alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

ASIA L. MARSHALL, ) 

 Plaintiff ) 

 ) 

VS ) Case No. 1:15-cv-00391-WCL-SLC 

 ) 

ALLEN COUNTY COMMUNITY ) 

CORRECTIONS, ) 

 Defendant ) 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

I, the below-signed, state that pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83-5(e), I have read and will abide by 

the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, including 

Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct Within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit. I 

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: Allen County Community Corrections. 

 BEERS MALLERS BACKS & SALIN, LLP 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Dated: February 2, 2016 BY: /s/ Laura L. Maser 

 Laura L. Maser (20335-02) 

 110 West Berry Street, Suite 1100 

 Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 

 T: (260) 426-9706 

 F: (260) 420-1314 

 
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on February 2, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and mailed by United States Postal Service, 

postage prepaid, a copy of the this document to the following non-CM/ECF participant: 

 

Asia L. Marshall 

4526 Redstone Court 

Fort Wayne, IN 46835 

 /s/ Laura L. Maser 

 Laura L. Maser 

23J4738 00015-16001
1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-4082

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Reginald Irish, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 30, 2008

Filed: July 31, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges

___________

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Irish pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court1

 sentenced Irish

to 77 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, Irish’s counsel

has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), and Irish has filed three pro se briefs. For the following reasons, we reject the

arguments that they have raised. 
-2-

First, the Second Amendment does not bar laws prohibiting felons from

possessing firearms. See Dist. of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783, 2816-17

(2008). Second, Congress did not exceed its authority or violate the Commerce

Clause when it enacted section 922(g). See United States v. Hill, 386 F.3d 855, 859

(8th Cir. 2004); United States v. Shepherd, 284 F.3d 965, 969 (8th Cir. 2002). Third,

general federal criminal laws like section 922(g) apply nationwide. See Lewis v.

United States, 523 U.S. 155, 171 (1998). Last, the required nexus between a firearm

and commerce is established by showing that the firearm at one time traveled in

interstate commerce. See United States v. Leathers, 354 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir.

2004).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. We grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw, and deny Irish’s motions for appointment of new counsel and for a writ of

habeas corpus ad testificandum. The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
#### In the Matter of Westley Primo, Respondent, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith,*105 AD2d 1142). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Forma, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ.
Shelton L. FRAZIER, petitioner, v. SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY, State of LOUISIANA.

No. 12-10593.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### Beavers *v.*The State.

*Assault and Battery With a Weapon.*

(Decided June 13, 1907.

*44*South. 401.)

1. *Criminal Lato; Appeal; Harmless Error; Admission of Evidence.*— Improper questions merely introductory to other questions, all of which latter questions were answered in the negative, if error, was harmless; and the allowing of improper questions merely introductory to another question which was not permitted to be answered, is harmless error.

2. *Assault and Battery; Evidence; Admissibility.*— The condition of the person assaulted as to age and physical infirmities, is properly admitted for the consideration of the jury in determining the amount of the fine in case, of a conviction for assault and battery.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson.

*6Joe Beavers was convicted of assault and battery with a rock upon the person of one Anderson and be appeals.

Affirmed.

■ The state was permitted to ask Fannie Corbet if she saAv the defendant that morning before the difficulty, and she Avas permitted to ansAver that she saAv him at Rorax Mill. Witness Anderson, who is also the person assaulted, was permitted to testily that he was old and infirm and had the rheumatism.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

The admission of the testimony of Corbett and Anderson with reference to statements made by the defendant, if error, were *harmless.*— Haralson *v. The*State, 82 Ala. *47; Sylvester v. The,*State, 71 Ala. 17; *Holmes v. The State,*100 Ala. 80.

SIMPSON, J.

The appellant Avas conAdcted of the offense of an assault Avith a rock upon the person of one John F. Anderson. The evidence introduced by the state tends to prove the charge in the indictment. According to the defendant’s own testimony he invited and brought on the difficulty, and “slapped dOAvn” John F. Anderson, avIio was a man 74 years of age, and slapped him again, after the old man had shoAvn that he Avas unable or utiAvilling to resent his assault.

The questions to the defendant, on cross-examination, as to his seeing Anderson’s Avife and Fannie Corbet, were only introductory to the main question as to defendant’s making offensive, remarks about said Anderson, Avhich question could Avork no injury to defendant, as he ansAvered it in the negative.

There Avas no reversible error in overruling the objections to the question to the Acitness Fannie Corbet, as they Avere merely introductory questions, for the pur*7pose of asking the main question as to Avh ether the defendant made a certain remark to Anderson’s wife, which question the witness was not allowed by the court to answer.

There Aras no error in admitting the testimony of the witness Anderson as to his physical condition at the time of the difficulty, as it was a circumstance which the jury might well take into consideration in determining the amount of the fine, if defendant should be found guilty. !

The judgment of the court is affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Haralson and Denson, JJ., concur.
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00361-JVB-JEM   document 3   filed 09/21/15   page 1 of 1
<PAGE>1


                                      				                    EXHIBIT 12


McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges



                                              Nine months ended
                                                September 30,
(Dollars in millions)                         1995          1994

Income:
  Income before taxes on income              $  45.4       $ 36.1
  Fixed charges                                 79.2         85.8
  Income before taxes on income and fixed    $ 124.6      $ 121.9
  charges

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           $  76.6       $ 83.2
  Preferred stock cash dividends                 2.6          2.6
                                             $  79.2       $ 85.8

Ratio of income before taxes on income
  and fixed charges to fixed charges             1.57         1.42
Acronyms and Abbreviations 

ACL Allowance for Credit Losses 

ADC Acquisition, Development, and Construction 

AML Anti-Money Laundering 

BSA Bank Secrecy Act 

C&I Commercial and Industrial 

Call Report Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income 

CARES Act Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act 

CISA Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 

CLO Collateralized Loan Obligation 

CPI Consumer Price Index 

CRE Commercial Real Estate 

ESG Environmental, Social, and Governance 

FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency 

FFIEC Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council 

FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank 

GDP Gross Domestic Product 

GNMA Government National Mortgage Association 

IT Information Technology 

KBW Keefe, Bruyette, and Woods (Bank Index) 

LCD Leveraged Commentary and Data (S&P) 

LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate 

2022 Risk Review | 69 
NASDAQ National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (Market Index) 

NIM Net Interest Margin 

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

ON RRP Overnight Reverse Repurchase Agreement 

OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 

PCE Personal Consumption Expenditures 

PDNA Past-Due and Nonaccrual 

PPP Paycheck Protection Program 

PPPLF Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility 

ROA Return on Assets 

S&P Standard and Poor’s (S&P 500) 

SOFR Secured Overnight Funding Rate 

TGA Treasury General Account 

USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture 

WTI West Texas Intermediate 

70 | 2022 Risk Review
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 15, 2005               /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy             STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
-31-
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS,INC.**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) byCreative Computer Applications, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned herebycertifies that to their knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and for theperiods presented in the Report.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 

 
| /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven M. Besbeck, President, Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Creative Computer Applications, Inc. and will be furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 10.37 Amendment to Promissory Note dated February 4, 2013


EXHIBIT 10.37




AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of February 9, 2015 (the “Amendment”) to the Promissory Note referred to below is entered into by and between, Sugarloaf Management, Inc., (the “Creditor”) and Jolley Marketing, Inc. (the “Debtor”).




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Promissory Note on February 4, 2013 (the “Note”);




WHEREAS, the original maturity date of the Note was February 4, 2015.




WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Note to extend the maturity date thereof.




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the receipt of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




MATURITY: The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended to February 4, 2016.




EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of this Amendment shall be February 9, 2015.




GENERAL PROVISIONS:




(a)

Except as amended hereby, the Note shall continue to be, and shall remain, in full force and effect. This Amendment shall not, except as otherwise provided herein, be deemed (i) to be a waiver of, or consent to, or a modification or amendment of, any other term or condition of the Note or (ii) to prejudice any right or rights which the parties may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Note, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.




(b)

The terms of the Note are incorporated herein by reference and shall form a part of this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed individually or by its officer thereunto duly authorized, as of the respective dates set forth below.




JOLLEY MARKETING, INC.







Date: February 9, 2015

/s/ Steve White

By Steve White, President







SUGARLOAF MANAGEMENT, INC.







Date: February 9, 2015

/s/ Brenda Hall

By Brenda Hall, Manager
#### WEISCO COMPUTERS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-14568.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 24, 2006.

Stefanie R. Shelley, Gerald F. Richman, Michael J. Napoleone, John R. Whittles, Richman, Greer, Weil, Brumbaugh, Mira-bito *&*Christensen, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gustavo J. Membiela, Ted Christopher Craig, Hunton & Williams, LLP, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DUBINA, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 12 filed 03/07/16 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 12 filed 03/07/16 page 2 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 12 filed 03/07/16 page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Anahita Villafane, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Creative Computer Applications, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  January 12, 2004 | /S/ Anahita Villafane                    |   |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Anahita Villafane                        |
|                         | Controller  and Chief Accounting Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lyndon R. Rive, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SolarCity Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SolarCity Corporation.



/s/ Lyndon R. RiveLyndon R. RiveChief Executive Officer


Date: March 27, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12864]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
[WY-920-41-5700; WYW130331]


Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

May 17, 1995.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW130331 for lands in Weston County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW130331 effective September 1, 1994, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Supervisory Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 95-12864 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27401-27402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12741]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 614, 615, and 618

RIN 3052-AB53


Loan Policies and Operations; Funding and Fiscal Affairs, Loan 
Policies and Operations, and Funding Operations; General Provisions; 
Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final 
regulation under parts 614, 615, 618 on April 24, 1995 (60 FR 20008). 
The final regulation repeals several regulations 
[[Page 27402]] concerning loan policies and operations, funding, and 
miscellaneous items as well as two Agency prior-approval requirements. 
These repeals are part of an ongoing effort by the FCA to reduce 
unnecessary regulatory burdens on Farm Credit System institutions. In 
accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 
30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register during 
which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the 
records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the 
regulations is May 24, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR parts 614, 615, 618 
published on April 24, 1995 (60 FR 20008) is effective May 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

W. Eric Howard, Policy Analyst, Regulation Development, Office of 
Examination, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, 
(703) 883-4498, TDD (703) 883-4444,

      or

Richard A. Katz, Senior Attorney, Regulatory Operations Division, 
Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 
22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TDD (703) 883-4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a) (9) and (10)).

    Dated: May 19, 1995.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12741 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P