alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 14920-0-III.

Division Three.

August 5, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Maria Magdaleno Galvan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 94-1-00553-1, Duane E. Taber, J., entered May 19, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Kurtz, J.
#### Bernhard Hufnagel et al., Appellants, *v.*The Village of Mount Vernon, Respondent.

(Argued May 1, 1890;

decided June 3, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme, Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 11,1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term reversing an interlocutory judgment and sustaining an amended demurrer and dismissing the complaint,..

*Mornay Williams*for appellants.

*Isaac W. Mills*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000701345
<NAME> US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             606
<SECURITIES>                                       549
<RECEIVABLES>                                      405<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,161
<PP&E>                                           6,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,467
<BONDS>                                          1,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                          45
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,653
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,358
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    608
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                363
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       363
<EPS-BASIC>                                     4.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.67
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2346 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2346

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ``John J. Hainkel, 
                       Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 105 NW 
Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 
the ``John J. Hainkel, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. Hainkel, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Pat J. HERLAN, d/b/a Almost Heaven WV Realty, WV Real Estate Broker, Inc., Debtor-Appellant, v. TIMBERLINE FOUR SEASONS RESORT, INC.; Long Run Realty, Inc., Movants-Appellees, and United States Trustee, Trustee.

No. 10-1675.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

Richard J. Stahl, Stahl Zelloe, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Frank P. Bush, Jr., The Law Office of Frank P. Bush, Jr., Elkins, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pat J. Herían appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order directing her to turn over a number of vacation home rental contracts to Timberline Four Seasons Resort, Inc. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and have found no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *In re Pat Herian,*Nos. 2:10-cv-00016-JPB; 2:09-bk-02665 (ND.W.Va. May 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2021

No. 04-21-00067-CV

Calvin HUMPHREY,

Appellant

v.

VECTOR AEROSPACE ENGINE SERVICES- ATLANTIC, INC.,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-12246

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of appearance and states the court reporter's fees for 

preparing and filing the record have been paid. We therefore order Diana Guerrero to file the 

reporter's record by April 23, 2021. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Ex 10d14 2014 10-K






EXHIBIT 10(d)14


BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


GULF POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2015, unless otherwise noted, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Gulf Power Company and certain other executive officers of Gulf Power Company who served during 2014.




	
			
	S. W. Connally, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$426,119
	 

	Richard S. Teel
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$261,168
	 

	P. Bernard Jacob*
Vice President
	$267,107
	 

	Michael L. Burroughs
Vice President
	$208,345
	 

	Bentina C. Terry
Vice President
	$280,264
	 






*  Retired May 3, 2014.  Salary shown was Mr. Jacob’s salary effective March 1, 2014.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6060

JOHN WAYNE TRICE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN KELLY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-00857-GBL)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wayne Trice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Wayne Trice seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Trice has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Order filed May 6, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00432

- CV

____________ NASSER CHEHAB , Appellant

V.
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 10745



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due March 15, 2021

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before May 26, 2021 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of p rosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan.
#### Marlene Lieberman, Appellant, v Shur Management Co., Inc., Respondent. Marlene Lieberman, Appellant, v Paul Schur, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alfred Callahan, J.), entered on April 18, 1984, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. *(See, Martinez v Lazaroff,*48 NY2d 819.) No opinion. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Ross, Bloom, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2143

To suspend temporarily the duty on Anthra[2,1,9-mna]naphth[2,3-h]acridine5,10,15(16H)-trione,3-[(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1-anthracenyl)amino]-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Anthra[2,1,9-

mna]naphth[2,3-h]acridine-5,10,15(16H)-trione,3-[(9,10-

dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1-anthracenyl)amino]-.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ANTHRA[2,1,9-MNA]NAPHTH[2,3-H]ACRIDINE4 5,10,15(16H)-TRIONE,3-[(9,10-DIHYDRO-9,10-

5 DIOXO-1-ANTHRACENYL)AMINO]-. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading:
2

•HR 2143 IH 

‘‘ 9902.06.71 Anthra[2,1,9-

mna]naphth[2,3-h]acridine5,10,15(16H)-trione,3-

[(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1-

anthracenyl)amino]- (CAS 

No. 4395–53–3) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.15.80) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No: 2:15 CR 54

)

NOEL CASTILLO )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE #21), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement (DE #17) pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count I of the Indictment (DE #1) is now hereby ACCEPTED, and

defendant is adjudged guilty of the offense as charged therein. A sentencing date will

be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 13, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

d0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137679 

MANUEL SPILLMAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137679 

 COA: 284589 

Chippewa CC: 07-009655-AH 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6536

FLOYD GLENN WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EUGENE NUTH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-2278-DKC)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Ann

Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997),

and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's orders and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v.

Nuth, No. CA-96-2278-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 5 & 24, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John R. Hecht, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/  JOHN R. HECHT     
|John R. Hecht          
|Chief Financial Officer



August 9, 2005



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### PROLE et al., Respondents, v. LOWE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by George Prole and another against George F. Lowe.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Muriel Winegrad et al., Respondents, v New York University Medical Center, Defendant, and Joseph Jacobs et al., Appellants.

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leonard Cohen, J.), entered on May 22, 1984, unanimously affirmed, and the parties are directed to settle an order at Special Term so as to provide for new dates for the examination of the defendant doctors. No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Fein,

opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Fein, JJ.
# C_2009042EN.01000801.xml

| 20.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4835 — Hexion/Huntsman)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 42/03)

On 30 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4835. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4835. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,789-01

EX PARTE JEFFERY LYN GASTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1089301-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance, and was sentenced pursuant to Section 12.44(a) of the Texas Penal Code to

sixty days in county jail. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because several years after he entered his plea, the evidence in his case was tested and found not to

contain anycontrolled substance or dangerous drug. Although Applicant has discharged hissentence
in this case, he alleges that he is suffering continuing consequences as a result of this conviction. 

Those continuing consequences are sufficient to allow this Court to address his claims. Ex parte

Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court

has determined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and

intelligent choice. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1089301 in the 179th District Court of Harris

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to

answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 25, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Louis E. PrezeauLouis E. PrezeauChief Executive Officer
and President CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward R. WrightEdward R. WrightChief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13871]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRIS K. AND STEWART L. UDALL FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Electronic Board Meeting to be held via email exchanges 
Thursday, July 8, 2021, 8:00 a.m. (PDT), through Wednesday, July 21, 
2021.

PLACE: Board of Trustees Meeting held via email.

STATUS: This special meeting of the Board of Trustees, to be held 
Electronically (in accordance with the Operating Procedures of the 
Board of Trustees of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall 
Foundation), is open to the public. Members of the public who would 
like to participate in this electronic meeting should email Elizabeth 
E. Monroe, Executive Assistant, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall 
Foundation, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#731e1c1d011c16330617121f1f5d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="016c6e6f736e64417465606d6d2f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than Thursday, July 8, 2021, 
8:00 a.m. (PDT).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Draft Udall Foundation 2022-2026 Strategic 
Plan.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David P. Brown, Executive 
Director, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 901-8500.

    Dated: June 24, 2021.
David P. Brown,
Executive Director, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, 
and Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-13871 Filed 6-24-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-FN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>