alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MESA
OFFSHORE TRUST 1997 THIRD QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 1997 THIRD QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,535,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,572,995
<PP&E>                                     380,905,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             380,076,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,401,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,572,995         
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,828,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,401,884
<SALES>                                      4,654,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,745,252         
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               870,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,874,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,874,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,874,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .054
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .054
        


</TABLE>
# C_2008292EN.01000601.xml

| 14.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 4 November 2008

on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council

(2008/C 292/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Decision No 234/2008 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Advisory Committee and repealing Council Decision 91/116/EC entered into force on 15 June 2008.

Having regard to the Recommendation of the Economic and Financial Committee of 26 June 2008,

The Council has decided to appoint Maria Lucília SALEMA E CARVALHO as the member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee (ESAC).

This decision shall enter into force 14 November 2008.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 2008.

---
Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief  Executive
Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

August 12, 2004

/S/    Scott A. Haire
---------------------
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
(Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7257

GARY LEWIS MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER RICHARDSON; SERGEANT POYTHRESS; MARGARET JAMES, Officer; OFFICER PLEASENT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-28-5-BR) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Lewis Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gary Lewis Miller filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on March 26, 1998; Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on August 10, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny Appellant’s motion objecting to the terms of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
exhibit_10-amend.htm



EXHIBIT 10.37


 







 


AMENDMENT A


 


August 22, 2002


 


1.           Reference is made to Lease dated December 6, 2000, by and between H&N Associates, LLC, a Massachusetts Limited Liability Company, as Landlord (“Landlord”), and Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as tenant (“Tenant”), with respect to premises known as Brickyard Square, 190 Everett Avenue, Chelsea, Massachusetts.  Said Lease is hereinafter referred to as “the Lease”.


 


2.           Landlord and Tenant hereby agree that the Lease is hereby amended in the following respects:


 


(A)           Landlord shall perform the work set forth on that Proposal of Multi-State Roofing, Inc. attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, all at Tenant’s sole cost and expenses.  Tenant shall pay to Landlord the amount set forth on any invoice of Multi-State Roofing, Inc., upon presentation of such invoice.  Tenant shall also pay for the cost of any change orders approved by tenant prior to work being begun.  Landlord shall give to Tenant the benefit of any and all warranties that Landlord may have from Multi-State Roofing, Inc. pursuant to the work set forth on Exhibit A.


 


(B)           Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (2) of Section (A) of Article 4 of the lease, Tenant shall repair the roof and keep same in good order and in serviceable condition.


 


3.           Except as expressly modified herein the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4.           The provisions of this Amendment A shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Landlord and Tenant and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


In Witness Whereof, Landlord and Tenant have caused this Amendment A to be executed as an instrument under seal as of the day and year first above written.


 



	
LANDLORD:


H & N ASSOCIATES, LLC

	
TENANT:


ADVANCED INHALATION RESEARCH, INC.


 


	  	  
	  	  
	
/s/  Harold C. Garnick


Harold C. Garnick, Manager

	
By  /s/ James M. Frates


Name: James M. Frates


Title:


 


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By                                  


Name:


Title:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10544

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

James Leon Higgins, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-15-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

James Leon Higgins appeals his guilty plea conviction for possessing a 

firearm following a felony conviction, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) 

and 924(a)(2), and his above-guidelines sentence of 64 months in prison. He 

raises arguments relating to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 22, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10544 Document: 00516103309 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2021
No. 21-10544

2

sufficiency of the factual basis in support of his guilty plea. The Government 

has filed a motion for summary affirmance, which Higgins does not oppose. 

In the alternative, the Government seeks an extension of time to file its brief. 

For the following reasons, we dispense with further briefing and AFFIRM.

First, Higgins argues that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as 

interpreted by this court, as there is no requirement to show that the weapon 

crossed state lines in the furtherance of interstate commerce or that the 

defendant’s possession resulted from an engagement in interstate commerce. 

As he concedes, these arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. 

Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013).

Higgins next argues that the factual basis in support of his guilty plea 

is insufficient because it does not establish that he knew that the firearm had 

traveled in interstate commerce. We have concluded that a § 922(g)(1) 

conviction does not require proof that a defendant knew that the firearm had 

traveled in interstate commerce. See United States v. Dancy, 861 F.2d 77, 81 

(5th Cir. 1988). Higgins does not articulate any argument that this specific 

holding in Dancy has been unequivocally overruled by Rehaif v. United States, 

139 S. Ct. 2191, 2196 (2019). See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 145–46 (discussing this 

court’s rule of orderliness). 

In light of the foregoing, the Government’s motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file an appellate brief is DENIED as unnecessary, and 

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-10544 Document: 00516103309 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2021
CONSENT



To:
        
        Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.And to:
        
        Berns & Berns, Counselors at LawAnd to:
        
        U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission(the Securities Regulator)


Gentlemen:

RE: TECHNICAL REPORTS - BONG MIEU AND PHUOC SON GOLD PROJECTS

Reference is made to the technical reports (the Technical Reports) entitled A TechnicalReviewof the Phuoc Son Gold Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam for Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. dated January 30, 2004, andA Technical Review of the Bong Mieu Gold Projectin Quang Nam Province, Vietnam for Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. dated September 17, 2004, by WGM which we prepared forOlympus Pacific Minerals Inc.(the Company or Olympus).

We hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Report with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure of the Technical Reports and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary thereof in the amended annual Form 20-F. We further agree to being named as an expert in the amended annual statement (Form 20-F).

Dated this 26th day of  March 2008.



Sincerely,WATTS, GRIFFIS AND McOUAT LIMITEDsignedJoe Hinzer, M.Sc., P.Geo.President






---
F E D E R A L D E P O S I T I N S U R A N C E C O R P O R AT I O N
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1970 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1970

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 7,7"- 
[(2-methyl-1,5-pentanediyl) bis[imino(6-fluoro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl) 
  imino]] bis[ 4-hydroxy-3-[(4-methoxy sulfophenyl) azo]-, potassium 
                              sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 7,7"- 
[(2-methyl-1,5-pentanediyl) bis[imino(6-fluoro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl) 
  imino]] bis[ 4-hydroxy-3-[(4-methoxy sulfophenyl) azo]-, potassium 
                              sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-NAPHTHALENESULFONIC ACID, 7,7" - [(2-METHYL-1,5-
              PENTANEDIYL) BIS[IMINO(6-FLUORO-1,3,5-TRIAZINE-4,2-DIYL) 
              IMINO]] BIS[ 4-HYDROXY-3-[(4-METHOXY SULFOPHENYL) AZO]-, 
              POTASSIUM SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9902.32.86 and inserting the following:

``      9902.32.86       2-                 Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Naphthalenesulfon                                                  31/2008
                         ic acid, 7,7" -
                         [(2-methyl-1,5-
                         pentanediyl)
                         bis[imino(6-
                         fluoro-1,3,5-
                         triazine-4,2-
                         diyl) imino]]
                         bis[ 4-hydroxy-3-
                         [(4-methoxy
                         sulfophenyl) azo]-
                         , potassium
                         sodium salt (CAS
                         No. 152397-21-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Virus and Prion Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to our website


Mission


People Adolphson, Deborah Anderson, Tavis Anderson, Sarah Arruda, Bailey Baker, Amy Bian, Jifeng Buckley, Alexandra Cassmann, Eric Frank, Ami Greenlee, Justin Hassall, Kevin Hau, Samantha Lesan, Renae Love, Emily Nicholson, Tracy Nicholson, Eric Shore, Sarah Vance, Natalie von Weber, Andrew von Weber, Andrew Wiarda, Jayne Wymore Brand, Meghan




Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Colin V. Hall, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Solanex
  Management Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I, the registrants certifying officer, am responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
  such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
  case of an annual report) that has affected, or is reasonably likely to affect,
  the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I, the registrants certifying officer, based on my most
  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, have disclosed
  to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All deficiencies and weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
  and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
  control over financial reporting.

April 2, 2007

/s/Colin V. Hall 
  Colin V. Hall 
  Acting Chief Executive Officer

---
#### ALLEN, Appellant, v. FARLEY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 15, 1912.)

Action by James L. Allen against William W. Farley and another. C. L. Hoffman, for appellant. C. Firestone, for respondents. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, infra.
**Exhibit32.1**

**ASPYRA, INC.**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned herebycertifies that to their knowledge:

1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.
| Date: August 20, 2007                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                                  |   |
| Steven M. Besbeck, President, Chief Executive  Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aspyra, Inc. and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 25, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0468

Lower Tribunal No. 17-23684

________________

Cordis Corporation,

Appellant,

vs.

Helen Smith, 

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for MiamiDade County, David C. Miller, Judge.

Crowell & Moring LLP, and Vincent J. Galluzzo (Washington, D.C.); 

Wallen Kelley, and John D. Golden, for appellant.

Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and Joseph R. 

Johnson (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Cortez v. Palace Resorts, Inc., 123 So. 3d 1085, 1091 

(Fla. 2013) (listing Kinney factors and citing Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. 

Co., 674 So. 2d 86, 90 (Fla. 1996)); see also Caraffa v. Carnival Corp., 34 

So. 3d 127, 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (noting abuse of discretion standard of 

review as provided in Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(a)(4)).