alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2329

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or 
    employee of a foreign government to receive a reward under the 
                  Department of State Rewards Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Rewards Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR AN AGENCY OF A FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENT TO RECEIVE A REWARD UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    (a) Eligibility.--Subsection (f) of section 36 of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(f)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(f) Ineligibility.--An officer'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(f) Ineligibility.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an 
        officer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Exception in certain circumstances.--The Secretary 
        may pay a reward to an officer or employee of a foreign 
        government (or any entity thereof) who, while in the 
        performance of his or her official duties, furnishes 
        information described in such subsection, if the Secretary 
        determines that such payment satisfies the following 
        conditions:
                    ``(A) Such payment is appropriate in light of the 
                exceptional or high-profile nature of the information 
                furnished pursuant to such subsection.
                    ``(B) Such payment may aid in furnishing further 
                information described in such subsection.
                    ``(C) Such payment is formally requested by such 
                agency.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b) of such section (22 
U.S.C. 2708(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 
inserting ``or to an officer or employee of a foreign government in 
accordance with subsection (f)(2)'' after ``individual''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2329

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or 
    employee of a foreign government to receive a reward under the 
                  Department of State Rewards Program.
```
## 1997 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

6-2-1997 

# RN S S e r I nc v

. S ecr et a r y L a

b or
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 96-3245

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1997 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" R N S S e r I nc v

. S e cr e t a r y L a

bor " (1997). 1997 D e cisio n s . P ape r 118. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997/118

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 96-3245 RNS Service v. Sec of Labor The following modifications have been made to the Court’s opinion issued on May 29, 1997 in the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: In the above slip opinion on page 8, line 17, delete the comma (,) after “(storage facilities). The corrected line should read: ...by such words as “impoundments” (storage facilities) and “custom coal preparation facilities,” since it serves..
..

On page 10, line 33, add a close bracket (]) after the letter T at the start of “[The committee is greatly concerned....” The corrected line should read: [T]he Committee is greatly concerned that.... Copies of the referenced pages are enclosed for your convenience and ready reference.

/s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk

June 2, 1997
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement (No. 333-141467) on Form S-8 of Signature Exploration and Production Corp. (formerly Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc.) and Subsidiary of our report dated July 11, 2007 relating to our audit of theconsolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Signature Exploration and Production Corp. (formerly Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc.) and Subsidiary for the year ended March 31, 2007. Ourreport dated July 11, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

/s/ Tedder, James, Worden and Associates, P.A. 

Orlando, Florida 

July 14, 2008
# L_2009010EN.01002201.xml

| 15.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/22

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 22 December 2008

on the request from the United Kingdom to accept Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)

(notified under document number C(2008) 8554)

(2009/26/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular to Article 11a thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 17 June 2008, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 17 June 2008, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (1).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 1 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, the United Kingdom did not participate in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 1 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, the United Kingdom did not participate in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, the United Kingdom notified the Commission by letter of 24 July 2008, received by the Commission on 30 July 2008, of its intention to accept and to participate in Regulation (EC) No 593/2008. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, the United Kingdom notified the Commission by letter of 24 July 2008, received by the Commission on 30 July 2008, of its intention to accept and to participate in Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.

| (4) | On 11 November 2008 the Commission gave a positive opinion to the Council on the request from the United Kingdom, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 11 November 2008 the Commission gave a positive opinion to the Council on the request from the United Kingdom,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 shall apply to the United Kingdom in accordance with Article 2.

Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 shall enter into force in the United Kingdom from the date of notification of this Decision. It shall apply from 17 December 2009, except for Article 26 which shall apply from 17 June 2009.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2008.

For the Commission

Jacques BARROT

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6.

1

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2283 

To provide for the extension of the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail 

into the Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the extension of the New Jersey Coastal 

Heritage Trail into the Township of Woodbridge, New 

Jersey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERIT4 AGE TRAIL. 

5 The second sentence of section 2 of Public Law 100– 

6 515 (102 Stat. 2563; 16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘including sites in the Township of 

8 Woodbridge, New Jersey,’’ after the words ‘‘cultural 

9 sites’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

 This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
 financial statements contained in the body of the accompanying  Form10-Q and is
 qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
       
<S>                                       <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          6,146,683
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,679,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,841,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,702,689
<PP&E>                                          2,099,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,282,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,045,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,420,704
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          578,712
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,046,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,045,965
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,831,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (394,954)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,437,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,437,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,437,006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        




</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory: West Lafayette, IN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach
                        Fact Sheets
                                    Videos
                                    Seminars
                                    Careers
                    Our Lab
                        Phosphorus Removal Structures
                                    CEAP St. Joseph River Watershed
                                    WEPP Model
                                    USLE Database
                                    RUSLE
                                    
                                    Conferences
                                    Scientist Almuni
                                    Local TalksSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Fact Sheetsheadline bar Legacy Phosphorus Project
               NSERL Fact Sheets
               Videos
               Seminars


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6431

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH LEON MYERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-345, CA-97-1950-4-12) Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Leon Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on January 20, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 27, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Leon Myers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Myers , Nos. CR-93-345; CA-97-1950-4-12 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2000). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Jean M. Daly, Petitioner, v Three Village Central School District et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to *773Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated May 30, 1984 which affirmed a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint upon a finding of no probable cause to believe the respondent employer had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment.

Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner was hired by respondent school district in 1960 as a teacher. Respondent school district’s policy was to deny extended leaves of absence to all its employees, males and females alike. In 1964 petitioner became pregnant and requested a leave of absence which was treated by respondent as a resignation effective in June 1964. In 1967 petitioner was rehired by respondent school district. In 1969 she again resigned and was rehired in 1971. She has been teaching since then without interruption. In 1979 a seniority list was prepared; pursuant to respondents’ general policy, petitioner was denied credit for preresignation service. As a result, she filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights arguing that the policy of denying preresignation service credit was discriminatorily applied to her in that two male teachers had been permitted to transfer to other jobs within the school system, with no loss of preresignation credit.

The Division and the Appeal Board concluded that there was no probable cause to believe that respondents had discriminated against petitioner on the basis of sex. We agree. This record clearly establishes that respondents’ “no leave” policy applied equally to males and females. There is also substantial evidence that no employees, male or female, were granted seniority credit for preresignation employment. The two males who petitioner claims were granted preresignation credit had, in fact, never resigned and petitioner was treated in accordance with a uniform practice. She therefore has failed to prove the truth of her allegation *(see, Medina v State Div. of Human Rights,*73 AD2d 870). The case of *Matter of Board of Educ. v New York State Div. of Human Rights*(56 NY2d 257) is inapposite to the case at bar. As noted in the instant case, respondents’ policies were uniformly applied to all employees, regardless of their sex. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


 


CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Convertible Promissory
Note (this “Amendment”), dated February 28, 2015, is by and between Champions Oncology, Inc. (the “Issuer”)
and Ronnie Morris (the “Noteholder”).


 


The Issuer and the Noteholder hereby agree
to revise the maturity date of the Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated December 1, 2014 issued by
the Issuer to the Noteholder in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) to April 1, 2015. All other terms of the Note remain
unchanged.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Issuer and the Noteholder have duly executed this Amendment as of date set forth above.


 


CHAMPIONS
ONCOLOGY, INC.


 


 


By:___________________________


Name:David
Sidransky

Title:Chairman of the Board of Directors


 


 


 


_______________________________


Ronnie Morris
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Michael Nevarez and The Law Offices of 

Michael R. Nevarez, a Professional 

Corporation, d/b/a Nevarez Law Firm, 

P.C.,

 

 Appellant,

v.

USAA Federal Savings Bank,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00120-CV

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2018-DCV-1121)

O R D E R

On April 25, 2019, this Court issued an order for mediation referral. The order required 

the parties to confer and attempt to agree upon a qualified mediator within twenty days of the date 

of the order and notify the Court of the mediator’s name and contact information. The parties have 

not complied with this requirement. Therefore, the Court, on its own motion, ORDERS the appeal 

to continue. The suspension of the appellate timetable is lifted and the Clerk’s Record shall be 

filed in this Court on or before June 23, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank M. Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

|/s/FRANK M. SEMPLEFrank M. Semple
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|February 29, 2008                                                                                     |  | 

This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent this
Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

TYQUAN STEWART,

Plaintiff,

v.

PARKVIEW BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL 

SECURITY GUARD, KISHA HOUSTON,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-CV-00138 – JTM-SLC

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

I, the below-signed, state that pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83-5(e), I have read and will abide 

by the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, including 

Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct Within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit. I 

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Enter my Appearance as counsel in this case for Lakisha Houston (inappropriately sued 

and served herein as Parkview Behavioral Hospital Security Guard, Kisha Houston).

Dated: October 18, 2016 s/Lauren R. Deitrich

Lauren R. Deitrich #33989-64

Rothberg Logan & Warsco LLP

505 E. Washington Blvd.

Fort Wayne, IN 46802

(260) 422-9454 - Telephone

(260) 422-1622 – Facsimile

ldeitrich@rlwlawfirm.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 18th day of October, 2016, the following non-CM/ECF 

participant was served by first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid to:

Tyquan Stewart

4510 Austin Dr.

Fort Wayne, IN 46806

s/Lauren R. Deitrich

Lauren R. Deitrich