alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

BRIETTE LAPLAND, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) CIVIL NO. 3:14cv1665

)

WILLOW-BROOKES SOLUTIONS, INC., )

)

 Defendant. )

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

On January 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Plaintiff’s motion for

default judgment be granted and that she be awarded $60,565.00, for violations of the Fair Debt

Collection Practices Act. Defendant has not filed a response to the Report and

Recommendation.

For the following reasons, the undersigned adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation.

Discussion

With respect to pretrial matters dispositive of a claim or defense, the district court

reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected

to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Should a party make objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation, such objections must be “specific” and “written.” Id. at 72(b)(2). “The

district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further

evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Id. at 72(b)(3).

In the present case, the Magistrate Judge clearly set out the background of the case,

including the eleven alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The

Magistrate Judge noted that even though the Defendant was served with summons and complaint

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01665-WCL-CAN document 17 filed 03/12/15 page 1 of 2
via certified mail, the Defendant did not respond in any way to Plaintiff’s complaint. After

Plaintiff moved for entry of default judgment, a telephonic status conference was held, at which

Defendant did not appear and the motion for entry of default judgment was referred to the

Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendation.

The Magistrate Judge held a hearing on the motion and, again, Defendant did not attend. 

Plaintiff testified and submitted exhibits to the court, supporting her claims. The Magistrate

Judge determined that Plaintiff was entitled to default judgment and, after carefully analyzing the

evidence, further determined that Plaintiff was entitled to damages totaling $60,565.00

As noted, there were no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation and, upon review, the undersigned finds that the Report and Recommendation

is in accordance with the law and therefore will be adopted.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned adopts Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein’s

Report and Recommendation. 

 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment [DE 8] is hereby GRANTED. Further, the

Defendant is ORDERED to pay the Plaintiff a total of $60,565.00, as detailed in the Report and

Recommendation. 

 

 Entered: March 12 , 2015.

 s/ William C. Lee 

 William C. Lee, Judge

 United States District Court

2

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01665-WCL-CAN document 17 filed 03/12/15 page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2100 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2100

    To amend Public Law 97-435 to extend the authorization for the 
Secretary of the Interior to release certain conditions contained in a 
patent concerning certain land conveyed by the United States to Eastern 
             Washington University until December 31, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2005

Miss McMorris introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend Public Law 97-435 to extend the authorization for the 
Secretary of the Interior to release certain conditions contained in a 
patent concerning certain land conveyed by the United States to Eastern 
             Washington University until December 31, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAND TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION 
              EXTENSION.

    Section 1(c) of Public Law 97-435 is amended by striking ``five 
years after the enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on December 31, 
2009''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-13,374-05

EX PARTE BOBBY JAMES MOORE, Applicant

ORDER PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF

APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.10

Per curiam.

ORDER

This cause is before this Court on application for writ of habeas corpus from trial

court case number 314483-C in the 185 District Court of Harris County.

th

The Clerk of this Court has discovered sensitive data in the record, namely:

personal identification information. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 9.10, the Clerk sought a ruling from the Court and thereafter notified

the parties. The Court now orders the Clerk of this Court to redact or seal the discovered

sensitive data from the records identified and listed below. The Court further orders the

trial court clerk, the clerk of the court of appeals, or any entity or individual possessing
Rule 9.10 Order - 2

the following documents to redact or seal the documents pursuant to this order:

1. Clerk’s Record Vol. 2

2. Clerk’s Record Vol. 7

Filed: January 25, 2016

Do not publish
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
 2005
    
    
    2004(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    373,403
    
    
    $
    375,232Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    173,767
    
    
    
    176,125Fixed charges
    
    
    867,355
    
    
    
    732,510Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (40,380
    )
    
    
    (35,282
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    1,374,145
    
    
    $
    1,248,585Fixed and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    3,328
    
    
    $
    2,861Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    147
    %
    
    
    147
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    $
    4,892
    
    
    $
    4,206Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    826,975
    
    
    
    697,228Capitalized interest
    
    
    40,380
    
    
    
    35,282Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    867,355
    
    
    
    732,510Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    872,247
    
    
    $
    736,716Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(A) divided by (B)
    
    
    1.58
    x
    
    
    1.70
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
(A) divided by (C)
    
    
    1.58
    x
    
    
    1.69
    x
 -29-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

LAFAYETTE DIVISION 

LAMONTE BRAZELTON, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CAUSE NO. 4:16-CV-29-PPS-PRC 

 ) 

TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF, ) 

ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL ) 

 HEALTHCARE, INC., ) 

NURSE J.KENNEDY, ) 

DR. NADIR AL-SHAMI, and, ) 

MICHAEL E. E. SVETANOFF, II, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

Come now the parties, by counsel, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) stipulate to the 

dismissal of this cause, with prejudice, each party bearing its own costs. 

 s/ James E. Porter s/ Ian L. Stewart 

James E. Porter, Attny. No. 28011-49 Ian L. Stewart, Attny. No. 23162-53 

EPSTEIN COHEN SEIF & PORTER,LLP STEPHENSON MOROW & SEMLER 

50 S. Meridian St., Suite 505 3077 E. 98th Street, Ste. 240 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 Indianapolis, IN 46280 

Attorney for plaintiff Attorney for defendants 

Lamonte Brazelton Tippecanoe County Sheriff, Jessica Kennedy 

and Michael Svetanoff 

 s/ Carol A. Dillon 

Carol A. Dillon, Attny. No. 25549-49 

BLEEKE DILLON CRANDALL, P.C. 

8470 Allison Pointe Boulevard, Suite 420 

Indianapolis, IN 46250-4362 

Attorney for defendants 

Advance Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Dr. Nadir Al-Shami; 

USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00029-RL-PRC document 31 filed 06/11/17 page 1 of 1
---

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Solanex Management Inc.,
  a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal
  year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  (the Report), I, Colin Hall, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
  Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:    | /s/ Colin Hall                
|------ | ------------------------------
|       |                               
|Name:  | Colin Hall                    
|       |                               
|Title: | Acting Chief Financial Officer
|       |                               
|Date:  | August 8, 2008                

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Solanex Management Inc. and will be retained by Solanex
  Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.]

---
[No. 15299-5-III.

Division Three.

August 21, 1997.]

#### Paul Klinke, et al., *Respondents,*v. Gerald W. Hankal, et al., *Defendants,*Carole W. Hankal, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 94-2-03712-3, Robert D. Austin, J., entered October 16, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, A.C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Brown, JJ.
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 1 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 2 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 3 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 4 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 5 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 6 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 7 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 8 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 9 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 10 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 11 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 12 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 13 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 14 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 15 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 16 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 17 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 18 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 19 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 20 of 21
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00346-RL-JEM document 3 filed 07/31/15 page 21 of 21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          69,011
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,099
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    593,698
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         593,698
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           593,698
<LOANS>                                        924,234
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,635,420
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,182,761
<SHORT-TERM>                                   214,519
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,008
<LONG-TERM>                                     74,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           835
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,635,420
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,940
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,890
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    20
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,850
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,304
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,185
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,665
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,401
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 231
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,012
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,012
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,735
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,516
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    44
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,200
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,756
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      743
<RECOVERIES>                                       300
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,709
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,709
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2038 

To prevent the retroactive application of changes to Trans-Alaska Pipeline 

Quality Bank valuation methodologies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prevent the retroactive application of changes to TransAlaska Pipeline Quality Bank valuation methodologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. 

4 In this Act: 

5 (1) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

6 means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

7 (2) TAPS QUALITY BANK VALUATION METH8 ODOLOGIES.—The term ‘‘TAPS quality bank valu9 ation methodologies’’ means valuation methodologies 

10 applied for the purpose of establishing monetary ad-
2 

•HR 2038 IH 

1 justments paid by or to shippers of oil on the Trans2 Alaska Pipeline (as authorized by the Trans-Alaska 

3 Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.) 

4 through the operation of a quality bank to com5 pensate for differentials in the value of shippers’ oil 

6 commingled in the pipeline. 

7 SEC. 2. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION RE8 VIEW OF TRANS-ALASKA PIPELINE CARRIER 

9 TARIFFS. 

10 Pursuant to the ratemaking authority of the Commis11 sion under section 60501 of title 49, United States Code, 

12 in carrying out a review of Trans-Alaska Pipeline carrier 

13 tariffs, the Commission shall not approve any retroactive 

14 application of TAPS quality bank valuation methodolo15 gies. 

16 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 This Act applies to orders of the Commission issued 

18 after December 31, 2005. 

Æ
#### DUNLEVIE v. DRONEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by Ernest V. Dunlevie against John R. Droney.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, without costs.

SPRING, J., dissents upon the ground that, if the plaintiff is entitled to recover at all, he should recover for all the timber on the tract, which, so far as appears, would naturally have been delivered to the river on the way to market.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 27151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12612]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 16, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW., Washington, DC, 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-12612 Filed 5-18-95; 3:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cr-00089-PPS-APR document 23 filed 07/06/16 page 1 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cr-00089-PPS-APR document 23 filed 07/06/16 page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                            20,002
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             1,528
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   1,744
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            0              
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           156,349
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             156,649
<LOANS>                                          254,538
<ALLOWANCE>                                        2,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   449,119
<DEPOSITS>                                       352,395
<SHORT-TERM>                                       8,995  
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                3,528
<LONG-TERM>                                       35,000
<COMMON>                                          15,285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        33,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   449,119  
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    5,798
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  2,446
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      31
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   8,275
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 3,029   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,494
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              4,781
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        140
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   123
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    3,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,159
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         1,538
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      4.81
<LOANS-NON>                                        3,103
<LOANS-PAST>                                         859
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0 
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   2,798
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        441
<RECOVERIES>                                         150    
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  2,887
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               2,887
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1787 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1787

          To suspend temporarily the duty on t-Butyl acrylate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on t-Butyl acrylate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. T-BUTYL ACRYLATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.56       tert-Butyl         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         acrylate (CAS No.                                                  31/2008
                         1663-39-4)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2916.12.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00272-JVB-PRC   document 17-9   filed 09/14/16   page 1 of 4

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00272-JVB-PRC   document 17-9   filed 09/14/16   page 2 of 4

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00272-JVB-PRC   document 17-9   filed 09/14/16   page 3 of 4

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00272-JVB-PRC   document 17-9   filed 09/14/16   page 4 of 4