alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

Prefix (check one) Mr. Ms. Mrs.

Last Name: First Name: Middle Name/Initial

Generation (Sr, Jr, etc):

Firm Name:

Street Address: Suite/Room No.:

City:

EDUCATION:

College: Degree: Year Completed:

Law School: Year Graduated:

Other Post-Graduate Schooling:

Office Telephone No.: Fax No.:

 E-Mail Address: 

v. Cause No.

MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF

Party(s) Represented

State: 

(COURT USE ONLY)

RECEIPT NO. 

Page 1 of 3

Zip:

Keen Roshna Bala Loevy & Loevy 311 N. Aberdeen, 3rd Fl. Chicago University of Chicago A.B. 1999 Northwestern University 2004 (312) 243-5900 (312) 243-5902 Roshna@Loevy.com TAMARA SCOTT JOHN BUNCICH, et al. 16-cv-114

TAMARA SCOTT

IL 60607

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00114-RL-JEM document 112 filed 02/14/18 page 1 of 4
, do solemnly swear or affirm that:

I am a member in good standing of the bar of every jurisdiction to which I am admitted to practice. 

I have read and will abide by the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Indiana, including Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct Within the Seventh 

Federal Judicial Circuit. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements in this application are true and correct. 

Signature of Applicant

Have you ever been publicly disciplined by any other court in the United States or its territories, commonwealths, 

or possessions?

Applicant: I,

Page 2 of 3

Yes (If yes, please attach an explanation) No

LIST EACH FEDERAL COURT TO WHICH YOU ARE ADMITTED TO PRACTICE LAW:

 COURT YEAR ADMITTED CURRENT STATUS

LIST EACH STATE TO WHICH YOU ARE ADMITTED TO PRACTICE LAW:

STATE YEAR ADMITTED CURRENT STATUS BAR I.D. NUMBER

Please include a current certificate of good standing (fewer than 60 days old) from each jurisdiction listed above in 

order to satisfy the requirements articulated in Local Rule 83-5(a)(2)(C)(ii). 

If admitted to the U.S. Supreme Court, please provide a current certificate of good standing (fewer than 60 days 

old.) Otherwise, no certificate of good standing is needed for any other Federal Court listed above. 

Dated: 

Roshna Bala Keen Western District of Michigan 2016 Good Standing Central District of Illinois 2014 Good Standing Eastern District of Wisconsin 2013 Good Standing Northern District of Illinois 2006 Good Standing Illinois 2005 Good Standing 6284469

2/14/2018

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00114-RL-JEM document 112 filed 02/14/18 page 2 of 4
Judge, U. S. District Court

Dated:

SO ORDERED. 

Considered and approved. 

Page 3 of 3

 Revised 06/05/2013

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00114-RL-JEM document 112 filed 02/14/18 page 3 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00114-RL-JEM document 112 filed 02/14/18 page 4 of 4
Exhibit
      32.2


**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EuroBancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yadira R. Mercado,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




EUROBANCSHARES,
                INC.Dated:
                March 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Yadira R. MercadoYadira
                R. MercadoChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to EuroBancshares, Inc. and will be retained by EuroBancshares, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
---

CONSENT OF J. DAVID GAUNT

|To: | United States Securities and Exchange               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|    | Commission                                          
|    |                                                     
|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the
      Company)
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                          
|    | Consent of Expert                                   

This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by
the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report). The
Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Companys
Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the AIF),
and the Companys Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December
31, 2016 (the MD&A).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical report
(the "Technical Report"):

- 2014 Technical Report on the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska, USA,
  effective date December 31, 2014

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report, the AIF, the MD&A and the Companys registration
statement on Form F-3, as amended (SEC File No. 333-209921) (the
Registration Statement) and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual
Report, the AIF, the MD&A and the Registration Statement.

Dated the 30th day of March, 2017.

Yours truly,

/ J. David Gaunt/

J. David Gaunt, P.Geo. Hunter Dickinson Services Inc.

---
H. R. 1472

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 167 East 

124th Street in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TITO PUENTE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 167 East 124th Street in New York, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | * November              2, 2007* |   |  */s/              G. Anthony Busseni* |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |   | G.                Anthony Busseni,          |
|   |                                  |   | President                and CEO            |

| Date:  |  *               11-2-07* |   |  */s/              Doug Carpenter*                  |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                |   | C.                Douglas Carpenter,                     |
|   |                                |   | Senior                Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |
**Exhibit 10.13**

**SCHEDULE OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**

For 2008, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. paid each non-employee member of our Board ofDirectors a $4,000 annual retainer, $4,000 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors attended by the member and $1,000 per board or committee meeting attended other than regularly scheduled quarterly meetings. TheChairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $4,000 annual retainer. Additionally, upon the date of election or re-election as a member of our Board of Directors, each non-employee director is awarded 1,500 restricted shares of our commonstock, which vest approximately 12 months from the date of grant. We review our compensation arrangement for directors from time to time.
# L_2008059EN.01001401.xml

| 4.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 59/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 59/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 February 2008

concerning the conclusion of the Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation between the European Community and the State of Israel

(2008/181/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 170 thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Community, the renewal of the Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation with the State of Israel (the Agreement). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Community, the renewal of the Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation with the State of Israel (the Agreement).

| (2) | The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 16 July 2007 in Brussels, subject to possible conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 16 July 2007 in Brussels, subject to possible conclusion at a later date.

| (3) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation between the European Community and the State of Israel (2) is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, acting on behalf of the Community, give the notification provided for in Article 5(2) of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

A. VIZJAK

---

(1)  Opinion of 25 September 2007 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 220, 25.8.2007, p. 5.

2

---
Oscar Ray BOLIN, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 13-6566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-89,197-01

EX PARTE THOMAS MCNAIR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20140D04769-34-1 IN THE 34TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

tampering with evidence and sentenced to imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his

convictions. McNair v. State, No. 08-16-00033-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso del. May 24, 2018).

Applicant claims he did not receive timely notice of the appellate court’s decision affirming

his convictions and that he was denied his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review

(PDR) through no fault of his own. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex

parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,

additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App.

1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order

appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use anymeans set out in TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was denied his right to file a pro se PDR through no fault of his own. The trial court shall also make

any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 5, 2018

Do not publish
**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing**

**Financial      Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|   |        |   |                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|-------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **•** |   | fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |        |   |                                                                                                                                     |

|   | **•** |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/               C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|        |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   |   |   | **Name:                 **C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.****                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   |   |   | **Title:                     **Treasurer and Chief Financial                Officer                               (Principal Financial Officer)****  |
|   |   |   | **Date:      ****January 17,              2006**                                                                                                                                                                                |

----
Dwight Ellis CARRINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1898 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on telephone and other communications services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. PAUL, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. 

GILCHREST, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. DUNCAN, Mrs. BONO, Mr. SAM JOHNSON

of Texas, Mr. GOODE, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. MEEKS of New York, 

Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. 

CAMP, Mr. CANNON, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. MACK, Mr. GREEN of 

Wisconsin, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. TERRY, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. 

CULBERSON, Ms. HART, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, 

Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. 

SOUDER, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. COX, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, and Mr. 

ADERHOLT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on telephone and other communications 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1898 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telephone Excise Tax 

3 Repeal Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND 

5 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to facilities and services) is 

8 amended by striking subchapter B. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

10 (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by 

11 striking ‘‘chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed 

12 by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of 

13 chapter 33,’’ and inserting ‘‘and chapter 32 (other 

14 than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 

15 4121),’’. 

16 (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such 

17 Code is amended by striking ‘‘section 4251 or’’. 

18 (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such 

19 Code is amended— 

20 (i) by striking ‘‘imposed by—’’ and all that 

21 follows through ‘‘with respect to’’ and inserting 

22 ‘‘imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect 

23 to’’, and 

24 (ii) by striking ‘‘bills rendered or’’. 
3 

•HR 1898 IH 

1 (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) 

2 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘Communica3 tions Services and’’. 

4 (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by 

5 striking ‘‘4251, 4261, or 4271’’ each place it ap6 pears and inserting ‘‘4261 or 4271’’. 

7 (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such 

8 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of 

9 subparagraph (B), by striking subparagraph (C), 

10 and by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subpara11 graph (C). 

12 (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of 

13 such Code is amended by striking the item relating 

14 to subchapter B. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills 

17 first rendered more than 90 days after the date of the 

18 enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### ABORN et al., Appellants, v. JANIS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme. Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 22, 1907.)

Action bj; Milton Aborn and others against Elsie Janis and others. A. Gross, for appellants. N. Burkan, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

v. ) No. 2:16 CR 87 

) 

SHANTERRA JONES ) 

O R D E R 

On February 27, 2019, the United States Probation Department filed a Petition for 

Warrant for Offender Under Supervision, alleging that defendant Shanterra Jones 

violated the terms and conditions of her probation. (DE # 85.) On March 21, 2019, the 

Government and defendant stipulated to an Agreed Disposition of the Petition. (DE # 

95.) 

On April 11, 2019, defendant filed a notice that she intended to waive her rights 

to a Rule 32.1(b)(2) probation revocation hearing. (DE # 100.) The same day, this court 

referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Joshua P. Kolar for a report and 

recommendation on defendant’s notice (DE # 100), specifically regarding whether 

defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to a Rule 32.1(b)(2) probation 

revocation hearing, and whether defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the

Agreed Disposition. (DE # 101.) 

After a hearing, Magistrate Judge Kolar issued his findings and 

recommendations. (DE # 104.) The parties have waived objections. (Id.) Accordingly, 

the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are now ADOPTED and the 

court finds: (1) defendant Shanterra Jones knowingly, freely, voluntarily, and 

intentionally entered into the Agreed Disposition of Probation Violations (DE # 95); and 
(2) defendant Shanterra Jones knowingly, freely, voluntarily, and intentionally waived

her right to a probation revocation hearing.

Pursuant to the Agreed Disposition of Probation Violations (DE # 95), defendant 

Shanterra Jones is now ADJUDGED to have committed the violation of probation 

described in the February 27, 2019, Petition and Agreed Disposition (DE ## 85, 95). 

Defendant Shanterra Jones’ term of probation is REVOKED and she is hereby 

committed to the United States Bureau of Prisons to serve a term of imprisonment of 

four (4) months. Upon her release from the Bureau of Prisons, defendant shall be 

discharged from any further term of probation. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 24, 2019 

s/James T. Moody .

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#### DRISCOLL, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF ELLICOTTVILLE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Nellie Driscoll against the village of Ellicottville.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.