alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1880 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1880

        To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,4-Dichloroaniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,4-Dichloroaniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,4-DICHLOROANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.74      2,4-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dichloroaniline                                                    31/2008
                         (CAS No. 554-00-
                         7) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2921.42.18)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

D E V I S S E R   G R A YCHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

401 - 905 West Pender Street 
  Vancouver, BC Canada 
  V6C 1L6
    
  Tel: (604) 687-5447
  Fax: (604) 687-6737

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
  Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (“the Company”)

Dear Sirs

We consent to the use of our report on the financial statements of the Company,
  as at and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, dated March 13, 2006
  and included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

Yours very truly,

“De Visser Gray”

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
  March 13, 2006

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27567-27568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12797]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Media Arts Advisory Panel; Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Advisory Panel (Arts on Radio Section) to the National Council 
on the Arts will be held on June 6, 1995 from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on 
June 6, 1995. This meeting will be held in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.
    Portions of this meeting will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 
9:15 a.m. for introductory remarks and from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. for 
a guideline and policy discussion.
    The remaining portion of this meeting, from 9:15 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 
is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of February 8, 1994 this session will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c) (4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance. [[Page 27568]] 
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-
5532, TYY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: May 19, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-12797 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

MICHAEL PAUL MATUSZCZAK

Plaintiff(s) 

v. Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-183

MIRAMED REVENUE GROUP LLC

Defendant(s)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

☐ the Plaintiff(s), recover from the 

Defendant(s) damages in the 

amount of , plus post-judgment interest at the rate of %

☐ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

X Other: JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant Miramed Revenue Group LLC and 

against Plaintiff Michael Paul Matuszczak on all counts.

This action was (check one):

☐ tried to a jury with Judge 

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

☐ tried by Judge 

without a jury and the above decision was reached.

X decided by Judge Philip P. Simon on a Motion for Summary Judgment

DATE: 11/14/2017 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

by /s/Jason Schrader 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00183-PPS document 31 filed 11/14/17 page 1 of 1
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed January 23, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00380

- CV

RICHARD A. MYERS, RE ALTY CAPITAL CORPORA TION, AND REALTY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LL C , Appellants

V.
LINDA PAVLIK AND PAV LIK AND ASSOCIATES , Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 13928



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Before the Court is the parties’ January 21, 2014 Agreed Motion to Dismiss the appeal.

The parties have informed the Court that they have settled all matters before the Court in this

appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(a)(2).

130380F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/
ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RICHARD A. MYERS, REALTY CAPITAL CORPORATION, AND REALTY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Appellants

No. 05

- 13

- 00380

- CV V.

LINDA PAVLIK AND PAVLIK AND ASSOCIATES, Appellees On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas,
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 13928. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Justices Bridges and Lewis p articipating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of January, 2014.

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE
JUSTICE
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JONATHAN WALLACE GURR

VERSUS

NO. 2021 CW 1255

ROBERT PORTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

NATURAL TUTOR OF HIS MINOR CHILD, 

R. P., BOH BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO., 

L. L. C., AND/ OR JAMES CONSTRUCTION

GROUP, L. L. C., BONE SAFETY SIGNS, 

LLC, SAFEAUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, FEBRUARY 10, 2022

ABC INSURANCE COMPANY AND DEF

INSURANCE COMPANY

In Re: G. E. C., Inc., Philip K. Meyers, P. E. and XL Specialty

Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton

Rouge, No. 660066. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s September 23, 2021

judgment which denied the motion for summary judgment filed by

defendants, G. E. C., Inc. and XL Specialty Insurance Company, is

reversed. We find the peremptive period in La. R. S. 9: 5607 is

applicable to plaintiff, Jonathan Gurr' s, claims against G. E. C., 

Inc., a firm licensed to practice engineering in the State of

Louisiana, and XL Specialty Insurance Company, and the claims in

this action arise out of an engagement to provide engineering

services. Plaintiff, Jonathan Gurr, filed his suit on August 1, 

2017, more than five years after the time the owner, the

Department of Transportation and Development, took possession of

the improvement with its March 4, 2005 Notice of Completion. We

further find that the indemnity provision in the contract

between G. E. C., Inc. and the Department of Transportation and

Development does not affect the applicability of the peremptive

period set forth in La. R. S. 9: 5607. Boes Iron Works, Inc. v. 

M. D. Descant, Inc., 2014- 0270 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 9/ 19/ 14), 154

So. 3d 555, 559; and Ebinger v. Venus Const. Corp., 2008- 379 ( La. 

App. 3rd Cir. 10/ 1/ 08), 995 So. 2d 1224, 1226. Plaintiff, 

Jonathan Gurr, failed to produce tactual support sufficient to

establish the existence of a genuine issuer of material fact or

that defendants are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

Accordingly, we grant the motion for summary judgment finding

plaintiff' s claims against G. E. C., Inc., and its insurer, XL

Specialty Insurance Company, are perempted, and dismiss

plaintiff' s claims against defendants, G. E. C., Inc. and XL

Specialty Insurance Company. 

JMM

WIL

EW

O PPIPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUT4EIRK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
[No. 36617-3-I.

Division One.

September 29, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard A. Parsons, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Ska-git County, No. 94-1-00317-7, George E. McIntosh, J., entered May 5, 1995. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judge Elder and 

 Senior Judge Cole 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

ANTHONY MONTREY WOOTEN, S/K/A 

 ANTOINE M. WOOTEN 

v. Record No. 2424-93-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

 CHIEF JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JUNE 13, 1995 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HENRICO COUNTY 

George F. Tidey, Judge 

 John M. Wright, Jr. (Downs & Wright, on 

brief), for appellant. 

 Margaret Ann B. Walker, Assistant Attorney 

General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney 

General, on brief), for appellee. 

 Anthony Montrey Wooten appeals his convictions of robbery 

and use of a firearm in the commission of a robbery. On appeal, 

Wooten contends that the indictment charging him with robbery of 

"U.S. currency" was fatally defective because the evidence 

indicated that the only item taken from the victim was a jacket. 

 Wooten also challenges the sufficiency of the Commonwealth's 

evidence to convict him. Because Wooten did not raise these 

issues before the trial court, he is barred from now raising them 

on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm his convictions. 

 "Rule 5A:18 and its companion Rule 5:25 are strictly 

enforced. . . . [And], [s]pecifically the Supreme Court has held 

that a challenge to the sufficiency of the Commonwealth's 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

evidence is waived if not raised with some specificity in the 

trial court." Mounce v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 433, 435, 357 

S.E.2d 742, 744 (1987). Only where a miscarriage of justice has 

clearly occurred do "the ends of justice" require this Court to 

consider an issue for the first time on appeal. Id. And "the 

`ends of justice' provision may be used when the record 

affirmatively shows that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, 

not when it merely shows that a miscarriage might have occurred." 

Id. at 436, 357 S.E.2d at 744. 

 Assuming, but not deciding, that the evidence did not prove 

robbery of currency as alleged in the indictments and, therefore, 

that the indictments were fatally defective, Rule 5A:18 bars our 

consideration of this argument on appeal. The evidence supported 

the defendant's conviction of robbery of the victim's jacket. 

The record does not reveal whether the jacket contained a wallet 

or loose currency. Nonetheless, the defendant failed at any time 

during the trial to raise this issue. Because we are unable to 

say upon this record that the jacket taken from the victim could 

not have contained money, we cannot hold that the "evidence 

clearly demonstrated that [Wooten] could not have been guilty and 

a miscarriage of justice surely ha[s] occurred." Id.

 For the above-stated reason, neither will we consider 

Wooten's contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain 

his convictions, regardless of the indictment's alleged flaw. 

 Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00053

- CV

IN RE R.M.M.

, From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 02913 Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file her brief is granted. We order appellant to file her brief by April 14, 2016

.

______________ ___________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of April, 2016

.

____________ _______________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.80

                    [Spanish Broadcasting System, inc. Logo]

December 10, 2003

Marko Radlovic
24949 Normans Way
Calabasas, CA 91302

Dear Marko Radlovic:

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
1999 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") and/or your Employment Agreement, if
applicable, you have been granted an Incentive Stock Option, subject to
limitations set forth by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time
to time, to purchase 17,318 shares (the "Option") of Class A common stock as
outlined below.

           Granted To:     Marko Radlovic

           Granted Date:   November 6, 2003

         Option Granted:   17,318

Option Price per Share: $9.44              Total Cost to Exercise:   $163,481.92

        Expiration Date:     November 6, 2013, unless terminated earlier.

       Vesting Schedule:   Special Vesting as follows:

                           5,821 on 11/06/2003
                           5,821 on 11/06/2004
                           5,676 on 11/06/2005


        Transferability:    Not transferable except in accordance with the Plan.

                                             Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

                                             By: /s/ Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                                 ---------------------

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Option granted on
the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions
of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to
conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the Plan.

Signature:  /s/ Marko Radlovic                  Date:   12/29/03
           ----------------------                       --------
             Marko Radlovic
FDIC Acronyms & 

Contracting Terms 

DIVISIONS AND OFFICES 

DOF – Division of Finance 

DOA – Division of Administration 

(Formerly Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection) 

(Formerly Office of Diversity and Economic Opportunity) 

ASB – 

BOA –

CCR –

CRL – 

FAR – 

FF&E –

IT – 

LSA – 

ORE – 

RAC – 

SAM – 

SOW – 

MWOB – 

CONTRACTING TERMS 

Acquisition Services Branch 

Basic Ordering Agreement 

Central Contractor Registration System 

Contractor Resource List 

Federal Acquisition Regulations 

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment 

Information Technology 

Loss Share Agreement 

Owned Real Estate 

Receivership Assistance Contract 

System for Award Management 

Statement of Work 

Minority and Woman–Owned Business 

DRR – Division of Resolution and

 Receiverships

RMS – Division of Risk Management Supervision

OMWI – Office of Minority and Women Inclusion

DOING

BUSINESS

WITH THE FDIC
#### VAN BEUREN v. WETHERSPOON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 18, 1898.)

Action by Elizabeth S. Van Beuren against Frances A. Wetherspoon and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 42 N. Y. Supp. 404, and 49 N. Y. Supp. 1150.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          58,748
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    560,414
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         560,414
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           560,414
<LOANS>                                      1,194,078
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,872,174
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,233,179
<SHORT-TERM>                                   342,202
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,638
<LONG-TERM>                                    107,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           903
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,872,174
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 71,887
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               27,359
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   505
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                99,751
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              33,853
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,303
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           50,448
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,644
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 194
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 32,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,392
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      22,392
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,898
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,405
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,587
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   945
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,176
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,429
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,013
<RECOVERIES>                                       826
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,886
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,886
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE NOBLE CIRCUIT COURT Fi LE D

STATE OF INDIANA })
) SS:

COUNTY OF NOBLE ) ep ot M6
STATE OF INDIANA ne wd

or CAUSE NUMBER: CLERK ost CIRCUIT COURT
Jeffrey Scott Brown )
D.0.B. 04/10/1964 _ ) 57C01- ] 5 0 9 Fh. 0 0 0 0 6 7
S.S.N. )

ORDER REGARDING PROBABLE CAUSE
The State of Indiana by Prosecuting Attomey Eric D. Blackman or his deputies, 33rd Judicial Circuit, files its
Information and Affidavit of Probable Cause charging the Defendant, Jeffrey Scott Brown , with:

1. Count], 11, Ill, IV, Failure to Register at a Sex Offender four Level 5 Felonies;

‘The Court examines said Information and Affidavit and finds and determines that:
‘They state facts showing that probable cause exists for the arrest of the Defendant,
0 The Defendant has already been arrested; or

be’ ‘The Clerk is now directed to issue immediately a warrant of arrest ta the Sheriff of ‘Noble County, Indiana
returnable forthwith, The Clerk is directed to endorse said bail on the warrant.

fo
vi The Court determines there is not probable cause for this defendant's arrest, and if in custody, the defendant
shall be released. .
Bail is set:

O inthe amount of $ , cash or surety;
C1 inthe amount set forth in the local rules; or

tote Defendant is to be held without bail until further order, court,

WANS at-L2 He. Bi
Time and Date JudgseAfble CIRCUIT COURT

EXHIBIT

1G

BO
#### In re Eddie Lavon McNEILL, Petitioner.

No. 10-1948.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 2011.

Decided: June 23, 2011.

Eddie Lavon McNeill, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

*148Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Lavon McNeill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied McNeill’s motion on March 25, 2011. Accordingly, because the district court has recently adjudicated McNeill’s Rule 59(e) motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant McNeill’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
[No. 21091-6-II.

Division Two.

September 26, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jerred Glen Wright, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 95-1-00310-8, George L. Wood, J., entered August 2,1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.