alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Acy, 2022-Ohio-3316.]

COURT OF APPEALS

STARK COUNTY, OHIO

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO JUDGES:

Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., P.J.

 Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.

Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.

-vsCase No. 2022CA00021

STEPHEN ACY

 Defendant-Appellant O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Appeal from the Stark County Court of 

Common Pleas, Case No. 2021-CR-0898

JUDGMENT: Affirmed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: September 20, 2022

APPEARANCES:

For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant

KYLE L. STONE D. COLEMAN BOND

Prosecuting Attorney 116 Cleveland Avenue, S.W.

Stark County, Ohio Suite #600

Canton, Ohio 44702

VICKI L. DESANTIS 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney

Appellate Division 

110 Central Plaza, South – Suite #510

Canton, Ohio 44702-1413
Stark County, Case No. 2022CA00021 2

Hoffman, J.

{¶1} Defendant-appellant Stephen Acy appeals the judgment entered by the 

Stark County Common Pleas Court convicting him following his plea of guilty to felonious 

assault (R.C. 2903.11(A)(1)) and sentencing him to an indefinite term of incarceration of 

two to three years. Plaintiff-appellee is the state of Ohio.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

{¶2} On April 6, 2021, Appellant was a resident at the Indian River Juvenile 

Correctional Facility for a misdemeanor offense of obstructing official business. Appellant 

struck A.G., breaking A.G.’s jaw, which required surgery. Appellant was indicted by the 

Stark County Grand Jury on one count of felonious assault.

{¶3} Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charged offense on January 26, 

2022. Over Appellant’s objection, the trial court sentenced Appellant pursuant to the 

Reagan Tokes Act to an indefinite term of incarceration of two to three years. 

{¶4} It is from the February 2, 2022 judgment of the trial court Appellant 

prosecutes this appeal, assigning as error:

THE MODIFICATIONS TO SENTENCING FOR FIRST- AND 

SECOND-DEGREE FELONIES MADE BY THE REAGAN TOKES ACT 

VIOLATE THE APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL, AS PROTECTED 

BY THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED 

STATES CONSTITUTION, AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS 

DOCTRINE EMBEDDED IN THE OHIO CONSTITUTION.

{¶5} Appellant argues the Reagan Tokes Act is unconstitutional, as it violates 

separation of powers and his right to trial by jury. 
Stark County, Case No. 2022CA00021 3

{¶6} For the reasons stated in this Court's opinion in State v. Householder, 5th 

Dist. Muskingum No. CT2021-0026, 2022-Ohio-1542, we find the Reagan Tokes act is 

constitutional. The assignment of error is overruled.

{¶7} The judgment of the Stark County Common Pleas Court is affirmed.

By: Hoffman, J.

Wise, Earle, P.J. and

Baldwin, J. concur
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Application Technology Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Departments
                        Agricultural Engineering
                                    Entomology
                                    Horticulture
                                    Plant Pathology
                                    IR-4 programSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Application Technology Research Entomology







More Informationheadline bar  For more information see: A Comparison of Oviposition Depth in Turf and Ornamental Plantings by Oriental Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)PosterContact:Betsy Anderson or Mike Reding


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128607 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128607 COA: 255856 Bay CC: 00-001004-FC JUSTIN DANIEL PERROU, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 09, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0113. CATHY CRIBB et al v. TIMOTHY MOORE et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2021SCV0296
[Nos. 21004-5-II; 21005-3-II; 21006-1-II; 21007-0-II; 21008-8-II; 21009-6-II; 21010-0-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Jeremy W. Spencer, *Respondent.*The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Robert Squally, *Respondent.*The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Tina L. Minjares, *Respondent.*The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Brian Lesage, *Respondent.*The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Douglas Squally, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Thurston County, Nos. 96-81162, 96-82657, 96-81766, 96-84340, 96-82649, 96-84358, and 95-819209, Richard D. Hicks, J., entered July 2, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000714634
<NAME>                        BIOMUNE SYSTEMS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-03-1999
<CASH>                                    40,660
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            910,209
<ALLOWANCES>                             (5,448)
<INVENTORY>                              399,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,847,381
<PP&E>                                   220,452
<DEPRECIATION>                         (132,808)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         6,457,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    860,777
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                            2,146,747
<COMMON>                                     239
<OTHER-SE>                             3,449,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           6,457,717
<SALES>                                1,387,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,387,394
<CGS>                                    552,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            552,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         919,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      519,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        (152,297)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             367,544
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.14



</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-859]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: AMRI Rensselaer, Inc. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before July 28, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before July 28, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on May 20, 2021, AMRI Rensselaer, Inc., 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
SchedulePoppy Straw Concentrate
9670
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substance to manufacture a bulk controlled substance for distribution to its customers. Approval of permit applications will occur only when the registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-13672 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Ex10.16 NEOComp2014




Exhibit 10.16


SUMMARY OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Effective as of January 1, 2014, the following are the annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers of Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc.  No named executive officer has an employment contract with the Company.  The Named Executive Officers participate in various compensation plans and other arrangements as described in the Company's 2015 Proxy Statement.
 	
				
	 
	2014 Base Salary

	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	780,000
	


	Chief Operating Officer
	$
	485,000
	


	Executive Vice President, CFO & Treasurer
	$
	345,050
	


	General Counsel and Secretary
	$
	470,000
	


	Executive Vice President, Paper & Reconstituted Tobacco Business
	$
	405,628
#### Jian Ying LIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

No. 04-4873-AG.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 17, 2006.

Jian Ying Lin, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner, pro se.

Because the Court did not receive a brief from the respondent within fifteen days of the December 5, 2005 due date specified in the scheduling order issued on October 5, 2005, this case has been decided without the benefit of respondent’s brief. See Local Rule § 0.29(d), for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Jian Ying Lin, pro *se,*petitions for review of the BIA decision denying her motion to reconsider. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

This Court has jurisdiction only over the August 26, 2004 BIA order denying Lin’s second motion to reconsider. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(B)(1), a petitioner is required to file a petition for review within 30 days of the final order of removal. The filing of a motion to reopen or reconsider does not toll that period. See Alam *v. Gonzales,*438 F.3d 184 (2d Cir.2006) (internal quotation and citation omitted). The late filing of a petition for review deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider it. *See Malvoisin v. INS,*268 F.3d 74, 75 (2d Cir.2001) (citing *Zaluski v. INS,*37 F.3d 72, 73 (2d Cir.1994) *(per*curiam)).

Lin did not file her petition for review until September 10, 2004, beyond the thirty-day time period for each of the BIA’s first two orders. Thus, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the June 2004 order denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief, and the August 3, 2004 order denying her first motion to reconsider. Further, because Lin did not devote any argument in her brief to the BIA’s denial of her second motion to reconsider, her petition for review is abandoned. *See Zhang v. Gonzales,*426 F.3d 540, 542 n. 1, 546 n. 7 (2d Cir.2005). In any event, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying that motion. *See Kaur v. BIA,*413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); *Khouzam v. Ashcroft,*361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004) (citing *Brice v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*806 F.2d 415, 419 (2d Cir.1986)).

We have considered all of the petitioners’ claims and find them to be without merit. The petition for review is therefore DENIED, and the outstanding motion for stay of deportation is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending *33motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules will hold a meeting 
on November 4, 2021 in San Diego, CA. The meeting is open to the public 
for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting 
materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: 
http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books.

DATES: November 4, 2021, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (Pacific).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Wilson, Esq., Acting Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bceec9d0d9cfffd3d1d1d5c8c8d9d9e3efd9dfced9c8ddcec5fcddd392c9cfdfd3c9cec8cf92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b496e777e6858747676726f6f7e7e44487e78697e6f7a69625b7a74356e6878746e696f68357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: June 21, 2021.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-13715 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

30923

Vol. 60, No. 112

Monday, June 12, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service

[Docket No. 95–038–1]

International Sanitary and

Phytosanitary Standard-Setting

Activities

Correction

In notice document 95–13241

beginning on page 28387 in the issue of

Wednesday, May 31, 1995, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 28388, in the first column,

in the sixth line, ‘‘customers’’ should

read ‘‘consumers’’.

2. On the same page, in the third

column, in paragraph 6., the Date of

Meeting should read ‘‘February 19–23,

1996’’.

3. On page 28389, in the first column,

in paragraph 8., in the General Purpose,

in the second line, ‘‘director’’ should

read ‘‘direction’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceainc and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 625

[Docket No. 950206038–5038–01; I.D.

051595E]

Summer Flounder Fishery;

Adjustments to 1995 State Quotas

Correction

In rule document 95–12935 beginning

on page 27906 in the issue of Friday,

May 26, 1995, make the following

corrections:

On page 27907, in the table, in the

seventh column, the third entry should

read ‘‘446,446’’; and in the sixth

column, in the fourth line, ‘‘6,446’’

should be removed.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34–35744; File No. SR–CBOE–

95–25]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice

of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness

of Proposed Rule Change by the

Chicago Board Options Exchange,

Incorporated, Relating to the

Examination Specifications for the

General Securities Registered

Representative (Series 7) Examination

Correction

In notice document 95–12983

beginning on page 28005 in the issue of

Friday, May 26, 1995, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 28006, in the third

column, the signature should read

‘‘Jonathan G. Katz’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, in the FR Doc. line, the file date

should read ‘‘5–25–95’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34–35746; FIle No. SR–CBOE–

95–27]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice

of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness

of Proposed Rule Change by the

Chicago Board Options Exchange,

Incorporated, Relating to the

Examination Specifications for the

General Securities Sales Supervisor

(Series 8) Examination

Correction

In notice document 95–12982

beginning on page 28006 in the issue of

Friday, May 26, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 28007, in the third column,

the FR Doc. line was omitted and

should appear after the signature as

follows:

[FR Doc. 95–12982 Filed 5–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
1

The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge

for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and

recommendations of the HONORABLE WILLIAM A. KNOX, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

___________

No. 96-2198

___________

Paul Everett Williams, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Randy Mobley, Classification * Western District of Missouri.

Caseworker; Dennis Stuecken, *

Classification Caseworker, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: November 29, 1996

 Filed: December 12, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Paul Everett Williams appeals from the district court's1 order

granting summary judgment to defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties'

briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's

report and recommendations. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit
      32**











**COMMUNITY
      BANKS, INC.**


**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









Each
      of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Community Banks, Inc.








Dated:
      August 8, 2007








/s/  Eddie
                L. DunklebargerEddie
                L. DunklebargerChairman,
                President, and Chief Executive Officer











/s/  Donald
                F. HoltDonald
                F. HoltExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer