alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>

This Schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from the financial
statements contained in the body of the
accompying Form [10-Q] and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.

</LEGEND>



<MULTIPLIER>                                           1
       
<S>                                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 OCT-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                             15,810,924
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   19,556,459
<PP&E>                                              1,907,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                      1,000,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     21,443,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,527,836
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              578,002
<OTHER-SE>                                         19,337,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21,443,711
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       5,181,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (732,218)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (4,448,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (4,448,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (4,448,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          ($0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        




</TABLE>
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2413 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1202 1st Street in Humble, Texas, as the 

‘‘Lillian McKay Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 2413 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1202 1st Street in Humble, Texas, shall be known 

4 and designated as the ‘‘Lillian McKay Post Office Build5 ing’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Lillian McKay Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the report on Form 10-K/A of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Nikolas Antonopoulos, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
June 28, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Nikolas AntonopoulosNikolas Antonopoulos
President and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or its staff, upon request.
#### DUNN, Respondent, v. CITY OF FULTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department-.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Michael Dunn against the city of Fulton.

*1124PEE CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Mclennan, p. j., and williams, j.,

dissent.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral Orion, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J.
Townsend, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                   /s/ RICHARD J. TOWNSEND
                                                   -----------------------
                                                      Richard J. Townsend
                                                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

May 10, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13714]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules will hold a meeting 
on October 7, 2021 in Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public 
for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting 
materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: 
http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books.

DATES: October 7, 2021, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Wilson, Esq., Acting Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82d0f7eee7f1c1edefefebf6f6e7e7ddd1e7e1f0e7f6e3f0fbc2e3edacf7f1e1edf7f0f6f1ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ad8ffe6eff9c9e5e7e7e3fefeefefd5d9efe9f8effeebf8f3caebe5a4fff9e9e5fff8fef9a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: June 21, 2021.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-13714 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10752

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TED CALVIN BLAND,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-104-1-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ted

Calvin Bland has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Bland has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Counsel

asserts that the district court did not abuse its discretion by

revoking Bland’s supervised release and that the court’s

subsequent sentence was neither in violation of the law nor

plainly unreasonable. Our independent review of counsel’s Anders
No. 99-10752

-2-

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
# Diario Oficial C 93I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 093I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 65.° año28 de febrero de 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 093I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

65.° año28 de febrero de 2022

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Información |
| | INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
| | Comisión Europea |
| 2022/C 93 I/01 | Anuncio a los importadores — Importaciones en la Unión de bienes originarios de las zonas no controladas por el Gobierno de las provincias ucranianas de Donetsk y Luhansk | 1 |

Sumario

Página

IV   Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Comisión Europea

2022/C 93 I/01

Anuncio a los importadores — Importaciones en la Unión de bienes originarios de las zonas no controladas por el Gobierno de las provincias ucranianas de Donetsk y Luhansk

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

IV Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Comisión Europea

| 28.2.2022 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 93/1

---

Anuncio a los importadores

Importaciones en la Unión de bienes originarios de las zonas no controladas por el Gobierno de las provincias ucranianas de Donetsk y Luhansk

(2022/C 93 I/01)

El Reglamento (UE) 2022/263 del Consejo, de 23 de febrero de 2022, relativo a medidas restrictivas en respuesta al reconocimiento de las zonas no controladas por el Gobierno de las provincias ucranianas de Donetsk y Luhansk y a la orden de entrada de fuerzas armadas rusas en la zona (1), introdujo la prohibición de importar en la Unión Europea bienes originarios de esas zonas a partir del día siguiente al de su publicación.

Se recomienda a los importadores en la Unión que comprueben con suma atención el origen real de los bienes que declaran, pues existen riesgos de que se importen en la Unión desde países vecinos de Ucrania, en particular desde Rusia y Bielorrusia, bienes sujetos a la prohibición establecida en el citado Reglamento. Este puede ser el caso, en especial, de los productos de carbón de la partida NC 2701 y de los productos de acero de las partidas NC 7201 a 7207 y de las partidas NC 7304, 7305 y 7306. Habida cuenta de tal riesgo de elusión, el despacho a libre práctica de esos bienes importados desde Rusia y Bielorrusia puede quedar supeditado a la presentación en aduana de pruebas concluyentes de que esos bienes no están afectados por la prohibición de las importaciones de bienes originarios de las zonas no controladas por el Gobierno de las provincias ucranianas de Donetsk y de Luhansk.

---

(1)  DO L 42 I de 23.2.2022, p. 77.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
William R. McManaman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ William R. McManaman
|William R. McManaman    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|November 9, 2009        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be
retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ELIZA GONZALEZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CV 207

)

HAMMOND SCHOOL CORPORATION, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

On November 6, 2013, this court referred defendant’s motion to dismiss (which

was closely related to plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint) to Magistrate Judge

John E. Martin. (DE # 20.) On February 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Martin issued an

order granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and

recommending that this court deny defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot. (DE # 21.)

In his report, Magistrate Judge Martin informed the parties that any objections to the

report and recommended finding must be made within 14 days after being served with

a copy of the report. (DE # 21 at 7.) That time has passed, and no objections have been

filed. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Martin’s report

and recommendation (DE # 21) and DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot

(DE # 10).

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 10, 2014

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

case 2:13-cv-00207-JTM-JEM document 23 filed 03/10/14 page 1 of 1
#### BIEBER, Appellant, v. ROSENGARTEN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Aaron Bieber against Philip Rosengarten. J. Manheimer, for appellant. M. Jaffe, for respondent.

No -opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### Billye J. Koch, Appellant-Respondent, v William R. Koch, Respondent-Appellant.

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 31, 1984, affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Doyle at Special Term. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
*

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

NO. 07-02-0522-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

DECEMBER 23, 2002

______________________________

EX PARTE ALBERT NICHOLAS BRANN

_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.*

Joseph Dale Robertson filed an “Application For The Most Extraordinary Writ of

Habeas Corpus” on behalf of Albert Nicholas Brann seeking to secure Brann’s release

from confinement resulting from his conviction for burglary of a habitation. We dismiss the

petition for want of jurisdiction.

This Court is obligated to determine, sua sponte, its jurisdiction in each case.

Welch v. McDougal, 876 S.W.2d 218, 220 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1994, writ denied). That

jurisdiction is established by various constitutional and statutory provisions. See, e.g.,
Tex. Const. art. 5, § 6; Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.220 (Vernon 1988); Ex Parte Lewis, 663

S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1983, no pet.). 

Article 11.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Annotated (Vernon 1977)

lists the courts which are authorized to issue a writ of habeas corpus. Absent from that list

are the courts of appeals. Greenville v. State, 798 S.W.2d 361, 362 (Tex.App.--Beaumont

1990, no pet.). This Court's habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate

only. Denby v. State, 627 S.W.2d 435 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, original

proceeding), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1110, 103 S.Ct. 2461, 77 L.Ed.2d 1338 (1983). 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
mm_Ex10-24


		
			Exhibit 10.24
		

		
			2014 Bonus Plan
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Bonus Pool is funded by achievement of corporate plan, with pro-rata payment for achievement between 50% -100% and between 100% - 150%.




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Maximum plan funding is 150% of target but individual bonus awards can exceed 150% of target with CEO recommendation and with Compensation Committee approval.




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			The Compensation Committee will establish for each executive a target bonus expressed as a percentage of his or her annual salary.




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to reasonably adjust the Revenue and EBITDA targets to exclude the impact of any dispositions and acquisitions or other corporate events during the plan year, as it deems appropriate.




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Company-wide qualitative metrics will be measured by CEO evaluation of specific goals established by management, and be included in CEO’s recommendation to the Compensation Committee




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Individual performance will be measured (i) for executives other than the CEO, by CEO evaluation of specific MBOs established by the CEO, and be included in CEO’s recommendation to the Compensation Committee, and (ii) for the CEO, by Compensation Committee evaluation of specific MBOs established by the Compensation Committee.




		
			Bonus Pool Funding
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Corporate Plan

					
					
						    

					
					
						Plan
Weight

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Revenue

					
					
						 

					
60 
					
					
						%

				
	
					
						EBITDA

					
					
						 

					
20 
					
					
						%

				
	
					
						Company-wide qualitative metrics

					
					
						 

					
20 
					
					
						%

				
	
					
						Discretionary evaluation and MBOs 

					
					
						 

					
20 
					
					
						%
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of New England Bancshares,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Scott D. Nogles,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




                                            /s/ Scott D. Nogles
                                            -------------------------
                                            Scott D. Nogles
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            June 28, 2005
#### STEINBERG et al., Respondents, v. BOSTON INS. CO., Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 22, 1912.)

Action by Isaac Steinberg and others against the Boston Insurance Company, impleaded with others. H. J. Cheyney, for appellant. E. Eschwege, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 144 App. Div. 110, 128 N. Y. Supp. 994.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec e dent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________ No. 04-60214 (Summary Calendar)

_________________
DARLENE AVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; ET AL Defendants
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; BRYAN WEINGARDNER, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s; JEFF MARKELL, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:02-CV-88-M-D
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Marlene Avant appeals the district court’s order granting Lowe’s Home Centers’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm the district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion of February 7, 2004.-2-

AFFIRMED.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 515 

To rescind amounts made available for water treatment improvements for 

the Flathead County Water and Sewer District and make the amounts 

available for Federal deficit reduction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2011 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To rescind amounts made available for water treatment improvements for the Flathead County Water and Sewer 

District and make the amounts available for Federal 

deficit reduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECISSION OF AMOUNTS FOR WATER TREAT4 MENT IMPROVEMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the amounts provided to the Flathead County 

7 Water and Sewer District No. 1––Evergreen, for water 

8 treatment improvements, identified as project number 283 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 515 IS

1 on page 1143 of the conference report to accompany H.R. 

2 2673 of the 108th Congress (Conference Report No. 108– 

3 401; 118 Stat. 3331) are rescinded. 

4 (b) DEFICIT REDUCTION.—Amounts rescinded under 

5 subsection (a) shall be used to reduce the Federal deficit. 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS