alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





SIGNATURE EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION CORP.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350




The undersigned, Steven Weldon, in his capacities as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Signature Exploration and Production Corp. do each hereby certify that the Form 10-K of Signature Exploration and Production Corp. for the year ended March 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Signature Exploration and Production Corp.





This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.








Executed this 15th day of July, 2013.








/s/    Steven Weldon


-----------------------------------------------


Steven Weldon


Chief  Executive  Officer, President and Chairman
[No. 20919-5-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph P. Dengler, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 96-1-00288-5, James D. Roper, J., entered July 9, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Peplin, Inc.
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation or OrganizationNeosil, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USAPeplin Biolipids Pty Ltd
    
    Queensland, AustraliaPeplin Ireland Limited
    
    IrelandPeplin Limited
    
    Queensland, AustraliaPeplin Operations Pty Ltd
    
    Queensland, AustraliaPeplin Operations USA, Inc.
    
    California, USAPeplin Research Pty Ltd
    
    Queensland, AustraliaPeplin Unit Trust
    
    Queensland, Australia
#### BRIGGS, Respondent, v. TRUE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Mary E. Briggs against Ransom B. True.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1992 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1992

             To suspend temporarily the duty on endosulfan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

  Mr. Hastings of Washington introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on endosulfan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENDOSULFAN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.38.06      Hexachlorohexahydr  Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         omethano-2,4,3-                                                    31/2009
                         benzodioxathlepin-
                         3-oxide (CAS No.
                         115-29-7)
                         (provided for in
                         subheadings
                         2904.90.50 and
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Austin Zuur, *Ltd., et al.,*Respondents, v Myles S. Lowell et al., Appellants.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert E. White, J.), entered November 29,1984, granting plaintiffs’ application to amend their complaint to increase the ad damnum clause and denying plaintiffs’ application to serve an amended bill of particulars and defendants’ request for further pretrial disclosure, modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to permit plaintiffs to serve an amended bill of particulars and to allow defendants further disclosure.

This is an action to recover the value of damages allegedly sustained as a result of water flowing from a burst water pipe. Plaintiffs moved to amend the complaint to increase the ad damnum clause, alleging that the belated receipt of their income tax returns made available information indicating a greater loss than had been previously estimated. In addition, plaintiffs moved for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars detailing new information with regard to the value of their losses.

Opposing the motion to increase the ad damnum clause, defendants requested an opportunity for further pretrial discovery addressed to the allegedly newly developed information if that motion should be granted. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to increase the ad damnum clause but denied defendants’ application for further pretrial discovery as well as plaintiffs’ application to amend the bill of particulars.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in permitting plaintiffs to increase the ad damnum clause. Under the circumstances, however, it was error to deny defendants’ request for further pretrial discovery as well as plaintiffs’ application for leave to update their bill of particulars. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Fein and Milonas, JJ.
[No. 37123-1-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Francisco Romolo, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-00652-0, George T. Mattson, J., entered August 11, 1995. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Adams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered April 14,1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence as a second violent felony offender.

Judgment affirmed.

Once the fact of the prior felony conviction was established by the People and admitted by defendant, the burden then fell on defendant to allege and prove facts underlying his claim that his prior conviction was unconstitutionally obtained (CPL 400.21 [7] [b]; *see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Anderson,*100 AD2d 937). Inasmuch as defendant failed to establish the need for a hearing, his 1974 conviction for armed robbery in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, was properly found to constitute a predicate violent felony conviction (Penal Law § 70.04 [1] [b] [i]). Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2148 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2148

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulcuren UPKA 1988.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulcuren UPKA 1988.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VULCUREN UPKA 1988.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.03       1,6-Bis(N,N-       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         dibenzylthiocarba                                                  31/2009
                         moyldthithio)hexa
                         ne (CAS No.
                         151900-44-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2930.20.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Health and Safetyheadline bar Health and Safety


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 3.1.1


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                         OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                BSP ONELINK, INC.



          BSP Onelink, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized

and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of

Delaware (the "Delaware General Corporation Law"), does here certify that:

     FIRST: The Corporation's Board of Directors have duly adopted and approved
a resolution setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation (as heretofore amended and restated), declaring
said amendment to be advisable and submitting the resolution to the
Corporation's shareholders for consideration. The resolution setting for the
proposed amendment is as follows:

           RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
       amended by changing the Article thereof numbered "Article I" so that, as
       amended, said Article will read as follow:


                                    ARTICLE I
                               NAME OF CORPORATION

     The name of the Corporation is One Link 4 Travel, Inc. (the "Corporation").

     SECOND: The foregoing amendment was approved by the holders of the
requisite number of shares of said Corporation in accordance with Sections 228
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     THIRD: The capital of the Corporation was not reduced under or by reason of
said amendment.

     FOURTH: Said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said BSP Onelink, Inc. has caused this certificate to
be signed by F. William Guerin, President of the Corporation this January 23,
2004.



                                  By:      /s/ F. William Guerin
                                           -----------------------------
                                           F. William Guerin, President




<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-                          ( print page 33381)                        463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:                

*Name and Committee Code:*                     National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force (84629).                

*Date and Time:*                     July 28, 2021; 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Virtual meeting attendance only; to attend the virtual meeting, please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following email:                     *cmessam@nsf.gov.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Brenda Williams, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8900; email:                     *bwilliam@nsf.gov.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     The Task Force shall investigate the feasibility and advisability of establishing and sustaining a National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource; and propose a roadmap detailing how such resource should be established and sustained.                

*Agenda:*                     In this inaugural meeting, the Task Force will discuss its charter and goals; key characteristics for the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource; the results of pilot efforts to enhance access to cloud computing resources for federally-funded researchers; and review the work plan going forward.                

Dated: June 21.2021.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-13332 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### HAUSERMAN, Respondent, v. WEISMANN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Charles Hauserman against Henry Weismann. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
# L_2008087EN.01001201.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/12

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 17 March 2008

amending Decision 2005/338/EC in order to prolong the validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to campsite service

(notified under document number C(2008) 1128)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/276/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,

After consulting the European Union Eco-labelling Board,

Whereas:

| (1) | The ecological criteria set out in Commission Decision 2005/338/EC of 14 April 2005 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to campsite service (2) expire on 14 April 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The ecological criteria set out in Commission Decision 2005/338/EC of 14 April 2005 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to campsite service (2) expire on 14 April 2008.

| (2) | Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 a timely review has been undertaken of the ecological criteria, as well as of the related assessment and verification requirements, established by Commission Decision 2005/338/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 a timely review has been undertaken of the ecological criteria, as well as of the related assessment and verification requirements, established by Commission Decision 2005/338/EC.

| (3) | Given the different stages of the revision process it is appropriate to prolong the relevant period of validity for a period of 18 months. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Given the different stages of the revision process it is appropriate to prolong the relevant period of validity for a period of 18 months.

| (4) | Decision 2005/338/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2005/338/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (5) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 5 of Decision 2005/338/EC is replaced by the following:

‘Article 5

The ecological criteria for the product group “campsite service”, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 October 2009.’.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2008.

For the Commission

Stavros DIMAS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 108, 29.4.2005, p. 67.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2078 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2078

   To suspend temporarily the duty on butylated hydroxyethylbenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2005

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on butylated hydroxyethylbenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUTYLATED HYDROXYETHYLBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.40       2,6-Di-tert-butyl- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         4-ethylphenol                                                      31/2008
                         (CAS No. 4130-42-
                         1) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2907.19.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Steele, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a *774judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.), rendered May 19, 1983, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People*v *Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −45)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See 896 F.Supp.2d 1339 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 231 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−45 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 13−03015 Bloomquist v. Biomet, Inc. et al

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 13−00800 Bayes et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al

OHIO NORTHERN

OHN 3 13−00568 Darah v. Biomet, Inc.