alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Thomas P. Friezen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: October 28, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Thomas P. Friezen    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas  P. Friezen       |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

1

----
2014 10-K Ex 10.17






Exhibit 10.17
Directors’ Compensation Summary Sheet
	
									
	 
	 
	Board
	 
	Chairman of

	 
	 
	Members
	 
	the Board

	Annual Retainer
	 
	$
	100,000
	

	 
	$
	180,000
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Committee Chairs
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Audit Committee
	 
	$
	25,000
	

	 
	—
	


	Compensation Committee
	 
	$
	15,000
	

	 
	—
	


	Nominating & Governance Committee
	 
	$
	8,000
	

	 
	—
	


	FIRM Committee
	 
	$
	8,000
	

	 
	—
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Stock Grants (1)
	 
	$
	140,000
	

	 
	$
	240,000
	







(1) Number of shares issued based upon FMV on date of grant
**Exhibit99.3**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,Michael D. Corbin, Vice President of Finance of Wheeling Island Gaming, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge and belief that:

 

(1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2002 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated:  March  27, 2003 |   | /s/ Michael D. Corbin     |   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Michael D. Corbin         |   |
|                         |   | Vice President of Finance |   |

 

----
[No. 20784-2-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Dependency of*D.G.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Jefferson County, No. 94-7-00028-1, Thomas Majhan, J. Pro Tern., entered May 21, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Hunt, J.
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2001-3
$ 236,085,000.00 Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001




           PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
              DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %

          ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Feb-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Mar-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Apr-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 May-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jun-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jul-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Aug-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Sep-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Oct-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Nov-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Dec-2001           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%

          ____________ ___________ ___________
  Totals            0           0           0

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
#### HARKOW, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO., Appellant. (Action No. 10.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 23, 1907.)

Action by Joseph H. Harkow against the New York City Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, on consent in open court, with costs. See 105 N. Y. Supp. 689.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Ruminant Diseases and Immunology Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Ruminant Diseases and Immunology Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles  Researchers Uncover Genetic Link to Cattle DiseasesSep 08, 2011


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fernando Nieves, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton Hecht, J.), rendered on February 2,1984, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2274 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2274

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur R-E.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur R-E.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESMODUR R-E.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.04      Polyisocyante       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         cross linking                                                      31/2008
                         agent products
                         containing
                         triphenylmethane
                         triisocyante (CAS
                         No. 2422-91-5) in
                         solvents
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3824.90.28)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1     Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-113452) pertaining to the2003 Stock Incentive Plan of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. of ourreports dated March 9, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of PinnacleAirlines Corp., Pinnacle Airlines Corp. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Pinnacle Airlines Corp., included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2004.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPMemphis, TennesseeMarch 9, 2005
Exhibit 12.1

MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.  Calculation of Earnings to Fixed Charges(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Year ended December 31,2005

2006

2007

2008

2009Total fixed charges

$
34,080

$
54,153

$
49,191

$
86,559

$
112,981Earnings:Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes

$
(8,515
)
$
74,498

$
(59,155
)
$
273,602

$
(155,370
)Add:Fixed charges


34,080


54,153


49,191


86,559


112,981Amortization of capitalized interest


195


255


478


1,110


1,444Cash distributions from equity method investments


2,441





10,840


445


Income (loss) from equity method investments


2,153


(5,316
)

(5,309
)

(90
)

(3,505
)Subtract:Interest capitalized


(2,133
)

(900
)

(3,344
)

(9,486
)

(12,228
)Total earnings

$
28,221

$
122,690

$
(7,299
)
$
352,140

$
(56,678
)Ratio


0.83


2.27


(0.15
)

4.07


(0.50
)


---



QuickLinks
# L_2008265EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 265/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 970/2008

of 3 October 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 October 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 October 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 91,4 |
| MK | 51,5 |
| TR | 98,5 |
| ZZ | 80,5 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 156,8 |
| TR | 89,6 |
| ZZ | 123,2 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 106,5 |
| ZZ | 106,5 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 75,3 |
| BR | 51,8 |
| TR | 96,3 |
| UY | 95,7 |
| ZA | 87,9 |
| ZZ | 81,4 |
| 0806 10 10 | TR | 87,0 |
| US | 162,4 |
| ZZ | 124,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | CL | 113,9 |
| CN | 61,6 |
| CR | 67,4 |
| NZ | 116,4 |
| US | 101,9 |
| ZA | 86,0 |
| ZZ | 91,2 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 68,8 |
| TR | 143,9 |
| ZA | 172,1 |
| ZZ | 128,3 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

91,4

MK

51,5

TR

98,5

ZZ

80,5

0707 00 05

JO

156,8

TR

89,6

ZZ

123,2

0709 90 70

TR

106,5

ZZ

106,5

0805 50 10

AR

75,3

BR

51,8

TR

96,3

UY

95,7

ZA

87,9

ZZ

81,4

0806 10 10

TR

87,0

US

162,4

ZZ

124,7

0808 10 80

CL

113,9

CN

61,6

CR

67,4

NZ

116,4

US

101,9

ZA

86,0

ZZ

91,2

0808 20 50

CN

68,8

TR

143,9

ZA

172,1

ZZ

128,3

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2372 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2- 

(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2- 

(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-(METHOXYCARBONYL)BENZYLSULFONAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.35 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2372 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Actua 2015 Performance Plan 
 The
Board of Directors of Actua Corporation (together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “Actua”) hereby establishes this 2015 Performance Plan (this “Plan”). The purposes of this Plan are to (1) advance the interests of
Actua’s stockholders by providing certain officers and other employees with bonus payments and/or vesting of performance shares upon the achievement of specified corporate and individual goals and (2) help Actua attract and retain key
employees. 
 The Compensation Committee of Actua’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) will administer and interpret this Plan. All
decisions and determinations of the Committee with respect to this Plan will be final and binding on all parties. 
 Actua’s 2015 goals include
quantitative and qualitative goals. The relative weighting of each element of the Actua-specific goals is described below. 
 Eighty percent (80%) of
the Plan is tied to the accomplishment of quantitative goals. The achievement of a specified consolidated GAAP revenue goal for Actua’s existing consolidated companies (FolioDynamix, GovDelivery, MSDSonline and Bolt) accounts for fifty percent
(50%) of the Plan, the achievement of a specified consolidated adjusted non-GAAP net income goal accounts for ten percent (10%) of the Plan, and the achievement of a specified consolidated adjusted non-GAAP cash flow from operations
goal accounts for twenty percent (20%) of the Plan. 
 Twenty percent (20%) of the Plan is tied to execution against the following qualitative
goals: (1) execution of strategic initiatives, (2) allocation of capital and corporate development, (3) brand enhancement and (4) reaction to unforeseen market/business conditions. 

Following the end of the 2015 fiscal year, the Committee will evaluate Actua’s 2015 performance and determine the extent (expressed as a percentage) to
which the corporate and individual goals, as applicable, were achieved (such percentage, the “Achievement Percentage”). The Committee will then award bonuses and/or provide for the vesting of performance shares in accordance with each
individual’s Achievement Percentage under the terms of this Plan.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 83369 RICHARD ALLEN HIGHTOWER, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA,



### Respondent. 

# FILED DEC 0 3 2021

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Third Judicial District Court, Lyon County; Leon Aberasturi, Judge.

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of withdrawal of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that she has informed appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal. Having been so informed. appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 1

, J.

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, 

### see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order. 

### ,40 , J Stiglich Silver arraguirre A. BROWN PREME OURT DEPUTY CLERKcc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge Walther Law Offices, PLLC Attorney General/Carson City Lyon County District Attorney Third District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0 ) 1947A 448#1. 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 236 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 236

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOY HANDGUNS.

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall promulgate a rule in 
accordance with section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2058) to declare as a banned hazardous product under section 8 any toy 
which in size, shape, or overall appearance resembles a real handgun.
                                 <all>
```
J

- S19005

- 15

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.

JERRY TAYLOR Appellant No. 394 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Order dated January 27 , 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No: CP

- 51

- CR

- 0004655

- 2013

BEFORE: STABILE, JENKINS, and MUSMANNO, JJ. JUDGMENT ORDER BY STABILE, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 12, 2015 This case returns to us following our decision to remand to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (“trial court”) for issuance of a supplemental opinion detailing the trial court’s compliance with Pa.R.Crim. P. 587(B). Briefly, we remanded the case to the trial court because we were unable to determine, based on the trial court’s noncompliance with Rule 587(B), whether we could exercise jurisdiction under Pa.R.A.P. 313 (relating to collateral orders) over App ellant’s appeal from an order of the trial court denying his pretrial motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. See Commonwealth v. Taylor , 120 A.3d 1017, 1021 (Pa. Super. 2015) (citation omitted). We explained in Taylor that an order denying a doubl e jeopardy motion is appealable as a collateral order so long as the motion is not found to be frivolous by the lower court. Id. at 1021

- 22. TheJ

- S19005

- 15

- 2

-

requirement that a lower court render a specific finding on frivolousness in

the event the court denies a dou ble jeopardy motion to dismiss is now expressly mandated under Rule 587(B). Instantly, consistent with our opinion and in compliance with Rule 587(B), the trial court found in its supplemental opinion that it denied Appellant’s pretrial motion to dism iss on double jeopardy grounds because it found the motion to be “frivolous and without merit.” Trial Court Opinion, 10/9/15, at 5, ¶ 15. Given the trial court’s finding on frivolousness, we now conclude that the trial court’s order denying the double je opardy motion does not qualify as a collateral order under Rule 313. Accordingly, we must quash this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appeal quashed. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 11/12/2015