alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008143EN.01003001.xml

| 3.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 143/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 143/30

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 489/2008

of 2 June 2008

amending Regulation (EC) No 806/2007 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas in the pigmeat sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1), and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 806/2007 (2) opened certain tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 806/2007 (2) opened certain tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products.

| (2) | In response to questions concerning imports of certain products under the quotas bearing the serial numbers 09.4038 and 09.4074, and to ensure uniform application, the designation of goods falling under these serial numbers needs to be clarified. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In response to questions concerning imports of certain products under the quotas bearing the serial numbers 09.4038 and 09.4074, and to ensure uniform application, the designation of goods falling under these serial numbers needs to be clarified.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 806/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 806/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following paragraph is added to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 806/2007:

‘4.   For the purposes of this Regulation, products falling within CN codes ex 0203 19 55 and ex 0203 29 55 within the quotas bearing the serial numbers 09.4038 (group G2) and 09.4074 (group G7) in Annex I include hams and cuts thereof.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2). Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) from 1 July 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 181, 11.7.2007, p. 3.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6358

GARY D. GILLESPIE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus HOWARD PAINTER, acting warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-98-104-1) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary D. Gillespie, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Leah Perry Macia, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We have given Gillespie the benefit of the filing provisions enunciated in Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Gary D. Gillespie seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West Supp. 1999) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Gillespie’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 22, 1999. Gillespie’s notice of appeal was filed on March 3, 2000. * Because Gillespie failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
| ATTEST:                                                                                                   | Community                  Banks, Inc.                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                   |
| By:_/s/                  Patricia E. Hoch__                                                               | By:                  /s/ Eddie L. Dunklebarger________________                                                                         |
|             Patricia                  E. Hoch |            Eddie                  L. Dunklebarger, President and CEO            |
|                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                   |
| ATTEST:                                                                                                   | CommunityBanks                                                                                                                         |
|                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                   |
| By:_/s/                  Patricia E. Hoch__                                                               | By:                  /s/ Eddie L. Dunklebarger________________                                                                         |
|                             Patricia E. Hoch            |           Eddie                  L. Dunklebarger, President and                  CEO |
#### Herman BURKE, Plaintiff, v. KINGSPORT PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. CIV-2-74-6.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division.

Feb. 6, 1974.

Herman Burke, pro se.

Walter O. Waddey, Kingsport, Tenn., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

In a document entitled “motion for declaratory judgement [sic: judgment].” the plaintiff Mr. Herman Burke seeks punitive damages from the defendant Kingsport Publishing Corporation for refusing on or after November 20, 1973 to publish in its newspaper a want-ad to be headed: “WANTED — JUSTICE IN SCOTT COUNTY.” The plaintiff asserts he was incarcerated in Virginia at the time, and the defendant publishes its newspaper in Tennessee.

The jurisdiction of this Court is sought to be invoked under 28 U.S.C. § *2221443; however, that statute relates to the removal of civil rights actions. This Court defers for the moment the issue of whether its jurisdiction has been invoked.

The defendant moved, *inter alia,*for a dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff failed to state á claim on which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There is merit to such motion. In the absence of circumstances amounting to an illegal monopoly or conspiracy, the publisher of a newspaper is not required to publish an advertisement, even where the advertisement is a proper one, and the regular fee for publication has been paid or tendered. Anno: Advertisement —Publisher’s Refusal, 18 A.L.R. (3d) 1287, citing In Re Louis Wohl, Inc., D.C.Mich. (1931), 50 F.2d 254; Approved Personnel, Inc. v. Tribune Co., C.A.Fla. (1965), 177 So.2d 704, 18 A.L.R.3d 1277, 1281-1284 [1]; Shuck v. Carroll Daily Herald (1933), 215 Iowa 1276, 247 N.W. 813, 87 A.L.R. 975, 978-979; Friedenberg v. Times Pub. Co. (1930), 170 La. 3, 127 So. 345; North Station Wine Co. v. United Liquors (1948), 323 Mass. 48, 80 N.E.2d 1; J. J. Gordon, Inc. v. Worcester Tel. Publishing Co. (1961), 343 Mass. 142, 177 N.E.2d 586; Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc., C.A.Mich. (1966) , 5 Mich.App. 74, 145 N.W.2d 800; Chronicle & Gazette Publishing Co. v. Atty. Gen. (1946), 94 N.H. 148, 48 A.2d 478, 168 A.L.R. 879, 883-884 (headnote 14), (dictum, appeal dismissed (1947), 329 U.S. 690, 67 S.Ct. 495, 91 L.Ed. 604, rehearing denied (1947), 329 U.S. 835, 67 S.Ct. 632, 91 L.Ed. 707; Camp-of-the-Pines, Inc. v. New York Times Co. (1945), 184 Misc. 389, 53 N.Y.S.2d 475; Poughkeepsie Buying Service v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers (1954), 205 Misc. 982, 131 N.Y.S.2d 515; *contra:*Uhlman v. Sherman (1919), 31 Ohio Dec. 54, 22 Ohio NP (NS) 225, which was afterward declared by another Ohio court to be a wrong decision, Sky High Theatre, Inc. v. Gaurner Publishing Co. (unreported), no. 22820.

Accordingly, even if this Court’s jurisdiction were properly invoked, the plaintiff has not stated a claim on which relief can be granted, and this action hereby is

Dismissed. Should the plaintiff give timely notice of an appeal, he is authorized to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Rule 24(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
#### ATKINSON, Respondent, v. HEINE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by William J. Atkinson against Arnold B. Heine and others. O. B. Rushmore, for appellants. A. S. Gilbert, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2329 

To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or employee 

of a foreign government to receive a reward under the Department 

of State Rewards Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on International Relations 

A BILL 

To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer 

or employee of a foreign government to receive a reward 

under the Department of State Rewards Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terrorist Rewards En5 hancement Act’’. 
2 

•HR 2329 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR AN 

2 AGENCY OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO RE3 CEIVE A REWARD UNDER THE DEPARTMENT 

4 OF STATE REWARDS PROGRAM. 

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Subsection (f) of section 36 of the 

6 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

7 U.S.C. 2708(f)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘(f) INELIGIBILITY.—An offi9 cer’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(f) INELIGIBILITY.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para12 graph (2), an officer’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION IN CERTAIN CIR16 CUMSTANCES.—The Secretary may pay a reward to 

17 an officer or employee of a foreign government (or 

18 any entity thereof) who, while in the performance of 

19 his or her official duties, furnishes information de20 scribed in such subsection, if the Secretary deter21 mines that such payment satisfies the following con22 ditions: 

23 ‘‘(A) Such payment is appropriate in light 

24 of the exceptional or high-profile nature of the 

25 information furnished pursuant to such sub26 section. 
3 

•HR 2329 IH 

1 ‘‘(B) Such payment may aid in furnishing 

2 further information described in such sub3 section. 

4 ‘‘(C) Such payment is formally requested 

5 by such agency.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b) of 

7 such section (22 U.S.C. 2708(b)) is amended in the mat8 ter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘or to an officer 

9 or employee of a foreign government in accordance with 

10 subsection (f)(2)’’ after ‘‘individual’’. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Rodriguez, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Archie Gorfinkel, J.), rendered on May 25, 1983, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Fein and Milonas, JJ.
# L_2012322DE.01000801.xml

| 21.11.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 322/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 322/8

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1333/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 16. Dezember 2008 über Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 354 vom 31. Dezember 2008
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 354 vom 31. Dezember 2008

Seite 24, Artikel 21 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„..., nur mit der in Artikel 22 der vorliegenden Richtlinie vorgesehenen Kennzeichnung in Verkehr gebracht werden, ...“

muss es heißen:

„..., nur mit der in Artikel 22 der vorliegenden Verordnung vorgesehenen Kennzeichnung in Verkehr gebracht werden, ...“

---
Exhibit
23.2






Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-158448) of Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc. of our report dated May
26, 2009 related to the financial statements of  Daybreak Oil and Gas,
Inc. as of February 28, 2009 and for each of the two years then
ended.






/s/
Malone & Bailey, PC





Malone
& Bailey, PC


www.malone-bailey.com


Houston,
Texas


May 26,
2009
# Publicatieblad C 93I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 093I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 65e jaargang28 februari 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 093I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

65e jaargang28 februari 2022

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informatie |
| | INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE |
| | Europese Commissie |
| 2022/C 93 I/01 | Bericht aan importeurs — Invoer in de Unie van goederen van oorsprong uit de niet onder het gezag van de regering vallende gebieden in de oblasten Donetsk en Loehansk in Oekraïne | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

IV   Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Europese Commissie

2022/C 93 I/01

Bericht aan importeurs — Invoer in de Unie van goederen van oorsprong uit de niet onder het gezag van de regering vallende gebieden in de oblasten Donetsk en Loehansk in Oekraïne

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

IV Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Europese Commissie

| 28.2.2022 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 93/1

---

Bericht aan importeurs

Invoer in de Unie van goederen van oorsprong uit de niet onder het gezag van de regering vallende gebieden in de oblasten Donetsk en Loehansk in Oekraïne

(2022/C 93 I/01)

Bij Verordening (EU) 2022/263 van de Raad van 23 februari 2022 betreffende beperkende maatregelen in antwoord op de erkenning van de niet onder het gezag van de regering vallende gebieden in de oblasten Donetsk en Loehansk van Oekraïne en het sturen van Russische strijdkrachten naar die gebieden (1), is een verbod ingesteld om goederen van oorsprong uit deze gebieden in de Europese Unie in te voeren met ingang van de dag na die van de bekendmaking ervan.

Importeurs in de Unie wordt aangeraden de nodige zorgvuldigheid te betrachten om de daadwerkelijke oorsprong van de door hen aangegeven goederen vast te stellen, aangezien het risico bestaat dat goederen waarop het verbod van bovengenoemde verordening van toepassing is, uit buurlanden van Oekraïne, met name Rusland en Belarus, in de Unie worden ingevoerd. Dit kan met name het geval zijn voor steenkoolproducten van GN-post 2701 en staalproducten van de GN-posten 7201 tot en met 7207 en van de GN-posten 7304, 7305 en 7306. Gezien dit risico op ontwijking, kan het in het vrije verkeer brengen van deze uit Rusland en Belarus ingevoerde producten afhankelijk worden gesteld van het voorleggen aan de douane van overtuigend bewijs dat deze goederen niet onder het invoerverbod van goederen van oorsprong uit de niet door de regering gecontroleerde gebieden Donetsk en Loehansk van Oekraïne vallen.

---

(1)  PB L 42 I van 23.2.2022, blz. 77.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2277 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Walocel VP-M 20660. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Walocel VP-M 20660. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WALOCEL VP-M 20660. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.06 Methyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose with a 77% or greater 

content of 2-hydroxyethyl 

methyl ether cellulose (CAS 

No. 9032–42–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

3912.39.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2277 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and
accompanies this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Richard A. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:    November 13, 2003.



/s/    Richard A. SmithName:    Richard A. Smith




Subscribed and sworn to before
me this 13th day of November 2003.



|/s/    Camaleta M. Roseman
|--------------------------
|Name:                     
|Title:                    



My commission expires: 05-24-04



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by
the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.54
 EXECUTIVE BONUS AGREEMENT
 2008 EXECUTIVE BONUS AGREEMENT
   Bonus.
 Payment Date #1
    
    No later than March 14, 2009Amount of Bonus to be Paid on Payment Date #1
    
    $256,444.39
 Withholding.
 Source of Benefits.
 Designated Beneficiary.
 Applicable Law.
 Compliance with Code Section 409A.
 EBA.3.SF
    
    Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



Forfeiture of other Awards.
 BY EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT, EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE OR SHE HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, AND AGREES THAT THIS AGREEMENT SHALL GOVERN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
OF THE BONUS.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 COMPANY:
    
    
    
    
    
    EMPLOYEE:ALION SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Bahman Atefi
    
    
    
    /s/ Scott FryName:
    
    Bahman Atefi
    
    
    
    Name: Scott FryTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 EBA.3.SF
    
    Page 2 of 2