alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 60410

**____________ Hemco Theodore,** 

Petitioner **,**

versus
**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

**______________________________** Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A074 648 642

**______________________________** Before **Higginbotham ,**  **Graves ,**  and **Douglas ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Hemco Theodore is a native and citizen of Haiti. He petitions us to review an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) negative reasonable fear and adverse credibility fin dings.
However, we lack jurisdiction. While his challenge was pending, Theodore was removed back to Haiti , thus mooting his petition

. See Mendoza

- Flores v. Rosen , 983 F.3d 845, 847 (5th Cir. 2020). Theodore does

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 11, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-60410 Document: 00516816442 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2023No. 22

- 60410

2 not challenge his removal order nor the reinstatement of that order , and we do not find he is likely to suffer any collateral consequences from the IJ’s decision

. See id. at 848; Molina

- Dominguez v. Garland , No. 21

- 60644, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 3232 (5th Cir. Feb. 9, 2023) ; Brenes

- Lezama v. G arland , N o. 20

- 60126, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 34244 (5th Cir. Nov. 18, 2021). Theodore’s petition is therefore **DISMI SS**  **ED** as moot

**.** Case: 22-60410 Document: 00516816442 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2023
Exhibit 31.1

Certification 

I, David N. Siegel, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ David N. Siegel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6593

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE GLYMPH, d/b/a Specifications and Standards, Inc.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-94-776, CA-96-3790-3-19)

Submitted: July 8, 1997 Decided: January 22, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Glymph, Appellant Pro Se. Eric William Ruschky, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Appellant is foreclosed from raising his sufficiency of evidence claim

because he litigated it on direct appeal and did not assert an

intervening change in law that warrants reconsideration. See Davis

v. United States, 417 U.S. 333, 342 (1974); Boeckenhaupt v. United

States, 537 F.2d 1182, 1183 (4th Cir. 1976). Further, because

Appellant failed to challenge the form of his indictment in his

direct appeal, he may not assert it in this collateral proceeding.

See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. United

States v. Glymph, Nos. CR-94-776; CA-96-3790-3-19 (D.S.C. Apr. 16,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
J. A15037/18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

L.M.B. :

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v. :

:

J.L.B., : No. 101 MDA 2018

:

 Appellant :

Appeal from the Order Entered August 18, 2017,

in the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County

Domestic Relations Division at No. 50803

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., MURRAY, J., AND FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED JUNE 07, 2018

J.L.B. appeals pro se from the August 18, 2017 order entered in the 

Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County that dismissed and denied his 

exceptions “filed to the hearing officer’s report dated June 23, 2017 and order 

of court of same date . . . which order dismissed and denied [appellant’s] 

petition to modify the support order of September 26, 2016.”1 We dismiss 

this appeal.

In reviewing appellant’s brief, we note that appellant fails to set forth 

the order on appeal. Additionally, although appellant includes a “statement 

of [s]cope and standard of view [sic],” appellant contends that “[t]he [s]cope 

of review in this case conflicts with the facts” in that appellant does not have 

 

1 Unnecessary capitalization omitted.
J. A15037/18

- 2 -

a current Pennsylvania pesticides license. Appellant sets forth the following 

statement of question involved:

How may the lower court judges agree the child 

support payment is wrong, and over look [sic] the 

criminal act of [e]xtortion / exaction that is a felony 

offence [sic] with the use of [f]ederal [m]ail 

system. [sic] (that offence [sic] carries up too [sic] a 

20 year jail sentance [sic], and it’s a felony crime for 

a judge not too [sic] report a felony crime?

Appellant’s brief at 1.

Moreover, appellant’s summary of the argument states that the order 

from which appellant appeals from does not comply with the Department of 

Labor’s requirements. Appellant’s seven-sentence argument is 

incomprehensible and fails to include citations to legal authority and record 

citations. Additionally, appellant fails to include a short conclusion stating the 

precise relief sought, but, rather, includes a section entitled “[t]ransfer 

interrupted.” As this court has stated, where, as here, “a court has to guess 

what issues an appellant is appealing, that is not enough for meaningful 

review.” Jones v. Jones, 878 A.2d 86, 89 (Pa.Super. 2005) (citation 

omitted).

Although we are mindful that appellant is proceeding pro se, his choice 

to do so does not relieve him of his responsibility to properly raise and develop 

appealable claims. See Smathers v. Smathers, 670 A.2d 1159, 1160 

(Pa.Super. 1996). Moreover, this court will not act as appellant’s counsel. 

See id. Accordingly, because the substantial defects in appellant’s brief 
J. A15037/18

- 3 -

preclude us from conducting any meaningful judicial review, we dismiss this 

appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. Rule 2101; see also Smathers, 670 A.2d at 

1160-1161.

Appeal dismissed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 06/07/2018
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00449-PPS-JEM document 1-3 filed 10/18/16 page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00449-PPS-JEM document 1-3 filed 10/18/16 page 2 of 2
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00035-CR

JIMMY EDWARD HARRIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 46638-B

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security 

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). Volume nine of the reporter’s record includes a social security number. 

Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, 

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume 

nine of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her 

appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume nine of the 

reporter’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 10, 2018
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Poultry Research: Mississippi State, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Poultry Research Unit - Mississippi State, MS (Photo by Jay Munyon)


Mission


People Benoit, Clint Carter, Melanie Collier, Stephanie Elliott, Katie Evans, Jeffrey
                                            *- Jeff* Halford, Larry Hamby, Franklin
                                            *- Frankie* Harmon, Jeffery Hill, James Hill, Richard Johnson, Jason Leigh, Spencer Magee, Christopher McCafferty, Klint McCarty, Ryan Morris, Hannah Olanrewaju, Hammed Prisock, John Purswell, Joseph
                                            *- Jody* Robinson, Kelsy Rowland, Matthew Whitham, Stephanie


Southeast Area   joseph.purswell@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the annual report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (Quantum) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Quantum, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the
best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quantum at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date: July 1, 2011



/S/    WILLIAM B.
OLSONWilliam B. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
MYL_EX10.58_2014.12.31-10K








Exhibit 58
	
		
	 
	

	 
	1000 Mylan Boulevard
Canonsburg, PA 15317 USA
Phone    724.514.1800
Fax    724.514.1870
Web    mylan.com






Retirement Benefit Agreement
Waiver Letter




Dear [l]:


Reference is made to your Retirement Benefit Agreement with Mylan Inc. (the “Company”), as such agreement has been and may be amended from time to time (the “RBA”).  The RBA provides for the possibility of accelerated vesting and certain other modifications upon a Change in Control of the Company (as such term is defined in the RBA).  By executing this waiver letter, for good and valuable consideration (including your continued employment and continued participation in the Company’s incentive plans and programs), you acknowledge and agree that the transactions consummated pursuant to the Business Transfer Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 13, 2014, by and among Abbott Laboratories, an Illinois corporation, the Company and the other parties thereto, as such agreement may be amended from time to time, shall not constitute a Change in Control for any purpose of the RBA.  All other provisions of the RBA, as modified by the foregoing, shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding this waiver letter.


	
		
	MYLAN INC.,

	by

	 
	 

	 
	Name:   

	 
	Title:   






Acknowledged and agreed:




_____________________________
Name:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1747 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1747

               For the relief of Veronica Mitina Haskins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2005

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Veronica Mitina Haskins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR VERONICA MITINA HASKINS.

    (a) In General.--Veronica Mitina Haskins shall be classified as a 
child under section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed under 
section 204 of such Act by her adoptive parent and the filing of an 
application for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Veronica Mitina Haskins enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Veronica Mitina Haskins, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Veronica 
Mitina Haskins shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP.

    For purposes of section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Veronica Mitina Haskins shall be considered to have satisfied the 
requirements applicable to adopted children under section 101(b)(1) of 
such Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 

 



 

 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
[No. 37861-9-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jamie Rae Seltz, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 95-1-00662-5, Ronald L. Castleberry, J., entered November 20, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Cox and Ellington, JJ.