alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, ) 

JOHN DOE, and JACK DOE, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) No. 3:15-cv-00463-JD-CAN 

 ) 

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING 

COME NOW Plaintiffs, by their counsel, and notify the Court and all other parties that 

Exhibit 1 to the plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction is a CD that is being manually filed 

with the Court contemporaneously with the filing of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and 

will be maintained in the case file in the Clerk’s office. This notice and the accompanying CD 

are being served on all parties by first-class U.S. mail. 

WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs respectfully notify the Court Court and all other parties 

that Exhibit 1 to the plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction is a CD that is being manually 

filed as described above, and request all proper relief. 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 14 filed 10/22/15 page 1 of 3
2 

 /s/ Gavin M. Rose 

 Gavin M. Rose, 

 ACLU OF INDIANA

 1031 E. Washington St. 

 Indianapolis, IN 46202 

 317/635-4059 

 fax: 317/635-4105 

grose@aclu-in.org 

Sam Grover 

Motion for admission pro hac vice pending 

Ryan Jayne 

Motion for admission pro hac vice to be filed

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION

P.O. Box 750 

Madison, WI 53701 

608/256-8900 

fax: 608/204-0422 

sgrover@ffrf.org 

rjayne@ffrf.org 

Daniel Mach, Pro Hac Vice 

Heather L. Weaver, Pro Hac Vice 

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION

915 15th Street, N.W., Ste. 600 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

202/675-2330 

fax: 202/546-0738 

dmach@dcaclu.org 

hweaver@aclu.org 

Attorneys for the plaintiffs 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 14 filed 10/22/15 page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on this 22nd day 

of October, 2015. Parties may access this document through the Court’s electronic system, and 

the following persons will be served with this document by operation of the Court’s electronic 

system. This document was also served, along with the described CD, on the following parties 

by first-class U.S. mail, postage pre-paid, on this 22nd day of October, 2015. 

Thomas E. Wheeler, II 

Frost Brown Todd LLC 

201 N. Illinois St., Ste. 1900 

P.O. Box 44961 

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961 

<twheeler@fbtlaw.com> 

 /s/ Gavin M. Rose 

 Gavin M. Rose 

 Attorney at Law

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 14 filed 10/22/15 page 3 of 3
#### In re WATSON. In the matter of the application of Samuel S. Watson for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 8, 1898.)

No opinion. Application granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                      43
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                     530
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   9,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  10,023
<PP&E>                                               0                   1,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  11,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   5,268
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     100
<COMMON>                                             0                  19,215
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                (15,534)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  11,256
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,474                   5,053
<CGS>                                            2,730                   4,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,730                   4,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  86                     174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     20                   (359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 20                   (359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                        20                   (359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                  (0.07)


</TABLE>
# C_2008087EN.01000401.xml

| 8.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4896 — CVC Capital Partners/Katope International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 87/02)

On 8 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4896. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4896. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13331]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-32; OTS No. 01562]


Bell Federal Savings and Loan Association of Bellevue, 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 11, 1995, the Deputy Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Bell Federal Savings and Loan Association of Bellevue, 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection at the 
Information Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the Northeast Regional Office, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 10 Exchange Place, 18th Floor, Jersey 
City, New Jersey 07302.

    Dated: May 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 95-13331 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2056 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2056

     To reduce temporarily the duty on palm fatty acid distillate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2005

 Mr. Gillmor introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce temporarily the duty on palm fatty acid distillate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PALM FATTY ACID DISTILLATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.40      Monocarboxylic      1%           No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         fatty acids                                                        31/2009
                         derived from palm
                         oil (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3823.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Elkan R.
Gamzu, certify that: 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmos Corporation; 2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and (b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. /s/ ELKAN R.
  GAMZUElkan R.
  GamzuChief
  Executive OfficerDate: August
  8, 2007
# Chart1

# Data
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2114 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2114

   To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-propene-2-methyl homopolymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

  Mr. Weller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-propene-2-methyl homopolymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPENE-2-METHYL HOMOPOLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.06      1-propene-2-methyl  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         homopolymer (CAS                                                   31/2008
                         No. 9003-27-4)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3902.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Antwion E. THOMPSON, petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, et al.

No. 13-5127.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Adinolfi, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeMakos, J.), rendered March 22, 1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim that his sentence should be reduced *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80), and we note that his other claims are either unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. *(See, People v Miles,*87 AD2d 599; *People v Campbell,*86 AD2d 403; *People v English,*75 AD2d 981.) Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 11, 2008
    
    /s/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy

STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZYDated: November 11, 2008
    
    /s/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUND
[Nos. 38317-5-I; 38361-2-I.

Division One.

September 2, 1997.]

#### Jerry Woodhead, *Appellant,*v. Discount Waterbeds, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*John E. Nees, et al., *Respondents,*v. Jerry Woodhead, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 93-2-24983-7 and 94-2-06790-7, James Bates and Carol A. Schapira, JJ., entered February 27 and March 25, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.
The Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2684

___________

Shirley J. Miller, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Kenneth S. Apfel, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 3, 1998

 Filed: March 19, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Shirley J. Miller appeals the district court&s grant of summary judgment affirming 1

the Social Security Commissioner&s decision to deny Miller&s applications for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income after a hearing before an

administrative law judge (ALJ). For reversal, Miller argues the ALJ failed to propound

an accurate hypothetical question to the vocational expert (VE) during the hearing,

because in describing impairments and functional limitations the ALJ failed to
-2-

include Miller&s headaches and dizziness. Miller also contends, given her extensive

history of head injuries and statements in the record as to depression, there was sufficient

basis to raise an issue as to her mental and psychological capacity to engage in workrelated activities. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the Commissioner&s decision

is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See McClees v. Shalala,

2 F.3d 301, 302 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review). Although the ALJ did not include

Miller&s headaches in the hypothetical posed to the VE, the ALJ expressly found Miller&s

testimony as to the severity of her impairments and attendant symptoms not credible, and

that finding was supported by the record as a whole. See House v. Shalala, 34 F.3d 691,

694 (8th Cir. 1994) (ALJ was not required to include claimant&s subjective complaints

of headaches in hypothetical question posed to VE where ALJ&s discrediting of

complaints of disabling headaches was supported by record as whole); Miller v. Shalala,

8 F.3d 611, 613-14 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (VE&s testimony amounts to substantial

evidence if question asked included precisely impairments that ALJ accepted as true).

In addition, there was no evidence Miller sought treatment for a mental

impairment, and she affirmatively stated at the hearing that she did not suffer from any

mental problems. The ALJ therefore was not required to complete a Psychiatric Review

Technique Form based on Miller&s potential mental problems. See 20 C.F.R. §

404.1520a(b). 

We affirm the judgment of the district court.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1995
        - Small Banks: 
        - Lending only for a Satisfactory Rating (100 percent)
        - Large Banks:
        - Lending (50 percent of the rating)
        - Investments (25 percent of the rating)
        - Services (25 percent of the rating)

2005
        - Intermediate Small Banks
        - Lending (50 percent of the rating)
        - Community Development Loans, Investments, or Services (50 percent of the rating) 

C.D.

Lending,

Investments, or 

Services
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00041-RLM-SLC document 1 filed 01/29/16 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00041-RLM-SLC document 1 filed 01/29/16 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00041-RLM-SLC document 1 filed 01/29/16 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00041-RLM-SLC document 1 filed 01/29/16 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00041-RLM-SLC document 1 filed 01/29/16 page 5 of 5
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1931 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to extend the firearm 

and ammunition prohibitions applicable to convicted felons to those convicted in a foreign court. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mrs. MCCARTHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

extend the firearm and ammunition prohibitions applicable to convicted felons to those convicted in a foreign 

court. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Felon Gun 

5 Prohibition Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1931 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FIREARM AND AMMUNITION PROHI2 BITIONS APPLICABLE TO CONVICTED FEL3 ONS TO THOSE CONVICTED IN A FOREIGN 

4 COURT. 

5 Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting ‘‘, includ8 ing any foreign court,’’ after ‘‘court’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ‘‘court of,’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘court, including any foreign court, 

11 of’’. 

Æ
#### Tehgrain JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH; Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7663.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 15, 2011.

Decided: June 30, 2011.

Tehgrain Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

*208Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tehgrain Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jones v. City of Portsmouth,*No. 3:10-cv-00531-HEH (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.