alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                            |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   |                                            |
|  Date:  May 6, 2010 |   |  /s/ Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.                 |
|                          |   |  Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.                     |
|                          |   |  President and CEO                         |
|                          |   |                                            |
|                          |   |                                            |
|  Date:  May 6, 2010 |   | /s/ Doug Carpenter                              |
|                          |   |  C. Douglas Carpenter                      |
|                          |   |  Senior Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 120 (Friday, June 25, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13694]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Part 668


Office of Post-Secondary Education

CFR Correction

0
In Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Education, Parts 400 to 
679, revised as of July 1, 2020, on page 417, in section 668.41, 
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iii) are reinstated to read as follows:


Sec.  668.41   Reporting and disclosure of information.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Class action means a lawsuit or an arbitration proceeding in 
which one or more parties seeks class treatment pursuant to Federal 
Rule of Civil Procedure 23 or any State process analogous to Federal 
Rule of Civil Procedure 23.
    (ii) Class action waiver means any agreement or part of an 
agreement, regardless of its form or structure, between a school, or a 
party acting on behalf of a school, and a student that relates to the 
making of a Direct Loan or the provision of educational services for 
which the student received title IV funding and prevents an individual 
from filing or participating in a class action that pertains to those 
services.
    (iii) Pre-dispute arbitration agreement means any agreement or part 
of an agreement, regardless of its form or structure, between a school, 
or a party acting on behalf of a school, and a student requiring 
arbitration of any future dispute between the parties relating to the 
making of a Direct Loan or provision of educational services for which 
the student received title IV funding.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-13694 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-D
Exhibit 32Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
officer of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: May 7, 2006 | /s/ G. Anthony Busseni
|----------------- | ----------------------
|                  | G. Anthony Busseni    
|                  | President and CEO     

|Date: 5-5-06 | /s/ C Douglas Carpenter                  
|------------ | -----------------------------------------
|             | C. Douglas Carpenter                     
|             | Senior Vice President, Secretary, and CFO

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Farmers Capital Bank Corporation
and will be retained by Farmers Capital Bank Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles  USDA's Agricultural Research Service Honors Scientists of the YearApr 24, 2024Securing Plant Genebank Collections and Providing Educational Resources For Training OpportunitiesJul 07, 2021ARS Finds Added Value in Seeds that Restore Damaged HabitatsNov 19, 2019


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[No. 19814-2-II.

Division Two.

August 15, 1997.]

#### Joyce Gilbertson, *Appellant,*v. Kitsap Bank, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 94-2-02560-2, James D. Roper, J., entered July 14,1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1883 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cyfluthrin (Baythroid). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cyfluthrin (Baythroid). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYFLUTHRIN (BAYTHROID). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.77 Cyano-(4-fluoro-3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl-3- 

(2,2-dichloroethenyl)–2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS No. 68359–37– 

5) (provided for in subheading 2926.90.30) ............ 3.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1883 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Honorable Coke R. Stevenson, Jr. 

Administrator 

Texas Liquor Control Board 

Sam Houston State Office Bldg. 

Austin 11, Texas 

Opinion No. C-150 

Re: Whether employees who are 

put in one of the special 

S-2 or S-l rates on September 1, 1963, may be subsequently raised to Step 1 of 

the classification salary 

~schedule of H.B. 86 as their 

experience and performance 

Dear Mr. Stevenson: warrants. 

You have requested our interpretation of House 

Bill 86, the Appropriation Bill for the current biennium 

pertaining to the following situation: 

"On September 1, 1963 certain employees 

received a change In group classification. 

Those employees have been put in the special 

S-2 rate of the new salary group. Our question is, 'May employees who are put In one of 

the special S-2 or S-l rates on September 1, 

1963 be subsequently raised to step 1 of the 

classification salary schedule of H.B. 86 as 

their experience and performance warrants It?"' 

In our recent opinion of August 8, 1.963, Attorney 

General's Opinion No. C-123, we Interpreted the section 

involved here, to-wit: Section 1B of Houses Bill 86, pertaining to the special "S" rates. In that opinion we held 

that the hiring policies set forth in Section 1B applied 

equally to both those employees hired on and after September 1, 1963, and those who were employed prior to that 

date. Further, it was held that the merit salary increases 

provisions did not apply as regards raises up to and including Step 1. We further held that the det.ermination of 

-729- 
Hon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 2 (C-150) 

when an employee's experience and performance warranted a 

raise from special "S-2" to "S-l" and "S-l" to Step 1 Is 

within the discretion of the Individual department. 

Therefore, employees who are put In any of the special "S" rates need not be frozen there and may be raised, 

at the discretion of the Department, to Step 1 of the classification salary schedule of House Bill 86 as their experience and performance warrant. 

SUMMARY 

Employees put in one of the special 'S" rates on September 1, 

1963, may subsequently be raised 

to Step,1 of the designated salary 

range as the employees' experience 

and performance may warrant. 

Yours very truly, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General 

PP:.ms 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

BY &@ 

Assistant 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Robert Lewis 

J. S. Bracewell 

Ernest Fortenberry 

John Reeves 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

By: Stanton Stone 

-730-
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Groups
                        Corn & Soybean Virus Lab
                                    Soft Wheat Quality LabSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research Docs





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Soft Wheat Quality Research Reviews 2006-2013headline bar 2006 Research Review Conference 2007 Research Review Conference 2009 Research Review Conference 2010 Research Review Conference 2011 Research Review Conference 2013 Research Review Conference


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
---

Exhibit 99.17

MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATESMINE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 CONSENT OF MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. To:

   United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549Alberta Securities CommissionBritish Columbia Securities CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionAutorité des marchés financiersNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNorthwest Territories Registrar of SecuritiesNova Scotia Securities CommissionNunavut Registrar of SecuritiesPrince Edward Island Securities OfficeSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorYukon Registrar of Securitie Rio Alto Mining Limited
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Technical Report entitled "Shahuindo Heap Leach Project, Cajabamba, Peru", effective 26 September 2012 (the "Report") prepared for Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd. (the "Company") We do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled "Shahuindo Heap Leach Project, Cajabamba, Peru" with an effective date 26 September 2012 and dated November 9, 2012 (the "Technical Report") prepared for Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd. ("Sulliden") in compliance with National Instrument 43 -101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("43-101") by Carl Defilippi of Kappes, Cassiday & Associates and Thomas L. Dyer and Paul Tietz of Mine Development Associates, Inc. ("'MDA"), and of extracts from or a summary of the technical report and of certain mineral resource or reserve estimates and other information pertaining to the project, the use of our name in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF. The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Fonn 40-F") and consents to being named in the Form 40-F and authorize the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report. DATED the 13th day of March, 2015 By: /s/ “Thomas L. Dyer”Company: MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.Name:Thomas L. Dyer, P. Eng.Title: Senior Engineer
  775-856-5700 210 South Rock Blvd.Reno, Nevada 89502FAX: 775-856-6053


---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM J. SMITH, Medical Director, Washington State Penitentiary; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 35421

D.C. No. 4:20

- cv

- 05071

- TOR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 18, 2021 * *

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND

, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner John Robert Demos, Jr. appeals pro se from the

district court’s order dismissing his 42 U. S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal pursuant to a contempt order

. In Re

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 35421

Fillbach , 223 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir. 2000). We af firm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Demos’s action

because Demos’s action was within the scope of the district court’s contempt

order. See Demos v. U.S. Dist. Ct

. for Eas t. Dist. of Wash. , 925 F.2d 1160 , 1161

(9th Cir. 1991) (con firming that the Eastern and Western Districts of Washington

have entered final prefiling orders against Demos restricting Demos’s permission

to file certain actions ); Demos v. McNichols

, No. 91

- CV

- 00027

- LRS (E.D. Wash.

Aug . 26, 1991) (issuing contempt order barring Demos from initiating actions in

the Eastern District of Washington); see also In Re Fillbach , 223 F.3d at 1091

(litigant may not avoid a vexatious litigant order by filing suit in a different venue).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court because

they are not part of the record on appeal. See United States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870,

874 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 57 West Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 2062 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 57 West Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2005. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post al Service located at 57 West Street in Newville,
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 2413

MARCELA VANESSA SIGUENZA

- DE HENRIGUEZ, a/k/a Marcela Vanessa Siguenza

- De Henriquez; M.A.H

- S; M.J.H

- S

,

Petitioners

,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : May 17, 2019 Decided: May 2 3 , 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Nancy Pulliam Quinn, QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Papu Sandhu, Assistant Director, Matthew A. Connelly, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Marcela Vanessa Siguenza

- De Henriguez (Siguenza) and her minor children,

natives and citizens of El Salvad or, petition for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s

denial of Siguenza’s requests for the relief of asylum, withholding of removal and

protection under the Convention Against Torture . We have thoroughly reviewed the

record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of

the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial

evidence supports the Board’s decisi on, see INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481

(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.

See In re Siguenza

- De Henriguez (B.I.A. Nov. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

838 

CA 14-02124 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

 

CHERYL VOSS AND GREGORY VOSS, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEFFREY DUCHMANN, DOING BUSINESS AS TRADE 

WINDS TENT & PARTY RENTAL, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (MICELLE M. RAGUSA OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (BRIAN R. HOGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R.

Glownia, J.), entered April 9, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed

from, denied the motion of defendant to compel discovery responses

from plaintiffs. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: “It is well settled that a court is vested with

broad discretion to control discovery and that the court’s

determination of discovery issues should be disturbed only upon a

showing of clear abuse of discretion” (Roswell Park Cancer Inst. Corp.

v Sodexo Am., LLC, 68 AD3d 1720, 1721). We perceive no such abuse of

discretion in Supreme Court’s denial of that part of the motion of

defendant seeking to compel plaintiffs to provide authorizations

permitting disclosure of the billing records of plaintiffs’ private

health care insurers. Plaintiffs previously had provided

authorizations permitting defendant to obtain the billing records of

the health care providers of Cheryl Voss, the injured plaintiff, and

defendant “failed to show the relevancy of the demanded documents” to

its defense (Jordan v Blue Circle Atl., 296 AD2d 752, 753). 

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court