alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40872 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ERNESTO GALVAN

- MATA, also known as Eduardo Martinez, also known as Wilfredo Garza , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 1761

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ernesto Galvan

- Mata raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S.
224 , 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. T he motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40872 Document: 00513383930 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 40872

2 of time to file a brief is DENIED , and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. Case: 15-40872 Document: 00513383930 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Application Technology Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Departments
                        Agricultural Engineering
                                    Entomology
                                    Horticulture
                                    Plant Pathology
                                    IR-4 programSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






ATRUheadline bar Business
               Services
               USDA-ARS Research Weather Network
               Weather Data Use Disclaimer


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 469 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 469

To rescind amounts made available for water treatment improvements for 
  the city of Kalispell, Montana, and make the amounts available for 
                       Federal deficit reduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2011

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To rescind amounts made available for water treatment improvements for 
  the city of Kalispell, Montana, and make the amounts available for 
                       Federal deficit reduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECISSION OF AMOUNTS FOR WATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
amounts provided to the city of Kalispell, Montana, for water treatment 
improvements, identified as project number 283 on page 1143 of the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2673 of the 108th Congress 
(Conference Report 108-401) are rescinded.
    (b) Deficit Reduction.--Amounts rescinded under subsection (a) 
shall be used to reduce the Federal deficit.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 31, 1997 AND NOVEMBER 30, 1997, THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997             MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1996             NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,468                  43,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      228                     203
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        327                     453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,802                  44,350
<PP&E>                                          47,326                  55,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,112                  14,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,819                 104,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,238                  13,735
<BONDS>                                         39,147                  86,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,394                  17,662
<COMMON>                                             1                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,346)                (24,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,819                 104,104
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,567                  36,317
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,291                  32,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,455                   2,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,179)                   1,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (243)                     845
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (936)                     829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                   (730)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (936)                      99
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.20)                  (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.88)                  (0.89)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered August 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00302-CV

IN RE DAVID R. BARNES, RELATOR

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-11126

ORDER

WE REINSTATE this proceeding. On June 19, 2019, pursuant to rule 7.2(b) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, we abated this case for the current judge of the 302nd District 

Court, the Honorable Sandra Jackson, to reconsider temporary orders issued on December 21, 

2018, by the predecessor judge in the 302nd District Court. On August 16, 2019 relator filed a 

status letter enclosing Judge Jackson’s order affirming the December 21, 2018 temporary orders.

In light of our August 21, 2019 order, the sealed, supplemental reporter’s record, for this 

court’s in camera review is due September 3, 2019. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32 (i)**

 

CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Grafmyre, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   Richard A. Grafmyre |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Richard   A. Grafmyre     |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |   |
|                      |   |
| May 10,   2011       |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 384 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.384

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                         breast cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.
    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2011'' and inserting ``2015''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
NO. 07-06-0293-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	DECEMBER 21, 2006

	______________________________

	GARES CORP., APPELLANT

	V.

	S & D INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 218TH DISTRICT COURT OF LA SALLE COUNTY;

	NO. 04-07-00064-CVL; HONORABLE STELLA H. SAXON, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON JOINT MOTION TO EFFECTUATE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

	Appellant, Gares Corporation (“Gares”), perfected an appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee’s, S & D Investments, L.L.C. (“S & D”), Amended Motion for Enforcement of Judgment and Release of Lien and Motion for Sanctions and the trial court’s supplemental order granting S & D’s Amended Motion for Enforcement of Judgment and Release of Lien and Motion for Sanctions.  The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Effectuate Settlement Agreement asserting that the parties have reached a settlement agreement.  The joint motion requests that this court set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.  This disposition is authorized by rules 42.1 (a)(2)(B) and 43.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  Finding the motion complies with the requirements of rules 6.6 and 42.1(a), we vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for rendition of judgment in conformity with the parties’ agreement.

	Having disposed of this appeal at the parties’ request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate shall issue forthwith.

						Per Curiam
City National Bancshares Corporation

Computation of Earnings Per Common Share on a
Primary & Fully Diluted Basis

In thousands, except per share data
                                       Nine Months Ended     Three Months Ended
                                          September 30,         September 30,
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                           1997       1996       1997       1996

Net income .........................   $    760   $    710   $    255   $    145
Dividends paid on
  preferred stock ..................         44          2       --            2
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------
Net income applicable
 to primary common shares ..........        716        708        255        143

Interest expense on
 convertible subordinated
 debentures, net of income
 tax ...............................          9          9          3          3
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------
Net income applicable to
 fully diluted common
 shares ............................   $    725   $    717   $    258   $    146
                                       ========   ========   ========   ========
Number of average common
 shares
Primary ............................    114,141    112,855    114,141    114,141
                                       ========   ========   ========   ========
Fully diluted:
 Average common shares
  outstanding ......................    114,141    112,855    114,141    114,141
 Average convertible
  subordinated debentures
  convertible to common
  shares ...........................     13,850     13,850     13,850     13,850
                                                                        --------
                                        127,991    126,705    127,991    127,991
                                                                        ========

Net income per common  share

    Primary ........................   $   6.27   $   6.27   $   2.22   $   1.25
    Fully diluted ..................       5.66       5.66       2.00       1.14
<PAGE>
                                       12
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 5 18390

________________________________ In the Matter of CHARLES GORDON, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 16, 2014 Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Charles Gordon, Marcy, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.-2- 518390

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2338 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to direct the President to designate a Small State Advocate in 

the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mrs. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to direct the President to designate 

a Small State Advocate in the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Disaster Assist5 ance Fairness Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2338 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SMALL STATE ADVOCATE. 

2 Title III of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

3 and Emergency Assistance Act (15 U.S.C. 5141 et seq.) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 326. DESIGNATION OF SMALL STATE ADVOCATE. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall designate in 

7 the Federal Emergency Management Agency a Small 

8 State Advocate. 

9 ‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Small State Advocate 

10 shall be an advocate for the fair treatment of rural com11 munities in the provision of assistance under this Act. 

12 ‘‘(c) DUTIES.—The Small State Advocate shall— 

13 ‘‘(1) participate in the disaster declaration 

14 process under section 401, and the emergency dec15 laration process under section 501, to ensure that 

16 the needs of rural communities are being addressed; 

17 ‘‘(2) assist small population States in the prep18 aration of requests for major disaster or emergency 

19 declarations; and 

20 ‘‘(3) conduct such other activities as the Under 

21 Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Re22 sponse of the Department of Homeland Security 

23 considers appropriate.’’. 

24 SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS. 

25 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

26 date of enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary for 
3 

•HR 2338 IH 

1 Emergency Preparedness and Response of the Depart2 ment of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee 

3 on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 

4 Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

5 and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report detailing 

6 the extent to which existing disaster declaration regula7 tions— 

8 (1) meet the particular needs of States with 

9 populations of less than 1,000,000 individuals; and 

10 (2) comply with existing statutory restrictions 

11 on the use of arithmetic formulas and sliding scales 

12 based on income or population. 

13 (b) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this 

14 section may be construed to authorize major disaster or 

15 emergency assistance that is not authorized as of the date 

16 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Second Department,

May 1985

(May 6, 1985)

#### Alex & Gregory, Inc., Respondent, v Nick La Vista’s Glen Cove Service Station, Inc., Appellant.

In an action *144pursuant to RPAPL 601 and 631 to recover possession of real property, defendant appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated May 22, 1984, which, *inter alia,*denied its motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment and (2), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated June 14, 1984, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Appeal from the order dated May 22, 1984, dismissed. That order was superseded by the order dated June 14, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order dated June 14,1984, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Justice Wager at Special Term dated May 11,1984. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

ROBERT C. MCCULLIGAN, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE AND, 

CHARLES STEINMETZ, PSP 

STATETROOPER, INDIVIDUAL AND 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND, MICHAEL J. 

MINANNO, PSP STATE TROOPER, 

INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY 

AND, ANTHONY J. SPAGNOLETTI, 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DETECTIVE, 

INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY 

AND, WALTER ZDUNOWSKI, 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DETECTIVE, 

INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY 

AND, ERICK ECHEVARRIA, 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DETECTIVE, 

INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, 

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 MAP 2015 

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 670 MD 

2014 dated September 10, 2015. 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 25, 2016 

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2016, the order of the Commonwealth Court is 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 of A123
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Granara, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of
Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:

Date: March 11, 2011/s/ JOHN GRANARA John Granara Interim Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President of Finance


---



QuickLinks
BILL OF COSTS

NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

09-15-00408-CV

State Farm Lloyds

v.

Dennis Webb

No. A-194,468 IN 58TH DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGE STATUS BY

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Filing

Reporter's record

Clerk's record

Statewide efiling fee

Indigent

Sup Ct chpter 51 fee

Filing

$15.00

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$6,834.60

$940.00

$30.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

Cossette R Callahan

Jill McClure

Cossette R Callahan

Kristine Holubec

Jill McClure

Meagan Martin

Meagan Martin

Cossette R Callahan

Cossette R Callahan

Brenda K Lauve

Jill McClure

David J. Fisher

Hampton Skelton

Skelton & Woody

Skelton & Woody

Skelton & Woody

Skelton & Woody

Balance of costs owing to the Ninth Court of Appeals, Beaumont, Texas: $ 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CAROL ANNE HARLEY, CLERK OF THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS OF 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and 

correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH DISTRICT 

OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as 

the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF 

APPEALS for the Ninth District of Texas, this April 2, 2018.

CAROL ANNE HARLEY

CLERK OF THE COURT