Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 / Notices 34745 

Formed,’’ provided on the SAB website 

(see the ‘‘Nomination of Experts’’ link 

under ‘‘Current Activities’’ at http://

www.epa.gov/sab). To be considered, 

nominations should include the 

information requested below. EPA 

values and welcomes diversity. All 

qualified candidates are encouraged to 

apply regardless of sex, race, disability 

or ethnicity. Nominations should be 

submitted in time to arrive no later than 

July 21, 2021. 

The following information should be 

provided on the nomination form: 

Contact information for the person 

making the nomination; contact 

information for the nominee; and the 

disciplinary and specific areas of 

expertise of the nominee. Nominees will 

be contacted by the SAB Staff Office and 

will be asked to provide a recent 

curriculum vitae and a narrative 

biographical summary that includes: 

Current position, educational 

background; research activities; sources 

of research funding for the last two 

years; and recent service on other 

national advisory committees or 

national professional organizations. 

Persons having questions about the 

nomination procedures, or who are 

unable to submit nominations through 

the SAB website, should contact the 

DFO at the contact information noted 

above. The names and biosketches of 

qualified nominees identified by 

respondents to this Federal Register 

notice, and additional experts identified 

by the SAB Staff Office, will be posted 

in a List of Candidates for the Panel on 

the SAB website at http://www.epa.gov/ 

sab. Public comments on the List of 

Candidates will be accepted for 21 days. 

The public will be requested to provide 

relevant information or other 

documentation on nominees that the 

SAB Staff Office should consider in 

evaluating candidates. 

For the EPA SAB Staff Office a 

balanced review panel includes 

candidates who possess the necessary 

domains of knowledge, the relevant 

scientific perspectives (which, among 

other factors, can be influenced by work 

history and affiliation), and the 

collective breadth of experience to 

adequately address the charge. In 

forming the expert panel, the SAB Staff 

Office will consider public comments 

on the Lists of Candidates, information 

provided by the candidates themselves, 

and background information 

independently gathered by the SAB 

Staff Office. Selection criteria to be used 

for panel membership include: (a) 

Scientific and/or technical expertise, 

knowledge, and experience (primary 

factors); (b) availability and willingness 

to serve; (c) absence of financial 

conflicts of interest; (d) absence of an 

appearance of a loss of impartiality; (e) 

skills working in committees, 

subcommittees and advisory panels; 

and, (f) for the panel as a whole, 

diversity of expertise and scientific 

points of view. 

The SAB Staff Office’s evaluation of 

an absence of financial conflicts of 

interest will include a review of the 

‘‘Confidential Financial Disclosure 

Form for Environmental Protection 

Agency Special Government 

Employees’’ (EPA Form 3110–48). This 

confidential form is required and allows 

government officials to determine 

whether there is a statutory conflict 

between a person’s public 

responsibilities (which include 

membership on an EPA federal advisory 

committee) and private interests and 

activities, or the appearance of a loss of 

impartiality, as defined by federal 

regulation. The form may be viewed and 

downloaded through the ‘‘Ethics 

Requirements for Advisors’’ link on the 

SAB website at http://www.epa.gov/sab. 

This form should not be submitted as 

part of a nomination. 

The approved policy under which the 

EPA SAB Office selects members for 

subcommittees and review panels is 

described in the following document: 

Overview of the Panel Formation 

Process at the Environmental Protection 

Agency Science Advisory Board (EPA– 

SAB–EC–02–010), which is posted on 

the SAB website at http://www.epa.gov/ 

sab. 

V Khanna Johnston, 

Deputy Director, Science Advisory Board Staff 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13857 Filed 6–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0287; EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2021–0288; FRL–10022–67] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed Renewal of Two 

Currently Approved Collections; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this 

document announces that EPA is 

planning to submit requests to renew 

two currently approved Information 

Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB). The 

ICRs are identified in this document by 

their corresponding titles, EPA ICR 

numbers, OMB Control numbers, and 

related docket identification (ID) 

numbers. Before submitting these ICRs 

to OMB for review and approval, EPA 

is soliciting comments on specific 

aspects of the information collection 

activities that are summarized in this 

document. The ICRs and accompanying 

material are available for public review 

and comment in the relevant dockets 

identified in this document for the ICR. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 30, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the corresponding ICR 

as identified in this document, online 

using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Do not submit electronically 

any information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Additional 

instructions on commenting or visiting 

the docket, along with more information 

about dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

Due to the public health concerns 

related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is 

closed to visitors with limited 

exceptions. The staff continues to 

provide remote customer service via 

email, phone, and webform. For the 

latest status information on EPA/DC and 

docket access, visit https://

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carolyn Siu, Mission Support Division 

7101M, Office of Program Support, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 

347–0159; email address: siu.carolyn@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. What information is EPA particularly 

interested in? 

Pursuant to PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) 

(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), EPA 

specifically solicits comments and 

information to enable it to: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility. 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

Agency’s estimates of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
34746 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 / Notices 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected. 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. In 

particular, EPA is requesting comments 

from very small businesses (those that 

employ less than 25) on examples of 

specific additional efforts that EPA 

could make to reduce the paperwork 

burden for very small businesses 

affected by this collection. 

II. What should I consider when I 

prepare my comments for EPA? 

You may find the following 

suggestions helpful for preparing your 

comments: 

1. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible and provide specific examples. 

2. Describe any assumptions that you 

used. 

3. Provide copies of any technical 

information and/or data you used that 

support your views. 

4. If you estimate potential burden or 

costs, explain how you arrived at the 

estimate that you provide. 

5. Submit your comments by the 

deadline identified under DATES. 

6. Identify the docket ID number 

assigned to the ICR action in the subject 

line on the first page of your response. 

You may also provide the ICR title and 

related EPA and OMB numbers. 

III. What do I need to know about the 

PRA? 

An Agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

subject to PRA approval unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. The OMB control numbers for 

the EPA regulations in title 40 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), after 

appearing in the preamble of the final 

rule, are further displayed either by 

publication in the Federal Register or 

by other appropriate means, such as on 

the related collection instruments or 

form, if applicable. The display of OMB 

control numbers for certain EPA 

regulations is consolidated in a list at 40 

CFR 9.1. 

As used in the PRA context, burden 

is defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b). 

IV. Which ICRs are being renewed? 

EPA is planning to submit two 

currently approved ICRs to OMB for 

review and approval under the PRA. In 

addition to specifically identifying the 

ICRs by title and corresponding ICR, 

OMB and docket ID numbers, this unit 

provides a brief summary of the 

information collection activity and the 

Agency’s estimated burden. The 

Supporting Statement for each ICR, a 

copy of which is available in the 

corresponding docket, provides a more 

detailed explanation. 

A. Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2021–0288 

Title: Certification of Pesticide 

Applicators. 

ICR number: EPA ICR No. 0155.14. 

OMB control number: OMB Control 

No. 2070–0029. 

ICR status: The approval for this ICR 

is scheduled to expire on December 31, 

2022. 

Abstract: EPA administers 

certification programs for pesticide 

applicators under section 11 of the 

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). FIFRA allows 

EPA to classify a pesticide as ‘‘restricted 

use’’ if the pesticide meets certain 

toxicity or risk criteria. The regulations 

in 40 CFR part 171 include procedures 

for certification programs for States, 

Federal agencies, Indian tribes, or U.S. 

territories who wish to develop and 

implement their own certification plans 

and programs, after obtaining EPA 

approval. This ICR addresses the 

paperwork activities performed by 

businesses, individuals and regulators 

to comply with training and 

certification requirements associated 

with applicators of restricted use 

pesticides (RUPs). Because of the 

potential of improperly applied RUPs to 

harm human health or the environment, 

pesticides under this classification may 

be purchased and applied only by 

‘‘certified applicators’’ or by persons 

under the direct supervision of certified 

applicators. To become a certified 

applicator, a person must meet certain 

standards of competency; these 

standards are met through completion of 

a certification program or test. The 

additional information requirements 

contained in the January 4, 2017 final 

rule (82 FR 952; RIN 2070–AJ20) that 

amended the regulations at 40 CFR part 

171 are addressed in another ICR that is 

currently approved under OMB Control 

No. 2070–0196. 

All 50 states, the District of Columbia, 

American Samoa, Cheyenne River 

Sioux, Guam, Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands, Oglala Sioux, 

Puerto Rico, Republic of Palau, 

Shoshone-Bannock Tribe Affiliated 

Tribes and U.S. Virgin Islands as well as 

the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, the U.S. 

Department of Energy and the U.S. 

Department of Agriculture 

(USDA)(USDA, APHIS/PPQ and USDA 

Forest Service) administer applicator 

certification programs within their 

jurisdictions, but each agency’s 

certification plan must be approved by 

EPA before it can be implemented. 

Agencies authorized by EPA to 

administer a certification program are 

collectively referred to in this document 

as ‘‘authorized agencies.’’ Currently all 

50 states, the District of Columbia, 6 

territories, 4 tribes and 5 federal 

agencies are authorized to run their own 

certification programs. Under 

authorized agencies’ certification 

programs, dealerships of RUP are not 

required to report their dealership 

information and RUP sales directly to 

EPA, and such information is not 

included in the paperwork burden 

estimates of this ICR. 

In areas where no authorized agency 

has jurisdiction, EPA may administer a 

certification program directly, called a 

Federal program. Federal certification 

programs require RUP dealers to 

maintain records of RUP sales and to 

report and update their names and 

addresses with the pesticide regulatory 

agency for enforcement purposes. 

Starting in 2007 and in 2014 

respectively, the Agency implemented 

EPA-administered applicator 

certification programs for Indian 

Country and for Navajo Nation (79 FR 

7185–89). Under the EPA plan for 

Indian Country, dealerships operating in 

Indian Country are required to report 

their dealership and individual business 

names and addresses to EPA Regional 

offices. 

This ICR also addresses how 

registrants of certain pesticide products 

are expected to perform specific, special 

paperwork activities, such as training 

and recordkeeping, in order to comply 

with the terms and conditions of the 

pesticide registration (e.g., registrants of 

anthrax-related pesticide products that 

assert claims to inactivate Bacillus 

anthracis (anthrax) spores). Paperwork 

activities associated with the use of 

such products are conveyed specifically 

as a condition of the registration. 

Burden statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 1,379,443.81 hours 

per response. The ICR, a copy of which 

is available in the docket, provides a 

detailed explanation of this estimate, 

which is only briefly summarized here: 

Respondents/Affected entities: 

Entities potentially affected by this ICR 

include pesticide applicators, 

administration of certification programs 

by States/Tribal lead agencies 

(authorized agencies), individuals or 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 / Notices 34747 

entities engaged in activities related to 

the registration of a pesticide product, 

and RUP dealers (only for EPA 

administrated programs). 

Estimated total number of potential 

respondents: 444,639 (total). 

Frequency of response: On occasion. 

Estimated total average number of 

responses for each respondent: Varies. 

Estimated total annual burden hours: 

1,379,444 hours (annual). 

Estimated total annual costs: 

$57,047,143.94. This includes an 

estimated burden cost of 

$57,047,143.94 and an estimated cost of 

$0 for non-burden hour paperwork 

costs, e.g., investment or maintenance 

and operational costs. 

Changes in the estimates from the last 

approval: The renewal of this ICR will 

result in neither a decrease nor increase 

of hours in the total estimated 

respondent burden identified in the 

currently approved ICR. Since the 

Agency is renewing this ICR as is, the 

total estimated respondent burden for 

this renewal ICR remains the same at 

59,190 hours. The only adjustments 

calculated is the cost in burden which 

is made to reflect the latest wage labor 

rates (BLS 2019). These changes are 

adjustments. 

In addition, OMB has requested that 

EPA move towards using the 18- 

question format for ICR Supporting 

Statements used by other federal 

agencies and departments and is based 

on the submission instructions 

established by OMB in 1995, replacing 

the alternate format developed by EPA 

and OMB prior to 1995. EPA intends to 

update this Supporting Statement 

during the comment period to reflect the 

18-question format, and has included 

the questions in an attachment to this 

Supporting Statement. In doing so, the 

Agency does not expect the change in 

format to result in substantive changes 

to the information collection activities 

or related estimated burden and costs. 

B. Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2021–0287 

Title: Pesticides; Certification of 

Pesticide Applicators; Final Rule [RIN 

2070–AJ20]. 

ICR number: EPA ICR No. 2499.03. 

OMB control number: OMB Control 

No. 2070–0196. 

ICR status: The approval for this ICR 

is scheduled to expire on February 28. 

2022. 

Abstract: This ICR amendment covers 

the revisions contained in thea final rule 

‘‘Certification of Pesticide Applicators’’ 

(Certification rule) at 40 CFR part 171, 

which regulates the certification of 

applicators of RUPs. This ICR estimates 

the incremental burden of revised 

requirements applicable under the PRA, 

that are not already included in the ICR 

‘‘Certification of Pesticide Applicators’’ 

covering 40 CFR part 171 prior to the 

new final rule. That ICR, which this ICR 

amends, was currently-approved by the 

OMB at the time this ICR was submitted 

to OMB with the final rule, and is 

termed the ‘‘existing ICR’’ in this 

document. 

The existing regulation (prior to the 

new final rule) has provisions for states, 

the District of Columbia (DC), tribes, 

territories, and federal agencies that 

wish to certify applicators to use RUPs, 

to submit certification plans to EPA for 

review and approval, and requirements 

to report specific information related to 

applicator certification activities 

annually. The regulation has standards 

of competency for persons who are 

certified to apply RUPs, as well as 

requirements related to noncertified 

applicators who apply RUPs under the 

direct supervision of certified 

applicators. In addition, it already 

requires pesticide retail dealers to 

maintain records of RUP sales in areas 

where the EPA administers an 

applicator certification program. 

The final rule is intended to improve 

the competency of certified applicators 

of RUPs and noncertified applicators 

who apply RUPs under the direct 

supervision of certified applicators. The 

final rule includes new and revised 

standards for certification for 

commercial and private applicators, 

provisions for recertification of 

applicators, and training for 

noncertified applicators applying RUPs 

under the supervision of certified 

applicators. The revisions also include 

changes to improve the clarity and 

organization of the rule and overall 

program operation. The proposed 

changes to the regulation are intended 

to ensure that all persons who use 

RUPs—i.e., private applicators, 

commercial applicators, and 

noncertified applicators using RUPs 

under the direct supervision of certified 

applicators—are competent to use RUPs 

in a manner that will not result in 

unreasonable adverse effects to 

themselves, others, or the environment. 

This amendment ICR estimates the 

burden and costs of the final rule 

changes related to information 

collection and includes: Training for 

noncertified applicators applying RUPs 

under the direct supervision of certified 

applicators, recordkeeping of the 

noncertified applicator training, 

recordkeeping of RUP sales by pesticide 

dealerships under certification programs 

not administered by the EPA, and 

burden to states, DC, territories, tribes, 

and federal agencies to revise 

certification plans as needed to comply 

with the revised requirements. 

The following sections provide a 

general overview of the paperwork 

requirements in the final rule; burden 

and cost estimates are found in section 

6. 

Burden statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 2,280,849 hours 

per response. The ICR, a copy of which 

is available in the docket, provides a 

detailed explanation of this estimate, 

which is only briefly summarized here: 

Respondents/Affected entities: 

Entities potentially affected by this ICR 

include Agricultural Establishments, 

Nursery and Tree Production, 

Agricultural Pest Control and Pesticide 

Handling on Farms and Crop Advisors, 

Agricultural (animal) Pest Control 

(livestock spraying), Forestry Pest 

Control, Wood Preservation Pest 

Control, Pesticide Registrants, Pesticide 

Dealers, Research & Demonstration Pest 

Control and Crop Advisor, Ornamental 

& Turf, Rights-of-Way Pest Control, 

Environmental Protection Program 

Administrators, and Governmental Pest 

Control Programs. 

Estimated total number of potential 

respondents: 1,860,974. 

Frequency of response: On occasion. 

Estimated total average number of 

responses for each respondent: 195. 

Estimated total annual burden hours: 

2,280,849 hours. 

Estimated total annual costs: 

$108,061,898. This includes an 

estimated burden cost of $108,061,898 

and an estimated cost of $0 for nonburden hour paperwork costs, e.g., 

investment or maintenance and 

operational costs. 

Changes in the estimates from the last 

approval: The renewal of this ICR will 

result in neither a decrease nor increase 

of hours in the total estimated 

respondent burden identified in the 

currently approved ICR. Since the 

Agency is renewing this ICR as is, the 

total estimated respondent burden for 

this renewal ICR remains the same at 

2,280,849 hours. The only adjustments 

calculated is the cost in burden which 

is made to reflect the latest wage labor 

rates (BLS 2019). These changes are 

adjustments. 

In addition, OMB has requested that 

EPA move towards using the 18- 

question format for ICR Supporting 

Statements used by other federal 

agencies and departments and is based 

on the submission instructions 

established by OMB in 1995, replacing 

the alternate format developed by EPA 

and OMB prior to 1995. EPA intends to 

update this Supporting Statement 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
34748 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 / Notices 

during the comment period to reflect the 

18-question format, and has included 

the questions in an attachment to this 

Supporting Statement. In doing so, the 

Agency does not expect the change in 

format to result in substantive changes 

to the information collection activities 

or related estimated burden and costs. 

IV. What is the next step in the process 

for these ICRs? 

EPA will consider the comments 

received and amend the individual ICRs 

as appropriate. The final ICR packages 

will then be submitted to OMB for 

review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.12. EPA will issue another Federal 

Register document pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the 

submission of these ICRs to OMB and 

the opportunity for the public to submit 

additional comments for OMB 

consideration. If you have any questions 

about any of these ICRs or the approval 

process in general, please contact the 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 

Dated: June 24, 2021. 

Michal Freedhoff, 

Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical 

Safety and Pollution Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13894 Filed 6–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R9–2021–04; FRL–10023–16–Region 

9] 

Commonwealth Utilities Corporation 

Power Plant Site, Rota, Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands; Notice 

of Proposed CERCLA Settlement 

Agreement and Order on Consent 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

122(i) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation 

and Liability Act of 1980, as amended 

(CERCLA), notice is hereby given of a 

proposed administrative settlement with 

Commonwealth Utilities Corporation 

(CUC), for payment of costs of a removal 

action at a power plant owned and 

operated by CUC on the Island of Rota 

in the Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands (CNMI). The 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

enters the settlement pursuant to 

Section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA. The 

settlement provides for CUC’s payment 

of $315,000, plus interest, towards costs 

incurred by EPA and the United States 

in removing polychlorinated biphenyl 

wastes from the CUC power plant in 

Rota during 2011–2013. The settlement 

includes a covenant not to sue pursuant 

to Sections 106 or 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 

U.S.C. 9606 or 9607(a). For thirty (30) 

days following the date of publication of 

this Notice in the Federal Register, the 

Agency will receive written comments 

relating to the settlement. The Agency 

will consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the settlement if comments received 

disclose facts or considerations that 

indicate the proposed settlement is 

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

The Agency’s response to any comments 

received will be available for public 

inspection at 75 Hawthorne Street, San 

Francisco, CA 94105. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before July 30, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is 

available for public inspection at EPA 

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 

Francisco, California. A copy of the 

proposed settlement may be obtained 

from David H. Kim, EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, ORC–3, San 

Francisco, CA 94105, telephone number 

415–972–3882. Comments should 

reference the CUC Power Plant Removal 

Site, Rota, CNMI and should be 

addressed to Mr. Kim at the above 

address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David H. Kim, Assistant Regional 

Counsel (ORC–3), Office of Regional 

Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94105; phone: (415) 972–3882; fax: (417) 

947–3570; email: kim.david@epa.gov. 

Enrique Manzanilla, 

Director, Superfund Division, U.S. EPA, 

Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13886 Filed 6–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice: 2021–3002] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (EXIM), as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

Agencies to comment on the proposed 

information collection, as required by 

the paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 30, 2021 to be assured of 

consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on 

WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV or to Tom 

Fitzpatrick tom.fitzpatrick@exim.gov, 

202–565–3642. Export-Import Bank of 

the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. 

NW, Washington, DC 20571. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice may be made available to the 

public through the 

WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV. For this 

reason, please do not include in your 

comments information of a confidential 

nature, such as sensitive personal 

information or proprietary information. 

If you send an email comment, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

internet. Please note that responses to 

this public comment request containing 

any routine notice about the 

confidentiality of the communication 

will be treated as public comments that 

may be made available to the public 

notwithstanding the inclusion of the 

routine notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request additional information, please 

Tom Fitzpatrick tom.fitzpatrick@

exim.gov, 202–565–3642. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

application tool can be reviewed at: 

https://www.exim.gov/sites/default/ 

files//forms/eib92-29.pdf. 

The Export-Import Bank of the United 

States, pursuant to the Export-Import 

Bank Act of 1945, as amended (12 

U.S.C. 635, et seq.), facilitates the 

finance of the export of U.S. goods and 

services. The ‘‘Report of Premiums 

Payable for Exporters Only’’ form will 

be used by exporters to report and pay 

premiums on insured shipments to 

various foreign buyers. 

Title and Form Number: EIB 92–29 

Export-Import Bank Report of Premiums 

Payable for Exporters Only. 

OMB Number: 3048–0017. 

Type of Review: Renewal. 

Need and Use: The ‘‘Report of 

Premiums Payable for Exporters Only’’ 

form is used by exporters to report and 

pay premiums on insured shipments to 

various foreign buyers under the terms 

of the policy and to certify that 

premiums have been correctly 

computed and remitted. The ‘Report of 

Premiums Payable for Exporters Only’ is 

used by EXIM to determine the 

eligibility of the shipment(s) and to 

calculate the premium due to EXIM for 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES