alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Archives
                        Presentations
                                    World Dairy Expo
                                    Newsletters and Research Summaries
                    Resources
                        General Resources
                                    Books
                                    Teacher's Resources
                                    New Research Dairy Updates
                                    Integrated Research at USDFRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center About Us







IACUC Summaries - U.S. Dairy Forage Research Centerheadline bar **Latest Summary** January 2024 **Past Summaries** July 2023 January 2023 July 2022 January 2022 July 2021 January 2021 March 2020 July 2019 March 2019 August 2018 February 2018 August 2017


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
           ----------------------------------------------------------
                         FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
                         ------------------------------


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT:

1.  Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended
    September 30, 2002:

        Net loss                                                    $   (27,000)
        Add:   Depreciation                                              50,000
               Equity in loss of Local Limited Partnerships              37,000
        Less:  Cash to reserves                                         (33,000)
                                                                    -----------
        Cash available for distribution                             $    27,000
                                                                    ===========
        Distributions allocated to General Partners                 $     2,000
                                                                    ===========
        Distributions allocated to Limited Partners                 $    25,000
                                                                    ===========

2.  Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
    General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
    September 30, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Entity Receiving                                 Form of
        Compensation                                 Compensation                       Amount
    --------------------          -------------------------------------------          --------
    <S>                           <C>                                                  <C>

    General Partners              Interest in Cash Available for Distribution          $  2,000

    WFC Realty Co., Inc.
    (Initial Limited Partner)     Interest in Cash Available for Distribution          $      5
</TABLE>
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                             |                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
| Date:    April      15, 2010 | /s/      Cheng-Yu Wang       |   |
|                                             | Cheng-Yu      Wang           |   |
|                                             | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William Kevin GOODWIN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-5147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 27, 2006.

Decided: May 3, 2006.

*290Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Kearns Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Kevin Goodwin pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and was sentenced to thirty months’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay the statutory assessment of $100. The district court denied Goodwin’s pre-plea motion in which Goodwin moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that his previous North Carolina conviction for possession with intent to sell and deliver cocaine did not constitute a “prior felony” for purposes of § 922(g)(1), because under North Carolina law and his particular criminal history he only faced six to eight months on the drug conviction. Goodwin asserted that the drug conviction was not a proper predicate offense under the indictment because the applicable term of imprisonment was less than one year. Goodwin appeals, raising the same issue, yet acknowledging that his claim is foreclosed by circuit precedent.

We conclude, as Goodwin admits, that the district court did not err because his argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in *United States v. Harp,*406 F.3d 242, 246 (4th Cir.) (holding that *United States v. Jones,*195 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1999), is still viable after *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and reaffirming that “a prior North Carolina conviction was for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year if *any*defendant charged with that crime could receive a sentence of more than one year.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted, emphasis in original)), *cert. denied,*— U.S. *291—, 126 S.Ct. 297, 163 L.Ed.2d 259 (2005). Thus, because a sentence of over twelve months could be imposed on a defendant convicted of possession with intent to sell and deliver cocaine, Goodwin’s prior conviction was properly considered a felony.

Accordingly, we affirm Goodwin’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Fabian DUNBAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7300.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
#### The Garman-Loomis Co. *v.*Ryan.

*Innkeepers'*— Common-law *liability*— *Guest’s apparel stolen during absence*— *Effect of failure to deposit key.*

1. The common-law rule of liability upon the part of an innkeeper for the loss of ordinary wearing apparel, left by a guest in his room, still exists in Ohio, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5983, General Code.

2. Where a guest is given possession of a key to his room upon the deposit by him of the value of the key, which deposit is to be returned when he returns the key, the innkeeper tacitly consents to the guest’s retention of the key when he is temporarily absent from the hotel, and the mere failure of the guest to return the key to the innkeeper during his temporary absence from the hotel, during which time his room is entered and wearing apparel taken, will not relieve the innkeeper from his common-law liability, where the foregoing circumstances are shown and it is admitted that another key was already in the possession of the innkeeper or his servants.

(Decided October 6, 1919.)

Error: Court of Appeals for Summit county.

*Messrs. ’Kimber Í& Huffman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Burch '& Adams,*for defendant in error.

Dunlap, P. J.

The supreme court of Ohio has announced, by syllabus to *The Palace Hotel Co.*v. *Medart, 87*Ohio St., 130, that the common-law rule of liability upon the part of an innkeeper for the loss, of ordinary wearing apparel, left by a guest in his room, still exists in Ohio, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5983, General Code. This conclusion, officially announced and sanctioned by the syllabus, is fully warranted and supported 'by the learned and searching opinion of Mr. Justice *225O’Hara, which ably presents the arguments and reasoning leading thereto. Little further need be added to show that this conclusion of the supreme court is decisive of the case at bar.

■ The only distinction, ably argued and contended for here, is that it is admitted that the plaintiff, the guest, kept possession of a key to the room during the day in which the apparel was taken from the room; but this admission is coupled with the undisputed evidence that such key was safely in his possession during the whole of the day during which he was wholly absent from the hotel, and in his possession when he returned to the hotel and opened his room and discovered and reported his loss, and that he had made a deposit of the value of the key with the innkeeper which was to be returned to him when he returned the key.

It is not claimed that he was not a guest, and it is admitted that there was at least one other key to the room in the possession of the innkeeper or his servants.

We hold, under the authority cited, that the evidence adduced was sufficient to make a *prima facie*case, and having made his *prima facie*case its sufficiency and the sufficiency of the defense were for the determination of the jury, whose verdict.must be conclusive.

We find no reversible error in the record of this case and the judgment will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Washburn and Vickery, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136010 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136010 

 COA: 273485 

Macomb CC: 2006-001701-FH 

DAVID BRIAN BINIENDA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0910 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 17, 2008 

 Clerk
#### ROCKET JEWELRY BOX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUALITY INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING, LTD., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-1132.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 10, 2006.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of
Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    STEPHEN R. LIGHT                                    
|Stephen R. Light Principal Executive Officer March 28, 2003
(May 31, 1985)

#### In the Matter of Harold W. Katz, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in 1946.

Respondent has submitted a petition and affidavit in support of his tender of resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law in accordance with 22 NYCRR 806.8 of this court’s rules.

In his papers, respondent, who is represented by counsel, states that he is acting freely and voluntarily and is fully aware of the consequences of his resignation. He further states that he is aware of pending investigations by petitioner concerning five separate complaints of professional misconduct, and he sets forth in detail the facts underlying each complaint in his affidavit. The complaints generally allege that respondent failed to repay substantial sums of money loaned or entrusted to him by various individuals and that, while acting as executor of an estate, he engaged in various acts of misconduct including the conversion of $83,724.56 in estate funds. Finally, respondent states that he does not contest the allegations of professional *597misconduct and recognizes that his failure to do so precludes him from asserting his innocence of the professional misconduct alleged.

Since we conclude that respondent’s petition and affidavit comply with the requirements of the rule (22 NYCRR 806.8), his application is granted and the resignation is accepted.

Application to resign granted and resignation accepted; respondent ordered disbarred as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective June 10,1985. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of Indiana

Design Basics, LLC, et al.

1:16-cv-00247

Sky Hill Homes, Inc., By Larry Myers, et al.

Fall Creek Homes, Inc.

c/o Barry Light, Registered Agent

1821 Meadowsweet Pkwy

Ft. Wayne, Indiana 46808

John D. LaDue

Sean J. Quinn

LaDue Curran & Kuehn LLC

205 W. Jefferson Blvd., Suite 200

South Bend, IN 46601

06/25/2016

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00247-TLS-SLC document 1-3 filed 06/25/16 page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

1:16-cv-00247

0.00

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00247-TLS-SLC document 1-3 filed 06/25/16 page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties V Limited Partnership First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000712753
<NAME> SHELTER PROPETIES V
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           1,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          76,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                (44,147)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.49<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2253 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyazofamid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyazofamid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYAZOFAMID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 Mixtures of 4-chloro-2- 

cyano-N,N-dimethyl-5-(4- 

methylphenyl)–1H-imidazole1-sulfonamide (Cyazofamid) 

(CAS No. 120116–88–3) 

with application adjuvants 

(provided for in subheading 

3808.20.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2253 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ