alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MacAfee *v.*Catchings.

*Receivership.*

(Decided Dec. 19, 1907.

45 So. Rep. 155.)

*Appeal; Review;.Subsequent Orders.*— Where the appeal is from a decretal order carrying into effect the provisions of the previous decree and the original decree is not in the record such original decree cannot be reviewed ou such an appeal.

Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court.'

Heard before Hon. A. H. Benners.

*427Action between B. S. Catchings, as assignee, and W. EL MacAfee, as assignee. From the decree, W. H. MacAfee, as assignee, appeals.

Affirmed.

John W. Tomlinson, for appellant:

There may be' two decrees, one settlting the merits, and the other based on the report of the register, and from each an appeal will *lie.*— Bradford *v. Bradley,*37 Ala. 433; *Jones v. Wilson,*54 Ala. 50; *Malone v. Mariott,*54 Ala. 486; *Adams v. Sayre,*76 Ala. 509; Sec. 426, Code 1896.

B. F. Catchings, and W. E. Fort, for appellee.

No brief came to the Reporter.

DOWDELL, J.

The record contains two appeals from two distinct decrees. The certificate of the register shows one appeal taken on the 23d of May from a decree rendered on the 17th of May, 1906, and the second appeal taken on the 1st of June from a decree rendered on the 29th of May, 1906. The record fails to show any decree of May 17, 1906, and the only final decree contained in the record from which an appeal would lie is the one of May 29, 1906. This latter decree is nothing more than a decretal order carrying into effect some prior final decree of the court, in which, manifestly, the rights of the parties had been .adjudicated. This condition of the record renders it impossible for us to do more than consider the decree of May 29th. This decree was entered on motion of the appellee to carry into effect a former decree, and was rendered on a hearing of the motion and on appellant’s demurrers thereto. The court overruled the demurrer, and granted the motion, decreeing accordingly. It was shown in the motion that by a former decree of the court in the cause the appellee, Catchings, had a lien upon the fund in question and was *428entitled to be paid bis claim out of it; and this the demurrer admitted. As stated above, the decree of May 29th was but the effectuation of a prior decree in the cause, which prior decree is not contained in the record, and hence cannot be reviewed. No error appears in the rendition of the decree of May 29, 1906.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Anderson and McClellan, JJ7, concur.
. 

- -- -.- _~-__-__I 

60 

OFFICE.OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

EOaorobl8 Bmt YOra Allmlalrtntor 

Fy~.?ga~ Oontroi Beard 

*x.8 1, Tonr 

Dear sir: Oplnlon no. o-ml8 

5Undsr this prodalon OS law, would it be unlawful t.2 have a mlgn advertlslng whiskey located 

In ao area zhere It 1s only leEa to sell aloohollo 

borerages csntainlnc not zore tbnr 4; of alcohol 

by weight as in the above qucstlor! of Cak cliff? 
~-__ ._. 

.__ . . - 

--.- 

. 

Bonof,ab& Bort Tord, AQinirtrator, ksgr 3 

. 

Would a nlakllar 8lgn adrrrtl8lng 14% bermage8 bo logal in M area or xmo when It 18 only 

lagal to eel1 l looholla bororagas 

more than 43 of aloohol by wol&ht? 

oontaielng not 

alFoul a ain.ilar rign advertlring liquor br 

legal ln an area whore it 18 only legal to rell 

l looholla beverage8 oootalnlng not 5or4 then 14$ 

of aloohol by roluae? xoferrlng to the above eeotlon of law, you will note the languqe 1s ‘where 

t&e ralo of aloohollo beremr,er 18 poohlblted by 

. law.* 

“. . . .a 

It is the oplnlon of thlr department that the abo~r 

q.uote4 atfituto In your reque8t, appearln(: ae A.-tlcls 667-f%+(3) 

OS Vernon'8 ,mnotated kenal Cc&o, is both clear and unambiguoue, 

therefore, not beily eubieot to oonstruotion. Th4 term aloohello bevrrage used therein 18 dofined in Seotlon 3a oi Artlolr 

668, v. A. r. c. as roiiowr: 

*Souo. Sa. 'tiooholio Benrage* shall mean 

alcohol aai any bsreraco oontalnlng o;ore than onahalf or one paroent or l loohol by volume rhioh la 

capable of use ror bsvera&r purpoees, rltber alone 

or when diluted.* 

SeOtlon Z4a-1 of Art1010 667, V.A.F.C., reads a4 

fOiiOW8 I 

"Billboard. The word 'billboard' as used herein 8hZll man a rtruotun dlreotly attached to tb 

lad, or to say houw or builblng, and havlIL: one 

or more gaoo8 used for displaying thereon a slqp or 

advertlssnent oS the aloohollo bevoraes buslnes6 of 

any person eqp3gea ln th4 a4nurciotur4, 4aal4 or amkrlbutlon of filcohollo boveraqas, or ror tBc advertlsement of any t14rera~4 oontxlning alcohol In 4x04~9 

or one-half or one (l/2 or 15) wr cant by ~411~x3, 

whether or not suoh rtruoture or elm be illtimtod 

by artlfloial mans. The tot.3 'billboard' shall mt 

be lnoluslve of any wall or otter pat of any struoture used as a bullding, Genoa, soreon, front or 

barr1er.O 

6: 
. 62 

BonorabltiBsrt lord, Admlnlstrator, tam 3 

Tlootrlo Sign. Tba term *olrotrio riga* am 

us44 honln rhall l 4m1 a 4truoturo or 44rio4, otkmr 

th a n l alllumlnatod billboard, by moana of rhloh 

l rtlrlolal llaht amatod throuuh th4 4mllo4tlon 

half iS one 

phaSi8 ad&O& I 

i/2 or 1%) pit ornt by v01ume.~ 

In oonoluslon, It 16 the opinion of this d4:artmr.t 

that where, as in the Oak Cliff section of 3alla8, the salr 

of hoer, an “tioohollo Bsvoragog, 1s not prohlbltsd, a slm 

adrertlslng the sale of whlsksy and oor~orrnln(2 to all other 

psrtlnent seotlons at the aot, 1s local. 

Trustlnc that tha above satisfaotorlly answers your 

lnqulry, we remain 

Yours very tnily 

ATTORNEY G’XZ?,U OF T”.LCJ 

'e4 U Eugsno + Al+18 

Adrtant 

By 

Bob brad&ox 

~osrearsoh k !mldonoo 

.~sslstant 

OPINION 

Lvmnu7xx
#### In re BUFFALO, R. & E. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 26, 1912.)

In the matter of the application of the Buffalo, Rochester & Eastern Railroad Company for a certificate of public necessity.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to submit, upon the appeal, the exhibits without printing the same, granted subject to an order to be made upon the argument, if deemed necessary, for the printing of any part or all of the same.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00047-TLS-SLC

)

MARCO A. GARCIA, also known as )

Marco A. Garcia Rodriguez )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on September 7, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the 10-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Chief Judge

Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and

Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 7th day of September 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Samuel Kenneth PORTER, petitioner, v. Muabe HOWARD, et al.

No. 13-6486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 213 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 213

  To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require a national primary 
               drinking water regulation for perchlorate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

   Ms. Solis (for herself, Mr. Dingell, Mrs. Capps, and Mr. Stupak) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require a national primary 
               drinking water regulation for perchlorate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Drinking Water for Healthy 
Communities Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATION FOR PERCHLORATE.

    Section 1412(b)(12) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300g-
1(b)(12)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Perchlorate.--
                            ``(i) Schedule and standard.--
                        Notwithstanding the deadlines set forth in 
                        paragraph (1), the Administrator shall 
                        promulgate a national primary drinking water 
                        regulation for perchlorate pursuant to this 
                        subsection, in accordance with the schedule 
                        established by this subparagraph.
                            ``(ii) Proposed regulations.--Not later 
                        than January 31, 2006, the Administrator shall 
                        propose a national primary drinking water 
                        regulation for percholate.
                            ``(iii) Final regulations.--Not later than 
                        July 31, 2007, after notice and opportunity for 
                        public comment, the Administrator shall 
                        promulgate a national primary drinking water 
                        regulation for perchlorate.''.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 2062

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 57 West 

Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

57 West Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 

designated as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Randall 

D. Shughart Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EX-10.45



 Exhibit 10.45 

Executive Officer Compensation Information 

The following table sets forth the annual base salaries for 2014 and 2015 for the executive officers of Seattle Genetics, Inc. (the
“Company”). The table below also sets forth the bonuses awarded to the Company’s executive officers for the 2014 fiscal year under the Company’s 2014 Senior Executive Annual Bonus Plan. The 2015 target bonuses (based on a
percentage of base salary) for the Company’s executive officers under the Company’s 2015 Senior Executive Annual Bonus Plan are also set forth in the table below. 
  

																	
	 Name and Title
	  	2014 Base Salary	 	  	2014 Bonus	 	  	2015 Base Salary	 	  	2015 Target Bonus
Percentage	 
	 Clay B. Siegall, Ph.D.
	  	$	784,000	  	  	$	646,800	  	  	$	815,000	  	  	 	100	% 
	 President & Chief Executive Officer
	  				  			
	 Todd E. Simpson
	  	$	443,000	  	  	$	215,298	  	  	$	458,550	  	  	 	50	% 
	 Chief Financial Officer
	  				  			
	 Eric L. Dobmeier
	  	$	473,600	  	  	$	260,480	  	  	$	492,550	  	  	 	50	% 
	 Chief Operating Officer
	  				  			
	 Jonathan Drachman
	  	$	469,000	  	  	$	240,597	  	  	$	487,800	  	  	 	50	% 
	 Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President, Research and Development
	  				  			
	 Vaughn Himes
	  	$	392,900	  	  	$	179,162	  	  	$	408,650	  	  	 	45	% 
	 Executive Vice President, Process Sciences and Technical Operations
	  				  				  				  			
	 Chris Boerner, Ph.D.
	  	$	435,000	  	  	$	807	  	  	$	435,000	  	  	 	N/A	1 
	 Executive Vice President, Commercial
	  				  			
	 Jean Liu
	  	$	390,000	  	  	$	46,508	  	  	$	393,450	  	  	 	45	% 
	 Executive Vice President, Legal Affairs & General Counsel
	  				  				  				  			

  

	1 	Dr. Boerner left the Company prior to establishment of the 2015 target bonus percentage. 

  







 Director Compensation Information 

The following table sets forth the compensation components for non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors for 2014 and 2015,
including equity awards.
  

									
	 Compensation Element
	  	2014	 	  	2015	 
			
	 General Board Service – Cash Retainer
	  	$	50,000	  	  	$	50,000	  
			
	 General Board Service – Equity
	  				  			
			
	 Initial Grant – Number of Options
	  	$	12,500	  	  	$	13,275	  
			
	 Initial Grant – Number of Restricted Stock Units
	  	$	5,000	  	  	$	5,310	  
			
	 Annual Grant – Number of Shares
	  	$	8,750	  	  	$	9,260	  
			
	 Annual Grant – Number of Restricted Stock Units
	  	$	3,500	  	  	$	3,700	  
			
	 Chair Service – Annual Retainer
	  				  			
			
	 Lead Director
	  	$	12,000	  	  	$	25,000	  
	 Audit
	  	$	20,000	  	  	$	20,000	  
	 Compensation
	  	$	15,000	  	  	$	15,000	  
	 Nominating & Governance
	  	$	10,000	  	  	$	10,000	  
			
	 Committee Member Service – Annual Retainer
	  				  			
			
	 Audit
	  	$	10,000	  	  	$	10,000	  
	 Compensation
	  	$	8,000	  	  	$	8,000	  
	 Nominating & Governance
	  	$	5,000	  	  	$	5,000
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Noah Education Holdings Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dora Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 17, 2008



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Dora Li            
|Name:  |  | Dora Li                
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
# L_2021382DE.01006001.xml

| 28.10.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 382/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 382/60

---

Berichtigung des Gemeinsamen Standpunkts 2008/944/GASP des Rates vom 8. Dezember 2008 betreffend gemeinsame Regeln für die Kontrolle der Ausfuhr von Militärtechnologie und Militärgütern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 335 vom 13. Dezember 2008
  )

Seite 100 Artikel 1 Absatz 2 zweiter Gedankenstrich

Anstatt:

| "— | Anträge auf Lizenzen für Waffenvermittlertätigkeiten;" |
| --- | --- |

"—

Anträge auf Lizenzen für Waffenvermittlertätigkeiten;"

muss es heißen:

| "— | Anträge auf Lizenzen für Vermittlertätigkeiten;" |
| --- | --- |

"—

Anträge auf Lizenzen für Vermittlertätigkeiten;"

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2026 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2026

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Bioallethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Bioallethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIOALLETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.11       [1RS-[1a(S*),3b]]- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         2-Methyl-4-oxo-3-                                                  31/2008
                         (2-propenyl)-2-
                         cyclopenten-1-yl
                         2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-
                         methylprop-1-
                         enyl)cyclopropane
                         carboxylate (CAS
                         No. 584-79-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2916.20.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2155 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2155

           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Octanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Octanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,2 OCTANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.32       1,2 Octanediol     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 1117-86-                                                  31/2008
                         8) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### McCANN et al., Respondents, v. SULLIVAN, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 4, 1912.)

Action by John McCann and another, as executors, etc., against James Sullivan, impleaded with Julia T. Dougherty and others. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pro Squared, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ Craig Crawford
                         ______________________________________
                         By: Craig Crawford
                         Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
                         April 10,  2003
<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934**

**and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, Anahita Villafane, ChiefFinancial Officer of Aspyra, Inc. ( the “Company”), certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350that:

 

(1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2008 (the “Quarterly Report”) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or780(d)); and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date: August 11, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Anahita Villafane   |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                       |   | Anahita Villafane       |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shallnot be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----