alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Crops Improvement Research: Fargo, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fargo, North Dakota Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center Cereal Crops Improvement Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1166

CAROL L. ORDEWALD, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-32-GEC) Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: December 16, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Schorsch, POINDEXTER, SCHORSCH & PATTERSON, Waynesboro, Virginia; Charles E. Samuels, HUBARD, SAMUELS & LEWANE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Donna L. Calvert, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief Counsel, Margaret M. Maguire, Assistant Regional Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carol L. Ordewald appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater , 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). In challenging the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, Ordewald’s sole argument is that, in his hypothetical to the vocational expert, the Administrative Law Judge failed to incorporate Ordewald’s anticipated absenteeism, a limitation to Ordewald’s residual functional capacity noted by the medical expert. Because this claim was not raised in the district court, Ordewald may not raise it now on appeal. SeeMuth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are generally waived absent exceptional circumstances). To the extent that Ordewald raises a general challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- BARC Home
- BARC Director's Office
- Facilities Services Director
- Physical Plant
- Real Property
- Safety
- Research Support Services
- Grants Mgt

Facilities Services (FS) **Chizo Irechukwu** FS Director Beltsville Agricultural Research Center 10300 Baltimore Avenue Bldg. 003, BARC-West Beltsville, MD 20705Chizo.Irechukwu@ars.usda.gov 301-504-5664 Facilities Services (FS) is the non-research management arm of the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC). The FS mission is to promote wise stewardship of the BARC campus and provide responsive, high quality, and cost-effective services in support of the Agency's mission to conduct research. FS includes the Physical Plant (Physical Plant Management Office, Building Maintenance Branch, Engineering and Construction Branch, External Services Branch, Plant Maintenance Branch, Systems Maintenance Branch, and Work Management Office); Safety, Occupational Health and Environmental Staff (SOHES), and the Real Property Office.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Donald H. Wilson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Donald H. Wilson   
|Donald H. Wilson       
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2006       

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



60
# L_2008048EN.01001701.xml

| 22.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 158/2008

of 21 February 2008

registering certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Salate von der Insel Reichenau (PGI), Gurken von der Insel Reichenau (PGI), Feldsalat von der Insel Reichenau (PGI), Tomaten von der Insel Reichenau (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, Germany's applications to register the names ‘Salate von der Insel Reichenau’, ‘Gurken von der Insel Reichenau’, ‘Feldsalat von der Insel Reichenau’ and ‘Tomaten von der Insel Reichenau’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, Germany's applications to register the names ‘Salate von der Insel Reichenau’, ‘Gurken von der Insel Reichenau’, ‘Feldsalat von der Insel Reichenau’ and ‘Tomaten von der Insel Reichenau’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objections within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 were received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objections within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 were received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names contained in the Annex to this Regulation shall be entered in the Register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 135, 19.6.2007, p. 22 (Salate von der Insel Reichenau), OJ C 135, 19.6.2007, p. 25 (Gurken von der Insel Reichenau), OJ C 135, 19.6.2007, p. 27 (Feldsalat von der Insel Reichenau), OJ C 135, 19.6.2007, p. 29 (Tomaten von der Insel Reichenau).

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6—

GERMANY

Salate von der Insel Reichenau (PGI)

Gurken von der Insel Reichenau (PGI)

Feldsalat von der Insel Reichenau (PGI)

Tomaten von der Insel Reichenau (PGI)

---
FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT
CARL O S AL B E RT O B RING ASRO D RIG UE Z , AK

A Patr ic io Ir onRodr igue z , Pe titione r,
v. L O RE T T A E . L YNCH , Attor ne y G e ne r al , R

e sponde nt . No. 13-72682 Age n c y No. A200-821-303
O R DE R

T H O M A S , C hie f Judge : Upon thevote of a

m a jority of nonre c use d

a c tive judge s, it is ordere d tha t this c a s e be re he ard e n ba n c pursua nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 35(a )
and C irc u it R

ule 35-3. The thre e -judge pa ne l opinion sha

ll not be c ite d a s pre c e de nt by

or to a ny c ourt of the Ninth C irc uit. Judge s M c Ke own a

nd W atford did not pa

rtic ipate in the de libe rations or vote in this c a se . 

# FIL ED JUN 14 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14511]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be conducted. The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, August 12, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 
or (510) 907-5274.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Thursday, 
August 12, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Matthew O'Sullivan. For more information 
please contact Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274, 
or write TAP Office, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612-5217 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 1, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-14511 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of R.H., Z.K., K.K., and 

L.K., Children

No. 06-20-00083-CV

Appeal from the 307th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2018-

779-DR). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss 

and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the trial court’s order.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 30, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7096

ROGELIO ARCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, FCI-Williamsburg,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

ARMANDO MIRELES, DHO & ERT Commander; MICHAEL DOPORTO, SIS,

Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (4:09-cv-02248-CMC)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rogelio Arce, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Rogelio Arce, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing without prejudice Arce’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition for failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. See Arce v. Warden, No. 4:09-cv02248-CMC (D.S.C. July 30, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the period
covered by this report, of MS Structured Asset Corp. on behalf of SATURNS Trust
No. 2002-1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                         By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                            --------------------
                                                         Name:    John Kehoe
                                                         Title:   Vice President
                                                         Date:    March 30, 2004
#### Networks USA, LLC, Appellant, v HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[942 NYS2d 356]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered June 16, 2011, which granted defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the sixth cause of action (breach of contract), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence demonstrating that, contrary to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits which provides that “[t]he Transferring Bank shall be under no obligation to effect [a] transfer except to the extent and in the manner expressly consented to by such bank” (Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits [1993 rev] Publication No. 500, art 48 [c], issued by the International Chamber of Commerce [now UCP Publication No. 600, art 38 (a)]), defendant did not expressly consent to transfer the letter of credit at issue. Although there is evidence that defendant approved of the transferee’s bank, it is insufficient since it is undisputed that defendant has a “know your client” responsibility with respect to *both*the transferee (which was as yet unknown) and its bank. Thus, consenting to the transferee’s bank without knowledge of the transferee does not establish defendant’s express consent.

In addition, to the extent plaintiff sought lost profits from its second, proposed deal with City Centre, the breach of contract claim was properly dismissed on summary judgment, as those profits were not within the contemplation of the parties at the time the agreement was made *(see e.g. Awards.com v Kinko’s, Inc.,*42 AD3d 178, 183-184 [2007], *affd*14 NY3d 791 [2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         11,829
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               13,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    14,305
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         31,618
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           32,307
<LOANS>                                        150,075
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,173
<DEPOSITS>                                     210,844
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,119
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,455
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 230,173
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9,729
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,988
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               242
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               11,959
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7,273
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (123)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             83
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,270
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,270
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,584
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.70
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,133
<LOANS-PAST>                                   156
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,165
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  48
<RECOVERIES>                                   43
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,181
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,181
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        958
        


</TABLE>
[No. 19571-2-II.

Division Two.

September 5, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Anthony Ryan Pugh, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 94-1-03753-8, Thomas Felnagle, J., entered June 2, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Armstrong, JJ.