alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(23 Misc. Rep. 123.)

#### WISNER v. OSTEYEE BROS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 28, 1898.)

Action on Coupon—Evidence.

Although the holder of a coupon who comes into possession thereof before maturity is entitled to the presumption that he acquired title thereto in good faith, this presumption may be rebutted; and a refusal to allow a party sued thereon to show that plaintiff had received it in bad faith, with knowledge of the fact that it had been stolen, and without having parted with any value therefor, constitutes error.

Appeal from Sixth district court.

Action by Archie L. Wisner against Osteyee Bros. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before BEEKMAJS, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVB and GIEGERICH, JJ.

Benjamin Patterson, for appellant.

Samuel G. Herriman, for respondent.

BEEKMAH, P. J.

The respondent brought this action to recover the amount of a coupon which had been attached to a bond issued by the appellant, which is a corporation. The proof, as far as it went, tended to show that he had come into possession of the instrument before maturity, and he was entitled to the presumption, which obtains under such circumstances, that he had acquired title thereto in good faith, and for value,—a presumption, however, which may be overcome by evidence tending to show the contrary. The trial justice, however, refused to allow the appellant to show that thé respondent had received the coupon in bad faith, with knowledge of the fact that it had been stolen, and without having parted with any value therefor. In ruling upon the question, the justice stated as follows:

> “The question is not allowed upon the ground, that there is no evidence before the court that the instrument which is offered here is anything but a negotiable paper; and, under the decisions of the highest courts, in both state and the *690United States, the coupons are negotiable, arid payable to the person having possession thereof.”

It is true that such an instrument is correctly classified as negotiable (Evertson v. Bank, 66 N. Y. 14)but the special immunities which are enjoyed by the holders of such paper extend only to those who have acquired it before maturity, in good faith, and for a valuable consideration. The appellant was therefore entitled to show that the respondent was not such a holder, and to adduce evidence tending to impeach his title to the coupon in question. As the ruling excepted to was clearly erroneous, the judgment must be reversed.

The objection taken by the appellant to the admission in evidence of the coupon was not broad enough to raise the question of the sufficiency of its proof. In order to take advantage of this omission, the objection should have been specifically made on that ground.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2213 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2213

    To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of Prosulfuron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of Prosulfuron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF PROSULFURON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.07.32       Preparations       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         containing                                                         31/2008
                         Prosulfuron
                         Technical (1-(4-
                         methoxy-6-
                         methyltriazin-2-
                         yl)-3-(2-(3,3,3-
                         trifluoropropyl)-
                         phenyls
                         ulfonyl)urea (CAS
                         No. 94125-34-5)
                         (provided for in
                         heading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX10.31_2014_Q4


Exhibit 10.31


SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


February 2015


Annual Cash Retainer.  Each of our non-employee directors receives an annual cash retainer of $55,000.  The Chair of the Audit Committee receives additional compensation of $17,000 per year, and each of the members of the Audit Committee (other than the Chair) receives additional compensation of $8,500 per year.  The Chair of the Management Development and Compensation Committee receives additional compensation of $14,000 per year, and each of the members of the Management Development and Compensation Committee (other than the Chair) receives additional compensation of $7,000 per year.  The Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receives additional compensation of $12,000 per year, and each of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (other than the Chair) receives additional compensation of $6,000 per year.  The non-executive Chairman of the Board receives an additional retainer of $100,000 per year.
Meeting Fees.  Each non-employee director (other than the non-executive Chairman of the Board) receives meeting fees for Board and Committee meetings attended beyond the normal number of regular or typical meetings for the Board and each Committee in a fiscal year, including: (i) Board meeting fees of $1,000 per in-person meeting and $500 per telephonic meeting after a minimum of four Board meetings for the fiscal year, and (ii) Committee meeting fees of $750 per in-person Committee meeting and $500 per telephonic Committee meeting after a minimum of eight Audit Committee meetings and after a minimum of four meetings of each other Committee for the fiscal year.
Equity Compensation.  Coincident with the annual meeting of shareholders, non-employee directors are eligible to receive equity compensation in amounts determined by the Management Development and Compensation Committee, of which generally three-quarters would be paid in the form of restricted stock and one-quarter in stock options, based on Black-Scholes valuation, with the grants to vest on the earlier of one year from the date of grant or the date of the next annual meeting at which directors are elected to the Board, so long as the director continues to serve on our Board of Directors.  All options granted to directors have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and remain exercisable for a period of up to 10 years, subject to continuous service on our Board of Directors.
Reimbursement of Expenses.  All of our directors are reimbursed for travel expenses for attending meetings of our Board or any Board committee and for attending approved director continuing education programs.
No Director Compensation for Employee Directors.  Any director who is also an employee of our company does not receive additional compensation for service as a director.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Bioprotection Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR HomepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Crop Bioprotection Research People







Bruce W Zilkowskiheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/6316/IMG_7068.jpg
 **CONTACT**
 **EDUCATION** MS, Biology, Illinois State University BS, Agronomy, University of Illinois
 **RESEARCH INTERESTS** Naturally occurring bioactive chemicals (insect pheromones, repellants, insecticides) Chemical Ecology of Insects
 **CURRENT RESEARCH:** Identification of natural products that adversely affect mosquitos. **LAB MEMBERS:** Currently working under Dr. Ephantus Juma Muturi.
 ProjectsNo projects listed for this employee.
 PublicationsNo publications listed for this employee.
 **HONORS AND AWARDS** 2004 Midwest Area Direct Research Support Person of the Year


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc.
(Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), David N. Siegel,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Neal S. Cohen, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David N. Siegel
-------------------------------
Name: David N. Siegel
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 14, 2003

/s/ Neal S. Cohen
-------------------------------
Name: Neal S. Cohen
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 14, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 213

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require a national primary drinking 

water regulation for perchlorate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Ms. SOLIS (for herself, Mr. DINGELL, Mrs. CAPPS, and Mr. STUPAK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require a national 

primary drinking water regulation for perchlorate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Drinking Water 

5 for Healthy Communities Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULA7 TION FOR PERCHLORATE. 

8 Section 1412(b)(12) of the Safe Drinking Water Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 300g–1(b)(12)) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 
2

•HR 213 IH 

1 ‘‘(C) PERCHLORATE.—

2 ‘‘(i) SCHEDULE AND STANDARD.—

3 Notwithstanding the deadlines set forth in 

4 paragraph (1), the Administrator shall 

5 promulgate a national primary drinking 

6 water regulation for perchlorate pursuant 

7 to this subsection, in accordance with the 

8 schedule established by this subparagraph. 

9 ‘‘(ii) PROPOSED REGULATIONS.—Not 

10 later than January 31, 2006, the Adminis11 trator shall propose a national primary 

12 drinking water regulation for percholate. 

13 ‘‘(iii) FINAL REGULATIONS.—Not 

14 later than July 31, 2007, after notice and 

15 opportunity for public comment, the Ad16 ministrator shall promulgate a national 

17 primary drinking water regulation for per18 chlorate.’’.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Issues Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                    IACUC Executive SummariesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Livestock Issues Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News
- Annual LIRU Reseach Newletter
- Annual Newsletter 2018
- 

Newsheadline bar There is no news information available at this time.   ARS News Articles  Scientists Collaborate to Study the Cause and Development of Liver Abscesses in CattleMar 20, 2024USDA Research Facility in Lubbock Commemorates Over 20 Years of Contributions to the Livestock IndustryAug 23, 2022


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,211
<SECURITIES>                                       868
<RECEIVABLES>                                      616<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,130
<PP&E>                                           5,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,930
<BONDS>                                          2,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,574
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,031
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    169
<INCOME-TAX>                                        68
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(23 Misc. Rep. 167.)

#### BURKHARD v. GEORGE HAGEMEYER & SONS LUMBER CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 28, 1898.)

Appeal—Review.

The appellate term of the supreme court will not disturb the conclusion of the trial justice, in a case tried without a jury, in which there was sufficient evidence to support a finding either way.

Appeal from Eleventh district court.

*668Action by Jacob Burkhard against George Hagemeyer & Sons Lumber Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BEEKHAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and GIEGERICH, JJ.

W. C. Beecher and Richard B. Kelly, for appellant.

Lewis S. Goebel, for respondent.

GIEGERICH, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $172.50, claimed to be due plaintiff for horses, harness, and drivers furnished to the defendant, at its request,' during the month of April, 1897. The issues in the action were joined by written complaint and answer, the latter containing a general denial. The substantial question of fact litigated upon the trial was whether or not the horses were furnished to the defendant; the plaintiff claiming that they were, while the defendant denies having hired or used them, insisting that the same were furnished to one August K. Kaufold upon his request. There was sufficient evidence in the case to support a finding either way; and, the justice having found for the plaintiff upon a conflict of evidence, we should not disturb his conclusion. Lynes v. Hickey, 4 Misc. Rep. 422, 24 N. Y. Supp. 731. We have examined with great care the exceptions taken at the trial to rulings respecting the admissibility of evidence, and fail to discover the existence of any substantial error which would require the reversal of the judgment.

The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### JAHSS, Respondent, v. C. S. LAMBIE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate DM*1136sion, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by Henry Jahss against the C. S. Lambie Company.

PER CURIAM.

Order, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements.

BURR, J., dissents.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of J.L. HalseyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), we, Luis Rivera and Joseph Lambert, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, of J.L.Halsey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  /s/ Luis Rivera                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Luis Rivera, Chief Executive Officer    |
| September 26, 2007                      |
|                                    |
|  /s/ Joseph Lambert                |   |
| Joseph Lambert, Chief Financial Officer |
| September 26, 2007                      |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flow International Corporation, a Washington
corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen D. Reichenbach, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/    STEPHEN D. REICHENBACH                      |  | September 15, 2003
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|Stephen D. Reichenbach Principal Financial Officer |  |
---

**CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON**

TO: United States Securities and Exchange Commission



I, J. **David Gaunt**, do hereby consent to the
  filing of the Technical Report with the regulatory authorities referred to above
  and to the written or electronic disclosure of the Technical Report entitled
  “Technical Report on the 2009 Program and Update on Mineral Resources
  and Metallurgy for the Pebble Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Project, Iliamna Lake Area,
  Southwestern Alaska, USA”, dated March 17 2010 and to extracts from, or
  a summary of, the Technical Report as may be required by the regulatory authorities.

I have read Northern Dynasty’s 2010 Form 40-F, dated
  March 30, 2010, and confirm that it documents fairly and accurately represent
  the information that supports the disclosure.

Submitted this 30th day of March, 2010.

Signed,

*/s/ J. David Gaunt*

________________________________

J. David Gaunt, P.Geo.
  Vice President Resources and Databases
  Hunter Dickinson Services Inc.

---