alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council will hold a public meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, July 14, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held virtually.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Anna Brown, Office of National Public Liaison, at 202-317-6564 or send an email to                         *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), that a public meeting of the Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council (IRSAC) will be held on Wednesday, July 14, 2021, to discuss topics that may be recommended for inclusion in a future report of the Council. The meeting will take place 3:00-4:00 p.m. EDT.

                    The meeting will be held via Zoom. To register and for meeting link instructions, members of the public may contact Ms. Anna Brown at 202-317-6564 or send an email to                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*                     Attendees are encouraged to join at least 5-10 minutes before the meeting begins.                

                    Time permitting, after the close of this discussion by IRSAC members, interested persons may make oral statements germane to the Council's work. Persons wishing to make oral statements should contact Ms. Anna Brown at                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov*                     and include the written text or outline of comments they propose to make orally. Such comments will be limited to five minutes in length. In addition, any interested person may file a written statement for consideration by the IRSAC by sending it to                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

Dated: June 24, 2021.

John A. Lipold,

Designated Federal Officer, Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council.

[FR Doc. 2021-13835 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*E. Remington *&*Sons, Respondent. In the Matter of Thomas Ringwood et al., Appellants.

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made July 20, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term refusing to admit the claims of the petitioners to be preferred in the order of payment.

*A. M. Mills*for appellants.

*Thomas Richardson*for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion of Follett, J.

All concur except Eabl and O’Bbien, JJ., taking no part.

Order affirmed.
.. 

Muhammed M. Abdullah, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

James C. Duff, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

APR 02 2009 

Clerk, u.s. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

09 0610 

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application 

to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be 

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a 

determination that the complaint, among other grounds, fails to state a claim upon which relief 

can be granted). 

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Salters, South Carolina. 

He seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Director of the Administrative Office of the United 

States Courts ("A.O.") to perform his duty to "investigate the work of the probation officers and 

make recommendations concerning the same to the respective judges[.]" 18 U.S.C. § 3672. This 

Court's mandamus authority extends only to "officer[s] or employee[s] of the United States or 

any agency thereof[.]" 28 U.S.C. § 1361. The mandamus statute "appl[ies] to matters arising in 

the executive branch and its administrative agencies." Seltzer v. Foley, 502 F. Supp. 600, 602 

n.2 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). The A.O. is part of the judicial branch of the federal government. See 28 

U.S.C. § 601 ("Director and a Deputy Director [are] appointed and subject to removal by the 
Chief Justice of the United States, after consulting with the Judicial Conference."). The 

complaint therefore fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A separate Order of 

dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: March ?.3~, 2009 

~{d~~ 

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0556

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

DAWN TAYLOR,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 v. 

JOHN TAYLOR,

 Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Dana Charles Christian, whose name appears next on 

the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals 

which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this October 16, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Kirsten Mull Core, Rebecca Robyn Swandal, Dana Charles Christian

10/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0556
## In **T he**  **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo**  No. 07 - 24 - 00155 - CV BENNY AND KERRICK HORTON D/B/A K & B PROPERTIES , A PPELLANT S V. ASHLEY SMITH , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 223rd District Court Gray County, Texas Trial Court No . 41049 , Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool , Presiding 

### August 13 , 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant s, Benny and Kerrick Horton d/b/a K & B Properties , appeal from the trial court ’ s Order Granting Defendant’s Rule 91(a) Motion to Dismiss . Now pending before this Court is Appellants and Appellee’s “Agreed Motion to Remand to Trial Court.” The motion is granted. Pursuant to the motion, we set aside the Order Granting Defendant’s Rule 91(a) Motion to Dismiss without regard to the merits, remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings , and dismiss the appeal . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1 (a)(2). As2 requested by the parties, costs shall be taxed against the parties who incurred them. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(d). Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Denis A.  Krusos,  the  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer  of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31,
          2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                         /s/ Denis A. Krusos
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Denis A. Krusos
                                         Chairman of the Board and
September 9, 2005                        Chief Executive Officer
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 6, 2014

No. 04-12-00739-CR

Jose Guadalupe MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-1132-DR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. The supplemental brief is due May 13, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Javier CERON-GOMEZ, a.k.a. Raul Gomez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 09-10029, 09-10031.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*469Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 1, 2011.

Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., USTU — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Enrique Rene Gonzales, Rio Rico, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Francisco Javier Ceron-Gomez appeals from (1) his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and (2) the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence of imprisonment. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ceron-Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB-A2 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we, Nicole Leigh van Coller, President, and Christopher R. Ebersole, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated: 7-11-07                         /s/Nicole Leigh van Coller ----------                       -------------------------- Nicole Leigh van Coller President  Dated: 7-11-07                        /s/Christopher R. Ebersole ----------                       -------------------------- Christopher R. Ebersole CFO
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 31019 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CESAR ALEJANDRO SORIANO, also known as Cesar Soriano, also known as Cesar Alejandro , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13

- CR

- 127

- 7

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Cesar Alejandro Soriano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soriano h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 1 8 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-31019 Document: 00513158517 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015No. 14

- 31019

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordi ngly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-31019 Document: 00513158517 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6449

JAMES GREGORY ARMISTEAD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JENNIE BOWEN; TIMOTHY WARE; ROGER SHACKLEFORD; MOSE DORSEY; SETH EDWARDS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:17

- ct

- 03281

- BO )

Submitted : August 10, 2018 Decided: August 31, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James G. Armistead, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Gregory Armistead appeals the district court’s order dismissing hi s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason s stated by the district court. See Armistead v. Bowen , No. 5:17

- ct

- 03281

- BO (E.D. N.C. Apr. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 10-2301

UNITED STATES, ex rel. Kenneth James Jones,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

PRISCILLA PITT JONES and KENNETH JAMES JONES,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, et al.,

Defendants, Appellees,

HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, et al.,

Defendants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court issued on May 7, 2012, is amended

as follows:

On page 4, replace the text of footnote 2 so that it reads,

"Both BWH and MGH were parties to the original grant. BWH and

MGH are sister hospitals under the same parent institution. 

Albert and Killiany were both affiliated with MGH."

On page 31, line 17, insert a closing quotation mark after

the comma that follows the word "raters."
Exhibit 13.2


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Torm A/S (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland M. Andersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: June 21, 2013











/s/ Roland M. Andersen


Roland M. Andersen


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                               Fiscal Years Ended
                                                   --------------------------------------------
                                                     August 31,     August 25,       August 28,
                                                       2002            2001            2000
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
                                                                   (As Restated)

<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income (loss) before income taxes              $     (1,063)   $     (3,929)   $        106


Fixed charges:(1)
   Interest charges                                      26,026          22,846          15,691
   Interest portion of lease expense                        833             735             309
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
Total fixed charges                                      26,859          23,581          16,000

Net income from operations before
   income taxes and fixed charges                  $     25,796    $     19,652    $     16,106
                                                   ============    ============    ============
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)                        --              --             1.0x
</Table>

(1) During the periods presented the Company had no preferred stock outstanding
that required a cash payment. Therefore, the ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preference dividends was the same as the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges for each of the periods presented.

(2) For purposes of computing this ratio, earnings consist of income (loss}
before taxes on income and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest
expense, amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and the portion of rental
expense that includes an interest factor. For the fiscal years ended August 31,
2002 and August 25, 2001, earnings before fixed charges were insufficient to
cover fixed charges by approximately $1.1 million and $3.9 mullion,
respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,372)
<INVENTORY>                                     41,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,315
<PP&E>                                          49,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,224)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,954
<BONDS>                                        273,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,081
<SALES>                                        232,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,973
<CGS>                                          148,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,145
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50961

Summary Calendar

KENNETH W. HICKMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEP’T OF CRIM. JUSTICE,

INST’L DIV.; SHERRY A. McDOUGLE;

JANIE MUNIZ; COREY HARRIS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(W-96-CV-210)

August 7, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kenneth W. Hickman, a Texas state prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint

and requested leave to pr oceed i n forma pauperis

. The district court ordered1 Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); McCullough v. Lynaugh , 835 F.2d 1126 (5th Cir. 1988).

2 Hickman to pay an initial partial filing fee of $6.00. Hickman sought an extension

of time withi n which to pay the fee and the district court extended same until

October 17, 1996. The district court subsequently dismissed the complaint on the

grounds that the initial partial filing fee had not been paid. Hickman moved for

reinstatement, contending that he had paid the $6.00 fee, attaching to hi s motion

a trust fund account statement and a date-stamped letter reflecting that a $6.00

payment had been made to the clerk of t h e district court during August 1996.

Hickman gave notice of his appeal. The district court then denied the motion for

reinstatement because of the appeal.

Although a district court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to

comply with any court order, if the action is dismissed for failure to pay the initial

partial filing fee when in fact the fee has been paid, the dismissal constitutes an

abuse of the district court’s discretion. 1 The docket sheet does not reflect that the

initial partial filing fee has been paid, but the documents submitted by Hickman in

his motion for reinstatement do. We therefore must VACATE the district court’s

order of dismissal and REMAND for determination of the actual fac t s and such

further proceedings as are found appropriate.

VACATED and REMANDED.