alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (158)
<INVENTORY>                                     25,442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,835
<PP&E>                                          29,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,552
<BONDS>                                        170,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,461)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,295
<SALES>                                        106,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,379
<CGS>                                           68,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

86 FR 34080, June 28, 2021.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, July 1, 2021 at 2 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 1, 2021 at 2 p.m., has been cancelled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: July 1, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-14426 Filed 7-1-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Hillman Companies, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James P. Waters, Chief Financial Officer of The Hillman Companies, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James P. WatersJames P. Waters
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing
 Financial
Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
 
 I, C.
Troy Woodbury, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of Wegener Corporation (the
“Company”), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best
of my knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended November 28, 2008 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:
  •
              
              fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 •
              
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/
      C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.Name:
                C.
      Troy Woodbury, Jr.Title:
                Treasurer
      and Chief Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Financial Officer)Date:
                January
      12, 2009
#### Fremont Investment & Loan, Respondent, v Mary Gentile, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[943 NYS2d 182]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Mary Gentile appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (James J. Golia, J.), entered January 20, 2011, as denied that branch of her motion pursuant to CELR 3126 which was to preclude the plaintiff from giving evidence at trial with respect to the denials of and defenses to her counterclaim, as set forth in the plaintiffs bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof, and prevent surprise at trial *(see Jones v LeFrance Leasing L.P.,*81 AD3d 900, 902 [2011]; *Mendelson v Szczupak,*199 AD2d 479 [1993]; *Nuss v Pettibone Mercury Corp.,*112 AD2d 744, 744 [1985]). “A bill of particulars may not be used to obtain evidentiary material” *(Nuss v Pettibone Mercury Corp.,*112 AD2d at 744; *see Tully v Town of N. Hempstead,*133 AD2d 657 [1987]; *Ginsberg v Ginsberg,*104 AD2d 482, 484 *[1984]).*

Here, the appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars improperly included requests *for*detailed information of an evidentiary nature *(see Posh Pillows v Hawes,*138 AD2d 472, 474 [1988]). Thus, the responses in the plaintiffs bill of particulars objecting to those demands constituted an adequate response. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was to preclude the plaintiff from giving evidence at trial with respect to the denials of and defenses to the appellant’s counterclaim, as set forth in the plaintiffs bill of particulars.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court. Balkin, J.E, Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### Hoffman Auto Leasing *v.*Mark Silk, P.C.

*Mark R. Silk,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided November 29, 1989

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is denied.
#### Eugene Issac PITTS, Appellant, v. Larry JEGLEY, Prosecuting Attorney, Pulaski County; W.A. McCormick, Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Pulaski County; Durthey Bishop, Investigator, Pulaski County; Kermit Channell, Executive Director, Arkansas State Crime Laboratory; Lisa Channell, Trace Evidence Analyst, Arkansas State Crime Lab; Stephanie Gray, Evidence Technician, Arkansas Department of Correction; Jeffrey M. Rosenzweig, Attorney, Little Rock Arkansas, Appellees.

No. 11-2306.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 2, 2011.

Filed: Nov. 7, 2011.

Eugene Issac Pitts, Tucker, AR, pro se.

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Pitts appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action based on the alleged “bad faith” mishandling and loss of evidence. '■ We grant Pitts leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Upon de novo review, we conclude that dismissal was proper because the complaint failed to state a claim. *See Ashcroft v. Iqbal,*556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (pleading that offers labels and conclusions or formulaic recitation of elements will not do; claim has facial plausibility when plaintiff pleads factual content that allows court to draw reasonable inference that defendant is liable for misconduct alleged); *Daniels v. Williams,*474 U.S. 327, 328, 106 S.Ct. 677, 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986) (Due Process Clause is not implicated by negligent act of official causing unintended loss of or injury to life, liberty, or property); *Holbird v. Armstrong-Wright,*949 F.2d 1019, 1020 (8th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (conduct of counsel, either retained or appointed, does not constitute *729state action for purposes of § 1983); see *also Phipps v. FDIC,*417 F.3d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir.2005) (court may affirm on any basis supported by record). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of 1st Colonial Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerard M. Banmiller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gerard M. Banmiller
-----------------------------
Gerard M. Banmiller
Chief Executive Officer
March 22, 2004
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 458 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish and 

enforce a maximum somatic cell count requirement for fluid milk. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

establish and enforce a maximum somatic cell count requirement for fluid milk. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Milk Quality Stand5 ards Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM SOMATIC CELL COUNT. 

7 Chapter IV of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

8 Act (21 U.S.C. 341 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 458 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 424. MAXIMUM SOMATIC CELL COUNT. 

2 ‘‘(a) MAXIMUM SOMATIC CELL COUNT.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The maximum somatic cell 

4 count for all dairy products sold, transported, or of5 fered for sale or transport, in interstate commerce 

6 shall be 400,000 cells per milliliter of fluid milk, or 

7 equivalent, as determined by the Secretary. 

8 ‘‘(2) ADJUSTMENT.—The Secretary, after con9 sideration of any recommendations submitted by the 

10 National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments, 

11 may lower the maximum somatic cell count estab12 lished under paragraph (1). 

13 ‘‘(b) CALCULATION.—The Secretary shall promulgate 

14 regulations to require that the calculation of a herd aver15 age somatic cell count under this section shall be made 

16 using a geometric, rather than an arithmetic, mean. 

17 ‘‘(c) REVISION.—The Secretary, in consultation with 

18 the National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments, 

19 shall revise the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance to take into 

20 account the requirement under subsection (a) and any reg21 ulations promulgated under subsection (b). 

22 ‘‘(d) ENFORCEMENT.— 

23 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date that 

24 is 18 months after the date of enactment of this sec25 tion, any person that sells, transports, or offers for 

26 sale or transport, in interstate commerce any dairy 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 458 IS

1 product in violation of subsection (a) shall be subject 

2 to a civil penalty in an amount determined in ac3 cordance with the regulations promulgated under 

4 paragraph (2). 

5 ‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 18 months 

6 after the date of enactment of this section, the Sec7 retary shall promulgate regulations establishing a 

8 schedule of civil penalties for violations of subsection 

9 (a).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equitex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry Fong, President,
Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



                                       /s/ Henry Fong
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Henry Fong
                                       President, Treasurer and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       May 17, 2004


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO EQUITEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EQUITEX, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**Exhibit 31 (ii)**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Sonya E. Scott, Chief Financial Officer, certifythat:

 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b) intentionally omitted

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 13, 2003 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    | /s/ Sonya E. Scott |   |
|                    | Sonya E. Scott |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Harley Channelview Properties, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 548

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 20

- 67063

Trial court: 80 th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed : August 23 , 2022

Party filing motion: Relator

I t is ordered that relator ’ s motion for rehearing and all outstanding motions are denied

. The Court’s stay order dated October 18, 2021 is withdrawn

. A ny disputes regarding suspension

of the trial court’s interlocutory order m ust be directed to the trial court.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Sherry Ra dack

_________ Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris

.

Date: ____ December 20, 2022

_____
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>

YEAR-TO-DATE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOUND ON PAGES
3,4,5 RESPECTIVELY, ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE CURRENT
PERIOD ENDED AND THE PREVIOUS PERIOD ENDED, ARE LISTED BELOW IN
TABULAR FORMAT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     APR-4-1998     JUL-4-1998
<CASH>                           71,941         84,219
<SECURITIES>                     32,679         26,103
<RECEIVABLES>                    59,934         61,119
<ALLOWANCES>                     892            958
<INVENTORY>                      51,158         50,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 198,262        210,146
<PP&E>                           178,177        184,442
<DEPRECIATION>                   98,476         100,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   313,161        322,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            60,761         59,476
<BONDS>                          0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0              0
<PREFERRED>                      0              0
<COMMON>                         382            384
<OTHER-SE>                       246,298        256,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     313,161        322,286
<SALES>                          68,685         135,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 68,685         135,203
<CGS>                            33,087         65,084
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    33,087         65,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 10,260         20,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 (127)          58
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               93             201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  14,523         27,412
<INCOME-TAX>                     4,357          7,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              10,166         19,600
<DISCONTINUED>                   0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0              0
<CHANGES>                        0              0
<NET-INCOME>                     10,166         19,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.28           0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.27           0.51
        

</TABLE>