Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-489-501]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: On June 16, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) issued its final judgment in the 2017-2018 antidumping duty administrative review of circular welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products from Turkey, Court no. 20-00015, sustaining the Department of Commerce (Commerce) first remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on circular welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products from Turkey covering the period of review (POR), May 1, 2017, through April 30, 2018. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
 DATES: Applicable June 26, 2021.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade  Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue  NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4162.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 22, 2020, Commerce published its 
                    *Final Results*
                     in the 2017-2018 AD administrative review of circular welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products from Turkey. Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 9.99 percent for Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Borusan).[1] After correcting ministerial errors contained in the 
                    *Final Results,*
                     on March 5, 2020, Commerce published the 
                    *Amended Final Results,*
                     with an amended weighted-average dumping margin of 8.48 percent.[2] Borusan appealed Commerce's 
                    *Amended Final Results.*
                     On February 17, 2021, the CIT remanded the 
                    *Amended Final Results*
                     to Commerce, ordering Commerce to “eliminate any adjustment to {cost of production} based on a {particular market situation (PMS)} in the sales-below-cost test.” [3]
                    
                     Also, while the CIT in 
                    *Borusan*
                     sustained Commerce's decision that the constructed export price (CEP) and export price (EP) may be reduced by section 232 duties paid,[4]
                    
                     the CIT ordered Commerce to reweigh all of the evidence, including any relevant sales data, with respect to the reduction of CEP by section 232 duties paid, “applying normal decision-making tools without an adverse inference.” [5] In its final remand redetermination, issued in April 2021, Commerce stated that it continues to find that a PMS existed in Turkey during the POR that distorted the price of hot-rolled coil, the principle material input for the production of the subject merchandise and significant component of the cost of production of the subject merchandise. Nevertheless, because the CIT has directed Commerce not to make an adjustment to Borusan's cost of production for purposes of the sales-below-cost test, under respectful protest, we recalculated Borusan's weighted-average dumping margin with no PMS adjustment to Borusan's cost of production for purposes of the sales-below-cost test.[6] Moreover, pursuant to the CIT order that Commerce reweigh all of the evidence, including any relevant sales data, with respect to the reduction of CEP by section 232 duties paid, without applying an adverse inference, we re-examined the information on the record. Based on record evidence, we determined that section 232 duties should not be deducted from CEP sales, because the CEP shipment on which section 232 duties were paid, shortly before the end of the POR, did not include products that Borusan sold between the shipment entry date and the end of the POR.[7]
                    
                     On June 16, 2021, the CIT sustained Commerce's final redetermination with regards to both issues.[8] Timken Notice In its decision in 
                    *Timken,*[9]
                    
                     as clarified by 
                    *Diamond Sawblades,*[10]
                    
                     the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not “in harmony” with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a “conclusive” court decision. The CIT's June 16, 2021, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in harmony with Commerce's 
                    *Final Results.*
                     Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
                    *Timken.* Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its 
                    *Final Results*
                     and 
                    *Amended Final Results*
                     with respect to Borusan as follows:
                    ( print page 33656) Exporter or producer
Final results 
                             of review 
                             weighted-average  
                             
                                dumping margin 11
Final results 
                             of remand  
                             redetermination 
                             
                                weighted-average dumping margin 12Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S./Borusan Mannesmann Pipe U.S. Inc
8.48
4.06
 Cash Deposit Requirements Because Borusan has a superseding cash deposit rate, 
                    *i.e.,*
                     there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the current cash deposit rate. Liquidation of Suspended Entries At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from liquidating entries that: Were produced and/or exported by Borusan and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period May 1, 2017, through April 30, 2018. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the pendency of any appeals process. In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by Borusan in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate is not zero or 
                    *de minimis.*
                     Where an import-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*[13]
                    
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 21, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018,*85 FR 3616 (January 22, 2020) (
                        *Final Results*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018,*85 FR 12,893 (March 5, 2020) (
                        *Amended Final Results*). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.Ş. and Borusan Mannesmann Pipe U.S. Inc.,*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00015, Slip Op. 21-18 (CIT February 17, 2021) (
                        *Borusan*) at 19. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See Borusan*
                         at 17. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *Id.*
                         at 17-19. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Commerce's Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, 
                        *Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.Ş. and Borusan Mannesmann Pipe U.S. Inc.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00015, Slip Op. 21-18, dated April 18, 2021. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00015, Slip Op. 21-75 (CIT June 16, 2021) (
                        *Borusan Mannesmann*). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See Timken Co.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (
                        *Timken*). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         See 
                        *Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition*
                         v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (
                        *Diamond*
                        Sawblades). Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Analysis for the Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.,” dated February 28, 2020. 12.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Borusan's Final Remand Results Analysis Memorandum. Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2021-13591 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P