alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2397 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2397

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Trifloxystrobin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2005

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Trifloxystrobin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSTROBIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.41 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Trifloxystrobin) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2003'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after January 1, 2004.
            (2) Retroactive application.--Notwithstanding section 514 
        of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other 
        provision of law, upon proper request filed with U.S. Customs 
        and Border Protection before the 90th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse 
        for consumption, of any good--
                    (A) that was made on or after January 1, 2004, and 
                before the date of the enactment of this Act, and
                    (B) with respect to which there would have been no 
                duty if the amendment made by subsection (a) applied to 
                such entry or withdrawal,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 
        applied to such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
|                                     |                                     |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Name      of Subsidiary                  | Place      of Incorporation or Formation |
|                                     |                                     |
| Aéropostale West,      Inc.    | Delaware                                 |
| Jimmy’Z Surf Co.,      Inc.   | Delaware                                 |
| Aéropostale Canada,      Inc.  | Canada                                   |
| Aero GC Management      LLC         | Virginia                                 |
| Aéropostale      Puerto Rico, Inc.  | Puerto      Rico                         |
| P.S.      from Aéropostale, Inc.    | Delaware                                 |
| Aéropostale      Licensing, Inc.    | Delaware                                 |

----
No. 07-17-00463-CR

Lucas Morin

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 137th District Court

of Lubbock County

July 11, 2018

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 11, 2018

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John White, Jr., Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), rendered September 8, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree (two counts), rape in the first degree, petit larceny, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Samenga, J.), of that branch of defendant’s motion which sought suppression of physical evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

On two separate occasions, defendant and his cohort, Kenneth Grant, selected a house at random, broke in during the night, tied the occupants to their beds, and proceeded to steal various items, as well as the owners’ cars in order to transport their bounty. On one of these occasions, both defendant and Grant were accused of raping their woman victim as she lay tied to her bed. Grant pleaded guilty, and his conviction has been affirmed by this court *(People v Grant,*99 AD2d 536).

Defendant does not raise for our review any question concerning the adequacy of his trial; rather, he argues that the hearing court should have granted that branch of his motion which was to suppress physical evidence. The evidence sought to be suppressed consisted of clothing and a wrist watch worn by defendant at the time of his arrest. Defendant contends that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him and that, therefore, this confiscated evidence should have been suppressed as the “poisonous fruit” of his unlawful arrest. We disagree.

The information which led the police to defendant consisted of a series of statements made to the police by his cohort, Grant, in which defendant was directly implicated in a pattern of criminal activity. On the basis of those statements, defendant was brought into the precinct house for questioning, was observed wearing articles of clothing and a wrist watch which matched those reported stolen by one of the complainants of one of the *860robberies, and was subsequently arrested and charged with those crimes.

It is well settled that the statement of an accomplice which implicates another in criminal activity provides the police with probable cause to arrest that other individual *(People v Berzups,*49 NY2d 417; *People v Thomas,*103 AD2d 854; *People v Riley,*95 AD2d 926). The statements of Kenneth Grant detailed both his and defendant’s participation in the crimes under investigation. Those statements provided the officers with probable cause for defendant’s arrest. Since the policé could lawfully arrest defendant based solely upon Grant’s statements, the evidence confiscated from defendant at the precinct house was legally obtained, and it was proper to deny that branch of defendant’s motion which sought suppression of physical evidence.

We have examined defendant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-K
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Stanberry, Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of West
      Bancorporation, Inc.




March
      7,
      2008






/s/
      Thomas E. Stanberry





Thomas
      E.
      Stanberry


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Donald Neal, President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of American Goldfields Inc. (the “Company”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: June 22, 2005

 

/s/ Donald Neal

Donald Neal

President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Goldfields Inc. and will be retained by American Goldfields Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 3.1**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENTOF THEAMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATIONOFNATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP**

Theundersigned, Scott A. Montgomery and Giovanna Soprano, hereby certify that:

1.               They are the duly elected and actingPresident and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of National MercantileBancorp, a California corporation (the “Corporation”).

2.               Article XIII, Section D of the Amended andRestated Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation is amended to read inits entirety as follows:

“(D)  *Termination. *This Article XIII shall have noapplicability and shall be of no force and effect notwithstanding notations tothe contrary on any certificates evidencing ownership of any securities of theCorporation, (i) on or after July 1, 2009 or (ii) upon the occurrence of anytransaction in which holders of all outstanding shares of capital stockreceive, or are offered theopportunity to receive, cash, stock or other property for all such shares andupon the consummation of which the acquirer will own at least a majority of theoutstanding shares of capital stock.”

3.               The foregoing amendment to the Amended andRestated Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation has been duly approvedby this Corporation’s Board of Directors.

4.               The foregoing amendment to the Amended andRestated Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation has been duly approvedby the required vote of this Corporation’s shareholders in accordance withSection 902 of the California General Corporation Law.  The total number of outstanding shares of theCorporation entitled to vote thereon was 4,443,024 shares of Common Stock.  The number of shares of Common Stock votingin favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required.  The percentage vote required was more than50% of the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock.  None of the Corporation’s Series ANoncumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock was outstanding.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Stateof California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true andcorrect of our own knowledge.

Executedat Los Angeles, California, on June 27, 2006.
|   | /s/ Scott A. Montgomery                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Scott A.  Montgomery, President and CEO |
|   |                                    |
|   | /s/ Giovanna  Soprano                   |   |
|   | Giovanna  Soprano, Assistant Secretary  |

 

1

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements  contained in the body of the accompanying  Form10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
 
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                              1  
       
 
<S>                                          <C>     

              

<NAME>                                          CopyTele, Inc.
<PERIOD-START>                                     NOV-1-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                              4,379,269
<SECURITIES>                                          489,444
<RECEIVABLES>                                          22,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         2,991,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    8,643,826
<PP&E>                                              2,128,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                      1,423,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     12,708,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,378,189
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              584,303
<OTHER-SE>                                         10,745,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       12,708,319
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,483,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (52,827)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,431,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,431,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,431,083)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.02)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (.02)  


        


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Search Collections
                        U.S. National Fungus Collections
                                    USDA Nematode CollectionSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Paulo Vieiraheadline bar Paulo1


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 
 Summary of BSA Plan 
 Non-employee warrants, or BSA, entitle a holder to exercise
the warrant for the underlying vested shares at an exercise price per share determined by our board of directors and at least equal to the fair market value of an ordinary share on the date of grant. 

In addition to any exercise price payable by a holder upon the exercise of any non-employee warrant, non-employee warrants need to be subscribed for at a
price at least equal to ten percent (10%) of the price of the underlying ordinary shares, which subscription price is meant to reflect at least the fair market value of the applicable warrants on the date of grant. 

There is no legal limitation to the size of the non-employee warrant pool. 
 Administration. Pursuant to delegations granted at our annual shareholders’ meeting, our board of directors determines the recipients, dates of grant and exercise price of non-employee
warrants, the number of non-employee warrants to be granted and the terms and conditions of the non-employee warrants, including the period of their exercisability and their vesting schedule. The board of directors has the authority to extend the
post-termination exercise period of non-employee warrants after the end of the term of office. 
 Non-Employee Warrants.
Our non-employee warrants are generally granted subject to a two-year vesting, subject to continued service. 
 The term of non-employee
warrants is determined by our Board of Directors at the time of the grant. With respect to our outstanding non-employee warrants, the term is ten years from the date of grant or, in the case of death or disability of the beneficiary during such
ten-year period, nine months from the death or disability of the beneficiary. In addition, the exercise period following a holder’s termination of continuous status with the Company is determined by our Board of Directors at the time of the
grant. Our non-employee warrants currently outstanding shall remain exercisable for three months following a holder’s termination of continuous status with the Company. 
 Non-employee warrants may be transferred to any person and may be exercised by their holder at any time subject to vesting. 
 As of December 31, 2014, 40,000 non-employee warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 41,549 ordinary shares at a weighted average exercise price of €10.40 per share, were outstanding,
all of which are held by one of our directors and exercisable at the date hereof.
[939 NYS2d 900]

#### In the Matter of Melissa Ann Mahler, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Seventh Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

March 16, 2012

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Andrea E. Tomaino, Principal Counsel, Seventh Judicial District Grievance Committee,*Rochester, for petitioner.

*115
      *Vincent E. Doyle, III,*Buffalo, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on July 13, 1998. On October 11, 2009, she was convicted upon her plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (District Court) of violating 18 USC § 1001, a federal felony. Respondent admitted that, during a telephone interview in 2004 with officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission, she made false statements regarding a securities transaction in her personal brokerage account. This Court determined that a violation of 18 USC § 1001 is a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d) and, on September 17, 2010, entered an order suspending respondent and directing her to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered *(Matter of Mahler,*77 AD3d 1455 [2010]). On November 3, 2011, respondent was sentenced in District Court to a two-year term of probation and was ordered to pay a fine in the amount of $2,500 and to perform 100 hours of community service. On February 28, 2012, respondent appeared before this Court and submitted matters in mitigation.

We have considered the matters submitted by respondent in mitigation, including her expression of remorse and the numerous letters of support submitted by individuals attesting to her good character and skill as an attorney. We have also considered, however, that respondent’s misconduct involved deceit and appears to have been committed for personal gain. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for two years, effective November 3, 2011, or until the termination of her federal term of probation, whichever period is longer, and until further order of the Court.

Smith, J.E, Fahey, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Royal & Sun Alliance
          Bond-Backed Series 2002-2 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on
          Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust
          filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
          annual report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2006


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Castro, Defendant, and Tony Oquendo, Appellant. (And Eight Other Proceedings.)

In proceedings, *inter alia,*to vacate and set aside the forfeiture of cash bail deposits, the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 10, 1983, and eight judgments of the same court each entered October 25,1983, which denied petitioners’ applications and dismissed the proceedings.

Judgments affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Yoswein at Special Term. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.