alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Archives
                        Presentations
                                    World Dairy Expo
                                    Newsletters and Research Summaries
                    Resources
                        General Resources
                                    Books
                                    Teacher's Resources
                                    New Research Dairy Updates
                                    Integrated Research at USDFRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Updates/Newslettersheadline bar 2017Winter
               2016autumn
               2016summer
               2016spring
               2016winter


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(ii)        the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  June 16, 2006

| /s/ Tony D. Maher       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Tony D. Maher           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit  99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Microwave Filter Company, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl F.
Fahrenkrug, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


/s/Carl F. Fahrenkrug

Carl F. Fahrenkrug
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002


Exhibit  99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Microwave Filter Company, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard
L. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


/s/Richard L. Jones

Richard L. Jones
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
#### In re: Bryant R. FILTER, Petitioner.

No. 11-2171.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. June 16, 2011.

Filed: July 7, 2011.

*118Bryant R. Filter,. Milan FCI, Milan, pro se.

Before: BARRY, FISHER and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Bryant Filter, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks to challenge his sentence via a petition for a writ of mandamus. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.

I.

In February 2010, the District Court sentenced Filter to 135 months’ imprisonment and five years of supervised release following his pleading guilty to multiple counts of fraud in two cases. In both of those cases, there was a written plea agreement that included a provision explicitly waiving his right to file a direct appeal1 or collaterally attack his conviction or sentence. Despite this provision, Filter appealed from the District Court’s judgment of sentence. The Government subsequently moved this Court to enforce the appellate waiver and summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment. In June 2010, we granted the Government’s motion. *See*C.A. No. 10-1897.

Shortly thereafter, Filter moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Government then moved to dismiss the § 2255 motion in light of the collateral waiver provision in the plea agreements. In October 2010, the District Court concluded that Filter had knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to collaterally attack his sentence, and that enforcing the collateral waiver would not work a miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, the court denied Filter’s § 2255 motion, and we subsequently declined to issue a certificate of appealability. *See*C.A. No. 10-4691.

Filter now once again seeks to challenge his sentence, this time via a mandamus petition.

II.

A writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy available only in extraordinary situations. *See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig.,*418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir.2005). To obtain mandamus relief, a petitioner must establish that “(1) no other adequate means exist to attain the relief he desires, (2) the party’s right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable, and (3) the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” *Hollingsworth v. Perry,*— U.S. -, -, 130 S.Ct. 705, 710, 175 L.Ed.2d 657 (2010) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Filter has not made this showing here. Mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal, *Madden v. Myers,*102 F.3d 74, 77 (3d Cir.1996), and Filter cannot use a mandamus petition as a means of circumventing the appellate waiver provision in his plea agreements — a provision *119that he agreed to knowingly and voluntarily. Accordingly, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

1

. Although there were a few narrow exceptions to the appellate waiver, none of those exceptions was implicated in this case.
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement    No. 333-91700    on    Form S-8    of our report on the financial statements and financial    statement schedule of Aeropostale, Inc. and its subsidiaries    (the “Company”) dated April 2, 2007, which    expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory    paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement    of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),    *Share-Based Payment*, as revised, effective    January 29, 2006, and the Company’s adoption of    Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,    *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and    Other Postretirement Plans*, relating to the recognition and    related disclosure provisions, effective February 3, 2007    and our report dated April 2, 2007, relating to    management’s report on the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual    Report on    Form 10-K    of Aéropostale, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year    ended February 3, 2007.      /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP     New York, New York    April 2, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3716 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3716

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include vaccines against 
     seasonal influenza within the definition of taxable vaccines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 2, 2013

 Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include vaccines against 
     seasonal influenza within the definition of taxable vaccines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF VACCINES AGAINST SEASONAL INFLUENZA TO LIST OF 
              TAXABLE VACCINES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (N) of section 4132(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``or any other 
vaccine against seasonal influenza'' before the period.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by this section shall 
        apply to sales and uses on or after the later of--
                    (A) the first day of the first month which begins 
                more than 4 weeks after the date of the enactment of 
                this Act, or
                    (B) the date on which the Secretary of Health and 
                Human Services lists any vaccine against seasonal 
                influenza (other than any vaccine against seasonal 
                influenza listed by the Secretary prior to the date of 
                the enactment of this Act) for purposes of compensation 
                for any vaccine-related injury or death through the 
                Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 
        4131 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales 
        on or before the effective date described in such paragraph for 
        which delivery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 
        be considered the sale date.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 20785 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MARIO DELGADO CRUZ, also known as Mario Delgado, also known as Mario Cruz Delgado, also known as Daniel Delgado, also known as Mario Cruz

Delgado , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 168

- 1

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mario Delgado Cruz appealed following his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He asserted that that the district court reversibly erred by convicting, sentencing, and entering judgment against him under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based upon its determination that his prior Texas

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-20785 Document: 00514665992 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2018No. 16

- 20785

2 conviction for burglary of a habitation qualified as a crime of violence under
18 U.S.C. § 16(b) and , therefore , an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). This court affirmed in United States v. Cruz , 692 F. App’x 187, 18 7

- 88 (5th Cir. 2017). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded for fu r ther consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya , 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018)

. In Dimaya , 138 S. Ct. at 1210 , 1223 , the Supreme Court invalidated the § 16(b) crime of vi olence definitio n as unconstitutionally vague. At our request, Cruz and the Government submitted supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of Dimaya

. They agree that in light of Dimaya ’s invalidation of § 16(b), Cruz’s prior Texas conviction for b urglary of a habitation does not constitute an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Godoy , 890 F.3d 531, 536

- 42 (5th Cir. 2018). As a result, the judgment erroneously reflects that Cruz was sentenced as an aggravated felon under §1326(b)(2). See id. at 542. Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting t he judgment to reflect that the statutory sentencing provision is § 1326(b)(1), not § 1326(b)(2), and for deletion of the incorrect description of the offense as “[i]llegal re

- entry by a previously deported alien after an aggravated felony conviction.” In all other respects, the judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-20785 Document: 00514665992 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/02/2018
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40195 c/w

No. 11-40199

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PABLO DAVILA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-945-1

USDC No. 2:10-CR-943-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this consolidated appeal, Pablo Davila appeals his sentences for two

counts of conspiracy to transport an unlawful alien within the United States in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(1)(A)(v)(I), and (a)(1)(B)(i). He was

sentenced to 46 months for each offense with 12 months of the sentence in S.D.

Tex. 2:10-CR-945 (5th Cir. 11-40195)to run consecutively to the sentence in S.D.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 29, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 11-40195 c/w

11-40199

2

Tex. 2:10-CR-943 (5th Cir. 11-40199) for a total sentence of 58 months of

imprisonment and three years of supervised release for each offense. He

contends that the district court’s reasons for departing were inadequate and the

departure was unreasonable.

Davila’s arguments pertain only to the sentence imposed in S.D.Tex. 2:10-

CR-945 (5th Cir. 11-40195). That sentence was an upward variance from the

Guidelines and not an upward departure within the framework of the

Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2(c), comment. (n.1(B)); United States v. Jacobs,

635 F.3d 778, 782 (5th Cir. 2011). Davila has failed to show any error, plain or

otherwise, in the adequacy of the district court’s reasons for varying from the

Guidelines or the substantive reasonableness ofthe sentence. See United States

v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806-07 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Smith,

440 F.3d 704, 708-10 (5th Cir. 2006). 

The judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Henry P. Herms,  the Vice  President - Finance  and Chief  Financial  Officer of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Company's  Form 10-Q  Quarterly  Report for the period ended April
          30,  2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            /s/ Henry P. Herms
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Henry P. Herms
                                            Vice President - Finance and
June 9, 2005                                Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 130 (Monday, July 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Motor function in healthy and clinical 
populations.
    Date: August 3, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maribeth Champoux, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3170, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-3163, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204348414d504f554d604353520e4e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e4d464f435e415b436e4d5d5c0040474600494158">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 6, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-14697 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 to 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 dated
May 3, 2012 
 by and among 

AXIS Specialty U.S. Services, Inc. (the “Company”), 

AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (“Holdings”) 

and 
 Albert A. Benchimol (the
“Executive”) 
 Dated March 9, 2015 

WHEREAS, the Company, Holdings and the Executive entered into an employment agreement dated as of May 3, 2012 (the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Holdings, the Company and the Executive have determined that it is in the best interests of
the Company, Holdings and their shareholders to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of service thereof; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is
hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3a of the Agreement (Employment Term) is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “on May 3, 2015” in the first line thereof and replacing such reference with “upon the earlier of
(i) the Closing, as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of January 25, 2015, by and among PartnerRe Ltd. and Holdings, as may be amended from time to time (the “Amalgamation Agreement”), or (ii) the
End Date, as defined in the Amalgamation Agreement”. 

  

	 	2.	Section 3a(vi) of the Agreement (Good Reason) is hereby amended by deleting “at least six (6) months before the end of the Employment Term” in clause (i)(F) thereof and replacing it with “,
prior to July 25, 2015,”. 

  

	 	3.	Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


[signatures on following page] 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of March 9, 2015. 

 

			
	AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:		 /s/ Noreen McMullan

	Name:		Noreen McMullan
	Title:		Executive Vice President
	
	AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
		
	By:		 /s/ Joseph Henry

	Name:		Joseph Henry
	Title:		Executive Vice President and
			Chief Financial Officer


 Accepted and Agreed 
 as of
the date first set forth above: 
  

	
	 /s/ Albert A. Benchimol

	Albert A. Benchimol


  
 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Amincor,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2012 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on April 17, 2013 (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: April 17, 2013        /s/ Joseph F. Ingrassia
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Joseph F. Ingrassia, Interim Chief Financial Officer