alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(121 App. Div. 689.)

#### FOSTER v. CURTIS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Pleading—Bell of Particulars.

It is improper to include, in an order requiring defendant to furnish a bill of particulars, a provision imposing a penalty for a failure to file the bill; but, if the bill be not furnished, plaintiff may then apply for an order preventing defendant from giving any evidence as to the items about which the bill of particulars was ordered.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 39, Pleading, § 995.]

Appeal from Special Term.

Action by Charles W. Foster against Harry F. Curtis and another. From an order requiring defendant to serve a bill of particulars, defendant appeals. Modified and affirmed.

See 105 N. Y. Supp. 362.

Argued before PATTERSON, P. J., and INGRAHAM, LAUGH-LIN, CLARKE, and HOUGHTON, JJ.

Edwin C. Vogel, for appellants.

Alexander S. Bacon, for respondent.

*389INGRAHAM, J.

Upon the papers presented I think the plaintiff was entitled to the particulars required to be furnished. The order should be modified, however, by striking out the provision imposing a penalty for a failure to file the bill of particulars required by the order. If a bill of particulars as required should not be furnished* the plaintiff may then apply to the court for an order preventing the defendants from giving any evidence as to the items about which the bill of particulars was ordered; but, until there has been a default* this provision is improper.

It follows that the order appealed from must be modified, by striking out the last clause of the order, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DoD-2021-OS-0026]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Information collection notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        On April 26, 2021, the DoD published a document that provided notice of a proposed public information collection titled Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of DoD Civilians; OMB Control Number 0704-WGRC. Subsequent to publication of the notice, DoD is making a correction to the contact information listed in the                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         section. An incorrect telephone number was listed. The correct telephone number is 831-236-9631.                    

# DATES:

This correction will be effective on June 24, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On April 26, 2021 (86 FR 22036-22037), the DoD published the information collection notice cited in the                     **SUMMARY**                     section with an incorrect telephone number. Subsequent to publication of the notice, DoD is correcting the telephone number. The correct telephone number is 831-236-9631. All other information in the notice of April 26, 2021 remains the same.                

Dated: June 16, 2021.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2021-13480 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 16, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00271

- CV

BRACKENRIDGE HEALTHCARE, INC. d/b/a Sonterra Health Center,

Appellant

v.

Susana CAMERO,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar Cou nty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI08010

Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is granted.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Just ice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Cl erk of Court
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Michael D. Corbin, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wheeling Island Gaming,Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

----

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 
|                        |   |                                          |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | /s/  Michael D. Corbin                        |
|                        |   |                                          |
|                        |   |                                          |
| Dated:  March 29, 2004 |   | Michael  D. Corbin  Vice President of Finance |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of National Energy Services  Company,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John A. Grillo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-  Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. Grillo
----------------------------
John A. Grillo
Chief Executive Officer
October 31, 2003
**Exhibit 11**

 

**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE**

 
| ** **                                                    | ** ** | **Three Months Ended March 31,** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                    | ** ** | **2005**                              | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| AVERAGE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                                |       | $                                     | 2.45       |   | $ | 1.61 |   |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| NET INCOME (LOSS)                                             |       | $                                     | (186,964   | ) | $ | 126,697 |   |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Basic weighted average number of common  shares outstanding   |       | 3,353,900                             |       | 3,318,900 |   |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Dilutive effect of stock options                              |       | —                                |       | 109,470 |   |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Diluted weighted average number of common  shares outstanding |       | 3,353,900                             |       | 3,428,370 |   |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share                               |       | $                                     | (.06       | ) | $ | .04 |   |
|                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share                             |       | $                                     | (.06       | ) | $ | .04 |   |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2422
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (123)
<INVENTORY>                                      11327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13793
<PP&E>                                           14400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5247)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11857
<BONDS>                                           6761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                          1041
<OTHER-SE>                                       11232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31195
<SALES>                                            418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   418
<CGS>                                              364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2193)             
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)             
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)             
        

</TABLE>
[No. 20823-7-II.

Division Two.

September 26, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Maurice Bard Wilcox, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 96-1-00346-8, Roger A. Bennett, J., entered May 17, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
Exhibit 10.8







Current Director Fee Arrangements







Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $1,000, which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2013 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $2,000. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals. The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries serving on the Audit Committee are paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended, except for the chairman of the Audit Committee, who is paid a fee of $350 per meeting attended.  Director Brown serves on the Bank's Compliance Committee and is paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended.  The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
Taherzadeh, PLLC

Attorneys & Counselors

5001 Spring Valley Road.

Suite 1020 West

Dallas, TX 75244

P: (469) 729-6800 F: (469) 828-2772

July 7, 2015

Dear Clerk,

Please be advised that our office has changed its address and phone number to the 

following:

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 1020 West

Dallas, TX 75244

P: (469) 729-6800

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. 

Yours truly,

/s/Lauren Langford 

Lauren Langford*

Legal Assistant to Selim Taherzadeh

*Not licensed to practice law

ACCEPTED

04-15-00306-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/7/2015 12:06:15 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/07/15 12:06:15 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13797]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, June 30, 2021--10:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Decisional Matter.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, 
Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).

    Dated: June 23, 2021.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-13797 Filed 6-24-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40872

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERNESTO GALVAN-MATA, also known as Eduardo Martinez, also known as 

Wilfredo Garza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1761-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ernesto Galvan-Mata raises 

an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 

224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a sentence 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. The motion 

for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40872 Document: 00513383930 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40872

2

of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40872 Document: 00513383930 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
Exhibit 32.1




                              COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                            (Chief Executive Officer)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Banks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Eddie  L.
Dunklebarger,  Chief Executive Officer,  Chairman, and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community  Banks,  Inc.,  and will be retained by  Community  Banks,
Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/  Eddie L. Dunklebarger
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and President
August 14, 2003
# C_2008268EN.01000701.xml

| 23.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5219 — VWAG/OFH/VWGI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 268/02)

On 25 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5219. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5219. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Order filed October 18, 2019. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00810-CV

____________

IN RE MICROWAVE NETWORKS INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-64733-A

ORDER

On October 17, 2019, real party-in-interest ABC Assembly LLC (“ABC”)

filed a motion, asking this court for leave to file under seal, Exhibit 8 to ABC’s 

Appendix (Corporate Representative Deposition Transcript of MNI dated October 

16, 2019) in support of its Response for Emergency Stay (“Exhibit 8”).
2

ABC has not provided this court with a permanent sealing order from the 

trial court that complies with the requirements of Rule 76a of the Texas Rules of 

Civil Procedure that seals Exhibit 8. Among other things, Rule 76a requires the 

sealing order to state, “the specific reasons for finding and concluding whether the 

showing required by paragraph 1, has been made; the specific portions of court 

records which are to be sealed; and the time period for which the sealed portions of 

the court records are to be sealed.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 76a(6). 

ABC has until December 13, 2019, to supplement the mandamus record with 

a copy of a permanent sealing order pertaining to Exhibit 8 that complies with Rule 

76a. Failure to do so will result in the denial of ABC’s motion for leave to file 

Exhibit 8 under seal, unless, before that date, ABC presents briefing, with citations 

to authority, establishing a valid legal basis on which this court may Exhibit 8

under seal without an order showing Exhibit 8 has been permanently sealed in 

accordance with Rule 76a.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
#### SEARLS, Respondent, v. CLARK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Henry Searls against Aaron P. Clark and others, as executors, etc.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.