alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 88A/24.

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 88A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6524. února 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 88A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6524. února 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2022/C 88 A/01 | Oznámení, kterým se mění Společný podnik iniciativy pro inovativní zdravotnictví — Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo výkonného ředitele společného podniku iniciativy pro inovativní zdravotnictví (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) — COM/2022/20075( Úř. věst. C 48 A, 31.1.2022 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropská komise

2022/C 88 A/01

Oznámení, kterým se mění Společný podnik iniciativy pro inovativní zdravotnictví — Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo výkonného ředitele společného podniku iniciativy pro inovativní zdravotnictví (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) — COM/2022/20075( Úř. věst. C 48 A, 31.1.2022 )

( Úř. věst. C 48 A, 31.1.2022 )

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropská komise

| 24.2.2022 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2022

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 88/1

---

Oznámení, kterým se mění „Společný podnik iniciativy pro inovativní zdravotnictví — Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo výkonného ředitele společného podniku iniciativy pro inovativní zdravotnictví (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) — COM/2022/20075“

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 48 A ze dne 31. ledna 2022
  )

(2022/C 88 A/01)

Strana 5, „Datum uzávěrky“, první pododstavec:

| místo: | „Datum uzávěrky registrací je 28. února 2022, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“, |
| --- | --- |

místo:

„Datum uzávěrky registrací je 28. února 2022, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“,

| má být: | „Datum uzávěrky registrací je 14. března 2022, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“ |
| --- | --- |

má být:

má být:

„Datum uzávěrky registrací je 14. března 2022, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“

---
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −130)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1407. See 896 F.Supp.2d 1339 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 512 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robert L. Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L. Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Mar 08, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

 I Certify that the foregoing is a 

true copy of the original on file in this

court and cause.

ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK 

By: 

Date: s/JDarrah
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−130 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

NEVADA

NV 2 16−00264 Franks v. Biomet, Inc., et al
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no

precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens

on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 95-10256

_______________

NOBLE D. MAYS, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

WAYNE SCOTT,

Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(7:89-CV-006-A)

_________________________

(March 30, 1995)

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The order appealed from, denying petitioner's motion to vacate

and re-enter judgment, is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set

forth in the district court's opinion of March 7, 1995. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over the merits of this habeas

corpus matter. As this is a capital habeas case, however, we wish
2

to note that we have reviewed the district court's sixty-four-page

opinion of April 15, 1994, and agree with its conclusions. We

commend the district court for its careful and thorough examination

of the issues. Petitioner's habeas claims are wholly without

merit.

The order appealed from is AFFIRMED. The motion for stay of

execution is DENIED.
Exhibit 13.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of NTT DoCoMo, Inc., a Japanese corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2004 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 28, 2004



/S/    YOSHIAKI
UGAKIYoshiaki UgakiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2009274DE.01004701.xml

| 20.10.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 274/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 274/47

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 910/2008 der Kommission vom 18. September 2008 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 951/2006 hinsichtlich der Durchführungsbestimmungen für Nichtquotenausfuhren im Zuckersektor

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 251 vom 19. September 2008
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 251 vom 19. September 2008

Auf Seite 14, Artikel 1 Punkt 4:

anstatt:

„Artikel 7b

Beantragung der Nichtquotenausfuhrlizenzen

(1)   Ausfuhrlizenzanträge für die gemäß Artikel 12 Buchstabe d der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 318/2006 festzusetzende Höchstmenge können nur von Rüben- und Rohrzucker- bzw. Isoglucose-Erzeugern gestellt werden, die in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 17 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 318/2006 zugelassen wurden und denen für das betreffende Wirtschaftsjahr gemäß Artikel 7 der genannten Verordnung eine Isoglucose-Quote zugeteilt worden ist, wobei je nach Fall Artikel 8, 9 bzw. 11 derselben Verordnung berücksichtigt wird.“

muss es heißen:

„Artikel 7b

Beantragung der Nichtquotenausfuhrlizenzen

(1)   Ausfuhrlizenzanträge für die gemäß Artikel 12 Buchstabe d der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 318/2006 festzusetzende Höchstmenge können nur von Rüben- und Rohrzucker- bzw. Isoglucose-Erzeugern gestellt werden, die in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 17 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 318/2006 zugelassen wurden und denen für das betreffende Wirtschaftsjahr gemäß Artikel 7 der genannten Verordnung eine Zucker- oder Isoglucose-Quote zugeteilt worden ist, wobei je nach Fall Artikel 8, 9 bzw. 11 derselben Verordnung berücksichtigt wird.“

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1489** 

In re: HOWARD SCOTT , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ( 2:09

- cr - 00991

- PMD

- 1 )

Submitted : June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016

Before DUNCAN , KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Howard Scott , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Howard Scott p etitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to hold an evidentiary hearing to address whether Amendment 709 to the Sentencing Guidelines applies to him . We conclude that Scott is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandam us relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when th e petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)

. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Scott is not available by way of mandamus because Scott fails to show any clear right to relief in the form of an evidentiary hearing regarding the applicability of Amendment 709 . Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argum ent would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 406 

To modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to require specific 

evidence for access to business records and other tangible things, and 

provide appropriate transition procedures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2011 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to require specific evidence for access to business records 

and other tangible things, and provide appropriate transition procedures, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIFIC EVIDENCE FOR COURT ORDERS TO 

4 PRODUCE RECORDS AND OTHER ITEMS IN IN5 TELLIGENCE INVESTIGATIONS. 

6 (a) FACTUAL BASIS FOR REQUESTED ORDER.—Sec7 tion 501(b)(2) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 406 IS

1 of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861(b)(2)) is amended to read as 

2 follows: 

3 ‘‘(2) shall include— 

4 ‘‘(A) a statement of facts showing that 

5 there are reasonable grounds to believe that the 

6 records or other things sought— 

7 ‘‘(i) are relevant to an authorized in8 vestigation (other than a threat assess9 ment) conducted in accordance with sub10 section (a)(2) to obtain foreign intelligence 

11 information not concerning a United 

12 States person or to protect against inter13 national terrorism or clandestine intel14 ligence activities; and 

15 ‘‘(ii)(I) pertain to a foreign power or 

16 an agent of a foreign power; 

17 ‘‘(II) are relevant to the activities of 

18 a suspected agent of a foreign power who 

19 is the subject of such authorized investiga20 tion; or 

21 ‘‘(III) pertain to an individual in con22 tact with, or known to, a suspected agent 

23 of a foreign power; and 

24 ‘‘(B) an enumeration of the minimization 

25 procedures adopted by the Attorney General 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 406 IS

1 under subsection (g) that are applicable to the 

2 retention and dissemination by the Federal Bu3 reau of Investigation of any tangible things to 

4 be made available to the Federal Bureau of In5 vestigation based on the order requested in such 

6 application.’’. 

7 (b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding the amendment 

8 made by subsection (a), an order issued by a court estab9 lished under section 103(a) of the Foreign Intelligence 

10 Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803) for access to 

11 business records under title V of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

12 1861 et seq.) in effect on, and issued prior to, September 

13 30, 2011, shall remain in effect under the provisions of 

14 such title V in effect on September 29, 2011, until the 

15 date of expiration of such order. Any renewal or extension 

16 of such order shall be subject to the provisions of such 

17 title V in effect on September 30, 2011. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect on September 30, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         10,964
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         54
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    13,563
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         27,707
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           27,613
<LOANS>                                        132,195
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,781
<DEPOSITS>                                     178,128
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,977
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,172
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 195,781
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,545
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,055
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               205
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,805
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4,010
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,083
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,083
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   724
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.75
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,516
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,516
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,356
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  50
<RECOVERIES>                                   8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,344
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,344
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,029
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2114]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports for Dickinson County, Kansas and Incorporated Areas.

# DATES:

This withdrawal is effective June 29, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2114 to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov;*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 12, 2021, FEMA published a proposed notice at 86 FR 18998, proposing flood hazard determinations for Dickinson County, Kansas, and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed notice.

Michael M. Grimm,

Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-13840 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wntteb ~tate~ Qtourt of §ppeaI~ 

for tbe jf eberaI Qttrcutt 

CHESTER A. WILDER, JR., 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent. 

2011-3105 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in case no. AT315HlO0987-I-1. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Chester A. Wilder, Jr. moves for leave to replace his 

informal brief received by the court on April 7, 2011 and 

submits the replacement informal brief. 

The Department of the Navy moves to recaption to 

designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent. Wilder does not oppose. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision con-
WILDER v. MSPB 2 

cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

employing agency is designated as the respondent when 

the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, 

the Board dismissed Wilder's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motions are granted. The replacement informal brief is accepted for filing. The revised official caption is reflected above. 

(2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from 

the date of filing of this order. 

JUl 152011 

Date 

cc: Chester A. Wilder, Jr. 

s21 

Robert C. Bigler, Esq. 

Katherine M. Smith, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FILED 

II.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JUL t 5 2011 

JANHORBAlY 

CLERK
EXHIBIT 4.5
 Second Amendment to
 Alion Science and Technology Corporation
Employee Ownership, Savings and Investment Plan
      th
 Alion Science and Technology CorporationBy:Its: Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Supplement No.5
 Carmel Applied Technologies, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan
 1.1
    
    Purpose. The purpose of this Supplement NO.5 is to set forth provisions applicable to
individuals who were previously participants in the Carmel Applied Technologies, Inc. Profit
Sharing 40 I (k) Plan (the CATI Plan) immediately before the acquisition of Cannel Applied
Technologies, Inc. by the Company (Former CATI Participants) and whose account balances
under the CATl Plan were transferred to the Plan on or after October I, 2007 (CATI Plan
Transfer Date). The provisions of the Plan shall apply to the accounts of such Former CATI
Participants which were transferred from the CATI Plan to the Non ESOP Component of the Plan
(the CATI Transfer Account).1.2
    
    A Former CATI Participant will become a Participant in the Plan on the CATI Plan Transfer
Date unless he or she was already a Participant in the Plan. Except as provided in this
Supplement 5, effective as of the CATI Plan Transfer Date, the provisions of the Plan shall
apply to the CATI Transfer Accounts.1.3
    
    A Former CATI Participant may withdraw any portion or all of his or her CATI Transfer Account
from the Non ESOP Component on or after attainment of age fifty-nine and one-half (59 1/2).1.4
    
    A Former CATI Participant may withdraw from the Non ESOP Component any portion of his or her
CATI Pre-Tax account (excluding earnings) pursuant to a financial hardship. All such
withdrawals must be in accordance with Section 8.1 and 8.3 of the Plan.1.5
    
    A Former CATI Pat1icipant shall be fully vested in his or her CATI Transfer Account.1.6
    
    Former CATI Participants shall have a lump sum form of distribution available under the
Non-ESOP Component of the Plan and, as of October 1, 2007, annuities and installments are not
available as optional forms of benefits for the CATI Transfer Accounts.
 
 2




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 Adopting Employers
 Effective Date ofName
    
    AdoptionAlion Science and Technology Corporation
    
    December 19, 2001Human Factors Applications, Inc.
    
    December 20, 2002Washington Consulting, Inc.
    
    February 25, 2006*Washington Consulting Government Services, Inc.
    
    October 1, 2007
 
 *amended effective October I, 2007 3