alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International LeaseFinance Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: July 27, 2004
/S/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUNDVice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
-29-
In re Warren Lee HILL, Jr., petitioner.

No. 12-10469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Statement of Compliance To CapMark Finance Inc., Master Servicer of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, (see Attachment A): I, Steven Johnson, in my capacity as Managing Director of Principal Global Investors, LLC, as a Primary Servicer for mortgage loans securing securities issued in conjunction with Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, (see Attachment A), hereby state that: 1.I am an officer of Principal Global Investors, LLC; 2.I have reviewed the activities and performance of Principal Global  Investors, LLC in its capacity as Primary Servicer during the calendar year ending December 31, 2007; and 3.To the best of my knowledge, Principal Global Investors, LLC, as Primary  Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Primary Servicing Agreement for said Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, (see Attachment A) throughout the above-referenced calendar year. /s/ Steven Johnson                              Date:   2-19-08    Steven Johnson, Managing Director Principal Global Investors, LLC **Attachment A**Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Capmark Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer Series 2002 IQ-3 dated 12/1/2002  Series 2002 WL-1 dated 6/1/2002  Series 2007 HQ-11 dated 2/28/2007  Series 2007 IQ-14 dated 5130/2007  Series 2007 IQ-15 dated 8/23/2007  Series 2007 IQ-16 dated 11/27/2007
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 17, 2005/S/ Alan H. Lund
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-CV-105-JD-SLC

)

RITEWAY TRUCKING, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

On May 1, 2015, Plaintiff Prime Insurance Company filed a complaint against

Defendants, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (DE

1). In the complaint, Plaintiff, a Utah corporation with its principal place of business in Utah,

alleges that Defendant Riteway Trucking, Inc., is an Illinois corporation with its principal place

of business in Illinois; Plaintiff also alleges that “[o]n information and belief,” Defendant

Decardo Humphrey and Darnell Wright are individuals “residing” in Illinois. (DE 1 at ¶¶ 1-4).

Plaintiff’s jurisdictional allegations with respect to the individual Defendants, however,

are inadequate. First, “[a]llegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on

the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek, 472 F. Supp.

2d 1055, 1057 n.1 (S.D. Ill. 2006) (citing Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980

F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992)); see also Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No.

04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor

World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL 187411, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2003).

Second, residency is meaningless for purposes of diversity jurisdiction; an individual’s

citizenship is determined by his domicile. Dakuras v. Edwards, 312 F.3d 256, 258 (7th Cir.
2002); see Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012) (“[R]esidence

may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile—that is to say, the state in

which a person intends to live over the long run.”); Guar. Nat’l Title Co. v. J.E.G. Assocs., 101

F.3d 57, 58-59 (7th Cir. 1996) (explaining that statements concerning a party’s “residency” are

not proper allegations of citizenship as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332). Accordingly, Plaintiff

must advise the Court of the domicile of the two individual Defendants, which demonstrates

citizenship. See Chase v. Shop’n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997)

(stating that the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction bears the burden of

demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met). 

Plaintiff is ORDERED to file on or before May 19, 2015, an Amended Complaint that

properly alleges the citizenship of Defendants.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 5th day of May, 2015.

s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Continuing Abatement Order filed April 18 , 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 18
- 00741
- CV

IN RE SCOTT M. CLEAR MAN , Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No
. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 461,672


### CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER On Friday, August 24, 2018, relator Scott M. Clearman filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel respondent, the Honorable Loyd Wright , presiding judge of Probate Court No

. 1 of Harris County , to vacate his orders of July 10, 2018, and August 2, 2018, regarding relator’s motion
to quash

. Because r espondent ceased to hold the office of Judge of Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, after the institution of this action , we abated this mandamus2 proc eeding to permit respondent’s successor, the Honorable Jerry Simoneaux , to reconsider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b) ; see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland , 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former one did.”)

. Judge Simoneaux advised this court by letter that he stood by Judge Wright’s decision not to vacate the July 10, 2018 and August 2, 2018 orders. However, Judge Simoneaux did not provide this court with a signed order reflecting his ruling s regarding the relators’ request for relief

. Therefore, the abatement of this case is continued until May 3 , 2019 , by which time Judge Simoneaux shall file with this
court a signed order reflecting his rulings concerning relator’s request. This c ourt will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this proceeding, as appropriate.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00050-TLS-SLC

)

CHRISTOPHER E. COOK )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on October 31, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his

right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Chief Judge

Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and

Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 31st day of October 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00318-CAN document 1 filed 01/24/14 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00318-CAN document 1 filed 01/24/14 page 2 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00318-CAN document 1 filed 01/24/14 page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 28204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13229]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

TIME AND DATE: June 16, 1995, 10:00 am-3:00 pm.

PLACE: The Presidio, Building 135, Fisher Loop, San Francisco, 
California, 94129.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating 
capacity of the room.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors of the Corporation for 
National and Community Service will meet on June 16, 1995, to review 
reports from Committees of the Board of Directors on Corporation 
activities, review the report from the Chief Executive Officer, and to 
review the status of various Corporation initiatives. There will be a 
period devoted to public comment at the end of the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Rhonda Taylor, Associate 
Director of Special Projects and Initiatives, The Corporation For 
National Service, 8th Floor, Room 8619, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-5000 ext. 282. Fax (202 565-2794.

    Dated: May 24, 1995.
Terry Russell,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-13229 Filed 5-25-95; 1:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-M
Order entered January 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01616-CR

CHARLES FREDRICK BELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-80942-2012

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s January 7, 2014 motion to substitute counsel. Franklyn 

Mickelsen is substituted for Stephanie Hudson as appellant’s counsel of record. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send all correspondence to Franklyn Mickelsen, Broden & 

Mickelsen, 2600 State Street, Dallas, Texas 75204; telephone: (214) 720-9552; telecopier: (214) 

720-9594. 

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1766 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the determination 

and deduction of interest on qualified education loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify 

the determination and deduction of interest on qualified 

education loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF ORIGINATION FEES AND CAP4 ITALIZED INTEREST CHARGES FOR QUALI5 FIED EDUCATION LOANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 221 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special 

8 rules) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(4) LOAN ORIGINATION FEES.—For purposes 

10 of this section— 
2 

•HR 1766 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) TREATMENT AS INTEREST.—Loan 

2 origination fees, other than fees for services or 

3 property— 

4 ‘‘(i) shall be treated as interest, and 

5 ‘‘(ii) shall accrue at the time the loan 

6 origination fees are deducted from the loan 

7 proceeds or otherwise are charged to or 

8 paid by the borrower. 

9 ‘‘(B) FEES UNDER CERTAIN FEDERAL

10 PROGRAMS.—Loan origination fees required 

11 under the Federal Family Education Loan Pro12 gram and Federal Direct Loan Program under 

13 title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

14 shall be treated as interest for purposes of sub15 paragraph (A). 

16 ‘‘(5) ACCRUAL OF INTEREST.—For purposes of 

17 this section, interest on a qualified education loan 

18 (other than loan origination fees) shall accrue in ac19 cordance with the stated terms of the loan. 

20 ‘‘(6) ALLOCATION OF PAYMENTS.—For pur21 poses of this section, a payment (other than pay22 ments of collection costs, late fees, and penalties, if 

23 any) is treated— 

24 ‘‘(A) first as a payment of interest to the 

25 extent of the interest that has accrued and re-
3 

•HR 1766 IH 

1 mains unpaid as of the date the payment is 

2 due, 

3 ‘‘(B) second as a payment of any loan 

4 origination fees or capitalized interest, until 

5 such amounts have been reduced to zero, and 

6 ‘‘(C) third as a payment of principal.’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 6050S(e) 

8 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing new sentence: ‘‘The term ‘interest’ has the same 

10 meaning as when used in section 221.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years ending on or 

14 after December 31, 2005. 

15 (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR INTEREST REPORT16 ING.—The reporting under section 6050S of the In17 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to capital18 ized interest and origination fees in accordance with 

19 the amendments made by this section shall not be 

20 required for loans made prior to September 1, 2004. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11692]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

President's Export Council: Meeting of the President's Export 
Council

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a Closed Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Export Council (Council) is holding an 
Executive Committee meeting. The meeting must be closed to the public 
due to the discussion of classified material including issues regarding 
relations with our trading partners, export controls and other 
sensitive matters properly classified under Executive Order 12356. The 
Executive Committee will discuss the work of its five subcommittees, 
its communications task force and the progress made toward the goals 
agreed to at the inaugural meeting of the Council on February 13. The 
President's Export Council was established on December 20, 1973, and 
reconstituted May 4, 1979 to advise the President on matters relating 
to U.S. export trade. It was most recently renewed on September 30, 
1993, by Executive Order 12689.
    A Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions of meetings 
of the Council to the public on the basis of 5 U.S.C. 5522b (c) (1) has 
been approved in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. A 
copy of the notice is available for public inspection and copying in 
the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 6204, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 202-482-4115.

    Dates: May 18, 1995.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.
    Place: The Montpeller Room.
    Address: The Washington Court Hotel, 525 New Jersey Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.
    For Further Information Contact: Jane Siegel or Rebecca Collins 
at (202) 482-1124, President's Export Council, Room 2015B, 
Washington, D.C. 20230.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Jane Siegel,
Staff Director and Executive Secretary, President's Export Council.
[FR Doc. 95-11692 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 3(i)(d)


                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                     OF THE
                        CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO THE
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                               POWERTEL USA, INC.


         POWERTEL USA, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certifies
pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware that:

         1. The Company filed on January 22, 1997, a Certificate of Correction
to the Certificate of Amendment of POWERTEL USA, INC., (SRV number 971021082)
(the "Certificate of Correction").

         2. The Certificate of Correction was an inaccurate record of the
corporate action and is null and void AB INITIO as confirmed by an ORDER
APPROVING AND CONFIRMING DEBTOR'S FIRST AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, AS
REVISED AND AMENDED of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Nevada, Case
No: 97-30265-BMG, dated September 15, 1998.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Correction to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 25th day of
November, 1998.

                                            POWERTEL USA, INC.

                                       By:     /s/ Richard A. Cascarilla
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Richard A. Cascarilla, President