35396 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

procedure for the public to request 

withdrawal or modification of a 

guidance document. Removal of these 

procedures imposes no significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Therefore, the 

undersigned certifies that this rule will 

not have a significant impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism 

E.O. 13132 (entitled ‘‘Federalism’’) 

prohibits an agency from publishing any 

rule that has federalism implications if 

the rule either: (1) Imposes substantial 

direct compliance costs on State and 

local governments and is not required 

by statute, or (2) preempts State law, 

unless the agency meets the 

consultation and funding requirements 

of Section 6 of the E.O. This Interim 

final rule does not have federalism 

implications and does not impose 

substantial direct compliance costs on 

State and local governments nor 

preempt state law within the meaning of 

the E.O. 

List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 11 

Administrative practice and 

procedure. 

PART 11 [REMOVED] 

■ Accordingly, for the reasons described 

in the preamble and under the authority 

of 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), the U.S. 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development removes 24 CFR part 11. 

Dated: June 24, 2021. 

Marcia L. Fudge, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14019 Filed 7–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of the Secretary 

31 CFR Part 1 

RIN 1505–AC73 

Privacy Act; Special Inspector General 

for Pandemic Recovery 

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, 

Department of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 

as amended, the Department of the 

Treasury, Departmental Offices (DO), is 

issuing a final rule to amend its 

regulations to exempt portion of the 

following new systems of records 

maintained by the Special Inspector 

General for Pandemic Recovery (SIGPR) 

from certain provisions of the Privacy 

Act. The exemption is intended to 

comply with the legal prohibitions 

against the disclosure of certain kinds of 

information and to protect certain 

information maintained in this system 

of records. 

DATES: Effective July 6, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions about this notice and privacy 

issues, contact: Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and 

Records at U.S. Department of the 

Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20220; telephone: 

(202) 622–5710. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

SIGPR was established by the 

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic 

Security (CARES) Act of 2020. SIGPR 

has the duty to conduct, supervise, and 

coordinate audits, evaluations, and 

investigations of the making, purchase, 

management, and sale of loans, loan 

guarantees, and other investments made 

by the Secretary of the Treasury under 

programs established by the Secretary, 

as authorized by Section 4018(c) of the 

CARES Act, and the management by the 

Secretary of programs, as authorized by 

Section 4018(c) of the CARES Act. 

SIGPR’s duties and responsibilities are 

set forth in Section 4018 of the CARES 

Act, and in the Inspector General Act of 

1978, 5 U.S.C. app. 3. SIGPR plans to 

create these systems of records to 

facilitate SIGPR’s audits, evaluations, 

investigations, and other operations to 

(1) promote economy, efficiency, and 

effectiveness in the administration of 

such programs; (2) prevent and detect 

fraud and abuse in the programs and 

operations within its jurisdiction; and 

(3) keep the head of the establishment 

and the Congress fully informed about 

problems and deficiencies relating to 

the administration of such programs and 

operations and the necessity for and 

progress of corrective action. Treasury is 

publishing separately the notice of the 

new system of records to be maintained 

by SIGPR. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2), 

the head of a federal agency may 

promulgate rules to exempt a system of 

records from certain provisions of 5 

U.S.C. 552a if the system of records 

contains investigatory materials 

compiled for law enforcement purposes. 

Pursuant to these provisions, Treasury 

exempts the following system of records 

from 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1), 

(d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), 

(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8), 

(f), and (g) of the Privacy Act: 

SIGPR .420—Audit and Evaluations 

Records 

SIGPR .421—Case Management System 

and Investigative Records 

SIGPR .423—Legal Records 

The following are the reasons the 

investigatory materials contained in the 

above-referenced systems of records 

maintained by SIGPR may be exempted 

from various provisions of the Privacy 

Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 

(k)(2): 

(1) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 

552a(e)(4)(G) and (f)(l) (Agency 

Requirements and Rules) because 

release would give individuals an 

opportunity to learn whether they have 

been identified as suspects or subjects of 

investigation. As further described in 

the following paragraph, access to such 

knowledge may impair the ability of the 

Department of the Treasury and SIGPR 

(the Department/SIGPR) to carry out its 

respective missions, since individuals 

could: 

(i) Take steps to avoid detection; 

(ii) Inform associates that an 

investigation is in progress; 

(iii) Learn the nature of the 

investigation; 

(iv) Learn whether they are suspects 

or, instead, have been identified as 

alleged law violators; 

(v) Begin, continue, or resume illegal 

conduct upon learning that they are not 

identified in the system of records; or 

(vi) Destroy evidence needed to prove 

the violation. 

(2) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 

552a(d)(1), (e)(4)(H) and (f)(2), (3) and 

(5) (Access to Records and Agency 

Requirements and Rules) because 

release might compromise the 

Department’s/SIGPR’s ability to provide 

useful tactical and strategic information 

to law enforcement agencies by: 

(i) Permitting access to records 

contained in the systems of records such 

that it might provide information 

concerning the nature of current 

investigations and enable possible 

violators to avoid detection or 

apprehension by: 

(A) Allowing the discovery of facts 

that could form the basis for violators’ 

arrests; 

(B) Enabling violators to destroy or 

alter evidence of alleged criminal 

conduct that could form the basis for 

arrest; and 

(C) Using knowledge of the status of 

criminal investigations to delay the 

commission of a crime or commit a 

crime at a location that might not be 

under surveillance. 

(ii) Permitting access to either ongoing or closed investigative files might 

also reveal investigative techniques and 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 35397 

procedures, the knowledge of which 

could enable individuals planning 

crimes to structure their operations to 

avoid detection or apprehension. 

(iii) Permitting access to investigative 

files and records also could disclose the 

identity of confidential sources and 

informants and the nature of the 

information supplied, and thereby 

endanger the physical safety of those 

sources by exposing them to possible 

reprisals for having provided the 

information. In addition, confidential 

sources and informants might refuse to 

provide criminal investigators with 

valuable information if they fear their 

identities may be revealed through 

disclosure of their names or the nature 

of the information they supplied. Loss 

of access to such sources would 

seriously impair the Department’s/ 

SIGPR’s ability to carry out its 

respective mandate. 

(iv) Furthermore, providing access to 

information contained in the systems of 

records could reveal the identities of 

undercover law enforcement officers 

who compiled information regarding the 

individual’s alleged criminal activities 

and thereby endanger the physical 

safety of those undercover officers or 

their families by exposing them to 

possible reprisals. 

(v) By compromising the law 

enforcement value of the systems of 

records for the reasons outlined in 

paragraph (2), subsections (i) through 

(iv), permitting access in keeping with 

these provisions would discourage other 

law enforcement and regulatory 

agencies, foreign and domestic, from 

freely sharing information with the 

Department/SIGPR and thus would 

restrict the Department’s/SIGPR’s access 

to information necessary to accomplish 

its respective mission most effectively. 

(vi) Finally, the dissemination of 

certain information that the 

Department/SIGPR maintains in the 

systems of records is restricted by law. 

(3) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 

552a(d)(2), (3) and (4), (e)(4)(H), and 

(f)(4) (Access to Records) because these 

provisions pertain to requesting an 

amendment or noting a dispute to 

records that are exempt from access for 

the reasons set forth in paragraph (2) 

above. 

(4) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) 

(Accounting for Disclosures) because 

release of the accounting of disclosures 

of the records in this system could 

impair the ability of law enforcement 

agencies outside the Department/SIGPR 

from making effective use of 

information provided by the 

Department/SIGPR. Making accountings 

of disclosures available to the subjects 

of an investigation could alert them to 

the fact that another agency is 

conducting an investigation into their 

alleged criminal activities and could 

reveal the geographic location of the 

other agency’s investigation, the nature 

and purpose of that investigation, and 

the dates on which that investigation 

was active. Individuals possessing such 

knowledge could take measures to avoid 

detection or apprehension by altering 

their operations, transferring their 

alleged criminal activities to other 

geographical areas, or destroying or 

concealing evidence that would form 

the basis for arrest. In the case of a 

delinquent account, such release might 

enable the subject of the investigation to 

dissipate assets before levy. 

(ii) Moreover, providing accountings 

to the subjects of investigations would 

alert them to the fact that the 

Department/SIGPR has information 

regarding their alleged criminal 

activities and could inform them of the 

general nature of that information. 

Access to such information could reveal 

the operations of the Department/ 

SIGPR’s information-gathering and 

analysis systems and permit individuals 

to take steps to avoid detection or 

apprehension. 

(5) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(4) 

(Accounting of Disclosures/Notice of 

Record Correction or Dispute) because 

this provision depends on an 

individual’s having access to and an 

opportunity to request amendment of 

records that are exempt from access for 

the reasons set out above, this provision 

should not apply to the systems of 

records. 

(6) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 

552a(e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements/ 

Publication of the Categories of Records) 

because it could compromise the 

Department/SIGPR’s ability to provide 

useful information to law enforcement 

agencies, since revealing sources for the 

information could: 

(i) Disclose investigative techniques 

and procedures; 

(ii) Result in threats or reprisals 

against informants by the subjects of 

investigations; and 

(iii) Cause informants to refuse to give 

full information to criminal 

investigators for fear of having their 

identities as sources disclosed. 

(7) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) 

(Agency Requirements/Maintaining 

Records) because the term ‘‘maintain’’ 

includes ‘‘collect’’ and ‘‘disseminate,’’ 

and application of this provision to the 

systems of records could impair the 

Department/SIGPR’s ability to collect 

and disseminate valuable law 

enforcement information in the 

following ways: 

(i) In many cases, especially in the 

early stages of an investigation, it may 

be impossible to immediately determine 

whether information collected is 

relevant and necessary, and information 

that initially appears irrelevant and 

unnecessary often may, upon further 

evaluation or upon collation with 

information developed subsequently, 

prove particularly relevant to a law 

enforcement program. 

(ii) Not all violations of law 

discovered by the Department/SIGPR 

fall within the investigative jurisdiction 

of the Department or SIGPR. To promote 

effective law enforcement, the 

Department/SIGPR may disclose such 

violations to other law enforcement 

agencies, including state, local and 

foreign agencies, that have jurisdiction 

over the offenses to which the 

information relates. Otherwise, the 

Department/SIGPR might be placed in 

the position of having to ignore 

information relating to violations of law 

not within the jurisdiction of the 

Department or SIGPR when that 

information comes to the Department/ 

SIGPR’s attention during the collation 

and analysis of information in its 

respective records. 

(8) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(2) 

(Agency Requirements/Collection from 

an Individual) because it could impair 

the Department’s ability to collate, 

analyze, and disseminate investigative, 

intelligence, and enforcement 

information. In addition: 

(i) Most information collected about 

an individual under criminal 

investigation is obtained from third 

parties, such as witnesses and 

informants. It is usually not feasible to 

rely upon the subject of the 

investigation as a source for information 

regarding his or her alleged criminal 

activities. 

(ii) An attempt to obtain information 

from the subject of a criminal 

investigation will often alert that 

individual to the existence of an 

investigation, thereby affording the 

individual an opportunity to attempt to 

conceal his or her alleged criminal 

activities and thus avoid apprehension. 

(iii) In certain instances, the subject of 

a criminal investigation may assert his 

or her constitutional right to remain 

silent and refuse to supply information 

to criminal investigators upon request. 

(iv) During criminal investigations, it 

is often a matter of sound investigative 

procedure to obtain information from a 

variety of sources to verify information 

already obtained from the subject of a 

criminal investigation or other sources. 

(9) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) 

(Agency Requirements/Informing 

Individuals) because it could impair the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
35398 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

Department/SIGPR’s ability to collect 

and collate investigative, intelligence, 

and enforcement data. In addition: 

(i) Confidential sources or undercover 

law enforcement officers often obtain 

information under circumstances in 

which it is necessary to keep the true 

purpose of their actions secret so as not 

to let the subject of the investigation, or 

his or her associates, know that a 

criminal investigation is in progress. 

(ii) If it became known that the 

undercover officer was assisting in a 

criminal investigation, that officer’s 

physical safety could be endangered 

through reprisal, and that officer may 

not be able to continue working on the 

investigation. 

(iii) Individuals often feel inhibited 

talking to a person representing a 

criminal law enforcement agency but 

are willing to talk to a confidential 

source or undercover officer whom they 

believe is not involved in law 

enforcement activities. 

(iv) Providing a confidential source of 

information with written evidence that 

he or she was a source, as required by 

this provision, could increase the 

likelihood that the source of information 

would be subject to retaliation by the 

subject of the investigation. 

(v) Individuals may be contacted 

during preliminary information 

gathering, surveys, or compliance 

projects concerning the administration 

of the internal revenue laws before any 

individual is identified as the subject of 

an investigation. Informing the 

individual of the matters required by 

this provision could impede or 

compromise subsequent investigations. 

(10) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 

552a(e)(5) (Agency Requirements/ 

Record Maintenance). Because the 

definition of ‘‘maintain’’ includes 

‘‘collect’’ and ‘‘disseminate,’’ this 

provision could hinder the initial 

collection of any information that might 

not be determined or determinable, at 

the moment of collection, to be accurate, 

relevant, timely, and complete. 

Similarly, application of this provision 

could seriously restrict the Department/ 

SIGPR’s ability to disseminate 

information pertaining to a possible 

violation of law to law enforcement and 

regulatory agencies. In collecting 

information during a criminal 

investigation, it is often impossible or 

unfeasible to determine accuracy, 

relevance, timeliness, or completeness 

prior to collection of the information. In 

disseminating information to law 

enforcement and regulatory agencies, it 

is often impossible to determine 

accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or 

completeness prior to dissemination 

because the Department/SIGPR may not 

have the expertise with which to make 

such determinations. Information that 

may initially appear inaccurate, 

irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete may, 

when collated and analyzed with other 

available information, become more 

pertinent as an investigation progresses. 

In addition, application of this 

provision could seriously impede 

criminal investigators and intelligence 

analysts in the exercise of their 

judgment in reporting results obtained 

during criminal investigations. 

(11) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 

552a(e)(8) (Agency Requirements/ 

Notice) because it could reveal 

investigative techniques and procedures 

outlined in those records and to prevent 

revelation of the existence of an ongoing 

investigation where there is need to 

keep the existence of the investigation 

secret. 

(12) Exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) 

(Civil Remedies) because, if the civil 

remedies relate to provisions of 5 U.S.C. 

552a from which these rules exempt the 

systems of records, there should be no 

civil remedies for failure to comply with 

provisions from which the Department/ 

SIGPR is exempted. Exemption from 

this provision will also protect the 

Department/SIGPR from baseless civil 

court actions that might hamper its 

ability to collate, analyze, and 

disseminate investigative, intelligence, 

and law enforcement data. 

Any information from a system of 

records for which an exemption is 

claimed under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or 5 

U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), which is also 

included in another system of records, 

retains the same exempt status such 

information has in the system of records 

for which such exemption is claimed. 

This rule is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’’ under Executive 

Order 12866. 

Pursuant to the requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 

U.S.C. 601–612, it is hereby certified 

that this rule will not have significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. The term 

‘‘small entity’’ is defined to have the 

same meaning as the terms ‘‘small 

business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’ and 

‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’ as 

defined in the RFA. 

The regulation, issued under sections 

(j)(2) and (k)(2) of the Privacy Act, is to 

exempt certain information maintained 

by the Department/SIGPR in the abovereferenced systems of records from 

certain Privacy Act requirements in this 

system of records by individuals who 

are United States citizens or aliens 

lawfully admitted for permanent 

residence. In as much as the Privacy Act 

rights are personal and apply only to 

U.S. citizens or an alien lawfully 

admitted for permanent residence, small 

entities, as defined in the RFA, are not 

provided rights under the Privacy Act 

and are outside the scope of this 

regulation. 

Public Comments 

Treasury received no comment on the 

notice of proposed rulemaking. No 

comment was received on the system of 

records notice. Treasury will implement 

the rulemaking as proposed. 

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1 

Privacy. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, part 1, subpart C of Title 31 

of the Code of Federal Regulations is 

amended as follows: 

PART 1—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. 

Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552, as 

amended. Subpart C also issued under 5 

U.S.C. 552a, as amended. 

■ 2. Section 1.36 is amended by adding 

entries for ‘‘SIGPR .420’’, ‘‘SIGPR .421’’, 

and ‘‘SIGPR .423’’ in alphanumeric 

order to the tables in paragraphs 

(c)(1)(ii) and (g)(1)(ii) to read as follows: 

§ 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part 

from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 522a and this 

part. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(ii) * * * 

Number System name 

* * * * * 

SIGPR .420—Audit and Evaluations 

Records. 

SIGPR .421—Case Management System 

and Investigative Records. 

SIGPR .423—Legal Records. 

* * * * * 

(g) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(ii) * * * 

Number System name 

* * * * * 

SIGPR .420—Audit and Evaluations 

Records. 

SIGPR .421—Case Management System 

and Investigative Records. 

SIGPR .423—Legal Records. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 35399 

* * * * * 

Ryan Law, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary Privacy, 

Transparency, and Records. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14213 Filed 7–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AK–P?≤ 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

31 CFR Part 520 

International Criminal Court-Related 

Sanctions Regulations 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets 

Control (OFAC) is removing from the 

Code of Federal Regulations the 

International Criminal Court-Related 

Sanctions Regulations as a result of the 

termination of the national emergency 

on which the regulations were based. 

DATES: This rule is effective July 6, 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

OFAC: Assistant Director for Licensing, 

202–622–2480; Assistant Director for 

Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855; or 

Assistant Director for Sanctions 

Compliance & Evaluation, 202–622– 

2490. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability 

This document and additional 

information concerning OFAC are 

available on OFAC’s website: 

www.treasury.gov/ofac. 

Background 

On June 11, 2020, the President, 

invoking the authority of, inter alia, the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) 

(IEEPA), issued Executive Order (E.O.) 

13928 (85 FR 36139, June 15, 2020), 

‘‘Blocking Property of Certain Persons 

Associated With the International 

Criminal Court.’’ In E.O. 13928, the 

President found that the International 

Criminal Court’s (ICC) assertions of 

jurisdiction over personnel of the 

United States and certain of its allies 

threatened to subject current and former 

United States Government and allied 

officials to harassment, abuse, and 

possible arrest, and that these actions on 

the part of the ICC, in turn, threatened 

to infringe upon the sovereignty of the 

United States. The President therefore 

determined that any attempt by the ICC 

to investigate, arrest, detain, or 

prosecute any United States personnel 

without the consent of the United 

States, or of personnel of countries that 

are United States allies and who are not 

parties to the Rome Statute or have not 

otherwise consented to ICC jurisdiction, 

constituted an unusual and 

extraordinary threat to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United 

States and declared a national 

emergency to deal with that threat. 

On October 1, 2020, OFAC issued the 

International Criminal Court-Related 

Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 520 

(85 FR 61816, October 1, 2020) (the 

‘‘Regulations’’), as a final rule to 

implement E.O. 13928. The Regulations 

were issued in abbreviated form for the 

purpose of providing immediate 

guidance to the public. 

On April 1, 2021, the President issued 

E.O. 14022, ‘‘Termination of Emergency 

With Respect to the International 

Criminal Court’’ (86 FR 17895, April 7, 

2021). In E.O. 14022, the President 

found that, although the United States 

continues to object to the ICC’s 

assertions of jurisdiction over personnel 

of such non-States Parties as the United 

States and its allies absent their consent 

or referral by the United Nations 

Security Council, the threat and 

imposition of financial sanctions against 

the ICC, its personnel, and those who 

assist it are not an effective or 

appropriate strategy for addressing the 

United States’ concerns with the ICC. 

Accordingly, the President terminated 

the national emergency declared in E.O. 

13928 and revoked that order. 

As a result, OFAC is removing the 

Regulations from the Code of Federal 

Regulations. Pursuant to section 202(a) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(a)) and section 2 of E.O. 

14022, termination of the national 

emergency declared in E.O. 13928 shall 

not affect any action taken or 

proceeding pending not finally 

concluded or determined as of April 1, 

2021 (the date of E.O. 14022), any action 

or proceeding based on any act 

committed prior to the date of E.O. 

14022, or any rights or duties that 

matured or penalties that were incurred 

prior to the date of E.O. 14022. 

Public Participation 

Because the Regulations involve a 

foreign affairs function, the provisions 

of E.O. 12866 of September 30, 1993, 

‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 

FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

553) requiring notice of proposed 

rulemaking, opportunity for public 

participation, and delay in effective date 

are inapplicable. Because no notice of 

proposed rulemaking is required for this 

rule, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601–612) does not apply. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act does 

not apply because this rule does not 

impose information collection 

requirements that would require the 

approval of the Office of Management 

and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 520 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Banks, Banking, Blocking of 

assets, International criminal court, 

Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sanctions. 

PART 520—[REMOVED] 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, and pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 

1601–1651 and E.O. 14022 (86 FR 

17895, April 7, 2021), OFAC amends 31 

CFR chapter V by removing part 520. 

Dated: June 30, 2021. 

Bradley T. Smith, 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14337 Filed 7–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket Number USCG–2021–0266] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Special Local Regulation; Back River, 

Baltimore County, MD 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary special local 

regulation for certain waters of Back 

River. This action is necessary to 

provide for the safety of life on these 

navigable waters located in Baltimore 

County, MD, during a high-speed power 

boat event on July 10, 2021, and July 11, 

2021. This regulation prohibits persons 

and vessels from entering the regulated 

area unless authorized by the Captain of 

the Port Maryland-National Capital 

Region or the Coast Guard Event Patrol 

Commander. 

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. 

on July 10, 2021, through 6 p.m. on July 

11, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES