alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
SHADAB DAIM GHAZALI, a .k.a
. Anwe r M oha m m a d M a lik, Pe titione r,
v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-71761 Age n c y No. A097-102-188
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d July 22, 2014 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, C ANB Y, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s . Sha da b Da im Gha z a li, a

native and c itiz e n of Pakista n, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his motion to re o pe n re m ova l 

# FIL ED AUG 4 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). Thus, we de ny Ha n’ s re que st for ora l a rgum e nt.proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for an a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion to re o pe n , Toufighi v . Muk ase y , 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th C i r. 2008), a

nd re v ie w de novo dueproc e ss c la im s, Hamazaspyan v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th C ir. 2009). W e de ny the pe tition for re v ie w. In this c a se , the B IA did not a buse its disc re tion in deny i ng Gha z a li’ s m otion to re ope n in orde r to pursue an a pplic ation for a sy lum

ba se d on its finding tha

t Gha z a li fa ile d to c om

port with a

proc e dura l re quire m e nt for m o tions to re o pe n. Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(1); Rome ro-Ruiz v . Muk ase y , 538 F.3d 1057, 1063-64 (9th C ir. 2008) (holding the B IA did not a

buse its disc re t ion in finding pe t itione r did not to sa

tisfy the proc e dura l re quire m e nts for his motion, in pa rt be c a use pe titione r fa ile d to submi t a “ c o m ple te d a pplic ation for re lie f[.] ” ). Furthe r, the B IA did not e rr by

not re m anding thec a se to the IJ. Se e Lata v . IN S , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (re q uiring e rror to pre va il on a due proc e ss c la im ). Fina lly , we do not re a c h Gha z a li’ s c onte ntions re ga rding theIJ’ s de nia l of his
m otion. S

e e Singh v . Ashc roft , 301 F.3d 1109, 1111 (9th C ir. 2002) (“ Whe re , a s he re , the B IA re v ie ws the IJ’ s de c ision denovo, our re vie wis limite d to the B IA’ s de c ision.” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 1
- 7 1 7 6 1 2
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1628 

For the relief of Elvira Arellano. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005 

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Elvira Arellano. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ELVIRA 

4 ARELLANO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, for purposes of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act, Elvira Arellano shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•HR 1628 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Elvira Arellano en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, notwithstanding any pro5 vision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, be eligible 

6 for adjustment of status under section 245 of such Act 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Elvira Arellano, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00262-TLS-JEM document 3 filed 06/23/16 page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease
Finance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October 22, 2004


                            /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy
                            ------------------------
                              STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY
                Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                                      -28-
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION of CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**The undersigned herby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:**•** the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and**•** the information contained in the report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the Company’s consolidated financial conditionand results of operations.The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the report or as a separate disclosure document.     /s/ JoAnn N. McMinn   JoAnnN. McMinn, Chief Financial Officer     Dated: 05-10-2006  
21
# L_2008086EN.01002701.xml

| 28.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 86/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 86/27

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 February 2008

on the conclusion of a Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(2008/271/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5) and 181 in conjunction with the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the 2005 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States on 21 February 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States on 21 February 2007.

| (2) | The Second Additional Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Second Additional Protocol should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community and its Member States.

The text of the Second Additional Protocol is attached to this Decision (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall give the notification provided for in Article 5 of the Second Additional Protocol.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

A. VIZJAK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 2.6.2007, p. 69.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with Amendment No. 2 filed on Form 10-KSB/A to the Annual Report of
Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I,  the undersigned, in the capacity and
on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  January 14,
2009








By /s/  JAMES F.
WESTMORELAND


James F. Westmoreland, President,Chief Executive Officer


andinterim principal finance
and accounting officer


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
[No. 20992-6-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Santana B. Rosas, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-8-00895-5, Brian M. Tollefson, J., entered July 8, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridge-water, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Morgan, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 384 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 239
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 384

                          [Report No. 112-97]

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                        breast cancer research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2011

  Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mrs. Hutchison, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Snowe, 
Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Portman, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Blumenthal, 
   Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Begich, Mr. Coons, Mr. Barrasso, Ms. 
  Mikulski, Mr. Burr, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Johnson of South 
Dakota, Mr. Tester, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Moran, Mr. Cochran, 
    Mrs. Murray, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Hatch, Mr. 
   Isakson, Mr. Risch, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
  Leahy, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Nelson of 
   Florida, Mr. Lugar, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Manchin, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. 
Murkowski, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Cornyn, 
  Mr. Rubio, Mrs. Hagan, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
Bingaman, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Kyl, Ms. 
Collins, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Corker, Mr. Udall of 
    Colorado, Mr. Casey, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Crapo) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                           November 29, 2011

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                        breast cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2011'' and inserting ``2015''.
                                                       Calendar No. 239

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 384

                          [Report No. 112-97]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                        breast cancer research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 29, 2011

                       Reported without amendment
```
[No. 37432-0-I.

Division One.

May 27, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jason Scott Bell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-01566-9, Richard M. Ishikawa, J., entered October 2, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, A.C.J., concurred in by Becker and Ellington, JJ.
# L_2008283EN.01003401.xml

| 28.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/34

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1059/2008

of 27 October 2008

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Arroz del Delta del Ebro or Arròs del Delta de l’Ebre (PDO))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Spain to enter the name ‘Arroz del Delta del Ebro’ or ‘Arròs del Delta de l’Ebre’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Spain to enter the name ‘Arroz del Delta del Ebro’ or ‘Arròs del Delta de l’Ebre’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The designation contained in the Annex to this Regulation shall be entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 314, 22.12.2007, p. 46.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Arroz del Delta del Ebro or Arròs del Delta de l’Ebre (PDO)

---
The Honorable Patrick A. Conmy, United States District Judge for the District 1

of North Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

__________________

Nos. 97-2805/97-3454

__________________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. * Appeals from the United States

 * District Court for the

Randy M. Oster, * District of North Dakota.

 *

Appellant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Lois M. Oster, *

 *

Defendant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 29, 1998

 Filed: May 4, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Randy M. Oster, co-defendant with his wife in an

eviction action initiated by the United States, appeals from the district court&s denial 1

of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions and its issuance of a writ of assistance. Oster
-2-

argues on appeal that he is entitled to Rule 60(b) relief because the district court lacked

jurisdiction to enter the eviction order, and the Osters were denied a full redemption

period. After careful review we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion

when it denied Oster Rule 60(b) relief. See Schultz v. Commerce First Fin., 24 F.3d

1023, 1024 (8th Cir. 1994). We also conclude Oster&s argument that the district court

lacked jurisdiction to issue the writ of assistance is meritless. See Lara v. Secretary of

Interior, 820 F.2d 1535, 1543 (9th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[No. 37954-2-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Ronald D. Dotzauer, *Respondent,*and Angela M. Dotzauer, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 93-3-03392-5, Paul D. Hansen, J., entered December 1, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, A.C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Agid, JJ.