alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Surveys Research Group: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Food Surveys Research Group Docs







CSFII 1989-1991, DHKS 1989-1991 Sample Sizeheadline bar CSFII 1989-91AgeMalesFemalesUnder 11331201-22892933-54083986-1175472212-1979083720-29903127230-39956136540-4972398950-5952372960-6958785170+52710231-day dietary intake data for 15,192 individuals3-day dietary intake data for 11,912 individualsDHKS 1989-91AgeMalesFemalesUnder 1--1-2--3-5--6-11--12-19105720-2920678030-39254100540-4918875750-5914853760-6917267870+1817575,730 individuals identified as main meal planners/preparers


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30439 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TREMELL ARMSTEAD, also known as Mel Armstead,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10 -CR- 197 -4

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Tremell Armstead , federal prisoner # 31567

- 034, is serving a 180 -month prison sentence for conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base offense levels in the drug quantity table of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined t hat this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED December 18, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30439 Document: 00514275834 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2017No. 17

- 30439

2 In his sole issue on appeal, Armstead argues that the district court erred in determining that it w as not authorized to consider a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction where the sentence was imposed pursuant to a binding plea agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) and not expressly tied to the Guid elines. Specifically, he assert s that this court’s adoption in United States v. Benitez , 822 F.3d 807 (5th Cir. 2016) , of Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in Freeman v. United States , 564 U.S. 522 (2011), “is erroneous because it misapplies the rule for determining the holding of a fractured Supreme Court opinion, and because the rule i t adopts is itself erroneous.” Armstead acknowledges that t his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, and he raises the issue to p reserve it for further review. Acco rdingly, t he judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-30439 Document: 00514275834 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2017
##### 



MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD.
 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 PERFORMANCE SHARE AND RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT
AWARD AGREEMENT
    SECTION 1 . Performance Share Target Award; Performance Period; Date of Grant:
 Target Award:
    
    [     ] Performance Shares (the Target Award)Performance Period:
    
    January 1, 2006 through and ending on December 31, 2008(the Performance Period)Date of Grant:
    
    January 1, 2006
 SECTION 2 . Nature of Award.
 SECTION 3 . Determination of Number of Shares Earned.
 # of Shares = Payout Percentage x Target Award




---



##### 



SECTION 4 . Payment of Performance Shares.
  Award:
    
    [     ] Restricted Share Units (the RSU Award)Vesting Period:
    
    December 31, 2006 through and ending on December 31, 2008Date of Grant:
    
    January 1, 2006
 SECTION 6 . Nature of Award.
 Vesting. st st st
  SECTION 9. Termination of Employment
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Change in Control.
   SECTION 11 . Tax Withholding.
 SECTION 12 . Rights As A Shareholder.
 Dividend Equivalents
 SECTION 14 . Transferability.
 SECTION 15 . Ratification of Actions.
 4




---



##### 



SECTION 16 . Notices.
 SECTION 17 . Definitions.
 SECTION 18 . Governing Law and Severability.
 SECTION 19 . No Rights to Continued Employment.
 SECTION 20 . Counterparts.
 5




---



##### 



MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD.By:Name:Title:
 PARTICIPANTBy:Name:Title:
 6
[No. 38534-8-I.

Division One.

October 13, 1997.]

#### Veronica B. Buffington, et al., *Appellants,*v. Harbor Properties, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 92-2-18274-2, Michael J. Fox, J., entered October 16, 1995 and April 16, 1996. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, A.C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.
#### BENSON, Appellant, v. WHITEHEAD, Respondent

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 4, 1912.)

Action by Neis Benson, as administrator, against Wilbur C. Whitehead. N. Burkan, for appellant. E. C. Sherwood, for respondent No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1326. JAMES REED v. THE STATE.

James Reed has appeared before this Court on numerous occasions. Reed was

convicted of burglary and other crimesin 1998, and his convictions were affirmed by

this Court. Reed v. State, Case No. A99A0222 (April 1, 1999). He subsequently filed

a number of post-conviction motions, resulting in direct appeals and applications to

this Court, all of which ultimately were either denied or dismissed.

1

In this latest

appeal, Reed seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his “Motion for Out of

Time Direct Appeal.” This order, however, is not subject to direct appeal.

Because Reed has already had a direct appeal, he cannot appeal from the trial

court’s denial of his motion for an out-of-time appeal. See Richards v. State, 275 Ga

190 (563 SE2d 856) (2002). Moreover, “[i]t is well established that any issue that was

raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this

Court, and that the law of the case doctrine is not confined to civil cases, but applies

also to rulings made by appellate courtsin criminal cases.” (Citation and punctuation

omitted.) Ross v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326, 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011). Prior to this

1 See Case Nos. A04A0044 (appeal from denial of motion for new trial;

dismissed on August 27, 2003); A06A0268 (appeal from denial of motion

challenging the legality of his sentence; dismissed on November 18, 2005);

A07D0208 (application for discretionary appealfromdenial of motion to set aside the

verdict and vacate the judgment; denied on April 2, 2007); A11D0101 (application

for discretionary appeal from denial of motion to correct his sentence; granted on

November 3, 2010, but direct appeal was subsequently dismissed in A13A0765 on

December 21, 2012); A13A2362 (appeal frommotion to probate remaining sentence;

dismissed on October 2, 2013).

April 22, 2015
appeal, Reed filed numerous appeals challenging orders of the trial court, and these

appeals essentially raised the same issues Reed argues in his motion for out of time

appeal. These issues have already been disposed of or otherwise waived by Reed in

prior appellate proceedings. We are precluded from revisiting an issue that has

already been decided. See Ross, supra at 328. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/22/2015
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of NTT DoCoMo, Inc., a Japanese corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: June 27, 2006
SPECIMEN
                                                                       EXHIBIT 4

================================================================================

     NUMBER                                                               SHARES
      BSP

                                BSP ONELINK INC.

                                                                 SEE REVERSE FOR
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE         CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

                               COMMON STOCK CUSIP                    055732 10 1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS CERTIFIES THAT:

IS THE OWNER OF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF
                      COMMOON STOCK OF $.001 PAR VALUE EACH
                              OF BSP ONELINK, INC.

      transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney
       upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This
      certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws
      of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and
 Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not
 valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the  Corporation  and the facsimile  signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

DATED:                                    COUNTERSIGNED:

                                          CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER
                                          & TRUST COMPANY

                                                                 JERSEY CITY, NJ
                                                    TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
                                                              AUTHORIZED OFFICER

    --------------------------------          --------------------------------
             Secretary                                   President

================================================================================
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Systematic Entomology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ECMU
                    SEL Twitter FeedSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Systematic Entomology Laboratory Docs







This page is not availableheadline bar         This page is temporarily off line while we make repairs and upgrade the content.  Please visit us again soon!


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 228 

To establish a realistic, threat-based allocation of grant funds for first 

responders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To establish a realistic, threat-based allocation of grant funds 

for first responders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Responders 

5 Funding Reform Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOCATION OF GRANT FUNDS. 

7 Section 1014 of the USA PATRIOT Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 3714) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ‘‘0.75 per10 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘0.5 percent’’; 
2 

•HR 228 IH 

1 (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub2 section (d); and 

3 (3) by adding after subsection (b) the following 

4 new subsection: 

5 ‘‘(c) BASIS FOR GRANT AWARDS.—(1) Grants under 

6 this section shall be awarded based on a quantitative as7 sessment of risk for three categories: threat, vulnerability, 

8 and consequences. 

9 ‘‘(2) Not later than March 1 of each year, the 

10 Office shall submit to Congress the quantitative as11 sessment required by paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2179 

To extend the suspension of duty on hexanedioic acid, polymer with 1,3- 

benzenedimethanamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on hexanedioic acid, 

polymer with 1,3-benzenedimethanamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HEXANEDIOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH 1,3- 

4 BENZENEDIMETHANAMINE. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT.—Heading 9902.01.71 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 hexanedioic acid, polymer with 1,3- 

8 benzenedimethanamine) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
2 

•HR 2179 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this 

5 Act. 

6 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—If the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act occurs on or after January 

8 1, 2007, then notwithstanding section 514 of the 

9 Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other 

10 provision of law, and upon proper request filed with 

11 the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection not 

12 later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from ware14 house for consumption, of goods described in head15 ing 9902.01.71 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

16 of the United States which— 

17 (A) was made after December 31, 2006, 

18 and before the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act, and 

20 (B) would have been subject to no duty 

21 had the amendment made by subsection (a) 

22 been in effect on the date of such entry or with23 drawal, 
3 

•HR 2179 IH 

1 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if the amend2 ment made by subsection (a) applied to such entry 

3 or withdrawal. 

Æ
#### The People ex rel. Hugh McCormack, Appellant, *v.*John McClave et al., as Police Commissioners, etc., Respondents.

(Argued June 17, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made November 18, 1889, which affirmed the proceedings of the respondents, the board of police commissioners of the police department of the city of New York, dismissing the relator from the police force of said city.

*John M. Tierney*for appellant.

*Damid J. Dean*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          37,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,897,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                    88,366
<INVENTORY>                                  3,228,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,452,474
<PP&E>                                       2,631,412
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,119,078)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,044,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,103,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,106
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,109,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,044,793
<SALES>                                      2,473,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,473,046
<CGS>                                        1,228,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,139,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Father's Day, 2021

Like so many fathers, my dad was a man of decency, honor, generosity, and kindness. He had a profound impact on me, and instilled in me the understanding of the basic truth that everyone is entitled to be treated with dignity and respect. The value set my father taught me, I taught to my children and my grandchildren. I hold his words, his wisdom, and his influence in my heart every day and every time I sign my name as President, Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

Father's Day is a time to recognize, appreciate, and celebrate the fathers and father figures in our lives who lift us up on their shoulders and shape our lives for the better. We thank the dads who have guided, taught, coached, cared for us, and supported us through life's trials and tribulations. And, we celebrate all that they impart: character and perspective, lessons borne from experience, and the sacrifices made from love.

We also know this can be a hard day for many—for those who have lost a father, a grandfather, a stepfather, or a fatherly role model; and for those fathers who have lost a child of their own. During the past year, too many families lost fathers too soon because of and during this pandemic. We think of them today and every day, and we honor their enduring memories and legacies.

My Administration is committed to strengthening American families and easing the burdens of caregiving, so that more fathers and mothers can raise children while pursuing fulfilling lives and careers of their own. The American Families Plan would provide 12 weeks of paid family leave, so that all parents who work outside the home can spend precious time with their newborn children or care for their children and other loved ones when they get sick. By investing in our caregiving infrastructure, we can help ensure that no father or mother has to choose between putting food on the table or caring for their children. My Administration is also committed to helping single moms and dads, many of whom shoulder all of the parenting responsibility in their children's lives, sacrificing greatly to ensure that their kids have the same opportunities as everyone else.

Today, we express our appreciation for the fathers, stepfathers, grandfathers, and father figures who enrich our character, love us unconditionally, and give so much of themselves every day so we can live lives worthy of their dreams and sacrifices.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, in accordance with a joint resolution of the Congress approved April 24, 1972, as amended (36 U.S.C. 109), do hereby proclaim June 20, 2021, as Father's Day. I direct the appropriate officials of the Government to display the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on this day. Let us remember our fathers, living and deceased, and give them the honor and gratitude they deserve.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2021-13455

Billing code 3295-F1-P