Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this 

Memorandum Decision shall not be 

regarded as precedent or cited before any 

court except for the purpose of establishing 

the defense of res judicata, collateral 

estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

EUGENE C. HOLLANDER GREGORY F. ZOELLER

Special Assistant to the Office Attorney General of Indiana

of the State Public Defender

Indianapolis, Indiana MICHELLE BUMGARNER

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

JEREMY L. MUSALL, )

)

Appellant-Defendant, )

)

vs. ) No. 61A01-1208-CR-371

)

STATE OF INDIANA, )

)

Appellee-Plaintiff. )

APPEAL FROM THE PARKE CIRCUIT COURT

The Honorable Samuel A. Swaim, Judge

Cause No. 61C01-1108-MR-217

March 19, 2013

MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

BRADFORD, Judge
2

Appellant-Defendant Jeremy Musall went to the home shared by his ex-girlfriend 

Tanya Yeagley, her new boyfriend Joe Snow, and Yeagley’s and Snow’s child J.S. As 

Yeagley and J.S. watched, Musall tortured Snow by beating him severely, strangling him, 

stabbing him, and even extinguishing a lit cigarette on his eyeball. Musall then proceeded to 

rape Yeagley. At some point, Snow died from his injuries, which included a skull fracture, 

crushed windpipe, and broken ribs. When Musall discovered that Snow had died, he put the 

body into the trunk of a car with the intention of dumping it in a remote location. Musall 

took J.S. with him, ordered Yeagley to follow in another vehicle, and told Yeagley that he 

would kill J.S. if she did not. Yeagley was able to contact authorities with Snow’s mobile 

telephone, and Musall was eventually apprehended. 

The State charged Musall with murder, felony murder, two counts of Class A felony 

burglary, Class A felony rape, and Class A felony kidnapping. After a jury found Musall 

guilty as charged, the trial court sentenced him to an aggregate term of 165 years of 

incarceration. Musall contends that, in light of the nature of his offenses and his character, 

his sentence is inappropriately harsh. We think not, and therefore affirm. 

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Yeagley began dating Snow “off and on” in 2008, and the couple had a daughter 

together, J.S. Tr. p. 231. In 2011, Yeagley had a three-month romantic relationship with 

Musall, which ended in August. By August 12, 2011, Yeagley and Snow were “on” again, 

and J.S. was now twenty months old. Musall apparently became suspicious that Yeagley 

might be back with Snow, a fact Yeagley wanted to conceal from him. That evening, Musall 
3

came to the Parke County home Yeagley, Snow, and J.S. shared, asking “Where the f*** is 

Joe?” Tr. p. 237. Snow hid in a closet, and Musall left after a few minutes. Although Snow 

and Yeagley made plans to go to her mother’s home, they did not and, instead, went to sleep.

At some point, Yeagley was awakened by a loud noise and saw Snow beside her, 

unconscious and bleeding from his mouth. Musall removed his shirt, saying, “I’m gonna 

take this shirt off. I don’t want to get blood on it.” Tr. p. 241. Musall yelled “Where the 

f*** is your phone. I want your phones[,]” and although he soon found Yeagley’s telephone,

Snow’s telephone could not be located. Tr. p. 243. Meanwhile, J.S. was also awake and was 

screaming, and Snow had regained consciousness. 

Stumbling, Snow attempted to escape the bedroom, but Musall followed, saying 

“Where the f*** do you think you’re going? You think I wouldn’t f****** find you?” Tr. p. 

241. Musall caught Snow in the kitchen, punched Snow several times, and strangled him, 

saying “You’re gonna f****** die tonight.” Tr. p. 241-42. Musall returned to the bedroom, 

said to Yeagley, “F****** whore. I knew you were lying[,]” dragged her around by her hair, 

shoved her into a shelf, and punched her in the back of head several times. Tr. p. 244. 

Musall ordered Yeagley to the living room, where he made her sit on the floor in front of the 

entertainment center. 

Musall dragged the again unconscious Snow into the living room, where he straddled 

him, slapped and punched his face repeatedly, and said, “You’re all gonna f****** die 

tonight.” Tr. p. 245. At one point, when Snow fell over onto a pillow, Musall said, “Quit 

bleeding on my girls’ pillow you f****** b [,]” which prompted Yeagley to scream. Tr. 
4

p. 246. Musall came over to Yeagley and punched her three times, saying “I knew you were 

a conniving whore. This is all your fault. You’re a f** **** whore. Now you’re gonna die 

tonight.” Tr. p. 246. 

Musall lit a cigarette and drank a beer, telling Yeagley that he would have to kill 

everyone because you cannot have living witnesses. After Musall extinguished his cigarette

on Snow’s eyeball, he beat Snow with a vacuum cleaner until it broke. Musall then retrieved 

a knife from the kitchen and began stabbing Snow with it, saying, “How does that feel 

f*****? How does that f****** feel?” Tr. p. 248. Musall bound Snow with duct tape and 

the vacuum cleaner power cord. When J.S. again began screaming and crying, Musall told 

her to “shut the f*** up” and put her on the couch. Tr. p. 248. Musall then told Yeagley to 

take a shower and, while brandishing the knife, said, “If you don’t I’m gonna cut [J.S.]’s 

neck off right here with this.” Tr. p. 249. 

When Yeagley and Musall finished showering, Musall said, “You’re gonna help me 

cover up your own murder. You’re gonna wash my clothes.” Tr. p. 250. When Yeagley 

attempted to dress, Musall said, “I don’t f****** think so. I’m gonna f*** you in the a**.” 

Tr. p. 251. Musall and Yeagley had vaginal intercourse, and Musall attempted anal 

intercourse on Yeagley, performed cunnilingus on her, and made her fellate him. Musall

took several pictures of the sexual activity on his mobile telephone. When Musall attempted 

to penetrate Yeagley anally a second time, she protested, and he said, “Shut the f*** up, 

b , I will do whatever I want.” Tr. p. 252. 
5

Eventually, Yeagley received a call from work, as she had failed to report at 6:00 a.m. 

as scheduled. Musall told Yeagley to call back and tell her employer that she would not be in 

that day, and as she tried to call she heard Musall shout, “Joe’s dead.” Tr. p. 253. Musall

removed the duct tape and power cord from Snow’s corpse and wrapped it in a quilt. Musall 

told Yeagley that he was going to dispose of Snow’s body and that she needed to come as 

well. Musall planned to take J.S. with him in his vehicle with Yeagley following in hers. 

Musall told Yeagley that “if [she] didn’t stay on his a**  he would kill [J.S.] and [she] would 

never see her again[.]” Tr. p. 254. After Snow’s body was loaded, Yeagley asked if she 

could return and retrieve J.S.’s diaper bag from her home. When Yeagley returned for the 

diaper bag, she spotted Snow’s mobile telephone under a bed and concealed it in her 

underwear. As the two drove, Yeagley managed to place a call to 911. Police soon arrived, 

but Musall evaded them long enough to leave Snow’s body in a cornfield. At some point, the 

vehicle driven by Musall sustained damage in a collision. Authorities eventually found 

Musall and J.S. at his grandmother’s house in Cloverdale, with J.S. apparently physically 

unharmed. 

The causes of Snow’s death were blunt force trauma to the head and manual and 

ligature strangulation. Snow had suffered at least twenty different head and brain injuries, 

including a skull fracture, brain laceration, and multiple incisions to his face. Snow’s neck 

showed evidence of both manual and ligature strangulation, and his windpipe showed 

evidence of being crushed from the outside. In addition, Snow suffered blunt force injuries 

to his torso and extremities, fractured ribs, and several injuries that could have been knife 
6

cuts, and there was evidence that Snow had been stomped on the chest. Yeagley suffered 

multiple bruises and abrasions on her scalp, face, and ears; swelling, redness, and 

discoloration to her throat; and multiple bruises to her arms, legs, and back. 

On August 17, 2011, the State charged Musall with Count I, murder; Count II, felony 

murder; Count III, Class A felony burglary causing bodily injury to Snow; Count IV, Class A 

felony burglary causing bodily injury to Yeagley; Count V, Class A felony rape of Yeagley 

compelled by force or threat of force; and Count VI, Class A felony kidnapping of J.S. with 

the intent to use her as a human shield or hostage. On July 16, 2012, a jury found Musall

guilty as charged. On August 9, 2012, the trial court merged the conviction for Count II into 

Count I and reduced the Count III conviction to a Class B felony. The trial court sentenced 

Musall to sixty-five years of incarceration for Count I, twenty years for Count III, fifty years 

for Count IV, fifty years for Count V, and fifty years for Count VI. The trial court ordered 

that the sentences for Counts I and III be served concurrently, the sentences for Counts IV 

and V be served concurrently, and that those sentences be served consecutive to one another 

and to the sentence for Count VI, for an aggregate sentence of 165 years of incarceration. 

With respect to Count I, the trial court found the following aggravating circumstances: 

the harm to Snow was much greater than necessary to commit murder, Musall’s criminal 

record, and the crime was committed in the presence of J.S. With respect to counts IV and 

V, the trial court found the following aggravating circumstances: the harm to Yeagley was 

much greater than necessary to commit Class A felony burglary or Class A felony rape, 

Musall’s criminal record, and the crime was committed in the presence of J.S. With respect 
7

to Count VI, the trial court found, as an aggravating circumstance, that the harm to J.S. was 

far greater than necessary to commit Class A felony kidnapping. 

DISCUSSION AND DECISION

Whether Musall’s Sentence Is Inappropriate

We “may revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the trial 

court’s decision, the Court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the 

offense and the character of the offender.” Ind. Appellate Rule 7(B). “Although appellate 

review of sentences must give due consideration to the trial court’s sentence because of the 

special expertise of the trial bench in making sentencing decisions, Appellate Rule 7(B) is an 

authorization to revise sentences when certain broad conditions are satisfied.” Shouse v. 

State, 849 N.E.2d 650, 660 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006), trans. denied (citations and quotation marks 

omitted). “[W]hether we regard a sentence as appropriate at the end of the day turns on our 

sense of the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, 

and myriad other factors that come to light in a given case.” Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 

1219, 1224 (Ind. 2008). In addition to the “due consideration” we are required to give to the 

trial court’s sentencing decision, “we understand and recognize the unique perspective a trial 

court brings to its sentencing decisions.” Rutherford v. State, 866 N.E.2d 867, 873 (Ind. Ct. 

App. 2007). As previously mentioned, the trial court sentenced Musall to an aggregate 165

years of incarceration. 

Musall’s offenses are among the worst we have seen. It was not enough for the 

jealous Musall to simply kill Snow. Instead, Musall brutally and sadistically tortured Snow 
8

to death. Musall severely beat Snow with his fists and a vacuum cleaner, stomped him, 

stabbed him, choked and strangled him, bound him with duct tape, and put out a lit cigarette 

on his bare eyeball. There was never any doubt of Musall’s intent, as he said repeatedly that 

Snow was going to die that night. As if this were not bad enough, Musall committed these 

atrocities in front of Snow’s child and the mother of that child. J.S. watched as her father 

was brutally murdered and, indeed, became covered in his blood, and Yeagley watched as her 

boyfriend and the father of her child was murdered. It is difficult to imagine a more heinous

murder. 

While Snow lay dying, or perhaps already dead, Musall turned to raping Yeagley, all 

while she was helping to cover up her own murder, as Musall put it. Musall, who gave

Yeagley every reason to believe that she and J.S. themselves would soon be killed, penetrated 

her vaginally and attempted to do so anally. Musall forced Yeagley to fellate him and forced 

cunnilingus on her. Very likely J.S. witnessed, or at least was aware of, her mother’s rape. 

Yeagley had to endure the additional humiliation of knowing that the entire episode was 

being documented by Musall on his mobile telephone. After being made to watch the torture 

and murder of Snow, Yeagley was then violated in the most egregious fashion, all while 

being told that she and her daughter would soon be killed. As with Snow’s murder, it is 

difficult to image a more heinous rape. 

Musall’s treatment of J.S. is no less egregious. As Musall was killing Snow, J.S. 

slipped and fell several times in her father’s blood and cried herself to sleep at one point on a 

pillow soaked in his blood. Having already tortured her father to death, raped her mother, 
9

and threatened to “cut her neck off,” Musall kidnapped J.S. to secure Yeagley’s assistance in 

disposing of Snow’s body. Musall again threatened to kill J.S., telling Yeagley that Yeagley 

would never see J.S. again if Yeagley did not follow him on his mission. We can only hope 

that J.S. was young enough that she does not remember the horrors to which Musall 

subjected her. In summary, the nature of Musall’s offenses more than justifies enhanced and 

consecutive sentences. 

Musall’s character is no less appalling. Musall, twenty-seven years old at the time of 

the events described in this opinion, had already amassed an extensive criminal record, most 

of which is related to violence. On February 2, 2006, Musall pled guilty to Class B 

misdemeanor public intoxication, Class A misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury, and

Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct. On August 2, 2006, Musall pled guilty to Class A 

misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury, Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct, and 

Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, charges apparently arising out of two 

separate incidents. On June 6, 2007, Musall pled guilty to Class A misdemeanor domestic 

battery. On December 6, 2007, Musall pled guilty to Class A misdemeanor battery resulting 

in bodily injury and Class B misdemeanor public intoxication. On December 8, 2008, Musall 

pled guilty to Class C felony battery resulting in serious bodily injury. Musall has served 

several terms of incarceration, been found to have violated the terms of probation on five 

occasions, and been charged with fourteen additional crimes. Musall’s criminal record 

clearly indicates a pattern of violence, escalating in severity and culminating in the events at 

issue in this appeal. 
10

Musall’s character is also revealed in statements made following Snow’s murder. In a 

police interview conducted the morning of his arrest, Musall showed no remorse for what he 

had just done, referring to Snow as “a piece of s***” and a “wimp” and to himself as “a 

fighter.” State’s Ex. 3004. In a telephone call made from jail on August 20, 2011—eight 

days after Snow’s murder—Musall can be heard joking with an unidentified female about 

Snow’s death. As it happens, the car Musall was driving the morning he killed Snow 

belonged to Musall’s sister’s boyfriend. When the unidentified female caller told Musall that 

the owner of that vehicle would have to purchase a new one because of the damage it had 

sustained, Musall’s response was, “How big’s the trunk?” State’s Ex. 851-A. When told that 

he should not make jokes like that on the telephone because his calls were likely being 

recorded, Musall replied, “They already know what I did.” State’s Ex. 851-A. Musall’s 

character also justifies the imposition of enhanced and consecutive sentences. 

Justifiably, Musall received a lengthy sentence, and that aggregate sentence needs to 

be evaluated in light of the number of victims. The Indiana Supreme Court has observed that 

“when the perpetrator commits the same offense against two victims, enhanced and 

consecutive sentences seem necessary to vindicate the fact that there were separate harms and 

separate acts against more than one person.” Serino v. State, 798 N.E.2d 852, 857 (Ind. 

2003). When one considers that Musall’s crimes had three victims—one tortured to death, 

one beaten and raped, and the third used as a hostage—Musall’s 165-year aggregate sentence 

does not strike us as at all inappropriate. 

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. 
11

NAJAM, J., and FRIEDLANDER, J., concur.