alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                            LUSCAR ENERGY PARTNERSHIP

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                  (SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the annual report of Luscar Energy Partnership (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned certifies that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: June 20, 2005

         /s/ Patrice Merrin Best                     /s/ Garnet Clark
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Name:  Patrice Merrin Best                   Name:  Garnet Clark
Title: Chief Executive Officer               Title: Chief Financial Officer
       Luscar Energy Partnership                    Luscar Energy Partnership

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Luscar Energy Partnership and will be retained by Luscar Energy
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### GOODRICH, Appellant, v. ROCKWOOD, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

Action by George C. Goodrich against Nash Rockwood. G. L. Lewis, for appellant. H. C. Todd, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11452]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Titian: Women, Myth and Power” at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston, Massachusetts, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-13819 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Kimberly Ann SHREVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kristen Lynn FETTER; Tina Tant Hoagland; C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-1549.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

Kimberly Ann Shreve, Appellant Pro Se.

*151Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly Ann Shreve appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Shreve’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Shreve has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 498 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 498

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To ensure objective, independent review of task and delivery orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Independent Task and Delivery Order 
Review Extension Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE FOR CERTAIN PROTESTS OF TASK AND 
              DELIVERY ORDER CONTRACTS.

    Section 4106(f)(3) of title 41, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(3) Effective period.--Paragraph 1(B) and paragraph (2) 
        of this subsection shall not be in effect after September 30, 
        2016.''.

SEC. 3. USE OF EXISTING RESOURCES TO PROCESS TASK AND DELIVERY ORDER 
              PROTESTS.

    No amounts are authorized to be appropriated for the specific 
purpose of processing protests authorized under section 4106(f) of 
title 41, United States Code, as amended by section 2, and all such 
protests shall be processed using the existing resources of the 
Government Accountability Office and executive agencies.

            Passed the Senate May 12, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 498

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To ensure objective, independent review of task and delivery orders.
```
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
Amendment No.1 for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Stephen Couture,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Stephen Couture
-------------------------
Stephen Couture
Chief Financial Officer
September 9, 2002
T hi s or de ri s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE OR GE A. B R OO KS an dB R OO KS I N D U S T R I E S , I N C ., P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, M I CHAEL J OSEP H TRE VELL I NE, A p p e llan t, v. M OTSE NBOCKER ADV AN CE D D E V E L O P M E N T S , I N C .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 55449 D. C . No . 3 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 7 7 3 - MM ANLS ORDER *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M i c ha e l M . A ne l l o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 9, 2010 * * P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED MA Y13 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSThe Honorable Rober t H. Whaley, United States District Judg e for the Easter

n *** District of Washington, sitting by designation. B e f or e : D . W . N E L S O N and R E I N H A R D T , C i r c ui tJudge s , and W H A L E Y , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. **** M i ch ael T rev el l i n e ap p eal s th e rev o cat i o n o f h i s p ro h ac v i ce st atu s as a sanct i on i n the un derl yi ng consol i dat ed ca se s of B rooks, et al . v. Mot

se nb ocke r A dv a n c e d

D e v e lo p m e n ts , I

n c ., e t a l. , S . D . C a l . N os . 07- c v- 773 M M A ( N L S ) & 08- c v - 3 7 8 B T M ( N L S ) . T h e r e v o c a tio n o f T r e v e llin e ’s p r o h a c v ic e s ta tu s w a s w ith r e g ar dto th a t a c tio n o n ly , an dth a t a c tio n h a s n o w s e ttle d . T r e v e llin e ’s ap p e a l is m oot , a s the r e i s no l onge ranyc a s e i n w hi c h t o r e s t or e hi m a s c ouns e l . T r e ve l l i ne w a s notapartyt o the unde r l y i ng s e tt l e m e nta gr e e m e nt ; tha ta gr e e m e nt , and the r e s ul t i ng m ootne s s of

hi s appe a l , w e r e be y ond hi s c ontr ol . “ A partyw ho s e e ks r e vi e w of

the m e r i t s of

an a dve r s e rul i ng, buti s f rus tr a t e d bythe va gar i e s of ci rc um st ance , ou gh tno ti n fai rnes s be f orce d t o acqui es ce i n the j ud gm ent . ” U . S. B a n c o r p Mo r tg . C o . v . B o n n e rM a ll P ’s h ip , 5 1 3 U . S . 1 8 , 2 5 (1 9 9 4 ). A cco rd i n g l y, w e v a c a te th e o r d e rr e v o k in g T r e v e llin e ’s p r o h a c v ic e s ta tu s . Se e i d. a t25 & n. 3; se e al so U ni ted States v. Mun si ng w ear, Inc. , 3 4 0 U .S . 3 6 , 4 0 ( 1 9 5 0 ) ; D i l leyv. G unn , 64 F . 3d 13 65 , 13 70 (9th C i r. 19 95 ). VA C A TED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I Michael Wagner hereby certify that:

1. The  annual  report of the  registrant  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained  in the annual  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.


/s/ Michael Wagner
-------------------
Michael Wagner
Principal and Chief Financial Officer
April 19, 2006
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 580 

To amend the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration 

Authorization Act of 1978 to require the appointment of a member 

of the Science Advisory Board based on the recommendation of the 

Secretary of Agriculture. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. LUGAR, and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Environmental Research, Development, and 

Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to require the 

appointment of a member of the Science Advisory Board 

based on the recommendation of the Secretary of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Representation for 

5 Farmers Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 580 IS

1 SEC. 2. SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD. 

2 Section 8(b) of the Environmental Research, Devel3 opment, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 

4 (42 U.S.C. 4365(b)) is amended in the first sentence by 

5 inserting ‘‘and not more than 3 of whom shall be ap6 pointed based on the recommendation of the Secretary of 

7 Agriculture,’’ after ‘‘Chairman,’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 16

- 00811

- CV

IN RE PATRIOT WELL S OLUTIONS LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED

On December 16, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of an

order signed by the trial court on December 7, 2016, denying Relator’s motion to stay litigation.

This cour t abated the proceeding pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P . 7.2(b) (“If the case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the

proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.”).

On January 12, 2017, the trial court signed an order setting aside the order compl ained of

in Relator’s petition and granting the relief sought by Relator. On January 18, 2017, Relator filed

a n unopposed motion to dismiss this proceeding. We order the abatement lifted and grant the

unopposed motion to dismiss.

PER CURIAM

1 This pr oceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- CI

- 15 492, styled KLX Energy Services, Inc. v. Patriot Well Solutions, LLC, Dragan Cicvaric, William Reed, Danny Stunkard, Brian Terry, and Paul Hulin , pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
#### P.M.M.J. Associates, Respondent, v Florence Cushing et al., Appellants, and Ambassador Factors Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant mortgagors appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Meade, J.) entered May 2, 1983, which, *inter alia,*directed that Ambassador Factors Corporation’s answer, cross claims and counterclaims be declared voluntarily withdrawn and the answer of defendants Cushing to the cross claims be dismissed, granted P.M.M.J. Associates a default judgment against defendants Cushing, and referred the matter to a referee to ascertain and compute the amount due.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in permitting Ambassador Factors Corporation to withdraw its answer, counterclaims and cross claims upon settlement with plaintiff P.M.M.J. As part of that settlement, P.M.M.J. assigned to Ambassador its mortgages and consolidation and extension agreement, as well as its rights in the instant foreclosure action. As defendants Cushing had defaulted in the principal action, foreclosure was properly granted. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136674 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136674 

 COA: 275477 

Ingham CC: 06-000617-FH

ANTERIO RECORDO WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1015 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 22, 2008 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

DALE PIERSON, ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) No. 2:16- CV-449 

 ) 

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ) 

LABOR RELATIONS RESEARCH ) 

 ET. AL. ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Now come the parties, by their respective counsel, and hereby stipulate to the dismissal 

of the above referenced cause of action with prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Christopher D. Stidham /s/ Paul Bozych 

Christopher D. Stidham, #34213-64 Paul Bozych 

Kenneth B. Elwood, #17937-45 John J. Murphy 

Rhame, Elwood & McClure, PC Nielsen, Zehe & Antas, P.C. 

3200 Willowcreek Road, Suite A 55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1800 

Portage, Indiana 46368 Chicago, Illinois 60603 

(219) 762-0494 (312) 322-9900 

chrisstidham@rhameandelwood.com pbozych@nzalaw.com 

kenelwood@rhameandelwood.com jmurphy@nzalaw.com 

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00449-PPS-JEM document 43 filed 09/19/19 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on September 19, 2019, a true and complete copy of the above and 

foregoing was served in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.5, pursuant to the district court’s ECF 

system as the ECF filers, and was served by regular mail to non-ECF filers and parties who do 

not appear to be registered with the Court’s ECF system. 

Paul Bozych 

John J. Murphy 

Nielsen, Zehe & Antas, P.C. 

55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1800 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

 /s/ Christopher D. Stidham 

 Christopher D. Stidham, #34213-64 

 Kenneth B. Elwood, # 17937-45 

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00449-PPS-JEM document 43 filed 09/19/19 page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1



March 27, 2003






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549


WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ACCOMPANYING
REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF VERIZON WIRELESS OF THE EAST LP
(THE "PARTNERSHIP") FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2002

I, Dennis F. Strigl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cellco
Partnership, which is the sole member of Verizon Wireless of Georgia LLC, the
managing general partner of the Partnership, certify that:

(1)  the report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ending December
     31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.

This statement is being provided pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code.



/s/ Dennis F. Strigl
---------------------
Dennis F. Strigl


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Verizon Wireless of the East LP and will be retained by Verizon
Wireless of the East LP and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code. This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification does not
constitute a part of Verizon Wireless of the East LP's Annual Report on Form
10-K accompanying this certification and to which it is an exhibit.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-473 and 731-TA-1173 (Second Review)]

## Determination

On the basis of the record [1]            developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order and antidumping duty order on potassium phosphate salts from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to U.S. industries producing dipotassium phosphate and tetrapotassium pyrophosphate within a reasonably foreseeable time.

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on November 2, 2020 (85 FR 69352, November 2, 2020) and determined on February 5, 2021 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 29288, June 1, 2021).

The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on June 30, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5208 (June 2021), entitled *Potassium Phosphate Salts China: Inv. Nos. 701-TA-473 and 731-TA-1173 (Second Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 30, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.     The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-14402 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P