alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Director, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Liddle,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

                                      /s/ Michael Liddle
                                      ------------------
                                      Michael Liddle
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

August 16, 2004
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






BA Awardsheadline bar News
               2005 Awards
               2004 Awards
               2003 Awards
               2002 Awards
               2001 Awards
               2000 Awards
               1999 Awards
               2006 Awards
               2007 Awards
               2008 Awards
               2009 Awards
               2010 Awards
               2011 Awards
               2012 Awards
               2014 Awards


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[No. 20101-1-II.

Division Two.

August 15, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Colleen Ann Austin, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 95-1-00104-1, Kenneth D. Williams, J., entered October 5, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Hunt, J.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Erick Ricardo BONILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50965

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 10, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Wayne Frost, Esq., Midland, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Erick Ricardo Bonilla was convicted of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and was sentenced to 14 months of imprisonment. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, specifically urging that the Government failed to prove he intended to violate the law because, as a member of the Lipan Apache tribe, he believed he was permitted to enter the United States legally.

In determining whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction, the relevant question is “whether the finding of guilt is supported by substantial evidence, i.e., evidence sufficient to justify the trial judge, as the trier of fact, in concluding beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.” *United States v. Turner,*319 F.3d 716, 720 (5th Cir.2003) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Bonilla’s belief that he was in the country legally based on his membership in the Lipan Apache tribe lacks merit because illegal reentry is not a specific-intent crime. *See United States v. Ortegon-Uvalde,*179 F.3d 956, 959 (5th Cir. 1999); *United States v. Trevino-Martinez,*86 F.3d 65, 68-69 (5th Cir.1996). The Government is required to prove only that Bonilla had the general intent to reenter the United States. *See United States v. Berrios-Centeno,*250 F.3d 294, 298 (5th Cir.2001). His intent is sufficiently demonstrated by the fact that he was previously removed and later found in the United States. *Id.*at 299. The conviction is thus supported by substantial evidence. *See Turner,*319 F.3d at 720.

Bonilla has additionally noted a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment improperly states that he was convicted following a “jury verdict,” when his conviction followed a bench trial. Accordingly, the judgment is REMANDED for the sole purpose of correcting the clerical error. *365
      *See*Fed.R.CrimJP. 36. The judgment is otherwise AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2153

BRUCE J. SOLOWAY; LORI A. BLOINK,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOME 

LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Board of Directors; FEDERAL HOUSING 

FINANCE AGENCY, Office of the Inspector General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00254-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce J. Soloway, Lori A. Bloink, Appellants Pro Se. Jessica Anne Clark, Virginia Beach, 

Virginia, Massie Payne Cooper, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; 

Michael A. Johnson, ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce J. Soloway and Lori A. Bloink appeal the district court’s order denying their 

motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing their complaint as barred by res judicata. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Soloway v. Federal Home Loan Mortg., No. 1:17-cv00254-CMH-JHA (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People ex rel. Myron Allen, Appellant, *v.*James J. Martin et al., as Police Commissioners, etc., Respondents.

(Argued April 28, 1890;

decided May 9, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made February 12,1890, which affirmed a decision of defendants as police commissioners of the city of New York dismissing the relator from the police force.

*James AL. Lydcby*for appellant.

*677
      *David J. Dean*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                            641,612
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  12,288,517
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     7,660,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               23,704,159
<PP&E>                          4,821,207
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 31,716,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          19,099,314
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                       10,938,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                        628,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   31,716,986
<SALES>                        62,121,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               62,121,468
<CGS>                          58,965,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  72,863,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (515,014)
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (10,798,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (1,668,680)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (10,798,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (9,129,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.04)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, W. Brian Olson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification
has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 30, 2004 |  | /s/ W. Brian Olson     
|                    |  | W. Brian Olson         
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2337 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2337

To provide permanent funding for the payment in lieu of taxes program, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

Mrs. Cubin (for herself and Mr. Cannon) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide permanent funding for the payment in lieu of taxes program, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Land Compensation Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT FUNDING FOR PILT AND REFUGE REVENUE SHARING.

    (a) Payments in Lieu of Taxes.--Section 6906 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Amounts authorized under this chapter shall be made available to the 
Secretary of the Interior, out of any other funds in the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated and without further appropriation, for 
obligation or expenditure in accordance with this chapter as follows:
            ``(1) For fiscal year 2006, 80 percent of the amount 
        authorized under this chapter in the prior fiscal year.
            ``(2) For fiscal year 2007, 90 percent of the amount 
        authorized under this chapter in the prior fiscal year.
            ``(3) For fiscal year 2008, and each fiscal year 
        thereafter, 100 percent of the amount authorized under this 
        chapter in the prior fiscal year.''.
    (b) Refuge Revenue Sharing.--Section 401(d) of the Act of June 15, 
1935 (16 U.S.C. 715s(d)), relating to refuge revenue sharing, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Such amount shall be made available to the Secretary, out of any 
other funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated and without 
further appropriation, for obligation or expenditure in accordance with 
this section as follows:
            ``(1) For fiscal year 2006, 80 percent of the amount 
        authorized under this chapter in the prior fiscal year.
            ``(2) For fiscal year 2007, 90 percent of the amount 
        authorized under this chapter in the prior fiscal year.
            ``(3) For fiscal year 2008, and each fiscal year 
        thereafter, 100 percent of the amount authorized under this 
        chapter in the prior fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00012

- CR

MAXIMILLION NICHOLAS MORENO, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 22nd District Court Hays County, Texas Trial Court No. CR

- 14

- 0604

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed April 8, 2019, and the reporter’s record was filed June 19, 2019, making the appellant’s brief originally due July 19, 2019. This Court extended that briefing deadline twice, on appellant’s motions, resulting in the most recent due date of September 9, 2019. While we warned counsel when granting his second motion that further

ext ension requests would not be granted, counsel has filed a third motion seeking another extension of the briefing deadline.
We have reviewed the case file and appellate record, as well as counsel ’s most recent
motion to extend time , and find no extraordinar y circumstances that would warrant an additional extension of the filing deadline. Consequently, counsel’s most recent motion to extend the deadline for filing appellant’s brief in this matter is denied.
W e hereby order counsel to file the appellate brief in this matter on or before October 9 , 201 9

. IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: September 17, 2019
EXHIBIT 99.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul Feldman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of Law Enforcement Associates Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
         ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2003


                                                 /s/ Paul Feldman
                                               Name: Paul Feldman
                                              Title: Principal Executive Officer
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00291

- CR

Katey Lavern McBrayer
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the County Court at Law of Navarro County , Texas Trial Cause No. C37640

- CR

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
March 26, 2020
Exh10.1 Sillerman Demand Notes 3.2.15


Exhibit 10.1


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


$1,000,000.00                                ____________, 2015
New York, New York




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Viggle Inc. (the “Borrower”), with an address at 902 Broadway, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10010, hereby promises to pay to the order of Robert F.X. Sillerman (the “Lender”), with an address at c/o SFX Entertainment, Inc., 430 Park Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10022, the principal sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), together with interest thereon from the date hereof at an annual rate equal to 12.00% per annum.  Principal and interest due under this Note shall be due and payable upon demand.
Interest hereunder shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months and shall accrue so long as any sum remains outstanding under this Note.  Anything in this Note to the contrary notwithstanding, the obligation of the Borrower to make payments of interest shall be subject to the limitation that payments of interest shall not be required to be made by the Borrower to the extent that the receipt thereof would not be permissible under the law or laws applicable to the Lender limiting rates of interest which may be charged or collected by the Lender.  Any such payments of interest which are not made as a result of the limitation referred to in the preceding sentence shall be made by the Borrower to the Lender on the earliest interest payment date or dates on which the receipt thereof would be permissible under the laws applicable to the Lender limiting rates of interest which may be charged or collected by the Lender.
Payments of principal and interest made more than (10) days after they are due, shall bear interest at the lesser of (i) 5% per annum or (ii) the highest rate permitted by applicable law.  Payment of the principal and interest due under this Note shall be made at such place as the Lender shall designate to the Borrower and in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of all public and private debts.
The principal amount of this Note may be prepaid at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.





Exhibit 10.1


The Borrower hereby waives presentment, demand for payment, notice of dishonor, and any and all other notices or demands in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Note.  The Borrower shall pay all fees, expenses and disbursements of the Lender’s counsel in connection with the enforcement of this Note and the collection of all sums due hereunder.
This Note shall be binding upon the Borrower, its successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of the Lender.
This Note and the rights and obligations of the Borrower hereunder shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has executed this Note as of the day and year first written above.
VIGGLE INC.


By:                    
Name:                    
Title:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 7096** 

ROGELIO ARCE ,
Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

WARDEN, FCI

- Williamsburg , Respondent

– Appellee,

and

ARMANDO MIRELES, DHO & ERT Commander; MICHAEL DOPORTO, SIS , Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 4:09

- cv
- 02248

- CMC )

Submitted : February 10, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rogelio Arce, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Rogelio Arce, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing without prejudice Arce’s 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241

(West 2 006 & Supp. 2010) petition for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies . We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Arce v. Warden , No. 4:09

- cv
02248

- CMC (D.S.C. J uly 30, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED