alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 11, 2006       /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,061
<SECURITIES>                                        41
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,369
<PP&E>                                           8,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,925
<SALES>                                          5,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,311
<CGS>                                            2,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    419
<INCOME-TAX>                                       239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ScandiumInternational Mining Corp. (formerly EMC Metals Corp.) (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,2013 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: January20, 2015 		/s/ Edward Dickinson		

                                      Edward Dickinson

                                      PrincipalFinancial Officer
[No. 31324-3-II.

Division Two.

February 15, 2005.]

#### Greg Isaacson, *Appellant,*v. The City of Centralia, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 01-2-00562-4, David R. Draper, J., entered January 5, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Houghton, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1691 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1691

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
  Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton, 
Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 
and designated as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
other paper of the United States to the facility referred to in section 
1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John H. Bradley Department 
of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1995
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         1,671
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,671
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             16
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (611)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,671
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  35
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     69
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (172)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (4.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (4.87)
        


</TABLE>
| (1) | the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                                  |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |                                                                  |   |
| Date:  December 12, 2011 | By:    |  /s/ Georges Benarroch                                           |   |
|                               |   | Georges Benarroch                                                     |   |
|                               |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                               |   |                                                                  |   |
# L_2008060EN.01002401.xml

| 5.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 60/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 60/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 February 2008

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on certain aspects of air services

(2008/190/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2) in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | By a decision of 5 June 2003 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements by a Community agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By a decision of 5 June 2003 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements by a Community agreement.

| (2) | On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of Moldova on certain aspects of air services in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Decision of 5 June 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of Moldova on certain aspects of air services in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Decision of 5 June 2003.

| (3) | The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision 2006/345/EC (2). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision 2006/345/EC (2).

| (4) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on certain aspects of air services is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to make the notification provided for in Article 8(1) of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

D. RUPEL

---

(1)  Opinion of 16 May 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 126, 13.5.2006, p. 23.

2

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1920 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Chlorophenylglycine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Chlorophenylglycine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-CHLOROPHENYLGLYCINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.65 p-Chlorophenylglycine (CAS 

No. 6212–33–5) (provided 

for in subheading 

2922.49.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1920 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:16-CR-18-TLS 

 ) 

ADAM BEAUCHOT ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 37], filed on November 16, 2016. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 37] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Count One (1) of the Superceding Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is 

adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on December 6, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[No. 31245-0-II.

Division Two.

February 8, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Randy Lynn Watters, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 03-1-00087-6, James B. Sawyer II, J., entered November 24, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Morgan, A.C. J., and Hunt, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Haim Aviv, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (i)   The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
            quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (ii)  The information in such report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            Pharmos Corporation (the "Company").


                                /s/ Haim Aviv
                                ----------------------------------
                                Haim Aviv, Chief Executive Officer
                                August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       23
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1899 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1899

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Thiochloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Thiochloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHORUS THIOCHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.92      Phosphorus          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Thiochloride (CAS                                                  31/2008
                         No. 3982-91-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2851.00.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 19661-1-II.

Division Two.

October 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eric Brian Crabtree, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 94-1-01319-3, Paula Casey, J., entered June 7, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2388

LISA WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, Department of Health and Human 

Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03638-GJH)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Vickie Elaine LeDuc, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Washington appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant

summary judgment on her race discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 

& Supp. 2017). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Washington v. Burwell, No. 

8:16-cv-03638-GJH (D. Md. Nov. 9, 2017). We deny Washington’s motion for 

appointment of counsel, to file a formal brief, and for oral argument. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Riviello, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered May 29, 1984, convicting him of conspiracy in the fourth degree and grand larceny in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed. This matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Complainant testified that he had two detailed conversations with defendant, in the presence of defendant’s coconspirators, during which defendant requested that complainant relinquish control of his restaurant without payment therefor. Several witnesses testified that the coconspirators constantly accompanied defendant, treated him deferentially, and that they drove complainant to the meeting with defendant.

Moreover, the witnesses testified that the coconspirators carried weapons, refused to pay their bills at the restaurant, would raise and lower the restaurant lights and jukebox at will, and violently attacked a restaurant employee after he refused to serve drinks after closing time.

This testimony was sufficient to establish a prima facie case of conspiracy to commit larceny by extortion and to link defendant *879to the conspiracy. The witnesses’ observations of the coconspirators’ conduct do not constitute hearsay *(see, People v Salko,*47 NY2d 230, *as amended*47 NY2d 1010). Moreover, complainant clearly could testify as to his observations of defendant’s acts and defendant’s declarations to him *(see, People v Salko, supra).*A prima facie case having been established, the court properly allowed the witnesses to testify as to hearsay declarations made by defendant’s coconspirators during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy *(see, People v Sanders,*56 NY2d 51; *People v Salko, supra).*Accordingly, the coconspirators’ declarations that defendant was their “boss”, that they followed his instructions, and that they were going to take over the restaurant, were properly admitted.

Therefore, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt and, moreover, that his guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they lack merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.