alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 32.1                                                                    

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Who's Your Daddy, Inc.
  (formerly Snocone Systems Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the Company),
  on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Edon Moyal,
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to §
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/ Edon Moyal          | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|Name:  | Edon Moyal              | 
|       |                         | 
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer | 
|       |                         | 
|Date:  | May 4, 2006             | 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Who's Your Daddy, Inc. (formerly Snocone Systems Inc.)
  and will be retained by Who's Your Daddy, Inc. (formerly Snocone Systems Inc.)
  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenon Durell SWEAT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6162.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

*149Kenon Durell Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenon Durell Sweat seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion and post-judgment motions. The orders are not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certifícate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sweat has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# L_2008281EN.01000101.xml

| 24.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1040/2008

of 23 October 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 October 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 106,4 |
| MA | 53,9 |
| MK | 47,0 |
| TR | 83,7 |
| ZZ | 72,8 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 162,5 |
| TR | 169,7 |
| ZZ | 166,1 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 139,7 |
| ZZ | 139,7 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 106,8 |
| TR | 98,3 |
| ZA | 80,1 |
| ZZ | 95,1 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 231,3 |
| TR | 122,0 |
| US | 223,5 |
| ZZ | 192,3 |
| 0808 10 80 | CA | 97,3 |
| CL | 72,8 |
| CN | 92,6 |
| MK | 32,9 |
| NZ | 109,7 |
| US | 140,7 |
| ZA | 93,9 |
| ZZ | 91,4 |
| 0808 20 50 | CL | 60,3 |
| CN | 110,4 |
| TR | 125,5 |
| ZZ | 98,7 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

106,4

MA

53,9

MK

47,0

TR

83,7

ZZ

72,8

0707 00 05

JO

162,5

TR

169,7

ZZ

166,1

0709 90 70

TR

139,7

ZZ

139,7

0805 50 10

AR

106,8

TR

98,3

ZA

80,1

ZZ

95,1

0806 10 10

BR

231,3

TR

122,0

US

223,5

ZZ

192,3

0808 10 80

CA

97,3

CL

72,8

CN

92,6

MK

32,9

NZ

109,7

US

140,7

ZA

93,9

ZZ

91,4

0808 20 50

CL

60,3

CN

110,4

TR

125,5

ZZ

98,7

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. KARELSEN, Respondent, v. SCULLY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 17, 1899.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Adolphus B. Karelsen, against P. Joseph Scully, as city clerk of the city of New York.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without costs.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Procera  Networks,  Inc. a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 29,
2003,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Jay Zerfoss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
to  the  best  of  his  knowledge,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Procera  Networks, Inc., and will be retained by Procera Networks,
Inc.  and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/  Jay  Zerfoss
--------------------------
Jay  Zerfoss
Chief  Financial  Officer
March  16,  2004




<PAGE>
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2385

AN ACT

To extend by 10 years the authority of the Secnancial report program. retary of Commerce to conduct the quarterly fi-

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2385

AN ACT

To extend by 10 years the authority of the Secretary of 

Commerce to conduct the quarterly financial report program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 2385 EH 

1 SECTION 1. TEN-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR 

2 SECRETARY OF COMMERCE TO CONDUCT 

3 THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend 

6 title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for 

7 the quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade 

8 Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other 

9 purposes’’, approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97–

10 454; 13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘2015’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2005. 

Attest:

Clerk.
# L_2008003EN.01001201.xml

| 5.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 3/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 3/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 5/2008

of 4 January 2008

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1282/2001 as regards the final date for submitting harvest and production declarations for the 2007/08 wine year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular Article 73 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 11(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1282/2001 (2) requires wine growers to submit harvest and production declarations no later than 10 December, with a view to knowing the volume of Community wine production in good time. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 11(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1282/2001 (2) requires wine growers to submit harvest and production declarations no later than 10 December, with a view to knowing the volume of Community wine production in good time.

| (2) | In one Member State, some of the computer centres to which producers have to submit those declarations have experienced a problem of capacity. Those centres are unable to take delivery of all the declarations by the deadline. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In one Member State, some of the computer centres to which producers have to submit those declarations have experienced a problem of capacity. Those centres are unable to take delivery of all the declarations by the deadline.

| (3) | To resolve the problem, which is not the fault of the producers, and to avoid their being unjustly penalised, those producers should be granted an extension for the submission of harvest and production declarations. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

To resolve the problem, which is not the fault of the producers, and to avoid their being unjustly penalised, those producers should be granted an extension for the submission of harvest and production declarations.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2001, for the 2007/08 wine year the declarations referred to in Articles 2 and 4 of that Regulation may be submitted up to 31 January 2008.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 10 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 January 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 176, 29.6.2001, p. 14.

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-59-TLS 

)

BRANDON M. BETZ )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 54], filed on September 20, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 54] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment IS hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on October 8, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Cirilo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), rendered on March 9, 1983, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Ellerin, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Xiao
      Ping Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
      in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.




Dated:May
                8, 2007/s/
                Xiao Ping ZhangXiao
                Ping ZhangChief
                Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 23, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00311

- CV

Margaret Fay GUIDRY,

Appellant

v.

Edward James GUIDRY, Jr.,

Appellee

From the 452nd District Court

, Menard County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- 05589

James L. Rex , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On March 17 , 2021, Margaret Faye Guidry filed a “Motion to Stay Order Pending

Appeal.” In order to stay enforcement of a final judgment pending appeal, a party must compl y

with Tex as Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and Ms. Guidry has failed to do so. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

24. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodrigue z , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of March, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research People Brent Dalzell







Newsheadline bar **External News Articles** **Lynch, B.M. Study shows constructed wetlands are best protection for agricultural runoff into waterways. KU Today, University of Kansas. 2021.**


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# L_2008242EN.01002701.xml

| 10.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 242/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 242/27

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2008 — Amending Budget No 1

(2008/706/EC)

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2008 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF |
| | Title 1 — Total | 11 710 000 | | 11 710 000 |
| 2 | BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 2 — Total | 1 577 000 | | 1 577 000 |
| 3 | EXPENSES RELATING TO PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC MISSIONS |
| 3 0 | OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY LINKED TO THE REGULATION (EC) No 881/2004 | 3 530 000 | –10 000 | 3 520 000 |
| 3 1 | OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES | 1 183 000 | 10 000 | 1 193 000 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 4 713 000 | 0 | 4 713 000 |
| 9 | EXPENSES NOT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR |
| | Title 9 — Total | | | |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 18 000 000 | 0 | 18 000 000 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2008

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

1

STAFF

STAFF

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

11 710 000

11 710 000

11 710 000

11 710 000

2

2

BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE

BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

1 577 000

1 577 000

1 577 000

1 577 000

3

3

EXPENSES RELATING TO PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC MISSIONS

EXPENSES RELATING TO PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC MISSIONS

3 0

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY LINKED TO THE REGULATION (EC) No 881/2004

3 530 000

–10 000

3 520 000

3 1

OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES

1 183 000

10 000

1 193 000

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

4 713 000

4 713 000

0

0

4 713 000

4 713 000

9

9

EXPENSES NOT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR

EXPENSES NOT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR

Title 9 — Total

Title 9 — Total

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

18 000 000

18 000 000

0

0

18 000 000

18 000 000

---
[No. 20037-6-II.

Division Two.

September 19, 1997.]

#### David L. Smith, *Appellant,*v. The Weyerhaeuser Company, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 94-2-00292-1, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered October 19,1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridge-water, J.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, Respondent, v. PURDY et al. Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of the National Bank of Commerce, against 'Lawson N. Purdy and others, as Commissioners. W. H. King, for appellants. J. Quinn, for respondent. With this case have been .consolidated in this court cases bearing titles as follows: National Reserve Bank v. Same; Coal & Iron Nat. Bank v. Same; Bank of Metropolis v. Same.

PER CURIAM.

Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Orders filed.

CLARKE and SCOTT, JJ., dissent.
[No. 38641-7-I.

Division One.

August 18, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Thomas W. Scoggins, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 94-1-00992-6, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered March 28, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John R. Hecht, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN R. HECHT                 
|                                     
|John R. Hecht Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2003                    



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## :BP -T^—CajzSj^DjZJoL £***.. ^- /?- /¥- oo<m^/t-
»_^aa FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JUL 02Zfli Abel Acosta, Cierk 

### e lli @OUSTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS

- JUL 01 2011 

### —p^o 

## 'X<u^J^9^^^^^L^tg^^^p/e. ~*< JLxijdu-JUAti^^



## j£^_,^2^a^_^

## fe(ia4Jk 

# OJ^mA At^rf LllM ^^JISoJ&cl

A.rr-yAj<-,%»-*'\._3^L£.jt Q-g\cb> io-ay-goi^ fif; CaLU^-frnzu C/6 it tin sou 

## CL^siJl Co^ait. UMH-oocm^* 0i'5J<>c\- o££.'cf 

## /J5 5. /^»;^ -?*/p/ feJ-ftoui. . pfyt&uvv/x 

### finkT*. 757^5 

## A^ jQ_ma_ 

# -6^4= IXJJUJL*^

^CUxX}- 

## -M^Jbl^ULcJjuL* ^>Ca.

•AJU&M 

### AwypmX .Vjrf ^yyU-4 ^xr^pJLfJl. -jmi^ JU^UwJMQ£alS-H £>LLA JOLUUsks 

### OjAS^XJj^- jUV\ ./%jrl±)tijn*UJl , flAJ^ntUebi 

## UM. 

# SI ' CctolaJtr>fl ^/ujwuaacJ fjLppjLCLibs ^f /?3QYyo_ -Q &et G^Tofe^