alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.     STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

City National Bancshares Corporation

Computation of Earnings Per Common Share on a
Basic &  Diluted Basis

In thousands, except per share data
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                          ----------------------

                                                              1999         1998

Net income .........................................      $    306      $    266

Dividends paid on preferred stock ..................           107            82
                                                          --------      --------
Net income applicable to basic
  common shares ....................................           199           184

Interest expense on convertible
  subordinated debentures, net of
  income tax .......................................             3             3
                                                          --------      --------
Net income applicable to diluted shares ............      $    202      $    187
                                                          ========      ========
Number of average common shares:
Basic ..............................................       118,221       114,141
                                                          ========      ========
Diluted:
  Average common shares outstanding ................       118,221       114,141
  Average convertible subordinated
    debentures convertible to common shares ........        13,850        13,850
                                                          --------      --------
                                                           132,071       127,991
                                                          ========      ========
Net income per common  share

    Basic ..........................................      $   1.68      $   1.64
    Diluted ........................................          1.53          1.46
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     3,156,830
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                513,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                2,174,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6,324,457
<PP&E>                                     2,676,724
<DEPRECIATION>                            (1,467,444)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             8,137,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,984,741
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   1,298,315
<OTHER-SE>                                         6
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               8,137,747
<SALES>                                    1,191,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,191,211
<CGS>                                        298,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,257,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (40,459)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            11,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2,336,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2,336,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,336,176)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)



</TABLE>
Order entered October 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00914-CV

RICHARD RALEY, ET AL., Appellants

V.

DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P.C., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00390-B

ORDER

The reporter’s record is past due. By letter dated October 5, 2018 counsel for appellants 

verified that appellants have paid the fee for the reporter’s record. Accordingly, on the Court’s 

own motion, we ORDER Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law 

No. 2, to file the reporter’s record by November 5, 2018.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Washington and 

all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Cornelia R. Ganiard, Respondent, *v.*The Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Submitted March 21, 1890;

decided April 15, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 19, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*Raines Brothers*for appellant.

*W. H. Beach*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2008170EN.01000601.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5159 — Apax Partners/D+S Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 170/04)

On 25 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5159. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5159. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Catherine S. Tunis, Petitioner, v Corning Glass Works, Respondent.

— Motion granted and proceeding dismissed, with costs to respondent *(see, Matter of Butler,*101 NY 307). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 29, 1985.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,918
<PP&E>                                         365,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,090
<BONDS>                                         70,000
<COMMON>                                           785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,908
<SALES>                                         25,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,737
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: A.A.,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

No. 08-14-00085-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and 

the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that Relator=s petition should be 

dismissed as moot. We therefore dismiss as moot the petition in accordance with the opinion of 

this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J., not participating
# C_2008248EN.01000201.xml

| 30.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5221 — Kenwood/JVC/Holdco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 248/03)

On 19 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5221. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5221. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7409
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS CARL HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-7410
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALFRED CALDWELL, a/k/a Big Al, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-01; 2:92-cr-00113-03) Submitted: July 31, 2007 Decided: August 14, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Carl Harris, Alfred Caldwell, Appellants Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Dennis Harris and Alfred Caldwell appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions for modification of their sentences, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), and denying reconsideration of those orders. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. Accordingly, although we grant Appellants’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 2:92-cr-00113-01 (E.D. Va. May 19, 2006; July 31, 2006); United States v. Caldwell , No. 2:92-cr-00113-03 (E.D. Va. May 19, 2006; July 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Charles Harris, Respondent, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, *People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith,*105 AD2d 1142). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Newman, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2220 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pontamine Green 2B. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Ms. HART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pontamine Green 2B. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PONTAMINE GREEN 2B. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.07.56 Dyestuff containing as active 

ingredient 2,7- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 

3,3′-[carbonylbis(imino-4,1- 

phenyleneazo)]bis[4-amino5-hydroxy-6-(phenylazo)-, 

tetrasodium salt (CAS NO. 

59262–64–5) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.14.30) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2220 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kevin D. ALLEN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-7124.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 11, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 14, 2009.

Kevin D. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin D. Alen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Allen,*No. 3:05-er-00041-nkm-bwc-2, 2008 WL 2518550 (W.D.Va. June 17 & 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Opinion issued November 17 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00272
- CV

——————————— RUDY CHEVALIER , Appellant

V. BERNADETTE PRESLEY , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. 2012
- 59031

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.3(a), 42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and n o opinion has
issued. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(c). F urther, although appellant failed to include a
certificate of conference in h is motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of2

service, more than ten days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has responded to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.
| ·  | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·  | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition and results      of operations. |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Francis J. Evanitsky                                         |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Francis      J. Evanitsky, President and Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research: Wenatchee, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Wenatchee, Washington Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   Visit the USDA-ARS NEWS Website!   ARS News Articles  Pampering Anjou Pears: ARS Studies Explore Storage IdeasJan 30, 2014USDA's Agricultural Research Service Announces Scientist of the Year and Other AwardsJun 11, 2013Catch the Subterranean Slug-Fest--Now, Live on VideoDec 01, 2009ARS-Studied Gas Helps Apples Stay CrispOct 17, 2007


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Marquesha Williams v. 16303 Imperial LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00914

- CV

Trial court case number: 1143136

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

On December 10, 2019 , appellant, Marquesha Williams , filed an emergency motion to

stay pending appeal of eviction. The Court grants the stay of the eviction.

The Court requests that the appellee, 16303 Imperial LLC , respond to the em ergency

motion by no later than ten days from the date of this order. It is therefore ordered that the

response of the appellee, if any, shall be due by Friday, December 20, 2019

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Richard Hightower

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _ December 10, 2019

___
# L_2010007EN.01002101.xml

| 12.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 7/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 7/21

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 10 December 2009

on the approval of the volume of coin issuance in 2010

(ECB/2009/25)

(2010/14/EU)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 128(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States that have adopted the euro (hereinafter the ‘participating Member States’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States that have adopted the euro (hereinafter the ‘participating Member States’).

| (2) | The participating Member States have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2010, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The participating Member States have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2010, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Approval of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2010

The ECB hereby approves the volume of euro coins to be issued by the participating Member States in 2010 as described in the following table:

| (EUR million) |
| --- |
| | Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins (not intended for circulation) in 2010 |
| Belgium | 105,2 |
| Germany | 668,0 |
| Ireland | 43,0 |
| Greece | 55,0 |
| Spain | 210,0 |
| France | 290,0 |
| Italy | 283,0 |
| Cyprus | 18,1 |
| Luxembourg | 40,0 |
| Malta | 10,5 |
| Netherlands | 54,0 |
| Austria | 306,0 |
| Portugal | 50,0 |
| Slovenia | 30,0 |
| Slovakia | 62,0 |
| Finland | 60,0 |

(EUR million)

Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins (not intended for circulation) in 2010

Belgium

105,2

Germany

668,0

Ireland

43,0

Greece

55,0

Spain

210,0

France

290,0

Italy

283,0

Cyprus

18,1

Luxembourg

40,0

Malta

10,5

Netherlands

54,0

Austria

306,0

Portugal

50,0

Slovenia

30,0

Slovakia

62,0

Finland

60,0

Article 2

Final provision

This Decision is addressed to the participating Member States.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 10 December 2009.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---