alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

CURTIS D. TAYLOR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:16-CV-2-TLS

)

DOLLAR TREE, and BRET BERHAM, )

)

Defendants. )

 OPINION AND ORDER

Curtis D. Taylor, a Plaintiff proceeding pro se, has filed an Amended Complaint [ECF

No. 5] against the Dollar Tree and Bret Berham. He also filed a Petition to Proceed Without

Prepayment of Fees and Costs [ECF No. 5]. The Court dismissed without prejudice the

Plaintiff’s previous complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), but granted him time to

amend his complaint. The Plaintiff has now cured the deficiencies in the original complaint

alleging discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as he has

identified the protected category to which he belongs, and stated what adverse action was taken

against him. His allegations give “‘fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon

which it rests.’” EEOC v. Concentra Health Serv., Inc., 496 F.3d 773, 776–77 (7th Cir. 2007)

(quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)) (other citation omitted); see

also Tamayo v. Blagojevich, 526 F.3d 1074, 1084 (7th Cir. 2008) (pleading standard for “simple

claims of race or sex discrimination” is minimal and requires only that the plaintiff aver that the

employer instituted a certain adverse employment action against the plaintiff on the basis of sex

or race). 

Additionally, the Plaintiff’s Petition establishes that he is unable prepay the filing fee. 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the Court:
(1) GRANTS the Plaintiff’s Petition [ECF No. 5]; 

(2) DEFERS payment of the filing fee;

(3) ORDERS the Plaintiff to pay the filing fee from the proceeds of any recovery that

is received in this case; and 

(4) DIRECTS that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the United States Marshals

Service effect service of process on the Defendant.

SO ORDERED on February 25, 2016.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

2
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Colin V. Hall, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Solanex
  Management Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I, the registrants certifying officer, am responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
  such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
  case of an annual report) that has affected, or is reasonably likely to affect,
  the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I, the registrants certifying officer, based on my most
  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, have disclosed
  to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All deficiencies and weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
  and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
  control over financial reporting.

August 8, 2008

/s/Colin V. Hall 
  Colin V. Hall 
  Acting Chief Executive Officer

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Kirk Singleton, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.), rendered June 18, 1980, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The victim of this incident died eight days later from a subdural hematoma and lacerations and contusions of the brain. Unlike *People v Stewart*(40 NY2d 692), there is no evidence of any intervening event which could have caused the subdural hematoma. Consequently, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s finding that the death resulted from traumatic head injuries sustained at the time that the defendant took the victim’s purse *(People v Kibbe,*35 NY2d 407).

Although the prosecutor made certain improper comments during summation, any prejudicial effect was dispelled by the court’s prompt curative instructions and admonitions to the prosecutor *(People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396).

Defendant’s other contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
EX-1023



		

			 

		


		

			EXHIBIT 10.23

		


		

			 

		




		
			DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
		

		
			GRANT NOTICE FOR 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
		

		
			FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Dresser-Rand Group Inc. (the "Company"), hereby grants to Grantee named below the number of restricted stock units specified below (the “Award”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Grant Notice, the Dresser-Rand Group Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the Standard Terms and Conditions (the “Standard Terms and Conditions”) adopted under such Plan and provided to Grantee, each as amended from time to time.    Grantee must formally accept the grant of restricted stock units no later than February 28, 2015; if Grantee fails to do so, Grantee’s Award will be forfeited and Grantee will have no further rights with respect to such Award.    Each restricted stock unit subject to this Award represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s Common Shares, subject to the conditions set forth in this Grant Notice, the Plan and the Standard Terms and Conditions.  This Award is granted pursuant to the Plan and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by the Standard Terms and Conditions.    The Standard Terms and Conditions may be accessed through Grantee’s personal Morgan Stanley Smith-Barney Benefit Access®   (www.benefitaccess.com)  account in the Plan Documents section.
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Name of Grantee:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Grant Date:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Number of restricted stock units subject to the Award:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Vesting Schedule:

					
					
						 

				



		
			 
		

		
			By accepting this Grant Notice, Grantee acknowledges that he or she has received and read, and agrees that this Award shall be subject to, the terms of this Grant Notice, the Plan and the Standard Terms and Conditions.
		

		
			 
		

		
			DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ VINCENT R. VOLPE JR.
		

		
			Name: Vincent R. Volpe Jr.
		

		
			Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
.AUSTIN.-rExAR 78711 September14,1976
The HonorableWilliam R. Knight, Jr. Opinion No. H-877 Secretary Texas State Board of Dental Examiners Re: Whether a member 718 SouthwestTower of the Dental Labora7th and Brazos Streets toryAdvisory Board Austin, Texas 78701 is required to be a resident of the State of Texas. Dear Dr. Knight: You have asked if amember of the Dental an individualmay continue to serve as LaboratoryAdvisory Board if he no longer advise that one member of the Board resides in Texas. You is moving his residence to the State of Colorado. We assume, without deciding, that the individual is in fact a resident of Colorado. Article 16, section 14 of the Texas Constitutionprovides: All civil officers shall residewithin the State: and all district or county officers within their districts or counties,and shall keep their offices at suchplaces as may be requiredby law; and failure to comply with this condition shall vacate the office so held. The Dental LaboratoryAdvisory Board is created in section 6(b) of article 4551f,V.T.C.S. Its members are clearly civil officers. LetterAdvisory No. 63 (1973).

p.3695

## I

.

The HonorableWilliam R. Knight, Jr. - page 2 (H-877)
Accordingly, under the clear terms of the constitution a member of the Dental LaboratoryAdvisory Board who removes his residence outside of Texas vacates his office. See Princev- Inman, 280 S.W.Zd 779 (Tex.Civ. App. -- Brmont mno wrm Cf. Whitmarsh s Buckle ---4-l 324 S.W.Zd 298 (Tex.Civ.App. --ouston 1959, no wri Lamb v. State, 267 S.W.Zd 285 (Tex.Civ. App. -- San AntonmS)n, no writ). SUMMARY A member of the Dental LaboratoryAdvisory Board vacates his officewhen he removes his residence outside the State of Texas. Very trulyyours,
JdHN L. HILL Attorney General of Texas

Opinion Committee

p.3696
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Owens, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dubin, J.), rendered May 19, 1982, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Rubin, J.), of defendant’s motion to suppress the weapon found on his person.

Judgment affirmed.

*274We see no basis, on this record, to substitute our judgment for that of the Judge presiding at the suppression hearing, who credited the testimony of the arresting officer *(see, People v Valo,*92 AD2d 1004; *People v Hopkins,*86 AD2d 937, 938; *People v Duncan,*75 AD2d 823, 824; *People v Wright,*71 AD2d 585, 586) and we reject defendant’s contention that this testimony “has all appearances of having been patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections” *(People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88; *see, People v Africk,*107 AD2d 700; *People v Rodriguez,*105 AD2d 718). O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angelo A., Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J.), rendered on November 21,1983, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no *634nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2054

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that consensual sexual 

activity between adults shall not be a violation of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2005

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that 

consensual sexual activity between adults shall not be 

a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Hypocrisy Act 

5 of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 2054 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CONSENSUAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY BE2 TWEEN ADULTS AS BASIS FOR PROSECUTION 

3 UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY 

4 JUSTICE. 

5 (a) SODOMY.—Section 925 of title 10, United States 

6 Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Jus7 tice), is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘nonconsensual’’ after ‘‘en9 gages in’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘carnal copulation’’ before 

11 ‘‘with an’’. 

12 (b) CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND A

13 GENTLEMAN.—Section 933 of such title (article 133 of 

14 such Code) is amended—

15 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Any commis16 sioned’’; and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(b) Neither of the following shall be the basis for 

19 a prosecution under this section: 

20 ‘‘(1) A consensual act of a sexual nature that 

21 is between adults and that does not involve com22 pensation. 

23 ‘‘(2) Cohabitation by adults.’’. 

24 (c) GENERAL ARTICLE.—Section 934 of such title 

25 (article 134 of such Code) is amended—
3

•HR 2054 IH 

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Though not’’; 

2 and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(b) Neither of the following shall be the basis for 

5 a prosecution under this section: 

6 ‘‘(1) A consensual act of a sexual nature that 

7 is between adults and that does not involve com8 pensation. 

9 ‘‘(2) Cohabitation by adults.’’. 

10 (d) CONSTRUCTION OF AMENDMENTS.—Nothing in 

11 the amendments made by this section shall be—

12 (1) construed to prevent prosecution under the 

13 Uniform Code of Military Justice for acts of frater14 nization; or 

15 (2) considered to prevent noncriminal discipli16 nary action or administrative proceedings against a 

17 person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Jus18 tice for misconduct (sexual or otherwise) that—

19 (A) constitutes a disorder and neglect to 

20 the prejudice of good order and discipline in the 

21 Armed Forces; 

22 (B) is of a nature to bring discredit upon 

23 the Armed Forces; or 
4

•HR 2054 IH 

1 (C) in the case of a commissioned officer, 

2 cadet, or midshipman, constitutes conduct un3 becoming an officer and a gentleman.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Introduction Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Main Menu
                        Home page
                                    About the Plant Introduction Station
                                    Crops
                                    Entomology
                                    Facilities
                                    Pathology
                                    Seed Storage
                                    Seed Viability
                                    Annual Reports
                                    Ash Conservation ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Entomology Programheadline bar Main


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13195]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than July 7, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. The Family Trust created under the Last Will and Testament of 
John R. Beyers dated August 17, 2017, and The RCB Marital Trust created 
under the Last Will and Testament of John R. Beyers dated August 17, 
2017, Patty Beyers as trustee of both trusts, all of Roscoe, South 
Dakota; to retain voting shares of Roscoe Community Bankshares, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of the First State Bank of 
Roscoe, both of Roscoe, South Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 17, 2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-13195 Filed 6-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana 

JASON SANFORD,

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 1:16cv128

THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.,

DS CORP, doing business as

Crossroads RV,

Defendants

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

 the plaintiff _______________________________________________________________________ 

recover from the defendant the amount of 

dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus post-judgment 

interest at the rate of % along with costs.

 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

 X Other: Judgment entered in favor of Defendants, Thor Industries, Inc., and DS Corp., doing 

business as Crossroads RV, and against Plaintiff, Jason Sanford.

This action was (check one):

 tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has 

rendered a verdict.

 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was 

reached.

 X decided by Judge Theresa L. Springmann on a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants.

DATE: February 9, 2018 ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/ L. Higgins-Conrad 

 Signature of Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00128-TLS document 33 filed 02/09/18 page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CAUSE NO.: 1:16-CR-33-HAB

 ) 

ALA EL BASHATLY ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 165], filed on February 5, 2020. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation. 

The Court being duly advised, ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 

165] in its entirety and ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. Subject to this Court’s 

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if 

applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 2 of the Indictment is 

hereby ACCEPTED, and the Defendant is adjudged GUILTY of the offense. 

 The Sentencing Scheduling Order scheduling sentencing-related deadlines and hearings 

will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on February 20, 2020. 

s/ Holly A. Brady 

JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT