alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

March 27th, 2013

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|    |                                               
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    
|    |                                               
|    | Consent of Expert                             

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form 40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2012, (the “Annual Report”) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

I, J. David Gaunt, P.Geo., hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the resource estimate in the  following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

•	          Preliminary Assessment of the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska dated February 17, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report related to me in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

|Original
      document signed by J. David Gaunt
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|J. David Gaunt, P.Geo.                            
|Hunter Dickinson Inc.                             

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1733 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electron guns for high definition cathode 

ray tubes (CRTs). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Ms. HART (for herself and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electron guns for high 

definition cathode ray tubes (CRTs). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.40 Electron guns actually used 

for high definition cathode 

ray tubes (CRTs) (provided 

for in subheading 

8540.91.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1733 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2013 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2013

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
  the air transportation tax for certain transportation by seaplanes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

  Mr. Reichert (for himself and Mr. Inslee) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
  the air transportation tax for certain transportation by seaplanes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM AIR TRANSPORTATION TAX FOR CERTAIN SEAPLANES.

    (a) In General.--Section 4261 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to imposition of tax) is amended by redesignating subsection 
(i) as subsection (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the 
following new subsection:
    ``(i) Exemption for Seaplanes.--No tax shall be imposed under this 
section or section 4271 on any air transportation by a seaplane with 
respect to any segment consisting of a takeoff from, and a landing on, 
water which is not part of an airport which receives or has received 
financial assistance from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 21119-0-II.

Division Two.

October 10, 1997.]

#### Shirley C. Cain, *Individually and as Personal Representative, Appellant,*v. The City of Tacoma, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 89-2-01419-5, Nile E. Aubrey, J., entered December 29, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-8 filed 10/23/14 page 1 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-8 filed 10/23/14 page 2 of 2
# L_2015225EN.01004901.xml

| 28.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 225/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 225/49

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 52 of 27 February 2008
  )

On page 13, Article 1(8), new Article 7(2):

for:

‘2.   Member States may ensure the provision of universal services by procuring such services in accordance with applicable public procurement rules and regulations, including, as provided for in Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services (*1), competitive dialogue or negotiated procedures with or without publication of a contract notice.

[...]

read:

‘2.   Member States may ensure the provision of universal services by procuring such services in accordance with applicable public procurement rules and regulations, including, as provided for in Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (*2), competitive dialogue or negotiated procedures with or without publication of a contract notice.

[...]

---

(*1)  
  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Council Directive 2006/97/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 107).’,

*1

(*2)  
  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114.’.

*2

---
Filed 6/27/14 P. v. L opez CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent ,

v.

LUIS FRANCISCO LOPEZ ,
Defenda nt and Appellant

. F067031
(Super. Ct. No. MCR042639)



### OPINION

THE COURT * APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Ernest J. LaCalsi, Judge.
Jake Stebner , under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant

. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Leanne LeMon and Louis M. Vasquez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Detjen, J. and Sarkisian, J.† † Judge of the Superior Court of Fresno County, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the Ca lifornia Constitution.2

.

A jury convicted a ppellant, Luis Francisco Lopez, of possession of a firearm by a person previously convicted of a felony (P en. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1) ), and in a separate proceeding, the court found true an enhancement allegation that appellant had served a prison term for a prior felony conviction (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). The court imposed a four

- year prison term and awarded appellant 904 days of presentence custody credit (Pen. Code, § 2900.5, subd. (a))

. Prior to trial, on August 15, 2 012, appellant filed a notice of a P i t chess motion ( Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531) , with supporting papers, for discovery
of certain information and materials regarding a City of Madera police officer. On September 14, 2012, the court conducted an in camera he aring, after which it advised
defense counsel that “there are no existing records [meeting the description of the records requested]

. ” On appeal, appellant asks this court to independently review the sealed records pertaining to the Pitchess proceedings. The People effectively concede , and we agree,
that such review is proper. ( People v. Mooc (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1216, 1229.) We have conducted an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing. Based on our review, we conclude the court’s ruli ng on the Pitchess motion did
not constitute an abuse of discretion. Appellant also argues in his opening brief that he was entitled to 905 days of presentence conduct credit, and not 904 days as ordered by the court. Subsequently, appellate counsel commu nicated to this court that the trial court had corrected the award of presentence credit and the refore that issue is resolved. We treat this communication as an abandonment of the claim o f error in the award of presentence custody credit

. Appellant raise s no other issues on appeal.
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1033

JOSE LUIS LARIOS-ALVAREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: August 25, 2015 Decided: September 29, 2015

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay S. Marks, Lauren Gold, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, 

Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, 

Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration 

judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the parties’ 

Joint Statement of Agreed Facts and all supporting evidence. We 

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling 

contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence 

supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 

U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. In re: Larios-Alvarez (B.I.A. Dec. 

19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit      31.1**

**COMMUNITY      BANKS, INC.**
** **

**RULE      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

**(Chief      Executive Officer)**

| Date   | November                  9, 2005 |   | /s/                   Eddie L. Dunklebarger            |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                              |   | Eddie                  L. Dunklebarger                      |
|   |                              |   | Chairman                  and President                     |
|   |                              |   | (Chief                  Executive                  Officer) |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Diaz, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered October 5,1984, convicting him of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

In the instant case, defendant was properly prosecuted for the crime of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree on the ground that he had filed a false New York State and local sales and use tax return *(see, People v Walsh,*108 AD2d 464). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-47-TLS 

 ) 

CARLOS SILVA-PONCE ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 278], filed on June 6, 2018. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation. 

The Court being duly advised, ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 

278] in its entirety and ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. Subject to this Court’s 

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if 

applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Count 1 of the Indictment 

are hereby ACCEPTED, and the Defendant is adjudged GUILTY of the offenses. 

 The Sentencing Scheduling Order scheduling sentencing-related deadlines and hearings 

will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on June 21, 2018. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
# C_2008084EN.01000201.xml

| 3.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4972 — Permira/Arysta)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 84/03)

On 25 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4972. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4972. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bio-oils Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR Homepage
                    BOR-NCAUR pilot plant facilities
                        Seed pressing and refining equipment
                                    Oil synthesis equipment
                                    Other equipmentSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Bio-oils Research Docs







French 324 seed cookerheadline bar French 324 seed cooker


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2139 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 2-[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-G6a-(met hanesulfonamido)-p-toluate whether or 

not mixed with application adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 2-[(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-G6a-(met 

hanesulfonamido)-p-toluate whether or not mixed with 

application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2139 IH 

1 SECTION 1. METHYL 2-[(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2- 

2 YLCARBAMOYL)SULFAMOYL]-α3 (METHANESULFONAMIDO)-p-TOLUATE 

4 WHETHER OR NOT MIXED WITH APPLICA5 TION ADJUVANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.76 Methyl 2-[(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-α- 

(methanesulfonamido)-ptoluate (CAS No. 208465– 

21–8) whether or not mixed 

with application adjuvants 

(provided for in subheading 

2935.00.75 or 3808.30.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Exhibit      31.2**

**COMMUNITY      BANKS, INC.**

**RULE      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

**(Chief      Financial Officer)**

| Date   | November                9, 2005 |   | /s/                 Donald F. Holt  |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                            |   | Donald                F. Holt            |
|   |                            |   | Executive                Vice President  |
|   |                            |   | (Chief                Financial Officer) |
# C_2009031EN.01000301.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5168 — EADS/SSTL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 31/03)

On 17 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5168. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5168. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
REPORT OF VOTE BY PROXY COMMITTEE

                  CCB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

             1999 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


I.   We, the undersigned, have been duly appointed, jointly
     and severally, to vote at the Annual Meeting of the
     Shareholders of CCB Financial Corporation the shares of
     common stock of CCB Financial Corporation standing in the
     name of the shareholders of record at the close of business
     on February 26, 1999 who have filed valid appointments of
     proxy with the Secretary.

II.  We, the undersigned, have been duly appointed, jointly
     and severally, to vote the shares of common stock of CCB
     Financial Corporation evidenced by valid appointments of
     proxy filed with the Secretary representing 32,272,565
     shares of the total of 40,183,281 entitled to vote at such
     meeting, and we do hereby vote the total shares so presented
     as follows:

     Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors:

     NOMINEE                    FOR              WITHHELD
     --------                 ---------         ----------
     Three-Year Term:
     Timothy B. Burnett       31,948,047        324,518
     Blake P. Garrett, Jr.    31,952,723        319,842
     Owen G. Kenan            31,951,161        321,404
     Bonnie McElveen-Hunter   31,944,441        328,124
     George J. Morrow         31,336,439        936,126
     Ernest C. Roessler       31,953,365        319,200
     H. Allen Tate, Jr.       31,917,339        355,226


     Proposal No. 2 - Ratification of Appointment of
     Independent Accounts:

                  FOR          AGAINST          ABSTAIN
                 -----         --------         --------
               32,122,854       34,106          115,603

     WITNESS our signatures this 27th day of April, 1999.


     /s/ LEO P. PYLYPEC
     ------------------
     Leo P. Pylypec

     /s/ W. HAROLD PARKER, JR.
     ------------------
     W. Harold Parker, Jr.

     /s/ MANUEL L. ROJAS
     ------------------
     Manuel L. Rojas
#### STEWART v. FERGUSON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 13, 1899.)

Action by Thomas C. Stewart against John W. Ferguson.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 54 N. Y. Supg. 615.