alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Application Technology Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Departments
                        Agricultural Engineering
                                    Entomology
                                    Horticulture
                                    Plant Pathology
                                    IR-4 programSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Application Technology Research Entomology







Development of alternatives to insecticide dips for Japanese beetle quarantine proceduresheadline bar The objectives of this research are to develop techniques thatprovide quarantine levels of control of Japanese beetle grubs in nursery cropsare less detrimental to the environment than traditional insecticidesThis research involves testing various application techniques for the control of Japanese beetle grubs in pre- and post-harvest plants, including dipping, drenching, and chemigation.In addition, we are testing reduced-risk insecticides and natural plant-derived materials to determine their efficacy against Japanese beetle grubs.This research is being conducted in commercial nurseries in collaboration with Jason Oliver, Tennessee State University, McMinnville, TN.  For more information contact:  Mike Reding


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Ellen Horgan, as Executrix, etc., et al., Appellants, *v.*Samuel Riker et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.

(Argued April 29, 1890;

decided May 9, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 18, 1888, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee.

*James M. Lyddy*for appellants.

*John E. Parsons*for respondents.

Agree to affirm ; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the annual report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Stanberry, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of West
Bancorporation, Inc.





March 6,
2009





/s/
      Thomas E. StanberryThomas
      E. StanberryChairman,
      President and Chief Executive
Officer

















29
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 88A/24 l

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 88A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6524 lutego 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 88A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6524 lutego 2022

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ogłoszenia |
| | POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE |
| | Komisja Europejska |
| 2022/C 88 A/01 | Zawiadomienie zmieniające Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie na rzecz Inicjatywy w dziedzinie Innowacji w Ochronie Zdrowia (Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie) – Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko dyrektora wykonawczego Wspólnego Przedsięwzięcia na rzecz Inicjatywy w dziedzinie Innowacji w Ochronie Zdrowia (Zatrudnienie na czas określony – grupa zaszeregowania AD 14) – COM/2022/20075 ( Dz.U. C 48 A z 31.1.2022 ) | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

V   Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Komisja Europejska

2022/C 88 A/01

Zawiadomienie zmieniające Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie na rzecz Inicjatywy w dziedzinie Innowacji w Ochronie Zdrowia (Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie) – Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko dyrektora wykonawczego Wspólnego Przedsięwzięcia na rzecz Inicjatywy w dziedzinie Innowacji w Ochronie Zdrowia (Zatrudnienie na czas określony – grupa zaszeregowania AD 14) – COM/2022/20075 ( Dz.U. C 48 A z 31.1.2022 )

( Dz.U. C 48 A z 31.1.2022 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

V Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Komisja Europejska

| 24.2.2022 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2022

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 88/1

---

Zawiadomienie zmieniające „Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie na rzecz Inicjatywy w dziedzinie Innowacji w Ochronie Zdrowia (Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie) – Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko dyrektora wykonawczego Wspólnego Przedsięwzięcia na rzecz Inicjatywy w dziedzinie Innowacji w Ochronie Zdrowia (Zatrudnienie na czas określony – grupa zaszeregowania AD 14)” – COM/2022/20075

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 48 A z dnia 31 stycznia 2022 r.
  )

(2022/C 88 A/01)

Strona 5, „Termin rejestracji kandydatów”, akapit pierwszy:

| zamiast: | „Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 28 lutego 2022 r., o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli. Po tym terminie rejestracja nie będzie możliwa.”, |
| --- | --- |

zamiast:

„Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 28 lutego 2022 r., o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli. Po tym terminie rejestracja nie będzie możliwa.”,

| powinno być: | „Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 14 marca 2022 r., o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli. Po tym terminie rejestracja nie będzie możliwa.”. |
| --- | --- |

powinno być:

powinno być:

„Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 14 marca 2022 r., o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli. Po tym terminie rejestracja nie będzie możliwa.”.

---
[No. 38674-3-I.

Division One.

October 13, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. J.K., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-02253-7, Norma Smith Huggins, J., entered May 1, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2329 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2329

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 2005

                                Received

                            January 27, 2006

     Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or 
    employee of a foreign government to receive a reward under the 
                  Department of State Rewards Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Rewards Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR AN AGENCY OF A FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENT TO RECEIVE A REWARD UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    (a) Eligibility.--Subsection (f) of section 36 of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(f)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(f) Ineligibility.--An officer'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(f) Ineligibility.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an 
        officer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Exception in certain circumstances.--The Secretary 
        may pay a reward to an officer or employee of a foreign 
        government (or any entity thereof) who, while in the 
        performance of his or her official duties, furnishes 
        information described in such subsection, if the Secretary 
        determines that such payment satisfies the following 
        conditions:
                    ``(A) Such payment is appropriate in light of the 
                exceptional or high-profile nature of the information 
                furnished pursuant to such subsection.
                    ``(B) Such payment may aid in furnishing further 
                information described in such subsection.
                    ``(C) Such payment is formally requested by such 
                agency.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b) of such section (22 
U.S.C. 2708(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 
inserting ``or to an officer or employee of a foreign government in 
accordance with subsection (f)(2)'' after ``individual''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# L_2008310EN.01000301.xml

| 21.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1152/2008

of 20 November 2008

granting no export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 18 November 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 18 November 2008.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 18 November 2008 no export refund shall be granted for the products and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 November 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
#### SLACK, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1907.)

Action by Will A. Slack against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Perkins, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered July 21, 1983, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of defendant’s pretrial motion as sought suppression of identification testimony and certain pretrial statements.

Judgment affirmed.

There was probable cause to arrest defendant, the lineup procedure was not suggestive, and defendant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his *Miranda*rights. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 1 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 2 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 3 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 4 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 5 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 6 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00224-TLS-SLC document 4 filed 05/13/16 page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 99.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Altus Explorationss, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew B. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Andrew B. Stewart

___________________________

Andrew B. Stewart

Principal Financial Officer

March 31, 2003
THFF-2014.12.31-10-K EX-10.3










EXHIBIT 10.3 -  Schedule of Director Compensation


Compensation of Directors. Each director of the Corporation is also a director of First Financial Bank (“FFB”), the lead subsidiary bank of the Corporation, and receives directors’ fees from each organization. For 2015 a director of the Corporation and FFB will receive a fee of $750 for each board meeting attended.


Non-employee directors also receive a fee for meetings attended of the Audit Committee of $1,000, the Compensation Committee of $1,000, the Governance/Nominating Committee of $500, and the Loan Discount Committee of $500. Each director also will receive from a quarterly director’s fee of $11,250. No non-employee director served as a director of any other subsidiary of the Corporation.


Directors of the Corporation and FFB who are not yet 70 years of age may participate in a deferred director’s fee program at each institution. Under this program, a director may defer $6,000 of his or her director’s fees each year over a five-year period. When the director reaches the age of 65 or age 70, the director may elect to receive payments over a ten-year period. The amount of the deferred fees is used to purchase an insurance product which funds these payments. Each year from the initial date of deferral until payments begin at age 65 or 70, the Corporation accrues a non-cash expense which will equal in the aggregate the amount of the payments to be made to the director over the ten-year period. The Corporation expects that the cash surrender value of the insurance policy will offset the amount of expenses accrued. If a director fails for any reason other than death to serve as a director during the entire five-year period, or the director fails to attend at least 60 regular or special meetings, the amount to be received at age 65 or 70, as applicable, will be pro-rated appropriately.


Directors also may receive compensation previously accrued under the Corporation’s 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, no other benefits may be accrued under this plan. Under this plan, directors received 90, 100 or 110 percent of the director’s “award amount” if the Corporation and FFB attained certain goals established by the Corporation’s Compensation Committee. See Exhibit 10.3 to this Form 10-K for a description of this plan.
II 

Calendar No. 337 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2346 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John J. Hainkel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN J. HAINKEL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in 

6 Hammond, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘John J. Hainkel Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 2346 RS 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John J. Hainkel Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 337 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2346 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Hammond, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John J. Hainkel al Service located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported without amendment
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicole L. Colucci, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 394]

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Sperrazza, J.), rendered April 14, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the second degree.

*1419It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that her waiver of the right to appeal was invalid *(see generally People v*Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). The plea colloquy and the written waiver of the right to appeal signed by defendant demonstrate that she knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal *(see People v James,*71 AD3d 1465, 1465 [2010]), and the record establishes that “ ‘defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty’ ” *(People v Dunham,*83 AD3d 1423, 1424 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 794 [2011], quoting *Lopez,*6 NY3d at 256).

Defendant’s further contention that County Court erred in relying upon improper statements by the prosecutor during sentencing does not survive defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal “inasmuch as defendant is essentially challenging the procedure pursuant to which [she] was sentenced . . . , rather than the legality of the sentence . . . ‘Because the power of the court is not implicated by [that] challenge [ ], appellate review of [that challenge] is foreclosed by the bargained-for waiver of [the right to] appeal’ ” *(People v Adams,*64 AD3d 1186, 1187 [2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 834 [2009]).

Finally, defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence is encompassed by her valid waiver of the right to appeal *(see Lopez,*6 NY3d at 255-256; *People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Smith, J.P., Bindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2242 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion-exchange resins. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ionexchange resins. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ION-EXCHANGE RESINS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.39.30 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain ion-exchange resins) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2242 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ