alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-15(e), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Brett White, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Meru Networks, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: March 11, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         606,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,063,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    438,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,917,505
<PP&E>                                       1,930,675
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,335,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,768,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,130,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,051,094
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,423,523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,768,517
<SALES>                                      2,506,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,509,085
<CGS>                                        1,342,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,212,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                291,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                   134,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            157,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,332
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
# L_2008259EN.01001902.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/19

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2008 of 20 December 2007 on the establishment of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 30 of 4 February 2008
  )

On page 66, in the Annex — Statutes of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking, Article 19(3)

for:

‘3.   The Annual Implementation Plan shall specify the plan for the execution of all the activities of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for a particular year, including planned calls for proposals and actions needing to be implemented through calls for proposals. (...)’,

read:

‘3.   The Annual Implementation Plan shall specify the plan for the execution of all the activities of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for a particular year, including planned calls for proposals and actions needing to be implemented through calls for tenders. (...)’.

On page 68, in the Annex — Statutes of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking, Article 23(3.4.2)

for:

| ‘3.4.2. | Subject to its obligations concerning confidentiality, where a project participant is required to pass on its obligations to provide access rights, it shall give at least 45 days prior notice to the other participants of the envisaged transfer, (...)’, |
| --- | --- |

‘3.4.2.

Subject to its obligations concerning confidentiality, where a project participant is required to pass on its obligations to provide access rights, it shall give at least 45 days prior notice to the other participants of the envisaged transfer, (...)’,

read:

| ‘3.4.2. | Subject to its obligations concerning confidentiality, where a project participant is required to pass on its obligations to provide access rights, it shall give at least 45 days prior notice to the other participants of the envisaged transfer (1), (...)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘3.4.2.

Subject to its obligations concerning confidentiality, where a project participant is required to pass on its obligations to provide access rights, it shall give at least 45 days prior notice to the other participants of the envisaged transfer (1), (...)’.

1

---

(1)  The participants may, by written agreement, agree on a different time limit or waive their right to prior notice in the case of transfers of ownership from one participant to a specifically identified third party.

1

---
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103690 and 333-92084) of New England
Bancshares, Inc., of our report dated April 21, 2005, on the consolidated
balance sheets of New England Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of March 31,
2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity accounts and cash flows for the years then ended, appearing
in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for New England Bancshares, Inc. for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.


                                          /s/ SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
                                          SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
June 22, 2005
#### McNAIR, Respondent, v. SALIT et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Mary H. McNair against Michael J. Salit and another.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2313

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sulfur Blue 7. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sulfur Blue 7.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SULFUR BLUE 7. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.08.01 Sulfur Blue 7 (CAS No. 

1327–57–7) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.19.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2313 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Claire M. Needham, Individually and as Administratrix of Malcolm L. Needham, Deceased, Appellant, v County of Nassau, Respondent.

— In a wrongful death action, plaintiff *784appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated August 22, 1984, which denied plaintiff’s motion seeking to vacate the findings of a medical malpractice panel.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order denying a motion to vacate the findings of a medical malpractice panel is not appealable as of right *(Kletnieks v Brookhaven Mem. Assn.,*53 AD2d 169, 174; *Fallon v Loree,*101 AD2d 1014). “The reasons for such a rule are manifest. The legislative intent underlying section 148-a [of the Judiciary Law] is for an expeditious and informal resolution of the litigation. Such an intent would be thwarted were we to construe section 148-a as permitting appeals from what does not even amount to an interim determination. Furthermore, section 148-a permits counsel to explore the claimed underlying infirmities of the nonbinding panel determination at the trial of the action (see Judiciary Law, § 148-a, subd 8)” *(Kletnieks v Brookhaven Mem. Assn., supra,*p 174). The within appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to plaintiff to argue the merits on appeal, if there is one, from a judgment after trial *(Fallon v Loree, supra).*O’Connor, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence, and Fiber, JJ., concur.
# L_2008251EN.01002501.xml

| 19.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 251/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 251/25

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 915/2008

of 18 September 2008

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2008 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 for poultrymeat and allocated to the United States of America

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 of 15 May 2007 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for poultrymeat allocated to the United States of America (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 opened a tariff quota for imports of poultrymeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 opened a tariff quota for imports of poultrymeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of [...] for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2008 do not cover the quantities available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined, and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of [...] for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2008 do not cover the quantities available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined, and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 under the quota with order number 09.4169 have not been lodged, to be added to the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2009, shall be 8 332 500 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 September 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2413 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2413

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1202 1st Street in Humble, Texas, as the ``Lillian McKay Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1202 
1st Street in Humble, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Lillian McKay Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lillian McKay Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Components and Health Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    FCHL Home
                    About FCHL
                        News
                                    Documents
                                    Directions to FCHLSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Food Components and Health Laboratory Docs 2021 civil rights statement







USDA 2021 Civil Rights Statementheadline bar Click here to view the 2021 USDA Civil Rights Statement


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Az Európai Unió C 93I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 093I |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 65. évfolyam2022. február 28. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 093I

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

65. évfolyam2022. február 28.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tájékoztatások |
| | AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK |
| | Európai Bizottság |
| 2022/C 93 I/01 | Közlemény importőrök részére – Ukrajna Donyeck és Luhanszk régiójának nem kormányzati ellenőrzés alatt álló területeiről származó áruk Unióba történő behozatala | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

IV   Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Európai Bizottság

2022/C 93 I/01

Közlemény importőrök részére – Ukrajna Donyeck és Luhanszk régiójának nem kormányzati ellenőrzés alatt álló területeiről származó áruk Unióba történő behozatala

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

IV Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Európai Bizottság

| 2022.2.28. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2022.2.28.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CI 93/1

---

Közlemény importőrök részére

Ukrajna Donyeck és Luhanszk régiójának nem kormányzati ellenőrzés alatt álló területeiről származó áruk Unióba történő behozatala

(2022/C 93 I/01)

Ukrajna Donyeck és Luhanszk régiójának nem kormányzati ellenőrzés alatt álló területei elismerése, valamint az orosz fegyveres erők említett területekre történő vezénylésének elrendelése miatti korlátozó intézkedésekről szóló, 2022. február 23-i (EU) 2022/263 tanácsi rendelet (1) a kihirdetését követő naptól megtiltotta az említett területekről származó áruknak az Európai Unióba történő behozatalát.

Az uniós importőröknek tanácsos kellő gondossággal megállapítani a bejelentett áruk tényleges eredetét, mivel fennáll annak a kockázata, hogy a fent említett rendeletben előírt tilalom alá tartozó árukat Ukrajnával szomszédos országokból, mindenekelőtt Oroszországból és Fehéroroszországból importálják az Unióba. Ez különösen igaz lehet a KN 2701 vámtarifaszám alá tartozó széntermékekre, valamint a 7201–7207 és a 7304, 7305 és 7306 KN-kód alá tartozó acéltermékekre. Tekintettel az intézkedések kijátszásának kockázatára, az Oroszországból és Fehéroroszországból importált termékek szabad forgalomba bocsátásának feltétele lehet meggyőző bizonyítékot szolgáltatni a vámhatóság részére arra vonatkozóan, hogy a szóban forgó áruk nem tartoznak Ukrajna Donyeck és Luhanszk nem kormányzati ellenőrzés alatt álló területeiről származó árukra vonatkozó behozatali tilalom hatálya alá.

---

(1)  HL L 42I., 2022.2.23., 77. o.

---
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no

precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 95-10256

_______________

NOBLE D. MAYS, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS
WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,
Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(7:89-CV-006-A)

_________________________ (March 30, 1995)

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The order appealed from, denying petitioner's motion to vacate
and re-enter judgment, is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set
forth in the district court's opinion of Marc h 7, 1995. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over the merits of this habeas

corpus matter. As this is a capital habeas case, however, we wish2

to note that we have reviewed the district court's sixty-four-page opinion of April 15, 1994, and agree with its concl usions. We

commend the district court for its careful and thorough examination

of the issues. Petitioner's habeas claims are wholly without
merit. The order appealed from is AFFIRMED. The motion for stay of
execution is DENIED.
---

|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 32.2                                                                  

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Who's Your Daddy, Inc.
  (formerly Snocone Systems Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the Company),
  on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Reuven Rubinson,
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to §
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/ Reuven Rubinson     | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|Name:  | Reuven Rubinson         | 
|       |                         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 
|       |                         | 
|Date:  | May 4, 2006             | 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided toWho's Your Daddy, Inc. (formerly Snocone Systems Inc.)
  and will be retained by Who's Your Daddy, Inc. (formerly Snocone Systems Inc.)
  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---