alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Marquesha Williams v. 16303 Imperial LLC

Appellate case number: 01-19-00914-CV

Trial court case number: 1143136

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

On December 10, 2019, appellant, Marquesha Williams , filed an emergency motion to

stay pending appeal of eviction. The Court grants the stay of the eviction. 

The Court requests that the appellee, 16303 Imperial LLC, respond to the emergency 

motion by no later than ten days from the date of this order. It is therefore ordered that the 

response of the appellee, if any, shall be due by Friday, December 20, 2019.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Richard Hightower_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _December 10, 2019___
# C_2008141EN.01001101.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5050 — Eaton/Moeller)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 141/04)

On 1 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5050. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5050. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |   11-3-10 |   |  /s/ Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr. |
|--------|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                |   | Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.           |
|   |                |   | President and CEO               |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                          5
       
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  3,323,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   64,000
<INVENTORY>                                                    10,485,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               16,370,000
<PP&E>                                                         27,886,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 58,230,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          7,037,000
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     29,850,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   58,230,000
<SALES>                                                        20,079,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               20,079,000
<CGS>                                                          16,141,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  17,842,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             423,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,189,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   249,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            940,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   940,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .19
        


</TABLE>
EX-10.19(A)



 Exhibit 10.19(A) 

SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 

In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing Change in Control Employment Agreements by and
between P. H. Glatfelter Company and the following employees as exhibits to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 because they are substantially identical to the Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H.
Glatfelter Company and certain employees, which is filed as Exhibit 10(Q) to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. 
  

	
	Christopher Astley
	Brian E. Janki
	Kent K. Matsumoto
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1934 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1934

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate 
                              copolymers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

  Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. LoBiondo) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate 
                              copolymers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN VINYL CHLORIDE-VINYL ACETATE COPOLYMERS.

    (a) In General.-- Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.02      Vinyl chloride-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         vinyl acetate                                                      31/2009
                         copolymers (CAS
                         No. 9003-22-9)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3904.30.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00021-TLS-SLC

)

SIE MERRIMAN )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan

Collins, on August 30, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the seven-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 30th day of August 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Leonard Storch, on Behalf of Jennifer Storch, an Infant, Appellant, v Monica Storch, Also Known as Monica Furlong, Respondent.

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Greenfield, J.), entered April 24, 1984, awarding respondent arrears of child support of $38,000 “together with interest from the date such payments were originally due and owing” and the further sum of $7,000 as counsel fees, modified, on the law and the facts, to reduce by $6,100 the principal of $38,000 found due and owing, and the order and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Judgment of the same court and Justice, entered May 15, 1984, granting to respondent the sum of $38,000, plus interest accrued of $12,345, modified, on the law and the facts, to reduce by $6,100 the principal sum of $38,000 found due, and to credit against the accrued interest of $12,345 interest on $3,500 from October 1,1976 to the date of the entry of judgment and interest on $2,600 from July 1,1977 to the date of the entry of judgment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ostrau, J.), entered September 20,1984, granting respondent’s motion to direct that petitioner be removed and respondent substituted as custodian of bank accounts maintained on behalf of the daughter of the parties and granting respondent judgment for $7,000 for unpaid counsel fees and directing petitioner to pay respondent $350 for motion counsel fees, affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The respondent’s counsel conceded on the argument of the appeal that there should be credited against the arrears of child support the sum of $6,100, representing two payments by the petitioner into a bank account maintained for the child, $3,500 in October 1976 and $2,600 in July 1977. We have examined the other points raised on appeal and find them without merit. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Fein and Lynch, JJ.
# C_2008207EN.01000201.xml

| 14.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4963 — Rexel/Hagemeyer)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 207/02)

On 22 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4963. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4963. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1941 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1941

  To reduce temporarily the duty on triethylene glycol bis[3-(3-tert-
              butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionate].

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on triethylene glycol bis[3-(3-tert-
              butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionate].

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL BIS[3-(3-TERT-BUTYL-4-HYDROXY-5-
              METHYLPHENYL)PROPIONATE].

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.88 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``4.1%''; and
            (2) in the effective period column, by striking ``12/31/
        2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1760

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. ‘‘Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office Build- Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin, as the al Service located at 215 Martin Luther King,

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1760

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in

Madison, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Robert M. La Follette, Sr.

Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1760 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madi4 son, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2005.

Attest:

Clerks.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11451]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that one object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Of Gods and Glamour” at the Art Institute of Chicago, in Chicago, Illinois, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-13355 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### EX PARTE LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. R. CO.

*Prohibition.*

(Decided May *8,*1907.)

Original Writ in the Supreme Court.

Gregory L. Smith, John P. Tillman, and George W. Jones, for petitioner.

Phares Coleman, and S. H. Dent, Jr., contra. '

Per Curiam.

Writ awarded.