alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

Michael Lohse,

Plaintiff,

v.

Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.; and 

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No.: 2:16-cv-00076-JTM-PRC

(

D

R

H

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the parties in the above-captioned case have reached 

a settlement. The Plaintiff anticipates filing a notice of withdrawal of Complaint and voluntary 

dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) within 60 days. 

Dated: November 17, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

PLAINTIFF, Michael Lohse

By: _/s/ Amy L. Cueller _________

Amy L. Cueller, Esq.

LEMBERG LAW, L.L.C.

43 Danbury Road, 3rd Floor

Wilton, CT 06897

Telephone: (203) 653-2250

Facsimile: (203) 653-3424

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00076-JTM-PRC document 30 filed 11/17/17 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 17, 2017, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Notice of Settlement was served electronically by the U.S. District Court Northern District of

Indiana Electronic Document Filing System (ECF) and that the document is available on the 

ECF system. 

Lyndsay I. Ignasiak, Esq.

REMINGER CO., L.P.A.

450 E. 96th Street, Suite 150

Indianapolis, IN 46240

Danny Merril Newman Jr., Esq.

REMINGER CO., L.P.A.

One Professional Center, Suite 202

2100 North Main Street 

Crown Point, IN 46307

David Hudson, Esq. 

REMINGER CO., L.P.A.

One SeaGate, Suite 1600

Toledo, OH 43604

Attorneys for Defendant

By_/s/ Amy L. Cueller_________

 Amy L. Cueller, Esq.

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00076-JTM-PRC document 30 filed 11/17/17 page 2 of 2
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 28, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00804-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.B., IV, A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-18597-Y



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Just ice Lang-Miers, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated September 4, 2014, we informed appellant that the Dall as County District Clerk had notif ied the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to file wr itten verification that he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the cler k’s record or that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if he did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal wit hout further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, appellant has not provided th e required documentation, nor has he otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).

140804F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF J.B., IV, A CHILD,
No. 05-14-00804-CV On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-18597-Y. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee The State of Texas rec over its costs of this appeal from appellant James Brock, III.
Judgment entered October 28, 2014.
#### KOCHMAN, Appellant, v. CHASE et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 17, 1899.)

Action between Lewis Kochman and Isaac W. Chase and John L. Chase. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed. Sullivan & Burke (H. V. Burke, of counsel), for appellant. L. A. Serviss (L. F. Fish, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We can see no substantial difference in the facts now appearing from what appeared when the case was last before us. We then held that such facts required the submission of the case to the jury (see 32 App. Div. 630, 52 N. Y. Supp. 740), and we have not changed our views since; and, for the reasons there given, we again reverse the judgment and order a new trial.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 STATEMENT
REGARDING CALCULATION OF RATIO OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS TO
CONSOLIDATED FIXED CHARGES
 (Dollars in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Pre-tax income (loss), as reported
    
    $
    455,277
    
    
    $
    204,063
    
    
    $
    16,233
    
    
    $
    204,792
    
    
    $
    126,047Equity in earnings of investees1
    
    
    87,762
    
    
    
    19,026
    
    
    
    5,205
    
    
    
    11,229
    
    
    
    9,939Pre-tax income (loss) before adjustment for
equity in earnings of equity investees
    
    
    367,515
    
    
    
    185,037
    
    
    
    11,028
    
    
    
    193,563
    
    
    
    116,108Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    41,765
    
    
    
    53,078
    
    
    
    63,841
    
    
    
    37,245
    
    
    
    17,502Rentals representing interest
    
    
    3,808
    
    
    
    3,810
    
    
    
    2,893
    
    
    
    4,829
    
    
    
    3,468Total fixed charges
    
    
    45,573
    
    
    
    56,888
    
    
    
    66,734
    
    
    
    42,074
    
    
    
    20,970Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    87,670
    
    
    
    9,148
    
    
    
    7,255
    
    
    
    24,444
    
    
    
    1,182Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in
earnings of investees plus fixed charges
and distributed income of equity method
investees
    
    $
    500,758
    
    
    $
    251,073
    
    
    $
    85,017
    
    
    $
    260,081
    
    
    $
    138,260Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    11.0
    x
    
    
    4.4
    x
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    6.2
    x
    
    
    6.6
    x
 
 1

    Equity in earnings of investees is in respect of those investments that are
investment companies or similar equity method investees and, as such, are included as part
of investment income on the consolidated statements of income. 115
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations for the forty weeks 
ended October 6, 1996, the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 6, 1996 
and the accompanying notes thereto and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-06-1996 
<CASH>                                           6,300 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,700 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                    321,900 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               440,700 
<PP&E>                                       1,759,600 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 576,700 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,152,900 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          706,000 
<BONDS>                                        423,200 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                         4,400 
<OTHER-SE>                                     697,600 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,152,900 
<SALES>                                      4,143,200 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,143,200 
<CGS>                                        3,092,400 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,092,400 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,400 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,200 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,600 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,600 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,600 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56 
        

</TABLE>
#### SCHLICHT, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by Lena Schlicht against the International Railway Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

SPRING, J., not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 125 (Friday, July 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14381]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission Asset Management Advisory Committee 
(``AMAC'') will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 
11:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be conducted by remote means. Members of the 
public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website 
at www.sec.gov.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 11:00 a.m. and will be open to the 
public by webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: On June 15, 2021, the Commission issued notice 
of the meeting (Release No. 34-92179), indicating that the meeting is 
open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments 
to AMAC. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of 
the Commission may attend the meeting.
    The meeting will include a discussion of matters in the asset 
management industry relating to: (1) The ESG, Diversity & Inclusion, 
and Private Investments Subcommittees, including potential 
recommendations from those Subcommittees; and (2) the Evolution of 
Advice Subcommittee, including a panel discussion.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

    Dated: June 30, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14381 Filed 6-30-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Robert A. Berman, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

 
    - The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended January 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 
    - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

                                                                           /s/ Robert A. Berman                          

                                                                           Robert A. Berman

                                                                           President and Chief Executive Officer 

March 18, 2013                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)           

 

----
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ ZHAOQING NEW ZHONGYA ALUMINUM CO., LTD.
AND ZHONGYA SHAPED ALUMI NUM (HK) HOLDING LIMITED ,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants
, AND GUANG YA ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., FOSHAN GUANGCHENG ALUMINUM CO., LTD., KONG AH INTERNATIONA L COMPANY LIMITED, GUANG YA ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES (HONG KONG) LIMITED, AND GUANG CHENG ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES (USA), IN C., Plaintiffs
,

v. UNITED STATES , Defendant

- Appelle e,

AND ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

__________________________ 201 3- 1113

__________________________ Case: 13-1113 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2013ZHAOQING NEW ZHONGYA ALUMINUM V

. US 2 Appeal from the United States Court of Internatio nal Trade in consolidated N os. 11

- CV

- 0178 and 11

- CV -0 196, Chief Judge Donald C. Pogue

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ Before N EWMAN , R EYNA , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges

. N EWMAN , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R

Z haoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. a nd Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited (A ppe l lants) move for an extension of time to file a brief

. Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee opposes and moves to dismiss this appeal. Appellants’ brief was due April 5, 2013. O n April 22, 2013, Appellants filed a motion for an extension of time until April 23, 2013 to file their brief. Appellants failed to file a brief on April 23, 2013. In its motion for an extension of time, Appellants’ counsel stated that he “was planning to file its principal brief by the Friday April 5, 2013 deadline ” but that a

“ computer crash and loss of the pertinent files” prevented him. Counsel then stated that he “ could have filed on Monday April 8, 2013 ” but “ further reflection especially over the weekend of April 5

- 7, 2013

. . . led to the concl usion that filing the principal brief was still premature

. . . .” Failure to comply wit h this court’s rules, including failure to file a brief , may result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute. Julien v. Zeringue , 864 F.2 d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989 ). Case: 13-1113 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2013ZHAOQING NEW ZHONGYA ALUMINUM V

. US 3 Accordingly
, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion for an extension of time is denied. (2) The motion to dismiss is granted. (3 ) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s26

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 18, 2013 Case: 13-1113 Document: 40 Page: 3 Filed: 06/18/2013
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 523 

To provide for enhanced criminal penalties for individuals who file a SEVP 

certification petition under false pretenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2011 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mrs. 

MCCASKILL, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for enhanced criminal penalties for individuals 

who file a SEVP certification petition under false pretenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VISA FRAUD. 

4 (a) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Chapter 75 of title 18, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘§ 1548. Filing of certification petition under false 

8 pretenses 

9 ‘‘Any person who knowingly, and for pecuniary gain, 

10 while representing himself or herself as a principal, officer, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 523 IS

1 or director of an educational institution, files a petition 

2 for certification or recertification with the Student and 

3 Exchange Visitor Program for attendance at such institu4 tion of nonimmigrant students under subparagraph (F)(i) 

5 or (M)(i) of section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and 

6 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)) under false pre7 tenses, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined 

8 under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or 

9 both.’’. 

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

11 for chapter 75 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

12 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘1548. Filing of certification petition under false pretenses.’’. 

13 SEC. 2. SENTENCING GUIDELINES. 

14 Pursuant to its authority under section 994 of title 

15 28, United States Code, the United States Sentencing 

16 Commission shall amend the Federal Sentencing Guide17 lines and policy statements to reflect the penalties applica18 ble to persons convicted of violating section 1548 of title 

19 18, United States Code, as added by section 1. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                     AGREEMENT DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2002


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-2


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2002-2, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                       BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv D30
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35795-35796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14422]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate 
Receivership; Correction

    In the notice the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or 
Receiver) published in the April 27, 2021, Federal Register (86 FR 
22204), Georgian Bank was incorrectly listed as Georgia Bank. This 
notice makes that correction.
    Notice is hereby given that the FDIC as Receiver for the 
institution listed below intends to terminate its receivership for said 
institution.

[[Page 35796]]



                                   Notice of Intent To Terminate Receivership
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Date of
            Fund                   Receivership name                City               State      appointment of
                                                                                                     receiver
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10122.......................  Georgian Bank..............  Atlanta...............  GA                 09/25/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The liquidation of the assets for the receivership has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing, 
identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and sent 
within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, 
Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, 
Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this timeframe.

(Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819)

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on July 1, 2021.
Debra A. Decker,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14422 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Thomas G. Lehmann, a First Vice President of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WAMU MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-S1;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:


None


Dated: March 29, 2005
                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann,
                                     First Vice President