alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906**

**Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the Quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Norman L. Lowery , as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and  Rodger A. McHargue, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

1.     This Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 6,   2011 | By                                               | /s/   Norman L. Lowery   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|               | Norman   L. Lowery, Vice Chairman & CEO |
|               | (Principal   Executive Officer)                  |
|               |                                             |                     |
|               |                                             |                     |
| May 6,   2011 | By                                               | /s/   Rodger A. McHargue |
|               | Rodger   A. McHargue, Treasurer & CFO   |
|               | (Principal   Financial Officer)                  |

 

----
#### Frankie ENRIQUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-17321.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 8, 2011.

Frankie Enriquez, Avenal, CA, pro se.

Krista Leigh Pollard, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Frankie Enri-quez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Enriquez contends that the Board’s 2006 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. *See Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S. -, -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam). Enri-quez raises no procedural challenges. Additionally, to the extent Enriquez contends that the Board misapplied state law, that does not provide a basis for granting a federal writ of habeas corpus. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of NTT DOCOMO, INC. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 23, 2011
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of AspenBio Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Stephen T. Lundy and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April 14, 2011/s/ Stephen T. LundyStephen T. Lundy,

Chief Executive Officer and President

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER







April 14, 2011/s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegalJeffrey G. McGonegal,

Chief Financial Officer

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER











A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
#### In the Matter of Chester Lelio, Respondent, v Edward J. Rutkowski, as County Executive of Erie County, et al., Appellants.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated at Special Term, McGowan, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ. [127 Mise 2d 383.]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2354 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2354

   To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from requiring 
           digital television tuners in television receivers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

    Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Frank of Massachusetts) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from requiring 
           digital television tuners in television receivers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TV Consumer Choice Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING DIGITAL TELEVISION TUNERS IN 
              TELEVISION RECEIVERS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Neither section 303(s) of the Communications Act 
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 303(s)) nor any other provision of such Act shall be 
construed to authorize the Federal Communications Commission to 
require, or prescribe any schedule for the implementation of, digital 
television reception capability in television broadcast reception 
equipment.
    (b) Commission Actions Nullified.--The requirements and schedule 
established by the Commission for the implementation of digital 
television reception capability in television broadcast reception 
equipment as contained in section 15.117(i) of the Commission's 
regulations (47 CFR 15.117(i)) as modified in FCC 02-230 (August 8, 
2002), shall not be effective except as expressly hereafter provided by 
Act of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
MYL_EX10.41(b)_2014.12.31-10K


EXECUTION VERSION


Exhibit 10.41(b)


MYLAN INC.


AMENDMENT TO 401(k) RESTORATION PLAN


In accordance with a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Mylan Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), the transactions consummated pursuant to the Business Transfer Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 13, 2014, by and among Abbott Laboratories, an Illinois corporation, the Company and the other parties thereto, as such agreement may be amended from time to time, shall not constitute a Change in Control for any purpose of the Mylan Inc. 401(k) Restoration Plan (the “Plan”).  All other provisions of the Plan, as amended by the foregoing, shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the adoption of this amendment.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this amendment as of the date indicated below.




	
			
	 
	MYLAN INC.,

	 
	by

	 
	 
	/s/ Robert J. Coury

	 
	 
	Name:    Robert J. Coury

	 
	 
	Title:   Executive Chairman

	 
	 
	Date: November 4, 2014


































































[Signature Page to 401(k) Restoration Plan Amendment]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Goodloe Marine, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 61960

)

Under Contract No. W912EP-11-D-0020 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael H. Payne, Esq.

 Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman, PC

 Philadelphia, PA

Casey J. McKinnon, Esq.

 Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman, PC

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Susan E. Symanski, Esq.

Bruce E. Groover, Esq.

Kristin M. Bigham, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 1, 2024

J. REID PROUTY

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61960, Appeal of Goodloe 

Marine, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 1, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2346 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 337
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2346

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 16, 2005

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ``John J. 
                    Hainkel Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. HAINKEL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Hainkel Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Hainkel Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 337

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2346

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ``John J. 
                    Hainkel Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2243 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2243

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6 Dichlorotoluene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2005

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6 Dichlorotoluene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,6 DICHLOROTOLUENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.82 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,6 Dichlorotoluene) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2224 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Levagard DMPP. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Ms. HART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Levagard DMPP. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEVAGARD DMPP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.07.51 Dimethyl propylphosphonate 

(CAS No. 18755–43–6) 

(provided for in subheading 

2931.00.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2224 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### TURTLE et al., Respondents, v. GLENDIN-NING & CO., Limited, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Henry F. Turtle and another against Glendinning & Co., Limited. J. S. Davenport, for appellant. J. H. Cohen, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment' affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend answer on payment of costs. Order filed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00062-TLS-SLC

)

FRANKIE WILLIAMS also known as Molly )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on February 28, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his

right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 3 and 4 of the nine-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Chief Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 28th day of February 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BURR-BROWN CORPORATION FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 1, 2000

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                1,000
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                 JUL-1-2000
<CASH>                       262,315
<SECURITIES>                 186,344
<RECEIVABLES>                75,366
<ALLOWANCES>                 703
<INVENTORY>                  54,950
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             586,836
<PP&E>                       226,025
<DEPRECIATION>               128,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               716,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        75,958
<BONDS>                      250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        0
<PREFERRED>                  0
<COMMON>                     586
<OTHER-SE>                   384,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 716,630
<SALES>                      194,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             194,069
<CGS>                        85,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                85,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             54,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>             21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           4,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>              58,882
<INCOME-TAX>                 17,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          41,805
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 41,805
<EPS-BASIC>                0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                0.68


</TABLE>
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 448 

For the relief of Shing Ma ‘‘Steve’’ Li. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Shing Ma ‘‘Steve’’ Li. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHING MA 

4 ‘‘STEVE’’ LI. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law or any order, for purposes of the Immigration 

7 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Shing Ma 

8 ‘‘Steve’’ Li shall be— 

9 (1) deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, 

10 and remained in, the United States; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 448 IS

1 (2) eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or 

2 for adjustment of status under section 245 of such 

3 Act (8 U.S.C. 1255). 

4 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub5 section (a) shall apply only if the applications for issuance 

6 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status are filed, 

7 with appropriate fees, not later than 2 years after the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

10 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa to Shing Ma 

11 ‘‘Steve’’ Li, the Secretary of State shall instruct the prop12 er officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next fol13 lowing fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

14 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

15 birth of Shing Ma ‘‘Steve’’ Li under— 

16 (1) section 203(a) of the Immigration and Na17 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)); or 

18 (2) section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 

19 1152(e)), if applicable. 

20 (d) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

21 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You22 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

23 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

24 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

25 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 448 IS

1 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

2 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
| 1. | The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | /s/ Denis A. Krusos       |   |
|--------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|               | Denis A. Krusos           |   |
|               | Chairman of the Board and |   |
| September 14, 2010 | Chief Executive Officer   |   |