alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Earl L Yager, as Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company"), and Tracy A. Kern, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that

      (1) the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004                   /s/ Earl L Yager
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Earl L. Yager
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Of
                                           CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.

Dated: November 15, 2004                   /s/ Tracy A. Kern
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Tracy A. Kern
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Of
                                           CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
**Exhibit32.2**

**ASPYRA, INC.**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,2007 (the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned herebycertifies that to their knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.
| Date: August 20, 2007                      |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                       |   |   |
| /S/ Anahita Villafane                      |   |   |   |   |
| Anahita Villafane, Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|                                            |        |        |  |  |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAspyra, Inc. and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
Jermaine KEYES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7247.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED 
STOCK DIVIDENDS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
 September 30,
    
    
    September 30,2009
    
    
    2008(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    685,695
    
    
    $
    588,171Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    374,491
    
    
    
    325,290Fixed charges
    
    
    1,052,619
    
    
    
    1,164,082Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (8,798
    )
    
    
    (20,681
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    2,104,007
    
    
    $
    2,056,862Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    3,262
    
    
    $
    3,909Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    155
    %
    
    
    155
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    5,056
    
    
    
    6,059Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    1,041,357
    
    
    
    1,140,886Capitalized interest
    
    
    8,798
    
    
    
    20,681Interest factors of rents
    
    
    2,464
    
    
    
    2,515Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    1,052,619
    
    
    
    1,164,082Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    1,057,675
    
    
    $
    1,170,141Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ((A) divided by (B))
    
    
    2.00
    x
    
    
    1.77
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
((A) divided by (C))
    
    
    1.99
    x

    
    
    1.76
    x
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 22, 2021 / Presidential Documents 32631 

Presidential Determination No. 2021–08 of June 11, 2021 

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (22 U.S.C. 2601(c)(1)) (MRAA), 

I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the MRAA, that it is 

important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the MRAA 

in an amount not to exceed $46 million from the United States Emergency 

Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected urgent refugee and migration needs, including through contributions 

to international organizations by the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and 

Migration of the Department of State, related to the humanitarian needs 

of vulnerable refugees and migrants in Central America and third countries 

in the region. 

You are authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress, 

along with the accompanying Justification, and to publish this determination 

in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 11, 2021 

[FR Doc. 2021–13208 

Filed 6–21–21; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC2BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1988

To amend section 1369 of title 18, United States Code, to extend Federal 

jurisdiction over destruction of veterans’ memorials on State or local 

government property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend section 1369 of title 18, United States Code, 

to extend Federal jurisdiction over destruction of veterans’ memorials on State or local government property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect our Veterans 

5 Memorials Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that—

8 (1) crimes against United States military vet9 erans’ memorials on public property dishonor all 
2

•HR 1988 IH 

1 American servicemen and women and their sacrifices 

2 for the Nation’s defense; and 

3 (2) Federal prosecution of crimes against such 

4 veterans’ memorials on public property is in the na5 tional interest of honoring the Nation’s military vet6 erans. 

7 SEC. 3. FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER DESTRUCTION OF 

8 VETERANS’ MEMORIALS ON STATE OR LOCAL 

9 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY. 

10 Section 1369(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, 

11 is amended by inserting ‘‘, or a State or local government’’ 

12 after ‘‘Federal Government’’.

Æ
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |    8-5-10 |   |   /s/ Doug Carpenter                 |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   | C. Douglas Carpenter                      |
|   |                |   | Senior Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |

----
#### WAY, Respondent, v. WENTZ et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 25, 1913.)

Action by Augustus F. Way against Elizabeth Wentz and others.

No opinion. Judgment of the County Court of Queens county affirmed,. with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Literature 
Selection Technical Review Committee.
    The meeting is devoted to the review and evaluation of journals for 
potential indexing by the National Library of Medicine and will be 
closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in 
section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. Premature disclosure 
of the titles of the journals as potential titles to be indexed by the 
National Library of Medicine, the discussions, and the presence of 
individuals associated with these publications could significantly 
frustrate the review and evaluation of individual journals.

    Name of Committee: Literature Selection Technical Review 
Committee.
    Date: October 28-29, 2021.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate journals as potential titles to 
be indexed by the National Library of Medicine.
    Place: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Dianne Babski, Associate Director, Division of 
Library Operations, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville 
Pike, Building 38, Room 2W04A, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301-827-4729, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe9c9f9c8d95979abe939f9792d0909796d0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="caa8aba8b9a1a3ae8aa7aba3a6e4a4a3a2e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 14, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-13368 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7630

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus ANTHONY MARK WILSON, a/k/a T-Bird, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00379-LDW; 1:07-cv-00804-LDW) Submitted: January 30, 2008 Decided: February 15, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Mark Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. G. David Hackney, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Because the district court failed to provide Wilson notice and an opportunity to amend his motion for enlargement of time prior to recharacterization, Wilson need not seek this court’s - 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Mark Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for enlargement of time to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and construing the motion as his first § 2255 motion and denying that motion, as well as its order denying Wilson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004) (requiring a certificate of appealability in Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) context). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. * We dispenseauthorization to file a future § 2255 motion raising additional claims. See Castro v. United States , 540 U.S. 375, 381-83 (2003). We express no opinion, however, regarding whether such a motion would be timely. - 3 - with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1831 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1831

             To extend the duty suspension on MUB 738 INT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To extend the duty suspension on MUB 738 INT.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MUB 738 INT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to MUB 738 INT) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 1 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 2 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 3 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 4 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 5 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 6 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 7 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 8 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 9 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 10 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 11 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 12 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 13 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 14 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 15 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 16 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 17 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 18 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 19 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 20 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 21 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 22 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 23 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 24 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 25 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 26 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 27 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 28 of 29

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00317-RLM-CAN   document 1   filed 10/29/15   page 29 of 29
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2003 (the“Report”) by Creative Computer Applications, Inc. (“Registrant”), each of theundersigned hereby certifies that to their knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofRegistrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

 

 
| Date: January 12, 2004                                                              |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                |
|                                                                                |
| /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                                                               |   |
| Steven M. Besbeck, President,  Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Creative Computer Applications,Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
#### IMPERIAL GARAGE v. RYTTENBERG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 22, 1912.)

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by the Imperial Garage against Clarkson P. Ryttenberg and others. From judgment entered upon a verdict for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed, and new trial ordered, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment, in which event judgment, as reduced, to be affirmed. R. M. Cohen, for appellant Ryttenberg. Stetson, Jennings & Russell, for appellant Matheson Automobile Co. Walter C. Low, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We think there was a question to be submitted to the jury as to whether the plaintiff was not responsible for the damages caused by the cracked cylinder, and it was therefore error to dismiss the counterclaim to that extent. The judgment and order will therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered to the sum of $501.09, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, and the order appealed from, will be affirmed, without costs.