alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nikolas P. Tsakos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/S/    NIKOLAS P. TSAKOSNikolas P. Tsakos President and Chief
Executive Officer June 30, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmelo Bonilla, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), rendered on August 17, 1983, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 490 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2011 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN 

4 ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER 

5 CHAMPVA PROGRAM. 

6 (a) INCREASE.—Subsection (c) of section 1781 of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol8 lows: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 490 IS

1 ‘‘(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of sec2 tion 101(4)(A) of this title and except as provided in para3 graph (2), for purposes of this section, a child who is eligi4 ble for benefits under subsection (a) shall remain eligible 

5 for benefits under this section until the child’s 26th birth6 day, regardless of the child’s marital status. 

7 ‘‘(2) Before January 1, 2014, paragraph (1) shall not 

8 apply to a child who is eligible to enroll in an eligible em9 ployer-sponsored plan (as defined in section 5000A(f)(2) 

10 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). 

11 ‘‘(3) This subsection shall not be construed to limit 

12 eligibility for coverage of a child described in section 

13 101(4)(A)(ii) of this title.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Such subsection, as so 

15 amended, shall apply with respect to medical care provided 

16 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# C_2008110EN.01001901.xml

| 1.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/19

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5061 — Renault/Russian Technologies/AvtoVaz)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 110/07)

On 8 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5061. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5061. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, David R. Burt, certifythat:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of J.L. HalseyCorporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   (Not applicable)

c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.

Dated: September 28, 2006

 
|        |   |    /s/ David R. Burt                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | David R. Burt, President, Chief Executive Officer,  President and acting Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00543

- CV

IN RE Nancy ALANIS

, Rel ator

From the County Court at Law No. 3

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CV

- 00584 Honorable David J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

Relator’s opposed emergency motion for temporary relief is DENIED AS MOOT

.

It is so ORDERED on December 10, 2021

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ______________________

_______

Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019

- CV

- 00584 , styled Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitize d Asset Backed Receivables

LLC Trust 2006

- NC2 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006 NC3 v. Nancy Alanis , pending in the County

Court at Law No. 3

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding and Cause No. 2021

- CI

20923, styled Nancy Alanis v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006

- NC2 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006 NC3; and Ma rk Douglas Cronenwett , pending in the 224 th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cathleen Stryker presiding.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2021

No. 04-21-00543-CV

IN RE Nancy ALANIS, Relator

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CV-00584

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Relator’s opposed emergency motion for temporary relief is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on December 10, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CV-00584, styled Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as 

Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables 

LLC Trust 2006-NC2 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006 NC3 v. Nancy Alanis, pending in the County 

Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding and Cause No. 2021-CI20923, styled Nancy Alanis v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing 

Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-NC2 Mortgage Pass 

Through Certificates, Series 2006 NC3; and Mark Douglas Cronenwett, pending in the 224th Judicial District 

Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cathleen Stryker presiding.
SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103690 and 333-92084) of New England Bancshares, Inc., of
our report dated May 6, 2004, on the consolidated balance sheets of New England
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in capital accounts and cash flows
for the years then ended, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for New
England Bancshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.


                                         /S/ Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.
                                         SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
June 28, 2004





83 PINE STREET - WEST PEABODY, MASSACHUSETS 01960-3635 - TELEPHONE (978)535-0206
                           - FACSIMILE (978)535-9908
           smc@shatwsell.com                           www. shatswell.com
# C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

A T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Th e C o u rt o f A p p e a l s h e re b y p a sse s t h e f o l l o w i n g o rd e r:

A 1 9 A 1 6 8 2

. T H E ST A T E v

. A R C H IE M A

R IO N B R Y

A NT

.

A r c h i e M a r i o n B r y a n t w a s i n d i c t e d f

o r o n e c o u n t o f m a l i c e m

u r d e r , t w o c o u n t s

o f f e l o n y m u r d e r , t w o c o u n t s o f a g g

r a v a t e d a s sa u l t

, a n d o n e c o u n t o f p o sse ssi o n o f

a f i r e a r m b y a f e l o n

. I n t h e t r i a l c o u r t

, h e f

i l e d a m o t i o n t o su p p r e ss a n d e x c l u d e

e v i d e n c e o n t

h e b a si s t h a t

, i n t e r a l i a , t

h e St a t e h a d f a i l e d t o p r o v i d e t i m e l y d i sc o v e r y

. T h e t r i a l c o u r t g

r a n t e d B r y a n t ’ s m o t i o n , a

n d t h e St a t e t h e n f i l e d t h i s a p p e a l p u r su a

n t

t o OC G A § 5

- 7

- 1

. U n d e r o u r C o n st i t

u t i o n , t h e Su p r e m e C o u r t h a s a p p e l l a t e j u r i sd i c t i o n o v e r

m u r d e r c a se s i n wh i c h a se n t e n c e o f d e a t h “ w a s i m p o se d o r c o u l d b e i m

p o se d

. ” G a

. C o n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3

, A

r t

. V I

, Se c

. V I

, Pa

r

. I I I ( 8 )

. T h i s j u r i sd i c t i o n i n c l u d e s a l l m u r d e r

c a se s , r e g a

r d l e ss o f w h e t

h e r t h e St a t e i s se e k i n g t

h e d e a t h p e n a l t y o r l i f e

i m p r i so n m e n t

. N

e a l v

. S t a t e , 2 9 0 G a

. 5 6 3

, 5 7 2 ( 7 2 2 SE 2 d 7 6 5 ) ( 2 0 1 2 ) ( H

u n st e i n , J.

,

c o n c u r r i n g )

. T h u s, “ [ b ] e c a u se t h e m u r d e r c o u n t [ s] o f t

h e i n d i c t m e n t r e m a i n [ ] p e n d i n g

b e l o w , j u r i sd i c t i o n o f t

h i s a p p e a l l i e s i n [ t

h e Su p r e m e ] C o u r t

. ” La n g l a n d s v

. S t a t e , 2 8 0 G a

. 7 9 9

, 7 9 9 ( 1 ) ( 6 3 3 SE 2 d 5 3 7 ) ( 2 0 0 6 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h i s a p p e a l i s h e r e b y

T R A N SFE R R E D t o t h e Su p r e m e C o u r t

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a
C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t

r u e e x t r a c t f

r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t

h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 09, 2019

04/09/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,065,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,346,559
<PP&E>                                       5,665,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,780,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,561,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,632,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,561,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,737,140
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,448,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             763,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (475,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (475,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (475,188)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julius Bell, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), rendered January 27, 1982, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, attempted assault in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was charged by a Kings County Grand Jury with the crimes of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in *927the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (two counts). The trial court found, *inter alia,*that defendant’s acts did not constitute murder in the second degree inasmuch as he had acted under the influence of extreme emotional stress at the time of the crime. Accordingly, defendant was found guilty of the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree. The court refused to consider the crime of manslaughter in the second degree notwithstanding defendant’s request that it do so.

There is no dispute that on December 18, 1980, Geraldine Lind was shot and stabbed to death by defendant, her paramour. Defendant thereafter engaged in a gun battle with Emergency Squad officers who responded to the scene. The officers were able to disarm defendant by shooting the gun out of his hand, whereupon they took him into custody. The sole issue contested at trial was whether defendant, who began the habitual abuse of drugs while serving in Vietnam and who also had a history of alcohol abuse, was so intoxicated as to have been unable to form the intent to kill.

The uncontroverted evidence that defendant shot his common-law wife three times and then stabbed her 51 times after she was immobilized established the requisite intent to prove his guilt of manslaughter in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt despite the indication that he was intoxicated at the time. Even an intoxicated person may be capable of forming the intent to kill *(People v Cintron,*74 AD2d 457) and the court’s verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.

There is no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a conclusion that defendant acted recklessly rather than intentionally and the trial court’s rejection of the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the second degree was not error (CPL 300.50 [1]; *People v Green,*56 NY2d 427, *rearg denied*57 NY2d 775). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carlos Zalduondo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Carlos Zalduondo                  			

Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | July 16, 2007 |
|--------|---------------|
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  VICE PRESIDENT,
  GENERAL COUNSEL AND CORPORATE SECRETARY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
  OF THE BOARD AUTHORIZED OFFICER TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR (Brooklyn, NY)
  AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC BY: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
  transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
  attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
  certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
  registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile signatures of the
  Corporation’s duly authorized officers. Dated: SolarEdge
  Technologies, Inc. FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE
  SHARES OF COMMON STOCK $0.0001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF IS THE RECORD HOLDER
  OF THIS CERTIFIES THAT CUSIP SEE REVERSE FOR
  CERTAIN DEFINITIONS SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

  






 















	
  

  	
  THE
  SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION
  (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
  MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO
  S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
  Signature(s) Guaranteed: NOTICE: Dated to transfer the said stock on the
  books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
  premises. Attorney of the common stock represented by the within Certificate,
  and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint shares (PLEASE PRINT OR
  TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) PLEASE INSERT
  SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER For value received, the
  undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto Additional abbreviations
  may also be used though not in the above list. UNIF
  GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under
  Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) TEN COM TEN ENT
  JT TEN as tenants in common as tenants by the entireties as joint tenants
  with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common ––– The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST
  CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY
  PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
#### RICHMOND v. BIRKETT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Frederick A. Richmond against Clarence T. Birkett. With this case has been consolidated in this court cases bearing titles as follows: Moe Frank v. City of New York; Madeline Olaussen v. S. O. Pell & Co.; Philip P. Carlon v. Francis J. Ryan (two cases); Penelope Kelly v. Lawrence E. Holden. No opinions. Applications denied, with $10 costs in each case. Orders signed.