alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U n i t ed S t at es C o u rt o f A p p eal s

F or t he S e ve nt h C i r c u i t

C hi c a go, I l l i noi s 60604

S ubm i t t e d S e pt e m be r 6

, 2006

D e c i de d S e pt e m be r 11

, 2006



### B e f or e

H on

. F RA N K H

. E A S T E RB RO O K

, C i r c ui t J udge



### H on

. D A N I E L A

. M A N IO N

, C i r c ui t J udge



### H on

. T E RE N CE T

. E V A N S

, C i r c ui t J udge

U

N IT E D S T A T E S O F A M E RIC A

, P l ai nt i f f

- A

ppe l l e e

,



### N o

. 06

- 1533 v.

M IC H A E L F A D E Y I

, D e f

e ndant

- A

ppe l l ant

. A ppe a l f r om t he U ni t e d S t a t e s

D i s t r i c t C our t f or t he N or t he r n

D i s t r i c t of I l l i noi s

, E a s t e r n

D i vi s i on.

N o. 00 C R 153

M a t t he w F

. K e nne l l y, J udge

.

O r d e r

F a de yi ' s c onv i c t i on a nd m os t of h i s s e n t e nc e w e r e a f f i r

m e d i n 2004, a l t hou g h w e

r e m a nd e d f o r r e c ons i d e r a t i on o f t he f or f e i t ur e o r d e r

. B e f or e t he a p p e a l f r o m t he r e v i s e d s e n t e nc e

c ou l d b e r e s ol v e d

, t he S u p r e m e C our t de c i d e d U ni t e d S t a t e s v

. B oo k e r

, 543 U

. S

. 220 ( 2005)

,

w hi c h l e d us t o a s k t he d i s t r i c t c our t w he t he r r e c o g n i t i on of a dd i t i ona l d i s c r e t i on w oul d h a v e

a f

f e c t e d t he s e n t e nc e

. A n a f f i r

m a t i v e a ns w e r l e d t o a no t he r r e m a nd a nd a r e du c t i on i n t he t e r m of

i m pr i s onm e n t f r o m 151 t o 132 m ont h s

. F a d e yi ha s f i l e d a t hi r d a p p e a l

.

T he on l y a r g

u

m e n t no w a dv a n c e d i s t ha t

, e v e n t ho u g h B oo k e r r e du c e d t he S e n t e n c i n g

G ui de l i n e s t o a dv i s or y s t a t u s

, t he d i s t r i c t c our t m u s t u s e a r e a s ona b l e

- doub t s t a nda r d w he n

r e s ol v i n g a n y c on t e s t e d f a c t ua l i s s ue

. T ha t a r g

u

m e n t i s i n c ons i s t e n t w i t h t he i nt e l l e c t ua l

f

ound a t i ons of B oo k e r

, w hi c h h e l d t ha t t he C on s t i t u t i on r e qu i r e s a n e l e v a t e d s t a nda r d ( a nd a n

o p p o r t uni t y

, he r e w a i v e d, f or d e c i s i on b y a j u r y) o n d i s p u t e s t ha t r a i s e t he " s t a t u t or y m a x i

m

u

m U N P U B LI S H E D O R D E R

No t t o b e c i t e d p e r C i r c u i t R u l e 5 3N o. 06

- 1533 P a ge 2

s e n t e nc e

. " T he r e m e d i a l p or t i on of B oo k e r r e m ov e d t he G ui d e l i n e s f r o m t he s e t of m a t t e r s t ha t

c a n c h a n g e t he s t a t u t or y m a x i

m

u

m

. T he bur d e n of p e r s ua s i on i n f e d e r a l s e n t e nc i n g a c c or d i n g l y i s

t he p r e p onde r a n c e of t he e v i d e n c e

. S e e

, e

. g

. , U ni t e

d S t a t e s v

. B r y an t

, 420 F

. 3d 652, 656 ( 7 t h C i r

. 2005) ; U ni t e d S t a t e s v

. Spe n c e

, 450 F

. 3d 691

, 697 ( 7 t h C i r

. 2006)

.

A f f i r

m e d
Narend CHAND, petitioner, v. Erasmo BRAVO, Warden, et al.

No. 13-6576.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. KELLY, Appellant, v. HEBBERD, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Edward J. Kelly, against Robert W. Hebberd, as-commissioner. H. J. Goldsmith, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
---

EXHIBIT 13.02

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marchand Snyman, Chief Financial Officer of Northern Dynasty
Minerals Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         
 The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2)          
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | By:    | /s/ M. Snyman          
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Marchand Snyman        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | May 22, 2015           



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2346 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2346

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ``John J. 
                    Hainkel Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

  Mr. Jindal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ``John J. 
                    Hainkel Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. HAINKEL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Hainkel Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Hainkel Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      99.3





Annual
      Administrator’s Certificate








Standard
      & Poor’s Ratings Services


55
      Water
      Street


New
      York,
      New York 10041


Attention:
      Asset-Backed Surveillance Group





Fitch
      Ratings


One
      State
      Street Plaza


New
      York,
      New York 10004


Attention:
      Structured Finance





Moody’s
      Investors Service Inc.


99
      Church
      Street


New
      York,
      New York 10007


Attention:
      Structured Finance





Wachovia
      Bank, National Association


401
      South
      Tryon Street


Charlotte,
      North Carolina 28288


Attention:
      Structured Finance Trust Services





SLC
      Student Loan Trust 2005-1


c/o
      Wilmington Trust Company


Rodney
      Square North, 1100 North Market Street


Wilmington,
      Delaware 19890-0001


Attention:
      Corporate Trust Administration





As
      an
      officer of The Student Loan Corporation, the Administrator of SLC Student Loan
      Trust 2005-1


(the
      Administrator) pursuant to a certain Administration Agreement dated as of June
      15, 2005 between the SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-1 and The Student Loan
      Corporation (the Administration Agreement), I hereby certify that:





(a)
            a
                review of the activities of the Administrator during the preceding
                calendar year and of its performance under the Administration Agreement
                has been made under my supervision,
                and




(b)
            to
                the best of my knowledge, based on such a review, the Administrator
                has
                fulfilled all of its obligations under the Administration
                Agreement for the period June 15, 2005 through December 31,
                2005, and there have been no known defaults in the fulfillment of
                such
                obligations.











/s/
      Daniel P. McHugh     March
      31, 2006


Daniel
      P.
      McHugh        Date


Chief
      Financial Officer


The
      Student Loan Corporation, as Administrator
Tyren ALI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7261.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
---

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Solanex Management Inc.,
  a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
  year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  (the Report), I, Colin Hall, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/ Colin Hall                
|------ | ------------------------------
|       |                               
|Name:  | Colin Hall                    
|       |                               
|Title: | Acting Chief Executive Officer
|       |                               
|Date:  | June 6, 2006                  

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Solanex Management Inc. and will be retained by Solanex
  Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.]

---
#### Rosemarie Schlecker, Appellant, v Yorktown Electrical & Lighting Distributors, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Yorktown Distributors, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v Rosemarie Schlecker, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

[941 NYS2d 886]

In an action and a related consolidated action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the rightful beneficiary of the proceeds of a life insurance policy, Rosemarie Schlecker, the plaintiff in action No. 1 and the defendant/counterclaim plaintiff in action No. 2, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated September 13, 2010, as declined to search the record and sua sponte award her summary judgment on the complaint in action No. 1, and determined that there had been no sale of a certain business.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appellant is not aggrieved by so much of the order as declined to search the record and sua sponte award her summary judgment on the complaint in action No. 1 *(see*CPLR 5511; *Franklin v Allen Health Care Servs.,*45 AD3d 637 [2007]; *QDR Consultants & Dev. Corp. v Colonia Ins. Co.,*251 AD2d 641 [1998]). “[A party] is not aggrieved by an order which does not grant relief [he or she] did not request” *(QDR Consultants & Dev. Corp. v Colonia Ins. Co.,*251 AD2d at 641; *cf. Coleman v Hayes,*294 AD2d 458, 459 [2002]; *Rhinebeck Bicycle Shop v Sterling Ins. Co.,*151 AD2d 122, 124 [1989]).

Furthermore, the appellant is not aggrieved by so much of the order as, in reaching a result which was not adverse to her, reasoned that there was not a “sale of the business.” “Merely because the order appealed from contains language or reasoning that a party deems adverse to its interests does not furnish ‘a basis for standing to take an appeal’ ” *(Castaldi v 39 Winfield*
      *856
      *Assoc., LLC,*22 AD3d 780, 781 [2005], quoting *Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v Austin Powder Co.,*68 NY2d 465, 472 [1986]).

Since the appellant is not aggrieved by the portions of the order from which she appeals, the appeal must be dismissed. Mastro, A.EJ., Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
STATE OF INDIANA, COUNTY OF NOBLE, SS:
IN THE NOBLE CIRCUIT COURT, 2016 TERM

CAUSE NO. 57D01-0906-FD-122

FILE

STATE OF INDIANA )

)
. , HAR 0-8 2016

) Tented Vata
JEFFREY S. BROWN ) CLERK NOBLE SUPERIOR COURT

ORDER
COMES NOW the Noble Superior Court and having reviewed the Defendant’s

Motion and the State’s Response thereto now finds as follows:

(1) That there was no factual or legal basis for Defendant’s Plea of Guilty and,
as such, said Plea is set aside.

(2) That there is no factual or legal basis for said charges and as such said
charges are now dismissed with prejudice. ’

(3) That a copy of this Order shall be provided to the Department of
Corrections informing the Department of Corrections that the Defendant is not required to
register as a Sex Offender.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

The conviction in the above-entitled matter is set aside, the charges are dismissed
against the Defendant and the Department of Corrections is to be informed that the Defendant is

not required to register as a Sex Offender.

Dated this_ day of March, Pe Ke

Robert E. Kirsch, Judge Noble Superior Court

EXHIBIT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION

FOUNDATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-463-JD-CAN

ORDER

On October 7, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Proceed by Anonymous Name and

Motion for Protective Order [Doc. No. 4]. Because counsel for Defendant did not enter his

appearance until October 19, 2015, and because the parties are currently in the midst of briefing

Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, the Court EXTENDS the deadlines for briefing

Plaintiffs’ pending motion to proceed anonymously. Defendant’s response brief is due no later

than November 19, 2015. Plaintiffs’ reply brief is due no later than November 26, 2015. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 3rd of November, 2015.

S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

Christopher A. Nuechterlein

United States Magistrate Judge

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 23 filed 11/03/15 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for
the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy K. Buese, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/NANCY K. BUESE Nancy K. Buese Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent this
Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[No. 37611-0-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jay R. Jackson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-07595-7, Patricia H. Aitken, J., entered March 25,1995. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
RPT-12.31.2014_EX 10.9






Exhibit 10.9


	
					
	SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR 

	THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

	RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	The following table sets forth the compensation program for non-employee Trustees:
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Annual cash retainer (1)
	 
	$
	30,000
	


	Additional cash retainer:
	 
	 

	 
	Chairman
	100,000
	


	 
	Audit Committee chair
	15,000
	


	 
	Compensation Committee chair
	10,000
	


	 
	Nominating and Governance Committee chair
	10,000
	


	 
	Executive Committee chair
	5,000
	


	 
	Executive Committee members
	—
	


	 
	 
	 

	Annual equity retainer (value of restricted shares) (2)
	 
	75,000
	


	 
	 
	 






		
	(1) 
	The annual cash retainer is equal to $105,000 less the grant date fair value, which approximates $75,000, of the restricted shares granted in the applicable year.


		
	(2) 
	Grants are made under the Trust's 2012 LTIP.  The restricted shares vest over one year.  The grant is made on July 1st or, if not a business day, the business day prior to July 1st.  During 2014, 4,472 shares were granted per Trustee. 




The Trust also reimburses all Trustees for all expenses incurred in connection with attending any meetings or performing their duties as Trustees.
Comdy VANG, petitioner, v. Tim VIRGA, Warden.

No. 12-7771.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11452]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Titian: Women, Myth and 
Power'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Titian: Women, Myth and Power'' 
at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston, Massachusetts, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e7d6b6d7a6761603c3a3b374e7d7a6f7a6b20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3043555344595f5e020405097043445144551e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000.

Matthew R. Lussenhop,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-13819 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered April 1 2 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 002 99
- CR No. 05
- 12
- 00 300
- CR
COURTNI MICHELLE SCH ULZ , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F10
- 0050 1
- J , F11
- 0034 2
- J 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the se appeals.
On February 27, 2013 , we ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the proper amount of restitution. We ADOPT the finding that the p arties have reached an agreement regarding the amount of restitution.
We ORDER the trial court to file a supplemental record, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order, that contains an order modifying the conditions of community supervision setting o ut the amount of restitution as agreed by the parties

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE