alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1796 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1796

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2006

                                Received

                           November 13, 2006

     Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route of the 
Mississippi River from its headwaters in the State of Minnesota to the 
Gulf of Mexico for study for potential addition to the National Trails 
 System as a national scenic trail, national historic trail, or both, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mississippi River Trail Study Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ROUTE OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER FOR STUDY FOR 
              POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM.

    (a) Designation.--Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the first paragraph after paragraph 
        (40) as paragraph (41) and, in such paragraph, by striking 
        ``The'' and inserting ``Long Walk Trail.--The'';
            (2) by redesignating the second paragraph after paragraph 
        (40) as paragraph (42); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(43) Mississippi River Trail.--The route of the Mississippi River 
from its headwaters in the State of Minnesota to the Gulf of Mexico.''.
    (b) Relation to Other Studies.--The study required by the amendment 
made by this section is intended to complement, and not duplicate, 
other studies of the scenic or historical importance of the Mississippi 
River that may be underway or undertaken.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2244 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Glyoxylic Acid 50%. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Glyoxylic Acid 50%. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID 50%. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.27 Glyoxylic Acid 50% (CAS 

No. 79–14–1) (provided for 

in subheading 2918.30.90) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2244 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Feldman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of Law Enforcement Associates Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 29, 2005

/s/ Paul Feldman
------------------
Paul Feldman
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
[No. 38887-8-I.

Division One.

October 13, 1997.]

#### Stacey Martinez, *Respondent,*v. Department of Social and Health Services, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 96-7-00001-0, Stanley K. Bruhn, J., entered July 1, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Kennedy, A.C.J., and Webster, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0                     242
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                     672
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   8,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                   9,541
<PP&E>                                               0                   1,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  10,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   3,273
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     200
<COMMON>                                             0                  19,115
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                (15,194)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  10,684
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,529                  12,023
<CGS>                                            4,462                   9,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,462                   9,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75                     242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    228                     285
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                228                     285
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       228                     285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04                    0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04                    0.05
        

</TABLE>
#### LAVINE v. LAVINE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Sadie Lavine against William S. Lavine. No opinion. Motion granted, with §10 costs. Order filed.
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −46)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See 896 F.Supp.2d 1339 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 242 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Aug 05, 2013
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−46 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 13−03032 Rosmarin v. Biomet, Inc. et al

NEW JERSEY

NJ 2 13−03662 FOUTS v. BIOMET, INC. et al
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DEVRA G. SHAPIRODevra G. Shapiro Chief Financial Officer


March 7, 2011
Joseph F. APUZZO, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 12-1118.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00023-TLS-SLC

)

CHRISTOPHER J. SEWELL )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on July 26, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Judge Theresa

L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation

are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 26th day of July 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
[No. 35506-6-I.

Division One.

September 2, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rickey Lee Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-04242-1, Faith Enyeart Ireland, J., entered October 17, 1994. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 10.19.3 Termination Agreement - Foster






Exhibit 10.19.3


February 27, 2015




Mr. Paul L. Foster 
Western Refining 
123 W. Mills Ave., Suite 200 
El Paso, TX 79901 




Re: Termination of Employment Agreement 




Dear Paul: 




This letter is written to confirm that effective as of February 27, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), you and Western Refining GP, LLC (“Western”) have mutually agreed to terminate that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated January 24, 2006, including any amendments, between you and Western. As of the Effective Date, neither party shall have any further rights, duties or obligations under the Agreement.


Please sign both originals of this letter where indicated below, keep one for yourself, and return the other to me. 




Sincerely, 


/s/Jeff A. Stevens




Jeff A. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer 
Western Refining GP, LLC




AGREED TO: 






By: /s/Paul L. Foster             
Name: Paul L. Foster
Date: February 27, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

JO-ELLEN KURTZ 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 93 DB 2015 (No. 45 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 66785 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 27, 2015, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Jo-Ellen Kurtz, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### In the Matter of Myron S. Rosen.

— Motion granted and respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective March 5, 1985. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Carro, Bloom and Fein, JJ.
# L_2008318EN.01001401.xml

| 28.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 November 2008

implementing Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)

(2008/890/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP of 19 November 2007 on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) (1) and, in particular, Article 12(1) thereof, in conjunction with the second indent of Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 19 November 2007 the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP establishing that the EUPM is to be continued until 31 December 2009. The financial reference amount for 2008 and 2009 is to be decided on an annual basis. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 19 November 2007 the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP establishing that the EUPM is to be continued until 31 December 2009. The financial reference amount for 2008 and 2009 is to be decided on an annual basis.

| (2) | The mandate of the EUPM will be implemented in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the EUPM will be implemented in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the implementation of Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP shall be EUR 12 400 000 for 2009.

2.   The expenditure financed by the amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2008.

For the Council

The President

M. ALLIOT-MARIE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 303, 21.11.2007, p. 40.

1

---
# L_2008323EN.01006501.xml

| 3.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/65

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2008/900/CFSP

of 2 December 2008

amending Joint Action 2008/107/CFSP extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Central Asia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 12 February 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/107/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 12 February 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/107/CFSP (1).

| (2) | The mandate of the European Union Special Representative should be amended to take account of his role in monitoring implementation of the European Union Strategy for a New Partnership with Central Asia, adopted by the European Council in June 2007, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the European Union Special Representative should be amended to take account of his role in monitoring implementation of the European Union Strategy for a New Partnership with Central Asia, adopted by the European Council in June 2007,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Article 3(1)(i) of Joint Action 2008/107/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following text:

| ‘(i) | provide input to the formulation of energy security, anti-narcotics and water resource management aspects of the CFSP with respect to Central Asia.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(i)

provide input to the formulation of energy security, anti-narcotics and water resource management aspects of the CFSP with respect to Central Asia.’

Article 2

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2008.

For the Council

The President

C. LAGARDE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 38, 13.2.2008, p. 19.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000701345
<NAME> USAIR GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         655,447
<SECURITIES>                                   631,114
<RECEIVABLES>                                  410,293<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    250,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,085,489
<PP&E>                                       6,431,580
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,464,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,371,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,741,413
<BONDS>                                      2,625,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          758,719
<PREFERRED>                                    213,153
<COMMON>                                        64,216
<OTHER-SE>                                   (938,776)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,371,828
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,090,476
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,702,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                254,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            236,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.15
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>