alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1853 

To ensure that the total amount of funds awarded to a State under part 

A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 

for each of fiscal years 2005 and 2006 is not less than the total 

amount of funds awarded to the State under such part for fiscal year 

2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2005 

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself and Mr. MOORE of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To ensure that the total amount of funds awarded to a 

State under part A of title I of the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965 for each of fiscal years 

2005 and 2006 is not less than the total amount of 

funds awarded to the State under such part for fiscal 

year 2003. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOLD HARMLESS PROVISIONS. 

4 (a) FISCAL YEAR 2005.— 
2 

•HR 1853 IH 

1 (1) PAYMENTS.—The Secretary of Education 

2 shall make a payment to each State that received 

3 less funds under part A of title I of the Elementary 

4 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

5 6311 et seq.) for fiscal year 2005 than such State 

6 received under such part for fiscal year 2003. 

7 (2) AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS.—The amount of a 

8 payment to a State under paragraph (1) shall be 

9 equal to the amount of the difference between the 

10 total amount of funds awarded to a State under part 

11 A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Edu12 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.) for fis13 cal year 2005 and the total amount of funds award14 ed to the State under such part for fiscal year 2003. 

15 (3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

16 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

17 as may be necessary to carry out this section. 

18 (b) FISCAL YEAR 2006.—Notwithstanding any other 

19 provision of law, the total amount of funds awarded to 

20 a State under part A of title I of the Elementary and Sec21 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.) 

22 for fiscal year 2006 shall not be less than the total amount 

23 of funds awarded to the State under such part for fiscal 

24 year 2003. 

Æ
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended September 30, 2003 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the“Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,James F. Palmer, President and Director of the Company, certify, that:**

 

**(1)****                                 ****the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and**

**(2)****                                 ****the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.**

 

 
| October 29, 2003 | /S/ JAMES F. PALMER     |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       | James F. Palmer         |
|                  | President  and Director |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Boeing Capital Corporation and will be retained by Boeing CapitalCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
# L_2009111EN.01005101.xml

| 5.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/51

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2008/113/EC of 8 December 2008 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include several micro-organisms as active substances

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 330 of 9 December 2008
  )

On page 14, in the Annex, row 213, column ‘Common name, identification numbers’:

for:

‘T11’,

read:

‘T25’;

on page 14, in the Annex, row 213, column ‘Specific provisions’:

for:

‘T11’,

read:

‘T25’.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1909 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Flutolanil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Flutolanil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUTOLANIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.04.43 N–3[3-(1- 

Methylethoxy)phenyl]-2- 

(trifluoromethyl)benzamide 

(Flutolanil) (CAS No. 

66332–96–5) (provided for 

in subheading 2924.29.47) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1909 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
COMPAQ  COMPUTER  CORPORATION'S  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AND  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR  THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<CAPTION>
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,253
<SECURITIES>                                     1,444
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,706
<PP&E>                                           3,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,751
<SALES>                                         23,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,047
<CGS>                                           18,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    499
<INCOME-TAX>                                       262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       237
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40894

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WALTER FERNANDO VELASQUEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-107-9

USDC No. 4:08-MJ-458-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Walter Fernando Velasquez is charged with conspiracy to manufacture or

distribute or possess with intentto distribute narcotics. Velasquez appeals from

an order of the district court that revoked the magistrate judge’s pretrial order

granting release on bond.

The district court revoked the magistrate judge’s order, determining that

Velasquez had failed to rebut the presumption that no condition or combination

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 8, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40894

2

of conditions will reasonably assure Velasquez’s presence at trial or the safety

of the community if Velasquez is released. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). We review

the order issued by the district court, not that of the magistrate judge. United

States v. Westbrook, 780 F.2d 1185, 1188 n.4 (5th Cir. 1986). Absent an error of

law, we will uphold a district court’s pretrial detention order if it is supported by

the proceedings below. United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 585 (5th Cir.

1992). Analysis of the factors set forth in § 3142(g) indicates that the district

court’s conclusions are supported by the record. See id. at 586; see also United

States v. Fortna, 769 F.2d 243, 249 (5th Cir. 1985). The pretrial detention order

is AFFIRMED.
#### LYMAN, Appellant, v. VENDERBOSCH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Henry H. Lyman, as state commissioner of excise of the state of New York, against Theodore Venderbosch.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Animal Environmental Systems Research: Bowling Green, KY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models & Software
                        Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheets
                                    Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model
                                    Modified Arcsine Log Calibration Curve (ALCC)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




**Main Unit** **2413 Nashville Rd,****B5** **Bowling Green, KY 42101**
 Headhouse/Greenhouse 230 Bennett Lane Bowling Green, KY 42104
 Digesters
 Research Corn Plots
 Droplet Digital PCR
 Subsurface Injection


Mission


People Agga, Getahun Antle, Stacy Berry, Zachary Bolster, Carl Borders, Kevin Bryant, Michael Loughrin, John Lovanh, Nanh Parekh, Rohan Rohde, Alexandra Silva, Philip
                                            *- Phil* Simmons, Jason Sistani, Karamat


Midwest Area   karamat.sistani@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Richard A. Butler, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v James D. Griffin, as Mayor of the City of Buffalo, et al., Appellants. —

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in memorandum at Special Term, Wolf, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ. [124 Misc 2d 13.]
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Plaintiff(s) 

v. Civil Action No. 1:16CV119

PAIN MANAGEMENT CARE, P.C.

 Defendant(s)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

9 the plaintiff recover from the defendant the amount of 

dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus post-judgment

interest at the rate of % along with costs.

9 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

X Other: See Consent Decree. 

This action was (check one):

9tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

9tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

Xdecided by Judge Philip P. Simon on a motion to Approve

Consent Judgment. 

DATE: 5/27/2016 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

by s/T. Castillo 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00119-PPS-SLC document 7 filed 05/27/16 page 1 of 1
# L_2008023EN.01002701.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/27

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 21 January 2008

regarding the position to be taken by the Community within the International Cocoa Council on the extension of the International Cocoa Agreement, 2001

(2008/76/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with Article 300(2), second subparagraph, thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The International Cocoa Agreement of 2001 was signed and concluded on behalf of the European Community on 18 November 2002 by Council Decision 2002/970/EC (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The International Cocoa Agreement of 2001 was signed and concluded on behalf of the European Community on 18 November 2002 by Council Decision 2002/970/EC (2).

| (2) | Under the provisions of Article 63(1) and (3), the International Cocoa Agreement of 2001 is due to expire on 30 September 2008 unless it is extended beyond that date by decision of the International Cocoa Council for one or two periods not exceeding four years in total. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Under the provisions of Article 63(1) and (3), the International Cocoa Agreement of 2001 is due to expire on 30 September 2008 unless it is extended beyond that date by decision of the International Cocoa Council for one or two periods not exceeding four years in total.

| (3) | The extension of that Agreement is in the interest of the European Community. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The extension of that Agreement is in the interest of the European Community.

| (4) | The European Community’s position in the International Cocoa Council should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The European Community’s position in the International Cocoa Council should be determined,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The European Community’s position within the International Cocoa Council shall be to vote in favour of extending the International Cocoa Agreement, 2001, for one or two periods not exceeding four years in total and to notify this extension to the United Nations Secretary-General.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2008.

For the Council

The President

I. JARC

---

(1)  
  OJ C 4, 9.1.2008, p. 6.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 342, 17.12.2002, p. 1.

2

---
[Nos. 38480-5-I; 39488-6-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kenneth James White, *Appellant. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of*Kenneth J. White, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-07254-9, Steven G. Scott, J., entered March 15, 1996 together with a petition for relief from personal restraint. Judgment *affirmed*and petition *dismissed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Coleman and Webster, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to the wide world of bees! Come learn about native bee diversity, the pollination needs of plants, and how to raise or enhance important, unusual bees. For more information, see our Bees, Pollination, and How To pages under Research Projects.
 For more information on Bees, please click the image.
 For more information on Pollination, please click the image.
 For more information on How To's, please click the image.


Mission


People Branstetter, Michael Cox-Foster, Diana Graham, Kelsey Griswold, Terry Huntzinger, Craig Ikerd, Harold Johnson, Makenna Koch, Jonathan Lindsay, Tien Love, Byron McCabe, Lindsie


Pacific West Area   Diana.Cox-Foster@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

Michelle HAYWOOD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No: 2:15-CV-373-RL-APR

v. )

)

NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. )

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Plaintiff Michelle Haywood, in the above-named case, hereby 

appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The plaintiff appeals from 

the final judgment of January 16, 2018 dismissing this case against Novartis Pharmaceutical 

Corp.

Signed this 13th day of February, 2018.

/s/ William Anthony Walker

 Attorney for the Plaintiff

THE WALKER LAW GROUP, P.C.

363 S. Lake Street

Gary, Indiana 46403

(219) 887-2626 Telephone

(800) 889-3689 Facsimile

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00373-RL-APR document 41 filed 02/13/18 page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-47-TLS 

 ) 

PATRICIA S. QUINONES ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 111], filed on July 18, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 111] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

One (1) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such 

offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on August 3, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#### In the Matter of Irving Tabman, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner. —

Motion by petitioner to confirm the report of the Special Referee, dated August 3,1984, together with his findings and recommendations sustaining the allegations of professional misconduct against the respondent Irving Tabman, who was admitted to practice by this court on June 27,1951, and to impose discipline for such misconduct.

Motion granted.

The petitioner had previously moved, pursuant to section 691.3 of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR), to discipline respondent based upon his suspension from the practice of law in New Jersey. Respondent requested a hearing in New York and by order of this court dated June 28, 1983 (95 AD2d 868) this matter was referred to Honorable Daniel E. Fitzpatrick, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, as Special Referee, to hear and to report. A hearing was held and respondent failed to appear at the hearing or offer any explanation for his nonappearance. Respondent has failed to set forth any of the defenses to discipline as enumerated in section 691.3 (c) of the Rules and the record before this court discloses no evidence of any viable defenses available under this rule. The respondent is presently under suspension in the State of New York and in the State of New Jersey, the latter State having requested his resignation from the practice of law.

This court confirms the findings of the Special Referee, and in view of the fact that respondent has failed to appear at the hearing conducted by the Special Referee and having been given sufficient notice of same, he is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New York forthwith, and the clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.