alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7724

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILBUR VINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CR-91-250-HM, CA-95-2761-WMN)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbur Vinson, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Vinson, Nos. CR91-250-HM; CA-95-2761-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 3, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2008108EN.01000601.xml

| 29.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5081 — Autogrill/Aldeasa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 108/05)

On 7 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5081. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5081. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000714286
<NAME> UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,703,467
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,246,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,005,107
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,664,333
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,005,107
<LOANS>                                     36,451,550
<ALLOWANCE>                                    762,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,458,397
<DEPOSITS>                                  47,824,081
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,100,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            342,323
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       831,590
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,360,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              54,458,397
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,617,930
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              326,417
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,944,347
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             773,790
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,334
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,163,223
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   34,279
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,040,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                192,551
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     192,551
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.03
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,781
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                850,331
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               747,374
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   19,519
<RECOVERIES>                                       600
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              762,734
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           762,734
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        468,045


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Application Technology Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Departments
                        Agricultural Engineering
                                    Entomology
                                    Horticulture
                                    Plant Pathology
                                    IR-4 programSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Application Technology Research Horticulture







Technology Transferheadline bar **Virtual Grower**
Virtual Grower Main Page
Virtual Grower Articles
Virtual Grower Tutorials**PhotoSim**
PhotoSim Main Page**Fertility Management Guides**
General Information
Crop-specific Information and Photo GuidesGeranium
Gerbera
Lettuce
Pansy
Petunia**Laboratory Methodology and Instrumentation**
Nutrient Recipes
Methods


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
2019 Risk Review | V

Contents

Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................1

Section I: Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................3

Key Risks to Banks ....................................................................................................................................................5

Section II: U.S. Economy, Financial Markets, and Banking Industry Overview........................................7 

U.S. Economic Overview .............................................................................................................................................7

Financial Markets......................................................................................................................................................11

Banking Industry Overview.......................................................................................................................................14

Section III: Key Bank Risk Issues .......................................................................................................................... 17

Agriculture ..................................................................................................................................................................17

Commercial Real Estate...........................................................................................................................................20

Energy ........................................................................................................................................................................24

Housing.......................................................................................................................................................................27

Leveraged Lending and Corporate Debt.................................................................................................................31

Nonbank Financial Institution Lending...................................................................................................................34

Interest Rate Risk and Deposit Competition.........................................................................................................36

Liquidity ......................................................................................................................................................................41

Acronyms and Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................... 45

Glossary of Terms......................................................................................................................................................... 47
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EMMANUEL JOEL BREADON

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 931

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 22, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit

Court for Marion County

, Jonathan D. Ohlman , Judge.

Patrick M ichael Megaro, of Appeals Law

Group, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

Emmanuel Breadon appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure 3.850 motion for post

- conviction relief. We affirm, except as to the claim that

trial counsel was ineffective by failing to explore and /or raise an insanity defense. The

trial court corr ectly found that Breadon had failed to allege that he was, in fact, insane at

the time of the offense. See Luc key v. State , 979 So. 2d 353, 354 (Fla. 5 th DCA 2008).2

However, rather than summarily denying the claim because of its facial insufficiency, th e

trial court should have afforded Breadon the opportunity to amend. I d. at 355 ; see also

Spera v. State , 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007).

AFFIRM ED , in part; REVERSE D , in part; and REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and WALLIS , JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Newkirk Master
Limited Partnership; (the "Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael L. Ashner, Chief Executive Officer of the Manager of
the Registrant's General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


By:   /s/ Michael L.Ashner
      --------------------------------------
Name: Michael L. Ashner
      Chief Executive Officer of the Manager
       of the Registrant's General Partner

Date:  March 29, 2005
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES ERIN MCKINNEY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES L. RYAN,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-99018

D.C. No.

2:03-cv-00774-DGC

ORDER

Filed March 12, 2014

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,

it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule

35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman, Murguia and Hurwitz did not

participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-126265, effectiveJune 30, 2005) of Lyris, Inc. of our report dated September 22, 2010 related to the financial Statements as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2010 which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. 

Burr PilgerMayer, Inc. 

San Francisco, CA 

September 22, 2010
[No. 38115-6-I.

Division One.

September 2, 1997.]

#### Frances Lee, et al., *Respondents,*v. Jon Lozier, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-10723-2, Peter Jarvis, J., entered January 8, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Cox, J. Now published at 88 Wn. App. 176.
#### MORNINGSTAR, Appellant, v. LAFAYETTE HOTEL CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by William Morning-star against the Lafayette Hotel Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

ROBSON, J., dissents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0556

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

PITASKUMMAPI DAVID GREEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 9 2023

05/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0556
### ***********************************************The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it wasreleased as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods fo r filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion.

All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appella te Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the advance release version of an opinion and the latest version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports , the latest version is to
be considered authoritative.

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official repo rts are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, Stat e of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
***********************************************BOWENS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION—CONCURRENCE AND

DISSENT
ECKER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with and join parts I, II, and III of the majority opinion. I respectfully dissent, however, from part IV of the majority opinion, in which the majority concludes that, even if the cruel and unusual punishment claims raised by the petitioner, Tyreese Bowens, are not barred by the doctrine of res judicata, he cannot prevail on those claims in light of this court’s recent decisions in
State v. McCleese , 333 Conn. 378, A.3d (2019),
and State v. Williams-Bey , 333 Conn. 468, A.3d (2019). For the reasons articulated in my dissenting opinions in those cases, I believe that juvenile offenders cannot constitutionally be sentenced as adults without an individualized sentencing proceeding in which the sentencing judge must consider the mitigating effects of youth and its associated features, and also that the availability of parole eligibility under § 1 of No. 15-84 of the 2015 Public Acts, codified at General Statutes § 54-125a, is not a substitute for such an individualized sentencing hearing. See State v. McCleese , supra, 429 ( Ecker

, J ., dissenting); State v. Williams-Bey , supra, 477 ( Ecker

, J ., dissenting); see also State v. Taylor G

., 315 Conn. 734, 796–97, 110 A.3d 338 (2015) ( Eveleigh

, J ., dissenting).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2315

To extend the suspension of duty on sulfur black 1. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the suspension of duty on sulfur black 1.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SULFUR BLACK 1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 sulfur black 1) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
CL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0589

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MIKEL S. LETHERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including March 31, 2023, within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 27 2023

02/27/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0589
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

DALE PIERSON, ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) No. 2:16- CV-449 

 ) 

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ) 

LABOR RELATIONS RESEARCH ) 

 ET. AL. ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND MOTION TO VACATE STATUS 

CONFERENCE 

 

 The parties respectfully notify the Court that the parties have agreed in principle to settle 

the above-captioned matter. Counsel for the parties are in the process of preparing and finalizing 

the Settlement Agreement and Stipulated Dismissal (“Agreement”). The parties intend to file a 

dismissal as soon as practicable. Accordingly, the parties respectfully requests that the Court 

vacate the telephonic status conference set for August 22, 2019 at 9:45 A.M. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Christopher D. Stidham /s/ Paul Bozych 

Christopher D. Stidham, #34213-64 Paul Bozych 

Kenneth B. Elwood, #17937-45 John J. Murphy 

Rhame, Elwood & McClure, PC Nielsen, Zehe & Antas, P.C. 

3200 Willowcreek Road, Suite A 55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1800 

Portage, Indiana 46368 Chicago, Illinois 60603 

(219) 762-0494 (312) 322-9900 

chrisstidham@rhameandelwood.com pbozych@nzalaw.com 

kenelwood@rhameandelwood.com jmurphy@nzalaw.com 

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00449-PPS-JEM document 41 filed 08/22/19 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on August 22, 2019, a true and complete copy of the above and foregoing 

was served in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.5, pursuant to the district court’s ECF system as the 

ECF filers, and was served by regular mail to non-ECF filers and parties who do not appear to be 

registered with the Court’s ECF system. 

Paul Bozych 

John J. Murphy 

Nielsen, Zehe & Antas, P.C. 

55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1800 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

 /s/ Christopher D. Stidham 

 Christopher D. Stidham, #34213-64 

 Kenneth B. Elwood, # 17937-45 

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00449-PPS-JEM document 41 filed 08/22/19 page 2 of 2
Order entered January 6, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00702

- CR

TERRISH JERMAINE GAR MON, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. F12

- 34332

- J



### O RDER
The reporter’s record filed in this case consists of five volumes. However, they are labeled to indicate that they are part of a seven

- volume record. Moreover, none of the exhibits
were filed with the record.
Accord ingly, the Court ORDERS court reporters Kimberly Xavier and Kelly Bryant to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, volumes six and seven of the reporter’s record, including all exhibits admitted into evidence during the trial.
We DIRECT the C lerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Kimberly Xavier, official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 3; court reporter Kelly Bryant; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE