Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 33491 

acreage has an adequate stand in the 

spring to produce the yield used to 

determine your production guarantee. 

However, if we fail to inspect the 

acreage by the spring final planting date, 

insurance will attach as specified in 

section 7(a)(2)(iii)(D)(3). 

(1) Your request for coverage must 

include the location and number of 

acres of winter barley, oats, or wheat. 

(2) The winter barley, oats, or wheat 

will be insured as a spring type for the 

purpose of the production guarantee, 

premium, projected price, and harvest 

price, if applicable. 

(3) Insurance will attach to such 

acreage on the date we determine an 

adequate stand exists or on the spring 

final planting date if we do not 

determine adequacy of the stand by the 

spring final planting date. 

(iv) Whenever the Special Provisions 

designate a spring type, any spring 

barley, oat, or wheat acreage damaged 

before such final planting date, to the 

extent that producers in the area would 

normally not further care for the crop, 

must be replanted to a spring type of the 

insured crop unless we agree that 

replanting is not practical. 

(v) Whenever the Special Provisions 

designate only a spring type, any winter 

barley, oat, or wheat acreage will not be 

insured unless you request such 

coverage on or before the spring sales 

closing date, and we inspect and give 

written confirmation that the acreage 

has an adequate stand in the spring to 

produce the yield used to determine 

your production guarantee. However, if 

we fail to inspect the acreage by the 

spring final planting date, insurance 

will attach as specified in section 

7(a)(2)(v)(C). 

(A) Your request for coverage must 

include the location and number of 

acres of winter barley, oats, or wheat. 

(B) The winter barley, oats, or wheat 

will be insured as a spring type for the 

purpose of the production guarantee, 

premium, projected price, and harvest 

price, if applicable. 

* * * * * 

(D) Any such winter barley, oats, or 

wheat acreage that is damaged after it is 

accepted for insurance but before the 

spring final planting date, to the extent 

that producers in the area would 

normally not further care for the crop, 

must be replanted to a spring type of the 

insured crop unless we agree it is not 

practical to replant. 

(E) If winter-planted acreage is not to 

be insured it must be recorded on the 

acreage report as uninsured winterplanted acreage. 

* * * * * 

9. Replanting Payments. 

* * * * * 

(b) No replanting payment will be 

made for acreage initially planted to a 

winter type of the insured crop 

(including rye) in any county for which 

the Special Provisions contain only a 

winter type. 

* * * * * 

11. Settlement of Claim. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(iii) 14.0 percent for oats; 

(iv) 16.0 percent for rye and 

buckwheat; or 

(v) As otherwise provided in the 

Special Provisions. 

* * * * * 

13. Prevented Planting. 

Your prevented planting coverage will 

be a percentage specified in the 

actuarial documents of your production 

guarantee for timely planted acreage. If 

you have additional coverage and pay 

an additional premium, you may 

increase your prevented planting 

coverage if such additional coverage is 

specified in the actuarial documents. In 

counties for which the Special 

Provisions designate a spring type, your 

prevented planting production 

guarantee will be based on your 

approved yield for spring-planted 

acreage of the insured crop. 

§ 457.118 [Removed and Reserved] 

■ 3. Remove and reserve § 457.118. 

Richard Flournoy, 

Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13113 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 1206 

[Document No. AMS–SC–20–0086] 

Mango Promotion, Research and 

Information Order; Removal of Frozen 

Mangos 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Agriculture (Department) is adopting, as 

a final rule with minor changes, an 

interim final rule that amends the 

Mango Promotion, Research and 

Information Order (Order) by removing 

the provisions of frozen mangos as a 

covered commodity. The Order is 

administered by the National Mango 

Board (Board) with oversight by the U.S. 

Department of Agriculture (USDA). In a 

referendum, first handlers and 

importers voted to remove frozen 

mangos as a covered commodity under 

the Order. This rule will remove frozen 

mangos as a covered commodity, 

discontinue the collection of 

assessments on frozen mangos, remove 

frozen mango entity representation on 

the Board, and make necessary 

conforming changes. 

DATES: Effective July 26, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marlene Betts, Marketing Specialist, 

Promotion and Economics Division, 

Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 

1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 

1406–S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC 

20250–0244; telephone: (202) 720–5057; 

or email: Marlene.Betts@usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

affecting 7 CFR part 1206 (the Order) is 

authorized under the Commodity 

Promotion, Research, and Information 

Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411– 

7425). 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts and equity). 

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the 

importance of quantifying both costs 

and benefits, reducing costs, 

harmonizing rules, and promoting 

flexibility. This action falls within a 

category of regulatory actions that the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) exempted from Executive Order 

12866 review. 

Executive Order 13175 

This action has been reviewed in 

accordance with the requirements of 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation 

and Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments. AMS has assessed the 

impact of this final rule on Indian tribes 

and determined that this rule will not 

have tribal implications that require 

consultation under Executive Order 

13175. AMS hosts a quarterly 

teleconference with tribal leaders where 

matters of mutual interest regarding the 

marketing of agricultural products are 

discussed. Information about the 

changes to the regulations will be 

shared during an upcoming quarterly 

call, and tribal leaders will be informed 

about these revisions to the regulation. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
33492 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

Executive Order 12988 

In addition, this rule has been 

reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 

Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended 

to have a retroactive effect. Section 524 

of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides 

that it shall not affect or preempt any 

other Federal or State law authorizing 

promotion or research relating to an 

agricultural commodity. 

Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7 

U.S.C. 7418), a person subject to an 

order issued under the Act may file a 

written petition with USDA stating that 

the order, any provision of the order, or 

any obligation imposed in connection 

with the order, is not established in 

accordance with the law, and request a 

modification of the order or an 

exemption from the order. Any petition 

filed challenging an order, any 

provision of an order, or any obligation 

imposed in connection with an order, 

shall be filed within two years after the 

effective date of an order, provision, or 

obligation subject to challenge in the 

petition. The petitioner will have the 

opportunity for a hearing on the 

petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a 

ruling on the petition. The Act provides 

that the district court of the United 

States for any district in which the 

petitioner resides or conducts business 

shall have jurisdiction to review a final 

ruling on the petition, if the petitioner 

files a complaint for that purpose not 

later than 20 days after the date of the 

entry of USDA’s final ruling. 

Background 

The Mango Promotion, Research, and 

Information Order (Order) took effect in 

November 2004 (69 FR 59120), and 

assessment collection began in January 

2005 for fresh mangos. The Order is 

administered by the National Mango 

Board (Board) with oversight by the U.S. 

Department of Agriculture. Originally, 

the program was funded by assessments 

on first handlers and importers of fresh 

mangos, and was focused on 

maintaining and expanding existing 

markets and uses for fresh mangos 

through its research, promotion and 

information efforts. 

Frozen mangos as a covered 

commodity was added to the Order on 

February 21, 2019 (84 FR 5335), and a 

referendum was held in 2019 to 

determine whether the industry favored 

the inclusion of frozen mangos as a 

covered commodity under the Order. In 

the 2019 referendum, 52.5 percent of 

first handlers and importers of fresh and 

frozen mangos were in favor of the 

amendment to add frozen mangos to the 

Order. Since the vote passed by a small 

margin, the frozen mango industry 

asked the Board to conduct another 

referendum on whether frozen mangos 

should continue as a covered 

commodity under the Order. 

The Order prescribes that every five 

years, the USDA conduct a referendum 

to determine if first handlers and 

importers of mangos favor the 

continuation of the Order. Such a 

referendum was required to be 

conducted in 2020. At the Board’s 

September 2019 meeting, it was 

unanimously recommended to the 

USDA to add a second question to the 

continuance referendum ballot 

concerning frozen mangos as a covered 

commodity. USDA conducted a 

referendum from September 21 through 

October 9, 2020, among eligible first 

handlers and importers to (1) ascertain 

whether the continuance of the Order is 

favored by eligible first handlers and 

importers covered under the Order, and 

(2) ascertain whether the continuance of 

frozen mangos as a covered commodity 

in the Order is favored by eligible first 

handlers and importers (including 

frozen mango importers) covered under 

the Order. The results were announced 

on October 20, 2020, stating that 60 

percent of mango first handlers and 

importers voting were in favor of 

continuing the Order. On the question 

as to whether to continue frozen mangos 

as a covered commodity in the Order, 42 

percent voted to keep frozen mangos in 

the Order, 49 percent voted to eliminate 

frozen mangos and 9 percent did not 

vote on this question. Of those 

representing frozen mangos, 83 percent 

voted to eliminate frozen mangos as a 

covered commodity. 

Section 522 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 

7421) and § 1206.72 of the Order (7 CFR 

1206.72) provide that if the Secretary 

determines that provisions of the Order 

are not favored by persons voting in a 

referendum, the Secretary shall 

terminate those provisions. An interim 

final rule was published in the Federal 

Register on February 24, 2021, 

providing a 60-day comment period that 

ended April 26, 2021. In accordance 

with the 1996 Act and Order, this rule 

adopts the interim rule, with a few 

minor changes to sections 1206.34 and 

1206.43. The interim final rule proposed 

removal of the provisions of frozen 

mangos as a covered commodity under 

the Order and the final rule is adopting 

these changes from the interim final rule 

without change. They include: 

Removing definitions for frozen mangos 

and foreign processor of frozen mangos; 

reducing the Board’s membership from 

21 to 18 by eliminating two importers of 

frozen mangos and one foreign 

processor of frozen mangos; removing 

assessment collection provisions for 

frozen mangos at a rate of $0.01 per 

pound and thereby eliminating 

assessments on frozen mango imports; 

and removing the exemption of 

assessment for importers who import 

less than 200,000 pounds of frozen 

mangos annually. In addition, the 

interim final rule proposed clarifying 

and conforming changes to other 

provisions of the Order. 

Sections 1206.34 and 1206.43 are 

being revised in this rule from the 

interim final rule for further 

clarification. 

Order Provisions 

The interim rule set forth the 

following proposed changes that are 

being adopted without change. In 

accordance with § 1206.72, the 

following changes are necessary to 

terminate and remove the provisions 

regarding frozen mangos from the Order. 

Sections 1206.6 and 1206.9 which 

define the terms ‘‘first handler’’ and 

‘‘importer,’’ respectively, were revised 

to add the reference that first handlers 

and importers, respectively, must 

receive or import 500,000 or more 

pounds of mangos; this volume was 

added for the purpose of clarity. 

Section 1206.8, which defines the 

term ‘‘foreign producers and foreign 

processor of frozen mangos or foreign 

processor’’, was revised to remove the 

definitions of ‘‘foreign processor of 

frozen mangos or foreign processor’’ 

because they are no longer covered 

under the Order. The definition for 

‘‘foreign producer’’ will remain. 

The definition of ‘‘mangos’’ in 

§ 1206.11 was revised to mean all fresh 

fruit of Mangifera indica L. of the family 

Anacardiaceae. The term ‘‘frozen 

mangos’’ was removed as it is no longer 

a covered commodity. 

Section 1206.30, which establishes 

the Board’s membership, was revised to 

reduce its size from 21 to 18 members 

due to the removal of three members, 

i.e., two importers of frozen mangos and 

one foreign processor. The three 

members have been removed from the 

Board. The remaining 18-member Board 

will be comprised of 8 importers, 1 first 

handler, 2 domestic producers, and 7 

foreign producers. In addition, 

eligibility requirements for Board 

members from the frozen mango 

industry are removed, and only those 

eligibility requirements for the first 

handler and fresh mango importers 

remain. Lastly, the four ‘‘Importer 

Districts’’ that were unintentionally 

removed from the CFR when this 

section was amended, were restored to 

section 1206.30 as paragraphs (b)(1)– 

(b)(4). 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 33493 

1https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated. 

Section 1206.31, which describes the 

procedures for nominating and 

appointing Board members to the Board, 

was revised to remove procedures for 

nominating foreign processors and 

importers of frozen mangos. Section 

1206.32, which specifies that Board 

members serve for a 3-year term of office 

and may serve a maximum of two 

consecutive 3-year terms, was revised to 

remove the references to importers of 

frozen mangos and foreign processors. 

Section 1206.42 specifies the 

assessment rate for fresh mangos and 

frozen mangos. Paragraph (b) was 

revised to remove the provisions 

assessing importers of frozen mangos 

one cent ($0.01) per pound, and 

paragraph (d)(2), which includes the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of 

the United States that applies to 

imported frozen mangos (number 

0811.90.5200), was removed from the 

Order. Assessments on frozen mango 

importers have been terminated. 

Subpart B of part 1206 specifies 

procedures for conducting a 

referendum. In § 1206.101, paragraphs 

(c), (d), and (e) were revised to delete 

the references to eligibility of frozen 

mango importers to vote in referenda, as 

frozen mangos are no longer a covered 

commodity, and to restore definitions 

prior to when this section was amended. 

Finally, the interim final rule updated 

the OMB control number specified in 

§ 1206.108 from 0581–0209 to 0581– 

0093. 

Sections 1206.34 and 1206.43 from 

the interim final rule are being further 

revised. Section 1206.34 specifies 

quorum requirements for Board 

meetings, and with the reduction of the 

Board from 21 to 18, a decrease in 

quorum requirements is necessary. 

Therefore, this section was revised to 

specify that a quorum at a Board 

meeting exists when at least 10 of the 18 

Board members are present. A comment 

was received requesting a quorum at 

Board meetings be when at least one 

more than half of the voting members 

are present. The comment was accepted, 

and the section is revised in this final 

rule. 

In § 1206.43, paragraphs (a) and (b) 

were revised to remove references to 

frozen mango exemptions as frozen 

mangos are no longer a covered 

commodity. In making these changes, 

paragraph (a) was inadvertently changed 

to exempting domestic first handlers 

when the intent was to simply remove 

frozen mangos as a covered commodity, 

and therefore, further revision is 

needed. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis and 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

In accordance with the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601– 

612), AMS is required to examine the 

impact of the rule on small entities. 

Accordingly, AMS has considered the 

economic impact of this action on such 

entities. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

businesses subject to such actions so 

that small businesses will not be 

disproportionately burdened. The Small 

Business Administration defines, in 13 

CFR part 121, small agricultural 

producers as those having annual 

receipts of no more than $750,000 and 

small agricultural service firms (first 

handlers and importers) as those having 

annual receipts of no more than $7.5 

million. 

According to the Board, there are five 

first handlers of fresh mangos. Based on 

2019 Customs data, the majority of first 

handlers handled less than $7.5 million 

worth of fresh mangos and would thus 

be considered small entities. 

Based on 2019 Customs data,1 there 

are about 100 importers of fresh mangos 

and 70 importers of frozen mangos. The 

majority of fresh and frozen mango 

importers import less than $7.5 million 

worth of fresh or frozen mangos and 

would also be considered small entities. 

This action will remove frozen mango 

importers from the requirements 

associated with this research and 

promotion Order and result in a 

regulatory relaxation, and is therefore 

expected to reduce costs for frozen 

mango importers. 

This rule amends AMS’s regulations 

regarding the mango research and 

promotion program to remove frozen 

mangos as a covered commodity under 

the Order. A continuance referendum 

was conducted September 21 through 

October 9, 2020, among eligible first 

handlers and importers to (1) ascertain 

whether the continuance of the Order is 

favored by eligible first handlers and 

importers covered under the Order, and 

(2) ascertain whether the continuance of 

frozen mangos as a covered commodity 

in the Order is favored by eligible first 

handlers and importers (including 

frozen mango importers) covered under 

the Order. The results were announced 

on October 20, 2020, stating that 60 

percent of mango first handlers and 

importers voting were in favor of 

continuing the Order. On the question 

as to whether to continue frozen mangos 

as a covered commodity in the Order, 42 

percent voted to keep frozen mangos in 

the Order, 49 percent voted to eliminate 

frozen mangos, and 9 percent did not 

vote on this question. Of those 

representing frozen mangos, 83 percent 

voted to eliminate frozen mangos as a 

covered commodity. 

This rule adopts the following 

proposed changes in the interim rule 

without change and removes references 

to frozen mangos as a covered 

commodity under the Order including: 

Removing definitions for frozen mangos 

and foreign processor of frozen mangos; 

reducing the Board’s membership from 

21 to 18 by eliminating two importers of 

frozen mangos and one foreign 

processor of frozen mangos; removing 

assessment collection provisions for 

frozen mangos at a rate of one cent 

($0.01) per pound and thereby 

eliminating assessments on frozen 

mango imports; removing the exemption 

of assessment for importers who import 

less than 200,000 pounds of frozen 

mangos annually; removing definitions 

for frozen mango importers concerning 

eligibility in a referendum; and 

clarifying and conforming changes to 

other provisions of the Order. This rule 

will also update the OMB number 0581– 

0209 listed in § 1206.108 to OMB 

number 0581–0093. 

Sections 1206.34 and 1206.43 from 

the interim final rule are being further 

revised for clarification in this rule. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35), the information collection 

and recordkeeping requirements 

previously approved by the OMB and 

titled Frozen Mango Research, 

Promotion and Information Program, 

and assigned OMB No. 0581–0314 will 

be submitted to OMB for withdrawal as 

these forms and information collection 

regarding frozen mangos are no longer 

needed. 

The information collection package 

(0581–0314) that imposes a total burden 

of 166 hours and 475 responses for 190 

respondents will be terminated. 

The industry voted in a referendum 

held September 21, through October 9, 

2020, to remove frozen mangos as a 

covered commodity from the Order. On 

October 20, 2020, the Department 

announced through a notice to trade 

that 42 percent of mango first handlers 

and importers voted to keep frozen 

mangos as a covered commodity, 49 

percent of mango first handlers and 

importers voting were not in favor of 

frozen mangos as a covered commodity 

and 9 percent did not vote on this 

question. Of those representing frozen 

mangos 83 percent voted to eliminate 

frozen mango as a covered commodity 

under the Order. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
33494 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

Analysis of Comments 

An interim final rule was published 

in the Federal Register on February 24, 

2021, providing a 60-day comment 

period that ended April 26, 2021. This 

rule will adopt most of the changes in 

the interim final rule. One comment was 

received requesting a change to section 

1206.34 Procedures, concerning what 

constitutes a quorum at a Board 

meeting. Section 1206.34 was changed 

due to the reduction of the Board from 

21 to 18, a decrease in quorum 

requirements was necessary, and 

therefore, changed from 11 to at least 10 

of the 18 Board members are present. 

The commenter stated that this is 

problematic when the Board is not at 

full capacity and recommends a quorum 

at Board meetings be when at least one 

more than half of the voting members 

are present. USDA believes that this 

comment has merit and is revising 

section 1206.34 Procedures to specify 

that a quorum at a Board meeting exists 

when at least one more than half of the 

voting members are present. 

In addition, USDA made a correction 

to section 1206.43 Exemptions to clarify 

a change that was made inadvertently 

exempting domestic first handlers when 

the intent was to simply remove frozen 

mangos as a covered commodity. 

Therefore, the section has been 

corrected to exempt first handlers or 

importers of less than 500,000 pounds 

of mangos per calendar year, and 

domestically exported mangos. 

After consideration of all relevant 

matters presented, including comments, 

the referendum vote and other available 

information, it is hereby found that 

finalizing the interim final rule, with the 

changes below, as published in the 

Federal Register [86 FR 11094] on 

February 24, 2021, will tend to 

effectuate the purposes of the 1996 Act. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1206 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Advertising, Consumer 

information, Marketing agreements, 

Mango promotion, Reporting and 

recording requirements. 

Accordingly, the interim final rule 

amending 7 CFR part 1206, which was 

published in the February 24, 2021, 

Federal Register [86 FR 11094], is 

adopted as final with the following 

changes: 

PART 1206—MANGO RESEARCH, 

PROMOTION, AND INFORMATION 

ORDER 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 1206 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and 7 

U.S.C. 7401. 

■ 2. In § 1206.34, revise paragraph (a) to 

read as follows: 

§ 1206.34 Procedure. 

(a) At a Board meeting, it will be 

considered a quorum when at least one 

more than half of the voting members 

are present. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. In § 1206.43, revise paragraph (a) to 

read as follows: 

§ 1206.43 Exemptions. 

(a) Any first handler or importer of 

less than 500,000 pounds of mangos per 

calendar year may claim an exemption 

from the assessments required under 

§ 1206.42. Mangos produced 

domestically and exported from the 

United States may annually claim an 

exemption from the assessments 

required under § 1206.42. 

* * * * * 

Erin Morris, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13317 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2020–0850; Project 

Identifier AD–2020–00288–E; Amendment 

39–21569; AD 2021–11–07] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; General 

Electric Company Turbofan Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

General Electric Company (GE) GEnx– 

1B64, 1B64/P1, –1B64/P2, –1B67, 

–1B67/P1, –1B67/P2, –1B70, –1B70/75/ 

P1, –1B70/75/P2, –1B70/P1, –1B70/P2, 

–1B70C/P1, –1B70C/P2, –1B74/75/P1, 

–1B74/75/P2, –1B76/P2, –1B76A/P2, 

–2B67, –2B67/P, and –2B67B model 

turbofan engines. This AD was 

prompted by a finding during an 

inspection by the manufacturer that two 

stages 6–10 compressor rotor spools in 

the high-pressure compressor (HPC) 

assembly were damaged at similar 

locations. Additionally, the 

manufacturer reported that certain 

stages 6–10 compressor rotor spool webs 

did not undergo a required fluorescent 

penetrant inspection (FPI) during 

production. This AD requires inspection 

of the stages 6–10 compressor rotor 

spool and, depending on the results of 

the inspection, replacement of the stages 

6–10 compressor rotor spool. The FAA 

is issuing this AD to address the unsafe 

condition on these products. 

DATES: This AD is effective July 30, 

2021. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of July 30, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this final rule, contact 

General Electric Company, 1 Neumann 

Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 

(513) 552–3272; email: 

aviation.fleetsupport@ae.ge.com; 

website: www.ge.com. You may view 

this service information at the FAA, 

Airworthiness Products Section, 

Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District 

Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (781) 238– 

7759. It is also available at https://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2020– 

0850. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket at 

https://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating Docket No. 

FAA–2020–0850; or in person at Docket 

Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The AD docket contains this 

final rule, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for 

Docket Operations is U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mehdi Lamnyi, Aviation Safety 

Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 

District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: (781) 238–7743; fax: (781) 238– 

7199; email: Mehdi.Lamnyi@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The FAA issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain GE GEnx–1B and 

GEnx–2B model turbofan engines. The 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1