alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                     SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906
          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the Quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the
"Report"), Norman L Lowery , as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Michael a Carty, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.    This Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

May 10, 2005                               By /s/ Norman L. Lowery
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Norman L. Lowery, Vice Chairman & CEO

May 10, 2005                               By /s/ Michael A. Carty
                                              --------------------------------
                                           Michael A. Carty, Treasurer & CFO

                                                                              34
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 502 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 502

                     For the relief of Maha Dakar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2011

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Maha Dakar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Maha Dakar shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, 
and remained in, the United States, and shall be eligible for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing an application for such 
adjustment of status.
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if Maha Dakar files an application for adjustment of status, with 
appropriate fees, not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
permanent resident status to Maha Dakar, the Secretary of State shall 
instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or 
subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 
made available to natives of the country of the birth of Maha Dakar 
under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)).
                                 <all>
```
#### Kay STALEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-20667.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 17, 2006.

Ayesha Khan, Richard Brian Katskee (argued), Americans United For Separation of Church *&*State, Washington, DC, Randall L. Kallinen, Houston, TX, for Sta-ley.

Bruce S. Powers, Asst. Cty. Atty. (argued), Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Edward Lawrence White, III, Thomas More Law Ctr., Ann Arbor, MI, for Thomas More Law Center, Amicus Curiae.

Douglas G. Smith, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for Eagle Forum Educ. *&*Legal Defense Fund, Amicus Curiae.

Joel Lance Thollander (argued), Austin, TX, for State of Texas, Amicus Curiae.

Benjamin David DuPré, Law Offices of Benjamin D. DuPré, Montgomery, AL, for Moral Law Inc, Amicus Curiae.

Peter Dominick Lepiscopo, Law Offices of Peter D. Lepiscopo, San Diego, CA, for Pacific Justice Institute, Amicus Curiae.

Joshua William Carden, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, AZ, for Star of Hope Mission, William L. Mosher, Jr., William L. Mosher, III, Emily Elizabeth Mosher, Rosenlund, Waldie and Jones, Amici Curiae.

Kelly J. Shackelford, Liberty Legal Institute, Plano, TX, for Liberty Legal Institute, Amicus Curiae.

Steven W. Fitschen, National Legal Foundation, Virginia Beach, VA, for National Legal Foundatin, Amicus Curiae.

Sylvia Ann Mayer, Stephen Todd Loden Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Houston, TX, for Anti-Defamation League, Amicus Curiae.

Michael F. Linz, Dallas, TX, for American Civil Liberties Union, Foundation of Texas, Amicus Curiae.

*1087Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
# Euroopa Liidu C 87I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 087I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 65. aastakäik23. veebruar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 087I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

65. aastakäik23. veebruar 2022

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2022/C 87 I/01 | Teatis importijatele — Väljaspool Ukraina valitsuse kontrolli olevatelt Donetski ja Luganski oblasti aladelt ELi-Ukraina assotsieerimislepingu alusel toodete liitu importimine | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2022/C 87 I/01

Teatis importijatele — Väljaspool Ukraina valitsuse kontrolli olevatelt Donetski ja Luganski oblasti aladelt ELi-Ukraina assotsieerimislepingu alusel toodete liitu importimine

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 23.2.2022 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2022

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 87/1

---

Teatis importijatele

Väljaspool Ukraina valitsuse kontrolli olevatelt Donetski ja Luganski oblasti aladelt ELi-Ukraina assotsieerimislepingu alusel toodete liitu importimine

(2022/C 87 I/01)

Euroopa Komisjon teatab importijatele, et Ukraina tolliasutustel puuduvad vajalikud tingimused, et tulemuslikult hallata ja kontrollida ühelt poolt Euroopa Liidu ja liikmesriikide ning teiselt poolt Ukraina vahelises assotsieerimislepingus sätestatud tariifse sooduskohtlemise kohaldamist kaupade suhtes, mis on toodetud väljaspool Ukraina valitsuse kontrolli olevatel Donetski ja Luganski oblasti aladel või nendelt aladelt eksporditud.

Kuna Ukraina tollil puudub võimalus kohaldada lepingu asjakohaseid sätteid, mille alusel teha kindlaks, et kõnealustelt aladelt pärit kaupade suhtes võib kohaldada tariifset sooduskohtlemist, ja kontrollida, kas kaubad vastavad kõigile vajalikele nõuetele, mis on sätestatud eelkõige assotsieerimislepingu protokolli nr 1 artiklis 33, ei ole täidetud tingimused, mille alusel saab selliste kaupade suhtes kohaldada tariifset sooduskohtlemist.

Seetõttu soovitatakse Euroopa Liidu ettevõtjatel mitte taotleda väljaspool Ukraina valitsuse kontrolli olevatel Donetski ja Luganski oblasti aladel toodetud või sealt eksporditud kaupade liitu importimisel sooduskohtlemist, sest nende kaupade vabasse ringlusse lubamine tekitab alates käesoleva teatise avaldamise kuupäevast tollivõla.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20829 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS ROJO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR H-90-240-3

- - - - - - - - - - August 14, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Rojo contends that the district court erred by determining that he had an aggravating role in the offense and by increasing his offense level. We review a district court’s determination that a defendant had an aggravating role in an offense for clear error. See United States v. Palomo , 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir. 1993). Rojo did not present sufficient rebuttal evidence to refute the information in the presentence report (PSR). United StatesNo. 96-20829 -2- v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995) (If the defendant does not submit affidavits or other evidence to rebut the information in the PSR, the district court may "adopt [the PSR] without further inquiry or explanation."). The district court did not clearly err by enhancing Rojo’s sentence based on his role in the offense. AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-17-2021]

      ( print page 35474)    
On March 2, 2021, Liebel-Flarsheim Company, LLC, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 93, in Raleigh, North Carolina.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 13524-13525, March 9, 2021). On June 30, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: June 30, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-14301 Filed 7-2-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
---

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

TO: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

I, Lawrence A. Melis, P.Eng., do hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Report with the regulatory authorities referred to above and to the written or electronic disclosure of the Technical Report entitled Technical Report on the 2007
Program and Update on Metallurgy and Resources for the Pebble Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Project, Iliamna Lake Area, Southwestern Alaska, USA, March 31, 2008 and to extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report as may be required by the
regulatory authorities.

I have read Northern Dynastys 2007 40F, dated March 31, 2008 and confirm that documents fairly and accurately represent the information that supports the disclosure.

Submitted this 31st day of March, 2008.

Signed,

/s/ Lawrence A. Melis, P.Eng.Lawrence S. Melis, P.Eng.Melis Engineering Ltd.Suite 100, 2366 Avenue C NorthSASKATOON SK S7L5X5

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00029-TLS-SLC

)

TIMOTHY RYAN )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on July 21, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Judge Theresa

L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation

are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 21st day of July 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,122
<SECURITIES>                                     1,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                      990<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,505
<PP&E>                                           5,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,003
<BONDS>                                          1,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,886
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,292
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    496
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### HUNTLEY, Respondent, v. FLURI, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Melanie Huntley against George V. Fluri. G. W. Elkins, for appellant. R. E. L. Lewis, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 498 

AN ACT 

To ensure objective, independent review of task and delivery 

orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 498 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent Task and 

3 Delivery Order Review Extension Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE FOR CERTAIN PRO5 TESTS OF TASK AND DELIVERY ORDER CON6 TRACTS. 

7 Section 4106(f)(3) of title 41, United States Code, 

8 is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(3) EFFECTIVE PERIOD.—Paragraph 1(B) 

10 and paragraph (2) of this subsection shall not be in 

11 effect after September 30, 2016.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. USE OF EXISTING RESOURCES TO PROCESS TASK 

13 AND DELIVERY ORDER PROTESTS. 

14 No amounts are authorized to be appropriated for the 

15 specific purpose of processing protests authorized under 

16 section 4106(f) of title 41, United States Code, as amend17 ed by section 2, and all such protests shall be processed 

18 using the existing resources of the Government Account19 ability Office and executive agencies. 

Passed the Senate May 12, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 498 

AN ACT 

To ensure objective, independent review of task and 

delivery orders.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory: West Lafayette, IN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach
                        Fact Sheets
                                    Videos
                                    Seminars
                                    Careers
                    Our Lab
                        Phosphorus Removal Structures
                                    CEAP St. Joseph River Watershed
                                    WEPP Model
                                    USLE Database
                                    RUSLE
                                    
                                    Conferences
                                    Scientist Almuni
                                    Local TalksSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






CPIDSheadline bar Research


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT A
                                                                       ---------



                     [Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers]




March 18, 2003





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Canadian
Pacific Railway Limited and Canadian Pacific Railway Company for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 40-F"), and the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements: Form S-3 no. 2-98605 (Canadian Pacific Railway
Company), Form S-8 no. 333-13846 (Canadian Pacific Railway Limited), Form S-8
no. 333-13962 (Canadian Pacific Railway Limited), and Form F-9 no. 333-14014
(Canadian Pacific Railway Company) of our report dated February 18, 2003, which
report is included in the financial statements included in the Form 40-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


                                       A-1
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Henry P. Herms, the Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31,
          2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Henry P. Herms
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Henry P. Herms
                                                    Vice President - Finance and
September 17, 2007                                  Chief Financial Officer