alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 535 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 535

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2011

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain lands 
     within Fort Pulaski National Monument, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fort Pulaski National Monument Lease 
Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. LEASE AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this 
section as the ``Secretary'') may lease to the Savannah Bar Pilots 
Association, or a successor organization, no more than 30,000 square 
feet of land and improvements within Fort Pulaski National Monument 
(referred to in this section as the ``Monument'') at the location on 
Cockspur Island that has been used continuously by the Savannah Bar 
Pilots Association since 1940.
    (b) Rental Fee and Proceeds.--
            (1) Rental fee.--For the lease authorized by this Act, the 
        Secretary shall require a rental fee based on fair market value 
        adjusted, as the Secretary deems appropriate, for amounts to be 
        expended by the lessee for property preservation, maintenance, 
        or repair and related expenses.
            (2) Proceeds.--Disposition of the proceeds from the rental 
        fee required pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be made in 
        accordance with section 3(k)(5) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 
        1a-2(k)(5)).
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--A lease entered into under this 
section--
            (1) shall be for a term of no more than 10 years and, at 
        the Secretary's discretion, for successive terms of no more 
        than 10 years at a time; and
            (2) shall include any terms and conditions the Secretary 
        determines to be necessary to protect the resources of the 
        Monument and the public interest.
    (d) Exemption From Applicable Law.--Except as provided in section 
2(b)(2) of this Act, the lease authorized by this Act shall not be 
subject to section 3(k) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-2(k)) or 
section 321 of Act of June 30, 1932 (40 U.S.C. 1302).

            Passed the Senate November 2, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Crum &Forster Holdings Corp., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periodspresented in this annual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  March 4, 2005 By:  /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*   Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 520 

To repeal the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2011 

Mr. COBURN (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volumetric Ethanol 

5 Excise Tax Credit Repeal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF VEETC. 

7 (a) ELIMINATION OF EXCISE TAX CREDIT OR PAY8 MENT.— 

9 (1) Section 6426(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue 

10 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 

11 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment of 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 520 IS

1 the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit Repeal 

2 Act)’’. 

3 (2) Section 6427(e)(6)(A) of such Code is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and in5 serting ‘‘the date of the enactment the Volumetric 

6 Ethanol Excise Tax Credit Repeal Act’’. 

7 (b) ELIMINATION OF INCOME TAX CREDIT.—The 

8 table contained in section 40(h)(2) of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘the en11 actment date of the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax 

12 Credit Repeal Act’’, 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘After such enactment date ................................................... zero zero’’. 

14 (c) REPEAL OF DEADWOOD.— 

15 (1) Section 40(h) of the Internal Revenue Code 

16 of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (3). 

17 (2) Section 6426(b)(2) of such Code is amend18 ed by striking subparagraph (C). 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to any sale, use, or removal for 

21 any period after the date of the enactment of the Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 13.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                        the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii)                     the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  Date: June 18, 2009 | /s/ Tony D.  Maher       |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                           | Tony D. Maher            |
|                           | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on July 14, 2003 (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin Brennan,  Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin Brennan
-------------------------
Kevin Brennan
Chief Executive Officer
July 14, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on July 14, 2003 (the "Report"),  I, Stephen Couture, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Stephen Couture
-------------------------
Stephen Couture
Chief Financial Officer
July 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 125 (Friday, July 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14215]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 19, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. The Lorene M. Roberton Testamentary Trust, James T. Roberton, 
individually, and as trustee, both of Ramsey, Minnesota; as members of 
the Roberton Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to retain 
voting shares of Rushford State Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
retain voting shares of Rushford State Bank, both of Rushford, 
Minnesota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Abigail Goodenow, West Des Moines, Iowa; Nicholas Goodenow, 
Okoboji, Iowa; John M. Blum, Centennial, Colorado; and Katie Blum Cone, 
Storm Lake, Iowa; to join the Goodenow Family Control Group, a group 
acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Goodenow Bancorporation, 
Okoboji, Iowa, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Bank 
Midwest, Spirit Lake, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-14215 Filed 7-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
TIER-EX10.4_2014.12.31-10K


Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT NO. TWO 
TO 
BEHRINGER HARVARD REIT I, INC. 
2005 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN


The Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc. 2005 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:
1.The Plan is hereby amended to replace all references to the name “Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.” with the name “TIER REIT, Inc” and all references to the name “Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP” with the name “Tier Operating Partnership LP.”
2.    Except as so amended, the Plan in all other respects is hereby confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be duly executed on this 21st day of June, 2013.




	
		
	 
	 

	 
	TIER REIT, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By: /s/ Telisa Webb Schelin

	 
	Name:  Telisa Webb Schelin

	 
	Title: Senior Vice President - Legal
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2081 

To extend the duty suspension on difenoconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on difenoconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 difenoconazole) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### WITTGREN, Respondent, v. WELLS BROS. CO. OF NEW YORK, Appellant

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Elsa Wittgren, as administratrix, etc., against the Wells Bros. Company of New York.

PEE CUEIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Wittgren v. Wells Bros. Co., 141 App. Div. 693, 126 N. Y. Supp. 896.

■ BUBE, J., concurs in the result, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the weight of evidence.

HIKSCHBEBG, J., dissents.
This order is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE A. BROOKS and BROOKS

INDUSTRIES, INC.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MICHAEL JOSEPH TREVELLINE,

 Appellant,

 v.

MOTSENBOCKER ADVANCED

DEVELOPMENTS, INC.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-55449

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00773-MMANLS

ORDER*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 9, 2010 *

*

Pasadena, California

FILED

MAY 13 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
The Honorable Robert H. Whaley, United States District Judge for the Eastern

 ***

District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Before: D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY, Senior

District Judge.****

Michael Trevelline appeals the revocation of his pro hac vice status as a

sanction in the underlying consolidated cases of Brooks, et al. v. Motsenbocker

Advanced Developments, Inc., et al., S.D. Cal. Nos. 07-cv-773 MMA (NLS) & 08-

cv-378 BTM (NLS). The revocation of Trevelline’s pro hac vice status was with

regard to that action only, and that action has now settled. Trevelline’s appeal is

moot, as there is no longer any case in which to restore him as counsel. Trevelline

was not a party to the underlying settlement agreement; that agreement, and the

resulting mootness of his appeal, were beyond his control. “A party who seeks

review of the merits of an adverse ruling, but is frustrated by the vagaries of

circumstance, ought not in fairness be forced to acquiesce in the judgment.” U.S.

Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship, 513 U.S. 18, 25 (1994). Accordingly,

we vacate the order revoking Trevelline’s pro hac vice status. See id. at 25 & n.3;

see also United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 40 (1950); Dilley v.

Gunn, 64 F.3d 1365, 1370 (9th Cir. 1995).

VACATED
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00304

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

LESLIE RACHELLE DAVI DSON,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 114T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORAND UM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant

and her counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s

motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismiss ed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered January 14, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Hoyle, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGM ENT

JANUARY 1 4 , 2015

NO. 12

- 14

- 00304

- CR

LESLIE RACHELLE DAVI DSON,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114

- 0772

- 14)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appe llant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observa nce.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Hoyle , J

.
(121 App. Div. 496.)

#### In re BAUM.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

1. Husband and Wife—Estate by Entirety—Application to Personal

Property.

The law of tenancy by the entirety does not apply to personal property. [Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 26, Husband and Wife, §§ 73, 88.]

2. Same—Termination.

That a bond and mortgage taken in the name of the husband and wife were given in part payment of the purchase price of land owned by them in entirety does not entitle the husband, as survivor on the death of the wife, to the whole of the proceeds of the bond and mortgage, since on the sale of the land the tenancy by the entirety ended.

*114Appeal from Surrogate’s Court, Queens County.

Accounting by John George Baum, administrator of the estate of Fredericka Baum, deceased. From a decree of the surrogate, charging him with one-half of the proceeds of certain bonds and mortgages, the administrator appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and WOODWARD, JENKS, MILLER, and GAYNOR, JJ.

Leander B. Faber (Charles H. Street, on the brief), for appellant.

James J. Conway, for respondent Breul.

Henry D. Merchant, for respondents Durkel and Fortcher.

GAYNOR, J.

This appellant and his wife owned a piece of real estate as tenants by the entirety. . They conveyed it, and took back a purchase money bond, and mortgage made payable to both of them for part of the purchase money. He owned another piece of real estate, conveyed it, she joining, and took back a like purchase money bond and mortgage made payable in the same way. She afterwards died and he is her administrator. The surrogate has charged him as such administrator with one-half of the proceeds of the said bonds and mortgages, they having been paid since the wife’s death. He claims that he is entitled to the whole of such proceeds as survivor, and appeals. The law of ownership or tenancy by the entirety does not apply to personal property. To enable the husband to take the whole by survivor-ship there would therefore have to be an agreement to that effect, or a gift causa mortis, and there is neither here. That one of the pieces of land was owned by the husband and wife as tenants by the entirety does not make a different case. When it was sold such tenancy was endéd. Matter of Albrecht, 136 N. Y. 91, 32 N. E. 632, 18 L. R. A. 329, 32 Am. St. Rep. 700.

The decree of the surrogate should be affirmed.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs payable out of the fund. All concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Town Sports International, Inc. (the
Company) on form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard Pyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (Section Mark) 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Pyle
Richard Pyle
Town Sports International, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2003

29
#### PARCKARD, Respondent, v. LYON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 26, 1912.)

Action by Nathan Parckard, substituted as plaintiff for the Ulster County Savings Institution, against Anna E. Lyon and another.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, and matter remitted to the Special Term, to inquire whether Anna E. Lyon has been discharged from personal liability upon the bonds or other obligations secured by the mortgages upon the lands in question. If it shall be found that she has been discharged in bankruptcy from such obligations, or if releases from all liability thereupon, including the deficiency judgment herein, be tendered her, and, if tender thereof be declined, the same deposited with the county clerk of Ulster county for her benefit, and proof thereof made to the Special Term, the Special Term is directed to deny the motion; otherwise, to grant the motion for resale herein. No costs.