alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1799 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1799

      To extend the duty suspension on ORGASOL polyamide powders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the duty suspension on ORGASOL polyamide powders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ORGASOL POLYAMIDE POWDERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Aaron RAISER, petitioner, v. CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, et al.

No. 12-9725.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT
32.1




PHARMOS
CORPORATION


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the quarterly report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, ROBERT
F. JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




Date:
August 12, 2009




By:
      /s/ Robert F. Johnston








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by
Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
** **

**Exhibit31.2**

**ASPYRA, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Anahita Villafane,certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Aspyra, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of thesmall business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2007 | /S/ Anahita Villafane   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    | Anahita Villafane       |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Theron Resource Group
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: September 8, 2009

/s/      Jerry
  R. Satchwell

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief
Executive Officer

---
Thomas F. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 13-7066.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**EXHIBIT 32**

May 6, 2004

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange CommissionJudiciary Plaza450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Mesa Offshore Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended  March 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely asthe trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,that to its knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Theabove certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
|   | JPMorgan Chase Bank,  Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |
|   | Mike Ulrich*Vice President and Trust Officer*         |

 

----
Todd James LUH, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 12-9488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-77 RLM

)

GARY WRIGHT )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on September 9, 2013 [Doc. No. 21].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Gary Wright’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty

of Count 2 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: September 30, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 130802-3 & (159)(160) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR WATER 

CONSERVATION, R. J. DOYLE, BARBARA 

DOYLE, JEFFREY R. SAPP and SHELLY M.

SAPP, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees, 

 SC: 130802-3 

v COA: 254202; 256153 

Mecosta CC: 01-014563-CE 

NESTLÉ WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC., 

Defendant-Appellee/ 

Cross-Appellant,

and 

DONALD PATRICK BOLLMAN and NANCY 

GALE BOLLMAN, a/k/a PAT BOLLMAN 

ENTERPRISES, 

Defendants. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiffs-appellants for leave 

to file a responsive brief and the motion by defendant-appellee for temporary admission 

to practice of Adam H. Charnes are considered, and they are GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 5, 2007 

 Clerk
#### SPANN V. THE STATE.

*Obstructing Public Road.-*

(Decided Feb. 14, 1907.)

Appeal from Geneva County Court.

Heard before Hon. P. N. Hickman.

No counsel for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., Simpson and Denson, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32**

November 14, 2006

Via EDGAR

Securities andExchange CommissionJudiciary Plaza450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:      Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Mesa Offshore Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of theTrust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust as of the dates and for theperiods presented.

Theabove certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

|          | JPMORGAN  CHASE BANK, N.A.,                                                    |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust                                                |
|     | /s/ MIKE ULRICH                                                           |
|     | Mike Ulrich                                                                    |
| * * | *Vice President,*                                                              |
| * * | The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,  as attorney-in-fact for the Trustee |

 

----
Gregory JONES, aka G, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7151.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28428-28429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13208]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following Applicant(s) have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.) [[Page 28429]] 

PRT-798900

    Applicant: Mr. Andy G. Grubbs, San Marcos, Texas.
    The Applicant requests a permit amendment to take the listed Texas 
cave invertebrates from previously unknown locations in Texas, for the 
purpose of scientific research, recovery actions, and survival of the 
species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.

PRT-802708

    Applicant: Mr. Karl Stephan, Red Oak, Oklahoma.
    The Applicant requests a permit to take the American burying beetle 
(Nicrophorus americanus) at specified locations in Oklahoma, for the 
purpose of scientific research, recovery actions, and survival of the 
species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.

PRT-802731

    Applicant: Mr. Kenneth D. Heil, San Juan College, Farmington, New 
Mexico.
    The Applicant requests a permit to take several threatened and 
endangered plant species within the San Juan Basin and drainages in 
Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah, for the purposes of scientific 
research and recovery actions, and survival of the species as 
prescribed by Service recovery documents.

PRT-802744

    Applicant: Ms. Karen Baud, The S.M. Stoller Corporation, Boulder, 
Colorado.
    The Applicant requests a permit to take southwestern willow 
flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and Mexican spotted owl (Strix 
occidentalis lucida) north of Pecos, New Mexico, for the purpose of 
scientific research and recovery actions, and survival of the species 
as prescribed by Service recovery documents.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days for 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See ADDRESSES above.)
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-13208 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Latoff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.














/s/ William S. Latoff


William S. Latoff


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-51-TLS 

)

DARNELL BONTEMPO )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 36], filed on December 30, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No.36] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on January 23, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
A photo of the late L. William Seidman, former FDIC and Resolution Trust Corporation chairman
**FDIC Expenditures 2000-2009**

| **Year** | **Dollars in Millions** |
|----------|-------------------------|
| 2000     | 1121.2                  |
| 2001     | 1043.8                  |
| 2002     | 1189.9                  |
| 2003     | 1035.4                  |
| 2004     | 1112.1                  |
| 2005     | 1052.2                  |
| 2006     | 997.6                   |
| 2007     | 1013.4                  |
| 2008     | 1230.8                  |
| 2008     | 2339.1                  |
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1816 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to protect employer rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2005 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. PAUL, Mr. WELDON of 

Florida, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. WICKER, Mr. MCHENRY, and Mr. 

SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to protect 

employer rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Employment 

5 Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that: 

8 (1) An atmosphere of trust and civility in labor9 management relationships is essential to a produc10 tive workplace and a healthy economy. 
2 

•HR 1816 IH 

1 (2) The tactic of using professional union orga2 nizers and agents to infiltrate a targeted employer’s 

3 workplace, a practice commonly referred to as ‘‘salt4 ing’’ has evolved into an aggressive form of harass5 ment not contemplated when the National Labor Re6 lations Act was enacted and threatens the balance of 

7 rights which is fundamental to our system of collec8 tive bargaining. 

9 (3) Increasingly, union organizers are seeking 

10 employment with nonunion employers not because of 

11 a desire to work for such employers but primarily to 

12 organize the employees of such employers or to in13 flict economic harm specifically designed to put non14 union competitors out of business, or to do both. 

15 (4) While no employer may discriminate against 

16 employees based upon the views of employees con17 cerning collective bargaining, an employer should 

18 have the right to expect job applicants to be pri19 marily interested in utilizing the skills of the appli20 cants to further the goals of the business of the em21 ployer. 

22 SEC. 3. PURPOSES. 

23 The purposes of this Act are— 

24 (1) to preserve the balance of rights between 

25 employers, employees, and labor organizations which 
3 

•HR 1816 IH 

1 is fundamental to our system of collective bar2 gaining; 

3 (2) to preserve the rights of workers to orga4 nize, or otherwise engage in concerted activities pro5 tected under the National Labor Relations Act; and 

6 (3) to alleviate pressure on employers to hire 

7 individuals who seek or gain employment in order to 

8 disrupt the workplace of the employer or otherwise 

9 inflict economic harm designed to put the employer 

10 out of business. 

11 SEC. 4. PROTECTION OF EMPLOYER RIGHTS. 

12 Section 8(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

13 U.S.C. 158(a)) is amended by adding after and below 

14 paragraph (5) the following: 

15 ‘‘Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as requir16 ing an employer to employ any person who seeks or has 

17 sought employment with the employer in furtherance of 

18 other employment or agency status.’’. 

Æ