EXHIBIT 10.23












AMENDED SETTLEMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT







This AMENDED SETTLEMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT (together with all Exhibits attached hereto, the “Agreement”), is made and entered into as of the date last executed by a Party (“Amendment Effective Date”) and amends and restates that certain Settlement and License Agreement dated May 14, 2010, by and among Microsoft Corporation, a Washington corporation (Microsoft Corporation together with its Affiliates, “Microsoft” as defined below), on the one hand, and VirnetX, Inc., a Delaware corporation (VirnetX, Inc. together with its Affiliates, “VirnetX” (as defined below), on the other hand.  As used herein, “Party” refers to any of VirnetX or Microsoft individually, and “Parties” refers to VirnetX and Microsoft, collectively.







RECITALS








		A.	SAIC and VirnetX, Inc. have accused Microsoft of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 B1; 7,188,180 B2; 7,490,151 B2; 7,987,274 B2; 7,418,504 B2; and 7,921,211 B2 (the “Patents-In-Suit”) in actions filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“the Court”), designated Civ. Action No. 6:07CV80 (LED), Civ. Action No. 6:10CV94 (LED) and Civ. Action No. 6:13CV351 (the “Actions”).











		B.	Microsoft Corporation has denied any such infringement of the Patents-in-Suit and challenged the validity thereof.  Microsoft has also challenged the enforceability of the Patents-in-Suit and raised other defenses.











		C.	Microsoft admits no liability with respect to any of the claims asserted in the Actions.










NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:







AGREEMENT








		1.	Compromise Only. This Agreement is entered into for purposes of settlement and compromise only. Nothing contained in this Agreement, or done or omitted in connection with this Agreement, is intended as or shall be construed as an admission of or by any Party, or on behalf of any Microsoft Released Party (as defined below), of any fault, liability or wrongdoing whatsoever, or an admission of or by any Microsoft Released Party that any Licensed Patents (as defined below) are infringed, valid, or enforceable.











		2.	Definitions.










“Licensed Patents” shall mean (a) all patents and patent applications worldwide, now or in the future, that are owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by, or assigned to, VirnetX, Inc. or any entity that, as of the Amendment Effective Date, Controls,  is Controlled by, or is under common Control with VirnetX, Inc. (including, without limitation, the Patents-In-Suit and the patents and applications set forth on Exhibit A); and (b) all patents and applications related to such patents and applications (including, without limitation, originals, divisionals, provisionals, re-exams, re-exam certificates, extensions, reissues, counterparts, parents, continuations, and continuations-in-part) in all countries of the world.







“Microsoft” shall mean Microsoft Corporation and its Affiliates.







“VirnetX” shall mean VirnetX, Inc. and its Affiliates.







“Effective Date” shall mean May 14, 2010.







“Affiliate” means any entity that Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with a Party.  For the avoidance of doubt, this definition applies to entities that became or become Affiliates at any time, whether in the past, currently, or in the future.  For the avoidance of doubt, all Skype entities Controlled by Microsoft at any time are deemed to be Affiliates of Microsoft for purposes of this definition.


 



1







“Control” of an entity means the possession, directly or indirectly, through the ownership of voting securities, other voting interests, or otherwise, of the right to direct or cause the direction of management and policies of that entity.  Control also includes the following: (a) direct or indirect ownership of 50% or more of the voting power, securities, or capital of that entity; or (b) direct or indirect ownership of interests representing 50% or more of the voting power to elect the board of directors or other governing body for that entity; or (c) in relation to a partnership, limited liability company, or other unincorporated association, the direct or indirect right to a share of 50% or more of its net assets or net income.







“Licensees” means Microsoft’s direct and indirect distributors, licensees  and customers, but only to the extent such third parties utilize Microsoft Products.







“Microsoft Products” means any past, present, or future Microsoft products or services, including without limitation, Microsoft software, Microsoft hardware, or Microsoft protocols.  For the avoidance of doubt, Microsoft Products include, without limitation, any past, present, or future products or services (including without limitation, Microsoft software, Microsoft hardware, or Microsoft protocols) designed, branded, made, sold (or leased), offered for sale (or offered for lease), purchased, obtained, made available, exported, imported, supplied, licensed, distributed, hosted, used, streamed, exploited, encoded, decoded, or otherwise provided to, by or for Microsoft.  For the avoidance of doubt, Microsoft products or services (including without limitation, Microsoft software, Microsoft hardware, or Microsoft protocols) remain “Microsoft Products” even if combined with any past, present, or future products or services, but only as to those portions of the combination consisting of Microsoft Products. For clarity, a patent, by itself, is an intellectual property right and not a product.







“Pending IPR’s” means the inter partes review proceedings brought by Microsoft Corporation challenging the patents asserted in the Actions, and consists of: IPR2014-00614 (which has been consolidated with IPR2014-00613); IPR2014-00610; IPR2014-00615 (which has been consolidated with IPR2014-00618); IPR2014-00403; IPR2014-00404; IPR2014-01418; and IPR2014-01421.







“SAIC” means Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC Inc.) and Leidos, Inc., and their respective Affiliates.







“Third Party” means any entity that is neither a Party nor an Affiliate of a Party.







“Third Party Products” means products, and services, including protocols, of a Third Party designed or developed by such Third Party, but specifically excluding Microsoft Products.








		3.	Releases











		3.1	Effective upon receipt of the payment set forth in Section 5.2, VirnetX, on behalf of itself and its predecessors, successors, assigns, attorneys, directors, shareholders, employees, and officers (collectively, the “VirnetX Releasing Parties”), hereby voluntarily, irrevocably and unconditionally fully and forever releases, discharges, acquits, covenants not to sue, and holds harmless Microsoft and predecessors to Microsoft’s businesses (including without limitation the previous owners of Microsoft’s businesses acquired from such persons or entities) and their predecessors, successors, assigns, attorneys, insurers, agents, servants, subcontractors, officers, directors, shareholders, representatives, employees, and Licensees (collectively, the “Microsoft Released Parties”) from and for any and all rights, claims, debts, liabilities, demands, suits, obligations, promises, damages, causes of action and claims for relief of any kind, manner, nature and description, known or unknown (collectively, “Claims”), which any of the VirnetX Releasing Parties have, may have had, might have asserted, may now have or assert, or may hereafter have or assert against the Microsoft Released Parties, or any of them, arising, accruing or occurring, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the Amendment Effective Date, including, without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any claims or causes of action arising out of or related to any of the facts, transactions, matters or occurrences giving rise to or alleged, or that could have been alleged in or discovered in, the Actions or under any of the Licensed Patents. (For the avoidance of doubt, this release and covenant applies to Microsoft Affiliates both before and after the time they become an Affiliate of Microsoft).  Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary, this release does not apply to any Third Party (other than a Licensee) with respect to Third Party Products, except to the extent such Third Party is utilizing Microsoft Products.





 



2








		3.2	Microsoft, on behalf of itself and its predecessors, successors and assigns (collectively, the “Microsoft Releasing Parties”), hereby voluntarily, irrevocably and unconditionally fully and forever releases, discharges, covenants not to sue, and holds harmless VirnetX and its predecessors, successors, assigns, attorneys, insurers, agents, servants, subcontractors, officers, directors, representatives, and employees (collectively, the “VirnetX Released Parties”) from and for any and all Claims which any of the Microsoft Releasing Parties have, may have had, might have asserted, or may now have or assert against the VirnetX Released Parties, or any of them, arising, accruing or occurring, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the Amendment Effective Date arising out of or related to any of the facts, transactions, matters or occurrences giving rise to or alleged, or that could have been alleged in or discovered in, the Actions as to VirnetX’s assertion of the Patents-in-Suit, except that the Microsoft Releasing Parties do not release or discharge (or grant a covenant or hold harmless as to) their Claims that the Licensed Patents are invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed by any Microsoft Releasing Parties.  For the avoidance of doubt, the Microsoft Releasing Parties may raise any defense of invalidity, unenforceability or non-infringement in any later proceeding in any court or administrative agency (including without limitation any review in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office) regardless of whether such defense was previously alleged or adjudicated in any forum.











		3.3	With respect to all claims released herein, the VirnetX Releasing Parties and Microsoft Releasing Parties expressly waive any and all statutes, legal doctrines and other similar limitations upon the effect of general releases. By way of example, and without limitation, the foregoing parties waive the benefit of California Civil Code Section 1542, which states as follows:










“A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.”







Each Party hereto acknowledges that the inclusion of such unknown claims in the releases above was separately bargained for and was a key element of this Agreement.  Each Party hereto acknowledges that they may hereafter discover facts which are different from or in addition to those that they may now know or believe to be true with respect to any and all claims herein released and agree that all such unknown claims are nonetheless released and that the releases above shall be and remain effective in all respects even if such different or additional facts are subsequently discovered.








		4.	Grant of Licenses and Covenants











		4.1	  VirnetX hereby grants to Microsoft a worldwide, irrevocable, nonexclusive, non-sublicensable, royalty-free, fully paid-up (subject to payment under Section 5.2) license and covenant not to sue under the Licensed Patents.  The license and covenant granted hereunder shall apply, without limitation, to all Microsoft Products and past, present and future activities of Microsoft.   The license granted hereunder fully exhausts all of the Licensed Patents as to Microsoft Products.











		4.2	VirnetX hereby grants to Licensees a worldwide, irrevocable, nonexclusive, non-sublicensable, royalty-free, fully paid-up (subject to payment under Section 5.2) license and covenant not to sue under the Licensed Patents solely as to Microsoft Products, including past, present and future activities of Licensees with respect to Microsoft Products.











3








		4.3	Without limiting the scope of the forgoing Sections 4.1 and 4.2, VirnetX, Inc., and any entity that, as of the Amendment Effective Date, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with VirnetX, Inc., hereby covenants that it, directly or indirectly, will not assert a claim of infringement of any patent (including without limitation the Licensed Patents) or other intellectual property or proprietary rights claim, based in any way, in whole or any part, on any Microsoft Products.  For the avoidance of doubt, VirnetX hereby covenants and agrees that no Microsoft Products shall be used or relied on (in whole or in part, and whether in litigation, mediation, arbitration, demand, cease and desist communication, licensing negotiation, PTO proceeding or otherwise) by VirnetX to satisfy (in whole or in part) any claim or any element, step, means, or limitation of any claim (including without limitation any in the preamble) of any of the Licensed Patents against any entity.











		4.4	The license and covenants by VirnetX in this Section 4 shall extend to each Affiliate or business of Microsoft.  If Microsoft divests an Affiliate or business, the licenses and covenants granted in this Amended Settlement Agreement will continue as to the Affiliate or business for those products and services existing at the time of divestiture, and direct derivatives thereof.











		4.5	The releases, licenses and covenants not to sue are expressly set forth in Sections 3 and 4 above and no other releases, licenses or covenants not to sue are granted or conveyed under this Agreement, whether expressly or by implication, estoppel, reliance or otherwise, all of which are expressly disclaimed.
















		5.	Consideration.











		5.1.	Dismissals.To the extent not already dismissed pursuant to that certain Settlement and License Agreement, dated on or about May 14, 2010, by and between Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc, VirnetX shall dismiss with prejudice (and cause SAIC to join in such dismissal) all claims against Microsoft in the Actions, and Microsoft Corporation shall dismiss with prejudice all counterclaims in the Actions (except that Microsoft Corporation’s affirmative defenses and counterclaims of (i) non-infringement and invalidity shall be dismissed without prejudice and (ii) unenforceability shall be dismissed without prejudice by filing (and VirnetX causing SAIC to file) on or before December 19, 2014, Stipulations of Dismissal and Proposed Order substantially in the form attached as Exhibit E that provide that each of VirnetX, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and SAIC will bear its own costs, expenses and attorney’s fees in connection with the Actions.  No Party shall take any action to oppose the Court’s entry of such dismissal, nor subsequently take any action to vacate, modify, or appeal such dismissal of the Actions.  In addition, VirnetX, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation agree to execute such additional papers and motions as may be necessary to cause the Court to effect a disposal of all issues before it with respect to the Parties and a dismissal of the Actions for these Parties.  For the avoidance of doubt only, the dismissal of the Actions (i.e., the prior lawsuits and the current lawsuit) are based solely on the consent of the parties, not the merits of any past ruling or present motions.  Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in this Section 5.1, VirnetX shall not be obligated to dismiss any separate pending proceedings against any Third Party, but henceforth shall not include Microsoft Products as a basis in whole or in part for its allegations against any Third Party.











		5.2.	Payment. In full and complete settlement of all claims asserted against Microsoft in the Actions, and in full and complete consideration of the licenses, releases, waivers, and other covenants and rights in this Agreement, to the extent not already paid, Microsoft Corporation shall pay a total lump sum amount of two-hundred, twenty-three million U.S. Dollars (USD $223,000,000) (“Payment”), as set forth in this Section 5.2.  Of that Payment, two-hundred million U.S. Dollars (USD $200,000,000.00) was already paid on or about June 7, 2010 by Microsoft Corporation to VirnetX, Inc.  The balance of the Payment (twenty-three million U.S. Dollars (USD $23,000,000)) shall be paid by Microsoft Corporation to VirnetX, Inc. by wire transfer into the following account within twenty(20) business days after the later of  (i) the Amendment Effective Date, or (ii) the provision to Microsoft by VirnetX, Inc. and its counsel of an IRS Form W-9 and a letter on its letterhead with payment instructions consistent with this paragraph:











4







Account Name:


Texas IOLTA Trust Account – Caldwell Cassady & Curry


Account No.: 8094381388


ABA Number: 111014325


Bank Name and Address: Bank of Texas


6215 Hillcrest Avenue Dallas, TX 75205


Beneficiary Name: VirnetX, Inc.







VirnetX, Inc. shall be solely responsible for any taxes incurred as a consequence of the Payment or this Agreement.  Microsoft shall not be responsible for any payment to SAIC.








		6.	Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until after the period ends in which any rights associated with the Licensed Patents might be exercised (for example, currently, as to U.S. patents: after six years after the expiration of the last patent to expire that is part of the Licensed Patents).  Sections 3.1 (provided that the payment in Section 5.2 has been made), 3.2, 3.3, 4 (provided that the payment in Section 5.2 has been made) and 7.1 shall survive termination of the Agreement.











		7.	Miscellaneous.











		7.1.	Confidentiality. The mere existence of this Agreement (including, without limitation, the identification of the Parties and any Licensed Patents) is not confidential.  Within five (5) days after the Amendment Effective Date, Microsoft agrees that VirnetX may issue the press release in the form attached as Exhibit B.  Microsoft may also issue the press release in the form attached as Exhibit B.  Subject to the foregoing, no Party may issue a press release or otherwise affirmatively attempt to publicize the terms or existence of this Agreement, except as set forth below. The Parties further agree that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by any Party to any other person except (a) as may be required by law (including, without limitation, SEC reporting requirements, or any other United States or foreign regulatory requirements) or stock exchange rule (after prior written notice to the other Party with opportunity to comment on the disclosure), (b) during the course of litigation so long as the disclosure of such terms and conditions are restricted in the same manner as is the confidential information of the litigating Party, which includes designating the Agreement under the highest available level of protection under a protective order; (c) in confidence to the professional legal, advisory, and financial counsel representing or auditing such Party; (d) in confidence, in connection with the enforcement of this Agreement or rights under this Agreement; (e) in confidence, in connection with a merger, or acquisition, divestiture, or proposed merger, acquisition, or divestiture of a Party, or the like; (f) in confidence by Microsoft to Licensees and any third parties covered by the terms of this Agreement; (g) in confidence to potential acquirers of all or substantially all of VirnetX; (h) in confidence to the insurers and third party claim administrators of Microsoft; (i) in confidence to any person covered by the releases, licenses, waivers or other covenants and rights granted herein; or (j) as otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties executing this Agreement.  Prior to any disclosure by VirnetX pursuant to the foregoing subsection (a), VirnetX will provide Microsoft with a draft copy of the proposed disclosure or filing (including, without limitation, any filing with the SEC) at least three business days before such disclosure or filing is made, and the Parties will consult in good faith with respect to the content of the proposed disclosure and the potential for VirnetX to request confidential treatment with respect to portions of the Agreement that VirnetX reasonably believes must be disclosed or filed.











		7.2.	Representations and Warranties.  VirnetX represents, warrants, and covenants to Microsoft that:











5








		(a)	VirnetX, Inc. represents and warrants that it is the sole, exclusive, and lawful owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the Licensed Patents (including, without limitation, the Patents-in-Suit).  VirnetX, Inc. represents and warrants that it has all rights necessary to enforce and license the Licensed Patents and, together with any corporate or other authority required to bind VirnetX, thus the right to enter into this Agreement and grant all of the releases, licenses, waivers, and other covenants and rights under this Agreement.  VirnetX, Inc. represents and warrants that from time to time in the Actions and in the Settlement and License Agreement between Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc. made and entered into on May 14, 2010, VirnetX, Inc. was referenced as “VirnetX Inc.” but that was a typographical error and at all times “VirnetX Inc.” should be considered to refer to VirnetX, Inc. VirnetX represents and warrants that the list of properties set forth on Exhibit A is a complete listing of all patents and applications owned or controlled by (in whole or in part), or assigned to VirnetX.











		(b)	VirnetX further represents and warrants that, as of June 30, 2010, SAIC no longer has any right of reversion to the Licensed Patents.  VirnetX further represents and warrants that SAIC has no right, title or interest in or to the Licensed Patents, and further represents and warrants that SAIC no longer holds the power to assert any claim or claims of the Licensed Patents against Microsoft Released Parties or Licensees.  VirnetX further represents and warrants that SAIC holds no right to review this Agreement prior to its execution and that SAIC holds no right or ability to control the actions or decisions of VirnetX.











		(c)	VirnetX represents and warrants that all releases, licenses, covenants, and other executory obligations made in this Agreement bind both SAIC and VirnetX, and fully encompass any and all rights and interests in the Licensed Patents.  VirnetX further represents and warrants that the review, consent and approval of SAIC is not needed for this Agreement to be binding and enforceable.











		(d)	In the event of any act (including without limitation, the assertion or threatened assertion of any of the Licensed Patents) by SAIC inconsistent with, or contrary to, any of the representations and warranties made by VirnetX in this Agreement, VirnetX agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless affected Microsoft Released Parties against SAIC’s actions, including any liability and attorneys’ fees incurred by Microsoft Released Parties.











		(e)	No Claim released herein, and no portion of any such Claim, has been assigned or otherwise transferred by VirnetX to any other person or entity, either directly, indirectly, or by subrogation or operation of law. VirnetX has not filed, commenced, served, or otherwise instituted (in each case, either on its own, or in conjunction with any third party) any complaints, claims, causes of action, or demands against Microsoft or Licensees other than those asserted in connection with the Actions.











		(f)	During the term of this Agreement any consideration required to be paid to any other person, corporation, or entity, if any, on account of any or all of the releases, licenses, waivers, or other covenants or rights granted under this Agreement to any Microsoft Released Parties shall be paid by VirnetX, and no additional consideration shall be required of any of the Microsoft Released Parties. VirnetX has not granted and will not grant any licenses, covenants, and/or other rights under the Licensed Patents and/or otherwise, that would conflict with, impair, and/or prevent any or all of the releases, licenses, waivers, or other covenants or rights granted under this Agreement. VirnetX, Inc. will cause its Affiliates to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement where applicable.











		(g)	VirnetX has been represented by competent and independent counsel of their own choice throughout all negotiations preceding the execution of the Agreement, and have executed this Agreement upon the advice of said competent and independent counsel regarding the meaning and legal effect of this Agreement, and regarding the advisability of making the agreements provided for herein, and fully understand the same.











		7.3.	Representations and Warranties.  Microsoft represents, warrants, and covenants to VirnetX that:











6








		(a)	No Claim released herein, and no portion of any such Claim, has been assigned or otherwise transferred by Microsoft to any other person or entity, either directly, indirectly, or by subrogation or operation of law. On or prior to the date of the execution of this Agreement, Microsoft has not filed, commenced, served, or otherwise instituted (in each case, either on its own, or in conjunction with any third party) any complaints, claims, causes of action, or demands against VirnetX other than those asserted in connection with the Actions and prior Patent Office proceedings, including the Pending IPRs, of the Licensed Patents.











		(b)	Microsoft has been represented by competent and independent counsel of its own choice throughout all negotiations preceding the execution of the Agreement, and has executed this Agreement upon the advice of said competent and independent counsel regarding the meaning and legal effect of this Agreement, and regarding the advisability of making the agreements provided for herein, and fully understands the same.











		7.4	Mutual Representations and Warranties. Each Party and each person signing this Agreement on behalf of a Party represents and warrants to the other that:











		(a)	Such Party has not entered this Agreement in reliance upon any promise, inducement, agreement, statement, or representation other than those contained in this Agreement.











		(b)	Such Party is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state, province or country of its organization or incorporation, and has the full right and power to enter into this Agreement, and the person executing this Agreement has the full right and authority to enter into this Agreement on behalf of such Party and the full right and authority to bind such Party to the terms and obligations of this Agreement.











		7.5	Notices. All notices and requests which are required or permitted to be given in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given as of the day they are received either by messenger, delivery service, or in the United States of America mails, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, and addressed as follows, or to such other address as the Party to receive the notice or request so designates by written notice to the other:










If to VirnetX, Inc.:







By Regular Mail to:


 Attn:  Kendall Larsen, Chief Executive Officer VirnetX, Inc.


P.O. Box # 439


Zephyr Cove, NV 89448


Facsimile:  (831) 438-3078







By Any Other  Service (Fedex, UPS, etc.) to:


Attn:  Kendall Larsen, Chief Executive Officer VirnetX, Inc.


308 Dorla Ct.


Zephyr Cove, NV 89448


Facsimile:  (831) 438-3078







with a copy to:







Caldwell Cassady & Curry


2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75201


Telephone: 214.888.4848


  Facsimile:  214.888.4849


 



7







If to Microsoft:







Attn:  Director of Licensing, LCA Patent Group Microsoft Corporation


One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052


Fax: (425) 936-7329







with a copy to:


Attn: Law & Corporate Affairs Microsoft Corporation


One Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington 98052


Facsimile: (425) 936-7329








		7.6.	Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be construed and controlled by the internal laws of the State of Texas (excluding conflict of laws principles) and applicable federal laws. The sole and exclusive venue for any lawsuit arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.











		7.7.	Costs. Each Party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the Actions, the making of this Agreement, and its performance under this Agreement. Each Party expressly waives any claim of costs and attorneys’ fees from or against the other Party.











		7.8.	Successors and Assigns. The terms, covenants, conditions, provisions and benefits of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns.  For the avoidance of doubt only, the releases, licenses and covenants in Section 3.1 and Section 4 run with each of the Licensed Patents covered by this Agreement and are binding on any entity claiming a right, title or interest therein at any time, and VirnetX will inform any such transferee in writing of this restriction prior to transfer.











		7.9.	No Construction Against Drafter. This Agreement results from negotiations between the Parties and their respective legal counsel, and each Party acknowledges that it has had the opportunity to negotiate modifications to the language of this Agreement. Accordingly, each Party agrees that in any dispute regarding the interpretation or construction of this Agreement, no statutory, common law or other presumption shall operate in favor of or against any Party by virtue of his, her or its role in drafting or not drafting the terms and conditions set forth herein.











		7.10.	Captions. Captions or headings used in this Agreement are for the convenience of the Parties only, and shall not be considered part of this Agreement or used to construe the terms of this Agreement.











		7.11.	Construction. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable or otherwise in conflict with law, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. If any provisions of this Agreement are deemed not enforceable, they shall be deemed modified to the extent necessary to make them enforceable. The Parties undertake to replace the invalid provision or parts thereof by a new provision which will approximate as closely as possible the intent of the Parties.  Provisions shall apply, as applicable, to past, current and successive events, parties, and transactions.











		7.12.	Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different Parties on separate counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Agreement. Execution of this Agreement may be accomplished by signing this Agreement and transmitting the signature page to opposing counsel by facsimile or email. The Parties so executing and delivering shall promptly thereafter deliver signed originals of at least the signature page(s), but failure to do so shall not affect the validity or enforceability of this Agreement.











8








		7.13.	Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless expressly stated in writing by the Party making the waiver.  No waiver of any provision shall be binding in any event unless executed in writing by the Party making the waiver.











		7.14.	Entire Agreement.This Agreement (including, without limitation, all Exhibits attached hereto) constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous written or oral agreements (including, without limitation, the Settlement and License Agreement between Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc. made and entered into on May 14, 2010), memorandums of understanding (including, without limitation, the Memorandum of Understanding between Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc. dated May 12, 2010), or communications as to such subject matter, all of which are superseded, merged and fully integrated into this Agreement. It shall not be modified except by a written agreement dated subsequent to the date of this Agreement and signed on behalf of the Parties by their respective duly authorized representatives.











	 	
7.15.

	
Inter Partes Review. Microsoft and VirnetX shall cooperate (and if necessary, VirnetX will cause SAIC to cooperate) to file in each of the Pending IPRs, a joint motion to terminate with respect to Microsoft Corporation pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §317(a) in the form set forth in Exhibit C, and a joint request to keep this agreement confidential pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) in the form set forth in Exhibit D. Microsoft and VirnetX will contact (and if necessary, VirnetX will cause SAIC to contact) the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) to request permission to file in each of the Pending IPRs the motion and the request within five (5) business days of the filing of the dismissals under Section 5.1, and upon receiving permission, file in each of the Pending IPRs the motion and the request within two (2) business days of the PTAB granting such permission. The parties will work together to modify the motion and request to address any issues raised by the PTAB. If the PTAB denies the motions to terminate, the Parties will take such other permitted steps to have Microsoft withdraw from the Pending IPRs. For example, Microsoft will not actively seek to participate in the Pending IPRs, and will not be bound by the results of the Pending IPRs. This covenant shall not be construed as preventing Microsoft from complying with any court or Patent Office order or applicable law.













	 	
7.16.

	
[***]







 



	
[***]

	
Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.







 








9








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, VirnetX, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation, being fully authorized and empowered to bind themselves to this Agreement, have caused this Agreement to be made and executed by duly authorized officers as of the Amendment Effective Date.








	
VIRNETX, INC.

	
 

	
MICROSOFT CORPORATION


	 		
	
/s/ Sameer Mathur

		
 

	
 

	
/s/ David Howard







 



	
Name:

	
Sameer Mathur

		
Name:

	
David Howard


	
Title:

	
VP of Corporate Development & Product Marketing

		
Title:

	
Corporate VP


	
Date:

	
12/17/14

		
Date:

	
12/17/14







 





10







EXHIBIT A


 



11







	
Country

	
App. No.

	
Filing date

	
Patent No.

	
Issue Date


	
WO

	
PCT/US99/25325

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
AU

	
00/14553

	
10/29/1999

	
761,388

	
09/18/2003


	
CA

	
2,349,519

	
10/29/1999

	 	
08/09/2011


	
CA

	
2,723,504

	
10/29/1999

	 	
04/29/2014


	
EP

	
99971606.1

	
10/29/1999

	
1125419

	
08/26/2009


	
EP-GB

	
99971606.1

	
10/29/1999

	
1125419

	
08/26/2009


	
EP-DE

	
99971606.1

	
10/29/1999

	
1125419

	
08/26/2009


	
EP-FR

	
99971606.1

	
10/29/1999

	
1125419

	
08/26/2009


	
EP-IT

	
46406/BE/2009

	
10/29/1999

	
1125419

	
08/26/2009


	
JP

	
2000-580350

	
10/29/1999

	
4,451,556

	
02/05/2010


	
JP

	
2009-246033

	
10/29/1999

	
4,824,108

	
09/16/2011





	
US

	
09/429,643

	
10/29/1999

	
7,010,604

	
03/07/2006


	
US

	
10/401,551

	
03/31/2003

	
7,133,930

	
11/07/2006


	
US

	
11/301,022

	
12/13/2005

	
7,996,539

	
08/09/2011


	
US

	
11/839,937

	
08/16/2007

	
8,874,771

	
10/28/2014


	
US

	
13/475,637

	
05/08/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
13/620,550

	
09/14/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
13/620,534

	
09/14/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
09/429,643

	
02/15/2000

	
6,502,135

	
12/31/2002


	
WO

	
PCT/US01/04340

	
02/12/2001

	 	 
	
EP

	
14172837.8

	
06/17/2014

	 	 
	
HK

	
14111309.7

	
11/07/2014

	 	 
	
EP

	
01910528.7

	
02/12/2001

	 	 
	
JP

	
2001-560062

	
02/12/2001

	 	 
	
US

	
10/082,164

	
02/26/2002

	
6,618,761

	
09/09/2003


	
US

	
10/401,888

	
03/31/2003

	
6,907,473

	
06/14/2005


	
US

	
10/082,285

	
02/26/2002

	
6,834,310

	
12/21/2004


	
US

	
10/259,494

	
09/30/2002

	
7,490,151

	
02/10/2009


	
US

	
11/839,969

	
08/16/2007

	
7,933,990

	
04/26/2011


	
US

	
13/075,081

	
03/29/2011

	 	 
	
US

	
13/093,785

	
05/11/2011

	
8,516,117

	
08/20/2013


	
US

	
13/890,206

	
05/08/2013

	 	 
	
WO

	
PCT/US99/25323

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
AU

	
00/16003

	
10/29/1999

	
765914

	
01/15/2004


	
CA

	
2,349,520

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
EP

	
99958693.6

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
EP-DE

	
99958693.6

	
10/29/1999

	
1125414

	
12/22/2010


	
EP-FR

	
99958693.6

	
10/29/1999

	
1125414

	
12/22/2010


	
EP-GB

	
99958693.6

	
10/29/1999

	
1125414

	
12/22/2010


	
EP

	
10011949.4

	
09/30/2010

	 	 
	
JP

	
2011-081416

	
04/01/2011

	
5198617

	
02/15/2013











12







	Country	
App. No.

	
Filing date

	
Patent No.

	
Issue Date


	
JP

	
2014-000051

	
04/01/2011

	 	
05/15/2014


	
WO

	
PCT/US01/13261

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
EP

	
01932629.7

	
04/25/2001

	
1302047

	
08/01/2012


	
EP

	
06014499.5

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
EP

	
06014500.0

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
EP-CH

	
01932629.7

	
04/25/2001

	
1302047

	
08/01/2012


	
EP-DE

	
01932629.7

	
04/25/2001

	
1302047

	
08/01/2012


	
EP-NL

	
01932629.7

	
04/25/2001

	
1302047

	
08/01/2012


	
EP-GB

	
01932629.7

	
04/25/2001

	
1302047

	
08/01/2012


	
EP

	
10012357

	
09/30/2010

	 	
	
EP

	
10012236

	
09/30/2010

	 	 
	
EP

	
11005789.0

	
07/15/2011

	 	 
	
EP

	
11005792.4

	
07/15/2011

		
	
EP

	
11005793.2

	
07/15/2011

	 	 
	
EP

	
10012356

	
09/30/2010

	 	 
	
EP

	
12004353.4

	
06/08/2012

	 	 
	
HK

	
07109112.7

	
08/21/2007

	 	 
	
HK

	
07109113.6

	
08/21/2007

	 	 
	
JP

	
2001-583006

	
04/25/2001

	
4765811

	
06/10/2011


	
JP

	
2010-239225

	 	
5377455

	
10/25/2013


	
JP

	
2011-085051

	
04/07/2011

	
5374535

	
10/25/2013


	
JP

	
2011-085052

	
04/07/2011

	
5374536

	
10/25/2013


	
US

	
10/702,486

	
11/07/2003

	
7,188,180

	
03/06/2007


	
US

	
11/679,416

	
02/27/2007

	
8,051,181

	
11/01/2011


	
US

	
11/839,987

	
08/16/2007

	
7,987,274

	
07/26/2011


	
US

	
10/702,522

	
11/07/2003

	
6,839,759

	
01/04/2005


	
US

	
10/702,580

	
11/07/2003

	
6,826,616

	
11/30/2004


	
US

	
13/181,041

	
07/12/2011

	 	 
	
US

	
13/285,962

	
10/31/2011

	 	 
	
US

	
14/526,669

	
10/29/2014

	 	 
	
WO

	
PCT/US01/13260

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
EP

	
01932628.9

	
04/25/2001

	
1284079

	
01/18/2006


	
EP-CH

	
01932628.9

	
04/25/2001

	
1284079

	
01/18/2006


	
EP-DE

	
60116754.6

	
04/25/2001

	
1284079

	
01/18/2006


	
EP-GB

	
01932628.9

	
04/25/2001

	
1284079

	
01/18/2006


	
EP-IT

	
01932628.9

	
04/25/2001

	
1284079

	
01/18/2006


	
EP-NL

	
01932628.9

	
04/25/2001

	
1284079

	
01/18/2006


	
EP

	
05102086.5

	
04/25/2001

	
1542429

	
06/12/2013


	
EP-CH

	
05102086.5

	
04/25/2001

	
1542429

	
06/12/2013


	
EP-DE

	
05102086.5

	
04/25/2001

	
1542429

	
06/12/2013











13







	
Country

	
App. No

	
Filing date

	
Patent No.

	
Issue Date


	
EP-IT

	
05102086.5

	
04/25/2001

	
1542429

	
06/12/2013


	
EP-GB

	
05102086.5

	
04/25/2001

	
1542429

	
06/12/2013


	
EP-NL

	
05102086.5

	
04/25/2001

	
1542429

	
06/12/2013


	
EP

	
10184542.8

	
09/30/2010

	 	 
	
EP

	
10184502.2

	
09/30/2010

	 	 
	
JP

	
2002-501144

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
JP

	
2010-239197

	
04/25/2001

	
5180274

	
01/18/2013


	
JP

	
2011-083414

	
04/05/2011

	
5165776

	
12/28/2012


	
JP

	
2012-256213

	
11/22/2012

	
5478697

	
02/21/2014


	
JP

	
2012-256228

	
11/22/2012

	
5478698

	
02/21/2014


	
JP

	
2011-083415

	
04/05/2011

	
5377562

	
10/04/2013


	
US

	
10/714,849

	
11/18/2003

	
7,418,504

	
08/26/2008


	
US

	
11/840,560

	
08/17/2007

	
7,921,211

	
04/05/2011


	
US

	
11/840,508

	
08/17/2007

	
7,945,654

	
05/17/2011


	
US

	
13/049,552

	
03/16/2011

	
8,572,247

	
10/29/2013


	
US

	
13/080,680

	
04/06/2011

	 	 
	
US

	
13/337,757

	
12/27/2011

	
8,504,696

	
08/06/2013


	
US

	
13/336,958

	
12/23/2011

	
8,513,131

	
08/20/2013


	
US

	
13/336,790

	
12/23/2011

	
8,458,341

	
06/04/2013


	
US

	
13/342,795

	
01/03/2012

	
8,560,705

	
10/15/2013


	
US

	
13/343,465

	
01/04/2012

	
8,521,888

	
08/27/2013


	
US

	
13/339,257

	
12/28/2011

	
8,504,697

	
08/06/2013


	
US

	
13/474,397

	
05/17/2012

	
8,554,899

	
10/08/2013


	
US

	
13/617,375

	
09/14/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
13/617,446

	
09/14/2013

		
	
US

	
13/615,528

	
09/13/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
13/615,536

	
09/13/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
13/615,557

	
09/13/2012

	
8,868,705

	
10/21/2014


	
US

	
13/903,788

	
05/28/2013

	 	 
	
US

	
13/911,792

	
06/06/2013

	
8,850,009

	
09/30/2014


	
US

	
13/911,813

	
06/06/2013

	
8,904,516

	
10/02/2014


	
US

	
13/950,877

	
07/25/2013

	 	 
	
US

	
13/950,897

	
07/25/2013

	 	 
	
US

	
13/950,919

	
07/25/2013

	
8,843,643

	
09/23/2014


	
US

	
14/482,956

	
09/10/2014

	 	 
	
WO

	
PCT/US02/01070

	
01/17/2002

	 	 
	
EP

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011


	
EP-CH

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011


	
EP-DE

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011


	
EP-FR

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011











14







	
Country

	
App. No.

	
Filing date

	
Patent No.

	
Issue Date


	
EP-GB

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011


	
EP-IT

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011


	
EP-NL

	
02 0718836.6

	
01/17/2002

	
1360803

	
11/30/2011


	
EP

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP-CH

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP-DE

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP-FR

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP-GB

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP-IT

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP-NL

	
10012248.0

	
12/22/2010

	
2264952

	
10/09/2013


	
EP

	
10012245.6

	
12/22/2010

	
2264951

	
07/31/2013


	
EP-CH

	
10012245.6

	
12/22/2010

	
2264951

	
07/31/2013


	
EP-DE

	
10012245.6

	
12/22/2010

	
2264951

	
07/31/2013


	
EP-GB

	
10012245.6

	
12/22/2010

	
2264951

	
07/31/2013


	
EP-IT

	
10012245.6

	
12/22/2010

	
2264951

	
07/31/2013


	
EP-NL

	
10012245.6

	
12/22/2010

	
2264951

	
07/31/2013


	
US

	
09/874,258

	
06/06/2001

	
7,209,479

	
04/24/2007


	
US

	
11/532,002

	
09/14/2006

	
7,986,688

	
07/26/2011


	
US

	
11/840,579

	
08/17/2007

	
7,944,915

	
05/17/2011


	
US

	
13/110,509

	
05/18/2011

	
8,571,025

	
10/29/2013


	
US

	
13/110,353

	
05/18/2011

	
8,761,168

	
06/24/2014


	
US

	
13/620,368

	
09/14/2012

	
8,780,906

	
07/15/2014


	
US

	
13/620,358

	
09/14/2012

	
8,780,905

	
07/15/2014


	
US

	
14/294,476

	
06/03/2014

	 	 
	
US

	
13/554,582

	
07/09/2012

	 	 
	
WO

	
PCT/US12/45921

	
07/09/2012

	 	 
	
CA

	
2841166

	
01/07/2014

	 	 
	
CN

	
201280034033.7

	
01/08/2014

	 	 
	
EP

	
12743274.8

	
02/05/2014

	 	 
	
HK

	
14110584.5

	
10/23/2014

	 	 
	
JP

	
2014-519097

	
01/07/2014

	 	 
	
AU

	
2012282841

	
07/09/2012

	 	 
	
US

	
14/037,301

	
09/25/2013

	 	 
	
WO

	
WO2008US74886A

	
08/29/2008

	 	 
	
DE

	
DE69943057A

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
DE

	
DE69941338A

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
US

	
11/924,460

	
10/25/2007

	 	 
	
US

	
09/558,209

	
4/26/2000

	 	 
	
US

	
09/588,210

	
4/26/2000

	 	 
	
US

	
60/262,063

	
1/18/2001

	 	 



 



15







	
Country

	
App. No.

	
Filing date

	
Patent No.

	
Issue Date


	
US

	
60/969,226

	
08/31/2007

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU200138123D

	
02/12/2001

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU200159140D

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU200159141A

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
JP

	
JP201451A

	
01/06/2014

	 	 
	
AT

	
AT2002718836T

	
01/17/2002

	 	 
	
AT

	
AT1999958693T

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
AT

	
AT1999971606T

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
JP

	
2000-580354

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
EP

	
EP2008799013A

	
8/29/2008

	 	 
	
EP

	
EP20103518A

	
02/12/2001

	 	 
	
CA

	
CA2696665A

	
08/29/2008

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU2008292833A

	
08/29/2008

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU2001238123A

	
02/12/2001

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU2001259140A

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU2001259141A

	
04/25/2001

	 	 
	
AU

	
AU2002249950A

	
01/17/2002

	 	 
	
JP

	
JP201452A

	
01/06/2014

	 	 
	
JP

	
JP201181417A

	
04/01/2011

	 	 
	
JP

	
JP2010523173A

	
08/29/2008

	 	 
	
JP

	
JP2000580354A

	
10/29/1999

	 	 
	
WO

	
PCT/US08/74886

	
8/29/2008

	 	 
	
AU

	
2008292833

	
8/29/2008

	 	 
	
CA

	
2696665

	
8/29/2008

	 	 
	
EP

	
08799013.1

	
8/29/2008

	 	 
	
JP

	
PCT/US08/74886

	
8/29/2008

	 	 



 



16







EXHIBIT B







VirnetX and Microsoft Settle Pending Patent Disputes and


Agree to Jointly Petition to Terminate IPR Proceedings as to Microsoft







ZEPHYR COVE, Nevada and REDMOND, WA – December XX, 2014 – VirnetX Holding Corporation (NYSE MKT: VHC) and Microsoft Corporation announced today that on December XX, 2014, VirnetX, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation have signed an Amended Settlement and License Agreement. This agreement amends and restates certain terms of the original Settlement and License Agreement, dated May 14, 2010, between VirnetX, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. As a result of the agreement, the parties have settled their pending patent disputes.







Under the terms of the amended agreement, Microsoft has agreed to pay $23 million to VirnetX to settle the patent dispute and expand Microsoft’s license. The parties have also agreed to dismiss the patent infringement case brought by VirnetX, Inc. before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and jointly move to terminate the pending inter partes review proceedings between Microsoft and VirnetX, Inc. as to Microsoft.  All other aspects of the agreement were not disclosed.







“We are pleased to have come to an agreement with Microsoft Corporation and put all our legal disputes behind us,” said Kendall Larsen, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of VirnetX, Inc.  “This agreement allows us to focus our resources towards the release of our Gabriel Secure Communication PlatformTM and Gabriel Collaboration SuiteTM products in the first-half of 2015 and our ongoing licensing and strategic partnership efforts.”







“Microsoft Corporation is pleased to have come to an agreement with VirnetX and that the settlement includes an expanded license to VirnetX’s entire patent portfolio,” said a Microsoft spokesperson.







About Microsoft


Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader in software, services, devices and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.







About VirnetX


VirnetX Holding Corporation is an Internet security software and technology company with patented technology for secure communications including 4G LTE security.  The Company’s software and technology solutions, including its secure domain name registry and GABRIEL Connection TechnologyTM, are designed to facilitate secure communications and to create a secure environment for real-time communication applications such as instant messaging, VoIP, smartphones, eReaders and video conferencing.  The Company’s patent portfolio includes over 107 U.S. and international patents with over 100 pending applications.  For more information, please visit www.virnetx.com.








17







Forward Looking Statements


Statements in this press release that are not statements of historical or current fact, including statements regarding the  strength of Virnetx’s intellectual property, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections about the markets in which the Company operates, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by management and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unknown factors that could cause the actual results of the Company to be materially different from the historical results or from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to (1) the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may be initiated by the Company or that may be initiated against the Company;, including pending and future inter partes review proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office (2) the ability to capitalize on the Company’s patent portfolio and generate licensing fees and revenues; (3) the ability of the Company to be successful in entering into licensing relationships with its targeted customers on commercially acceptable terms; (4) potential challenges to the validity of the Company’s patents underlying its licensing opportunities; (5) the ability of the Company to achieve widespread customer adoption of the Company’s GABRIEL Communication TechnologyTM and its secure domain name registry; (6) the level of adoption of the 3GPP Series 33 security specifications; (7) whether or not the Company’s patents or patent applications may be determined to be or become essential to any standards or specifications in the 3GPP LTE, SAE project or otherwise; (8) the extent to which specifications relating to any of the Company’s patents or patent applications may be adopted as a final standard, if at all; and (9) the possibility that Company may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors.  In addition to statements which explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider statements labeled with the terms “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” or “plans” to be uncertain and forward-looking.  The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described from time to time in the Company’s reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those under the heading “Risk Factors” in Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2014.  Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of the subject matter of this press release are beyond the Company’s  ability to control or predict.  Except as required by law, the Company is under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this press release to conform to actual results.


 


Contact:


Greg Wood


VirnetX Holding Corporation


775.548.1785


greg_wood@virnetx.com


 



18







David Cuddy


Microsoft Corporation


425.421.2502


dcuddy@microsoft.com


 


VirnetX and GABRIEL Connection Technology are trademarks of VirnetX Holding Corporation. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.


 



19







EXHIBIT C1


 


JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE


IPR2014-01418, AND IPR2014-01421


 



20







Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding


IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX












[Parties will edit the following caption and the motion as appropriate depending on the IPR and Board’s guidance.]







Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc.







UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE


 








 


BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD


 








 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION


Petitioner


 


v.


 


VIRNETX, INC.


Patent Owner


 








 


Case IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 








 


JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING


 



21







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



	
I.

	
Precise Relief Requested







 


Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft” or “Petitioner”) and Patent Owner VirnetX, Inc. (“Patent Owner” or “VirnetX”) jointly request that this inter partes review proceeding (“this Review”) involving U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX (“the ’XXX patent”) be terminated based on a settlement between Petitioner and Patent Owner (“the Parties”).


 



	
II.

	
Reasons for Granting the Motion







 


Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement.  See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).  The Board authorized the filing of the instant motion in [the order/email] dated [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  IPR2013-00428, Paper No. 56 provides guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate.  There, the Board indicates that a joint motion, such as this one, should (1) include a brief explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all parties in any related litigation involving the patents at issue; (3) identify any related proceedings currently before the Office, and (4) discuss specifically the current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.  Id. at 2.  This motion satisfies each of the above requirements and is accompanied by a copy of the Parties’ settlement agreement, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).


 



22







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



		(1)	Brief Explanation of Why Termination is Appropriate





 


Termination is appropriate because a final written decision has not been reached in this Review.  Indeed, Petitioner filed its petition for inter partes review on [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  Patent Owner filed its preliminary response on MONTH DAY, YEAR].  The Board has not yet instituted this proceeding.


 


Termination of this proceeding is appropriate because, if this Motion is granted, Microsoft will not be participating as a party in this proceeding going forward, and the Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding.  The Parties have settled their dispute and executed a settlement agreement to terminate this proceeding, as well as the Parties’ related district court litigation regarding the ’XXX patent:  VirnetX, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex.).  The Parties expect that this district court litigation will be dismissed per the parties’ settlement agreement.  For all these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this proceeding.








		(2)	All parties in any pending related litigation involving the patents at issue





 


Patent Owner, but not Petitioner, is also involved in several other pending related litigations involving the ’XXX patent.  These related litigations, and their current status with respect to the litigating parties, are as follows:


 



23










IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



	
Related Case(s)

	
Defendants

	
Status


	        	            	             
	          	               	               
	               	               	              
	          	               	                 











		(3)	Related proceedings currently before the Office





 


Aside from this inter partes review proceeding, the ’XXX patent is also the subject of the following proceeding(s) currently before the Office:


 



	
Related Proceeding(s)

	
Requester/Petitioner

	
Status


	
Control No. XX/XXXXXX

	             	           
	
IPR2014-000XX

	                 	             











		(4)	Current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding










Above, a status field indicates the status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.


 



24







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



	
III.

	
Settlement Agreement







 


Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’ settlement agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit [XXXX].1  The Parties are also filing concurrently herewith a joint request under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential information and keep it separate from the files of the involved patent.


 


Respectfully submitted,


 



	
                          

	
 

	
                             

	
 


	
[Name]

	
 

	
[Name]

	
 


	
[Address]

	
 

	
[Address]

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Counsel for Petitioner

	
 

	
Counsel for Patent Owner

	
 


	
Microsoft Corporation

	
 

	
VirnetX, Inc.

	
 







 


Dated:  [MONTH DAY, YEAR]


 








1            The settlement agreement is being filed electronically via the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) with access to the “Parties and Board Only.”


 



25







EXHIBIT C2







JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE


IPR2014-00610, IPR2014-00614 (CONSOLIDATED WITH IPR2014-00613), 


IPR2014-00615 (CONSOLIDATED WITH IPR2014-00618)


 



26







Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding


IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 


[Parties will edit the following caption and the motion as appropriate depending on the IPR and Board’s guidance.]







Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc.







 


UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE


 








 


BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD


 








 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION


Petitioner


 


v.


 


VIRNETX, INC.


Patent Owner


 








 


Case IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 








 


JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING


 



27







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



	
I.

	
Precise Relief Requested







 


Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft” or “Petitioner”) and Patent Owner VirnetX, Inc. (“Patent Owner” or “VirnetX”) jointly request that this inter partes review proceeding (“this Review”) involving U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX (“the ’XXX patent”) be terminated based on a settlement between Petitioner and Patent Owner (“the Parties”).


 



	
II.

	
Reasons for Granting the Motion







 


Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement.  See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).  The Board authorized the filing of the instant motion in [the order/email] dated [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  IPR2013-00428, Paper No. 56 provides guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate.  There, the Board indicates that a joint motion, such as this one, should (1) include a brief explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all parties in any related litigation involving the patents at issue; (3) identify any related proceedings currently before the Office, and (4) discuss specifically the current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.  Id. at 2.  This motion satisfies each of the above requirements and is accompanied by a copy of the Parties’ settlement agreement, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).


 



28







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



		(1)	Brief Explanation of Why Termination is Appropriate





 


Termination is appropriate because a final written decision has not been reached in this Review.  Indeed, Petitioner filed its petition for inter partes review on [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  The Board instituted this proceeding on [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  Patent Owner has not filed a Patent Owner’s Response, and one is not due until [MONTH DAY, YEAR].


 


Termination of this proceeding is appropriate because, if this Motion is granted, Microsoft will not be participating as a party in this proceeding going forward, and the Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding.  The Parties have settled their dispute and executed a settlement agreement to terminate this proceeding, as well as the Parties’ related district court litigation regarding the ’XXX patent:  VirnetX, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex.).  The Parties expect that this district court litigation will be dismissed per the parties’ settlement agreement.  For all these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this proceeding.


 



29







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



		(2)	All parties in any pending related litigation involving the patents at issue





 


Patent Owner, but not Petitioner, is also involved in several other pending related litigations involving the ’XXX patent.  These related litigations, and their current status with respect to the litigating parties, are as follows:


 



	
Related Case(s)

	
Defendants

	
Status


	                 	                 	               
	               	                	                
	               	                   	                
	                      	                   	                       











		(3)	Related proceedings currently before the Office





 


Aside from this inter partes review proceeding, the ’XXX patent is also the subject of the following proceeding(s) currently before the Office:


 



	
Related Proceeding(s)

	
Requester/Petitioner

	
Status


	
Control No. XX/XXXXXX

	                    	             
	
IPR2014-000XX

	                      	                      











		(4)	Current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding










Above, a status field indicates the status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.


 



30








IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 





	
III.

	
Settlement Agreement







 


Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’ settlement agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit [XXXX].2  The Parties are also filing concurrently herewith a joint request under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential information and keep it separate from the files of the involved patent.


 


Respectfully submitted,


 



	
                       

	
 

	
                        

	
 


	
[Name]

	
 

	
[Name]

	
 


	
[Address]

	
 

	
[Address]

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Counsel for Petitioner

	
 

	
Counsel for Patent Owner

	
 


	
Microsoft Corporation

	
 

	
VirnetX, Inc.

	
 







 


Dated:  [MONTH DAY, YEAR]


 








2            The settlement agreement is being filed electronically via the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) with access to the “Parties and Board Only.”


 



31







EXHIBIT C3







JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE


IPR2014-00403 AND IPR2014-00404


 



32







Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding


IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 


[Parties will edit the following caption and the motion as appropriate depending on the IPR and Board’s guidance.]







Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc.


 


UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE


 








 


BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD


 








 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION


Petitioner


 


v.


 


VIRNETX, INC.


Patent Owner


 








 


Case IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 









 


JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING WITH RESPECT TO MICROSOFT CORPORATION


 



33








	
I.

	
Precise Relief Requested







 


Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft” or “Petitioner”) and Patent Owner VirnetX, Inc. (“Patent Owner” or “VirnetX”) jointly request that this inter partes review proceeding (“this Review”) involving U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX (“the ’XXX patent”) be terminated with respect to Microsoft based on a settlement between Petitioner and Patent Owner (“the Parties”).


 



	
II.

	
Reasons for Granting the Motion







 


Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement.  See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).  The Board authorized the filing of the instant motion in [the order/email] dated [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  IPR2013-00428, Paper No. 56 provides guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate.  There, the Board indicates that a joint motion, such as this one, should (1) include a brief explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all parties in any related litigation involving the patents at issue; (3) identify any related proceedings currently before the Office, and (4) discuss specifically the current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.  Id. at 2.  This motion satisfies each of the above requirements and is accompanied by a copy of the Parties’ settlement agreement, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).


 



34







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



		(1)	Brief Explanation of Why Termination is Appropriate





 


With respect to Microsoft, termination is appropriate because a final written decision has not been reached in this Review.  Indeed, Petitioner filed its petition for inter partes review on [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  The Board instituted this proceeding on [MONTH DAY, YEAR].  Patent Owner filed a Patent Owner’s Response on [MONTH DAY, YEAR], but Petitioner has not filed its Reply, which is not due until [MONTH DAY, YEAR].


 


Termination of this proceeding with respect to Microsoft is appropriate because, if this Motion is granted, Microsoft will not be participating as a party in this proceeding going forward, and the Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding.  The Parties have settled their dispute and executed a settlement agreement to terminate this proceeding as to Microsoft, as well as the Parties’ related district court litigation regarding the ’XXX patent:  VirnetX, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex.).  The Parties expect that this district court litigation will be dismissed per the parties’ settlement agreement.  For all these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this proceeding with respect to Microsoft.



35







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



		(2)	All parties in any pending related litigation involving the patents at issue





 


Patent Owner, but not Petitioner, is also involved in several other pending related litigations involving the ’XXX patent.  These related litigations, and their current status with respect to the litigating parties, are as follows:


 



	
Related Case(s)

	
Defendants

	
Status


	              	                 	                    
	                 	                     	                  
	                  	                  	                 
	                      	                    	                      











		(3)	Related proceedings currently before the Office





 


Aside from this inter partes review proceeding, the ’XXX patent is also the subject of the following proceeding(s) currently before the Office:


 



	
Related Proceeding(s)

	
Requester/Petitioner

	
Status


	
Control No. XX/XXXXXX

	                   	                  
	
IPR2014-000XX

	                      	                 











		(4)	Current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding










Above, a status field indicates the status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.


 



36







IPR2014-000XX

U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 



	
III.

	
Settlement Agreement







 


Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’ settlement agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit [XXXX].3  The Parties are also filing concurrently herewith a joint request under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential information and keep it separate from the files of the involved patent.


 


Respectfully submitted,


 



	
                    

	
 

	
                         

	
 


	
[Name]

	
 

	
[Name]

	
 


	
[Address]

	
 

	
[Address]

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Counsel for Petitioner

	
 

	
Counsel for Patent Owner

	
 


	
Microsoft Corporation

	
 

	
VirnetX, Inc.

	
 







 


Dated:  [MONTH DAY, YEAR]


 








3            The settlement agreement is being filed electronically via the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) with access to the “Parties and Board Only.”


 



37







EXHIBIT D







JOINT REQUEST TO TREAT SETTLEMENT


AGREEMENT AS CONFIDENTIAL


 



38







[Parties will edit the following caption and the request as appropriate depending on the IPR and Board’s guidance.]







Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation and VirnetX, Inc.







UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE


 









 




BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD


 









 




MICROSOFT CORPORATION


Petitioner







v.







VIRNETX, INC.


Patent Owner


 









 




Case IPR2014-000XX


U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX


 









 




JOINT REQUEST TO TREAT SETTLEMENT


AGREEMENT AS BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL


UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)


 








39







Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), and the Board’s [order/email] of [MONTH DAY, YEAR], authorizing the filing of this joint request, Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Petitioner”) and Patent Owner VirnetX, Inc. (“Patent Owner”), hereby jointly request that a true copy of the settlement agreement filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit [XXXX] be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX (“the ’XXX Patent”).  Exhibit [XXXX] is being submitted in the PRPS system as “Parties and Board Only.”  The Parties further request the Board to not make Exhibit [XXXX] available to any third party, except as provided for in 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).


 


Respectfully submitted,


 



	
                              

	
 

	
                    

	
 


	
[Name]

	
 

	
[Name]

	
 


	
[Address]

	
 

	
[Address]

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Counsel for Petitioner

	
 

	
Counsel for Patent Owner

	
 


	
Microsoft Corporation

	
 

	
VirnetX, Inc.

	
 







 





Dated:  [MONTH DAY, YEAR]








40







EXHIBIT E


 


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


TYLER DIVISION







	
VIRNETX, INC., and


LEIDOS, INC.,


 


Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,


 


v.


 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION,


 


Defendant/Counterclaimant.


 

	
§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§

	
 


 


 


 


Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-00351-LED


 


 










JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS BY ALL PARTIES


 


In accordance with a certain agreement between VirnetX, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation, VirnetX, Inc., Leidos, Inc. (formerly Science Applications International Corp.) (VirnetX, Inc. and Leidos, Inc. collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) file this joint motion to dismiss the litigation captioned above.


 


Plaintiffs dismiss all claims in this action against Microsoft with prejudice.  Microsoft dismisses without prejudice its affirmative defenses and counterclaims of (i) non-infringement and invalidity and (ii) unenforceability in this action.  Microsoft dismisses with prejudice its other counterclaims in this action.


 


Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.







(signatures                 follow)


 



41








	
Dated:  February 28, 2015

	
Respectfully submitted,


	 	 
	 	
FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.


	 	 
	 	
/s/                                                      

	 
	 	
Melissa R. Smith (Texas Bar No. 24001351)


	 	
303 South Washington Avenue


	 	
Marshall, Texas 75670


	 	
Telephone:  903.934.8450


	 	
Facsimile:  903.934.9257


	 	 
	 	
Ruffin B. Cordell (Texas Bar No. 04820550)


	 	
Indranil Mukerji (Massachusetts Bar No. 644059)


	 	
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.


	 	
1425 K Street NW, Suite 1100


	 	
Washington, DC 20005


	 	
Telephone:  202.783.5070


	 	
Facsimile:  202.783.5331


	 	 
	 	
David J. Healey (Texas Bar No. 09327980)


	 	
Benjamin C. Elacqua (Texas Bar No. 24055443)


	 	
Tony Nguyen (Texas Bar No. 24083565)


	 	
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.


	 	
1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800


	 	
Houston, Texas 77010


	 	
Telephone:  713.654.5300


	 	
Facsimile:  713.652.0109













42








	 	
Katrina G. Eash (Texas Bar No. 24074636)


	 	
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.


	 	
1717 Main Street, Suite 5000


	 	
Dallas, Texas 75201


	 	
Telephone:  214.747.5070


	 	
Facsimile:  214.747.2091


	 	 
	 	
Benjamin K. Thompson (Georgia Bar No. 633211)


	 	
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.


	 	
1180 Peachtree Street, NE, 21st Floor


	 	
Atlanta, Georgia 30309


	 	
Telephone:  404.892.5005


	 	
Facsimile:  404.892.5002


	 	 
	 	
Attorneys for Defendant


	 	
MICROSOFT CORPORATION


	 	 
	 	
Caldwell Cassady & Curry


	 	
	 	/s/	
	 	
Bradley W. Caldwell


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24040630


	 	
E-mail: bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com


	 	
Jason D. Cassady


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24045625


	 	
E-mail: jcassady@caldwellcc.com


	 	
John Austin Curry


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24059636


	 	
E-mail: acurry@caldwellcc.com


	 	
Daniel R. Pearson


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24070398


	 	
E-mail: dpearson@caldwellcc.com


	 	
Hamad M. Hamad


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24061268


	 	
E-mail: hhamad@caldwellcc.com


	 	
Justin T. Nemunaitis


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24065815


	 	
E-mail:  jnemunaitis@caldwellcc.com


	 	
Christopher S. Stewart


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24079399


	 	
E-mail: cstewart@caldwellcc.com


	 	
John F. Summers


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24079417


	 	
E-mail: jsummers@caldwellcc.com


	 	
Jason S. McManis


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 24088032


	 	
E-mail: jmcmanis@caldwellcc.com







 



43








	 	
Warren J. McCarty, III


	 	
Illinois State Bar No. 6313452


	 	
E-mail:  wmccarty@caldwellcc.com


	 	
CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY P.C.


	 	
2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 1000


	 	
Dallas, Texas 75201


	 	
Telephone: 214.888.4848


	 	
Facsimile: 214.888.4849


	 	 
	 	
Robert M. Parker


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 15498000


	 	
Email:  rmparker@pbatyler.com


	 	
R. Christopher Bunt


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 00787165


	 	
Email:  rcbunt@pbatyler.com


	 	
Charles Ainsworth


	 	
Texas State Bar No. 00783521


	 	
Email:  charley@pbatyler.com


	 	
PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.


	 	
100 East Ferguson, Suite 1114


	 	
Tyler, Texas 75702


	 	
Telephone: 903.531.3535


	 	
Telecopier: 903.533.9687


	 	 	
	 	
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LEIDOS, INC.


	 	
	 	/s/	
	 	
ANDY TINDEL (Lead Counsel)


	 	
State Bar No. 20054500


	 	
MT2 LAW GROUP


	 	
Mann | Tindel | Thompson


	 	
112 East Line Street, Suite 304


	 	
Tyler, Texas 75702


	 	
Telephone: 903.596.0900


	 	
Facsimile: 903.596.0909


	 	
Email: atindel@andytindel.com


	 	 
	 	
Of Counsel:











44








	 	
DONALD URRABAZO


	 	
California State Bar No. 189509


	 	
ARTURO PADILLA


	 	
California State Bar No. 188902


	 	
URRABAZO LAW, P.C.


	 	
2029 Century Park East, 14th Floor


	 	
Los Angeles, CA 90067


	 	
Direct: 310.388.9099


	 	
Facsimile: 310.388.9088


	 	
Email: durrabazo@ulawpc.com


	 	
Email: apadilla@ulawpc.com


	 	 
	 	
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LEIDOS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION







 


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


 


The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a).  As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service on this 17th day of December, 2014.  Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).


 



	
 

	
/s/ Jason D. Cassady

	
 


	
 

	
Jason D. Cassady

	
 







 



45







IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION







	
VIRNETX, INC. and


LEIDOS, INC.,


 


Plaintiffs,


 


v.


 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION,


 


Defendant.


 

	
§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§


§

	
 


 


 


 


Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-00351


 


 


JURY TRIAL DEMANDED










[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL







On this day came on to be heard the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss, and the Court having considered same, is of the opinion the dismissal should be GRANTED.


 


IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims asserted against Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) in this action are dismissed with prejudice.


 


  Microsoft’s affirmative defenses and counterclaims of (i) non-infringement and invalidity and (ii) unenforceability in this action are dismissed without prejudice.  Microsoft’s other counterclaims in this action are dismissed with prejudice.


 


Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.


 


This is a final judgment.


 


 




46