alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DR. JAY SNIPES 

Chief 

Diversity and Business Inclusion Branch 

OFFICE OF 

MINORITY AND WOMEN 

INCLUSION (OMWI) 

POLICY 

The FDIC, through its Minority and Women Outreach 

Program (MWOP), strongly encourages FDIC 

program managers, contracting o ̃icers, and prime 

contractors to include qualifed minority-and 

women-owned businesses(MWOBs) to the 

maximum extent possible in all contracts. 

The Diversity and Business Inclusion Branch is 

responsiblefor conducting outreach activities 

focused on providinginformation regarding FDIC’s 

contracting activities to 

minorities-and women-owned businesses including 

financial institutions, investment banking firms, 

underwriters, accountants, and providers of legal 

services. 

PURPOSE 

The purpose of the FDIC Minority and Women 

Outreach Program is to ensure that 

minorities-and women-owned businesses with the 

requisite skill sets are given the opportunity to 

participate fully in all contracts entered into by 

the FDIC. 

FDIC INFORMATION RESOURCE WEBSITES 

The FDIC maintains a variety of information on its 

website, www.fdic.gov. Below is a brief overview of 

information on the website that may be of interest 

to you. 

Click on “ABOUT/Doing Business with the FDIC” 

and scroll to: 

– FDIC Acquisition Policy Manual 

FDIC policies and procedures for procurements 

and acquisitions 

– Key Contacts in the FDIC Acquisition Services 

Branch System for Award Management (SAM) 

Information regarding how to register in SAM 

can be obtained by visiting www.sam.gov 

– Minority and Women Outreach Program 

(www.fdic.gov/mwop) 

– List of Awards & Contractor Contact 

– Information Procuring Legal Services 

ASK FDIC 

Central Call Center (877) 275-3342 

Information Specialists answer general questions 

about the FDIC and refer more complicated issues to 

the appropriate FDIC subject matter expert. 

For additional information regarding the FDIC’s Minority and Women Outreach Program 

send an e-mail to: MWOBOUTREACH@fdic.gov 

www.fdic.gov 

FDIC-006-2019 (Revised 03/2020)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2082 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2082

          To extend the duty suspension on Lambda-Cyhalothrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the duty suspension on Lambda-Cyhalothrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.09 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Lambda-Cyhalothrin) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 40502-1-I.

Division One.

October 13, 1997.]

#### Norma J. Webster, *Appellant,*v. The Employment Security Department, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-2-30497-4, R. Joseph Wesley, J., entered January 10, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EMMANUEL JOEL BREADON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-931

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 22, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Marion County,

Jonathan D. Ohlman, Judge.

Patrick Michael Megaro, of Appeals Law 

Group, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Emmanuel Breadon appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm, except as to the claim that 

trial counsel was ineffective by failing to explore and/or raise an insanity defense. The 

trial court correctly found that Breadon had failed to allege that he was, in fact, insane at 

the time of the offense. See Luckey v. State, 979 So. 2d 353, 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). 
2

However, rather than summarily denying the claim because of its facial insufficiency, the 

trial court should have afforded Breadon the opportunity to amend. Id. at 355; see also

Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007). 

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             360
<SECURITIES>                                       941
<RECEIVABLES>                                      537<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,275
<PP&E>                                           5,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,318
<BONDS>                                          1,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,478
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,040
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    109
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 67
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing


Financial
Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





I, Robert
A. Placek, the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation (the “Company”),
in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May
29, 2009 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:




•
            fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and





•
            the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.





/s/
      Robert A. PlacekName:
              Robert
      A. PlacekTitle:
              Chairman
      of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
              July
      13, 2009
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2042

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 

a monthly stipend to the surviving parents (known as ‘‘Gold Star parents’’) of members of the Armed Forces who die during a period of 

war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2005

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

payment of a monthly stipend to the surviving parents 

(known as ‘‘Gold Star parents’’) of members of the 

Armed Forces who die during a period of war.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Parents An5 nuity Act’’. 
2

•HR 2042 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD STAR PARENTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 15 of title 38, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing new subchapter: 

5 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD 

6 STAR PARENTS 

7 ‘‘§ 1571. Gold Star parents 

8 ‘‘(a) The Secretary shall pay monthly to each person 

9 who has received a Gold Star lapel pin under section 1126 

10 of title 10 as a parent of a person who died in a manner 

11 described in subsection (a) of that section a special pen12 sion in an amount determined under subsection (b). 

13 ‘‘(b) The amount of special pension payable under 

14 this section with respect to the death of any person shall 

15 be $125 per month. In any case in which there is more 

16 than one parent eligible for special pension under this sec17 tion with respect to the death of a person, the Secretary 

18 shall divide the payment equally among those eligible par19 ents. 

20 ‘‘(c) The receipt of special pension shall not deprive 

21 any person of any other pension or other benefit, right, 

22 or privilege to which such person is or may hereafter be 

23 entitled under any existing or subsequent law. Special pen24 sion shall be paid in addition to all other payments under 

25 laws of the United States. 
3

•HR 2042 IH 

1 ‘‘(d) Special pension shall not be subject to any at2 tachment, execution, levy, tax lien, or detention under any 

3 process whatever. 

4 ‘‘(e) For purposes of this section, the term ‘parent’ 

5 has the meaning provided in section 1126(d)(2) of title 

6 10.’’. 

7 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such 

8 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD STAR PARENTS

‘‘1571. Gold Star parents.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1571 of title 38, 

10 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

11 effect on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning 

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; Centers for Multiple 
Chronic Diseases Associated With Health Disparities: Prevention, 
Treatment, and Management (P50).
    Date: July 27-28, 2021.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Gateway Plaza, 7201 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20817, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maryline Laude-Sharp, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Research Administration, National 
Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National 
Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Ste. 
525, MSC. 9206, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-9536, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096465687c6d6c7a61687b79496468606527676061276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f99495988c9d9c8a91988b89b994989095d7979091d79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 17, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-13289 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

JULIA D. DENDER and WILLIAM R. )

DENDER, individually and as )

husband and wife, )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:14-CV-190-JVB-PRC

)

DIMITRE KATCHOULEV and )

KATCHOULEV CORPORATION )

d/b/a BULTRANS EXPRESS, )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dimitre Katchoulev and Katchoulev Corp.,

d/b/a Bultrans Express’s Motion to Compel Non-Party Discovery [DE 13], filed on February 25,

2015. The motion was served on all parties and on non-party Franciscan Physicians Network

(Franciscan). No response has been filed, and the time to do so has passed. 

Defendants represent that Plaintiff William Dender has been treated by doctors at Franciscan

for the injuries for which he is seeking compensation in this case. They represent that, on June 19,

2014, they served a Subpoena as well as a Request for Production on non-party Franciscan seeking

medical records of that treatment. They also represent that Plaintiffs have not objected to the

Subpoena or Request for Production and that the records are necessary for Defendants to properly

defend this case. Franciscan has refused to comply, explaining that an authorization signed by the

patient (that is, Plaintiff William Dender) is required before it will hand over the medical records

to Defendants. Defendants now ask that the Court compel Franciscan to produce the requested

records. 

Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 37-1 provides that a “party filing any discovery
motion must file a separate certification that the party has conferred in good faith or attempted to

confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the matter raised in the motion without court

action.” N.D. Ind. L.R. 37-1. The Court may deny discovery motions if they are not accompanied

by a proper certification. Id.

Though the dispute here is between Defendants and a non-party, a conferral between

Plaintiffs and Defendants might well have resolved this dispute without Court action since Plaintiff

William Dender is presumably able to provide the authorization requested by Franciscan. 

Defendants’ motion is thus premature. The Court therefore DENIES Defendants Dimitre

Katchoulev and Katchoulev Corp., d/b/a Bultrans Express’s Motion to Compel Non-Party Discovery

[DE 13]. 

SO ORDERED this 17th day of April, 2015.

s/ Magistrate Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1724 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1724

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Asulam sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2005

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Asulam sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASULAM SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.50 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jerry Bernard JACKSON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Doug E. MITCHELL, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 06-6016.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 27, 2006.

Decided: May 5, 2006.

Jerry Bernard Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*326PER CURIAM:

Jerry Bernard Jackson, a North Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 148

)

BRADLEY FASTABEND )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge dated February 26, 2019 (DE # 91), to which the parties have waived any

objections (id. at 3), the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are now

ADOPTED. Defendant is ADJUDGED to have committed the violations of his

supervised release described in the July 17, 2017, Petition (DE # 47). Defendant’s term of

supervised release is REVOKED and he is hereby committed to the United States

Bureau of Prisons to serve an additional term of imprisonment of seven months. Upon

his release from the Bureau of Prisons, defendant shall be discharged from any further

term of supervision.

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 28, 2019

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Latoff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.














/s/ William S. Latoff


William S. Latoff


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


May 14, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

SAMUEL CALLANTINE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:15CV620-PPS

)

MEDICREDIT, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff Samuel Callantine’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [DE 8] is SO

ORDERED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and thereby CLOSED.

ENTERED: May 23, 2016

 s/ Philip P. Simon 

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00620-PPS-JEM document 9 filed 05/23/16 page 1 of 1