alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BYRON MITCHELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:11-cr-00525-PJM-1; 8:13-cv-01551-PJM)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Byron Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sujit Raman, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Byron Mitchell seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) and Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 59(e) motions. Parties are accorded sixty days after 

the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to 

note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). The district court 

may, however, extend the time for filing a notice of appeal if a 

party so moves within thirty days after expiration of the 

original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or 

good cause for the extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i)-

(ii); Washington v. Bumgarner, 882 F.2d 899, 900–01 (4th Cir. 

1989). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil 

case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 

U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s final order dismissing Mitchell’s 

Rule 59(e) motion was entered May 22, 2014. Mitchell filed his 

notice of appeal, at the earliest, on July 30, 2014, nine days 

after the appeal period expired. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 

266, 276 (1988). Because Mitchell’s notice of appeal was filed 

beyond the expiration of the appeal period but within the 

thirty-day excusable neglect period and offered some excuse for 

his untimeliness, we construe it as a timely request for an 

extension of time accompanying Mitchell’s notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the 
3

limited purpose of determining whether Mitchell has demonstrated 

excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the 

appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be 

returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
[No. 15999-0-III.

Division Three.

September 16, 1997.]

#### Donald Wadsworth, et al., *Respondents,*v. Clifford F. McGuire, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Klickitat County, No. 95-2-00134-9, Tom Reynolds, J., entered July 31, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Thompson, J., and Kato, J. Pro Tem.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             602
<SECURITIES>                                       549
<RECEIVABLES>                                      598<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,297
<PP&E>                                           6,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,457
<BONDS>                                          1,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,288
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    667
<INCOME-TAX>                                       261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       406
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

HAKEEM MILES, §

§ No. 558, 2017

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§

STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1703001283

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 31, 2018

Decided: November 1, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 1st day of November 2018, we affirm the Superior Court on the basis of 

its pertinent rulings on the record. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1881 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLBUTYROLACTONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.75 2-Acetylbutyrolactone (CAS 

No. 517–23–7) (provided for 

in subheading 2932.29.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1881 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2020

No. 04-19-00359-CR

Laura Flores MESSICK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR11174

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 

U.S. 738 (1967). On January 28, 2020, this court ordered appellant to file her pro se brief, if any, 

by February 27, 2020. On February 18, 2020, appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of 

time to file her pro se brief. After consideration, we GRANT appellant a 30-day extension of 

time and ORDER her to file her brief by March 30, 2020. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2022

_____________________________

ANTHONY HANNAH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County.

Jennifer Johnson, Judge.

March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           9

<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         US
                                     
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         10,926
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              6
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               12,650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    16,292
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         32,284
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           32,445
<LOANS>                                       148,014
<ALLOWANCE>                                     1,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                228,424
<DEPOSITS>                                    210,158
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,040
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,389
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                228,424
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,184
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 674
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   69
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                3,927
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,579
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  6
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           2,342
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 43
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   544
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        544
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.45
<LOANS-NON>                                     1,387
<LOANS-PAST>                                      126
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 1,446
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                1,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      13
<RECOVERIES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               1,330
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            1,330
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         1,050
                                     


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT A (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD) March 16, 2004  Consent of Independent Accountants Dear Sirs: We hereby consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Canadian
Pacific Railway Limited and Canadian Pacific Railway Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Form 40-F), and the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements: Form S-8 no. 333-13846 (Canadian Pacific Railway
Limited), Form S-8 no. 333-13962 (Canadian Pacific Railway Limited), and Form
F-9 no. 333-14014 (Canadian Pacific Railway Company) of our Auditors Report
and Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference
each dated February 6, 2004, which reports are included in the financial
statements included in the Form 40-F. Yours very truly, (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP) Chartered Accountants   PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited,
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
#### HARRISON, Respondent, v. REUBEL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by David Harrison against Henry Reubel.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 36 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 100 percent 

reimbursement for medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian 

through a Federally-qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 

care system. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

100 percent reimbursement for medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian through a Federally-qualified 

health center or a Native Hawaiian health care system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native Hawaiian Med5 icaid Coverage Act of 2011’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 36 IS

1 SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT FMAP FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE 

2 PROVIDED TO A NATIVE HAWAIIAN THROUGH 

3 A FEDERALLY-QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER 

4 OR A NATIVE HAWAIIAN HEALTH CARE SYS5 TEM UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM. 

6 (a) MEDICAID.—The third sentence of section 

7 1905(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) 

8 is amended by inserting ‘‘, and with respect to medical 

9 assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian (as defined in 

10 section 12 of the Native Hawaiian Health Care Improve11 ment Act) through a Federally-qualified health center or 

12 a Native Hawaiian health care system (as so defined) 

13 whether directly, by referral, or under contract or other 

14 arrangement between a Federally-qualified health center 

15 or a Native Hawaiian health care system and another 

16 health care provider’’ before the period. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section applies to medical assistance provided on or 

19 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 99


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                        --------------------------------

I, Louis E. Prezeau, the Chief Executive Officer and President of City National
Bancshares Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2002

                                                 /s/ Louis E. Prezeau
                                                 ______________________________
                                                 Louis E. Prezeau
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 and President

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                        --------------------------------

I, Edward R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of
City National Bancshares Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2 ) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2002

                                                 /s/ Edward R. Wright
                                                 ______________________________
                                                 Edward R. Wright
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 and Senior Vice President
**Exhibit 32 (ii)**

 

CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sonya E. Scott, ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Sonya E.  Scott          |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     |
| May 10, 2004             |

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 Lawrence consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 **

U.S.C. § 636(c).

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TANYA LATRICE LAWRENCE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

BERRY, Doctor; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-16118

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-01936-DLB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Dennis L. Beck, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted February 11, 2013*** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Tanya Latrice Lawrence appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

FILED

FEB 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-16118

deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs as barred by the statute of

limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Weilburg v. Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205

(9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lawrence’s action as time-barred

because all claims accrued more than four years before Lawrence filed her

complaint. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 335.1, 352.1(a) (two-year statute of

limitations for personal injury claims; limitations period may be tolled for an

additional two years for prisoners); Knox v. Davis, 260 F.3d 1009, 1012-13 (9th

Cir. 2001) (§ 1983 actions are governed by the forum state’s statute of limitations;

a claim accrues when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury which

is the basis of the action; continuing impact from past violations does not cause a

claim to accrue anew). 

Lawrence’s motion requesting a “withdrawal and abeyance,” filed on July

27, 2012, is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,523,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,523,970
<PP&E>                                       5,665,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,692,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,789,517 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,533
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,231,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,789,517
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               603,528
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               423,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             254,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (74,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (74,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2385 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To extend by 10 years the authority of the Secretary of 

Commerce to conduct the quarterly financial report program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 2385 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. TEN-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR 

2 SECRETARY OF COMMERCE TO CONDUCT 

3 THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend 

6 title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for 

7 the quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade 

8 Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other 

9 purposes’’, approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97– 

10 454; 13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Owens, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Cornelius, J.), rendered September 3, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have considered defendant’s contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.