alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Marvin Rounick, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deb Shops, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended April 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: June 13, 2003



                                                  Marvin Rounick
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Marvin Rounick, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer



  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
    provided to Deb Shops, Inc. and will be retained by Deb Shops, Inc. and
 furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVATEX CORPORATION FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,283
<SECURITIES>                                     8,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                       350
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,283
<PP&E>                                          27,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,119
<BONDS>                                         32,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          195,567
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,032
<OTHER-SE>                                   (227,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,458
<SALES>                                          3,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,163
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,946)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.12)
        

</TABLE>
| Entity                                                      | Jurisdiction of    Incorporation | Names Under Which the Entities Conduct      Business |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |                             |                                                 |
| Trinity      River International Investments (Bermuda) Ltd. | Bermuda                          | N/A                                                  |
|                                                        |                             |                                                 |
| Alcon      Pharmaceuticals Ltd.                             | Fribourg,Switzerland             | N/A                                                  |
|                                                        |                             |                                                 |
| Alcon      Holdings Inc.                                    | State      of Delaware, U.S.A.   | N/A                                                  |
|                                                        |                             |                                                 |
| Alcon      Laboratories, Inc.                               | State      of Delaware, U.S.A.   | N/A                                                  |
|                                                        |                             |                                                 |
EX-10.18 Non-employee Directors' Annual Compensation






Exhibit 10.18








Dynex Capital, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation
Effective January 1, 2015






Cash Compensation


Annual retainer
Non-Employee Director                            $ 55,000 
Lead Independent Director                        $ 15,000        
Audit Committee Chair                            $ 10,000
Compensation Committee Chair                         $  5,000
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chair              $  5,000


Annual retainers are payable in quarterly installments, prorated for the number of months served in the case of a change during the calendar year.  




Excess meeting fee
In addition to the annual retainer, non-employee directors will also receive a cash fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or a Board Committee attended as a member in excess of 15 meetings per year.






Equity Compensation


Non-employee directors will also receive an annual grant of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock with a grant date fair value of $50,000, which shares will vest at the end of one year.  The shares are to be granted on the first Friday following the annual meeting of shareholders.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Interest Rate Paid on Cash Deposited To Secure U.S. Immigration 
and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bonds

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: For the period beginning July 1, 2021, and ending on September 
30, 2021, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bond 
interest rate is .02 per centum per annum.

DATES: Rates are applicable July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may be mailed to Will Walcutt, 
Supervisor, Funds Management Branch, Funds Management Division, Fiscal 
Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Services, Parkersburg, West Virginia 
26106-1328.
    You can download this notice at the following internet addresses: 
http://www.treasury.gov or http://www.federalregister.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Hanna, Manager, Funds Management 
Branch, Funds Management Division, Fiscal Accounting, Bureau of the 
Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia 261006-1328 (304) 480-5120; 
Will Walcutt, Supervisor, Funds Management Branch, Funds Management 
Division, Fiscal Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Services, 
Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106-1328, (304) 480-5117.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal law requires that interest payments 
on cash deposited to secure immigration bonds shall be ``at a rate 
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, except that in no case 
shall the interest rate exceed 3 per centum per annum.'' 8 U.S.C. 
1363(a). Related Federal regulations state that ``Interest on cash 
deposited to secure immigration bonds will be at the rate as determined 
by the Secretary of the Treasury, but in no case will exceed 3 per 
centum per annum or be less than zero.'' 8 CFR 293.2. Treasury has 
determined that interest on the bonds will vary quarterly and will 
accrue during each calendar quarter at a rate equal to the lesser of 
the average of the bond equivalent rates on 91-day Treasury bills 
auctioned during the preceding calendar quarter, or 3 per centum per 
annum, but in no case less than zero. [FR Doc. 2015-18545]. In addition 
to this Notice, Treasury posts the current quarterly rate in Table 2b--
Interest Rates for Specific Legislation on the TreasuryDirect website.
    The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Finance, Gary Grippo, 
having reviewed and approved this document, is delegating the authority 
to electronically sign this document to Heidi Cohen, Federal Register 
Liaison for the Department, for purposes of publication in the Federal 
Register.

Heidi Cohen,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2021-14487 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
#### In the Matter of Angela M. Oppenheim, Appellant, v Maureen O’Connell, Nassau County Clerk, et al., Respondents.

[943 NYS2d 779]-

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Maureen O’Connell, the Nassau County Clerk, dated September 25, 2008, which terminated the petitioner’s desk license effective immediately, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered March 25, 2011, as, upon the granting of that branch of the petition which was to annul the determination, denied that branch of her motion which was, in effect, to compel Maureen O’Connell and the County of Nassau to immediately reinstate her desk license.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Pursuant to a desk license agreement, the petitioner, Angela M. Oppenheim, was issued a desk license which permitted her to use desk space in the title room of the Nassau County Clerk’s office for a term of one year, commencing on January 1, 2008, and expiring on December 31, 2008. In September 2008 the petitioner’s license was terminated based upon charges that she violated certain rules and regulations of the Nassau County Clerk. The petitioner subsequently commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 against Maureen O’Connell, the Nassau County Clerk, and the County of Nassau (hereinafter together the respondents), inter alia, to review that determination. The Supreme Court, among other things, granted that branch of the petition which was to annul the determination.

In September 2010 the respondents denied the petitioner’s request to reinstate her desk license, since the license had expired on December 31, 2008. Thereafter, the petitioner moved, inter alia, in effect, to compel the respondents to immediately reinstate the desk license. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, among other things, denied that branch of the motion. We affirm the order insofar as appealed from.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her motion which was, in effect, to compel the respondents to immediately reinstate the desk license. Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court did not have the authority to reinstate the petitioner’s desk.license, which expired on December 31, 2008 *(cf. Rob Tess Rest. Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*68 AD2d 821 [1979], *mod*49 NY2d *1133874 [1980]; *Matter of Agnello v State Liq. Auth.,*32 AD2d 92 [1969]). Angiolillo, J.P., Lott, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

)

v ) CAUSE NO. 2:16-CR-99-JTM-JEM

 )

KENNETH TREMAINE BLACKMAN, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT KENNETH BLACKMAN

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant

to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before

Magistrate Judge John E. Martin, on May 4, 2017, with the consent of Defendant Blackman, counsel

for Defendant Blackman, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Blackman’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11,

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Blackman under oath

on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant Blackman,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman understands the nature of the charge against

him to which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman understands his right to trial by jury, to

persist in his plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine
adverse witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman understands what the maximum possible

sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Kenneth Tremaine

Blackman understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those

guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman has been knowingly

and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman understands that her answers may later be

used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman’s plea; and

further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Kenneth Tremaine Blackman’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Kenneth Tremaine Blackman be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A

Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and

Kenneth Tremaine Blackman be adjudged guilty, sentencing before Senior Judge James T. Moody

will be set at a later date by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are

waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 12th day of May, 2017.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Honorable James T. Moody
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth Hicks, President of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Argentex Mining
      Corporation for the year ended January 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Argentex Mining Corporation.                                                                 

Dated: May 8, 2008

| | /s/
      Kenneth Hicks      
| | -----------------------------
| | Kenneth Hicks                
| | President                    
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Argentex Mining Corporation  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
### VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 23

- AP

- 379

109 State Street Montpelier VT 05609

- 0801

802

- 828

- 4774 www.vermontjudiciary.org

Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a cross

appellant. Decisions of a three

- justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal.



### ENTRY ORDER

AUGUST TERM

, 2024

Crissy King* v. Deborah Towslee } APPEALED FROM: } } Superior Court, Bennington Unit

, Civil Division } CASE NO. 23

- ST

- 00795 Trial Judge: David A. Barra

In the above

- entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

Plaintiff appeals a civil division order denying her request for a n anti

- stalking order against defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant, the former property manager of her apartment building

, seeking an anti

- stalking order

. The court denied plaintiff’s request for a temporary order, and plaintiff requested a hearing. Following a hearing, the civil division made findings of fact on the record and concluded that plaintiff failed to prove her claim. The court accordingly denied the request.

On appeal, plaintiff makes lengthy factual allegations regarding defendant’s behavior, including that defendant stalked her online and through third parties. Plaintiff contends that the

court erred in finding that defendant’s conduct did not amount to stalking and in denying her request for an anti

- stalking order

.

Because plaintiff did not order a transcript of the proceedings below, w e are unable to review plaintiff’s claim s

.  “By failing to order a transcript, the appellant waives the right to raise

 Plaintiff received permission to waive the filing fee in this appeal. Her docketing statement indicated that no transcripts were necessary, and that she could not afford transcripts. Plaintiff did not, however, move to use the audio recording in lieu of a written transcript. See V.R.A.P. 10(b)(8) (allowing party to request use of audio in lieu of written transcript if party has received permission to waive filing fee and proceedings did not exceed four hours).2

any issue for which a transcript is necessary for informed appellate review.” V.R.A.P. 10(b)(1). Without the transcript, we are “unable to review the evidence to determine if it supports the trial

court ’ s factual findings.” Airi v. Nagra , 2017 VT 42, ¶ 5, 205 Vt. 40. Accordingly, we must “assume[ ] that the trial court ’ s findings are supported by the evidence.” Evans v. Cote , 2014 VT 104, ¶ 7, 197 Vt. 523. Moreover, because the court’s findings were on the record, without a transcript, we are not able to assess whether those findings support the court’s conclusion that defendant’s actions did not amount to stalking

. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the court erred in denying her request for relief.

Affirmed

.

BY THE COURT:

Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice

William D. Cohen, Associate Justice

Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement    No. 333-91700    on    Form S-8    of our report dated March 31, 2008, relating to the    consolidated financial statements and financial statement    schedule of Aéropostale, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the    “Company”), (which expresses an unqualified opinion    and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the    Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board    Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in    Income Taxes,*effective February 4, 2007, the    Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting    Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for    Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans*,    relating to the recognition and related disclosure provisions,    effective February 3, 2007, and the Company’s adoption    of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),    *Share-Based Payment*, as revised, effective    January 29, 2006) and our report dated March 31,    2008, relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s    internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this    Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Aéropostale, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year    ended February 2, 2008. /s/  DELOITTE &    TOUCHE LLP     New York, New York    April 1, 2008