alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

Wegener Corporation 10-Q

|   | • |   | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |  /s/ C. Troy Woodbury, Jr. |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   | Name: | C. Troy Woodbury, Jr. |   |
|   |   |   |   | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|   |   |   |   | Date: | April 18, 2011 |   |
#### WEINSTEIN v. SINGER MFG. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Appeal from Trial Term.

Action by Sofi Weinstein against the Singer Manufacturing Company. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, it appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before PATTERSON, P. J., and INGRAHAM, CLARKE, SCOTT, and LAMBERT, JJ.

Henry A. Prince, for appellant.

Alfred S. Katzenstein, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

As we have reversed the judgment in this action and ordered a new trial (106 N. Y. Supp. 517), it is unnecessary to consider the questions presented on this appeal.

The order will be affirmed, without costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

LORRAINE CAPPELLO, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs )

v. ) Cause No. 3:16-CV-290 RLM-MGG

)

FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC., et al., ) 

)

Defendants )

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal [Doc. No. 208] and Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party bearing its

own attorneys’ fees and costs.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: October 19, 2020 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge 

United States District Court

USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00290-RLM-MGG document 209 filed 10/19/20 page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre Bernard DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10788.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided May 4, 2006.

Paul E. Gartner, Jr., Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Raymond J. Rodgers, Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendants Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andre Bernard Davis appeals the sentence of 12 months imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Davis’s sentence, which did not exceed the advisory range set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, was not imposed in violation of law and was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable under the facts of this case. *See United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 119-20 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. — , 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006).

We review Davis’s contention that the district court erred by failing to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for plain error. *See United States v. Gonzalez,*250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.2001). The district court stated on the record that a 12-month sentence was necessary for punishment and deterrence, and the sentence was not unlawful. Accordingly, there is no reversible plain error. *See id.*at 931.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EE EX_10.42-05 2014.12.31 10K


Exhibit 10.42-05




              




Emmanuel Villalobos
Forward Marketer, Long-Term Trading
El Paso Electric Company


May 13, 2013


Mr. Don Stoneberger
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services
333 North Central Avenue Suite 21.021
Phoenix, AZ   85004


Re:  Power Purchase and Sale Agreement between Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC and El
         Paso Electric Company


Dear Mr. Stoneberger,


Pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Power Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Agreement”) between Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC (“FMES”) (formerly, Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC) and El Paso Electric Company (“EPE”), FMES and EPE (collectively the “Parties”) hereby agree to maintain the quantity for energy to be purchased and sold under Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Agreement at 125 MW per hour through 11:59 p.m. Mountain Standard Time on December 31, 2014.  This is in accordance with our recent phone conversations, and subsequent acceptance of FMES’ offer for an additional 25 MW for the period of one year.  The parties further agree that the quantity of firm energy that may be dispatched by EPE pursuant to Section 3.6 of the Agreement is 125 MW per hour, less the quantity of energy sold and delivered by FMES pursuant to Section 3.1.  The amount of energy to be purchased and sold under the Agreement was set to revert to the original base contract amount of 100 MW per hour, on 11:59 p.m. Mountain Standard Time on December 31, 2013, based on an April 29, 2011 agreement between the Parties.


Please indicate FMES’ acknowledgment of the foregoing agreement by signing this letter in the place indicated below and returning the original or a copy thereof to my attention at your earliest convenience.


Sincerely,


/s/ Emmanuel Villalobos
                                        
Emmanuel Villalobos






El Paso Electric Company


/s/ David C. Hawkins                                      
VP, Power Marketing & Fuels and Resource Delivery Planning




Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC




/s/ Don Stoneberger____________________
President, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC
| FX      Luxury, LLC (formerly known as FX Luxury Realty, LLC)                                                                                                                                                                                                | Delaware |   |   | 100% | *  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------|--------|------|---------|
| RH1,      LLC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | Nevada   |   |   | 100% |    |
| Flag      Luxury Riv, LLC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | Delaware |   |   | 100% |    |
| FX      Luxury Las Vegas I, LLC(formerly known as Metroflag BP, LLC),      successor by merger to FX Luxury Las Vegas Parent, LLC (formerly known as      BP Parent, LLC) and FX Luxury Las Vegas II, LLC (formerly known as      Metroflag Cable, LLC) | Nevada   |   |   | 100% |    |
| FXL,      Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | Delaware |   |   | 100% |    |

| *  |   | Common      membership interests |
|---------|--------|----------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7396

OWAIIAN M. JONES,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 

CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA; THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT, Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division; 

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GOVERNOR OF 

VIRGINIA; MAYOR OF CITY OF ROANOKE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-7400

OWAIIAN M. JONES,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROANOKE CITY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES; STATE OF VIRGINIA; 

WILLIAM BROADHURST; CHARLES DORSEY; JOHN DOES; TIMOTHY 

ALLEN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-7401

OWAIIAN M. JONES,
2

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; ROANOKE CITY JAIL; ROANOKE 

CITY JAIL PHYSICIAN; JOHN DOES; TIMOTHY ALLEN; DR. ALI,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-7487

OWAIIAN M. JONES

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WALTER L. DAVIS, SR.; EDWARD L. JENKINS; DEPUTY LEE, 

Roanoke City Sheriff Office; JOHN DOES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:14-cv-00416-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00408-MFU-RSB; 

7:14-cv-00415-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00502-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Owaiian M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Owaiian M. Jones appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing his complaints for failure to comply with the court 

orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Jones v. The Supreme Court of Virginia, No.

7:14-cv-00416-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Roanoke 

City Circuit Court, No. 7:14-cv-00408-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 

2014); Jones v. Ronaoke City Sheriff’s Office, No. 

7:14-cv-00415-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Davis, 

No. 7:14-cv-00502-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Cobb *v.*The State

*Using Profane Language in the Presence of Females.*

(Decided Dec. 19, 1907.

45 South. 223.)

*Criminal Law; Affidavit.*— Where the affidavit charged defendant with using profane language in the presence of females it was proper to allow it to be amended by inserting the words “abusive, insulting or obscene” between the words, “profane” and “language,” it not being shown that it was not re-verified.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Weaver.

Sam Cobb was convicted of using profane and insulting language in the presence of females, and appeals.

Affirmed.

The defendant was charged with using profane langauge in the presence or hearing of females. This was the wording of the affidavit which was taken before a justice of the peace, and on which a warrant was issued returnable to the Jefferson criminal court. The warrant charged abusive, insulting, or obscene language in the presence or hearing of females. Demurrer was interposed to the affidavit, because it fails to charge any offense known to the law, which demurrer was overruled. No amendment is shown by the record; hut the judgment entry recites that on motion of the solicitor leave was granted to amend the affidavit so as to insert after the word “profane,” and before the word “language,” the words “abusive, insulting, or obscene.” The defendant was convicted, and fined $1 costs.

Andress & Chappell, for appellant.

No brief came to the Reporter.

*67Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

ANDERSON, J.

— The affidavit was made before a justice of the peace, and the warrant was returnable to the criminal court of Jefferson county, which said court had original jurisdiction. The judgment entry shows that the affidavit was amended so as to charge an offense, which amendment was authorized under the law, and for aught that appears the affidavit was reverified.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Tyson, O. J., and Dowdell and McClellan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Earl L Yager, as Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “registrant”), herebycertify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 14, 2006 /s/ Earl L. Yager   Earl L. Yager        Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0594

_________________ KIRK B. REISBECK,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Defendant and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Mike Menahan , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 21 2022

09/21/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0594
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 03-0691

IN RE  ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND RYNTHIA CLEMENTS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s unopposed supplemental motion for temporary relief, filed April 9, 2004, is granted.   The trial court’s order dated March 30, 2004, in Cause No. 352-185093-00, styled *Matthew T. Hinterlong v. Rynthia R. Clements, Et Al.*, in the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, and the court of appeals opinion and judgment in Cause No. 02-02-00016-CV, styled *In re  Matthew T. Hinterlong*, in the Second Court of Appeals**are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The motion for rehearing in the above petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this April 15, 2004.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01).
    Date: July 29, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kelly L. Hudspeth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5067, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90fbf5fcfce9bef8e5f4e3e0f5e4f8d0fef9f8bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acc7c9c0c0d582c4d9c8dfdcc9d8c4ecc2c5c482cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

     Dated: June 17, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-13222 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[No. 36946-6-I.

Division One.

October 20, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kevin C. Graham, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-07122-6, Steven G. Scott, J., entered June 19, 1995. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1927 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1927

      To reduce temporarily the duty on unit asy-battery hi volt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reduce temporarily the duty on unit asy-battery hi volt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIT ASY-BATTERY HI VOLT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.85.03      Nickel-metal        .077%        No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         hydride storage                                                    31/2008
                         batteries,
                         exceeding 300 V,
                         designed for use
                         in hybrid motor
                         vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8507.80.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13345]



[[Page 33358]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1546-1549 (Final)]


Thermal Paper From Germany, Japan, Korea, and Spain; Notice of 
Correction Concerning Scheduling of Record Closing and Final Comments

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Correction of notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Correction is made to the October 20, 2021 date of record 
closing, and the October 22, 2021 deadline for filing final comments, 
in the Written Submissions section of the notice which was published on 
June 9, 2021 (86 FR 30627). The correct deadline dates are as follows: 
The record closing is October 19, 2021; and deadline for final comments 
is October 21, 2021.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 14, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-13345 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P