Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices 26423

(c) the United States Government; or, (d)

any current or former DOE contractor, or

employee of such contractor is a party

to, or has an interest in, the proceeding

and the DOE determines that the records

are both relevant to and necessary for

the proceeding and that such use is

deemed by DOE to be compatible with

the purpose for which DOE collected

the records.

7. When a record on its face or in

conjunction with other records indicates

a violation or potential violation of law,

whether civil, criminal or regulatory in

nature and whether arising by general

program statute or particular program

pursuant thereto, the relevant records

may be referred as a routine use to the

appropriate agency, whether Federal,

foreign, state, local or tribal, charged

with the responsibility of investigating

or prosecuting such violation or charged

with enforcing or implementing the

statute, or rule, regulation or order

issued pursuant thereto.

8. A record in this system of records

may be disclosed as a routine use to a

Member of Congress submitting a

written request involving the individual

when the individual is a constituent of

the member and has requested

assistance from the member with

respect to the subject matter of the

record.

9. A record from this system of

records may be disclosed to the

Archivist of the United States, the

National Archives and Records

Administration or to the General

Services Administration for records

management conducted under 44 U.S.C.

2904 and 2906.

10. A record from this system may be

disclosed to DOE’s contractors in

performance of their contracts, and their

officers and employees who have a need

for the record in the performance of

their duties, subject to the same

limitations applicable to DOE’s officers

and employees under the Privacy Act.

11. A record from this system of

records may be disclosed to officials and

contractor personnel of the Agency for

Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

in carrying out that agency’s authorized

activities at DOE’s facilities pursuant to

setion 104(i) of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Records are maintained on

electromagnetic or optical storage

media, and paper records.

RETRIEVABILITY:

These records are entered into a

database. Accordingly, retrievability

may be by name, or other personal

identifier, as dictated by the needs of

the particular researcher.

SAFEGUARDS:

Data is kept in secured areas that are

locked when not in regular use and

buildings with controlled access. Hard

copy data are stored in locked files.

Appropriate safeguards for electronic

information are built into program

software as warranted by sensitivity of

the data.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Records are retained and disposed of

in accordance with authorities

contained in DOE Order 1324.2

‘‘Records Disposition.’’

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESSES:

U.S. Department of Energy, Director,

Office of Human Radiation Experiments,

Washington, DC 20585.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:

Requests by an individual to

determine if this system of records

contains information about him or her

should be directed to the Privacy Act

Officer, U.S. Department of Energy,

Washington, DC 20585, in accordance

with DOE’s Privacy Act regulation (10

CFR part 1008, September 16, 1980, 45

FR 61576). Requests should include the

individual’s current full name and

address, the individual’s name and

address at the time of any specific

events of interest to the requester, and,

if the requester is a current or former

employee of a DOE contractor, the

contractor’s name, the individual’s

employment dates, and the individual’s

social security number.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

Same as notification procedures.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

Same as notification procedures.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Persons conducting or otherwise

having a role in the organization and

financing of experiments or releases,

present and former DOE and

predecessor agency contractors and

subcontractors, physicians, medical

records, dosimetry records, subject

individuals, DOE and its predecessor

agency officials and operating offices.

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

None.

Appendix A

As defined in Executive Order 12891, 59

FR 2935 (January 20, 1994) Human Radiation

Experiments include:

(1) Experiments on individuals involving

intentional exposure to ionizing radiation.

This category does not include common and

routine clinical practices, such as established

diagnosis and treatment methods, involving

incidental exposures to ionizing radiation;

(2) Experiments involving intentional

environmental releases of radiation that (A)

were designed to test human health effects of

ionizing radiation; or (B) were designed to

test the extent of human exposure to ionizing

radiation;

(3) The experiment into the atmospheric

diffusion of radioactive gases and test of

detectability, commonly referred to as the

‘‘Green Run test,’’ conducted by the former

Atomic Energy Commission and the Air

Force in December 1949 in Hanford,

Washington;

(4) Two radiation warfare field

experiments conducted at the Atomic Energy

Commission’s Oak Ridge office in 1948

involving gamma radiation released from

non-bomb point sources at or near ground

level;

(5) Six tests conducted during 1949–1952

of radiation warfare ballistic dispersal

devices containing radioactive agents at the

U.S. Army’s Dugway, Utah, site;

(6) Four atmospheric radiation-tracking

tests in 1950 at Los Alamos, New Mexico;

and

(7) Other similar human experiments that

may later be identified by the Human

Radiation Interagency Working Group.

[FR Doc. 95–12043 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Energy Information Administration

Notice of Proposed One Year

Extension of Forms

SUMMARY: The Energy Information

Administration (EIA), as part of its

continuing effort to reduce paperwork

and respondent burden conducts a

presurvey consultation program to

provide the general public and other

Federal agencies with an opportunity to

comment on proposed and/or

continuing reporting forms. This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden is minimized,

reporting forms are clearly understood,

and the impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, EIA is

soliciting comments concerning the

proposed extension to the Forms EIA–

800–804, 807, 810–814, 816, 817, 819M,

819A, 820 and 825, ‘‘Petroleum Supply

Reporting System.’’

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before June 16, 1995. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of
26424 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below of your

intention to do so as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Stacey

Ungerleider, Energy Information

Administration, EI–421, Forrestal

Building, U.S. Department of Energy,

Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586–

5130.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the form and instructions

should be directed to Stacey

Ungerleider at the address listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

II. Current Actions

III. Request for Comments

I. Background

In order to fulfill its responsibilities

under the Federal Energy

Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. No.

93–275) and the Department of Energy

Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 95–91),

the Energy Information Administration

is obliged to carry out a central,

comprehensive, and unified energy data

and information program. As part of this

program, EIA collects, evaluates,

assembles, analyzes, and disseminates

data and information related to energy

resource reserves, production, demand,

and technology, and related economic

and statistical information relevant to

the adequacy of energy resources to

meet demands in the near and longer

term future for the Nation’s economic

and social needs. The Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, 511, 44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq. requires the EIA to conduct

these presurvey consultation programs.

The Petroleum Supply Reporting

System collects information needed for

determining the supply and disposition

of crude oil, petroleum products and

natural gas liquids. These data are

published by the Energy Information

Administration in the Weekly Petroleum

Status Report, Winter Fuels Report,

Petroleum Supply Monthly and the

Petroleum Supply Annual. Respondents

to the surveys are producers of

oxygenates, operators of petroleum

refining facilities, blending plants, bulk

terminals, crude oil and product

pipelines, natural gas plant facilities,

tanker and barge operators and oil

importers.

II. Current Actions

EIA will request a one year extension

to the existing collections to collect data

in 1996.

In anticipation of the 1997 OMB

clearance package, the Petroleum

Supply Division is conducting a

Business Process Re-engineering effort

to review the collection, validation and

dissemination of petroleum supply data.

Changes to these processes will focus on

reducing respondent burden and

making data more accessible and timely.

The changes will begin with the

collection of the petroleum supply data

in 1997. Requests for comments on

these changes will be made in 1996.

III. Request for Comments

Prospective respondents and other

interested parties should comment on

the actions discussed in item II. The

following general guidelines are

provided to assist in the preparation of

responses. Please indicate to which

form(s) your comments apply.

As a potential respondent:

A. Are the instructions and

definitions clear and sufficient? If not,

which instructions require clarification?

B. Can the data be submitted using the

definitions included in the instructions?

C. Can data be submitted in

accordance with the response time

specified in the instructions?

D. Public reporting burden for this

collection is estimated to average per

submission: EIA–800—1 hour 10

minutes; EIA–801—40 minutes; EIA–

802—40 minutes; EIA–803—25 minutes;

EIA–804—1 hour 10 minutes; EIA–

807—50 minutes; EIA–810—3 hours 10

minutes; EIA–811—1 hour 40 minutes;

EIA–812—2 hours; EIA–813—1 hour 30

minutes; EIA–814—1 hour 5 minutes;

EIA–816—40 minutes; EIA–817—1 hour

30 minutes; EIA–818—2 hours; EIA–

819M—30 minutes; EIA–819A—1 hour

15 minutes; EIA–820—2 hours; EIA–

825—30 minutes. How much time,

including time for reviewing

instructions, searching existing data

sources, gathering and maintaining the

data needed, and completing and

reviewing the collection of information,

do you estimate it will require you to

complete and submit the required form?

E. What is the estimated cost of

completing this form, including the

direct and indirect costs associated with

the data collection? Direct costs should

include all costs, such as administrative

costs, directly attributable to providing

this information.

F. How can the form be improved?

G. Do you know of any other Federal,

State, or local agency that collects

similar data? If you do, specify the

agency, the data element(s), and the

means of collection.

As a potential user:

A. Can you use data at the levels of

detail indicated on the form?

B. For what purpose would you use

the data? Be specific.

C. How could the form be improved

to better meet your specific needs?

D. Are there alternate sources of data

and do you use them? What are their

deficiencies and/or strengths?

E. For the most part, information is

published by EIA in U.S. customary

units, e.g., cubic feet of natural gas,

short tons of coal, and barrels of oil.

Would you prefer to see EIA publish

more information in metric units, e.g.,

cubic meters, metric tons, and

kilograms? If yes, please specify what

information (e.g., coal production,

natural gas consumption, and crude oil

imports), the metric unit(s) of

measurement preferred, and in which

EIA publication(s) you would like to see

such information.

EIA is also interested in receiving

comments from persons regarding their

views on the need for the information

contained in the Petroleum Supply

Reporting System.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of the form; they also will

become a matter of public record.

Statutory Authorities: Section 2(a) of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L.

No. 96–511), which amended Chapter 35 of

Title 44 of the United States Code [See 44

U.S.C. 3506(a) and (c)(1)].

Issued in Washington, D.C. May 10, 1995.

Yvonne M. Bishop,

Director, Office of Statistical Standards,

Energy Information Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–12040 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP92–237–016]

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company; Notice of Filing of a

Corrected Refund Report

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on April 4, 1995,

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company (Alabama-Tennessee),

tendered for filing a corrected refund

report in compliance with ordering

paragraph (F) of the Commission’s

March 20, 1995 order in Docket No.

RP92–237–013, et al.

Consistent with ordering paragraph

(E) of the March 20 order AlabamaTennessee states that it sent letters on

March 27, 1995, offering each of its

customers that had an effective

Operational Balancing Agreement

(OBA) the option of receiving refunds

for fuel retainage either in-kind, or as a

credit to the customer’s OBA account.

Alabama-Tennessee further states that it

has calculated interest at the rates