alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7687

TROY W. DALTON, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:09-cv-00337-GEC-MFU) 

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Troy W. Dalton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Troy Dalton seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. 

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Dalton has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny Dalton’s motion for a certificate 

of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Maxtor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. C.S. Park, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Dr. C.S. ParkDr. C.S. ParkChairman and Chief Executive
Officer Date: June 9, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan Osvaldo VEGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30027.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 8, 2011.

Michael J. Fica, Assistant U.S., USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Pocatello, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ivan Osvaldo Vega, Pollock, LA, pro se.

Dennis Alan Benjamin, Esquire, Nevin, Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett LLP, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ivan Osvaldo Vega appeals from his conviction and 92-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vega’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

*799Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Mary F. Seabrook, Respondent, v R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered May 10, 1984, denying defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3216 for failure to prosecute, and granting plaintiff’s cross motion to deem her service and filing of a notice of precalendar conference, within 90 days of her receipt of the Zenith defendants’ demand that she notice the action for trial, to be adequate compliance with that demand on condition that plaintiff pay the defendants $500 within 10 days after service of a copy of the court’s order, and upon failure to make such payment granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying plaintiff’s cross motion, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to condition the grant of the cross motion upon payment of $1,500 to defendants by plaintiff’s attorney personally, and not by his client.

Plaintiff’s notice does not literally satisfy the requirements of a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216. However, as Special Term noted, the rules changed, while this action was pending, to require a precalendar conference prior to serving and filing a note of issue and statement of readiness. (Rules of Sup Ct, NY & Bronx Counties, 22 NYCRR 660.35.) Here, issue was joined more than one year prior to promulgation of the rule. On the facts of this case, it was not an abuse of discretion to deem the notice served by plaintiff’s attorney to have been sufficient *24compliance. Defendants do not deny the action is meritorious, as demonstrated in plaintiff’s moving papers. Moreover the action now appears to be ready for trial.

However, the dilatory tactics of plaintiff’s attorney throughout have been so gross that a sanction of $1,500 to be paid to defendants by plaintiff’s attorney personally, and not by his client, is appropriate, as we have directed. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Fein, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

DUSTIN SMITH, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Judge Rudy Lozano

)

) Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins

v. )

) CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00306-RL-SLC

WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC. )

)

Defendant. )

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties, by and through

counsel, stipulate that this case, including all claims that were or could have been brought, is

dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his or its own costs.

/s/ Paul J. Cummings___________

Paul J. Cummings

David M. Henn

Henn Haworth Cummins & Page

625 N. Madison Ave., Suite A

Greenwood, Indiana 46142

/s/ Ryan M. Martin

Ryan M. Martin

Jackson Lewis P.C.

150 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Telephone: (312) 787-4949

Facsimile: (312) 787-4995

E-mail: ryan.martin@jacksonlewis.com

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00306-RL-SLC document 14 filed 01/19/17 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 19, 2017, a copy of the foregoing Stipulation of

Dismissal with Prejudice was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the

following parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system.

/s/ Ryan M. Martin

Ryan M. Martin

4828-5330-2848, v. 1

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00306-RL-SLC document 14 filed 01/19/17 page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John R. Hecht, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John R. Hecht                                    
|John R. Hecht Chief Financial Officer August 11, 2003



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2383 

To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 19550 

Kelso Road in Byron, California, as the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mr. NUNES (for himself, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. COSTA, and 

Mr. CARDOZA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of Reclamation 

located at 19550 Kelso Road in Byron, California, as 

the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF FACILITY. 

4 The facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 

5 15990 Kelso Road in Byron, California, and known as the 

6 Tracy Pumping Plant, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 
2 

•HR 2383 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

Æ
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 450 

For the relief of Jacqueline W. Coats. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Jacqueline W. Coats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JAC4 QUELINE W. COATS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Jacqueline W. Coats shall be eligible 

8 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im11 migrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 450 IS

1 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 

2 resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Jacqueline W. 

4 Coats enters the United States before the filing deadline 

5 specified in subsection (c), Jacqueline W. Coats shall be 

6 considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the 

7 United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of sta8 tus under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of enactment of this 

10 Act. 

11 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub12 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

13 issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for ad14 justment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later 

15 than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Jacqueline W. Coats, the Secretary of State shall 

19 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur20 rent or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immi21 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun22 try of birth of Jacqueline W. Coats under section 203(a) 

23 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

24 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

25 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 450 IS

1 birth of Jacqueline W. Coats under section 202(e) of that 

2 Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

3 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

4 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You5 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

6 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

7 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

8 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

9 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

10 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                                  Certification
                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ELXSI Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 14, 2004                             /s/ DAVID M. DOOLITTLE
                                                --------------------------------
                                                David M. Doolittle
                                                Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ELXSI Corporation and will be retained by ELXSI Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      E-7
# C_2008157EN.01001801.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5151 — Boeing/Alenia NA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 157/04)

On 3 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5151. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5151. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2086 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2086

           To extend the duty suspension on mucochloric acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the duty suspension on mucochloric acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MUCOCHLORIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.05 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mucochloric acid) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #16932 and #16933; Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00084]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Kentucky (FEMA-4595-DR), dated 04/23/2021.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/27/2021 through 03/14/2021.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 06/15/2021.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/08/2021.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/24/2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Kentucky, dated 04/23/2021, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 07/08/2021.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2021-13499 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
# L_2009238EN.01003301.xml

| 9.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 238/33

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex) for the financial year 2009 — Amending Budget No 1

(2009/694/EC)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2009 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9 | REVENUE |
| 9 0 | SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS | 83 250 000 | 5 000 300 | 88 250 300 |
| | Title 9 — Total | 83 814 771 | 5 000 300 | 88 815 071 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 83 814 771 | 5 000 300 | 88 815 071 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2009

Amending budget No 1

New amount

9

9

REVENUE

REVENUE

9 0

SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS

83 250 000

5 000 300

88 250 300

Title 9 — Total

Title 9 — Total

83 814 771

83 814 771

5 000 300

5 000 300

88 815 071

88 815 071

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

83 814 771

83 814 771

5 000 300

5 000 300

88 815 071

88 815 071

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2009 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF |
| | Title 1 — Total | 15 956 000 | | 15 956 000 |
| 2 | OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 2 — Total | 10 044 000 | | 10 044 000 |
| 3 | OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES |
| 3 0 | OPERATIONS | 44 150 000 | 4 100 300 | 48 250 300 |
| 3 1 | RISK ANALYSIS & SITUATION CENTER | 2 050 000 | 400 000 | 2 450 000 |
| 3 2 | TRAINING | 6 300 000 | 500 000 | 6 800 000 |
| 3 4 | POOLED RESOURCES | 1 400 000 | | 1 400 000 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 57 250 000 | 5 000 300 | 62 250 300 |
| 4 | EARMARKED EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 4 — Total | 564 771 | | 564 771 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 83 814 771 | 5 000 300 | 88 815 071 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2009

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

1

STAFF

STAFF

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

15 956 000

15 956 000

15 956 000

15 956 000

2

2

OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE

OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

10 044 000

10 044 000

10 044 000

10 044 000

3

3

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

3 0

OPERATIONS

44 150 000

4 100 300

48 250 300

3 1

RISK ANALYSIS & SITUATION CENTER

2 050 000

400 000

2 450 000

3 2

TRAINING

6 300 000

500 000

6 800 000

3 4

POOLED RESOURCES

1 400 000

1 400 000

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

57 250 000

57 250 000

5 000 300

5 000 300

62 250 300

62 250 300

4

4

EARMARKED EXPENDITURE

EARMARKED EXPENDITURE

Title 4 — Total

Title 4 — Total

564 771

564 771

564 771

564 771

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

83 814 771

83 814 771

5 000 300

5 000 300

88 815 071

88 815 071

---