alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Systems Research Unit: Burlington, VT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to our website


Research Projects
                            More... Improving Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability of Animal-based Food Systems in the Northeast States in a Manner that Enhances Nutrition and Public Health Increasing Small-Farm Viability, Sustainable Production and Human Nutrition in Plant-Based Food Systems of the New England States


People Ewing, Patrick Hammond-Wagner, Courtney Jones, William Morgan, Caitlin Peplinski, Hannah Peters, Christian


Northeast Area   CHRISTIAN.PETERS2@USDA.GOV


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7392

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN A. NICKLES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-92-473-A, CA-97-796-AM)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin A. Nickles, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin A. Nickles seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998), his motion for reconsideration, and his motion for a

certificate of appealability. We dismiss the appeals from the denial of relief on the § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration

for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was filed

beyond the sixty-day appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). As

for the denial of the motion for a certificate of appealability, we

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Nickles, Nos. CR-92-473-A; CA-97-796-AM

(E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2008298EN.01000101.xml

| 21.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5306 — Metso Power/Wärtsilä Finland/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 298/01)

On 14 November 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5306. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5306. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Clements JAB  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jefferson A. Bootes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joseph Rizzuti
-----------------------
Jefferson A. Bootes
Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2002
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Denis A. Krusos, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CopyTele, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ Denis A. Krusos                              
|                  |  |  |  | Denis A. Krusos                                  
|November 30, 2011 |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**SECTION      906 CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                            |                                                     |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | EUROBANCSHARES,              INC.               |
|                              |                                       |                                                |
| Dated:              March 8, 2006 | By:                                   | /s/ Rafael              Arrillaga Torréns, Jr. |
|                                   | Rafael              Arrillaga Torréns, Jr. |
|                                   | Chief              Executive Officer            |

----
**Exhibit 32     Section 1350Certifications**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofPinnacle Airlines Corp. (the “Company”) for the yearended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicatedbelow, each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complieswith requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.April 6, 2005     /s/ Philip H. Trenary           Philip H. Trenary *President and Chief Executive Officer*      /s/ Peter D. Hunt           Peter D. Hunt *Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
#### COLUMBUS TRUST CO., Appellant, v. MOSHIER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by the Columbus Trust Company against George Moshier.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Burr at Special Term, 100 N. Y. Supp. 1066.
#### Elsie R. Feitner, Appellant, *v.*Francis X. Hoegker et al., Respondents.

(Submitted March 20, 1890;

decided April 15, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made April 3,1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

*Henry Brewster*for appellant.

*Richard J. Lewis*for respondents.

*Per Ouriam*

opinion for affirmance on authority of *Feitner*v. *Lewis*(119 N. Y. 131).

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nikolas P. Tsakos, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nikolas P. TsakosNikolas P. TsakosPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 9, 2010
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John F. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.



By: /s/ John F. ColeName: John F. ColeTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 14, 2004




I, Philip S. Bushnell, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.



By: /s/ Philip S. BushnellName: Philip S. BushnellTitle: Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryDate: May 14, 2004
# C_2008164EN.01000301.xml

| 27.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5187 — Warburg Pincus/JPMP SK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 164/05)

On 17 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5187. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5187. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Nikolas P. Tsakos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Nikolas P. TsakosNikolas P. Tsakos President and Chief Executive
Officer June 29, 2004
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2363 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty on persons 

who are convicted of killing peace officers and who flee the country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mr. DREIER (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. MCKEON, and Mrs. BONO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the 

penalty on persons who are convicted of killing peace 

officers and who flee the country. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Officer Justice 

5 Act’’. 
2 

•HR 2363 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF FEDERAL CRIME FOR KILLING 

2 PEACE OFFICERS AND TRAVELING IN FOR3 EIGN COMMERCE. 

4 (a) FEDERAL CRIME RELATING TO PEACE OFFI5 CERS.—Section 1121 of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub8 section (d); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol10 lowing new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(c)(1) Whoever intentionally kills any peace officer 

12 engaged in, or on account of the performance of, such offi13 cer’s official duties, and moves or travels in foreign com14 merce with intent to avoid prosecution or confinement 

15 after conviction of that crime, shall be sentenced according 

16 to the terms of section 1111. 

17 ‘‘(2) As used in this section, the term ‘peace officer’ 

18 means any officer of the United States, a State, or a polit19 ical subdivision of a State who is empowered by law to 

20 conduct investigations of or to make arrests for offenses 

21 against the criminal laws of the United States, the State, 

22 or the political subdivision.’’. 

23 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

24 (1) The heading for section 1121 of title 18, 

25 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
3 

•HR 2363 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 1121. Killing persons aiding Federal investigations, 

2 killing State correctional officers, and 

3 killing peace officers’’. 

4 (2) The item relating to section 1121 in the 

5 table of sections for chapter 51 of such title is 

6 amended to read as follows: 

‘‘1121. Killing persons aiding Federal investigations, killing State correctional 

officers, and killing peace officers.’’. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2286 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2286

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cases for certain 
                          children's products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

  Ms. Harman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cases for certain 
                          children's products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CASES FOR CERTAIN CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.81 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                     SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906
          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the Quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the
"Report"), Norman L. Lowery, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Michael A. Carty, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.   This Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


August 4, 2006                          By /s/ Norman L. Lowery
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Norman L. Lowery, Vice Chairman & CEO


August 4, 2006                          By /s/ Michael A. Carty
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael A. Carty, Treasurer & CFO
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BEVINS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 27, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Michael Bevins. No opinion. Judgment of conviction (74 Misc. Rep. 377, 134 N. Y. Supp. 212) affirmed.
#### Broadhollow Funding Corp., Appellant, v Ruby H. Morgan et al., Respondents.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, *894Kings County (Rader, J.), dated May 25, 1984, as denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The conflict between the contract of sale and the deed, as well as the mortgage executed by the defendants, present triable issues of fact which preclude an award of summary judgment. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.