alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory Docs





- Molecular Plant Pathology Main Page
- MPPL retired scientists
- Pseudomonas kuykendallii - new!
- 'Candidatus Phytoplasma pruni' - new!
- MPPL's Retired Scientists
- Spiroplasma kunkelii
- Phytoplasma Resource Center
- Phytoplasma classification database
- Grapevine Yellows
- Xylella fastidiosa
- viroids
- Potato spindle tuber viroid
- viruses
- Potato Yellow vein virus
- Beet mosaic virus
- peach
- sugarbeet root maggot
- citrus
- Grapes
- Alfalfa
- plant-bacterial recognition

Research - Davisheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of National Mercantile Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Brown, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of and for theperiods covered in the report.

 

 
|   |   |                     | /s/  DAVID R. BROWN |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | David R. Brown           |
|   |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

Date:  November 10, 2005

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NationalMercantile Bancorp and will be retained by National Mercantile Bancorp andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB and shall not be consideredfiled as part of the Form 10-QSB.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 10.16


 


SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS









The following summarizes the current compensation and benefits received by the Company’s non-employee directors as of January 1, 2015.  This document is intended to be a summary of existing oral, at will arrangements, and in no way is intended to provide any additional rights to any non-employee director.  Compensation of the non-employee directors may be adjusted from time to time.







Retainer







Non-employee directors each receive an annual retainer fee of $40,000.  The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $20,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000 and the Chairman of each of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee and Diversity Committee receives an annual retainer of $6,000.  A director that chairs more than one committee receives a retainer with respect to each Committee he chairs.  All of the retainers are paid on a quarterly basis.







Meeting Fees







Per meeting fees for non-employee directors are as follows:








		–	For meetings of the Board of Directors, $2,500











		–	For meetings of the Compensation Committee, $2,000











		–	For meetings of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee and Diversity Committee, $1,500.











		–	For meetings of the Audit Committee either in person or over the telephone, $2,500.











		–	In addition, the Chairman receives an additional $2,500 for preparing to conduct each quarterly meeting.










Equity Compensation







Under the terms of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, directors are eligible to receive stock options, stock awards, and other types of equity-based compensation awards.  However, the Company does not make any such awards to non-employee directors under its current compensation practices.







All non-employee directors are entitled to reimbursement of expenses for all services as a director, including committee participation or special assignments.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Durham, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J., on plea; Bernstein, J., on sentence), rendered May 19, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606.) Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6497

KELVIN GOULD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NEWPORT NEWS; VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S, City of Newport News, VA; ALEXANDER C. LEVY; BRIAN P. KEELEY; OLDRIC J. LABELL, JR.; ROBERT N. PRITCHARD; ALEXANDRIA CHUN; AARON M. THOMPSON, Detective; JEFFREY C. ROUNTREE, Attorney at Law,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00092-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gould v. Newport News , No. 2:09-cv00092-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2009). We deny Gould’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|Date:  June 30, 2005 |                                           
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                     | /s/DMITRY A. ANISIMOV                     
|                     | Dmitry A. Anisimov
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### Helen Butchino et al., Appellants, v John W. Bush, Respondent.

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court in favor of defendant, entered October 25, 1983 in St. Lawrence County, upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Trial Term (Ford, J.), at the close of all the evidence.

During the trial of this personal injury action, the testimony of plaintiff Helen Butchino (hereinafter plaintiff) was that since the motor vehicle accident of April 8,1979, she has suffered from pain and dizziness in performing once basic and routine activities. Her medical expert, a chiropractor, first began seeing her in mid-1983. Prior to that time, for some *3¥2*years, plaintiff’s claimed injuries were attended to by an osteopath, who had died earlier in 1983. The chiropractor testified that his examination of plaintiff and her X rays revealed two separate subluxations in the cervical spine which resulted from the accident. He described a subluxation, a condition chiropractors are expressly authorized by statute to manage (Education Law § 6551), as a locking of cervical vertebrae within or slightly beyond the normal range of motion; defendant’s expert, a general surgeon, referred to it as a partial dislocation. In the chiropractor’s opinion, these subluxations were permanent conditions producing in plaintiff the following disabilities: headaches, dizziness, pain in the neck, numbness in the fingers and hands, atrophy in the muscles of the hands and a further weakening of grip strength. In addition, the doctor found that due to pain, plaintiff’s motion was limited to 45 degrees on extension, in contrast to the normal range of 55 to 60 degrees.

At the close of the evidence, the trial court dismissed the action on defendant’s motion for failure to establish a serious injury within the meaning of former Insurance Law § 671 (4) (renum Insurance Law § 5102 [d] by L 1984, ch 367).

Unless there is no line of reasoning by which a jury could have concluded that plaintiff suffered a significant limitation of use of a body function or system, that issue is to be left with the jury (see, *Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230, 239-240). In view of plaintiff’s medical evidence authenticating that plaintiff suffers permanent disabilities from these subluxations, and this court’s recent recognition that pain may form the basis of a serious injury and that whether it does so is ordinarily a triable fact issue *(Hourigan v McGarry,*106 AD2d 845; *Kaiser v Edwards,*98 AD2d 825, 826), a new trial should be had.

*1002Order reversed, on the law, with costs, and matter remitted to Trial Term for a new trial. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ. concur.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Louis E. PrezeauLouis E. PrezeauChief Executive Officer
and President CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward R. WrightEdward R. WrightChief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice President
OFFICE OF THE ARORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eon. iho. .i, 001, X. D. 

state Health ofrioer 

Austin * ?SxaS 

3ear 3lr: 

--~_ 

apinion Iio. M&Z72 ’ 

.:a~---, tiuthority oP.~the Attorhey General tii\rrg$resent 

I’ .,ta Xate Department or 

ijealth In suit for recovery or fees due under 

provisions or 2tiole 

’ &76-a, ~ernon*s motated 

-\ ,.' \ Civil Statutes. 

/ 

YOU- letter of August 17, '194~2, requests the opinion 0r this dk3piiHXqAt as tQ WBether it is the duty or the 

attorney c.3enera.l. 

to eaoh QtSele,,dr bedding mnufaotured, snd that a revenue 

atamp,shal'i, bri"&tyohed to suah label. The mnufacturer, deacribed by yoq had refused to attaoh the label or the revenue 

stamp to artiDf'es ol bedding nanufaotured by hkn. 

:hilo the statute provides a oriminsl penalty for 

violation of its provisibns, we are of the opinion that upon 

the mnufacture or th,e artiole of bedding, the ;zunuf,?oturer 

beames liable to the State for the amouut sl the revenue 

stamp required to be attached thereto. 3uch liability is a 

debt to the state, and ir;ay be anforoed by suit. :<oward V. 
IIon. Sao. X. Cox, LD., Tage 2 

baagor or liouston, 59 Tex. 76; Cave v. city or ::ouston, 

Tex. 619; State V. L~illlianm, d Tex. 354; Yexae ?anking 

Iniuranoe CO. v. state, k2 Tex. 636. 

65 

& 

Seation 22, A%.ole 4 or the Sonstitution, after 

proaoribing oertain, specifio duties of tCe .+ttorney General, provides that he ahall *perform suoh okher duties as 

nay be presoribed by law.** 

lrtiole j&l&, X.C.Y. reads, in >art, 3s fz~llo-mr 

WI all matters :uherein the State aoard 

of l’fealth shall invoke the aid oi' the oo*tita, 

the clotion shall run in ihe naftie ol %e Aate 

or Texas. The Attorney Generai shall assign 

a special a~asiatant to attend to ull legal 

natters of the board. Upon uemod of the 

board, the Attomey General shall fur;iish the 

neaeesary assistanoe to the board to attend 

to all its legal requirernenta. . . .I* 

Seotion 5, Artiole 4476-a. charges the Sate Board 

of IIealth with the enforoement gi" the .;ct. 

\a am, thsrerore, or the opinion that it ia the 

duty of the Attorney General to represent the State, in a 

suit brought at the instance of the state Soard of Ysalth 

for the oolleotion of delinquent ices knposed by Article 

476-a, V.A.G.3. 

Truatlng that ws have fully anmered your tiquiry, 

we are
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00598-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J.A.

From the County Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-05-00005 JVK

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 4, 2019.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #16876 and #16877; Texas Disaster Number TX-00591]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-4586-DR), dated 02/19/2021.

*Incident:* Severe Winter Storms.

*Incident Period:* 02/11/2021 through 02/21/2021.

# DATES:

Issued on 06/24/2021.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* Filing Period for counties listed below ends on 08/23/2021.

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:* Filing Period for counties listed below ends on 03/24/2022.

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Texas, dated 2/19/2021, is hereby amended to include the counties listed below. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov* or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 to request an application. Applications for physical damages may be filed until 08/23/2021 and applications for economic injury may be file until 03/24/2022.

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Kerr, Lamar, Shackelford.

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Oklahoma: Choctaw.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2021-14038 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### OWENS v. OWENS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 4, 1912.)

Action by William Owens against John Owens and others. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to abide the final award of costs.
Exhibit 4.9a


 


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 


  






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


  






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 


  






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 


  






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


  






    	 



    	 



    

 


 0
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2387

To provide an exemption from certain requirements under the Gramm-LeachBliley Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2005

Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota (for himself and Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To provide an exemption from certain requirements under 

the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Privacy Protection Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 509(3) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 

8 U.S.C. 6809(3)) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing new subparagraph: 
2

HR 2387 IH 

1 ‘‘(E) CERTAIN FINANCIAL INSTITU2 TIONS.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), 

3 the term ‘financial institution’ does not include 

4 any provider of financial services, or any affil5 iate thereof, that is subject to regulation of cli6 ent confidentiality that prohibits unauthorized 

7 disclosure of confidential client information 

8 without the consent of the client in the form of 

9 laws, rules, or regulation of professional con10 duct or ethics promulgated either by the court 

11 of highest appellate authority or by the prin12 cipal legislative body or regulatory agency or 

13 body of any State of the United States, the Dis14 trict of Columbia, any territory of the United 

15 States, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, 

16 the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, the 

17 Virgin Islands, or the Northern Mariana Is18 lands, or by the laws of the United States.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”),on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Frank M. Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of thePartnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 
| /S/ FRANK M. SEMPLE                   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                  |   |   |
| Frank M. Semple                       |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
| May 7, 2008                      |   |   |

 

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under thatsection. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct except to the extent this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specificallyincorporated by reference in any such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----