35070 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

1See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 

2016–2017, 84 FR 24471 (May 28, 2019) (Final 

Results). 

2 Id. at 24472. 

3See Dong-A Steel Company v. United States, 475 

F. Supp. 3d 1317 (CIT 2020) (Remand Order). 

4See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 19–00104, 

dated December 21, 2020 (Final Remand Results) at 

1. 

5See Dong-A Steel Company v. United States, 

Slip Op. 21–79, Consol. Court No. 19–00104 (CIT 

2021) (DOSCO). 

6See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 

341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

7See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United 

States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond 

Sawblades). 

8See sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act. 

9See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017, 83 FR 

50892 (October 10, 2018), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4 (explaining 

the method for determining the rate applied to 

companies not selected for individual examination), 

method unchanged in the Final Results; and 

Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Review-Specific 

Average Rate for the Final Results of 

Redetermination,’’ dated December 21, 2020. 

10See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

11For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

administrative review of HWR from 

Korea.1 As reflected in the Final Results, 

Commerce calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin of 20.79 

percent for DOSCO and 12.81 percent 

Kukje Steel, one of the companies 

receiving the review-specific average 

rate.2

DOSCO and Kukje Steel appealed 

Commerce’s Final Results to the CIT. On 

September 29, 2020, the CIT remanded 

for Commerce to explain or reconsider 

its finding of a particular market 

situation (PMS) in the Korean market for 

the hot-rolled coil input and its 

application of a PMS adjustment to the 

respondents’ cost of production (COP).3

On December 22, 2020, Commerce 

issued the First Remand Results, in 

which, under protest, it determined that 

there is no PMS that distorts the COP of 

HWR and recalculated the weightedaverage dumping margin for DOSCO 

without the PMS adjustment to the COP 

for the sales-below-cost test.4 As a 

result, Commerce calculated a revised 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

DOSCO of 11.00 percent. Moreover, as 

a result of Commerce’s recalculation of 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

for DOSCO, Commerce revised the 

review-specific average rate applied to 

Kukje Steel to 7.89 percent. 

On June 24, 2021, the CIT sustained 

Commerce’s Final Remand Results.5

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,6 as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades,7 the Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce must publish a 

notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Commerce 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.8 The CIT’s 

June 24, 2021 judgment in this case 

constitutes a final decision of that court 

that is not in harmony with Commerce’s 

Final Results. This notice is published 

in fulfillment of the publication 

requirements of Timken. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, Commerce is amending its 

Final Results with respect to the 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

DOSCO and Kukje Steel.9 The revised 

weighted-average dumping margins are 

as follows: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dong A-Steel Company ........ 11.00 

Kukje Steel Co., Ltd ............. 7.89 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because DOSCO and Kukje Steel have 

a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., 

there have been final results published 

in a subsequent administrative review, 

we will not issue revised cash deposit 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP). This notice will not 

affect the current cash deposit rate. 

Liquidation of Suspended Entries 

During the pendency of litigation, 

including any appeal, Commerce 

remains enjoined by Court order from 

liquidating entries: (1) Produced and/or 

exported by Dong-A Steel Company or 

Kukje Steel Co., Ltd.; (2) the subject of 

the Final Results; (3) entered, or were 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after March 1, 2016, 

up to and including August 27, 2016, 

and on or after September 12, 2016, up 

to and including August 31, 2017; and 

(4) remain unliquidated as of the date 

the Court issued the applicable statutory 

injunction. These entries will remain 

enjoined pursuant to the terms of the 

injunction during the pendency of any 

appeals process. 

In the event that the CIT’s final 

judgment is not appealed or, if 

appealed, is upheld by a final and 

conclusive court decision, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on unliquidated entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by DOSCO and Kukje Steel, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b) and 

the Final Remand Results. We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

not zero or de minimis. Where an 

import-specific ad valorem assessment 

rate is zero or de minimis,10 we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by DOSCO or Kukje Steel for 

which they did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the all 

others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.11

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: June 25, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14048 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) is 

automatically initiating the five-year 

reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

(AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended 

investigation(s) listed below. The 

International Trade Commission (the 

ITC) is publishing concurrently with 

this notice its notice of Institution of 

Five-Year Reviews which covers the 

same order(s) and suspended 

investigation(s). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 35071 

1See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 

10, 2020). 2See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Commerce official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. For 

information from the ITC, contact Mary 

Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission at (202) 

205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 

13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 

62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to Commerce’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping 

Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 

Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 

2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with section 751(c) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are 

initiating the Sunset Reviews of the 

following antidumping and 

countervailing duty order(s) and 

suspended investigation(s): 

DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact 

A–351–602 ....... 731–TA–308 ..... Brazil ................ Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (5th Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–570–814 ....... 731–TA–502 ..... China ................ Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (5th Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–570–028 ....... 731–TA–1279 ... China ................ Hydrofluorocarbon Blends and Components Thereof (1st Review).Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–570–506 ....... 731–TA–298 ..... China ................ Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware (5th Review) ....... Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. 

A–588–602 ....... 731–TA–309 ..... Japan ................ Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (5th Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–588–843 ....... 731–TA–771 ..... Japan ................ Stainless Steel Wire Rod (4th Review) .................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–580–829 ....... 731–TA–772 ..... South Korea ..... Stainless Steel Wire Rod (4th Review) .................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–583–605 ....... 731–TA–310 ..... Taiwan .............. Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (5th Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–583–828 ....... 731–TA–775 ..... Taiwan .............. Stainless Steel Wire Rod (4th Review) .................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–549–807 ....... 731–TA–521 ..... Thailand ............ Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (5th Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Commerce’s 

regulations, Commerce’s schedule for 

Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on Commerce’s website at the 

following address: https://enforcement.

trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in 

these Sunset Reviews must be filed in 

accordance with Commerce’s 

regulations regarding format, 

translation, and service of documents. 

These rules, including electronic filing 

requirements via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS), 

can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 

In accordance with section 782(b) of 

the Act, any party submitting factual 

information in an AD/CVD proceeding 

must certify to the accuracy and 

completeness of that information. 

Parties must use the certification 

formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). 

Commerce intends to reject factual 

submissions if the submitting party does 

not comply with applicable revised 

certification requirements. 

Letters of Appearance and 

Administrative Protective Orders 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), 

Commerce will maintain and make 

available a public service list for these 

proceedings. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these five-year 

reviews must file letters of appearance 

as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To 

facilitate the timely preparation of the 

public service list, it is requested that 

those seeking recognition as interested 

parties to a proceeding submit an entry 

of appearance within 10 days of the 

publication of the Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties who want access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (APO) to file an APO 

application immediately following 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation. Commerce’s 

regulations on submission of proprietary 

information and eligibility to receive 

access to business proprietary 

information under APO can be found at 

19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that 

Commerce has temporarily modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.1

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), 

and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b), wishing to participate in a 

Sunset Review must respond not later 

than 15 days after the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation by filing a notice 

of intent to participate. The required 

contents of the notice of intent to 

participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with 

Commerce’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce 

will automatically revoke the order 

without further review.2

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, Commerce’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in a Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that Commerce’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the ITC’s information 

requirements. Consult Commerce’s 

regulations for information regarding 

Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. 

Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 

CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35072 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices 

countervailing duty proceedings at 

Commerce. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: June 16, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14111 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Draft Revised Management Plan for the 

Mission-Aransas National Estuarine 

Research Reserve 

AGENCY: Office for Coastal Management 

(OCM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA), U.S. 

Department of Commerce (DOC). 

ACTION: Request for comments on draft 

revised management plan. 

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is 

soliciting comments from the public 

regarding a proposed revision of the 

management plan for the MissionAransas National Estuarine Research 

Reserve. The management plan provides 

a framework for the direction and 

timing of a reserve’s programs; allows 

reserve managers to assess a reserve’s 

success in meeting its goals and to 

identify any necessary changes in 

direction; and is used to guide 

programmatic evaluations of the reserve. 

Plan revisions are required of each 

reserve in the National Estuarine 

Research Reserve System at least every 

five years. This revised plan is intended 

to replace the plan approved in 2015. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 2, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted by: 

• Electronic Submission: Submit all 

electronic public comments by email to 

matt.chasse@noaa.gov and 

jace.tunnell@austin.utexas.edu. Include 

‘‘Comments on draft Mission-Aransas 

Management Plan’’ in the subject line of 

the message. 

Instructions: The draft revised 

management plan can be downloaded or 

viewed at: http://missionaransas.org/ 

about/management-plan. The document 

is also available by sending a written 

request to the point of contact identified 

below under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt 

Chasse, NOAA Office for Coastal 

Management, matt.chasse@noaa.gov, or 

410–570–1020. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Pursuant to 15 CFR 921.33(c), a state 

must revise the management plan for 

the research reserve at least every five 

years. If approved by NOAA, the 

Mission-Aransas Reserve’s revised plan 

will replace the plan previously 

approved in 2015. 

The draft revised management plan 

outlines strategic goals and objectives 

and the administrative structure, as well 

as programs or plans for conducting 

research and environmental monitoring, 

education, and training; volunteer 

management, communications, and 

resource protection; public access and 

visitor use; restoration and resource 

manipulation; and considerations for 

future land acquisition and facility 

development to support reserve 

operations. 

In particular, this draft plan describes 

how reserve programs will address 

specific goals. These goals include the 

advancement and dissemination of 

scientific knowledge about Texas 

coastal ecosystems; increasing the 

understanding, appreciation, and 

stewardship of coastal ecosystems; the 

conservation, protection, and restoration 

of Texas coastal habitats and wildlife; 

establishing and nurturing partnerships 

to promote and advance coastal 

research, management, and community 

resiliency and literacy; recognition of 

staff and volunteer contributions; and 

maintaining strong facilities that build 

capacity and enrich programs. 

The revised management plan builds 

upon past successes and 

accomplishments and is designed to 

address specific priority coastal 

management issues. The priority issues 

for research and monitoring include 

marine debris, industrial growth 

impacts, eDNA, freshwater inflow, 

biological monitoring, and sea level rise 

and coastal subsidence. For education 

and training, priorities to be addressed 

include connecting children and nature; 

outdoor education programming, 

climate change and its effects on coastal 

environments; coastal ecology and 

habitat diversity; marine debris and its 

impacts on the coastal environment; and 

stewardship of estuarine and coastal 

resources. These issues align with the 

2017–2022 National Estuarine Research 

Reserve System’s strategic plan. 

Since its inception, this reserve has 

engaged in strategic partnerships with 

its land managing partners and others 

based on mutual interests. These 

partnerships are expected to be 

maintained or expanded through the 

revised management plan including 

reserve administration of the Amos 

Rehabilitation Keep (ARK), providing 

animal rehabilitation services for 

species endemic to the estuary. The 

reserve is also planning to maintain and 

improve reserve facilities including 

Fennessey Ranch, the Bay Education 

Center, the ARK, and the Patton Marine 

Science Education Center. Additionally, 

no boundaries changes are incorporated 

into the revised management plan. The 

revised management plan, once 

approved, would serve as the guiding 

document for the 186,189-acre research 

reserve for the next five years. 

NOAA’s Office for Coastal 

Management analyzes the 

environmental impacts of the proposed 

approval of this draft revised 

management plan in accordance with 

section 102(2)(C) of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 

amended, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), and the 

Council on Environmental Quality 

Regulations for Implementing the 

Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 

1500–1508). The public is invited to 

comment on the draft revised 

management plan. NOAA will take 

these comments into consideration in 

deciding whether to approve the draft 

revised management plan in whole or in 

part. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.; 15 CFR 

921.33. 

Keelin S. Kuipers, 

Deputy Director, Office for Coastal 

Management, National Ocean Service, 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14042 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XB204] 

Marine Mammals; File No. 25761 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; receipt of application. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

Earthscape Productions, Ltd., St 

Stephens Avenue, Bristol, BS1 1YL, 

United Kingdom, (Responsible Party: 

Tina Razdan), has applied in due form 

for a permit to conduct commercial or 

educational photography on pinnipeds. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES