alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM COMPAQ
COMPUTER  CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME  FOR  THE  PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        4596 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5431 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                   2202 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             14788 
<PP&E>                                        2855 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               21748 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        10566 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      6724 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                    3638 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 21748 
<SALES>                                      10947 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             11519 
<CGS>                                         9007 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 9386 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              5957 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (74)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (134)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (2.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.35)
        

</TABLE>
No. 76-5804.

#### Darnell *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit      31.2**

**COMMUNITY      BANKS, INC.**

**RULE      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

**(Chief      Financial Officer)**

| Date   | August                9, 2006 |   | /s/                Donald F. Holt        |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                          |   | Donald                F. Holt            |
|   |                          |   | Executive                Vice President  |
|   |                          |   | (Chief                Financial Officer) |
In the Senate of the United States,

September 6, 2006.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2066) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title 40, United

States Code, to establish a Federal Acquisition Service, to replace the General Supply Fund and the Information Technology Fund with an Acquisition Services Fund, and for

other purposes.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 2, line 25, strike out øup to five¿

2 Ω2æPage 10, line 7, strike out øor¿ and all that follows

3 through the end of line 9, and insert:
 †

2

HR 2066 EAS

1 ‘‘(B) the exceptional difficulty in recruiting

2 or retaining a qualified employee, or

3 ‘‘(C) a temporary emergency hiring need,

4 Ω3æPage 10, line 20, strike out øDecember 31, 2011.¿

5 and insert: December 31, 2011.’’.

6 Ω4æPage 10, strike out line 21 and all that follows

7 through page 13, line 8, and insert the following new sec8 tion and renumber subsequent section:

9 SEC. 5. DISPOSAL OF FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY TO

10 HISTORIC LIGHT STATIONS.

11 Section 549(c)(3)(B) of title 40, United States Code,

12 is amended—

13 (1) in clause (vii), by striking ‘‘or’’ after the

14 semicolon;

15 (2) in clause (viii), by striking the period and

16 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

17 (3) by adding at the end the following:

18 ‘‘(ix) a historic light station as defined

19 under section 308(e)(2) of the National His20 toric Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470w–

21 7(e)(2)), including a historic light station

22 conveyed under subsection (b) of that sec23 tion, notwithstanding the number of hours
†

3

HR 2066 EAS

1 that the historic light station is open to the

2 public.’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2066

AMENDMENTS
[No. 21395-8-II.

Division Two.

October 10, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert A. Howell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 96-1-00149-8, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered November 22, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
#### Gregory Stephen COOK, et al., Plaintiffs, Charles C. Sauvage, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John W. SNOW, Secretary of the Department of the Treasury, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-15681

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 28, 2006.

Ronald H. Tonkin, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Todd B. Grandy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Patricia D. Barksdale, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case.

The evidentiary rulings of the trial court1 were well within discretion and do not constitute reversible error.

The trial court’s findings of fact are amply supported by the evidence and con-*933elusions of law drawn therefrom are not erroneous.

The judgment adverse to the appellant is

AFFIRMED.

1

. The Honorable Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge, conducted a non-jury trial by consent of the parties.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PIERRE L. HOFFMAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CHARLES D. LEE; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-16737

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-04499-JW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

James Ware, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Pierre L. Hoffman appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs and safety. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16737

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056

(9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Hoffman

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants knew of

and disregarded an excessive risk to his health or safety. See id. at 1058 (prison

officials act with deliberate indifference only if they know of and disregard an

excessive risk to inmate health or safety, and a mere difference of opinion

concerning the appropriate course of treatment does not amount to deliberate

indifference). 

Hoffman’s motion for default, received on January 7, 2011, is ordered filed

and is denied as moot. 

AFFIRMED.
Deborah BUSH, petitioner, v. STEVENSON COMMONS ASSOCIATES, LLP, et al.

No. 12-9893.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 3(i)(c)


                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                     OF THE
                        CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               POWERTEL USA, INC.


         POWERTEL USA, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certifies
pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware that:

         1. The Company filed on January 14, 1997, a Certificate of Correction
of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of POWERTEL USA, INC., (SRV number
971013560) (the "Certificate of Correction").

         2. The Certificate of Correction was an inaccurate record of the
corporate action and is null and void AB INITIO as confirmed by an ORDER
APPROVING AND CONFIRMING DEBTOR'S FIRST AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, AS
REVISED AND AMENDED of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Nevada, Case
No: 97-30265-BMG, dated September 15, 1998.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Correction to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 25th day of
November, 1998.

                                            POWERTEL USA, INC.


                                       By:      /s/ Richard A. Cascarilla
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Richard A. Cascarilla, President
EXHIBIT 32.2





PHARMOS CORPORATION


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION








In connection with the quarterly report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, S. COLIN NEILL, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: April 28, 2011





By: /s/ S. Colin Neill





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2027 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Deltamethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Deltamethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.12 (S)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl 

(1R,3R)–3-(2,2- 

dibromovinyl)–2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS No. 52918–63– 

5) (provided for in subheading 2926.90.30) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2027 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### CRAMMOND, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 26, 1907.)

Action by Earle D. Crammond, an infant, by Elizabeth B. Orr, his guardian ad litem, against the International Paper Company.

No opinion. Motion denied^
#### GARREPY, Respondent, v. DONOVAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1898.)

Action by Maurice E. Garrepy against William Donovan.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing
 Financial
Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
 
 I, C.
Troy Woodbury, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation (the
“Company”), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best
of my knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended February 26, 2010 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:
  •
              
              fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 •
              
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/
      C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.Name:
                C.
      Troy Woodbury, Jr.Title:
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
                April
      12, 2010
#### MALONEY v. HOLDEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Kate Maloney against Lawrence Holden. No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. , Order signed.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO)PricewaterhouseCoopersChartered AccountantsDorchester House7 Church StreetHamiltonBermuda HM 11.Telephone +1 441 295 2000Facsimile +1 441 295 1242
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(File No. 333-112792) and Form S-8 (No. 333-103977), of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd., of our
report dated March 4, 2005
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Hamilton, Bermuda
March 4, 2005   MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX HM 1171, Hamilton, Bermuda HM EX A list of partners can be obtained from the above address
Exhibit 32 (a)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-QSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, Harold C. Rauner, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Banking
Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) |  | such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
United Financial Banking Companies, Inc.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harold C. Rauner

---

Harold C. Rauner

President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2008060EN.01003301.xml

| 5.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 60/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 60/33

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 February 2008

on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(2008/199/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 310 in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the 2005 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States on 26 November 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States on 26 November 2007.

| (2) | The Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (1), is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community and its Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

D. MATE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 312, 30.11.2007, p. 33.

1

---
# C_2008089EN.01000801.xml

| 10.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5024 — Tui/Royal Caribbean Cruises/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 89/02)

On 7 March 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5024. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5024. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Kim BROWN, petitioner, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.

No. 13-6196.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Battle *v.*The State

*Petit Larceny.*

(Decided June 27, 1907.

45 So. Rep. 67.)

(Rehearing denied Dec. 19, 1907.)

*Criminal Law; Appeal; Bill of Exceptions.*— The judgment entry recites “defendant has sixty days in which to take an appeal.” The bill of exceptions was not signed until after the adjournment of the court at which the cause was tried. Held, the recitaal in the judgment entry was not an extension of time for signing the bill of exceptions.

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. A. Evans.

Hiram Battle was convicted of petit larceny and he appeals.

Affirmed.

C. S. McDowdell, Jr., for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

*52ANDERSON, J.

— What purports to be a bill of exceptions in this, case was signed after the adjournment of court, and the record proper fails to show that any order was made for the signing of the bill in vacation. The judgment entry recites: “Defendant has 60 days in which to take an appeal.” This was in no sense an extension of time for signing the bill of exceptions.

As there is no bill of exceptions in this case, and no error appearing upon' the record proper, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Dowdell and McClellan, JJ., concur.
[Nos. 20939-0-II; 21045-2-II.

Division Two.

September 12, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Shelly Lynn Clark, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, Nos. 96-1-00227-2 and 96-1-00226-4, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered July 16 and August 7, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.