alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2183 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2183

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Vincent 
                        Palladino Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

  Mr. Fossella (for himself, Mrs. McCarthy, Mr. King of New York, Mr. 
Meeks of New York, Mr. Towns, Mr. Engel, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Crowley, Mr. 
Ackerman, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Higgins, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Kuhl 
  of New York, Mr. Boehlert, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
 Serrano, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Weiner, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Owens, 
 Mr. Israel, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Sweeney, and Ms. 
  Velazquez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Vincent 
                        Palladino Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VINCENT PALLADINO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Vincent Palladino Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vincent 
Palladino Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,357
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              26
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,075
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     29,466
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          43,220
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            42,923
<LOANS>                                        129,883
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,006
<DEPOSITS>                                     185,239
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,456
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,117
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 216,006
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,959
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  976
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    54
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,989
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,900
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,089
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    900
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         900
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.86
<LOANS-NON>                                        293
<LOANS-PAST>                                       216
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,334
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,707
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,765
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLINTON REED KUHLMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 162 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
exhibit_4-26.htm










Exhibit 4.26


 








 


[•], 2015


 


 


 



To


Polat Maden Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Collectively, "Polat Maden")


Istanbul, Turkey


 


Dear Enver Sever, Siamak Jalili, Didem Polat


 


Following our discussions, here is a summary of our agreement re supply during 2015.


 


     1.     Estimated Quantities and binding orders and supply


 


Caesarstone’s working plan for year 2015 is as follows:




 





	
Product

	
Quantity 2015


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*


	
*

	
*

	
*











 



The above is Caesarstone’s working plan with a non-binding purchases projection from Polat Maden for year 2015 (the “Estimated Quantities”) for the abovementioned products (the “Products”). Caesarstone’s actual orders may significantly differ from the Estimated Quantities. As always, Caesarstone will deliver to Polat Maden a binding Purchase Order on a monthly basis, and Polat Maden shall supply to Caesarstone all such Purchase Orders (in accordance with the specifications set in writing by Caesarstone) up to the Estimated Quantities.


 


2. Prices – For quantities of the Products that shall be ordered by Caesarstone during year 2015, Polat Maden will charge from Caesarstone the following prices per ton, US$* (* US  Dollar).


 


3. Payment terms – for Products that shall be ordered by Caesarstone during year 2015 payment terms shall be the same as applied between the parties hereto during year 2014.


 


4. The products will be supplied by Polat Maden in a timely manner and in accordance with Caesarstone’s quality standards and specifications as will be updated by Caesarstone in writing from time to time, in accordance with each Caesarstone’s purchase order.


 


5. Polat Maden will maintain in confidence the terms of this agreement as well as any other confidential information of Caesarstone without time limitation.


 


6. This agreement and its performance will be governed by the English law and subject to the jurisdiction of the competent courts in England. Without derogating from the generality and validity of the foregoing, Caesarstone shall be entitled, at its sole discretion, to initiate legal proceedings related to this Agreement in Turkey, and in such case only same proceeding will be subject to the jurisdiction of the competent courts in Turkey.


 


7. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Polat Maden and CaesarStone, and all prior understandings and/or commitments of any of the parties with respect to the matters covered herein are superseded and null.


 


 * Confidential treatment has been requested for redacted portions of this exhibit. This copy omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as [*]. A complete version of this exhibit has been provided separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
[No. 39622-6-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David L. Love, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-06085-4, Richard A. Jones, J., entered October 29, 1996. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          39,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,782,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (57,167)       
<INVENTORY>                                  3,414,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,563,526
<PP&E>                                       2,495,007
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,008,891)       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,277,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,088,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,098
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,178,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,277,407
<SALES>                                      2,144,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,144,395
<CGS>                                        1,107,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,292,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (18,668)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (166,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (63,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (103,301)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 449 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 449

            For the relief of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2011

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel shall each be deemed to have been 
lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, and shall be 
eligible for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 
for permanent residence under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing an application for such 
adjustment of status.
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the application for adjustment of status is filed with 
appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
permanent resident status to Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 2, 
during the current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)), or, if applicable, 
the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 
to the country of birth of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel under section 
202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (d) PAYGO.--The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be 
determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary 
Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in 
the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget 
Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1869

BRO T. HESED

- EL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE, in its official capacity , Defendant

- Appellee , and JOHN DOE, in his individual capacity; ROBIN BRYSON, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, in her official capacity; MISSION HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED, in its official capacity , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger , Chief District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00285

- MR

- WCM )

Submitted : September 21, 2022 Decided: November 7, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1869 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 Bro T. Hesed

- El, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1869 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Bro T. Hesed

- El appeals the district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Hesed

- El ’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and denying reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hesed

- El’s motion s for appointme nt of counsel and to strike Appellee’s informal response brief, and we affirm the district court’s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1869 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7053** 

DE’MARION L. WILSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Sir, Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00358

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. De’Marion Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: De’Marion L. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as an unauthorized, successive petition . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merit s, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appea l. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Components and Health Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    FCHL Home
                    About FCHL
                        News
                                    Documents
                                    Directions to FCHLSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar Human Studies Facility
               About Us
               Agriculture Research Magazine Articles
               Business
               Main
               Information Meetings
               Current Studies
               Completed Studies
               2021 civil rights statement
               Food Components and Health Lab Human Study Volunteers Database Sign-up Form
               HS65: Taste Test Study


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          45,226
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              85
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    294,441
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,999
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,998
<LOANS>                                      1,394,917
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,781,212
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,378,883
<SHORT-TERM>                                    83,559
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,662
<LONG-TERM>                                    150,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,926
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,781,212
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 50,819
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,190
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   179
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                60,188
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,871
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,857
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           35,331
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,142
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  90
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,046
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      14,046
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.68
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,463
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,999
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   213
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,971
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,048
<RECOVERIES>                                       251
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,316
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,316
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>