alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM [IDENTIFY
SPECIFIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HERE] BALANCE SHEET AT 9/28/96 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AT 9/28/96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                         722,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,531,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,213,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,452,439
<PP&E>                                       2,717,251
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,492,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,677,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          989,792
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,687,386<F1>        
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,677,178
<SALES>                                      6,755,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,760,848
<CGS>                                        4,591,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,523,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,241,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,241,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,241,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.423
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.402
<FN>
<F1> Tag 21  Common Stock as reported above is net of $2,275,291 Accumulated 
     Deficit
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### HAAK, Respondent, v. BUFFALO, R. & P. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 19, 1907.)

Action by Jeremiah Haak against the Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Company.

No opiniofi. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs.
[No. 15752-1-III.

Division Three.

September 9, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Timothy James Lanctot, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Klickitat County, No. 95-1-00097-7, Tom Reynolds, J., entered April 29,1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Raekes, J. Pro Tern.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert D. McDougal, the Chief Financial Officer of Ireland
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/
      Robert D. McDougal         
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| | Name:  | ROBERT D. MCDOUGAL                   
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| | Date:  | January 11, 2013                     

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
**Exhibit 13.02**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Genetic Technologies Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Godfrey Howitt, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)            the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   Thomas G. Howitt                                                                      |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:   Thomas G. Howitt                                                                    |   |
|            Chief   Financial Officer |   |
|                                                                                        |   |
|                                                                                        |   |
| October 24,   2012                                                                     |   |

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area El Reno, Oklahoma Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 2

- 2022

_____________________________ A NTHONY H ANNAH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County

. Jennifer Johnson , Judge

. March 26, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and R AY and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-19-TLS 

 ) 

LATWON L. FORD ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 31], filed on January 20, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 31] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Counts 

One (1), Two (2), and Three (3) of the Indictment are hereby accepted, and the Defendant is 

adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on February 6, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**COMMUNITY
      BANKS, INC.**


**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**


**(Chief
      Financial Officer)**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Banks, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald F. Holt, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350 and
      is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Community Banks, Inc., and will be retained by Community Banks, Inc., and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.








/s/
      Donald F.
      Holt


Donald
      F.
      Holt


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      9,
      2005
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 1 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 2 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 3 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 4 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 5 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 6 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 7 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 8 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 9 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 10 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 11 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 12 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 13 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 14 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 15 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 16 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 17 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 18 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 19 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 20 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 21 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 22 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 23 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 24 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 25 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 26 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 27 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 28 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 29 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 30 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 31 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 32 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 33 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 34 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 35 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 36 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 37 of 38
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00158-APR document 12 filed 07/26/16 page 38 of 38
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

denied

NO. 14-0818

MINH TRAN

v.

HONG KONG CORPORATION

A/K/A HONG KONG CITY MALL §

§

§

§

§

§ Harris County,

1st District.

November 21, 2014

Petitioner 's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

January 9, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, MINH TRAN, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 21st day of January, 2015

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2229

 To amend title 36 of the United States Code to ensure that memorials 
commemorating the service of the United States Armed Forces may contain 
               religious symbols, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2005

 Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Lewis of California, and 
  Mr. Issa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 36 of the United States Code to ensure that memorials 
commemorating the service of the United States Armed Forces may contain 
               religious symbols, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``War Memorial Preservation Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS AS PART OF MILITARY MEMORIALS.

    (a) Authority.--Chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 2113. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military 
              memorials
    ``(a) Inclusion of Religious Symbols Authorized.--To recognize the 
religious background of members of the United States Armed Forces, 
religious symbols may be included as part of--
            ``(1) a military memorial that is established or acquired 
        by the United States Government; or
            ``(2) a military memorial that is not established by the 
        United States Government, but for which the American Battle 
        Monuments Commission cooperated in the establishment of the 
        memorial.
    ``(b) Limitation on Jurisdiction.--No court created by Act of 
Congress shall have any jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have 
no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining to 
the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitution of, this 
section.
    ``(c) Military Memorial Defined.--In this section, the term 
`military memorial' means a memorial or monument commemorating the 
service of the United States Armed Forces. The term includes works of 
architecture and art described in section 2105(b) of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``2113. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military 
                            memorials.''.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129661 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129661 COA: 263420 Kalamazoo CC: 03-001841-FC PAUL MICHAEL REED, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
#### VALENTINE, Respondent, v. WUPPERMAN, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by Lincoln G. Valentine against E. Edward Wupperman, impleaded with others. A. Furber, for appellant. L. Kauffman, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $Í0 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Taylor, Also Known as Duane Taylor, Appellant.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Mazur, J.), both rendered on February 28, 1984, unanimously affirmed. *707Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on these appeals. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2395
In Re: ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE, Debtor.

_________________________ GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT, Creditor - Appellant, versus ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE, Debtor - Appellee, versus OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95- 3904-MJG, BK-88-42746) Submitted: April 14, 1998 Decided: May 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George E. McDermott, Appellant Pro Se. Janet Marsha Nesse, RILEY & ARTABANE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: George McDermott appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying his motion to compel performance under Andrew Moore's bankruptcy plan of reorganization. We have reviewed the bankruptcy court record, the district court record, and the district court's opinion affirming the decision of the bankruptcy court and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny McDermott's motion for a motions hearing and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDermott v. Moore, Nos. CA-95- 3904-MJG, BK-88-42746 (D. Md. Sept. 5, 1996). The following peoplefiled nearly identical motions entitled "Partner's Motion in Support of Appellant George E. McDermott's Pro Se Motion for Return of Partnership Assets to Rightful Owners and Motion for Appointment of a Trustee/Receiver": Louis W. Johnson, Jr., Harold and Rosanna McDermott, Tamara Sheaff, Steven J. Evan, David and Ruth Kay, Billie Jo and Elaine Walker, and Jon Johnson. Because these peopleare not parties to this appeal and have not moved for leave to intervene, and because McDermott has not filed a motion for return of partnership assets in this court, we deny these motions. McDermott filed in this court an objection to the debtor's attorney's motion to withdraw from further proceedings. The motion was filed in, and granted by, the bankruptcy court. McDermott's objection is not properly before the court, and, in any event, it is meritless. Wedeny, as moot, McDermott's motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions4 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED