alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Muzaffar Sa’id Abdullah, Appellant, v Edward R. Hammock, as Chairman of the New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Division of Pa; ole which, after a hearing, set petitioner’s minimum period of imprisonment, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Nicolai, J.), dated May 27,1983, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the proceeding, apparently as untimely.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On January 19, 1978, after a nonjury trial, petitioner was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree and given an indeterminate sentence of zero to fifteen years under Penal Law *754§ 70.00 (3) (b) (subsequently amended by L 1980, ch 873, § 1, eff Sept. 1, 1980). After several hearings and court actions, the Parole Board set petitioner’s minimum period, of imprisonment at nine years. This decision was based on the seriousness of the crime, the circumstances surrounding the crime, and petitioner’s criminal history. The determination was affirmed by the Appeals Unit on or about September 23, 1982. Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding on or about March 28, 1983. Special Term dismissed the proceeding, apparently as untimely, and this appeal ensued.

The determination of the Parole Board having become final and binding on or about September 23,1982 *(Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*60 NY2d 832), petitioner failed to commence this proceeding in a timely fashion *(see,*CPLR 217; *Matter of Collins v Coughlin,*83 AD2d 657). Therefore, Special Term was correct in dismissing the petition.

Were we to reach the merits, we would conclude that the court’s interference with the Parole Board’s determination is unwarranted since there was no showing of “irrationality bordering on impropriety” on the part of the board. *(Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Centaurus Resources Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Weaver, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
22nd day of October, 2008.


/s/ Robert C. Weaver, Jr.
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 120 (Friday, June 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13484]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request for Land Use Change From 
Aeronautical to Non-Aeronautical for 7.6 Acres of Land at Lebanon 
Municipal Airport, Lebanon, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request 
from the City of Lebanon, NH to change the land use from Aeronautical 
to Non-Aeronautical use for 7.6 acres of land at Lebanon Municipal 
Airport, Lebanon, NH. The land is not required for aeronautical use and 
can be developed as an extension of the existing business park. The 
expansion would create a new long term revenue source for the airport 
and the proceeds will be deposited in the airport's operations and 
maintenance account.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 26, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
    <bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and 
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 
01803. Telephone: 781-238-7618.

    Authority: 49 United States Code 47107(h)(2).

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 21, 2021.
Julie Seltsam-Wilps,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-13484 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### BRETTLE, Respondent, v. HIBBARD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by Dorothy Brettle, an infant, etc., against Frank C. Hibbard. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.1
  Annual
    Certification Pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on
    Form 10-K
    of FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc., Inc. for the year
    ended December 31, 2008;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and  (c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  (b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.    ROBERT
    F.X. SILLERMAN
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Marc G. Blythe, Chief Executive Officer of Tarsis Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 3, 2015





/s/  Marc G. Blythe

Marc G. Blythe,

President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1848 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1848

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bitumen-coated polyethylene 
     sleeves specifically designed to protect in-ground wood posts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Holden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bitumen-coated polyethylene 
     sleeves specifically designed to protect in-ground wood posts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.40      Bitumen-coated      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         polyethylene                                                       31/2008
                         sleeves
                         specifically
                         designed to
                         protect in-ground
                         wood posts
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3926.90.98)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

KEVIN MILLER, )

)

Plaintiff )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 2:15-CV-390 RLM-JEM

)

CAROLYN COLVIN, COMMISSIONER )

OF SOCIAL SECURITY, in her Official )

Capacity, )

Defendant )

OPINION AND ORDER

Kevin Miller filed a pro se complaint against the Commissioner of Social

Security, in her official capacity, under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and a petition to proceed

without pre-payment of fees and costs. He alleges that the Commissioner violated

his right to due process when she denied his application for Supplemental

Security Income benefits, following a remand in 2014. See Miller v. Colvin, No.

4:13-CV-16 (N.D. Ind. Sep 25, 2014). For the following reasons, the motion to

proceed without prepayment of fees and costs is DENIED, and Mr. Miller’s

complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides a cause of action against state officials who

violate constitutional or other federally protected rights. But Mr. Miller’s complaint

seeks relief against a federal official, in her official capacity, and is effectively a

suit against the Social Security Administration, a federal agency. To the extent it

could be construed as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) – the “federal analog to a § 1983

suit”, Pahls v. Thomas, 718 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2013) – Mr. Miller’s claim is
barred by sovereign immunity. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Meyer, 510 U.S.

471, 485-86 (2015) (Bivens action can’t be brought against a federal agency);

Horne v. Social Security Admin., 359 Fed. Appx. 138, 144 (11th Cir. 2010)

(“Bivens permits suits only against federal agents in their individual capacities.”);

Cuevas v. Dept. Homeland Security, 233 Fed. Appx. 642, 643-44 (claim against

federal agency and federal officials in their official capacity prohibited under

Bivens). 

To the extent Mr. Miller meant to bring a Bivens action against the

Commissioner in her individual capacity, his complaint has no factual allegations

that would explain how the Commissioner violated his constitutional rights and

doesn’t state a plausible claim on which relief could be granted. While the court

might have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) to review the

Commissioner's denial of benefits following the 2014 remand, Mr. Miller doesn’t

request such relief, didn't provide a copy of the decision, and doesn't allege any

facts from which the court could infer that a request for review was timely filed or

that the Commissioner's decision wasn't supported by substantial evidence.

Accordingly, the petition to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs

[Doc. No. 2] is DENIED, and the complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice,

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, Mr.

Miller shall have twenty-one days from the date of this order to file an amended

complaint and petition to proceed in forma pauperis. 

SO ORDERED.

2
ENTERED: November 19, 2015 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

3
---

March 27, 2013

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
      (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                     
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                          
|    |                                                     
|    | Consent of Expert                                   

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form 40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2012, (the “Annual Report”) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

I, Stephen Hodgson, PEng, hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the review of 2011-2012 engineering programs on behalf of the company as stated in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

|Original
      document signed by Stephen Hodgson
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|Stephen Hodgson, PEng,                             
|Hunter Dickinson Inc.                              

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
F. Sopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.














/s/ Gerald F.
Sopp


Gerald F.
Sopp


Chief
Financial Officer


August
14, 2008
#### HOLLENDER, Appellant, v. REINOLD et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Olivia E. Hollender, against Bernard A. Reinold and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Zong Yun Zhou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.


Date:  November 11, 2005


/s/ Zong Yun Zhou
----------------------------
Zong Yun Zhou
Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
FDIC Advisory Committee of 

State Regulators

October 14, 2020

Update on Financial Inclusion Efforts
Agenda

• Economic Inclusion – Five Areas of Opportunity

• COVID-19 Response – How We Are Helping

• Expanding Affordable and Sustainable Account Access

• Opportunities to Improve Financial Capability 

2
Areas of Opportunity

Encourage insured depository institutions and their 

partners to prudently serve the financial needs of 

emerging entrepreneurs and small businesses. 

__________________________________________________

Encourage insured depository institutions to make 

available prudently underwritten, affordable, and 

responsible mortgage credit for LMI households.

__________________________________________________

Improve household financial stability and resilience by 

encouraging safe and affordable savings and credit 

solutions from insured depository institutions and access 

by underserved consumers.

__________________________________________________

Promote access to and use of safe, affordable, insured 

deposit accounts for everyday transactions and savings.

__________________________________________________

Support quality and innovation in programs 

to build financial capability and develop educational 

resources responsive to the needs of LMI individuals, 

emerging small businesses, and diverse households and 

communities.

3
Highlights of How We’re Helping

• Consumer engagement, including:

• FDIC Consumer News

• COVID-19 & Your Financial Health

• FAQs 

• Economic Impact Payments

• For financial institutions, such as:

• Supervisory flexibilities

• Interagency coordination

• FAQs 

• Information on PPP (with SBA)

4
Opportunities to Expand Account Access

• Increased availability of consumer-friendly, digital accounts with remote 

account opening

• Expanded public awareness of the benefits of a banking relationship

• Greater engagement across local networks 

5
Opportunities to Improve Financial Capability

• Work with us and Money Smart Alliance Members to 

reimagine outreach

• Connect financial education to banking products and 

services using “just in time” moments

• Receipt of unemployment funds and Economic Impact 

Payments

• Explore broader use of financial education in digitally 

delivered financial services

• Consider statewide initiatives to encourage youth 

savings

FDIC Education Webpage

6
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
               AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
                          ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
                                  AND 1997
                           (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     1998
1997
                                               ----------
---------

(Unaudited)
<S>                                            <C>
<C>
Earnings:
Net Income                                     $  262,803
$  220,415
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes                    142,750
123,386
    Fixed charges                                 588,170
552,473
  Less:
    Capitalized interest                           41,193
35,101
                                                ---------
---------
  Earnings as adjusted (A)                     $  952,530
$  861,173
                                               ==========
==========

Preferred dividend requirements                $   12,656
$  12,466
Ratio of income before provision
    for income taxes to net income                   154%
156%
                                                  -------
------
  Preferred dividend factor on pretax
    basis                                          19,490
19,447
                                                  -------
------
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                                477,318
477,209
  Capitalized interest                             41,193
35,101
  Interest factor of rents                         69,659
40,163
                                                 --------
-------
  Fixed charges as adjusted (B)                   588,170
552,473
                                                 --------
---------

Fixed charges and preferred stock
    dividends (C)                               $ 607,660
$ 571,920
                                                =========
=========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    (A) divided by (B)                              1.62x
1.56x
                                                    =====
=====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    and preferred stock dividends
    (A) divided by (C)                              1.57x
1.51x
                                                    =====
=====

</TABLE>
Kenric Lavaughn JACKSON, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8831.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.