27524 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices

provide such capacity, but due to

circumstances beyond its control, such

capacity could not reasonably be made

available by the effective date. Great

Lakes adequately met these

requirements and was granted an initial

Case-By-Case Extension for one year

effective June 30, 1994 to June 30, 1995,

with the option to renew this extension

for up to one additional year (see FR

5151–3). Based on the Case-By-Case

extension provisions and request by

Great Lakes to extend the ban date,

Great Lakes will be allowed, upon final

approval to land dispose of its K117,

K118, K131, K132, AND F039 wastes

upon final approval, until September

30, 1995, without being subject to the

land disposal restrictions applicable to

such wastes. Final Approval of this

extension, will only be valid for

injection into Well Nos. 5 and 6.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This approved

extension of the LDR effective date

becomes effective May 11, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 6, Water Management

Division, Water Supply Branch (6W–

SU), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas

75202–2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The

RCRA/Superfund Hotline, at (800) 424–

9346 (toll free) or (703) 412–9810, in the

Washington, DC metropolitan area.

Dated: May 11, 1995.

Myron O. Knudson,

Director, Water Management Division.

[FR Doc. 95–12773 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

Gulf of Mexico Program Technical

Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the

Technical Advisory Committee of the

Gulf of Mexico Program.

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Program’s

Technical Advisory Committee will

hold a meeting at the Marriott Hotel,

555 Canal Street, New Orleans,

Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Douglas Lipka, Acting Director, Gulf

of Mexico Program Office, Building

1103, Room 202, John C. Stennis Space

Center, Stennis Space Center, MS

39529–6000, at (601) 688–3726.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A meeting

of the Technical Advisory Committee of

the Gulf of Mexico Program will be held

June 20, 1995, at the Marriott Hotel, 555

Canal Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.

The committee will meet from 8 a.m. to

5 p.m. Agenda items will include: A

report from Battelle on the draft QA/QC

plan for the Gulf of Mexico Program;

Development of a conceptual model for

the Gulf of Mexico; Strategies for

locating long-term monitoring sites on

the Gulf coast (this will focus on

possible integration of GEMS, LTER

sites, LMER sites and REMAP); A

research needs/coordination conference

for the Gulf Program partner agencies;

Hypoxia (Dead Zone) Symposium

Planning; and Introduce the role of the

TAC in the issue integration process.

The meeting is open to the public.

Douglas A. Lipka,

Acting Director, Gulf of Mexico Program

[FR Doc. 95–12774 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5210–4]

Clean Water Act (CWA) 304(l):

Availability of List of Submissions and

Proposed Approval Decisions

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (U.S. EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

availability of a list submitted to U.S.

EPA pursuant to Section 304(l)(1)(C) of

the CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1314(l)(1)(C) as well

as U.S. EPA’s proposed approval

decision, and request for public

comment.

DATES: Comments must be submitted to

U.S. EPA on or before June 23, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of these items can be

obtained by writing or calling: Mr.

Howard Pham, U.S. EPA—Region 5,

304(l) Coordinator, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency-Region 5, Water

Division (Mail Code WQP–16J), 77 West

Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604–

3507, telephone: (312) 353–2310.

Comments on these items should be

sent to Howard Pham, U.S. EPA—

Region 5 at the address given above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Howard Pham at the address and

telephone number given above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

304(l) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1314(l),

required each State, within 2 years after

February 4, 1987, to submit to the U.S.

EPA, three lists of waters, including a

list of those waters in which the State

does not expect to achieve applicable

water quality standards, after

application of technology-based

controls, due to discharges of toxic

pollutants from point sources (the ‘‘B

List’’ or ‘‘Short List’’). 33 U.S.C.

1314(l)(1)(B). The second, or ‘‘Mini’’ list

consists of waters that are not meeting

the new water quality standards

developed under Section 303(c)(2)(B)

for toxic pollutants because of pollution

from point and nonpoint sources. 33

U.S.C. 1314(l)(1)(A)(i). The third, or

‘‘Long’’ list includes all waters on the

other two lists, plus any waters which,

after the implementation of technologybased controls, are not expected to meet

the water quality goals of the Act. 33

U.S.C. 1314(l)(1)(A)(ii).

For each water segment identified in

these lists, the State was required, by

February 4, 1989, to submit a ‘‘C List’’

specifying point sources discharging

toxic pollutants believed to be

preventing or impairing such water

quality. 33 U.S.C. 1314(l)(1)(C).

For each point source identified on

the State’s C list as discharging toxic

pollutants into a water segment on the

State’s B list, the State was further

required to submit to U.S. EPA, an

individual control strategy (ICS) that the

State determined would serve to reduce

point source discharges of toxic

pollutants to the receiving water to a

degree sufficient to attain water quality

standards in that water within 3 years

after the date of the establishment of the

ICS. 33 U.S.C. 1314(l)(1)(D).

U.S. EPA initially interpreted the

statute to require States to identify on

the C list, only those facilities that

discharge toxic pollutants believed to be

impairing waters listed on the B list. In

Natural Resources Defense Council

(NRDC) v. U.S. EPA, the Ninth Circuit

Court of Appeals remanded that portion

of the regulation and directed U.S. EPA

to amend the regulations to require the

States to identify all point sources

discharging any toxic pollutant that is

believed to be preventing or impairing

water quality of any stream segment

listed on any of the three lists of waters,

and to indicate the amount of the toxic

pollutant discharges by each source. See

NRDC v. U.S. EPA, 915 F.2d 1313,

1323–24 (9th Cir. 1990). U.S. EPA

amended 40 CFR 130.10(d)(3)

accordingly. See 57 FR 33040 (July 24,

1992).

Consistent with U.S. EPA’s amended

regulation, the State of Ohio submitted

on April 20, 1992, to U.S. EPA, for

approval a supplemental facility list

(SFL) as required under Section

304(l)(1)(C). U.S. EPA’s review of Ohio’

304(l) SFL and its procedures used to

develop the list, found the procedures to

be consistent with the requirements of

the amended regulations. Based on the

above findings, U.S. EPA noticed the

availability of Ohio’s SFL, as well as the

Agency’s proposed approval decisions

and request for public comments (see

U.S. EPA’s Notice of Availability and

Proposed Approval Decisions published

at FR 12332, March 24, 1994).
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices 27525

On June 20, 1994, the Ohio

Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio

EPA) notified U.S. EPA in writing that

it was withdrawing its 304(l) SFL

submitted to U.S. EPA on April 20,

1992. Based upon public comments

received and other information gathered

by Ohio EPA during the public

comment period, Ohio determined that

its 304(l) SFL needed to be re-evaluated

based upon criteria set forth at 40 CFR

130.10.

Ohio EPA in its re-evaluation

procedures, examined each segment to

be impaired to identify the specific

toxicant responsible for the impairment,

identify the contaminated water

columns, assess data to evaluate the

magnitude of contamination,

incorporate newer data into the

assessment, and more specifically

identify the location of an impairment

in relation to dischargers in the same

waterbody. Using the re-evaluation

procedures the State of Ohio, on

February 8, 1995, resubmitted a SFL to

U.S. EPA for approval. The procedures

have been reviewed and accepted by

U.S. EPA. The following table indicates

the decisions made for the State of

Ohio’s SFL. Ohio’s SFL contains 36

facilities. U.S. EPA notes that the

National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System permits for those

facilities already include requirements

that meet water quality-based

considerations for parameters of

concern. Therefore, those permits will

be considered acceptable ICSs.

U.S. EPA today proposes to approve

the 304(l) SFL for the State of Ohio. U.S.

EPA solicits public comment on the

approval decision.

Dated: May 8, 1995.

David A. Ullrich,

Acting Regional Administrator.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Section 304(1) supplemental list]

Waterbody ID Water body name, upper

RM–lower RM Discharge name NPDES #/Ohio # Parameters ofconcern

OH 2–12 ....................... Mill Creek, 20.9–0.0 .............. Mahoning County Boardman

WWTP.

OH0037249/3PK00002 ......... Zn, Cu, Cr.

OH 2–20 ....................... Mahoning River (Mill Creek

to Meander Creek—

WWTP 28.5–20.0.

Girard–WWTP ....................... OH0025364/3PD00010 ......... Cr, Zn.

Niles–WWTP ......................... OH0026743/3PD00036 ......... Cr, Zn.

OH 2–23 ....................... Meander Creek, 20.4–0.0 ..... Mahoning County, Meander

Creek, WWTP.

OH0045721/3PK00011 ......... Cu, Zn.

OH 2–27 ....................... Mosquito Creek (Mosquito

Creek Reservoir to

Mahoning River), 12.4–0.0.

Trumbull County, Mosquito

Creek.

OH0043401/3PK00009 ......... Cu, Pb, Hg.

OH 2–35 ....................... Mahoning River (Meander

Creek to Duck Creek),

43.8–28.5.

LTV Steel–Warren ................ OH0011274/31D00004 ......... Cr.

City of Warren, WWTP ......... OH0027987/3PE00008 ......... Cr, Pb, Ni.

OH 10–5 ....................... Tuscarawas River (Newman

Creek to Pigeon Run),

91.9–86.7.

Mercury Stainless Steel–

Washington.

OH0092444/31D00067 ......... Cr, Pb, Cu.

Massillon–WWTP .................. OH0020516/3PE00007 ......... Cr, Zn, Pb, Cu.

OH 10–19 ..................... Little Chippewa Creek, 12.9–

0.0.

Orrville–WWTP ..................... OH0020371/3PD00017 ......... Zn.

OH 10–31 ..................... Pigeon Creek, 8.6–0.0 .......... Polysar Resins ...................... OH0088072/31Q00035 ......... Organics.

OH 15–31 ..................... Tuscarawas River (Conotton

Creek to Sugar Creek)

65.6–58.1.

Empire Detroit ....................... OH0004910/01D00036 ......... Cr+6, Pb, Zn.

OH 16–19 ..................... Rocky Fork Mohican River,

19.6–0.0.

Stone Container Corporation OH0005649/21A00001 ......... Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr, Ni.

Cyclops Industries (Armco

Steel).

OH0006840/21D00003 ......... Zn, Cd, Pb, Cu, Ni.

OH 17–14 ..................... Jerome Ford Mohican River

(Lang Creek to Lake Fork)

12.2–0.0.

Ashland–WWTP .................... OH0023906/2PD00010 ......... Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn.

OH 22–58 ..................... Beaver Run, 4.8–0.0 ............. Hebron–WWTP ..................... OH0021539/4PB00005 ......... Cd, Zn, Hg.

OH 24–106 ................... Muskingum River (Salt Creek

to Millers Run), 67.0–50.5.

Glacier Clevite/

McConnellsville.

OH0048372/01C00000 ......... Cu, Pb, Cr, Zn.

Gould/McConnellsville .......... OH0048364/01C00011 ......... Cr, Cu, Pb.

OH 44–16 ..................... Little Salt Creek (Headwaters

to Buckeye Creek), 28.5–

21.2.

Jackson–WWTP ................... OH0020834/OPD00008 ........ Cu, Pb, Zn.

OH 50–9 ....................... Little Beaver Creek, 9.0–0.0 . Montgomery County Eastern

Regional–WWTP.

OH0026590/1PL00001 ......... Cu, Zn.

OH 55–18 ..................... Blue Jacket Creek, 7.8–0.0 .. Bellefontaine WWTP ............. OH0024066/1PD00000 ......... Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn.

OH 63–19 ..................... Wabash River (Headwaters

to Stony Creek), 508.8–

481.3.

Fort Recovery Industries ...... OH0010138/21C00001 ......... Cu.

OH 66–3 ....................... Blanchard (Eagle Creek to

Ottawa River), 58.1–45.6.

Findlay–WWTP ..................... OH0025135/2PD00008 ......... Zn, Hg.

OH 69–15 ..................... Town Creek, 26.3–0.0 .......... Van Wert WWTP NOOS ...... OH0027910/2PD00006 ......... Cd, Zn.

OH 72–11 ..................... Prairie Creek, 12.7–0.0 ......... Bryan–WWTP ....................... OH0020532/2PD00018 ......... Cu.
27526 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued

[Section 304(1) supplemental list]

Waterbody ID Water body name, upper

RM–lower RM Discharge name NPDES #/Ohio # Parameters ofconcern

OH 73–26 ..................... Maumee River (Auglaize

River to Wade Creek),

64.0–52.0.

GMC Defiance ...................... OH0002666/21N00004 ......... Zn.

Defiance–WWTP .................. OH0024899/2PD00013 ......... Zn.

OH 76–24 ..................... Otter Creek, 10.2–0.0 ........... Sun Oil Refinery ................... OH0002763/21G00003 ......... Cr.

Libbey-Owens Ford .............. OH0002445/21N00020 ......... As.

OH 83–11 ..................... Raccoon Creek, 14.9–0.0 ..... Clyde–WWTP ....................... OH0024686/2PD00004 ......... Cu.

OH 88–5 ....................... Cuyahoga River (Congress

Lake Out to Lower Cuyahoga), 56.8–42.3.

Kent–WWTP ......................... OH0025917/3PD00031 ......... Cd, Cu, Zn.

OH 89–1 ....................... Cuyahoga River (Big Creek

Lake to Lake Erie).

LTV Steel Cleveland East

Side (west side merge with

the east side).

OH0000957/31D00003 ......... Zn, CN.

DuPont/Cleveland (Zaclon) ... OH0000990/31E00005 ......... Zn, CN.

OH 89–8 ....................... Tinkers Creek (Pond Brook

to Cuyahoga River), 22.5–

0.0.

Bedford Heights WWTP ....... OH0024058/3PD00006 ......... Cu, Pb.

Twinsburg WWTP ................. OH0027863/3PD00039 ......... Cu.

OH 89–8.3 .................... Beaver Meadow Creek, 3.0–

0.0.

Solon Central WWTP ........... OH0027430/3PD00019 ......... Cu, Hg.

[FR Doc. 95–12775 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA–1049–DR]

Louisiana; Amendment to Notice of a

Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice

of a major disaster for the State of

Louisiana (FEMA–1049–DR), dated May

10, 1995, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pauline C. Campbell, Response and

Recovery Directorate, Federal

Emergency Management Agency,

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is

hereby given that the incident period for

this disaster is closed effective May 16,

1995.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.516, Disaster Assistance.)

Richard W. Krimm,

Associate Director, Response and Recovery

Directorate.

[FR Doc. 95–12740 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–02–M

[FEMA–1051–DR]

Mississippi; Amendment to Notice of a

Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice

of a major disaster for the State of

Mississippi (FEMA–1051–DR), dated

May 12, 1995, and related

determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pauline C. Campbell, Response and

Recovery Directorate, Federal

Emergency Management Agency,

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is

hereby given that the incident period for

this disaster is closed effective May 17,

1995.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.516, Disaster Assistance.)

Richard W. Krimm,

Associate Director, Response and Recovery

Directorate.

[FR Doc. 95–12739 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–02–M

U.S. Fire Administration

Arson Prevention Grant Program

AGENCY: U.S. Fire Administration,

FEMA.

ACTION: Notice of funds and grant

availability.

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA), gives

notice of funds and grant availability

under the Arson Prevention Act of 1994.

This grant program is limited to States

or consortia of States for demonstration

programs on arson research, prevention

and control.

DATES: The grant application materials/

Application for Federal Assistance will

be available on or about June 19, 1995.

Grant Applications must be received by

the FEMA Assistance Officer not later

than July 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Applications for assistance

must be in writing to the following

address: Patricia A. English, Office of

Financial Management, Federal

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C

Street, SW., room 731, Washington, DC

20742.

Ask for Request for Assistance No.

EMW–95–S–4780. Please include a selfaddressed mailing label with your

request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth J. Kuntz, Fire Studies

Specialist, United States Fire

Administration, 16825 South Seton Ave,

Emmitsburg, MD. 21727, (301) 447–

1271, (facsimile)(301) 447–1102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Federal Emergency Management Agency

(FEMA) gives notice that $2,000,000 is

available to support not more than ten

(10) competitive grant awards for

demonstration programs on arson

research, prevention, and control. Under

the Arson Prevention Act of 1994 this

grant program is limited to States or

consortia of States. Elements of local

government such as fire and police