alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Max W. Hillman, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of The HillmanCompanies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: 3/26/04 /s/ Max W. Hillman       Max W. Hillman   Chief Executive Officer
ERNST & YOUNG	**Ernst & Young LLP** 	 Phone: (213) 977-3200
725 South Figueroa Sunset	www.ey.com 

Los Angeles, California 90017

 

	

Report on Management's Assertion on                                                                      Compliance with the Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the

Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

 

Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors

Fairbanks Capital Corp.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled Report of Management, that Fairbanks Capital Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Fairbanks Capital Holding Corp., (the "Company") complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage for Mortgage Bankers("USAP") during the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31,2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 
**Ernst & Young LLP

 

 **
January 20, 2003

 

Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd
**Exhibit 31 (ii)**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Sonya E. Scott, ChiefFinancial Officer, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PennsWoods Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

 (b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 9, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Sonya E. Scott      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Sonya E. Scott          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10-B

<Page>

                     THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "AMENDMENT"), dated
and effective as of September 25, 2001, is entered into by and between Avatex
Corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Grady E. Schleier ("EMPLOYEE").

         The Company and Employee hereby agree that this Amendment amends the
Employment Agreement dated and effective as of November 12, 1996, as amended by
the Amendment thereto dated as of February 1, 1998, and the Second Amendment
thereto dated as of September 1, 1999, by and between the Company and Employee
(the "AGREEMENT"), as follows:

         1.   Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by changing the date
specified therein to January 31, 2004.

         2.   Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all other terms
and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
on the date and year first above written.


AVATEX CORPORATION
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Grady E. Schleier

By:
    ---------------------------
    Melvyn J. Estrin
    Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CAREY and Leone Carey, Defendants-Appellants, and Douglas J. Carpa, (or his successor trustee), as Trustee of the Ranch Holding Trust; et al., Defendants, *490John Carey; et al., Applicants for Intervention.

No. 10-16361.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 1, 2011.

Kari D. Larson, Esquire, Richard Far-ber, Esquire, Supervisory, Steven W. Parks, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Leone Carey, Redding, CA, pro se.

Michael Carey, Redding, CA, pro se.

John Carey, Palo Cedro, CA, pro se.

Byron Carey, Palo Cedro, CA, pro se.

George Carey, Palo Cedro, CA, pro se.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Carey and Leone Carey appeal pro se from the district court’s order denying their motion to vacate the judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision on a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) motion. *Retail Clerks Union Joint Pension Trust v. Freedom Food Ctr., Inc.,*938 F.2d 136, 137 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm.

The district court properly denied the Careys’ motion to vacate as untimely because the motion was filed nearly three years after the judgment, and the Careys did not provide any legitimate excuse for the delay. *See, e.g., Hammer v. Drago (In re Hammer),*940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir.1991) (un-excused two year delay in filing a motion for relief from judgment was unreasonable). Moreover, contrary to the Careys’ contentions, the bankruptcy court ruled that their tax liability was non-dis-chargeable. *See United States v. Carey (In Re Carey),*326 B.R. 816, 824 (Bankr. E.D.Cal.2005).

The Careys’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters that are not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William F. Holt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ WILLIAM F. HOLTWilliam F. Holt Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

March
27, 2003

---

QuickLinks
IB 

Union Calendar No. 198 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 535 

[Report No. 112–298] 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 1, 2011 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 535 RH

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain 

lands within Fort Pulaski National Monument, and for 

other purposes. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 535 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Pulaski National 

5 Monument Lease Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEASE AUTHORIZATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (re8 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may lease to 

9 the Savannah Bar Pilots Association, or a successor orga10 nization, no more than 30,000 square feet of land and im11 provements within Fort Pulaski National Monument (re12 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Monument’’) at the loca13 tion on Cockspur Island that has been used continuously 

14 by the Savannah Bar Pilots Association since 1940. 

15 (b) RENTAL FEE AND PROCEEDS.— 

16 (1) RENTAL FEE.—For the lease authorized by 

17 this Act, the Secretary shall require a rental fee 

18 based on fair market value adjusted, as the Sec19 retary deems appropriate, for amounts to be ex20 pended by the lessee for property preservation, 

21 maintenance, or repair and related expenses. 

22 (2) PROCEEDS.—Disposition of the proceeds 

23 from the rental fee required pursuant to paragraph 

24 (1) shall be made in accordance with section 3(k)(5) 

25 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–2(k)(5)). 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 535 RH

1 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—A lease entered into 

2 under this section— 

3 (1) shall be for a term of no more than 10 

4 years and, at the Secretary’s discretion, for succes5 sive terms of no more than 10 years at a time; and 

6 (2) shall include any terms and conditions the 

7 Secretary determines to be necessary to protect the 

8 resources of the Monument and the public interest. 

9 (d) EXEMPTION FROM APPLICABLE LAW.—Except 

10 as provided in section 2(b)(2) of this Act, the lease author11 ized by this Act shall not be subject to section 3(k) of 

12 Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–2(k)) or section 321 

13 of Act of June 30, 1932 (40 U.S.C. 1302). 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 198 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 535 

[Report No. 112–298] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease 

Monument, and for other purposes. certain lands within Fort Pulaski National 

DECEMBER 1, 2011 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 48 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of pharmacists in National Health Services Corps programs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. INOUYE (for himself, Mr. REED, and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of pharmacists in National Health Services Corps programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pharmacist Student 

5 Loan Repayment Eligibility Act of 2011’’. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 48 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPA2 TION OF PHARMACISTS IN LOAN REPAYMENT 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS.—Section 

5 331(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 254d(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘nursing and 

8 other schools of the health professions,’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘nursing, pharmacy, and other schools of the 

10 health professions,’’; and 

11 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and physi12 cian assistants who have an interest and a commit13 ment to providing primary health care,’’ and insert14 ing ‘‘physician assistants, and pharmacists who have 

15 an interest and commitment to providing primary 

16 health care,’’. 

17 (b) NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS LOAN RE18 PAYMENT PROGRAM.—Section 338B of the Public Health 

19 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) is amended— 

20 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘and physi21 cian assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘physician assistants, 

22 and pharmacists’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

24 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘den25 tistry, or another health profession,’’ and inVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:45 Jan 28, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S48.IS S48

pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 48 IS

1 serting ‘‘dentistry, pharmacy, or another health 

2 profession,’’; and 

3 (B) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking 

4 ‘‘dentistry, or other health profession’’ and in5 serting ‘‘dentistry, pharmacy, or other health 

6 profession’’. 

7 (c) CORPS PERSONNEL.—Section 333(e) of the Pub8 lic Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254f(e)) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘dentistry, or any other health profession’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘dentistry, pharmacy, or any other health pro11 fession’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS R13's.                    

*Date:*                         July 21, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marilyn Moore-Hoon, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-9087,                         *mooremar@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 23, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-13816 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0190 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LISA ROSE HUEY- MCLEOD ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until August 11 , 2021, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 6 2021

07/06/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0190
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER J. RUFFIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:09-cr-00335-HEH-1; 3:12-cv-00432-HEH)

Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 26, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher J. Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher J. Ruffin seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Ruffin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3962

___________

Darlene Louise Rooney, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Federal Communications Commission, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 6, 1998

 Filed: May 11, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Darlene Louise Rooney appeals the district court&s order dismissing her

1

complaint without prejudice. Having carefully reviewed the record, we affirm the

judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.