alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009009EN.01005101.xml

| 14.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 9/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 9/51

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 December 2008

appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union

(2009/22/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207 thereof,

Recalling Council Decision 2001/79/CFSP of 22 January 2001 setting up the Military Committee of the European Union (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 3 of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee is to be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee is to be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence.

| (2) | At its meeting on 29 October 2008, the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Håkan SYRÉN be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

At its meeting on 29 October 2008, the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Håkan SYRÉN be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

General Håkan SYRÉN is appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union for a period of three years as from 6 November 2009.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 December 2008.

For the Council

The President

B. KOUCHNER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 27, 30.1.2001, p. 4.

1

---
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 

MacroGenics, Inc. 

Second Amendment to Lease Agreement 

This Second Amendment to the Lease Agreement (“AMENDMENT”) is made and entered into this 6th day of November 2014, by and between
RED GATE III LLC (“LANDLORD”) and MACROGENICS, INC. (“TENANT”). 
 WITNESSETH: 

Whereas, the LANDLORD and TENANT entered into a certain lease dated May 31, 2011, as amended by First Amendment dated
March 26, 2013 (“LEASE”), covering 46,267 square feet of space located in 9640 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland. 

Now, therefore, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, do covenant and agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	In the event a lease is executed at 9620 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland between LANDLORD and TENANT (“SECOND LEASE”), the term of the LEASE shall expire or terminate upon the applicable expiration
or termination of the SECOND LEASE. The parties anticipate the expiration of the SECOND LEASE to occur on January 31, 2020. 


Ratification of LEASE: Except as expressly modified or amended by this AMENDMENT, all terms, covenants and conditions of the
LEASE shall remain the same. 
 In witness whereof, LANDLORD and TENANT have caused this AMENDMENT to be executed as of this
6th day of November 2014, and do hereby declare this AMENDMENT to be binding on them, their respective successors and assigns. 
  

							
	WITNESS:		 		 		LANDLORD:
				
							RED GATE III LLC
				
	  
						 /s/ William M. Rickman

							By: William M. Rickman
				
	WITNESS:						TENANT:
				
							MACROGENICS, INC.
				
	  
						 /s/ Scott Koenig M.D., PhD

							By: Scott Koenig


  
 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Delta Water Management Research: Jonesboro, AR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Jonesboro, Arkansas Delta Water Management Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

**Linda Mooney**Supervisory Project Manager (Acting)linda.w.mooney@ars.usda.gov Debbie CreelSupport Services AssistantDebbie.j.creel@ara.usda.gov Beltsville Area Research Support ServicesBeltsville Agricultural Research Center Bldg 177C Beltsville, Maryland, 20705-2325 301-504-9243 Provides responsive research support to the Beltsville Area scientific community through excellent plant and animal care, forage and crop production, feed preparation, utilizing sustainable management programs that preserve local ecosystems.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                       859
<INVENTORY>                                     50,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,444
<PP&E>                                          43,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,317
<SALES>                                         41,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,261
<CGS>                                           24,127
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    93
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                       559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
#### H. Nelson Curtice, Respondent, *v.*Amasa B. West, Appellant.

(Argued June 6, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order *697made the first Tuesday of October, 1888, which modified, and affirmed as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered Upon the report of a referee.

*Horace L. Bemiett*for appellant.

*S. D. Bentley*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### LARSEN, Respondent, v. UNITED STATES MORTGAGE & TRUST CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second De*1135partment.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Ludiska H. Larsen, as administratrix, etc., against the United States Mortgage & Trust Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs.
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. PD-1579-13

COREY THOMAS FREEMAN, Appellant 

### v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS COLLIN COUNTY
Per curiam.



### OPINION
Appellant was convicted of online solicitation of a minor under section 33.021 (b) of
the Penal Code. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Freeman v. State, No. 05-12-
00923-CR (Tex. App. --Dallas 20 13). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review contending the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the constitutionality of the statute.
This Court granted discretionary review recently in Ex parte Lo in order to addresswhether section 33.021(b) is unconstitutional. We held it to be unconstitutional on its face
due to overbreadth, reversed the decision of the court of appeals, and remanded to the trial

court to dismiss the indictment. Ex parte Lo,

_ S.W.3d _(Tex. Crim. App. No. PD-1560- 12, delivered October 30, 2013). The State's motion for rehearing was denied on March 19,
2014. The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in Ex
parte Lo. Accordingly, we grant Appellant's petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further
action in light of our opinion in Ex parte Lo.

Delivered April 2, 2014 PublishP.O.BOX12308,CAPITOLSTATIONAUSTIN,TEXAS78711OFFICIALBUSINESS(/)STATEOFTEXASPENALTYFORPRIVATEUSEa..u.PD-1579-135THCOURTOFAPPEALSCLERKLISAMATZ600COMMERCE2NDFLOORDALLASTX7520240CQT-53975202l"h·t1\"t'htl··'''1·t'hl'tll't'l'll'··t·th·11•Hhl••tllhI
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 93I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 093I |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 65° anno28 febbraio 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 093I

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

65° anno28 febbraio 2022

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informazioni |
| | INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA |
| | Commissione europea |
| 2022/C 93 I/01 | Avviso agli importatori — Importazioni nell’Unione di merci originarie delle zone non controllate dal governo delle oblast di Donetsk e Luhansk dell’Ucraina | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

IV   Informazioni

INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA

Commissione europea

2022/C 93 I/01

Avviso agli importatori — Importazioni nell’Unione di merci originarie delle zone non controllate dal governo delle oblast di Donetsk e Luhansk dell’Ucraina

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

IV Informazioni

INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA

Commissione europea

| 28.2.2022 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CI 93/1

---

Avviso agli importatori

Importazioni nell’Unione di merci originarie delle zone non controllate dal governo delle oblast di Donetsk e Luhansk dell’Ucraina

(2022/C 93 I/01)

Il regolamento (UE) 2022/263 del Consiglio, del 23 febbraio 2022, concernente misure restrittive in risposta al riconoscimento delle zone non controllate dal governo delle oblast di Donetsk e Luhansk dell’Ucraina e all’invio di forze armate russe in tali zone (1), ha introdotto il divieto di importare nell’Unione europea le merci originarie di tali zone a decorrere dal giorno successivo alla pubblicazione.

Si invitano gli importatori dell’Unione a prestare la dovuta attenzione per accertare l’effettiva origine delle merci da essi dichiarate, poiché sussiste il rischio che le merci soggette al divieto di cui al suddetto regolamento siano importate nell’Unione da paesi vicini dell’Ucraina, in particolare Russia e Bielorussia. Si tratta particolare dei prodotti carbonieri di cui alla voce NC 2701 e dei prodotti di acciaio di cui alle voci NC da 7201 a 7207 e alle voci NC 7304, 7305 e 7306. In considerazione di tale rischio di elusione, l’immissione in libera pratica di tali prodotti importati dalla Russia e dalla Bielorussia può essere subordinata alla presentazione alle autorità doganali di prove inconfutabili che tali merci non sono incluse nel divieto di importazione di merci originarie delle zone non controllate dal governo di Donetsk e Luhansk dell’Ucraina.

---

(1)  GU L 42 I del 23.2.2022, pag. 77.

---
#### Frankie Karen WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-55287.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 6, 2011.

*523Frankie Karen Washington, Chowehilla, CA, pro se.

Craig J. Miller, Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frankie Karen Washington, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment and judgment, following a jury trial in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. *Morrison v. Hall,*261 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Wren because Washington failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Wren had reason to know that a constitutional violation was being committed and was physically capable of preventing the alleged violation. *See Ting v. U.S.,*927 F.2d 1504, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991); *see also Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.,*509 F.3d 978, 984 (9th Cir.2007) (“Conclusory, speculative testimony in affidavits and moving papers is insufficient to raise genuine issues of fact and defeat summary judgment.”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant City of Los Angeles because Washington failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the Los Angeles Police Department’s use-of-force policy was the moving force behind the police officer’s alleged use of excessive force. *See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs.,*436 U.S. 658, 694-95, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (local government may be liable under § 1983 when official policy is “the moving force of the constitutional violation”).

We do not consider Washington’s claims of error at trial, or that Officer Washington lacked probable cause to stop her or used excessive force against her, *524because Washington did not include a trial transcript in the record on appeal as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(b)(2), or explain her failure to do so. *See*9th Cir. R. 10-3.1(d) & (e); *Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade,*924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal of pro se appellant for failure to provide a trial transcript).

Washington’s remaining contentions, including those concerning her Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, are unpersuasive. *See Johnson v. Neilson (In re*Slatkin), 525 F.3d 805, 811 (9th Cir.2008) (“[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”).

Washington’s “Motion for Leave to File Evidence of Incompetence to Stand Trial Outside of the Record” is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
2014-Q4 Exhibit 10.11 Severance




Exhibit 10.11




The following current executive officers have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with the Company in the form filed herewith. The information listed below is inserted into the blanks for the respective executive officer’s Executive Severance Agreement.
	
							
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Salary Multiplier
	 
	 
	 
	Change of Control

	 
	 
	Rate
	 
	Termination Period
	 
	Continuation Period

	 
	 
	(Section 4(a)(4))
	 
	(Section 1(n))
	 
	(Section 2)

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	James A. Gabel
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months

	Brendan M. Gibbons
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months

	Melissa A. Howell
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months

	Michael Jeppesen
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months

	Andrew Simister
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

[LOGO] PLANTE                                                 PLANT & MORAN, LLP
       MORAN                                                           Suite 700
                                                            107 W. Michigan Ave.
                                                             Kalamazoo, MI 49007
                                                               Tel: 616.385.1858
                                                               Fax: 616.385.2936
                                                             www.plantemoran.com

                          Independent Auditor's Report



To the Board of Directors
Sturgis Bank & Trust Co. and Subsidiaries
Sturgis, Michigan


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Sturgis Bank &
Trust Co. and subsidiaries (collectively, the "Bank") as of December 31, 2001
and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each year in the three-year period ended
December 31 2001. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Bank's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sturgis
Bank & Trust Co. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each year in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting

<PAGE>

[LOGO] PLANTE                                                 PLANT & MORAN, LLP
       MORAN                                                           Suite 700
                                                            107 W. Michigan Ave.
                                                             Kalamazoo, MI 49007
                                                               Tel: 616.385.1858
                                                               Fax: 616.385.2936
                                                             www.plantemoran.com


principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



Kalamazoo, Michigan
February 8, 2002, except for Note 16, as to
     which the date is March 11, 2002
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00186-CV

JUAN FRANCISCO CASTRO

v.

MARIVEL CASTRO

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2010-DCV-4548-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 31, 2014