alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ashton B. Talbot, Respondent, v. Doran and Wright Company (Limited), Appellant.

(Submitted June 16, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, made January 13, 1890, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant to vacate an order for the examination of its witnesses before trial and for the production of books and papers.

*707
      *William H. Shepard*for appellant.

*Wm. Parkin*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Nicholas Venetucci *v.*Phyllis Salvino

*Daniel Shepro,*in support of the petition.

*Louis Volpintesta, Jr.,*in opposition.

Decided November 29, 1989

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Is the controversy between the defendant and her former employer concerning the interpretation and enforcement of a covenant not to compete a ‘labor dispute’ as defined by Connecticut General Statutes § 31-112 (e)?”
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, the undersigned, Michael T. Kennedy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the most recent fiscal quarter (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2004 |  | /s/ Michael T. Kennedy               
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        



A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab Docs Cereal Rust Bulletins





- 2023
- 2022
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- 2005
- 2004
- 2003
- 2002
- 2001
- 2000
- Older Cereal Rust Bulletins

2003 Cereal Rust Bulletinsheadline bar Bulletin #1
Bulletin #2
Bulletin #3
Bulletin #4
Bulletin #5
Bulletin #6
Bulletin #7
Bulletin #8
Bulletin #9
Final bulletin for 2003


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### TODD v. BECK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

May 9, 1912.)

Costs (§ 32*)—Statutory Provisions.

As the only authority for the taxation of costs upon the dismissal of a defendant’s counterclaim is Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) § 332, subd. 4, which provides that, upon a judgment for a plaintiff on the counterclaim in an action brought for a sum less than $50 in which the defendant interposed a counterclaim amounting to $50 or over, the court *1109shall allow as costs the sum the plaintiff would be entitled to recover if the amount of his claim were the amount of the defendant’s counterclaim, costs were improperly taxed in favor of a plaintiff, suing for more than $50, upon the dismissal of a counterclaim for $175 and a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $43.80.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Costs, Cent. Dig. §§ 108, 111-114; Dec. Dig. § 32.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Isaac Todd against Maks Beck. From a judgment for plaintiff, taxing costs upon a dismissal of the defendant’s counterclaim, defendant appeals. Modified and affirmed.

Argued April term, 1912, before SEABURY, GUY, and GERARD, JJ.

Jacob W. Block, of New York City, for appellant.

Nathan Kelmenson, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from so much of a judgment as taxes $15 in favor of the plaintiff upon a dismissal of the defendant’s counterclaim. Plaintiff sued, claiming $154. The defendant counterclaimed for $175. Upon the trial the defendant’s counterclaim was dismissed, and the jury found a verdict upon plaintiff’s claim for the sum of $43.80. Upon motion of the plaintiff, the clerk.was directed to tax $15 to the plaintiff upon the dismissal of defendant’s counterclaim.

The right to tax costs is given by statute, and in the Municipal Court is fixed by section 332 of the Municipal Court Act and the several subdivisions thereof. The only provision in that section for the recovery of costs by the plaintiff upon the dismissal of a defendant’s counterclaim is contained in subdivision 4, which provides that:

> “Where an action is brought by the plaintiff for a sum less than $50, and the defendant shall have interposed a counterclaim amounting to $50 or more, and the plaintiff recovers judgment upon the counterclaim, the same sum as plaintiff would have been entitled to recover if the amount of his claim were the amount of the defendant’s countérelaim.”

As the action was brought by plaintiff for a sum over $50, he is not entitled to recover costs upon the dismissal of defendant’s counterclaim.

Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the sum of $15 costs, and, as modified, affirmed, with $15 costs to appellant.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 488 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 488

  To require the FHA to equitably treat homebuyers who have repaid in 
       full their FHA-insured mortgages, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2011

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the FHA to equitably treat homebuyers who have repaid in 
       full their FHA-insured mortgages, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reduce Excessive Interest Payments 
Act'' or the ``REIP Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTEREST CHARGES FOR ON-TIME PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS.

    Section 203 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(z) Prohibition on Interest Charges for On-time Principal 
Payments.--Each mortgagee (or servicer) with respect to a mortgage 
under this section may not impose, nor may the Secretary require the 
imposition of, any interest charge on such a mortgage as a result of 
the loss of any time period provided by the mortgagee (or servicer) 
within which the mortgagor may fully repay the principal balance amount 
of the mortgage, with respect to--
            ``(1) any days in the billing cycle that precedes the most 
        recent billing cycle in which such amounts were repaid; or
            ``(2) any amounts repaid in the current billing cycle that 
        were repaid within such time period.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35498-35499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in 
accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and 
following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, 
General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the 
Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee will be renewed for a 
two-year period beginning on June 28, 2021. The Committee will provide 
advice to the Director, Office of Science (DOE), on the Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research Program managed by the Office of Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research. Additionally, the renewal of the 
Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee has been determined to 
be essential to the conduct of the Department of Energy business and to 
be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The 
Committee will operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, adhering to the rules and regulations in 
implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Chalk at (301) 903-5152 or 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82e1eaf0ebf1f6ebece7ace1eae3eee9c2f1e1ebe7ece1e7ace6ede7ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62010a100b11160b0c074c010a030e092211010b070c01074c060d074c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>.

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on June 29, 
2021, by Miles Fernandez, Acting Committee Management Officer, pursuant 
to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with 
the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document 
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.


[[Page 35499]]


    Signed in Washington, DC, on June 30, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-14274 Filed 7-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of National Mercantile Bancorp (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Brown,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                     | /s/  DAVID R. BROWN |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     | David R.  Brown          |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     |                     |
| Date:  May 15, 2003 |                     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NationalMercantile Bancorp and will be retained by National Mercantile Bancorp andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Esther Boone et al., Respondents, v Supermarkets General Corporation, Appellant.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated November 2, 1983, as, “on consent”, denied a part of its request for a protective order. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated July 5, 1984, as, upon granting defendant’s motion to resettle the original ord.er to the extent of deleting the words “on consent”, adhered to that portion of the original order which denied a part of defendant’s request for a protective order.

Appeal from the order dated November 2,1983 dismissed. The portion of that order from which defendant appeals was superseded by the resettled order dated July 5, 1984.

Order dated July 5, 1984, affirmed, insofar as reviewed.

Respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

Upon review of the record, we conclude that Special Term did not abuse its discretion by allowing disclosure of investigation reports concerning other “slip-and-fall” accidents that occurred in defendant’s supermarket during the five years prior to the date the injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell in the store *(see, Mott v Chesebro-Whitman Co.,*87 AD2d 573; *Abrams v Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.,*37 AD2d 833). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Annual Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 18, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dale L. Gifford    
|                        |  |     |  | Dale L. Gifford        
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 55 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 

of services provided by nursing school clinics under State Medicaid programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

for coverage of services provided by nursing school clinics 

under State Medicaid programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nursing School Clinics 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY 

7 NURSING SCHOOL CLINICS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(a) of the Social Se9 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) is amended— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 55 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (28), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) by redesignating paragraph (29) as para4 graph (30); and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (28), the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(29) nursing school clinic services (as defined 

8 in subsection (ee)) furnished by or under the super9 vision of a nurse practitioner or a clinical nurse spe10 cialist (as defined in section 1861(aa)(5)), whether 

11 or not the nurse practitioner or clinical nurse spe12 cialist is under the supervision of, or associated with, 

13 a physician or other health care provider; and’’. 

14 (b) NURSING SCHOOL CLINIC SERVICES DEFINED.— 

15 Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) 

16 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub17 section: 

18 ‘‘(ee) The term ‘nursing school clinic services’ means 

19 services provided by a health care facility operated by an 

20 accredited school of nursing which provides primary care, 

21 long-term care, mental health counseling, home health 

22 counseling, home health care, or other health care services 

23 which are within the scope of practice of a registered 

24 nurse.’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 55 IS

1 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

2 1902(a)(10)(C)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

3 1396a(a)(10)(C)(iv)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and (29)’’ 

4 after ‘‘(24)’’. 

5 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall be effective with respect to payments 

7 made under a State plan under title XIX of the Social 

8 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) for calendar quar9 ters commencing with the first calendar quarter beginning 

10 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Historical Perspectives







Aubrey Riner Feeds his Chickens in the 1930'sheadline bar Aubrey Riner and his chickens in the 1930'sDuring the Great Depression, produce raised on the family farm was an important source of food to rural families. Aubrey Riner, while feeding his family's flock of chickens, pauses for a photo in Fayette County, WV during the 1930's.Photo courtesy of Sarah Coffey Historical Perspectives Photo Index AFSRC Home


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov