alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
I, Earl L Yager, as Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the“registrant”), hereby certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CHAD Therapeutics,Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registranthave:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date:August 11, 2004 /s/ Earl L. Yager   Earl L. Yager Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-56-TLS 

)

AMANDA J. MCBRIDE )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 52], filed on December 9, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No.52] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 6 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on December 27, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
An Update on Emerging Issues in Banking 

FDIC Introduces Quarterly 

Letter to Stakeholders

July 10, 2002 

Dear FYI Reader: 

As Chairman of the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (FDIC), I believe 

that ongoing communication with the 

institutions we supervise and insure, 

employees, and other stakeholders is 

very important. I want to keep you 

informed on how we are doing with the 

priorities we've set at the FDIC, what 

management indicators we use at the 

FDIC, and significant approved actions 

by the Board of Directors. 

The Letter to Stakeholders will be published at the end of each calendar 

quarter. It will appear in both electronic and hard-copy forms. This is just one 

of many tools we are using to communicate significant activities at the FDIC. I 

would appreciate your feedback on how to improve future editions. 

Sincerely, 

Don Powell

Chairman 

Last Updated 01/16/2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1877 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1877

      To suspend temporarily the duty on hydraulic control units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

   Mr. Camp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on hydraulic control units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNITS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.90.01      Hydraulic control   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         units designed                                                     31/2008
                         for braking
                         systems of hybrid
                         motor vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9032.89.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

TIMOTHY COLLINS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) 

v. ) No. 3:13 CV 625

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Timothy Collins, a pro se prisoner, filed two very similar habeas corpus petitions

– this one and 3:13-CV-624. Each petition attempts to challenge a prison disciplinary

proceeding which was held at the New Castle Correctional Facility on October 5, 2012.

In both petitions, Collins challenges the fact that he was found guilty of

Conspiring/Attempting /Aiding to Commit a Class A Offense in violation of 111/113.

However, because neither petition identified the number of the challenged prison

disciplinary proceedings, the court was unable to differentiate the two petitions.

As a result, he was ordered to supplement the petitions in both cases by

September 19, 2013. He did so in the other case, but not in this one. Therefore this case is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the court cannot identify what prison

disciplinary proceeding Collins is attempting to challenge. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: October 16, 2013

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 16, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60222

Summary Calendar

 

LAL RAM MUANA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA No. A78-318-165)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, AND STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Lal Ram Muana, a native and citizen of Burma,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision

to deny his application for asylum. Muana has waived the denial of

his applications for withholding of removal and relief under the

Convention Against Torture by failing to argue those issues.

Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir. 1986). 

This court will uphold the BIA’s factual finding that an alien

is not eligible for asylum if the determination is supported by
2

substantial evidence. Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir.

2002). “The substantial evidence standard requires only that the

Board’s conclusion be based upon the evidence presented and be

substantially reasonable.” Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 303 F.3d

341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks and citations

omitted). As the BIA summarily affirmed without opinion the IJ’s

decision, the IJ’s decision is the final agency determination for

judicial review. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 831-32

(5th Cir. 2003).

Muana has failed to make the requisite showing that he is

unable or unwilling to return to Burma “because of persecution or

a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion,

nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political

opinion . . . .” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); see also Jukic v. INS,

40 F.3d 747, 749 (5th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

LAFAYETTE DIVISION

ANGELA YARBROUGH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CAUSE NO. 4:15-CV-14-PPS-PRC

v. )

)

INDIANA VETERANS HOME and )

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF )

VETERANS AFFAIRS, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before me on Magistrate Judge Cherry’s Report and

Recommendation dismissing this matter on the basis of pro se Plaintiff Yarbrough’s

failure to comply with court orders or even prosecute this case. [DE 34.] Despite the

fact that this case was filed over two years ago, Yarbrough has failed to produce any

initial disclosures or discovery responses in violation of this Court’s January 11, 2017

Order compelling her to do so. [DE 25.] In its January 11, 2017 Order, the Court

explicitly warned Yarbrough that this cause of action might be dismissed if she failed to

comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Orders issued by the Court. [Id. at

2.] Despite that Order, Yarbrough failed to meet the court-ordered February 1, 2017

deadline to respond to discovery. [DE 25.] In fact, Yarbrough stated at the March 16,

2016 hearing in front of Judge Cherry that she had not even fully read the entire

discovery requests. [DE 31.]
Thereafter, the State Defendants moved to dismiss this action for lack of

prosecution. [DE 32.] On April 6, 2017, Judge Cherry issued his Report and

Recommendation recommending that I dismiss Yarbrough’s case. [DE 34.] Yarbrough

did not file any objections. Accordingly, I will ADOPT the Report and

Recommendation [DE 34] and will GRANT the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, DE 32,

and DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE this case. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: April 25, 2017.

 s/ Philip P. Simon 

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1792 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1792

 To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to authorize appropriations 
  for fiscal years 2006 through 2010 for nutrition services for older 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. LoBiondo (for himself and Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to authorize appropriations 
  for fiscal years 2006 through 2010 for nutrition services for older 
                              individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Senior Hunger Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR CONGREGATE AND HOME 
              DELIVERED NUTRITION SERVICES.

    The Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 303(b) by striking ``2001'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``2006'', and
            (2) in section 311(e) by striking ``2001'' and inserting 
        ``2006''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99
                                                                    ----------

           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                         FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 1997

Supplementary information required pursuant to section 9.4 of the partnership
agreement:

1.    Statement of cash available for distribution for the three months ended
      September 30, 1997:

       Net Loss                                                    $    (19,000)
       Add:     Depreciation and amortization                            46,000
                Cash from reserves                                        2,000
       Less:    Equity in income of Local Limited Partnerships           (2,000)
                                                                  -------------
       Cash Available for Distributions                           $      27,000
                                                                  =============
       Distributions allocated to General Partners                $       2,000
                                                                  =============
       Distributions allocated to Limited Partners                $      25,000
                                                                  =============


2.    Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
      General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
      September 30, 1997:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             Entity Receiving                                      Form of
               Compensation                                     Compensation                              Amount
             ----------------                    -------------------------------------------            -----------
<S>                                              <C>                                                    <C>
              General Partners                   Interest in Cash Available for Distribution             $  2,000

              WFC Realty Co., Inc.
              (Initial Limited Partner)          Interest in Cash Available for Distribution             $      5
</TABLE>

                                    12 of 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties V Limited Partnership Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000712753
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          76,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                (44,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         30,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,309
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,206
<EPS-BASIC>                                    22.73<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
CONSENT



To:
        Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.And to:
        Berns & Berns, Counselors at LawAnd to:
        U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission(the Securities Regulator)


Gentlemen:

RE: TECHNICAL REPORTS - BONG MIEU AND PHUOC SON GOLD PROJECTS

Reference is made to the technical report (the Technical Reports) entitled A Technical Review of the Bong Mieu Gold Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnamdated August 31, 2007, by Terra Mining Consultants and Stevens & Associates which we prepared for Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.(the Company or Olympus).

We hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Report with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure of the Technical Reports and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary thereof in the amended annual Form 20-F. We further agree to being named as an expert in the amended annual statement (Form 20-F).

Dated this 20th day of December, 2007.



Sincerely,STEVENS & ASSOCIATES/s/ M. R StevensSigned by Murray Stevens, Principal




TERRA MINING CONSULTANTS/s/ Graeme FultonSigned by Graeme Fulton, Director






---
Israel NAVA-ARELLANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6856.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael M. REVELES, petitioner, v. Lizzy TEGELS, Warden.

No. 12-10427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12785]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 22, 1995, Roche 
Diagnostic Systems Inc., 1080 U.S. Highway 202, Somerville, New Jersey 
08876, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) 
for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Drug                               Schedule  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lysergic acid diethylamide (7315).........................  I           
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)..............................  I           
Phencyclidine (7471)......................................  II          
Methadone (9250)..........................................  II          
Morphine (9300)...........................................  II          
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture very small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances which will be incorporated in drug of abuse 
detection kits.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application and may also file a written 
request for a hearing thereon in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.54 and in 
the form prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of 
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than June 26, 1995.

    Dated May 18, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-12785 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 157

  To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a 
report about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by 
    public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay 
                   inequity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a 
report about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by 
    public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay 
                   inequity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Pay Improvement Report Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. REPORT BY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

     Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, using information supplied 
by the Department of Labor, the Office of Management and Budget, and 
the General Accounting Office, shall submit a report to the Congress 
making findings and recommendations relating to how the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) has been used by public 
and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay inequities, 
especially such inequities based on an employee's gender, race, color, 
religion, or national origin, or such other factor as the Commission 
finds relevant.
                                 <all>
```