alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2029 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Resmethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Resmethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.14 [5-(Phenylmethyl)–3- 

furanyl]methyl 2,2-dimethyl3-(2-methylprop-1- 

enyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate 

(CAS No. 10453–86–8) 

(provided for in subheading 

2932.19.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2029 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION 

FRANCIS MARTINZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-269

)

DAPAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, Francis Martinez, by counsel, George T. Blackmore, and Defendant, Dapan 

Entertainment, Inc., by counsel, Brian M. Smith (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby jointly 

stipulate and agree that Plaintiff’s June 24, 2016 Complaint (the “Complaint”) shall be dismissed. 

Said dismissal shall be with prejudice and each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

WHEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree to the dismissal of the Complaint with 

prejudice.

Date: October 3, 2018

FRANCIS MARTINEZ DAPAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

By: /s/ George T. Blackmore By: /s/ Brian M. Smith

George T. Blackmore Brian M. Smith, #25802-64

21411 Civic Center Dr., Ste. 200 LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN M. SMITH, P.C.

Southfield, MI 48076 2260 W. 93rd Avenue

george@blackmorelawplc.com Merrillville, IN 46410

(248) 845-8594 (219) 769-2051

(480) 999-0665 (fax) (219) 769-8801 (facsimile)

Attorney for Plaintiff attybmsmith15@gmail.com

Attorney for Defendant

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00269-JTM document 25 filed 10/04/18 page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-45-TLS-1 

) 

BRENT A. GARRETT ) 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 35], filed on March 25, 2016. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 35] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count Five (5) of the Indictment is 

hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on April 11, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 15, 2005
    
    /S/ Steven F. Udvar-HazySTEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZYDated: August 15, 2005
    
    /S/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUND
 - 34 -
#### NEW YORK COUNTY NAT. BANK v. HERRMAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by the New York County National Bank against James S. Herrman. No opinion. Motion for resettlement granted. Settle order on notice. See, also, 133 N. Y. Supp. 200.
ATEC-2014.12.31-EX-10.23




Exhibit 10.23


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is effective as of May 1, 2014 (“Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Leslie Cross (the “Employee”) and Alphatec Spine, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms undefined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, on or about February 26, 2012, the Company and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”).  


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to enter into this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date to amend the Agreement. 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:


1.    AMENDMENTS


1.1    Amendment of Section 3 Title: Capacity: Office_.  Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:  


            The Company shall employ Executive and Executive agrees to work for the Company as its Chairman of the Board.  Executive shall perform the duties and responsibilities inherent in the position in which Executive serves and such other duties and responsibilities as the Board of Directors or its designee shall from time to time reasonably assign to Executive.  Executive shall report to the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors.


           1.2 Amendment of Section 4.1 Salary.  Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


           Commencing on the Amendment Effective Date, the Company shall pay Executive a salary (the “Base Salary”) at an annualized rate of $364,000, less applicable payroll withholdings, payable in accordance with the Company’s customary payroll practices.



1






2.    MISCELLANEOUS.
    
In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall prevail.  Other than as set forth in this Amendment, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement on May 1, 2014.


ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.        




By: /s/ Michael O’Neill
Name:    Michael O’Neill        
Title: CFO




EMPLOYEE


By: /s/ Les Cross        

2
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Montpelier ReHoldings Ltd. (the “Company”), for the year ending December 31, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Anthony Taylor, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(a)                The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

 

(b)               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Anthony Taylor                   |
|--------------------------------------|
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)        |

 

 

February 28, 2008

 

 

----

 

 

 

 

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Montpelier ReHoldings Ltd. (the “Company”), for the year ending December 31, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Kernan V. Oberting, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(a)                The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

 

(b)               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Kernan V. Oberting                               |
|------------------------------------------------------|
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                        |

 

 

 

February 28, 2008

 

----
Kenn GOLDBLATT, petitioner, v. James DOERTY, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Judge of the Superior Court of Washington, King County.

No. 12-1440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### HERRMANN, Appellant, v. MURRAY, Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

Action by Hattie Herrmann against John L. Murray, impleaded with others. B. H. Sandler, for appellant. C. S. Petraseh, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             384
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,115
<PP&E>                                           8,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,917
<SALES>                                          6,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,552
<CGS>                                            2,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (85)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    771
<INCOME-TAX>                                       474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert A. Placek, the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation (the
"Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best
of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended February 27, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:

     o    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                              /s/ Robert A. Placek
                              -----------------------------------
                              NAME:   ROBERT A. PLACEK
                              TITLE:  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PRESIDENT AND
                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
                                      (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
                              DATE:   APRIL 12, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

SHARON A. SCHMITZ and )

FRANCES A. FIELDS, )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:13-CV-214-RL-PRC

)

FOUR D TRUCKING, INC., et al., )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel [DE 62], filed on March 3,

2015. No response has been filed, and the time to do so has passed. This is a personal injury case

arising from an alleged accident involving a passenger car and a semi trailer. This case is now in the

discovery phase. Plaintiffs sent a notice of deposition to Defendant Halquist Stone Company, Inc.

(Halquist) on January 20, 2015, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). The notice

requested that Halquist designate an appropriate person to testify on its behalf regarding a variety

of subjects relating to this case. Plaintiffs represent that they contacted Halquist’s attorneys on at

least three occasions, starting on January 26, 2015, in an attempt to determine when the deposition

could proceed. So far, however, they haven’t received any response. 

Plaintiffs now ask that the Court order Halquist to designate the name of a person (or

persons) competent to testify on its behalf and to provide a date for the deposition. The request is

well taken. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 allows a party to file a motion to compel if a

corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under Rule 30(b)(6). See Fed. R. Civ. P.

37(a)(3)(B). There is nothing before the Court suggesting that Halquist has made such a

designation, nor has it responded to this motion. 

As a result, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Compel [DE 62] and ORDERS Halquist to
designate an appropriate person to testify on its behalf and to provide a date on which the deposition

can take place. Halquist must do so by April 24, 2015.

Rule 37 also provides that if a motion to compel is granted, “the court must, after giving an

opportunity to be heard, require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion, the

party or attorney advising that conduct, or both to pay the movant’s reasonable expenses incurred

in making the motion, including attorney’s fees.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). This issue has not been

briefed. Any objection to the award of attorney fees incurred by Plaintiffs in the litigation of this

motion must be filed by April 24, 2015. Any response by Plaintiffs must be filed by May 11, 2015.

If a response is filed, a reply may be filed no later than May 21, 2015.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of April, 2015.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
A photo of FDIC Chief Financial Officer Steven O. App
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark T. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of Tarsis Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 3, 2015





/s/  Mark T. Brown

Mark T. Brown,

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Newkirk Master
Limited Partnership; (the "Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Thomas Staples, Chief Financial Officer of the Manager of the
Registrant's General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


By: /s/ Thomas Staples
    ----------------------------------------
Name: Thomas Staples
      --------------------------------------
      Chief Financial Officer of the Manager
        of the Registrant's General Partner

Date: July 19, 2005
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00618-CAN document 8 filed 11/30/15 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00618-CAN document 8 filed 11/30/15 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00618-CAN document 8 filed 11/30/15 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00618-CAN document 8 filed 11/30/15 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00618-CAN document 8 filed 11/30/15 page 5 of 5
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11 - Computation of earnings per share


Earnings per common share were computed as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                            Nine Months ended                        Three Months ended
                                                 -----------------------------------------   ---------------------------------------
                                                 September 30, 1996     September 30, 1995   September 30, 1996  September 30, 1995

<S>                                              <C>                    <C>                  <C>                 <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to common
     shares:                                     $    191,000              ($   106,000)       $   366,000            ($     7,000)
                                                 ============               ===========        ===========             ===========


Weighted average number of common
 shares and of common share equivalents:

Weighted average common shares                     22,032,227                21,286,301         22,261,301              21,286,301

Common share equivalents pursuant
  to APB 15                                         2,032,782                        --          2,010,162                      --
                                                 ------------              ------------        -----------             -----------

Total primary weighted average number
  of common shares and common share
  equivalents                                      24,065,009                21,286,301         24,271,463              21,286,301

Additional shares for full dilution
  pursuant to APB 15                                       --                        --                 --                      --
                                                 ------------               -----------        -----------             ------------ 

Total fully diluted average number of
  common shares and common share
  equivalents                                      24,065,009                21,286,301         24,271,463               21,286,301
                                                 ============               ===========        ===========             ============

Net income (loss) per share:
     Primary                                     $       0.01               ($     0.01)       $      0.02             $       0.00 
                                                 ============               ===========        ===========             ============
     Fully diluted                               $       0.01               ($     0.01)       $      0.02             $       0.00
                                                 ============               ===========        ===========             ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:
 
 (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December  31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: June 7, 2011
 /s/ John A. G. Seton
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.