alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

ERIC WILBURN, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) Case No. 3:16-CV-107 JD 

 v. ) 

 ) 

SUPERINTENDENT, ) 

 ) 

 Respondent. ) 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 Eric Wilburn, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the prison 

disciplinary hearing (ISO 16-01-0009) that was held at the Indiana State Prison on January 27, 

2016, where the Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) found him guilty of Refusing to Submit a 

urine sample for a drug test in violation of B-203. As a result, he lost 15 days earned credit time. 

In response, the respondent filed a motion to dismiss arguing that “[b]ecause the finding of guilt 

and sanction affecting the duration of confinement have been vacated, Wilburn’s habeas petition 

is moot and this Court lacks a live case or controversy to adjudicate.” DE 4 at 2. The Respondent 

also attached documentation showing that the sanctions have been vacated and the credit time 

restored. 

 Wilburn agrees that ISO 16-01-0009 has been vacated and the earned credit time for this 

proceeding has been restored. However he argues that he has been found guilty of refusing to 

submit a urine sample on other dates in different prison disciplinary proceedings and that those 

sanctions remain. He believes that they should be overturned for the same reasons that this one 

was overturned. However, this case is only about ISO 16-01-0009. If Wilburn wants to challenge 

other disciplinary proceedings, he needs to file a separate habeas corpus case for each one of them. 
2 

He cannot challenge them in this case. Copies of the court’s form for challenging a prison 

disciplinary hearing are available in the prison law library. Wilburn also argues that it is a civil 

rights violation to require him to provide a urine sample because he is physically incapable of 

doing so. However, this is a habeas corpus case, not a civil rights case. If Wilburn wants to pursue 

a civil rights case, he can obtain a copy of the court’s approved prisoner complaint form from the 

prison law library. He cannot litigate civil rights claims in this habeas corpus case. 

 Because the parties agree that the finding of guilt in ISO 16-01-0009 has been vacated and 

the earned credit time restored, this case must be dismissed. See Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 

664 (7th Cir. 2003). For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss (DE 4) is GRANTED, and 

this case is DISMISSED. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: May 26, 2016 

 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992

To suspend temporarily the duty on endosulfan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on endosulfan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENDOSULFAN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.38.06 Hexachlorohexahydromethano-2,4,3-benzodioxathlepin3-oxide (CAS No. 115–29–

7) (provided for in subheadings 2904.90.50 and 

3808.30.15) ......................... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2

•HR 1992 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Introduction Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Main Menu
                        Home page
                                    About the Plant Introduction Station
                                    Crops
                                    Entomology
                                    Facilities
                                    Pathology
                                    Seed Storage
                                    Seed Viability
                                    Annual Reports
                                    Ash Conservation ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Seed Storage Programheadline bar Main


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

TRUCK CITY OF GARY, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA 

LLC, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00348-RL-JEM 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

 It is hereby stipulated by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff Truck City of Gary, Inc. 

and the attorneys for Defendant Daimler Trucks North America LLC (hereinafter “DTNA”) that 

the above-captioned Complaint and all claims against DTNA are dismissed with prejudice and 

without attorneys’ fees, costs, and/or expenses being awarded to any party. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 

 

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00348-RL-JEM document 18 filed 02/27/17 page 1 of 2
2

Dated: February 27, 2017 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/Robert D. MacGill 

Robert D. MacGill (#9989-49) 

Jessica M. Lindemann (#31058-49) 

Justin D. Rumer (#31494-49) 

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 

11 South Meridian Street 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

Telephone: (317) 236-1313 

Facsimile: (317) 231-7433 

E-mail: rmacgill@btlaw.com 

 jlindemann@btlaw.com 

 jrumer@btlaw.com 

Attorneys for Truck City of Gary, Inc.

/s/Russell S. Abrams

Wayne C. Turner 

Susanne A. Johnson 

Email: wturner@hooverhullturner.com 

Email: sjohnson@hooverhullturner.com 

HOOVER HULL TURNER LLP 

111 Monument Circle, Suite 4400 

P.O. Box 44989 

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0989 

Telephone: 317.822.4400 

Facsimile: 317.822.0234 

Russell S. Abrams (Fed. ID No. 12293) 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Email: russ.abrams@klgates.com 

K&L GATES LLP 

134 Meeting Street, Suite 500 

Charleston, SC 29401 Telephone: 

843.579.5600 

Facsimile: 843.579.5601 

Attorneys for Daimler Trucks North 

America, LLC 

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv-00348-RL-JEM document 18 filed 02/27/17 page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

TYQUAN STEWART,

Plaintiff,

v.

PARKVIEW BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL 

SECURITY GUARD, KISHA HOUSTON,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-CV-00138 – JTM-SLC

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

I, the below-signed, state that pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83-5(e), I have read and will abide 

by the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, including 

Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct Within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit. I 

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Enter my Amended Appearance as counsel in this case for Lakisha Houston 

(inappropriately sued and served herein as Parkview Behavioral Hospital Security Guard, 

Kisha Houston).

Dated: October 18, 2016 s/Mark W. Baeverstad

Mark W. Baeverstad #3896-02

Rothberg Logan & Warsco LLP

505 E. Washington Blvd.

Fort Wayne, IN 46802

(260) 422-9454 - Telephone

(260) 422-1622 – Facsimile

mbaeverstad@rlwlawfirm.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 18th day of October, 2016, the following non-CM/ECF 

participant was served by first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid to:

Tyquan Stewart

4510 Austin Dr.

Fort Wayne, IN 46806

s/Mark W. Baeverstad

Mark W. Baeverstad
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2017 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2005 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Torture Victims Relief Act of 1998 to authorize appropriations to provide assistance for domestic and 

foreign programs and centers for the treatment of victims of torture, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 2017 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Torture Victims Relief 

3 Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY. 

5 It is the policy of the United States— 

6 (1) to ensure that, in its support abroad for 

7 programs and centers for the treatment of victims of 

8 torture, particular incentives and support should be 

9 given to establishing and supporting such programs 

10 and centers in emerging democracies, in post-conflict 

11 environments, and, with a view to providing services 

12 to refugees and internally displaced persons, in areas 

13 as close to ongoing conflict as safely as possible; and 

14 (2) to ensure that, in its support for domestic 

15 programs and centers for the treatment of victims of 

16 torture, particular attention should be given to re17 gions with significant immigrant or refugee popu18 lations. 

19 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR DOMES20 TIC TREATMENT CENTERS FOR VICTIMS OF 

21 TORTURE. 

22 Section 5(b)(1) of the Torture Victims Relief Act of 

23 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2152 note) is amended to read as follows: 

24 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Of 

25 the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the 

26 Department of Health and Human Services for fis-
3 

HR 2017 RDS 

1 cal years 2006 and 2007, there are authorized to be 

2 appropriated to carry out subsection (a) 

3 $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 and 

4 2007.’’. 

5 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FOR6 EIGN TREATMENT CENTERS FOR VICTIMS OF 

7 TORTURE. 

8 Section 4(b)(1) of the Torture Victims Relief Act of 

9 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2152 note) is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Of 

11 the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 

12 years 2006 and 2007 pursuant to chapter 1 of part 

13 I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, there are 

14 authorized to be appropriated to the President to 

15 carry out section 130 of such Act $12,000,000 for 

16 fiscal year 2006 and $13,000,000 for fiscal year 

17 2007.’’. 

18 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 

19 UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTION TO THE 

20 UNITED NATIONS VOLUNTARY FUND FOR 

21 VICTIMS OF TORTURE. 

22 Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fis23 cal years 2006 and 2007 pursuant to chapter 3 of part 

24 I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, there are author25 ized to be appropriated to the President for a voluntary 
4 

HR 2017 RDS 

1 contribution to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for 

2 Victims of Torture $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2006 and 

3 $8,000,000 for fiscal year 2007. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 

2005. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing


Financial
Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





I, C.
Troy Woodbury, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation (the
“Company”), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best
of my knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended November 27, 2009 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:




•
            fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




•
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.Name:
              C.
      Troy Woodbury, Jr.Title:
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
              January
      11, 2010
[No. 19341-8-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Eileen Werstiuk, *Appellant,*and Howard S. Werstiuk, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 94-3-00057-3, Leonard W. Costello, J., entered January 12, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 

HealthStream, Inc. (the “Company”) 

Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation 

I. Director Compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors of the Company.
The following table sets forth current rates of cash compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors. 
  

					
	 Retainers and Fees
	  	2015	 
	 Annual Retainer fee
	  	$	4,000	  
	 Board meeting fee
	  	$	1,000	  
	 Committee chair meeting fee
	  	$	1,000	  
	 Committee member meeting fee
	  	$	500	  

 In addition to the cash compensation set forth above, each non-employee director is eligible to receive a
nondiscretionary annual grant of restricted share units for conversion to shares of the Company’s common stock. The restricted share units are granted annually and vest ratably over a three year period. 

II. Executive Officer Compensation. The following table sets forth the current base salaries and fiscal 2014 performance bonuses provided to our
executive officers, including the individuals who the Company expects to be its Named Executive Officers for 2015. 
  

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Current Base Salary	 	  	Fiscal 2014 Bonus Amount	 
	 Robert A. Frist, Jr.
	  	$	283,343	  	  	$	85,001	  
			
	 J. Edward Pearson
	  	$	267,729	  	  	$	80,317	  
			
	 Arthur E. Newman
	  	$	253,071	  	  	$	75,920	  
			
	 Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
	  	$	248,745	  	  	$	74,622	  
			
	 Jeffrey S. Doster
	  	$	248,745	  	  	$	74,622	  
			
	 Michael Sousa
	  	$	260,000	  	  	$	35,341	  
			
	 Thomas Schultz
	  	$	200,000	  	  	$	-0-	  

 III. Additional Information. The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding Director
and Named Executive Officer compensation will be contained in the Company’s 2015 Proxy Statement.
#### Duncan Victor Ayemere IDOKOGI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General; Kevin D. Rooney; Edward J. McElroy; Benedict Ferro; Caryl G. Thompson, Acting District Director; United States Department of Justice, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 03-30721.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 26, 2004.

*204Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi, Federal Detention Center Oakdale, Oakdale, LA, Petitioner-Appellant.

Thomas Burton Thompson, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Lafayette, LA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Petitioner-Appellant Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, from an order of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). As an initial matter, the district court had jurisdiction over the issues raised in this habeas petition. *See INS v. St Cyr,*533 U.S. 289, 314, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001).

Idokogi’s argument that his prior convictions for theft do not qualify as aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Naturalization Act is meritless. Each prior conviction involved the receipt of stolen property, and he was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of at least one year on each conviction. *See Lopez-Elias v. Reno,*209 F.3d 788, 791 (5th Cir.2000); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G).

Idokogi’s arguments surrounding the process he received at the removal proceeding is likewise without merit, as he fails to make a showing of substantial prejudice. *See Anwar v. INS,*116 F.3d 140, 144 (5th Cir.1997). As Idokogi is not entitled to habeas relief from the removal order, neither is he entitled to have his removal held in abeyance while he collaterally challenges his 1998 conviction.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                   906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, John A. Grillo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of National Energy Services Company, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment #2) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment #2) fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 21, 2006                          By: /s/ John Grillo
                                        ---------------------------
                                        John Grillo
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-44-TLS 

 ) 

LAWRENCE HILL ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 92], filed on January 12, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 92] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

Two (2) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such 

offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on January 27, 2017. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research Docs





- John Bamberg
- Paul Bethke
- Johanne Brunet
- Dennis Halterman
- Michael Havey
- Shelley Jansky
- Philipp Simon
- David Spooner
- Yiqun Weng
- David Willis
- IFAFS

IFAFS: Pigment Powerheadline bar Pigment Power in Carrot Colors How pigments promote good health **WHITE (PARENT CARROT)****ORANGE****PURPLE OUTSIDEORANGE INSIDE****RED****YELLOW**white rootorange rootpurple rootred rootyellow rootHealth benefit = no medicinal value from pigmentHealth benefit = Vitamin A essential for well-being, healthy eyesHealth benefit = Helps prevent heart disease from blood clotting, antioxidant ties up harmful free radicalsHealth benefit = Helps prevent cancerHealth benefit = develops healthy eyes and helps prevent cancerPigment = no pigmentPigment = beta carotenePigment = beta carotene and anthocyaninPigment = Lycopene (another form of carotene)Pigment = xanthophyllsOrigin = Afghanistan, Iran, PakistanOrigin = Europe and Mid EastOrigin = Turkey, Mid and Far EastOrigin = India, ChinaOrigin = Mideast  They all taste the same!


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov