alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 29, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0494]


Security Zones, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels, 
Puget Sound, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notification of non-enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will not enforce the security zones for 
Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week moving vessels, Puget Sound, WA in July or 
August 2021. The Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound has determined 
that enforcement of this regulation is not necessary because the event 
is cancelled.

DATES: The Coast Guard does not plan to enforce regulations in 33 CFR 
165.1333 in July or August 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of non-enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Peter 
McAndrew, Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#184b7d7b6c776a486d7f7d6c4b776d767c4f4f55586d6b7b7f36757174"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="481b2d2b3c273a183d2f2d3c1b273d262c1f1f05083d3b2b2f66252124">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard normally enforces the 
Security Zones in 33 CFR 165.1333 for the Seattle Seafair Fleet Week 
moving vessels and parade of ships. This event is typically held 
annually during the parade of ships between July 25 and August 14. This 
year, the event organizers cancelled Seafair and Fleet Week. Therefore, 
the Coast Guard does not plan to enforce the security zones in 33 CFR 
165.1333 in July or August 2021.
    In addition to this notification of non-enforcement in the Federal 
Register, if the situation changes and the Captain of the Port Sector 
Puget Sound (COTP) determines that the regulated area needs to be 
enforced, the COTP will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and 
provide actual notice of enforcement to any persons in the regulated 
area.

    Dated: June 21, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2021-13834 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
QBP-Stats At A Glance

Total

Dollar Amounts in Billions 4th Qtr 2002 4th Qtr 2001 4th Qtr 2002 4th Qtr 2001 4th Qtr 2002

Number of FDIC-Insured 7,887 8,079 1,467 1,534 9,354

Number of FDIC-Supervised 4,859 4,971 493 513 5,352

Total Assets $ 7,075 6,552 1,359 1,317 8,434

Total Loans $ 4,160 3,889 897 878 5,057

Domestic Deposits $ 4,031 3,748 879 812 4,910

Net Income $ 21.657 18.446 3.986 3.657 25.643

Percent Profitable % 89.3 87.2 92.0 89.8 89.7

Average Return on Assets % 1.24 1.12 1.18 1.13 1.23

Assets under $1 Billion % 1.12 1.03 0.51 0.76 0.99

Assets over $1 Billion % 1.26 1.14 1.36 1.23 1.27

Average Return on Equity % 13.46 12.49 12.45 12.96 13.30

Net Interest Margin % 4.04 4.16 3.33 3.41 3.92

Equity to Assets % 9.16 9.06 9.47 8.60 9.21

Noncurrent Loans * % 1.46 1.41 0.93 0.86 1.36

Real Estate Loans % 0.89 0.96 0.90 0.82 0.89

C&I Loans % 2.92 2.41 1.99 1.92 2.88

Consumer Loans % 1.51 1.48 0.67 0.72 1.44

Coverage Ratio ** % 127.13 131.72 98.91 102.59 123.72

Net Charge-Off Rate % 1.10 1.32 0.41 0.34 0.97

Real Estate Loans % 0.18 0.22 0.10 0.05 0.16

C&I Loans % 1.75 2.42 2.95 1.09 1.80

Consumer Loans % 3.14 3.36 2.41 2.97 3.08

* Nonaccruing loans and loans past due 90+ days

** Loss reserve as a percentage of noncurrent loans

All Insured Institutions 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998

Credit Card Loans

Held on Balance Sheet $ 292 250 266 227 242

Securitized and Sold $ 378 339 301 293 259

Unused Commitments $ 3,361 2,885 2,539 2,129 2,042

Total Credit Card Lines $ 4,031 3,474 3,106 2,649 2,543

Credit Card Loss Rate % 6.22 5.16 4.36 4.39 5.15

No. of Personal Bankruptcies 1,537,730 1,451,575 1,217,628 1,281,360 1,397,695

As of December 31, 2002

Commercial Banks Savings Institutions
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130187 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, JOANN KUSMIERZ, KERRY KUSMIERZ, Justices KIM L. LINDEBAUM, JAMES B. LINDEBAUM, and M SUPPLY CO., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 130187 COA: 258021 Bay CC: 01-003467-CZ JOYCE SCHMITT and DIANE RANKIN, Defendants-Appellees,

and

RONALD SCHMITT, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On November 14, 2006, the Court heard or al argument on the ap plication for leave to appeal the November 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is ag ain considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1 ). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of th e Court of Appeals judgment assessing case evaluation sanctions, and REMAND this cas e to the Bay Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent w ith this order. Because the pa rties stipulated to a lump sum case evaluation award, there was no “amount of the evaluation . . . as to . . . particular pair[s] of parties” for purpose s of MCR 2.403(O)(4)(a). Without such an amount, the court cannot compare the verdict to the case evaluation award for each pair of parties as required by the court rules, a nd the court cannot determine whether either party received a more favorable verdict. Th erefore, neither party is entitled to case
evaluation sanctions. Plaintiffs are direct ed to reimburse defendants for the case
evaluation sanctions that have already been paid.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

d1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          73,250
<SECURITIES>                                   282,611
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,312
<INVENTORY>                                     23,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               498,222
<PP&E>                                         224,970
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 704,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,690
<BONDS>                                         64,289
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           739
<OTHER-SE>                                     558,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   704,912
<SALES>                                        109,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,391
<CGS>                                           23,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000714719
<NAME> FIRST COLONIAL GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,832
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             142
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     63,325
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,585
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,541
<LOANS>                                        224,153
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 332,142
<DEPOSITS>                                     274,704
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,443
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,544
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,813
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 332,142
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,718
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,294
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    18
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,030
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,557
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,473
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      113
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 140
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    967
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         704
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.68
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,006
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,100
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,532
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      128
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,537
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,004
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            533
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

[Date]

 

[Name]

[Street Address]

[City], [State]   [Zip Code]

 

Re:          Retention Bonus

 

Dear                                                 :

 

Alteva, Inc. (the “Company”) wants to ensure your continued services to the Company.  Therefore, we are pleased to inform you that you are eligible to receive a retention bonus, subject to the terms of this letter.

 

1.              Retention Bonus.  You are eligible to receive a total retention bonus amount equal to 25% of your current base salary (the “Retention Bonus”) based on your continued service relationship with the Company.  If you are continuously employed by or in a service relationship with the Company from the date of this letter through June 15, 2015, then the Company will pay you the Retention Bonus on the first payroll ending after June 15, 2015.  The Retention Bonus payment will be reduced by all applicable tax withholdings.

 

2.              Prerequisites to Payment.  The Company will pay you the Retention Bonus on the applicable payment date described in paragraph 1 above only if you are continuously employed by or providing services to the Company through June 15, 2015.  If your employment or service relationship with the Company terminates for any reason before the applicable payment date, then you will forfeit any and all right to payment of the unpaid Retention Bonus.

 

3.              At-Will Employment.  Your employment with the Company remains at-will and may be terminated at any time with or without advance notice and with or without cause subject to the terms of your employment agreement, if any.

 

4.              Choice of Law/Entire Agreement.  This letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its rules on choice of law.  This letter agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties relating to this subject matter and supersedes all prior or simultaneous representations, discussions, negotiations, and agreements, whether written or oral.

 

signature page follows

 











 

Please indicate your agreement to the terms and conditions of this letter agreement by signing the enclosed copy of this letter agreement under the acknowledgment below and returning it to Brian Callahan at the following address: 401 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

 

 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Alteva, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    


 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

 

I have read this letter agreement in its entirety and fully understand and agree to the terms and conditions for receiving the Retention Bonus.

 

 

	
Dated:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, in connection with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(i) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                    |  | 
| |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
| |  | March 31, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael S. McClure                                             |  | 
| |  | Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Michael S. McClure                                                 |  | 
| |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer) |  |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12681]



[[Page 27560]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Northrop Grumman Corporation Research and 
Development Venture

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 22, 1995, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Northrop Grumman Corporation has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are: Grumman Aerospace Company, 
Bethpage, NY (a subsidiary of Northrop Grumman Corporation); The Cyril 
Bath Company, Monroe, NC; and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 
Cambridge, MA. The objective of the venture is to conduct joint 
research to develop commercially viable technology for reconfigurable 
tooling for sheet metal forming and other potential low rate production 
applications for an adaptive factory environment.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12681 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
EXHIBIT 32
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Steven B. Solomon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of CDSS Wind Down Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CDSS Wind Down Inc.
 
 
 By: /s/STEVEN B. SOLOMON
 Steven B. Solomon
 Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
 March 31, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 

LANCE BARRON ROBEY, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) No. 1:13-cv-0889-TWP-DKL 

 ) 

GRANT COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) 

DEPARTMENT, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

Order Transferring Action to Northern District of Indiana

Plaintiff Lance Barron Robey resides in Marion, Indiana. In this civil rights 

complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983, Robey names as defendants the 

Grant County Sheriff’s Department and Grant County Sheriff’s Deputy Brent 

Beebe. Grant County, Indiana lies within the Northern District of Indiana. 28 

U.S.C. ' 94. Robey alleges that the defendants violated his Fourth Amendment 

rights. He has paid the filing fee. He has requested the court’s assistance with 

serving process on the defendants. 

When jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity, venue is proper only in 

the district in which (1) any defendant resides, if all of the defendants reside in the 

same state, (2) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim 

occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is 

situated, or (3) any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the 

action may otherwise be brought. 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b). Here, the events giving rise 
to the claim occurred, and the defendants can be found, in the Northern District of 

Indiana. Another statute, 28 U.S.C. ' 1404, provides: "For the convenience of 

parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any 

civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought." 

Under these circumstances, the better venue for the action is the Northern District 

of Indiana. 

Accordingly, the above action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana at Fort Wayne, Indiana. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: __________________ 

Distribution: 

Lance Barron Robey 

3728 Frances Slocum Trail, Apt. #11 

Marion, IN 46952 

06/05/2013

 ________________________ 

 Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge 

 United States District Court 

 Southern District of Indiana
USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00033-RLM-MGG document 240 filed 06/14/19 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00033-RLM-MGG document 240 filed 06/14/19 page 2 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00033-RLM-MGG document 240 filed 06/14/19 page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                     SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906
          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the Quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the
"Report"), Norman L Lowery , as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Michael A. Carty, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.    This Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

November 3, 2004                      By /s/ Norman L. Lowery
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Norman L. Lowery, Vice Chairman & CEO
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)

November 3, 2004                      By /s/ Michael A. Carty
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Michael A. Carty, Treasurer & CFO
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)
# L_2008276EN.01002701.xml

| 17.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1014/2008

of 16 October 2008

entering certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (České pivo (PGI), Cebreiro (PDO))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and pursuant to Article 17(2) thereof, the Czech Republic’s application to register the name ‘České pivo’ and Spain’s application to register the name ‘Cebreiro’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and pursuant to Article 17(2) thereof, the Czech Republic’s application to register the name ‘České pivo’ and Spain’s application to register the name ‘Cebreiro’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objections under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 were received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objections under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 were received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby entered in the Register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 October 2008.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 16, 23.1.2008, p. 14 (České pivo), OJ C 16, 23.1.2008, p. 23 (Cebreiro).

2

---

ANNEX

1.

| Class 1.3. | Cheeses |
| --- | --- |

Class 1.3.

Cheeses

SPAIN

Cebreiro (PDO)

2.

| Class 2.1. | Beers |
| --- | --- |

Class 2.1.

Beers

CZECH REPUBLIC

České pivo (PGI)

---