alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,325
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,392
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,348
<LOANS>                                         59,560
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,962
<DEPOSITS>                                      93,300
<SHORT-TERM>                                        61
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,619
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,350
<COMMON>                                        24,614
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,905)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 106,962
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,950
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  741
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   320
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,011
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,351
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,365
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,646
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (212)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (212)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.21
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,271
<LOANS-PAST>                                         2
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 5,487
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,969
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      650
<RECOVERIES>                                       227
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,546
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,948
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            598
        

</TABLE>
[No. 19809-6-II.

Division Two.

August 8, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph Duncan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 94-1-00187-6, James B. Sawyer II, J., entered August 3, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

J AM E S E R

I N M C K I N N E Y , Petitioner-Appellant , v. C HAR L E S L
. RY

A N , R espondent-Appellee
. No. 09-99018 D.C. No. 2 :03-cv-00774-DGC
ORDER
F iled March 12, 2014
ORDER KOZ I NSKI , Chief J udg e : Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judg es, it is ordered that this case be reheard en b a nc pursuant to F ederal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judg e p anel opinion shall no t b e cited a s precedent by

or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. J udg e s Silverm a n , Murg uia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2195

To provide for the withdrawal of the drug OxyContin from the commercial 

market. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To provide for the withdrawal of the drug OxyContin from 

the commercial market.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Act to Ban 

5 OxyContin’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds as follows: 

8 (1) The drug OxyContin has proven to be high9 ly addictive. 
2

•HR 2195 IH 

1 (2) The use of over-the-counter narcotics such 

2 as OxyContin has risen to as much as 9 percent 

3 among students in middle schools and high schools. 

4 (3) Overdoses of OxyContin have increased by 

5 450 percent in recent years. 

6 (4) The abuse of the drug, which is prevalent 

7 in economically depressed areas, has been strongly 

8 linked to criminal activity and has in some cases 

9 overwhelmed local law enforcement. 

10 (5) Over 1.5 million tablets of the drug were 

11 stolen from pharmacies between 2001 and 2003. 

12 (6) The active ingredient of OxyContin, 

13 oxycodone, is twice as strong as morphine. 

14 (7) OxyContin’s time-released effect, an impor15 tant element of its pharmaceutical use, is easily ne16 gated by abusers to achieve a heroin-like effect. 

17 (8) The manufacturer of the drug has been 

18 cited twice for using negligent and inappropriate ad19 vertising, downplaying the potentially fatal risks of 

20 abuse. 

21 (9) OxyContin is the first brand-name product 

22 targeted for monitoring by the Drug Enforcement 

23 Administration. 

24 (10) Health care professionals, such as phar25 macists and physicians, have been among those ar-
3

•HR 2195 IH 

1 rested and indicted for distributing the drug in a 

2 nonofficial capacity. 

3 (11) The burdens of this drug to the public 

4 health outweigh its potential therapeutic benefits, 

5 and given that alternative pain medicines and meth6 ods are widely available, OxyContin should be 

7 banned. 

8 SEC. 3. WITHDRAWAL OF DRUG OXYCONTIN FROM COM9 MERCIAL MARKET. 

10 Effective upon the expiration of 45 days after the 

11 date of the enactment of this Act, the approved application 

12 under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos13 metic Act for controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride, 

14 which drug is marketed as OxyContin, is deemed to have 

15 been withdrawn under section 505(e) of such Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000713138
<NAME> MEDIA 100, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,117
<SECURITIES>                                    28,991
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                       372
<INVENTORY>                                      1,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,023
<PP&E>                                           5,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,291
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,342
<SALES>                                         11,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,524
<CGS>                                            4,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    220
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CR 100

)

ANTOINE T. McCLAIN. )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 47), to which the parties have no objection, (DE # 48), the Magistrate

Judge’s findings and recommendation are now ADOPTED. Defendant’s Motion for

Modification of Supervised Release (DE # 40), is hereby GRANTED. The terms of his

supervised release shall be modified to include that he surrender and reside in a

halfway house for up to 120 days to fully participate in intensive drug treatment, shall

follow the rules and directions of the halfway house, and shall participate in substance

abuse counseling.

SO ORDERED.

Date: May 20, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                     SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906
          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the Quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the
"Report"), Norman L Lowery , as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Michael A. Carty, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.    This Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

August 11, 2004                         By  /s/ Norman L. Lowery
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Norman L. Lowery, Vice Chairman & CEO
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

August 11, 2004                         By /s/ Michael A. Carty
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Michael A. Carty, Treasurer & CFO
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research Docs







Haltermanheadline bar This page has been moved to /people-locations/person?person-id=36423


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John J. Hagan, Appellant. Lillian Roberts, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent. —

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 18, 1984, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he did not file a valid original claim.

Claimant had been employed as a dock worker for a private parcel delivery service until August 2, 1982, when he sustained a compensable back injury. After receiving workers’ compensation benefits through 1983, claimant, in February 1984, resigned from his position, which still remained available to him, to accept a $42,000 lump sum severance payment because of a reorganization by the employer. This payment could be taken advantage of at the time by any employee electing to retire or resign. Thereafter, claimant filed for unemployment insurance benefits effective February 20, 1984, thus establishing a base period from February 21, 1983 through February 19, 1984. While claimant does not challenge the conclusion that workers’ compensation payments are not remuneration within the meaning of the Labor Law § 517 (2) and that the weeks for which he received those payments did not constitute covered employment for purposes of computing his base period, he maintains that his claim comes within the reach of Labor Law § 527 (3) which, as recently amended (L 1984, ch 381, § 1), allows for an extension of the base period in those instances where claimants have received workers’ compensation benefits during their base periods. Since the amendment took effect September 17, 1984 and retroactive applicability is not indicated, that argument is ineffectual since claimant’s original claim was effective February 20, 1984 *(cf. Matter of Gettinger*[Lubin], 9 AD2d 586).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northwest Sustainable Agroecosystems Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to the Northwest Sustainable Agroecosystems Research Unit (NSAR). The NSAR develops technologies that help growers more economically produce food, feed, fiber, and fuel while enhancing air, soil, and water resources of the Pacific Northwest.


Long-Term Agroecosystem Research NSAR is a member of the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Network and is dedicated to providing a scientific foundation for enhancing decision support for precision and conservation agriculture and synergistic cropping system intensification and diversification. For more information see: www.cafltar.org.


People Beringer, Dannielle Carlson, Bryan Casanova, Joaquin Guest, Ian Halsey, Caven Hansen, Teri Hansen, Jeremy Heineck, Garett Huggins, David Leslie, Ian Letourneau, Melissa Morse, John Peery, Sarah Phillips, Claire


Pacific West Area   david.huggins@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### FOX, Appellant, v. GALLO et aL, Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 4, 1912.)

Action by Henry E. Fox against Joseph Gallo and another. 0. Blandy, for appellant. H. S. Marshall, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of InternationalLease Finance Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: February 19, 2004
/S/ Steven F. Udvar-HazySTEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZYChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
-23-
#### ROSCOE LUMBER CO., Appellant, v. REYNOLDS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by the Roscoe Lumber Company against William I-I. Reynolds and another.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without consideration, -for the reason that the record fails to show that the case was settled by the justice of the Municipal Court before whom it was tried, as required by section 318 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1581, c. 580).
gLTIESIIIIMIZEIMINE111

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. Kathy A. Hardcastle, Senior Judge Steven Samuel Braunstein Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
#### BAXTER, Respondent, v. GUITON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 26, 1912.)

Action by Grace Baxter against Mary C. Guitón.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SMITH, P. J., not voting.
[No. 38786-3-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Cotgageorge, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-07809-1, Laura Inveen, J., entered June 6, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Order entered February 12 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01068
- CR No. 05
- 18
- 0106 9
- CR ROBERT HOWARD GREEN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F16
- 76425
- T & F16
- 76426
- T



### O RDER On February 4, 2019, we ordered court reporter Trashuna Salaam to file the complete reporter’s record. Three days later, Ms. Salaam filed a request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record and stated (1) she was not the court reporter who reported the appeals, and (2) appellant had not requested the reporter’s record and had not paid or made arrangements to pay
for the reco rd.
We first note that the trial court appointed counsel for these appeals because appellant is indigent; thus, he is not required to pay or make arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. Nevertheless, appellant is required to request the record. Se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 34.6(b); 35.3(b). Therefore, w e ORDER appointed counsel Bruce Kaye to provide this Court, within TEN DAYSof the date of this order, with written proof he has requested the reporter’s record. The failure to

do so will result in these ap peals being submitted without a reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3 ( c )

. Because Ms. Salaam is not the court reporter in these appeals, we DENY her request for
additional time.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Lel a Lawrence Mays, Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Trashuna Salaam, court reporter; Debi Harris, court reporter; Sharina Fowler, court reporter; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE