alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Altus Explorations Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don Sytsma, the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 13, 2004

Don Sytsma

/s/ Don Sytsma			______________________
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Frank Powell and Evans and Powell, PLLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00516

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 67151

Trial court: 257th District Court of Harris County

Relators have filed an original proceeding challenging the Harris County District Clerk’s

failure to forward relators’ notice of appeal from the trial court’s September 3, 2020 sanctions

order. Real parties in interest, Kevin Alan Fletc her and Stephen Fletcher, have filed a motion to

stay the proceeding.

The Court grants the motion and orders all trial court proceedings challenging the

September 3, 2020 sanctions order stayed pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus.

It i s so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Peter Kelly

______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ July 25, 2022

____
# C_2008228EN.01000201.xml

| 5.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5275 — Delek Nederland/Salland Olie Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 228/03)

On 27 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5275. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5275. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2153

BRUCE J. SOLOWAY; LORI A. BLOINK , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Board of Directors; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Office of the Inspector General , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 00254

- CMH

- JFA )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bruce J. Soloway, Lori A. Bloink, Appellants Pro Se. Jessica Anne Clark, Virginia Beach, Virginia , Massie Payne Cooper, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Michael A. Johnson, ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER C URIAM: Bruce J. Soloway and Lori A. Bloink appeal the district court’s order denying their
motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing their complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly , we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Soloway v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. , No. 1:17

- cv
00254

- CMH

- JHA (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before this court and argument would no t aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-31189 Summary Calendar

LESLIE BURNS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BRUCE LYNN, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF LOUISIANA; JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY; MARTIN REGEL; LESLIE DUPONT, Major; CHARLES CRAIN; BERT DUCOTE, Doctor; CALVIN BATISTE; STANLEY GRIFFIN; FOSTER ANDREWS, Security Major; DONNIE PARKER; ROBERT E. SCHOTT, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 90-CV-941-A-1

- - - - - - - - - - May 12, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff-Appellant Leslie Burns appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants on Burns’s claims, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by intentionally forcing him to perform work duties that they knew would significantly aggravate his back condition. Burns has also filedNo. 96-31189 -2- a motion for an order of production of medical records and a motion for an order to supplement the record with these medical records, or, in the alternative, to remand and stay the instant appeal. We generally review a grant of summary judgment de novo . Green v. Touro Infirmary , 992 F.2d 537, 538 (5th Cir. 1993). Here, however, despite the magistrate judge’s warning, Burns failed to object to any of the factual findings, conclusions of law, or recommendations contained in the magistrate judge’s report, which was adopted by the district court in granting summary judgment for the defendants. Accordingly, we review Burns’s appeal from the summary judgment for plain error. See Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Assoc. , 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)( en banc ). “Under the plain error standard, we may exercise our discretion to correct errors that seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings if the appellant shows clear or obvious error that affects his substantial rights.” United States v. McPhail , 112 F.3d 197, 199 (5th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted). After closely examining the record, and considering the parties’ arguments, we can discern no plain error in the district court’s ruling. Accordingly, Burns’s motions are denied, and the district court’s grant of summary judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2



DIABETIC TREATMENT CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



The undersigned, Allan Woodlief, in his capacities as Chief Financial Officer of Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc do each hereby certify that
the Form 10-KSB of Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc for the year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diabetic Treatment Centers of America, Inc



This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein.



Executed this 12thday of July, 2005



/s/ Allan WoodliefAllan WoodliefChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1896 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1896

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fosetyl-Al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fosetyl-Al.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOSETYL-AL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99-1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Pankey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Long Beach Acceptance Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Long Beach Acceptance
Auto Receivables Trust 2002-A;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided to
the trustee by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the sale and servicing agreement and based upon the review required under the
sale and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the report, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the sale and servicing agreement;
and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by and independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure as set forth in the sale and servicing agreement that is included in
these reports.

Date: March 30, 2004



By:  Long Beach Acceptance Corp., as Servicer

/s/ Michael J. Pankey
---------------------------------------
         Michael J. Pankey
         Senior Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 8, 2007

/S/ Steven F. Udvar-HazySTEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZYDated: November 8, 2007

/S/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUND
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005            /S/ Alan H. Lund         ALAN H. LUND
#### MENSING, Appellant, v. COOK IRON STORE CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by Anna M. Mensing, as .administratrix, etc., against the Cook Iron Store Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J., dissents, upon the ground that the court erred in charging in effect that the servant assumed the risk of obvious defects.
# C_2008330EN.01000101.xml

| 30.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5396 — EN+/Russneft)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 330/01)

On 18 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5396. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5396. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Michael K. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-5716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 120 (Friday, June 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13494]



[[Page 33806]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 04/04-0307]


CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund III, L.P.; Surrender of License 
of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 04/04-0307 issued to 
CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund III, L.P. said license is hereby 
declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Thomas G. Morris,
Acting Associate Administrator, Director, Office of Liquidation, Office 
of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2021-13494 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
US Airways Group, Inc.
US Airways, Inc.
Arlington, Virginia

May 11, 2000

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the combined Form 10-Q of
US Airways Group, Inc. ("US Airways Group") and US Airways,
Inc. ("US Airways"), collectively referred to as the
"Companies" for the three months ended March 31, 2000, and have
read the Companies' statements contained in Note 1 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements included therein.  As
stated in Note 1, the Companies changed their method of
accounting for the sale of mileage credits in its Dividend Miles
program from recognizing revenue when the credits are sold to
deferring a portion of the revenue attributable to future
transportation and recognizing it as passenger revenue when the
service is provided. Also, as stated in Note 1, the newly adopted
accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because
the Companies believe the new method results in a better matching
of revenues with the period in which travel services are
provided.  In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and
discussed with officials of the Companies the circumstances and
business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make
this change in the method of accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Companies as
of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 1999,
nor have we audited the information set forth in the
aforementioned Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning
the factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change,
authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating
the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over
another acceptable method.  However, for purposes of the
Companies compliance with the requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's
business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted
method of accounting is preferable in the Companies'
circumstances.


Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG LLP
Page
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I Paul
Feldman, hereby certify that:





1. The
annual report of the registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the  financial  condition  and results
of operations of the registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
the report.








/s/ Paul
Feldman





Paul
Feldman


President,
Chief Executive Officer


March 23,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Shelter
Properties  V 2000 Second  Quarter  10-QSB and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000712753
<NAME>                              Shelter Properties V
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 2,559
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            723
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                77,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                        45,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        36,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               36,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (1,999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          36,529
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       7,388
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       6,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,148
<EPS-BASIC>                                            21.64 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>