alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FIRST QUARTER 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIERTY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,950,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,437,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     29,998,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (20,636,541)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,437,758
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               759,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             275,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                333,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            333,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   333,036
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.46


</TABLE>
United States
                       Securities and Exchange Commission
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    Form 10-Q - A

|X| Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997

                                       OR

|_| Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934

      For the transition period from ________________ to _________________


            

                           BOEING CAPITAL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                           Delaware 95-2564584 0-10795
     (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer (Commission File No.)
               Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)

     4060 Lakewood Boulevard, 6th Floor o Long Beach, California 90808-1700
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (562) 627-3000
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                      McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation
                   (Former name if changed since last report)


  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months,  and (2) has been subject to such filing  requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|


Common shares outstanding at August 14, 1997:                     50,000 shares

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b)
to Form 10-Q and is  therefore  filing  this Form  with the  reduced  disclosure
format.



                                   Signatures


Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned,  its principal  financial  officer and by its principal  accounting
officer, thereunto duly authorized.



                                      Boeing Capital Corporation


August 14, 1997                        /s/ STEVEN W. VOGEDING
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Steven W. Vogeding
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial
                                      Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and
                                      Registrant's Authorized Officer




                                      /s/ MAURA R. MIZUGUCHI
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Maura R. Mizuguchi
                                      Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### MITZKY, Appellant, v. DUFFY-McINNER-NEY CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by Elmer L. Mitzky, an infant, etc., against the Duffy-Melnnerney Company. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs.
EX-33.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015-10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria
are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(i)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President


Dated: February 29, 2008
SCWC-13-0003397

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THE ESTATE OF ETHEL CAMACHO, Deceased.

----------------------------------------------------

IN THE MATTER OF 

THE ETHEL CAMACHO LIVING TRUST DATED MARCH 3, 2008.

----------------------------------------------------

NEPHI DANIEL IOANE CAMACHO, 

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellee,

vs.

BEVERLY J. CALKOVSKY, 

Respondent/Respondent-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0003397; PROBATE NO. 08-1-0192; TRUST NO. 08-1-0094)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellee Nephi Daniel Ioane

Camacho’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 8,

2018, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 27, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0003397

27-FEB-2018

10:42 AM
16

aspect of insurance is removed completely, might be termed the user-fee

or priced service model of deposit

insurance. The insurer collects premiums on an expected-loss or riskadjusted basis from each institution.

The premium is simply a payment for a

service, namely the use of the deposit

guarantee for a specified time. In this

“demutualized” model, the premium

payer has neither an ownership interest

in collected premiums nor a responsibility to pay for the insurance losses of

other banks. An insurance fund to provide rapid resolution flexibility is consistent with this model, provided government reaps all surplus funds during

good times and readily recapitalizes it

to cover all insurance losses.

The pure priced service model, taken

to its logical extreme, makes moot a

number of issues raised in this article.

Concentrations of deposit insurance

exposure – although an issue for the

government insurer and its ability to

diversify risks – are not an issue for

insured institutions because they are

never asked to help pay for the failures

of other banks. Rebates from the

insurance funds are ruled out, but conversely banks are relieved of the

responsibility to rebuild a fund during

periods of economic hardship.

Whereas history casts doubt on the

long-term economic viability of a pure

private deposit insurance model, it also

casts doubt on the long-term political

sustainability of a pure user-fee model.

It is human nature to keep score. As

assessment revenues mount far above

cumulative insurance losses during

good times, bankers will point out that

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

Source: Commercial Bank Call Reports and Thrift F

Note: For more details, see BIF and SAIF.

1960 70 

Dollars in billions

Real Value of Insured Depo

1938

1941

1944

1947

1950

1953

1956

$120,000

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

0

1935
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1893 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1893

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Chlorobenzyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Chlorobenzyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-CHLOROBENZYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.56 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
ANNUAL 

REPORT

2015
Rene Guadalupe TREVINO, petitioner, v. Jeffrey BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

No. 12-9793.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I,
        Xiao
        Ping Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
        Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
        quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
        information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
        in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.
  Dated:
                  November 12, 2007/s/
                  Xiao Ping ZhangXiao
                  Ping ZhangChief
                  Executive Officer
F E D E R A L 

D E P O S I T 

I N S U R A N C E 

CORPORATION

2009 ANNUAL REPORT
David K. JENNER, petitioner, v. Angel MEDINA, Warden, et al.

No. 13-7029.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9255
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           18057
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     187868
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         313548
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  550011
<DEPOSITS>                                      340750
<SHORT-TERM>                                     16160
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4243
<LONG-TERM>                                     123025
<COMMON>                                          5220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       60613
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  550011
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7169
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2696
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9959
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4961
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             4998
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 310
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2732
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2732
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                       1232
<LOANS-PAST>                                      2094
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3130
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      239
<RECOVERIES>                                        47
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3238
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              3238
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            710
        

</TABLE>
#### NILES, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. *&*H. R. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Adaline Niles, as administratrix, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 55 N. Y. Supp. 1144.
Onofrio POSITANO, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 13-6223.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2388

LISA WASHINGTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv
- 03638

- GJH )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lisa Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Vickie Elaine LeDuc, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in t his circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lisa Washington appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant summary judgment on her race discrimination and retaliation claims , brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2 000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. See Washington v. Burwell , No.
8 :16

- cv
- 03638

- GJH (D. Md

. Nov. 9 , 2017 ). We deny Washington’ s motion for appointment of counsel, to file a formal brief, and for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisiona l process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER U.S.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

HERAEUS MEDICAL LLC, HERAEUS MEDICAL 

GMBH,

Intervenors

______________________

2021-2286

______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1175.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation to 

voluntarily dismiss this appeal, which the court construes 

as a motion to voluntarily dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 21-2286 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2022
2 ZIMMER, INC. v. ITC

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

March 15, 2022

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 15, 2022

Case: 21-2286 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 03/15/2022
[No. 39663-3-I.

Division One.

October 6, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Troy A. Center, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-02598-1, LeRoy McCullough, J., entered October 14, 1996. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Greg Jarman,  the Chief  Executive  Officer and Don Prest the
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Omnicity  Corp.  (the  "Company"),   each  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report
on Form  10-K  for the  year  ended  July  31,  2010,  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that the  information  contained  in the Annual  Report on Form
10-K,  as  amended,  fairly  presents in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 17, 2010

By: /s/ Greg Jarman
    -------------------------------------------------
    Greg Jarman
    Chief Executive Officer, President and a director

By: /s/ Don Prest
    -------------------------------------------------
    Don Prest
    Chief Financial Officer and a director

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signatures
that  appear  in typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
```
Amendment to the Offer Letter to Robert Fair



 Exhibit 10.5 
 December 22, 2008 
 Robert Fair 
 Teradata
Corporation 
 Dear Bob: 
 This letter amends the letter
agreement between you and Teradata Corporation (“Teradata”) dated September 20, 2007 (the “Agreement”) and shall be effective as of December 31, 2008. As we have discussed, the amendment set forth below is necessary in
order for the Agreement to comply with the new tax rules imposed under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 
  

	1.	The section of the Agreement entitled “Arbitration” is amended by adding the following at the end of the sixth sentence thereof:


 “at any time from the Start Date through your remaining lifetime (or, if longer, through the 20th anniversary of the
Start Date). To the extent that the reimbursement for reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses is considered “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, then the reimbursement
must be paid as soon as reasonably practicable after, but in any event not later than the end of the calendar year in which, you are declared the prevailing party. The amount of such attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses that
Teradata is obligated to pay in any given calendar year shall not affect the attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses that Teradata is obligated to pay in any other calendar year, and your right to have Teradata pay such
attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses may not be liquidated or exchanged for any other benefit.” 
  

	2.	Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 

 Please indicate your acceptance of the amendment to the Agreement by signing below and returning a copy to me. 
  

									
	Sincerely,	 		 		 	
				
	TERADATA CORPORATION	 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Molly A. Treese
	 		 		 	
		 	Molly A. Treese	 		 		 	
		 	Chief Corporate & Governance Counsel and Assistant Secretary	 		 	
				
	Agreed and Accepted:	 		 		 	
				
	 /s/ Robert Fair
	 		 	 12/22/08
	 	
	Robert Fair	 		 	Date