alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 4784-106]

On June 15, 2021, Topsham Hydro Partners Limited Partnership submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6, we hereby notify the Maine Department of Environmental Protection of the following:

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:* June 9, 2021

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:* One year

*Date Waiver Occurs for Failure to Act:* June 9, 2022

If the Maine Department of Environmental Protection fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request by the above waiver date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: June 16, 2021.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-13161 Filed 6-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2188 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2188

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the placement in a 
national cemetery of memorial markers for the purpose of commemorating 
   servicemembers or other persons whose remains are interred in an 
             American Battle Monuments Commission cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

  Mr. Langevin (for himself, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Harris, Mrs. 
McCarthy, Mrs. Christensen, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Butterfield, 
 Mr. McDermott, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
    Brown of Ohio, and Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the placement in a 
national cemetery of memorial markers for the purpose of commemorating 
   servicemembers or other persons whose remains are interred in an 
             American Battle Monuments Commission cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF INTERNMENT OF REMAINS IN AN AMERICAN BATTLE 
              MONUMENTS COMMISSION CEMETERY AS UNAVAILABLE FOR THE 
              PURPOSES OF PLACEMENT OF MEMORIAL MARKERS IN NATIONAL 
              CEMETERIES.

    Paragraph (3) of section 2306(b) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (C);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(E) are interred in an American Battle Monuments 
        Commission cemetery.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### WELD RACING, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ULTRA WHEEL COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-1493.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 31, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The parties jointly move to dismiss this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to dismiss 2011-1493 is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
# C_2008264EN.01000601.xml

| 17.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 13 October 2008

appointing a Belgian member of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers

(2008/C 264/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (1), and in particular Articles 26 and 27 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 25 September 2008 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2008 to 24 September 2010, with the exception of certain members including a Belgian member in the category of representatives of workers' organisations. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 25 September 2008 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2008 to 24 September 2010, with the exception of certain members including a Belgian member in the category of representatives of workers' organisations.

2

| (2) | The Belgian Government has put forward a candidate for the vacant seat, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Belgian Government has put forward a candidate for the vacant seat,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed a member of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period expiring on 24 September 2010:

REPRESENTATIVES OF WORKERS' ORGANISATIONS

Country: Belgium

Member: Mr Sakis DIMITRAKOPOULOS

Done at Luxembourg, 13 October 2008.

For the Council

The President

B. KOUCHNER

---

(1)  OJ L 257, 18.10.1968, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ C 253, 4.10.2008, p. 7.

2

---
#### COIN NOVELTY CO. v. LINDENBORN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Discovery—Examination Before Trial—Production of Books and Papers. An order for the examination of an individual defendant before trial', cannot properly require him to produce books and papers for inspection. [Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol‘. 16, Discovery, § 89.]:

Appeal from Special Term.

Action by the Coin Novelty Company against Solomon Lindenborn.. ■From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant before trial, and for the production of certain books-- and papers for inspection, defendant appeals. Modified and affirmed.

Argued before PATTERSON, P. T., and INGRAHAM, CLARKE,. . SCOTT, and LAMBERT, JJ.

Maxwell Davidson, for appellant.

Nathaniel A. Elsberg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be so modified as-to strike out of the order for defendant’s examination so much as directs him to produce for inspection certain books and papers. Gee v. Pendas, 87 App. Div. 157, 84 N. Y. Supp. 32; Matter of Sands, 98 App. Div. 148, 90 N. Y. Supp. 749.

As so modified, the order will be affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 12.2
  CERTIFICATION
    Form 20-F
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
    to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
    period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; andd)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the period covered by the annual report that has materially
    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
    Companys internal control over financial
    reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
    financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    Companys internal control over financial reporting.     KAZUTO
    TSUBOUCHI
  Kazuto Tsubouchi
  Executive Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0**

**- 2297** 

ORLANDO C. DIAZ ; BRENDA ARACELY CARRERA,

P etitioner s ,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , Attorney General

,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : July 7, 2011 Decided: July 12, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Petition d enied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dustin W. Dyer, DYER IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, PC, Richmond, Virginia , fo r Petitioner s

. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, R. Alexander Goring , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Orlando C. Diaz and his wife, Brenda Aracely Carrera,

natives and citizens of Guatemala , petition for review of an

order of the Board of Immigrati on Appeals (“Board”) denying

their motion to reopen immigra tion proceedings . We have

reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of

discretion

. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011) (setting forth

standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board. I n re: Diaz (B.I.A.

Oct. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-59-TLS 

 ) 

JONATHAN A. GALINDO ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 46], filed on January 5, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 46] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Counts 

One (1) and Four (4) of the Indictment are hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty 

of such offenses. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on January 23, 2017. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-570V

Filed: November 14, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

BARBARA KEIL, as Personal *

Representative of the Estate of *

MARK DENEEN, Decedent, *

*

 Petitioner, * Voluntary dismissal under

 * Vaccine Rule 21(a)

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Justine E. Daigneault, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On September 5, 2012, Mark Deneen filed a petition under the National Childhood 

Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2006), alleging that he suffered Guillain-Barré

Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of the trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on 

September 15, 2009. 

Mark Deneen died on August 3, 2013, and Barbara Keil, the personal representative of his 

estate, was substituted as petitioner on July 23, 2014.

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

delete such material from public access.
2

On November 14, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, stating the parties

give notice of petitioner’s voluntary dismissal pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). 

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a), the above-captioned case is hereby 

dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the 

instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

CONCLUSION

Proceedings are concluded in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 14, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         112,686
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,998
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,263,313
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          12,294
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,097
<LOANS>                                      2,800,199
<ALLOWANCE>                                     29,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,369,639
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,144,291
<SHORT-TERM>                                   549,965
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             55,110
<LONG-TERM>                                    337,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,587
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,369,639
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 57,074
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,299
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   559
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                78,932
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              32,401
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,970
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           32,962
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,390
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 703
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 29,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,639
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,639
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,087
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.44
<LOANS-NON>                                     22,321
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,647
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 30,122
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                28,377
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,172
<RECOVERIES>                                       571
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               29,166
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,584
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,582


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Corn Host Plant Resistance Research: Mississippi State, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Mississippi State, Mississippi Crop Science Research Laboratory Corn Host Plant Resistance Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar Dr. Marilyn Warburton recently joined the Corn Unit as a Research Geneticist.She will be responsible for mapping genes associated with resistance traits in corn.Prior to accepting the position, Dr. Warburton was employed for 10 years with The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Mexico.
   ARS News Articles  New Tool Could Help Scientists Dig Deeper for Prized Crop GenesMar 12, 2020Corn Lines Resist Fungal ToxinsSep 02, 2010A New Approach that Saves Eyesight and Lives in the Developing WorldMay 03, 2010Researchers Study Benefits of Grain Harvesting DeviceAug 27, 2009Research Agency Announces Top Scientists for 2004Feb 09, 2005


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### NOLAN, Appellant, v. NOLAN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 10, 1899.)

Action by Clara E. Nolan against Catherine F. L. Nolan and others.

No opinion. Motion for re-argument denied. Section 953 of the Code of Civil Procedure has no reference to_ records of the character here under consideration. It relates only to records or other judicial proceedings of courts of foreign countries. See 54 N. Y. Supp. 975.
Exhibit 11.1

                  First Colonial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
                                     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                    Sept. 30,  Sept. 30,   Sept. 30,  Sept. 30,
                                      1996       1995        1996       1995
                                 ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
<S>                            <C>        <C>          <C>        <C>   
Primary
  Earnings                           $ 702      $ 659       $2,007      $ 767
                                 ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
  Shares *
   Weighted average number of 
    common shares outstanding    1,527,717  1,508,401    1,522,862  1,502,870
   Assuming exercise of option 
    reduced by the number of 
    shares which could have been
    purchased with the proceeds
    from exercise of such options    1,224        **         1,224       **
                                 ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
   Weighted average number of 
    common shares outstanding as
    adjusted                     1,528,941  1,508,401    1,524,086  1,502,870

 Primary earnings per common share  $ 0.46    $  0.44       $ 1.32    $  0.51
                                 =========  =========    =========  =========

Assuming full dilution
 Earnings                           $  702    $   659       $2,007     $  767
                                 ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
 Shares *
  Weighted average number of 
   common shares outstanding     1,527,717  1,508,401    1,522,862  1,502,870
  Assuming exercise of option 
   reduced by the number of 
   shares which could have been
   purchased with the proceeds 
   from exercise of such options     1,224       **          1,224        **
                                 ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
  Weighted average number of 
   common shares outstanding as
   adjusted                      1,528,941  1,508,401    1,524,086  1,502,870

Earnings per common share 
 assuming full dilution            $  0.46    $  0.44      $  1.32    $  0.51
                                 =========  =========    =========  =========

</TABLE>

   *    Restated per 5% Stock Dividend paid on June 19, 1996.
  **    The stock options are not included since the option price on the stock
        options outstanding was greater than the average market price and the
        period-end market price.