alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM COMPAQ
COMPUTER  CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME  FOR  THE  PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        4596 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5431 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                   2202 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             14788 
<PP&E>                                        2855 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               21748 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        10566 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      6724 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                    3638 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 21748 
<SALES>                                      10947 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             11519 
<CGS>                                         9007 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 9386 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              5957 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (74) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (134)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (2.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.35)
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2119 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Paliotol Yellow L 2140 HD. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. WELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Paliotol Yellow L 2140 

HD. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PALIOTOL YELLOW L 2140 HD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.12 2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)- 

Pyrimidinetrione,5,5’-(1Hisoindole-1,3(2H)- 

diylidene)bis- (CAS No. 

36888–99–0) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.17.90) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2119 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 27374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12667]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 2:02 p.m. on 
Thursday, May 18, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider the following:

    Recommendations regarding an administrative enforcement 
proceeding.
    Application of Savings Bank of Mendocino County, Ukiah, 
California, to assume the liability to pay deposits made in the 
Ukiah, California Branch of U.S. Bank of California, Sacramento, 
California.
    Matters relating to the Corporation's corporate activities.

    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Jonathan L. Fiechter (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), 
seconded by Vice Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., concurred in by Director 
Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Ricki 
Helfer, that Corporation business required its consideration of the 
matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier 
notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not 
require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public 
observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed 
meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and 
(c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: May 19, 1995.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Patti C. Fox,
Acting Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12667 Filed 5-19-95; 10:38 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
# C_2008055EN.01000301.xml

| 28.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4893 — Quebecor World/RSDB)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 55/02)

On 14 December 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4893. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4893. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### Isaac Eugene SLAPPY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard E. BAZZLE, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution, Respondent—Appellee, and A.L. Bowers, Corporal; Robert Murray, Captain, Respondents.

No. 05-7901.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 27, 2006.

Decided: May 4, 2006.

Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Peterson, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Isaac Eugene Slappy, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his *301petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Slappy has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See Slappy v. Bazzle,*No. CA-05-14-0-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Claunce Montrel MAZYCK, a/k/a Claunce Montrel Mazck, a/k/a Cabbage Mazyck, a/k/a Claunce Montrel Mazyeck, a/k/a Clarence Mazyck, a/k/a Clarence Montrel Mazyck, a/k/a Claunce J. Mazyck, a/k/a Clarenc Mazyck, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-4671.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 31, 2006.

Decided: May 4, 2006.

Thaddeus J. Doughty, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Gasser, Acting United States Attorney, John C. Duane, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

*322Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion reinstated; sentence affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

This case is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court. We previously affirmed Claunce Montrel Mazyck’s conviction and sentence. *United States v. Mazyck,*111 Fed.Appx. 683 (4th Cir.2004) (unpublished). The Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded Mazyck’s case to us for further consideration in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Mazyck pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000). At sentencing, the district court assigned a base offense level of 20, and Mazyck received a two-level enhancement because the firearm in question was reported stolen. *See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2K2.1(b)(4) (2002). After a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, Mazyck’s adjusted offense level was 19. Mazyck’s criminal history category V yielded a guideline range of 57 to 71 months’ imprisonment. The district court imposed a sentence of 71 months’ incarceration.

On remand, Mazyck argues that he is entitled to resentencing in light of *Booker*because his sentence was improperly enhanced by two levels because the firearm in question was stolen. He asserts that the government did not prove that the firearm was stolen and that he thus should be resentenced without the two-level enhancement. Because Mazyck did not challenge the enhancement on this ground below, we review for plain error. *United States v. Hughes,*401 F.3d 540, 547 (4th Cir.2005).

For purposes of determining *Booker*error, we consider the guideline range based on the facts the defendant admitted before any adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. *United States v. Evans,*416 F.3d 298, 300 n. 4 (4th Cir.2005). Using this calculation with criminal history category V, the guideline range would have been 63 to 78 months. Because Mazyck’s sentence is within that range, he cannot show plain error.

Accordingly, we reinstate our October 21, 2004 opinion and affirm Mazyck’s sentence after our reconsideration in light of *Booker.*We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*OPINION REINSTATED; SENTENCE AFFIRMED*
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2136 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethyl 4,5-dihydro-5,5-diphenyl-1,2- 

oxazole-3-carboxylate (Isoxadifen-ethyl). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethyl 4,5-dihydro-5,5- 

diphenyl-1,2-oxazole-3-carboxylate (Isoxadifen-ethyl). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHYL 4,5-DIHYDRO-5,5-DIPHENYL-1,2-OXAZOLE4 3-CARBOXYLATE (ISOXADIFEN-ETHYL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•HR 2136 IH 

‘‘ 9902.06.74 Ethyl 4,5-dihydro-5,5-diphenyl-1,2-oxazole-3- 

carboxylate (Isoxadifenethyl) (CAS No. 163520– 

33–0) (provided for in subheading 2934.99.39) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 18

)

EBONY GREEN )

OPINION and ORDER

Defendant has moved for relief under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018,

H.R. 5682, 115th Cong. (Dec. 21, 2018). (DE # 74.) The First Step Act of 2018

independently authorized a district court to resentence eligible defendants as if the

statutory penalties of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-220, S. 1789, 111th

Cong. (Aug. 3, 2010), were in effect at the time of the original sentencing. A defendant is

eligible for a reduced sentence under Section 404(b) if he or she was sentenced for a

“covered offense,” defined in Section 404(a) as a “violation of a Federal criminal statute,

the statutory penalties for which were modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing

Act . . . , that was committed before August 3, 2010.” First Step Act, § 404 (a), (b).

In this case, defendant was convicted of charges involving conduct occurring in

2014. (DE # 1.) Accordingly, defendant received the benefit of the Fair Sentencing Act of

2010 when she was sentenced, and she is ineligible for further relief under Section 404

of the First Step Act of 2018. Therefore, her motion (DE # 74) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: December 1, 2020

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cr-00018-JTM-PRC document 77 filed 12/01/20 page 1 of 1
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Procera Networks, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Thomas H. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
        the
        best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Procera Networks, Inc., and will be retained by Procera Networks,Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
  Date:
        April 15, 2007
 
 /s/
        Thomas H. Williams
 Thomas
        H.
        Williams
 Chief
        Financial Officer
# L_2008247EN.01002501.xml

| 16.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 247/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 247/25

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 September 2008

appointing a Slovak member and a Slovak alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2008/727/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Slovak Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Milan MURGAŠ of the Committee of the Regions. An alternate member’s seat becomes vacant following the appointment of Mr Vladimír BAJAN as a member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Milan MURGAŠ of the Committee of the Regions. An alternate member’s seat becomes vacant following the appointment of Mr Vladimír BAJAN as a member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

| (a) | as a member:
  Mr Vladimír BAJAN, predseda Bratislavského samosprávneho kraja (President of the Bratislava Self-governing Region) (change of mandate); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

as a member:

Mr Vladimír BAJAN, predseda Bratislavského samosprávneho kraja (President of the Bratislava Self-governing Region) (change of mandate);

| (b) | as an alternate member:
  Mr Milan MURGAŠ, predseda Banskobystrického samosprávneho kraja (President of the Banská Bystrica Self-governing Region). |
| --- | --- |

(b)

as an alternate member:

Mr Milan MURGAŠ, predseda Banskobystrického samosprávneho kraja (President of the Banská Bystrica Self-governing Region).

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2008.

For the Council

The President

B. KOUCHNER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

United States District Court

for the

Northern District of Indiana

_________________ Dennis Trover________ :________ )

Plaintiff )

v . ) Case No. 16-C V -1 4 6

Thomas H eneghan, O l i v ie r L i v o l s i , )

P o r t f o l i o M an ag ers, I n c . , and N a tio n a l )

F u tu re s A s s o c ia tio n ,

D eten d a n t|p pEARANCE QE COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Nisen & Elliott, LLC 

200 W. Adams St., Ste. 2500 

Chicago, IL 60606

Address

mdaley@nisen.com

E-mail address

(312)346-7800

Telephone number

(312)346-9316

FAX number

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00146-SLC document 3 filed 07/08/16 page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1918 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1918

To suspend temporarily the duty on 80% 2,3-Dimethylbutylnitrile and 20% 
                                toluene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 80% 2,3-Dimethylbutylnitrile and 20% 
                                toluene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 80% 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTYLNITRILE AND 20% TOLUENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.63      80% 2,3-            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dimethylbutylnitr                                                  31/2008
                         ile (CAS No.
                         13893-53-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3824.90.91) and
                         20% toluene......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      11

<PAGE>

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON MANAGEMENT'S
           ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS
            SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
                               MORTGAGE BANKERS



Board of Directors
Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion about Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL) ("the Company") compliance with the minimum
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of
and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying
management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc., and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CHL) complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 7, 2002



                                      12
[No. 38211-0-I.

Division One.

October 13, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stewart Thomas Piper, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 93-1-01335-8, Thomas J. Wynne, J., entered November 28, 1995 and February 14, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.