alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

MICHAEL A. JONES, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No. 3:13-CV-1330 JD 

 ) 

LAPORTE COUNTY SHERIFF’s ) 

DEPARTMENT, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 This case arises from the allegedly discriminatory termination of Mr. Jones, a former 

employee of the LaPorte County Sheriff’s Department. Mr. Jones filed a complaint, alleging 

claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 2000e. [DE 1.] The Defendants filed an answer to 

the complaint. [DE 7.] The same day, they filed a Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 

Complaint, In Part. [DE 8.] The motion seeks to dismiss those claims brought directly under 42 

U.S.C. § 1981, arguing that no cause of action exists under that section for claims against those 

acting under the color of state law. [DE 8 at 2; DE 9 at 2–7.] 

 Mr. Jones did not respond to the partial motion to dismiss within the time to do so under 

the Local Rules. N.D. Ind. L.R. 7-1(d)(2)(A) (“A party must file any response brief to a motion 

within 14 days after the motion is served.”). However, Mr. Jones later filed a document titled 

“Stipulation to Dismiss Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.” [DE 16.] The filing states: “Inasmuch 

as plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 are essentially identical to his claims under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff hereby withdraws his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.” [Id. at 1.] The 

parties stipulated that “the withdrawal of plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 moots 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.” [Id. at 2.] 
2 

 Based on Mr. Jones’s stated intent to withdraw his claims under section 1981 and the 

parties’ stipulation, the Plaintiff’s section 1981 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. The Court DISMISSES AS MOOT the Motion of Defendants to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, In Part. [DE 8.] 

 SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: July 24, 2014 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2107 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2107

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
  To amend Public Law 104-329 to modify authorities for the use of the 
  National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Maintenance Fund, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Law Enforcement Officers 
Memorial Maintenance Fund Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 
              MEMORIAL MAINTENANCE FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 201 of Public Law 104-329 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Cooperative Agreement.--
        ``(1) In general.--Effective on and after the date of the 
    enactment of the National Law Enforcement Memorial Maintenance Fund 
    Act of 2005, the following applies, notwithstanding other 
    provisions of this Act:
            ``(A) The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
        National Park Service, shall enter into a cooperative agreement 
        with the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, Inc., 
        a nonprofit corporation incorporated under the laws of the 
        District of Columbia, to carry out the purposes of the Fund as 
        described in subsection (b).
            ``(B) In accordance with the terms of such agreement, the 
        Secretary shall transfer all amounts in the Fund to the 
        Corporation.
        ``(2) Definitions.--For purposes of this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `Corporation' means the National Law 
        Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, Inc.; and
            ``(B) the term `Secretary' means the Secretary of the 
        Interior.''.
    (b) Purposes of Fund.--Section 201(b) of Public Law 104-329 is 
amended--
        (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``and'' after the semicolon;
        (2) by striking paragraphs (4), (6), and (7), and redesignating 
    paragraph (5) as paragraph (4); and
        (3) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), by striking the 
    semicolon and inserting a period.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

STATESVILLE DIVISION 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-26

SIMPSON PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, 

INC. and SFI FOUNDATION, INC.

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROBERT WAGONER and

DEREK RANDALL CATHCART

 Defendants.

 ORDER

ORDER EXTENDING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND RE-SETTING

HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion filed on March 13, 2015, for 

extension of the Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) granted by the Order of the Court dated 

February 19, 2015, and previously extended by the Order of the Court dated March 3, 2015. 

Based on this Court having reviewed and considered this Motion, the record, and the original 

motion, the Court finds good cause to extend the TRO until March 30, 2015. Further, the Court 

will hear Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction on March 30, 2015.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the TRO is extended 14 days from March 16, 

2015, until March 30, 2015. 
A hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion For Preliminary Injunction is re-set for Monday, March 

30, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Statesville, North Carolina.

This 19th day of March, 2015 at 2:42 pm.

Signed: March 19, 2015
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bioproducts Research: Albany, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Guayule plant and guayule concept tire. This **Bioproducts Research** partnership with industry demonstrated that a modern passenger tire can be made from US-grown guayule natural rubber. Read more.


Mission


The **Bioproducts Research Unit** works closely with growers' groups, processors and a wide range of commercial partners to provide new technologies that add value to agricultural coproducts. This includes creating environmentally-friendly biomaterials, including green chemicals, nanocomposites, sustainable plastics, and critical commodities, such as US-grown rubber.  The team is uniquely placed to develop strategies that are specifically applicable to serve the agricultural community of the Western US.


Pacific West Area   charles.lee@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### PEOPLE, Respondents, v. MATHEWS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 18, 1899.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Joseph Mathews.

No opinion. Judgment modified by striking out the provision for imprisonment in case the defendant fails to pay the fine, and, as thus modified, judgment affirmed. Judgment to be entered and certified to the Oneida county court, pursuant to section 547 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. All concur, except WARD, J., not voting.
Gene Tony COOPER, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 12-8674.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina denied.
#### KOESTER, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER CANDY WORKS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate' Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Charles W. Koester against the Rochester Candy Works.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.’

. WILLIAMS, J., dissents. ROBSON, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2113 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2113

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 2000 McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, as the ``John F. 
                Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2113

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 2000 McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, as the ``John F. 
                Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2000 
McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, shall be known and designated as 
the ``John F. Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John F. Whiteside Joliet 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-30-TLS 

 ) 

CARLOS SANCHEZ ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 105], filed on November 7, 2017. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 105] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Counts One (1) and Eleven (11) of the Superseding Indictment is hereby accepted, 

and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on November 27, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 9 filed 10/13/15 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 9 filed 10/13/15 page 2 of 3
10/13/2015 s/Christopher A Nuechterlein

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 9 filed 10/13/15 page 3 of 3
# C_2008060EN.01000101.xml

| 5.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 February 2008

appointing the Luxembourg member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2008/C 60/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Luxembourg Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009.

2

| (2) | A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Gilbert ENGEL. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Gilbert ENGEL.

| (3) | The Luxembourg member of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2009, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Luxembourg member of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2009:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

Luxembourg: Mr Nic ALFF.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

A. VIZJAK

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 240, 5.10.2006, p. 1.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 120 (Friday, June 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13496]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/09-0462]


Hercules Technology III, LP; Surrender of License of Small 
Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 09/09-0462 issued to 
Hercules Technology III, LP, said license is hereby declared null and 
void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Thomas G. Morris,
Acting Associate Administrator, Director, Office of SBIC Liquidation, 
Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2021-13496 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 3(i)(e)


                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                     OF THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               POWERTEL USA, INC.


         POWERTEL USA, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certifies
pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware that:

         1. The Company filed on January 22, 1997, a Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of POWERTEL USA, INC., (SRV number 971021090) (the "Restated
Certificate").

         2. The Restated Certificate was an inaccurate record of the corporate
action and is null and void AB INITIO as confirmed by an ORDER APPROVING AND
CONFIRMING DEBTOR'S FIRST AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, AS REVISED AND AMENDED
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Nevada, Case No: 97-30265- BMG,
dated September 15, 1998.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Correction to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 25th day of
November, 1998.

                                            POWERTEL USA, INC.


                                       By:     /s/ Richard A. Cascarilla
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard A. Cascarilla, President
---

March 29, 2011

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|    |                                               
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    
|    |                                               
|    | Consent of Expert                             

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Tysen Hantelmann, P.Eng , hereby consent to the use of my
name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the
following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Preliminary Assessment of the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska dated
  February 17, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report.

I have read the Companys Annual Report and confirm that it
documents fairly and accurately represent the information that supports the
disclosure.

Yours truly,



/s/ Tysen Hantelmann<

---

Tysen Hantelmann, P.Eng

Wardrop Engineering Inc.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICEROR**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q, of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert J. McCormack, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert J. McCormack                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | President & Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                    |
| Date:  | August 11, 2003                         |   |   |
|        |                                         |        |  |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

C. WAYNE SEELEY III, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-589 RM

)

)

CLAY KELLERMAN, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

C. Wayne Seeley III, a pro se prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (DE

1.) The court must review the complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or

malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A Courts apply the same standard under Section

1915A as when deciding a motion under FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6).

Lagerstrom v. Kingston, 463 F.3d 621, 624 (7th Cir. 2006). To survive dismissal, a complaint

must state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. Bissessur v. Indiana Univ. Bd. of

Trs., 581 F.3d 599, 602-03 (7th Cir. 2009). “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff

pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the

defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. at 603. The court must bear in mind that

“[a] document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however

inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 
Mr. Seeley is suing Clay Kellerman, a judge in Franklin County Circuit Court. He

claims that Judge Kellerman violated his right to a speedy trial, as well as other rights,

during a criminal case. He seeks $200,000 “for the suffering mentally and getting found

guilty[.]” This claim can’t proceed. The judge is entitled to absolute immunity for acts

performed within his judicial capacity, including rulings made in Mr. Seeley’s case. See

Dawson v. Newman, 419 F.3d 656, 660-661 (7th Cir. 2005). If the judge’s orders were

erroneous as Mr. Seeley argues, his remedy would be through state appellate process, not

a federal civil rights suit for damages. Id. at 661. To the extent Mr. Seeley is trying to have 1

his conviction invalidated or otherwise obtain release from prison, he must pursue such

relief in a habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, subject to the requirements of the

Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2254;

Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 488 (1973) (habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy for

a state prisoner who challenges the fact or duration of his confinement). 

Forthe reasons set forth above, the court DISMISSES the complaint (DE 1) pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: June 19 , 2013

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

Mr. Seeley lists the State of Indiana in the caption but not in the body of the 1

complaint. If he is trying to sue the state for damages, such a claim is barred by the

Eleventh Amendment. Kashani v. Purdue University, 813 F.2d. 843, 845 (7th Cir. 1987). 

2