alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1824 

To provide for the duty-free entry of certain tramway cars and associated 

spare parts for use by the city of Portland, Oregon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2005 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the duty-free entry of certain tramway cars 

and associated spare parts for use by the city of Portland, Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRAMWAY CARS AND ASSOCIATED 

4 SPARE PARTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of the Bureau 

6 of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of 

7 Homeland Security shall admit free of duty 3 tramway 

8 cars (provided for in subheading 8603.10.00 of the Har9 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States) manufac10 tured in Ostrava, Czech Republic, for the use by the city 
2 

•HR 1824 IH 

1 of Portland, Oregon, and imported pursuant to a contract 

2 with the city of Portland, Oregon, and associated spare 

3 parts for such tramway cars (provided for in applicable 

4 subheadings of heading 8607 or other headings of the 

5 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) im6 ported pursuant to such contract, the foregoing to be en7 tered into the customs territory of the United States by 

8 not later than December 31, 2006. 

9 (b) RELIQUIDATION; REFUND OF AMOUNTS

10 OWED.— If the liquidation of the entry of any of the tram11 way cars or associated spare parts described in subsection 

12 (a) becomes final before the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs and Bor14 der Protection, notwithstanding any other provision of 

15 law, shall— 

16 (1) within 15 days after such date, reliquidate 

17 the entry in accordance with the provisions of this 

18 Act; and 

19 (2) at the time of such reliquidation, make the 

20 appropriate refund of any duty paid with respect to 

21 the entry. 

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research People Dennis Halterman





- Welcome Page
- About Dr. Halterman
- Positions Available
- Halterman Lab Photos
- Potato Late Blight
- Potato Early Dying
- Potato Early Blight
- Potato Virus Y
- Where the Wild things Grow
- How to Make a Better Potato
- Teaching Resources
- American Phytopathological Society
- Potato Association of America
- International Society for Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Our Lab Group Photos   /ARSUserFiles/50901000/HaltermanLab/DSCF0742.jpg Summer 2005  /ARSUserFiles/50901000/HaltermanLab/DSC_0505.jpg Summer 2010  /ARSUserFiles/50901000/HaltermanLab/P1010224.jpg Summer 2014  /ARSUserFiles/50901000/HaltermanLab/IMG_2678.jpg Spring 2016


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 9, 2010, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Form 20-F filed on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Durham, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul DurhamPaul DurhamChief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting OfficerDate: October 25, 2010
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE; THE

BOAT COMPANY; ALASKA

WILDERNESS RECREATION AND

TOURISM ASSOCIATION; SOUTHEAST

ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL;

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE

COUNCIL; TONGASS CONSERVATION

SOCIETY; GREENPEACE, INC.;

WRANGELL RESOURCE COUNCIL;

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL

DIVERSITY; DEFENDERS OF

WILDLIFE; CASCADIA WILDLANDS;

SIERRA CLUB,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

AGRICULTURE; UNITED STATES

FOREST SERVICE; TOM VILSACK, in

his official capacity as Secretary of

Agriculture; HARRIS SHERMAN, in

his official capacity as Under

Secretary of Agriculture of Natural

Resources and Environment; TOM

TIDWELL, in his official capacity as

Chief, USDA Forest Service,

Defendants,

No. 11-35517

D.C. No.

1:09-cv-00023-

JWS

ORDER
2 ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE V. USDA

ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Intervenor-Defendant,

and

STATE OF ALASKA,

Intervenor-Defendant—Appellant.

Filed August 29, 2014

ORDER

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,

it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule

35-3.

Judge Berzon did not participate in the deliberations or

vote in this case.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                              OF DONLAR CORPORATION

         ARTICLE FOUR of the Articles of Incorporation of DONLAR CORPORATION
shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

                                  ARTICLE FOUR

         The authorized shares shall be:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Par Value                              Number of
    Class                                            Per Share                          Shares Authorized
    -----                                            ---------                          -----------------
<S>                                                  <C>                                <C>
Common Stock                                          No Par                               200,000,000
Preferred Stock                                       No Par                               100,000,000
</TABLE>

The Board of Directors is expressly authorized at any time, and from time to
time, to provide for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in one or more
series, with such voting powers, full or limited, or without voting powers, and
with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or
other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof,
as shall be expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the
issuance thereof adopted by the Board of Directors and as are not expressed in
these Articles of Incorporation or any amendment thereto.
#### NORTON, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by Roscoe G. Norton against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# L_2008252EN.01004302.xml

| 20.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 914/2008 of 18 September 2008 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 251 of 19 September 2008
  )

On page 23, recital 5:

for:

‘The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,’,

read:

‘The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,’.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL 

Case No. CV 15-5224-DMG (RAOx) Date May 20, 2016 

Title Micheal Mabry, et al. v. Quality Drive Away, Inc., et al. 

CV-90 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk KT 

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Kane Tien Not Reported 

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter 

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) 

Not Present Not Present 

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of 

Prosecution 

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons 

and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the 

defendant is the United States). 

In the present case, it appears that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, 

on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before June 3, 2016 why this action 

should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. 

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand 

submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) 

is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the 

date indicated above.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Animal Disease Center: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Food Safety and Enteric PathogensSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Docs Modernization





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News
- NADC Seminar Series
- International Symposium
- Proteomics Group
- Production Session Talks and Handouts
- Virtual Conference

Page 6headline bar 1 - Modernization
               2 - Page 2
                  3 - Page 3
                  4 - Page 4
                  5 - Page 5
                  6 - Page 6
                  7 - Page 7  Modernization HeaderGroundbreaking for the Phase II Laboratory began on September 26, 2005.This laboratory will be comprised of 4 main lab wings and will cover 545,803 square feet. Animal health research, diagnostic, and product evaluation testing will take place in this facility.Modernization Footer << Previous

                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        [6]
                        7

                     Next >>


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:16-CR-008 JD

)

MATTHEW MURPHY (03) )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on March 9, 2016 [DE 46]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Matthew Murphy’s plea of guilty, and FINDS

the defendant guilty of Count 3 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: March 25, 2016

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court

USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cr-00008-JD-MGG document 51 filed 03/25/16 page 1 of 1
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Procera Networks, Inc.; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 6, 2012                                |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   |
| /s/ Charles Constanti                        |   |
| Charles Constanti                            |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |

----
# L_2008280EN.01000101.xml

| 23.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1037/2008

of 22 October 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 October 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 107,3 |
| MA | 53,1 |
| MK | 47,2 |
| TR | 86,0 |
| ZZ | 73,4 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 162,5 |
| TR | 108,4 |
| ZZ | 135,5 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 134,9 |
| ZZ | 134,9 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 99,6 |
| TR | 106,2 |
| ZA | 80,2 |
| ZZ | 95,3 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 245,5 |
| TR | 107,3 |
| US | 174,6 |
| ZZ | 175,8 |
| 0808 10 80 | AU | 161,1 |
| CA | 97,3 |
| CL | 72,8 |
| CN | 93,4 |
| MK | 32,9 |
| NZ | 103,2 |
| US | 126,3 |
| ZA | 90,0 |
| ZZ | 97,1 |
| 0808 20 50 | CL | 60,3 |
| CN | 97,1 |
| TR | 125,5 |
| ZZ | 94,3 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

107,3

MA

53,1

MK

47,2

TR

86,0

ZZ

73,4

0707 00 05

JO

162,5

TR

108,4

ZZ

135,5

0709 90 70

TR

134,9

ZZ

134,9

0805 50 10

AR

99,6

TR

106,2

ZA

80,2

ZZ

95,3

0806 10 10

BR

245,5

TR

107,3

US

174,6

ZZ

175,8

0808 10 80

AU

161,1

CA

97,3

CL

72,8

CN

93,4

MK

32,9

NZ

103,2

US

126,3

ZA

90,0

ZZ

97,1

0808 20 50

CL

60,3

CN

97,1

TR

125,5

ZZ

94,3

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMCORE
Financial, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth E. Edge, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth E. Edge    
|Kenneth E. Edge        
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 10, 2006           

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will
be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Court of Honor v. Wallace *et al.*

No. 673.

Opinion Filed May 12, 1909.

(102 Pac. 111.)

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Grounds. A *petition in error will*be dismissed on motion, even though the same is filed in this court within the year allowed under the statute, where no waiver of issuance and service of summons in error is had, and no praecipe for the same filed, and no summons issued of general appearance made, within such time.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from District Court, Logan County j A. H. Houston, Judge.*

Action„by Mary M. Wallace and another against the Court of Honor. Judgment for plaintiffs, and , defendant brings error. Plaintiffs move to dismiss the petition in error.

Motion sustained.

*F. C. Hunt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ilainer & Martin*and *Tibbets & Green,*for defendants in error.

Dunn, J.

On February 26, 1908, a judgment was rendered in the above-entitled cause in fávor of defendants in error, and on the same day a -motion for new trial was filed and overruled by the trial court, and plaintiff in error given 90 days in which to serve a case-made. The case-made was served on the 28th day of August, 1908, and on the same' day signed and settled by the trial judge. The petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court *735February 20, 1909, but no praecipe for or issuance of summons in error, or waiver thereof, or general appearance of any kind made, until March 8, 1909, at which time plaintiff in error filed a praecipe and had issued a summons in error. Defendants in error move to dismiss the petition in error, for the reason that the court has no jurisdiction because of the fact that the proceeding in error was not commenced within one year from the date of the judgment and order of the district court overruling the'motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial.

This motion must be sustained. This question was passed upon at this term of court in the case of *McMurtry v. Byrd et al.,*ante, p. 597, 101 Pac. 1117, in which it is held:

> "A petition in error will be dismissed on motion, even though the same is filed in this court wfithin the year allowed under the statute, where no waiver of issuance and service of summons in error is had, and no praecipe for the same filed, and no summons issued or general appearance made within such time.”

See, also, *Walton et al. v. Williams et al.,*5 Okla. 642, 49 Pac. 1022; *Wedd v. Gates et al.,*15 Okla. 602, 82 Pac. 808.

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

All the Justices concur.
#### Peter E. Grevelding, Jr., as Executor of Jason M. Rhoades, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 109855.)

[944 NYS2d 713]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Smith, J.E, Feradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.