alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-45-TLS 

 ) 

RUFUS THOMAS JONES ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 47], filed on November 9, 2015. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 47] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count Two (2) of the 

Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on November 25, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1691 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1691

 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2005

    Mr. Green of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              APPLETON, WISCONSIN.

     The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton, 
Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 
and designated as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the John H. Bradley Department 
of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1897 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1897

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Flufenacet (FOE Hydroxy).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Flufenacet (FOE Hydroxy).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUFENACET (FOE HYDROXY).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.38 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Procera Networks, Inc.; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 21, 2015                        |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ James Brear                       |   |
| James Brear                           |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

----
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

DEBORAH RENAY NELSON-SEAMSTER

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 2:13CV265

MANSARDS APARTMENTS 

(Terminated 2/11/2015)

EDGEWATER SYSTEMS

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

X other: summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Edgewater Systems and AGAINST plaintiff Deborah

Renay Nelson-Seamster

.

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

X decided by Judge Jon E. DeGuilio on a motion for summary 

judgment

.

Date: June 1, 2015 CLERK OF COURT

s/T. Castillo

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00265-JD-JEM document 65 filed 06/01/15 page 1 of 1
Harry NIE, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 12-9798.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.1 (al)


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER 7

TO THE

SAUER-DANFOSS EMPLOYEES’

SAVINGS PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1997)


 


By virtue and
in exercise of the amending power reserved to Sauer-Danfoss (US) Company (the
“Company”) by Section 14.1 of Sauer-Danfoss Employees’ Savings Plan as amended
and restated effective January 1, 1997 (the “Plan”) and pursuant to the
authority delegated to the undersigned officer of the Company by the Employee
Benefits Committee of the Company, the Plan is hereby amended and, effective as
of February 1, 2003, by adding the following new Section A-10 to follow
immediately after Section A-9 of the Appendix A entitled “Application of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001:”


 


“A-10. Catch-up
Contributions.    All Employees who
are eligible to make elective deferrals under the Plan and who have attained
age 50 before the close of the Plan Year shall be eligible to make “Catch-up
Contributions” in accordance with, and subject to the limitations of, Section
4l4(v) of the Code. Such Catch-up Contributions shall not be taken into account
for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required
limitations of Sections 402(g) and 415 of the Code or for purposes of the
Matching Contribution provisions of Section 5.1(b) of the Plan. The Plan shall
not be treated as failing to satisfy the provisions of the plan implementing
the requirements of Section 401(k)(3), 401(k)(11), 401(k)(12), 410(b), or 416
of the Code, as applicable, by reason of the making of such Catch-up
Contributions.”


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Company has authorized the execution on its behalf this Amendment
Number 7, this 20th day of January, 2003.


 


 


	
   

  	
  SAUER
  DANFOSS (US) COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Kenneth D. McCuskey

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Kenneth D. McCuskey

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Vice President Finance
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,342 Roosevelt, Utah; TA-W-30,342A Denver, Colorado]


Linmar Petroleum Co.; Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    On December 13, 1994, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the former 
workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on December 27, 1994 (59 FR 66559).
    Investigation findings show that all production ceased on September 
1, 1994 when all production workers were laid off.
    U.S. imports of crude oil and natural gas increased absolutely and 
relative to domestic shipments in the first eight months of 1994 
compared to the same period in 1993.
    On reconsideration, the Department surveyed the subject firm's 
major declining customers for the relevant period. The survey findings 
show that customers accounting for a substantial portion of the subject 
firm's sales in 1994 increased their import purchases of crude oil 
while reducing their purchases from the subject firm.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the former workers of Linmar 
Petroleum Company in Roosevelt, Utah and Denver, Colorado were 
adversely affected by increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with the crude oil produced at the Linmar Petroleum 
Company.

    All workers of Linmar Petroleum Company, in Roosevelt, Utah and 
Denver, Colorado who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after August 19, 1993 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of January 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-1325 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 1 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 2 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 3 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 4 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 5 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 6 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 7 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 8 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 9 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 10 of 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00532-RLM-CAN document 1 filed 11/13/15 page 11 of 11
[No. 20787-7-II.

Division Two.

September 26, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Margaret A. Whiteford, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 95-1-00768-0, Paula Casey, J., entered May 31,1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-857]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Cambrex Charles City has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
                        **Supplementary Information**
                         listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 23, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before August 23, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on May 6, 2021, Cambrex Charles City, 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid
2010
ITetrahydrocannabinols
7370
IAmphetamine
1100
IILisdexamfetamine
1205
IIMethylphenidate
1724
IIANPP (4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine)
8333
IIPhenylacetone
8501
IICodeine
9050
IIOxycodone
9143
IIHydromorphone
9150
IIHydrocodone
9193
IIMethadone
9250
IIMorphine
9300
IIOripavine
9330
IIThebaine
9333
IIOpium extracts
9610
IIOpium fluid extract
9620
IIOpium tincture
9630
IIOpium, powdered
9639
IIOxymorphone
9652
IINoroxymorphone
9668
IIFentanyl
9801
II
 The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled substances in bulk for conversion to other controlled substances and sales to its customers for dosage form development, clinical trials and use in stability qualification studies. In reference to drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company plans to bulk manufacture this drug as synthetic. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-13252 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
ALDORIG1)INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAPR22-0005INRETHEMOTIONOFJONATHANC.WOODFORADMISSIONTOTHEBAROFTHESTATEOFMONTANAORDERJonathanC.WoodhasfiledamotionforadmissiontotheBaroftheStateofMontanapursuanttoRuleVoftheRulesforAdrnission,AdmissiononMotion.TheBarAdrnissionsAdministratoroftheStateBarofMontanahasinformedtheCourtthattheCommissiononCharacterandFitnesshascertifiedthatWoodhasprovidedthenecessarydocumentationandhassatisfiedtherequirementsprerequisitetoadmissiononmotionunderRuleV.Therefore,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatuponpaymentofanyapplicationfeesandcompletionofanyotherprocessingrequirernentsassetforthbytheBarAdmissionsAdministrator,JonathanC.WoodrnaybeswomintothepracticeoflawintheStateofMontana.ArrangementsforswearinginmaybemadebycontactingtheofficeoftheClerkoftheMontanaSupremeCourt.TheClerkisdirectedtoprovidecopiesofthisordertoPetitionerandtotheStateBarofMontana.DATEDthisIdayofFebruary,2022.ChiefJusticeFEB152022Bovvz-,,nGrc,...rivvoodClerl<ofSupremeCSat.e.ofMontanseourt02/15/2022Case Number: PR 22-0005(......AgollsoirSii1114214,....,Justices2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12

            INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
                                    AND 1999
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        2000             1999
                                                      --------         --------
                                                             (Unaudited)
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>
Earnings:
Net Income                                            $ 93,082         $ 86,648
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes                          50,468           48,529
    Fixed charges                                      207,078          188,452
  Less:
    Capitalized interest                                11,399           12,381
                                                      --------         --------
  Earnings as adjusted (A)                            $339,229         $311,248
                                                      --------         --------

Preferred dividend requirements                       $  3,362         $  4,054
Ratio of income before provision
    for income taxes to net income                         154%             156%
                                                      --------         --------
  Preferred dividend factor on pretax
    basis                                                5,177            6,324
                                                      --------         --------
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                                     174,174          157,690
  Capitalized interest                                  11,399           12,381
  Interest factor of rents                              21,505           18,381
                                                      --------         --------
  Fixed charges as adjusted (B)                        207,078          188,452
                                                      --------         --------

Fixed charges and preferred stock
    dividends (C)                                     $212,255         $194,776
                                                      --------         --------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    (A) divided by (B)                                   1.64x            1.65x
                                                      --------         --------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    and preferred stock dividends
    (A) divided by (C)                                   1.60x            1.60x
                                                      --------         --------
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.3





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No 333-150936) pertaining to the 2007 Executive Equity Incentive
Plan and the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan of FX Real Estate and
Entertainment Inc. of our report dated August 23, 2007, with respect to the
combined statements of operations, members’ equity and cash flows of Metroflag
BP, LLC, Metroflag Polo, LLC, Metroflag Cable, LLC, CAP/TOR, LLC, Metroflag SW,
LLC, Metroflag HD, LLC, and Metroflag Management, LLC (“Metroflag”) for the
period from January 1, 2007 through May 10, 2007 and our report dated
August 13, 2007, with respect to the combined statements of operations,
members’ equity and cash flows of Metroflag for the year ended December 31,
2006 included in the FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.





/s/  
      ERNST &
      YOUNG LLPLas
      Vegas, Nevada
                April 14,
      2010
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

case 3:13-cv-00072-JVB-CAN document 7-5 filed 04/05/13 page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

case 3:13-cv-00072-JVB-CAN document 7-5 filed 04/05/13 page 2 of 2
Anthony Sterling MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6731.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Deposit Insurance Fund Reserve Ratios (Fund Balances as a Percent of Insured Deposits)**

| **Month    and Year** | **Percent** |
|-----------------------|-------------|
| Sep-07                | 1.22        |
| Dec-07                | 1.19        |
| Mar-08                | 1.01        |
| Jun-08                | 0.76        |
| Sep-08                | 0.36        |
| Mar-09                | 0.27        |
| Jun-09                | 0.22        |
| Sep-09                | -0.16       |
| Dec-09                | -0.39       |