alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, David N. Siegel, President and Chief Executive Officer of US Airways, Inc. (the Company), certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ David N. Siegel Name:  David N. Siegel
Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 14, 2003
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID DION FOSTER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4651 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. David Dion Foster, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

Santiago Abreu,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC;

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00248

Hon. Jon E DeGuilio

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)

Plaintiff Santiago Abreu, by and through his counsel of record, hereby dismisses his claim 

against Defendant Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC with prejudice.

Dated: March 2, 2017 /s/ George T. Blackmore

George T. Blackmore (P76942)

21411 Civic Center Drive, Suite 200

Southfield, MI 48076

Email: george@cnalawgroup.com

Telephone: (248) 845-8594

Fax: (480) 999-0665

Attorney for Plaintiff

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00248-JD-JEM document 6 filed 03/02/17 page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar Upcoming Events   ARS News Articles  Findings on Biochar, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and EthyleneDec 13, 2011Farms, Fertilizers and Greenhouse Gas EmissionsDec 09, 2009Computer Program Eases Climate Change ResearchSep 29, 2008Prairie Towers Watch Carbon and Water Losses from CornfieldsApr 29, 2005


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Flores, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered August 25, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial, which included proof that defendant was apprehended by the police while fleeing from the complainant’s apartment, in possession of property stolen from the complainant’s apartment, was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the crimes of which he was convicted (see, *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be unpreserved or without merit. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sherman Batts, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), rendered October 6,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the People’s case, since the proof adduced at trial was not only legally sufficient to establish every element of the *762crimes charged but was, in fact, overwhelming. We find nothing incredible as a matter of law about the identification testimony of the complainant. The accuracy of an eyewitness identification is a question of fact to be resolved by the jury *(People v Dukes,*97 AD2d 445).

Further, under the circumstances, defendant’s sentence was neither unduly harsh nor excessive. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6773

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
THOMAS EDWARD BURWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00111-REP-1)

Submitted: July 29, 2009 Decided: August 10, 2009

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Edward Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Thomas Edward Burwell appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence reduction filed pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burwell , No. 3:04-cr-00111-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Real Estate Associates Limited VI;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November
7, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of National Partnership Investments Corp., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
[No. 20799-1-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Steven Ralph Chipman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 95-1-000978-6, Edwin L. Poyfair, J., entered May 7, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
[No. 20166-6-II.

Division Two.

October 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Scott Michael Hughes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 95-1-00218-7, Kenneth D. Williams, J., entered December 1, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Armstrong, JJ.
**Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124628, as amended) of Pinnacle Airlines Corp., and (2) Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-124625 and 333-113453) pertaining to the 2003Savings Plan of Pinnacle Airlines Corp.;of ourreports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Pinnacle Airlines Corp., Pinnacle Airlines Corp. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Pinnacle Airlines Corp., includedin this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPMemphis, Tennessee    March 8, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Orlando RODRIGUEZ AMADOR, also known as Orlando Rodriguez, also known as Amador Orlando, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20815

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*278Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Orlando Rodriguez Amador has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rodriguez Ama-dor has filed a response and has moved for the appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez Amador’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Rodriguez Amador’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. *Cf. United States v. Wagner,*158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EX-35.2
(logo) SUNTRUST


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attention: BAFC 2007-8


Re: Annual Compliance Statement for BAFC 2007-8

In connection with the loans serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (the
"Company") pursuant to the Company's Servicing Agreement(s)/Purchase and Sale
Agreement(s) with Bank of America, National Association and any applicable
Reconstitution Agreement(s) (together, the "Transaction Agreements"), I, the
undersigned officer, hereby certify the following as of December 31, 2007:


(i)  The Company conducted a review of its activities during the immediately
     preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its
     performance under the Transaction Agreements during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction Agreements in all
     material respects throughout such calendar year (or applicable portion
     thereof), except as follows:

   * SunTrust Mortgage did not maintain the required fidelity bond coverage
     amount in accordance with Section 229.1122(d)(i)(iv) at all times during
     2007. The Company maintained fidelity bond coverage in the amount of
     $150MM throughout calendar year 2007, which was determined to be
     insufficient according to applicable FNMA transaction agreement terms.
     This deficiency was an issue for limited portions of the year and resulted
     from an increase in the volume of the servicing portfolio. SunTrust
     Mortgage has requested a waiver from FNMA stating this coverage amount is
     adequate without regard for the size of the residential servicing
     portfolio, subject to an annual FNMA review. FNMA has verbally agreed to
     this request, and SunTrust Mortgage is working to formalize this
     agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby certify the foregoing as of the date hereof.


/s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.
John R. Purcell, Jr.
Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

Date: March 12, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:16 CR 34

)

DWIGHT MOORE )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which objections have been waived, the Magistrate Judge’s findings and

recommendations are now ADOPTED. Defendant is ADJUDGED to have committed

the violation of supervised release described in the October 14, 2021, Petition. (DE # 66.)

The supervised release of defendant is REVOKED. The Agreed Disposition of

Supervised Release Violation (DE # 74) is now ACCEPTED. Defendant Moore is

sentenced to a term of 4 months of incarceration, with no further term of supervised

release to follow.

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 11, 2023

s/ James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cr-00034-JTM-JEM document 79 filed 01/11/23 page 1 of 1
# L_2008016EN.01000701.xml

| 19.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 44/2008

of 18 January 2008

determining the extent to which the applications for import licences lodged during the first 10 days of January 2008 for butter originating in New Zealand under quota numbers 09.4195 and 09.4182 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 of 14 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the import arrangements for milk and milk products and opening tariff quotas (2), and in particular Article 35a(3) thereof,

Whereas:

Applications for import licences, lodged from 1 to 10 January 2008 for butter originating in New Zealand under quotas numbers 09.4195 and 09.4182 referred to in Annex IIIA to Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 and notified to the Commission by 15 January 2008, concern quantities greater than those available. Allocation coefficients should therefore be fixed for the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for butter originating in New Zealand under the quota numbers 09.4195 and 09.4182 lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 from 1 to 10 January 2008 and notified to the Commission by 15 January 2008 shall be accepted subject to the application of the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 January 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2). Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 July 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1565/2007 (OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p. 37).

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota number | Allocation coefficient |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4195 | 12,685836  % |
| 09.4182 | 100  % |

Quota number

Allocation coefficient

09.4195

12,685836  %

09.4182

100  %

---
# C_2008196EN.01000201.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5105 — SEPI/CDTI/INTA/Abertis/Hispasat)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 196/02)

On 26 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5105. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5105. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---