alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab Docs Fusarium head blight





- FHB Epidemic in wheat and barley - overview
- Fusarium head blight in U.S.
- Pathogen that causes FHB - Fusarium graminearum
- How many species of the Fusarium head blight fungus are there?
- PCR and sequencing primers used for Fusarium graminearum
- Mycotoxin analysis of genetically defined strains of Fusarium graminearum
- Lineage of Fusarium head blight
- The Fusarium International Genomics Initiative
- FHB images

Fusarium Head Blightheadline bar FHB (Scab) Epidemic in Wheat and Barley - An OverviewFusarium head blight in the U.S.
The pathogen that causes FHB: Fusarium graminearum.
How many species of the Fusarium head blight fungus are there?
PCR and sequencing primers used for Fusarium graminearum
The Fusarium International Genomics Initiative
A First for Fusarium: Wheat and barley disease fungus is fully mapped and on the Web
Scab Images
DNA Profiling: Guarding Against a Plant Disease Epidemic
U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative Other Resources: FHB Prediction CenterOhio State UniversityPurdue UniversityUniversity of NebraskaVirginia TechCanadian Grain Commission


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Archives
                        Presentations
                                    World Dairy Expo
                                    Newsletters and Research Summaries
                    Resources
                        General Resources
                                    Books
                                    Teacher's Resources
                                    New Research Dairy Updates
                                    Integrated Research at USDFRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Resourcesheadline bar General Resources
               Books
               Teacher's Resources
               New Research Dairy Updates
               Integrated Research at USDFRC


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September30,  2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Scott A. Haire, Chief
Executive  Officer and  principal  financial  officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott A. Haire
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
(Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(A)

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
American Honda Finance Corporation

Members of the Board:

We have examined management's assertion about American Honda Finance
Corporation's (the Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, as they relate to the servicing of
retail automobile loan contracts, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2002
included in the accompanying management's assertion. The minimum servicing
standards not considered by the Company to be applicable to the servicing of
retail automobile loans include procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section I - Custodial
Bank Accounts, procedures 1, 2, 3 and 4 of section III - Disbursements and
procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section V - Mortgage Loan Accounting. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, including
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with insurance
requirements applicable to the Company as of and for the year ended March 31,
2002. The Company was not in compliance with minimum servicing standards for
maintaining an errors and omissions policy effective during the year ended March
31, 2002.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the third
paragraph, American Honda Finance Corporation has complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2002.


/s/ KPMG LLP


September 25, 2003
[No. 14158-6-III.

Division Three.

September 9, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Elton Johnson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Stevens County, No. 93-1-00127-9, Fred L. Stewart, J., entered June 27, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### DOTY, Respondent, v. SYRACUSE & SUBURBAN R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Mary M. Doty against the Syracuse & Suburban Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order of County Court and judgment and order of Municipal Court of the city of Syracuse reversed, and a new trial ordered in the Municipal Court, with costs in all courts to the appellant to abide the event. New trial to be had on Tuesday, the 3d day of December, 1907, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon. Held, that the verdict was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence.

SPRING and KRUSE, JJ., dissent.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sylvester D. JONES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6311.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 16, 2011.

Decided: June 21, 2011.

*221Sylvester D. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester D. Jones, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 393 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ LARRY GREEN , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 3 19 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez , Garza , and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Larry Green, filed a pro se notice of appeal regarding his conviction for the failure to register as a sex offender in trial court cause number 14

- CR

- 0022

- G in the 319th District Court of Nuec es County, Texas. However, appellant has now filed two motion s to dismiss his appeal. Appellant is unrepresented by counsel and has made no request for the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we conclude that appellant’s2

motion s comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a) ( allowing voluntary dismissals in criminal appeals where the attorney and appellant both s ign a written motion to dismiss ); see also Flores v. State , No. 07

- 0 8

- 0256

- CR, 2008 WL 4180296 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo Sept. 12, 2008 , no pet. ) (not designated for publication) ( stating that a pro se appeal could be dismissed in accordance with a mot ion signed by the appellant) ; Guerra v. State , No. 04

- 02

- 00135

- CR, 2002 WL 1973854 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Aug. 28, 2002 , no pet. ) (per curiam) (not designated for publication) ( stating that a pro se motion to dismiss signed by the appellant complied with the appellate rules pertaining to the voluntary dismissal of crim inal appeals). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the motion s to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b). D elivered and filed the 3 1 st d ay of July, 2014

.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ROSA HERNANDEZ, * No. 15-356V 

 * Special Master Christian J. Moran 

 Petitioner, * 

 * 

v. * 

 * Filed: July 12, 2016

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Stipulation; Influenza vaccine;

 * GBS.

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Danielle A. Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA (DC), Washington, DC, for 

Petitioner;

Douglas Ross, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On July 11, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition 

for compensation filed by Rosa Hernandez on April 9, 2015. In her petition, 

petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine 

Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which Rosa Hernandez

received on or about October 24, 2012, caused her to develop Guillain-Barre 

Syndrome (GBS), with residual effects lasting more than six months. Petitioner 

represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for 

damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

 1

 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
2 

Respondent denies that any of the vaccines that petitioner received either 

caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s GBS or any other injury or 

condition. 

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as 

Appendix A. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the 

decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

 

Damages awarded in that stipulation include: 

A lump sum payment of $135,000.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner, Rosa Hernandez. This amount represents compensation for 

all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 15-356V according to this decision 

and the attached stipulation.2

 

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357-

6360. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Christian J. Moran

 Christian J. Moran

 Special Master

 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
#### HULBERT, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF EAST SYRACUSE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by Almira D. Hulbert against the Village of East Syracuse. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00167-JD document 11-2 filed 07/22/15 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00167-JD document 11-2 filed 07/22/15 page 2 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00167-JD document 11-2 filed 07/22/15 page 3 of 3
Lorenzo Prado NAVARETTE and Jose Prado Navarette, petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-9490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 01, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, granted limited to Question 1 presented by petition.
#### In re AKIN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 19, 1912.)

In the matter of the application of Charles E. Akin, and another. No opinion. Order (133 N. Y. Supp. 881) reversed, and application granted, without costs. See, also, 134 N. Y. Supp. 20.
#### In re MILLER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

In the matter of Alexander Miller, deceased. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1.     |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.     |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the    Report. |
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



                           PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
                                    FORM 10-Q
                       CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS




We, Norman L. Lowery, CEO, and Michael A. Carty, Chief Financial Officer, of
First Financial Corp., hereby individually certify the following:

-   This Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and,

-   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial position and results of operations of First
    Financial Corp. as of and for the periods presented.





November 14, 2002                         By /s/ Norman L. Lowery
                                             ----------------------------
                                          Norman L. Lowery, CEO



November 14, 2002                         By /s/ Michael A. Carty
                                             ------------------------------
                                          Michael A. Carty, Treasurer & CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            8521
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             857
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     262372
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            261720
<LOANS>                                         339087
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  634685
<DEPOSITS>                                      362854
<SHORT-TERM>                                     18040
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4769
<LONG-TERM>                                     184000
<COMMON>                                         72949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4139)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  634685
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7246
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3909
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    63
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11218
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3504
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6061
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5157
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      450
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 592
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3123
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3123
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                       1061
<LOANS-PAST>                                      2196
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3327
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      367
<RECOVERIES>                                        83
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3493
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2480
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1013
        

</TABLE>