alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:16-CR-22-JVB-JEM

 )

ELISSA SALAZAR, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT ELISSA SALAZAR

TO: THE HONORABLE JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Elissa Salazar’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge John E.

Martin on August 24, 2016, with the consent of Defendant Salazar, counsel for Defendant Salazar,

and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Salazar’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Federal Rule

of Criminal Procedure 11 before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Salazar under oath

on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant Salazar,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Salazar understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea

is offered;

(2) that Defendant Salazar understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and her

right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant Salazar understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including

the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Salazar understands that the sentencing

guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Salazar has been knowingly and voluntarily made

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Salazar is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Salazar understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Salazar’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Elissa Salazar’s plea of guilty to the offenses

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Salazar be adjudged guilty of the offenses

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have a sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been

ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant Salazar be adjudged

guilty, sentencing before Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen will be set at a later date by separate order. 

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen

(14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2016.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Honorable Joseph S. Van Bokkelen
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Animal Disease Center: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Food Safety and Enteric PathogensSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center AACRAC Video Library Docs Ames links





- Main Page
- Sponsored Observances
- Members
- Video Library
- Book Library
- Past Observances
- ODEO Video Library

AACRAC Video Libraryheadline bar AACRAC has many videos available for checkout by USDA-ARS employees in the Ames, Iowa area. They can be checked out of the library in the NCAH building. Followthelink below to the NCAH library and search the term "AACRAC" or the specific DVD. NCAH Library Services


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Arturo DIAZ, petitioner, v. William STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 13-6541, 13A307.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 26, 2013.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice SCALIA and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Taino Rivera, True Name Edward Soba, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J., and a jury), rendered on December 3,1981, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree, two counts of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree and imposing concurrent sentences of 12V2 to 25 years’ imprisonment on the manslaughter and attempted murder counts and 5 to 15 years’ imprisonment on the assault count, modified, on the law, so as to reduce the minimum term of imprisonment imposed on the manslaughter and attempted murder convictions from *72
      *12V2*years to 8Vs years, and, as so modified and reduced, affirmed.

Possession of a deadly weapon or display of a firearm is not an element of either manslaughter in the first degree or attempted murder in the second degree. Consequently neither crime is an armed felony offense as defined by CPL 1.20 (41) and the imposition of a minimum term of imprisonment of one half the maximum term of 25 years pursuant to Penal Law § 70.02 (4) was illegal. *(See, People v Lawrence,*97 AD2d 718.) The minimum term of imprisonment under an indeterminate sentence for a class B violent felony cannot exceed one third of the maximum term imposed. We therefore modify the judgment so as to impose minimum terms of *8Va*years’ imprisonment on the manslaughter and attempted murder convictions. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Bloom, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 17, 2018

N o. 04

- 17

- 00777

- CV

PREMIER LEARNING ACA DEMY, INC. , and Juan Padilla,

Appellants

v.

Becky LUNA

- CRISTAN and Miranda De La Rosa,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16355B

Honorable Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellants.

It is so ORDERED on January 17, 2018

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of January, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

* *

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-11574

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1729 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1729

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase inpatient 
 hospital payments under the Medicare Program to Puerto Rico hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2005

Mr. Fortuno (for himself, Mr. Weller, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Lincoln 
   Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Dent, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. 
 Velazquez, Mr. Owens, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, and Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase inpatient 
 hospital payments under the Medicare Program to Puerto Rico hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Puerto Rico Medicare Reimbursement 
Equity Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF MEDICARE INPATIENT HOSPITAL PAYMENT RATE FOR 
              PUERTO RICO HOSPITALS.

    Section 1886(d)(9)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(9)(E)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (iii);
            (2) in clause (iv), by inserting ``and before October 1, 
        2005,'' after ``2004,'' and by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
            ``(v) on or after October 1, 2005, the applicable Puerto 
        Rico percentage is 0 percent and the applicable Federal 
        percentage is 100 percent.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1895 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1895

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Iprodione.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Iprodione.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IPRODIONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.51 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2008105EN.01000301.xml

| 15.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 105/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 105/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 April 2008

appointing a Netherlands member and a Netherlands alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2008/300/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Netherlands Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr H. DIJKSMA. A seat as an alternate member has fallen vacant following the resignation of Ms R. KRUISINGA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr H. DIJKSMA. A seat as an alternate member has fallen vacant following the resignation of Ms R. KRUISINGA,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which ends on 25 January 2010:

| (a) | as a member:
  Ms R. KRUISINGA, gedeputeerde van de provincie Noord-Holland (change of mandate);
  and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

as a member:

Ms R. KRUISINGA, gedeputeerde van de provincie Noord-Holland (change of mandate);

and

| (b) | as an alternate member:
  Mr H. DIJKSMA, gedeputeerde van de provincie Flevoland (change of mandate). |
| --- | --- |

(b)

as an alternate member:

Mr H. DIJKSMA, gedeputeerde van de provincie Flevoland (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 2008.

For the Council

The President

R. ŽERJAV

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flow International Corporation,
a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, and Douglas P. Fletcher, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ STEPHEN R. LIGHT                         
|Stephen R. Light                             
|Principal Executive Officer December 20,
2005



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. FLETCHERDOUGLAS P. FLETCHER   
|Principal Financial Officer December 20,
2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Beverly Morgan, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by her brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Hickman, J.), imposed April 23,1982, upon her plea of guilty to attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, the sentence being two concurrent indeterminate terms of 3 to 9 years’ imprisonment.

Sentence affirmed.

The sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment (CPL 720.10 [3]; *see, People v Williams,*78 AD2d 642). The record reveals that defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that she would receive the subject sentence unless the court, after reviewing the probation report, could not in good conscience adhere to its promise. Under the circumstances of this case, defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(People v Robinson,*105 AD2d 762; *People v Taper,*105 AD2d 813; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016

NO. 03-15-00430-CV

Sanadco Inc., a Texas Corporation; Mahmoud Ahmed Isba; Broadway Grocery, Inc.; 

Shariz, Inc.; Ruby & Sons Store, Inc.; and Rubina Noorani, Appellants

v.

Glenn Hegar, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Comptroller of Public Accounts; 

Office of Comptroller of Public Accounts for The State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, in his 

Official Capacity as Attorney General of The State of Texas, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 27, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the 

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### Davis, *et al. v.*Gerson, *et al.*

*Bill to Declare an Absolute Deed a Mortgage, and to Have Been Obtained by Fraud.*

(Decided Dec. 19, 1907.

45 South. 587.)

1. *Aclcnoioledgment; Talcing and Certifying; Time.*— An acknowledgment is not void because not certified at the very time the execution is made.

2. *Same; Construction.*— Certificates of acknowledgment should be liberally construed and held sufficient if it fairly appears that there has been a substantial compliance with the statute.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. A. I). Sayre.

Bill by Edmund Davis and another against Samuel Gerson and another to declare á deed absolute in form a mortgage, or to declare the absolute deed relinquishing the equity of redemption to have been obtained by the mortgagee by fraud and oppression, and to redeem the land thereunder. From a judgment denying the relief prayed, and dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

Affirmed.

Gunter & Gunter, for appellant.

The law in this case is aptly stated in the case of *Tilla v.*Rodriguez, 12 Wall. 323. This principle is *universal.*— Woodruff *v. Adair,*9 A. & E. Equity Oases, 671; 3 Pom. Eq. Jur. secs. 1193 to 1196 and note; *Russell v. Southard,*12 How. 136; *Thompson v. Lee,*31 Ala. 292; *Locke v. Palmer,*26 Ala. 324; *Noble v. Graham.,*140 Ala. 413. Counsel discuss at some length the burden of proof and as to what determines the nature of the transaction, but as this is not discussed in the opinion it will not be abstracted.

*504Steiner, Crum & Weil, for appellee.

Counsel discuss all phases of the case and cite authorities.

ANDERSON, J.

— It is needless for us to determine upon whom lies the burden of proof in this cause, as the evidence is conclusive that the deed ivas absolute, and not intended as a mortgage, and that it was not fraudulently obtained.

The acknowledgement of Francis Davis was not void because of a. discrepancy between the dates, as to when she was- examined when the certificate was signed by the officer. We do not understand that an, acknowledgment is void because the certificate is not signed at the very time the execution is made. Moreover, the proof shows that the wife was examined on the 7th, the date of the certificate, and that the “2d” was inadvertently left at the top. The certificate of acknowledgement should be liberally construed, and it is sufficient if it fairly appears that there has been a substantial compliance with the *statute.*— Sharpe *v.*Orme, 61 Ala. 263; *Scott v. Simmons,*70 Ala. 352; *Frederick v. Wilcox,*119 Ala. 355, 24 South. 582, 72 Am. St. Rep. 925.

The decree of the city court is affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Dowdell and McClellan, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of OEF Corporate Solutions, Inc. a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  annual period ending
December  31,  2004  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"),  I,  Natalie  Shahvaran,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350),  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d));  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.





                                        /s/Natalie  Shahvaran
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Natalie  Shahvaran
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer
Date:  April 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          I, Zong Yun Zhou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment to Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.

| January 31,   2006 |                      |
|--------------------|---------------------------|
|               | /s/ Zong Yun   Zhou       |
|               |                           |
|               | Zong Yun   Zhou           |
|               | Chief   Financial Officer |