alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil Drainage Research: Columbus, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About usSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbus, Ohio Soil Drainage Research Docs







Servicesheadline bar Click left side bar menu for a list of publications.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research People Pamela Rice







Contaminant Mitigation and Remediation Strategiesheadline bar Determine the effectiveness of application setbacks, vegetative filter strips, vegetative mulches and low-input turf to reduce off-site transport of plant protection products and contaminants with surface runoff  Toxicological significance of chemical residues and contaminants


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 23.1

(LONQUIST & CO. LLC LOGO)

May 26, 2011

Daybreak Oil
and Gas, Inc.
601 W. Main Ave.
Suite 1012
Spokane, WA 99201

Re: Securities and Exchange Commission Annual Report on Form 10-K;
Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineer

Dear Sirs:

We hereby consent to the use of the name Lonquist & Co. LLC, and to
references to Lonquist & Co. LLC an independent petroleum engineering
firm, and to the inclusion of information contained in our reports as of March
1, 2011, in your Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28,
2011 to be filed on or around May 26, 2011.

LONQUIST &
CO. LLC
Texas Firm Registration No. F-8952
May 26, 2011

|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/ RICHARD R. LONQUIST   | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|Richard R. Lonquist, P.E. | 
|President                 | 

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




I
      hereby
      certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      of
      TechnoConcepts, Inc. (formerly Technology Consulting Partners, Inc.) for the
      period ending September 30, 2006:





(1)
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of TechnoConcepts,
      Inc.







/s/
      Antonio E. Turgeon


Antonio
      E. Turgeon


Chief
      Executive Officer





May
      11,
      2007











/s/
      Michael Handelman


Michael
      Handelman


Chief
      Financial Officer





May
      11,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to TechnoConcepts, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      TechnoConcepts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-20

)

SHERRI L. MILLER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on October 30, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 4 of the four-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 30th day of October, 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2038 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2038

   To prevent the retroactive application of changes to Trans-Alaska 
             Pipeline Quality Bank valuation methodologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent the retroactive application of changes to Trans-Alaska 
             Pipeline Quality Bank valuation methodologies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Energy Regulatory Commission.
            (2) TAPS quality bank valuation methodologies.--The term 
        ``TAPS quality bank valuation methodologies'' means valuation 
        methodologies applied for the purpose of establishing monetary 
        adjustments paid by or to shippers of oil on the Trans-Alaska 
        Pipeline (as authorized by the Trans-Alaska Pipeline 
        Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.) through the 
        operation of a quality bank to compensate for differentials in 
        the value of shippers' oil commingled in the pipeline.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION REVIEW OF TRANS-ALASKA 
              PIPELINE CARRIER TARIFFS.

    Pursuant to the ratemaking authority of the Commission under 
section 60501 of title 49, United States Code, in carrying out a review 
of Trans-Alaska Pipeline carrier tariffs, the Commission shall not 
approve any retroactive application of TAPS quality bank valuation 
methodologies.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act applies to orders of the Commission issued after December 
31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 40646-9-I.

Division One.

October 13, 1997.]

#### Clifford Davidow, et al., *Appellants,*v. Western Soap Co., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 95-2-04138-2, Tari S. Eitzen, J., entered August 9, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**Exhibit - 10.19**

##### ** **

##### ** **

**MontpelierRe Holdings Ltd.2007 Annual Bonus Plan**

 

**Purpose**

 

The purpose of this Planis to increase the intrinsic business value of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. andits operating subsidiaries (the “Company”) by aligning employee performancewith the interests of the Company’s owners. All full-time employees of theCompany shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.

 

**PerformanceTargets**

 

The Plan shall be tied toa calendar year performance cycle consistent with the Company’s fiscal year.Annual bonus pool targets for categories of employees and an overall Companyperformance target under the Plan shall be set by the Company’s Compensationand Nominating Committee (the “Committee”). At the conclusion of the calendaryear, the Committee shall judge Company performance against the bonus pooltargets when determining the final size of the bonus pools and the level ofpayout for each employee. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, inconsultation with the Committee, shall then recommend the distribution of thepool to individual Plan participants who are non-executive officers of theCompany. The Committee shall approve any payments to the Company’s executiveofficers.

 

**BonusPool Targets**

 

For the 2007 calendaryear, the annual bonus pool targets for the Company’s officers and allremaining Company staff shall be the following percentages of eligiblesalaries:

 

| Performance |   | Group A |   | Group B |   | Group C |
|-------------|--------|---------|--------|---------|--------|---------|
| Minimum     |   | 50%     |   | 37.5%   |   | 12.5%   |
| On Target   |   | 100%    |   | 75%     |   | 25%     |
| Superior    |   | 200%    |   | 150%    |   | 50%     |

 

Eligible salaries for allofficers and staff shall be equivalent to the 2007 base salaries of Planparticipants, pro-rated in the case of any officer or staff member employed bythe Company for less than the entire 2007 calendar year.

 

----
#### Clarence Jay LYNCH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-7815.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2006.

Decided April 27, 2006.

Clarence Jay Lynch, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Jay Lynch seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).* An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certifi*226cate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lynch has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Although the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after the district court’s decision, the appeal is deemed timely because there was no separate document reflecting the entry of judgment, as required by Fed. R.Civ.P. 58. *See Hughes v. Halifax County Sch. Bd.,*823 F.2d 832, 835 (4th Cir.1987)
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief  Executive
Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/    Scott A. Haire
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
(Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
---

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Solanex Management Inc.,
  a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal
  year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  (the Report), I, Colin V. Hall, Acting Chief Executive Officer of
  the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and

(2) The information contained in
  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/ Colin V. Hall             
|------ | ------------------------------
|       |                               
|Name:  | Colin V. Hall                 
|       |                               
|Title: | Acting Chief Executive Officer
|       |                               
|Date:  | August 8, 2008                

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Solanex Management Inc. and will be retained by Solanex
  Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.]

---
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Luis A. Rivera,certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of J.L. HalseyCorporation;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    (Notapplicable)

 

c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

Dated:  October 29,2007

 

 
|   | /s/ Luis A. Rivera                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Luis A. Rivera, President and Chief Executive  Officer, |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 11                          Page 17

                       BIOGEN, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

                     Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                (unaudited)
                 (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                    Three months ended  
                                                         March 31,      
                                                    1997          1996  

Primary earnings per share

Weighted average number of 
  shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 73,268      $ 71,200

Shares deemed outstanding from
  the assumed exercise of stock
  options and warrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . .    3,575            --
                                                  --------      --------
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   76,843        71,200
                                                  ========      ========

Net income(loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 17,010      $ (3,658)
                                                  ========      ========
Primary earnings per
  share of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   0.22      $  (0.05)
                                                  ========      ========

Fully diluted earnings per share (a)

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 73,268      $ 71,200

Shares deemed outstanding from
  the assumed exercise of stock
  options and warrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . .    3,575            --
                                                  --------      --------
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   76,843        71,200
                                                  ========      ========

Net income(loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 17,010      $ (3,658)
                                                  ========      ========

Fully diluted earnings
  per share of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . $   0.22      $  (0.05)
                                                  ========      ========


(a)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item   
     601 (b) (11) although not required by Footnote 2 to Paragraph 14 of    
     APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.