alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

VITALIY KURNOSKIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 1:14 CV 406

)

REINHART TRANSPORTATION )

LLC, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION and ORDER

Plaintiff Vitaliy Kurnoskin, a resident of Florida, filed the present lawsuit based

on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). (DE # 1.) Defendant Reinhart

Transportation LLC, has moved to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b)(2). (DE # 20.) Rule 12(b)(2) requires dismissal of a claim where personal

jurisdiction is lacking. After a defendant moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2), “the

plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating the existence of jurisdiction.” Purdue

Research Found. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., 338 F.3d 773, 782 (7th Cir. 2003). 

Section 1332(a)(1) requires diversity of citizenship – that is, all plaintiffs in this

lawsuit must be citizens of different states than all of the defendants. For limited

liability companies like defendant Reinhart Transportation LLC, citizenship “for

purposes of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members.” Cosgrove v.

Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Further, citizenship of an LLC “may need to
be traced through multiple levels if any of its members is itself a partnership or LLC.”

Mut. Assign. & Indemn. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004).

Defendant Reinhart Transportation LLC has informed the court that its only

member is Reinhart Foodservice, LLC, which in turn has three individual members. (DE

# 20.) Two of these members are Florida residents, like plaintiff. (Id.) The time for

plaintiff to respond to Reinhart’s motion has passed, and plaintiff has not attempted to

demonstrate the existence of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, defendant Reinhart Transportation LLC’s motion to dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction (DE # 20) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: July 15, 2015

 s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26884-26885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12307]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Revocations

    Notice is hereby given that the following ocean freight forwarder 
licenses have been revoked by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the 
regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of ocean 
freight forwarders, 46 CFR 510.

License number: 1153
Name: Nettles & Company, Inc.
Address: 601 Busse Highway, Elk Grove, IL 60007
Date Revoked: March 29, 1995
Reason: Failed to furnish a valid surety bond.

[[Page 26885]] License Number: 281
Name: H.G. Ollendorff, Inc.
Address: c/o Martin P. Ochs, 501 Fifth Ave., NY, NY 10017
Date Revoked: March 30, 1995
Reason: Failed to furnish a valid surety bond.

License Number: 697
Name: Transport Masters International Inc.
Address: 20 Pershing Pl., Cresskill, NJ 07626
Date Revoked: April 14, 1995
Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

License Number: 229
Name: Milton Snedeker Corporation
Address: P.O. Box 1118, Valley Stream, NY 11582-1118
Date Revoked: April 19, 1995
Reason: Failed to furnish a valid surety bond.

License Number: 3477
Name: Walker International Transportation, Inc.
Address: 182-16 147th Ave., #201, Jamaica, NY 11413
Date Revoked: April 22, 1995
Reason: Failed to furnish a valid surety bond.

License Number: 3210
Name: Dateline Forwarding Service, Inc.
Address: 415 E. Grand Ave., Unit B, San Francisco, CA 94080
Date Revoked: April 23, 1993
Reason: Failed to furnish a valid surety bond.

License Number: 2683
Name: Intersped, Inc.
Address: 39 Beacon Street, Port Reading, NJ 07064
Date Revoked: April 25, 1995
Reason: Failed to furnish a valid surety bond.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Director, Bureau of Tariffs, Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 95-12307 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
EX-33.5
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054



REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2007 and for the period from January 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria
set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"),
except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(ii),
(d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded
are not applicable to the servicng activities it performs with respect to the
transactions covered by this report (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(4)(vii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are
performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the
Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes
responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include
all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as
all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting
Party served as servicer (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as
of December 31, 2007 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the
Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Servicing
Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.


PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 28, 2008


/s/ Terence W. Edwards
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Mark Danahy
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Martin L. Foster
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President - Loan Servicing
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 179

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
                 in taxes on Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

Mr. Paul (for himself and Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
                 in taxes on Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Beneficiary Tax 
Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year 
beginning after December 31, 2004.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``85 percent'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``50 percent''.
            (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) of the Social 
        Security Amendments of 1983 (Public Law 98-21) is amended--
                    (i) by striking ``(A) There'' and inserting 
                ``There'';
                    (ii) by striking ``(i)'' immediately following 
                ``amounts equivalent to''; and
                    (iii) by striking ``, less (ii)'' and all that 
                follows and inserting a period.
            (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B).
            (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B) and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (C) as subparagraph (B).
            (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        in the first sentence by striking ``paragraph (1)(A)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraph (1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Northern District of Indiana 

NYKAZA GEE 

Plainitff(s) 

v. Civil Action No. 3:15CV452 

 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

(Terminated 1/26/2016) 

ERIC PARRISH Indiana State 

Correctional Officer 

KEN YOUNG Sergeant Indiana 

State Correctional Officer 

OFFENDERS Several State 

Officers 

(Terminated 1/26/2016) 

 Defendant(s) 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one): 

9 the plaintiff recover from the defendant 

the amount of dollars $ , which includes prejudgment 

interest at the rate of % plus post-judgment interest at the rate of 

% along with costs. 

9 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff . 

X Other: this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). 

This action was (check one): 

9 tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury 

has rendered a verdict. 

9 tried by Judge without a jury and the 

above decision was reached. 

X decided by Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. on a motion for summary judgment. 

DATE: 10/14/2016 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT 

by s/T. Castillo 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00452-RLM-MGG document 29 filed 10/14/16 page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Julius Gale, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.), *408rendered May 9, 1983, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant an adjournment *(see, People v Foy,*32 NY2d 473; *Matter of Anthony M.,*63 NY2d 270). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-54-TLS 

 ) 

DARNELL BONTEMPO ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 57], filed on October 14, 2016. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 57] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

One (1) of the single Count Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty 

of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on November 1, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana

NYKAZA GEE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-442 JVB

v. )

)

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF )

CORRECTIONS, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Nykaza Gee, a pro se prisoner, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (DE 2.)

Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), the court:

(1) GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 2); 

(2) ORDERS the plaintiff Nykaza Gee, IDOC #127839 to immediately pay (and the

facility having custody of him to automatically remit) $19.00 to the clerk of this court as

payment of the initial partial filing fee; 

(3) ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically

remit) to the clerk of this court 20 percent of the money he receives for each calendar month

during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and 

(4) DIRECTS the clerk of court to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each

facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full.

SO ORDERED on October 2, 2015.

 s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen 

Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

United States District Judge

Hammond Division

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 4 filed 10/02/15 page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John J. Dolan, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (First Commonwealth), certify that the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|DATED: August 7, 2009 |  | /s/ John J. Dolan                    
|                      |  | John J. Dolan                        
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
 2007
    
    
    2006(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    244,536
    
    
    $
    267,720Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    137,518
    
    
    
    127,577Fixed charges
    
    
    814,019
    
    
    
    723,545Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (19,638
    )
    
    
    (25,389
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    1,176,435
    
    
    $
    1,093,453Fixed and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    2,711
    
    
    $
    2,562Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    156
    %
    
    
    148
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    4,229
    
    
    
    3,792Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    792,828
    
    
    
    696,623Capitalized interest
    
    
    19,638
    
    
    
    25,389Interest factors of rents
    
    
    1,553
    
    
    
    1,533Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    814,019
    
    
    
    723,545Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    818,248
    
    
    $
    727,337Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(A) divided by (B)
    
    
    1.45
    x
    
    
    1.51
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
(A) divided by (C)
    
    
    1.44
    x
    
    
    1.50
    x
 -28-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         167,341
<SECURITIES>                                       600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,375
<PP&E>                                       4,001,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,781,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,439,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,395,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,439,272
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               281,876
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            229,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   229,115
<EPS-BASIC>                                      25.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    25.92


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4613

In Re: GARY ROBINSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-02-253-WMN)

Submitted: September 8, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gary Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment

of conviction motions. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay

in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Robinson

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ

of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andd. Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Company’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: July 15, 2010 /s/ David Seton  David Seton   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





PHARMOS CORPORATION


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, ROBERT F. JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: November 12, 2009





By: /s/ Robert F. Johnston











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99-2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Pankey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Long Beach Acceptance Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Long Beach Acceptance
Auto Receivables Trust 2002-A;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided to
the trustee by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the sale and servicing agreement and based upon the review required under the
sale and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the report, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the sale and servicing agreement;
and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure as set forth in the sale and servicing agreement that is included in
these reports.

Date: March 31, 2003



By:  Long Beach Acceptance Corp., as Servicer

/s/ Michael J. Pankey
-------------------------------
      Michael J. Pankey
      Senior Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
Shenitha COMB, et al., petitioners, v. Ron ROWELL, Superintendent, Benji's Special Educational Academy, Inc., et al.

No. 13-348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.