alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PEOPLE v. RUSSELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

May 9, 1912.)

Food (§ 16*)—Milk—Natukb and Elements of Defense.

In an action to recover a penalty for selling adulterated milk, under Agricultural Law (Consol. Laws 1909, c. 1) § 52, evidence *held,*to warrant a judgment for the plaintiff.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Food, Cent. Dig. § 16; Dec. Dig. § 16.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Action to recover a penalty by the People of the State of New York against Thomas W. Russell. From a judgment for defendant, the People appeal. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued April term, 1912, before SEABURY, GUY, and GERARD, JJ.

Thomas Carmody, Atty. Gen. (Robert P. Beyer, of New York City, of counsel), for the People.

Cahn & Nordlinger, of New York City (Emanuel S. Cahn, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

*1069PER CURIAM.

This action is brought to recover a penalty alleged to have been incurred by section 52 of the Agricultural Law (Consol. Laws 1909, c. 1) for selling adulterated milk, as defined by subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 30 of the said law, being chapter 9 of the Laws of 1909, as amended by chapter 341 of the Laws of 1910.

The uncontradicted testimony upon the part of the plaintiff shows that the defendant served the customers in his restaurant with milk taken from the same can as were the inspected samples, which samples were shown upon analysis to contain more than the percentage of water allowed by law. The mere fact that one inspector actually saw the waiters in the restaurant delivering milk to customers, and that another inspector did not, does not negative the evidence of the first.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing**

**Financial      Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|   | · |   | fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |  /s/                Robert A. Placek |                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                           |                                                                                                                           |
|   |   | **Name:**                                 | **Robert                A. Placek**                                                                                            |   |
|   |   | **Title:**                                | **Chairman                of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer****(Principal                Executive Officer)** |   |
|   |   | **Date:**                                 | **January                16, 2007**                                                                                            |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAIN SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         261,374
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          92,312
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                53,915
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,613,704
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          69,997
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            71,905
<LOANS>                                      6,179,370
<ALLOWANCE>                                     78,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,549,687
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,943,401
<SHORT-TERM>                                   393,603
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            107,684
<LONG-TERM>                                    383,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       195,809
<OTHER-SE>                                     525,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               8,549,687
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                129,104
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               26,892
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,485
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               157,481
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              65,263
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,966
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           81,515
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,097
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 210
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 61,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,236
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,178
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,178
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                     24,745
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,478
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,241
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,356
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                77,266
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,907
<RECOVERIES>                                       721
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               78,177
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            78,177
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         30,454


</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 197 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a State to charge inState tuition rates to active-duty members of the Armed Forces domiciled 

or stationed on active duty in that State and to the dependents of 

such members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. SCOTT of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a State 

to charge in-State tuition rates to active-duty members 

of the Armed Forces domiciled or stationed on active 

duty in that State and to the dependents of such members. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military In-State Tui5 tion Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 197 IH 

1 SEC. 2. IN-STATE TUITION RATES FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

2 ARMED FORCES ON ACTIVE DUTY AND DE3 PENDENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 49 of title 10, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 982 the 

6 following new section 

7 ‘‘§ 982a. In-State tuition rates 

8 ‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—A member of the armed forces 

9 on active duty for a period of more than 30 days whose 

10 domicile or permanent duty station is in a State, and the 

11 dependents of such a member, may not be charged tuition 

12 for attendance at a public institution of higher education 

13 in that State at a rate that is greater than the rate 

14 charged for residents of that State. 

15 ‘‘(b) CONTINUATION.—If a member of the armed 

16 forces, or a dependent of a member, pays tuition at a pub17 lic institution of higher education in a State at a rate de18 termined by reason of subsection (a), the provisions of 

19 subsection (a) shall continue to apply to such member or 

20 dependent while continuously enrolled at that institution, 

21 notwithstanding a subsequent change in permanent duty 

22 station of the member to a location outside the State. 

23 ‘‘(c) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

24 ‘State’ has the meaning given that term in section 982 

25 of this title.’’. 
3 

•HR 197 IH 

1 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such 

2 chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

3 to section 982 the following new item: 

‘‘982a. In-State tuition rates.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 982a of title 10, 

5 United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall 

6 take effect with respect to tuition payments required to 

7 be paid for periods beginning on or after August 1, 2006. 

Æ
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. SCHULTZ, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 21, 1912.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, against John E. Schultz. No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal (from 134 N. Y. Supp. 293) to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs, on the ground that permission is unnecessary.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13332]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-33; OTS No. 06005]


Clayton County Federal Savings and Loan Association, Jonesboro, 
Georgia; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 12, 1995, the Deputy Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Clayton County Federal Savings and Loan Association, 
Jonesboro, Georgia, to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection at the 
Information Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20552, and the Southeast Regional Office, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30309.

    Dated: May 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 95-13332 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-5F (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    National City Mortgage Co. as Servicer, SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as
    Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities
    Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2151 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkacit MOZ/LG and Vulkacit MOZ/ 

SG. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkacit MOZ/LG and 

Vulkacit MOZ/SG. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VULKACIT MOZ AND VULKACIT MOZ/SG. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.02 2- 

(morpholinothio)benzothiazole (CAS No. 

102–77–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2934.20.15) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2151 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2084 

To extend the duty suspension on Wakil XL. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Wakil XL. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAKIL XL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.04 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Wakil XL) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and in7 serting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2162 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2162

           To extend the duty suspension on Methyl cinnamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the duty suspension on Methyl cinnamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL CINNAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl cinnamate) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Ex10.12-2014.10K






Exhibit 10.12


DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
 
First Data Corporation (Company) directors do not receive compensation. However, all of the directors of the Company are also directors of the Company’s parent company, First Data Holdings Inc. (Holdings).  The Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors of Holdings approved an annual cash retainer of $40,000, payable in semi-annual installments, for each non-employee director of Holdings associated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR).  The Committee also approved compensation for each director of Holdings not employed by Holdings or affiliates of KKR as follows:


		
	•
	At the time of their appointment, a one-time grant of 500,000 options to purchase shares of common stock of Holdings pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and Its Affiliates (Incentive Plan), with a strike price equal to the Fair Market Value at the time of grant to vest in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date.




		
	•
	Annual grant of restricted stock of Holdings equivalent in value to $125,000, both at the time of their appointment and during the first quarter of each subsequent calendar year during which they continue to serve pursuant to the Incentive Plan on the following terms:




		
	◦
	20% vesting upon later of end of lockup period following an Initial Public Offering, and one year from the grant date;


		
	◦
	40% vesting upon later of end of lockup period following an Initial Public Offering, and two years from the grant date;


		
	◦
	40% vesting upon later of end of lockup period following an Initial Public Offering, and three years from the grant date;


		
	◦
	Forfeiture of unvested awards upon termination of Board service for any reason other than Death or Disability; and


		
	◦
	In the event of Death or Disability, Holdings shall exercise call rights and pay 100% of the fair market value for unvested awards.




		
	•
	Annual cash retainer of $75,000 to be paid in quarterly installments on the first day of each calendar quarter.  




All cash compensation may be deferred under the First Data Holdings Inc. 2008 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan based upon the election made prior to each calendar year by each director.  All amounts deferred will accrue earnings based on the performance of Holdings common stock and be paid to the director upon termination of the director’s service, subject to acceleration of the payout under certain circumstances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,886
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              22
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,425
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    111,893
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,026
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,058
<LOANS>                                        282,561
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 435,724
<DEPOSITS>                                     352,421
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,249
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,954
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,266
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 435,724
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,971
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,210
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   100
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,281
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,665
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,616
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      655
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 732
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,686
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,974
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        531
<LOANS-PAST>                                       378
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   177
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,300
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,908
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      388
<RECOVERIES>                                       108
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,283
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,283
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:16-CR-028 JD

)

DARNELL WILLIAMS )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon 

a plea of guilty issued on February 12, 2020. [DE 17]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS 

those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Darnell Williams’ plea of guilty, 

ACCEPTS the plea agreement, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 6 of the Indictment, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence 

Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should 

the Addendum to the final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that 

party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. 

If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any 

evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, 

consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 27, 2020 

 /s/JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court