alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
        CHIEF
        FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  I
        hereby
        certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
        of
        TechnoConcepts, Inc. (formerly Technology Consulting Partners, Inc.) for
        the
        period ending September 30, 2006:
 
 (1)
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of TechnoConcepts,
        Inc.
  
 /s/
        Antonio E. Turgeon
 Antonio
        E. Turgeon
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 
 January
        15, 2007
 
 
 
 /s/
        Michael Handelman
 Michael
        Handelman
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 January
        15, 2007
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 has been provided to TechnoConcepts, Inc. and will be retained
        by
        TechnoConcepts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        upon request.
Exhibit 10.6


  


OMNIBUS
AGREEMENT EXTENSION


 


This Omnibus Agreement Extension (“Agreement”)
is entered into on February 25, 2015, and is by and between EnerVest, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (“EnerVest”)
and EV Energy GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “General Partner”).


 


WHEREAS, the Omnibus Agreement (the “First
Omnibus Agreement”), was entered into on September 29, 2006, by and among EnerVest, EV Management LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“EV Management”), the General Partner, EV Energy Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(the “Partnership”), and EV Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“OLP”). Any
capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth therein;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.3 of the First
Omnibus Agreement, EnerVest and the General Partner determine the amount of general and administrative expenses that will be properly
allocated to the Partnership after December 31, 2008;


 


WHEREAS, the First Omnibus Agreement automatically
renews each year if it is not terminated by either EnerVest or the General Partner;


 


WHEREAS, the First Omnibus Agreement was extended
by the Omnibus Agreement Extensions entered into on December 17, 2008, December 10, 2009, December 21, 2010, December 20, 2011;
February 25, 2013 and February 15, 2014;


 


WHEREAS, neither party has terminated the First
Omnibus Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, based on the recommendation of the
Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors of EV Management, which provided Special Approval (as defined in the limited partnership
agreement of the Partnership) to the extension of the First Omnibus Agreement as contemplated by this Agreement, the Board of Directors
of EV Management has authorized and approved the extension of the First Omnibus Agreement as contemplated by this Agreement.


 


In consideration of the premises and the covenants,
conditions, and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, EnerVest and the General Partner hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The First Omnibus Agreement shall continue in effect
until December 31, 2015, subject to termination or automatic renewal on such date as provided in the First Omnibus Agreement.


 




    	1



    	 



    

  


2. The Partnership shall pay EnerVest a fee of $1,096,160.17
per month for the services described in the First Omnibus Agreement, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.3 therein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed
this Agreement on, and effective as of, the date above first written.


 


ENERVEST, LTD.


 


	By:	EnerVest Management GP, L.C., 	 
	 	its general partner	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/MARK A. HOUSER	 
	 	Mark A. Houser 	 
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	EV ENERGY GP, L.P.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	EV MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., 	 
	 	its general partner	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/MICHAEL E. MERCER	 
	 	Michael E. Mercer	 
	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 


 




    	2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 120 (Friday, June 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-13-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 72--Indianapolis, Indiana; Authorization 
of Production Activity; XPO Logistics (Wearable Electronic 
Communication/Data Device Kitting); Clayton, Indiana

    On February 18, 2021, XPO Logistics submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
FTZ 72, in Clayton, Indiana.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 11921, March 1, 2021). On June 
21, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: June 21, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-13548 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Fiber Bioscience and Utilization Research: New Orleans, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area New Orleans, Louisiana Southern Regional Research Center Cotton Fiber Bioscience and Utilization Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Stephen J. Antal et al., Appellants, v City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Respondent.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the revocation of a preliminary certificate of eligibility for a partial tax exemption pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 421-a and to compel the issuance of a final certificate of eligibility, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated March 16,1984, which dismissed the petition.

Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, petition granted, revocation of the preliminary certificate of teligibility annulled, and respondent is directed to issue a final certificate of eligibility to the petitioners.

At Special Term, and on appeal, the petitioners contended that respondent issued and revoked a preliminary certificate of eligibility for a partial tax exemption, based upon the same facts (concerning the demolition of Village Mall and construction of Bayside Mews Condominium). Respondent did not controvert that allegation, but rather argued, in effect, that its “understanding” of the operative facts changed. While the “authorities are in agreement that upon a change of circumstances * * * or new information, an agency may reconsider and alter a prior determination” *(Matter of Sullivan County Harness Racing Assn. v Glasser,*30 NY2d 269, 277), “[cjapricious action in a legal sense is established when an administrative agency on identical facts decides differently” *(Matter of Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v Galvin,*40 AD2d 211, 217, *affd*32 NY2d 796, *cert denied sub nom. Baum v Lefrak Forest Hills Corp.,*414 US 1004). Accordingly, respondent’s revocation of the preliminary certificate of eligibility was arbitrary and capricious and a final certificate of eligibility should be issued. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2383 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2383

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 
   19550 Kelso Road in Byron, California, as the ``C.W. `Bill' Jones 
                            Pumping Plant''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF FACILITY.

    The facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 19550 Kelso 
Road in Byron, California, and known as the Tracy Pumping Plant, shall 
be known and designated as the ``C.W. `Bill' Jones Pumping Plant''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``C.W. `Bill' Jones Pumping 
Plant''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 8, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2383

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 
   19550 Kelso Road in Byron, California, as the ``C.W. `Bill' Jones 
                            Pumping Plant''.
```
[No. 20215-8-II.

Division Two.

September 5, 1997.]

#### Scott L. Havsy, D.O., et al., *Appellants,*v. Frederick G. Flynn, D.O., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-2-11137-3, Arthur W. Verharen, J., entered December 8, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J. Now published at 88 Wn. App. 514.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of Wyndham International, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wyndham International, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Fred J. Kleisner   
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Fred J. Kleisner       
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      32.2


**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EuroBancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yadira R. Mercado,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
              as
              applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



EUROBANCSHARES,
              INC.Dated:
              March 16, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Yadira
              R.
              MercadoYadira
              R. MercadoChief
              Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to EuroBancshares, Inc. and will be retained by EuroBancshares, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
      Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “ Company ”) ,
      does
      hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
      10-Q
      for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “ Report ” )
      that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date:
                May 9, 2007
            /s/
                Vernon W. Hill, IIVernon
                W. Hill, IIPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                May 9, 2007
            /s/
                Douglas J. PaulsDouglas
                J. PaulsExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer







The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as a separate disclosure
      document.




28
[No. 34709-8-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### Ronald D. Bingham, *as Administrator, Appellant,*v. Timothy A. Lechner, *as Trustee,*et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-2-24623-2, Robert S. Lasnik, J., entered May 18, 1994. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.
| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 8, 2007 | /s/                Dennis M. DiFlorio                               |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Dennis                M. DiFlorio                                   |   |
|                                | Chairman,                Commerce Bank, N.A.                        |   |
|                                |                                                                |   |
| Date:                August 8, 2007 | /s/                Douglas J. Pauls                                 |
|                                | Douglas                J. Pauls                                     |   |
|                                | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6739

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS PAUL JORDAN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-94-618, CA-97-3344-8-20)

Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Paul Jordan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Paul Jordan, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jordan, Nos.

CR-94-618; CA-97-3344-8-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1969 

To suspend temporarily the duty on N,N′-hexane-1,6-diylbis(3-(3,5-di-tertbutyl-4-hydroxyphenyl opionamide)). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. BAKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on N,N′-hexane-1,6- 

diylbis(3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl opionamide)). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. N,N′-HEXANE-1,6-DIYLBIS(3-(3,5-DI-TERT-BUTYL4 4-HYDROXYPHENYLPROPIONAMIDE)). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•HR 1969 IH 

‘‘ 9902.04.82 N,N′-hexane-1,6-diylbis(3- 

(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4- 

hydroxyphenylpropionamide)) (CAS No. 23128–74–7) 

(provided for in subheading 

2924.29.31) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### O'HORO, Respondent, v. KELSEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 18, 1899.)

Action by James O’Horo against James E. Kelsey.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw his demurrer and answer upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal. All concur, except WARD, J., not voting.