alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.44


         ADDENDUM TO NOTE FOR BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL LOANS LIBOR RATE


Addendum to Note for Business and  Commercial  Loans dated May 13, 2003,  in the
principal amount of $1,000,000.00.

As used herein, "LIBOR Reserve Requirements" means the maximum reserves (whether
basic. supplemental.  marginal, emergency, or otherwise) prescribed by the Board
of Governors of the Federal  Reserve System (or any  successor)  with respect to
liabilities or assets consisting of or including "Eurocurrency  liabilities" (as
defined  in  Regulation  D of the  Board of  Governors  of the  Federal  Reserve
System).  If there is any change in LIBOR  Reserve  Requirements,  then Borrower
shall,  from time to time upon demand by Holder,  pay to Holder such  additional
amounts as Holder may deem  necessary  to  compensate  Holder for any  increased
costs resulting from such change. Borrower agrees that Holder's determination of
such  additional  amounts  and  increased  costs will be made in  Holder's  sole
discretion and shall be conclusive,  if, because of the  introduction  of or any
change in, or because of any  judicial,  administrative,  or other  governmental
interpretation of any applicable law or regulation,  there shall be any increase
in the cost to Holder of making, funding,  maintaining, or allocating capital to
any amount  outstanding  under the Loan bearing  interest at a rate based on the
LIBOR Rate, then Borrower shall, from time to time upon demand by Holder, pay to
Holder  additional  amounts  sufficient to compensate  Holder for such increased
costs.

If, because of the introduction of or any change in, or because of any judicial,
administrative,  or other governmental  interpretation of, any applicable law or
regulation,  it becomes  unlawful  for Holder to make,  fund,  or  maintain  any
advance or balance at a rate based on the LIBOR Rate,  then Holder's  obligation
to make,  fund, or maintain any such advance or balance shall  terminate and any
such affected outstanding advance or balance shall bear interest at a rate equal
to the prime rate of the Bank in effect from time to time as  designated  by the
Bank (the  `Prime  Rate") plus 0%, with  changes in such  interest  rate to take
effect as the Prime Rate changes.  The Prime Rate is merely a reference rate and
is not necessarily the best or lowest rate offered by the Bank.



Signed for identification:




ATTEST:                             SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES. INC.

By: /s/ Davis Woodward              (SEAL)  By:  /s/ Jeffrey F. O'Donnell (SEAL)
    ------------------                           ----------------------
      Davis Woodward                               Jeffrey F. O'Donnell

Its:  Corporate Counsel                     Its: President and CEO


By: /s/ Davis Woodward              (SEAL)  By:  /s/ Dennis McGrath       (SEAL)
    ------------------                           ------------------
     Davis Woodward                              Dennis McGrath

Its:  Corporate Counsel                     Its: VP of Finance and CFO
EXHIBIT 10.15


 


SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS









The following summarizes the current compensation and benefits received by the Company’s non-employee directors as of January 1, 2015.  This document is intended to be a summary of existing oral, at will arrangements, and in no way is intended to provide any additional rights to any non-employee director.  Compensation of the non-employee directors may be adjusted from time to time.







Retainer







Non-employee directors each receive an annual retainer fee of $40,000.  The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $20,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000 and the Chairman of each of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee and Diversity Committee receives an annual retainer of $6,000.  A director that chairs more than one committee receives a retainer with respect to each Committee he chairs.  All of the retainers are paid on a quarterly basis.







Meeting Fees







Per meeting fees for non-employee directors are as follows:








		–	For meetings of the Board of Directors, $2,500











		–	For meetings of the Compensation Committee, $2,000











		–	For meetings of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee and Diversity Committee, $1,500.











		–	For meetings of the Audit Committee either in person or over the telephone, $2,500.











		–	In addition, the Chairman receives an additional $2,500 for preparing to conduct each quarterly meeting.










Equity Compensation







Under the terms of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, directors are eligible to receive stock options, stock awards, and other types of equity-based compensation awards.  However, the Company does not make any such awards to non-employee directors under its current compensation practices.







All non-employee directors are entitled to reimbursement of expenses for all services as a director, including committee participation or special assignments.
~FKLED= 

SEP 2 8 2015 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A Ro\3°ER"T.-------M 

/\Io rt he< n DISTRICT OF INDIANA U.S. D~~1if~8DR'flerk 

So 1.cfb Bend DIVISION 

Petitioner, 

) 

) 

) 

CAUSE NO.: 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

V. ) 

IncL·a..na.... }:>ep,.,nfwien f- ) -------

of Co rr-ec. fl o ..-1 ) 

Respondent. ) 

PRISON PETITIONER TO PROCEED 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS 

I, tJvkAzA G££ , offender number /d.-'7'f[31 declare that I am unable to 

prepay the full filing fees and costs of this proceeding, or to give security because of my 

poverty. I believe that I am entitled to redress and I petition the court for leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis in my: 

~2 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights complaint =: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Corpus Petition 

'--- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Appeal _ 28 U.S.C. § Habeas Corpus Appeal 

1. Do you work? Z'l\f o =: YES, I earn $ ____ per month. 

2. Do you receive idle pay ~ YES, I earn$ ____ per month. 

3. Ha:e you e~ ~led a law suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Indiana? 7No 1 t YES. · 

4. Have you ever filed a law suit in a federal court outside of Indiana? 

~ =: YES, in the _______ District of ______ in the year __ 

I declare under penalty of perjury, Pursuant to 28U.S.C.§1746, that the 

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 

Executed on this 2!i_ day of 56(pf ~/1·1 b €I , 20 IS-. 

f flJ/la.,,,dt J!t_.__ 

) ~\ A/~1/{A ZE/ UEC Petitioner {; ;)...7~3!,} 

3:15cv442

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 2 filed 09/28/15 page 1 of 2
OFFICIAL NOTARIZED CERTIFICATE OF PRISONER ACCOUNT 

I certify that N";/{f/zA GE£, DOC# ld-78'31, has$ Q l-\ .51 in his 

I 

prisoner trust account. I certify that during the last six months (or __ months 

if the prisoner has been confined less than six months) that The prisoner's 

average monthly BALANCE was $ Lf 5, Cf S--

And that the prisoner's average monthly DEPOSITS were $ 

I certify that I have attached a true and correct copy of the prisoner trust account 

statement for the last six months or for the duration of his confinement in the 

Indiana Department of Corrections. 

Signed this J_J_ day of S-e..p-k-Wl.\()Rt- , 20 j ':) . 

Business Administration Office 

Indiana State Prison 

1 Park Row 

Michigan City, IN 46360 

Signature of Authorized Officer 

('Af•"- h·\\ Ci._ kst o. A-cl.(.,"v1'\~iti,"'+(p Printed Name and Job Title 

Subscribed and sworn to before me on this It day of SEmrn 13 €:./Z.. 

20 J6. -

- ~i~ 

Notary1.:>ublic Signature 

~is. F leaoe.c 

My commission Expires: Nota ame Printed 

~C{ Port<L 

County of Residence 

2 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 2 filed 09/28/15 page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                             OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,
being the duly elected and appointed chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of MPSI Systems Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), subject in
all respects to the principle of "materiality" that is inherent in financial
reporting under generally accepting accounting principles, and subject further
to knowledge actually in their possession at the date of this Certificate,
hereby certify that :

     1.   the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002, complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));

     2.   the financial statements, including notes thereto and supplemental
information contained in various parts of such periodic report, fairly present,
in all material respects when considered in the context of the financial
statements taken as a whole, the financial condition, results of operations and
changes in cash flow of the Company for the indicated periods;

     Executed this 14th day of November, 2002.



                                                 /s/ Ronald G. Harper
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ronald G. Harper, Chief Executive Officer


                                                  /s/ James C. Auten
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James C. Auten, Chief Financial Officer
#### FEDERAL KEMPER LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff—Appellee, and Karen Ann Leimbach, Defendant—Appellee, v. Dean Scott FINGLASS, Defendant—Appellant, and Caron Beth Finglass, Defendant.

No. 04-1155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 5, 2004.

Decided May 17, 2004.

*895Dean Scott Finglass, Appellant pro se. Rob Ross Hendrickson, Boyd, Benson & Hendrickson, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Leimbach. Bryan David Bolton, His-ham M. Amin, Funk & Bolton, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Dean Scott Finglass appeals the district court’s order and judgment of interpleader granting Karen Ann Leimbach’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Finglass,*2004 WL 422618, No. CA-03-81AMD (D.Md. Jan. 20, 2004). We grant Finglass’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

JOSHUA BLIGH and DARRIN

EASTLICK, On Behalf of Themselves and

All Others Similarly Situated,

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CAUSE NO.: 1:15-cv-00234-JD-SLC

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONSTRUCTION RESOURCES OF

INDIANA, INC., GEIGER

EXCAVATING, INC., GEIGER

LEASING, LLC, JAY C. GEIGER, and

JODI GEIGER,

Defendants.

JOINT MOTION TO MAINTAIN DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

The parties, by counsel, pursuant to local rule 5-3, jointly move the Court to maintain the

settlement agreements under seal. (Copies of the settlement agreements attached as Exhs. “A”

and “B”) The documents should be maintained under seal because (1) they are not relevant to

the questions raised in the Complaint, and (2) good cause exists to maintain the settlement

agreements under seal because in FLSA actions, “Parties do not have the option, as litigants do

in most non-FLSA collective action cases to execute a private, confidential settlement agreement

and then file a stipulation of dismissal.” Swarthout v. Ryla Teleservices, Inc., 2012 WL

5361756, at *3 (N.D. Ind. Oct 30, 2012). The settlement of this matter includes a confidentiality

provision, necessitating filing the settlement agreements under seal under Swarthout. Id. The

Motion to Approve the Settlement is filed contemporaneously herewith. The parties agree that

the provisions of the settlement agreement, negotiated at arms-length by experienced counsel,

fairly and adequately resolves the claims in this matter, and that maintaining the settlement

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00234-JD-SLC document 30 filed 05/25/16 page 1 of 2
2

agreements under seal is required to maintain the confidentiality negotiated between the Parties

under Swarthout. Therefore, the parties jointly request that the Court maintain the seal for the

settlement agreements in this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP

s/Marcia A. Mahony

Marcia A. Mahony, Atty No. 18779-49

Attorneys for Defendants, Jay C. Geiger,

Jodi Geiger and Geiger Excavating, Inc.

mmahony@k-glaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The forgoing was filed electronically this 25th day of May, 2016. Notice of this filing

will be sent to the following parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties

may access this filing through the court’s system.

Robert A. Hicks

MACEY SWANSON AND ALLMAN

445 N. Pennsylvania Street, #401

Indianapolis, IN 46204

rhicks@maceylaw.com

Craig R. Patterson

Matthew J. Elliott

BECKMAN LAWSON LLP

201 W. Wayne St.

Fort Wayne, IN 46803

cpatterson@beckmanlawson.com

melliott@beckmanlawson.com

Jason T. Brown

Nicholas R. Conlon

JTB Law Group, LLC

155 2nd Street, #4

Jersey City, NJ 07302

jtb@jtblawgroup.com

nicholasconlon@jtblawgroup.com

s/ Marcia A. Mahony

Marcia A. Mahony

KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP

One Indiana Square, Suite 300

211 N. Pennsylvania Street

Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 638-4521

mmahony@k-glaw.com

151170\3289588-1

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00234-JD-SLC document 30 filed 05/25/16 page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1906 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1906

                 To reduce temporarily the duty on ACM.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

Mr. Etheridge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To reduce temporarily the duty on ACM.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.46       (3-Acetoxy-3-      0.7%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         cyanopropyl)methy                                                  31/2008
                         lphosphinic acid,
                         butyl ester (CAS
                         No. 167004-78-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2931.00.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Charvis RODGERS, petitioner, v. Richard KIRKLAND, Warden.

No. 12-9356.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13139]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 55 and 71

[FRL-5211-7]


Federal Operating Permits Program

agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

action: Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: On April 27, 1995, the EPA gave notice of the proposed Federal 
Operating Permits rule and of the opportunity for a public hearing to 
present oral testimony concerning the proposed rule. Because the sole 
party that requested a public hearing has withdrawn its request, the 
public hearing scheduled for May 30, 1995 has been cancelled.
    Written comments on the proposed rule will continue to be accepted 
until June 26, 1995. Send the written comments to the address given 
below.
    Public hearing cancellation: Notice is hereby given that the public 
hearing originally scheduled for May 30, 1995 has been canceled.

address: Comments should be mailed (in duplicate if possible) to: EPA 
Air Docket (Mail Code 6102), Attn: Docket No. A-93-51, Room M-1500, 
Waterside Mall, 401 M Street SW, Washington, DC 20460.

for further information, contact: Candace Carraway (telephone 919-541-
3189), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality 
Planning and Standards, Information Transfer and Program Integration 
Division, Mail Drop 12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

    Dated: May 23, 1995.
Mary Henigan,
Acting Director, Information Transfer and Program Integration Division.
[FR Doc. 95-13139 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
#### NILES,' Appellant, v. - WINKLER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by- Cecilia W. Niles, as administratrix, against Leopold Winkler and others. H. H. Gibbs, for appellant. W. G. Cooke, for respondents.

■ PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 139 App. Div. 906, 124 N. Y. Supp. 1123. LAUGHLIN and DOWLING, JJ., dissent
# Chart

# Data

# image1.emf
EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
 June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2010
    
    
    2009(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    47,827
    
    
    $
    439,882Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    27,919
    
    
    
    239,417Fixed charges
    
    
    747,263
    
    
    
    717,427Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (3,080
    )
    
    
    (7,216
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    819,929
    
    
    $
    1,389,510Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    207
    
    
    $
    2,560Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    158
    %
    
    
    154
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    327
    
    
    
    3,942Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    742,574
    
    
    
    708,607Capitalized interest
    
    
    3,080
    
    
    
    7,216Interest factors of rents
    
    
    1,609
    
    
    
    1,604Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    747,263
    
    
    
    717,427Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    747,590
    
    
    $
    721,369Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ((A) divided by (B))
    
    
    1.10
    x
    
    
    1.94
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
((A) divided by (C))
    
    
    1.10
    x
    
    
    1.93
    x
 -64-
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 11, 2006       /S/ Alan H. Lund
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2020 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Uniconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Uniconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNICONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.19 (E)–(+)–(S)–1-(4- 

Chlorophenyl)–4,4-dimethyl2-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)pent-1- 

en-3-ol (Uniconazole) (CAS 

No. 83657–17–4) (provided 

for in subheading 

3808.30.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2020 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ