alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND> 
YEAR-TO-DATE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOUND
ON PAGES 3,4,5, RESPECTIVELY, ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
CURRENT PERIOD ENDED AND THE PREVIOUS PERIOD ENDED, ARE LISTED BELOW
IN TABULAR FORMAT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1996           DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-29-1996           SEP-28-1996           
<CASH>                          73,086              66,268
<SECURITIES>                        0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                   47,649              43,398
<ALLOWANCES>                     1,333               1,450
<INVENTORY>                     48,027              48,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               201,665             195,202
<PP&E>                         136,090             140,933
<DEPRECIATION>                  79,088              82,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 262,462             257,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           66,620              58,464
<BONDS>                             0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0                   0
<PREFERRED>                         0                   0 
<COMMON>                           166                 166
<OTHER-SE>                     189,216             192,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   262,462             257,848
<SALES>                        119,355             169,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               119,355             169,464
<CGS>                           58,924              83,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   58,924              83,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                43,526              62,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   (35)                 34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 370                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                250,285              32,746 
<INCOME-TAX>                     7,080               8,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0                   0
<CHANGES>                           0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                    18,205              23,905 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     1.08                1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                     1.08                1.43
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth E. Edge, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/  KENNETH E. EDGE   
|Kenneth E. Edge        
|Chief Executive Officer



November 9, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |  *May              7, 2007* | * * | * /s/              G. Anthony Busseni*              |
|--------|----------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |     | G.                Anthony Busseni,                       |
|   |                             |     | President                and CEO                         |
|   |                             |     |                                                     |
| Date:  |  *5-7-07*                   | * * | * /s/              C Douglas Carpenter*             |
|   |                             |     | C.                Douglas Carpenter,                     |
|   |                             |     | Senior                Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |
#### In the Matter of the Petition of the Rector, Churchwardens and Vestrymen of St. Andrew’s Protestant Episcopal Church, to Vacate an Assessment for Paving One Hundred and Twenty-seventh street.

(Argued June 16, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 28,1889, which reversed an order of Special Term vacating an assessment.

*Elliot JScmdford*for appellant.

*Demid J. Dean*for respondent.

Agreé to affirm; no opinion.

All concur. r

Order affirmed.
[No. 36919-9-I.

Division One.

September 8, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stanley James Lamothe, Jr., et al., *Defendants,*Robert James Williams, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-03433-9, Linda Lau, J., entered July 3, 1995. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# C_2008117EN.01000501.xml

| 14.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5035 — Radeberger/Getränke Essmann/Phoenix)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 117/03)

On 27 March 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5035. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5035. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
[No. 37260-2-I.

Division One.

September 15, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jason Paul Haack, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-02795-1, Robert H. Alsdorf, J., entered August 21, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Webster, J. Now published at 88 Wn. App. 423.
---

CONSENT OF JAMES LANG

|To: | United States Securities and Exchange               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|    | Commission                                          
|    |                                                     
|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the
      Company)
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                          
|    | Consent of Expert                                   

This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by
the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report). The
Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Companys
Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the AIF),
and the Companys Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December
31, 2016 (the MD&A).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical report
(the "Technical Report"):

- 2014 Technical Report on the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska, USA,
  effective date December 31, 2014

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report, the AIF, the MD&A and the Companys registration
statement on Form F-3, as amended (SEC File No. 333-209921) (the
Registration Statement) and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual
Report, the AIF, the MD&A and the Registration Statement.

Dated the 30th day of March, 2017.

Yours truly,

/James Lang/

James Lang, P.Geo. Hunter Dickinson Services Inc.

---
**Exhibit 13.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of GeneticTechnologies Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas G. Howitt, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)            the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Thomas G. Howitt |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
| Name:                | **Thomas G. Howitt**    |
| Title:               | Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |                         |  |

 

December 23rd, 2005

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Genetic Technologies Limited and will be retained by GeneticTechnologies Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
# L_2008278EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1027/2008

of 20 October 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 October 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 107,3 |
| MA | 62,8 |
| MK | 51,5 |
| TR | 98,8 |
| ZZ | 80,1 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 108,1 |
| ZZ | 108,1 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 138,0 |
| ZZ | 138,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 64,2 |
| TR | 101,1 |
| ZA | 77,1 |
| ZZ | 80,8 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 231,7 |
| TR | 106,5 |
| US | 174,6 |
| ZZ | 170,9 |
| 0808 10 80 | AU | 161,1 |
| CA | 97,3 |
| CL | 72,8 |
| CN | 93,4 |
| MK | 37,6 |
| NZ | 98,9 |
| US | 113,9 |
| ZA | 84,9 |
| ZZ | 95,0 |
| 0808 20 50 | CL | 60,3 |
| CN | 66,4 |
| TR | 132,8 |
| ZA | 83,4 |
| ZZ | 85,7 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

107,3

MA

62,8

MK

51,5

TR

98,8

ZZ

80,1

0707 00 05

TR

108,1

ZZ

108,1

0709 90 70

TR

138,0

ZZ

138,0

0805 50 10

AR

64,2

TR

101,1

ZA

77,1

ZZ

80,8

0806 10 10

BR

231,7

TR

106,5

US

174,6

ZZ

170,9

0808 10 80

AU

161,1

CA

97,3

CL

72,8

CN

93,4

MK

37,6

NZ

98,9

US

113,9

ZA

84,9

ZZ

95,0

0808 20 50

CL

60,3

CN

66,4

TR

132,8

ZA

83,4

ZZ

85,7

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 26, 2010 

d0519 

Order 

 

May 26, 2010 

140191 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140191 

 COA: 293187 

Wayne CC: 02-003960-FH 

DAVID ANTHONY JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Wayne Circuit Court and we 

REMAND this case to that court for resentencing in light of People v Hendrick, 472 

Mich 555 (2005). On remand, the trial court shall sentence the defendant within the 

appropriate sentencing guidelines range or state on the record a substantial and 

compelling reason for the departure, in accordance with MCL 769.34(3) and People v 

Babcock, 469 Mich 247 (2003). We note that under Hendrick, supra at 564, the acts 

giving rise to the probation violation may provide a substantial and compelling reason to 

depart.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

Term Loan Note 
  

			
	 U.S. $6,453,172.77
	 	September 17, 2013

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, RainDance Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to Parallel Investment Opportunities Partners II L.P. or its assigns (the “Lender”) at the Lender’s principal office in 1000 Main Street, Suite 2500, Houston,
TX 77002, in immediately available funds, the aggregate principal sum set forth above, or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Loans made by the Lender pursuant to Section 2.01 of the Term
Loan Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2013 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, renewed, refinanced or replaced, the “Loan Agreement”), among Borrower, the Lender, the other lenders party
thereto and the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, on the date or dates specified in the Loan Agreement, together with interest on the principal amount of such Loans from time to time outstanding thereunder at the rates, and payable in the manner
and on the dates, specified in the Loan Agreement.  
 This Note is a Note issued pursuant to the terms of
Section 2.04 of the Loan Agreement, and this Note and the holder hereof are entitled to all the benefits and security provided for thereby or referred to therein, to which Loan Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement thereof.
All defined terms used in this Note, except terms otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meaning as in the Loan Agreement. 
 THIS
NOTE AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, INCLUDING SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW, AND WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES
OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS THAT WOULD RESULT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. 
 FOR PURPOSES OF SECTIONS 1272, 1273 AND
1275 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED, AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, THIS NOTE IS BEING ISSUED WITH ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT; PLEASE CONTACT DAVID KEENE, TITLE: DIRECTOR, FINANCE & CORPORATE CONTROLLER, ADDRESS:
749 MIDDLESEX TURNPIKE, BILLERICA, MA 01821, TELEPHONE: (978) 495-3353, TO OBTAIN INFORMATION REGARDING THE ISSUE PRICE, THE AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT AND THE YIELD TO MATURITY. 

Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, protest or notice of any kind hereunder, other than notices provided for in the Loan Documents.
The non-exercise by the holder hereof of any of its rights hereunder in any particular instance shall not constitute a waiver thereof in such particular or any subsequent instance. 

THIS NOTE MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT. 

 

			
	RAINDANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ S. Roopom Banerjee

	Name:	 	S. Roopom Banerjee
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00071-TLS-SLC

)

LORA SEXTON )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan

Collins, on October 27, 2016, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America. The Defendant waived in open Court

prosecution by indictment and consented that the proceedings may be by information rather than

by indictment.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant’s waiver of indictment is knowing and voluntary;

(3) that the Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not
guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and

her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(4) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the sentencing guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(5) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(6) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(7) that the Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(8) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept both the Defendant’s waiver of indictment and

plea of guilty and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the Information

and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 3rd day of November 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
[No. 38033-8-I.

Division One.

April 28, 1997.]

#### Michael D. Cull, et al., *Appellants,*v. Sr. Clare Hospital, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 92-2-06871-6, Thomas R. Sauriol, J., entered November 4, 1994. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Coleman and Ellington, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2226 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Ms. HART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ethylene-vinyl 

acetate copolymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ETHYLENE-VINYL ACETATE COPOLY4 MERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.07.54 Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers containing 50% by 

weight vinyl acetate monomer content (CAS No. 

24937–78–8) (provided for 

in subheading 3905.29.00) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2226 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ