alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Procera Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas Williams, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  April
      1, 2008
              
              By:
              
              /s/    Thomas
      H. WilliamsThomas
      Williams
                Chief
      Financial Officer
  This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 31092 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JAQUIRRO T. SCOTT

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 105

- 1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jaquirro T. Scott has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Scott h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 5, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-31092 Document: 00515404852 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2020No. 18

- 31092

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further respon sibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-31092 Document: 00515404852 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2020
#### PRAY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE NAT. BANK AT ALBANY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Alice E. Pray against the New York State National Bank at Albany.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer, on payment of costs of demurrer and of this appeal.

SMITH, P. J„ dissents.
Exhibit 10.15

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

WMI HOLDINGS CORP. 

2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 

 

This Second Amendment amends the WMI Holdings Corp. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated effective May 22, 2012 (as amended, the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Second Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 

1.Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“4.1 NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject to the possible increases provided by Section 4.2 and adjustments as provided in Section 4.4, the aggregate number of shares of Stock authorized and available for grant (or to be used to determine the value of an Award payable in cash) pursuant to the Plan shall be 12,000,000.” 

2.This Second Amendment is effective as of the date it is approved by the Board, subject to approval by the shareholders of WMI Holdings Corp. 

3.Except as specifically set forth in this Second Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect as previously adopted by the Board. 

Adopted by the Board of Directors of WMI Holdings Corp. on February 25, 2015. 


	
	
 

	
 

	
/s/  Charles Edward Smith

	
Name: Charles Edward Smith

	
Title: Interim Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of WMI Holdings Corp.




 

 

710345.0001/6282122.2
#### Kenard E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. L. WILEY, Detective, ID No. 447; Sergeant Wyne, ID No. 740, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-7840.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 27, 2006.

Decided: May 4, 2006.

*303Kenard E. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, Assistant County Attorney, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Kenard E. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Johnson v. Wiley,*No. CA-05-1865-RWT (D.Md. Nov. 14, 2005). We deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00054-TLS-SLC

)

MARLON COLE )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on January 20, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his

right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the three-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 20th day of January 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT - 99.1

                                  COMPANY NAME

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIATELEVISION.TV, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Penny Green, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition, results of
                  operations, and cash flows of the Company.

/s/ Penny Green
--------------------------------
    President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
    January 13, 2004

                                       52
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                            579,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   4,978,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      144,000
<INVENTORY>                     9,941,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               20,755,000
<PP&E>                         31,480,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 66,778,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           9,506,000
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                            5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                     44,745,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   66,778,000
<SALES>                        74,087,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               74,087,000
<CGS>                          58,089,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  67,541,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                745,000
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                6,201,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    2,647,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             3,554,000
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    3,554,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .69
        


</TABLE>
# C_2008302EN.01000101.xml

| 25.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5328 — Goldman Sachs/Appliances Components Company/Bianchi Vending/Finder)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 302/01)

On 30 October 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5328. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5328. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. SHERRY v. WALDO, Police Com’r.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 23, 1913.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of William A. Sherry, against Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York.

No opinion. Writ dismissed, and determination confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements.
#### CENTRAL TRUST CO. v. MANHATTAN TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 8, 1912.)

Action by the Central Trust Company against the Manhattan Trust Company. No opinion. Reargument (of 144 App. Div. 560, 129 N. Y. Supp. 730) ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-52-2020]

                    The rebuttal period for the amended application for production authority within FTZ 38 on behalf of Teijin Carbon Fibers, Inc., in Greenwood, South Carolina, submitted by the South Carolina State Ports Authority (85 FR 49359, August 13, 2020), is being extended to July 2, 2021, based on a request from the applicant, to allow additional time for the submission of rebuttal comments. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*

                    For further information, contact Diane Finver at                     *Diane.Finver@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-1367.                

Dated: June 21, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-13376 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
H. R. 1691

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 

Appleton, Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this 

Act be known and designated as the ‘‘John H. Bradley Department 

of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, record, 

or other paper of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John H. 

Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2018

No. 04-17-00777-CV

PREMIER LEARNING ACADEMY, INC., and Juan Padilla,

Appellants

v.

Becky LUNA-CRISTAN and Miranda De La Rosa,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16355B

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellants. 

It is so ORDERED on January 17, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of January, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
(121 App. Div. 402.)

#### PEOPLE v. SIMPSON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Appeal—Right to Review—Persons Entitled.

A county treasurer, not a party to an application for an allowance for counsel fees for defending one charged with murder, cannot appeal from the allowance constituting, under Code Crim. Proc. § 808, a charge on the county, payable on the certificate of the justice presiding at the trial.

Appeal from Special Term, Suffolk County.

Martin T. Mantón, appointed to defend James W. Simpson, on trial for murder in the first degree, applied for an allowance for fees and expenses. From an order making the allowance, Henry S. Brush, .as county treasurer, appeals. Dismissed.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and HOOKER, RICH, MILLER, and GAYNOR, JJ.

Timothy M. Griffing, for appellant.

Martin T. Manton, in pro. per.

HIRSCHBERG, P. J.

The respondent was duly assigned as counsel to defend James W. Simpson, who was indicted in the county of Suffolk for the crime of murder in the first degree. The accused was thereafter tried and acquitted. Subsequently an application was made to the Supreme Court at Special Term, by the respondent, upon notice • to the district attorney for an allowance of counsel fees and his personal and incidental expenses. The application resulted in an order granting to the respondent an allowance in the sum of $500 and certain items of disbursements, including expert fees.

*46By section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the allowance made to the counsel becomes a charge upon the county, and the order requires the appellant, as county treasurer, to pay the sum allowed. That official was not a party, however, to the motion, nor has he been substituted or made a party in any way. I do not think he has any connection with the case, which makes him an aggrieved party within the meaning of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, or that he has any standing authorizing him to take this appeal.

The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2060 

To amend the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act 

of 2005 to exempt from the means test in bankruptcy cases, for a 

limited period, qualifying reserve-component members who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to perform a homeland 

defense activity for not less than 60 days. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2005 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. EVANS, Mr. JONES

of North Carolina, and Mr. MCKEON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer 

Protection Act of 2005 to exempt from the means test 

in bankruptcy cases, for a limited period, qualifying reserve-component members who, after September 11, 

2001, are called to active duty or to perform a homeland 

defense activity for not less than 60 days. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 101(a)(2)(C) of the Bankruptcy Abuse Pre5 vention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (Public 
2 

•HR 2060 IH 

1 Law 109–8) is amended by adding at the end of para2 graph (2) of section 707(b) of title 11 of the United States 

3 Code, as added by such Act, the following: 

4 ‘‘(E) Subparagraphs (A) through (C) shall not apply, 

5 and the court may not dismiss or convert a case filed 

6 under this chapter based on any form of means testing— 

7 ‘‘(i)(I) while the debtor is on, and during the 

8 180-day period beginning immediately after the 

9 debtor is released from, a period of active duty (as 

10 defined in section 101(d)(1) of title 10) of not less 

11 than 60 days; or 

12 ‘‘(II) while the debtor is performing, and during 

13 the 180-day period beginning immediately after the 

14 debtor is no longer performing, a homeland defense 

15 activity (as defined in section 901(1) of title 32) per16 formed for a period of not less than 60 days; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) if after September 11, 2001, the debtor 

18 while a member of a reserve component of the 

19 Armed Forces or a member of the National Guard, 

20 was called to such active duty or performed such 

21 homeland defense activity.’’. 

22 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

23 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub24 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by this Act 

25 shall take effect on April 20, 2005. 
3 

•HR 2060 IH 

1 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend2 ment made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

3 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

4 after April 20, 2005. 

Æ
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Who’s Your Daddy, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  May
12, 2008





/s/ John F.
Moynahan


Name:    John
F. Moynahan


Title:     Chief
Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.










---