alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1919 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3-Quinolinedicarboxylic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3-Quinolinedicarboxylic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,3-QUINOLINEDICARBOXYLIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.64 2,3-Quinolinedicarboxylic 

acid (CAS No. 643–38–9) 

(provided for in subheading 

2933.49.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1919 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
[No. 20946-2-II.

Division Two.

September 5, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Ronald L. Miller, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 95-1-00380-8, Leonard W. Kruse, J., entered October 4, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Armstrong, J.; Hunt, J., dissenting.
#### Ilya MANYK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL *48SERVICES,1 Defendant-Appellee, Ukrainian Financial Group, Defendant.

No. 10-3278-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2011.

Alexander J. Segal, Grinberg & Segal, P.L.L.C., New York, NY., for Appellant.

David Fallek (Garrett Duffy, Fogarty, Felicione & Duffy, Mineóla, NY, on the brief), Western Union, LLC, Oakland, CA, for Appellee.

PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.

1

. The Clerk is directed to change the caption of this case to read as indicated above.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Ilya Manyk appeals from a judgment of the District Court granting the motion for summary judgment of defendant-appellee Western Union Financial Services (“Western Union”), and denying his motion to reopen discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f).2*See Manyk v. W. Union Fin. Co.,*No. 07 Civ. 6260, 2009 WL 1490827 (S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2009). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case.

This appeal arises out of a claim for personal injury against Western Union and Ukrainian Financial Group (“UFG”), a foreign corporation,3 in which Manyk alleged that he had been assaulted by an employee or agent of UFG or Western Union. Manyk argued that Western Union was vicariously liable for his injuries because the UFG location in which he was assaulted had actual authority to conduct limited types of business on behalf of Western Union.4

The District Court granted summary judgment against Manyk, finding that he could not establish grounds for Western Union’s vicarious liability. It also denied his motion to reopen discovery in order to procure additional evidence regarding the relationship between Western Union and UFG. Manyk argues on appeal that the District Court erred by granting summary judgment against him and by denying his motion to reopen discovery.

Having conducted an independent review of the record, we AFFIRM the judgment on appeal for substantially the rea*49sons stated by the District Court in its careful Opinion and Order of May 27, 2009.

2

. This appeal was originally docketed under No. 09-2651-cv. The original appeal was withdrawn on August 26, 2009 in order to resolve several claims that remained pending in the District Court, and a new appeal was brought under the current docket number on August 16, 2010.

3

. Defendant UFG was voluntarily dismissed from the case when it was determined that its presence destroyed the District Court’s subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2). *See Manyk v. W. Union Co. Fin. Co.,*No. 07 Civ. 6260, 2010 WL 3062891 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2010) (Scheindlin, J.). The dismissal of UFG is not at issue on appeal, and UFG is not a party to the appeal.

4

.Manyk does not argue on appeal that the record below supports any other basis for finding an agency relationship to have existed between Western Union and UFG.
#### In re BRIGGS AVE. SCHOOL SITE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 18, 1907.)

In the matter of the Briggs Avenue school site.

No opinion. Reference ordered. Settle order on notice.
#### CHICK, Respondent, v. MENIHAN CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 13, 1912.)

Action by B. Barker Chick against the Menihan Company. No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals (from 133 N. Y. Supp. 1115) denied, with $10 costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1721 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1721

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2005

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize 
 programs to improve the quality of coastal recreation waters, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COASTAL RECREATION WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND 
              NOTIFICATION.

    Section 406(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1346(i)) is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2011''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 8 of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal 
Health Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 877) is amended by striking ``2005'' and 
inserting ``2011''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.14.3    
    


Amendment No. 5 (the "Amendment") To

Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") between

C. Douglas Kranwinkle ("Employee") and Univison Management Co. ("Company")  


Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 


        1.     Term. The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31, 2006, unless earlier terminated in
accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement. 



        2.     Salary. The annual Base Salary rate will be: Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) for the annual period from
January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. 


        3.     Effective Date of Amendment. Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment will become effective as of
January 1, 2004. 


        4.     Other. Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement will remain in
full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed. 



	 	 	UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  GEORGE W. BLANK       
 George W. Blank

Chief Financial Officer
	

/s/  C. DOUGLAS KRANWINKLE      
 C. Douglas Kranwinkle	
 	

 	
 	

 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.14.3
A99A1808, A99A1809.

#### COSTELLO v. THE STATE (two cases).

(522 SE2d 572)

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

In notices of appeal filed in Case Nos. A99A1808 and A99A1809, defendant Costello, an indigent pro se, appeals his conviction in the State Court of Fayette County after a jury verdict finding him guilty of violation of the open container law, operating a motor vehicle with defective equipment, no Georgia driver’s license, no valid Georgia registration, and possession of marijuana. Defendant enumerates 19 identical enumerations of error in each case. We have consolidated the two appeals for review. *Held'.*

Upon review of the record of defendant’s convictions it does not appear that the trial court advised defendant of his right to have counsel appointed for any appeal he might wish to pursue. *Cochran v. State,*253 Ga. 10 (315 SE2d 653) (1984).

> While a defendant has a right to pursue an appeal pro se, *88Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XII, *Cochran v. State,*supra, it must be preceded by an appropriate waiver of the right to appellate counsel. The failure to advise of the right to appeal [is] harmless error because defendant has in fact appealed, and in a timely fashion. But this does not cover the failure to advise of the right to counsel on appeal, *Reid v. State,*235 Ga. 378 (219 SE2d 740) (1975), because [defendant] is here pro se without a showing on the record of an opportunity to choose.

Decided September 16, 1999.

Christopher L. Costello, *pro se.*

*Steven L. Harris, Solicitor,*for appellee.

*Jacobs v. State,*184 Ga. App. 869 (363 SE2d 155) (1987). Consequently, we must vacate the judgments in these cases sub judice since the consolidated record does not reveal any explanation to defendant of his entitlement to appellate counsel, the dangers of proceeding without counsel and a valid waiver of appellate counsel. We remand these cases to the trial court in order for appropriate instructions by the trial court, upon the record, to be given to defendant consistent with *Cochran v. State,*253 Ga. 10, supra, and *Clarke v. Zant,*247 Ga. 194 (275 SE2d 49). See also *Wright v. State,*198 Ga. App. 531, 532 (402 SE2d 807).

Upon remand, the trial court should give appropriate instructions to defendant consistent with *Cochran v. State,*253 Ga. 10, supra, regarding defendant’s entitlement to appellate counsel and the dangers of proceeding without counsel.

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove the appeals in the cases sub judice from the appellate docket and remand each to the trial court. If, after the trial court has complied with the directions herein and reconsidered its decision on the defendant’s motion for new trial, the trial court may grant a new trial or enter a new judgment of conviction and sentence. If a new judgment of conviction and sentence is entered, defendant Costello may, within 30 days of the trial court’s ruling, file a notice of appeal from that decision.

*Judgments vacated and cases remanded with direction.*

*Johnson, C. J., and Phipps, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. II 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          35,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,244
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,172)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,969
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,455
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    202
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing**

**Financial      Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|  | **•** |   | fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/              C. Troy Woodbury, Jr. |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |   |
| **Name:**                              | **C.                Troy Woodbury, Jr.** |
| **Title:**                             | **Treasurer                and Chief Financial Officer****(Principal                Financial Officer)** |
| **Date:**                              | **January                1****4,                2008** |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1854 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1854

 To suspend temporarily the duty on magnesium zinc aluminum hydroxide 
                           carbonate hydrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on magnesium zinc aluminum hydroxide 
                           carbonate hydrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAGNESIUM ZINC ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE CARBONATE HYDRATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.61      Magnesium zinc      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         aluminum                                                           31/2008
                         hydroxide
                         carbonate hydrate
                         (CAS No. 169314-
                         88-9) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3812.30.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
d69970exv10w25w1w2a






EXHIBIT 10.25.1.2a
Schedule of Omitted Guaranties


(Fixed Rate Pools)
The agreements listed below are substantially identical in all material respects to the Guaranty for Fixed Rate Pool 1, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association (the “Form Guaranty”), except as to the identity of the borrowers of the underlying debt, the principal amount of the underlying debt and the maximum amount payable by the guarantor. The following table specifically identifies each of these differences. There are no other material differences between any of the agreements listed below and the Form Guaranty. These agreements are not being filed as exhibits in reliance on Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
	
											
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Principal
Balance of
Borrowers’
	 
	Maximum
Guaranteed

	Omitted Agreement
	 
	Borrowers
	 
	Debt
	 
	Amount

	Guaranty for Fixed Rate Pool 2, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association
	 
	Ashford Phoenix Airport LP
Ashford Plano-R LP
Ashford San Jose LP
Ashford Richmond LP
Ashford Plymouth Meeting LP
Ashford Hawthorne LP
Ashford Manhattan Beach LP
	 
	$
	126,466,000
	

	 
	$
	21,300,000
	


	Guaranty for Fixed Rate Pool 3, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association
	 
	Ashford San Francisco II LP
Ashford Seattle Downtown LP
	 
	$
	128,408,000
	

	 
	$
	21,650,000
	


	Guaranty for Fixed Rate Pool 4, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association
	 
	Ashford LLB C-Hotel
Management, LP
Ashford LLB SHS Management, LP
Ashford LLB F-Inn
Management, LP
Ashford Edison LP
Ashford Atlanta Buckhead LP
	 
	$
	103,906,000
	

	 
	$
	17,500,000
	


	Guaranty for Fixed Rate Pool 5, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association
	 
	Ashford Durham I LLC
Ashford Durham II LLC
Ashford Bucks County LLC
Ashford Flagstaff LP
Ashford Market Center LP
Ashford Bridgewater Hotel
Partnership, LP
	 
	$
	158,105,000
	

	 
	$
	26,650,000
	


	Guaranty for Fixed Rate Pool 6, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association
	 
	Ashford Plano-M LP
Ashford Seattle Waterfront LP
Ashford Tampa International
Hotel Partnership, LP
	 
	$
	260,980,000
	

	 
	$
	43,975,000
	


	Guaranty for Courtyard Philadelphia, executed as of April 11, 2007, by the Registrant for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National Association
	 
	Ashford Philadelphia Annex LLC
	 
	$
	35,000,000
	

	 
	$
	5,900,000
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Ramos, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered on November 10, 1983, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree *626with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Ellerin, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-41-TLS 

 ) 

TIMOTHY GILMORE ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 29], filed on March 9, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 29] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

One (1) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such 

offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on March 28, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


          Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE
BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE,
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE
FINANCE CORPORATION (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, hereby
certifies that to the best of their knowledge:

          (i)       the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                    ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                    requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
                    Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 13, 2005                               /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY


Dated: May 13, 2005                               /S/ Alan H. Lund
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  ALAN H. LUND