alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1328]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-29,916 etc.]

Smith Equipment Co. Inc., Clifton, New Jersey, et al.; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    TA-W-29,916  Smith Equipment Company, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey and 
operating in the following States: TA-W-29,916A  California, TA-W-
29,916D  Oregon, TA-W-29,916B  Missouri, TA-W-29,916E  Washington, TA-
W-29,916C  Ohio and TA-W-29,917  Smith Megapak, Inc., Clifton, New 
Jersey, and operating in the following States: TA-W-29,917A  
California, TA-W-29,917D  Oregon, TA-W-29,917B  Missouri, TA-W-29,917E  
Washington, TA-W-29,917C  Ohio; amended certification regarding 
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 2, 1994, applicable 
to all workers of the subject firm. The certification notice will soon 
be published in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred in the states of California, Missouri, 
Ohio, Oregon and Washington.
    This amendment also corrects the location in the operative portion 
of the initial certification to Clifton, New Jersey instead of Clayton, 
New Jersey.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Smith Equipment Company, Inc., and its operating subsidiary 
Smith Megapak, Inc., both located in Clifton, New Jersey.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-29,916 and TA-W-29,917 is 
hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of Smith Equipment Company, Inc., Clifton, New 
Jersey and operating in the following states of California, 
Missouri, Ohio, Oregon and Washington and all workers of Smith 
Megapak, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey and operating in the states of 
California, Missouri, Ohio, Oregon and Washington who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after May 16, 1993 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1994.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of January, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-1328 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ELXSI Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   August 20, 2004               /s/ ALEXANDER M. MILLEY
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Alexander M. Milley
                                       Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ELXSI Corporation and will be retained by ELXSI Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       27
Steven Charles LAUBLY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9258.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1924 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1924

         To reduce temporarily the duty on certain transaxles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reduce temporarily the duty on certain transaxles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRANSAXLES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.02      Transaxles,         .077%        No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         incorporating an                                                   31/2008
                         integral
                         electronic
                         controller,
                         designed for use
                         in hybrid motor
                         vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8708.40.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 15320-7-III.

Division Three.

August 26, 1997.]

#### Marcella M. Brown, *Appellant,*v. Leo B. Galang, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 93-2-00242-5, Yancey Reser, J., entered October 23, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, A.C.J., concurred in by Thompson, J., and Munson, J. Pro Tern.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00078

- CV

NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Leslie Wayne RATLIFF and Shannon Ratliff,

Appellee s

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 05

- 00091

- CVL Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On February 28, 2019, this court ordered the court reporter to file the reporter’s record within thirty (30) days of the date appellant filed proof of payment of the reporter’s fee . We advised the court reporter that f urther requests for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

would be disfavored. Appellant filed proof of payment on March 11, 2019, making the reporter’s record due by April 10, 2019. On April 15, 2019, the court reporter filed a notice of late record requesting until April 22, 2019 to file the reporter’s record. The request is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the reporter’s record is due by no later than April 22, 2019. No further requests for extension of ti me to file the reporter’s record will be granted.

______________ ___________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of April, 2019

.

___ ________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID: 0648-XB176]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Tilefish Monitoring Committee will hold a public meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Thursday, July 22, 2021; from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. For agenda details, see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Webinar connection information will be available at:                         *https://www.mafmc.org/​council-events.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or on their website at                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is for the Tilefish Monitoring Committee to review and possibly revise the 2022 annual catch limits, trip limits, discard estimates, and other management measures for the golden tilefish fishery, and to set new specifications for the golden tilefish fishery for 2023 and 2024.

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Kathy Collins, (302) 526-5253, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: June 15, 2021.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-13321 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the G REIT, Inc.
(the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 31, 2003

/s/    ANTHONY W. THOMPSONAnthony W. Thompson Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPAQ
COMPUTER CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,307
<INVENTORY>                                      2,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,966
<PP&E>                                           6,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,114
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,936
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,393
<SALES>                                          9,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,200
<CGS>                                            7,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  74
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    809
<INCOME-TAX>                                       259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       550
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

815 

TP 14-00108 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JERRY GARRETT, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK 

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M.

Mohun, A.J.], entered January 15, 2014) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Entered: July 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

AND
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Earth Life Sciences Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December
31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Angelo Marino, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | Dated: April 14, 2021                                                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                    
| | /s/
    Angelo Marino                                                              
| | Angelo Marino                                                                      
| |                                                                                    
| | Principal Executive Officer and Principal
    Financial and 
    Accounting Officer
#### SUBCZAK, Respondent, v. AMERICAN LOCOMOTIVE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 4, 1913.)

Action by Joseph Subczak against the American Locomotive Company.

PER CU1IIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal. Held: (1) That the plaintiff failed to establish his freedom from contributory negligence. (2) That the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence.

LAMBERT, J., not sitting.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Bryan D. Gross, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MPSI SystemsInc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.     Date: May 13, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

MICHAEL EDWARD YARBROUGH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) NO. 1:13-CV-160

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Petition under 28 U.S.C.

Paragraph 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State

Custody filed by Michael Edward Yarbrough, a pro se prisoner, on

May 16, 2013. (DE # 1.) The Court is obligated to review the

petition and dismiss it if “it plainly appears from the petition

and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to

relief[.]” RULE 4 OF THE RULES GOVERNING SECTION 2254 CASES. For the

reasons set forth below, the petition (DE # 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

BACKGROUND

According to the petition, Yarbrough is presently detained at

the Steuben County Jail awaiting trial on a charge that he

committed fraud on a financial institution. (DE # 1 at 1.) Giving

the petition liberal construction, he claims that the prosecutor

case 1:13-cv-00160-RL-RBC document 7 filed 05/31/13 page 1 of 3
improperly reneged on a promise to dismiss the pending charge if he

provided certain information about a murder case. (Id. at 3-4.) He

seeks dismissal of the fraud charge and immediate release from

custody. (Id. at 6.)

DISCUSSION

“Ordinarily the attempt of a state prisoner to obtain federal

habeas corpus relief in advance of his state criminal trial [is]

completely hopeless.” United States ex rel. Stevens v. Circuit

Court of Milwaukee County, 675 F.2d 946, 947 (7th Cir. 1982); see

also Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Although there is a

narrow exception involving double jeopardy claims, see Justices of

Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon, 466 U.S. 294, 302–03 (1984), this

case does not present a double jeopardy claim. If Yarbrough

believes that he has a viable defense to the pending criminal

charge or that his case is not being properly adjudicated, he can

present those claims to the state courts. The petition will be

dismissed, but the dismissal will not preclude him from seeking

federal habeas relief at a later date, if he is convicted and

properly exhausts his claims in one complete round of state review.

See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A).

2

case 1:13-cv-00160-RL-RBC document 7 filed 05/31/13 page 2 of 3
CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, the petition (DE # 1) is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATED: May 31, 2013 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court

3

case 1:13-cv-00160-RL-RBC document 7 filed 05/31/13 page 3 of 3