alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i)
        the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(ii)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 21, 2007



/s/ Colin PattersonColin PattersonChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-11068

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JONATHAN WALLACE GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CR-16-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jonathan Wallace Gomez appeals the 264-month sentence imposed 

following his convictions for carjacking and possession of a firearm in 

furtherance of a crime of violence. Gomez argues that the district court 

reversibly erred in applying the career offender enhancement, pursuant to 

U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2, to his sentence based on his Texas conviction for 

aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. Gomez urges that the Texas 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 23, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-11068 Document: 00515463005 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2020
No. 19-11068

2

aggravated assault statute is broader than generic aggravated assault and 

lacks force as an element. 

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance, correctly asserting that the issue raised on appeal is foreclosed. 

See United States v. Guillen-Alvarez, 489 F.3d 197, 200–01 (5th Cir. 2007) 

(holding that a Texas aggravated assault conviction under TEXAS PENAL CODE

§ 22.02 is a crime of violence under the former U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2); see also 

United States v. Shepherd, 848 F.3d 425, 427–28 (5th Cir. 2017) (reaffirming 

the continued validity of Guillen-Alvarez after Mathis v. United States, 136 S. 

Ct. 2243 (2016), and specifically holding that a Texas aggravated assault 

conviction is a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1 and 4B1.2); United 

States v. Gomez Gomez, 917 F.3d 332, 333–34 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed

(U.S. July 19, 2019) (No. 19-5325) (holding Texas aggravated assault qualifies 

as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) because it includes as an element 

the use of force). 

Gomez concedes that the sole issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by our 

precedent, but he seeks to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, 

summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 

F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The Government’s motion for summary 

affirmance is therefore GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief is DENIED.

 Case: 19-11068 Document: 00515463005 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2020
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-75 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
HAWKINS  ACCOUNTING
-------------------
Certified  Public Accountants and Business Consultants
Member  SEC  Practice  Sections  of  the  AICPA

1210  Homestead  Ave
Santa  Clara  ,  CA  95050
Phone:  (408)  247-3029



May 7,  2004


United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
Division  of  Corporate  Finance
450  Fifth  Street,  N.W.
Washington,  D.C.  20549

To  Whom  It  May  Concern:

We  have  read Item 8 of Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
and  dated  May  7,  2004, of OEF Corporate solutions, Inc. and are in agreement
with  the  statements  contained  therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree
with  other  statement  of  the  registrant  contained  in  the  Form  10-KSB.

Very  truly  yours,



Hawkins  Accounting
-----------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNISHA FORREST, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:15-cv-00080

)

v. ) Hon. Philip P. Simon 

)

NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., )

)

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Unisha Forrest, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby dismisses the 

above-captioned proceeding against Defendant, National Credit Systems, Inc., with prejudice

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. An answer has not been filed.

Dated: 5/7/2015 By: /s/ David B. Levin 

Attorney for Plaintiff

David B. Levin 

Illinois Attorney No. 6212141 

Licensed to Practice in the Northern District of Indiana 

Jason Allen Law LLC 

79 W. Monroe Street 

5th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Phone: (312) 940-8163 

Fax: (866) 359-7478 

dlevin@uprightlaw.com

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00080-PPS-CAN document 4 filed 05/07/15 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on 5/7/2015, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Dismissal with 

Prejudice, was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s 

electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt.

/s/ David B. Levin 

Attorney for Plaintiff

David B. Levin 

Illinois Attorney No. 6212141 

Licensed to Practice in the Northern District of Indiana 

Jason Allen Law LLC 

79 W. Monroe Street 

5th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Phone: (312) 940-8163 

Fax: (866) 359-7478 

dlevin@uprightlaw.com

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00080-PPS-CAN document 4 filed 05/07/15 page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1 PHARMOS CORPORATION
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION In connection
with the quarterly report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, ELKAN R. GAMZU, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated. This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Date: August
8, 2007 By:
/s/ ELKAN R.
  GAMZU A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Aisha Wilkes, M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (404) 639-6473; Email: *awilkes@cdc.gov.*

The meeting is closed to the public.

The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign **Federal Register** notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2021-13121 Filed 6-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
FDIC Advisory Committee of 

State Regulators 

October 14, 2020 

Discussion of State Banking Conditions 

Select Examination Trends 
FDIC 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Risk Management Trends 

Most CRE portfolios appear to be satisfactorily managed 

 More frequently cited CRE-related supervisory recommendations 

are related to: 

• Board/management oversight – concentration/policy limits, strategic 

planning. 

• Portfolio sensitivity analysis – analysis process, consideration of results. 

• Portfolio management – concentration monitoring, contingency planning. 

 Funding strategy and credit underwriting supervisory 

recommendations are less often cited; however, funding strategy 

has more often involved MRBA citation. 
FDIC 

 

 

 

 

Matters Requiring Board Attention (MRBA) Trends 

Overall, MRBA occurrences have been declining 

at satisfactorily rated institutions the past five years 

 In first half of 2020, 1 in 4 examinations of satisfactorily rated 

institutions cited MRBA(s). 

 Most MRBAs are centered around Board/management oversight 

matters: 

• Corporate governance issues like policy concerns, audit, and Board 

oversight are most prevalent. 

 Credit/lending administration MRBA occurrences remain at 

manageable levels.
NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 140

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

RODOLFO A. ESCAMILLA , A ppellant ,

v.

SHELLY HOGAN ESCAMIL LA , A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the County Court of Live Oak County, Texas



### ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant ’ s unopposed joint

motion to abate the appeal and remand to the trial court for further consideration of all

final orders therein subject of this appeal. According to the motion, the dissolution of the

injunction/restraining order entered against appellant is the subject of the appeal and2

upon entry of an agreement before the trial court, appellant will move for the appeal to be

dismissed.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the

unopposed joint motion to abate and remand , is of the opinion that the motion should be

granted. Accordingly, we hereby GRANT the motion, ABATE the appeal and REMAND

the cause t o the trial court

. The Court directs appellants to file, on or before January 21, 20 20 , either (1) a

motion to reinstate the appeal, accompanied by appellant ’s brief in this matter, or (2) a

motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

PER CURI AM

D elivered and filed the 1 2 t h day of Decemb er, 201 9

.
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Besra Gold Inc. (formerly Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.) (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:





(i)  the accompanying Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: September 17, 2013


/s/John A. G. Seton


Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
[No. 15151-4-III.

Division Three.

October 7, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Anna Maria Torres, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 95-1-00104-5, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered September 1, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Brown, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                                  Certification
                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ELXSI Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   August 20, 2004               /s/ DAVID M. DOOLITTLE
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David M. Doolittle
                                       Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ELXSI Corporation and will be retained by ELXSI Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       28
Jerry WEEKS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 13-6785.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1937 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bifenthrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bifenthrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIFENTHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.04 (2-Methyl[1,1’-biphenyl]-3- 

yl)methyl 3-(2-chloro-3,3,3- 

trifluoro-1-propenyl)–2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (Bifenthrin) (CAS No. 

82657–04–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2916.20.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1937 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
我的名字叫 Mariela,我的故事可能因此改變你的生命。

半夜我感到身體不適,但我仍 我應該待在家裡,但後來身體好 上班時,我沒有穿戴手套就直接拿取薯 當時其中一個家庭正在慶祝兒子 4 歲

決定隔天照常去上班。 轉,我當時並不曉得我的雙手已 片。 生日,他的名字是 Jose Antonio。

遍佈病菌。

Jose Antonio 很喜歡吃我送上的薯片。一 在家中養病的那幾天,來自四面八方的申訴湧進衛生局。 若時間可以倒轉,我那天絕不會選擇照常

個小時後我因又感到不適而提早請假回家 總共有 20 名客戶在我們餐廳用餐而感到身體不適,並確 上班。我自己也有小孩,我對於小小年紀

了,接下來的兩天身體都不太舒服。 定這些身體不適的顧客皆是由我服務。 的 Jose Antonio 感到無法釋懷,他因我的

疏忽承受痛苦。

為維護大眾健康,生病時請待

在家中休息。
Joan A. DEMAREST, petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 12-10134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
GERALD C. MANN ~.1\ GST3 s ('1. T.r?;rA~
A'CT"KaNmcY

~~Nm!xaAE.

AZ

## w,ki776/ Hon. Walker Carson CountyAttorney HudspGth County Sierra Blanca, Texas
Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-1967 Re: May the Commissioners'Court legally expend county funds for the hospitalization ofDeputy Sheriff shot while in line of duty?
Your request for opinion upon the above stated question has been received and carefully consideredby this department.

"Counties,being component parts of the State, have no powers or duties except those which are clearly set forth and defined in the Constitutionand statutes, The statutes have clearly defined the powers, prescribed the duties, and imposed the liabilities of the commissioners' courts, the medium throughwhich the different countiesact, and from these statutesmust come all the authority vested in the counties. "Thegrants of power to such governmental agencies as counties, townships and school distrlcts are generallymore strictly construed than those to incorporatedmunicipalities. The Commissioners'Court is not vested with any general police power......" (TexasJurisprudence,Vol. 11, Sec. 36, p. 563) "Commissioners'courts are courts of llmitea jurisdiction,in that their authority extends only to matters pertaining to the general welfare of their respective counties, and that their powers are only those expressly or lmpliedlgconferred upon theti

by law, - that Is, by the Constitutionand statutesof the State."~ (Texas Jurisprudence,Vol. 11, Sec. 37, pp. 564-565) Also see the following cases:Hon. Walker Carson, page 2 

### o-1967

Edwards County vs. Jennings, 

### 33 SW 

### 585;Seward vs. Falls County, 

### 246 SW 

### 728;Dun Vapor Electric Company vs. Reenan, 

### 30 SW 

### 868;City of Breckenridge vs. Stephens County, 

### 26 SW (2nd) 

### ,405; Scaling vs. Williams, 

### 284,SW310; Moore vs. McLennan County, 255 SW 

### 478; Hill County vs. Hamilton, 273 SW 292; Temple Lumber~Co. vs. Commissioners'Court of Sabine County, 239 SW 

### 668; Commissioners'Court vs. Wallace, 

### 15SW (2nd) 

### 535. After a most careful and exhaustive study of this questionwe have been unable to find any authority, express or implied,which would authorize the commissioners'court of your county to expend county funds for the hospitalization of a deputy sheriff shotwhile in line of duty.

You .are,therefore,respectfully advised that it is the opinion of this department that your question should be answered in the negative and it is so answered. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

By s/Wm. J. Fanning Wm. J. Fanning Assistant
WJF:AW;wc

APPROVED FEE 20, 1940 s/W. F. Moore FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Approved Opinion Comm$tteeBs s/BwB Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11676]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aircraft Flight Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

ACTION: Correction to notice of cancellation of Technical Standard 
Orders (TSO's) C51a and C84.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice was issued in Vol. 60, No. 74, on page 19443, 
Tuesday, April 18, 1995, to make the following correction:
    On page 19444 in the first column, first sentence ``Based on the 
findings of the NTSB TSO-C54a, and TSO-C81 are canceled May 18, 1995.'' 
The sentence should read ``Based on the findings of the NTSB TSO-C51a, 
and TSO-C84 are canceled May 18, 1996.''
John K. McGrath,
Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 95-11676 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M