alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2169 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2169

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Cohedur RL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Cohedur RL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COHEDUR RL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.08       Mixtures of        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         resorcinal,                                                        31/2009
                         hexamethylolmelam
                         ine ether (CAS
                         No. 3089-11-0)
                         and dibutyl
                         phthalate (CAS
                         No. 84-74-
                         2)(provided for
                         in subheading
                         3824.90.28)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2147 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2147

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkanox MB (MBI).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkanox MB (MBI).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VULKANOX MB (MBI).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.01       2-                 Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Mercaptobenzimidi                                                  31/2009
                         azole (CAS No.
                         583-39-1)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.99.82)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Altus Explorations Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Milton Cox, the President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 13, 2004

Milton Cox

/s/ Milton Cox			______________________
President and Director 
(Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:20 a.m. on Tuesday, June 15, 2021.

# PLACE: 

The meeting was held via video conference on the internet.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director David Uejio (Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and concurred in by Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Jelena McWilliams, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Ms. Debra A. Decker, Deputy Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

Dated this the 15th day of June, 2021.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-12997 Filed 6-15-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDY ALEJANDRO HIDALGOSANTACRUZ and ELENA MAGO

HIDALGO,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72084

Agency Nos. A096-066-964

 A096-066-965

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

April 20, 2011** 

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Fredy Alejandro Hidalgo-Santacruz and Elena Mago Hidalgo, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision

FILED

MAY 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72084

denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.

2005). We deny the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen because the motion was filed more than five years after the January 15,

2003, removal order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(i)(A)(1), and petitioners failed

to establish that they acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003), or fell within the exceptions

to the filing deadline, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(2); 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a);

Flores-Chavez v. Aschcroft, 362 F.3d 1150, 1156 n.4 (9th Cir. 2004) (“Current law

does not require that the Notice of Appear. . . be in any language other than

English.”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Report of Sturgis Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric L. Eishen, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



Date   March 25, 2004           /s/
       --------------           ------------------------------------------------
                                Eric L. Eishen, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2255 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2255

           To suspend temporarily the duty on on Flonicamid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on on Flonicamid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLONICAMID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      N-(Cyanomethyl)-4-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (trifluoromethyl)                                                  31/2009
                         -3-
                         pyridinecarboxami
                         de (Flonicamid)
                         (CAS No. 158062-
                         67-0) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2933.39.27)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 27663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13041]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / 
Presidential Documents 
[[Page 27663]] 
                Memorandum of May 19, 1995

                
Delegation of Responsibilities Under Section 509 
                of the
                Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 
                and 1995 (Public Law 103-236)

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                laws of the United States of America, including section 
                301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby 
                delegate to the Secretary of Defense the functions 
                conferred upon the President by section 509 of the 
                Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 
                and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), to transfer, with the 
                concurrence of the Secretary of State, to the Republic 
                of Korea, in return for concessions to be negotiated by 
                the Secretary of Defense, any or all of the items 
                described in paragraph (2) of section 509 of that Act, 
                subject to the conditions, requirements and limitations 
                set forth in section 509 of said Act.

                Any reference in this delegation of authority to any 
                Act shall be deemed to be a reference to such Act as 
                amended from time to time.

                The authority delegated to the Secretary of Defense may 
                be redelegated within the Department of Defense.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 19, 1995.

[FR Doc. 95-13041
Filed 5-23-95; 4:00 pm]
Billing code 5000-04-M
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Veterinary Pest Genetics Research Unit: Kerrville, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Kerrville, Texas Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory Veterinary Pest Genetics Research Unit





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 1 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 2 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 3 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 4 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 5 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 6 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 7 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00361-TLS-SLC document 7 filed 08/30/16 page 8 of 8
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2181 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the manufacturing 

deduction provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 with 

respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto 

Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. FORTUN ̃O introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

manufacturing deduction provided by the American Jobs 

Creation Act of 2004 with respect to income attributable 

to domestic production activities in Puerto Rico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Inclusion 

5 Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2181 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION ALLOWABLE WITH RESPECT TO IN2 COME ATTRIBUTABLE TO DOMESTIC PRO3 DUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PUERTO RICO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 199 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions 

6 and special rules) is amended by redesignating paragraph 

7 (7) as paragraph (8) and by inserting after paragraph (6) 

8 the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(7) UNITED STATES DEFINED.—For purposes 

10 of this section, the term ‘United States’ includes the 

11 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section 

14 102 of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000715369
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1983-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          29,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,829
<PP&E>                                      31,385,559
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,195,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,879
<SALES>                                         59,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,215
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAISY LANE,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

AARON RILEY,

Petitioner Below,

 Appellee.

§

§ No. 152, 2021

§

§ Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN-12-02677

§ Petition No. 21-01292

§ 

§ IN THE INTEREST OF:

§ Jordan Riley

§ Julia Riley

 Submitted: October 29, 2021

 Decided: December 7, 2021

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY-REEVES,

Justices.

O R D E R

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we 

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Family 

Court’s order dated April 14, 2021. The appellee filed a petition in the Family Court 

seeking modification of the parties’ children’s primary residential placement, which 

had been determined in October 2018 after a full hearing on the merits. The Family 

Court appropriately considered the factors set forth in 13 Del. C. § 729(c)(2), 

including carefully weighing the best interest factors in light of the evidence 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

presented. In concluding that the parents would have shared residential placement 

on an alternating weekly schedule, the Family Court acted within its broad 

discretion.2 Factual findings will not be disturbed on appeal unless they are clearly 

erroneous, and when the determination of facts turns on a question of the credibility 

of the witnesses appearing before the trial court, we will not substitute our opinion 

for that of the trier of fact.3 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves

Justice

2

See Russell v. Stevens, 2007 WL 3215667, at *2 (Del. Nov. 1, 2007) (affirming Family Court’s 

award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately 

considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the “law vests wide discretion in the trial 

court to determine where custody shall be placed”).

3

Shimel v. Shimel, 2019 WL 2142066, at *2 (Del. May 14, 2019).
#### HARRIS, Respondent, v. UNITED STATES RAINCOAT CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by David Harris against the United States Raincoat Company. J. Sapinsky, for appellant. E. I. Yuells, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00253-WCL-JEM document 1 filed 07/24/13 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00253-WCL-JEM document 1 filed 07/24/13 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00253-WCL-JEM document 1 filed 07/24/13 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00253-WCL-JEM document 1 filed 07/24/13 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00253-WCL-JEM document 1 filed 07/24/13 page 5 of 5