Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices 35733 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

47731, 47734 (August 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 2See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

March 25, 2021. 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM (CACFP)—Continued 

[Per meal rates in whole or fractions of U.S. dollars; effective from July 1, 2021–June 30, 2022] 

Centers Breakfast Lunch and 

supper 1 Supplement 

FREE .................................................................................................................................... 1.97 3.66 1.00 

ALASKA: 

PAID ..................................................................................................................................... 0.50 0.57 0.14 

REDUCED PRICE ................................................................................................................ 2.85 5.54 0.81 

FREE .................................................................................................................................... 3.15 5.94 1.63 

HAWAII: 

PAID ..................................................................................................................................... 0.38 0.41 0.10 

REDUCED PRICE ................................................................................................................ 1.99 3.88 0.58 

FREE .................................................................................................................................... 2.29 4.28 1.17 

Day care homes 

Breakfast Lunch and supper Supplement 

Tier I Tier II Tier I Tier II Tier I Tier II 

CONTIGUOUS STATES .......................... 1.40 0.51 2.63 1.59 0.78 0.21 

ALASKA ................................................... 2.23 0.79 4.26 2.57 1.27 0.35 

HAWAII .................................................... 1.63 0.58 3.08 1.86 0.91 0.25 

Administrative reimbursement rates for sponsoring 

organizations of day care homes 

(per home/per month rates in U.S. dollars) 

Initial 50 Next 150 Next 800 Each 

additional 

CONTINGUOUS STATES ............................................................................... 126 96 75 66 

ALASKA ........................................................................................................... 204 155 121 107 

HAWAII ............................................................................................................ 147 112 88 77

1These rates do not include the value of USDA Foods or cash-in-lieu of USDA Foods which institutions receive as additional assistance for 

each CACFP lunch or supper served to participants. A notice announcing the value of USDA Foods and cash-in-lieu of USDA Foods is published separately in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a rule as defined by 

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 

601–612) and thus is exempt from the 

provisions of that Act. This notice has 

been determined to be exempt under 

Executive Order 12866. 

CACFP is listed in the Catalog of 

Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 

10.558 and is subject to the provisions 

of Executive Order 12372, which 

requires intergovernmental consultation 

with State and local officials. (See 2 CFR 

415.3–415.6). 

This notice imposes no new reporting 

or recordkeeping provisions that are 

subject to OMB review in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3518). 

Authority: Sections 4(b)(2), 11a, 17(c) and 

17(f)(3)(B) of the Richard B. Russell National 

School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1753(b)(2), 

1759a, 1766(f)(3)(B)) and section 4(b)(1)(B) of 

the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 

1773(b)(1)(B)). 

Cynthia Long, 

Acting Administrator, USDA Food and 

Nutrition Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14435 Filed 7–6–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–883] 

Glycine From India: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

producers or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review 

October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Preston Cox or Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5041 or (202) 482–5760, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2020, Commerce 

initiated the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on glycine 

from India.1 On March 25, 2021, 

Commerce extended the time limit for 

these preliminary results to June 30, 

2021, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).2

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is glycine. For a complete description of 

the scope of this administrative review, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.3

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Act. Export price and constructed 

export price are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35734 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices 

4See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 9 for 

more details. 

5See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020) 

(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs 

via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date 

for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs 

are filed (while these modifications remain in 

effect).’’) 

6See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

7See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

8See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

9See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

10 Id. at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

11See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

12See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

conclusions, see Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Rates for Non-Selected Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. For the 

respondents that were not selected for 

individual examination in this 

administrative review, we have assigned 

to them the simple average of the 

margins for Avid Organics Private 

Limited and Kumar Industries/Rudraa 

International, consistent with the 

guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) of the 

Act.4

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020. 

Producer/exporter 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Avid Organics Private Limited ............... 0.00 

Kumar Industries/Rudraa International 13.61 

Mulji Mehta Enterprises ........................ 6.81 

Mulji Mehta Pharma .............................. 6.81 

Paras Intermediates Private Ltd ........... 6.81 

Studio Disrupt ........................................ 6.81 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this 

administrative review within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.5 Commerce has modified certain 

of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information until further 

notice.6 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.7

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

The party’s name, address and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. If a request for a 

hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. An electronically filed 

hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.8

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any written briefs, 

no later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, unless 

extended, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for Avid 

Organics Private Limited or Kumar 

Industries/Rudraa International is not 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of this review, we will calculate, for 

each company, an importer-specific 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of such 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).9 If any of these 

companies’ weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis in the final 

results of review, or if an importerspecific assessment rate for one of these 

companies is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regards to 

antidumping duties.10 For entries of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review produced by any of these 

companies for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries.11

Consistent with its recent notice,12

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). The final results of this 

administrative review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise under 

review and for future cash deposits of 

estimated antidumping duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of glycine from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices 35735 

13See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended 

Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171 

(June 21, 2019). 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19, 

2018) (Order). 

2See Petitioners’ Letter ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Order on Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China—Petitioners’ Request for 2019/ 

2020 Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2020 

(Petitioners’ Review Request); Valeo’s Letter 

‘‘Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of 

China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

April 30, 2020 (Valeo’s Review Request); Xiashun’s 

Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic 

of China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated April 30, 2020 (Xiashun’s Review Request); 

Dingsheng Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China (C–570–054),’’ dated April 30, 

2020 (Dingsheng Companies’ Review Request); and 

Zhongji Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Aluminum 

Foil from the Peoples Republic of China: Request 

for Second Administrative Review,’’ (Zhongji 

Companies’ Review Request). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

35068 (June 8, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

5The petitioners withdrew their requests for 

review of all companies for which they had 

requested a review, except those companies covered 

by other parties’ review requests. See Petitioners’ 

Letter, ‘‘2nd Administrative Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Aluminum 

Foil from the People’s Republic of China— 

Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Certain Requests for 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated September 8, 2020 

(Petitioner’s Withdrawal of Review Requests). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum Foil 

from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated February 

26, 2021. 

7See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

rate for companies subject to this review 

will be equal to the company-specific 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

a company not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will be 7.23 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation, adjusted for the 

export-subsidy rate in the companion 

countervailing duty investigation.13

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221. 

Dated: June 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Affiliation and Collapsing 

V. Application of Facts Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VI. Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Currency Conversion 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14450 Filed 7–6–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–054] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that producers and exporters of certain 

aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

received countervailable subsidies 

during the period of review (POR), 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tyler Weinhold, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1121. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 19, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

countervailing duty order on aluminum 

foil from China.1 On April 1, 2020, 

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register a notice inviting interested 

parties to request a review of the Order 

for the POR. On April 30, 2020, we 

received timely review requests for 33 

companies.2 On June 8, 2020, 

Commerce published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the Order, covering the requested 

companies.3 On July 21, 2020, 

Commerce tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by 60 days, 

thereby extending the deadline for the 

preliminary results until March 1, 

2021.4 As explained below, on 

September 8, 2020, the Aluminum 

Association Trade Enforcement Working 

Group (the petitioners) withdrew their 

review requests with respect to certain 

companies.5 On February 26, 2021, 

Commerce fully extended the deadline 

for these preliminary results until June 

29, 2021.6

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

aluminum foil from China. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES