alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit_4-5.htm










Exhibit 4.5


 






 


[●], 2015


 



To


Mikroman Madencilik Mining


Hisarardi Koyo


Yatagan Mugla


Turkey


 


Dear Murat, Serhat, Karabay,


 


Following our discussions, and in continuation with the Agreement entered between us on 2012 here is a summary of our agreement re supply during 2015.


 


     1.     Estimated Quantities and binding orders and supply


 


Caesarstone’s working plan for year 2015 is as follows:


 






	
Product

	
Quantity 2015


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*









 



The above is Caesarstone’s working plan with a non-binding purchases projection from Mikroman for year 2015 (the “Estimated Quantities”) for the abovementioned products (the “Products”). Caesarstone’s actual orders may significantly differ from the Estimated Quantities. As always, Caesarstone will deliver to Mikroman a binding Purchase Order on a monthly basis, and Mikroman shall supply to Caesarstone all such Purchase Orders (in accordance with the specifications set in writing by Caesarstone) up to the Estimated Quantities.


 


2. Prices – For quantities of the Products that shall be ordered by Caesarstone during year 2015, Mikroman will charge from Caesarstone the following prices per ton, US$* (* US  Dollar).


 


3. Payment terms – for Products that shall be ordered by Caesarstone during year 2015 payment terms shall be the same as applied between the parties hereto during year 2014.


 


4. The products will be supplied by Mikroman in a timely manner and in accordance with Caesarstone’s quality standards and specifications as will be updated by Caesarstone in writing from time to time, in accordance with each Caesarstone’s purchase order.


 


5. Mikroman will maintain in confidence the terms of this agreement as well as any other confidential information of Caesarstone without time limitation.


 


6. This agreement and its performance will be governed by the English law and subject to the jurisdiction of the competent courts in England. Without derogating from the generality and validity of the foregoing, Caesarstone shall be entitled, at its sole discretion, to initiate legal proceedings related to this Agreement in Turkey, and in such case only same proceeding will be subject to the jurisdiction of the competent courts in Turkey.







7. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Mikroman and CaesarStone, and all prior understandings and/or commitments of any of the parties with respect to the matters covered herein are superseded and null.


 


 * Confidential treatment has been requested for redacted portions of this exhibit. This copy omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as [*]. A complete version of this exhibit has been provided separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; RFA DK20-025: Diabetes 
Research Centers (P30 Clinical Trial Optional).
    Date: October 4-5, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7349, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-8894, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4426212331292a042a2d20202f6a2a2d2c6a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b191e1c0e16153b15121f1f1055151213551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 30, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-14416 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14405]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 14, 2021; 10 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Decisional Matter.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, 
Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).

    Dated: June 30, 2021.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14405 Filed 7-1-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeremy Jason BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50604.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 7, 2011.

Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., David P. Curnow, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Devin Burstein, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jeremy Jason Brooks appeals from his sentence of eight months imprisonment followed by 24 months of supervised release imposed on revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Brooks contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain adequately the reasons for the sentence *789imposed. The record reflects the district court adequately explained the reasons for the sentence. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); *see also Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

Brooks also contends that the district court improperly relied on the unsupported allegation that he drove while under the influence. The court did not plainly err. See *United States v. Hammons,*558 F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th Cir.2009).

Brooks also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. However, the sentence was reasonable in light of the relevant factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *See United States v. Simtob,*485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007); *see also*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ALEXANDER S. ORENSHT EYN, Plaintiff

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

v.

DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON, Sanctioned Parties

- Appellants

______________________

2015

- 1056

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:02

- cv

- 60478

- WJZ, Jud ge William J. Zloch.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID F INK , Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for appellants.

T IMOTHY J. R OUSSEAU , Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented byD OUGLAS J. K LINE , Boston, MA; W ILLIAM M. J AY , Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, L OURIE and L INN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3704 

To clarify the authorized uses of funds in the Crime Victims Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. KYL (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify the authorized uses of funds in the Crime Victims 

Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CRIME VICTIMS FUND. 

4 Section 1402(d)(3) of the Victims of Crime Act of 

5 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10601(d)(3)) is amended by— 

6 (1) inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘Of the sums’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(B) Amounts made available under subpara9 graph (A) may not be used for any purpose that is 

10 not specified in subparagraph (A).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.19


                      ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION-FOR PROFIT

                                       OF

                           MILESTONE MANAGEMENT, INC.


[XX]   Business Stock (15Pa.C.S.1306)        [  ]   Professional (15Pa.C.S.2903)
[  ]   Business Nonstock (15Pa.C.S.2102)     [  ]   Management (15Pa.C.S.2702)
[  ]   Business-Statutory Close              [  ]   Insurance (15Pa.C.S.3101)
       (Pa.C.S.2303)
[  ]   Cooperative (15Pa.C.S.7102)

         In compliance with the requirements of the applicable provisions of 15
Pa.C.S. (relating to corporations and unincorporated associations) the
undersigned, desiring to incorporate a corporation for profit hereby, state(s)
that:

1.       The name of the corporation is:

                           MILESTONE MANAGEMENT, INC.

2.       The address of this corporation's initial registered office in this
         Commonwealth or name of its commercial registered office provider and
         the county of venue is:

         Eric A. Weiss
         30 Sugar Maple Drive
         Newtown Square, PA 19073      Delaware County

3.       The corporation is incorporated under the provisions of the Business
         Corporation Law of 1988.

4.       The aggregate number of shares authorized is: 1500 @ no par value

5.       The name and address, including number and street, if any, of each
         incorporator is:

         Lisa L. Davidson
         319 Market Street
         Harrisburg, PA 17101

6.       The specified effective date, if any, is:

7.       Additional provisions of the articles, if any, attach an 8 1/2 x 11
         sheet.

8.       Statutory close corporation only: Neither the corporation nor any
         shareholder shall make an offering of any of its shares of any class
         that would constitute a "public offering" within the meaning of the
         Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.)



<PAGE>

Page 2
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


9.       Cooperative corporations only: (Complete and strike out inapplicable
         term) The common bond of membership among its members/shareholders is:

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the incorporator has signed these Articles of
Incorporation on November 24, 1998.




/s/ LISA L. DAVIDSON
-----------------------------
----

CODE OF ETHICS 

Preface 

The chief executive officer, chief financial officer,comptroller, chief accounting officer or persons performing similar functions(collectively, "Senior Financial Officers") hold an important andelevated role in corporate governance. Senior Financial Officers fulfill thisresponsibility by prescribing and enforcing the policies and procedures employedin the operation of the enterprise's financial organization, and bydemonstrating the following: 

I. Honest and Ethical Conduct 

Senior Financial Officers will exhibitand promote the highest standards of honest and ethical conduct through theestablishment and operation of policies and procedures that:

- Encourage and reward professional integrity in all aspects  of the financial organization, by eliminating inhibitions and barriers to  responsible behavior, such as coercion, fear of reprisal, or alienation from  the financial organization or the enterprise itself.
- Prohibit and eliminate the appearance or occurrence of  conflicts between what is in the best interest of the enterprise and what  could result in material personal gain for a member of the financial  organization, including Senior Financial Officers.
- Provide a mechanism for members of the finance organization  to inform senior management of deviations in practice from policies and  procedures governing honest and ethical behavior.
- Demonstrate their personal support for such policies and  procedures through periodic communication reinforcing these ethical standards  throughout the finance organization.

II. Financial Records and Periodic Reports

Senior Financial Officers willestablish and manage the enterprise transaction and reporting systems andprocedures to ensure that:

- Business transactions are properly authorized and  completely and accurately recorded on the Company's books and records in  accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and  established Company financial policy.
- The retention or proper disposal of Company records shall  be in accordance with established enterprise financial policies and applicable  legal and regulatory requirements.
- Periodic financial communications and reports will be  delivered in a manner that facilitates the highest degree of clarity of  content and meaning so that readers and users will quickly and accurately  determine their significance and consequence.

III. Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations

Senior Financial Officers willestablish and maintain mechanisms to: 

- Educate members of the finance organization about  any federal, state or local statute, regulation or administrative procedure  that affects the operation of the finance organization and the enterprise  generally.
- Monitor the compliance of the finance organization with any  applicable federal, state or local statute, regulation or administrative rule. Identify, report and correct in a swift and certain  manner, any detected deviations from applicable federal, state or local  statute or regulation.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a) the Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ NISAN COHEN        |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Nisan Cohen                 |
|   | *Chief   Executive Officer* |
|   | March 22, 2018         |
|   |                        |
|   | /s/ VINCENT FUSCO      |
|   | Vincent Fusco               |
|   | *Chief   Financial Officer* |
|   | March 22, 2018         |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004, (the Report) of The Hillman Companies, Inc. (the Registrant), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, James
P. Waters, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ James P. WatersName:
    James P. WatersDate: August 13, 2004
#### FOSTER, Appellant, v. FOSTER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by George A. Foster against Albert G. Foster and another. R. McMahon, for appellant. H. W. Griffiths, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp. (the Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Nicholson, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
     
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     
     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.Date:
     
     December 22, 2006                                                                                      By:
     
     /s/ Donald NicholsonName: Donald Nicholson  Title: Principal Executive Officer


---
No. 98-40179

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40179

Summary Calendar

 

SHERMAN L. DARNELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIM WEST; MARK TOMBLIN; VICTOR GARZA;

JAVIER PEREZ; DAVID LOPEZ; DAVID BUYERS;

MARCO VARELA; BUCKLEY ATKINSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-94-CV-546

- - - - - - - - - -

December 22, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sherman Darnell, Texas state prisoner # 593265, has appealed

the district court’s order denying his motion for the appointment

of counsel to represent him in his civil rights action. See

Robbins v. Maggio, 750 F.2d 405, 412-13 (5th Cir. 1985). However,

Darnell has failed to brief the only valid appellate issue, whether

the district court’s said ruling constitutes an abuse of 

discretion. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th

Cir. 1980). Darnell “has effectively abandoned his claim by
No. 98-40179

-2-

failing to brief it.” Al-Ra’id v. Ingle, 69 F.3d 28, 33 (5th Cir.

1995). Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### In the Matter of Jacob H. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Appellant; Logann K., Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 353]

Order of fact-finding, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about August 16, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition alleging that respondent mother had neglected the subject children, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the petition reinstated as to those children, findings of derivative neglect entered as to them, and the matter remanded for dispositional hearings.

Family Court found that the mother had used inappropriate and excessive corporal punishment against her oldest son and six-year-old daughter, and had derivatively neglected her youngest daughter. We find that the same evidence supporting those findings demonstrates, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the mother had derivatively neglected the subject children as well *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [i]; *Matter of Ameena C. [Wykisha C.],*83 AD3d 606, 607 [2011]; *Matter of Joseph C. [Anthony C.],*88 AD3d 478, 479 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, *JJ.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral Orion, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J.
Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard J. Townsend
-----------------------------------
Richard J. Townsend
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003

                                       37