Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35065 

1See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 

Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return, destruction, or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Failure to comply is a violation of the 

APO which may be subject to sanctions. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This five-year sunset review and 

notice are in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and the notice is 

published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: June 25, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14054 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may 

request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by Commerce 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review. We intend to release 

the CBP data under Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) to all parties 

having an APO within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 35 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Therefore, we 

encourage all parties interested in 

commenting on respondent selection to 

submit their APO applications on the 

date of publication of the initiation 

notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. 

Commerce invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the review. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, Commerce finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of a review 

and will not collapse companies at the 

respondent selection phase unless there 

has been a determination to collapse 

certain companies in a previous 

segment of this antidumping proceeding 

(i.e., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to a review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. Parties are requested to: (a) 

Identify which companies subject to 

review previously were collapsed; and 

(b) provide a citation to the proceeding 

in which they were collapsed. Further, 

if companies are requested to complete 

a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for 

purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of a proceeding 

where Commerce considered collapsing 

that entity, complete quantity and value 

data for that collapsed entity must be 

submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that requests a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Deadline for Particular Market 

Situation Allegation 

Section 504 of the Trade Preferences 

Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act 

by adding the concept of particular 

market situation (PMS) for purposes of 

constructed value under section 773(e) 

of the Act.1 Section 773(e) of the Act 

states that ‘‘if a particular market 

situation exists such that the cost of 

materials and fabrication or other 

processing of any kind does not 

accurately reflect the cost of production 

in the ordinary course of trade, the 

administering authority may use 

another calculation methodology under 

this subtitle or any other calculation 

methodology.’’ When an interested 

party submits a PMS allegation pursuant 

to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce 

will respond to such a submission 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). 

If Commerce finds that a PMS exists 

under section 773(e) of the Act, then it 

will modify its dumping calculations 

appropriately. 

Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor 

19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline 

for the submission of PMS allegations 

and supporting factual information. 

However, in order to administer section 

773(e) of the Act, Commerce must 

receive PMS allegations and supporting 

factual information with enough time to 

consider the submission. Thus, should 

an interested party wish to submit a 

PMS allegation and supporting new 

factual information pursuant to section 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35066 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

2Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when Commerce is closed. 

773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later 

than 20 days after submission of initial 

Section D responses. 

Opportunity to Request a Review: Not 

later than the last day of July 2021,2

interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

July for the following periods: 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

BELGIUM: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, A–423–813 ....................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

COLOMBIA: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, A–301–803 .................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

INDIA: 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, A–533–863 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber, A–533–875 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, A–533–824 .............................................................................................................. 7/1/20–6/30/21 

IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios, A–507–502 .......................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

ITALY: 

Certain Pasta, A–475–818 ..................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, A–475–832 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

JAPAN: 

Clad Steel Plate, A–588–838 ................................................................................................................................................. 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A–588–873 ........................................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Polyvinyl Alcohol, A–588–861 ................................................................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A–588–845 ............................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar, A–588–876 ......................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

MALAYSIA: 

Steel Nails, A–557–816 .......................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe, A–557–815 .............................................................................................................. 7/1/20–6/30/21 

OMAN: Steel Nails, A–523–808 .................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, A–580–878 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber, A–580–893 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A–580–834 ............................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Steel Nails, A–580–874 .......................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: 

Steel Nails, A–552–818 .......................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe, A–552–816 ....................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

TAIWAN: 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, A–583–856 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber, A–583–860 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, A–583–837 .............................................................................................................. 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A–583–831 ............................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Steel Nails, A–583–854 .......................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

THAILAND: 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A–549–807 ................................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, A–549–833 .................................................................................................................. 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Weld Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe, A–549–830 .................................................................................................................. 7/1/20–6/30/21 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A–570–814 ................................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Certain Sodium Potassium Phosphate Salts, A–570–962 ..................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Certain Steel Grating, A–570–947 ......................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe, A–570–910 ...................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A–570–029 ........................................................................................................................ 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Collated Steel Staples, A–570–112 ....................................................................................................................................... 1/8/20–6/30/21 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, A–570–026 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber, A–570–060 ................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Persulfates, A–570–847 ......................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Quartz Surface Products, A–570–084 ................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Xanthan Gum, A–570–985 ..................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

TURKEY: 

Certain Pasta, A–489–805 ..................................................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar, A–489–829 ......................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

UKRAINE: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–823–815 ..................................................................................................................... 7/1/20–6/30/21 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

INDIA: 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, C–533–864 .................................................................................................................. 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, C–533–825 .............................................................................................................. 1/1/20–12/31/20 

ITALY: 

Certain Pasta, C–475–819 ..................................................................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, C–475–833 .................................................................................................................. 1/1/20–12/31/20 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, C–580–879 ................................................................................. 1/1/20–12/31/20 

SOCIALIST OF REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Steel Nails, C–552–819 ........................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: 

Certain Sodium and Potassium Phosphate Salts, C–570–963 ............................................................................................. 1/1/20–12/31/20 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35067 

3See the Enforcement and Compliance website at 

https://legacy.trade.gov/enforcement/. 4See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 5 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

6See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

7See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 

10, 2020). 

Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe, C–570–911 ...................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, C–570–030 ........................................................................................................................ 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Collated Steel Staples, C–570–113 ....................................................................................................................................... 11/12/19–12/31/20 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products, C–570–027 .................................................................................................................. 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, C–570–946 .......................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Quartz Surface Products, C–570–085 ................................................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Steel Grating, C–570–948 ...................................................................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

TURKEY: 

Certain Pasta, C–489–806 ..................................................................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar, C–489–830 ......................................................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters. If the interested party intends 

for the Secretary to review sales of 

merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which was produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Note that, for any party Commerce 

was unable to locate in prior segments, 

Commerce will not accept a request for 

an administrative review of that party 

absent new information as to the party’s 

location. Moreover, if the interested 

party who files a request for review is 

unable to locate the producer or 

exporter for which it requested the 

review, the interested party must 

provide an explanation of the attempts 

it made to locate the producer or 

exporter at the same time it files its 

request for review, in order for the 

Secretary to determine if the interested 

party’s attempts were reasonable, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011), Commerce clarified 

its practice with respect to the 

collection of final antidumping duties 

on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders.3

Commerce no longer considers the 

non-market economy (NME) entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to an 

antidumping duty administrative 

reviews.4 Accordingly, the NME entity 

will not be under review unless 

Commerce specifically receives a 

request for, or self-initiates, a review of 

the NME entity.5 In administrative 

reviews of antidumping duty orders on 

merchandise from NME countries where 

a review of the NME entity has not been 

initiated, but where an individual 

exporter for which a review was 

initiated does not qualify for a separate 

rate, Commerce will issue a final 

decision indicating that the company in 

question is part of the NME entity. 

However, in that situation, because no 

review of the NME entity was 

conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters 

not named in the initiation notice, 

including those that were suspended at 

the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

website at https://access.trade.gov.6

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.7

Commerce will publish in the Federal 

Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of 

Administrative Review of Antidumping 

or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, 

or Suspended Investigation’’ for 

requests received by the last day of July 

2021. If Commerce does not receive, by 

the last day of July 2021, a request for 

review of entries covered by an order, 

finding, or suspended investigation 

listed in this notice and for the period 

identified above, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping or 

countervailing duties on those entries at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35068 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

1See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019, 85 FR 84297 (December 28, 2020) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 

1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief 

Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 1, 2021; 

‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative 

Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,’’ 

dated February 1, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from 

Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief 

Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 1, 2021; see 

also BCF’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case 

Brief,’’ dated February 1, 2021; Agro Sevilla’s 

Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives from 

Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; 

Angel Camacho’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Camacho 

Alimentacio ́n S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469– 

817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; and Dcoop’s 

Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,’’ dated 

February 1, 2021. 

3See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 

1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief 

Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 8, 2021; 

‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative 

Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning 

Camacho,’’ dated February 8, 2021; ‘‘Ripe Olives 

from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco 

Rebuttal Brief Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 

8, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st 

Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief 

Concerning BCF,’’ dated February 8, 2021; see also 

Agro Sevilla’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla 

Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated 

February 8, 2021; Angel Camacho’s Letter, 

‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Camacho Alimentacio ́n S.L. Ripe 

Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated 

February 8, 2021; and Dcoop’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives 

from Spain: Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated February 8, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

April 5, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

6 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

Dated: June 28, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14112 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–817] 

Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the 

producers/exporters subject to this 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise in the United States at less 

than normal value during the period of 

review (POR) January 26, 2018, through 

July 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0665. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 28, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2018–2019 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ripe olives 

from Spain.1 The administrative review 

covers three producers or exporters of 

the subject merchandise, Agro Sevilla 

Aceitunas S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), 

Camacho Alimentacion S.L. (Angel 

Camacho), and Alimentary Group 

Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop). We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. On February 1, 

2021, we received case briefs from the 

domestic interested parties, Musco 

Family Olive Company (Musco) and 

Bell-Carter Foods, LLC (BCF), both 

members of the Coalition for Fair Trade 

in Ripe Olives, and from the mandatory 

respondents, Agro Sevilla, Angel 

Camacho, and Dcoop.2 On February 8, 

2021, Musco, Agro Sevilla, Angel 

Camacho, and Dcoop submitted rebuttal 

briefs.3 On April 5, 2021, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the final 

results by 59 days to June 25, 2021.4

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

are ripe olives. A full description of the 

scope of the order is contained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs that were submitted by 

parties in this investigation are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

Appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received we 

made changes for these final results 

which are discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the period January 26, 2018, 

through July 31, 2019. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Agro Sevilla Aceitunas 

S.COOP Andalusia ........... 15.65 

Angel Camacho 

Alimentacion S.L ............... 22.41 

Alimentary Group Dcoop S. 

Coop. And ......................... 5.78 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

final results to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after the date of 

publication of the final results or, if 

there is no public announcement, 

within five days of the date of 

publication of the notice of final results 

in the Federal Register, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

For Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and 

Dcoop, we calculated importer-specific 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of those 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).6 Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis 

(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries 

by that importer will be liquidated 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES