alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with this Annual Report of Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet
Torm (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Klaus Kjaerulff, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
 
 Date:
June 25, 2008
 
 /s/Klaus
Kjaerulff
 Klaus
Kjaerulff
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SK 03810 0001 893015
v2
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Stephen P. DeSantis, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of TCI Solutions, Inc.;
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

- The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 26, 2004

 

 

/s/ Stephen P. DeSantis
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephanie Gunther, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.), rendered May 30, 1984, convicting her of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*933Judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

It was not error for the court to deny a hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress the gun in question. Defendant voluntarily surrendered the gun to Sergeant Carlson. Therefore, there was no search conducted and the issue of suppression is nonexistent *(People v Hill,*45 AD2d 1028; *People v Cotton,*22 AD2d 692). Furthermore, the record supports the court’s determination that the on-the-scene inquiries of defendant did not constitute custodial interrogation but, rather, constituted a proper investigative inquiry. Therefore, the statement made by defendant during the inquiry prior to her arrest did not require suppression *(see, People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, *cert denied*400 US 851). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be unpreserved or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                           the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii)                        the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  April 23, 2010 | /s/ Tony D.  Maher       |
|----------------------------|--------------------------|
|                       | Tony D. Maher            |
|                       | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2375

JAMES ELLIS HALL, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01080-LO-TCB)

Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 25, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ellis Hall, II, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Frederick Nieman, JACKSON LEWIS 

PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

James Ellis Hall, II, appeals the district court’s order granting Verizon 

Communications, Inc.’s (Verizon) motion to dismiss Hall’s complaint alleging Verizon 

violated his First Amendment rights when it terminated Hall after he published an article 

criticizing the company. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). Because it is possible that Hall could cure the defects in his complaint 

through amendment, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 

623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction, and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Hall to 

file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
fs1ex10ii_wecosign.htm


     

    
      Exhibit 10.2


       

      ADAMS
PROPERTIES

      3420-H
W. Macarthur Blvd.

      Santa
Ana, CA. 92704

      Phone:
714-957-8888    Fax: 714-957-0416

      ShaunaNels@aolcorn

       

      May 28,
2009

       

      WeCoSign
Inc.

      3400-I W.
Macarthur Blvd. 

      Santa Ma,
CA 92704

       

      LEASE
RENEWAL

       

      This
letter, when signed by both parties, will serve as a lease renewal on the unit
you lease from us at 3400-I W. Macarthur BI., Santa Ana, California, and located
within the MacArthur/Susan Industrial Park.

       

      All terms
and conditions of the original lease, dated June 1, 2008 will prevail during the
term of this lease renewal with the exception that the new rental rate will be
$1200.00 (same) effective June 1,
2009.

       

      The term
of this renewal will be one year commencing on June 1, 2009 and expiring on May 31, 2010. (Rent will be due on the first day of
each month)

       

      Lessee
agrees to deposit with Lessor and additional (0) which will make the amount on
deposit with Lessor the sum of $1200.00 (see addendum to lease regarding
security deposits. )

       

      Lessee
agrees to pay an additional 10%
late charge if rent is not paid within 5 days of due date.

       

       

      

       

       

      
        Please
sign and return to the leasing office. If you should need a copy one can be
provided for you.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grape Genetics Research Unit (GGRU): Geneva, NY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Geneva, New York Grape Genetics Research Unit (GGRU) Docs







**Bioinformatics** There are a number of computational biology projects at USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU) and Grape Genetics Research Unit (GGRU) in Geneva, NY, working on problems of germplasm conservation, characterization, and improvement. Typical applications of bioinformatics include molecular marker discovery/prediction, sequence clustering and annotation, genetic data analyses, molecular evolution, data mining for genes of interest to our rootstock and scion breeders, virtual differential display analyses, population genetics, and trait mapping.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
(55 Misc. Rep. 320.)

#### In re POPHAM AVE. IN CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

July 23, 1907.)

Eminent Domain—Opening Avenue—Pboperty Taken.

Where the question whether certain property was embraced in a proceeding for the opening of an avenue in the city of New York and properly the subject of an award was determined on a motion to waive the order appointing commissioners, it will not be considered on application for confirmation of the commissioners’ report.

In the matter of Popham avenue. On motion to confirm report of commissioners of estimate and assessment. Motion granted.

*483William B. Ellison, Corp. Counsel (John P. Dunn and F. W. Gahrmann, of counsel), for the motion.

John C. Shaw, opposed.

BISCHOEF, J.

Asserting that property not embraced within the proceeding has been taken and made the subject of awards, thus increasing the assessments, certain property owners assessed oppose the confirmation of the report. The question whether the land taken was properly within the scope of the proceedings depends upon a construction of the resolution of the board of estimate and apportionment, the basis of the proceedings, and, further, upon the order whereby the commissioners were appointed. Concededly, the order justifies the city’s position that this land was included, and upon an earlier motion by these property owners for a modification of the order, so far as to exclude the land in conformity, as was claimed, with the intention of the resolution referred to, the application was denied. Apparently the court decided the question of construction before it; and there is direct authority for the proposition that the application to modify the order was the proper means to a determination of the true scope of the proceeding, a determination which cannot with propriety be made upon the motion to confirm the report. Matter of Grand Boulevard and Concourse, 33 App. Div. 210, 53 N. Y. Supp. 331.

I can find no ground for the assumption of counsel for the respondents that the motion was denied upon the theory that the point should be reserved until the motion for confirmation was heard. Such a result would have been contrary to the rule announced by the Appellate Division in the case referred to, and there is nothing in the record to give color to the contention. Under the circumstances, there is no escape from the conclusion that the point sought to be raised by the objecting parties has been determined by an order in the proper form of proceeding, and cannot be again presented for determination now.

Motion to confirm report granted.
#### Edward Stephen GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. T.E. VAUGHAN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-55764.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 7, 2011.

Edward Stephen Gonzales, Blythe, CA, pro se.

J. Conrad Schroeder, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Edward Stephen Gonzales appeals pro se from the *765district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss.

Gonzales contends that the Board of Prison Terms’ 2002 decision to deny him parole deprived him of due process because it was not supported by “some evidence,” and relied on static factors and other allegedly impermissible factors. After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a certificate of appeala-bility (“COA”) is required to challenge the denial of parole. *See Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). Now the Supreme Court has held that the only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. *See Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam). Because Gonzales raises no procedural challenges regarding his parole hearing, a COA cannot issue, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Further, because Gonzales has not has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we decline to certify his remaining claims. *Id.*

We deny Gonzales’ request for additional briefing.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

Postal ServiceTM.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:* July 1, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 14, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 196 to Competitive Product List.* Documents are available at *www.prc.gov,* Docket Nos. MC2021-102, CP2021-105.

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-14022 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# L_2009088EN.01013301.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 88/133 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 88/133

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 22 April 2008

on the closure of the accounts of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2006

(2009/206/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2006 (1),

having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2006, together with the Centre's replies (2),

having regard to the Council's recommendation of 12 February 2008 (5843/2008 — C6-0084/2008),

having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (3), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (4), and in particular Article 23 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (5), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0117/2008),

| 1. | Notes that the final annual accounts of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control are as annexed to the Court of Auditors' report; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2006; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

3.

The President

Hans-Gert PÖTTERING

The Secretary-General

Harald RØMER

---

(1)  
  OJ C 261, 31.10.2007, p. 49.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 309, 19.12.2007, p. 99.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

5

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 11:00 
a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 1, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-14507 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Campea, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered January 22, 1982, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could *747be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606.) Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.