alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered June 17, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01300
- CR RAUL R. RICOY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F11
- 54024
- P



### O RDER The trial court’s certification reflects that appellant waived his right to appeal. After reviewing the record, the Court questions the accuracy of the certification. Specifically, although the plea form signed at the hearing o n the State’s motion to adjudicate guilt has the box checked that states appellant waives his right to appeal, the record reflects that appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the motion to adjudicate without benefit of a plea bargain. The hearing on the motion to adjudicate was conducted on one day and the trial court sentenced appellant on a different day. Nothing in the record reflects any agreement between appellant and the State as to the sentence imposed, nor does the record contain anything to show appellant waived his right to appeal after he knew what his sentence would be. Therefore, it appears the certification may be incorrect. Additionally, appellant’s brief is overdue.Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to deter mine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine the following:

 Whether appellant waived his right to appeal in conjunction with a plea agreement with the Stat e or after appellant was aware of the sentence that would be imposed. See Ex parte Delaney , 207 S.W.3d 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Blanco v. State , 18 S.W.3d 218 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). If the trial court determines that appellant waived his right to app eal in one of the manners set out above, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines appellant did not waive his right to appeal, the trial court shall prepare an amended rule 25.2(d) certification that accurately reflects the tr ial court proceedings.

 The trial court shall next determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the tria l court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam ).
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, any orders, and any supporting documentation, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with th e above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### Catherine Moutoussis et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Carole A. Moore et al., Respondents-Appellants. Langtry Realty Corp., as Assignee of Banker’s Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant, v Catherine Moutoussis, Also Known as Catherine Mavroyanis, Appellant-Respondent.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Orest Maresca, J.), entered on September 4, 1984, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The renewed motion to supplement the record is granted. No opinion. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.
MYL_EX10.56(b)_2014.12.31-10K














Exhibit 10.56(b)
	
		
	 
	

	 
	1000 Mylan Boulevard
Canonsburg, PA 15317 USA
Phone    724.514.1800
Fax    724.514.1870
Web    mylan.com








One-Time Special Five-Year 
Performance-Based Realizable Value Incentive Program




Dear [l]:


On April 17, 2014, Mylan Inc. (the “Company”) granted you a special award of performance-based restricted stock units (the “One-Time Performance-Based Award”) under the Company’s 2003 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  The One-Time Performance-Based Award provides for the possibility of accelerated vesting upon a Change in Control of the Company (as such term is defined in the Plan).  By executing this letter agreement, for good and valuable consideration (including your continued employment and continued participation in the Company’s incentive plans and programs), you acknowledge and agree that the transactions consummated pursuant to the Business Transfer Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 13, 2014, by and among Abbott Laboratories, an Illinois corporation, the Company and the other parties thereto, as such agreement may be amended from time to time, shall not constitute a Change in Control for any purpose of the One-Time Performance-Based Award.  All other provisions of the One-Time Performance-Based Award, as modified by the foregoing, shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding this letter agreement.


	
			
	 
	MYLAN INC.,

	 
	by

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Name:    

	 
	 
	Title:    






Acknowledged and agreed:


_____________________________
Name:
# C_2008249EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 September 2008

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2008/C 249/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the lists of nominees submitted to the Council by the Commission as regards the employees' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009.

2

| (2) | A members' seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of the Employees' representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Johannes HYLANDER (Sweden), |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A members' seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of the Employees' representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Johannes HYLANDER (Sweden),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2009:

| REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS |
| --- |
| SWEDEN | Ms Ulrika HEKTOR |

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS

SWEDEN

Ms Ulrika HEKTOR

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2008.

For the Council

The President

L. CHATEL

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 240, 5.10.2006, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                          255624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1898925
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     771902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3470064
<PP&E>                                         1835608
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1186287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6046446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2324237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5819185
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2150196)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6046446
<SALES>                                        3094499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3095645
<CGS>                                          2033407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3595912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (534158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (534158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (534158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



        Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE
CORPORATION (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby
certifies that to the best of their knowledge:

        (i)     the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




Dated: April 29, 2004                    /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY


Dated: April 29, 2004                    /S/ Alan H. Lund
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             ALAN H. LUND



                                      -28-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                Certification of
                             Chief Executive Officer
                         of Wyndham International, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of Wyndham
International, Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  November 12, 2002.


                                        /s/ Fred J. Kleisner
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Fred J. Kleisner

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 12 day of November 2002.

 /s/  CAMALETA M. ROSEMAN
---------------------------------------
Name: Camaleta M. Roseman
     ----------------------------------
Title:  Notary Public

My commission expires:   05-24-2004
                      -----------------
Exhibit 10.39 12.31.14






Exhibit 10.39
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
2003 DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
The Progressive Corporation 2003 Directors Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:
 	
			
	 
	1.
	The following is hereby added as Paragraph (13) of SECTION 5, thereof:




(13) Any Participant who is then eligible to participate in The Progressive Corporation Directors Restricted Stock Deferral Plan, or any other deferral plan hereafter adopted or maintained by the Company for the benefit of Eligible Directors which allows for the deferral of Restricted Stock Awards, (a “Deferral Plan”), may elect to defer all or any portion of any Restricted Stock Award granted to him or her under this Plan, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the applicable Deferral Plan.
This Amendment will be effective as of February 1, 2004.
 	
	
	 

	 

	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett

	Charles E. Jarrett
Secretary







- 1 -
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Elizabeth Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 16, 2005.



/s/ Elizabeth SchroederName:

Elizabeth Schroeder




|                                                             |  |                
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16th
day of May 2005.
|                                                             | 
|                                                             |  | /s/ Vita Branch
|                                                             | 
|Name:                                                        |  | Vita Branch    
|Title:                                                       |  | Notary Public  



My commission expires: 12-6-08



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by
the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AEE 2014 10-K Exhibit 10.24


EXHIBIT 10.24




FORMULA FOR DETERMINING 2015 TARGET PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT
AWARDS TO BE ISSUED TO NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The target number of performance share units to be issued to each Named Executive Officer listed below for 2015 will be determined in accordance with the following formula:


	
					
	2015 Target Number PSU Awards
	=
	Base Salary 
as of 1/1/15
	x
	Long‐Term Incentive Target listed below

	Average closing price of Ameren Corporation Common Stock on The New York Stock Exchange for each trading day in December 2014








	
		
	NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	LONG-TERM INCENTIVE 
TARGET AS PERCENT OF BASE SALARY

	Baxter
	350%

	Lyons
	185%

	Naslund
	150%

	Nelson
	160%

	Moehn
	165%

	Mark
	165%

	Diya
	140%

	Cole
	140%

	Steinke
	100%
#### MAVERICK-CLARKE LITHO CO., Appellant, v. HAYES LITHOGRAPHING CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by the Maverick-Clarke Litho Company against the Hayes Lithographing Company. No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals (from 132 N. Y. Supp. 1138) denied, with $10 costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 151

)

BRANDY K. HERO. )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY AND

 ADJUDICATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 59), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this

court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offenses charged in Count 2 and Count 8 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED,

and defendant is adjudged guilty of those offenses. A sentencing date will be set under

separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 5, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EXHIBIT H

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00297-JVB-SLC document 46-8 filed 05/09/16 page 1 of 2
From: Mark Walters

To: Laurie Gero

Subject: Fwd: Today"s Letter

Date: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:53:21 PM

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Dean McConnell <dean@im-iplaw.com>

Date: May 3, 2016 at 12:10:24 PM PDT

To: "Walters@LoweGrahamJones.com" <Walters@LoweGrahamJones.com>

Cc: Gregg S Gordon <ggordon@geistlaw.com>

Subject: Today's Letter

Mark:

Our motion to stay discovery pending the Court’s ruling on the dismissal issue is just that, a

motion to stay discovery in this case. There is no need for either side to spend any more time

or money on this matter if the Court dismisses the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. My

client will not be available for deposition on May 6. We will respond to your discovery

requests after the Court rules on both motions. 

I am free to discuss if you would like. Thanks.

Dean E. McConnell, Esq.

9795 Crosspoint Blvd., Suite 185 | Indianapolis, IN 46256

Office: 317-912-1331 | Fax: 317-927-8279

dean@im-iplaw.com www.im-iplaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any

unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the

sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. IRS Circular 230 Notice: Advice rendered in this

communication, including attachments, on U.S. tax issues (i) is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the

purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS on taxpayers, and (ii) may not be used or referred to in promoting,

marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement. This notice is intended to comply

with Section 10.35 of IRS Circular 230, which is located at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/pcir230.pdf.

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00297-JVB-SLC document 46-8 filed 05/09/16 page 2 of 2
[No. 38072-9-I.

Division One.

October 20, 1997.]

#### Ewald Mauser, et al., *Appellants,*v. The City of Edmonds, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 94-2-02025-9, Ann Schindler, J., entered April 25, December 27, 1995, January 12, February 26, March 6, and December 27, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.
Exhibit 10.5
 AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT
 Amendment Effective Date Seller Buyer
  A.
    
    Seller and Buyer are parties to a Purchase and Sale Agreement for 1910 Pacific Avenue
dated as of March 26, 2010 (the PSA), pursuant to which Seller has agreed to sell and
buyer has agreed to purchase the property described therein, commonly known as 1910 Pacific
Avenue or Pacific Place, being the Land, Improvements (the Building), and Personalty
located 1910 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, TX (collectively, with certain Property Agreements and
Parking Lease described in the PSA, the Property).B.
    
    The parties now desire to extend the Closing Date.
 Closing Date




---



##### 



GREIT-PACIFIC PLACE, LP,
 By:
    
    GREIT-PACIFIC PLACE GP LLC,a Delaware limited liability company,Its General PartnerBy:
    
    GREIT Liquidating Trust,a Maryland trust,Its Sole MemberBy:
    
    Gary T. Westcombe, Trustee,Gary H. Hunt, Trustee,W. Brand Inlow, Trustee,Edward A. Johnson, Trustee,D. Fleet Wallace, Trustee,As Trustees of the GREIT Liquidating Trust
 By:
    
    /s/ Andrea R. Biller

Name: Andrea R. BillerTitle:   Authorized Representative
  ASSIGNEE
 BOXER F2, L.P.
 By:
    
    Boxer M2, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company,
its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew Segal

Andrew Segal, Manager
USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00052-RL-JEM   document 18   filed 10/11/16   page 1 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00052-RL-JEM   document 18   filed 10/11/16   page 2 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00052-RL-JEM   document 18   filed 10/11/16   page 3 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00052-RL-JEM   document 18   filed 10/11/16   page 4 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 4:16-cv-00052-RL-JEM   document 18   filed 10/11/16   page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2132 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2132

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2005

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend the waiver authority of the Secretary of Education with 
respect to student financial assistance during a war or other military 
                    operation or national emergency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.

    Section 6 of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students 
Act of 2003 (20 U.S.C. 1070, note) is amended by striking ``September 
30, 2005'' and inserting ``September 30, 2007''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```