alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.80


 


January 5,
2004


 


Jack Toolan


c/o Russ Berrie and Company,
Inc.


111 Bauer Drive


Oakland, New Jersey  07436


 


Dear Jack:


 


As you know,
the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the exploration of a
possible sale of or other major corporate transaction involving the Company,
although no decision to effect such a transaction has been made and there can
be no assurance that it will occur or as to the timing thereof.


 


The Board of
Directors believes that your continued service as an executive and effective
participation in the exploration of a possible sale is important to the
Company.  Accordingly, the Board of
Directors has determined that if the Company consummates a Change in Control,
as defined in the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan, on or before
April 30, 2004, and you remain employed by the Company through the consummation
of that Change in Control, you will be awarded a special bonus of
$250,000.  (If for any reason you are
not employed by the Company when the Change in Control is consummated, you will
not be entitled to any payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus
contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation to which you may be
entitled from the Company.  Nothing in
this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with the Company or
creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you as an
employee.  This letter supercedes the
letter to you, dated July 2, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto, which
letter shall be of no further force or effect.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly
  yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ ANGELICA
  BERRIE

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica
  Berrie

  
	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Groups
                        Corn & Soybean Virus Lab
                                    Soft Wheat Quality LabSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Corn, Soybean and Wheat Quality Research Docs







Business (1)headline bar Partners Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center/ The Ohio State UniversityPioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Collaborators Saskia Hogenhout- Department of Disease and Stress Biology, John Innes CentreRich Pratt- Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State UniversityAnne Dorrance- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State UniversityKay Scheets- Department of Botany, Oklahoma State UniversityDr. Ron Hammond- Department of Entomology, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Andy Michel- Department of Entomology, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Steve St. Martin- Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Roger Boerma- Department of Crop and Soils Sciences/Plant Breeding and Genomics, University of GeorgiaDr. Grover Shannon- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri-Delta CenterDr. Tommy Carter Jr.- Res. Geneticist, ARS,Raleigh,NCDr. Randall L. Nelson, RL, ARS Urbana, ILDr. Prakash Arelli- Supervisory Research Geneticist, ARS, Jackson, TN


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2205

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the veterans’ preference 

provisions of such title to individuals who served on active duty in 

the armed forces for a period of more than 180 consecutive days any 

part of which occurred after September 11, 2001, and before January 

1, 2006, and separated from the armed forces under honorable conditions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005

Mr. TIBERI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform 

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the veterans’ 

preference provisions of such title to individuals who 

served on active duty in the armed forces for a period 

of more than 180 consecutive days any part of which 

occurred after September 11, 2001, and before January 

1, 2006, and separated from the armed forces under 

honorable conditions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2205 IH 

1 SECTION 1. VETERANS’ PREFERENCE. 

2 Section 2108(1) of title 5, United States Code, is 

3 amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (C), by adding ‘‘or’’ after 

7 the semicolon; and 

8 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(D) served on active duty as defined by 

11 section 101(21) of title 38 at any time in the 

12 armed forces for a period of more than 180 

13 consecutive days any part of which occurred 

14 after September 11, 2001, and before January 

15 1, 2006;’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0166

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KYLE ALEXANDER HAMM,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 5, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 30 2021

03/30/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0166
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1823

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the provisions 
  governing nonimmigrant status for spouses and children of permanent 
resident aliens awaiting the availability of an immigrant visa, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

 Mr. Andrews (for himself and Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the provisions 
  governing nonimmigrant status for spouses and children of permanent 
resident aliens awaiting the availability of an immigrant visa, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONIMMIGRANT STATUS FOR SPOUSES AND CHILDREN OF PERMANENT 
              RESIDENTS AWAITING THE AVAILABILITY OF AN IMMIGRANT VISA.

    Section 101(a)(15)(V) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(V)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the date of the enactment of the Legal 
        Immigration Family Equity Act,'' and inserting ``January 1, 
        2011,''; and
            (2) by striking ``3 years'' each place such term appears 
        and inserting ``6 months''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Wallace, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole et al., Respondents.

In a habeas corpus proceeding petitioner *941appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated March 29,1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In the instant proceeding, petitioner sought release from incarceration on a parole violation warrant on the ground that the Parole Board lacked jurisdiction to prosecute him for a violation based on criminal charges pending in the courts. However, the Division of Parole has the authority to revoke parole if a preponderance of the evidence presented at a hearing shows that a violation of parole conditions has occurred, regardless of the pendency of criminal charges based on the same evidence (Executive Law § 259-i; *People ex rel. Maggio v Casscles,*28 NY2d 415). Further, petitioner’s double jeopardy claim is without merit *(People ex rel. Miller v Harris,*74 AD2d 885).

Petitioner’s claim that the hearing evidence was legally insufficient to sustain the violation is not properly before this court for review since the parole revocation hearing occurred subsequent to the filing of the notice of appeal herein *(Matter of Eagle v Paterson,*57 NY2d 831). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Bioprotection Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR HomepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Crop Bioprotection Research People







Madeleine R Adolf    Biological Science Technician (Plants) /ARSUserFiles/55536/Maddy/20181012_162234.jpg
 **CONTACT** Phone: (309) 681-6585 Fax: (309) 681-6672 Room: 3103  USDA ARS NCAUR 1815 N University Peoria, IL 61604
 **EDUCATION** BA, Biology, St. John Fisher College, 2016
 
 
 **LAB MEMBERS:** Currently working under Dr. Jeannie Klein-Gordon


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### George M. Katzman et al., Respondents, v Eugene A. Derouin et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: On appeal from a denial of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff, Annette Katzman, did not suffer a “serious injury” under Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (formerly § 671 [4]), defendants concede that there is a triable issue as to whether the injuries to plaintiff’s left thumb, hand and wrist meet the threshold *(see, Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230). They argue, however, that partial summary judgment should have been granted limiting the proof to the foregoing injuries to the exclusion of other injuries (neck, back and urinary tract) incurred in the same accident which would not, if taken alone, pass the threshold. We disagree. There is nothing in the statute, in the policies underlying its enactment, or in the case law giving support to defendant’s position. Article 51 of the Insurance Law is in derogation of the right to sue for injuries at common law *(see, Montgomery v Daniels,*38 NY2d 41, 58) and must be *1087strictly construed *(see, Maxwell v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*92 AD2d 1049, 1050; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 301). Had the Legislature intended to permit trial of only those injuries which, standing alone, can meet the threshold, it would have included language to that effect in the statute. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Lawton, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.
#### BEEMAN V. THE STATE.

*Murder.*

(Decided June 5, 1907.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. W. H. Ti-iomas.

F. W. Jackson, for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion by

Anderson, J.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., Dowdell and Simpson, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Closing and Filing Deadlines

    Take notice that on Friday, June 18, 2021, the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission will be closed in observance of Juneteenth 
National Independence Day.
    On June 17, 2021, the President of the United States signed into 
law the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act, establishing June 19 
as a federal holiday. Because June 19, 2021, falls on a Saturday, the 
holiday will be observed this year on June 18, 2021.
    In accordance with section 385.2007 of the Commission's rules, 18 
CFR 385.2007 (2020), all filings and documents due to be filed on 
Friday, June 18, 2021, will be accepted as timely on the next official 
business day.

    Dated: June 17, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-13297 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-147-CR

KENNETH GRAY	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Kenneth Gray appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated sexual assault of a child.2  We affirm.  

	Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California3 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.  We gave appellant the opportunity to file a pro se brief, and he has not filed one.  The State also has not filed a brief.

	Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record.4  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.5 

	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief.  We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.6  Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment. 

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH	

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 19, 2009
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD G. ENGLISH, ) a/k/a RICHARD GOLEN ENGLISH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-760 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 18, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Nash, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13305]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of a Change in Status of the Extended Benefit (EB) Program 
for New Mexico

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor's (DOL) Employment and Training 
Administration (ETA) published in the Federal Register on April 27, 
2021, concerning New Mexico's EB change. On March 17, 2021, New Mexico 
Senate Bill 52 was enacted authorizing the use of the optional TUR 
trigger to determine New Mexico's EB status, and based on data released 
on March 15, 2021 by BLS, the seasonally-adjusted 3-month average total 
unemployment rate (TUR) for New Mexico rose above the 8.0 percent 
threshold necessary to trigger ``on'' to a High Unemployment Period for 
EB. However, in New Mexico, with the exception of general appropriation 
legislation, laws go into effect 90 days after date of enactment. This 
delay was not originally considered, and the original Federal Register 
Notice published on April 27, 2021 (86 FR 22268) contained an incorrect 
status change for New Mexico. Therefore, DOL is issuing this 
correction.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment 
and Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance Room S-
4524, Attn: Thomas Stengle, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20210, telephone number (202) 693-2991 (this is not a toll-free number) 
or by email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    The New Mexico State Constiution stipulates that unless otherwise 
specified, legislation becomes effective 90 days after date of 
enactment. As such, New Mexico Senate Bill 52 authorizing the use of 
the optional TUR trigger to determine New Mexico's EB status does not 
become effective until June 18, 2021. Therefore, New Mexico's EB status 
preceding June 18, 2021 should not have considered the optional TUR 
trigger and New Mexico's EB status is corrected to reflect that due to 
the insured unemployment rate in the state droping below 5.0 percent 
for the week ending March 13, 2021, New Mexico triggered ``off'' EB 
effective April 3, 2021.

    Signed in Washington, DC.
Suzan G. LeVine,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, 
Labor.
[FR Doc. 2021-13305 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
```
ACCEPTED 01-15-00987-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/14/2015 6:30:05 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-525 and 731-TA-1260-1261 (Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on certain welded line pipe from Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on certain welded line pipe from Korea and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on November 2, 2020 (85 FR 69354) and determined on February 5, 2021 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 24889, May 10, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on June 14, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5202 (June 2021), entitled                     *Certain Welded Line Pipe from Korea and Turkey, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-525 and 731-TA-1260-1261 (Review).*

By order of the Commission.
      ( print page 33357)    
Issued: June 14, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-13346 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P