation Committee under authority delegated by our Board of Directors. The terms and conditions of option grants to our non-employee directorsunder our 2002 Stock Incentive Plan are determined in the discretion of our Compensation Committee, and must be consistent with the terms of the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, which is filed as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form10-K.****

 

The compensation arrangements we have with ourdirectors are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by our Board of Directors. ****
1997 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-2-1997

RNS Ser Inc v. Secretary Labor

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 96-3245

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"RNS Ser Inc v. Secretary Labor" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 118.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/118
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 96-3245 

 

RNS Service v. Sec of Labor 

The following modifications have been made to the Court’s 

opinion issued on May 29, 1997 in the above-entitled appeal and 

will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: 

In the above slip opinion on page 8, line 17, delete the comma 

(,) after “(storage facilities). The corrected line should read: 

...by such words as “impoundments” (storage facilities) and 

“custom coal preparation facilities,” since it serves.... 

On page 10, line 33, add a close bracket (]) after the 

letter T at the start of “[The committee is greatly 

concerned....” The corrected line should read: 

[T]he Committee is greatly concerned that.... 

Copies of the referenced pages are enclosed for your 

convenience and ready reference. 

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, 

 Clerk 

June 2, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001029850
<NAME>                        LORAL ORION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                            57,005
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     14,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 126,780
<PP&E>                                           297,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (25,876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,422,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             54,509
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       424,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,422,332
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  60,186
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    113,072 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  41,106 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     800 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                40,939 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (93,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       4,932 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (89,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (89,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2008065EN.01000101.xml

| 11.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5052 — INEOS/BP VAM & EtAc Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 65/01)

On 25 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5052. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5052. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of NX Global Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                         |  |                         |  |  |  | 
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | 
|February 20, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Patrick A McGough   |  |                         |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | Patrick A McGough       |  |                         |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |                         |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |                        
|                  |  |  |  |                         |  | /s/ Patrick A McGough   |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |                         |  | Patrick A McGough       |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |                         |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Louis E. PrezeauLouis E. PrezeauChief Executive Officer

and President CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward R. WrightEdward R. WrightChief Financial Officer

and Senior Vice President 19
S. 655 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 95 Dogwood 

Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPENCER BYRD POWERS, JR. POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### RUSSO-CHINESE BANK, Respondent, v. DICK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by the Russo-Chinese Bank •■against Evans R. Dick and others. G. S. Graham, for appellants. B. N. Cardozo, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, •also, 143 App. Div. 933, 128 N. Y. Supp. 1144.
# L_2008163EN.01005301.xml

| 24.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 163/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 163/53

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2008/269/EC of 19 March 2008 amending Decision 2001/618/EC to include the departments of Côtes-d’Armor, Finistère, Ille-et-Vilaine, Morbihan and Nord, France, in the list of regions free of Aujeszky’s disease

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 85 of 27 March 2008
  )

The publication of Decision 2008/269/EC should be considered as null and void.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. FLAXMAN v. HENNESSY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 23, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Louis Flaxman, against Joseph P. Hennessy and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order (134 N. Y. Supp. 145) affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

BURR, J., not voting.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7392

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEVIN A. NICKLES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-92-473-A, CA-97-796-AM) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kevin A. Nickles, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kevin A. Nickles seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), his motion for reconsideration, and his motion for acertificate of appealability. We dismiss the appeals from the denial of relief on the § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was filed beyond the sixty-day appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). As for the denial of the motion for a certificate of appealability, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nickles , Nos. CR-92-473-A; CA-97-796-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Kevin Fager et al. and Other Petitioners United in Interest, Appellants, v Board of Education, Rochester City School District, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 830]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David Michael Barry, J.), entered November 1, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied and dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
#### Linda D. ELLISION, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 2012-3006.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 3, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Linda D. Ellision moves to withdraw her appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.