alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Animal Disease Center: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Food Safety and Enteric PathogensSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Past Observances Docs Ames links





- Main Page
- Sponsored Observances
- Members
- Video Library
- Book Library
- Past Observances
- ODEO Video Library

Past Observancesheadline bar **FY2021** **FY2020** **FY2019** **FY2018** **FY2017** **FY2016** **FY2015** **FY2014**


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# STATS AT A GLANCE

# image1.jpeg
# STATISTICS AT A GLANCE
#### Richard McSpedon et al., Appellants, v Liberty Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered February 14,1984, as dismissed their action for failure to serve a notice of claim upon the County of Westchester pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

It is undisputed that the bus involved in this accident, was owned by the County of Westchester. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ failure to serve a notice of claim requires dismissal *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-b [1]; *Coleman v Westchester St. Transp. Co.,*57 NY2d 734; *James v Liberty Lines,*97 AD2d 749). Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

TAMARA RACHEL SCOTT, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:16-cv-00114

)

OSCAR MARTINEZ, in his official capacity

as SHERIFF OF LAKE COUNTY, et al.,

)

)

Defendants. )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE

Attorney Joseph F. Spitzzeri, pursuant to Local Rule 83-8(c), respectfully moves this

Court for the entry of an order granting him leave to withdraw his Appearance for

Defendants, Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, Robert M. Ehresman, and

Kumpol Dennison, and in support thereof, respectfully states as follows.

1. On December 3, 2018, Attorney Heather Gilbert, of the law of firm of

Cassiday Schade LLP, filed her Appearance [DE 144] on behalf Defendants, Correctional

Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, Robert M. Ehresman, and Kumpol Dennison, and

will continue to represent such Defendants in this case.

2. Attorney Spitzzeri requests, pursuant to Local Rule 83-8(c), that this Court

grant leave for the withdrawal of his Appearance on behalf of Defendants, Correctional

Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, Robert M. Ehresman, and Kumpol Dennison.

WHEREFORE, Attorney Joseph F. Spitzzeri, respectfully requests that this Court

enter an order withdrawing his Appearance on behalf of Defendants, Correctional Health

Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, Robert M. Ehresman, and Kumpol Dennison.

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00114-RL-JEM document 147 filed 12/06/18 page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully Submitted:

/s/ Joseph F. Spitzzeri

Joseph F. Spitzzeri, ARDC No. 6184520

Johnson & Bell, Ltd.

33 W. Monroe St. Suite 2700

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Phone: (312) 984-6683

Email: spitzzerij@jbltd.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on December 6, 2018, a copy of this document was filed electronically

using this Court’s ECF System. Notice of this filing will be sent by e-mail to all ECFregistered counsel by operation of this Court’s ECF System, that is:

Alfredo Estrada estrada@bcclegal.com

Angela M. Jones ajones@angelajoneslegal.com

Arthur Loevy arthur@loevy.com

Casey J. McCloskey attymccloskey@hotmail.com

Cindy Tsai cindy@loevy.com

Danielle O. Hamilton hamilton@loevy.com

Heather T. Gilbert hgilbert@cassiday.com

Joel Feldman joel@loevy.com

John M Kopack john@kopack-law.com

John S Dull jsdull@yahoo.com

Jon Loevy jon@loevy.com

Roshna Bala Keen roshna@loevy.com

Ruth Z. Brown ruth@loevy.com

/s/ Joseph F. Spitzzeri

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00114-RL-JEM document 147 filed 12/06/18 page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Jenkins, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), rendered February 22, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant pleaded guilty following denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence. The motion was properly denied in that the arresting officer’s undisputed testimony was credible and plausible and, therefore, sufficient to satisfy the People’s burden of initially demonstrating that the police conduct was proper. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2033 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2033

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Flumioxazin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Flumioxazin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUMIOXAZIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.17       2-[7-fluoro-3,4-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         dihydro-3-oxo-4-                                                   31/2008
                         (2-propynl)-2H-
                         1,4-benzoxazin-6-
                         yl]-4,5,6,7-
                         tetrahydro-1H-
                         isoindole-1,3(2H)-
                         dione (CAS No.
                         103361-09-7)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2934.99.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 12

            INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
     COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
          DIVIDENDS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 AND 2003
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  2004               2003
                                                                --------           --------
                                                                        (Unaudited)
<S>                                                             <C>                <C>
Earnings:
Net Income                                                      $129,204           $119,301
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes                                    60,688             57,504
    Fixed charges                                                246,513            235,760
  Less:
    Capitalized interest                                          12,712             13,100
                                                                --------           --------
  Earnings as adjusted (A)                                      $423,693           $399,465
                                                                ========           ========

Preferred dividend requirements                                      964           $  1,021
Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to
  net income                                                         147%               148%
                                                                --------           --------
  Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis                        1,417              1,511
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                                               233,801            219,110
  Capitalized interest                                            12,712             13,100
  Interest factor of rents                                            --              3,550
                                                                --------           --------
  Fixed charges as adjusted (B)                                  246,513            235,760
                                                                --------           --------

Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)                 $247,930           $237,271
                                                                ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    (A) divided by (B)                                             1.72x              1.69x
                                                                ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends
    (A) divided by (C)                                             1.71x              1.68x
                                                                ========           ========
</TABLE>



                                      -25-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

DEANTE TYRELL TAYLOR, )

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) No. 1:14 CV 325

)

STATE OF INDIANA, )

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Deante Tyrell Taylor, a pro se prisoner, filed a complaint seeking $2,600,000 from

the State of Indiana for violating his speedy trial rights. “A document filed pro se is to be

liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to

less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551

U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if

the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 

The Eleventh Amendment generally precludes a citizen from suing a state or one

of its agencies or departments in federal court. Wynn v. Southward, 251 F.3d 588, 592 (7th

Cir. 2001). There are three exceptions to Eleventh Amendment immunity: (1) suits against

state officials seeking prospective equitable relief for ongoing violations of federal law; (2)

suits involving circumstances where Congress has abrogated the state’s immunity from

suit; and (3) suits involving circumstances where the state has waived its sovereign

immunity and consented to suit in federal court. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Ill.
Commerce Comm’n, 183 F.3d 558, 563 (7th Cir. 1999). None of these exceptions applies in

this case. First, Taylor is not suing a state official and is not seeking injunctive relief.

Second, State immunity was not abrogated by the enactment of Section 1983. Joseph v. Bd.

of Regents of Univ. of Wis. Sys., 432 F.3d 746, 748 (7th Cir. 2005). Third, Indiana has not

consented to this lawsuit. Therefore this case must be dismissed because the State of

Indiana is immune from suit. 

It is usually necessary to permit a plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended

complaint when a case is dismissed sua sponte, see Luevano v. Wal-Mart, 722 F.3d 1014 (7th

Cir. 2013), but not when any amendment would be futile. Hukic v. Aurora Loan Servs., 588

F.3d 420, 432 (7th Cir. 2009) (“[C]ourts have broad discretion to deny leave to amend

where . . . the amendment would be futile.”) Such is the case here. Taylor cannot amend

to name either his State court trial judge nor the prosecuting attorney because they have

absolute immunity. See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 359 (1978) and Imbler v. Pachtman,

424 U.S. 409, 431 (1976). Neither can he amend to seek injunctive relief to overturn his

criminal conviction because “habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy for a state prisoner

who challenges the fact or duration of his confinement and seeks immediate or speedier

release . . ..” Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 481 (1994). 

For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 

SO ORDERED. 

Date: October 30, 2014

 s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Hongdun Zhou, Chief Executive Officer of Cougar Holdings Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  |  | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ HONGDUN ZHOUHongdun ZhouChief Executive OfficerOctober 27, 2005




14
Exhibit 5.1




CONSENT
 
 
  To:         Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.
  And to:                      Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, Counselors at Law
  And to:                      U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
 (the “Securities Regulator”)
 
 
 Gentlemen:
 
 RE: Technical Reports – Bong Mieu, Phuoc Son and Bau Gold Projects
 
 Reference is made to the technical reports (the “Technical Reports”) entitled “A Technical Review of the Bong Mieu Gold Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam” dated August 31, 2007, and “Preliminary Assessment of the Phuoc Son Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam’ dated December 2007, and “Technical Report on Feasibility Studies for the Phuoc Son Gold Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam” dated March 26, 2008 and “Technical Report on the Bau Project, Bau, Sarawak, East Malaysia” dated August 6, 2010, by Terra Mining Consultants and Stevens & Associates which we prepared for Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. (the “Company” or “Olympus”).
 
 We hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Reports with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure of the Technical Reports and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary thereof in the annual Form 20-F.  We further agree to being named as an expert in the annual statement (20-F).
 
 Dated this 30th day of April, 2011.
   
  Sincerely,

Stevens & Associates

graphic

_____________________________

“Signed” by Murray Stevens

Principal

Terra Mining Consultants

graphic
 ___________________________

“Signed” by Graeme Fulton

Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 33323)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, July 15, 2021, 11:00 a.m. to July 15, 2021, 05:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20817 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 10, 2021, FR DOC 2021-12142, 86 FR 30963.                

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel meeting is being amended to the change the meeting format from virtual to video assisted. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 17, 2021.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-13275 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2036 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2036

  To make unlawful the establishment or maintenance within the United 
  States of an office of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

   Mr. Weiner (for himself, Mr. Norwood, and Mr. Burton of Indiana) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make unlawful the establishment or maintenance within the United 
  States of an office of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOWNGRADE IN STATUS OF PLO OFFICE IN THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Requirement.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
President shall withdraw or terminate any waiver by the President of 
the requirements of section 1003 of the Foreign Relations Authorization 
Act of 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. 5202) (prohibiting the establishment or 
maintenance of a Palestinian information office in the United States), 
and such section shall apply so as to prohibit the operation of a 
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) or Palestinian Authority office 
in the United States from carrying out any function other than those 
functions carried out by the Palestinian information office in 
existence prior to the Oslo Accords.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 604(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-228), is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −130)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1407. See 896 F.Supp.2d 1339 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 512 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robert L. Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L. Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Case NV/2:16-cv-00264 Document 3 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 2

Mar 08, 2016
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−130 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

NEVADA

NV 2 16−00264 Franks v. Biomet, Inc., et al

Case NV/2:16-cv-00264 Document 3 Filed 03/08/16 Page 2 of 2