33646 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Notices 

1See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 83886 (December 23, 

2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Extension of Deadline 

for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated March 

31, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe 

and Tube from Mexico: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4 Id. 

5 Id. 

6 In the case of two mandatory respondents, our 

practice is to calculate: (A) A weighted average of 

the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory 

respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping 

margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; 

and (C) a weighted average of the dumping margins 

calculated for the mandatory respondents using 

each company’s publicly ranged values for the 

merchandise under consideration. We compare (B) 

and (C) to (A) and select the rate closest to (A) as 

the most appropriate rate for all other companies. 

See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 

2016, 82 FR 31555, 31556 (July 7, 2017). We have 

applied that practice here. See Memorandum, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Dated: June 21, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

V. Diversification of China’s Economy 

VI. Partial Rescission of the Administrative 

Review 

VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

VIII. Subsidies Valuation 

IX. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Discount Rates, 

Inputs, Electricity, and Land 

Benchmarks 

X. Analysis of Programs 

XI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Not Individually 

Examined 

1. Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd. 

2. Chaoyang Long March Tyre Co., Ltd. 

3. Doublestar International Trading 

(Hongkong) Co., Limited 

4. Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company 

5. Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd. 

6. Giti Tire Global Trading Pte Ltd. 

7. Guangrao Kaichi Trading Co., Ltd. 

8. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. 

9. Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

10. Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd. 

11. Hongtyre Group Co. 

12. Jiangsu General Science Technology Co., 

Ltd. 

13. Koryo International Industrial Limited 

14. Maxon Int’l Co., Limited 

15. Megalith Industrial Group Co., Limited 

16. Qingdao Awesome International Trade 

Co., Ltd 

17. Qingdao Doublestar Overseas Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

18. Qingdao Doublestar Tire Industrial Co., 

Ltd. 

19. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp. Ltd 

20. Qingdao Jinhaoyang International Co., 

Ltd. 

21. Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited 

22. Qingdao Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd 

23. Qingdao Powerich Tyre Co., Ltd. 

24. Qingdao Shinego Tire Tech Co., Limited 

(also known as Qingdao Shinego Tyre 

Tech Co., Ltd.) 

25. Qingdao Sunfulcess Tyre Co., Ltd. 

26. Shandong Habilead Rubber Co., Ltd. 

27. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd. 

28. Shandong Huasheng Rubber Co., Ltd 

29. Shandong Hugerubber Co., Ltd. 

30. Shandong Kaixuan Rubber Co., Ltd 

31. Shandong Province Sanli Tire 

Manufactured Co., Ltd 

32. Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd. 

33. Shandong Transtone Tyre Co., Ltd 

34. Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd. 

35. Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., 

Ltd. 

36. Shanghai Huayi Group Corporation 

Limited 

37. Shengtai Tyre Co., Ltd. 

38. Sichuan Kalevei Technology Co., Ltd. 

39. Tongli Tyre Co., Ltd. 

40. Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd. 

41. Weifang Shunfuchang Rubber and Plastic 

Products Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13586 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that lightwalled rectangular pipe and tube from 

Mexico was sold in the United States at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR) August 1, 2018, 

through July 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable June 25, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle 

Clahane or John Conniff, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5449 or (202) 482–1009, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 23, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

March 31, 2021, Commerce extended 

the deadline for these final results.2 For 

a complete description of the events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are light-walled rectangular pipe and 

tube from Mexico. For a full description 

of the scope, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues addressed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is provided 

in the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received, we 

made changes for these final results 

which are explained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.5

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, Commerce 

determines the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

mandatory respondents, Maquilacero 

S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) and 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de 

R.L. de C.V. (Regiopytsa), for the period 

August 1, 2018, through July 31, 2019. 

In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the firms not selected for individual 

examination using the weighted-average 

dumping margins calculated for the 

mandatory respondents, which are not 

zero, de minimis, or determined entirely 

on the basis of facts available.6


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Notices 33647 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Mexico: Calculation of Margin for Respondents Not 

Selected for Individual Examination,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

7 In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily 

determined that Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos 

S. de R.L. de C.V. to be successor-in-interest to 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V. We 

did not receive comments from interested parties on 

this finding. Accordingly, we continue to determine 

that it is the successor-in-interest. For additional 

information on Commerce’s analysis regarding the 

successor-in-interest finding. See Preliminary 

Results PDM at 6. 

8See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, and 

the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 

FR 45403 (August 5, 2008). 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. and Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V ............................................................................................... 4.23 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. (formerly Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V.) 7 ............. 5.44 

Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V .......................................................................................................................................... 4.92 

Fabricaciones y Servicios de Mexico .......................................................................................................................................... 4.92 

Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles ....................................................................................................................................................... 4.92 

Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V ............................................................................................................................................................. 4.92 

Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V ....................................................................................................................... 4.92 

Disclosure of Calculations 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

final results to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after the date of 

publication of this notice, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protections (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. For each 

individually examined respondent 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.50 percent), we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for each importer’s examined sales and 

the total entered value of the sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

For each company which was not 

individually examined whose weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties at an ad 

valorem rate equal to each company’s 

weighted-average dumping margin 

noted above. Where a non-examined 

company’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by each 

respondent for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 41 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for the companies listed 

above will be the rate established in the 

final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this administrative review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.76 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.8 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

Dated: June 21, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Successor-in-Interest 

V. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Model Match Criteria 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
33648 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Notices 

1 See Pentafluoroethane (R–125) from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigation, 86 FR 8589 

(February 8, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

2 See Pentafluoroethane (R–125) from the 

People’s Republic of China: Postponement of 

Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigation, 86 FR 14406 (March 16, 2021). 

3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Determination of the 

Countervailing Duty Investigation of 

Pentafluoroethane (R–125) from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 

Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). 

5 See Initiation Notice. 

6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

7 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. 

8 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request to Align Final 

Countervailing Duty Determination with Final 

Antidumping Duty Determination,’’ dated May 21, 

2021. 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust Maquilacero’s Costs for NonPrime Products 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Use Average Net Price to Value 

Maquilacero’s Non-Prime Product 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Selling, General, and 

Administrative (SG&A) Cost Calculation 

Maquilacero Provided for Tecnicas de 

Fluidos S.A. de C.V. (TEFLU) 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise Its Adjustment to Maquilacero’s 

Costs for Coil Obtained From Affiliated 

Parties 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Recalculate the Adjustment to 

Maquilacero’s Scrap Offset 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust TEFLU’s Further Processing Costs 

Comment 8: Whether Maquilacero’s and 

TEFLU’s Sales Were Made at the Same 

Level of Trade 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Collapse Maquilacero and TEFLU 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should 

Make Certain Changes to Maquilacero’s 

SAS Programs 

Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should 

Assign Perfiles the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin It Received as a 

Mandatory Respondent in the 2013–2014 

Administrative Review 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–13550 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–138] 

Pentafluoroethane (R–125) From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination and Alignment of 

Final Determination With Final 

Antidumping Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

pentafluoroethane (R–125) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China). The 

period of investigation is January 1, 

2020, through December 31, 2020. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on this preliminary 

determination. 

DATES: Applicable June 25, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joshua Tucker or Adam Simons, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2044 or (202) 482–6172, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This preliminary determination is 

made in accordance with section 703(b) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). Commerce published the 

notice of initiation of this investigation 

on February 8, 2021.1 On March 16, 

2021, Commerce postponed the 

preliminary determination of this 

investigation to June 11, 2021.2 For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the initiation of this 

investigation, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

II to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The product covered by this 

investigation is R–125 from China. For 

a complete description of the scope of 

this investigation, see Appendix I. 

Scope Comments 

In accordance with the preamble to 

Commerce’s regulations, the Initiation 

Notice set aside a period of time for 

parties to raise issues regarding product 

coverage, (i.e., scope).4 Certain 

interested parties commented on the 

scope of the investigation as it appeared 

in the Initiation Notice.5

Commerce intends to issue its 

preliminary decision regarding 

comments concerning the scope of the 

antidumping (AD) and countervailing 

duty (CVD) investigations in the 

preliminary determination of the 

companion AD investigation. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

investigation in accordance with section 

701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial 

contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that 

gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, 

and that the subsidy is specific.6

Commerce notes that, in making these 

findings, it relied, in part, on facts 

available and, because it finds that one 

or more respondents did not act to the 

best of their ability to respond to 

Commerce’s requests for information, it 

drew an adverse inference where 

appropriate in selecting from among the 

facts otherwise available.7 For further 

information, see ‘‘Use of Facts 

Otherwise Available and Adverse 

Inferences’’ in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Alignment 

As noted in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, in accordance with 

section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(4), Commerce is aligning the 

final CVD determination in this 

investigation with the final 

determination in the companion AD 

investigation of R–125 from China based 

on a request made by the petitioner.8

Consequently, the final CVD 

determination will be issued on the 

same date as the final AD 

determination, which is currently 

scheduled to be issued no later than 

October 25, 2021, unless postponed. 

All-Others Rate 

Sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act provide that in the preliminary 

determination, Commerce shall 

determine an estimated all-others rate 

for companies not individually 

examined. This rate shall be an amount 

equal to the weighted average of the 

estimated subsidy rates established for 

those companies individually 

examined, excluding any zero and de 

minimis rates and any rates based 

entirely under section 776 of the Act. 

In this investigation, Commerce 

calculated individual estimated 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1