alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

CHARLES HESS; MARTY HIGGINS; 

ROBERT “GLEN” MCCORMICK; RONALD 

PAPA, FRANK SHERA and AL TORNQUIST, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BIOMET, INC. and ZIMMER BIOMET 

HOLDINGS, INC., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:16-cv-00208-JD-MGG 

DEFENDANTS’ COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION 

DESIGNATIONS 

Defendants, Biomet, Inc. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., (“Biomet”), by counsel, 

hereby submits their counter-designations to Plaintiffs’ deposition designations, attached as 

Exhibit A, filed contemporaneously with this document. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

QUARLES & BRADY LLP 

By: /s/ Elizabeth A. Trachtman 

 Joshua B. Fleming, #25954-29 

Elizabeth A. Trachtman, #29518-49 

Daniel M. Janssen, PHV WI #1022112

Attorneys for Defendants

USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00208-JD-MGG document 250 filed 07/31/19 page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 31st day of July, 2019, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the 

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system: 

Joseph R. Fullenkamp 

Alice J. Springer 

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 

joseph.fullenkamp@btlaw.com 

alice.springer@btlaw.com 

Gary Cruciani admitted PHV

Jonathan N. Powers admitted PHV

Travis E. DeArman admitted PHV

McKool Smith PC 

gcruciani@mckoolsmith.com 

jpowers@mckoolsmith.com 

tdearman@mckoolsmith.com 

Hess_Biomet@mckoolsmith.com 

/s/ Elizabeth A. Trachtman 

 

QUARLES & BRADY LLP 

135 North Pennsylvania Street 

2400 BMO Building 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 

Phone: 317-957-5000 

Fax: 317-957-5010 

josh.fleming@quarles.com 

daniel.janssen@quarles.com 

elizabeth.trachtman@quarles.com 

QB\990327.00256\58593765.2 

USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00208-JD-MGG document 250 filed 07/31/19 page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-22-TLS 

 ) 

BRITTNEY JOHNSON ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 32], filed on October 29, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 32] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count One (1) of the Indictment is 

hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on November 13, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
# L_2008060EN.01002301.xml

| 5.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 60/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 60/23

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 February 2008

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Georgia on certain aspects of air services

(2008/189/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2), in conjunction with Article 300(2), first sentence of the first subparagraph thereof and Article 300(3), first subparagraph,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | By a decision of 5 June 2003 the Council has authorised the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements by a Community agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By a decision of 5 June 2003 the Council has authorised the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements by a Community agreement.

| (2) | The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an agreement with Georgia on certain aspects of air services in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Decision of 5 June 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an agreement with Georgia on certain aspects of air services in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Decision of 5 June 2003.

| (3) | The Agreement has been signed on behalf of the Community subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision 2006/357/EC (2). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement has been signed on behalf of the Community subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision 2006/357/EC (2).

| (4) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Georgia on certain aspects of air services is approved on behalf of the Community.

Article 2

The president of the Council is authorised to designate the person empowered to make the notification provided in Article 8.1 of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

D. RUPEL

---

(1)  Opinion of 6 September 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 23.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, C. Troy Woodbury, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener
Corporation (the “Company”), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 1, 2012 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:



| | • |  | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | • |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |
Exhibit
23.1
  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board
of Directors:
 Procera  Networks,
Inc.
 Los
Gatos, California
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-74026, No. 333-52180, No. 333-42892, No. 333-37196, No. 333-102944, No.
333-115373, No. 333-130560) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-115374) on Form S-3 of
Procera Networks, Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Procera Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December
31,2007 and 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in this December 31,
2007, amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Procera Networks,
Inc.
  Our
report dated March 10, 2009, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of  financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, expresses our opinion that Procera
Networks, Inc. did not maintain sufficient control over the closing process and
could not prepare its financial statements, footnotes and 10-K disclosures in a
timely fashion, which resulted in last minute changes and could have resulted in
material errors to the financial statements.
  /s/ PMB Helin
Donovan
 San
Francisco, California
 March10, 2009
[No. 20563-7-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Erick John Juvonen, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-1-05366-3, Sergio Armijo, J., entered March 28, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Triadimefon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Triadimefon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIADIMEFON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.72 1-(4-Chlorophenoxy)–3,3-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1- 

y1)–2-butanone (CAS No. 

43121–43–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2933.99.22) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1727 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 10.31

Amendment to 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement Dated February 25, 2014

THIS AMENDMENT to the Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated February 25, 2014, by and between Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Paul M. Black (“Black”), is effective as of December 23, 2014.

WHEREAS, the Company and Black previously entered into the Agreement and now mutually wish to amend certain terms contained therein.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:


	
1.
	
Effective as of the date of this Amendment, the Agreement is cancelled, void and of no further force or effect.  





	
2.
	
Effective as of the date of this Amendment, all performance-based restricted stock units grant pursuant to the Agreement are hereby forfeited and cancelled.




(Signature Page Follows)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on the day and year first above written.

 


	
 
	
 
	
 

	
ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC.

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Brian P. Farley

	
Name:
	
 
	
Brian P. Farley

	
 

	
/s/ Paul M. Black

	
Paul M. Black
94

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

DONNA TANOUE

ANDREW C. HOVE, JR.

ELLEN SEIDMAN

JOHN D. HAWKE, JR.

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

DONNA TANOUE

CHAIRMAN

DEPUTY TO THE CHAIRMAN

JADINE NIELSEN

CHIEF OF STAFF

MARK P. JACOBSEN

CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

DONALD C. DEMITROS

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

GASTON L. GIANNI, JR.

INSPECTOR GENERAL

DEPUTY TO THE CHAIRMAN AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CHRIS M. SALE

DEPUTY TO THE CHAIRMAN AND

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

JOHN F. BOVENZI

GENERAL COUNSEL

WILLIAM F. KROENER, III

DIVISION OF SUPERVISION

JAMES L. SEXTON

DIRECTOR

DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE

AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS

STEPHEN M. CROSS

DIRECTOR

DIVISION OF INSURANCE

ARTHUR J. MURTON

DIRECTOR

DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND

STATISTICS

WILLIAM R. WATSON

DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF CORPORATE 

COMMUNICATIONS

JAMES P. BATTEY

ACTING DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF THE

OMBUDSMAN

LESLIE R. CRAWFORD

ACTING OMBUDSMAN

DIVISION OF INFORMATION

RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

DONALD C. DEMITROS

DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND

ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY

D. MICHAEL COLLINS

DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE

AFFAIRS

ALICE C. GOODMAN

DIRECTOR

LEGAL DIVISION

WILLIAM F. KROENER, III

GENERAL COUNSEL

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE

SECRETARY

ROBERT E. FELDMAN

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

DIVISION OF FINANCE

FREDERICK S. SELBY

DIRECTOR

DIVISION OF RESOLUTIONS

AND RECEIVERSHIPS

MITCHELL F. GLASSMAN

ACTING DIRECTOR

DIVISION OF

ADMINISTRATION

ARLEAS UPTON KEA

DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF INTERNAL 

CONTROL MANAGEMENT

VIJAY G. DESHPANDE

DIRECTOR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0                       7
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                     737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   9,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  10,770
<PP&E>                                               0                   1,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  11,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   6,572
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                  19,315
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                (16,032)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  11,857
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,312                   4,619
<CGS>                                              995                   3,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      995                   3,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108                     210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (383)                   (377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (383)                   (377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (383)                   (377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)                  (0.07)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben GOMEZ-LUEVANO, also known as Ruben Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10712

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 2011.

Susan Cowger, Cara Foos Pierce, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory Don Sherwood, Esq., Law Office of Gregory Sherwood, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*361Before KING, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Gomez-Luevano on appeal has filed a renewed motion for leave to withdraw and an amended brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez-Luevano filed a response to counsel’s initial motion and a supplemental pleading withdrawing his ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

We have reviewed counsel’s amended brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gomez-Luevano’s response and supplemental filing. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Zitong Li, Chief Executive Officer of Cougar Holdings Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  |  | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ ZITONG LIZitong LiChief Executive OfficerApril 29, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 134

)

JOSE M. DURAN-HERNANDEZ )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY AND

 ADJUDICATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 17), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this

court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED, and defendant

is adjudged guilty of that offense. A sentencing date will be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 26, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2214 

To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of triasulfuron and dicamba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of 

triasulfuron and dicamba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF TRIASULFURON AND 

4 DICAMBA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.38.21 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 formulations of trisulfuron and dicamba) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘12/31/2003’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2214 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
# C_2008075EN.01000901.xml

| 26.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5037 — Beko Elektronik/Grundig Multimedia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 75/03)

On 7 March 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5037. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5037. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICEROR**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q, of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”),for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, James P. Radick, Senior Vice President of Financeof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge

 

1.                                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 
|        | /s/ James P. Radick              |   |
|-------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|        | Senior Vice President of Finance |
|        |                             |
|  Date: | May 7, 2004                      |   |   |
|             |                                  |        |  |  |

 

----