alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil Management Research: Morris, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar 2000 Reprints
               2001 Reprints
               2002 Reprints
               2003 Reprints
               2004 Reprints
               2005 Reprints
               2006 Reprints
               2007 Reprints
               2008 Reprints
               2009 Reprints
               2010 Reprints
               2011 Reprints
               2012 Reprints
               Abdullah Jaradat's Publications
               AGNPS: A Nonpoint-Source Pollution Model
               Author's Advisories for Nitrogen Decision Aid
               Barnes Aastad
               Carrie Eberle Publications
               Directions to Swan Lake Research Farm
               Directions to the NCSCRL (Soils Lab)
               PAGMan
               Publications by Author
               Publications by Year
               Reprints
               Services
               Sharon Weyers' Reprints
               Software Downloads Available
               Stakeholders and Collaborators
               Summer Employment Opportunities
               Weather
               Weather Current
               Wheat Landraces
               About Us


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
AGCO EX 10.25 - 2014 10K






                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                  Exhibit 10.25










A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON -  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2014)
     _____________________________________________________




	
			
	Retainers  (1)
	USD 

	 
	 

	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director): 
	30,000
	


	 
	 

	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):
	100,000
	


	 
	 

	Annual Committee Chairperson Retainer:
(except Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	15,000
	


	 
	 

	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer: 
	25,000
	


	 
	 

	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	20,000
	















	
			
	Additional Compensation
	USD 

	 
	 

	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	120,000
	


	 
	 








In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred in the attendance of the meeting.


















              
Page 1 of 2 

















A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON - EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2014)
_______________________________________________________






Notes:


		
	1)
	Payments of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:






		
	I)
	Annual Retainers are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).


		
	II)
	Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.


		
	III)
	Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).


		
	IV)
	Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons) will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarter's retainer amounts (up or down).


		
	V)
	Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will be reflected in the ensuing quarter's retainer payment.  






		
	2)
	Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the 2006 Plan Document. The stock grant equivalent to USD 120,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual Shareholder's meeting.




























Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Cause No. 2:16-cr-98 

 ) 

JOHN A. SANDERS. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY 

TO: THE HONORABLE JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 Upon defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11, this matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Andrew P. Rodovich, United 

States Magistrate Judge, on September 7, 2016, with the written consents of the defendant, 

counsel for the defendant, and counsel for the United States of America. 

 The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, before the 

Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record. 

 In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on 

the record, and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of Assistant United States Attorney, 

Nicholas Padilla, and of Attorney Matthew Soliday, counsel for the defendant, 

 I FIND as follows: 

1. that the defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the 

plea is offered; 

2. that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not 

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse 

witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination; 
2 

3. that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including 

the effect of the supervised release term, and the defendant understands that the 

Probation Department will prepare a pre-sentence report based upon the 

sentencing guidelines but that the court may depart from those guidelines under 

some circumstances; 

4. that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made 

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises; 

5. that the defendant is competent to plead guilty; 

6. that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a 

prosecution for perjury or false statement; 

7. that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further, 

 I RECOMMEND that the court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A presentence report has been 

ordered. 

 ENTERED this 7th day of September, 2016. 

 /s/ Andrew P. Rodovich 

 United States Magistrate Judge
[No. 19857-6-II.

Division Two.

October 10, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Farogh Moavenzadeh, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 95-1-00027-3, George L. Wood, J., entered Augsut 29, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Armstrong, J.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Centurion Gold Holdings, Inc.. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.

              CENTURION GOLD HOLDINGS, INC.


        By:  /s/ Andrew Dale Paul
             ---------------------------------------------------
                 Andrew Dale Paul
                 Principal Executive Officer,
                 Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman


        By:  /s/ Arthur V. Johnson
             ---------------------------------------------------------
                 Arthur V. Johnson
                 Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
                 Principal Accounting Officer and Director

Date: December 17, 2004
# L_2008115EN.01003201.xml

| 29.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 115/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 115/32

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 April 2008

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2008/336/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

Having regard to the nominations submitted by the SPANISH and the NETHERLANDS Governments,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009.

| (2) | Two members' seats on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives have become vacant as a result of the resignations of Ms Pilar GÓMEZ MUÑOZ and Mr Marcel NOLLEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two members' seats on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives have become vacant as a result of the resignations of Ms Pilar GÓMEZ MUÑOZ and Mr Marcel NOLLEN,

| (3) | The two members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2009, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The two members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following persons are hereby appointed members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2009:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| | SPAIN: Ms María José GARIJO EQUIZA |
| --- | --- |

SPAIN: Ms María José GARIJO EQUIZA

| | The NETHERLANDS: Mr Peter van IJSSELMUIDEN |
| --- | --- |

The NETHERLANDS: Mr Peter van IJSSELMUIDEN

Done at Luxembourg, 14 April 2008.

For the Council

The President

I. JARC

---

(1)  
  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 240, 5.10.2006, p. 1.

2

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1979

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005

Mrs. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:
2

•HR 1979 IH 

‘‘ 9902.55.01 Acrylic fiber tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) consisting of 6 sub-bundles 

crimped together, each containing 45,000 filaments 

(plus or minus 0.06) and 2–

8 percent water, such acrylic 

fiber containing by weight a 

minimum of 92 percent acrylonitrile, not more than 

0.1 percent zinc, and average filament denier of either 

1.48 decitex (plus or minus 

0.08) or 1.32 decitex (plus 

or minus 0.089) (provided 

for in subheading 

5501.30.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00046-TLS-SLC

)

DANIEL D. MILLER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on September 13, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Judge Theresa

L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation

are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 13th day of September 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GARY PARENT a/k/a GARY JOHN PARENT,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2572

[ June 9, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18

-

020900

.

Michael A lex Wasylik of Ricardo & Wasylik PL , Dade City for appellant.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Van Ness Law Fir m, PLC, Fort Lauderdale, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 57 West Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 2062 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 57 West Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1971 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,5-[[4- 

chloro-6-[[3-[[8-[4-fluoro-6- (methylphenylamino)–1,3,5-triazin-2- 

yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6- disulfo-2-naphthalenyl]azo]-4- 

sulfophenyl],amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[(1-sulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl)azo]-sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. BAKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,5-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[8-[4- 

fluoro-6- (methylphenylamino)–1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]- 

1-hydroxy-3,6- disulfo-2-naphthalenyl]azo]-4- 

sulfophenyl],amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy3-[(1-sulfo-2-naphthalenyl)azo]-sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1971 IH 

1 SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID,5-[[4- 

2 CHLORO-6-[[3-[[8-[4-FLUORO-6- 

3 (METHYLPHENYLAMINO)–1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

4 YL]AMINO]-1-HYDROXY-3,6-DISULFO-2- 

5 NAPHTHALENYL]AZO]-4- 

6 SULFOPHENYL],AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

7 YL]AMINO]-4-HYDROXY-3-[(1-SULFO-2- 

8 NAPHTHALENYL)AZO]-SODIUM SALT. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

11 amended by striking heading 9902.32.04 and inserting the 

12 following: 

‘‘ 9902.32.04 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid,5-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[8- 

[4-fluoro-6- 

(methylphenylamino)–1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl]azo]-4- 

sulfophenyl],amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[(1-sulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl)azo]-sodium 

salt (CAS No. 155522–05– 

7) (provided for in subheading 3402.16.30) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
[No. 20550-5-II.

Division Two.

October 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Armando B. Marquina, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 95-1-00608-9, F. Mark McCauley, J., entered March 4, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridge-water, J.
#### BAUER, Appellant, v. EAGLE INS. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

Action by Ruth L. Bauer against the Eagle Insurance Company. W. P. Butler, for appel*1126lant. E. H. Sykes, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MARK BOYLE and TERESA BOYLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC. and its whollyowned subsidiaries: INFRASOURCE

CONSTRUCTION, LLC; INFRASOURCE

UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION,

INC.; INFRASOURCE, LLC;

INFRASOURCE FIELD SERVICES, LLC;

INFRASOURCE SERVICES, LLC;

INFRASOURCE UNDERGROUND

INSTALLATION, LLC; INFRASOURCE

INSTALLATION, LLC; INFRASOURCE

UNDERGROUND SERVICES, INC.;

INFRASOURCE CONCRETE & PAVING

SERVICES, LLC; and PETER L.

ANTHONY, individually,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-732 RL-CAN

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

The parties, by counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),

hereby stipulate and agree that the causes of action filed against (1) Quanta Services, Inc., (2)

InfraSource Underground Construction, Inc., (3) InfraSource, LLC, (4) InfraSource Field

Services, LLC (5) InfraSource Services, LLC, InfraSource Underground Installation, LLC, (6)

InfraSource Installation, LLC, (7) InfraSource Underground Services, Inc., and (8) InfraSource

Concrete & Paving Services, LLC shall be dismissed without prejudice and without cost to any

party. Plaintiffs’ causes of action against Defendants InfraSource Construction, LLC, f/k/a as

InfraSource Underground Construction, LLC, and Peter L. Anthony shall proceed, with the

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00732-RL document 10 filed 09/24/13 page 1 of 3
2

caption being amended hereafter to reflect the removal of eight dismissed defendants (“Mark

Boyle and Teresa Boyle v. InfraSource Construction, LLC, f/k/a as InfraSource Underground

Construction, LLC, and Peter L. Anthony”)

Respectfully submitted,

RHAME AND ELWOOD

Patrick B. McEuen

By: /s/Patrick B. McEuen

Patrick B. McEuen

Attorney for Plaintiffs

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

By: /s/Timothy L. Karns

Kevin C. Schiferl

Timothy L. Karns

Attorneys for Defendants

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00732-RL document 10 filed 09/24/13 page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 24th day of September, 2013, a copy of the foregoing was filed

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system:

Patrick B. McEuen

RHAME AND ELWOOD

patrickmceuen@rhameandelwood.com

/s/Timothy L. Karns

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

201 North Illinois Street, Suite 1900

P.O. Box 44961

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961

317-237-3800

Fax: 317-237-3900

kschiferl@fbtlaw.com

tkarns@fbtlaw.com

INDLibrary1 LR10946.0608763 1138194v1

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00732-RL document 10 filed 09/24/13 page 3 of 3