alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                               EXHIBIT 27.1


                          Financial Data Schedule


             GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                (Unaudited)
                    (In millions, except per share data)

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1998  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      230<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,046
<PP&E>                                             297<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     136<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              916
<BONDS>                                            299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,552
<SALES>                                          1,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,706
<CGS>                                            1,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    251
<INCOME-TAX>                                        90
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                161
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.13

<FN>
Amounts  inapplicable  or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement
of Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported as 0 herein.

<F1> Notes and accounts  receivable - trade are reported net of  allowances
     for doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
<F2> Property,   plant  and  equipment  are  reported  net  of  accumulated
     depreciation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-23-TLS 

) 

CHRISTOPHER J. SEWELL ) 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 23], filed on July 26, 2016. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 23] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count One (1) of the single Count 

Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on August 12, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
# L_2008107EN.01003101.xml

| 17.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 107/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 107/31

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 April 2008

appointing an Irish member to the European Economic and Social Committee

(2008/311/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2006/651/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Irish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Arthur FORBES,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms Heidi LOUGHEED, Head of IBEC Europe, is hereby appointed a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 14 April 2008.

For the Council

The President

I. JARC

---

(1)  
  OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 13. Decision as amended by Decision 2007/622/EC, Euratom (OJ L 253, 28.9.2007, p. 39).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         10,503,316
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,964,827
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,792,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,730,794
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    224
<COMMON>                                       933,641
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,925,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,792,427
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,493,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,436,016)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,436,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,436,016)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)
        



</TABLE>
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00025-RL-SLC document 22-3 filed 02/22/16 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00025-RL-SLC document 22-3 filed 02/22/16 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00025-RL-SLC document 22-3 filed 02/22/16 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00025-RL-SLC document 22-3 filed 02/22/16 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00025-RL-SLC document 22-3 filed 02/22/16 page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of

Chief Executive Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies this report
on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 5, 2005.



/s/ Fred J. KleisnerName: Fred J. Kleisner




Subscribed and sworn to before me

this 5th day of August 2005.



|       |  |              
|------ |  | -------------
|Name:  |  | Vita Branch  
|Title: |  | Notary Public



My
commission expires: 12-6-08



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

GEORGE METCALF, )

)

Petitioner, )

) 

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:16CV528-PPS

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

George Metcalf, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the prison

disciplinary hearing (ISP 16-03-12) that was held at the Indiana State Prison on March 9, 2016.

The Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) found him guilty of Interfering with Staff in violation

of C-364 and sanctioned him with a written reprimand. A prison disciplinary action can only be

challenged in a habeas corpus proceeding where it results in the lengthening of the duration of

confinement. Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003). A written reprimand did not

lengthen the duration of Metcalf’s confinement, therefore habeas corpus relief is not available in

this case. 

For these reasons, the petition is DENIED pursuant to Habeas Corpus Rule 4 and the

Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: August 16, 2016

 /s/ Philip P. Simon 

 CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil Drainage Research: Columbus, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About usSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbus, Ohio Soil Drainage Research Docs





- Safety
- Environmental Management System
- Civil Rights, Equal Employment Opportunity, and Diversity
- Index

Aboutusheadline bar **Mission:**Management of excess water on agricultural lands, to reduce or prevent detrimental on-site and off-site impacts, is the most serious production problem facing agriculture in the cool, humid region of the U.S. Our mission is to develop and demonstrate integrated water management and cropping systems that support profitable agriculture and environmental protection within this region.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

TYQUAN STEWART,

Plaintiff,

v.

PARKVIEW HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a PARKVIEW 

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HOSPITAL,

and Lakisha HOUSTON,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-CV-00138 – JTM-SLC

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

I, the below-signed, state that pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83-5(e), I have read and will abide 

by the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, including 

Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct Within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit. I 

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Enter my Appearance as counsel in this case for Parkview Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Parkview 

Behavioral Health Hospital (inappropriately sued and served herein as Parkview Behavioral 

Hospital), and Lakisha Houston (inappropriately sued and served herein as Kisha 

Houston).

Dated: September 26, 2016 s/Mark W. Baeverstad

Mark W. Baeverstad #3896-02

Rothberg Logan & Warsco LLP

505 E. Washington Blvd.

Fort Wayne, IN 46802

(260) 422-9454 - Telephone

(260) 422-1622 – Facsimile

mbaeverstad@rlwlawfirm.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 26th day of September, 2016, the following non-CM/ECF 

participant was served by first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid to:

Tyquan Stewart

4510 Austin Dr.

Fort Wayne, IN 46806

s/Mark W. Baeverstad

Mark W. Baeverstad
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1966

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Robert Fount Mahan, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________

 Submitted: February 2, 2016

Filed: February 5, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Mahan, Jr. directly appeals after he pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written

plea agreement, to a felon-in-possession offense, and the district court sentenced him

1

The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri.
to 120 months in prison and three years of supervised release. Mahan’s counsel has

moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967); and Mahan has filed a pro se supplemental brief. For the reasons that follow,

we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Counsel argues in the Anders brief that Mahan’s plea was not voluntary, but

the issue is not properly before us. See United States v. Umanzor, 617 F.3d 1053,

1060-61 (8th Cir. 2010) (where defendant did not move to withdraw guilty plea in

district court, he could not challenge voluntariness of plea for first time on direct

appeal, and any claim that plea was involuntary needed to be addressed in 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 proceedings where factual record could be further developed). Counsel also

argues that the felon-in-possession statute underlying Mahan’s conviction is invalid

under the Missouri Constitution because it violates the right to bear arms, and

accordingly, the conviction and sentence are invalid. These arguments are patently

meritless and do not warrant extended discussion. See United States v. Joos, 638

F.3d 581, 586 (8th Cir. 2011); Heart of Am. Grain Inspection Serv., Inc. v. Mo. Dep’t

of Agric., 123 F.3d 1098, 1103 (8th Cir. 1997) (discussing Supremacy Clause). The

final Anders brief argument addresses pretrial-detention credit, but this matter must

first be raised with the Bureau of Prisons. See United States v. Iversen, 90 F.3d 1340,

1344 (8th Cir. 1996).

In his pro se brief, Mahan complains generally of the ambiguity of his plea

agreement, but does not explain what terms are ambiguous or what relief he seeks. 

He also raises ineffective-assistance claims, which we decline to consider in this

direct appeal, see United States v. Looking Cloud, 419 F.3d 781, 788-89 (8th Cir.

2005); we reject his assertions that alleged misstatements in his plea agreement

undermined the district court’s jurisdiction; and his reliance on Alleyne v. United

States, 133 S. Ct. 2151, 2155 (2013), is misplaced. Finally, having reviewed the

record independently as required under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find

-2-
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw.

_______________________

-3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPAQ
COMPUTER CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,260
<INVENTORY>                                      2,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,032
<PP&E>                                           6,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,804
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,028
<SALES>                                          8,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,127
<CGS>                                            6,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    569
<INCOME-TAX>                                       182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       387
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Procera Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Paul Eovino, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  March
      16, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/    Paul
      EovinoPaul
      Eovino
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.