alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-753, 754, and 756 (Fourth Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and the termination of the suspended investigations on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Russia and Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on November 2, 2020 (85 FR 69362) and determined on February 5, 2021 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 26067, May 12, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on June 21, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5205 (June 2021), entitled                     *Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from China, Russia, and Ukraine: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-753, 754, and 756 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 21, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-13523 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Earl James WATSON, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 13-7093.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
NISSAN
MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S
CERTIFICATE




The
undersigned, Steven R. Lambert, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN
MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as
follows:




(1)           The
undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its
capacity as Servicer, during the period July 31, 2007 through March 31, 2008
(the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing
Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the
2007-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of July 31, 2007 (as supplemented, the
“Agreement”), by and among the Nissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust, NILT Trust,
as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his
supervision; and




(2)           To
the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.




This
Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities
and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed
securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have
the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of
June, 2008.




/s/ Steven R. Lambert


Steven R.
Lambert


President and Chief
Executive Officer
# C_2008255EN.01000201.xml

| 8.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5290 — Phoenix/CERP Lorraine — Répartition France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 255/03)

On 30 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5290. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5290. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2008248EN.01000101.xml

| 30.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5266 — Bertelsmann/3i/Buy Vip)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 248/01)

On 18 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5266. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5266. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00494

- CV

Phillip G. “ Baby Shark ” Scott , Appellant

v.

Judge Daniel Mills and Jennifer Feldman , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL C OUNT Y

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED

– OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order s dat ed by the tr i a l court on July 1 9, 2023 and July 25, 2023

.

Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

.

Therefore, the C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appel la nt is indigent

and unable t o pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Science Research: Raleigh, NC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Our location USDA ARS Plant Science Research Unit Scientists.
 Climate Change\Air Quality
 Small Grains\Wheat
 Maize Research
 **Jim Holland, USDA-ARS Research Geneticist** Received the international Maize Genetics Executive Committee’s 2020 L. Stadler Mid-Career Maize Genetics Award for his research on maize genetics. Click here for University Article
 Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions


Research Projects
                            More... Genetic Diversity and Disease Resistance in Maize Improving Abiotic and Biotic Stress Tolerance of Small Grains Strategies to Optimize Productivity through Enhancement of Plant Stress Tolerance and Agroecological Farming Systems in the Southeastern US


Mission Statement Research Spotlight Southeast Regional Climate Hub (SERCH)   Nursery ReportsGenotyping Marker ReportsHelping Farmers in Pakistan and the U.S.


Southeast Area   kent.burkey@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[No. 19252-7-II.

Division Two.

October 10, 1997.]

#### Kiewit Construction Group, *Appellant,*v. Clark County, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 94-2-01014-3, Thomas L. Lodge, J., entered February 17, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_____________________

NO. 09-12-00412-CV

_____________________

IN RE COMMITMENT OF RICHARD HAUBOIS

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-09-08953 CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an appeal from an order entered in a sexually-violent-predator proceeding, 

we are asked to address whether we possess appellate jurisdiction over an order 

changing the entity that approves where Richard Haubois is required to reside. We 

conclude that the trial court’s order is not appealable, and we also conclude that 

mandamus relief on the issues Haubois raises is not warranted. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

Recently, in In re Commitment of Holt and In re Commitment of Cortez, we 

addressed the same issues Haubois raises in his brief, and we concluded that we 
2

did not have appellate jurisdiction over these same issues. In re Commitment of 

Holt, No. 09-12-00406-CV, 2013 WL ______, at *__ (Tex. App.—Beaumont July 

11, 2013, no pet. h.); In re Commitment of Cortez, No. 09-12-00385-CV, 2013 WL 

3270613, at *2 (Tex. App.—Beaumont June 27, 2013, no pet. h.). We also 

considered whether Holt and Cortez raised issues entitling them to mandamus 

relief. See Holt, 2013 WL _______, at *__; Cortez, 2013 WL 3270613, at **2-6.

For the same reasons stated in Holt and Cortez, we conclude that we lack 

appellate jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order dated July 26, 2012, and that

Haubois has not demonstrated that he should receive mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we dismiss Haubois’s appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

___________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Submitted on July 10, 2013

Opinion Delivered August 15, 2013

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Benito CASTRO, aka Tony R. Lanier Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-50216.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2006.

Decided May 5, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Beverly Reid O’Connell, Esq., Steve Kim, Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los An-geles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Karen L. Landau, Esq., Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: WARDLAW and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and CEBULL,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Richard F. Cebull, U.S. District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

On appeal, Juan Benito Castro (Castro) challenges his sentence, asserting that the judge’s factfinding violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

1. Judicial factfinding under an advisory Guidelines regime does not violate the Sixth Amendment. *See United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 250-52, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); *see also United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1081 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *Booker*did not alter the preponderance of the evidence standard for factfinding set forth in *United States v. Howard,*894 F.2d 1085, 1090 (9th Cir.1990). *See Ameline,*409 F.3d at 1086.

2. The district court was not required to make the drug quantity finding beyond a reasonable doubt to comport with the guarantee of due process contained in the Fifth Amendment. *See United States v. Melchor-Zaragoza,*351 F.3d 925, 928 (9th *733Cir.2003); *see also McMillan v. Pennsylvania,*477 U.S. 79, 84, 90-91, 106 S.Ct. 2411, 91 L.Ed.2d 67 (1986); *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 487 n. 13, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 131405 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131405 COA: 268733 Genesee CC: 05-016398-FH TIMOTHY ANDREW DEWAR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v Conway , 474 Mich 1140 (2006).

M ARKMAN , J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in People v Wright , 474 Mich 1138 (2006).

d0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Archives
                        Presentations
                                    World Dairy Expo
                                    Newsletters and Research Summaries
                    Resources
                        General Resources
                                    Books
                                    Teacher's Resources
                                    New Research Dairy Updates
                                    Integrated Research at USDFRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar Business
               Full-text Articles by DFRC
               About Us & Contact Information
               USDFRC Library
               test
               U.S. DFRC Updates
               Digestibility
               Whole-Farm
               | Full-text Articles |
               Nutrient Use Efficiency
               APLE Homepage
               APLE Lots
               tannin
               newsletter


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wound Management  Technologies,  Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30,  2008 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief Executive
Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

August 12, 2008

/S/ Scott A. Haire
------------------
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           62574
<SECURITIES>                                    335403
<RECEIVABLES>                                    60692
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1390
<INVENTORY>                                      22405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                525834
<PP&E>                                          233025
<DEPRECIATION>                                   61491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  747348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            95943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           741
<OTHER-SE>                                      587180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    747348
<SALES>                                         169469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                303592
<CGS>                                            35686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   207494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    73
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  96098
<INCOME-TAX>                                     38655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              57443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     57443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32 Section 1350 Certifications**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. (the “Company”)for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        /s/ Philip H. Trenary     Philip H. Trenary  President and Chief Executive Officer     /s/ Peter D. Hunt     Peter D. Hunt  Vice-President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 8, 2007