U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems Sustainable Agricultural Systems Research Docs





- Sarah Beebout, co-Lead
- Dave Knaebel, co-Lead
- Expanding Public Access to Agricultural Information
- Workshops
- Strategic Vision
- Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network
- Action Plan
- Organic Agriculture Production Research
- Annual Reports
- Accomplishment Reports
- Assessment Reports
- List of Projects in this Program
- List of Project Annual Reports in this program

Organic Agriculture Production Researchheadline bar    ARS Support of Organic Agriculture For projects to participate in the ARS Organic Agriculture Portfolio, they are required to have specific organic research objectives in their project plans that are coded for budget tracking. In FY2007, ARS invested $15,446,600 in research that directly addresses organic agriculture challenges, of which $8,244,400 is conducted under organic production conditions. ARS funding supporting organic research is up from $8.1-million in 2002. Most of the increase has been the result of redirection to research with organic objectives. The ARS National Program Leader for Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability (NP-216) coordinates ARS Organic Agriculture Portfolio, provides contacts for ARS researcher with regional and national organic organizations, and contact with other Department agencies. ARS organic research cuts across different CRIS projects, management units, and other National Programs. Research planning and accountability are achieved through shared research objectives that are documented via existing Agency administrative research planning, peer review, and implementation instruments. Past growth in ARS Organic Agriculture research has primarily come from existing research projects taking on specific organic objectives as a part of their existing research portfolio. ARS research projects with objectives that directly benefit the organic industry are being conducted at: Ames, IA; Beltsville, MD; Beaumont, TX; Booneville, AR; Brookings, SD; Dawson, GA; Geneva, NY; Ithaca, NY; Kearneysville, WV; Lane, OK; Morris, MN; Orono, ME; Parlier, CA; Prosser, WA; Salinas, CA; Shafter, CA; Stoneville, MS; Tifton, GA; Urbana, IL; Wenatchee, WA; and Wyndmoor, PA. To ensure that ARS research is relevant, organic industry specific customer workshops were held in Austin, TX in January 2005 and Atlanta, GA in October 2006. The Atlanta workshop was attended by organic producers and industry representatives, ARS scientists, and managers from AMS, CSREES, ERS, and NRCS. A list of nationally important challenges was developed by the customers, and ARS developed a national five-year research action plan that addresses those issues. A national strategic action plan for growth in ARS Organic Agriculture Research was developed based on input from customers and workshop participants.  In February of 2012 a customer/stakeholder workshop was held in Beltsville, MD and through a webcast at four other ARS locations throughout the U.S.  This most recent workshop was attended by organic producers and industry representatives, ARS scientists, and managers from NIFA and NRCS. ARS Organic Agriculture Research Focus: Develop transition strategies for conventional-to-organic production systems with known risk of economic loss.Identify genetic plant growth efficiency mechanisms and combine with soil fertility management strategies to increase crop productivity with improved cultivars suited to organic production conditions.Develop whole-system biological-based management strategies for weed, insect pest, and disease control using preventive approaches as first defense, and therapeutic controls as rescue practices.Assess the prevalence of pathogens and their transport that can be associated with fresh produce from organic and conventional production systems, and develop whole-systems strategies to prevent their occurrence and growth.Develop whole-system biological-based management strategies for weed, insect pest, and disease control using preventive approaches as first defense, and therapeutic controls as rescue practices.Develop whole-system biological-based management strategies for prevention of parasites in small ruminant grazing animals.Determine the effects of organic production practices and whole-farm systems on ecosystem services, and provide guidelines that contribute to support of USDA Farm Bill Conservation Title.Identify optimal whole-farm strategies to integrate crop and livestock enterprises to increase on-farm resource utilization, minimize purchased production input needs, increase farm gate profitability with reduced risk of economic loss, and enhance natural resource quality.Develop market-driven production strategies to satisfy urban population center demand for regional organic and other specialty food products, and diversify food supply chains for increased National food security. Examples of Accomplishments from ARS Organic Agriculture Research: **Cover cropping practices improve organic weed management****.**ARS scientist in Salinas and cooperators showed different cover crops produce similar amounts of biomass, but there are large differences in their weed suppressive abilities. At typical seeding rates, weed suppression was excellent by mustard and rye, but extremely poor in legume/cereal mixes. Increasing the seeding rate of the legume/cereal mixes improved weed suppression to acceptable levels. Also, rotary hoe use can reduce weed seed production in winter cover crops by up to 80%, so weeds are less of a problem in the spring. **Non-chemical disease controls for organic and conventional potato systems.** ARS scientists at Orono, ME demonstrated that oregano completely inhibited growth of the Late Blight pathogen (Phytophthora infestans) in the laboratory and partially inhibited the pathogen in growth chamber studies. Also, commercially-available biological control organisms such as Trichoderma virens and Bacillus subtilis can reduce Rhizoctonia stem canker by 37-75% and black scurf by 11-20%, while increasing potato yield by 15-20%. Similarly, crop rotations of Brassica species reduced several diseases on potato. This research identified several options for controlling diseases that are now employed by both organic and conventional growers. **Organic treatments for deworming sheep and goats****.** ARS scientists at Booneville, Arkansas and cooperators showed genetic resistance against parasites to be a viable approach for parasite control, with St. Croix and Katahdin hair breeds being more resistant to parasites than Dorper and other wool breeds. Preliminary results suggest small ruminants ingesting sericea lespedeza forage, that is rich in condensed tannins, had lower populations of the Haemonchus contortus internal parasites. Low doses of copper oxide wire particles appeared to be an effective means to control Haemonchus infestations in small ruminants. These approaches to control internal parasites are essential for organic sheep and goat meat production. **Rotation length and crop complexity reduces weed pressure and increases yields****in organic cereal crops.**ARS scientists in Beltsville, Maryland and cooperators showed the number of weeds seed in the soil in spring was often correlated with weed cover percentage at maturity the same year, demonstrating that maintaining a low seed bank by using diverse rotations can lead to improved weed control in organic crops. During favorable years, corn yield losses due to weeds were less than 5% in the longest organic rotation, a level similar to that achieved using herbicides in conventional no-till and chisel-till systems. This result indicates that with good management, longer organic crop rotations can function comparably to conventional systems that use herbicides. These results will be of great benefit to organic farmers and conventional producers considering who are considering transitioning to organic cropping. **Reducing weed control costs to organic vegetable****producers.**Hand labor for weed management in high-value organic vegetable crops can cost up to $1500 per acre. ARS scientists in Salinas, California and cooperators conducted on-farm research to evaluate the effectiveness and costs of six organic weed management tools to prepare stale seed beds in high-density vegetable production. These techniques included organic herbicides, propane flamers, and various cultivation tools. Most techniques controlled more than 70% of the weeds and cost less than $230 per acre. However, the organic herbicide was ineffective and cost $1557 per acre. These findings identified effective methods to help organic producers minimize the need for hand weeding of high value vegetable crops contact: Gene Lester, National Program Leader USDA-ARS (301) 504-4616 gene.lester@ars.usda.gov


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov