alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1906 

To reduce temporarily the duty on ACM. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on ACM. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.46 (3-Acetoxy-3- 

cyanopropyl)methylphosphinic acid, 

butyl ester (CAS No. 

167004–78–6) (provided for 

in subheading 2931.00.90) .. 0.7% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1906 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Investment Spending 2003-2009**

| **Year** | **Dollars in Millions** |
|----------|-------------------------|
| 2003     | 27                      |
| 2004     | 108                     |
| 2005     | 62                      |
| 2006     | 25                      |
| 2007     | 12                      |
| 2008     | 26                      |
| 2009     | 6                       |
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer of No Show, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K
of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 and filed with the U. S.
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 14, 2008
        ----------------
                                           /s/ Doreen E. Zimmerman
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Doreen E. Zimmerman
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
[No. 21312-5-II.

Division Two.

September 19, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Torrance Mason, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-1-02144-1, D. Gary Steiner, J., entered November 4, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1456 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1456

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

 Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. 
  Andrews, and Mr. Pascrell) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Christopher Kangas Fallen 
Firefighter Apprentice Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF FIREFIGHTER TO INCLUDE APPRENTICES 
              AND TRAINEES.

    Section 1204(4) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(4)) is amended by inserting ``, regardless of 
age, status as an apprentice or trainee, or duty restrictions imposed 
because of age or status as an apprentice or trainee,'' after ``fire 
department''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect to deaths 
and injuries which occur on or after May 4, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6239

JOSEPH H. SPARKS, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-00440-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: July 31, 2015 Decided: August 18, 2015

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Rittenhouse Haywood, SHELDON, FLOOD & HAYWOOD, PLC, 

Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Benjamin Hyman Katz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph H. Sparks, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Sparks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### FINCH v. GILLESPIE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 23, 1907.)

Action by Edward C. J. Finch against Earl A. Gillespie.

No opinion. Submission dismissed, without costs, with leave to the parties to provide for judgment by an additional submission, if so advised, within 20 days.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         112,367
<SECURITIES>                                 1,370,194
<RECEIVABLES>                                  930,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,440,328
<PP&E>                                          61,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,479,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          387,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,747
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,016,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,479,987
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,805
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,669
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,819
<PP&E>                                         172,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 379,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           282
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   379,006
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,928
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  367,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 99.4

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Marchand Snyman, Chief Financial Officer of Northern
Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2016(the Annual Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                



|By:    | /s/ M. Snyman           | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|Name:  | Marchand Snyman         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 
|       |                         | 
|       |                         | 
|Date:  | March 30, 2017          | 



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Robert W. Cook, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmos Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ ROBERT W. COOK
------------------
Robert W. Cook
Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 13, 2003


                                       18
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-856]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Purisys, LLC. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 23, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before August 23, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on March, 12, 2021, Purisys, LLC., 1550 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601-1602, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
Schedule3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine
7400
I3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine
7404
I3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine
7405
IPsilocybin
7437
IPsilocyn
7438
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances for the internal use intermediates or for sale to its customers. The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled substances as clinical trial and starting materials to make compounds for distribution to its customers. No other ( print page 32977)activity for these drug codes is authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-13096 Filed 6-22-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 29, 2019

t0522 

# Order

Clerk May 29, 2019

158471

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158471

COA: 344325

Kalamazoo CC: 2016

- 000285

- FC

VICTOR PEERY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration, as on leave granted, of whether MCL 768.7a authorized the trial court to

require the sentences in this case to run consecutively with the defendant’s sentence for

violating probation in an earlier case. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall address:

(1) whether the definition of “prison” found in MCL 750.193(2) controls wheth er a

facility is a “penal or reformatory institution” for purposes of MCL 768.7a(1), even

though the two statutes appear in different codes, compare People v Johnson , 96 Mich

App 84, 86

- 88 (1980), and People v Parker , 319 Mich App 410 (2017), with People v

Washington , 501 Mich 342, 357 (2018); (2) if so, whether the Kalamazoo Probation

Enhancement Program (KPEP) falls within that definition of “prison”; and (3) if not,

whether the Legislature intended for a program like KPEP to be treated as a “penal or

ref ormatory institution” for purposes of MCL 768.7a. In all other respects, leave to

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented

should be reviewed by this Court.