alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of J.L. HalseyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David R. Burt, President, Chief Executive Officer and actingChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ David R. Burt                           |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| David R. Burt,  President, Chief Executive  |   |
| Officer and  acting Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

September 28, 2005

 

----
# L_2009002EN.01001801.xml

| 6.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 2/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 2/18

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1285/2008 of 15 December 2008 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 347 of 23 December 2008
  )

The publication of Regulation (EC) No 1285/2008 should be considered as null and void.

---
#### Ada Pretto Aparicio, Appellant, v Gary Goldberg, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[942 NYS2d 58]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 22, 2010, dismissing the complaint pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered November 10, 2010, which granted defendant Dr. Gary Goldberg’s motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff Ada Pretto Aparicio alleges that defendant was negligent in his treatment *503of decedent May Aparicio for a form of abdominal cancer, known as pseudomyxoma peritonei. Defendant performed surgery on decedent in November 1997, removing, inter alia, tumors from her abdomen. Over the next several years, defendant monitored decedent’s health, ordering tumor marker blood tests and CT scans to detect the return of disease. He testified that, although blood tests performed in June 2000, December 2000 and March 2001 revealed increasing levels of tumor markers, and a June 2001 CT scan showed recurrence of decedent’s disease, his treatment plan was to intervene surgically only in the event that decedent became symptomatic, as surgery would only be palliative in nature. Defendant stopped treating decedent in May 2003 and in August 2003, another physician performed surgery in an unsuccessful attempt to remove or “debulk” decedent’s tumor. She died approximately six weeks later.

At trial, plaintiffs experts opined that defendant’s failure to perform a second surgery after a rise in tumor markers and the results of the June 2001 CT scan constituted a deviation from accepted medical practice. While defendant’s experts disagreed with plaintiffs experts, the weight to be accorded to conflicting expert testimony is within the province of the jury *(see Torricelli v Pisacano,*9 AD3d 291 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 612 [2004]). The jury clearly credited the testimony of plaintiffs experts on the issue of deviation from the standard of care and its determination on that issue was not one that “could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

However, plaintiff failed to establish that defendant’s negligence was “a substantial factor in producing the injury” as the “injury [wa]s one which might naturally occur” in the progress of decedent’s disease and in the absence of negligence *(Mortensen v Memorial Hosp.,*105 AD2d 151, 158 [1984]). Plaintiffs experts’ speculation and conclusory assertions that decedent would have otherwise had a more favorable prognosis is insufficient to establish causation *(see Mosezhnik v Berenstein,*33 AD3d 895, 897 [2006]; *Rodriguez v Montefiore Med. Ctr.,*28 AD3d 357, 357-358 [2006]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2415 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2415

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty provided 
                for the sexual abuse of a minor or ward.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2005

Mr. Snyder (for himself and Mr. Chabot) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty provided 
                for the sexual abuse of a minor or ward.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2243(b) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ``one year'' and 
inserting ``five years''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Groups
                        Corn & Soybean Virus Lab
                                    Soft Wheat Quality LabSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research Docs





- CSWQRU Home
- Soft Wheat Quality Laboratory
- --Publications
- --Personnel
- --Partnering

2017 SWQRR registration announcementheadline bar Greetings Soft Wheat Quality Collaborators, The Soft Wheat Quality Lab is pleased to announce open registration for the 2017 **Annual Soft Wheat Quality Research Review** meeting to be held **May 1, 2017**at **Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana**. The meeting is announced as the “Small Grains Conference” and will be held in conjunction with and followed by the **Eastern Wheat Workers and Southern Small Grain Workers meeting**, May 2 and 3. You can see the agendas, accommodations, directions and **REGISTER** for either or both meetings now by clicking on the link below: http://www.conf.purdue.edu/SmallGrainConference


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[No. 39365-1-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### Sugar Ray Robinson, et al., *Appellants,*v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-2-09464-3, J. Kathleen Learned, J., entered September 6, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Becker, JJ.
[No. 16033-5-III.

Division Three.

July 29, 1997.]

#### Jim C. Hollis, et al., *Respondents,*v. Garwall, Inc., et al., *Appellants.*

The opinion in the above captioned case which appeared in the advance sheets at 87 Wn. App. 220-228 has been omitted from this permanent bound volume because of an amendment of the opinion made by an order of the Court of Appeals dated October 21, 1997. The opinion, as modified, appears at 88 Wn. App. 10.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of United Companies  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: March 31, 2005                       By:    /s/ Robert M. Carmichael
                                                  ________________________
                                           Name:  Robert M. Carmichael
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to United  Companies
Corporation and will be retained by United  Companies  Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Peanut Research Laboratory: Dawson, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Technology
                        Patents & Licenses
                                    Technology Transfer and CRADAs
                                    NPRL SoftwareSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to the National Peanut Laboratory in Dawson, Georgia


Mission


People Arambulo, Ricardo Arias De Ares, Renee Bellamy, Lavon Bucior, Erika Collins, Corey Cook, Hunter Dang, Phat Devane, Marvin Duke, Larry Faustinelli, Paola Gardner, John Hagler, Bobby Ingram, Staci Lamb, Marshall Massa, Alicia McIntyre, Joseph Moon, Terence Orner, Valerie Page, Jessica Rodriguez, Hector Sheppard, Harry
                                            *- Hank* Sobolev, Victor Sorensen, Ronald
                                            *- Ron* Todd, Kenneth
                                            *- Dan* Walk, Travis Williams, Latosha


Southeast Area   marshall.lamb@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL BROWN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74779

Agency No. A078-497-007

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Paul Brown, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration

judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de

FILED

JUN 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74779

novo questions of law, Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2008), and

we deny the petitions for review. 

The record of conviction establishes that Brown was convicted of

“Attempted Possession of Marijuana for Sale,” a felony, in violation of Arizona

Revised Statutes §§ 13-3401, 3405, 3418, 1001, 301, 302, 303, 304, 701, 702,

702.01, and 801. See United States v. Snellenberger, 548 F.3d 699, 702 (9th Cir.

2008) (en banc) (per curiam). The agency properly concluded that “Attempted

Possession of Marijuana for Sale” contains a trafficking element and is therefore an

aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). See Rendon, 520 F.3d at 975-

76. Accordingly, the agency did not err in finding Brown removable. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### MUNSON, Respondent, v. GENESEE IRON & BRASS WORKS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Anna E. Munson against the Genesee Iron & Brass Works and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 56 N. Y. Supp. 139.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon F. Burley, Chief Financial Officer of Merritt
Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/ Gordon F.
      Burley
| | ------ | --------------------------
| | Name:  | GORDON F. BURLEY          
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer   
| | Date:  | October 18, 2005          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# C_2008194EN.01000401.xml

| 31.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5218 — Altor Fund II/Akers Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 194/02)

On 22 July 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5218. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5218. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### Dates *v.*The State.

*Murder.*

(Decided Dec. 19, 1907.

45 So. Rep. 163.)

*Criminal Law: Bill of Exceptions; Timo for*Prcurniaiion.— The time 1'or signing a bill of exception cnnnot be extended beyond the time of commencement of the term of tbe court next after that at which the trial is held, even by written consent of the parties or their counsel. (Rule 30, Supreme Court Practice.)

*24Appeal from Talladega City Court.

Heard before Hon. G. K. Miller.

Moses Dates was convicted of murder and appeals.

Affirmed.

Jabíes C. Burt, for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, and Marion H. Sibis, Solicitor, for the State.

HARALSON, J.

— The time for signing a bill of exceptions cannot be extended beyond the commencement of the term of the court succeeding that of the trial, even by written consent of the parties or their counsel. — Code 1896, p. 1200, rule 30.

The regular term of the city court of Talladega begins on the first Monday in September, in each year, and ends on the last day of June of the succeeding year. — Acts 1894-95, p. 3220., § 5. -

In this case, the trial was had at the September term, 1906, of the said city court.

On the 18th of May, 1907, the defendant having been convicted, was duly sentenced for murder, and praying an appeal, it was ordered by the court, after suspending the sentence, “that defendant have 60 days from this date (May 18, 1907) in which to present and have filed a bill of exceptions in this case.”

What purports to be a bill of exceptions was tendered, 'and approved by the judge of that court, on the 14th of September, 1907. This action of the court was taken, as stated, “in accordance with the agreement of counsel.”

After this order, it was agreed between the attorneys, that 60 days from the time fixed for the signing of a bill of exceptions by order of the court before adjournment, be allowed for preparing and signing a bill of exceptions. *25This last period of 60 days overlapped and extended into the September term, 1907, of said court, which began on the first Monday in September of that year, and the bill of exceptions that was signed, under this agreement, was not presented and signed, as has appeared, until the 14th of September in that year, several days after the beginning of the September term, 1907, of said court. Under repeated decisions of this court, the bill of exceptions was signed out of time, and cannot be considered. The motion to strike it must *prevail.*— Adams *v.*State, 145 Ala. 680, 40 South. 85; *Davis v.*State, 146 Ala. 157, 41 South. 298.

There being no error apparent in the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Denson and McClellan, JJ., concur.