alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14404]



[[Page 35497]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday July 7, 2021; 10 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Decisional Matter.

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 7, 2021; 11 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Briefing Matter.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, 
Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).

    Dated: June 30, 2021.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14404 Filed 7-1-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Township of Bristol : CASES CONSOLIDATED

:

v. : No. 658 C.D. 2017

:

1 Enterprises, LLC, :

Appellant :

Township of Bristol, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 727 C.D. 2017

:

1 Enterprises, LLC :

O R D E R

NOW, February 23, 2018

, having considered designated appell ee 1

Enterprises, LLC’s application for reconsideration/ reargument , the application is

denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
##### 






Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Timothy Whelan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------
|
| | By: /s/ Timothy Whelan                             
| |                                                    
| | Timothy Whelan
Chief Financial Officer
June 6, 2003
|

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to IPC Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by IPC
Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Judith Carré Sutfin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Judith Carré Sutfin
|Judith Carré Sutfin    
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 11, 2008        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2018

No. 04-18-00253-CV

JC FODALE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Jenny HENNES,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI12710

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

A motion to abate this appeal has been filed. The motion alleges the parties have entered 

into a settlement agreement regarding the underlying case. We deny the motion, but on our own 

motion suspend the deadlines in this appeal until December 21, 2018, at which time we order 

appellants to file either a motion that disposes of this appeal in accordance with the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure or a response explaining why such a motion has not been filed. The court 

will not look favorably on any further requests for extensions of time.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
        on
        Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
        United
        States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
        the
        undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
        certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Date:
                        March 28, 2008
                  By:
                  /s/
                      Robert
                      M. CarmichaelName:
                  Robert
                      M. CarmichaelTitle:
                  Chief
                      Executive Officer
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
        appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to United Companies Corporation and will
        be
        retained by United Companies Corporation and furnished to the United States
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Donald Neal, President, Director,  President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of American Goldfields Inc. (the “Company”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: April 27, 2007

 

/s/ Donald Neal

Donald Neal

Director,  President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Goldfields Inc. and will be retained by American Goldfields Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00565-CR

John Anthony SCHARRINGHAUSEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR2612

Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Beth Watkins, Justice

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 28, 2023

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Appellant John Anthony Scharringhausen entered a plea of not guilty at the beginning of 

his murder trial. After the State rested, Scharringhausen changed his plea to no contest and the trial 

court found the evidence sufficient to substantiate the plea. The trial court sentenced 

Scharringhausen to a term of forty years’ confinement. After sentencing, Scharringhausen filed a 

motion to withdraw his plea, which the trial court denied. Scharringhausen then filed a motion for 

new trial on the grounds that he was harmed by relying on his trial counsel’s judgment in changing 

his plea. 
04-21-00565-CR

- 2 -

Scharringhausen’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional 

evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel 

concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Scharringhausen with a copy of the brief 

and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 

S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 

n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Scharringhausen did not file a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s request to withdraw 

is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will 

be appointed. Should Scharringhausen wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals, Scharringhausen must either retain an attorney to file a petition for 

discretionary review or Scharringhausen must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any 

petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of 

this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the 

requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

Beth Watkins, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10797 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DERRICK ARNOLD GRAY; LARRY WAYNE WALKER, Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CR-45

- - - - - - - - - - July 11, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Government argues that the evidence should be reviewed for plain error because the appellants did not reurge their motion for acquittal at the conclusion of the evidence. We reject the Government's argument because the record reflects that the parties and the district court agreed that the appellants' motion for acquittal made at the close of theNo. 95-10797 -2- Government's case would be considered as having been reurged at the conclusion of all evidence. Derrick Arnold Gray and Larry Wayne Walker argue that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions for carjacking because the Government failed to prove that the carjacked vehicle had been transported, shipped, and received in interstate commerce. We have reviewed the record, including the trial transcripts, the district court's rulings, and the briefs of the parties, and find that the appellants' carjacking convictions should be affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, a rational jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the carjacked vehicle had been transported in interstate commerce. See United States v. Johnson , 22 F.3d 106, 108-09 (6th Cir. 1994). The appellants have abandoned on appeal their argument that the district court erred in denying their motion to dismiss the indictment because the Government failed to show that the offenses committed by the appellants had a direct effect on interstate commerce. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). AFFIRMED.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Felicia Pierce, Appellant

No. 06

- 17

- 00013

- CV v.

Debbie Blalack, et al., Appellee s Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2015

- 1679

- CCL2 ). Opinion de livered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the t rial court

. We note that the appellant, Felicia Pierce, has adequately indicated h er inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTE MBER 29, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[No. 21151-3-II.

Division Two.

September 19, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard Alaniz, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 96-8-00324-7, Richard Brosey, J., entered September 4, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6723

JIMMY L. WEBB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE, Orthopedic doctor; GREENVILLE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-420)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy L. Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy L. Webb filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss

for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of

appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,

361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty

days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal

from judgments or orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The only exception

to the appeal period is when the district court extends the time to

appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) upon a showing of excusable

neglect or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on August 11, 1997. On

February 19, 1998, Webb moved to file a late notice of appeal. On

April 9, 1998, the district court, finding that Webb demonstrated

good cause, extended the appeal period until May 15, 1998. Webb

complied with the district court’s order and filed a notice of appeal on that date. We find, however, that the district court impermissibly extended the appeal period beyond that prescribed in Fed.

R. Civ. P. 4(a)(5). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5); see generally Ali

v. Lyles, 769 F.2d 204, 205 (4th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
3

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Emily Ocasio, Respondent, v MHR Management, Inc. et al., Appellants.

[941 NYS2d 847]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated April 11, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see*CPLR 3212). Mastro, A.P.J, Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Systematic Entomology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ECMU
                    SEL Twitter FeedSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Systematic Entomology Laboratory Docs







Specimen Preparation Guidelines: Hymenopteraheadline bar   Microhymenoptera should be submitted in 95% ethanol. If you have access to a critical point dryer and are skilled at point-mointing, dried specimens may be submitted.Wheneverpossible, transfer living microhymenoptera specimens directly into ethanol for preservation. Specimens that have been allowed to air-dry are usually impossible to identify since diagnostic characters will have shriveled up beyond recognition.Please isolate microhymenoptera specimens from labels by inserting a piece of cotton into the vial between the specimens and the labels. This will prevent damage to the specimens during shipping. specimen vial Ichneumonidae shouldbe submitted in 95% ethanol.All larvae and pupae should be submitted in 70% ethanol.Large submissions should be sorted by family and/or morpho-species, and all specimens should be individually labeled with collection locality data.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended  December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on April 15, 2011 (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: August 25, 2011                      /s/ John R. Rice, III
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John R. Rice, III, President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6291** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. COREY MCKENZIE DAVIS, a/k/a Lil C , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00672

- JFA

- 2 )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Corey McKenzie Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Tara L. McGregor, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Corey McKenzie Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis , No. 3:07

- cr 00672

- JFA

- 2 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED