alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2304

To provide for the payment of certain annuities under section 376 of title 

28, United States Code, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005

Mr. SNYDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To provide for the payment of certain annuities under section 

376 of title 28, United States Code, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDICIAL SURVIVOR 

4 ANNUITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 376(h) 

6 of title 28, United States Code, shall not apply with re7 spect to the payment of an annuity to any individual de8 scribed under subsection (b) of this section, which would 

9 otherwise be payable (but for the operation of such para10 graph). 
2

•HR 2304 IH 

1 (b) INDIVIDUALS.—An individual referred to under 

2 subsection (a) is any individual who—

3 (1) became a widow on the death of her spouse 

4 on July 14, 1987; 

5 (2) was remarried on October 20, 1990; and 

6 (3) again became a widow on the death of her 

7 spouse on February 11, 2004. 

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 This Act shall take effect as of October 20, 1990.

Æ
# C_2009014EN.01000101.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5366 — Iberdrola Renovables/Gamesa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 14/01)

On 4 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5366. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5366. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 14, 2015 

# Order

April 14 , 2015

150725 (1 91 ) ( 19 4 )

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, Minor, by and

through ERIC BRAVERMAN, Conservator

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, and

KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK

, Plaintiff,

v

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., and WILLIAM

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL

, Defendant s

- Appell ants,

and

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF GYNECOLOGY

AND OBSTETRICS, P.C.,

Defendant. SC: 150725

COA: 309680

Oakland CC: 2006

- 074585

- NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants

- appellants to exceed the

page limit restriction for their reply brief is GRANTED. The 25

- page reply brief

submitted on April 1, 2015, is accepted for filing. On further order of the Chief Justice,

the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to strike the reply brief and to recover the costs associated

with filing the motion are DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2334 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2334

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2006

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
  participate in the design, planning, and construction of permanent 
facilities for the GREAT project to reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired 
               waters in the area of Oxnard, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``City of Oxnard Water Recycling and 
Desalination Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. OXNARD, CALIFORNIA, WATER RECLAMATION, REUSE, AND TREATMENT 
              PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (title XVI of Public Law 102-575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. __. OXNARD, CALIFORNIA, WATER RECLAMATION, REUSE, AND TREATMENT 
              PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the City 
of Oxnard, California, may participate in the design, planning, and 
construction of Phase I permanent facilities for the GREAT project to 
reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired water in the area of Oxnard, 
California.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
following:
            ``(1) The operations and maintenance of the project 
        described in subsection (a).
            ``(2) The construction, operations, and maintenance of the 
        visitor's center related to the project described in subsection 
        (a).
    ``(d) Sunset of Authority.--The authority of the Secretary to carry 
out any provisions of this section shall terminate 10 years after the 
date of the enactment of this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is 
amended by inserting after the last item the following:

``Sec. __. Oxnard, California, water reclamation, reuse, and treatment 
                            project.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00245-CV

LINDSEY BAGE, Appellant

V.

GALVESTON COUNTY SHERIFF HENRY TROCHESSET, ET AL., 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 405th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-CV-0912

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed February 27, 2024. The court reporter 

indicated on April 15, 2024 that there was no reporter’s record. The clerk’s record 

was filed May 14, 2024. No brief was filed.

On June 14, 2024, we issued a notice stating that unless appellant filed a brief 

along with a motion requesting an extension of time on or before June 24, 2024, the 

appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See
2

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no brief or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Grain Legume research throughout Eastern Washington and Idaho


Mission


People Chen, Weidong Chen, Tony Holden, Joanne McGee, Rebecca McGrew, Sheri Miklas, Phillip
                                            *- Phil* Pfaff, Jarrod Pierre-Pierre, Nickisha Porter, Lyndon Powell, Robert Raver, Chris Vandemark, George


Pacific West Area   george.vandemark@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NOEL LIFE

,

Appellant,

v.

GINO MORENA ENTERPRISES, LLC

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00055

- CV

Appeal from the

41st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV4281)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further

proceedings, in accordance wit h this Court’s opinion. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 7 TH DAY OF JULY 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bioenergy Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR Homepage
                    About BER
                        Mission Statement
                                    Strategic Goals
                                    Specialized Research ResourcesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Bioenergy Research Docs







Mission Statementheadline bar **Mission Statement:** The Bioenergy Research Unit (BER) conducts a broad-based program of microbial, biochemical, genetic, and fermentation engineering research that is international in scope and importance addressing national research needs for new environmentally acceptable agricultural practices and value-added products. The overall mission of the BER research program is to develop bioproducts and bioprocesses for conversion of agricultural commodities into biofuels and chemicals, enzymes, and polymers.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### KOENIG et al., Respondents, v. BLOOMGARTEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 15, 1898.)

Action by Edward Koenig and others against Henry Bloomgarten.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 47 N. Y. Supp. 1138, and 48 N. Y. Supp. 1108.
Exhibit 10.7


 


Sino Mercury Acquisition Corp.



7/F Metropolis Tower,


No.2 Dongsan Street, Zhongguancun
Xi Zone


Haidian District, Beijing,
100080, China 


 


This letter
is to confirm the undersigned's commitment to Sino Mercury Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) that, through the consummation
of the Company’s initial business combination (as described in the Company's final prospectus, dated August 26, 2014), if
funds are needed by the Company and upon request by the Company, the undersigned will provide loans of up to an aggregate of $200,000
to the Company. The undersigned understands that if the Company does not consummate a business combination, all amounts loaned
to the Company hereunder will be forgiven except to the extent that the Company has funds available to it outside of its trust
account established in connection with the Company's initial public offering.


 


/s/ Jianming Hao


Jianming Hao
IN THEU NITED STATES DISTRICTCOU RT

NORTHERN DISTRICTOFINDIANA

SOU TH BEND DIV ISION

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION

FOU NDATION,etal.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONCORD COMMU NITY SCHOOLS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Cause No.3:15-CV -00463-JD-CAN

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Iam adm itted or otherw ise authorized to practice in this Court,and Iappear in this case

as counsel for:

DefendantConcord Com m unity Schools .

Novem ber4,2015 /s/ Anthony W. Overholt

Date Signature

Anthony W .Overholt,#16481-49

Print Name

FROSTBROW N TODD LLC

201N.Illinois Street,Suite 1900

P.O.Box 44961

Address

Indianapolis IN 46244-0961

City State Zip Code

(317)237-3800

Phone Number

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 24 filed 11/04/15 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 4th day of Novem ber,2015,a copy of the

foregoing w as filed electronically.Notice ofthis filing w ill be sentto the follow ing parties by

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system . Parties m ay access this filing through the

Court’s system :

Daniel I.Mach

HeatherL.W eaver

Am erican Civil Liberties U nion

91515th Street,NW ,6th Floor

W ashington,DC 20005

Gavin M.Rose

ACLU ofIndiana

1031E.W ashington Street

Indianapolis,IN 46202

Ryan D.Jayne

Sam uel T.Grover

Freedom From Religion Foundation

10N.Henry Street

Madison,W I53701

/s/ Anthony W. Overholt

Anthony W .Overholt

FROSTBROW N TODD LLC

201North Illinois Street,Suite 1900

P.O.Box 44961

Indianapolis,IN 46244-0961

317-237-3800

Fax:317-237-3900

aoverholt@fbtlaw .com

LR00264.0631345 4828-7893-2522v1

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 24 filed 11/04/15 page 2 of 2
#### SCHIFFER et al., Appellants, v. LAUTERBACH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1899.)

Action by Herman Schiffer and an*1116•other against Edward Lauterbach and others. From a judgment dismissing the complaint on re.port of a referee, and an order granting an extra allowance, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed. Samuel Untermeyer, for appellants. John E. Par■sons, for respondents.

O’BRIEN, J.

This action was brought by surviving partners to compel specific performance of agreements by which the beneficiaries of the will of Isaias Meyer were to convey their inter•ests in the partnership of Pelgram & Meyer. The surviving partners, the Schiffers, based their •claim upon an alleged agreement by which said interests were to be conveyed for the sum of $585,000, or, failing in that, on the original partnership agreement, by which, according to the •estimate presented, the interests were to be conveyed for the sum of $609,000. The action has -already been before this court, on a former ap.peal (7 App. Div. 223, 40 N. Y. Supp. 40), and a new trial was then ordered for the reason that the trial judge, in dismissing the complaint on ■the ground that the $585,000 agreement was of ■no effect, refused to consider the plaintiff’s rights under the original’ partnership agreement. This court held, as did the trial judge,- that the •$585,000 agreement should receive no consideration, and in the opinion set forth the leading facts involved, but stated that the plaintiff should have been allowed to prove his claim, if possible, ■under the prior agreement. The referee has also discarded the $585,000 agreement, after receiving evidence in regard to it, for the same reasons as on the previous trial, namely, that it was not executed or delivered “as a consum■mated and effectual instrument”; and we find no cause to change the decision, the pleadings and proof here submitted being almost identical with those previously presented. The other "branch of the case—that relating to the rights of the parties under the first agreement—involves the same facts brought before the referee and determined by him in an action by the ex•ecutors of Isaias Meyer tried at the same time, in which an appeal is also taken by the surviving partners. 56 N. Y. Supp. 674. The issues arising on the subject of the prior partnership agreement will therefore be considered in the disposition of the executors’ action. For the reasons •therein given, we think the. judgment and order should he reversed, with costs to appellants to •■abide the event. All concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food and Feed Safety Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Food and Feed Safety Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar  To go to the News & Events page for the Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center **Click Here**   ARS News Articles  Organic Compounds Eliminate Disease-causing PathogensJun 28, 2012Cleaning Cows from Inside OutNov 15, 2011Blocking E. coli Bacteria Before They Move InSep 07, 2010Soil Scientist Wins Top Honor from USDA Research AgencyFeb 12, 2008Chlorate Compound Found to Quell Microbes in Meat AnimalsOct 31, 2006


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12557]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Wyoming Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Wyoming Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, June 17, 1995, at the Little 
America, 2800 W. Lincolnway, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003. The purpose of 
the meeting is to brief Committee members on Commission and regional 
activities, discuss current civil rights issues in the State, and 
approve plans for future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Oralia G. 
Mercado, 307-472-2105 or Ki-Taek Chun, Acting Director of the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office, 303-866-1040 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 16, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-12557 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P