alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00044-TLS-SLC

)

LAWRENCE HILL )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on January 12, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his

right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the three-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 12th day of January 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket No. USCG-2021-0452]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notification of non-enforcement of regulation.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard will not enforce the safety zone for the Seafair Air Show Performance in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA in July and August 2021. The Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound has determined enforcement of this regulation is not necessary because this event is cancelled.

# DATES:

The Coast Guard does not plan to enforce regulations in 33 CFR 165.1319 in July and August 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions about this notification of non-enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Peter McAndrew,                               ( print page 33888)                            Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email                         *SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Coast Guard normally enforces the safety zone in 33 CFR 165.1319 for the Seattle Seafair Air Show Performance held in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. This event is typically held annually during last week of July and the first 2 weeks of August. This year, the event organizers cancelled Seafair. Therefore, the Coast Guard does not plan to enforce the safety zone in 33 CFR 165.1319 in July or August 2021.

                    In addition to this notification of non-enforcement in the                     **Federal Register**                    , if the situation changes and the Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound (COTP) determines that the regulated area needs to be enforced, the COTP will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and provide actual notice of enforcement to any persons in the regulated area.                

Dated: June 21, 2021.

P.M. Hilbert,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound.

[FR Doc. 2021-13721 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
#### McMAHON, Appellant, v. MICHAEL FOX AMUSEMENT CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 4, 1912.)

Action by Francis J. McMahon against the Michael Fox Amusement Company. A. Rosenthal, for appellant. G. A. Rogers, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      20,395,430
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,469,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,237,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     12,721,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    400,000
<COMMON>                                         3,582
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,889,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,237,922
<SALES>                                      1,112,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,159,560
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  481,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             359,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                318,278
<INCOME-TAX>                                   112,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            206,022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   206,022
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Briggs, certify that: 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Law Enforcement Associates Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; and 

d. Disclosed in the report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. I havedisclosed any sufficient deficiencies, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 5.1

CONSENT



TO:
			 
			 OLYMPUS PACIFIC MINERALS INC,AND TO:
			 
			 BERNS & BERNS, COUNSELORS AT
				  LAWAND TO:
			 
			 U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE
				  COMMISSION (THE SECURITIES REGULATOR)FROM:
			 
			 MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
				  (Micon)RE:
			 
			 TECHNICAL REPORT - BONG MIEU GOLD
				  PROJECT, VIETNAM


Reference is made to the technical report
		(the Technical Report) entitled A Technical Review of the
		Bong Mieu Gold Project, Vietnam, dated November 30, 2004, and
		incorporated by reference in the Technical Report, another report titled
		Pre-Feasibility Study on the HoGan Deposit of the Bong Mieu
		Gold Project, Vietnam, dated November 2004, which we prepared for Olympus
		Pacific Minerals Inc. (the Company or Olympus).

We hereby consent to the filing of the
		Technical Report with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure
		of the Technical Report and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary
		thereof in the Annual Form 20-F. We further agree to being named as an expert
		in the Annual 20F statement (Form 20-F).

Dated this 12th day of July, 2007.



Micon International LimitedPer: SignedIan Ward, P. Eng.President, Micon International
				  Limited.






---

CONSENT



TO:
			 
			 OLYMPUS PACIFIC MINERALS INC.AND TO:
			 
			 BERNS & BERNS, COUNSELORS AT
				  LAWAND TO:
			 
			 US. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE
				  COMMISSION (THE SECURITIES REGULATOR)PROM:
			 
			 MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
				  (Micon)RE:
			 
			 TECHNICAL REPORT, THE DAK SA PROJECT
				  - PHUOC SON GOLD PROPERTY, VIETNAM


Reference is made to a preliminary
		assessment study (the Report) entitled A Technical Report,
		The Dak Sa Project  Phuoc Son Gold Property, Vietnam, dated June
		17, 2005,which we prepared for Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. (the
		Company or Olympus).

We hereby consent to the filing of the
		Report with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure of the
		Report and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary thereof in the
		Annual Form 20-F. We further agree to being named as an expert in the Annual
		20F statement (Form 20-F).

Dated this 12th day ofJuly,2007.



Micon International LimitedPer: SignedIan Ward, P.Eng.President, Micon International
				  Limited.






---
#### Noemi SOSA ACOSTA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Defendants, Appellants.

No. 03-2121.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 7, 2004.

Julio C. Alejandro-Serrano, with whom Anabelle Rodriguez, Secretary of Justice, Ivonne Palerm, Deputy Secretary of Justice, Eileen Landron Guardiola, Eduardo A. Vera Ramirez, and Landron & Vera, LLP were on brief, for appellants.

Alfredo Fernández Martinez, for appellees.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, and LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was taken from a refusal of the district court to stay discovery pending its decision on certain dispositive motions. The district court decided those motions on March 31, 2004. This appeal is, therefore, moot.1*See CMM Cable Rep., Inc. v. Ocean Coast Props., Inc.,*48 F.3d 618, 621 (1st Cir.1995) (explaining that “an appeal, although live when taken, may be rendered moot by subsequent developments”).

In addition, the defendants have filed a motion to stay discovery in the district court pending the determination of the appeals that they have taken from the district court’s March 31 orders. That motion is not properly filed in this proceeding. In all events, the record does not reflect that similar relief was requested and denied in the lower court. Consequently, even were the motion properly before us, we would reject it. *See Beaulieu v. IRS,*865 F.2d 1351, 1352 (1st Cir. 1989) (“[I]t is a party’s first obligation to seek any relief that might fairly have been though available in the district court before seeking it on appeal.”).

We need go no further. This appeal is terminated.

*The appeal is dismissed as moot and the motion to stay is denied without prejudice. Costs will be taxed in favor of the appellees.*

1

. Because the appeal is dismissed as moot, we need not decide — and take no view on— the appealability vel non of the initial stay order.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Genetics and Breeding Research: Tifton, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Southeast Biomass Research Center
                    Forage & Turf ResearchSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Tifton, Georgia Crop Genetics and Breeding Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar Using Floating Vegetated Mats To Treat Fishery WastewaterAgricultural Reseach Magazine, January 2009.    ARS News Articles  Sorghum: The Unlikely Food Source for PollinatorsJan 31, 2023Grass Flowers are Something to Buzz AboutJan 07, 2021USDA's Agricultural Research Service Announces Scientist of the Year and Other AwardsJun 11, 2013Napiergrass: A Potential Biofuel Crop for the Sunny SoutheastSep 27, 2012Sorghum Eyed as a Southern Bioenergy CropSep 17, 2012Keeping the Green in Putting GreensJun 21, 2012USDA's Agricultural Research Service Announces Scientist of the Year and Other AwardsJun 15, 2011Tracking Virus Resistance Genes in Watermelon Made Easier with New
		Molecular MarkersDec 28, 2009Watermelon: Fruit on the Fast TrackDec 11, 2009Floating Vegetative Mats May Help Clean Fishery WastewaterJan 29, 2009New Peanut Variety Resistant to Nematodes, VirusMay 15, 2008Faster Forage Option for GrowersApr 01, 2008Floating Plant Mats Help Clean Manure LagoonsAug 01, 2006


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# L_2008280EN.01003801.xml

| 23.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/38

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 306/2008 of 2 April 2008 establishing, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, minimum requirements and the conditions for mutual recognition for the certification of personnel recovering certain fluorinated greenhouse gas-based solvents from equipment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 92 of 3 April 2008
  )

On page 22, Article 2, paragraph 1, second line:

for:

‘... as referred to in Article 4.’,

read:

‘... as referred to in Article 3.’

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Groups
                        Corn & Soybean Virus Lab
                                    Soft Wheat Quality LabSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research Docs





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

2011 Research Review Conferenceheadline bar Download the 2011 Research Review Annual Report(PDF, ~10Mb) Presentations from the conference: Wheat Improvement and Management for Grain Yield and Flour QualityHrb Ohm, Purdue University Molecular Marker SelectionGina Brown-Guedira, USDA-ARS Raleigh Do phenolics contribute to sensory perception of baked wheat products?Lisa Duizer, University of Guelph Update on Quality Targets and TestingEd Souza with US Wheat Team and AACCI Cincinnati Section Dietary Fiber: Recent Developments in the Definition and Methodology ArenasJonathan DeVries, Medallion Lab Update of Pancake and Cake Baking MethodMeera Kweon, Campbell Soup *Triticeae* - CAP: A new national program for wheat and barley researchClay Sneller, The Ohio State University Whole Grain NIR Calibrations for Soft Wheat QualityMary Guttieri, The Ohio State University


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-mj-00196-JEM document 10 filed 10/27/15 page 1 of 1