35068 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

1See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019, 85 FR 84297 (December 28, 2020) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 

1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief 

Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 1, 2021; 

‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative 

Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,’’ 

dated February 1, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from 

Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief 

Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 1, 2021; see 

also BCF’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case 

Brief,’’ dated February 1, 2021; Agro Sevilla’s 

Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives from 

Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; 

Angel Camacho’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Camacho 

Alimentacio ́n S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469– 

817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; and Dcoop’s 

Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,’’ dated 

February 1, 2021. 

3See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 

1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief 

Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 8, 2021; 

‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative 

Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning 

Camacho,’’ dated February 8, 2021; ‘‘Ripe Olives 

from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco 

Rebuttal Brief Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 

8, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st 

Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief 

Concerning BCF,’’ dated February 8, 2021; see also 

Agro Sevilla’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla 

Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated 

February 8, 2021; Angel Camacho’s Letter, 

‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Camacho Alimentacio ́n S.L. Ripe 

Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated 

February 8, 2021; and Dcoop’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives 

from Spain: Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated February 8, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

April 5, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

6 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

Dated: June 28, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14112 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–817] 

Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the 

producers/exporters subject to this 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise in the United States at less 

than normal value during the period of 

review (POR) January 26, 2018, through 

July 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0665. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 28, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2018–2019 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ripe olives 

from Spain.1 The administrative review 

covers three producers or exporters of 

the subject merchandise, Agro Sevilla 

Aceitunas S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), 

Camacho Alimentacion S.L. (Angel 

Camacho), and Alimentary Group 

Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop). We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. On February 1, 

2021, we received case briefs from the 

domestic interested parties, Musco 

Family Olive Company (Musco) and 

Bell-Carter Foods, LLC (BCF), both 

members of the Coalition for Fair Trade 

in Ripe Olives, and from the mandatory 

respondents, Agro Sevilla, Angel 

Camacho, and Dcoop.2 On February 8, 

2021, Musco, Agro Sevilla, Angel 

Camacho, and Dcoop submitted rebuttal 

briefs.3 On April 5, 2021, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the final 

results by 59 days to June 25, 2021.4

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

are ripe olives. A full description of the 

scope of the order is contained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs that were submitted by 

parties in this investigation are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

Appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received we 

made changes for these final results 

which are discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the period January 26, 2018, 

through July 31, 2019. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Agro Sevilla Aceitunas 

S.COOP Andalusia ........... 15.65 

Angel Camacho 

Alimentacion S.L ............... 22.41 

Alimentary Group Dcoop S. 

Coop. And ......................... 5.78 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

final results to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after the date of 

publication of the final results or, if 

there is no public announcement, 

within five days of the date of 

publication of the notice of final results 

in the Federal Register, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

For Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and 

Dcoop, we calculated importer-specific 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of those 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).6 Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis 

(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries 

by that importer will be liquidated 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35069 

7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

8See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 884 (Jan.15, 

2021). 

9See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty 

Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018). 

without reference to antidumping 

duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by each 

respondent for which it did not know 

that its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

all-others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.7

Consistent with its recent notice,8

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice for all shipments of ripe 

olives entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rates for the companies subject 

to this review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

completed segment of the proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published in 

the completed segment for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will continue to be 19.98 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value investigation 

for this proceeding.9 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: June 25, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Agro Sevilla 

Comment 1: Home-Market Database 

Comment 2: Constructed Export Price 

Offset 

Comment 3: Major-Input Rule Adjustment 

Angel Camacho 

Comment 4: Price Comparisons for a 

Certain Product Control Number Sold in 

the U.S. Market 

Comment 5: Cost Adjustment to Ending 

Inventory Value 

Comment 6: General and Administrative 

Expenses 

Comment 7: Certain Inland Freight 

Expenses 

Comment 8: Beginning Dates in Programs 

DCoop 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available to 

Dcoop’s Cost Database 

Comment 10: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available to Dcoop’s General and 

Administrative Expenses 

Comment 11: Early Payment and Quantity 

Discounts 

Comment 12: U.S. Freight and U.S. Indirect 

Selling Expenses 

Comment 13: Rescission of the 

Administrative Review of Dcoop 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14060 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–880] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With the 

Final Results in the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; Notice of 

Amended Final Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 24, 2021, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

sustained the Department of 

Commerce’s (Commerce’s) remand 

results pertaining to the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on heavy 

walled rectangular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes (HWR) from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the 

period of review (POR) of March 1, 

2016, through August 31, 2017. 

Commerce is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment in this case is 

not in harmony with Commerce’s final 

results in the first administrative review 

of HWR from Korea. Consistent with the 

CIT’s final judgment, Commerce is 

amending the weighted-average 

dumping margins calculated for Dong 

A-Steel Company (DOSCO) and Kukje 

Steel Co., Ltd. (Kukje Steel). 

DATES: Applicable July 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alice Maldonado, AD/CVD Operations 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4682. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 28, 2019, Commerce 

published its Final Results in the first 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES