Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 36253 

1See Melamine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 80 FR 80751 (December 28, 2015) (Orders). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 

85 FR 69585 (November 3, 2020). 

3See Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Melamine 

from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic 

Interested Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ 

dated November 10, 2020; see also Cornerstone’s 

Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of 

Antidumping Duty Order On Melamine from the 

People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested 

Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

November 10, 2020. 

4See Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Melamine 

from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic 

Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ dated 

November 25, 2020; see also Cornerstone’s Letter, 

‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty 

Order On Melamine from the People’s Republic Of 

China: Domestic Interested Party Substantive 

Response,’’ dated November 25, 2020. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

November 2020,’’ dated December 23, 2020. 

6See Melamine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 86 

FR 11501 (February 25, 2021); see also Melamine 

from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 13528 (March 9, 

2021). 7See Melamine from China, 86 FR 35531 (July 6, 

2021). 8Melamine is also known as 2,4,6-triamino-striazine; 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine; 

Cyanurotriamide; Cyanurotriamine; Cyanuramide; 

and by various brand names. 

China.1 On November 3, 2020, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the first sunset review of 

the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On November 10, 2020, 

Commerce received notices of intent to 

participate from Cornerstone Chemical 

Company (Cornerstone, or domestic 

interested party), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

Cornerstone claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the 

Act, as a domestic producer engaged in 

the production of melamine in the 

United States. 

On November 25, 2020, Commerce 

received substantive responses from the 

domestic interested party within the 30- 

day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no 

substantive responses from any other 

domestic or interested parties and no 

hearing was requested. 

On December 23, 2020, Commerce 

notified the ITC that it did not receive 

adequate substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties.5 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted expedited (120-day) sunset 

reviews of these Orders. 

As a result of its reviews, Commerce 

determined that revocation of the AD 

and CVD orders on melamine from 

China would likely lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping and 

subsidization. Therefore, Commerce 

notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail should the 

orders be revoked, pursuant to sections 

751(c)(1) and 752(b) and (c) of the Act.6

On July 6, 2021, the ITC published its 

determinations, pursuant to sections 

751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that 

revocation of the Orders would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.7

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise subject to the 

Orders is melamine (Chemical Abstracts 

Service (CAS) registry number 108–78– 

01, molecular formula C3H6N6).8

Melamine is a crystalline powder or 

granule typically (but not exclusively) 

used to manufacture melamine 

formaldehyde resins. All melamine is 

covered by the scope of these Orders 

irrespective of purity, particle size, or 

physical form. Melamine that has been 

blended with other products is included 

within this scope when such blends 

include constituent parts that have been 

intermingled, but that have not been 

chemically reacted with each other to 

produce a different product. For such 

blends, only the melamine component 

of the mixture is covered by the scope 

of these Orders. Melamine that is 

otherwise subject to these orders is not 

excluded when commingled with 

melamine from sources not subject to 

these Orders. Only the subject 

component of such commingled 

products is covered by the scope of 

these Orders. 

The subject merchandise is provided 

for in subheading 2933.61.0000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheading and CAS registry 

number are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

countervailable subsidies, and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), 

Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the AD and CVD orders 

on melamine from China. U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection will continue to 

collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the 

rates in effect at the time of entry for all 

imports of subject merchandise. 

The effective date of continuation of 

these Orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce 

intends to initiate the next five-year 

reviews of the Orders not later than 30 

days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 

effective date of continuation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These five-year (sunset) reviews and 

this notice are in accordance with 

sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and published in accordance with 

section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: July 6, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14640 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that Heze Huayi 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (Heze Huayi) and 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Kangtai) did not have any shipments of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review (POR) June 1, 2019, through 

May 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 8, 2021, Commerce 

published its Preliminary Results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on chlorinated 

isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from 

China covering the period June 1, 2019, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
36254 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020, 86 FR 13291 (March 8, 

2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Heze Huayi’s Letter, ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: 

No Sales Certification,’’ dated September 8, 2020; 

see also Kangtai’s Letter, ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: 

No Sales Certification,’’ dated September 8, 2020. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) Data for Heze Huayi Chemical Co., 

Ltd. and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd.,’’ 

dated November 17, 2020. 

4CBP message 1139404, dated May 19, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates 

from the People’s Republic of China; No Shipment 

Inquiry for Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. and 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. during the 

period 06/01/2019 through 05/31/2020,’’ dated May 

25, 2021. 

6See Preliminary Results PDM at 2. 

7See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 13291–13292. 

8See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’ ’’ section, below. 

9See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

10See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). For an explanation on 

the derivation of the China-wide rate, see Notice of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value: Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China, 70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 

2005). 

11See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

through May 31, 2020.1 The petitioners 

in this investigation are Bio-lab, Inc., 

Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical 

Corp. (collectively, the petitioners). The 

mandatory respondents in this 

administrative review are Heze Huayi 

and Kangtai. No case or rebuttal briefs 

for this review were submitted by the 

parties. 

On September 8, 2020, Heze Huayi 

and Kangtai both certified that their 

respective companies had no entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR.2

On November 17, 2020, our review of 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data indicated that Heze Huayi 

and Kangtai had no entries of subject 

merchandise originating from China, 

that were subject to antidumping duties 

during the POR.3 On May 19, 2021, 

Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry 

to CBP with respect to Heze Huayi and 

Kangtai.4 On May 24, 2021, CBP 

responded that it has no record of any 

subject entries for this inquiry.5

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

chlorinated isos, which are derivatives 

of cyanuric acid, described as 

chlorinated s-triazine triones. For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.213. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that Heze Huayi and Kangtai had no 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR.7 No parties commented on, 

nor did we receive information that 

contradicts this preliminary 

determination. Therefore, for the final 

results, we continue to find that Heze 

Huayi and Kangtai had no reviewable 

entries during the POR. Consistent with 

our assessment practice in non-market 

economy administrative reviews, 

Commerce did not rescind this review 

for Heze Huayi and Kangtai but 

completed the review and will issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on these final results.8

China-Wide Entity 

Pursuant to Commerce’s policy, the 

China-wide entity will not be under 

review unless a party specifically 

requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a 

review of the entity.9 Because no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, we did not review the entity in 

this segment of the proceeding. Thus, 

the China-wide entity’s rate (i.e., 285.63 

percent) did not change. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment 

practice, if Commerce determines that 

an exporter had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, we intend to issue 

liquidation instructions for any 

suspended entries that entered under 

that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) and to liquidate at the 

China-wide entity rate.10

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Consistent with its recent 

notice,11 Commerce intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Heze 

Huayi and Kangtai, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the existing 

producer/exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (2) 

for previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing producer/exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be eligible for a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the China-wide rate 

of 285.63 percent; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

has occurred and that subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 36255 

1See Magnesium Metal from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Administrative Review; 2019–20, 86 

FR 12621 (March 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: 

Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of 

China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005) (Order). 

3The meaning of this term is the same as that 

used by the American Society for Testing and 

Materials in its Annual Book for ASTM Standards: 

Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys. 

4The material is already covered by existing 

antidumping orders. See Notice of Antidumping 

Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from the People’s 

Republic of China, the Russian Federation and 

Ukraine; Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty 

Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the Russian 

Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in 

Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China, 

66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001). 

5This third exclusion for magnesium-based 

reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for 

reagent mixtures in the 2000–2001 investigations of 

magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the 

People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 

(September 27, 2001); see also Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium 

from Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); and 

Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair 

Value: Pure Magnesium from the Russian 

Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). 

These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because 

they are not combined in liquid form and cast into 

the same ingot. 

6See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 12622. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Correction of February 2, 

2021 Memorandum Placing CBP Data on the 

Record,’’ dated February 3, 2021; see also 

Memorandum, ‘‘Magnesium Metal from China; No 

Shipment Inquiry for Tianjin Magnesium 

International Co., Ltd and Tianjin Magnesium Metal 

Co., Ltd. during the period 04/01/2019 through 03/ 

31/2020,’’ dated February 24, 2021. On February 5, 

2021, Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry to 

CBP with respect to TMI and TMM. On February 

18, 2021, CBP responded that it had no evidence 

of shipments of magnesium metal from China 

exported by TMI and TMM during the POR. 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

Dated: July 2, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14639 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–896] 

Magnesium Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that 

Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., 

Ltd. (TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium 

Metal, Co., Ltd. (TMM) had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

covered by the antidumping duty order 

on magnesium metal from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) for the period 

of review (POR) April 1, 2019, through 

May 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle 

Clahane, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5449. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 4, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register.1 No interested party 

submitted comments concerning the 

Preliminary Results or requested a 

hearing in this administrative review. 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). The current 

deadline for these final results is July 2, 

2021. 

Scope of the Order 2

The product covered by the Order is 

magnesium metal from China, which 

includes primary and secondary alloy 

magnesium metal, regardless of 

chemistry, raw material source, form, 

shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or 

alloy containing by weight primarily the 

element magnesium. Primary 

magnesium is produced by 

decomposing raw materials into 

magnesium metal. Secondary 

magnesium is produced by recycling 

magnesium-based scrap into magnesium 

metal. The magnesium covered by the 

Order includes blends of primary and 

secondary magnesium. The subject 

merchandise includes the following 

alloy magnesium metal products made 

from primary and/or secondary 

magnesium including, without 

limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, 

slabs, rounds, billets, and other shapes; 

magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, 

or machined into rasping, granules, 

turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and 

other shapes; and products that contain 

50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 

percent, magnesium, by weight, and that 

have been entered into the United States 

as conforming to an ‘‘ASTM 

Specification for Magnesium Alloy’’ 3

and are thus outside the scope of the 

existing antidumping orders on 

magnesium from China (generally 

referred to as ‘‘alloy’’ magnesium). 

The scope of the Order excludes: (1) 

All forms of pure magnesium, including 

chemical combinations of magnesium 

and other material(s) in which the pure 

magnesium content is 50 percent or 

greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by 

weight, that do not conform to an 

‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium 

Alloy;’’ 4 (2) magnesium that is in liquid 

or molten form; and (3) mixtures 

containing 90 percent or less 

magnesium in granular or powder form 

by weight and one or more of certain 

non-magnesium granular materials to 

make magnesium-based reagent 

mixtures, including lime, calcium 

metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, 

calcium carbonate, carbon, slag 

coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, 

feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium 

aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, 

graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth 

metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly 

ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, 

ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and 

colemanite.5 The merchandise subject to 

this Order is classifiable under items 

8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

is dispositive. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined TMI and TMM had no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR.6 As noted 

in the Preliminary Results, we received 

no-shipment statements from TMI and 

TMM, and the statements were 

consistent with the information we 

received from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP).7 Because Commerce 

did not receive any comments on its 

preliminary finding, Commerce 

continues to find that TMI and TMM 

did not have any shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

Assessment Rates 

We have not calculated any 

assessment rates in this administrative 

review. Based on record evidence, we 

have determined that TMI and TMM 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES