alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Richard Connelly certify that:


1. I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Citadel Security Software
      Inc.;


2. Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and


(c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


5. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and


(b) Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.







/s/ Richard
      Connelly


Richard
      Connelly


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      27,
      2006
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27493-27494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12724]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I. D. 050195F]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of Scientific Research Permits Nos. 954 (P492A) and 
955 (P492B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr. Graham Worthy and Co-
investigators Mr. Alan Abend and Ms. Lisl Shoda have been issued 
permits No. 954 and 955, to obtain and import/export marine mammal 
specimens and to take specimens from rehabilitated elephant seals, 
respectively, for purposes of scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, 
MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    (P492A) Director, Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center 
Drive North, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2532 (813/570-5312); (P492B) 
Director, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, 
Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4001).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson, 301/713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 10, 1995, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (60 FR 13121) that applications had been filed by 
the above named individuals to obtain tissue samples for scientific 
research purposes. The requested Permits have been granted under 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the regulations 
governing the taking, importing, and exporting of 
[[Page 27494]] endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR part 222).
    Issuance of permit No. 954 as required by the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended, was based on a finding that such permit: (1) 
Was applied for in good faith; (2) will not operate to the disadvantage 
of the endangered species which is the subject of the permit; and (3) 
is consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in section 2 of 
the Endangered Species Act.

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-12724 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00410-JPK document 52 filed 07/24/19 page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Robert N. Trgovich, Clerk www.innd.uscourts.gov

RECORD TRANSMITTAL LETTER

Gino J. Agnello, Clerk

United States Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit

219 South Dearborn Street, Room 2722

Chicago, IL 60604

Re:

District Court Docket #

U.S. Court of Appeals #

Dear Mr. Agnello:

I am sending you herewith the

following:

Volume(s) of Pleadings

Volume(s) of Transcripts

Volume(s) of State Court Records 

Volume(s) of Depositions

Exhibits: 

Impounded Documents/PSI Reports: 

Other (specify):

Please acknowledge receipt of the above-listed materials on the attached copy of this

letter.

Sincerely,

ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK

By:

 Deputy Clerk

Date Received:__________________ By:__________________________ 

1108 E. Ross Adair Federal Bldg. • 1300 S. Harrison Street • Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 • (260) 423-3000 • Fax (260) 423-3007

5400 Federal Plaza • Suite 2300 • Hammond, Indiana 46320 • (219) 852-6500 • Fax (219) 852-6509

102 Robert A. Grant Federal Bldg. • 204 South Main Street • South Bend, Indiana 46601 • (574) 246-8000 • Fax (574) 246-8002

214 Charles Halleck Federal Bldg. • 230 North Fourth Street • Room 105 • Lafayette, Indiana 47902 • (765) 420-6250 • Fax (765) 420-6314

3:15-cv-463

17-1591 and 17-1683

Original Record on Appeal. It consists of the

9

1 Restricted Document (filed in error)

s/ N. Eddy

Reply to: South Bend Office

Freedom From Religion Foundation, Incorporated, et al v. Concord Community Schools

September 14, 2017

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 83 filed 09/14/17 page 1 of 1
Larry Eugene MANN, petitioner, v. John PALMER, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9671 (12A974).

Supreme Court of the United States

April 10, 2013.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, Scott Mitchell Rosenberg, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Platinum Studios, Inc. for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2009;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.       Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a.       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

----
Exhibit (31)(1)

Certification

I, Robert N. Martin, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Daybreak Mines, Inc. Company.



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Not required;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  June 14, 2005



By /s/  ROBERT N. MARTIN

Robert N. Martin, President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2062 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2062

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 57 West Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, as the ``Randall D. 
                    Shughart Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 57 West 
Street in Newville, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 
``Randall D. Shughart Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Randall D. Shughart Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Steven B. Solomon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of CDSS Wind Down Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Annual Report on 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CDSS Wind Down Inc.








By: /s/STEVEN B. SOLOMON


Steven B. Solomon


Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


April 15, 2009
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 18, 2019.

________________ No. 3D19-737 Lower Tribunal No. 18-10746

________________ 

### Terrance Benjamin, Petitioner,

vs. 

### Daniel Junior, etc., et al., Respondents.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction -- Habeas Corpus Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant A ttorney General, for respondent The State of Florida.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 UPON CONFESSION OF ERROR Petitioner, Terrance Benjamin, seeks a writ of habeas corpus, c hallenging his pretrial detention. Petitioner was charged with failure to ret urn a hired vehicle, a third-degree felony. See § 817.52(3), Fla. Stat. (2018). The trial court ordered petitioner held without bond following a failure to appear for jury trial. Petitioner argues the trial court failed to make a finding that his failure to appear was willful and that “no conditions of release can reaso nably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the pre sence of the accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process.” St ate v. Blair, 39 So. 3d 1190, 1192 (Fla. 2010) (quoting art. I, § 14, Fla. Const.); see Willi ams v. State, 68 So. 3d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The State, properly and commendably, concedes error. See § 907.041, Fla. Stat. (2018); State v. Paul, 783 So. 2d 104 2 (Fla. 2001). Accordingly, w e grant the petition and direct the trial court to release petitioner with reasonable conditions. This opinion should not be read to limit the ability of the trial court to take additional evidence or impos e ancillary conditions on pretrial release. Petition granted.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Byron Raul RAMIREZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-50674.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 13, 2006.*

Decided May 3, 2006.

U.S. Attorney, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michelle A. Villasenor-Grant, Esq., FDSD — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*669MEMORANDUM**

Byron Raul Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Ramirez contends that the district court erred in sentencing him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) to more than the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), when he did not admit and a jury did not find a date of deportation or any prior convictions. He argues that the avoidance-of-constitutional-doubt doctrine requires that *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), be limited to the holding that a prior conviction that increases the maximum penalty need not be alleged in the indictment when the prior conviction, unlike here, is admitted as part of a guilty plea. He also argues that in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and subsequent Supreme Court decisions, *Al-mendarez-Torres*has been overruled and § 1326(b) is unconstitutional.

These contentions are foreclosed. *See United States v. Velasquez-Reyes,*427 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005) (rejecting contention that the government is required to plead prior convictions in the indictment and prove them to a jury unless the defendant admits the prior convictions); *United States v. Weiland,*420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that we continue to be bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in *Almendarez-Torres*that a district judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt); *United States v. Castillo-Rivera,*244 F.3d 1020, 1025 (9th Cir.2001) (rejecting contention that the fact of the temporal relationship of the removal to the prior conviction is beyond the scope of the Supreme Court’s recidivism exception).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# L_2008327EN.01001801.xml

| 5.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/18

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 November 2008

appointing a Dutch member and two Dutch alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2008/904/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Nico SCHOOF. One alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Lodewijk ASSCHER. Another alternate member’s seat becomes vacant following the appointment, by this Decision, of Mr Bas VERKERK as a member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Nico SCHOOF. One alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Lodewijk ASSCHER. Another alternate member’s seat becomes vacant following the appointment, by this Decision, of Mr Bas VERKERK as a member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Bas VERKERK, Burgemeester van Delft (change of mandate); |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Bas VERKERK, Burgemeester van Delft (change of mandate);

and

| (b) | as alternate members:






  — | Mr Job COHEN, Burgemeester van Amsterdam, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate members:

—

Mr Job COHEN, Burgemeester van Amsterdam,

| — | Mr Hans KOK, Burgemeester van Hof van Twente. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Hans KOK, Burgemeester van Hof van Twente.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2008.

For the Council

The President

L. CHATEL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
#### STROBEL & WILKEN CO., Appellant, v. WIESEN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Apr pellate Division, First Department.

May 29, 1913.)

Action by the Strobel & Wilken Company against Max Wiesen. F. Hemley, of New York City, for appellant. ID. H. Myers, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 144 App. Div. 149, 128 N. Y. Supp. 798.