alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009026EN.01000601.xml

| 30.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/6

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 402/2008 of 6 May 2008 on procedures for the importation of rye from Turkey (Codified version)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 120 of 7 May 2008
  )

On page 3, in Article 1, fourth line:

for:

‘A.TR.1’,

read:

‘A.TR.’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Jean-Luc
Berger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Kyto Biopharma, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1)    the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
             March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
             the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material
             respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
             Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.


 Date:  June 27, 2005
                                       By:   /s/ Jean-Luc Berger
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Jean-Luc Berger
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Acting Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARTHUR BURTON SCHIRMER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 115 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file a 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within five days of the date of this order.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13632]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 45

[Docket ID: DOD-2021-OS-0047]
RIN 0790-AL22


Medical Malpractice Claims by Members of the Uniformed Services; 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD) Office of General Counsel, DoD.

ACTION: Interim final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is correcting an interim final rule 
that appeared in the Federal Register on June 17, 2021. The interim 
final rule implements requirements of the National Defense 
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2020 permitting members of the 
uniformed services or their authorized representatives to file claims 
for personal injury or death caused by a Department of Defense (DoD) 
health care providers in certain military medical treatment facilities. 
Because Federal courts do not have jurisdiction to consider these 
claims, DoD is issued this rule to provide uniform standards and 
procedures for considering and processing these actions.

DATES: This correction is effective on July 19, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2021-12815, appearing at 86 FR 
32194-32215 in the Federal Register on Thursday, June 17, 2021, the 
following correction is made:


Sec.  45.11  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 32213, in the third column, line 47 from the top, in Sec.  
45.11, the second paragraph (g)(5) and paragraphs (g)(6) and (7) that 
follow are redesignated as (g)(6) through (8).

    Dated: June 22, 2021.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-13632 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### MINCH v. NEW YORK EVENING JOURNAL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Michael Minch against the New York Evening Journal and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed,1 with costs, with leave to defendants to withdraw demurrer and to answer, on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Order filed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models
                        What Are Crop Simulation Models?
                                    2DSoil Model
                                    Spudsim (Potato) Model
                                    CLASSIM
                    Controlled Environment FacilitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






PPDheadline bar Pesticide Properties DataBase
               Introduction
               Property Descriptions
               Coden List
               Units
               Pesticide List


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 99.1

                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth E.
Edge, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kenneth E. Edge
-----------------------
Kenneth E. Edge
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will
be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6438

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus LORENZO BUTTS, JR., a/k/a Lorenza Butts, a/k/a Lorenza Butts, Jr. Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00067-JBF) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 22, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Butts, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Butts, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Butts’ notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims- 3 - based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Butts’ claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ex_102.htm


Exhibit 10.02


 








PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 



	EXECUTED BY:     	  	
EFLO ENERGY, INC.



(the "Borrower")




	 	 	 
	IN FAVOR OF:   	 	FUNDACION INVERSIONES BARROCO 

(the "Lender")


	 	 	 
	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:          	 	$600,000 (CAD)
	 	 	 
	DATE OF EXECUTION:          	 	March 2, 2015
	 	 	 
	 	 	 





 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED the Borrower hereby promises to pay to or to the order of the Lender, the principal sum of $600,000 (CAD), together with interest thereon at the rate of 10% per annum, calculated and compounded annually, on the Maturity Date in accordance with the terms of Loan Agreement between the Borrower and the Lender.


 


The Borrower waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Promissory Note.


 


The Borrower agrees this Promissory Note may be negotiated, assigned, discounted, or pledged by the Lender and in every case payment will be made to the holder of this Promissory Note instead of the Lender upon notice being given by the holder to the undersigned, and no holder of this Promissory Note will be affected by the state of accounts between the undersigned and the Lender or by any equities existing between the undersigned and the Lender and will be deemed to be a holder in due course and for the value of the Promissory Note held by him.


 


DATED at Houson, Texas this 2nd day of March, 2015.







 




	 	
EFLO ENERGY, INC.


by its authorized signatory:

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Al Conrad Kerr Jr.	 
	 	 	
Al Conrad Kerr Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714909
<NAME> 82I.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         104,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,465
<PP&E>                                      10,409,838
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,047,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,535,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,504,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,535,064
<SALES>                                        501,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               549,015
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                221,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            221,527
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    31.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order filed, January 31, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01027-CR

____________

RAUL GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1365300

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 23, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On January 06, 2014 this court GRANTED Janet Ragan’s motion 

for extension of time to file the record until January 22, 2014. The court has not 

received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been 

filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.
We order Janet Ragan, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

JEROME CURTIS,*

 Beneficiary )

Pre-1933 Private American National )

Citizen of the United States, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 1:16 CV 179

 )

BARACK OBAMA, Trustee )

Commander in Chief, and )

ROSA G. RIOS, Trustee Treasurer of )

the Treasury, )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION and ORDER

This matter is before the court on plaintiff curtis, jerome’s (hereinafter for

simplicity referred to only as “Plaintiff”) request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The statute allowing the court to authorize the commencement of a

suit in forma pauperis directs: “[T]he court shall dismiss the case at any time if the

court determines that . . . the action . . . is frivolous or malicious.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (Emphasis added.)

Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a “Petition to Seal” and a document he

called a “Bill in Equity” (DE #1), along with a declaration of his status as a “Pre-1933

Private Citizen” and “American Freeman.” (DE # 4.) He also filed an “acceptance of

deed” along with a document appearing to show that he has legally changed his name

*

 Plaintiff has attached an exhibit which appears to show that he has legally

changed his name to “curtis, jerome.” (DE # 3 at 2-4.) The caption used herein is as the

case has been docketed by the clerk. The court notes that plaintiff also in some places

adds “aka Jerome Curtis” to his signature.
from “JEROME CURTIS” to “curtis, jerome” (DE # 3), and a “declaration of exhibits”

(DE # 5) disavowing that either JEROME CURTIS or Jerome Curits is his name and

purporting to show that he is renouncing and voiding ab initio every “signature of

suretyship” ever made using either of those name formats. The only thing the court will

add is that the gist of the “Bill in Equity” Plaintiff filed is that he wants President

Obama and Treasurer Rosa Rios to provide a full accounting of the assets and property

they are holding in trust for him.

Plaintiff’s filings smack of the “free sovereign” or “redemptionist” movements

and are patently frivolous. See In re Cherney, No. 15-22401-SVK, 2015 WL 9312098, at *2

(Bankr. E.D. Wis. Dec. 21, 2015). In addition, secrecy in court proceedings is strongly

disfavored, Duff v. Cent. Sleep Diagnostics, LLC, 801 F.3d 833, 844 (7th Cir. 2015), and

Plaintiff has stated no non-frivolous reason for his filings to be under seal.

Accordingly:

1) the clerk is ORDERED to unseal the record in this case, and not to place any

further filings herein under seal;

2) Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (DE # 2) is DENIED; and

3) this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

 

SO ORDERED.

Date: June 9, 2016

 s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4581-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4581-DR), dated January 15, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on June 7, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

      ( print page 35118)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Alana B. Kuhn, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Jon K. Huss, as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-14085 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P