alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PNM 12.31.2014 EX 10.4.1




Exhibit 10.4.1            
SHAREWORKS
Template Type Group: Grant Agreement
Template Type: Grant Agreement Template
Template Name:  PNM Officer Performance Share Grant Agreement
Language (s): English
Label: Agreement
HTML:
Acknowledgment Form




###GRANT DATE###


###PARTICIPANT NAME###


Dear ###PARTICIPANT_ NAME###:


Pursuant to the PNM Resources, Inc. 20__ Long-Term Performance Plan (‘LTIP’), you have earned____ shares of stock of PNM Resources, Inc. as outlined below.


	
			
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Employee ID:
	_______________
	 

	Granted To:
	_______________


	 

	Grant ID:
	_______________


	 

	Grant Date:
	_______________


	 

	Granted:
	_______________


	 

	Grant Price:
	$0.0000
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Vesting Schedule
	:  100% immediately






By my acceptance below, I hereby (1) accept delivery of the shares, which are being issued to me under the LTIP and the PNM Resources, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Omnibus Performance Equity Plan, as amended (the ‘Plan’) and (2) acknowledge my prior receipt of the LTIP and the Plan.  If you need additional copies of the LTIP and the Plan, please contact Gail Vavruska-Marcum at 505-241-4631.


[I ACCEPT/ACCEPTANCE BUTTON]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Benjamin Tampu-Bolon, Appellant.

Jüdgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered on April 30, 1984, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Carro, Lynch and Ellerin, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-13-2021]

On February 18, 2021, XPO Logistics submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 72, in Clayton, Indiana.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 11921, March 1, 2021). On June 21, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: June 21, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-13548 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John F. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 2, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/ John F. ColeName:

John F. ColeTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 9, 2005




I, Philip S. Bushnell, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 2, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Philip S. BushnellName:

Philip S. BushnellTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 9, 2005
# L_2010276EN.01008001.xml

| 20.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/80

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1137/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part One

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 311 of 21 November 2008
  )

On page 29, Annex, point 5.6, paragraph 3 of the new Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004:

for:

‘3.   Implementing measures shall be adopted at least nine months before the start of a data collection period.’,

read:

‘3.   Implementing measures shall be drawn up at least nine months before the start of a data collection period.’.

---
#### OTTOWAY, Appellant, v. MOSELY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by John E. Ottoway against Mose Mosely. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

OPTI INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VIA TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. (TAIWAN),

Defendants-Appellants

______________________ 

2013-1670, 2014-1839

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00279-JRG, 

Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MICHAEL LOUIS BRODY, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by JAMES ETHAN MCCOMB; GEOFFREY P. EATON, 

Washington, DC.

BRIAN ANDREW CARPENTER, Beuther Joe & Carpenter 

LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for defendants-appellants. Also 

represented by ERIC WILLIAM BEUTHER; TIMOTHY J.H.

CRADDOCK, Klemchuk LLP, Dallas, TX.
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019055DE.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.2.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 55/18 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1272/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 16. Dezember 2008 über die Einstufung, Kennzeichnung und Verpackung von Stoffen und Gemischen, zur Änderung und Aufhebung der Richtlinien 67/548/EWG und 1999/45/EG und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 353 vom 31. Dezember 2008](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2008_353_R_TOC)
)

Seite 102, Anhang I Teil 3 Nummer 3.5.3.2.1:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „3.5.3.2.1 | Die Einstufung von Gemischen beruht auf den verfügbaren Testdaten für die einzelnen Bestandteile des Gemisches, wobei Konzentrationsgrenzwerte für Bestandteile gelten, die als Keimzell-Mutagene eingestuft sind, Konzentrationsgrenzwerte sind.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „3.5.3.2.1 | Die Einstufung von Gemischen beruht auf den verfügbaren Testdaten für die einzelnen Bestandteile des Gemisches, wobei Konzentrationsgrenzwerte für Bestandteile gelten, die als Keimzell-Mutagene eingestuft sind.“ |

---
Amendment to Supplemental Benefit Plan, effective as of January 1, 1998



 Exhibit (10)(d)(i) 
  
 CERTIFICATE 
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE OF THE POTLATCH CORPORATION 
 SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1989) 
  
 Whereas this Corporation, by resolution adopted by its Board of Directors effective May 5, 1989, authorized the Vice President-Employee Relations of this
Corporation to adopt non-substantive changes to benefit plans established and maintained by this Corporation if those changes do not have a material financial impact on such plans or the Corporation; and 
  
 Whereas it is deemed necessary and desirable to amend the Potlatch Corporation
Supplemental Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) to make certain non-substantive changes. 
  
 Now, Therefore, be it 
  
 Resolved that effective as
of January 1, 1998, Section 4(c) of the Potlatch Corporation Salaried Employees’ Supplemental Benefit Plan shall be amended to delete the last sentence thereof and to replace it in its entirety by the following: 
  
 If the vested amount credited to a Participant’s Savings Plan
Supplemental Benefit account, which is established after December 31, 1996, is less than $1,000 on the third anniversary of the establishment of such account, such benefit will be paid to the Participant in a single lump sum as soon as practicable
after the third anniversary of the establishment of such account. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	 POTLATCH CORPORATION

					
	 	 	 September 15, 1998
 Date
	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    BARBARA M. FAILING        
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Vice President-Employee Relations
2978743 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Supreme Court Cause No. OP 20-0233 

WARDEN LYNN GUYER, WARDEN 

JENNIE HANSEN, AND MONTANA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Petitioners, 

 v. 

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE 

COUNTY, THE HONORABLE 

ELIZABETH A. BEST, DISTRICT 

JUDGE, 

 Respondents. 

PROPOSED ORDER 

Pursuant to the Montana Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association’s 

(“MSPOA”) Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and good 

cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Leave to File 

Amicus Curiae Brief is GRANTED. MSPOA shall file its brief on or before May 

14, 2020. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 7 2020

05/07/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0233
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2265 

To extend the suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange resin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 

resin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MACROPOROUS ION EXCHANGE RESIN COM4 PRISING A COPOLYMER OF STYRENE 

5 CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENEZENE, 

6 THIOL FUNCTIONALIZED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.30 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2265 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In re ABRAHAMS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

In the matter of Paul M. Abrahams. No opinion. Reference ordered to official referee. Settle order on notice.
[No. 20140-2-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ernest Joseph Perea, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 94-1-04382-1, Nile E. Aubrey, J., entered October 25, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
| 100% Owned Subsidiaries:           |                                   |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                   |
| Wound Care Innovations, LLC             | Nevada limited liability company       |
|                                    |                                   |
|                                    |                                   |
| BioPharma Management Technologies, Inc. | Texas corporation                      |
|                                    |                                   |
|                                    |                                   |
| Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC     | Texas limited liability company        |
|                                    |                                   |
|                                    |                                   |
| Secure eHealth, LLC                     | Nevada limited liability company       |
|                                    |                                   |
|                                    |                                   |
| 50% Owned Joint Venture:           |                                   |
|                                    |                                   |
| Pharma Tech International, LLC     | Nevada limited liability company  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000715369
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1983-2 LTD PTSP

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    87,744
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             54,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         142,178
<PP&E>                                31,346,134
<DEPRECIATION>                        31,272,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           262,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     64,721
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               155,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             262,042
<SALES>                                  200,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         206,623
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            119,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           86,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       86,946
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              86,946
<EPS-BASIC>                                13.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2346 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John J. 

Hainkel Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mr. JINDAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John J. Hainkel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN J. HAINKEL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 105 NW Railroad Avenue in 

6 Hammond, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘John J. Hainkel Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•HR 2346 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John J. Hainkel Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ
#### CARTIER v. SPOONER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 18, 1907.)

Action by Emmaline Cartier against William R. Spooner.

No opinion. Motion denied, on condition that appellant have his case ready for argument on the first - motion day of the December term. Order filed.
[No. 20271-9-II.

Division Two.

September 19, 1997.]

#### Helen Call, *Appellant,*v. The Carriage House Restaurant of Longview, Inc., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 94-2-00418-3, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered December 5, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
[No. 39777-0-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Abel L. Martinez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-00860-1, Donald D. Haley, J., entered November 25, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[No. 15533-1-III.

Division Three.

August 19, 1997.]

#### Dairyland Insurance Company, *Respondent,*v. Nancy Bateman, et al., *Defendants,*Patrick Wayne Day, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 95-2-01579-9, Neal Q. Rielly, J., entered February 6,1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Thompson, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES TALBERT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 322 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[No. 19366-3-II.

Division Two.

September 26, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jeffery Lynn Wentworth, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 90-1-00092-2, James D. Roper, J., entered February 28, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Armstrong, J.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of National Mercantile Bancorp (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ScottMontgomery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| DATE: August 14, 2002 |   | /s/   SCOTT  A. MONTGOMERY |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | **SCOTT  A. MONTGOMERY**             |   |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer              |   |

 

----
[No. 37839-2-I.

Division One.

May 27, 1997.]

#### Stanley Hahn, *Appellant,*v. Yale N.W. Materials Handling, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-33592-8, John M. Darrah, J., entered November 15, 1995. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Coleman and Ellington, JJ.
**Exhibit      31.2**

**COMMUNITY      BANKS, INC.**

**RULE      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

** (Chief      Financial Officer)**

| Date   | June                21, 2007 |   | /s/                Donald F. Holt        |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                         |   | Donald                F. Holt            |
|   |                         |   | Executive                Vice President  |
|   |                         |   | (Chief                Financial Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,357
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              63
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,925
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          42,026
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            42,003
<LOANS>                                        133,328
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,708
<DEPOSITS>                                     187,515
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,306
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,401
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 218,708
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,008
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,986
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    81
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,078
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,830
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,830
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,248
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  65
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,902
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,902
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.90
<LOANS-NON>                                        225
<LOANS-PAST>                                       228
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    496
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,707
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       41
<RECOVERIES>                                        30
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,786
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>