34172 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

In considering these factors, the 

Commission will treat as an important 

component of each one the relative 

priority of the risk of injury associated 

with the product about which the 

petition has been filed and the 

Commission’s resources available for 

rulemaking activities with respect to 

that risk of injury. 16 CFR 1051.9(b). 

The CPSC Policy on Establishing 

Priorities for Commission Action, 16 

CFR 1009.8, sets forth the criteria upon 

which Commission priorities are based. 

The petition is available on the CPSC 

website https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fspublic/Petition-from-Families-UnitedAgainst-Inhalant-Abuse-FUAIA.pdf?

EYYcWmPdktNDi5NiVt8Vixck_.Sz.Mnf 

or http://www.regulations.gov, under 

Docket No. CP–21–1, Supporting and 

Related Materials. Alternatively, 

interested parties may obtain a copy of 

the petition by writing or calling the 

Division of the Secretariat, Consumer 

Product Safety Commission, 4330 East 

West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; 

telephone (301) 504–6833. 

Alberta E. Mills, 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13337 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Safety and Environmental 

Enforcement 

30 CFR Part 250 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

30 CFR Part 550 

[Docket ID BSEE–2019–0008, EEEE500000, 

21XE1700DX, EX1SF0000.EAQ000] 

RIN 1082–AA01 

Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in 

the Outer Continental Shelf— 

Revisions to the Requirements for 

Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer 

Continental Shelf 

AGENCY: Bureau of Safety and 

Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

(BOEM), Department of the Interior. 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the 

Interior (DOI or Department), acting 

through BSEE and BOEM, hereby 

withdraws in its entirety the proposed 

rule published on December 9, 2020, 

entitled ‘‘Revisions to the Requirements 

for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic 

Outer Continental Shelf.’’ 

DATES: As of the date of signature, June 

23, 2021, the proposed rule published 

on December 9, 2020, at 85 FR 79266 is 

withdrawn. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions on any BSEE issues, contact 

Kirk Malstrom, BSEE, at kirk.malstrom@

bsee.gov or at (703) 787–1751. For 

questions on any BOEM issues, contact 

Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, BOEM, Chief, 

Office of Policy, Regulation, and 

Analysis, at Deanna.Meyer-Pietruszka@

boem.gov or by mail to 1849 C Street 

NW, Washington, DC 22040 or by 

calling (202) 208–6352. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 

15, 2016, BSEE and BOEM promulgated 

a narrowly focused rule (see 2016 Arctic 

Exploratory Drilling Rule at 81 FR 

46478) revising the regulations 

applicable to exploratory drilling 

operations conducted during the Arctic 

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) openwater drilling season by drilling vessels 

and ‘‘jack-up rigs’’ (collectively known 

as mobile offshore drilling units or 

MODUs) in the Beaufort Sea and 

Chukchi Sea Planning Areas. The 

regulations promulgated through the 

2016 Arctic Exploratory Drilling Rule 

were intended to ensure that Arctic OCS 

exploratory drilling operations are 

conducted in a safe and responsible 

manner, while taking into account the 

unique conditions of the Arctic OCS as 

well as Alaska Natives’ cultural 

traditions and their need for access to 

subsistence resources. 

E.O. 13795, ‘‘Implementing an 

America-First Offshore Energy Strategy’’ 

(82 FR 20815), issued on April 28, 2017, 

and S.O. 3350, ‘‘America-First Offshore 

Energy Strategy,’’ issued on May 1, 

2017, directed BSEE and BOEM to 

undertake a review of the 2016 Arctic 

Exploratory Drilling Rule. In response, 

on December 9, 2020, the Department 

published the proposed rule: ‘‘Oil and 

Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer 

Continental Shelf—Revisions to the 

Requirements for Exploratory Drilling 

on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf’’ 

(85 FR 79266) (2020 Proposed Arctic 

Exploratory Drilling Rule). The 

proposed rule provided a 60-day public 

comment period, which closed February 

8, 2021. After publication of the 

proposed rule, BSEE and BOEM 

received requests to extend the 

comment period for 60 days. BSEE and 

BOEM subsequently re-opened the 

comment period for an additional 60 

days through a notice published in the 

Federal Register on February 10, 2021 

(86 FR 8878). That comment period 

closed on April 9, 2021. 

Since publication of the 2020 

Proposed Arctic Exploratory Drilling 

Rule, President Biden issued E.O. 

13990, ‘‘Protecting Public Health and 

the Environment and Restoring Science 

to Tackle the Climate Crisis’’ (86 FR 

7037, Jan. 25, 2021). E.O. 13990 

establishes a policy to, among other 

things, promote and protect public 

health and the environment. Section 7 

of the E.O. revoked E.O. 13795. Further, 

on April 16, 2021, Secretary Haaland 

issued S.O. 3398, which revoked S.O. 

3350. The Department has decided it 

will not proceed with a final rule 

codifying any provisions of the 2020 

Proposed Arctic Exploratory Drilling 

Rule, and the proposed rule is hereby 

withdrawn. The withdrawal of the 

proposed rule does not preclude the 

Department from initiating the same or 

a similar rulemaking at a future date. 

Should the Department decide to 

undertake such a rulemaking, it will 

begin with a new proposed rule and 

provide new opportunities for comment. 

Laura Daniel-Davis, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land 

and Minerals Management. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13803 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P; 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2019–0955] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New 

River, Fort Lauderdale, FL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: On July 13, 2020, the Coast 

Guard published a notification of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to change 

the operating schedule that governs the 

Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad Bridge 

across the New River, mile 2.5, at Fort 

Lauderdale, Florida. This proposed 

change would allow the drawbridge to 

operate on a more predictable schedule. 

The Coast Guard is publishing this 

supplemental notice of proposed 

rulemaking (SNPRM) as considerable 

time has passed since the NPRM was 

published and minor modifications 

have been made to the proposed rule. 

We invite your comments on this 

proposed rulemaking. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

July 29, 2021. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 34173 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2019–0955 using Federal e-Rulemaking 

Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this 

supplemental proposed rule, call or 

email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge 

Management Specialist, Seventh Coast 

Guard District, telephone 305–415– 

6740, email Jennifer.N.Zercher@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed 

rulemaking 

ANPRM Advance Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking 

Pub. L. Public Law 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

FL Florida 

FRA Federal Rail Administration 

FECR Florida East Coast Railway 

FEC Florida East Coast 

VTUS–F Virgin Trains USA-Florida, LLC 

MIASF Marine Industries Association of 

South Florida 

II. Background, Purpose and Legal 

Basis 

The Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad 

Bridge across the New River, mile 2.5, 

at Fort Lauderdale, Florida is a singleleaf bascule railroad bridge with a fourfoot vertical clearance at mean high 

water in the closed position. Traffic on 

the waterway includes both commercial 

and recreational vessels. Brightline, 

formerly Virgin Trains—USA Florida 

(VTUS–F), with support from the bridge 

owner, Florida East Coast Railway 

(FECR), requested a change to the 

drawbridge operating schedule due to 

an increase in rail traffic in recent years. 

The operating schedule for the bridge 

set forth in 33 CFR 117.313(c) no longer 

balances the needs of vessel and rail 

traffic. 

On January 23, 2020, the Coast Guard 

published a Test Deviation, with a 

request for comments, entitled 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New 

River, Fort Lauderdale, FL in the 

Federal Register (85 FR 3852), to test 

the proposed operating schedule for the 

FEC New River Railroad Bridge. Seven 

comments were received and addressed 

in the NPRM. 

On July 13, 2020, the Coast Guard 

published a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking entitled Drawbridge 

Operation Regulation; New River, Fort 

Lauderdale, FL in the Federal Register 

(85 FR 41932). During the comment 

period that ended August 12, 2020, we 

received two comments and those 

comments are addressed in Section III of 

this SNPRM. 

We are issuing this supplemental 

proposal as considerable time has 

passed since the NPRM was published 

and comments were considered after the 

comment period had closed that lead to 

minor changes to the proposed rule. An 

Ex Parte Memorandum summarizing the 

communication is available in the 

docket. 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

proposed rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 

499. 

III. Discussion of Comments and 

Change 

Two comments were received. One 

comment received was a re-submission 

by Brightline, formerly VTUS–F, which 

was addressed in the NPRM. 

The second comment addressed 

concerns with the abbreviated vessel 

traffic study, interpretation of and 

language used in the proposed 

regulation. The commenter felt the 

inclusion of the abbreviated vessel 

traffic study might not have represented 

an accurate impact on the waterway as 

train service was disrupted by the 

coronavirus pandemic. The Coast Guard 

evaluated the survey provided. A 

decision was made to consider the data 

as train service was not reduced until 

March 18, 2020, the last day of the 

study. 

The commenter’s interpretation of the 

requirement to publish the 10-minute 

opening periods is correct. The 

requirement to publish the 10-minute 

opening periods applies to fixed 10- 

minute periods and the additional 10- 

minute periods from Noon to 2:59 p.m. 

In regards to the commenter’s 

interpretation of paragraph (5), actions 

taken by the Coast Guard, the Coast 

Guard will follow notification 

procedures to the maritime community 

as outlined by Coast Guard policy. 

Additionally, the Coast Guard will 

clarify who is to maintain the 

drawbridge log, mobile application and 

website in paragraphs (6) and (7) by 

adding the phrase ‘‘by the drawbridge 

owner’’ to the regulation. 

The commenter requested to add 

language in paragraph (7)(ii), that would 

require notification of emergency 

circumstances be included on the 

website and mobile application. The 

following language was added ‘‘. . . 

schedules, including but not limited to 

impacts due to emergency 

circumstances, minor repairs and 

inspections . . .’’ 

The commenter’s interpretation of the 

paragraph (8)(iii) is accurate. The 

drawbridge must open after the passage 

of rail traffic. However, the bridge may 

remain closed to navigation if periodic 

maintenance or inspections will be 

conducted in accordance with 

paragraph (1). 

Lastly, the Coast Guard received a 

request from Marine Industries 

Association of South Florida (MIASF) to 

review and potentially define the term 

‘‘minor repairs’’ as written in the 

propose rule after the comment period 

had closed. The Coast Guard evaluated 

the term ‘‘minor repairs’’ as it relates to 

drawbridge operating regulations and 

Federal Rail Administration (FRA) 

regulations. The Coast Guard does not 

define nor quantify ‘‘minor repairs’’ 

when authorizing federal drawbridge 

operation regulations; whereas FRA 

outlines what constitutes ‘‘major 

repairs’’ in 49 CFR 232.303. The Coast 

Guard made the decision to remove 

‘‘minor repairs’’ from the proposed rule 

and include the following ‘‘. . . and to 

perform periodic maintenance 

authorized in accordance with subpart 

A of this part.’’ 

IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The proposed rule will allow the 

drawbridge to operate on a more 

predictable schedule. Under this 

proposed regulation, the draw of the 

FEC Railroad Bridge would provide a 

pre-determined 10-minute opening 

between 5:00 a.m. and 11:59 p.m. An 

additional 10-minute opening would be 

provided at various times throughout 

the day. A mobile application and 

website shall be maintained depicting 

the operational status of the drawbridge. 

This SNPRM proposes to remove 

‘‘minor repairs’’ from the proposed 

regulatory text. This action allows for 

consistency with regulatory language 

frequently used in other regulations in 

33 CFR part 117 subpart B. There are no 

other proposed changes to the operating 

schedule. The regulatory text we are 

proposing appears at the end of the 

document. 

This proposed change would still 

allow vessels that are capable of 

transiting under the bridge, without an 

opening, to do so at any time while 

taking into account the reasonable needs 

of other modes of transportation. 

Vessels in distress and public vessels of 

the United States must be allowed to 

pass at any time or as soon as the train 

has cleared the bridge. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
34174 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive Orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on these statutes and Executive 

Orders and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This SNPRM has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

the SNPRM has not been reviewed by 

the Office of Management and Budget. 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the ability that vessels can 

continue to transit the bridge at 

designated times throughout the day 

and when trains are not crossing or 

when a vessel is in distress. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this proposed rule would not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the bridge 

may be small entities, for the reasons 

stated in section V.A above this 

proposed rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on any 

vessel owner or operator. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule. If the 

rule would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will 

not retaliate against small entities that 

question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Government 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132 

(Federalism), if it has a substantial 

direct effect on the States, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175 (Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments) because it would not 

have a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

If you believe this proposed rule has 

implications for federalism or Indian 

tribes, please contact the person listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule will not result in such an 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this proposed rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, 

associated implementing instructions, 

and Environmental Planning Policy 

COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which 

guide the Coast Guard in complying 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321– 

4370f). The Coast Guard has that this 

action is one of a category of actions that 

do not individually or cumulatively 

have a significant effect on the human 

environment. This proposed rule 

promulgates the operating regulations or 

procedures for drawbridges. Normally 

such actions are categorically excluded 

from further review, under paragraph 

L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. 

Coast Guard Environmental Planning 

Implementation Procedures. 

Neither a Record of Environmental 

Consideration nor a Memorandum for 

the Record are required for this rule. We 

seek any comments or information that 

may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

VI. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We view public participation as 

essential to effective rulemaking, and 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period. 

Your comment can help shape the 

outcome of this rulemaking. If you 

submit a comment, please include the 

docket number for this rulemaking, 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. 

We encourage you to submit 

comments through the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at https://

www.regulations.gov. If your material 

cannot be submitted using https://

www.regulations.gov, contact the person 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document for 

alternate instructions. 

We accept anonymous comments. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to https://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. For more about privacy and 

submissions in response to this 

document, see DHS’s eRulemaking 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules 34175 

System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, 

March 11, 2020). 

Documents mentioned in this SNPRM 

as being available in this docket and all 

public comments, will be in our online 

docket at https://www.regulations.gov 

and can be viewed by following that 

website’s instructions. Additionally, if 

you go to the online docket and sign up 

for email alerts, you will be notified 

when comments are posted or a final 

rule is published. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

and Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Amend § 117.313 by revising 

paragraph (c) to read as follows: 

§ 117.313 New River. 

* * * * * 

(c) The draw of the Florida East Coast 

(FEC) Railroad Bridge across the New 

River, mile 2.5, at Fort Lauderdale shall 

operate as follows: 

(1) The drawbridge shall be 

maintained in the fully open-tonavigation position for vessels at all 

times, except during period when it is 

closed for the passage of rail traffic, 

inspections and to perform periodic 

maintenance authorized in accordance 

with subpart A of this part. 

(2) The drawbridge shall not be closed 

to navigation for more than 60 

consecutive minutes. 

(3) The drawbridge shall open and 

remain open to navigation for a fixed 

10-minute period each hour from 5 a.m. 

to 11:59 p.m., except that the 

drawbridge shall be open at the 

following times which shall serve as the 

hourly fixed 10-minute period: 

—7:00 a.m. until 7:10 a.m. 

—9:00 a.m. until 9:10 a.m. 

—4:00 p.m. until 4:10 p.m. 

—6:00 p.m. until 6:10 p.m. 

—10:00 p.m. until 10:10 p.m. 

(i) Additionally, in each hour from 

12:00 p.m. to 2:59 p.m., the drawbridge 

shall open and remain open to 

navigation for an additional 10-minute 

period. 

(ii) The 10-minute opening periods 

shall be published on a quarterly basis 

by the drawbridge owner and reflected 

on the drawbridge owner’s website and 

mobile application. 

(4) The drawbridge shall have a 

drawbridge tender onsite at all times 

who is capable of physically tending 

and operating the drawbridge by local 

control, if necessary, or when ordered 

by the Coast Guard. 

(i) The drawbridge tender shall 

provide estimated times of drawbridge 

openings and closures, upon request. 

(ii) Operational information will be 

provided 24 hours a day on VHF–FM 

channels 9 and 16 or by telephone at 

(305) 889–5572. Signs shall be posted 

visible to marine traffic and displaying 

VHF radio contact information, website 

and application information, and the 

telephone number for the bridge tender. 

(5) In the event of a drawbridge 

operational failure, or other emergency 

circumstances impacting normal 

drawbridge operations, the drawbridge 

owner shall immediately notify the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port Miami 

and provide an estimated time of repair 

and return to normal operations. 

(6) A drawbridge log shall be 

maintained including drawbridge 

opening and closing times. The 

drawbridge log should include reasons 

for those drawbridge closings that 

interfere with scheduled openings in 

this part. This drawbridge log shall be 

maintained by the drawbridge owner 

and upon request, be provided to the 

Coast Guard. 

(7) A website and mobile application 

shall be maintained by the drawbridge 

owner and publish: 

(i) Drawbridge opening times required 

by this subsection; 

(ii) Timely updates to schedules; 

including but not limited to impacts due 

to emergency circumstances, minor 

repairs and inspections; 

(iii) At least 24-hour advance notice 

for each schedule in order to facilitate 

planning by maritime operators; and 

(iv) To the extent reasonably 

practicable, at least 60-minutes advance 

notice of schedule changes or delays. 

(8) The drawbridge shall display the 

following lights: 

(i) When the drawbridge is in the fully 

open position, green lights shall be 

displayed to indicate that vessels may 

pass. 

(ii) When rail traffic approaches the 

block signal, the lights shall go to 

flashing red, then the drawbridge lowers 

and locks, and the lights shall remain 

flashing red. 

(iii) After the rail traffic has cleared 

the drawbridge, the drawbridge shall 

open and the lights return to green. 

* * * * * 

Dated: June 21, 2021. 

Eric C. Jones, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander 

Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13701 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0378; FRL–10024– 

86–Region 7] 

Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Infrastructure 

State Implementation Plan 

Requirements for the 2015 Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

certain elements of a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submission 

from the State of Iowa addressing the 

applicable requirements of section 110 

of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 

Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS). Section 110 

requires that each state adopt and 

submit a SIP revision to support the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each new or revised 

NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These 

SIPs are commonly referred to as 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure 

requirements are designed to ensure that 

the structural components of each 

state’s air quality management program 

are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 29, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2021–0378 to https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the Docket ID No. for this 

rulemaking. Comments received will be 

posted without change to https://

www.regulations.gov/, including any 

personal information provided. For 

detailed instructions on sending 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason Heitman, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air 

Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1