alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00034-TLS-SLC

)

JAMIE BUCKNER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan

Collins, on March 3, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and her
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises between the parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the eight-count

Indictment, and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this

Findings and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be

scheduled before Chief Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections

to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14)

days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 3rd day of March 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7247

FREDDY L. WAMBACH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES M. CREECY, JR.; GARY DIXON; DOCTOR

SHAH; MS. LOWNEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CA-96-545-BR)

Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: December 24, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddy L. Wambach, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994)

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison

Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wambach v. Creecy,

No. CA-96-545-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3881-3882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1322]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Glass Ceiling Commission: Open Meeting

    Summary: Pursuant to Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. 
L. 102-166) and section 9 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) 
(Pub. L. 92-462, 5 U.S.C. app. II) a Notice of establishment of the 
Glass Ceiling Commission was published in the Federal Register on March 
30, 1992 (57 FR 10776). Pursuant to section 10(a) of FACA, this is to 
announce an open meeting of the Commission for Tuesday, January 31, 
1995 from 4 pm--7 pm and Wednesday, February 1, 1995 from 1 pm--4 pm. 
The purpose of the Commission is to, among other things, focus greater 
attention on the importance of eliminating artificial barriers to the 
advancement of minorities and women to management and decisionmaking 
positions in business. The Commission has the practical task of: (a) 
Conducting basic research into practices, polices, and 

[[Page 3882]]
manner in which management and decisionmaking positions in business are 
filled; (b) conducting comparative research of businesses and 
industries in which minorities and women are promoted or are not 
promoted; and (c) recommending measures to enhance opportunities for 
and the elimination of artificial barriers to the advancement of 
minorities and women to management and decisionmaking positions.
    Time and Place: The meeting will be held on January 31, 1995, 4 
pm--7 pm and February 1, 1 pm--4 pm (Eastern Standard Time) in the 
Department of Labor, Secretary's Conference Room S2508. The meeting is 
open to the public. This meeting will take the place of an earlier 
January 23rd and 24th meeting which had to be postponed.
    The Commission will meet to discuss the status of the activities 
and tasks of the Commission.
    The agenda for the meeting include:

Review of Perkins-Dole Application Process for 1995
Update on Research
Review of Report

    Individuals with disabilities should contact Ms. Rene A. Redwood at 
(202) 219-7342 no later than January 27, 1995 if special accommodations 
are needed.
    For Further Information Contact: Ms. Rene A. Redwood, Executive 
Director, Glass Ceiling Commission, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room C-2313, Washington, DC 20210, (202) 219-
7342.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of January 1995.
Robert B. Reich,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 95-1322 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
Exhibit 10.2_10K2014


Exhibit 10.2


Summary of the Registrant's Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers


	
			
	Name and Title
	 
	Base Salary for 2015 - Effective April 1, 2015

	F. Thomson Leighton
Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$1

	James Benson
Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$450,000

	Robert Blumofe
Executive Vice President - Platform
	 
	$430,000

	James Gemmell
Executive Vice President - CHRO
	 
	$400,000

	Melanie Haratunian
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
	 
	$430,000

	Robert Hughes
President - Worldwide Operations 
	 
	$530,000

	Rick McConnell
President - Products and Development
	 
	$530,000
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2227 

To extend the duty suspension on ortho-phenylphenol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Ms. HART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on ortho-phenylphenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ORTHO-PHENYLPHENOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-Phenylphenol) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,346,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  223,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    567,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,689,280
<PP&E>                                         390,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,525,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          605,593
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,094,680
<COMMON>                                         2,194
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,525,663
<SALES>                                        673,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               673,868
<CGS>                                          383,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  383,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,251,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,419,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,419,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,419,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2018

No. 04-16-00768-CV

Jana Lee FLANAGAN and Lucas Matthew Flanagan,

Appellants

v.

RBD SAN ANTONIO L.P., Davidson Hotel Company, LLC and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), 

Inc.,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-18601

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellants’ motion for rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bio-oils Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR Homepage
                    BOR-NCAUR pilot plant facilities
                        Seed pressing and refining equipment
                                    Oil synthesis equipment
                                    Other equipmentSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Bio-oils Research Docs







Heat exchangerheadline bar Heat exchanger


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2262 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2262

   To extend the suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A COPOLYMER OF STYRENE 
              CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, IMINODIACETIC ACID, 
              SODIUM FORM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-33.1
(logo) FIS
TAX SERVICES
A DIVISION OF FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES

FIS Tax Services
3100 New York Drive, Suite 100
Pasadena, CA 91107
tel: 626.345.2010 * 866-457.4112
fax: 626.398.5205


Management Compliance Statement


Management of FIS Tax Services (FIS) and formerly known as LSI Tax Services, is
responsible for assessing compliance with applicable servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to residential mortgage loans (the Platform), except for
General Servicing Consideration criteria (i) - (iv), Cash Collections and
Administration (i) - (vii), Investor Remittances and Reporting (i) - (iv), and
Pool Asset Administration (i) - (x), (xiv), and (xv), which FIS has determined
are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform.

FIS' management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. FIS has
determined the following servicing criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of Item 1122
are applicable to the activities it performed with respect to the Platform:

(xi)   Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance
       payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates,
       as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments,
       provided that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30
       calendar days prior to these dates, or such other number of days
       specified in the transaction agreements.

(xii)  Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on
       behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged
       to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error
       or omission.

(xiii) Disbursements made on behalf of an obligor are posted within two
       business days to the obligor's records maintained by the servicer, or
       such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2007, FIS has complied in all material respects with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities
and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to management's assessment of compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007.

To the best of my knowledge and belief, based on such assessment, FIS has
fulfilled all of its applicable obligations throughout the reporting period.



/s/ Darryl A. De Bond
Darryl A. De Bond
Executive Vice President

January 05, 2008
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 8, 2007      /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy    STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption Experts and to the use of our reports dated January 25, 2010, in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-136142, 333-138639, 333-144720, 333-152124 and 333-152133), and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-96923, 333-106975, 333-118705, 333-126415, 333-137258 and 333-152125), pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of
Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated January 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc., and with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc., both included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2009.

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orange County, California

January 25, 2010
# C_2008163EN.01000401.xml

| 26.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5174 — Iberia/ST Aerospace/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 163/02)

On 10 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5174. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5174. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
JMK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0020

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JACOB ANDREW SAUNDERS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including February 19, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2020

12/11/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0020
;b^_cU-V_

Q^t^^^Jl^^J^Z*^^

f^O^Ji-CJL. r\V^c_V-NO--4o^=jo^-/ AN-.ste

-"f

^ 5j2_cfc^s^Ai^-r

1«2_<

-GQUBT-OFGRIMINAL-APPEALS-

-Ab@iAcostirci^