alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 2113

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2000 

McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, as the ‘‘John F. Whiteside Joliet Post Office 

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2000 McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, shall be known and 

designated as the ‘‘John F. Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John F. 

Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 37 filed 01/07/14 page 1 of 2
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 37 filed 01/07/14 page 2 of 2
2014.12.31-EX10.1.7






FIRST AMENDMENT TO ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, is made by and between Keene S. Turner (the “Executive”) and ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) effective as of February 27, 2015 (the “Effective Date”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated effective as of September 13, 2013 (“Original Agreement”); and 
WHEREAS, Company and Executive have mutually agreed to amend the Original Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Original Agreement is amended and restated as follows:
1.Section 5.3(a) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
5.3    Termination Upon a Change in Control.  
(a)    Subject to the conditions of Section 5.3(b) and Section 6, in the event Executive’s employment is terminated in a Termination Upon a Change in Control (as defined below), provided that such termination constitutes a Separation from Service as defined in Section 6.1, in addition to payments contemplated by Section 5.1, Executive shall be paid the following as severance compensation:  (i) an amount equal to two (2) years of Executive’s Base Salary at the rate in effect on his termination of employment; plus (ii) an amount equal to the amount of any annual cash Targeted Incentives for the year in which such termination occurs as though all “target levels” of performance for such year are fully and completely achieved multiplied by two.  Such amounts will be paid to Executive in a single sum cash payment, subject to applicable taxes and withholding within ten (10) days of the satisfaction of all of the conditions in Section 5.3(b).  
2.Except as expressly amended pursuant to this Amendment, the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and effect without modification.  
3.Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Original Agreement unless the context clearly and unambiguously requires otherwise.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on the Effective Date.


ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP
By:             /s/ Peter F. Benoist                             
Name:          Peter F. Benoist                                           
Title:          President & CEO                                




EXECUTIVE:




                  /s/ Keene S. Turner                                         
          Keene S. Turner
1 

IN THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, ) 

JOHN DOE, and JACK DOE, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) No. 3:15-cv-00463-JD-CAN 

 ) 

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

 COME NOW Plaintiffs, by their counsel, and respectfully request a short extension of 

time, to and including November 16, 2015, within which to file their reply brief in support of 

their Motion for Preliminary Injunction. In support of this request, the plaintiffs state as follows:

1. On October 22, 2015, the plaintiffs filed their Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF 

No. 13). The defendant responded to that Motion on November 5, 2015 (ECF No. 26). 

Pursuant to this Court’s Order of October 22, 2015, the plaintiffs reply brief is currently 

due on November 12, 2015 (ECF No. 17). 

2. The plaintiffs intend to take a short Federal Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the defendant 

prior to a hearing on their preliminary injunction request. Counsel for both parties have 

been in contact with each other and have scheduled that deposition for November 12, 

2015. 

3. In light of this scheduling, the plaintiffs are requested a short extension of time to file 

their reply brief in order to allow them to review the defendant’s deposition testimony 

and to incorporate that testimony into their reply brief. 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 30 filed 11/08/15 page 1 of 3
2 

4. Undersigned counsel has been authorized to represent that the defendant has no objection 

to this Motion. 

WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs respectfully request a short extension of time, to and 

including November 16, 2015, within which to file their reply brief in support of their Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction, and request all other proper relief. 

 /s/ Gavin M. Rose 

 Gavin M. Rose, 

 ACLU OF INDIANA

 1031 E. Washington St. 

 Indianapolis, IN 46202 

 317/635-4059 

 fax: 317/635-4105 

grose@aclu-in.org 

Sam Grover, Pro Hac Vice 

Ryan Jayne, Pro Hac Vice 

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION

P.O. Box 750 

Madison, WI 53701 

608/256-8900 

fax: 608/204-0422 

sgrover@ffrf.org 

rjayne@ffrf.org 

Daniel Mach, Pro Hac Vice 

Heather L. Weaver, Pro Hac Vice 

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION

915 15th Street, N.W., Ste. 600 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

202/675-2330 

fax: 202/546-0738 

dmach@dcaclu.org 

hweaver@aclu.org 

Attorneys for the plaintiffs 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 30 filed 11/08/15 page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on this 8th day 

of November, 2015. Parties may access this document through the Court’s electronic system. 

The following persons will be served with this filing by operation of the Court’s electronic 

system: 

Thomas E. Wheeler, II 

<twheeler@fbtlaw.com> 

Anthony W. Overholt 

<aoverholt@fbtlaw.com> 

 /s/ Gavin M. Rose 

 Gavin M. Rose 

 Attorney at Law 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 30 filed 11/08/15 page 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Reef Oil & Gas Income and Development
Fund III, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Daniel C. Sibley, principal financial officer of Reef Oil &
Gas Income and Development Fund III, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





Date:  April
      2, 2010
              /s/
      Daniel
      C. SibleyDaniel
      C. SibleyChief
      Financial OfficerReef
      Exploration, L.P.(principal financial and
      accounting officer)





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the partnership and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40875 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAYMUNDO SEGURA

- RESENDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 1300

- 1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymundo Segura

Resendez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Segura

- Resendez h a s not fil ed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40875 Document: 00513882726 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 40875

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40875 Document: 00513882726 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2132 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2132

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
   To extend the waiver authority of the Secretary of Education with 
 respect to student financial assistance during a war or other military 
                    operation or national emergency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.

    Section 6 of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students 
Act of 2003 (20 U.S.C. 1070, note) is amended by striking ``September 
30, 2005'' and inserting ``September 30, 2007''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS , )

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) No. 3:13 CV 686

)

INDIANA STATE PRISON, et al., )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56(e), this court granted Demajio

Jerome Ellis, a pro se prisoner, until October 9, 2014, to supplement his response to the

defendants’ motion for summary judgment by providing declaration(s) and/or

exhibit(s) explaining in detail when and how he either filed a formal grievance or

explaining when and how he tried to do so as well as what prevented him from

succeeding or from making additional efforts to file one. See Order dated August 26,

2014. (DE #32.) Ellis was cautioned that if he did not respond by that deadline, the

motion for summary judgment would be granted for the reasons stated in that opinion.

The deadline has passed and Ellis has not responded. 

For the foregoing reasons, the motion for summary judgment (DE #21) is

GRANTED for the reasons explained in this court’s order (DE #32) of August 26, 2014. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: October 27, 2014

 s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#### COLWELL v. TINKER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 18, 1898.)

Action by Frederick L. Col-well against Charles A. Tinker.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Sala, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered on January 20, 1984, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Bloom, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Krauss, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on April 29, 1982, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2246 

To suspend temporarily the duty on allethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on allethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.11 -2-Methyl-4-oxo-3-(2-propenyl)–2-cyclopenten-1-yl 

2,2-dimethyl-3-(2- 

methylprop-1- 

enyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate 

(CAS No. 584–79–2) (provided for in subheading 

2916.20.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2246 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 
2 

•HR 2246 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
[No. 38140-7-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Johnny R. Puckett, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 79-1-00602-0, Ronald L. Castleberry, J., entered February 2, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 1 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 2 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 3 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 4 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 5 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 6 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 7 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 8 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 9 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 10 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 11 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 12 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 13 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 14 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 15 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 16 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 17 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 18 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 19 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 20 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 21 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 22 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 23 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 24 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 25 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 26 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 27 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 28 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 29 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 30 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 31 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 32 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 33 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 34 of 35
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00042-TLS document 112 filed 11/25/19 page 35 of 35
Exhibit
      32.2


Certification
        of the Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In
          connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Aces Wired, Inc. (the
          Company) for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2006, as filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
          Christopher C. Domijan, Executive
          Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
          Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
          1350, as
          adopted pursuant to Section 906
          of
          the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1) The
            Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or l5(d)
            of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
            The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
                  */s/*CHRISTOPHER
                    C. DOMIJANChristopher C. Domijan
                    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                    Date:
                        February 6, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Arthur D’AMARIO, III, Appellant.

No. 06-1498.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed April 28, 2006.

George S. Leone, Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for United States of America.

Arthur D’Amario, Philadelphia, PA, pro se.

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, RENDELL and AMBRO, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Arthur D’Amario appeals from the District Court’s order denying his motion to stay or revoke his supervised release. Because D’Amario’s appeal presents no substantial question, we will summarily affirm.

Because we write primarily for the parties, the facts of this case need not be recounted in detail. The background of this case can be found at *D'Amario v. United States,*403 F.Supp.2d 361 (D.N.J. 2005). In 2005, the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island *152revoked D’Amario’s supervised release after he violated the conditions of that release.1*See United States v. D’Amario,*412 F.3d 253 (1st Cir.2005). On January 17, 2006, D’Amario moved in the District of New Jersey to prevent his release from prison.2 Because he appears to have challenged the commencement of his supervised release in the wrong jurisdiction, the District Court properly denied his motion.

Upon his initial release from prison D’Amario began serving two concurrent terms of supervised release, one from a conviction in the District of New Jersey, the other from the District of Rhode Island. On May 2, 2003, the District of New Jersey transferred jurisdiction over D’Amario’s supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3605 to the District of Rhode Island. *United States v. D’Amario,*No. 01-0346 (D.N.J. May 2, 2003). Thus, the District of New Jersey no longer has jurisdiction to provide the relief that he seeks and properly denied his motion.

In short, upon consideration of the record, we conclude that his appeal presents us with no substantial question. *See*Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Accordingly, we will affirm the District Court’s order.

1

. According to D’Amario, his term of incarceration for the supervised release revocation ended on February 10, 2006.

2

. After he filed a notice of appeal regarding the District Court’s denial of his motion, D’Amario filed an emergency motion in this Court, which we denied. *D’Amario v. United States,*No. 06-1498 (Feb. 8, 2006).
case 3:13-cv-00700-JD-CAN document 4 filed 07/17/13 page 1 of 4
case 3:13-cv-00700-JD-CAN document 4 filed 07/17/13 page 2 of 4
case 3:13-cv-00700-JD-CAN document 4 filed 07/17/13 page 3 of 4
case 3:13-cv-00700-JD-CAN document 4 filed 07/17/13 page 4 of 4