alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PEOPLE ex rel. ECKERSON et al., Respondents, v. ZUNDEL et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 10, 1899.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of J. Esler Eckerson and others, against Charles H. Zundel and others.

No opinion. Motion to open default granted, and hearing on original application set down for the third Monday of January, instant. See 55 N. Y. Supp. 1145.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11487]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee; Environment and 
Safety Subcommittee

    Pursuant to Section 10(A) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
Public Law (72-362); 5 U.S.C. (App. I), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) sponsored Civil 
Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee (CTRDAC) Environment & Safety 
Subcommittee will be on June 6-7, 1995 at the headquarters of the 
Helicopter Association International located at 1635 Prince Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia. This site is within easy walking distance of the 
King Street Metro Station. The meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. on June 
6 and conclude by 5:00 p.m. on June 7.
    The agenda for the Environment & Safety Subcommittee meeting will 
include the following:
    (1) Discussion of draft Subcommittee report on Safety Issues.
    (2) Discussion of draft Subcommittee report on Environmental 
Issues.
    (3) Review Subcommittee Work Plan/Schedule.
    All persons who plan to attend the meeting must notify Mrs. Karen 
Braxton at 202-267-9451 by June 1, 1995.
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting.
    Members of the public may provide a written statement to the 
Subcommittee at any time.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Mrs. Braxton at 
least seven days prior to the meeting.

    Issues in Washington, D.C., May 3, 1995.
Richard A. Weiss,
Designated Federal Official Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory 
Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-11487 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1878 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1878

      To suspend temporarily the duty on shield asy-steering gear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

   Mr. Camp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on shield asy-steering gear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHIELD ASY-STEERING GEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.01      Steering gear       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         assemblies for                                                     31/2008
                         single-pinion
                         constant-ratio
                         electronic power
                         assisted steering
                         systems, rated at
                         80 amperes at 12
                         V, designed for
                         use in hybrid
                         motor vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8708.99.73)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1804 

To prescribe the oath of renunciation and allegiance for purposes of the 

Immigration and Nationality Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. BAKER, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, and Mr. EVERETT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prescribe the oath of renunciation and allegiance for 

purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OATH OF RENUNCIATION AND ALLEGIANCE. 

4 Section 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1448(a)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘the 

6 child is unable to understand its meaning.’’ the following: 

7 ‘‘The oath referred to in this section shall be the oath pro8 vided for in paragraph (a) or (b) of section 337.1 of title 
2 

•HR 1804 IH 

1 8, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on April 1, 

2 2005.’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,501,234
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    954,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,810,806
<PP&E>                                         914,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (79,925)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,457,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,552,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       159,749
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,715,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,457,260
<SALES>                                        570,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          325,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,224,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,385,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,385,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (646,542)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,032,262)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
#### MYERS, Appellant, v. BUELL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 18, 1899.)

Action by Jacob H. Myers against George C. Buell and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except WARD, J., not voting.
#### ARNETT, Appellant, v. STATE MUT. LIFE ASSUR. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by Harriett S. Arnett against the State Mutual Life Assurance Company. No opinion. Judgment vacated, and order modified, by granting a new trial, on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, without costs of this appeal to either party.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1888 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1888

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiromesifen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiromesifen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPIROMESIFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.82      2-oxo-3-(2,4,6-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         trimethylphenyl)-                                                  31/2008
                         1-
                         oxaspiro[4.4]non-
                         3-en-4-yl 3,3-
                         dimethylbutanoate
                         (CAS No. 283594-
                         90-1) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2932.29.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1
 DEBT COVENANT COMPLIANCE
AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2009
 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA:
 (in 000s)
    
    LTM(i)
    
    
    Q3 FY09
    
    
    Q4 FY09
    
    
    Q1 FY10
    
    
    Q2 FY10Net Income (Loss)
    
    $
    (33,683
    )
    
    $
    (21,363
    )
    
    $
    (4,471
    )
    
    $
    (8,546
    )
    
    $
    697Add Back:Depreciation and Amortization
    
    
    4,839
    
    
    
    1,113
    
    
    
    1,133
    
    
    
    1,232
    
    
    
    1,361Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
    
    
    (14,585
    )
    
    
    (11,106
    )
    
    
    (1,950
    )
    
    
    (606
    )
    
    
    (923
    )Interest Charges
    
    
    2,709
    
    
    
    328
    
    
    
    943
    
    
    
    964
    
    
    
    474Non-Cash Charges
    
    
    3,487
    
    
    
    1,210
    
    
    
    1,492
    
    
    
    163
    
    
    
    622Allowable Add backs Pursuant to Credit Facility
Agreement, as amended
    
    
    42,169
    
    
    
    32,064
    
    
    
    4,336
    
    
    
    5,698
    
    
    
    71Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
    
    $
    4,936
    
    
    $
    2,246
    
    
    $
    1,483
    
    
    $
    (1,095
    )
    
    $
    2,302I. Consolidated Leverage RatioA. Total Long-Term Obligations and Notes Payable (ii)
    
    $
    7,722B. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
    
    $
    4,936C. Consolidated Leverage Ratio (Line I.A ÷ Line I.B)
    
    
    1.56Maximum Permitted
    
    3.35x to 1II. Liquidity TestBook Value of Consolidated Accounts Receivable at 65%
    
    $
    25,346Book Value of Consolidated Inventory at 40%
    
    $
    7,909A.
    
    $
    33,255B. Total Long-Term Obligations and Notes Payable (ii)
    
    $
    7,722(Line II.A) must be greater than (Line II. B)
    
    YesIII. Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (i)A. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA1 Consolidated Net Income
    
    $
    (33,683
    )2 Consolidated Interest Charges
    
    $
    2,7093 Provision for income taxes
    
    $
    (14,585
    )4 Depreciation expenses
    
    $
    4,4745 Amortization expenses
    
    $
    3656 Non-recurring non-cash reductions of Consolidated Net Income
    
    $
    3,4877 Allowable Add backs Pursuant to Credit Facility Agreement,
as amended
    
    $
    42,1698 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (Lines III.A.1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5
+ 6 + 7)
    
    $
    4,936B. Cash payments for taxes
    
    $
    1,180C. Maintenance Capital Expenditures
    
    $
    2,000D. Consolidated Interest Charges (except non-cash interest)
    
    $
    1,082E. Current portion of other long term debt (iii)
    
    $
    69F. Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio ((Line III.A.8 -
Line III.B  Line III.C) / (Line III.D + Line III.E)
    
    
    1.5Minimum required
    
    1.2x to 1
  
 (i)
    
    Last Twelve Months (Most Recent Four Fiscal Quarters)(ii)
    
    Includes letters of credit of $7.4 million and excludes subordinated debt(iii)
    
    Represents current portion of other long-term debt as of October 31, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1760 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1760

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin, as the 
          ``Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 215 
Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert M. La Follette, Sr. 
Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
850 F.2d 694

#### FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., et al.

No. 88-5048.

Civ. A. No. 88-00022.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 8, 1988.

Before ROBINSON, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Suggestion of Mootness and Motion to Vacate Order of the District Court and to Remand With Instructions to Dismiss Complaint, and the Response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the court that the motion be granted. The present appeal, from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion for a preliminary injunction, has become moot as a result of the consummation of the merger sought to be enjoined. Accordingly, because the case has become moot, the judgment of the District court is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint. *See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc,*340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

The Clerk is directed to withhold the issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. *See*D.C. Cir. Rule 15.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAROLD PETTIT, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) CIVIL NO. 2:13CV253

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

 Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Appeal of Magistrate Judge’s Decision, filed by the

Plaintiff, Harold Pettit (“Pettit”), on September 4, 2014. The Defendant, United States of

America (“Government”), filed a response on September 26, 2014, to which Pettit replied on

October 2, 2014.

Discussion

Pettit has brought a Federal Tort Claims Act claim against the Government arising from

Pettit’s fall at the Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center (JBVAMC) in Chicago in July

2012. Pettit requested documents relating to his fall, which the Government withheld on the

basis of a privilege created by 38 U.S.C. § 5705. The Government claims that the documents are

privileged because they are quality assurance documents. Pettit argues that the Government is

abusing the privilege to shield fact witnesses. Pettit states he needs the documents because the

witnesses the Government has identified have forgotten important facts and he believes the

contemporaneous witness statements may reveal both forgotten facts and additional undisclosed

witnesses. 

Pettit requests an in camera review of the documents identified in Privilege Logs 1-3,
which consist of a “Patient Fall Report”, “Report of an Adverse Event”, and “Root Cause

Analysis”. The Government insists that Pettit has no need for the privileged documents because

equivalent information is in medical records produced to Pettit. 

The court will grant Pettit’s request for an in camera review of the documents. The court

also requests the Government to submit to the court the medical records it claims provide the

equivalent information to Pettit.

Conclusion

The court hereby GRANTS Pettit’s request for in camera review of the documents

identified in Privilege Logs 1-3. The Government is ORDERED to submit the documents to the

court, along with the equivalent medical records, within 30 days. Pettit’s appeal remains

UNDER ADVISEMENT.

 Entered: December 29, 2014.

 s/ William C. Lee 

 William C. Lee, Judge

 United States District Court

2
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer of YDI Wireless, Inc.,
certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q of YDI
Wireless, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date: March 25, 2004                              /s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                              Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION

FOUNDATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Cause No. 3:15-CV-00463-JD-CAN

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A ONE DAY EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Comes now the Defendant, the Concord Community Schools, by counsel, and for its

motion for a one-day extension of time to file their reply in support of its Motion for Summary

Judgment, state:

1. Pursuant to this Court’s April 14, 2016 Order, Defendant’s reply in support of

their Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before Friday, July 1, 2016.

2. On Monday, June 27, 2016, the undersigned counsel was involved in a bicycle

accident, resulting in a dislocated shoulder, which will require him to be off work for a couple of

days.

3. Anthony Overholt, co-counsel for the Defendants, is departing on an out-of-state

family vacation on June 29, 2016, returning July 7, 2016.

4. Counsel of record for the Plaintiff could not be reached, however, in an e-mail

dated June 28, 2016, Kenneth J. Falk, Legal Director for the ACLU of Indiana indicated no

objection to this brief extension of time.

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests a one-day extension of time, to and

including July 5, 2016, within which to file its reply in support of its Motion for Summary

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 58 filed 06/28/16 page 1 of 2
2

Judgment and for all other just and proper relief in the premises.

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

By: /s/Thomas E. Wheeler

Thomas E. Wheeler, II, #13800-49

Anthony W. Overholt, #16481-49

Attorneys for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 28th day of June, 2016, a copy of the

foregoing was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the

Court’s system:

Daniel I. Mach

Heather L. Weaver

American Civil Liberties Union

915 15th Street, NW, 6th Floor

Washington, DC 20005

Gavin M. Rose

ACLU of Indiana

1031 E. Washington Street

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Ryan D. Jayne

Samuel T. Grover

Freedom From Religion Foundation

10 N. Henry Street

Madison, WI 53701

Timothy S. Shelly

121 W. Franklin Street, Suite 400

Elkhart, IN 46516

/s/Thomas E. Wheeler

Thomas E. Wheeler, II

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

201 North Illinois Street, Suite 1900

P.O. Box 44961

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961

317-237-3800

Fax: 317-237-3900

twheeler@fbtlaw.com

aoverholt@fbtlaw.com

LR00264.0631345 4829-7096-3508v1

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 58 filed 06/28/16 page 2 of 2