alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |   11-3-10 |   |   /s/ Doug Carpenter            |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   | C. Douglas Carpenter                      |
|   |                |   | Senior Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2334 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2334

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
  participate in the design, planning, and construction of permanent 
facilities for the GREAT project to reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired 
            waters water in the area of Oxnard, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

  Mrs. Capps introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
  participate in the design, planning, and construction of permanent 
facilities for the GREAT project to reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired 
            waters water in the area of Oxnard, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``City of Oxnard Water Recycling and 
Desalination Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. OXNARD, CALIFORNIA, WATER RECLAMATION, REUSE, AND TREATMENT 
              PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (title XVI of Public Law 102-575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. __. OXNARD, CALIFORNIA, WATER RECLAMATION, REUSE, AND TREATMENT 
              PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the City 
of Oxnard, California, may participate in the design, planning, and 
construction of permanent facilities for the GREAT project to reclaim, 
reuse, and treat impaired waters water in the area of Oxnard, 
California.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation and maintenance of the project described in subsection 
(a).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is 
amended by inserting after the last item the following:

``Sec. ___. Oxnard, California, water reclamation, reuse, and treatment 
                            project.''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Appellate case name: John Henry Skillern v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00517-CR & 01-15-0000518-CR

Trial court case number: 1436278 & 1436279

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

On December 29, 2015, this Court granted the form motion by the appellant, John 

Henry Skillern, for access to the appellate records and sua sponte granted a 45-day

extension of time to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by his appellate 

counsel in the above appeals. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 1400 (1967). In that Order, the Court also ordered the trial clerk to mail a copy of 

the records to the pro se appellant and certify the date of delivery within 15 days of that 

Order. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

On February 10, 2016, appellant filed this “First Motion for Extension of Time to 

File Appellant’s Pro Se Brief or Response to Anders Brief” seeking 30 days to file his

response to the Anders brief because, among other reasons, he has yet to receive the 

appellate records as of February 7, 2016. To date, no certification of delivery of the 

records has been filed by the trial clerk with the Clerk of this Court.

Accordingly, the Court grants the motion and again orders the trial court clerk, 

no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the records, 

including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the 

appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the 

date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the records to the appellant is made. 

Finally, appellant’s pro se response to his appointed counsel’s Anders brief shall be filed 

within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually 

Date: February 18, 2016
#### Rutger Fabrics Corporation et al., Appellants, v United States Laminating Corporation et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Edwards, J.), entered February 28, 1984, denying plaintiffs’ motion to (1) excuse their default in failing to restore the action to the calendar, (2) vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 and (3) restore the case to the calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to grant the motion, vacate the default and restore the case to the calendar, on condition that plaintiffs’ attorneys personally pay costs in the sum of $1,000 to defendant within 20 days after service of a copy of the order to be entered on the appeal. Upon the failure to comply with the foregoing, the order is affirmed, with costs and disbursements to defendants.

Special Term, denying the motion to excuse the default, cited the long period of delay on the part of plaintiffs’ attorneys in preparing the case for trial. While some period of time could be excused as a result of counsel’s illness and the breakup of a partnership, it is clear that, in terms of trial preparation, there was a great deal of inaction on the part of the attorneys. As held at Special Term, the pendency of a motion to serve an amended pleading did not relieve counsel of the obligation to restore the action to the calendar within the required one-year period, since the dismissal under CPLR 3404 is self-executing.

Nevertheless, pursuant to CPLR 2005, we may, in our discretion, excuse the delay and vacate the default which resulted from law office failure. On such a motion, it must be demonstrated that there was a sufficient excuse for the default, that the defaulting party has a meritorious cause of action or defense *41and that no prejudice will result to the adverse party *(Palmieri v Romat Realty Corp.,*45 AD2d 948). This standard applies to motions to excuse a default where an action has been automatically dismissed upon the failure of a party to restore the case to the calendar under CPLR 3404 *(see, Pirnak v Savino,*96 AD2d 857).

CPLR 3404 creates a presumption that the action has been abandoned where it has not been restored to the calendar within the one-year period but the presumption is rebuttable and does not apply where litigation in the case is actually in progress *(see, Marco v Sachs,*10 NY2d 542, 550; *Sygman v Pep Fashions,*87 AD2d 787). As applied here, while there was less than due diligence exercised by plaintiffs’ attorneys in moving the case to trial, it does appear that plaintiffs do have a meritorious claim and no real prejudice would result were the action to be restored to the calendar. Moreover, there were proceedings in preparation for trial during the period and, under the circumstances, dismissal of the action because of counsel’s inaction would be unjustifiably harsh. In our view, a monetary sanction is appropriate with the case to proceed to a disposition on the merits. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Lynch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
# STATS AT A GLANCE

# Exported_File

# image1.jpeg
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Support for Conferences and 
Scientific Meetings (Parent R13 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: July 26-28, 2021.
    Time: 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F21B, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maryam Feili-Hariri, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F21B, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5026, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#335b52415a415a5e55735d5a525a571d5d5a5b1d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c444d5e455e45414a6c42454d454802424544024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-13815 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[No. 20423-1-II.

Division Two.

October 10, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Christopher J. Connolly, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Ska-mania County, No. 95-8-00024-3, Tom Reynolds, J., entered February 14, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridge-water, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  2,447
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,447
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      50
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             (1,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,447
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           89
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              67
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            22
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        22
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               22
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.61
        

</TABLE>
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00361-JVB-JEM   document 1-1   filed 09/21/15   page 1 of 3

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00361-JVB-JEM   document 1-1   filed 09/21/15   page 2 of 3

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00361-JVB-JEM   document 1-1   filed 09/21/15   page 3 of 3
|  | • | fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.                                               |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                         |
| Name:  | C.      Troy Woodbury, Jr.                                                   |
| Title: | Treasurer      and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |
| Date:  | April      13, 2009                                                          |

----
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of STARM Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-4 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
# C_2008205EN.01000101.xml

| 12.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5245 — Wistron/Lite-On LCD Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 205/01)

On 29 July 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5245. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5245. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# L_2019117EN.01000801.xml

| 3.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/8

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 353 of 31 December 2008
  )

On page 324, Annex IV, Part 2, Table 1.5 ‘Precautionary statements — Disposal’, third column, the entry concerning LT:

for:

‘Turinį/talpyklą išpilti (išmesti) į ...’,

read:

‘Turinį/talpyklą šalinti ...’.

---
NWL-EX4.18-12.31.14




Exhibit 4.18


MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP




	
			
	 
	1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLAZA
NEW YORK, NY 10005-1413
	 

	LOS ANGELES
213-892-4000
FAX: 213-629-5063
	
212-530-5000
	BEIJING
8610-5969-2700
FAX: 8610-5969-2707

	 
	 
	 

	WASHINGTON, D.C
202-835- 7500
FAX: 202-835-7586


	Re: Newell
	HONG KONG852-2971-4888
FAX: 852-2840-0792

	 
	 
	 

	LONDON
44-20-7615-3000
FAX: 44-20-7615-3100
	 
	SINGAPORE
65-6428-2400
FAX: 65-6428-2500



	 
	 
	 

	FRANKFURT
49-(0)69-71914-3400
FAX: 49-(0)69-71914-3500
	 
	TOKYO
813-5410-2801
FAX: 813-5410-2891

	 
	 
	 

	MUNICH
49-89-25559-3600
FAX: 49-89-25559-3700
	 
	SAO PAULO
55-11-3927-7700
FAX: 55-11-3927-7777






MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP
MEMORANDUM
November  12, 2014 To:  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is made to Amendment No. 2 dated as of November 10, 2014 (the "Amendment") to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 2, 2011 among Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (the "Borrower"), the Subsidiary Borrowers party thereto, the Lenders party thereto from time to time and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent for the Lenders  (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"). Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Amendment.


We have received signed counterparts to the Amendment from the parties thereto, and you have advised us that the Lenders who have provided signature pages constitute the Required Lenders under the Credit Agreement. As such, we are pleased to confirm that the conditions precedent set forth in Section 4 of the Amendment have been satisfied and that the Amendment is effective.


This letter is furnished to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and may not be used or relied upon by, or published or communicated to, any person or entity other than you for any purpose whatsoever without our prior written consent in each instance.


Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
[No. 21170-0-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. William R. Lounsbury, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 96-8-00520-1, Leonard W. Kruse, J., entered August 28, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Morgan, J.