alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock and Range Research Laboratory: Miles City, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Public Notice
                        Recent Notices
                                    2024 School Tours
                    2024 Research Animal Sale On-line AuctionSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Miles City, Montana Livestock and Range Research Laboratory





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar We are proud to share our research with those that are interested.  Below you will find a list of archived news articles written specifically about the research that we conduct here at Fort Keogh. The most recent articles, published in the AgResearch Magazine, can be found here: Managing Animals with Precision. Dec 2017. by Sandra Avant. Rangeland Grasses Recover Quickly After Fire. Sep 2017. by Dennis O'Brien. Keeping Rangelands Healthy and Productive. Dec 2015. by Dennis O'Brien.   ARS News Articles  Benefits of Early Calving Are Increasing Due to Late Winter WarmingMar 22, 2022ARS Ecologists Address a Burning QuestionJan 22, 2020Finding Long-term Links between Weather and Cattle ProductionNov 24, 2014USDA Study Shows Benefits of Weaning Calves EarlyAug 29, 2013Seeded Pastures Can Sustain Cattle--and Native RangelandsFeb 14, 2006Fertility Study Looks at Ovulation's Intricate WorkingsMay 31, 2005


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EX-31.2 9
exh31-2.htm EXHIBIT 31.2








I,
Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Citadel Security Software Inc., a
Delaware corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.





Date:
March 31, 2005





/s/
RICHARD CONNELLY


Richard
Connelly, Chief Financial Officer


Principal
Financial Officer
**Exhibit      31.2**

**COMMUNITY      BANKS, INC.**

**RULE      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

** (Chief      Financial Officer)**

| Date   | June                26, 2007 |   | /s/                Donald F. Holt        |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                         |   | Donald                F. Holt            |
|   |                         |   | Executive                Vice President  |
|   |                         |   | (Chief                Financial Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2242 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2242

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion-exchange 
                                resins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2005

  Mr. Saxton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion-exchange 
                                resins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ION-EXCHANGE RESINS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.30 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain ion-exchange resins) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 99-10762

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10762

Summary Calendar

 

ROY LEE SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VANESSA R. SMITH; 

JEROME THOMAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-2410-G

--------------------

March 24, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roy Lee Smith appeals the district court’s grant of the

appellees’ motion for summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983

case. He argues that the district court erred in granting their

motion. The district court did not so err. The appellees’

summary judgment evidence showed that they exercised reasonable

professional judgment in obtaining the warrant for appellant 

Smith’s arrest, and Smith’s summary judgment evidence was

insufficient to rebut this showing. See Little v. Liquid Air
No. 99-10762

-2-

Corp., Inc., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc); Malley

v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 345-46 (1986). The appellees’ summary

judgment evidence also showed that they did not act with malice

in initiating the investigation of appellant Smith, and Smith

likewise did not rebut this showing. See Kerr v. Lyford, 171

F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1999). The district court thus did not

err in granting summary judgment to the appellees on appellant

Smith’s federal law claims.

The district court also did not err in granting summary

judgment to the appellees on appellant Smith’s state law claims,

as he was arrested pursuant to a valid warrant and the appellees

did not act with malice in initiating the investigation against

him. See Cantu v. Botello, 910 S.W.2d 65, 66 (Tex. App. 1995);

Thrift v. Hubbard, 974 S.W.2d 70, 77 (Tex. App. 1998). Finally,

the district court did not abuse its discretion when handling

appellant Smith’s Rule 56 motion for continuance and request for

discovery, as Smith failed to show how additional discovery would

create a genuine issue of material fact. See Richardson v.

Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir. 1990); International

Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1266 (5th Cir.

1991). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
 2007
    
    
    2006(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    428,955
    
    
    $
    363,144Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    227,668
    
    
    
    169,122Fixed charges
    
    
    1,240,449
    
    
    
    1,123,876Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (27,672
    )
    
    
    (36,715
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    1,869,400
    
    
    $
    1,619,427Fixed and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    4,045
    
    
    $
    4,108Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    153
    %
    
    
    147
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    6,189
    
    
    
    6,039Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    1,210,398
    
    
    
    1,084,860Capitalized interest
    
    
    27,672
    
    
    
    36,715Interest factors of rents
    
    
    2,379
    
    
    
    2,301Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    1,240,449
    
    
    
    1,123,876Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    1,246,638
    
    
    $
    1,129,915Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(A) divided by (B)
    
    
    1.51
    x
    
    
    1.44
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
(A) divided by (C)
    
    
    1.50
    x
    
    
    1.43
    x
#### In the Matter of the City of Amsterdam, Respondent, v Board of Assessors of the Town of Providence, et al., Appellants, and Broadalbin Central School District, IntervenorAppellant. (And Two Other Related Proceedings.)

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Dier, J.), entered September 19, 1984 in Saratoga County, which, in proceedings pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, granted petitioner’s motion to file a supplemental appraisal report.

By motion dated August 17, 1984, petitioner sought permission pursuant to 22 NYCRR 839.2 to file and serve a supplement to its appraisal report. Specifically, this supplemental report prepared by an engineer detailed the question of depreciation of certain improvements on petitioner’s real property. Special Term granted this motion and the instant appeal ensued.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether Special Term abused its discretion in granting the motion. After conducting a review of the record, we conclude that Special Term abused its discretion. We do not find that the requisite “good cause” has been established to permit an exception to the strict standards imposed by prior decisions of this court *(see, Salesian Socy. v Village of Ellenville,*98 AD2d 927, 928).

Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and motion denied. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr. and Harvey, JJ., concur.
1 The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE WILLIAM A. KNOX, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-2198

___________ Paul Everett Williams, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Randy Mobley, Classification * Western District of Missouri. Caseworker; Dennis Stuecken, * Classification Caseworker, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 29, 1996 Filed: December 12, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Paul Everett Williams appeals from the district court's 1 order granting summary judgment to defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendations. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### MALONEY v. HURRY. ADLER v. MAY-PER. CALHOUN v. COMMONWEALTH TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912..)

Actions by Michael Maloney against Randolph Hurry, by David Adler against Samuel Máyper, and by Jbhn C. Calhoun against the Commonwealth Trust Company. No opinion. Motions denied, with $10 costs. Orders filed. See, also, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1147; 133 N. Y. Supp. 1132; 133 N. Y. Supp. 1114.
[No. 21217-0-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dana M. Warness, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 96-1-00222-7, F. Mark McCauley, J., entered September 30, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period  ending  September  30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief Executive
Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/S/ Scott A. Haire
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
(Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
---

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Whos Your Daddy, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), Reuven I. Rubinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company does
hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|By:    | /s/ Reuven I. Rubinson  | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|Name:  | Reuven I. Rubinson      | 
|       |                         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 
|       |                         | 
|Date:  | April 16, 2007          | 

[A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Whos Your Daddy, Inc. and will be retained by
Snocone Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0710

CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTIAN BRIDENSTINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant

and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2020

10/13/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0710
Exhibit 32.1



DIABETIC TREATMENT CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



The undersigned, Arden Oliphant, in his capacities as Chief Executive Officer of Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc do each hereby certify that
the Form 10-KSB of Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc for the year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc



This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein.



Executed this 12thday of July, 2005.



/s/ Arden OliphantArden OliphantChief Executive Officer
#### FERGUSON, Appellant, v. R. H. SELLERS CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 22, 1912.)

Action by John Ferguson, Jr., against the R. H. Sellers Company. H. R. Griffith, for appellant. L. Squires, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed with §10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, infra.

SCOTT, J., dissents.
# C_2008190EN.01000101.xml

| 29.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 July 2008

appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency

(2008/C 190/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency (1), and in particular Article 79 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 provides that the Council should appoint as Members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency one representative from each Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 provides that the Council should appoint as Members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency one representative from each Member State.

| (2) | By Decision of 7 June 2007 (2) the Council appointed 27 members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By Decision of 7 June 2007 (2) the Council appointed 27 members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency.

2

| (3) | The Danish Government has informed the Council of its intention to replace the Danish representative on the Management Board and has submitted a nomination for a new representative, who should be appointed for a period which runs until 31 May 2011, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Danish Government has informed the Council of its intention to replace the Danish representative on the Management Board and has submitted a nomination for a new representative, who should be appointed for a period which runs until 31 May 2011,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Per NYLYKKE, of Danish nationality, born on 19 January 1965, shall be appointed member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency in place of Mr Helge ANDREASEN for the period from 30 July 2008 to 31 May 2011.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2008.

For the Council

The President

B. HORTEFEUX

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 134, 16.6.2007, p. 6.

2

---
#### Sullivan & Sons, Inc., Respondent, v Superior Dry Wall Systems Corp., et al., Appellants.

— In an action to set aside the transfer of certain real property, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burchell, J.), dated August 30, 1983, which, after a nonjury trial, *inter alia,*set aside the conveyance.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The transfer to Superior Carpentry Contractors, Inc. of certain real property amounted to a preferential transfer, in derogation of plaintiff’s rights, and thus lacked the indispensable element of good faith. Consequently, the conveyance was properly set aside *(see,*Debtor and Creditor Law §§ 272, 273; *Laco X-Ray Sys. v Fingerhut,*88 AD2d 425, 432-433, *lv dismissed*58 NY2d 970; *Southern Indus. v Jeremias,*66 AD2d 178; *Julien J. Studley, Inc. v Lefrak,*66 AD2d 208, 215, *affd*48 NY2d 954). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.