alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BARLING, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, - Appellate Division, First Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Walter R. Barling, against the Board of Education. J. K. Holtzmann, for appellant. C. McIntyre, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABNER JONATHAN GONZALEZDELGADO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72624

Agency No. A200-691-137

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Abner Jonathan Gonzalez-Delgado, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding

of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We

FILED

APR 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.

2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that, even if

Gonzalez-Delgado was a member of a particular social group, he failed to establish

past persecution or a clear probability of future harm on account of a protected

ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 741 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[T]o

demonstrate that a protected ground was ‘at least one central reason’ for

persecution, an applicant must prove that such ground was a cause of the

persecutors’ acts.”); see also Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010)

(petitioner’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus,

Gonzalez-Delgado’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Gonzalez-Delgado does not challenge the agency’s denial of his CAT claim. 

See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

supported by argument are deemed waived). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-72624
**Exhibit 23.2****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consentto the incorporation by reference in the registration statementNo. 333-114935 on FormS-8 of Alion Science and Technology Corporation of our report dated January 31, 2006, with respectto the consolidated balance sheet of Alion Science and Technology Corporation as of September 30,2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder’s equity (deficit) andcash flows for years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related financial statementschedule for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, which report appears in the September 30,2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Alion Science and Technology Corporation./s/ KPMG LLPChicago, Illinois
EXHIBIT 17.4


RESIGNATION  OF JOHN GRILLO AS CHAIRMAN OF  NATIONAL  ENERGY  SERVICES  COMPANY,
INC., a Nevada Corporation



I, John Grillo,  hereby resign all my capacities as Chairman of NATIONAL  ENERGY
SERVICES COMPANY,  INC., a Nevada Corporation (the "Company") effective February
20, 2004. My resignation  is not because of a  disagreement  with the Company on
any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices. Further,
I release the Company from any and all  obligations  they may have to me as well
as from any and all claims (asserted or not asserted) to date.




/s/  John A. Grillo                                       2/4/2005
------------------------------------------      --------------------------------
 John Grillo                                              Date
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Innovative Fruit Production, Improvement, and Protection: Kearneysville, WV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Upcoming Events
                    Recent Events
                        International Workshop The Fruit Microbiome: A New Frontier
                                    Open House 2019Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




**Welcome to the Appalachian Fruit Research Station**
 **Open House Staff Photo**


**Research Projects                                                   More...** Improving Fruit Crop Traits Through Advanced Genomic, Breeding, and Management Technologies
Integrated Orchard Management and Automation for Deciduous Tree Fruit Crops


**** **VIDEOS** Aerial Tour of the Appalachian Fruit Research Station(HD)(Mobile)


Northeast Area   tracy.leskey@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-149445) of MAKO Surgical Corp. of our report dated March 10, 2009, with
respect to the financial statements of MAKO Surgical Corp. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|                          |                             
|------------------------- | ----------------------------
|                          | /s/Ernst & Young LLP        
|                          | Certified Public Accountants
|                          |                             
|Fort
 Lauderdale, Florida |                             
|March 10,
 2009           |                             

---
# L_2008028EN.01000701.xml

| 1.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 28/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 28/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 90/2008

of 31 January 2008

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 900/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/08 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/08 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 31 January 2008, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 31 January 2008, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 31 January 2008, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 shall be 33,832 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 February 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1260/2007 (OJ L 283, 27.10.2007, p. 1). Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 October 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 26. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1298/2007 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2007, p. 3).

2

---
SNV_Exhibit 10.34_12.31.2014


Exhibit 10.34


SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers


Set forth below are the base salaries for persons identified as “named executive officers” of Synovus Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2014, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:


	
					
	Name
	Title
	Base Salary

	 
	 
	 

	Kessel D. Stelling
	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
	$
	950,000
	 

	Thomas J. Prescott
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	431,000
	 

	Allen J. Gula, Jr.
	Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer
	428,750
	 

	Allan E. Kamensky
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	412,000
	 

	Roy Dallis Copeland, Jr.
	Executive Vice President and Chief Community Banking Officer
	350,250
USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cr-00068-JD-MGG document 1 filed 08/10/16 page 1 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cr-00068-JD-MGG document 1 filed 08/10/16 page 2 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cr-00058-TLS-RBC   document 1   filed 07/24/13   page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

Plaintiff, )

) Case Number: 1:16-CR00033-TLS-SLC

)

v. )

)

ALA EL BASHATLY )

Defendant, )

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCLOSURE OF RULE 404(B) 

EVIDENCE THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO INTRODUCE AT TRIAL

The Defendant, Ala El Bashatly, by counsel, respectfully requests from the Government 

pretrial notice of any other crimes, wrongs, or acts evidence the Government intends to introduce 

at trial in accordance with Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Stacy R. Uliana___________ 

#20413-32

P.O. Box 744

Bargersville, IN 46106

(317) 422-1686

Fax (317) 732-1870

stacy@ulianalaw.com

/s/ Dorothy A. Maryan_________

Dorothy A. Maryan #22392-53

P.O. Box 282

Bargersville, IN 46106

Telephone: (317) 245-6141

Fax: (317) 245-6140

doriemaryan@gmail.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 8th day of May, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana by 

using the CM/ECF System.

/s/ Dorothy A. Maryan

Dorothy A. Maryan #22392-53
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33887-33888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0452]


Seafair Air Show Performance, Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of non-enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will not enforce the safety zone for the 
Seafair Air Show Performance in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA in July 
and August 2021. The Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound has 
determined enforcement of this regulation is not necessary because this 
event is cancelled.

DATES: The Coast Guard does not plan to enforce regulations in 33 CFR 
165.1319 in July and August 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of non-enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Peter 
McAndrew,

[[Page 33888]]

Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 206-217-6051, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fead9b9d8a918cae8b999b8aad918b909aa9a9b3be8b8d9d99d0939792"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24774147504b567451434150774b514a4073736964515747430a494d48">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard normally enforces the safety 
zone in 33 CFR 165.1319 for the Seattle Seafair Air Show Performance 
held in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. This event is typically held 
annually during last week of July and the first 2 weeks of August. This 
year, the event organizers cancelled Seafair. Therefore, the Coast 
Guard does not plan to enforce the safety zone in 33 CFR 165.1319 in 
July or August 2021.
    In addition to this notification of non-enforcement in the Federal 
Register, if the situation changes and the Captain of the Port Sector 
Puget Sound (COTP) determines that the regulated area needs to be 
enforced, the COTP will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and 
provide actual notice of enforcement to any persons in the regulated 
area.

    Dated: June 21, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2021-13721 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
*Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40997

Summary Calendar

 

DEBRA DILLARD; ALFREDA BLAKE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

CITY OF SULPHUR SPRINGS; ET AL.,

Defendants,

JOHNNY P. MOSELEY, Sulphur Springs Police Officer;

DAVID GILMORE, Sulphur Springs Police Officer;

LEONARD STOUT, Sulphur Springs Police Officer,

Defendants-Appellants.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:98-CV-364

 

March 29, 2000

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Defendants police officers Johnny P. Moseley, David Gilmore,

and Leonard Stout appeal the district court’s denial of their

motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. They

argue that they reasonably believed the five-dollar bill used by

plaintiffs Debra Dillard and Alfreda Blake–which was in fact a
 

1We express no opinion as to whether or not, on a more fully

developed record, appellants or any of them would be entitled to

judgment as a matter of law on the issue of qualified immunity.

2

genuine and valid five dollar Federal Reserve Note issued in

1953–was counterfeit because it was unusual in appearance, the

serial number was written in red ink, the paper was not

consistent with other currency, and the store clerk’s counterfeit

detector pen (no evidence was presented as to the nature or

reliability of such a pen) made a mark on the bill indicating

that it was counterfeit. In their appeal, appellants do not

challenge the district court’s determination that the evidence

created a genuine issue of fact as to whether (or established

that) plaintiffs were arrested by appellants without either a

warrant or probable cause. 

Dillard and Blake submitted an affidavit of a criminal

justice expert, John W. Watson, stating that “no properly trained

officer could have believed that the $5 bill was counterfeit.” 

Appellants presented no contrary evidence, expert or otherwise,

in this respect (and it is not common knowledge or judicially

known that the matters referenced by appellants are indicia of

likely counterfitting). On the basis of the present scanty

record we cannot say that the district court erred in holding

that the summary judgment record reflects a genuinely disputed

issue of fact concerning whether a reasonable police officer

could have reasonably concluded that there was probable cause to

arrest.1 Therefore, the district court’s denial of the motion

for summary judgment based on qualified immunity filed by
3

Moseley, Gilmore, and Stout is

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                       703
<INVENTORY>                                     36,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,398
<PP&E>                                          36,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,056
<SALES>                                         74,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,805
<CGS>                                           42,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,985
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2363 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2363

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty on 
 persons who are convicted of killing peace officers and who flee the 
                                country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2005

    Mr. Dreier (for himself, Mr. Schiff, Mr. McKeon, and Mrs. Bono) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty on 
 persons who are convicted of killing peace officers and who flee the 
                                country.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Peace Officer Justice Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF FEDERAL CRIME FOR KILLING PEACE OFFICERS AND 
              TRAVELING IN FOREIGN COMMERCE.

    (a) Federal Crime Relating to Peace Officers.--Section 1121 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(c)(1) Whoever intentionally kills any peace officer engaged in, 
or on account of the performance of, such officer's official duties, 
and moves or travels in foreign commerce with intent to avoid 
prosecution or confinement after conviction of that crime, shall be 
sentenced according to the terms of section 1111.
    ``(2) As used in this section, the term `peace officer' means any 
officer of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a 
State who is empowered by law to conduct investigations of or to make 
arrests for offenses against the criminal laws of the United States, 
the State, or the political subdivision.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) The heading for section 1121 of title 18, United States 
        Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 1121. Killing persons aiding Federal investigations, killing 
              State correctional officers, and killing peace 
              officers''.
            (2) The item relating to section 1121 in the table of 
        sections for chapter 51 of such title is amended to read as 
        follows:

``1121. Killing persons aiding Federal investigations, killing State 
                            correctional officers, and killing peace 
                            officers.''.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 21458-0-II.

Division Two.

October 17, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rene Espinoza-Mendez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-1-01743-6, Frederick B. Hayes, J., entered December 17, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J.