alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/    RYUJI YAMADARyuji YamadaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### ZEITZ et al. v. COOK et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1913.)

Action by Hyman Zeitz and another against Harry Cook and Aaron Benjamin.

PER CURIAIM.

Order vacating order for examination before trial reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Tbe affirmative defense is a legitimate ground to examine a plaintiff before trial. Plaintiffs' relation to this bond and mortgage necessarily implies that tbey know how they took It with the guaranty, and hence that a plaintiff can give testimony that is material upon tbe issue whether or not tbey made it a cover for a usurious loan to the mortgagor. Anderson v. Lisman, 130 App. Div. 134, 114 N. Y. Supp. 343. The grounds shown for such axamlnatioa were sufficient. Tisdale Lumber Co. v. Droge, 147 App. Div. 55, 131 N. 1. Supp. 633; Continental Securities Co. v. Belmont, 147 App. Div. 113, 131 N. Y. Supp. 713; Poole v. Means, 144 App. Div. 155, 128 N. Y. Supp. 751.
FDIC-Stats At A Glance

2nd Qtr 2001

Number of FDIC-Insured 8,178 8,477 1,569 1,624 9,747

Number of FDIC-Supervised 5,027 5,178 520 533 5,547

Total Assets $ 6,360 5,983 1,275 1,179 7,635

Total Loans $ 3,859 3,704 861 799 4,720

Domestic Deposits $ 3,565 3,289 776 716 4,341

Net Income $ 19.164 14.702 3.354 2.752 22.518

Percent Profitable % 92.9 93.0 89.1 92.0 92.2

Average Return on Assets % 1.24 0.99 1.01 0.99 1.20

 Assets under $1 Billion % 1.19 1.28 0.70 0.80 1.08

 Assets over $1 Billion % 1.25 1.14 1.10 1.05 1.22

Average Return on Equity % 14.31 11.81 11.90 12.02 13.92

Net Interest Margin % 3.86 3.99 3.10 3.02 3.73

Equity to Assets % 8.76 8.41 8.51 8.16 8.71

Noncurrent Loans * % 1.26 0.99 0.77 0.65 1.18

 Real Estate Loans % 0.91 0.77 0.74 0.62 0.86

 C&I Loans % 2.03 1.41 1.66 1.25 2.01

 Consumer Loans % 1.39 1.32 0.74 0.72 1.32

Coverage Ratio ** % 134.71 169.01 114.55 134.12 132.04

Net Charge-Off Rate % 0.78 0.58 0.25 0.18 0.68

 Real Estate Loans % 0.12 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.10

 C&I Loans % 1.05 0.60 1.23 0.58 1.05

 Consumer Loans % 2.48 2.23 1.92 1.66 2.43

* Nonaccruing loans and loans past due 90+ days

** Loss reserve as a percentage of noncurrent loans

Dollar Amounts in Billions

All Insured Institutions

2nd Qtr

Total

2nd Qtr 2001

2000

2nd Qtr 2000

2001 YTD 1998

2nd Qtr 2000

1999 1997

2nd Qtr 2001

Commercial Banks Savings Institutions

See back of page for FDIC historical trends.

Credit Card Loans

 Held on Balance Sheet $ 226 266 227 242 243

 Securitized and Sold $ 308 306 395 261 193

 Unused Commitments $ 2,727 2,537 2,129 2,042 1,677

 Total Credit Card Lines $ 3,261 3,108 2,751 2,544 2,112

Credit Card Loss Rate % 5.10 4.28 4.39 5.15 5.10

No. of Personal Bankruptcies 390,064 1,217,628 1,281,360 1,397,695 1,349,510
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**Statement Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**By**

**Principal Executive OfficerRegarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings**

 

Dated – January 14, 2003

 

Inaccordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Steven M.Besbeck, Chief Executive Officer of Creative Computer Applications, Inc. aCalifornia Corporation (“Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2002, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the quarterly reporton Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2002, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the datefirst written above.

 

 
|   | /s/  Steven M. Besbeck                                      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Steven M. Besbeck                                                |
|   | President, Chief Executive  Officer, and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Procera Networks, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Douglas J. Glader, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
        best
        of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        ss. 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Procera Networks, Inc., and will be retained by Procera Networks,Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
  Date:
        April 15, 2007
  /s/
        Douglas J. Glader
 Douglas
        J. Glader
 Chief
        Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2137 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2137

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-
           trifluoromethylbenxoyl)i soxazole (Isoxaflutole).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

  Mr. Berry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-
           trifluoromethylbenxoyl)i soxazole (Isoxaflutole).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-CYCLOPROPYL-4-(2-METHYLSULFONYL-4-
              TRIFLUOROMETHYLBENXOYL)ISOXAZOLE (ISOXAFLUTOLE).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.75       5-Cyclopropyl-4-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (2-methylsulfonyl-                                                 31/2008
                         4-
                         trifluoromethylbe
                         nxoyl)isoxazole
                         (Isoxaflutole)
                         (CAS No. 141112-
                         29-0) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2934.99.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7374
MACK WAYNE PETERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-979-5-BO) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mack Wayne Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. The district court dismissed the petition as f rivolous. Because Appellant has not exhausted his claims in state court, we grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal and modify the dismissal in this case, pursuant to our authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988), to reflect that the petition is dismissed without prejudice due to Appellant's failure to exhaust. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
# L_2010096EN.01000801.xml

| 16.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 96/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 96/8

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 of 25 February 2008 concerning the establishment of a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 60 of 5 March 2008
  )

On page 6, Article 8(4)(b):

for:

| ‘(b) | the consultation referred to Article 7(3)(b) indicates that the data has not been provided by Member States in accordance with Articles 16(3) and 20(1); or’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

the consultation referred to Article 7(3)(b) indicates that the data has not been provided by Member States in accordance with Articles 16(3) and 20(1); or’,

read:

| ‘(b) | the consultation referred to in Article 7(3)(b) indicates that the data has not been provided by Member States in accordance with Articles 16(4) and 20(1); or’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

the consultation referred to in Article 7(3)(b) indicates that the data has not been provided by Member States in accordance with Articles 16(4) and 20(1); or’.

---
Exhibit 10.59

 

AMENDMENT TO OCTOBER 1, 2014 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment, effective as of October 1, 2014, between Rockwell Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert L. Chioini (the “Optionee”).

 

WHEREAS, the October 1, 2014 resolutions of the Compensation Committee authorizing the October 1, 2014 Tranche B grant of 250,000 options (the “Tranche B Options”) to Optionee provide that the related option agreement shall state that such options are not intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

 

WHEREAS, this Amendment is being executed in accordance with the authorizing resolutions for the Tranche B Options in order to modify the grant agreement, dated as of October 1, 2014 (the “Tranche B Grant Agreement”);

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Tranche B Grant Agreement is amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Section 1.1 is amended to add the following at the end of such section:

 

The Option is not intended to satisfy the requirements of or be exempt from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

 

2.                                      Except as specifically modified herein, the remaining provisions of the Tranche B Grant Agreement remain in full force and effect.

 

3.                                      This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same Amendment.  This Amendment may be executed by signatures delivered by facsimile or electronic mail, each of which shall be fully binding on the signing party.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be duly executed on this 17th day of February, 2015, effective as of October 1, 2014.

 

	
ROBERT L. CHIOINI, as Optionee
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Robert L. Chioini
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ROCKWELL MEDICAL, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Thomas E. Klema
    	
 
    
	
Thomas E. Klema
    	
 
    
	
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and   Treasurer
Exhibit
10.l


 


AMENDMENT TO THE


CHANGE IN CONTROL,


SEVERANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


FOR THOMAS R. NELSON


 


This Amendment to
the Change in Control, Severance and Employment Agreement for Thomas R. Nelson
(the “Amendment”), is made this 17th day of September, 2003, between Hudson
United Bancorp and Hudson United Bank (collectively, the “Company”), a New
Jersey corporation which maintains its principal office at 1000 MacArthur
Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey, and Thomas R. Nelson (the “Executive”), and
amends the Change in Control, Severance and Employment Agreement for Thomas R.
Nelson, which was made effective as of October 1, 2002 (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Executive is presently an executive officer of the Company;  and


 


WHEREAS, the
Executive and the Company wish to amend the Agreement to clarify certain
provisions therein;


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
for the good and valuable consideration set forth herein and the Executive’s
continued valuable service to the Company, the Company and the Executive, each
intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Paragraph
9(d) of the Agreement, relating to “Payments and Benefits,” is amended by
adding the following language after the end of the first sentence thereof:


 


“For purposes of
the calculation of the bonus amount component of the Lump Sum only, Paragraph
1(b)(ii)(B), regarding the Time of the Change of Control, will be disregarded.”


 


2.                                       The
Company agrees that it will not treat (for tax reporting purposes or for
calculation purposes under Section 10 of the Agreement) any benefits under the
Hudson United Bancorp Supplemental Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) as
parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, to the
extent that such benefits were vested and accrued prior to the occurrence of
the change of control, as the SERP was not adopted in contemplation of such
change of control.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company
has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized representatives
pursuant to the authority of its Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee,
and the Executive has personally executed this Agreement, all as of the day and
year first above written.


 


	
  ATTEST:

  	
  HUDSON UNITED BANCORP
  AND

  
	
   

  	
  HUDSON UNITED BANK

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Charles F.X. Poggi

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Charles F. X. Poggi

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman, Compensation
  Committee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  WITNESS:

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Thomas R. Nelson

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Thomas R. Nelson
[No. 39566-1-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kristen Raquel Tait, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-06517-1, Michael Spearman, J., entered October 23, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### In re PRENTICE. In the matter of William S. P. Prentice.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 18, 1898.)

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 47 N. Y. Supp. 1146; 49 N. Y. Supp. 353.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lynn Owens, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on April 16, 1982, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Fein and Lynch, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, David R. Brown, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of National Mercantile Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusiness issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | November 14,  2006 |   | /s/ DAVID R. BROWN   |
|--------|--------------------|--------|----------------------|
|   |               |   | David R. Brown Chief |
|   |               |   | Financial Officer    |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
        This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                  1,723
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,723
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      32
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            (1,188)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,723
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          116
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              42
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            74
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        74
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               74
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.09
        

</TABLE>