alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13210

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00327-CEH-KRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

MICHAEL DENARD JONES, 

a.k.a. Bleek Jones,

a.k.a. Michael D. Jones,

a.k.a. Bleek,

a.k.a. B,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 21, 2014)

Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Michael Denard Jones in his 

sentence-reduction proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has filed a 

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent 

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of 

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals 

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the 

denial of Jones’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                         185,588
<SECURITIES>                                    94,802
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,975
<INVENTORY>                                    127,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               688,981
<PP&E>                                         334,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                 221,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 809,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,509
<BONDS>                                         90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,029
<OTHER-SE>                                     294,412<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   809,981
<SALES>                                        681,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               681,590
<CGS>                                          595,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,625<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<FN>
<F1>OTHER SE INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL OF $980,477 UNREALIZED GAIN ON
INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY SECURITIES OF $38,710, AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT OF
$724,775.
<F2>OTHER EXPENSES INCLUDE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF $46,840 AND SELLING, GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF $19,920, AND STOCK COMPENSATION EXPENSE OF $865.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2022

NO. 03-22-00216-CR

Bethany Danielle Molina, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF RUNNELS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
#### Peter Napoli, Respondent, v Alfred Carrano, Appellant. In the Matter of Peter Napoli, Petitioner, Alfred Carrano et al., Appellants, and Doris Carrano, Respondent.

— In a consolidated action and proceeding, *inter alia,*to direct defendant corporation and its majority shareholders to reinstate plaintiff Peter Napoli as an officer and employee of the corporation and seeking damages for breach of contract, Alfred Carrano and Car-Nap Electric Sales, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated September 30, 1983, as awarded plaintiff the principal sums of $59,050 in back salary, $144,000 in compensatory damages, $5,000 in punitive damages and $20,000 in attorney’s fees.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find no merit to appellants’ claim that Peter Napoli’s employment was at will. There is an implicit exception in provisions requiring unanimous consent to remove an employee where removal is for good cause shown *(Fells v Katz,*256 NY 67). The purported reasons given by appellant Carrano were mere pretexts for his action and Special Term correctly concluded that they were insufficient to constitute good cause. Accordingly, Carrano was in breach of the shareholders’ agreement and of his fiduciary obligation as the majority shareholder, and plaintiff was entitled to compensatory damages including lost wages and *829the value of his shares *(Southern Pacific Co. v Bogert,*250 US 483; *Kavanaugh v Kavanaugh Knitting Co.,*226 NY 185; *Matter of Topper v Park Sheraton Pharmacy,*107 Misc 2d 25; *cf.*Business Corporation Law § 1104-a). The provisions of the shareholders’ agreement governing voluntary sales of shares are not applicable in this case.

Further, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in awarding punitive damages given the circumstances and the manner in which Carrano carried out the termination in this case and the great disparity between the fair value of Napoli’s shares and the amount Carrano offered. Similarly, we decline to overturn Special Term’s exercise of discretion awarding attorneys’ fees *(cf.*Business Corporation Law § 263 [h] [7]; *Matter of Fleischer [Gift Pax, Inc.],*79 AD2d. 636; *Matter of Blake v Blake Agency,*107 AD2d 139).

We find no error was committed by Special Term in fixing the value of Peter Napoli’s shares at $144,000 based upon the thorough testimony and analysis by his expert witness *(Matter of Endicott Johnson Corp. v Bade,*37 NY2d 585; *Matter of Blake v Blake Agency,*107 AD2d 139, *supra;*Rev Rul 59-60,1959-1 CB 237; Rev Rul 65-193,1965-2 CB 370). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Fiber, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Choptank Watershed







Research (1)headline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### BOAK, Respondent, v. HAMILTON TUBE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by William O. Boak against the Hamilton Tube Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 48 N. Y. Supp. 1101.
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

SERGIO GARCIA SR

Petitioner 

v. Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-401 

 arising from 2:16-cr-89

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

☐ the Plaintiff(s), recover from the 

Defendant(s) damages in the 

amount of , plus post-judgment interest at the rate of %

☐ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

X Other: Petitioner Sergio Garcia, Sr.’s Amended Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, 

Set Aside or Correct Sentence is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is also DENIED. 

Judgment is ENTERED favor of Respondent United States of America and against Petitioner 

Sergio Garcia, Sr. 

This action was (check one):

☐ tried to a jury with Judge 

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

☐ tried by Judge 

without a jury and the above decision was reached.

X decided by Judge Philip P. Simon on an Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct 

Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

DATE: July 18, 2022 GARY T. BELL, CLERK OF COURT

by s/J. Barboza 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cr-00089-PPS-APR document 316 filed 07/18/22 page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Timothy Whelan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
|
| | By: /s/ Timothy Whelan                              
| |                                                     
| | Timothy Whelan
Chief Financial Officer
April 4, 2003
|




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to IPC Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by IPC
Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Gene Expression Center: Albany, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Albany, California Plant Gene Expression Center





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar Learn more about our research throughtechnical publicationssubmitted to scientific journals etc. Or, reviewless technical reports and articlespublished for non-specialists by the Agricultural Research Service.      ARS News Articles  ARS Plant Molecular Geneticist Barbara Baker Elected to National Academy of SciencesApr 29, 2021ARS Plant Molecular Geneticist Barbara Baker Elected to National Academy of SciencesApr 29, 2021USDA's Agricultural Research Service Honors Scientists of the YearSep 12, 2017Three Scientists Named to ARS Science Hall of FameSep 11, 2013Three Scientists Named to ARS Science Hall of FameSep 11, 2013Immature Switchgrass Could Help Cellulosic Ethanol IndustrySep 06, 2012USDA's Agricultural Research Service Announces Scientist of the Year and Other AwardsJun 15, 2011Corngrass: Youthful Plant May Quicken Biofuels ResearchNov 03, 2008Fresh Ideas from ARS Nutrition ResearchMar 05, 2008Johanns Announces Top USDA-ARS Scientists for 2005Feb 07, 2006Protein Profilers Sleuth Wheat KernelsJan 04, 2005


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Eugenia Gehrke, an Infant, etc., Respondent, *v.*Mary Hayes, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued March 12, 1890;

decided April 15, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City-Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made Hovember 28,1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a • new trial.

*S. T. Maddox*for appellant.

*Getting*and *Hinman*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 6, 2021)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 35383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14498]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 6, 2021 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 35383]]

                Memorandum of June 29, 2021

                
Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities 
                Under the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of Defense[,] the Secretary of Homeland Security[, and] 
                the Administrator of the United States Agency for 
                International Development

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of 
                State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, 
                the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the 
                Administrator of the United States Agency for 
                International Development, the authority to submit to 
                the Congress the reports required by sections 5(a) and 
                8(b) of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 
                (Public Law 115-68).

                The delegation of authority provided in this memorandum 
                shall apply to any provisions of any future public laws 
                that are the same or substantially the same as those 
                provisions referenced in this memorandum.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 29, 2021

[FR Doc. 2021-14498
Filed 7-2-21; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
[No. 38657-3-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Marcellis C. King, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-08513-6, William L. Downing, J., entered May 13, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William R. Hardcastle, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
February 26, 2009



/s/ William R. Hardcastle, Jr.William R. Hardcastle, Jr.Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-210965) of Genetic Technologies Limited (the “Company”) of our report dated October 31, 2017 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F.

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Melbourne, Australia

October 31, 2017

 

***PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757***

*2 Riverside Quay, SOUTHBANK  VIC  3006, GPO Box 1331, MELBOURNE  VIC 3001*

*T: 61 3 8603 1000, F: 61 3 8603 1999, www.pwc.com.au*

 

----
<PAGE>



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Peter  Schulhof,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Delbrook  Corporation  for the annual period ended
January  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Delbrook  Corporation.


                                By:    /s/ Peter  Schulhof
                                       --------------------
                                Name:  Peter  Schulhof
                                Title: Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer
                                Date:  May  1,  2003
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Basic Empire Corporation
File No. 0-49608


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Basic Empire Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn A. Little,
Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: January 9, 2004                            By:       Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                               ----------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Basic  Empire  Corporation  and will be  retained  by Basic  Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.