35124 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

To the extent required by law, the 

parcel is subject to the requirements of 

Section 120(h) of the CERCLA, as 

amended. Accordingly, notice is hereby 

given that the lands have been 

examined and no evidence was found to 

indicate that any hazardous substances 

have been stored for one year or more, 

nor that any hazardous substances have 

been disposed of or released on the 

subject properties. 

No warranty of any kind, express or 

implied, is given by the United States as 

to the title, whether or to what extent 

the land may be developed, its physical 

condition, future uses, or any other 

circumstance or condition. The 

conveyance of a parcel will not be on a 

contingency basis. 

Authority: 43 CFR 2711.1–2. 

Stephen Leslie, 

Acting Assistant Field Manager, Division of 

Lands. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14026 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1527 (Final)] 

Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh 

From Mexico; Scheduling of the Final 

Phase of Anti-Dumping Duty 

Investigation 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

DATES: June 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

Duffy ((202) 708–2579), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

the Commission’s antidumping duty 

and countervailing duty investigations 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective 

December 3, 2020, the Commission 

established a general schedule for the 

conduct of the final phase of its 

investigations on standard steel welded 

wire mesh (‘‘wire mesh’’) from Mexico 

(85 FR 81487, December 16, 2020), 

following a preliminary determination 

by the U.S. Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) that imports of subject 

wire mesh from Mexico were being 

subsidized by the government of Mexico 

(85 FR 78124, December 3, 2020). Notice 

of the scheduling of the final phase of 

the Commission’s investigations and of 

a public hearing held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on December 16, 2020 (85 FR 

81487). In light of the restrictions on 

access to the Commission building due 

to the COVID–19 pandemic, the 

Commission conducted its hearing 

through written testimony and video 

conference on February 12, 2021. All 

persons who requested the opportunity 

were permitted to participate. The 

Commission subsequently issued its 

final determination that an industry in 

the United States was materially injured 

by reason of imports of wire mesh from 

Mexico provided for in subheadings 

7314.20.00 and 7314.39.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) that have been 

found by Commerce to be subsidized by 

the government of Mexico (86 FR 18555, 

April 9, 2021). 

Commerce has issued a final 

affirmative antidumping duty 

determination with respect to wire mesh 

from Mexico (86 FR 32891, June 23, 

2021). Accordingly, the Commission 

currently is issuing a supplemental 

schedule for its antidumping duty 

investigation on imports of wire mesh 

from Mexico. 

This supplemental schedule is as 

follows: The deadline for filing 

supplemental party comments on 

Commerce’s final antidumping duty 

determination is July 2, 2021. 

Supplemental party comments may 

address only Commerce’s final 

antidumping duty determination 

regarding imports of wire mesh from 

Mexico. These supplemental final 

comments may not contain new factual 

information and may not exceed five (5) 

pages in length. The supplemental staff 

report in the final phase of the 

Commission’s antidumping duty 

investigation covering subject imports 

from Mexico will be placed in the 

nonpublic record on July 8, 2021, and 

a public version will be issued 

thereafter. 

For further information concerning 

this proceeding see the Commission’s 

notice cited above and the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

antidumping duty and countervailing 

duty investigations must be served on 

all other parties to the investigations (as 

identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Authority: This proceeding is being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 25, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14020 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–771–772, and 

775 (Fourth Review)] 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Japan, 

Korea, and Taiwan; Institution of a 

Five-Year Review 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted a review 

pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the 

Act’’), as amended, to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on stainless steel wire rod 

from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury. Pursuant 

to the Act, interested parties are 

requested to respond to this notice by 

submitting the information specified 

below to the Commission. 

DATES: Instituted July 1, 2021. To be 

assured of consideration, the deadline 

for responses is August 2, 2021. 

Comments on the adequacy of responses 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35125 

may be filed with the Commission by 

September 10, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lawrence Jones (202–205–3358), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On September 15, 

1998, the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) issued antidumping duty 

orders on imports of stainless steel wire 

rod from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, 

Sweden, and Taiwan (63 FR 49327). 

Following the first five-year reviews by 

Commerce and the Commission, 

effective August 13, 2004, Commerce 

issued a continuation of the 

antidumping duty orders on imports of 

stainless steel wire rod from Italy, Japan, 

Korea, Spain, and Taiwan (69 FR 

50167). Commerce revoked the 

antidumping duty order on imports of 

stainless steel wire rod from Sweden, 

effective April 23, 2007 (72 FR 25261, 

May 4, 2007). Following the second 

five-year reviews by Commerce and the 

Commission, effective June 17, 2010, 

Commerce issued a continuation of the 

antidumping duty orders on imports of 

stainless steel wire rod from Italy, Japan, 

Korea, Spain, and Taiwan (75 FR 

34424). Following the third full fiveyear reviews by Commerce and the 

Commission, effective August 15, 2016, 

Commerce revoked the antidumping 

duty orders on imports of stainless steel 

wire rod from Italy and Spain, as a 

result of the ITC’s determination that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on stainless steel wire rod from 

Italy and Spain would not likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States. Additionally, Commerce issued a 

continuation of the antidumping duty 

orders on imports of stainless steel wire 

rod from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan (81 

FR 54043). The Commission is now 

conducting a fourth review pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act, as amended 

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine 

whether revocation of the orders would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to the 

domestic industry within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. Provisions concerning 

the conduct of this proceeding may be 

found in the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 

201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 

207, subparts A and F. The Commission 

will assess the adequacy of interested 

party responses to this notice of 

institution to determine whether to 

conduct a full review or an expedited 

review. The Commission’s 

determination in any expedited review 

will be based on the facts available, 

which may include information 

provided in response to this notice. 

Definitions.—The following 

definitions apply to this review: 

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or 

kind of merchandise that is within the 

scope of these five-year reviews, as 

defined by the Department of 

Commerce. 

(2) The Subject Countries in these 

reviews are Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. 

(3) The Domestic Like Product is the 

domestically produced product or 

products which are like, or in the 

absence of like, most similar in 

characteristics and uses with, the 

Subject Merchandise. In its original and 

full first and second and third five-year 

review determinations, the Commission 

found one Domestic Like Product 

consisting of all stainless steel wire rod 

corresponding to Commerce’s scope. 

(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. 

producers as a whole of the Domestic 

Like Product, or those producers whose 

collective output of the Domestic Like 

Product constitutes a major proportion 

of the total domestic production of the 

product. In its original and full first, 

second, and third five-year review 

determinations, the Commission 

defined the Domestic Industry as 

consisting of all domestic producers of 

stainless steel wire rod. 

(5) An Importer is any person or firm 

engaged, either directly or through a 

parent company or subsidiary, in 

importing the Subject Merchandise into 

the United States from a foreign 

manufacturer or through its selling 

agent. 

Participation in the proceeding and 

public service list.—Persons, including 

industrial users of the Subject 

Merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in the proceeding as parties 

must file an entry of appearance with 

the Secretary to the Commission, as 

provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules, no later than 21 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. The Secretary will 

maintain a public service list containing 

the names and addresses of all persons, 

or their representatives, who are parties 

to the proceeding. 

Former Commission employees who 

are seeking to appear in Commission 

five-year reviews are advised that they 

may appear in a review even if they 

participated personally and 

substantially in the corresponding 

underlying original investigation or an 

earlier review of the same underlying 

investigation. The Commission’s 

designated agency ethics official has 

advised that a five-year review is not the 

same particular matter as the underlying 

original investigation, and a five-year 

review is not the same particular matter 

as an earlier review of the same 

underlying investigation for purposes of 

18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment 

statute for Federal employees, and 

Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 

201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 

73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). 

Consequently, former employees are not 

required to seek Commission approval 

to appear in a review under Commission 

rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the 

corresponding underlying original 

investigation or an earlier review of the 

same underlying investigation was 

pending when they were Commission 

employees. For further ethics advice on 

this matter, contact Charles Smith, 

Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 

205–3408. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and APO service list.—Pursuant to 

§ 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the 

Secretary will make BPI submitted in 

this proceeding available to authorized 

applicants under the APO issued in the 

proceeding, provided that the 

application is made no later than 21 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. Authorized 

applicants must represent interested 

parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), 

who are parties to the proceeding. A 

separate service list will be maintained 

by the Secretary for those parties 

authorized to receive BPI under the 

APO. 

Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of 

the Commission’s rules, any person 

submitting information to the 

Commission in connection with this 

proceeding must certify that the 

information is accurate and complete to 

the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In 

making the certification, the submitter 

will acknowledge that information 

submitted in response to this request for 

information and throughout this 

proceeding or other proceeding may be 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35126 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel, solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All contract personnel will 

sign appropriate nondisclosure 

agreements. 

Written submissions.—Pursuant to 

§ 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each 

interested party response to this notice 

must provide the information specified 

below. The deadline for filing such 

responses is August 2, 2021. Pursuant to 

§ 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, 

eligible parties (as specified in 

Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also 

file comments concerning the adequacy 

of responses to the notice of institution 

and whether the Commission should 

conduct an expedited or full review. 

The deadline for filing such comments 

is September 10, 2021. All written 

submissions must conform with the 

provisions of § 201.8 of the 

Commission’s rules; any submissions 

that contain BPI must also conform with 

the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 

207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The 

Commission’s Handbook on Filing 

Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. Also, in accordance 

with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the 

Commission’s rules, each document 

filed by a party to the proceeding must 

be served on all other parties to the 

proceeding (as identified by either the 

public or APO service list as 

appropriate), and a certificate of service 

must accompany the document (if you 

are not a party to the proceeding you do 

not need to serve your response). 

Please note the Secretary’s Office will 

accept only electronic filings at this 

time. Filings must be made through the 

Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS, https://

edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any 

electronic filings will be accepted until 

further notice. 

No response to this request for 

information is required if a currently 

valid Office of Management and Budget 

(‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the 

OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 

21–5–492, expiration date June 30, 

2023. Public reporting burden for the 

request is estimated to average 15 hours 

per response. Please send comments 

regarding the accuracy of this burden 

estimate to the Office of Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 

20436. 

Inability to provide requested 

information.—Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of 

the Commission’s rules, any interested 

party that cannot furnish the 

information requested by this notice in 

the requested form and manner shall 

notify the Commission at the earliest 

possible time, provide a full explanation 

of why it cannot provide the requested 

information, and indicate alternative 

forms in which it can provide 

equivalent information. If an interested 

party does not provide this notification 

(or the Commission finds the 

explanation provided in the notification 

inadequate) and fails to provide a 

complete response to this notice, the 

Commission may take an adverse 

inference against the party pursuant to 

§ 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) 

in making its determination in the 

review. 

Information to be provided in 

response to this notice of institution: If 

you are a domestic producer, union/ 

worker group, or trade/business 

association; import/export Subject 

Merchandise from more than one 

Subject Country; or produce Subject 

Merchandise in more than one Subject 

Country, you may file a single response. 

If you do so, please ensure that your 

response to each question includes the 

information requested for each pertinent 

Subject Country. As used below, the 

term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. 

(1) The name and address of your firm 

or entity (including World Wide Web 

address) and name, telephone number, 

fax number, and Email address of the 

certifying official. 

(2) A statement indicating whether 

your firm/entity is an interested party 

under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, 

including whether your firm/entity is a 

U.S. producer of the Domestic Like 

Product, a U.S. union or worker group, 

a U.S. importer of the Subject 

Merchandise, a foreign producer or 

exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a 

U.S. or foreign trade or business 

association (a majority of whose 

members are interested parties under 

the statute), or another interested party 

(including an explanation). If you are a 

union/worker group or trade/business 

association, identify the firms in which 

your workers are employed or which are 

members of your association. 

(3) A statement indicating whether 

your firm/entity is willing to participate 

in this proceeding by providing 

information requested by the 

Commission. 

(4) A statement of the likely effects of 

the revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on the Domestic Industry in 

general and/or your firm/entity 

specifically. In your response, please 

discuss the various factors specified in 

section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1675a(a)) including the likely volume of 

subject imports, likely price effects of 

subject imports, and likely impact of 

imports of Subject Merchandise on the 

Domestic Industry. 

(5) A list of all known and currently 

operating U.S. producers of the 

Domestic Like Product. Identify any 

known related parties and the nature of 

the relationship as defined in 

§ 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1677(4)(B)). 

(6) A list of all known and currently 

operating U.S. importers of the Subject 

Merchandise and producers of the 

Subject Merchandise each Subject 

Country that currently export or have 

exported Subject Merchandise to the 

United States or other countries after 

2015. 

(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in 

the U.S. market for the Domestic Like 

Product and the Subject Merchandise 

(including street address, World Wide 

Web address, and the name, telephone 

number, fax number, and Email address 

of a responsible official at each firm). 

(8) A list of known sources of 

information on national or regional 

prices for the Domestic Like Product or 

the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or 

other markets. 

(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the 

Domestic Like Product, provide the 

following information on your firm’s 

operations on that product during 

calendar year 2020, except as noted 

(report quantity data in short tons and 

value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). 

If you are a union/worker group or 

trade/business association, provide the 

information, on an aggregate basis, for 

the firms in which your workers are 

employed/which are members of your 

association. 

(a) Production (quantity) and, if 

known, an estimate of the percentage of 

total U.S. production of the Domestic 

Like Product accounted for by your 

firm’s(s’) production; 

(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to 

produce the Domestic Like Product (that 

is, the level of production that your 

establishment(s) could reasonably have 

expected to attain during the year, 

assuming normal operating conditions 

(using equipment and machinery in 

place and ready to operate), normal 

operating levels (hours per week/weeks 

per year), time for downtime, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35127 

maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a 

typical or representative product mix); 

(c) the quantity and value of U.S. 

commercial shipments of the Domestic 

Like Product produced in your U.S. 

plant(s); 

(d) the quantity and value of U.S. 

internal consumption/company 

transfers of the Domestic Like Product 

produced in your U.S. plant(s); and 

(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost 

of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, 

(iv) selling, general and administrative 

(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating 

income of the Domestic Like Product 

produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include 

both U.S. and export commercial sales, 

internal consumption, and company 

transfers) for your most recently 

completed fiscal year (identify the date 

on which your fiscal year ends). 

(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a 

trade/business association of U.S. 

importers of the Subject Merchandise 

from any Subject Country, provide the 

following information on your firm’s(s’) 

operations on that product during 

calendar year 2020 (report quantity data 

in short tons and value data in U.S. 

dollars). If you are a trade/business 

association, provide the information, on 

an aggregate basis, for the firms which 

are members of your association. 

(a) The quantity and value (landed, 

duty-paid but not including 

antidumping or countervailing duties) 

of U.S. imports and, if known, an 

estimate of the percentage of total U.S. 

imports of Subject Merchandise from 

each Subject Country accounted for by 

your firm’s(s’) imports; 

(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. 

port, including antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties) of U.S. 

commercial shipments of Subject 

Merchandise imported from each 

Subject Country; and 

(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. 

port, including antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties) of U.S. internal 

consumption/company transfers of 

Subject Merchandise imported from 

each Subject Country. 

(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, 

or a trade/business association of 

producers or exporters of the Subject 

Merchandise in any Subject Country, 

provide the following information on 

your firm’s(s’) operations on that 

product during calendar year 2020 

(report quantity data in short tons and 

value data in U.S. dollars, landed and 

duty-paid at the U.S. port but not 

including antidumping or 

countervailing duties). If you are a 

trade/business association, provide the 

information, on an aggregate basis, for 

the firms which are members of your 

association. 

(a) Production (quantity) and, if 

known, an estimate of the percentage of 

total production of Subject Merchandise 

in each Subject Country accounted for 

by your firm’s(s’) production; 

(b) capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) 

to produce the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country (that is, the level 

of production that your establishment(s) 

could reasonably have expected to 

attain during the year, assuming normal 

operating conditions (using equipment 

and machinery in place and ready to 

operate), normal operating levels (hours 

per week/weeks per year), time for 

downtime, maintenance, repair, and 

cleanup, and a typical or representative 

product mix); and 

(c) the quantity and value of your 

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of 

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an 

estimate of the percentage of total 

exports to the United States of Subject 

Merchandise from each Subject Country 

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. 

(12) Identify significant changes, if 

any, in the supply and demand 

conditions or business cycle for the 

Domestic Like Product that have 

occurred in the United States or in the 

market for the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country after 2015, and 

significant changes, if any, that are 

likely to occur within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. Supply conditions to 

consider include technology; 

production methods; development 

efforts; ability to increase production 

(including the shift of production 

facilities used for other products and the 

use, cost, or availability of major inputs 

into production); and factors related to 

the ability to shift supply among 

different national markets (including 

barriers to importation in foreign 

markets or changes in market demand 

abroad). Demand conditions to consider 

include end uses and applications; the 

existence and availability of substitute 

products; and the level of competition 

among the Domestic Like Product 

produced in the United States, Subject 

Merchandise produced in each Subject 

Country, and such merchandise from 

other countries. 

(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of 

whether you agree with the above 

definitions of the Domestic Like Product 

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree 

with either or both of these definitions, 

please explain why and provide 

alternative definitions. 

Authority: This proceeding is being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s 

rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 25, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14014 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–298 (Fifth 

Review)] 

Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From 

China; Institution of a Five-Year 

Review 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted a review 

pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the 

Act’’), as amended, to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on porcelain-on-steel 

cooking ware from China would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury. Pursuant 

to the Act, interested parties are 

requested to respond to this notice by 

submitting the information specified 

below to the Commission. 

DATES: Instituted July 1, 2021. To be 

assured of consideration, the deadline 

for responses is August 2, 2021. 

Comments on the adequacy of responses 

may be filed with the Commission by 

September 10, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lawrence Jones (202–205–3358), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background.—On December 2, 1986, 

the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping 

duty order on imports of porcelain-onsteel cooking ware from China (51 FR 

43414). Following the first five-year 

reviews by Commerce and the 

Commission, effective April 14, 2000, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES