alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00042-TLS-SLC

)

TYLER M. MCCARTHY also known as )

Tyler McCarthy, )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on September 22, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not
guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,

and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 2, 3, and 5 of the Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 22nd day of September 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
#### SEXSMITH, Appellant, v. MILLS, Respondent.

(Supreme Cgurt, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Thomas Sexsmith against Henry H. Mills.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. See 55 N. Y. Supp. 114.8.
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |    8/3/10 |   |   /s/ Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr. |
|--------|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |                |   | Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.            |
|   |                |   | President and CEO                |

----
#### HOUSE v. HOUSE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Hattie E. House against Stephen D. House.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
each of the undersigned Gregory Pusey, the President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, the Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 16, 2005              /s/ Gregory Pusey
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Gregory Pusey, President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  May 16, 2005              /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Senior Vice President-
                                  Finance and Chief Financial Officer



                                    * * * * *



A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[No. 20438-0-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### Lydia Keller, et al., *Respondents,*v. Corina L. Thorsen, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 94-2-00805-7, Randolph Furman, J., entered February 6, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  In connection with the annual report of Earth Life Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2016 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 8, 2016/s/ Angelo MarinoAngelo MarinoPresident
Exhibit 31.1

Certification 

I, Bruce R. Lakefield, certify that:

      (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 (5) The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Bruce R. Lakefield

Name: Bruce R. Lakefield

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

Date:   August 4, 2004
# L_2008342EN.01004201.xml

| 19.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/42

---

Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2008

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 2 April 2008
  )

On page 48, the table is replaced by the following table:

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Financial year 2008 | Financial year 2007 | Financial year 2006 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY |
| 2 0 | EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY | 15 000 000 | 14 191 093 | 9 393 907,50 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 15 000 000 | 14 191 093 | 9 393 907,50 |
| 5 | REVENUE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE CHAPTERS |
| 5 2 | REVENUE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE CHAPTERS | p.m. | p.m. | 0,— |
| | Title 5 — Total | p.m. | p.m. | 0,— |
| 9 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE |
| 9 0 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE | p.m. | 207 173 | 0,— |
| | Title 9 — Total | p.m. | 207 173 | 0,— |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 15 000 000 | 14 398 266 | 9 393 907,50 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Financial year 2008

Financial year 2007

Financial year 2006

2

2

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY

2 0

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY

15 000 000

14 191 093

9 393 907,50

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

15 000 000

15 000 000

14 191 093

14 191 093

9 393 907,50

9 393 907,50

5

5

REVENUE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE CHAPTERS

REVENUE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE CHAPTERS

5 2

REVENUE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE CHAPTERS

p.m.

p.m.

0,—

Title 5 — Total

Title 5 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

0,—

0,—

9

9

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

9 0

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

p.m.

207 173

0,—

Title 9 — Total

Title 9 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

207 173

207 173

0,—

0,—

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

15 000 000

15 000 000

14 398 266

14 398 266

9 393 907,50

9 393 907,50

---
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00130-TLS document 5 filed 03/29/16 page 1 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00130-TLS document 5 filed 03/29/16 page 2 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00130-TLS document 5 filed 03/29/16 page 3 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00130-TLS document 5 filed 03/29/16 page 4 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00130-TLS document 5 filed 03/29/16 page 5 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00130-TLS document 5 filed 03/29/16 page 6 of 6
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2120 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lycopene 10% 25kg 4G 3. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2005 

Mr. WELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lycopene 10% 25kg 

4G 3. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LYCOPENE 10% 25KG 4G 3. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.13 Lycopene 10% 25kg 4G 3 

(CAS No. 502–65–8) (provided for in subheading 

2106.90.95) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2120 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

GLOBAL ARCHERY PRODUCTS, ) 

INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:16-cv-00019-JVB-SLC

)

CHRIS FIRGAIRA, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Global Archery Products, Inc., filed a complaint against Defendant Chris

Firgaira on January 18, 2016, alleging that this Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1332. (DE 1). The complaint recites that Plaintiff is an Indiana corporation with its

principal place of business in Indiana, and that “upon information and belief,” Defendant is an

individual “residing” in Australia. (DE 1 ¶¶ 2, 3).

Plaintiff’s jurisdictional allegations with respect to Defendant are inadequate. 

“Allegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information

and belief, only personal knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek, 472 F. Supp. 2d 1055, 1057 n.1 (S.D.

Ill. 2006) (citing Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir.

1992)); see Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114,

at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004). 

Furthermore, residency is meaningless for purposes of diversity jurisdiction; an

individual’s citizenship is determined by his or her domicile. Dakuras v. Edwards, 312 F.3d

256, 258 (7th Cir. 2002); see Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir.
2012) (“[R]esidence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile—that

is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”). Therefore, Plaintiff

must advise the Court of the domicile of Defendant. 

Additionally, the complaint does not contain any language regarding the amount in

controversy. The Court has a duty to ascertain whether the amount in controversy meets the

jurisdictional amount, and, in determining whether the threshold is met, “the Court must evaluate

‘the controversy described in the plaintiff’s complaint and the record as a whole, as of the time

the case was filed.’” Saylor v. Boyd, No. 11-cv-1072-DRH-SCW, 2012 WL 482389, at *1 (S.D.

Ill. Feb. 14, 2012) (quoting Uhl v. Thoroughbred Tech. & Telecomms., Inc., 309 F.3d 978, 983

(7th Cir. 2002)). 

Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement the record on or before February 2,

2016, by filing an amended complaint that adequately alleges the citizenship of Defendant and

the amount in controversy between the parties.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 19th day of January 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Introduction 

The FDIC was created in 1933 to maintain stability and 

public confidence in the nation’s financial system. A key 

part of accomplishing this mission is the FDIC’s work to 

identify and analyze risks that could affect banks. The 

Risk Review summarizes the FDIC’s assessment of risks 

related to conditions in the U.S. economy, financial 

markets, and the banking industry. The analysis of the 

banking industry pays particular attention to risks that 

may affect community banks. As the primary federal 

regulator for most community banks, the FDIC has a 

unique perspective on these institutions. 

The Risk Review presents key risks to banks in four 

broad categories—credit risk, market risk, operational 

risk, and climate-related financial risk. The credit risk 

areas discussed are agriculture, commercial real estate, 

consumer debt, energy, housing, leveraged lending and 

corporate debt, nonbank lending, and small business 

lending. The market risk areas discussed are interest rate 

risk and net interest margin, and liquidity and deposits. 

The 2022 Risk Review expands coverage of risks from 

prior reports by examining operational risk to banks 

from cyber threats and illicit activity and climate-related 

financial risks to banking organizations. Monitoring 

these risks is among the FDIC’s top priorities. 

Section I is an executive summary. Section II is an 

overview of economic, financial market, and banking 

industry conditions. Section III is an analysis of the key 

credit, market, operational, and climate-related financial 

risks facing banks.1 

1 This report contains banking information available as of December 31, 2021, with updates reflecting more recent market developments as of April 1, 2022. 

2022 Risk Review | 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          I, Zong Yun Zhou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment to Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-QSB/1 for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.

| Date:  January 31, 2006 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Zong Yun   Zhou          |   |
|                              |   |
| Zong Yun   Zhou              |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer    |   |

----
#### In re WEED.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 24, 1899.)

In the matter of the application of Chester A. Weed for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the courts of .the state of New York.

No opinion. Application granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Georges Benarroch, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Kyto Biopharma, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



|                    |     |                                                                                        
|------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 29, 2009 |     |                                                                                        
|                    | By: | /s/ Georges Benarroch                                                                  
|                    |     | Georges Benarroch
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Acting Chief Financial Officer
|                    |