alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued August 31 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00 724
- C R

——————————— IN RE BLAISE ALLEN JOHNSON , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Bl aise Allen Johnson , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to have the trial court appoint and pay for expert witnesses and to grant his motion to suppress

. 1

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Blaise Allen Johnson , cause number 1529282 , pending in the 1 74 t h District Court o f Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Hazel B. Jones presiding

.2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(a).
P ER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey

. Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

TRAVIS CUNNINGHAM, 

 Plaintiff, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

v. Cause No. 3:16-CV-441 JD 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS and WESTVILLE 

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

 Defendants. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 Travis Cunningham, a pro se prisoner, sent the clerk a document captioned, “In 42 U.S.C. 

1983 Act Civil Rights Complaint” with several other documents. This complaint names the Indiana 

Department of Corrections and the Westville Correctional Facility as defendants and alleges that 

they are “depriving plaintiff his due process of law in evidence proceedings and good time credit, 

plus credit class[, b]reaching plaintiffs court sentence order, and denying him medical treatment 

for mental illness[, c]ausing plaintiff mental anguish, duress, and pain, and suffering[, m]oney loss 

from not being allowed to work at work release.” DE 1 at 1. 

 Because Cunningham did not put a case number on any of these papers, the clerk properly 

used them to open this new case. However, Cunningham is already suing these same defendants 

raising similar claims in 3:16-CV-397. It would be malicious to sue the same defendants for the 

same events in two cases. Though it is unclear what Cunningham intended when he filed these 

papers, it does not appear that he intended to bring a duplicate lawsuit. 

 For these reasons, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as inadvertently 

opened and the clerk is DIRECTED to transfer Cunningham’s filings in this case (DE 1, 2, 3, and 
2 

4) into 3:16-CV-397. Cunningham is ADMONISHED to put that cause number on everything he 

is filing in that case. 

 SO ORDERED. 

ENTERED: July 11, 2016 

 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge 

United States District Judge
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bruce R.
Lakefield, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David M. Davis, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bruce R. Lakefield
-----------------------------------
Name: Bruce R. Lakefield
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 7, 2004


/s/ David M. Davis
-----------------------------------
Name: David M. Davis
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 7, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         5,524,614
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  810,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,785,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,515,670
<PP&E>                                         1,996,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,212,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,071,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,630,635
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          3,721,850
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,118,128
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,439,445) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,071,437
<SALES>                                        893,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,243,156
<CGS>                                          339,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,438,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (208,426)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,333,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,333,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,333,660)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF
                  CCB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                              
                              
The undersigned corporation hereby submits these Articles of
Amendment for the purpose of amending its Amended and
Restated Charter:


     1.   The name of  the corporation is CCB Financial Corporation.

     2.   The Amended and Restated Charter of the corporation are hereby
          amended by replacing the first sentence of Paragraph 4 of the
          Amended and Restated Charter as follows:

          "4.  The total number of shares of capital stock which the
               corporation has authority to issue is 110,000,000, of which
               100,000,000 shall be common stock, $5.00 par value, and
               10,000,000 shall be serial preferred stock."

     3.   The foregoing amendment was adopted on the 21st day of April, 1998,
          by shareholder action pursuant to  55-10-06 of the General Statutes
          of North Carolina.

This the 28th day of April, 1998.

                         CCB FINANCIAL CORPORATION



                         By:_________________________________
                            Ernest C. Roessler
                            Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                            Officer
Exhibit 99.3

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                      OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between
Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2002-2 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee,
dated as of September 1, 2002, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has
          been made under my supervision; and

     2.   Based on my knowledge of such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
          its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such year.

March 15, 2005




By:     /s/ Terry J. Heimes
        -----------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer, Assistant
        Secretary and Executive Director,
        Nelnet, Inc.
#### In re McCABE’S WILL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 18, 1907.)

In the matter of the probate of the last will and testament of Mary McCabe, deceased.

No. opinion. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court óf Kings county affirmed, with costs.
# L_2008011EN.01000701.xml

| 15.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 December 2007

appointing a Greek member of the Committee of the Regions

(2008/44/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Greek Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Fofi GENNIMATA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Fofi GENNIMATA,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

Ms Evangelia SCHINARAKI-ILIAKI, prefect of the city of Heraklion in Crete.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2007.

For the Council

The President

F. NUNES CORREIA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
Exhibit 10.86 12.31.14






Exhibit 10.86
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO 
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE SEPARATION ALLOWANCE PLAN 
(2006 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT)


WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation Executive Separation Allowance Plan (“Plan”) is currently maintained pursuant to the 2006 Amendment and Restatement and five amendments thereto; and


WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend the Plan further;


NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 29, 2015, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below:


1.Section 3.1 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows:


3.1  The separation allowance payable to each Eligible Employee who is entitled to such allowance under Section 2 above shall be equal to the number of weeks of Compensation set forth in the table below, based on the Eligible Employee’s Grade Level and Years of Service as of his/her Separation Date:


	
		
	Eligible Employees at Grade Levels 47 through 52
	26 weeks of Compensation plus two additional weeks of Compensation for each full Year of Service in excess of 13 Years of Service, not to exceed an aggregate of 52 weeks of Compensation

	Eligible Employees at Grade Levels 53, 54 and 55
	52 weeks of Compensation

	(1) The Company’s Chief Executive Officer; (2) Eligible Employees who (i) report directly to him/her and (ii) have no assigned Grade Level; (3) Any other Eligible Employee designated in writing by (i) the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, if the Eligible Employee is an executive officer, or (ii) the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer, if the Eligible Employee is not an executive officer.
	•    Less than one Year of Service:  52 weeks of Compensation
•    At least one, but less than two, Years of Service:  104 weeks of Compensation
•    At least two Years of Service:  156 weeks of Compensation







1








		
	2.
	Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain entirely unchanged and continue in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has hereunto caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the 29th day of January, 2015.




The Progressive Corporation




By:      /s/Charles E. Jarrett                


Title:      Vice President and Secretary            



2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

KENDRA MABRY, et al., )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:16-CV-402-JVB-JEM

)

CITY OF EAST CHICAGO, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [DE 129] filed on May 

26, 2021. The Court referred this motion to Magistrate Judge John Martin for a report and 

recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and 

Local Rule 72-1. [DE 132]. Judge Martin issued his Amended Report and Recommendation

[DE 153] on October 20, 2021, in which he recommended that the Court grant the motion to 

dismiss. The parties were given notice that they had fourteen days in which to file objections to 

the report and recommendation. No party has filed objections.

Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, 

noting the lack of objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS in its entirety Judge Martin’s Amended 

Report and Recommendation [DE 153] and incorporates the Amended Report and 

Recommendation into this Order. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss [DE 129], DISMISSES Counts III, IV, V, and VII, and DISMISSES Counts VIII and IX 

insofar as they assert claims for the personal liability of Anthony Copeland and Tia Cauley for the 

Fair Housing Act disparate impact claims, the claim for violation of Section 1982, and the claim 

for violation of due process.

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00402-JVB-JEM document 154 filed 11/04/21 page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on November 4, 2021.

s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00402-JVB-JEM document 154 filed 11/04/21 page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2153 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisic Aldehyde. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisic Aldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANISIC ALDEHYDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.34 Anisic Aldehyde (CAS No. 

123–11–5) (provided for in 

subheading 2912.49.10) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2153 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ