alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Lehman Mortgage Trust 2007-9 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Newport Management
    Corporation, as Sub-Contrator for Aurora Loan Services LLC, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation, as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A., as Custodian and Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as
    Sub-Contrator for Aurora Loan Services LLC.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    E. Todd Whittemore

    Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
#### WENDEL, Respondent, v. WENDEL et al., Appellants (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Actions by Georgiana G. R. Wendel, individually, etc., against John G. Wendel and others. G. F. Warren, for appellants. A. Thain, for respondent.

No opinion. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Orders filed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11446]

# SUMMARY:

The Secretary of State has determined to terminate the sanctions that were imposed, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13846, on Aoxing Ship Management (Shanghai) Ltd and Sea Charming Shipping Company Limited and remove those entities from the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) maintained by the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

# DATES:

                        The Secretary of State's determination and selection of certain sanctions to be imposed upon the two entities identified in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section was effective as of March 18, 2020. The Secretary of State's subsequent termination of sanctions with respect to those entities was effective as of June 10, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Taylor Ruggles, Director, Office of Economic Sanctions Policy and Implementation, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, tel.: (202) 647 7677, email:                         *RugglesTV@state.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On June 10, 2021, the Secretary of State determined that the sanctions that had been imposed with respect to Aoxing Ship Management (Shanghai) Ltd and Sea Charming Shipping Company Limited on March 18, 2020 pursuant to section 3(a)(iii) of E.O. 13846 were terminated as of June 10, 2021. Accordingly, Aoxing Ship Management (Shanghai) Ltd and Sea Charming Shipping Company Limited are being removed from the SDN List.

Peter Haas,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-13241 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P
#### BODDIE V. COLBURN, ET AL. SAME V. HERRIOTT, ET AL. SAME V. SIMMS, ET AL. SAME V. GASTON, ET AL.

*Cancellation of Instrument.*

(Decided June 4, 1907.)

Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court.

*670Heard before Hon. A. H. Benners.

Winkler & Moore, and A. O. Lane, for appellant.

Cabaniss & Bowie, Z. T. Rudolph, A. C. & H. R. Howze, Henry Upton Sims, and Gaston *&*Pettus, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of *Boddie v. Ward,*151 Ala. 198, 44 South. 105.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza One, Inc., (the “Company”), on Form
10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the
requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), John Holcomb, the
President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the
Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Report.




Date:
      February 18, 2010
            By:
            /s/ John HolcombJohn
      HolcombPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
              and
      Principal Financial Officer)




* This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 24, 2021.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 17, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-13155 Filed 6-17-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SECOND QUARTER 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      12,726,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,492,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     49,154,559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (30,782,213)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,492,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,730,422
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               346,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,927,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,456,346
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,456,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,456,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    47.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    47.65
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1 Pharmos Corporation
99 Wood Avenue South, Suite 311
Iselin, NJ 08830 As of January
  25, 2006 Dr. Haim Aviv 
Pharmos Ltd.
Kiryat Weizmann 
Rehovot, Israel Re: Amendment
of
Employment Agreement Dear Haim: I
am writing to confirm the decision of the Board of Directors of Pharmos
Corporation (the Company), upon the recommendation of its Compensation
Committee, to amend the Employment Agreement dated as of April 2, 2001 between
the Company and you (the Employment Agreement). Unless otherwise indicated,
capitalized terms used in this letter shall have the same meaning as when used
in the Employment Agreement. Except for the changes provided herein, the
Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect. We
have agreed to clarify the Employment Agreement to confirm that the calculation
of any severance payments to be received by you upon a termination of
employment in certain circumstances shall be based on the aggregate annual
compensation you had been receiving at the time of termination, both in the
form of base salary as an employee of the Companys Pharmos Ltd. subsidiary and
in the form of an annual consulting fee paid directly by the Company to an
entity owned by you. We have also agreed to make certain additional conforming
changes to the Employment Agreement. To that end, we have agreed to add the
following sentence at the end of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement, as
follows: When
used herein, the term Base Compensation shall mean the aggregate of the
annual salary paid to AVIV from Limited and the consulting fees paid to HA
Ventures from the Corporation. We
have also agreed to substitute the words Base Compensation for base salary
in Sections 6(d)(i),6(e)(i), 6(f)(i), 7(b) and 7(d)(ii) of the Employment
Agreement. Please
acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by signing and returning a copy of
this letter to us. PHARMOS
  CORPORATIONBy:James Meer,Senior Vice
  President andChief
  Financial OfficerAGREED AND
  ACCEPTED:Haim Aviv
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flow
International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kathryn L. Munro, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/S/ KATHRYN L.
MUNRO


Kathryn L. Munro


Principal Executive Officer


December 16, 2002
#### NATIONAL UNITED BENEFIT SAVINGS & LOAN CO. et al., Respondents, v. SABLOWSKY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by National United Benefit Savings & Loan Company and others against Abraham Sablowsky and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except FOLLEIT, J., not voting.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-cr-16-JTM-JEM

 )

BRANDON JUAN CRUZ, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT BRANDON JUAN CRUZ

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Brandon Juan Cruz’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11

of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge

John E. Martin on April 16, 2015, with the consent of Defendant Cruz, counsel for Defendant Cruz,

and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Cruz’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 11 before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Cruz under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant Cruz,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Cruz understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea

is offered;

(2) that Defendant Cruz understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Cruz understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Cruz understands that the sentencing guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Cruz has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Cruz is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Cruz understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Cruz’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Brandon Juan Cruz’s plea of guilty to the offense

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Cruz be adjudged guilty of the offense

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been

ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant Cruz be adjudged

guilty, sentencing before Senior Judge James T. Moody will be set at a later date by separate order. 

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen

(14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 17th day of April, 2015.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 1999
and the consolidated statement of operations as found on form 10q for the three
months ended February 28, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           3,881
<SECURITIES>                                    24,719
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                       371
<INVENTORY>                                      2,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,567
<PP&E>                                          14,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,053
<SALES>                                         12,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,139
<CGS>                                            4,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph Velez, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Christine Velez, et al., Appellants, v Our Lady of Victory Church et al., Respondents.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated May 6,1983, which dismissed the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case at a jury trial on the issue of liability only.

Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On October 15,1974, the then seven-year-old plaintiff lost her balance while reaching to pick up a dropped pencil. She fell as her school desk toppled over and landed on her fingers. At trial, the complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ case for failure to establish actual or constructive notice to the defendant school of the desk’s alleged propensity to tip over as testified to by a professional engineer. On this record, we can find no evidence which would warrant an inference that the defendants had any notice, actual or constructive, that the desks were defective. Accordingly, plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case *(cf. DeGeorge v City of New York,*51 AD2d 991). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING
OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
hereby certifies, to their knowledge that:  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Dated: December 10, 2004
    /s/ Steven F. Udvar-HazySTEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY Dated: December 10, 2004
    /s/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUND -10-