alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009026EN.01000801.xml

| 3.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5293 — Santander/Alliance & Leicester)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 26/03)

On 15 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5293. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5293. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### BERGER, Respondent, v. BARCLAY CONST. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action b;y Morris Berger against the Barclay Construction Company and others. (Appeal No. 1.) No opinion. Order of the County Court of Kings County, dated November 22, 1911, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2085 

To extend the duty suspension on Azoxystrobin Technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Azoxystrobin Technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AZOXYSTROBIN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.06 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Azoxystrobin Technical) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Healthy Body Weight Research: Grand Forks, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Grand Forks, North Dakota Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Healthy Body Weight Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2009038EN.01000801.xml

| 17.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5224 — EDF/British Energy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 38/04)

On 22 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5224. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5224. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Imported Fire Ant and Household Insects Research: Gainesville, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Fire ant impact on agriculture
 Fire ant impact on endangered species, ground-nesting birds, and other animals
 Fire ant impact on humans at risk from developing hypersensitivity to venom
 Pheromones can lead to novel biologically-based fire ant control methods


Publications
                            More... Measuring local genetic variation in permethrin resistant head lice, pediculus humanus capitis (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae), from Buenos Aires, Argentina


**Quick Links**AccomplishmentsResearch Highlights CooperatorsTechnology Transfer Ant-Related Publications FORMIS


Southeast Area   bob.vandermeer@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willis Payne, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), rendered January 11, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree, and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s *pro se*contention, we find that his guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

The alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct, most of which have not been preserved for appellate review, did not serve to deprive defendant of a fair trial. While some of the prosecutor’s remarks during summation might otherwise have exceeded the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment, they were not unreasonable in light of those made by defense counsel during his summation *(see, People v Blackman,*88 AD2d 620).

Defendant’s *pro se*contention that the trial court’s alibi charge was “deficient” and “impermissibly shifted the burden of proof onto [his] shoulders” has not been preserved for our review *939as a matter of law. In any event, while the alibi charge was not exemplary *(cf.*1 CJI [NY] 12.10, pp 696-697), the charge as a whole adequately apprised the jury of the relevant concepts to be applied *(see, People v Canty,*60 NY2d 830).

We have considered the remaining contentions raised on appeal and find them to be either unpreserved (CPL 470.05 [2]) or lacking in merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Weinstein, J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: I have considered the contentions raised by and on behalf of defendant and find them to be either unpreserved or lacking in merit. Defendant received a fair trial.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906
          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

                           PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
                                    FORM 10-Q
                       CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS

We, Norman L. Lowery, Vice Chairman and CEO, and Michael A. Carty, Chief
Financial Officer, of First Financial Corporation, hereby individually certify
the following:

o    This Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and,

o    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial position and results of operations of First
     Financial Corporation as of and for the periods presented.

August 8, 2003                  By  /s/ NORMAN L. LOWERY
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Norman L. Lowery Vice Chairman, & CEO

August 8, 2003                  By  /s/ MICHAEL A. CARTY
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Michael A. Carty, Treasurer & CFO

                                                                              19
April  019 The Fi tech Ecosystem Robo Ad isors and Payments andPersonal Finance Regtechs Biometric Digital Banks Remittances 

1 

Bank Software Pro iders Blockchain / DLT & Bitcoin Finance Lending Algorithms 

Insurtechs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JARON BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 395 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 23.2


The Board of Directors
One Link 4 Travel Inc.
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower
Suite 3600
San Francisco
CA 94105

                                                                  April 28, 2004

Dear Sirs,


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statement of One
Link 4 Travel Inc on Form S-8 of our report dated April 14,  2004,  appearing in
this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of One Link 4 Travel Inc.  for the year ended
December 31, 2003.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         71,839
<SECURITIES>                                  388,775
<RECEIVABLES>                                  87,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,645
<INVENTORY>                                    30,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              612,325
<PP&E>                                        254,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 76,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                833,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         105,576
<BONDS>                                        59,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          741
<OTHER-SE>                                    618,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  833,571
<SALES>                                       163,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              257,215
<CGS>                                          32,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 166,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                90,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                   31,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            59,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   59,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.77
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC., and Zong Yun Zhou, Chief Financial Officer of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.





Dated: May 16, 2011/s/ Xiao Ping ZhangXiao Ping Zhang

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Zong Yun ZhouZong Yun ZhouChief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danford TAYLOR-WALTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-13244.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 26, 2006.

David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*904Darlene Calzón Barror, Law Office of Darlene Calzón Barror, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before ANDERSON, FAY and SILER,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

We note that appellant does not challenge his conviction, and it is accordingly affirmed. After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the appellant’s sentence is also due to be affirmed. The government’s challenge to the court’s jurisdiction to review the sentence for reasonableness is foreclosed by our decision in *United States v. Martinez,*434 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir.2006). Appellant’s challenges to the district court’s denial of the safety-valve adjustment and a minor role reduction, as well as his challenge to the reasonableness of his sentence, are rejected for the reasons discussed at oral argument.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2107 

To amend Public Law 104–329 to modify authorities for the use of the 

National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Maintenance Fund, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Mr. SAXTON (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, and Mr. DUNCAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 104–329 to modify authorities for 

the use of the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Maintenance Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Law Enforce5 ment Officers Memorial Maintenance Fund Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2107 IH 

1 SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO NA2 TIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL 

3 MAINTENANCE FUND. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 201 of Public Law 104– 

5 329 is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 subsection: 

7 ‘‘(d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Effective on and after the 

9 date of the enactment of the National Law Enforce10 ment Memorial Maintenance Fund Act of 2005, the 

11 following applies, notwithstanding other provisions of 

12 this Act: 

13 ‘‘(A) The Secretary of the Interior, acting 

14 through the National Park Service, shall enter 

15 into a cooperative agreement with the National 

16 Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, 

17 Inc., a nonprofit corporation incorporated under 

18 the laws of the District of Columbia, to carry 

19 out the purposes of the Fund as described in 

20 subsection (b). 

21 ‘‘(B) In accordance with the terms of such 

22 agreement, the Secretary shall transfer all 

23 amounts in the Fund to the Corporation. 

24 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub25 section— 
3 

•HR 2107 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) the term ‘Corporation’ means the Na2 tional Law Enforcement Officers Memorial 

3 Fund, Inc; and 

4 ‘‘(B) the term ‘Secretary’ means the Sec5 retary of the Interior.’’. 

6 (b) PURPOSES OF FUND.—Section 201(b) of Public 

7 Law 104–329 is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘and’’ after 

9 the semicolon; 

10 (2) by striking paragraphs (4), (6), and (7), 

11 and redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4); 

12 and 

13 (3) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), by 

14 striking the semicolon and inserting a period. 

Æ
(May 9, 1985)

#### In the Matter of Christopher Zehner, Appellant, v County of Rensselaer, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Pennock, J.), entered July 25, 1983 in Rensselaer County, which denied petitioner’s applica*470tion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem and assignment of counsel to represent him in a civil lawsuit brought against him while incarcerated in the Rensselaer County Jail.

In view of the fact that the underlying civil lawsuit against petitioner has been discontinued, this appeal from Special Term’s order denying petitioner’s request that he be furnished a guardian and counsel to defend that action has been rendered moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000701345
<NAME> US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,125
<SECURITIES>                                     1,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                      396<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,946
<PP&E>                                           6,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,070
<BONDS>                                          1,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                         969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,590
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    490
<INCOME-TAX>                                       197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.89
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2100 

To amend Public Law 97–435 to extend the authorization for the Secretary 

of the Interior to release certain conditions contained in a patent concerning certain land conveyed by the United States to Eastern Washington University until December 31, 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Miss MCMORRIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 97–435 to extend the authorization 

for the Secretary of the Interior to release certain conditions contained in a patent concerning certain land conveyed by the United States to Eastern Washington University until December 31, 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2100 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAND 

2 TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION EXTENSION. 

3 Section 1(c) of Public Law 97–435 is amended by 

4 striking ‘‘five years after the enactment of this Act’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘on December 31, 2009’’. 

Æ