alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Eastern Regional Research Center: Wyndmoor, PA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About ERRC
                        Greetings from the Director
                                    Directions/Lodging
                                    History and Accomplishments
                    Our Work
                        Biomass Pyrolysis Research
                                    IPMP 2013
                                    IPMP Dynamic Prediction
                                    IPMP Global Fit
                                    Pathogen Modeling Program (PMP)
                                    Predictive Microbiology Information Portal (PMIP)
                                    PoultryFARMSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Engineering SUPER Support Groupheadline bar Main
               Pilot Plant Facilities and Equipment for Production Runs and Scale-Up of Official USDA Projects
               Equipment Design and Development
               Process and Cost Simulation
               Dry Grind Production of Ethanol from Corn
               Corn Wet Milling Models
               Biodiesel Production Models
               Analytical Laboratory


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Michael T. Kennedy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies
that:



The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the
period ended June 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|Dated: August 6, 2003 |  | 
|                      |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WACHOVIA         
SECURITIES	
8739 Research Drive

Charlotte, NC 28288
**Commercial Loan Servicing

 

Management's Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Wachovia Bank National Association    (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single**Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (USAP), except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank                        had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200       million and $20 million, respectively.

 

 
*John M. Church					March 10, 2003
                  John M. Church					Date

Managing Director/ Senior Vice President

  Wachovia Bank National Association

 

 
*Timothy S. Ryan					March 10, 2003
                Timothy S. Ryan					Date

           Director/Vice President

  Wachovia Bank National Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wachovia Services is the trade name under which Wachovia Corporation conducts its investment banking, capital markets and institutional securities business 

Through First Union Securities, Inc. ("FUSI"), member NYSE, NASD, SIPC and through other bank and non bank and broker dealer subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation,

Including Wachovia Bank, N.A. and First Union National Bank.****
#### HUBBARD, Respondent, v. BROWN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Elbert G. Hubbard against Frank H. Brown and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order confirming the referee’s report vacated for irregularity, without cost's to either party.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7085

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RONNIE RAY NEWTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-91-180-N, CA-96-429-2)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Ray Newton, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Newton, No. CR-91-180-N; CA-96-429-2

(E.D. Va. June 18, 1996). Appellant's motion to place this case in

abeyance is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,676,209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,676,209
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,247,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     619,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,247,038
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,881
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               279,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (219,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (219,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (219,506)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000916 09-DEC-2015 08:06 AM
#### In the Matter of Darrell McKinney, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 696]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing, among other things, Uniform Commercial Code or “Redemptive Process” materials* after a document he submitted for typing was confiscated as a suspected redemptive document. *1326Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charge. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting the commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony and documentary evidence, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Mullady v Bezio,*87 AD3d 765, 766 [2011]; *Matter of Bunting v Fischer,*85 AD3d 1473, 1474 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 712 [2011]). To the extent that petitioner argues that the confiscated document does not fit within the scope of the applicable rule *(see*7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xx]), a Senior Attorney with the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision testified that the document violated the rule *(see Matter of Bunting v Fischer,*85 AD3d at 1474), thereby creating a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Pettus v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*73 AD3d 1411, 1411 [2010]).

Petitioner’s various procedural arguments have been examined and found to be without merit. We find no error in the Hearing Officer’s removal of petitioner from the hearing given his argumentative and disruptive behavior *(see Matter of Jackson v Fischer,*67 AD3d 1207, 1208 [2009]). Nor do we find any “indication that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias” *(Matter of Dawes v Venettozzi,*87 AD3d 1219, 1220 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 803 [2012]). As for petitioner’s contention that the subject rule is unconstitutional, this claim is not properly before us inasmuch as “it must first be raised in the context of the prison grievance procedure” *(Matter of Samuels v Department of Correctional Servs. Staff,*84 AD3d 1629, 1630 [2011]).

Peters, PJ., Rose, Lahtinen, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 According to respondent, the “Redemptive Process” refers to a scheme by certain inmates involving, among other things, the use of Uniform Commercial Code forms to file baseless liens in order to harass government employees and officials.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Links
                        USDA Main Page
                                    ARS Main PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles  New Discovery Speeds Scientists’ Push for HLB-Tolerant CitrusFeb 28, 2024


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00492-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.B.F. and Z.A.R., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-02954

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother because she is indigent. 

SIGNED January 7, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Gilligan, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 859]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), dated August 26, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Pettigrew,*14 NY3d 406 [2010]; *People v Mingo,*12 NY3d 563 [2009]; *People v Leeks,*43 AD3d 1251, 1252 [2007]). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was improperly assessed certain points under the Risk Assessment Instrument, or that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation *(see People v Wyatt,*89 AD3d 112 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 803 [2012]; *People v Mabee,*69 AD3d 820 [2010]; *People v Williams,*34 AD3d 662 [2006]; *People v Lombard,*30 AD3d 573, 574 [2006]; *see also People v Vaughn,*26 AD3d 776 [2006]). Florio, J.P., Lott, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
| 1. | The amount of the Loan: RMB Sixty million (RMB 60,000,000.00); |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The term of the loan agreement: From July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | The type of the Loan: short-term loan; |
|----|----------------------------------------|

| 4. | The interest rate is the same as benchmark interest rate of the people’s bank of china in July 1 (5.31%APR); |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The Lender approves that the Borrower can pay off the loan before December 31, 2010 without any default interest.   The Borrower only needs to pay the interest during the period of July 1, 2010 to the day paying off the loan. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| The Lender:                                                 |   | The Borrower:                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Tianjin Tianshi Biological  Engineering Co., Ltd. |   | Tianjin Tiens Life Resources Co., Ltd. |
|                                                        |   |                                   |
| By: /s/ Jinyuan Li                                          |   | By: /s/ Baolan Li                      |
| Jinyuan Li                                                  |   | Baolan Li                              |
| Title: Legal Representative                                 |   | Title: Legal Representative            |
| August 24, 2010                                             |   | August 24, 2010                        |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40510 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHRISTIAN ALFREDO PRADO-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-766-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Christian Alfredo Prado-Vasquez appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by attempting to enter the United States without permission after deportation. He argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the 46-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencingNo. 06-40510 -2- factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. Prado-Vasquez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). PradoVasquez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 417 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 417

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the Secretary of 
       the Navy certain Federal land in Churchill County, Nevada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2011

  Mr. Ensign introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the Secretary of 
       the Navy certain Federal land in Churchill County, Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Churchill County Land Transfer 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LAND.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to 
the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration, the Federal land 
described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Federal Land.--The Federal land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres of land under 
the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior that--
            (1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill 
        County, Nevada; and
            (2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV-943-
        4214-10; N-37875).
    (c) Management.--On transfer of the Federal land described under 
subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall have full jurisdiction, custody, and control of the Federal land.
                                 <all>
```