alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Službeni list C 93I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 093I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 65.28. veljače 2022. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 093I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 65.28. veljače 2022.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Europska komisija |
| 2022/C 93 I/01 | Obavijest uvoznicima – Uvoz u Uniju robe podrijetlom iz područja ukrajinskih regija Donjeck i Lugansk koja nisu pod kontrolom vlade | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

2022/C 93 I/01

Obavijest uvoznicima – Uvoz u Uniju robe podrijetlom iz područja ukrajinskih regija Donjeck i Lugansk koja nisu pod kontrolom vlade

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

| 28.2.2022 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 93/1

---

Obavijest uvoznicima

Uvoz u Uniju robe podrijetlom iz područja ukrajinskih regija Donjeck i Lugansk koja nisu pod kontrolom vlade

(2022/C 93 I/01)

Uredbom Vijeća (EU) 2022/263 od 23. veljače 2022. o mjerama ograničavanja kao odgovor na priznavanje područja ukrajinskih regija Donjeck i Lugansk koja nisu pod kontrolom vlade i naredbu ruskim oružanim snagama da uđu u ta područja (1) uvedena je zabrana uvoza u Europsku uniju robe podrijetlom iz tih područja od sljedećeg dana od dana njezine objave.

Uvoznicima u Uniji savjetuje se da postupaju s dužnom pažnjom kako bi utvrdili stvarno podrijetlo robe koju deklariraju jer postoje rizici da se roba koja podliježe zabrani propisanoj prethodno navedenom uredbom uvozi u Uniju iz zemalja susjednih Ukrajini, konkretno Rusije i Bjelarusa. To bi se posebno moglo odnositi na proizvode od ugljena iz tarifnog broja KN 2701 i proizvode od čelika iz tarifnih brojeva od KN 7201 do KN 7207 i tarifnih brojeva KN 7304, 7305 i 7306. S obzirom na taj rizik izbjegavanja mjera, puštanje u slobodni promet tih proizvoda uvezenih iz Rusije i Bjelarusa može biti uvjetovano dostavljanjem carinskim tijelima uvjerljivih dokaza da ta roba nije obuhvaćena zabranom uvoza robe podrijetlom iz područja ukrajinskih regija Donjeck i Lugansk koja nisu pod kontrolom vlade.

---

(1)  SL L 42 I, 23.2.2022., str. 77.

---
Fairbanks Capital Corp.

 

 

Agreement:	Pooling and Servicing Agreement-Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc., Depositor, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., Seller, Fairbanks Capital Corp., Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, Trustee MLMI Trust 2002 AFC1

Dated:		February 1, 2002

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

 

In accordance with the applicable section in each of the Pooling and Servicing Agreements specified:

a review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2002 and of performance under this Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and
to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement throughout such year.

 

March 6, 2003

 

William P. Garland

William P. Garland

President

Fairbanks Capital Corp.	

	

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3815 South West Temple  Salt Lake City, Utah 84115-4412

P.O. Box 65250  Salt Lake City, Utah 84165-0250

Telephone (801) 293-1883  Facsimile  (801) 293-1297
American Goldfields Inc.

                           200-4170 Still Creek Drive
                          Burnaby, B.C. Canada, V5C 6C6

                                                                  April 20, 2004

Lorne B. Warren
President
CJL Enterprises Ltd.
Box 662
Smithers B.C., Canada
V0J 2N0

         Re: Termination of Joint Venture

Gentlemen:

         Reference is hereby made to the Joint Venture  Agreement dated December
28, 2001, as amended by Joint Venture Agreement - Amendment No. 1 dated December
17, 2002 (together, the "Agreement"),  by and between Baymont Explorations Inc.,
a  subsidiary  of  Baymont  Corporation,  a Nevada  corporation  n/k/a  American
Goldfields Inc. (the "Company") and Lorne B. Warren (the "Operator").

         Each of the  undersigned  agrees to terminate the Agreement and any and
all other agreements,  arrangements and  understandings  between the Company and
the Operator.  Execution of this letter  agreement  shall serve as  confirmation
that as of the date hereof, neither party has any outstanding debts, liabilities
or  obligations  of  any  nature  (whether  absolute,   accrued,  contingent  or
otherwise) owed to the other.

         Each of the undersigned agrees to indemnify and hold each other and its
respective officers,  directors,  stockholders,  affiliates,  employees, agents,
consultants,   representatives  and  their  respective  successors  and  assigns
harmless from any loss, liability,  claim, damage,  expense (including,  but not
limited to, attorneys' fees and expenses) arising from or in connection with any
inaccuracy or breach of any of the foregoing.

                                                        American Goldfields Inc.

                                                        /s/ Donald Neal
                                                        --------------------
                                                        Name: Donald Neal
                                                        Title: President, CEO

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:
/s/ Lorne B. Warren
--------------------
Lorne B. Warren
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddie Lewis, Appellant.

Main, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Scheinman, J.), rendered September 19,1983, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree.

Defendant was indicted for the crimes of grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree as a result of his alleged participation in the burglary of a jewelry shop located in a resort hotel. Plea bargaining resulted in an agreement wherein defendant would plead guilty to the criminal possession count in full satisfaction of the indictment in exchange for which the District Attorney agreed to recommend that defendant, a predicate felon, be sentenced to an indeterminate prison sentence of *IV2*to 3 years. When defendant appeared in court to enter his plea, he professed his innocence and claimed that he was being “railroaded” and was pleading guilty only because he had no chance of success if he chose to go to trial. County Court quite properly declined to accept the plea and remitted defendant to the custody of the Sheriff to await trial. Defendant apparently changed his mind and, when before the court five days later, pleaded guilty and was sentenced in compliance with the plea bargain.

Defendant appeals from that conviction and asserts that County Court erred in accepting the plea because defendant’s responses at the first plea proceeding indicated his innocence and that he was so confused as not to be able to make a knowing and intelligent plea, so that there was no valid basis for a proper plea.

From our search of the record, it does not appear that this issue was raised by a motion to vacate or otherwise in the court of first instance and, accordingly, has not, as a matter of law, been preserved for appellate review *(People v Pascale,*48 NY2d 997; *People v Bell, 47*NY2d 839; *People v Dunbar,*105 AD2d 986). Moreover, our review further indicates that defendant’s assertions pay no heed to his second appearance before County Court, when he admitted the essential elements of the crime to which he pleaded and clearly made a voluntary and knowing plea. Hence, we find no reason to reverse the judgment in the *423interest of justice *(cf. People v Johnson,*107 AD2d 947; *People v Santiago,*100 AD2d 857; *People v Fernandez,*91 AD2d 1073).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
[No. 38847-9-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *on the Relation of Derick K. Webb, Respondent,*v. Mark Richard Webb, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 86-3-05949-4, JoAnne Alumbaugh, J., entered May 24, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA**

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF LOWELL TIMOTHY SKUNBERG, Deceased. )

) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. DA 22
- 0 493 **ORDER GRANTING**  **SECOND MOTION**  **FOR EXTENSION**  **OF TIME**  Appellant Craig Bac ken has filed a Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Appellant’s Opening Brief. Appellant has requested 46 days, or until march 13 th , 2023. Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that Appellee’s counsel has been contacted and has no objectio n to the Motion. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an additional 46
- day extension of

t ime up to and including March 13 th , 2023, to prepare, file and serve his Opening Brief. DATED this ______ day of January, 2023
.

_______________________________ Clerk of the Montana Supre me Court

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2023

01/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0493
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Timothy J. Dodd, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controlsand procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c) presented in this annualreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  October 29, 2004 |   |                                   |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                    |   |                                   |
|                    |   | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                    |   |
|                    |   | Timothy  J. Dodd                       |
|                    |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Eva Marcus, Respondent, v Glenn Marcus, Appellant. (And a Second Action.)

In consolidated divorce actions, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated September 24,1983, as (1) awarded the wife custody of the parties’ child, (2) directed him to pay child support in the sum of $65 per week, (3) granted him allegedly inadequate visitation, and (4) failed to direct that the wife provide him with maintenance.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term’s conclusion that the child’s best interests would be better served by giving the mother custody has support in the *750record. The awards of child support and visitation and the denial of maintenance were likewise supported by the evidence. Our determination is not intended to preclude Special Term’s review of the issue of visitation, which matter is now pending. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
#### Timothy M. Sheahan, Appellant, v County of Suffolk et al., Respondents.—

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated January 17, 1984, as granted the motion of defendant Town of Huntington and the cross motion of the County of Suffolk for summary judgment.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

*833The affidavits based upon personal knowledge which were submitted by respondents clearly establish that respondents did not exercise any degree of control over New York State Route 495 and therefore had assumed no duty with respect to vehicles left abandoned upon the highway shoulder. Plaintiff’s submission of his attorney’s affirmation, which was not predicated upon personal knowledge, wholly failed to controvert the evidence of respondents. Mere unsubstantiated allegations of negligence by an attorney are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Plaintiff thus failed to raise any triable issues of fact. Accordingly, we affirm the order insofar as appealed from. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Safety, Health and Environmental Training







Sample Formheadline bar This is my sample form page  Email (required)Subject (required)EmployerGovernmentAcademicPrivate IndustryComments


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C.
1350)







The
undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham, has executed this certificate in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2009 (the
“Report”).





The
undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:




1. 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”); and
  2. 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
30th day of March, 2009.







/s/
      MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAMMichael
      J. CunninghamExecutive
      Vice President — Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)






This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








59
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth E. Edge, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/  KENNETH E. EDGE                   
|Kenneth E. Edge Chief Executive Officer



August 9, 2005



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008141EN.01001301.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5088 — Scholz Recycling/ERG/ESR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 141/08)

On 29 May 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5088. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5088. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.A.B. INTERNATIONAL,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form  [10-Q/10-QSB]  for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Stephen H. Durland,  Chief Financial  Officer (or the equivalent  thereof) of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




                                        /s/ Stephen H. Durland
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Stephen H. Durland
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (or the equivalent thereof)
                                        August 19, 2002