alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models
                        What Are Crop Simulation Models?
                                    2DSoil Model
                                    Spudsim (Potato) Model
                                    CLASSIM
                    Controlled Environment FacilitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Modelsheadline bar What Are Crop Simulation Models?
               2DSoil Model
               Spudsim (Potato) Model
               CLASSIM


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
----

|   | 1. | A      review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Amended      and Restated Private Student Loan Servicing Agreement, dated as of      September 28, 2006, as amended, between the Servicer and The First      Marblehead Corporation (the “Servicing Agreement”) for the period that is      the subject of each of the Reports has been made under the supervision of      the undersigned; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on such review, the Servicer      has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all      material respects throughout the period that is the subject of each of the      Reports; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | To      the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on such review, there have      been no failures to fulfill any such obligation in any material      respect. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | PENNSYLVANIA      HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                 |   |   |
|   |                                                 |   |   |
|   | By:                                                  | /s/ James L. Preston |   |
|   |                                                 | Name:      James L. Preston |   |
|   |                                                 | Title:  President      & CEO |   |

----

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Cause No. 2:15-cr-72 

 ) 

ALDON PEREZ, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY 

TO: THE HONORABLE PHILIP P. SIMON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 Upon defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11, this matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Andrew P. Rodovich, United 

States Magistrate Judge, on September 20, 2017, with the written consents of the defendant, 

counsel for the defendant, and counsel for the United States of America. 

 The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, before the 

Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record. 

 In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on 

the record, and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of Assistant United States Attorney David 

J. Nozick, and of Attorney Richard S. Kling, counsel for the defendant, 

 I FIND as follows: 

1. that the defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the 

plea is offered; 
2 

2. that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not 

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse 

witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination; 

3. that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including 

the effect of the supervised release term, and the defendant understands that the 

Probation Department will prepare a pre-sentence report based upon the 

sentencing guidelines but that the court may depart from those guidelines under 

some circumstances; 

4. that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made 

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises; 

5. that the defendant is competent to plead guilty; 

6. that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a 

prosecution for perjury or false statement; 

7. that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further, 

 I RECOMMEND that the court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Count 1 of the Third Superseding Indictment and have sentence imposed. A 

presentence report has been ordered. 

 ENTERED this 20th day of September, 2017. 

 /s/ Andrew P. Rodovich 

 United States Magistrate Judge
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Amendment  to the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB  (the
"Report") of One Link 4 Travel, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December
31, 2003, each of the  undersigned,  F. William Guerin,  the President and Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and David J.  Bolton,  the Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  April 28, 2004                  /s/ F. William Guerin
----------------------                  ----------------------------------------
                                        F. William Guerin,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  April 28, 2004                  /s/ David J. Bolton
----------------------                  ----------------------------------------
                                        David J. Bolton, Chief Financial Officer



                                    * * * * *

A signed  original  of the  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission of its staff upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3 

To promote fiscal responsibility and control spending. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, 

Mr. KERRY, Mr. BENNET, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. COONS, Mrs. BOXER, 

and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To promote fiscal responsibility and control spending. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Responsibility 

5 and Spending Control Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

7 It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should— 

8 (1) address the growing public concern about 

9 our rising national debt and long-term fiscal chal10 lenges through a bipartisan agreement that— 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3 IS

1 (A) significantly corrects our Nation’s 

2 long-term fiscal imbalances and closes the gap 

3 between projected revenues and expenditures; 

4 (B) ensures the economic security of the 

5 United States; and 

6 (C) enhances future prosperity and growth 

7 for all Americans; 

8 (2) reduce the Federal deficit and stabilize the 

9 national debt without damaging the economic recov10 ery; 

11 (3) consider deficit reduction proposals recently 

12 developed by leading budget experts, including var13 ious members of the National Commission on Fiscal 

14 Responsibility and Reform, and establish a plan that 

15 can attract broad bipartisan support; 

16 (4) ensure that any plan to address our Na17 tion’s long-term fiscal problems is balanced and pro18 vides fundamental reform of the Federal tax code 

19 along with prudent controls on spending; 

20 (5) lower tax rates and raise Federal revenues 

21 by eliminating tax expenditures that only serve spe22 cial interests, as well as take aggressive measures to 

23 close the tax gap and stop cheating; 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3 IS

1 (6) ensure that the Federal tax code fairly dis2 tributes the tax burden and helps American busi3 nesses compete in the global marketplace; 

4 (7) extend the solvency of Social Security for its 

5 own sake and ensure that no savings are used to 

6 meet deficit reduction goals in the remainder of the 

7 budget; 

8 (8) achieve savings through the elimination or 

9 consolidation of duplicative Federal programs and 

10 activities while also modernizing Federal procure11 ment practices in order to reduce waste and leverage 

12 better value out of every dollar spent by the Federal 

13 Government; and 

14 (9) reject efforts to exempt tax breaks for mil15 lionaires and special interests from strong pay-as16 you-go budgetary rules. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    AIP
                        Home
                                    About
                                    Publications
                                    Software
                                    People
                                    Collaborations
                                    Careers
                                    Centennial
                                    Contact
                                    Dairy industry links
                    DirectionsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






MTDFREMLheadline bar Obtaining_MTDFREML
               MTDFREML
               LDVV_Message
               Permissions
               Standard_Errors
               Training
               Practice
               Cite
               Executables


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 10.15

 

Indemnity Agreement

 

The undersigned, Mr. Maodong Xu (“Mr. Xu”), a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), ID Number                                   , with respect to the potential approvals that may be required from any and all PRC government authorities (the “Regulatory Approval”) in connection with the incurrence or assignment of rights of all indebtedness owed to Mr. Xu directly, or indirectly through one or more of his controlled entities, by Wowo Limited, a Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), and any of the Company’s subsidiaries, consolidated affiliated entities, or subsidiaries of such consolidated affiliated entities (the “VIEs”) including, but not limited to, Beijing Wowo Tuan Information Technology Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Wowo Tuan”), hereby irrevocably commits and warrants that:

 

In the event any legal or administrative sanctions or fines are imposed on the Company or the VIEs, including, but not limited to, Beijing Wowo Tuan, as a result of a delay or failure to obtain any Regulatory Approval, Mr. Xu hereby commits to undertake all responsibilities and liabilities resulting from such a delay or failure and wil indemnify the full amount of such sanctions or fines, if any, to the Company, the VIEs, including but limited Beijing Wowo Tuan, and any of their respective directors, shareholders and employees.

 

This indemnity agreement is irrevocable and effective as of the date hereof.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Maodong Xu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Maodong   Xu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
February 20,   2015
# L_2008333EN.01000301.xml

| 11.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1229/2008

of 10 December 2008

entering certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, Spain’s application to register the name ‘San Simón da Costa’, France’s application to register the name ‘Ail blanc de Lomagne’ and Austria’s application to register the name ‘Steirischer Kren’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, Spain’s application to register the name ‘San Simón da Costa’, France’s application to register the name ‘Ail blanc de Lomagne’ and Austria’s application to register the name ‘Steirischer Kren’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby entered in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 85, 4.4.2008, p. 13 (San Simón da Costa), OJ C 87, 8.4.2008, p. 8 (Ail blanc de Lomagne), OJ C 91, 12.4.2008, p. 26 (Steirischer Kren).

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SPAIN

San Simón da Costa (AOP)

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Ail blanc de Lomagne (IGP)

AUSTRIA

Steirischer Kren (IGP)

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Buggs, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment upon conviction of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant faults the prosecutor for presenting improper rebuttal, rendering a prejudicial summation and improperly cross-examining a defense witness. Defendant also argues that the trial court’s charge on defendant’s flight was improper. None of these claims requires reversal and the claim relating to the prosecutor’s summation was not preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311, 324).

Defendant confessed to stabbing the victim with a steak knife. His defense was justification. Defense witnesses, including the defendant, testified that the victim had threatened to kill the mother of defendant’s two children and had in fact assaulted this woman several times. Defendant claimed that prior to the stabbing, he saw a flash of metal in the victim’s hand. On rebuttal, the prosecutor called several witnesses to impeach the testimony that the victim had a knife. This was entirely proper.

The People had the burden to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt (Penal Law § 25.00). A party may properly impeach opposing testimony provided it is not collateral to the issue upon which that witness has testified *(see, People v Harris,*57 NY2d 335, *cert denied*460 US 1047). Evidence is not collateral if it is relevant to some issue other than credibility *(see, People v Schwartzman,*24 NY2d 241, 245, *cert denied*396 US 846). The issue of whether the victim brandished a knife prior to or during the incident was not collateral, particularly given the fact that defendant failed to mention in his confession that the victim possessed a knife *(see, People v Wise,*46 NY2d 321; *People v Fontaine,*105 AD2d 710; *see also,*CPL 260.30 [7]).

The prosecutor’s cross-examination of a defense witness concerning her failure to pay rent was error. Failure to pay a debt does not tend to show moral turpitude (see, *People v Montlake,*184 App Div 578, 583.) The error was harmless, however, given the cumulative nature of the witness’ testimony and the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

The trial court’s charge on flight was proper. In view of the court’s permissive language and cautionary instruction, no reasonable juror would have been obligated to find guilt from defendant’s flight *(see, People v Yazum,*13 NY2d 302, 304; *People v Leyra,*1 NY2d 199, 208; *cf. People v Fava,*86 AD2d 975, *appeal dismissed*58 NY2d 807). (Appeal from judgment of *1053Supreme Court, Monroe County, Pine, J., at trial; Kennedy, J., on suppression hearing — manslaughter, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131405 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131405 

 COA: 268733 

Genesee CC: 05-016398-FH 

TIMOTHY ANDREW DEWAR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

MARKMAN, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration 

as on leave granted for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in People v 

Wright, 474 Mich 1138 (2006). 

d0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

Clerk