alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research: University Park, PA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Software
                        Integrated Farming Systems Project
                                    Integrated Farm System Model
                                    Dairy Gas Emissions Model
                                    Beef Gas Emissions Model
                                    Projected Future Climate Data for IFSMSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area University Park, Pennsylvania Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar ****     ARS News Articles  To Press or Not to Press: That is the QuestionMar 25, 2019Study Clarifies U.S. Beef's Resource Use and Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMar 11, 2019New System Affords Greater Flexibility on Using Phosphorus from ManureDec 14, 2016USDA's Agricultural Research Service Announces Scientist of the Year and Other AwardsJun 11, 2013A Study of Switchgrass for Home Heating in the NortheastMar 21, 2013Forecasting the Fate of Fertilizer in the Chesapeake Bay WatershedAug 18, 2010Ditching Phosphorus RunoffAug 09, 2010New Poultry Litter Applicator Holds Promise for Chesapeake Bay AreaAug 02, 2010Put More Nitrogen into Milk, Not ManureMay 28, 2010


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Introduction Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Main Menu
                        Home page
                                    About the Plant Introduction Station
                                    Crops
                                    Entomology
                                    Facilities
                                    Pathology
                                    Seed Storage
                                    Seed Viability
                                    Annual Reports
                                    Ash Conservation ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa Plant Introduction Research Home Entomology Program







Mainheadline bar  Entomology Team logoThe Entomology Team conducts the following activities:ServicesProviding suitable insect pollinators in proper quantity and good health for caged plant increases in field plots and greenhouses as requested by curatorial staff.Building domiciles and other equipment needed for insect pollinators.ResearchResearching alternate insect pollinators or handling techniques in cooperation with curators and other cooperators.Identifying insect pests found in stored seed or field/greenhouse and recommending treatment options.Quick Linkto Pollinators at PI.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### AUFFERMANN, Appellant, v. PUBLISHERS’ PAPER CO. et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by Frederick A. Auffermann against the Publishers’ Paper Company and another. No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. See, also, 146 App. Div. 911, 131 N. Y. Supp. 1102.
#### Rockland County Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, Inc., Appellant, v Town of Haverstraw, Respondent. —

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Marbach, J.), dated August 15,1983, which denied its application to vacate and set aside an award in arbitration and remitted the matter to the arbitrator to determine the amount of sick leave, vacation and personal leave due petitioner.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner has failed to establish that the arbitrator’s award was irrational. Therefore, the award should not be set aside *(Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines],*50 NY2d 1007). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

17
[No. 20312-0-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 1997.]

#### Willis Enterprises, Inc., *Respondent,*v. DaPaul, Inc., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 94-2-00674-2, F. Mark McCauley, J., entered December 14, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Hunt, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab Docs Cereal Rust Bulletins







2020 Cereal Rust Bulletinsheadline bar **2020 Cereal Rust Bulletins** Cereal rust bulletin #1  4/9/2020
Cereal rust bulletin #2  5/8/2020
Cereal rust bulletin #3  6/5/2020
Cereal rust bulletin #4  7/2/2020
Final bulletin for 2020 8/28/2020 **2020 cereal rust collection maps***(Maps are updated as collections**are received.)* Wheat Leaf Rust (08/27/2020)
Oat Crown Rust (08/27/2020) **2020 cereal rust observation maps***(Maps are updated as reports**are received.)* Wheat Stripe Rust (07/06/2020)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wound Management Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott A. Haire, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,        that: 

> 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

> 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: November 20, 2009                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                           |
| /S/    Scott A. Haire                                      |
| Scott A. Haire,                                                                |
| Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
[No. 21823-2-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Daniel W. Ryckman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurr ston County, No. 96-8-01568-6, Paula Casey, J., entered January 14, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Robert N. Trgovich, Clerk www.innd.uscourts.gov

RECORD TRANSMITTAL LETTER

Gino J. Agnello, Clerk

United States Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit

219 South Dearborn Street, Room 2722

Chicago, IL 60604

Re:

District Court Docket #

U.S. Court of Appeals #

Dear Mr. Agnello:

I am sending you herewith the

following:

Volume(s) of Pleadings

Volume(s) of Transcripts

Volume(s) of State Court Records 

Volume(s) of Depositions

Exhibits: 

Impounded Documents/PSI Reports: 

Other (specify):

Please acknowledge receipt of the above-listed materials on the attached copy of this

letter.

Sincerely,

ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK

By:

 Deputy Clerk

Date Received:__________________ By:__________________________ 

1108 E. Ross Adair Federal Bldg. • 1300 S. Harrison Street • Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 • (260) 423-3000 • Fax (260) 423-3007

5400 Federal Plaza • Suite 2300 • Hammond, Indiana 46320 • (219) 852-6500 • Fax (219) 852-6509

102 Robert A. Grant Federal Bldg. • 204 South Main Street • South Bend, Indiana 46601 • (574) 246-8000 • Fax (574) 246-8002

214 Charles Halleck Federal Bldg. • 230 North Fourth Street • Room 105 • Lafayette, Indiana 47902 • (765) 420-6250 • Fax (765) 420-6314

3:15-cv-463

17-1683 and 17-1591

Supplemental Record on Appeal. It consists of the

(2) manual pleadings: DE 53 and DE 14 shipped via UPS

s/ N. Eddy

Reply to: South Bend Office

Freedom From Religion Foundation Inc et al v. Concord Community Schools

September 15, 2017

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 84 filed 09/15/17 page 1 of 1
#### McCULLOUGH v. METROPOLITAN EL. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 13, 1899.)

Action by Mary R. McCullough against the Metropolitan Elevated Railroad Company.

No opinion. On payment of $10 costs, motion granted.
NO. 07-03-0152-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C MARCH 28, 2003

______________________________ IN RE NATHAN FELDER, Relator

_____________________ __________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT

OF PROHIBITION

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAV IS, JJ. Pending before the court is a motion for a w rit of prohibition filed by Nathan Felder. The latter seeks an order “prohibiting Judge Bill Sheehan of the 69th Distri ct [C]ourt of Dallum [sic] County from continuing prosecution of cause numbe r 3539 until it is determined whether s aid court has p roper jurisdiction . . . to try Relator.” The relator is being tried for capital murder. Furthermo re, the trial court purportedly la cks jurisdict ion
over the proceeding because the indictment allegedly fails to charge F elder “w ith a viol ation of an of fen se un der A rticl e 5 Se ctio n 12b , Tx. C onst . as d efi ned by A rticl e 3 Section 29, Tx. Const.”We deny the motion. Texas Rule of

Appell ate Procedure 52. 3(j)(1) requiresthe one seeking a writ of prohibi tion to ap pend to the req uest “a cert ified copy or sworn copy of . . . any

. . . documentshowing the matter complai ned of.” There are at least two documents which fall within the categorydescribed by Felder. The fir

st is the in dictment whi ch purportedly failed2

to charge an offense. The second is the pretrial pet ition for w rit of habeas corpus which he allegedly

filed and awai ts determinati on. According to the moti on be fore us, it isthat petition for habeas reli ef which must fir st be consider

ed and determined before the trial court can continue w ith the cri minal prosecut ion. Yet, neither document accompanied Felde r’s request for a wri t of prohibition. Thus, he not only has failed to pr

ovide us w ith documentation necessary to assess his contentions but also f ail e d to comply with Rule 52.3(j)(1). Accordingl y, the req uest for a writ of prohibiti on is denied.

Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                            13,578
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             1,302
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   3,332
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            0              
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           170,310
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             172,055
<LOANS>                                          255,140
<ALLOWANCE>                                        2,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   459,546
<DEPOSITS>                                       350,602
<SHORT-TERM>                                       3,766  
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                4,039
<LONG-TERM>                                       50,000
<COMMON>                                          15,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        35,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   459,546  
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    5,922
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  2,757
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      75
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   8,754
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 3,043   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,784
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              4,970
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        140
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    3,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,224
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         1,594
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      4.62
<LOANS-NON>                                        2,610
<LOANS-PAST>                                         992
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0 
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   2,798
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        649
<RECOVERIES>                                         244    
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  2,913
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               2,913
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      23





CONSENT
      OF SELIGSON & GIANNATTASIO, LLP





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated September 30,
      2006
      with respect to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of
      TechnoConcepts, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the fiscal
      year ended September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      into the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2(SEC File No.
      333-124609).







/s/
      Seligson & Giannattasio LLP


Seligson
      & Giannattasio, LLP


White
      Plains, NY


May
      11,
      2007
Exhibit  11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                                    QUARTER ENDED
                                      MARCH 31,
                                      ---------
                                  1998          1997
                                  ----          ----
                       (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<S>                                                          <C>     <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Shares used in computing basic earnings per common share:
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding            1,523   1,494
                                                             ======  ======

Earnings:
     Net income                                              $   16  $  414
                                                             ======  ======

Basic earnings per common share                              $ 0.01  $ 0.28
                                                             ======  ======


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Shares used in computing diluted earnings per common share:
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding            1,523   1,494
     Incremental shares attributed to outstanding options        61      47
                                                             ------  ------
                                                              1,584   1,541
                                                             ======  ======

Earnings:
     Net income                                              $   16  $  414
                                                             ======  ======

Diluted earnings per common share                            $ 0.01  $ 0.27
                                                             ======  ======
<FN>


See  accompanying  notes  to  consolidated  financial  data.
</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6426** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. TRACY MAURICE THOMAS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville
. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 4:08

- cr - 00020

- BR

- 1 ; 4:12

- cv - 00001

- BR )

Submitted : May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tracy Maurice Thomas , Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak , Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, fo r Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tracy Maurice Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certi ficate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonabl e jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on
pr ocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED