alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,614
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    111,267
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        230,396
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,763
<DEPOSITS>                                     257,608
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,004
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,758
<LONG-TERM>                                     44,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,011
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 357,763
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,740
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,267
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,008
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,769
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,080
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,159
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 151
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,097
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,097
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,061
<LOANS-PAST>                                       764
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    219
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,071
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      190
<RECOVERIES>                                       129
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,145
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,483
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,562
        

</TABLE>
[No. 15491-2-III.

Division Three.

October 2, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Bruce Alan Harshman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 95-1-00343-2, Yancy Reser, J., entered January 16, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Brown, JJ.
#### REISER, Respondent, v. ALMY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 2, 1898.)

Action by William H. Reiser against Elnora Almy.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
case 2:14-cv-00060-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 02/26/14 page 1 of 6
case 2:14-cv-00060-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 02/26/14 page 2 of 6
case 2:14-cv-00060-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 02/26/14 page 3 of 6
case 2:14-cv-00060-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 02/26/14 page 4 of 6
case 2:14-cv-00060-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 02/26/14 page 5 of 6
case 2:14-cv-00060-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 02/26/14 page 6 of 6
II 

Calendar No. 289 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1972 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of including in the National Park System certain sites 

in Williamson County, Tennessee, relating to the Battle 

of Franklin. 
2 

HR 1972 PCS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Franklin National Bat5 tlefield Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 

10 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

11 means the cities of Brentwood, Franklin, Triune, 

12 Thompson’s Station, and Spring Hill, Tennessee. 

13 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 

15 special resource study of sites in the study area relating 

16 to the Battle of Franklin to determine— 

17 (1) the national significance of the sites; and 

18 (2) the suitability and feasibility of including 

19 the sites in the National Park System. 

20 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The study conducted under 

21 subsection (a) shall include the analysis and recommenda22 tions of the Secretary on— 

23 (1) the effect on the study area of including the 

24 sites in the National Park System; and 
3 

HR 1972 PCS 

1 (2) whether the sites could be included in an 

2 existing unit of the National Park System or other 

3 federally designated unit in the State of Tennessee. 

4 (c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under 

5 subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with— 

6 (1) appropriate Federal agencies and State and 

7 local government entities; and 

8 (2) interested groups and organizations. 

9 (d) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

10 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with Pub11 lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.). 

12 SEC. 4. REPORT. 

13 Not later than 3 years after the date funds are made 

14 available for the study, the Secretary shall submit to the 

15 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives 

16 and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 

17 the Senate a report that describes— 

18 (1) the findings of the study; and 

19 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

20 Secretary. 
4 

HR 1972 PCS 

1 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

3 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

Calendar No. 289 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1972 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct 

Tennessee, relating to the Battle of Franklin. Park System certain sites in Williamson County, ability and feasibility of including in the National a special resource study to determine the suitNOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




I
      hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      of TechnoConcepts, Inc. (formerly Technology Consulting Partners, Inc.) for
      the period ending September 30, 2005:





(1)
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of TechnoConcepts, Inc.







/s/
      Antonio E. Turgeon


Antonio
      E. Turgeon


Chief
      Executive Officer





December
      29, 2005








/s/
      Michael Handelman


Michael
      Handelman


Chief
      Financial Officer





December
      29, 2005








A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to TechnoConcepts, Inc. and will be retained
      by TechnoConcepts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      upon request.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2022 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bispyribac-sodium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bispyribac-sodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BISPYRIBAC-SODIUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.21 Sodium 2,6-bis[(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

yl)oxy]benzoate (Bispyribacsodium) (CAS No. 125401– 

92–5) (provided for in subheading 2933.59.10) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2022 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,834
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              45
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,675
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    107,097
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,115
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,144
<LOANS>                                        281,253
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,040
<DEPOSITS>                                     338,624
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,121
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,885
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,274
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 421,040
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,897
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,553
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,477
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,189
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,732
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,745
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      445
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 348
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,282
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         941
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        388
<LOANS-PAST>                                       127
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   219
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,700
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,908
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      213
<RECOVERIES>                                        49
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,189
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,189
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Juan Manuel GUERRERO-SANCHEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70945.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 27, 2004.

Juan Manuel Guerrero-Sanchez, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

Maria De Jesus Aguilar De Guerrero, Santa Ana, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le*505Fevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of yhe District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., John L. Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Manuel Guerrero-Sanchez and his wife Maria De Jesus Aguilar De Guerrero, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying their motion to reconsider the denial of their application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion for reconsideration because the BIA considered the arguments raised in the motion and determined that petitioners failed to identify any errors of law or fact in the BIA’s prior order. *See Caruncho v. INS,*68 F.3d 356, 361-62 (9th Cir.1995) (denying petition for review where BIA stated reasons and considered relevant equities before denying relief).

To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s September 17, 2002 order affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider the order because petitioners did not file a timely petition for review of that order. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
2021 Risk Review | V

Table of Contents

Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1

Section I: Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 3

Key Risks to Banks ......................................................................................................................4

Section II: Economic, Financial Markets, and Banking Industry Overview........................................ 7

Economy.....................................................................................................................................7

Financial Markets ...................................................................................................................... 12

Banking Industry....................................................................................................................... 16

Section III: Key Risks to Banks ................................................................................................... 21

Credit Risk....................................................................................................................................... 21

Agriculture ............................................................................................................................... 21

Commercial Real Estate ............................................................................................................. 26

Consumer Debt.......................................................................................................................... 33

Energy ..................................................................................................................................... 36

Housing.................................................................................................................................... 40

Leveraged Lending and Corporate Debt ....................................................................................... 46

Nonbank Financial Institution Lending ........................................................................................ 50

Small Business Lending.............................................................................................................. 52

Market Risk ..................................................................................................................................... 58

Interest Rate Risk and Net Interest Margin.................................................................................... 58

Liquidity and Deposits................................................................................................................ 62

Acronyms and Abbreviations..................................................................................................... 65

Glossary of Terms..................................................................................................................... 66
case 4:13-cv-00070-PPS-PRC document 4 filed 09/27/13 page 1 of 2
case 4:13-cv-00070-PPS-PRC document 4 filed 09/27/13 page 2 of 2
|DEAN HELLER
Secretary of State
204 North Carson Street, Suite 1
Carson City, Nevada 88701-4299
(775) 684 5706
Website: secretaryofstate.biz | FILED # C29353-01
FEB 05 2004
IN THE OFFICE OF
DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Certificate of Change Pursuant
to NRS 78.209
|--------------------------------------------

Certificate of Change filed Pursuant to NRS 78.209
For Nevada Profit Corporations

1. Name of corporation:

|ALTUS EXPLORATIONS INC.
|-----------------------

2. The board of directors have adopted a resolution pursuant to NRS 78.207 and have obtained any required approval of the stockholders.

3. The current number of authorized shares and the par value, if any, of each class or series, if any, of shares before the change:

|200,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001
|-------------------------------------------------------------

4. The number of authorized shares and the par value, if any, of each class or series, if any, of shares after the change:

|800,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001
|-------------------------------------------------------------

5. The number of shares of each affected class or series, if any, to be issued after the change in exchange for each issued share of the same class or series:

|The Corporation shall issue four (4) shares of common stock for every one (1) share of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the forward stock split.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. The provisions, if any, for the issuance of fractional shares, or for the payment of money or the issuance of scrip to stockholders otherwise entitled to a fraction of a share and the percentage of outstanding shares affected thereby:

|N/A
|---

7. Effective date of filing (optional):

|8. Officer Signature: | /s/ Milton Cox
Signature | PRESIDENT
Title
|--------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
MDTplc-2015Q3-EX10.24






EXHIBIT 10.24
AMENDMENT TO THE
MAY 11, 2011 LETTER AGREEMENT




Medtronic, Inc. (“the Company”) and Omar Ishrak, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby agree to this Amendment (“Amendment”), dated as of February 12, 2015, to the Letter Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by the parties on May 11, 2011, and amended as of August 24, 2011.
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2014, the Company entered into a Transaction Agreement with Covidien plc and the other parties named therein (the “Transaction Agreement”) to acquire Covidien through the formation of a new holding company incorporated in Ireland which was renamed Medtronic plc (the “Transaction”); and
WHEREAS, technical changes to the Agreement are required in connection with the Transaction; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Effective Time (as defined in the Transaction Agreement):
		
	1.
	You shall hold the title set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Agreement at both the Company and at Medtronic plc, a Irish public limited company and the parent company of the Company (“Medtronic plc”).




		
	2.
	The Board membership and chairmanship set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall change from the Company to Medtronic plc (the “Plc Board”), and you shall be annually nominated for reelection to such position.  




		
	3.
	References to any compensation and benefit plans and policies previously maintained by the Company which have been adopted, amended and restated by Medtronic plc shall be deemed to refer to those amended and restated plans and policies where the context requires.  References to any future benefit plan participation will be deemed to refer to plans maintained by the Company or Medtronic plc, as applicable, based on the terms of such future benefits programs.




		
	4.
	Any reference to a Change of Control of the Company shall instead be deemed to refer to a Change of Control of Medtronic plc.




		
	5.
	References in Paragraph 16 to your duties and obligations with the Company shall be deemed to refer to your duties and obligations with the Company and its affiliates, including Medtronic plc.




		
	6.
	References to the Board in the definition of Cause on Attachment 1 shall be deemed to refer to the Plc Board, and references in such definition to an impact on the Company shall be deemed to refer to an impact on the Company and its affiliates, including Medtronic plc.




		
	7.
	References to your position with the Company in prong (b) of the definition of Good Reason on Attachment 1 shall be deemed to refer to any of your positions as set forth in Section 1 of this Amendment.




		
	8.
	Except as provided herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  The Agreement, together with this Amendment and the August 24, 2011 amendment, shall be considered one and the same agreement.




COMPANY


__________________________
Name:
Title:











EXECUTIVE


___________________________
Omar Ishrak
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[No. 20366-9-II.

Division Two.

August 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Arthur B. Crawley III, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 95-1-01247-1, David R. Draper, J., entered January 10, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Hunt, JJ.