alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          668182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                686796
<PP&E>                                           13500
<DEPRECIATION>                                   10651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  810516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2015
<OTHER-SE>                                      786151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    810516
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 21012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    56591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6723)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28856)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28856)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSA MARIA GONZALEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 07-74077

 11-72034

Agency No. A096-493-547

MEMORANDUM*

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Rosa Maria Gonzalez, a native

and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) orders dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision

denying her application for cancellation of removal and denying her motion to

FILED

DEC 28 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74077 / 11-72034

reopen alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. 

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We dismiss the

petition for review in No. 07-74077, and deny the petition for review in No. 11-

72034.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Gonzalez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her

qualifying relatives. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir.

2009). Gonzalez’s contention that the agency erred by failing to consider hardship

to her eldest daughter is belied by the record.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Gonzalez’s motion to reopen

for failure to establish prejudice. Mohammed, 400 F.3d at 793-94 (prejudice

results when counsel’s actions may have affected the outcome of the proceedings). 

We need not reach Gonzalez’s remaining contentions in light of these

conclusions.

In No. 07-74077: PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

In No. 11-72034: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Order entered December 19, 2012**

**In The**

**Court of Appeals**

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

**No. 05-11-01119-CV**

**Imagine Automotive Group, INC., et al., Appellants**

**V.**

**Boardwalk Motor Cars, LTD. d/b/a boardwalk**

**porsche (formerly the porsche store), et al., Appellees**

**On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court**

**Collin County, Texas**

**Trial Court Cause No. 296-982-07**

**ORDER**

The Court has before it appellants’ December 17, 2012 unopposed motion for extension.  The Court **GRANTS** the motion and **ORDERS**that any reply be filed by December 31, 2012.

/s/MOLLY FRANCISJUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

80/20 INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) NO. 1:15-cv-00221-RLM-SLC

)

BERENDSEN FLUID POWER, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff 80/20 Inc., filed a complaint against Defendant Berendsen Fluid Power, Inc., on

August 18, 2015, alleging that this Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

(DE 1). The complaint recites that 80/20 is an Indiana corporation with its headquarters in

Indiana, and that “[u]pon information and belief,” Berendsen is an Oklahoma corporation with

its headquarters in Oklahoma. (DE 1 ¶¶ 1-2). 

These jurisdictional allegations are inadequate with respect to Berendsen. “Allegations

of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief,

only personal knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek, 472 F. Supp. 2d 1055, 1057 n.1 (S.D. Ill. 2006)

(citing Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992));

see Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1

(N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL

187411, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2003).

As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, 80/20 bears the burden of

demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. Chase v. Shop’n Save

Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). Therefore, 80/20 is ORDERED to
supplement the record on or before September 2, 2015, by filing an amended complaint that

adequately alleges the citizenship of Berendsen.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 19th day of August 2015.

s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2016 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2016

To suspend temporarily the duty on glass bulbs, designed for sprinkler 
systems and other release devices, filled with liquid that expands and 
     breaks the bulb at a release temperature predetermined by the 
                             manufacturer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

   Mr. Shaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on glass bulbs, designed for sprinkler 
systems and other release devices, filled with liquid that expands and 
     breaks the bulb at a release temperature predetermined by the 
                             manufacturer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GLASS THERMO BULBS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.70.07       Glass bulbs        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         designed for                                                       31/2008
                         sprinkler systems
                         and other release
                         devices, filled
                         with liquid that
                         expands and
                         breaks (provided
                         for in subheading
                         7020.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 20225-5-II.

Division Two.

October 10, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Daniel B. Gallagher, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 95-1-00102-3, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered November 17, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Hunt, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

MID-AMERICAN SALT LLC )

f/k/a Midwest Salt of Fort Wayne, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO: 1:16-cv-00280-PPS-SLC

)

D.J.’S LAWN SERVICE, INC., )

d/b/a DJ’s Landscape Management, )

 )

 Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by Defendant, alleging that the Court has

diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (DE 1). In the Notice of Removal,

Defendant alleges that “[u]pon information and belief, each of Plaintiff’s members is a citizen of

the state of Indiana.” (DE 1 ¶ 3). 

There are two problems with the Notice of Removal. First, “[a]llegations of federal

subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal

knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek, No. Civ. 06-753-GPM, 2006 WL 4017975, at *10 n.1 (S.D. Ill.

Dec. 7, 2006) (citing Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th

Cir. 1992)); see Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL

2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004).

Second, a limited liability company’s citizenship “for purposes of . . . diversity

jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members.” Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th

Cir. 1998). Therefore, the Court must be advised of the name and citizenship of each of the

members of Plaintiff Mid-American Salt, LLC, to ensure that none of the members share a
common citizenship with Defendant. Hicklin Eng’g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 347 (7th Cir.

2006). Such citizenship must be “traced through multiple levels” for those members of Plaintiff

who are a partnership or a limited liability company, as anything less can result in a remand for

want of jurisdiction. Mut. Assignment & Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858,

861 (7th Cir. 2004). Defendant cannot, as it attempts to do here, simply allege a “naked

declaration that there is diversity of citizenship,” Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531,

533 (7th Cir. 2007), by asserting that “each of Plaintiff’s members is a citizen of the state of

Indiana” and “none of Plaintiff’s members is a citizen of Michigan.” (DE 1 ¶ 3). 

As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, Defendant bears the burden

of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. Chase v. Shop‘N Save

Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). Therefore, Defendant is ORDERED

to supplement the record by filing an amended notice of removal that properly alleges the

citizenship of each of the parties on or before August 3, 2016.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 20th day of July 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge 

2
Anthony BOYD, petitioner, v. Kim T. THOMAS, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

No. 12-9391.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1927 

To reduce temporarily the duty on unit asy-battery hi volt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on unit asy-battery hi volt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNIT ASY-BATTERY HI VOLT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.03 Nickel-metal hydride storage 

batteries, exceeding 300 V, 

designed for use in hybrid 

motor vehicles of heading 

8703 (provided for in subheading 8507.80.80) ............ .077% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1927 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
# L_2009024EN.01003401.xml

| 28.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 24/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 24/34

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2008/173/EC of 18 February 2008 on the tests of the second Schengen Information System (SIS II)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 57 of 1 March 2008
  )

In the contents on the cover and in the title on page 14:

for:

‘2008/173/EC’,

read:

‘2008/173/JHA’.

This Decision should be considered a published under Section L III, Title VI.

---
[No. 21326-5-II.

Division Two.

August 8, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jason R. Watkins, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 96-1-01039-5, Paula Casey, J., entered October 22, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718 

To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act of 1980 to require public availability of an accounting 

of all funds used, or required to be used, for response to a release 

of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 to require public 

availability of an accounting of all funds used, or required to be used, for response to a release of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pollution Account5 ability Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1718 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 117 of the Comprehensive Environmental Re3 sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 

4 U.S.C. 9617) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(f) ACCOUNTING.—Any person who undertakes, or 

7 who is required to undertake, a response to a release of 

8 a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant shall 

9 make available to any person, on request, an accounting 

10 of any funds used, or required by any court or administra11 tive action to be used, for such response.’’. 

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Archives
                        Presentations
                                    World Dairy Expo
                                    Newsletters and Research Summaries
                    Resources
                        General Resources
                                    Books
                                    Teacher's Resources
                                    New Research Dairy Updates
                                    Integrated Research at USDFRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center About Us





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summaries - Milwaukee, WI Aquaculture

**Latest Summary** June 2022  **Past Summaries** January 2022 June 2021 March 2021 December 2020 June 2020 December 2019 June 2019 February2019 June2018 January 2018 August2017


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
I, Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Citadel Security Software Inc., a Delaware corporation;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: March 15, 2004
 
 /s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
 Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer
 Principal Financial Officer
#### W. H. KURTZ CO. et al., Respondents, v. TEALL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by the W. H. Kurtz Company and another against William W. Teall, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000712964
<NAME> SEALRIGHT CO., INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                       725
<INVENTORY>                                     44,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,614
<PP&E>                                         235,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,741
<BONDS>                                         76,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,107
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,347
<SALES>                                        133,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,021
<CGS>                                          112,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,418
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     54
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>