3854 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices

the Customers distribute and sell

electric energy at retail.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Public Service Company of Colorado

[Docket No. ER95–370–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of

Colorado (Public Service), filed the

Midway Facilities Service Agreement

Between Public Service Company of

Colorado and Tri-State Generation and

Transmission Association, Inc., dated

December 21, 1994 (Midway Facilities

Agreement).

Under the Midway Facilities

Agreement, Public Service will provide

Tri-State Generation and Transmission

Association, Inc. (Tri-State), with 55

MW of firm capacity in its Midway

Facilities, which consist of its Midway

Transmission Substation, including a

100 MVA, 230/115 Kv auto-transformer,

and associated 230 Kv and 115 Kv

power circuit breakers, switches and

bus work. Public Service requests an

effective date of April 15, 1992, and

requests waiver of the notice

requirements, for good cause shown.

Public Service states that copies of the

filing were served on Tri-State, its

customer, the Colorado Public Utilities

Commission, and the Office of

Consumer Counsel.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Commonwealth Edison Co.

[Docket Nos. ER95–371–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd), tendered for filing a Firm

Transmission Service Tariff FTS–1 and

a Network Services Tariff NTS–1. By

these Tariffs, ComEd offers to provide

firm flexible point-to-point transmission

service and network transmission

service. The FTS–1 Tariff supersedes in

its entirety ComEd’s TS–1 Tariff

currently on file, subject to refund, and

set for hearing in Docket No. ER93–777–

000. ComEd asks that this filing be

consolidated with Docket No. ER93–

777–000.

ComEd asks for an effective date of

February 28, 1995, for the FTS–1 and

NTS–1 Tariffs. ComEd has served copies

of the filing on the Illinois Commerce

Commission and all parties to Docket

No. ER93–777–000. A copy of the filing

is also available for public inspection at

ComEd’s offices in Chicago, Illinois.

Comment date: January 27, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–372–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light

Company (Fitchburg), filed a service

agreement between Fitchburg and Green

Mountain Power Corporation (Green

Mountain). The service agreement

provides for the sale by Fitchburg of

capacity and associated energy. Also

submitted is a notice of cancellation for

this service agreement. This is a service

agreement under Fitchburg’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2,

which was accepted for filing in Docket

No. ER92–88–000, and is governed by

that tariff. Fitchburg requests an

effective date of January 1, 1995, and

seeks waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements for good cause shown.

Fitchburg states that copies of the

filing were served on Green Mountain

Power and the Massachusetts

Department of Public Utilities.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Boston Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–373–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Boston Edison Company (Boston

Edison), of Boston, Massachusetts, in

connection with its adoption of

Financial Accounting Standards No. 106

to recognize Postretirement Benefits

Other than Pensions (PBOP) on an

accrual basis, tendered for filing rate

schedule supplements to its following

contracts for the sale of power from the

Pilgrim nuclear power plant.

Utility

Rate

schedule No.

Entitlement (in

percent)

Commonwealth Electric

Co .............................. 68 11.00000

Montaup Electric Co ..... 69 11.00000

Boylston ........................ 77 .07463

Holyoke ......................... 79 .89552

Westfield ....................... 81 .22388

Hudson .......................... 83 .37313

Littleton ......................... 85 .14925

Marbelhead ................... 87 .14925

North Attleboro .............. 89 .14925

Peabody ........................ 91 .22388

Shrewsbury ................... 93 .37313

Templeton ..................... 95 .04478

Wakefield ...................... 97 .14925

West Boylston ............... 99 .07463

Middleborough .............. 102 .10448

Reading ......................... 113 .74627

The supplements ask the Commission

for permission (i) to use the 1993

$27,788,000 and 1994 $24,993,000

actuarially determined PBOP costs for

purposes of its contract billings in those

years; (ii) to use the 1994 cost on an

interim basis for 1995 contract year

billing until the 1995 actuarial study is

available; (iii) to use 1993–1995 phasein amounts derived from a Boston

Edison settlement before the

Massachusetts Department of Public

Utilities (MDPU); and (iv) to create a

regulatory asset to be amortized in

future years based on the Pilgrim

customers’ share of 1993–1995 PBOP

costs which is not recovered as an

expense or capitalized as part of the cost

of plant under construction.

Boston Edison states that it has served

the filing on each affected customer and

on the MDPU.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1238 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project 6939–059; West Virginia]

City of Jackson, Ohio and Certain Ohio

Municipalities; Notice of Availability of

Draft Environmental Assessment

January 12, 1995.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission’s)

Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order

486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Commission’s

Office of Hydropower Licensing has

reviewed a non-capacity related

amendment of license for the Belleville

Hydroelectric Project, No. 6939–059.

The Belleville Hydroelectric Project is

located on the Ohio River in Wood

county, West Virginia. The application

is for the construction of a 138–Kilovolt

transmission in Rutland, Ohio. A Draft
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3855

Environmental Assessment (DEA) was

prepared for the application. The DEA

finds that approving the application

would not constitute a major federal

action significantly affecting the quality

of the human environment.

Copies of the DEA are available for

review in the Public Reference Branch,

Room 3104, of the Commission’s offices

at 941 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

Please submit any comments within

30 days from the date of this notice. Any

comments, conclusions, or

recommendations that draw upon

studies, reports, or other working papers

of substance should be supported by

appropriate documentation.

Comments should be addressed to

Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426. Please affix Project No. 6939–

059 to all comments. For further

information, please contact the project

manager, Rebecca Martin, at (202) 219–

2650.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1296 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP95–132–000, et al.]

Northwest Pipeline Corp., et al.;

Natural Gas Certificate Filings

January 10, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Northwest Pipeline Corp.

[Docket No. CP95–132–000]

Take notice that on December 22,

1994, Northwest Pipeline Corporation

(Northwest), located at 295 Chipeta

Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108–0900,

filed in Docket No. CP95–132–000 an

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act. Northwest requests

authorization to abandon by sale to

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG)

an undivided 11.11 percent of

Northwest’s interest in the Shute Creek

pipeline in Wyoming; all as more fully

set forth in the request that is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Northwest states that, presently, both

the 17.5 mile, 20-inch Shute Creek

pipeline extending from the outlet of

Exxon’s Shute Creek Plant in Lincoln

County, Wyoming to Northwest’s Shute

Creek Receipt Meter Station near Opal,

Wyoming and the Shute Creek Meter

Station are owned jointly by Northwest

(75%) and ANR Pipeline Company

(ANR) (25%). CIG has agreed to acquire

11.11% of Northwest’s interest and all

of ANR’s interest in the pipeline.

Northwest’s sale to CIG will be at

Northwest’s net book value as of the

closing date. As of October 31, 1994 the

net book value of the subject 11.11%

interest is approximately $320,000.

Upon completion of its acquisitions

from Northwest and ANR, CIG will own

an undivided one-third interest in the

Shute Creek pipeline and both CIG and

Northwest will have the right to use up

to the entire capacity of the Shute Creek

pipeline (initially approximately 260

MMcf per day) under the terms of the

Shute Creek Hub Ownership

Agreement. CIG will construct and

operate a new meter station under its

Part 157 blanket certificate to receive

gas from the Shute Creek Hub into its

adjacent King Lateral at Opal.

Comment date: January 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

2. ANR Pipeline Co.

[Docket No. CP95–133–000]

Take notice that on December 22,

1994, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR),

located at 500 Renaissance Center,

Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed in Docket

No. CP95–133–000 an application

pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural

Gas Act. ANR requests authorization to

abandon by sale to Colorado Interstate

Gas Company (CIG) its 25 percent

interest in the Shute Creek residue

pipeline in Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Additionally, ANR requests

authorization to abandon by sale its

interest in the associated metering

facilities to Northwest Pipeline

Company (Northwest), all as more fully

set forth in the request that is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

ANR states that, presently, both the

17.5 mile, 20-inch Shute Creek residue

pipeline and the metering facilities are

owned jointly by Northwest (75%) and

ANR (25%). ANR’s sale of the facilities

will be at net book value as of the

closing date.

Comment date: January 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

3. Southern Natural Gas Co.

[Docket No. CP95–134–000]

Take notice that on December 23,

1994, Southern Natural Gas Company

(Southern), P.O. Box 2563, Birmingham,

Alabama 35202–2563, filed in Docket

No. CP95–134–000 a request pursuant to

Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to construct

and operate a delivery point for service

to Alabama Gas Corporation (Alagasco),

under Southern’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP82–406–000

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Southern proposes to construct and

operate a delivery point, including

measurement and appurtenant facilities,

to provide transportation service to

Alagasco who will then provide natural

gas service to a Briggs and Stratton

Company manufacturing plant and

other commercial and residential

customers in Lee County, Alabama.

Southern states that the facilities will be

located at or near Mile Post 164.4 on its

10-inch Montgomery-Columbus Line.

The estimated project cost is $168,700.

Accordingly, Southern will transport

gas for Alagasco under its existing

Service Agreements to Southern’s FT

and IT Rate Schedules. Alagasco intends

to assign a Maximum Daily Delivery

Quantity of 2,000 Mcf per day for the

new delivery point. To allow for this

new assignment, Alagasco will reduce

its Maximum Daily Delivery Quantity at

its Montgomery Area delivery point by

2,000 Mcf per day. The additional

delivery point won’t require Alagasco to

add more transportation demand to its

firm service. Southern has stated that

the installation of the proposed facilities

will have no adverse effect on its ability

to provide its firm deliveries.

Comment date: February 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

4. Ozark Gas Transmission System

[Docket No. CP95–147–000]

Take notice that on January 5, 1995,

Ozark Gas Transmission System

(Ozark), 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas,

Texas 75201, filed in Docket No. CP95–

147–000 an application pursuant to

Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act, for

permission and approval to abandon

three lateral compressors and related

facilities, located at Ozark’s Stephens

McBride Compressor Station in

Sebastian County, Arkansas, all as more

fully set forth in the application on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Ozark is proposing to abandon three

of the four compressor units at its

Stephens McBride Compressor Station,

specifically Units No. 34014, 34016, and

34017, because there has been a

significant drop in volumes at the

Stephen McBride Compressor Station.

Ozark will continue to provide service

at this station by retaining one existing

unit, which has exhibited the capacity