alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana

Hammond Division

AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 

v. Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-220 JVB

STEVEN GREER, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge

James Martin entered on August 25, 2014. For reasons fully explained in the report, Judge

Martin recommends that the Court dismiss Defendants Juanita Estes, Melinda Wade, and Donita

Warmack from the case without prejudice.

These parties were notified that they had fourteen days within which to file objections to

the recommendation. More than fourteen days have passed without any objections having been

filed. Accordingly, the Court adopts Judge Martin’s report and recommendation and orders that

Defendants Juanita Estes, Melinda Wade, and Donita Warmack are DISMISSED from the case

without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED on September 16, 2014.

s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen 

Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             508
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         75
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,016
<PP&E>                                           5,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,918
<SALES>                                          3,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,801
<CGS>                                            1,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief  Executive
Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

August 11 , 2006

/s/ Scott A. Haire
------------------
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
(Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2019

NO. 03-17-00724-CR

Lee Ray Medina, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00527-PPS document 1-1 filed 11/09/15 page 1 of 1
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40617 

Conference Calendar

__________________

REYES FLORES,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JIMMY E ALFORD, Warden; ROBERT J PARKER;

IEASHA M HAYNES; DERRICK BLAKEMORE,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:94-CV-913

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Flores appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing

his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for an

excessive use of force. Flores argues that his factual

allegations show that Haynes and Blakemore subjected him to cruel

and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

Flores challenges the factual findings made by the magistrate

judge after a bench trial. Flores also argues that Officers

Haynes and Blakemore filed their answers beyond the 20-day time

limit set by the magistrate judge in her order. He also argues
No. 95-40617

-2-

that Attorney Kosanovich was present at trial after Edward

Sanchez was substituted as attorney for the defendants.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error in relation to the filing of the

defendants' answers and the substitution of counsel issues. 

Further, review of the magistrate judge's findings depends on a

trial transcript. Flores has failed to provide a transcript. 

These issues are therefore meritless. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b);

Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 113

S. Ct. 668 (1992); Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990) (citation omitted). 

Accordingly, Flores' appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Flores that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Flores is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32246-32247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Public Meetings of the New Jersey Advisory Committee; 
(1) Cancellation of Meeting Date and (2) Change of Meeting Date

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

[[Page 32247]]


ACTION: Notice; (1) cancellation of meeting date and (2) change of 
meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the 
Federal Register concerning meetings of the New Jersey Advisory 
Committee. The meeting scheduled for Friday, June 18, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. 
(ET) is cancelled. The meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 1 at 
1:00 p.m. (ET) is changed to Thursday, September 2 at 1:00 p.m. (ET).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evelyn Bohor, (202) 921-2212, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69394999e9984b68385959584d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="680d0a0700071a281d1b0b0b1a460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice is in the Federal Register of 
Thursday, February 11, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-02797, in the second and 
third columns of page 9049.

    Dated: June 14, 2021.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2021-12827 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00024-TLS-PRC document 10 filed 06/17/16 page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned officer of G REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to hisknowledge, that:
   (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/Anthony W. Thompson   Anthony W. Thompson    *Chief Executive Officer*   
Date: March 31, 2005
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provide to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
     The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general information language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1546-1549 (Final)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Correction of notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Correction is made to the October 20, 2021 date of record closing, and the October 22, 2021 deadline for filing final comments, in the                         *Written Submissions*                         section of the notice which was published on June 9, 2021 (86 FR 30627). The correct deadline dates are as follows: The record closing is October 19, 2021; and deadline for final comments is October 21, 2021.                    

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 14, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-13345 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13237]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, June 24, 2021.

PLACE: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the 
public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.ncua.gov) and access the provided webcast link.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Action, Federal Credit Union Loan Interest Rate Ceiling.
    2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Current Expected Credit Loss 
Methodology.
    3. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Capitalization of Interest.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-13237 Filed 6-21-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                         261,476
<SECURITIES>                                   116,964
<RECEIVABLES>                                  271,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,522
<INVENTORY>                                    107,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               760,853
<PP&E>                                         438,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                 260,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 953,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          549,666
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,132
<OTHER-SE>                                     294,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   953,685
<SALES>                                        691,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               691,286
<CGS>                                          582,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  582,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,601
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 16 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 16

  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

 Mr. Hayworth (for himself, Mr. Boehner, and Mr. Paul) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Labor Relations Restoration 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER.

    Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or any business owned 
        and operated by an Indian tribe and located on its Indian 
        lands,'' after ``subdivision thereof''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) The term `Indian tribe' means any Indian tribe, 
        band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community 
        which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and 
        services provided by the United States to Indians because of 
        their status as Indians.
            ``(16) The term `Indian' means any individual who is a 
        member of an Indian tribe.
            ``(17) The term `Indian lands' means--
                    ``(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 
                reservation;
                    ``(B) any lands title to which is either held in 
                trust by the United States for the benefit of any 
                Indian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe 
                or individual subject to restriction by the United 
                States against alienation; and
                    ``(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that are 
                within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 
                defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a 
                federally recognized Indian tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

MATTHEW BISSONNETTE, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

KEVIN PODLASKI and 

CARSON BOXBERGER, LLP, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO: 1:15-cv-334- SLC 

STIPULATION ON AUTHENTICATION OF DE POSITION EXHIBITS 

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Matthew Bissonnette, hereinafter called 

"Plaintiff' and Kevin Podlaski and Carson Boxberger, LLP, hereinafter called "Defendants." 

Plaintiff and Defendants are collectively called the "Parties." 

WHEREAS, the depositions of Matthew Bissonnette and Kevin Podlaski were taken in 

this case on November 16 and 17, 2016, the non-party depositions of Benjamin Sevier, Robert D. 

Luskin, Alan Enslen, and Elyse Cheney were taken on January 6, 2017, January 18, 2017, 

January 24, 20167, and January 27, 2017; 

WHEREAS, the Parties marked 142 exhibits in the depositions, numbered consecutively 

as Exhibits 1 - 142; and 

WHEREAS, to streamline this case for trial, the Parties desire to stipulate to the 

authenticity of the deposition exhibits as set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate as follows: 

1. Deposition exhibits 1-142 are authentic in accordance with Fed. R. Evid. 901 and 

constitute records of a regularly conducted activity as defined in Fed. R. Evid. 803 (6)

. 

1 

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00334-SLC document 75 filed 02/06/17 page 1 of 3
2. Nothing in paragraph 1 above prevents any party from challenging the 

admissibility of deposition exhibits 1-142 on the grounds of relevance or any other evidentiary 

objections other than the objection that the exhibits are inadmissible hearsay. Nothing herein 

precludes an objection that the content of an exhibit contains hearsay, and is thus inadmissible to 

prove the truth of the statement asserted. 

3. As additional depositions are taken in this case, more deposition exhibits may be 

added to this stipulation. 

4. The parties agree that this Stipulation will become enforceable upon its execution 

by their counsel ofrecord, effective as of January 31, 2017. 

SIGNATURES FOLLOW 

2 

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00334-SLC document 75 filed 02/06/17 page 2 of 3
• 

• 

• 

Johnston Tobey Baruch, P.C. 

.. ��� State Bar No. 10834400 

randy@jtlaw.com 

Robert L. Tobey 

State Bar No. 20082975 

rltobey@jtlaw.com 

Chad Baruch 

State Bar No. 01864300 

Coyt Johnston, Jr. 

State Bar No. 24058772 

cjohnston@jtlaw.com 

3308 Oak Grove Avenue 

Dallas, Texas 75204 

Telephone: (214) 741-6260 

Facsimile: (214) 741-6248 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MAITHEW BISSONNETTE 

Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP 

,?� -A-. -M-i-ch-a""e�l �· q. 

mfurman@fkblaw.com 

Izabell Lemkhen, Esq. 

ILcmkhen(?/J,tkblaw.com 

61 Broadway, 26111 Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Telephone: (212) 867-4100 

Facsimile: (212) 857-4118 

A lforneys for Defendants 

KEVJN PODLASKJ and 

CARSON BOXBERGER, LLP 

3 

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00334-SLC document 75 filed 02/06/17 page 3 of 3
# L_2008129EN.01004801.xml

| 17.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/48

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 April 2008

concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Turkey on the participation of the Republic of Turkey in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction

(2008/375/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 152 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first paragraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 of 8 February 1993 on the establishment of a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2), provides, in Article 13 thereof, that the Centre is to be open to the participation of non-Community countries which share the Community’s interests and those of its Member States in the Centre’s objectives and work. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 of 8 February 1993 on the establishment of a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2), provides, in Article 13 thereof, that the Centre is to be open to the participation of non-Community countries which share the Community’s interests and those of its Member States in the Centre’s objectives and work.

| (2) | The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Turkey on the participation of the Republic of Turkey in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction was signed on behalf of the Community on 30 October 2007 (3), subject to its conclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Turkey on the participation of the Republic of Turkey in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction was signed on behalf of the Community on 30 October 2007 (3), subject to its conclusion.

| (3) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Turkey on the participation of the Republic of Turkey in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2008.

For the Council

The President

D. RUPEL

---

(1)  
  ΟJ C 308 E, 16.12.2006, p. 17.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 36, 12.2.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1651/2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 30).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 323, 8.12.2007, p. 24.

3

---