alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MARK
E. ANDERSEN, P.E.
  RESERVE
APPRAISALS, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, & PROSPECT EVALUATION
   1221
      Arroyo Grande Drive
              fax:
      (916) 285-5271; tel: (916) 606-4090Sacramento,
      CA 95864
              e-mail:
      e-mail:mandersen.pe@comcast.net








To Whom
It May Concern:





As an
independent engineering consultant, I hereby consent to the use of my
report entitled
“Estimated Future Reserves and Revenues for Delta Oil and Gas Inc.’s
interest in Sunset
Exploration’s Wilson Creek 1-27 leasehold located in the Willows
Beehive Bend Gas
Field as of December 31, 2009” dated January 22, 2010 and data
extracted there
from (and all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this Form
10-K Annual
Report to be filed on or about March 30, 2010.








Name:   
Mark E.
Andersen


Title:     
P.E., Consulting Engineer








Signed
:March 31, 2010


Sacramento,
California








Mark E.
Andersen, P.E.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- L-3 Communications Integrated

Systems, L.P. ) ) ) ) ) Under Contract No. F09604-03-D-0024 etal.) APPEARANCES FORTHEAPPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 60479, 60480 60481,60482

Karen L. Manos, Esq. Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Cara A. Wulf, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Boston, MA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthese appeals having been settled, the appeals are hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeals must be filed within 30 days ofthe date ofthis Order. Dated: I June 2017I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA Nos. 60479, 60480, 60481, 60482, Appeals ofL-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 

### JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,896
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,729
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             200
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               201
<LOANS>                                        169,840
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,336
<DEPOSITS>                                     213,960
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,324
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,553
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 251,336
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,824
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  734
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    63
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,621
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,459
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,631
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,990
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      148
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (20)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    966
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         966
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.58
<LOANS-NON>                                        263
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   880
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,010
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       46
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,122
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,122
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### BOENING, Respondent, v. BOENING, Appellant (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Actions by Carrie C. Boening against William C. Boening.

No opinion. Motions- to dismiss appeals denied, without costs.
# L_2009333EN.01004301.xml

| 17.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/43

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA) for the financial year 2009 — Amending Budget No 2

(2009/929/EC)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2009 | Amending budget No 2 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | PAYMENTS FROM THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| 2 0 | PAYMENTS FROM THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES | 7 410 000 | 37 008 957 | 44 418 957 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 7 410 000 | 37 008 957 | 44 418 957 |
| 9 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE |
| | Title 9 — Total | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 7 410 000 | 37 008 957 | 44 418 957 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2009

Amending budget No 2

New amount

2

2

PAYMENTS FROM THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

PAYMENTS FROM THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

2 0

PAYMENTS FROM THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

7 410 000

37 008 957

44 418 957

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

7 410 000

7 410 000

37 008 957

37 008 957

44 418 957

44 418 957

9

9

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

Title 9 — Total

Title 9 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

7 410 000

7 410 000

37 008 957

37 008 957

44 418 957

44 418 957

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2009 | Amending budget No 2 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF |
| | Title 1 — Total | 3 320 000 | | 3 320 000 |
| 2 | BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 2 — Total | 1 180 000 | | 1 180 000 |
| 3 | OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE |
| 3 9 | OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES — BATCH 1 | p.m. | 37 008 957 | 37 008 957 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 2 910 000 | 37 008 957 | 39 918 957 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 7 410 000 | 37 008 957 | 44 418 957 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2009

Amending budget No 2

New amount

1

1

STAFF

STAFF

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

3 320 000

3 320 000

3 320 000

3 320 000

2

2

BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE

BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

1 180 000

1 180 000

1 180 000

1 180 000

3

3

OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE

OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE

3 9

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES — BATCH 1

p.m.

37 008 957

37 008 957

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

2 910 000

2 910 000

37 008 957

37 008 957

39 918 957

39 918 957

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

7 410 000

7 410 000

37 008 957

37 008 957

44 418 957

44 418 957

---
EXHIBIT 23.1**Independent Auditors’ Consent**The Board of Directors of     Alion Science and Technology Corporation:We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-114395) on FormS-8 of Alion Science and Technology Corporation of our report dated December 6, 2002, except as toNote 13, which is as of December 20, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SelectedOperations of IIT Research Institute as of September 30, 2001 and 2002, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, owner’s net investment, and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended September 30, 2002, which report appears in the September 30, 2005annual report on Form 10-K of Alion Science and Technology Corporation./s/ KPMGLLPChicago, Illinois
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10544 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**James Leon Higgins,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 15

- 1

Before **Jolly, Willett,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
James Leon Higgins appeals his guilty plea conviction for possessing a firearm following a felony conviction, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and his above

- guidelines sentence of 64 months in prison

. He raises arguments relating to t he constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F ILED November 22, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10544 Document: 00516103309 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2021No. 21

- 10544

2 sufficiency of the factual basis in support of his guilty plea. The Government has filed a motion for summary affirmance, which Higgins does not oppose. In the alternative, the Government seeks an extension of time to file its brief. For the following reasons, we dispense with further briefing and **AFFIRM**

. First, Higgins argues that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as interpreted by this court , as there is no requirement to show that the weapon
crossed state lines in the furtherance of interstate commerce or that the defendant’s possession resulted from an engagement in interstate commerce

. As he concedes, these arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013).
Higgins next argues that the factual basis in support of his guilty plea
is insufficient because it does not establish that he knew that the firearm had
traveled in interstate commerce. We have concluded tha t a § 922(g)(1) conviction does not require proof that a defendant knew that the firearm had
traveled in interstate commerce. See United States v. Dancy , 861 F.2d 77, 81 (5th Cir. 1988). Higgins does not articulate any argument that this specific holding in Dancy has been unequivocally overruled by Rehaif v. United States , 139 S. Ct. 2191, 2196 (2019). See Alcantar , 733 F.3d at 145

– 46 (discussing this court’s rule of orderliness).
In light of the foregoing, the Government’s motio n for summary
affirmance is **GRANTED** , the Government’s altern ative motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief is **DENIED** as unnecessary, and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-10544 Document: 00516103309 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2021
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
TCI SOLUTIONS, INC.

The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1. He is the duly elected, qualified and acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of TCI Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation").
2. The first sentence of Article IV of the Corporation's Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. The amendment set forth herein has been duly approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
4. The necessary number of issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.
5. Such amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Stephen P. DeSantis, its Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, this 28th day of July, 2003.

/s/  Stephen P. DeSantis                            Stephen P. DeSantis

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2329 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2329

   To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or 
    employee of a foreign government to receive a reward under the 
                  Department of State Rewards Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or 
    employee of a foreign government to receive a reward under the 
                  Department of State Rewards Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Rewards Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR AN AGENCY OF A FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENT TO RECEIVE A REWARD UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    (a) Eligibility.--Subsection (f) of section 36 of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(f)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(f) Ineligibility.--An officer'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(f) Ineligibility.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an 
        officer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Exception in certain circumstances.--The Secretary 
        may pay a reward to an officer or employee of a foreign 
        government (or any entity thereof) who, while in the 
        performance of his or her official duties, furnishes 
        information described in such subsection, if the Secretary 
        determines that such payment satisfies the following 
        conditions:
                    ``(A) Such payment is appropriate in light of the 
                exceptional or high-profile nature of the information 
                furnished pursuant to such subsection.
                    ``(B) Such payment may aid in furnishing further 
                information described in such subsection.
                    ``(C) Such payment is formally requested by such 
                agency.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b) of such section (22 
U.S.C. 2708(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 
inserting ``or to an officer or employee of a foreign government in 
accordance with subsection (f)(2)'' after ``individual''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2385 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2385

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend by 10 years the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to 
            conduct the quarterly financial report program.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2385

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend by 10 years the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to 
            conduct the quarterly financial report program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEN-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF COMMERCE TO 
              CONDUCT THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PROGRAM.

    Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act to amend title 13, United 
States Code, to transfer responsibility for the quarterly financial 
report from the Federal Trade Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, 
and for other purposes'', approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97-454; 
13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting 
``2015''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### John Fahey, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 21, 1890;

decided May 6, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made July 2, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor. of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*G. D. Prescott*for appellant.

*O. J. Palmer*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEITH ALAN LASKO, Reverend Doctor, 

Minister of Worldwide Ministries of Jesus 

Christ, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

WILLIAM C. ROBERTS; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 16-15455 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00967-KJD-GWF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Keith Alan Lasko appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing as duplicative his action alleging violations of federal and state law. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 25 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15455 

discretion, Adams v. Cal. Dep’t of Health Servs., 487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir. 

2007), overruled on other grounds by Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 904 (2008),

and we may affirm on any basis supported by the record, Johnson v. Riverside 

Healthcare System, LP, 543 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Dismissal of Lasko’s action was proper on the basis of issue preclusion

because the issue of whether the allegedly defamatory statements were false was

actually litigated and decided against Lasko in a prior action, Lasko v. Am. Bd. of 

Surgery, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01893-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2015). See Taylor, 

553 U.S. at 892 (setting forth elements of issue preclusion).

We reject as meritless Lasko’s contention that he was held to a higher 

pleading standard as a pro se litigant.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


         Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                         Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC, as
Servicer of DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2002-C (the "Trust"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Dated: March 26, 2003

                                    /s/ Juergen H. Walker
                                    ------------------------
                                    Juergen H. Walker
                                    President and Chief Executive
                                    Officer, DaimlerChrysler
                                    Services North America LLC,
                                    as Servicer of DaimlerChrysler
                                    Auto Trust 2002-C

Dated: March 26, 2003               /s/ D. H. Olsen
                                    ---------------
                                    D. H. Olsen
                                    Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    DaimlerChrysler Services,
                                    North America LLC, as
                                    Servicer of DaimlerChrysler
                                    Auto Trust 2002-C


A signed original of the this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code) has been provided to DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust
2002-C and will be retained by DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2002-C and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	2



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	3



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	4



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	5



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	6



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	7



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	8
Exhibit 99.3

                        Certification of CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John
R. Hecht, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ John R. Hecht
-----------------------------
John R. Hecht
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.