U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home News & Events News Articles Research News 2007





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News
- Search News & Events
- Pesticide Drift May Endanger Pollinators
- ARS Seeks a Fire Ant Fix
- Scientific Discoveries 2024
- ARS Featured Photos
- Down on the Farm
- Facebook Live Events
- Food and Nutrition Research Briefs
- News Archive
- Science in Your Shopping Cart
- Scientific Discoveries
- Social Media
- Under the Microscope
- AgResearch magazine
- ARS at Work
- ARS Memorial Lectures
- ARS Science Hall of Fame
- Citrus Disease (Huanglongbing)
- Contact Office of Communications
- Plant Hardiness Zone Map
- Mobile Apps
- Public Affairs Contacts
- Publications and Other Resources
- USDA Blog
- Videos

Archived Page
 This page has been archived and is being provided for reference purposes only. The page is no longer being updated, and therefore, links on the page may be invalid.
 Read the magazine story to find out more.Chart showing yield v. fertilizer rate for conventionally tilled and no-till corn.Higher yields from conventional till (above) could mistakenly convince growers to avoid no-till, which is actually more profitable (below).Chart showing net returns v. nitrogen fertilizer rate for conventionally tilled and no-till corn.For further readingNo-till reduces global warming potentialA little phosphorus goes a long wayIncreasing corn yields with narrow rows Proper Management Can Make Lower Yields Profitable By Laura McGinnis  July 9, 2007 In agriculture, less is sometimes more. That's the conclusion of Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists who discovered that reduced tillage can increase soil carbon, and that lower corn yields can net higher profitsunder the right management. Corn leaves a lot of crop residue, so many growers till fields intensively when preparing soil for the next crop. To find out how tillage affects greenhouse gas emissions, soil scientist Ardell Halvorson with the ARS Soil Plant Nutrient Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colo., and Arvin Mosier, formerly with ARS, measured trace gases being emitted from the soil in three cropping systems: corn under conventional till and continuous no-till, and a no-till corn-soybean rotation. With several ARS colleagues, they found that when adequately fertilized, no-till soils sequestered more carbon than conventionally tilled soils, significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Halvorson and his colleagues also measured the effects of nitrogen fertilization and tillageboth conventional and no-tillon irrigated continuous corn yields. No-till management had multiple benefits, such as reducing soil erosion and fossil fuel consumption, sequestering carbon in the soil and lowering emission of greenhouse gases. However, no-till also lowered yields by about 23 bushels per acre at optimal nitrogen rate. The initial results made conventional tillage look like the better economic strategy, but further analysis revealed a surprising twist. David Archer, an ARS economist then located at the North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, Morris, Minn., found that no-till was actually moreprofitable than conventional tillage. Archer is currently located at the Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, Mandan, N.D. Using a statistical model, Archer determined that no-till management increased net profits by enabling significant reductions in tillage operations, machinery and labor costs and fossil fuel consumption. Net savings were $83 per acreenough to compensate for lower yields and still turn a profit. The economic benefits for farmers using these conservation practices could be even greater when participating in USDA conservation programs. Read more about the research in the July 2007 issue of Agricultural Research magazine. ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief scientific research agency.


Return to top


Research
                            Media
                            About ARS
                            Work With Us


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov