alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009308DE.01002701.xml

| 24.11.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 308/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 308/27

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1166/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 19. November 2008 über die Betriebsstrukturerhebungen und die Erhebung über landwirtschaftliche Produktionsmethoden sowie zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 571/88 des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 321 vom 1. Dezember 2008
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 321 vom 1. Dezember 2008

Seite 33, Anhang V, unter „Merkmal“ in der zweiten Spalte, Eintragung für „Dungausbringung“:

anstatt:

„Aus dem Betrieb exportierte Gülle in % der erzeugten Gesamtmenge“

muss es heißen:

„Aus dem Betrieb exportierter Wirtschaftsdünger in % der erzeugten Gesamtmenge“.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAY-28-1999
<CASH>                               7,767,998
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        5,402,192
<ALLOWANCES>                          (371,382)
<INVENTORY>                          6,200,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    20,475,947
<PP&E>                              12,756,084
<DEPRECIATION>                      (8,420,179)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      25,958,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                5,020,902
<BONDS>                                752,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                               123,146
<OTHER-SE>                          19,491,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        25,958,649
<SALES>                             20,541,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    20,541,706
<CGS>                               13,317,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       19,013,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      (248,217)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       125,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     111,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,540,016
<INCOME-TAX>                           570,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    970,016
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           970,016
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.08


</TABLE>
#### POTTER, Respondent, v. BUFFALO, L. & R. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 27, 1912.)

Action by Genevieve T. Potter, an infant, etc., against the Buffalo, Lockport & Rochester Railway Company, No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel NIDCD Clinical Trial Review.                    

*Date:*                         July 20, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Andrea B. Kelly, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 8351, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-6339,                         *kellya2@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 24, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-13854 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yokohiro Vidal Ortiz, Also Known as Ortiz, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 838]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered September 8, 2009. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [6]) and criminal mischief in the third degree (§ 145.05 [2]) and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment. Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly determined that the People met their burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated the terms and conditions of his probation *(see People v Pringle,*72 AD3d 1629, 1629 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 855 [2010]; *People v Donohue,*64 AD3d 1187, 1188 [2009]; *People v Bergman,*56 AD3d 1225 [2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 756 [2009]). The People provided the necessary “residuum of competent legal evidence” *(Pringle,*72 AD3d at 1630 [internal quotation marks omitted]), and “the decision to revoke his probation will not be disturbed, [absent a] clear abuse of discretion” *(Bergman,*56 AD3d 1225 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 10.24 12.31.2014 10-K








Exhibit 10.24


FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE 
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION 
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




In accordance with Section 12.1 of the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2013 (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.    Section 3.1(a)(i) is amended effective January 1, 2015 to replace “(B) his job classification is grade 15 or above” with the following: 
“(B) his job classification is grade A 21 or above” 
2.    Section 4.1(b)(i) is amended by inserting the following sentence immediately before the last sentence: 
“Notwithstanding the forgoing, effective as of January 1, 2015, the deferral of base salary shall not take effect until the Participant has contributed the maximum pre-tax (including Roth) contributions to the Savings Plan for such year.”
3.    The provisions of this First Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2015. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer has caused these presents to be signed this 14th day of November, 2014.


ALBEMARLE CORPORATION


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Susan Kelliher
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30509 22-SEP-2014 02:46 PM

SCWC-30509 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
THE MALULANI GROUP, LIMITED, fka MAGOON BROTHERS, LTD.,

a Hawai ' i corporation, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. KAUPO RANCH, LTD., a Hawai ' i corporation, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee, and HEIRS AND/OR DEVISEES OF HAMOLE AKA MARIA HAMOLE, et al., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30509; CIV. NO. 08-1-0501(3))

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of the application for writ of certiorari filed by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Kaupo Ranch, Ltd., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is deemed rejected as of September 18, 2014. See HRS § 602-59(c).The order accepting application for writ of certiorari filed on September 19, 2014, is therefore void. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, September 22, 2014. Brian R. Jenkins for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
# L_2008344EN.01007501.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 344/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/75

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1320/2008

of 19 December 2008

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2008 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 for poultrymeat originating in Turkey

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 779/98 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain quotas for imports into the Community of poultrymeat products originating in Turkey (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2008 for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2009 do not cover the quantities available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2008 for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2009 do not cover the quantities available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 under the quota with order number 09.4103 have not been lodged, to be added to the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2009, shall be 250 000 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 December 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 34.

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SUMO DUKULAH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 16 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER J. ANDERSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO: 1:16-cv-00332-RL-SLC

)

URS MIDWEST, INC., et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

On September 14, 2016, Plaintiff Christopher J. Anderson filed a complaint against

Defendants URS Midwest, Inc., and Juan T. Smith, alleging that this Court has diversity

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (DE 1). The complaint alleges that Anderson is a

citizen of Wisconsin, that Smith is a citizen of Maryland, and that URS Midwest, Inc., is a

“foreign corporation with a principal business address of . . . Michigan . . . .” (DE 1 ¶¶ 2, 4).

Anderson’s allegations concerning the citizenship of the parties is insufficient to establish

diversity jurisdiction. As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, Anderson

bears the burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. 

Chase v. Shop’n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). 

 With respect to URS Midwest, Inc., corporations “are deemed to be citizens of the state

in which they are incorporated and the state in which they have their principal place of

business.” N. Trust Co. v. Bunge Corp., 899 F.2d 591, 594 (7th Cir. 1990) (emphasis added)

(citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)). Therefore, Anderson’s allegation that URS Midwest, Inc., is a

“foreign corporation” is insufficient; the Court must be informed of the state in which URS

Midwest, Inc., is incorporated. Also, a corporation’s citizenship turns on the state in which the
corporation has its “principal place of business,” not its “principal business address.” 

Accordingly, Anderson is ORDERED to file an amended complaint on or before

September 30, 2016, that properly alleges the citizenship of each party.

SO ORDERED. 

Enter for this 16th day of September 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge 

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SUSAN E. PRAMUK, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-572 

) 

TERRY HIESTAND, ) 

PATRICK PRAMUK, CHERYL L. ) 

MONTALBANO RAHMANY, THE ) 

FOOD PANTRY, PORTER COUNTY ) 

SUPERIOR COURT, TILTON & TILTON ) 

 ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On August 26, 2016, Susan E. Pramuk filed a complaint against various defendants in this 

Court but failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. 

Pramuk may not proceed with her complaint unless she files the $400 fee, see 28 U.S.C. ' 1914 

and the District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, or is excused by the Court from paying such 

fee as set out in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915. 

Mindful of her pro se status, the Court grants Ms. Pramuk until October 14, 2016, to either 

pay the filing fee or to petition the Court to proceed without the prepayment of such fee. Failure 

to abide by this order will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. The CLERK is 

DIRECTED to mail, along with this Order, the court’s pre-printed form to request in forma 

pauperis status. 

SO ORDERED. This 14th day of September, 2016. 

s/ William C. Lee 

United States District Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annualperiod ended July 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Date: October 29, 2008

 
|   | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd   |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                  |
|   | Timothy J. Dodd       |
|   | *President and Chief* |
|   | *Executive Officer*   |

 

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALFAYS LEE LANDIS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2622

[ March 7, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L

. Roby, Judge;

L.T. Case No s

. 432015CF000626B

, 432015CF000828A

, 432015CF000830A and 432015CF000832A

.

Alfays Lee Landis, Madison

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99.1
 DEBT COVENANT COMPLIANCE
AS OF JANUARY 31, 2009
 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA:
 (in 000s)
    
    LTM*
    
    
    Q4 FY08
    
    
    Q1 FY09
    
    
    Q2 FY09
    
    
    Q3 FY09Net Income
    
    $
    (6,013
    )
    
    $
    13,335
    
    
    $
    1,603
    
    
    $
    412
    
    
    $
    (21,363
    )Add Back:Depreciation and Amortization
    
    
    4,549
    
    
    
    1,339
    
    
    
    1,050
    
    
    
    1,047
    
    
    
    1,113Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
    
    
    (14,671
    )
    
    
    (8,391
    )
    
    
    2,664
    
    
    
    2,162
    
    
    
    (11,106
    )Interest Income (Expense)
    
    
    276
    
    
    
    (60
    )
    
    
    (49
    )
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    348Non-Cash Charges
    
    
    9,945
    
    
    
    3,566
    
    
    
    526
    
    
    
    1,672
    
    
    
    4,181Allowable Add backs Pursuant
to Credit Facility Agreement,
as amended
    
    
    31,400
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,696
    
    
    
    404
    
    
    
    29,300Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
    
    $
    25,486
    
    
    $
    9,789
    
    
    $
    7,491
    
    
    $
    5,734
    
    
    $
    2,473Minimum Required
    
    $
    20,000
 
 *
    
    Last Twelve Months (Most Recent Four Fiscal Quarters) Consolidated Leverage Ratio:
 Long-Term Obligations and Notes Payable
    
    $
    5,444Letters of Credit
    
    
    2,066Consolidated Debt
    
    $
    7,510Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
    
    $
    25,486Consolidated Leverage Ratio
    
    
    0.3Maximum Permitted
    
    2.5 to 1.0
 Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio:
 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
    
    $
    25,486Interest Expense
    
    $
    729Interest Coverage
    
    
    35.0Minimum Interest Coverage Required
    
    
    3.5
Page 17
                                EXHIBIT 11

                       BIOGEN, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
                     Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                (unaudited)
                 (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                           Three Months         Six Months
                                          Ended June 30,      Ended June 30,
                                         1997       1996     1997       1996
Primary earnings per share

Weighted average number of 
  shares outstanding. . . . . . . . .  73,887      71,416   73,578    71,308

Shares deemed outstanding from
  the assumed exercise of stock
  options and warrants. . . . . . . .   2,361        --      2,968       --
                                      -------     -------   ------    ------
  Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  76,248      71,416   76,546    71,308
                                       ======     =======   ======    ======

Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,948    $(9,093)  $36,958  $(12,751)
                                      =======    ========  =======  =========
Primary earnings per
  share of common stock . . . . . . . $  0.26    $ (0.13)  $  0.48  $(0.18)
                                      =======    ========  =======  =======

Fully diluted earnings per share (a)

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding. . . . . . . . .  73,887    71,416    73,578    71,308

Shares deemed outstanding from
  the assumed exercise of stock
  options and warrants. . . . . . . .   2,416        --     2,996        --
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  76,303    71,416    76,574    71,308
                                       ======    ======    ======    ======

Net income  . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,948  $ (9,093)  $36,958  $(12,751)
                                      =======   =======   =======  ========

Fully diluted earnings
  per share of common stock . . . . . $  0.26  $  (0.13)   $ 0.48    $(0.18)
                                      =======   ========   =======   =======


(a) This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
    601 (b) (11) although not required by Footnote 2 to Paragraph 14 of APB
    Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2302 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2302

     To extend the suspension of duty on certain 12-volt batteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. Ramstad introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the suspension of duty on certain 12-volt batteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN 12-VOLT BATTERIES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain 12V lead-acid 
storage batteries) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```