alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of Indiana

Design Basics, LLC, et al.

1:16-cv-00247

Sky Hill Homes, Inc., By Larry Myers, et al.

Sky Hill Homes, Inc., By Larry Myers

c/o Larry E. Myers, Registered Agent

14218 Schwartz Road

Grabill, Indiana 46741

John D. LaDue

Sean J. Quinn

LaDue Curran & Kuehn LLC

205 W. Jefferson Blvd., Suite 200

South Bend, IN 46601

06/25/2016

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00247-TLS-SLC document 1-6 filed 06/25/16 page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

1:16-cv-00247

0.00

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00247-TLS-SLC document 1-6 filed 06/25/16 page 2 of 2
#### GRZYWACZ, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 28, 1912.)

Action by Stanislaw Grzywacz against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. No opinion. Judgment (74 Misc. Rep. 343, 134 N. Y. Supp. 209), affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either-party. New trial to be had in justice’s court on the 15th day of April, 1912, at 10 o’clock, a. m.
# L_2008173EN.01003001.xml

| 3.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/30

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPT/1/2008

of 6 June 2008

amending Decision EUPT/2/2007 appointing the Head of the European Union Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo)

(2008/545/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP of 10 April 2006 on the establishment of an EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO, and in particular Articles 4(3) and 5(2) thereof (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision EUPT/2/2007 (3), the Political and Security Committee (PSC) decided to appoint Roy REEVE as the Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo, with effect as from 1 January 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision EUPT/2/2007 (3), the Political and Security Committee (PSC) decided to appoint Roy REEVE as the Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo, with effect as from 1 January 2008.

| (2) | Article 6 of Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP provides for the Council to authorise the PSC to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo), |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 6 of Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP provides for the Council to authorise the PSC to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The second paragraph of Article 2 of Political and Security Committee Decision EUPT/2/2007 shall be deleted.

Done at Brussels, 6 June 2008.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

M. IPAVIC

---

(1)  
  OJ L 112, 26.4.2006, p. 19. Joint Action as last amended by Joint Action 2008/228/CFSP (OJ L 75, 18.3.2008, p. 78).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 42, 16.2.2008, p. 92.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 346, 29.12.2007, p. 29.

3

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Edward GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-1384-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 26, 2004.

Sally Wasserman, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

John P. Collins, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney (Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Katherine Polk Failla, on the brief) for Appellee, of counsel.

PRESENT: Hon. JOSEPH M. McLaughlin, Hon. dennis Jacobs, and Hon. B.D. PARKER,* Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Barrington D. Parker recused himself and took no part in the disposition of this appeal. It was decided by the two remaining members of the panel, who are in agreement. *See*2d Cir. R. § 0.14(b).

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Green appeals from his sentence, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We assume familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Green must show that counsel’s representation “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness” judged by prevailing professional norms. *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Additionally, Green must show prejudice: that but for the identified, alleged errors, a different outcome would have been reasonably probable. *Davis v. Greiner,*428 F.3d 81, 90 (2d Cir.2005).

Green has made no showing of prejudice. Contrary to Green’s assertions, the district court “meaningfully entertain[ed]” Green’s objections to the presentence report: The judge reviewed Green’s letter in chambers, afforded Green’s trial attorney an opportunity to present her objections at the sentencing hearing, and announced that he understood Green’s position. Green was also not prejudiced by counsel’s use of the contemporaneous police reports. The court considered those reports, and concluded they were consistent with the sentencing enhancement. Thus, Green has established no “reasonable probability” that further citation to the reports would have relieved Green from the sentencing enhancement.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Research: Gainesville, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Jesusa C. Legaspi, Research Entomologist, sampling whiteflies in collards on research on the use of companion planting such as mustard plants to control insect pests in vegetable crops at the ARS-CMAVE / FAMU-CBC satellite lab. in Tallahassee, FL.
 Richard Mankin, Research Entomologist, using an insect acoustic detection system to monitor hardwood stump borer beetle larvae in an avocado tree in Homestead, Florida.
 Robert L Meagher, far right, Research Entomologist, prepares to launch a helikite, a small “blimp” used to catch migratory fall armyworm and corn earworm moths, in a corn field near Sequin, Tx. John K. Westbrook, USDA-ARS (retired), Don R. Reynolds, and Jason W. Chapman, both from the UK, are coordinating the launching team.


Publications
                            More...


**Quick Links** IBBRU Research IBBRU Collaborators


Southeast Area   sandy.allan@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1885 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Deltamethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Deltamethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.79 (1R,3R)-cis-3-(2,2- 

dibromovinyl)–2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid, (S)-α-cyano-3- 

phenoxybenzyl ester (CAS 

Nos. 52918–63–5 and 

52820–00–5) (provided for 

in subheading 2926.90.30) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1885 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0                      35
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                     606
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  10,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  10,808
<PP&E>                                               0                   1,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  11,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   6,973
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     200
<COMMON>                                             0                  19,115
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                (15,422)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  11,843
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,527                   6,493
<CGS>                                            3,558                   5,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,558                   5,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83                     166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    198                      57
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                198                      57
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       198                      57
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04                    0.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 195 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 195

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the required 
 beginning date for distributions from individual retirement plans and 
    for distributions of elective deferrals under qualified cash or 
                         deferred arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

  Mr. Saxton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the required 
 beginning date for distributions from individual retirement plans and 
    for distributions of elective deferrals under qualified cash or 
                         deferred arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRED BEGINNING DATE FOR DISTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL 
              RETIREMENT PLANS AND FOR DISTRIBUTIONS OF ELECTIVE 
              DEFERRALS UNDER QUALIFIED CASH OR DEFERRED ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C) of section 401(a)(9) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to required distributions) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(v) Special rule for individual 
                        retirement plans and deferred compensation 
                        arrangements.--In the case of any individual 
                        retirement plan (other than a Roth IRA) and 
                        elective deferrals (as defined in section 
                        402(g)(3)) of any qualified cash or deferred 
                        arrangement (as defined in section 401(k))--
                                    ``(I) subparagraph (A)(i) shall not 
                                apply, and
                                    ``(II) the required beginning date 
                                shall be the date of death of the 
                                employee.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to distributions after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

 FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

v. ) Cause No. 1:16CR33 

) 

ALA EL BASHATLY ) 

NOTICE OF VICTIM’S REQUEST TO OBSERVE 

SENTENCING HEARING

The United States of America, by and through Thomas L. Kirsch, II, 

United States Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana, and Stacey R. 

Speith, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Notice of Victim’s 

Request to Observe Sentencing Hearing. 

On February 5, 2020, Ala El Bashatly entered a plea of guilty to Count 

2 of the Indictment. Sentencing is scheduled for May 19, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. 

The victim of the offense is E.P. E.P. is currently 18 years old. Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3771, E.P. has right to be present at any public proceedings, 

including a sentencing hearing and to be heard. 

E.P. has notified the Government that she wishes to observe the 

sentencing hearing scheduled for May 19, 2020. E.P. wishes to watch the 

sentencing hearing but, if possible, would like to not be seen. I have spoken 
2 

to defense counsel who does not object to E.P.’s request. I have spoken to the 

Court’s technology specialist who has informed me that it is technologically 

possible for E.P. to observe the proceedings and have her video turned off. 

WHEREFORE, the Government now notifies the Court of E.P.’s desire 

to participate in the sentencing hearing scheduled for May 19, 2020 at 1:30 

p.m. The Government further requests the Court allow E.P. to observe the 

hearing while having her video turned off. 

Respectfully submitted, 

THOMAS L. KIRSCH, II 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

 /s/ Stacey R. Speith 

By: Stacey R. Speith 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

E. Ross Adair Federal Bldg. 

& U.S. Courthouse 

1300 S. Harrison Street, Room 3128 

Fort Wayne, IN 46802-3489 

Telephone: (260) 422-2595 

Facsimile: (260) 426-1616 

E-mail Address: 

Stacey.speith@usdoj.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report
of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Vincent N. Tozzi, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Corporation as of the dates presented and
the consolidated results of operations of the Corporation for the periods presented.



|Date: May 9, 2013 | /s/ Vincent N. Tozzi                                 
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                  | Vincent N. Tozzi                                     
|                  | Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EX-33.8
(logo) PHH Mortgage
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054



REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB
SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2007 and for the period from January 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria
set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"),
except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(ii),
(d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded
are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the
transactions covered by this report (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(4)(vii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are
performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the
Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes
responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include
all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as
all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting
Party served as servicer (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as
of December 31, 2007 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the
Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Servicing
Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.


PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 28, 2008


/s/ Terence W. Edwards
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Mark Danahy
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Martin L. Foster
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President - Loan Servicing
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13234]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Virtual meeting. Note: Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the 
meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual 
meeting, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-06: Representative Robin Kelly and the 
Democratic Party of Illinois
Motion to Amend Directive 68 to Include Additional Information in 
Quarterly Status Reports to Commission
Proposed Statement of Policy Regarding the Disclosure of Vote 
Certifications Relating to Litigation
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-13234 Filed 6-21-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P