alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction to meeting purpose, time, and access information.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Thursday, June 4, 2021, concerning a meeting of the New York Advisory Committee. The document contained an incorrect purpose, meeting time, and access information.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mallory Trachtenberg at                         *mtrachtenberg@usccr.gov*                         or (202) 809-9618.                    

*Correction:*                         In the                         **Federal Register**                         of Thursday, June 4, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-11713, on pages 29997-29998, correct the purpose, time, web-link and dial-in information to read: The purpose of the meeting is to hear testimony and debrief the Committee's briefings on potential racial discrimination in eviction policies and enforcement in New York.                         *When:*                         Friday, July 16, 2021, from 1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. EST at web conference link:                         *https://bit.ly/​3j4f7J8*                         password is USCCR; to join by phone only, dial: 1-800-360-9505; Access code: 199 338 2002.                    

Dated: June 22, 2021.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2021-13650 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
PNM 12.31.2014 EX 10.4.2




Exhibit 10.4.2        
SHAREWORKS
Template Type Group: Grant Agreement
Template Type: Grant Agreement Template
Template Name:  PNM Officer RSA Grant Agreement
Language (s): English
Label: Agreement
HTML:
Acknowledgment Form


###GRANT_DATE###


###PARTICIPANT NAME###


Dear ###PARTICIPANT_ NAME###:


Pursuant to the PNM Resources, Inc. 20__ Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘LTIP’), you have been granted a Restricted Stock Rights Award for ____ shares of stock of PNM Resources, Inc. as outlined below.


	
			
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Employee ID:
	_______________
	 

	Granted To:
	_______________


	 

	Grant ID:
	_______________


	 

	Grant Date:
	_______________


	 

	Granted:
	_______________


	 

	Grant Price:
	$0.0000
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Vesting Schedule:
	One-third per year for 3 years
### on 3/_/__
### on 3/_/__
### on 3/_/__






By my acceptance below, I hereby (1) acknowledge receipt of this Grant on the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the  LTIP and the attached PNM Resources, Inc. 2014 Performance Equity Plan (the ‘Plan’), (2) acknowledge my prior receipt of the Plan and the LTIP, and (3) agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Grant set forth in the Plan and the LTIP.  For an additional copy of the LTIP, please contact Gail Vavruska-Marcum at 505-341-4631.


[I ACCEPT/ACCEPTANCE BUTTON]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flow International Corporation, a Washington
corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN R. LIGHT    
|Stephen R. Light           
|Principal Executive Officer
|January 10, 2005           



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Stephen D. Reichenbach, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN D. REICHENBACH
|Stephen D. Reichenbach       
|Principal Financial Officer  
|January 10, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12863]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
[CO-050-1220-00]


Emergency Road Closure

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Emergency closure of road.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that lands administered by BLM adjacent 
to and including the Phantom Canyon Road, (Fremont County Road 67) will 
be temporarily closed from approximately Mile Post 4.5 to approximately 
Mile Post 15 to motorized vehicle use. This notice is in accordance 
with 43 CFR 8364.1(a), Closure and Restriction orders. This closure is 
in cooperation with the Fremont County road closure and is to 
facilitate the replacement of a bridge on County Road 67. The closure 
is necessary for the safety of the public, the construction crews 
working in the area and to prevent vandalism at the work site.

DATES: This closure is in effect from May 15, 1995 and will remain in 
effect until the reopening of the Phantom Canyon Road by the Fremont 
County Road Dept.

ADDRESSES: Comments can be directed to the Area Manager, Royal Gorge 
Resource Area or District Manager, Canon City District, 3170 East Main, 
Canon City, CO 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack H. Hagan, District Law 
Enforcement Ranger at (719) 275-0631.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These restrictions do not apply to 
Emergency, Law Enforcement, Federal, State, County and other authorized 
personnel who are in the area for official or emergency purposes and 
who are expressly authorized by BLM or county officials. Any person who 
fails to comply with this closure order will be subject to the 
penalties as defined in 18 USC 3571.
Adrian Neisius,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-12863 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
EX-10.26



 Exhibit 10.26 

RESTATED AMENDMENT 
 TO
THE KEYCORP 
 EXCESS CASH BALANCE PENSION PLAN 

WHEREAS, KeyCorp has established the KeyCorp Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan (the “Plan”), a nonqualified plan of deferred
compensation for a certain select group of KeyCorp employees, and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of KeyCorp has authorized its
Compensation Committee to permit amendments to the Plan, and 
 WHEREAS, in conjunction with the enactment of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of KeyCorp determined it desirable to preserve those earned and vested Plan benefits of December 31, 2004 in accordance with the law in effect prior to the enactment of
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and accordingly, has authorized the freezing of the Plan to preserve such vested Plan benefits as of December 31, 2004, and 

WHEREAS, to effectuate a simplified administration of those December 31, 2004 vested and frozen Plan benefits in accordance with
the laws in effect prior to the enactment of the Act, as well as to comply with the requirements of the Act with regard to those participant Plan benefits that have not vested as of December 31, 2004, the Compensation Committee has accordingly
directed the establishment of a KeyCorp Second Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to such action of the
Compensation Committee, the Amendment to the Plan is hereby restated to clarify that in conjunction with the freezing of the Plan, participants’ not vested Plan benefits as of December 31, 2004 shall be transferred to the KeyCorp Second
Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan effective January 1, 2005, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	A new Article XI has been added to the Plan to provide the following: 

 “ARTICLE XI

 AMENDMENT TO FREEZE 

11.1 No New Accruals, Deferrals, and Contributions Under the Plan. As of January 1, 2005 the Plan shall be frozen
with regard to all new accruals, deferrals, and contributions to the Plan after December 31, 2004 and all Participants’ Plan benefits that are earned and vested as of December 31, 2004 shall be administered in accordance with the
terms of the Plan as frozen and with the requirements of the law in effect prior to the enactment of Section 409A of the Code. In conjunction with the foregoing, all Participants’ not vested Plan benefits as of December 31, 2004 shall
be transferred to the KeyCorp Second Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan effective January 1, 2005 and shall be administered in accordance with the requirements of the KeyCorp Second Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan. 

 

	 	2.	The amendment set forth in Paragraphs 1 shall be effective as of December 31, 2004. 

  

	 	3.	Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, KeyCorp has caused this Restated Amendment to the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer on January 20, 2005, to be effective as of December 28, 2004. 

 

			
	KEYCORP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas E. Helfrich





			
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the use in this  Amendment No. 2 to  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-130173) on Form SB-2 of InfoSearch Media, Inc. of our report dated March 20,
2006  relating  to  our  audit  of the  financial  statements  appearing  in the
Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.

We also consent to the  reference  to our firm under the  captions  "Experts" in
such Prospectus.


SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 20, 2006
#### In the Matter of Dorothy Siegert, Appellant, v William Luney, as Chairman of the Zoning Board of the Village of Tarrytown, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent Zoning Board of the Village of Tarrytown that respondent Temple Beth Abraham could operate a playground and nursery school daycare center on its property as a matter of right, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered February 15,1984, which granted a motion to dismiss the petition and confirmed the Zoning Board’s determination.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Petitioner sought to have the Zoning Board place restrictions on the situs of the playground being constructed by respondent Temple Beth Abraham (Temple) on the property adjoining petitioner’s. After first granting the Temple a variance, the Zoning Board annulled that determination, holding that Temple could *855construct the playground as a matter of right, and that it did not have the authority to consider petitioner’s request. This determination was confirmed by Special Term. Special Term’s judgment should be affirmed.

While a religious institution cannot be prohibited from constructing a church, synagogue or its accessory uses, such as a playground, where they bear a substantial relationship to the promotion of public health, safety, morals or the community’s general welfare, appropriate restrictions may be imposed on that construction *(Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd.,*1 NY2d 508; *Matter of American Friends v Schwab,*68 AD2d 646; *Matter of Seaford Jewish Center v Board of Zoning Appeals,*48 AD2d 686).

However, at bar, the situs of the playground does not result in a prima facie violation of the village zoning ordinance, and petitioner does not specifically cite a violation. Therefore, the Zoning Board was without authority to consider petitioner’s requests, and it properly declined to do so *(see,*Village Law § 7-712 [2]; *Matter of Garden City Jewish Center v Incorporated Vil. of Garden City,*2 Misc 2d 1009). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
[Nos. 39891-1-I; 39892-0-I.

Division One.

October 20, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Dependency of*O. J., et al. Gwendolyn May, *Appellant,*v. Department of Social and Health Services, *Respondent.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-7-01499-4, Charles W. Mertel, J., entered November 14, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Coleman and Becker, JJ. Now published at 88 Wn. App. 690.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION S

Appellate case name: John Henry Skillern v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 517

- CR & 01

- 1 5

- 00 00 518

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 4 3 6278 & 1 4 3 6279

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harri s County

On December 29, 2015, this Court granted the form motion by the appellant, John Henry Skillern, for access to the appellate records and sua sponte granted a 45

- day

extension of time to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by his appellate

counsel in the above appeals

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 1400 (1967)

. In that Order, the Court als o ordered the trial clerk to mail a copy of

the records to the pro se appellant and certify the date of delivery within 15 days of that

Order. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). On February 10, 2016, appellant filed this “First Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Pro Se Brief or Response to Anders Brief” seeking 30 days to file his response to the Anders brief because , among other reasons , he ha s yet to receive the appellate records as of February 7, 2016

. To date, no certification of delivery of the

records has been filed by the trial clerk with the Clerk of this Court. Accordingly, the Court grant s the motion and again order s the trial court clerk,

no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to pro vide a copy of the record s

, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which deliv ery of the record s to the appellant is made. Finally, appellant’s pro se response to h is appointed counsel’s Anders brief shall be filed

within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: February 18, 2016
#### Julius E. MOGYOROSSY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 2006-3095.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 27, 2006.

Julius E. Mogyorossy, pro se.

ORDER

Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is,

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner’s brief is due within 21 days from the date of filing of this order.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Crops Research: Fargo, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ETSARC Research Units
                        ETSARC Home page
                                    Office of the Center Director
                                    Location Support Staff
                                    Animal Metabolism-Agricultural Chemicals Research
                                    Cereal Crops Research
                                    Insect Genetics and Biochemistry Research
                                    Sugarbeet and Potato Research
                                    Sunflower and Plant Biology ResearchSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fargo, North Dakota Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center Cereal Crops Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar 2005 RRVARC News & Events!   ARS News Articles  ARS Researchers Develop Method to Speed Up Breeding of
		Scab-Resistant Barley CultivarsFeb 02, 2010Wheat Genotyping: An Invaluable ServiceAug 06, 2008Fighting a Worldwide Wheat ThreatJun 16, 2008Johanns Announces Top USDA-ARS Scientists for 2005Feb 07, 2006


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### PEOPLE v. O’BRIEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 18, 1907.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against James O’Brien.

No opinion. Motion granted. Order filed.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2256 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Zeta-Cypermethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Zeta-Cypermethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZETA-CYPERMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 
2 

•HR 2256 IH 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 (S)-Cyano-(3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl 

(+)cis-3-(2,2- 

dichloroethenyl)–2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and (S)-cyano-(3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl 

(+)trans-3-(2,2- 

dichloroethenyl)–2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (Cypermethrin) (CAS 

No. 52315–07–8) (provided 

for under subheading 

2926.90.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of InternationalLease Finance Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: February 19, 2004
/S/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUNDVice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
-27-