alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                               
<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>                         
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                        
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                     
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                 10,248
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       10,248
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         11,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     302
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             11,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           11,749
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          267
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              96
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           171
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       171
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            4.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                            4.86
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Luis A. Rivera,certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of J.L. Halsey Corporation;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             (Not applicable)

c)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)             Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

Dated:  September 26, 2007
|        | /s/ Luis A.  Rivera                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Luis A. Rivera, President and Chief Executive  Officer, |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1246

WILLIAM GROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate

Judge. (1:10-cv-02416-SAG)

Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: July 31, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elliott Andalman, ANDALMAN & FLYNN, P.C., Silver Spring, 

Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States 

Attorney, Alex S. Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Gross appeals the magistrate judge’s order 

affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Gross supplemental 

security income under the Social Security Act.* We must uphold 

the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by 

substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 

(4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). Having thoroughly reviewed the 

parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the materials 

submitted in the joint appendix, we find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See Gross v. Astrue, No. 1:10-cv-02416-

SAG (D. Md. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the 

magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00012-TLS-SLC

)

ANTONIO CORTEZ HARRIS )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on February 15, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his

right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the three-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Chief Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 15th day of February 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
[No. 38287-0-I.

Division One.

August 18, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. J.C.W., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-8-06849-1, Anthony P. Wartnik, J., entered February 29, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.23    
    


 
 

SCHEDULE TO EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT    
    


        The following is a list of our senior executive officers who are party to an Executive Severance Agreement, the form of which was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002: 


        Mara
G. Aspinall; Mark R. Bamforth; Earl M. Collier, Jr.; Zoltan A. Csimma; Thomas J. DesRosier; Richard H. Douglas; David D. Fleming; Georges A. Gemayel; James A. Geraghty; John V.
Heffernan; Elliot D. Hillback, Jr.; Alison F. Lawton; Mary McGrane; David J. McLachlan; John M. McPherson; David P. Meeker; C. Ann Merrifield; Richard A. Moscicki; Donald E. Pogorzelski; Alan E.
Smith; Sandford D. Smith; G. Jan van Heek; and Michael S. Wyzga. 


        We
are a party to Executive Severance Agreements with the executive officers named above, under which payments will be made under certain circumstances following a Change of Control of
the Company (as defined in the Executive Severance Agreements). The Executive Severance Agreements provide that in the event the officer's employment is terminated by the Company Without Cause (as
defined) or by the officer for Good Reason (as defined) following a Change of Control, the Company will make a lump sum severance payment to the officer of up to two times annual salary and bonus.
Upon such termination, the Executive Severance Agreements also provide for (i) a cash payment equal to the additional retirement benefit which would have been earned under the Company's
retirement plans if employment had continued for two years following the date of termination, (ii) participation in the life, accident and health insurance plans of the Company for such period
except to the extent such benefits are provided by a subsequent employer and (iii) in certain circumstances, legal costs and expenses associated with such termination. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.23


SCHEDULE TO EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
EWBC 10.12 10K 12.31.2014






Exhibit 10.12
 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
 
 The following compensation arrangements have been established for the Board of Directors of the Company:  All outside directors will receive an annual retainer of $40,000.  The chairpersons of Strategic Markets, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Risk Oversight Committee, and the Nominating/Governance Committee will, for these services, receive retainers of $70,000, $20,000, $20,000, $15,000, and $12,500, respectively.  Additionally, the individual filling the lead director role will receive a retainer of $50,000.  Outside directors also, receive a meeting fee of $1,500 for each Committee meeting attended.  All outside directors receive an annual grant of $70,000 of stock.  No separate compensation is paid to directors who are employees of the Company.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE
CORPORATION (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby
certifies that to the best of their knowledge:

            (i)   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
                  the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: October 22, 2004                             /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY





Dated: October 22, 2004                             /S/ Alan H. Lund
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    ALAN H. LUND


                                      -30-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
 STOCK DIVIDENDS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996
                     (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>

<S>                                   <C>             <C> 
                                            1997            1996
                                          ------          ------
                                               (Unaudited)

Earnings:
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$  131,333      $  121,499 
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes . . . .    72,739          71,683 
    Fixed charges. . . . . . . . . . .   364,296         317,589 
  Less:
    Capitalized interest . . . . . . .    23,455          24,643 
                                         -------         -------
  Earnings as adjusted (A) . . . . . .$  544,913      $  486,128 
                                         =======         =======

Preferred dividend requirements. . . .$    8,197      $    8,480 
Ratio of income before provision
    for income taxes to net income . .      155%            159% 
                                         -------         -------
  Preferred dividend factor on pretax
    basis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    12,705          13,483 
                                         -------         -------

Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense . . . . . . . . . .   314,086         280,551 
  Capitalized interest . . . . . . . .    23,455          24,643 
  Interest factor of rents . . . . . .    26,755          12,395 
                                         -------         -------
  Fixed charges as adjusted (B). . . .   364,296         317,589 
                                         -------         -------

Fixed charges and preferred stock
    dividends (C). . . . . . . . . .  $  377,001       $ 331,072 
                                         =======         =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    (A) divided by (B) . . . . . . . .     1.50x           1.53x 
                                           =====           =====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    and preferred stock dividends
    (A) divided by (C) . . . . . . . .     1.45x           1.47x 
                                           =====           =====

/TABLE
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
-1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHAYLENE SUSAN NEWBY, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

 Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00104-MEJ 

{PROPOSED} ORDER AWARDING 

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 

ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES 

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 

AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 

U.S.C. § 1920

Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 

Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: 

IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,000.00 as 

authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 

DATE: 

 

 ___________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE MARIA ELENA JAMES 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
[No. 20794-0-II.

Division Two.

September 12, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rubin Thomas, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-1-04096-1, Thomas Felnagle, J., entered June 4, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Morgan and Hunt, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief  Executive
Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 14, 2007

/S/    Scott A. Haire
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ANDRE VANCLIFF, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 422 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
# C_2008056EN.01000101.xml

| 29.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5003 — REWE/UAB Palink)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 56/01)

On 11 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5003. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5003. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie Martinez, Also Known as Jose Rodriguez, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lodato, J.), rendered October 4,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years.

Judgment affirmed.

By failing to move to withdraw his plea prior to the imposition of sentence or to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, defendant has not preserved for appellate review any alleged insufficiency in the plea allocution *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Lowry,*64 AD2d 1136; *People v Mattocks,*100 AD2d 944). In any event, an examination of the record reveals that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered and properly received by the court *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Sargent,*100 AD2d 978). Nor was a sentence, of 2 to 6 years’ imprisonment excessive as it was the minimum allowable by statute (Penal Law § 70.02 [2] [a]; [3], [4]). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
[No. 14918-8-III.

Division Three.

October 21, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Larry G. Moore, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Franklin County, No. 94-1-50228-9, Dennis D. Yule, J., entered April 4, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Kurtz, J.
John K. WHITEFORD, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 12-10760.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.