Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices 35735 

13See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended 

Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171 

(June 21, 2019). 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19, 

2018) (Order). 

2See Petitioners’ Letter ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Order on Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China—Petitioners’ Request for 2019/ 

2020 Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2020 

(Petitioners’ Review Request); Valeo’s Letter 

‘‘Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of 

China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

April 30, 2020 (Valeo’s Review Request); Xiashun’s 

Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic 

of China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated April 30, 2020 (Xiashun’s Review Request); 

Dingsheng Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China (C–570–054),’’ dated April 30, 

2020 (Dingsheng Companies’ Review Request); and 

Zhongji Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Aluminum 

Foil from the Peoples Republic of China: Request 

for Second Administrative Review,’’ (Zhongji 

Companies’ Review Request). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

35068 (June 8, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

5The petitioners withdrew their requests for 

review of all companies for which they had 

requested a review, except those companies covered 

by other parties’ review requests. See Petitioners’ 

Letter, ‘‘2nd Administrative Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Aluminum 

Foil from the People’s Republic of China— 

Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Certain Requests for 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated September 8, 2020 

(Petitioner’s Withdrawal of Review Requests). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum Foil 

from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated February 

26, 2021. 

7See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

rate for companies subject to this review 

will be equal to the company-specific 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

a company not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will be 7.23 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation, adjusted for the 

export-subsidy rate in the companion 

countervailing duty investigation.13

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221. 

Dated: June 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Affiliation and Collapsing 

V. Application of Facts Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VI. Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Currency Conversion 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14450 Filed 7–6–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–054] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that producers and exporters of certain 

aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

received countervailable subsidies 

during the period of review (POR), 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tyler Weinhold, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1121. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 19, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

countervailing duty order on aluminum 

foil from China.1 On April 1, 2020, 

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register a notice inviting interested 

parties to request a review of the Order 

for the POR. On April 30, 2020, we 

received timely review requests for 33 

companies.2 On June 8, 2020, 

Commerce published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the Order, covering the requested 

companies.3 On July 21, 2020, 

Commerce tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by 60 days, 

thereby extending the deadline for the 

preliminary results until March 1, 

2021.4 As explained below, on 

September 8, 2020, the Aluminum 

Association Trade Enforcement Working 

Group (the petitioners) withdrew their 

review requests with respect to certain 

companies.5 On February 26, 2021, 

Commerce fully extended the deadline 

for these preliminary results until June 

29, 2021.6

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

aluminum foil from China. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35736 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices 

8See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

9As explained above, the petitioners withdrew 

their requests for review of all companies for which 

they had requested a review, except those 

companies covered by other parties’ review 

requests. 

10Of the 33 companies for which we initiated a 

review in the Initiation Notice, 16 were subject to 

the review requests of other interested parties: (1) 

Alcha International Holdings Limited; (2) Anhui 

Maximum Aluminium Industries Company Ltd.; (3) 

Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) 

Trading Co. Ltd.; (4) Hangzhou Dingsheng Import 

& Export Co. Ltd.; (5) Hangzhou Five Star 

Aluminum Co., Ltd.; (6) Hunan Suntown Marketing 

Limited; (7) Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd.; (8) 

Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., 

Ltd.; (9) Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., 

Ltd.; (10) Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., 

Ltd.; (11) Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., 

(HK) Limited; (12) Shantou Wanshun Package 

Material Stock Co., Ltd.; (13) SNTO International 

Trade Limited; (14) Suntown Technology Group 

Corporation Limited; (15) Xiamen Xiashun 

Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd.; and (16) Yinbang Clad 

Material Co., Ltd. Among the 16 companies 

included in the petitioners’ review request, for 

which no other interested party requested a review, 

and for which the petitioners have withdrawn their 

request, five were found to have been cross-owned 

in the Final Determination with companies subject 

to this review: (1) Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum 

Co., Ltd.; (2) Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group 

Co. Ltd.; (3) Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., 

Ltd.; (4) Luoyang Longding Aluminium Industries 

Co., Ltd.; and (5) Walson (HK) Trading Co., Limited. 

Because these five companies were previously 

found to be cross-owned with a company which is 

subject to this review, we preliminarily intend not 

to rescind the review with respect to these five 

companies. See Petitioners’ Review Request; 

Dingsheng Companies’ Review Request; Valeo’s 

Review Request; Xiashun’s Review Request, 

Zhongji Companies’ Review Request; Petitioner’s 

Withdrawal of Review Requests; Initiation Notice; 

and Order. 

11 In the first administrative review of the Order, 

Commerce found the following companies to be 

cross-owned: Anhui Maximum Aluminum 

Industries Company Ltd.; Jiangsu Huafeng 

Aluminum Industry Co. Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji 

Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji 

Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Ltd.; Shantou 

Wanshun Material Stock Co., Ltd.; and Anhui 

Maximum Aluminum Industries Company Limited. 

The subsidy rate applies to all cross-owned 

companies. See Certain Aluminum Foil from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 

2018, 86 FR 12171 (March 2, 2021). 

12 In the investigation, Commerce found the 

following companies to be cross-owned: Dingsheng 

Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., 

Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; 

Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & Export Co. Ltd.; 

Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co. Ltd.; 

Hangzhou Five Star Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou 

Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Dingsheng 

New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; Luoyang 

Longding Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) 

Trading Co., Limited. The subsidy rate applies to 

all cross-owned companies. See Order. 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

preliminarily determine that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by 

an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a 

benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.8 For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Commerce notes that, in making these 

findings, it relied, in part, on facts 

available and, because it finds that the 

Government of China did not act to the 

best of its ability to respond to 

Commerce’s requests for certain 

information, it drew an adverse 

inference, where appropriate, in 

selecting from among the facts 

otherwise available. For further 

information, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum at ‘‘Use of Facts 

Otherwise Available and Adverse 

Inferences.’’ 

Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party or parties that 

requested a review withdraw the request 

within 90 days of the publication date 

of the notice of initiation of the 

requested review. As noted above the 

petitioner timely withdrew its requests 

for review of certain companies. 

Because no other party requested a 

review of these companies, and in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

we are rescinding the review with 

respect to these companies.9 Therefore, 

we are rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to: (1) Baotou Alcha 

Aluminum Co., Ltd.; (2) Granges 

Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; (3) 

Guangxi Baise Xinghe Aluminum 

Industry Co., Ltd.; (4) Huafon Nikkei 

Aluminium Corporation; (5) Jiangsu 

Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., 

Ltd.; (6) Jiangyin Dolphin Pack Ltd. Co.; 

(7) Shandong Yuanrui Metal Material 

Co., Ltd.; (8) Suntown Technology 

Group Limited; (9) Suzhou Manakin 

Aluminum Processing Technology Co., 

Ltd.; (10) Yantai Donghai Aluminum 

Foil Co., Ltd.; (11) Yantai Jintai 

International Trade Co., Ltd.; and (12) 

Zhejiang Zhongiin Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd.10

Preliminary Results 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that, during the POR, the following 

countervailable subsidy rates exist: 

Company 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Alcha International Holdings Limited ................................................................................................................................................... 23.34 

Anhui Maximum Aluminum Industries Company Ltd.; Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination 

Materials Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Limited; and Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock 

Co., Ltd.11 ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 23.34 

Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou 

Dingsheng Import & Export Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Five Star Aluminum Co., 

Ltd.; Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint Stock Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Longding Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) Trading Co., Limited.12 .......................................................................................... 23.34 

Hunan Suntown Marketing Limited ..................................................................................................................................................... 23.34 

Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................... 305.07 

SNTO International Trade Limited ....................................................................................................................................................... 23.34 

Suntown Technology Group Corporation Limited ............................................................................................................................... 23.34 

Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Foil Co. Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 23.34 

Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................... 23.34 

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act, upon issuance of the final 

results, Commerce shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties 

on all appropriate entries covered by 

this review. We intend to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices 35737 

13See 19 CFR 224(b). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1); 

see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) 

(Temporary Rule). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2). 

16See Temporary Rule. 

17See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

19See 19 CFR 351.310. 

1See Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination 

and Extension of Provisional Measures, 86 FR 9051 

(February 11, 2021) (Preliminary Determination), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Affirmative 

Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value 

Investigation of Certain Metal Lockers and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For 12 companies for which this 

review is rescinded with these 

preliminary results, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to assess countervailing 

duties on all appropriate entries at a rate 

equal to the cash deposit of estimated 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

period January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Commerce 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP no later 

than 35 days after publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the 

Act, upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

collect cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties for each of the 

companies listed above on shipments of 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, except where the 

rate calculated in the final results is zero 

or de minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the most recent 

company-specific or all-others rate 

applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

instructions, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We will disclose to parties to this 

proceeding the calculations performed 

in reaching the preliminary results 

within five days of the date of 

publication of these preliminary 

results.13 Interested parties may submit 

written comments (case briefs) within 

30 days of publication of the 

preliminary results and rebuttal 

comments (rebuttal briefs) within seven 

days after the time limit for filing case 

briefs.14 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs. Parties who submit arguments are 

requested to submit with the argument: 

(1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.15 Note that 

Commerce has modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.16

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice.17 Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number, the 

number of participants, whether any 

participant is a foreign national, and a 

list of the issues to be discussed. Issues 

addressed during the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in the briefs.18 If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce will inform parties of the 

scheduled date of the hearing.19 Parties 

should confirm by telephone the date, 

time, and location of the hearing two 

days before the scheduled date. 

Parties are reminded that all briefs 

and hearing requests are to be filed 

electronically using ACCESS and 

received successfully in their entirety by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in their 

comments, within 120 days after 

publication of these preliminary results. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 29, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

V. Scope of the Order 

VI. Diversification of China’s Economy 

VII. Subsidies Valuation 

VIII. Interest Rates, Discount Rates, and 

Benchmark Prices 

IX. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

X. Analysis of Programs 

XI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14446 Filed 7–6–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–133] 

Certain Metal Lockers and Parts 

Thereof From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Affirmative Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that imports of 

certain metal lockers and parts thereof 

(metal lockers) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) are being, or 

are likely to be, sold in the United States 

at less than fair value (LTFV). The 

period of investigation is January 1, 

2020, through June 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurel LaCivita or Patrick Barton, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4243 and (202) 482–0012, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 11, 2021, Commerce 

published its Preliminary Determination 

of sales at LTFV of metal lockers from 

China.1 A summary of the events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Determination, as well as a 

full discussion of the issues raised by 

parties for this final determination, may 

be found in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is available electronically via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES