alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2077 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Garenoxacin mesylate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2005 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Garenoxacin mesylate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GARENOXACIN MESYLATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.81 1-cyclopropyl-8- 

(difluoromethoxy)–7-[(1R)– 

1-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-5- 

isoindolyl]-4-oxo-1,4- 

dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic 

acid monomethanesulfonate 

monohydrate (CAS No. 

223652–90–2) (provided for 

in subheading 2933.49.26) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2077 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

CHAD McKINNEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-677 PS

 )

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the habeas corpus petition of Plaintiff Chad McKinney,

a pro se prisoner, challenging his prison disciplinary proceeding at the Indiana State Prison on

May 31, 2011, where he was found guilty of Possessing Unauthorized Property in violation of B215 (DE 1). On September 5, 2013, the respondent filed a motion to dismiss arguing that these

claims are unexhausted because McKinney did not appeal to the Final Reviewing Authority and

has provided the administrative record proving that McKinney did not appeal beyond the

Superintendent of the Indiana State Prison. I waited for a response from McKinney, but he did

not respond. So on November 9, 2013, I granted the motion to dismiss because in Indiana, “to

exhaust a claim [in a prison disciplinary case], and thus preserve it for collateral review under §

2254, a prisoner must present that legal theory to the . . . Final Reviewing Authority . . ..” Moffat

v. Broyles, 288 F.3d 978, 982 (7th Cir. 2002). However, on November 20, 2013, McKinney

asked to reopen the case so that he could respond. In the interests of justice, I granted him until

January 16, 2014, to do so. I also cautioned him that if he did not respond by that deadline, that I

would dismiss this case without further notice. That deadline has now passed without a response.

Therefore, because the undisputed record shows that McKinney did not file an administrative

case 3:13-cv-00677-PPS document 10 filed 03/13/14 page 1 of 2
appeal to the Final Reviewing Authority, all of his grounds are procedurally defaulted. See Lewis

v. Sternes, 390 F.3d 1019, 1025-1026 (7th Cir. 2004).

For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss (DE 4) is GRANTED, the habeas

corpus petition (DE 1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: March 13, 2014

s/ Philip P. Simon

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

case 3:13-cv-00677-PPS document 10 filed 03/13/14 page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION


Earnings per share calculations may be affected by the granting of stock options
under the provisions of MPSI Systems Inc. Stock Option Plans. The granting of
these options may have a dilutive effect on earnings per common and common
equivalent share. Following is a summary computation of the average number of
shares outstanding and earnings per share using the treasury-stock method.


WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                     Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                              2002            2001
                                                     -------------   -------------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>
Common stock outstanding throughout the period           2,912,000       2,912,000
Weighted average exercised options                              --              --
Dilutive unexercised stock options
     (Treasury-Stock Method):
     Shares presumed issued at exercise                          *               *
     Less:  Shares repurchased with presumed
               proceeds at average per share price              --              --
                                                     -------------   -------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
     assuming full dilution                              2,912,000       2,912,000
                                                     =============   =============
</Table>

* Not applicable in periods noted, as the effect of these items would be
  antidilutive.

Exercisable antidilutive options for 46,000 and 29,000 shares were outstanding
at March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.


PER SHARE COMPUTATION

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                     (b)
                                                            (a)              Shares Outstanding                Per Share
                                                        Results of       --------------------------      ------------------
                                                        Operations         Basic            Diluted       Basic     Diluted
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>              <C>          <C>       <C>
Net loss    - Three  Months Ended March 31, 2002       $  (126,000)      2,912,000        2,912,000    $(.04)    $(.04)

Net loss    - Three Months Ended March 31, 2001        $  (376,000)      2,912,000        2,912,000    $(.13)    $(.13)
</Table>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2154 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl Salicylate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl Salicylate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYL SALICYLATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.35 Methyl Salicylate (CAS No. 

119–36–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2918.23.20) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2154 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1





Annual
Certification Pursuant to
 Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





The
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      April 14, 2010
            
            /s/
      ROBERT F.X. SILLERMANRobert
      F.X. Sillerman
              Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by FX
Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-1-TLS 

 ) 

RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 252], filed on June 15, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 252] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

Three (3) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such 

offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on June 30, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00517-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J., A 

CHILD

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On September 25, 2012, we ordered appellant to file a response 

reasonably explaining the failure to timely file his brief as required by Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we 

could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party 

desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response 

showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c). We 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

received appellant’s response on October 5, 2012, but he has not provided a 

reasonable explanation or shown grounds for continuing the appeal.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED: October 18, 2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 3(i)(g)


                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                       OF
                                       THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               POWERTEL USA, INC.


         POWERTEL USA, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certifies
pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware that:

         1. The Company filed on January 27, 1997, a Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of POWERTEL USA, INC., (SRV number 971026370) (the "Restated
Certificate").

         2. The Restated Certificate was an inaccurate record of the corporate
action and is null and void AB INITIO as confirmed by an ORDER APPROVING AND
CONFIRMING DEBTOR'S FIRST AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, AS REVISED AND AMENDED
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Nevada, Case No: 97-30265- BMG,
dated September 15, 1998.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Correction to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 25th day of
November, 1998.


                                            POWERTEL USA, INC.


                                       By:     /s/ Richard A. Cascarilla
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Richard A. Cascarilla, President
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the G REIT, Inc.
(the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Daniel, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  March 31, 2003

/s/    WILLIAM C. DANIELWilliam C. Daniel Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0460

_____________________________

TYREQ J. ROBINSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

January 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Tyreq J. Robinson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Feldman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of Law Enforcement Associates Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 1, 2005

/s/ Paul Feldman
------------------
Paul Feldman
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
MET-2014.12.31-EX10.88




Exhibit 10.88


AMENDMENT NUMBER NINE TO THE 
METLIFE LEADERSHIP DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As amended and restated effective with respect to salary and Cash Incentive Compensation January 1, 2005 and with respect to Stock Compensation, April 15, 2005)


The MetLife Leadership Deferred Compensation Plan (“the Plan”)  is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2015, as follows:


		
	1.
	 Section 22.11 containing the definition of “Eligible Associate” is amended to delete subsection (d) added by Amendment Number Five to the Plan.




		
	2.
	Section 22.24 containing the definition of “Officer” is  amended to delete the last sentence in that definition referring to grade levels 32, 120 and 123.




		
	3.
	Section 22.32 “Stock Compensation” is hereby amended to read as follows:




“22.32 “Stock Compensation” shall mean compensation payable in the form of shares of MetLife, Inc. Stock including awards in that form under the Long Term Performance Compensation Plan, the MetLife, Inc. 2005 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, the MetLife, Inc. 2005 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, the MetLife, Inc. 2015 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan and any successor plans thereto.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MetLife, Inc. has caused this amendment to be executed on the 30th day of December, 2014, by the duly authorized individual below.


MetLife, Inc.
                    
By _____/s/__Mark J. Davis_______
Mark J. Davis, Plan Administrator


Date ___12-30-2014______________


Witnessed by:


__/s/__Candice Martin______________
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714256
<NAME>             MB Software Corporation
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         1119025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3136549
<ALLOWANCES>                                     80381
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4406987
<PP&E>                                          303336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  163349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5967838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4478110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         67885
<OTHER-SE>                                      101862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5967838
<SALES>                                        2354823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2425476
<CGS>                                           339390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   339390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1697297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               95079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    392161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.006
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.006
        

</TABLE>
#### BARBER, Appellant, v. DAVIDSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, - First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

Action by Clarence L. Barber against Edward W. Davidson. A. Thain, for appellant. M. J. Tierney, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1121.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          74,262
<SECURITIES>                                   963,634
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,250)
<INVENTORY>                                    290,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,106,448
<PP&E>                                         423,225
<DEPRECIATION>                               (362,156)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,207,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          267,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    190,017
<COMMON>                                           811
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,748,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,207,752
<SALES>                                        457,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               457,790
<CGS>                                          226,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,087,095)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,764,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,764,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (148,625)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,913,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)



</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Germplasm Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Stages of cotton bloom
 Mandan Pecan
 Collecting wild cotton sample
 Self-pollination of cotton plants in the U.S. National Cotton Germplasm Collection and research program in College Station, Texas.  Covering cotton flowers with organza bags helps ensure a pure seed source by keeping pollinators away from flowers
 Sorghum breeding


Mission


People Bridgeland, Aya Chatwin, Warren Cox, Toni Frelichowski, James
                                            *- Jim* Hilton, Angelyn Hinze, Lori Klein, Robert
                                            *- Bob* Kubenka, Keith Love, Janna McCollum, Julie Tondre, Braden Udall, Joshua
                                            *- Josh* Velez Rivera, Francisco Wang, Xinwang Yu, John


Plains Area   joshua.udall@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

Joseph Keith Gould 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A