alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#####  

**Exhibit 31**

AMANASU TECHNOLOGIES**Certification of President and Principal Financial Officer				Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act				As Adopted Pursuant to				Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			I, Yukinori Yoshino, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Amanasu Technologies Corporation;
-  					Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a					material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,					in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading					with respect to the period covered by this annual report;				 
-  					Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included					in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,					results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented					in this annual report;				 
-  					I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures					(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:				 
							designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material							information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,							is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the							period in which this annual report is being prepared;						
							evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and							procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this							annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and						
							presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness							of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of							the Evaluation Date;						

-  					I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors					and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the					equivalent function):				 
							all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls							which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,							summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's							auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and						
							any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees							who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and						

-  					I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant					changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect					internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including					any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.				 

 Dated: April 13, 2008
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Systematic Entomology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ECMU
                    SEL Twitter FeedSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Systematic Entomology Laboratory Docs







SysEntLab_Tweetsheadline bar Tweets by USDA_ARS


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          49,986
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             143
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    263,017
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         163,103
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           163,966
<LOANS>                                      1,157,222
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,653,498
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,349,832
<SHORT-TERM>                                   108,055
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,415
<LONG-TERM>                                     38,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,504
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,653,498
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,034
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,262
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    18
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,314
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,681
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,827
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,487
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,230
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  21
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,302
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,302
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.63
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,736
<LOANS-PAST>                                       480
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   265
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,766
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,180
<RECOVERIES>                                       100
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,916
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,916
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION of PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**The undersigned herby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:**•** the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and**•** the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, theCompany’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the report or as a separate disclosure document.   /s/ Francis J. Evanitsky   Francis J. Evanitsky, President and Chief Executive Officer  Dated 05-09-2008
24
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 384 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 384

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                        breast cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2011'' and inserting ``2015''.

            Passed the Senate December 5, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 384

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                        breast cancer research.
```
Exhibit 4.2


 


SEE REVERSE FOR RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER


 


 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS


OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


March 31, 1999


 


 


 





	 	 	 	 	 






 


 


 


ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.


Series B Convertible Preferred


 


1,764 Shares Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Authorized


 


THIS
CERTIFIES THAT _____________________
are the owners of ________________ (_________) fully paid and non-assessable SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED Shares,
with a par value of $0.001, of


 


ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.


transferable only on the books of the Corporation
by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon the surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


 


The designations, preferences, qualifications,
limitations, restrictions, and special or other relative rights of the Preferred Shares and Common Shares, respectively, are set
forth on the back of this certificate, and the holder hereof, by accepting this certificate, expressly assents to and is bound
by all of said provisions.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by
its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation, this ____th day of _______, 20__.


 


 





	 	 	 
	Robert G. Watson, Jr., Secretary	 	Robert G. Watson, Jr., President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0600

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ASHLEY MARIA HOWARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 4 2022

02/04/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0600
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 597 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 597

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include neurologists 
   as primary care physicians for purposes of incentive payments for 
           primary care services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2011

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include neurologists 
   as primary care physicians for purposes of incentive payments for 
           primary care services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICARE PRIMARY CARE INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR NEUROLOGISTS.

    (a) Medicare.--Section 1833(x)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(x)(2)(A)(i)(I)) is amended by striking ``or 
pediatric medicine'' and inserting ``pediatric medicine, or 
neurology''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply as if included in the enactment of Public Law 111-148.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                      |   |   |   |
| Dated: July 16, 2010 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /s/   Eddie Vakser |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   | Eddie VakserChief Executive Officer |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50931

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE JURADO-ENRIQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-389-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Jurado-Enriquez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Jurado-Enriquez has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there is

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### POST, Appellant, v. CURRAN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Jacob K. Post against Richard Cur-ran and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 48 N. Y. Supp. 1113.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

SPRESIM ALIMI, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30204 

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00028-TMB-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 

Spresim Alimi appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and

subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291, and we affirm. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30204 

Alimi contends that the district court erred by applying U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 as 

an applicable policy statement, erred in its 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and dangerousness 

analysis, and wrongly concluded that Alimi’s obesity alone could not constitute an 

extraordinary and compelling reason for release. We need not decide whether the 

district court erred in its “extraordinary and compelling” analysis because the court 

did not abuse its discretion in independently concluding that the § 3553(a) 

sentencing factors did not support relief. See United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 

1281, 1284 (9th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review and explaining that court 

may deny compassionate release based on its § 3553(a) analysis alone). As the 

district court observed, Alimi’s criminal history, the seriousness of his offense, and 

the need to protect the public weighed against shortening his sentence by more 

than half. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(A), (C). Moreover, contrary to 

Alimi’s argument, the court did not rely on any clearly erroneous facts in 

calculating the remaining time on Alimi’s custodial sentence. 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          74,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  281,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       19,210,23
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,314,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,284,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     11,681,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    400,000
<COMMON>                                         3,582
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,284,414
<SALES>                                        531,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               549,703
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,468
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,082
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Luis Maldonado

*PaulF. Thomas*and *David P. Friedman,*special public defenders, in support of the petition.

*Richard F. Jacobson,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided November 9, 1989

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 137, is denied.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Statement



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Foundry, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: February 3, 2005



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Rimas P. Buinivicius
|By:    |  | Rimas P. Buinivicius    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer 



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Kenneth A. Minor   
|By:    |  | Kenneth A. Minor       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



20
#### Keith E. WIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ken CLARK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-15312.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed June 29, 2011.

Keith E. Wiggins, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Christopher John Rench, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attor*420ney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Keith E. Wiggins appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ha-beas petition. We dismiss.

In his petition, Wiggins contends that the 2005 decision of the Board of Parole Hearings (“Board”) denying his parole was not supported by “some evidence” of current dangerousness and, therefore, violated his due process rights. After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a certificate of appealability (“COA”) is required to challenge the denial of parole. *See Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). Now the Supreme Court has held that the only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. *See Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S. -, -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam). Because Wiggins raises no procedural challenges to his 2005 parole determination, a COA cannot issue, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Wiggins’s Motion for Judicial Notice is denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.