Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 34175 

System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, 

March 11, 2020). 

Documents mentioned in this SNPRM 

as being available in this docket and all 

public comments, will be in our online 

docket at https://www.regulations.gov 

and can be viewed by following that 

website’s instructions. Additionally, if 

you go to the online docket and sign up 

for email alerts, you will be notified 

when comments are posted or a final 

rule is published. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

and Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Amend § 117.313 by revising 

paragraph (c) to read as follows: 

§ 117.313 New River. 

* * * * * 

(c) The draw of the Florida East Coast 

(FEC) Railroad Bridge across the New 

River, mile 2.5, at Fort Lauderdale shall 

operate as follows: 

(1) The drawbridge shall be 

maintained in the fully open-tonavigation position for vessels at all 

times, except during period when it is 

closed for the passage of rail traffic, 

inspections and to perform periodic 

maintenance authorized in accordance 

with subpart A of this part. 

(2) The drawbridge shall not be closed 

to navigation for more than 60 

consecutive minutes. 

(3) The drawbridge shall open and 

remain open to navigation for a fixed 

10-minute period each hour from 5 a.m. 

to 11:59 p.m., except that the 

drawbridge shall be open at the 

following times which shall serve as the 

hourly fixed 10-minute period: 

—7:00 a.m. until 7:10 a.m. 

—9:00 a.m. until 9:10 a.m. 

—4:00 p.m. until 4:10 p.m. 

—6:00 p.m. until 6:10 p.m. 

—10:00 p.m. until 10:10 p.m. 

(i) Additionally, in each hour from 

12:00 p.m. to 2:59 p.m., the drawbridge 

shall open and remain open to 

navigation for an additional 10-minute 

period. 

(ii) The 10-minute opening periods 

shall be published on a quarterly basis 

by the drawbridge owner and reflected 

on the drawbridge owner’s website and 

mobile application. 

(4) The drawbridge shall have a 

drawbridge tender onsite at all times 

who is capable of physically tending 

and operating the drawbridge by local 

control, if necessary, or when ordered 

by the Coast Guard. 

(i) The drawbridge tender shall 

provide estimated times of drawbridge 

openings and closures, upon request. 

(ii) Operational information will be 

provided 24 hours a day on VHF–FM 

channels 9 and 16 or by telephone at 

(305) 889–5572. Signs shall be posted 

visible to marine traffic and displaying 

VHF radio contact information, website 

and application information, and the 

telephone number for the bridge tender. 

(5) In the event of a drawbridge 

operational failure, or other emergency 

circumstances impacting normal 

drawbridge operations, the drawbridge 

owner shall immediately notify the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port Miami 

and provide an estimated time of repair 

and return to normal operations. 

(6) A drawbridge log shall be 

maintained including drawbridge 

opening and closing times. The 

drawbridge log should include reasons 

for those drawbridge closings that 

interfere with scheduled openings in 

this part. This drawbridge log shall be 

maintained by the drawbridge owner 

and upon request, be provided to the 

Coast Guard. 

(7) A website and mobile application 

shall be maintained by the drawbridge 

owner and publish: 

(i) Drawbridge opening times required 

by this subsection; 

(ii) Timely updates to schedules; 

including but not limited to impacts due 

to emergency circumstances, minor 

repairs and inspections; 

(iii) At least 24-hour advance notice 

for each schedule in order to facilitate 

planning by maritime operators; and 

(iv) To the extent reasonably 

practicable, at least 60-minutes advance 

notice of schedule changes or delays. 

(8) The drawbridge shall display the 

following lights: 

(i) When the drawbridge is in the fully 

open position, green lights shall be 

displayed to indicate that vessels may 

pass. 

(ii) When rail traffic approaches the 

block signal, the lights shall go to 

flashing red, then the drawbridge lowers 

and locks, and the lights shall remain 

flashing red. 

(iii) After the rail traffic has cleared 

the drawbridge, the drawbridge shall 

open and the lights return to green. 

* * * * * 

Dated: June 21, 2021. 

Eric C. Jones, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander 

Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13701 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0378; FRL–10024– 

86–Region 7] 

Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Infrastructure 

State Implementation Plan 

Requirements for the 2015 Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

certain elements of a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submission 

from the State of Iowa addressing the 

applicable requirements of section 110 

of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 

Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS). Section 110 

requires that each state adopt and 

submit a SIP revision to support the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each new or revised 

NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These 

SIPs are commonly referred to as 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure 

requirements are designed to ensure that 

the structural components of each 

state’s air quality management program 

are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 29, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2021–0378 to https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the Docket ID No. for this 

rulemaking. Comments received will be 

posted without change to https://

www.regulations.gov/, including any 

personal information provided. For 

detailed instructions on sending 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason Heitman, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air 

Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
34176 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; 

telephone number (913) 551–7664; 

email address heitman.jason@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. A technical 

support document (TSD) is included in 

this proposed rulemaking docket. 

Table of Contents 

I. Written Comments 

II. What is being addressed in this document? 

III. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Written Comments 

Submit your comments, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021– 

0378, at https://www.regulations.gov. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

II. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

The EPA is proposing to approve the 

infrastructure SIP submission received 

from the state on November 30, 2018 in 

accordance with section 110(a)(1) of the 

CAA. Specifically, the EPA is proposing 

to approve the following infrastructure 

elements of section 110(a)(2) of the 

CAA: (A) through (C), (D)(i)(II)— 

prevention of significant deterioration of 

air quality (prong 3) and protection of 

visibility (prong 4), (D)(ii), (E) through 

(H), and (J) through (M). Elements of 

section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—significant 

contribution to nonattainment (prong 1) 

and interfering with maintenance of the 

NAAQS (prong 2) will be addressed in 

a separate action. 

Section 110(a)(2)(I) was discussed in 

the submission, however, the EPA does 

not expect infrastructure SIP 

submissions to address element (I). 

Section 110(a)(2)(I) requires states to 

meet the applicable SIP requirements of 

part D of the CAA relating to designated 

nonattainment areas. The specific part D 

submissions for designated 

nonattainment areas are subject to 

different submission schedules than 

those for section 110 infrastructure 

elements. The EPA will act on part D 

attainment plan SIP submissions 

through a separate rulemaking governed 

by the requirements for nonattainment 

areas, as described in part D. 

A TSD is included as part of the 

docket to discuss the details of this 

proposed action, including an analysis 

of how the SIP meets the applicable 110 

requirements for infrastructure SIPs. 

III. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. The state provided a 

public comment period for this SIP 

revision from September 18, 2018 to 

October 19, 2018, and received two 

comments related to a request for more 

stringent ozone requirements and an 

increase in ozone monitors. The state 

provided an adequate response to these 

comments. In addition, as explained in 

more detail in the TSD which is part of 

this docket, the revision meets the 

substantive SIP requirements of the 

CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

The EPA is proposing to approve 

elements of the November 30, 2018, 

submission addressing the 

infrastructure elements for the 2015 O3

NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is 

proposing to approve the following 

infrastructure elements of section 

110(a)(2): (A) through(C), (D)(i)(II) prong 

3 and prong 4, (D)(ii), (E) through (H), 

(J) through (M). The EPA is not acting 

on the elements of section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prong 1 and prong 2 

at this time. Section 110(a)(2)(I) was 

discussed in the submission as not 

being an applicable element and the 

EPA does not expect section 110(a)(2)(I) 

to be addressed in an infrastructure SIP 

submission. The EPA’s analysis of the 

submission is addressed in a TSD which 

is part of this docket. 

We are processing this as a proposed 

action because we are soliciting 

comments on this proposed action. 

Final rulemaking will occur after 

consideration of any comments. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, 

this action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTA) because this 

rulemaking does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 34177 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Infrastructure, 

Intergovernmental relations, Ozone. 

Dated: June 22, 2021. 

Edward H. Chu, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 

40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart Q—Iowa 

■ 2. In § 52.820, the table in paragraph 

(e) is amended by adding the entry 

‘‘(54)’’ in numerical order to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.820 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of 

nonregulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable 

geographic 

or nonattainment area 

State 

submittal 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

(54)Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2015 O3 NAAQS.

Statewide ....... 11/30/18 [Date of publication of the final 

rule in the Federal Register], [Federal Register citation of the final rule].

[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0378; FRL–10024– 

86–Region 7]. 

This action proposes to approve the following 

CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(i)(II)—prongs 3 and 4, (D)(ii), (E), (F), 

(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2 will be 

addressed in a separate action. 110(a)(2)(I) 

is not applicable. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13824 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0391; FRL–10025– 

26–Region 7] 

Air Plan Approval; Missouri 

Redesignation Request and 

Associated Maintenance Plan for the 

Jefferson County 2010 SO2 1-Hour 

NAAQS Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: On December 27, 2017, the 

State of Missouri submitted a request for 

the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) to redesignate the Jefferson 

County, Missouri, 2010 1-hour sulfur 

dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

nonattainment area to attainment and to 

approve a State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) revision containing a maintenance 

plan for the area. The State provided 

supplemental information on: May 15, 

2018; February 7, 2019; February 25, 

2019; and April 9, 2021. In response to 

these submittals, the EPA is proposing 

to take the following actions: Approve 

the State’s plan for maintaining 

attainment of the 2010 1-hour SO2

primary standard in the area; and 

approve the State’s request to 

redesignate the Jefferson County SO2

nonattainment area to attainment for the 

2010 1-hour SO2 primary standard. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 29, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2021–0391 to https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the Docket ID No. for this 

rulemaking. Comments received will be 

posted without change to https://

www.regulations.gov/, including any 

personal information provided. For 

detailed instructions on sending 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ashley Keas, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality 

Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7629 or by email at 

keas.ashley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Written Comments 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What is the background for the EPA’s 

proposed actions? 

IV. What are the criteria for redesignation? 

V. What is the EPA’s analysis of the request? 

VI. What are the actions the EPA is proposing 

to take? 

VII. Environmental Justice Concerns 

VIII. Incorporation by Reference 

IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Written Comments 

Submit your comments, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021– 

0391, at https://www.regulations.gov. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1