alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714909
<NAME> 82I
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          63,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,289
<PP&E>                                       9,884,989
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,580,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 430,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,929
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     412,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   430,993
<SALES>                                        315,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,162
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  317,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (544)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report ofWestwood Holdings Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian O. Casey, President &Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: February 25, 2011 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

LACEY POVRZENICH

v.

JENNIFER K. RIPEPI, M.D.; JENNIFER K. 

RIPEPI PEDIATRICS, LLC; FRANK G. 

DIETTINGER, M.D.; IMAGING 

ASSOCIATES OF GREATER 

PITTSBURGH, LLC; AND MONONGAHELA 

VALLEY HOSPITAL LACEY 

POVRZENICH, A MINOR, BY AND 

THROUGH HER PARENTS AND NATURAL 

GUARDIANS, JANNA PALLOTTA AND 

EDWARD POVRZENICH

v.

DAWN R. MCCRACKEN, M.D.; DAWN 

MCCRACKEN, M.D., P.C.; 

MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL; 

AND MON VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH 

SERVICES, INC.

PETITION OF: MON VALLEY COMMUNITY 

HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 191 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

LACEY POVRZENICH, A MINOR BY AND 

THROUGH HER PARENTS AND NATURAL 

GUARDIANS, JANNA PALLOTTA AND 

EDWARD POVRZENICH

v.

DAWN R. MCCRACKEN, M.D., DAWN 

MCCRACKEN, M.D., PC.; MONONGAHELA 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 192 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[191 WAL 2021 and 192 WAL 2021] - 2

VALLEY HOSPITAL; AND MON VALLEY 

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

PETITION OF: MON VALLEY COMMUNITY 

HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### HUGHES, Appellant, v. SHEFFIELD FARMS-SLAWSON-DECKER CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 22, 1912.)

Action by Ellen Hughes, as administratrix, etc., against the Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Company. C. J. Earley, for appellant. G. W. Alger, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cicero Murphy, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered July 22, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant urges that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because the People did not turn over to defense counsel *896a sworn statement by one of the robbery victims when a request for *Brady*material was made *(Brady v Maryland,*373 US 83). Although the People should have turned over the statement at the time of the original request, we agree with the trial court that no evidence in the withheld statement was “so material or relevant to defendant’s case that * * * [he] was deprived of * * * a fair trial” *(People v Jones,*85 AD2d 50, 52-53). The trial court therefore acted properly in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to hand over the statement. Moreover, defendant (and his codefendant at trial) not only knew all of the facts and information contained in the statement, but were in direct contact with that victim with whom both they and their attorneys spoke. That victim even appeared in court in response to defendant’s subpoena and was available to testify.

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000715357
<NAME> FARM FRESH INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-06-1997
<CASH>                                             616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,054
<INVENTORY>                                     43,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,960
<PP&E>                                         201,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,791
<BONDS>                                        201,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,912
<SALES>                                        483,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               483,665
<CGS>                                          367,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  367,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2008200EN.01000601.xml

| 29.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 200/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 729/2008

of 28 July 2008

entering certain designations in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Czwórniak (TSG), Dwójniak (TSG), Półtorak (TSG), Trójniak (TSG))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, and pursuant to Article 19(3) of the same Regulation, Poland’s applications to enter the designations ‘Czwórniak’, ‘Dwójniak’, ‘Półtorak’ and ‘Trójniak’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, and pursuant to Article 19(3) of the same Regulation, Poland’s applications to enter the designations ‘Czwórniak’, ‘Dwójniak’, ‘Półtorak’ and ‘Trójniak’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the register. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the register.

| (3) | Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 266, 8.11.2007, p. 27, corrected in OJ C 83, 2.4.2008, p. 10 (Czwórniak), OJ C 268, 10.11.2007, p. 22, corrected in OJ C 43, 16.2.2008, p. 37 (Dwójniak), OJ C 267, 9.11.2007, p. 40, corrected in OJ C 83, 2.4.2008, p. 10 (Półtorak), OJ C 265, 7.11.2007, p. 29, corrected in OJ C 83, 2.4.2008, p. 10 (Trójniak).

2

---

ANNEX

Products of Annex I to the EC Treaty intended for human consumption:

Class 1.8.   Other products of Annex I to the Treaty

Czwórniak (TSG)

Dwójniak (TSG)

Półtorak (TSG)

Trójniak (TSG)

---
#### Rodking Service Station, Inc., Appellant, v Nathaniel D. Gribin, Respondent.

— In an action for a judgment declaring *874a subtenant’s use of leased premises to be proper, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), entered September 26, 1984, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment.

Order affirmed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of an appropriate judgment declaring the rights of the parties in accordance herewith.

The plaintiff corporation is the assignee of a lease between its assignor, Look Oil Company, Inc., and defendant’s father, which provides that the subject premises are “to be used and occupied only for a gasoline station”. Plaintiff subsequently sublet the premises to Joseph Intermor and, in January 1984, the subtenant, in addition to using the premises for the sale of gasoline, began using them for the sale and rental of video tapes. In February 1984, the defendant, who had inherited ownership of the leased property, became aware that the subtenant was selling and renting video tapes on the premises and, by a notice dated May 31, 1984, demanded that such use cease. Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action for a declaration that the use was proper.

The use clause in the lease is restrictive, permitting the premises to be used solely as a gasoline station. The sale and rental of video tapes is not incidental to the use of the premises as a gasoline station and is therefore prohibited by the terms of the lease *(Dennis & Jimmy’s Food Corp. v Milton Co.,*99 AD2d 477, *affd*62 NY2d 613). The affidavits of plaintiff’s three experts were insufficient to create an issue of fact requiring a trial.

Defendant did not .waive any objection to the sale and rental of video tapes by accepting rent for four months after he became aware of such use. The lease contains a so-called no-waiver provision which reserves the landlord’s rights and remedies even if there is a failure to insist upon strict performance of any terms. Defendant is entitled to exercise its remedies under the lease *(Dennis & Jimmy’s Food Corp. v Milton Co., supra).*Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2274 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur R-E. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur R-E. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR R-E. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.04 Polyisocyante cross linking 

agent products containing 

triphenylmethane 

triisocyante (CAS No. 2422– 

91–5) in solvents (provided 

for in subheading 

3824.90.28) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2274 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thomas P. Friezen,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c) presented in this annualreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: October 29, 2004 |   |                     |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                   |   |                     |
|                   |   | /s/ Thomas P. Friezen    |   |
|                   |   | Thomas  P. Friezen       |
|                   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NationalMercantile Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Scott A. Montgomery, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and forthe periods covered in the report.
|                       | /s/ SCOTT A. MONTGOMERY |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       | Scott A. Montgomery     |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |                    |
|                       |                    |
| Date: October 2, 2006 |                    |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2260 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2260

      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain adsorbent resins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain adsorbent resins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ADSORBENT RESINS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.07.11       Adsorbent resin    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         comprised of a                                                     31/2008
                         macroporous
                         polymer of
                         diethenylbenzene,
                         (CAS No. 9003-69-
                         4) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3911.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-01-1997
<CASH>                                         107,492
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,709
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,742
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,563,150
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,915
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,083
<LOANS>                                      1,904,178
<ALLOWANCE>                                     21,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,725,667
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,472,408
<SHORT-TERM>                                   791,953
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             48,854
<LONG-TERM>                                    131,829
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,152
<OTHER-SE>                                     274,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,725,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 42,297
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,898
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   935
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                68,130
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,091
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,666
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,464
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,673
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 574
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,161
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,047
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.58
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,903
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,457
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   418
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 28,600
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                20,173<F1>
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,717
<RECOVERIES>                                       286
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               21,415
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            14,661
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,754
<FN>
<F1>The allowance for LOAN LOSS - BEGINNING OF PERIOD has been restated to reflect
the merger with Country Bank Shares Corporation on July 16, 1997.
Accounted for under the pooling of interests method.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>