alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Agritech, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yu
      Chang, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Yu ChangYu
                Chang*Chief
                Executive Officer, President and
                Secretary*

























August
      10, **** 2007
NUMBER 13-19-00140-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RODOLFO A. ESCAMILLA, Appellant,

v.

SHELLY HOGAN ESCAMILLA, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court

of Live Oak County, Texas

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s unopposed joint 

motion to abate the appeal and remand to the trial court for further consideration of all 

final orders therein subject of this appeal. According to the motion, the dissolution of the 

injunction/restraining order entered against appellant is the subject of the appeal and 
2

upon entry of an agreement before the trial court, appellant will move for the appeal to be 

dismissed. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 

unopposed joint motion to abate and remand, is of the opinion that the motion should be 

granted. Accordingly, we hereby GRANT the motion, ABATE the appeal and REMAND 

the cause to the trial court. 

The Court directs appellants to file, on or before January 21, 2020, either (1) a 

motion to reinstate the appeal, accompanied by appellant’s brief in this matter, or (2) a 

motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

12th day of December, 2019.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARRYANNE MOSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUTOMOBILE WARRANTY SERVICES 

INC,

Defendant.

Case No.17-cv-00115-JSC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 57, 105, 108

Defendant Automobile Warranty Services Inc. (“Automobile”) was originally named as a 

Defendant in Case No. 15-cv-03456-JSC. On June 23, 2016, the default of Automobile was 

entered. (Dkt. No. 57.) Automobile has not consented to the jurisdiction of this Court, therefore 

on December 28, 2016, the Court proposed to sever the action against Automobile from Plaintiff’s 

action against the appearing defendants so that the Court could finally adjudicate the appearing 

parties’ claims and ordered the parties to file any objections to that proposal by January 6, 2017. 

(Dkt. No. 104.) No objections were filed and the Court severed the action against Automobile 

from Case No. 15-cv-03456-JSC and directed the Clerk’s Office to assign a new case number, 

which resulted in the case at hand, Case No. 17-cv-00115. (Dkt. No. 105.)

On June 7, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment or a 

notice of voluntary dismissal within 30 days. Plaintiff failed to do so. Plaintiff is ordered to show 

cause as to why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff’s response is due by October 11, 

2017. Failure to respond to this Order will result in dismissal of the action without further notice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2017
2

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2173 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,2 HEXANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.31 1,2 Hexanediol (CAS No. 

6920–22–5) (provided for in 

subheading 2905.39.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2173 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Laboratory for Agriculture and The Environment: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Additional Resources
                        About NLAE
                                    National Programs
                                    Soil, Water & Air Resources Research Unit
                                    Agroecosystem Management Research Unit
                                    Midwest Climate Hub
                                    NLAE Outreach to Stakeholders
                                    Data Sources
                                    ISU Partnership
                                    Cover Crops Resources
                                    Software Available from NLAE
                                    Natl. Lab for Ag. and the Env. Pubs
                                    Natl. Soil Tilth Lab Pubs
                                    Environmental, Safety, & Health
                                    IACUC Summary
                                    Presentations
                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Laboratory for Agriculture and The Environment Docs





- NLAE Home Page
- IACUC Summary

Environmental, Safety & Healthheadline bar < Return to Additional Resources  EMS Policy Statement (R. 2016)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Center for Agricultural Resources Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar Dryland Agriculture Interviews and Video   ARS News Articles  Truce Between Prairie Dogs and Livestock Farmers?Jul 29, 2021


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### KOZLOWSKI, Appellant, v. ROCHESTER, S. & E. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 13, 1912.)

Action by Anthony Kozlowski against the Rochester, Syracuse & Eastern Railroad Company. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See, also, 143 App. Div. 920, 127 N. Y. Supp. 1128.
# C_2008112EN.01001201.xml

| 7.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5116 — Total France/S-Oil/Total Isu Oil)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 112/08)

On 28 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5116. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5116. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Veraso Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Greer Foster Salvanita, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for appellant.The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered May 10, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is denied.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Since MVAIC established that there had been no timely filing of a notice to make claim (<i>see</i> Insurance Law ยง 5208 [a]), plaintiff's assignor is not a "covered person" (Insurance Law ยง 5221 [b] [2]). Thus, a condition precedent to plaintiff's right to apply for payment of no-fault benefits from defendant has not been satisfied (<a href="../2009/2009_50041.htm" target="_blank"><i>see M.N.M. Med. Health Care, P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 22 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50041[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]; <a href="../2007/2007_51607.htm" target="_blank"><i>Bell Air Med. Supply, LLC v MVAIC</i>, 16 Misc 3d 135</a>[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51607[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 2007]). In opposition to MVAIC's motion, plaintiff failed to establish that leave had been obtained to file a late notice of claim or otherwise raise a triable issue of fact (<i>see</i> Insurance Law ยง 5208 [c]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is reversed, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 08, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
# L_2008206EN.01003401.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 206/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 206/34

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 717/2008 of 17 July 2008 establishing a Community procedure for administering quantitative quotas

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 198 of 26 July 2008
  )

On page 1 the cover in the Contents, on page 1 in the title and on page 6 in the closing formula:

for:

‘
  17 July 2008
  ’,

read:

‘
  15 July 2008
  ’.

---
[No. 38021-4-I.

Division One.

August 4, 1997.]

#### Leader National Insurance Company, *Respondent,*v. Les Theriaults, Ltd., et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-2-05191-0, Robert S. Lasnik and Anthony P. Wartnik, JJ., entered January 2, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Agid, J.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of G REIT, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Annual Report on
    Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
    December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                           



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ ANTHONY W. THOMPSON
| |                        
| | Anthony W. Thompson    
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 14, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document. The signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to G REIT, Inc. and
will be retained by G REIT, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2279 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2279

               To suspend temporarily the duty on XAMA 2.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on XAMA 2.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. XAMA 2.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.10      (2,2-               Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Bishydroxybutyl                                                    31/2008
                         tris[3-1-
                         aziridinyl)propio
                         nate) (CAS No.
                         52234-82-9)
                         (provided for
                         subheading
                         2933.99.97)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Michael D. Corbin, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wheeling IslandGaming, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
|                   |   | /s/Michael  D. Corbin      |   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  March 31, 2005 |   | Michael  D. Corbin         |
|                   |   | Vice  President of Finance |

 

----
[No. 20860-1-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Samuel S. Diercks, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 95-1-00449-5, David R. Draper, J., entered June 27, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Armstrong, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2148 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulcuren UPKA 1988. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulcuren UPKA 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VULCUREN UPKA 1988. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.03 1,6-Bis(N,N′- 

dibenzylthiocarbamoyldthithio)hexane (CAS No. 

151900–44–6) (provided for 

in subheading 2930.20.20) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2148 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ