alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

MUHAMMAD AZIZ, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

HONORABLE SHEILA WOODSSKIPPER, 

 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 149 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED, and the 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
[No. 39336-7-I.

Division One.

October 20, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jerome Steven Talley, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-02787-8, Marilyn R. Sellers, J., entered September 9, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# C_2009014EN.01000201.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5324 — Centrica/Segebel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 14/03)

On 14 January 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5324. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5324. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of Wyndham International, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wyndham International, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:    November 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/    Fred J.
Kleisner          
|-------------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------
|                           |  |     |  | Name:  Fred J. Kleisner          
|                           |  |     |  | Title:    Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

SANTIAGO ABREU,

Plaintiff,

vs.

L. C., LTD; PHILIP STRUEBIG; AND

CYNTHIA J. STRUEBIG,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:16-cv-00245

Hon. Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties, by and through the undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to the dismissal

of Plaintiff’s Complaint, and all claims made therein, against Defendant in its entirety with

prejudice and without costs or fees to either party. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: October 27, 2016 /s/ George T. Blackmore

By: George T. Blackmore, Esq.

21411 Civic Center Drive, Suite 200

Southfield, MI 48076

Email: george@cnalawgroup.com

Telephone: (248) 845-8594

Fax: (480) 999-0665

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: October 27, 2016 /s/Daniel Zamudio

By: Daniel Zamudio, Esq.

Zamudio Law Professionals, PC

233 South Colfax

Griffith, Indiana 46319

Email: dan@zlawpro.com

Phone: (219) 924-2300

Fax: (219) 924-2401

Attorney for Defendants

1

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00245-JVB-PRC document 16 filed 11/08/16 page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab Docs Cereal Rust Bulletins







2021 Cereal Rust Bulletinsheadline bar **2021 Cereal Rust Bulletins** Cereal rust bulletin #1  4/23/2021
Cereal rust bulletin #2  5/20/2021
Cereal rust bulletin #3  6/14/2021
Cereal rust bulletin #4  7/09/2021
Cereal rust bulletin #5  8/20/2021 **2021 cereal rust collection maps***(Maps are updated as collections**are received.)* Wheat Leaf Rust (08/24/2021)
Wheat Stem Rust (08/24/2021)
Oat Crown Rust (08/24/2021)
Oat Stem Rust (08/24/2021) **2021 cereal rust observation maps***(Maps are updated as reports**are received.)* Wheat Stripe Rust (07/09/2021)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Walker, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered on September 30, 1983, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. •

Judgment affirmed.

By his guilty plea, defendant effectively waived any claim that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30 *(People v O’Brien,*56 NY2d 1009). Furthermore, it does not appear that Criminal Term erred in *859rejecting defendant’s constitutionally based speedy-trial claims *(People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442; *People v Williams,*91 AD2d 1028).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for our review *(People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Cates,*104 AD2d 895) and no valid basis for reversal in the interest of justice appears on this record. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmos Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James A. Meer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ss. of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ James A. Meer
                                        -------------------------------
                                        James A. Meer, Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 2, 2004
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 11027 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Bradley Paul Nichols,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20
- CR
- 205 - 1

**________________ ______________**  Before **Stewart, Dennis,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bradley Paul Nichols has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nichols has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r elevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 21, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-11027 Document: 00516720880 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2023No. 22
- 11027

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further res ponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-11027 Document: 00516720880 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2023
EX-10.100



 Exhibit 10.100 

lNG GROUP 
 MANAGEMENT BOARD
INSURANCE 
 Thomas J. Mcinerney 
 September 21,
2009 
 Mr. Mike Smith 
 [home address] 

Dear Mike – 
 I am very pleased to extend you this offer of
a new assignment with ING. We extend this offer, and the opportunity it represents, with great confidence in your abilities. You have made a very favorable impression with ING, and we are excited about your continuing contribution. 

Your position will be Head of Closed Block Annuity, reporting to me, and will be located in West Chester. Your start date will be September 14, 2009.

 Base Salary: Your annual base salary will be $400,000. The Company reserves the right to review and adjust compensation to reflect what is
appropriate for each position and consistent with your performance. 
 Incentive Compensation Plan: You will remain eligible to participate in
our Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP). Your incentive target will remain at 50% of your year-end base salary. ICP payments are not guaranteed and are contingent on the goals outlined above; including continued employment with the Company. The ICP is
a discretionary plan and the Company reserves the right to modify or discontinue the plan at any time. 
 Long-Term Incentive Program: You
will remain eligible to participate in the Long-Term Incentive Program with a non-guaranteed target value of 75% of your base salary under the same terms and conditions as similarly situated employees. Awards are reviewed each year and are not
guaranteed, therefore, participation is at the discretion of the company. 
 Benefits: You will continue to be eligible for your ING benefits.

 Mike, I am really excited about your future contribution in this position. I know that you will play an integral role in ING Americas’ success. 

Sincerely, 
 /s/ Tom 

Thomas J. Mcinerney 
 Agreed to by: 

 

									
	 /s/ Michael S. Smith
	 		 		 	 9/22/09
	 	
	Signature	 		 		 	Date	 	

  

					
	230 Park Avenue. 13th Floor	 		 	
	New York, NY 10169	 		 	
	T  860.580.3001     F  212.309.8913	 		 	
	E  tom.mcinerney@us.ing.com	 		 	

  

							
	BANKING	  	INVESTMENTS	  	LIFE INSURANCE	  	RETIREMENT SERVICES
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

December 8, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10377 Summary Calendar

DOUGLAS GREEN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

COLE JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center

Fort Worth,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(4:05-CV-122)

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Convicte d in 1997 on drug charges and given a 144-month

sentence, Douglas Green (federal prisoner # 72853-079), pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenges, pro se , the Bureau of Prisons’

(BOP’s) method of calculating his good-time credits under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3624(b).

Green claims the BOP incorrectly interpreted § 36 24(b),

resulting in the potential loss of 84 days of good-time credits.

Green seeks to have the BOP ordered to credit him the total amount2

of good-time credits (648 days) to which he believes he is

entitled, based on his 12-year sentence.

In Sample v. Morrison
, 406 F.3d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir. 2005),

for the claim Green advances, the appeal was dismissed for lack of

subject-matter jurisdiction because the petition was not ripe for

r eview. The court concluded t he “temporally distant and

speculative nature” of the claims rendered the § 2241 petition

premature. Id.

Green is seeking the same relie f found premature in S ample

.

Therefore, this ins tant appeal is D ISMISSED for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties V Limited Partnership (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), MarthaL. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1857 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1857

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on polytetramethylene ether 
                                glycol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on polytetramethylene ether 
                                glycol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYTETRAMETHYLENE ETHER GLYCOL.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 9902.02.98 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Solanex Management Inc.,
  a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal
  year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  (the Report), I, Colin V. Hall, Acting Chief Financial Officer of
  the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and

(2) The information contained in
  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/ Colin V. Hall             
|------ | ------------------------------
|       |                               
|Name:  | Colin V. Hall                 
|       |                               
|Title: | Acting Chief Financial Officer
|       |                               
|Date:  | August 8, 2008                

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Solanex Management Inc. and will be retained by Solanex
  Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.]

---
#### SCHENCK, Appellant, v. BARNES et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 8, 1898.)

Action' *1134by Belle C. Schenck against William D. Barnes and Henry W. Taft, as trustees.

No opinion. Leave to appeal to the court óf appeals granted. Proposed questions 1 and 2 certified; third question refused. See 45 N. Y. Supp. 1148.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CAUSE NO.: 1:15-CR-38-HAB

 ) 

DAN I. WILSON ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 85], filed on June 22, 2020. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation. 

The Court being duly advised, ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 85] 

in its entirety and ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration 

of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and 

necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED, and the Defendant is adjudged GUILTY of the offense. 

 The Sentencing Scheduling Order scheduling sentencing-related deadlines and hearings 

will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on July 10, 2020. 

s/ Holly A. Brady 

JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cr-00038-HAB-SLC document 88 filed 07/10/20 page 1 of 1