alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of United  Companies  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:    April 14, 2004                 By: /s/ Michelle Mathis
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name:   Michelle Mathis
                                          Title:  Acting Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to United  Companies
Corporation and will be retained by United  Companies  Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                      A-1

<PAGE>
ex10-22.htm


Exhibit 10.2.2

 

AMENDMENT TO

LITHIA MOTORS, INC.

RSU DEFERRAL PLAN

(a Sub-plan of the Lithia Motors, Inc. 2013 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan)

 

This Amendment to RSU Deferral Plan, effective July 26, 2013, amends the Lithia Motors, Inc. RSU Deferral Plan effective January 1, 2012 (the “Plan”). 

 

Amendment to Clarify Timing of Deferral Elections. Section 4.3 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows. 

 

4.3     Timing of Deferral Election. Generally, an election to defer receipt of all or part of the Award Proceeds for a particular Award shall be made by completing and delivering an RSU Deferral Election Form to the Plan Administrator 

 

	 	
●
	
no later than the end of the Annual Election Period, or for newly Eligible Persons, the Initial Election Period, or 



 

	 	
●
	
on or before the 30th day after the award is granted in the case of payment in a subsequent year that is subject to the recipient’s continuing to provide services for a period of at least 12 months from the date the award is granted, or



 

	 	
●
	
for performance-based compensation based on services to be performed over a period of at least 12 months, no later than six months before the end of the period.



 

Except as expressly set forth in this amendment, all terms of the Plan remain in effect. 

 

 

LITHIA MOTORS, INC.

 

 

By:                                                               

      Chris Holzshu, CFO
1

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2605

___________

Dawn Edlund, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Ridgedale Automotive, Inc., a * District of Minnesota.

Minnesota corporation d/b/a Morrie’s *

Minnetonka Ford and f/k/a Bob Ryan * [UNPUBLISHED]

Motors, Inc.; Bob Ryan Motors, Inc., a *

Minnesota corporation; *

*

Appellees.

___________

Submitted: June 8, 2004

Filed: June 14, 2004

___________

Before RILEY, LAY, and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dawn Edlund appeals from the district court’s1

 denial of her Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 52(b) and 60(b) motions in which she requested that the district court

amend its judgment to include an award of attorney’s fees and costs. After careful
-2-

review of the record, including Edlund’s prior unsuccessful appeal, we conclude that

the instant appeal is governed by the law-of-the-case doctrine. See Jones v. United

States, 255 F.3d 507, 510 (8th Cir. 2001) (all issues decided by appellate court

become law of the case; this rule extends not only to actual holdings but also to all

issues implicitly settled in prior holdings); Edlund v. Ridgedale Auto., Inc., No. 01-

3965, 2002 WL 31455108, at *1 (8th Cir. Nov. 5, 2002) (unpublished per curiam),

cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1194 (2003).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zowcom, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Marc
Seely, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Zowcom, Inc., and will be retained by Zowcom, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Marc Seely
--------------------------
Marc Seely
Chief Financial Officer
April 29, 2003
NUMBERS 13-13-00151-CR AND 13-13-152-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

ARTHUR CANN, Appellant,

 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 148th District Court of 

Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Garza

In an open plea, appellant Arthur Cann pleaded guilty to (1) burglary of a habitation, 

a second-degree felony offense, see TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(3), (c)(2) (West, 

Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.), in appellate cause number 13-13-151-CR, and (2) arson, 
2

a first-degree felony offense, see id. § 28.02(a)(2)(A), (d)(2) (West, Westlaw through 2013 

3d C.S.), in appellate cause number 13-13-152-CR. The trial court sentenced him to 

twenty years’ imprisonment for each offense, with the sentences ordered to be served 

concurrently. By a single issue, appellant contends that his sentence in each case was 

unconstitutionally disproportionate to the seriousness of his crimes. See U.S. CONST.

amends. VIII, XIV. We affirm. 

The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “[e]xcessive 

bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment 

inflicted.” Id. amend. VIII. The Eighth Amendment is applicable to punishments imposed 

by state courts through the due process clause of the Fourteenth amendment. Id. amend. 

XIV. This right can be waived if a defendant fails to object to a sentence on this basis. 

Smith v. State, 721 S.W.2d 844, 855 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).

The State responds that appellant failed to preserve any issue for review because 

he did not object to his sentence in the trial court. We agree.

Appellant made no objection to his sentence either at the time of sentencing or in 

any post-trial motion. To preserve error for our review, appellant was required to show 

that he made a timely objection to the trial court, stated the specific grounds for the 

objection, and obtained a ruling. TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a); see Jacoby v. State, 227 S.W.3d 

128, 130 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, pet. ref’d). By failing to specifically object 

during trial or in a post-trial motion, appellant has waived any error for our review. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a); see Jacoby, 227 S.W.3d at 130; Trevino v. State, 174 S.W.3d 

925, 927–28 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2005, pet. ref’d) (“Because the sentence 

imposed is within the punishment range and is not illegal, we conclude that the rights 

[appellant] asserts for the first time on appeal are not so fundamental as to have relieved 
3

him of the necessity of a timely, specific trial objection.”); see also Johnson v. State, No. 

13-13-00180-CR, 2014 WL 3399818, at *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 10, 2014, no. 

pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (rejecting disproportionate punishment 

claim because issue not preserved for review).

Having overruled appellant’s sole issue, we affirm the trial court’s judgment in each 

case.

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA,

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

25th day of August, 2014.
# L_2009238EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 238/1

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2009 — Amending Budget No 1

(2009/686/EC)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2009 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY, EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION AND NEW MEMBER COUNTRIES CONTRIBUTION |
| | Title 1 — Total | 39 627 082 | | 39 627 082 |
| 2 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE |
| 2 2 | CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS — ASSIGNED REVENUE | p.m. | 60 000 | 60 000 |
| | Title 2 — Total | p.m. | 60 000 | 60 000 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 39 627 082 | 60 000 | 39 687 082 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2009

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

1

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY, EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION AND NEW MEMBER COUNTRIES CONTRIBUTION

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY, EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION AND NEW MEMBER COUNTRIES CONTRIBUTION

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

39 627 082

39 627 082

39 627 082

39 627 082

2

2

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

2 2

CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS — ASSIGNED REVENUE

p.m.

60 000

60 000

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

60 000

60 000

60 000

60 000

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

39 627 082

39 627 082

60 000

60 000

39 687 082

39 687 082

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2009 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF |
| | Title 1 — Total | 20 600 000 | | 20 600 000 |
| 2 | ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE |
| 2 2 | MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS | 265 000 | 60 000  (1) | 325 000 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 3 450 000 | 60 000 | 3 510 000 |
| 3 | OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 3 — Total | 15 577 082 | | 15 577 082 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 39 627 082 | 60 000 | 39 687 082 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2009

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

1

STAFF

STAFF

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

20 600 000

20 600 000

20 600 000

20 600 000

2

2

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE

2 2

MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS

265 000

60 000  (1)

1

325 000

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

3 450 000

3 450 000

60 000

60 000

3 510 000

3 510 000

3

3

OPERATING EXPENDITURE

OPERATING EXPENDITURE

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

15 577 082

15 577 082

15 577 082

15 577 082

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

39 627 082

39 627 082

60 000

60 000

39 687 082

39 687 082

---

(1)  – R0: CSS

1

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2402 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur IL. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2005 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur IL. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR IL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.03 A specific toluene 

diisocyanate homopolymer 

(CAS No. 26006–20–2) dissolved in organic solvents 

(provided for in subheading 

3911.90.45) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2402 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Appellant, v Juan C. Porcelli et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5206 (e) to enforce a lien of a judgment on a homestead in which the real property has a value in excess of $10,000, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), entered August 3,1984, which denied petitioner’s application, with leave to renew after a traverse hearing ordered pursuant to a separate motion by respondents to vacate the underlying default judgment.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

The order appealed from in essence merely directs a judicial hearing to aid in the disposition of a motion. The order does not affect a substantial right and is not appealable as of right *(see, Perez v Perez,*100 AD2d 962; *Astuto v New York Univ. Med. Center,*97 AD2d 805). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.
| ·  | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·  | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition and results      of operations. |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ JoAnn N. McMinn                           |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| JoAnn      N. McMinn, Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         117,873
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          25,575
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,298,110
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,554
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,480
<LOANS>                                      2,701,831
<ALLOWANCE>                                     28,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,314,083
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,992,899
<SHORT-TERM>                                   652,156
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             52,584
<LONG-TERM>                                    310,876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,578
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,314,083
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 54,294
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               20,662
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   714
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                75,670
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              29,526
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,232
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           33,438
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,613
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (341)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 29,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,738
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,738
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.58
<LOANS-NON>                                     20,823
<LOANS-PAST>                                    10,008
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 28,216
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                27,636
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,188
<RECOVERIES>                                       374
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               28,435
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,481
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          8,954



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by ATX
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas
Gravina, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael A. Peterson, as
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Thomas Gravina
    -----------------------------------
    Name:  Thomas Gravina
    Title: Chief Executive Officer
    Date:  April 9, 2003

By: /s/ Michael A. Peterson
    -----------------------------------
    Name:  Michael A. Peterson
    Title: Executive Vice President, Chief
           Operating Officer and Chief
           Financial Officer
    Date:  April 9, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this certification required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Order entered April 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00395
- CV IN RE LESTER TRICHE, Relator On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA
- 09
- 15662 

### O RDER
The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests that respondent and real party in interest file any responses to the petition by April 15, 2013.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
# L_2008282EN.01000101.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 282/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 282/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1046/2008

of 24 October 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 October 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 106,4 |
| MA | 46,2 |
| MK | 40,8 |
| TR | 72,2 |
| ZZ | 66,4 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 162,5 |
| TR | 118,2 |
| ZZ | 140,4 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 121,3 |
| ZZ | 121,3 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 112,1 |
| MA | 96,1 |
| TR | 91,9 |
| ZA | 85,2 |
| ZZ | 96,3 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 224,2 |
| TR | 119,1 |
| US | 224,6 |
| ZZ | 189,3 |
| 0808 10 80 | CA | 97,3 |
| CL | 72,8 |
| CN | 91,2 |
| MK | 37,6 |
| NZ | 75,6 |
| US | 136,5 |
| ZA | 92,0 |
| ZZ | 86,1 |
| 0808 20 50 | CL | 60,3 |
| CN | 110,4 |
| TR | 125,5 |
| ZZ | 98,7 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

106,4

MA

46,2

MK

40,8

TR

72,2

ZZ

66,4

0707 00 05

JO

162,5

TR

118,2

ZZ

140,4

0709 90 70

TR

121,3

ZZ

121,3

0805 50 10

AR

112,1

MA

96,1

TR

91,9

ZA

85,2

ZZ

96,3

0806 10 10

BR

224,2

TR

119,1

US

224,6

ZZ

189,3

0808 10 80

CA

97,3

CL

72,8

CN

91,2

MK

37,6

NZ

75,6

US

136,5

ZA

92,0

ZZ

86,1

0808 20 50

CL

60,3

CN

110,4

TR

125,5

ZZ

98,7

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---