alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HEARST, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by the City of New York against William R. Hearst. T. Farley, for appellant. C. J. Shearn, for respondent. No opinion. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See also, 142 App. Div. 343, 126 N. Y. Supp. 917.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 207 -CR

Jo nat han Se nov io A gui lar , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF HAY S COUNTY , 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-06 -35 4 , HO NORAB LE GARY L. STEEL , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
J onathan Senovio Ag

uilar seeks to appea l a judgment of conviction for ag g ravated assault with a dea dly wea pon. Sentence was imposed on F ebrua ry 13, 2007. There was no motion fo r n ew t rial. The de adline for perf ectingappea l was there fore Marc h 15, 2007. See Tex. R. App. P . 26.2(a)(1 ). No t i ce o f appeal wa s mailed on April 3, 2007 and f iled on April 9, 2007. A motion for extension of time for filing notice of appea l w as filed on April 18, 2007, and an a mended notice was filed two da y s later. Ne ither the notice of appe al nor the m otion for extension of tim e wa s filed within the fiftee n-day g rac e per iod, and the mot ion and amended motion
are overr uled. See Te x. R. A

pp . P. 26 .3 . U nd e r t

he c ir c ums tanc e s, we la c k ju ri sd ic tio n to dis po se of the purpor

ted appe al in any

manner other than by

dismiss ing i t fo r wa

nt of jurisdiction. Se e Sla ton v . S

tate , 981 S.W. 2d 20 8 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . S tate , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522-2

23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Ag uilar must see k an out-of-time a ppeal by means of a

post-conviction habea s corpus a

pplication. SeeTex. Code Crim. P roc. A nn. art. 11.07 (West 2005). The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: May

8, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
<PAGE>

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Louis E. Prezeau, the Chief Executive Officer and President of City National
Bancshares Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2006


                                        /s/ Louis E. Prezeau
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Louis E. Prezeau
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        and President

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Edward R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of
City National Bancshares CORPORATION (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2006


                                        /s/ Edward R. Wright
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Edward R. Wright
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        and Senior Vice President


                                       19
Exhibit 99.6

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                   OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

In compliance with Section 3(a) of the Administration Agreement (the
"Agreement") among Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2003-1, as Issuer, Wilmington Trust
Company, as Delaware Trustee, Zions First National Bank, as Indenture Trustee,
and NELN, Inc. (fka Nelnet, Inc.), as Administrator, dated as of January 1,
2003, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Administrator during the preceding
          12-month period and of its performance under this Agreement has been
          made under my supervision; and

     2.   Based on my knowledge of such review, the Administrator has fulfilled
          its obligations in all material respects under this Agreement.


December 31, 2004




By:     /s/ Terry J. Heimes
        ----------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
        and Executive Director,
        NELN, Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.84


 


January 5,
2004


 


Ricky Chan


c/o Russ Berrie and Company,
Inc.


111 Bauer Drive


Oakland, New Jersey  07436


 


Dear Ricky:


 


As you know,
the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the exploration of a
possible sale of or other major corporate transaction involving the Company,
although no decision to effect such a transaction has been made and there can
be no assurance that it will occur or as to the timing thereof.


 


The Board of
Directors believes that your continued service as an executive and effective
participation in the exploration of a possible sale is important to the
Company.  Accordingly, the Board of
Directors has determined that if the Company consummates a Change in Control,
as defined in the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan, on or before
April 30, 2004, and you remain employed by the Company through the consummation
of that Change in Control, you will be awarded a special bonus of
$100,000.  (If for any reason you are
not employed by the Company when the Change in Control is consummated, you will
not be entitled to any payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus
contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation to which you may be
entitled from the Company.  Nothing in
this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with the Company or
creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you as an
employee.  This letter supercedes the
letter to you, dated July 2, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto, which
letter shall be of no further force or effect.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly
  yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ ANGELICA
  BERRIE

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica
  Berrie

  
	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer
#### BARBER v. BARNUM et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March, 1907.)

Action by Clarence L. Barber, as assignee of Horace M. Hooker and David J. McGown, judgment creditors, against Curtis A. Barnum, judgment debtor, and others.

COCHRANE, J.

Decision amended, so as to read as follows: “Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs.” See 117 App. Div. 325, 101 N. Y. Supp. 1065. All concur, except PARKER, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2380 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2380

To suspend temporarily the duty on gemifloxacin, gemifloxacin mesylate, 
                and gemifloxacin mesylate sesquihydrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2005

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on gemifloxacin, gemifloxacin mesylate, 
                and gemifloxacin mesylate sesquihydrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEMIFLOXACIN, GEMIFLOXACIN MESYLATE, AND GEMIFLOXACIN 
              MESYLATE SESQUIHYDRATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.68      Gemifloxacin (CAS   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         No. 175463-14-6);                                                  31/2008
                         gemifloxacin
                         mesylate (CAS No.
                         210353-53-0);
                         gemifloxacin
                         mesylate
                         sesquihydrate
                         (CAS No. 210353-
                         56-3 ) (the
                         foregoing
                         provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.99.46)......

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after January 1, 2005.
            (2) Retroactive application.--Notwithstanding section 514 
        of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other 
        provision of law, upon proper request filed with U.S. Customs 
        and Border Protection before the 90th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse 
        for consumption, of any good--
                    (A) that was made on or after January 1, 2005, and 
                before the date of the enactment of this Act, and
                    (B) with respect to which there would have been no 
                duty if the amendment made by subsection (a) applied to 
                such entry or withdrawal,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 
        applied to such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2341 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2341

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
 participate in the design, planning, and construction of a project to 
reclaim and reuse wastewater within and outside of the service area of 
        the City of Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

 Mr. Doggett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
 participate in the design, planning, and construction of a project to 
reclaim and reuse wastewater within and outside of the service area of 
        the City of Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, WASTEWATER RECLAMATION AND 
              REUSE PROJECT.

    (a) Authorization of Project.--The Reclamation Wastewater and 
Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 
U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 1636. AUSTIN, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the City 
of Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas, is authorized to 
participate in the planning (including an appraisal and feasibility 
study), design, and construction of, and land acquisition for, a 
project to reclaim and reuse wastewater, including degraded 
groundwaters, within and outside of the service area of the City of 
Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost of the project.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation and maintenance of the project authorized by this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 2 of 
Public Law 102-575 (106 Stat. 4600) is amended by adding at the end of 
the items relating to chapter XVI the following:

``Sec. 1636. Austin, Texas, water reclamation and reuse project.''.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1542 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Honorable Judge George N. Leighton 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 1542 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachu4 setts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Honorable 

5 Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office 

11 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICEROR**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Wilmer D. Leinbach, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 
|                              | /s/ Wilmer  D. Leinbach                 |   |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                              | Exec. VP  & Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                              |
| Date:   August 14, 2002 |

 

----
# L_2008244EN.01000601.xml

| 12.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 886/2008

of 11 September 2008

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 10 September 2008, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 10 September 2008, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 10 September 2008, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 shall be 318,07 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 September 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 September 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 242, 15.9.2007, p. 8.

2

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Environmentally Integrated Dairy Management Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Environmentally Integrated Dairy Management Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Campbell, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), each rendered October 21,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

The issue raised by defendant as to the adequacy of his plea allocutions was not preserved for review as a matter of law *{People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). Further, no adequate reason has been set forth as to why defendant’s sentences, imposed in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreements, should be set aside *{People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.
** **

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 

ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 

ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No