alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                   FORM 10-QSB/A


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996

                                       OR

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to
                              ---------------------    ---------------------

Commission File Number 0-12761

                  BRUSH CREEK MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

           NEVADA                                             88-0180496
-------------------------------                           -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                            (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                            Identification No.)


970 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 200
GRASS VALLEY, CALIFORNIA                                        95945
---------------------------------------                       ----------
(Address of principal executive offices)                      (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (916) 477-5961

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                                        Yes   X    No
                                           ------    ------

Shares of common stock outstanding as of November 13, 1996: 18,526,584

Transactual Small Business Disclosure Forms

                                        Yes   X    No
                                           ------    ------

                                       -1-

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

                  BRUSH CREEK MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in
the capacity and on the date indicated.


Signature                            Capacity                      Date


/s/ James S. Chapin          Chief Executive Officer         January 3, 1996
-----------------------
James S. Chapin

                                      -2-
#### Diana M. Klug *v.*Inland Wetlands Commission of the City of Torrington et al.

*George B. Simoncelli, Jr.,*corporation counsel, in support of the petition.

*John R. Logan,*in opposition.

Decided October 25, 1989

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 713, is denied.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40524 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Brian McCuiston,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 2:04

- CR

- 676

- 2

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Brian McCuiston, federal prisoner #14835

- 064, was convicted of con
spiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of meth am
phetamine and was sentenced to 280 months in prison. In this appeal, he chal lenges the denial of his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 29, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40524 Document: 00516259214 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2022No. 21

- 40524

2 § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
We review the denial of compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). A district court abuses i ts discretion when its decision is based on a legal error or a clearly

erron eous assessment of the evidence. Id. at 693

– 94. A motion for compassionate release may be granted if, after con sid

ering the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, the district court finds, inter alia , that “ extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction ” and that a sentence “ reduction is consistent with applicable policy state

ments issued by the Sentencing Commission. ” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). T he district c ourt denied relief based on its assessment of the § 3553(a) fac

tors a nd for other reasons

. McCuiston has failed to show that the court abused its discre tion in determining that the § 3553(a) factors did not warrant compassionate release. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 693

– 94. The judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-40524 Document: 00516259214 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
**Exhibit23**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to the use of our report datedOctober 20, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofDakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (a North Dakota corporation) for the yearended July 31, 2004 in this Form 10-K (file number 000-50111).

 

EIDE BAILLY LLP

 
| /s/ Eide Bailly LLP |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |
| Fargo, North Dakota |
| October  29, 2004   |

 

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 388 

To prohibit Members of Congress and the President from receiving pay 

during Government shutdowns. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2011 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. CASEY, Mr. TESTER, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit Members of Congress and the President from 

receiving pay during Government shutdowns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PAY DURING GOVERNMENT 

4 SHUTDOWN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Members of Congress and the 

6 President shall not receive basic pay for any period in 

7 which— 

8 (1) there is more than a 24-hour lapse in ap9 propriations for any Federal agency or department 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 388 IS

1 as a result of a failure to enact a regular appropria2 tions bill or continuing resolution; or 

3 (2) the Federal Government is unable to make 

4 payments or meet obligations because the public 

5 debt limit under section 3101 of title 31, United 

6 States Code, has been reached. 

7 (b) RETROACTIVE PAY PROHIBITED.—No pay for8 feited in accordance with subsection (a) may be paid retro9 actively. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Richard Pyle, Chief Financial Officer of Town Sports International, Inc.,certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town SportsInternational, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(a) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; and
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the designor operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting;     Date: August 16, 2004 By: /s/ Richard Pyle     Richard Pyle
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles G. Mitchell, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered March 10, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The police acted properly in stopping the car in which defendant was riding as a passenger, arresting the occupants, and searching the car. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions, to the extent that they are preserved, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### VAN NESS, Respondent, v. ERIE R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 11, 1913.)

Action by Seely S. Van ~ess against the Erie Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff shall, within iG days, stipulate to modify the order by striking out the provision for the trebling of the damages to certain property, and reduce the recovery to the actual damages, viz., $938.75, as of the date of the rendition of the verdict, in which event the order and the judgment are modified accordingly, and, as so modified, are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that plaintiff is not entitled to recover treble damages against the defendant.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 125 (Friday, July 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35290-35291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 19, 2021.

[[Page 35291]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b4a7b7b6762686a7f6264657825486466666e657f784b6a7f67256d79692564796c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="337243435f5a5052475a5c5d401d705c5e5e565d47407352475f1d5541511d5c4154">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The Sue Soileau Trust, Steven G. Durio and Anthony Kip Bertrand, 
as co-trustees, The David C. Brignac, Jr. Trust, Steven G. Durio, as 
trustee, all of Lafayette, Louisiana; and the Washington State 
Bancshares Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), Washington Louisiana, 
Steven G. Durio, as trustee of the ESOP, as a group acting in concert 
to acquire additional voting shares of Washington State Bancshares, 
Inc. and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of 
Washington State Bank, both of Washington, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 28, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-14153 Filed 7-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of
the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Denis A. Krusos, the Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Companys Form 10-Q/A Quarterly Report (Amendment No. 2) for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ Denis A. Krusos                              
|                  |  |  |  | Denis A. Krusos                                  
|November 30, 2011 |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 498 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 498

  To ensure objective, independent review of task and delivery orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2011

   Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mrs. McCaskill, and Mr. 
   Portman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure objective, independent review of task and delivery orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Independent Task and Delivery Order 
Review Extension Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE FOR CERTAIN PROTESTS OF TASK AND 
              DELIVERY ORDER CONTRACTS.

    Section 4106(f)(3) of title 41, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(3) Effective period.--Paragraph 1(B) and paragraph (2) 
        of this subsection shall not be in effect after September 30, 
        2016.''.
                                 <all>
```
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 444 

For the relief of Shirley Constantino Tan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Shirley Constantino Tan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIRLEY 

4 CONSTANTINO TAN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shirley Constantino Tan shall be eli8 gible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 

9 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma10 nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of 

11 an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 444 IS

1 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful perma2 nent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Shirley Constanti4 no Tan enters the United States before the filing deadline 

5 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

6 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi7 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

9 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res17 idence to Shirley Constantino Tan, the Secretary of State 

18 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during 

19 the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 

20 of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 

21 the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of 

22 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) 

23 or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that 

24 are made available to natives of the country of the alien’s 

25 birth under section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 444 IS

1 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

2 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You3 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

4 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

5 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

6 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

7 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

8 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 70 

To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial 

Day, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF TRADITIONAL DAY OF OB4 SERVANCE OF MEMORIAL DAY. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION OF LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY.— 

6 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘Memorial Day, the last Monday in May.’’ and 

8 inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘Memorial Day, May 30.’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 70 IS

1 (b) OBSERVANCES AND CEREMONIES.—Section 116 

2 of title 36, United States Code, is amended— 

3 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The last 

4 Monday in May’’ and inserting ‘‘May 30’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para7 graph (3); 

8 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

9 paragraph (5); and 

10 (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(4) calling on the people of the United States 

13 to observe Memorial Day as a day of ceremonies to 

14 show respect for United States veterans of wars and 

15 other military conflicts; and’’. 

16 (c) DISPLAY OF FLAG.— 

17 (1) TIME AND OCCASIONS FOR FLAG DIS18 PLAY.—Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, 

19 is amended by striking ‘‘the last Monday in May;’’ 

20 and inserting ‘‘May 30;’’. 

21 (2) NATIONAL LEAGUE OF FAMILIES POW/MIA

22 FLAG.—Section 902(c)(1)(B) of title 36, United 

23 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the last Mon24 day in May’’ and inserting ‘‘May 30’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Wilson B. Sheldon, Respondent, v. The Western Union Telegraph Company, Appellant.

(Argued June 9, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 11, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*Herbert E. Dickson*for appellant.

*698
      *Homer A. Nelson*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.