alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008070EN.01000601.xml

| 14.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 70/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 70/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 227/2008

of 13 March 2008

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 March 2008, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 March 2008, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Sugar has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Sugar has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 March 2008, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 shall be 410,73 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 March 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 March 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1260/2007 (OJ L 283, 27.10.2007, p. 1). Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 October 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 242, 15.9.2007, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 148/2008 (OJ L 46, 21.2.2008, p. 9).

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

GARY DOZIER, )

)

Petitioner, )

) No. 3:13 CV 634

v. )

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION and ORDER

Gary Dozier, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his

prison disciplinary proceeding which was held at the Miami Correctional Facility on

May 10, 2013. Under case number MCF 13-05-108, the Disciplinary Hearing Body (DHB)

found him guilty of Assault/Battery w/ Serious Bodily Injury in violation of A-102.

Dozier lists five grounds in his petition, but all five of them are fundamentally the same

claim. In Ground One, he argues that the inmate witnesses against him were not

credible because their statements were made to internal affairs while in segregation. In

Ground Two, he argues that prison officials only believe inmate statements when they

are made in support of a disciplinary charge against another inmate. In Ground Three,

he argues that the victim did not see who attacked him, that no correctional officer

witnessed the attack, that he did not have any injuries, and that he did not have any

blood on him. In Ground Four, he again argues that no correctional officer witnessed

the attack. In Ground Five, he argues that eyewitness testimony is frequently faulty. In

sum, he is arguing that the DHB improperly weighed the evidence. He is arguing that

case 3:13-cv-00634-JTM document 2 filed 07/23/13 page 1 of 2
the hearing officer should have disbelieved the witnesses that he credited and believed

the witnesses that he discredited. 

None of these arguments is a basis for habeas corpus relief because district courts

do not “conduct an examination of the entire record, independently assess witness

credibility, or weigh the evidence, but [rather, they] only determine whether the prison

disciplinary board’s decision to revoke good time credits has some factual basis.”

Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 457 (1985) (quotations marks and citation omitted).

Here, Dozier clearly understands that there were other inmates who testified that they

saw him attack the victim. This court will not re-weigh the evidence presented during

his prison disciplinary hearing. See McPherson v. McBride, 188 F.3d 784, 786 (7th Cir.

1999). “[T]he relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could

support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Superintendent v. Hill, 472

U.S. 445, 455-56 (1985). “The Federal Constitution does not require evidence that

logically precludes any conclusion but the one reached by the disciplinary board.” Id. at

457. Here, the testimony of those other inmates is some evidence that Dozier attacked

the victim, as the DHB concluded. 

For the foregoing reasons, the court DENIES the petition pursuant to RULE 4 of

the RULES GOVERNING SECTION 2254 CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: July 23, 2013

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

case 3:13-cv-00634-JTM document 2 filed 07/23/13 page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research People Kurt Spokas







Personal Backgroundheadline bar **Education:**B.S. in Chemistry and Physics - Lewis University 1992M.S. in Geochemistry - Northern Illinois University 1998Ph.D. Soil Physics - University of Minnesota 2005 **Professional Experience:**Adjunct Professor - University of Minnesota, Dept. of Soil, Water & ClimateAdjunct Professor - University of Minnesota, Water Resources Center (WRC)Soil Scientist - USDA/ARS/Soil and Water Management Research Unit (St. Paul, MN)Chair - ASA Environmental Quality Section (2014)Treasurer - University of Minnesota Chapter Sigma Xi **Awards:**Inspiring Young Scientist of the Year Award (ASA-Environmental Quality Section) (2011)Research paper received a 2014 Genetics Spotlight Award (2014)Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (2017)Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (2017)Most Highly Cited Researcher Award from Web of Science Group (Clarivate Analytics) (2018, 2019)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit
      32.2





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Dennis
      M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 9, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Dennis M. McGrathDennis
                M. McGrathChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex. rel., )

MICHAEL P. MISCH, et al., Relators, )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

v. ) Case No. 3:16CV587

 )

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF )

SOUTH BEND, INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

________________________________________)

CONSENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

TO RELATORS’ VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Relators filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal on January 19, 2018. Docket No. 169. 

Pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b), the United States notifies the Court that 

the United States consents to the dismissal of this case without prejudice to the United States. 

The United States previously notified the Court that it had declined to intervene in this case on 

November 17, 2017. Docket No. 37.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS L. KIRSCH II

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Wayne T. Ault

WAYNE T. AULT

Assistant United States Attorney

Northern District of Indiana

5400 Federal Plaza, Suite 1500

Hammond, Indiana 46320

Telephone: 219-937-5500

Telecopy: 219-852-2770

Internet Address: Wayne.Ault@usdoj.gov

Counsel for United States of America

USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00587-JD-MGG document 170 filed 01/19/18 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 19th day of January 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing Consent 

of United States of America to Relators’ Voluntary Dismissal with the Clerk of the Court using 

the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing to all counsel of record.

/s/ Wayne T. Ault

Wayne T. Ault

Assistant United States Attorney

USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00587-JD-MGG document 170 filed 01/19/18 page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate

                          -----------------------------
                                 February 21, 2006



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

              PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Thomas J. Bogert, the Vice President-Manager of The Bank of New
York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such capacity
that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all material
respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the "Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities
Intermediary for each series of trust certificates listed in the attached
schedule.




                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BANK OF NEW YORK


                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bogert
                                        ------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas J. Bogert
                                    Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series TWC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CMT-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCNA-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1
PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3
INDEXPLUS Trust 2003-1



                                       2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food and Feed Safety Research: New Orleans, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




The primary research objective of our scientists is to safeguard U.S. agricultural commodities (e.g., corn, cottonseed and peanut) from aflatoxin contamination using a multidisciplinary approach.


People Carter-Wientjes, Carol Castano-Duque, Lina Chang, Perng Kuang Downey, Darlene Ford, Gregory Gilbert, Matthew Gross, Stephanie Guo, Yingqing Hruska, Zuzana Kumarihamy, Mallika Lamb, Alencia Lebar, Matthew Lohmar, Jessica Mack, Brian Moore, Geromy Rajasekaran, Kanniah
                                            *- Rajah* Reed, Valerie Sickler, Christine Sweany, Rebecca Wei, Qijian
                                            *- Mei Mei*


Research Projects
                            More... Aflatoxin Control through Identification of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Governing the Aspergillus Flavus-Corn Interaction Development of Aflatoxin Resistant Corn Lines Using Omic Technologies


Southeast Area   kanniah.rajasekaran@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (Section  1350 of
Chapter  63 of Title 18 of the  United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned
officers of Commerce  Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2004                       /s/    Vernon W. Hill, II
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Vernon W. Hill, II
                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2004                       /s/   Douglas J. Pauls
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Douglas J. Pauls
                                         Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate disclosure document.
Jack Leonard HAYS, petitioner, v. IOWA.

No. 12-9126.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar Mission Statement
               Strategic Goals
               Detect and Measure
               Environmental Factors
               What are Mycotoxins?
               Biological Factors
               NRRL Culture Collection
               Visiting Scientists
               Test
               New Scientists
               Holisitic MPM


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Kerry RICHARDS, petitioner, v. COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA.

No. 12-9780.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
| (1) | The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                                  |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |                                                                  |   |
| Date:  June 29, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Georges Benarroch                                                 |   |
|                           |   | Georges Benarroch                                                     |   |
|                           |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |