alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research: Wenatchee, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




***Apple Bloom***
 ***Apple Flowers***
 ***Apple Orchard***
 ***Apple Trees***


Mission


People Anderson, Delaney Borden, Benjamin De Angelis, Daniel Gabel, Sarah Haase, Alexander Hargarten, Heidi Heuchert, Ashley Honaas, Loren Jeffries, Amanda Klarer, Emmi Leisso, Rachel McMurtrey, Shawn Ortiz-Uriarte, Bianca Rainbow, Jordan Rudell, David Somera, Tracey Sycalik, Jennifer Turner, Janet Valdez, Natalie Waite, Jessica Zhu, Yanmin


Pacific West Area   david.rudell@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2008159EN.01000201.xml

| 24.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5080 — Oracle/BEA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 159/02)

On 29 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5080. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5080. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### Frederick Waldron et al., Respondents, v La Guardia Medical Group et al., Defendants, and Y. Hahn et al., Appellants.

— In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, defendants Y. Hahn and John Ohnysty appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Young, J.), dated October 4, 1983, as, (1) upon purportedly denying that branch of their motion which sought renewal of plaintiffs’ prior motion for leave to enter a default judgment but, in effect, granting that branch of their motion which sought renewal, adhered to its original determination dated June 24, 1983 granting plaintiffs’ motion, and (2) denied that branch of appellants’ motion which sought vacatur of their default.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and, upon renewal, order dated June 24,1983 vacated, plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment denied, and that branch of appellants’ motion which sought vacatur of their default granted, on condition that each appellant pays plaintiffs $2,000 within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. In the event either appellant fails to comply with this condition, then order affirmed as to that appellant, with costs.

Despite its ostensible denial of appellants’ motion to “renew and/or reargue”, the subsequent language of its order indicates *793that Special Term did in fact consider appellants’ and their counsel’s newly submitted affidavits dated July 26, 1983. Thus, Special Term must be deemed to have exercised its discretion to grant renewal *(Esa v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*89 AD2d 865).

Upon renewal, Special Term adhered to its original determination refusing to vacate the default judgment. Under the totality of the circumstances here presented, the interest of justice is better served by vacating this inadvertent default and allowing appellants their day in court. The condition imposed should redress plaintiffs for any inconvenience suffered. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32
          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
          ------------------------------------------------------------


In connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Farmers Capital Bank
Corporation  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the undersigned  hereby  certifies in his capacity as officer of Farmers Capital
Bank Corporation,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.

    Date:  August 8, 2005          /s/ G. Anthony Busseni
          -----------------------  -----------------------------------------
                                   G. Anthony Busseni
                                   President and CEO


    Date:  8-8-05                  /s/ Doug Carpenter
          -----------------------  -----------------------------------------
                                   C. Douglas Carpenter
                                   Vice President, Secretary, and CFO




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Farmers  Capital  Bank  Corporation  and will be retained by Farmers
Capital Bank Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Nancy K. Buese, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: February 29, 2008 |  | By: | /s/NANCY K. BUESENancy K. Buese
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|----------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-cr-16-TLS-SLC

)

ARTHUR L. COOPER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

October 16, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the three-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 16th day of October 2015.

s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report ofWestwood Holdings Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian O. Casey, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: February 25, 2010 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2008265EN.01000401.xml

| 18.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5325 — Alliance Boots/Megapharm)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 265/05)

On 10 October 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5325. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5325. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties V Limited Partnership (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C SECTION
1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
    In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PRINCIPLE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL,
INC. (the “Company”) for the period ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles
Payne, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   a)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   b)  The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
the financial condition and results of operations of all the
Company.
   Dated: August 20,
2009                                             
/s/   Charles Payne
 By:   Charles Payne, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2096 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain high tenacity rayon 

filament yarn. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Mr. LINDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain high 

tenacity rayon filament yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN EXISTING DUTY SUS4 PENSIONS. 

5 (a) EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSIONS.—Each of the fol6 lowing headings are amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’: 

8 (1) Heading 9902.03.06, relating to high tenac9 ity multiple (folded) or cabled yarn of viscose rayon. 
2 

•HR 2096 IH 

1 (2) Heading 9902.05.07, relating to high tenac2 ity single yarn of viscose rayon with a decitex equal 

3 to or greater than 1,000. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

6 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

7 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Order filed May 27, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00273-CV

____________

KATRINA RIDGE, Appellant

V.

AMANDA RIDGE, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 358,034

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed May 25, 2021. Our review has determined that a 

relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). 

The record does not contain: (1) Appellant's Notice of Appeal filed May 13, 2021;

nor (2) Appellant’s Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an 

Appeal Bond filed on May 13, 2021.
The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before June 7, 2021 containing: (1) Appellant's Notice of Appeal filed May 13, 

2021; and Appellant’s Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or 

an Appeal Bond filed on May 13, 2021.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1806

To require prisons and other correctional facilities holding Federal prisoners 

under a contract with the Federal Government to make the same information available to the public that Federal prisons and correctional 

facilities are required to do by law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005

Mr. STRICKLAND (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. HOLDEN, and Mr. 

KENNEDY of Rhode Island) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To require prisons and other correctional facilities holding 

Federal prisoners under a contract with the Federal Government to make the same information available to the 

public that Federal prisons and correctional facilities are 

required to do by law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Private Prison Infor5 mation Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 1806 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUIREMENT FOR 

2 CONTRACT PRISONS. 

3 Each non-governmental entity contracting with the 

4 Federal Government to provide a prison or other correc5 tional facility, shall have the same duty to release informa6 tion about the operation of that prison or facility as a Gov7 ernment owned and run prison or correctional facility has 

8 under section 552 of title 5, United States Code, com9 monly called the Freedom of Information Act. Any party 

10 aggrieved by a violation of that duty may, in a civil action, 

11 obtain appropriate relief against that entity or any other 

12 proper party.

Æ
#### KELLEY, Appellant, v. HOEY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 3, 1899.)

Action by Sarah Curran Kelley against M. J. Hoey and Charles Reese, individually, and as executors and trustees of, and under, the will of John McGrath.

No opinion. If any alteration of the order is desired in regard to the question of costs, notice of the application for such change should be given. See 55 N. Y. Supp. 94.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Vincent N. Tozzi, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Corporation as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations of the Corporation for the periods presented.  Date: August 8, 2012

          

          /s/ Vincent N. TozziVincent N. Tozzi Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer