alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  OF PACIFIC ENERGY GP, INC.  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 that is being filed concurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of Pacific Energy GP, Inc., the general partner of
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") hereby certifies that:

| |  | /s/IRVIN TOOLE, JR.Irvin Toole, Jr.
March 12, 2004
| |  | --------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and will be retained by Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 655 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 47
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 655

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ``Spencer Byrd 
                       Powers, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2011

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                              May 12, 2011

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ``Spencer Byrd 
                       Powers, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPENCER BYRD POWERS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Spencer 
Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office''.
                                                        Calendar No. 47

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 655

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ``Spencer Byrd 
                       Powers, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 12, 2011

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### THERESA PUZIO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CIRO PUZIO, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Louis Santorf*for the petitioner.

*Mr. J. Mortimer Rubinstein*for the respondent.

May 16, 1960.

Denied.
#### Roselyne Gisors, Appellant, v New York City Department of Education for City School District Region 10, et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 108]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered July 22, 2010, denying the petition to vacate an arbitration award dated November 14, 2008, and granting respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a and CPLR 7511, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award was made in accord with due process, is supported by adequate evidence, is rational and is not arbitrary and capricious *(see Lackow v Department of Educ. [or “Board”] of City of N.Y.,*51 AD3d 563, 567 [2008]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, hearsay evidence can be the basis of an administrative determination *(Matter of Gray v Adduci,*73 NY2d 741, 742 [1988]), and each of the specifications upheld by the hearing officer was supported by testimony of witnesses having personal knowledge of the material facts or hearsay evidence that substantiated the basis for the charges. The hearing officer’s credibility findings are entitled to deference *(see Matter of D’Augusta v Bratton,*259 AD2d 287, 288 [1999]), and there is no basis upon which to disturb those findings.

Petitioner’s arguments to vacate or modify the determination *(see*CPLR 7511 [b]), including that the hearing officer was biased and exceeded her authority in reaching a determination without affording petitioner due process, are refuted by the record. Petitioner was afforded every opportunity to present a defense and she acknowledges intentionally attempting to stonewall the proceedings by not appearing for and/or not participating on many of the hearing dates. Petitioner’s argument that the findings of the hearing officer were predetermined *585is conclusory and otherwise undermined by the evidence which supports the findings. Moreover, petitioner failed to meet her burden of showing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the hearing officer was partial in her consideration of the evidence and ultimate determination (see *Matter of Infosafe Sys. [International Dev. Partners],*228 AD2d 272, 272-273 [1996]).

The penalty of six months’ suspension, without pay, was neither shocking to our sense of fairness nor disproportionate to the multiple offenses (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 232-233 [1974]), given that petitioner’s actions tended to undermine the credibility of the academy’s grading system, involved repeated tampering with multiple school records, and circumvented the authority of the school. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. JA C IN T O L O P E Z -B A R B A , a. k. a. G uadal up e H ernand ez -B arba, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 07- 10258 D . C . N o . C R - 0 6 - 0 0 9 6 8 - J MR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J ohn M . R ol l , C hi e f

Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a c in to L o p e z - B a rb aap p e a ls f r o m 7 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is g u i l ty - p l e ac o n v i c t i o n f o ri l l e g a l r e - e n trya f

t e rd e p o rt a t i o n , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1326( a ) . P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ), L o p ez -B arb a’s 

# FI LED MA R 08 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 10258 2 c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appe l l a ntw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. W e d is m is s in lig h t o f

th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . See U ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 235 F . 3d 11 79 , 11 82 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. DI S MI S S E D.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hamish Malkin, Chief Financial Officer of Argentex Mining
Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Argentex Mining
      Corporation for the year ended January 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Argentex Mining Corporation.                                                                 

Dated: June 2, 2009

| | /s/
      Hamish Malkin                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Hamish Malkin                                                       
| | Chief Financial Officer                                             
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Argentex Mining Corporation                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Town Sports International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(Section Mark)1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section Mark)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ ROBERT GIARDINA
Town Sports International, Inc.
Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2003
1 The Hon. David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri, sitting by agreement of the parties under 28 U.S.C. §636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-3545EM

_____________ Judy Cohn, * * Appellant, * * v. * On Appeal from the United * States District Court for * the Eastern District of Missouri Department of Mental Health, * Missouri. Division of Comprehensive Psychiatric * Services, Great Rivers Mental Health * [Not to be published] Services, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 11, 1999 Filed: March 24, 1999

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. This is an action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §12101 etseq . The District Court 1 granted the defendant's motion for summary2–

judgment. The Court held, among other things, that no genuine issue of fact had been presented with respect to whether defendant realized that plaintiff was disabled, or whether plaintiff had ever requested an accommodation. Having read the briefs and heard oral argument, we affirm. We do not believe that the case has enough precedential significance to justify a full opinion. We agree with the result reached by the District Court and with much of that Court's reasoning. The motion of appellee to strike appellant's addendum is denied. Affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period
ending December 31, 2002, of Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John L. Harrison, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) certify (i) that the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ John L. Harrison
                                         --------------------------
                                         John L. Harrison
                                         Senior Vice President,
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

                                         May 15, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. and will be retained by Cedar Brakes II,
L.L.C. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-862]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Aspen API, Inc. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 9, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before August 9, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All request for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on May 5, 2021, Aspen API, Inc., 2136 Wolf Road, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018, applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleRemifentanil
9739
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substance as a bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for distribution to manufacturers of finished dosage prescription drugs. No other activity for these drug codes is authorized for this registration. Approval of permit applications will occur only when the registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import of the Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-14530 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### In the Matter of Sherri L. Pape-Becker, Petitioner, v Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Respondent.

Main, J.

Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 29, 1982, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on sex.

Petitioner’s complaint with the State Division of Human Rights charged respondent, for whom she worked as an agent-trainee pursuant to a contract of employment, with sex discrimination. Her complaint was dismissed upon a finding of no probable cause following an investigation by the Division. Petitioner now challenges, *inter alia,*the adequacy of the investigation.

*428Where determinations of no probable cause were based on investigations which were one-sided and abbreviated, either for failure to hold a confrontation conference or to examine witnesses crucial to the complainant’s case, the determinations have been annulled *(Matter of Gregory v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*64 AD2d 775, 776; *see, Wolchok v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*83 AD2d 850). In this case, the Division’s determination was based on petitioner’s verified petition, a letter from respondent’s attorney and petitioner’s written response to that letter. Petitioner was not interviewed in person and the witnesses to whom she alluded in her written materials were apparently never questioned. Respondent’s attorney did not have firsthand knowledge of the facts and the information submitted by him in his written material should not have been relied upon *(Matter of Gregory v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., supra,*p 777). There was evidently no contact with any supervisory or personnel officer employed by respondent who might have had firsthand knowledge of petitioner’s situation *(cf. Matter of Tirino v Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Center,*99 AD2d 513). Furthermore, certain statistical data showing a significantly lower success rate for women than for men was apparently disregarded by the investigator *(see, Steins v State Div. of Human Rights,*86 AD2d 795, 795-796, *appeal dismissed*56 NY2d 805). Considering investigations which have been adequate *(see, e. g., Mathis v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation,*109 AD2d 931; *Matter of Tirino v Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Center, supra; Matter of Jochnowitz v Junior Coll.,*96 AD2d 1131, *lv denied*60 NY2d 559; *Matter of Taber v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*64 AD2d 990) and the abbreviated, one-sided investigation in this case, we are of the view that the determination must be annulled and the matter remitted for further investigation so that there can be a proper determination as to whether probable cause exists. We express no view on this issue.

Determination annulled, with costs, and matter remitted to the State Division of Human Rights for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 48 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 48

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
  of pharmacists in National Health Services Corps programs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

   Mr. Inouye (for himself, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Begich) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
  of pharmacists in National Health Services Corps programs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pharmacist Student Loan Repayment 
Eligibility Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPATION OF PHARMACISTS IN 
              LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) National Health Service Corps.--Section 331(b) of the Public 
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``nursing and other 
        schools of the health professions,'' and inserting ``nursing, 
        pharmacy, and other schools of the health professions,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and physician 
        assistants who have an interest and a commitment to providing 
        primary health care,'' and inserting ``physician assistants, 
        and pharmacists who have an interest and commitment to 
        providing primary health care,''.
    (b) National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program.--Section 
338B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``and physician 
        assistants'' and inserting ``physician assistants, and 
        pharmacists''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``dentistry, 
                or another health profession,'' and inserting 
                ``dentistry, pharmacy, or another health profession,''; 
                and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking 
                ``dentistry, or other health profession'' and inserting 
                ``dentistry, pharmacy, or other health profession''.
    (c) Corps Personnel.--Section 333(e) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 254f(e)) is amended by striking ``dentistry, or any 
other health profession'' and inserting ``dentistry, pharmacy, or any 
other health profession''.
                                 <all>
```