alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|                        | Deloitte & Touche LLP
|----------------------- | ---------------------
|3900 U.S. Bancorp Tower
|111 S.W. Fifth Ave.    
|Portland, OR 97204-3642
|USA                    
|                       
|                       
|Tel: +1 503 222 1341   
|Fax: +1 503 224 2172   
|www.deloitte.ca        

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-209921 on Form F-3 of our report dated May 15, 2015, relating
to the consolidated financial statements of Pebble Limited Partnership and
subsidiaries (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to going concern uncertainty), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2015.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Portland, Oregon 
May 2, 2016

---
Robert G. GARZA, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-6445, 13A283.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 19, 2013.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice SCALIA and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
S. Latoff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.














/s/ William S.
Latoff


William
S. Latoff


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer


May 15,
2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-99-PPS-PRC

 )

CLAUDIO TINO MARTINEZ a/k/a “C.K.”, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT CLAUDIO TINO MARTINEZ

TO: THE HONORABLE PHILIP P. SIMON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11

of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul

R. Cherry, on September 11, 2015, with the consent of Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez, counsel for

Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with

Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the

record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez

under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez understands the nature of the charge against him to

which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his

plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez understands what the maximum possible sentence

is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez

understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines

under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez has been knowingly and

voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez understands that his answers may later be used

against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Claudio Tino Martinez’s plea of guilty to the offense

charged in Count 1 of the Information and that Defendant Claudio Tino Martinez be adjudged guilty

of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Information and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report

has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Claudio Tino Martinez be

adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before Judge Philip P. Simon will be set by separate order.

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen

(14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2015.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmos Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Haim Aviv, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ss. of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Haim Aviv
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Haim Aviv, Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 2, 2004
"t\U 'rSx AT<. D^ "VO^aS T^xfcX Cause w^. 00~\' \2°c\ - V3>

C^C^OW TO S^evvoX SkxVg, ^.3) Op")

Y\c>v^> G&x^eS. "VvrcxCvV^ -C^rO^ov^ ^T\XX^\S P^V^^^A-V

-^ AUG 19 2015

-^ ' Abe! Acosta, Clerk

(3- u;GM oC O^O-V^.^x Co9\€S „ FILED IN

~^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL0

AUG 19 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
V- "O • ^ . ~Tc> ^o£ c>v^ \Xv^ QxxaVs OoeVCeVf.wCi^rvt—

^9^\\a^v \^^ S<2~

A~ V>ra^\( QAV\pnn^ ^;r,^c, ^-c, {\Tre^\\avr^V

y

Pry ?-e v\a^vv 9 <o $£,
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 15, 2005               /S/ Alan H. Lund             ALAN H. LUND      Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer    
-32-
#### RAUPP, Appellant, v. McLAUGHLIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 20, 1899.)

Action by Michael Raupp against John McLaughlin. W. Goldsticker, for appellant. J. L. Cadwalader, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000712757
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE HOLDINGS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,629,944
<SECURITIES>                                   563,263
<RECEIVABLES>                                  570,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,842,016
<PP&E>                                          21,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,863,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,747
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,756,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,863,883
<SALES>                                      1,300,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,313,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,052,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                193,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   193,672
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.,
      and Zong Yun Zhou, Chief Financial Officer of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.
      on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.




Dated:
                May 13, 2008/s/
                Xiao Ping ZhangXiao
                Ping Zhang
              Chief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Zong Yun ZhouZong
                Yun ZhouChief
                Financial Officer
#### ROSS, Appellant, v. CAYWOOD et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Lewis P. Ross against Chauncey C. Caywood and another.

No opinion. Motion granted, without prejudice to the defendants’ right to apply to the court of appeals for leave-to withdraw their appeal. See 44 N. Y. Supp. 985.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.124  


 
 

Contribution to SOURCECORP, Incorporated
  Non-Qualified Retirement Plan    
    



        In 2004, the Company made a contribution to the following individuals Non-Qualified Retirement Plan account matching their 2003 contribution for such
account up to ten percent of such individual's base salary: 


Ed
H. Bowman, Jr.

Thomas C. Walker

Barry L. Edwards

Charles S. Gilbert 









QuickLinks


Contribution to SOURCECORP, Incorporated Non-Qualified Retirement Plan
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor Entech Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad Houtkin, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: September 11, 2009 /s/ Brad Houtkin Brad Houtkin President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Russell A. Evans, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                                                 
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 23, 2008 |  | /s/ RUSSELL A. EVANS Russell A. Evans Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



23
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00265-JD-JEM   document 3   filed 08/07/13   page 1 of 3

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00265-JD-JEM   document 3   filed 08/07/13   page 2 of 3

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00265-JD-JEM   document 3   filed 08/07/13   page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kevin R. Millison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                             
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|April 22, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ KEVIN R. MILLISON                                       
|               |  |  |  | Kevin R. Millison Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer



24
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 29, 2019 t0522

Order 

Clerk

May 29, 2019

158471

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158471

COA: 344325 

Kalamazoo CC: 2016-000285-FC

VICTOR PEERY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2018 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration, as on leave granted, of whether MCL 768.7a authorized the trial court to 

require the sentences in this case to run consecutively with the defendant’s sentence for 

violating probation in an earlier case. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall address: 

(1) whether the definition of “prison” found in MCL 750.193(2) controls whether a 

facility is a “penal or reformatory institution” for purposes of MCL 768.7a(1), even 

though the two statutes appear in different codes, compare People v Johnson, 96 Mich 

App 84, 86-88 (1980), and People v Parker, 319 Mich App 410 (2017), with People v

Washington, 501 Mich 342, 357 (2018); (2) if so, whether the Kalamazoo Probation 

Enhancement Program (KPEP) falls within that definition of “prison”; and (3) if not, 

whether the Legislature intended for a program like KPEP to be treated as a “penal or 

reformatory institution” for purposes of MCL 768.7a. In all other respects, leave to 

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1344 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1344

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2006

                                Received

                           November 13, 2006

     Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 
Farmington River and Salmon Brook in the State of Connecticut for study 
 for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Farmington River and Salmon 
Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL SEGMENT OF FARMINGTON RIVER AND 
              SALMON BROOK IN CONNECTICUT FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL 
              ADDITION TO NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Farmington River and Salmon Brook in the State of 
        Connecticut possess important resource values, including 
        wildlife, ecological, and scenic values, and historic sites and 
        a cultural past important to America's heritage.
            (2) There is a longstanding interest among State and local 
        officials, area residents, and river and brook users in 
        undertaking a concerted cooperative effort to manage the river 
        and brook in a productive and meaningful way.
    (b) Designation.--Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(139) Lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook, Connecticut.--The 
segment of the Farmington River downstream from the segment designated 
as a recreational river by section 3(a)(156) to its confluence with the 
Connecticut River, and the segment of the Salmon Brook including its 
mainstem and east and west branches.''.
    (c) Time for Submission.--Not later than three years after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study 
required by the amendment made by subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### STERNBERG et al., Appellants, v. LOUIS METZGER & CO., Respondent.

(Supreme courj; Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1913.)

Action by Ulrike Sternberg apd others against Louis Metzger & Co. -\y. J. Miller, of New York City, for appellants. L. Joseph, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.