alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (Section  1350 of
Chapter  63 of Title 18 of the  United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned
officers of Commerce  Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date: August 9, 2004                                 /s/    Vernon W. Hill, II
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Vernon W. Hill, II
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2004                                 /s/   Douglas J. Pauls
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Douglas J. Pauls
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and is not  being  filed  as part of the  Report  or as a
separate disclosure document.


                                       29


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                          ( print page 33330)    

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; GUDMAP Applications.                    

*Date:*                         July 22, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7015, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-4721,                         *ryan.morris@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 15, 2021. 

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-13330 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### GRIMM, Respondent, v. GRIMM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 15, 1898.)

Action by Amelia Grimm against Paul Grimm.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 4.22


 


English Language Summary


 


Authorization Agreement for radiofrequency blocks associated with the National Mobile Service – Termo de Outorga de Uso de Blocos de Radiofrequências associadas do Serviço Móvel Pessoal - SMP No 138/2014


 



	
Parties:

	
Telefônica Brasil S.A., as authorizee, and Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), as grantor.


	 	 
	
Date:

	
December 2, 2014


	 	 
	
Term:

	
15 years


	 	 
	
Purpose:

	
Authorization to provide service in radiofrequency blocks associated with the national mobile service, under the private regime.


	 	 
	
Area:

	
States of Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraíba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará and Piauí.


	 	 
	
Amount:

	
The amount owed under the grant is R$1,719,838,447.08.


	 	 
	
Penalty:

	
Breach of the Authorization Agreement and applicable regulations to Multimedia Communication Services may result in administrative proceedings by ANATEL, the application of warning sanctions, fines, temporary suspension or revocation of licenses.
Alex HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. Greg LEWIS, Warden.

No. 12-9547.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
## T aherzadeh, PLLC

Attorneys & Counselors

5001 Spring Valley Road.

Suite 1020 West

Dallas, TX 75244

P: (469) 729

- 6800 F: (469) 828

- 2772

July 7, 2015

Dear Clerk,

Please be advised that our office has changed its address and phone number to the

followin g:

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 1020 West

Dallas, TX 75244

P: (469) 729

- 6800

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

Yours truly,

/s/ Lauren Langford

Lauren Langford *

Legal Assistant to Selim Taherzade h

*Not licensed to practice law ACCEPTED

04-15-00306-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/7/2015 12:06:15 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

GLOBAL ARCHERY PRODUCTS, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00019-JVB-SLC

)

ASHLEIGH RENEE FIRGAIRA, )

ARCHERY SPORTS, and ARCHERY )

ATTACK )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FRCP

12(b)(2) AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FRCP 12(b)(6)

COME NOW Defendants, Ashleigh Renee Firgaira, Archery Sports, and Archery 

Attack, and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), move to dismiss with 

prejudice Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for the reason that the Court lacks 

jurisdiction over the persons of the Defendants. In the alternative, should the Court 

determine it does have personal jurisdiction over the Defendants, the Defendants move to 

dismiss with prejudice the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for the reason that the Second Amended Complaint fails 

to state a claim against the Defendants upon which relief can be granted. 

In further support of the Defendants’ Motion, and in compliance with N.D. Ind. L.R. 

7-1(b)(1), the Defendants submit their brief in support.

WHEREFORE, Defendants, Ashleigh Renee Firgaira, Archery Sports, and Archery 

Attack, pray this Court will dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint with 

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00019-JVB-SLC document 24 filed 06/06/16 page 1 of 2
2

prejudice as brought against Defendants over which this Court has no jurisdiction or, 

alternatively, as failing to state a claim for which relief can be granted, and pray the Court 

will grant them all other just and proper relief. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BARRETT MCNAGNY LLP

By /s/ Jeremy N. Gayed

Jeremy N. Gayed, #27551-35

215 East Berry Street

Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802

Tel: (260) 423-9551

Fax: (260) 423-8920

Email: jng@barrettlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants Ashleigh

Renee Firgaira, Archery Sports, 

and Archery Attack

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 6th of June, 2016, the foregoing document was filed 

electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system. Notice and a copy of this filing will 

be sent to all counsel of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system.

 /s/ Jeremy N. Gayed

Jeremy N. Gayed

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00019-JVB-SLC document 24 filed 06/06/16 page 2 of 2
**Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc.**

**Board of Directors’ Compensation Policy**

 

Each director who is not an employee or officer of the Company (“non-employee director”) receives  an annual cash retainer of $9,000.  Each non-employee director also receives $500 per Board meeting attended and $500 per committee meeting attended.  Additionally, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $1,500 and all other committee chairmen receive an additional $750 annual retainer.  Director fees are paid in cash on a quarterly basis.  Additionally, directors are reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses.

 

In addition to cash fees, non-employee directors receive automatic awards of 150,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the “restricted shares”) upon election to the Board.  Additionally each non-employee director will receive 5,000 restricted shares annually, granted in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and pursuant to the 2009 Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “2009 Plan”).  Shares granted to non-employee directors, under the 2009 Plan, are restricted and fully vest equally over a period of three years, at a rate of 33 1/3% each year, or immediately upon termination by reason of death, disability or retirement from the Board.  The Board has discretion to remove any restrictions on restricted shares in the case of any other circumstance deemed appropriate by the Board.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2208 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2208

     To amend the Exchange Rates and International Economic Policy 
Coordination Act of 1988 to clarify the definition of manipulation with 
              respect to currency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2005

 Mr. Manzullo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on 
  Financial Services and International Relations, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Exchange Rates and International Economic Policy 
Coordination Act of 1988 to clarify the definition of manipulation with 
              respect to currency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Currency Practices Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL POLICY.

    (a) Bilateral Negotiations.--Section 3004(b) of the Exchange Rates 
and International Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988 (22 U.S.C. 
5304(b)) is amended in the second sentence by striking ``and (2)'' and 
inserting ``or (2)''.
    (b) Definition of Manipulation.--Section 3006 of the Exchange Rates 
and International Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988 (22 U.S.C. 
5306) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Manipulation of rate of exchange.--For purposes of 
        this Act, a country shall be considered to be manipulating the 
        rate of exchange between its currency and the United States 
        dollar if there is a protracted large-scale intervention in one 
        direction in the exchange markets. The Secretary may find that 
        a country is manipulating the rate of exchange based on any 
        other factor or combination of factors.''.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall undertake an examination, 
and submit a report to Congress, regarding the trade surplus of the 
People's Republic of China. The Secretary shall examine why the trade 
surplus with the United States and other countries reported by the 
People's Republic of China differs from the trade surplus reported by 
the other countries. The report shall also quantify the differences 
between the trade surplus reported by the United States and other 
countries and what is reported by the People's Republic of China.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008237EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5170 — E.ON/Endesa Europa/Viesgo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 237/01)

On 19 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5170. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5170. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

 SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

BRIAN VARNADO, ) 

) 

Petitioner, ) 

) 

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-454 

) 

SUPERINTENDENT, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the amended Petition under 

28 U.S.C. Paragraph 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brian 

Varnado, a pro se prisoner, on October 14, 2015. For the reasons 

set forth below, the Court DENIES the petition pursuant to Section 

2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4 and DIRECTS the clerk to close this case. 

DISCUSSION 

 Varnado is challenging WCC 15-06-511, a prison disciplinary 

proceeding held at the Westville Correctional Facility where the 

Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) found him guilty of Threatening 

in violation of B-213 and sanctioned him with the loss of 30 days 

earned credit time on July 1, 2015. Varnado lists three grounds in 

his petition, but they are all merely different ways of presenting 

one argument. Varnado states that he was not restrained. He states 

that he was not handcuffed. He states that he was not sent to 
segregation. He argues that he was not aggressive. He argues that 

if he had been aggressive, prison policy requires that he be 

restrained in handcuffs and sent to segregation. He argues that 

because he was not, this proves that he is not guilty. 

 However, he was not found guilty of being aggressive. He was 

found guilty of threatening. The conduct report states that he 

told the reporting officer: “Fuck you, I’ll beat your fucking bitch 

ass!” DE 7 at 4. 

[T]he findings of a prison disciplinary board [need 

only] have the support of some evidence in the record. 

This is a lenient standard, requiring no more than a 

modicum of evidence. Even meager proof will suffice, so 

long as the record is not so devoid of evidence that the 

findings of the disciplinary board were without support 

or otherwise arbitrary. Although some evidence is not 

much, it still must point to the accused’s guilt. It is 

not our province to assess the comparative weight of the 

evidence underlying the disciplinary board’s decision. 

Webb v. Anderson, 224 F.3d 649, 652 (7th Cir. 2000) (quotation 

marks, citations, parenthesis, and ellipsis omitted). Even a 

Conduct Report alone can be sufficient evidence to support a 

finding of guilt. McPherson v. McBride, 188 F.3d 784, 786 (7th 

Cir. 1999). Such is the case here. There was nothing arbitrary 

about the DHO concluding that the words, “Fuck you, I’ll beat your 

fucking bitch ass!” were a threat. This was more than sufficient 

evidence to have found him guilty. 
CONCLUSION 

 For the reasons set forth above, the Court DENIES the petition 

pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4 and DIRECTS the clerk 

to close this case. 

DATED: April 18, 2016 

 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge 

United State District Court
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                               EXHIBIT 27.1


                     Financial Data Schedule
                 For Period Ended March 31, 1997
                                
        GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           (Unaudited)
               (In millions, except per share data)

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      125*
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0*
<INVENTORY>                                        630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   964
<PP&E>                                             124**
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0**
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              797
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (149)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,238
<SALES>                                            376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   379
<CGS>                                              305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     42
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 40
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        40
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        


Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the
Statement of Financial Position or Results of Operations are
reported as 0 herein.

*   Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of
allowances for doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet.

**  Property, plant and equipment are reported net of accumulated
depreciation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2094 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2094

          To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2005

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIONYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.22       Thionyl chloride   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 7719-09-                                                  31/2008
                         7) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2812.10.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```