alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. CAUSE NO.: 1:15-CR-33-HAB 

KELLY CUSTER 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On September 3, 2019, this Court sentenced Defendant Kelly Custer to 63 months 

of imprisonment upon her conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 1343. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Letter [ECF No. 249], 

submitted to the Court on October 10, 2019. In her Letter, Defendant asks that she be 

granted a hearing and appointed new counsel, but she does not identify any statutory or 

other legal source for the requested remedy. The essence of her complaints are as follows: 

(1) that trial counsel did not fight hard enough for her or file an appeal on her behalf (2) 

she did not receive a fair sentencing hearing because she was medicated, and (3) she has 

information about various drug houses and dealers that would be valuable to the 

Government and justify a departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. 

 As stated, this Court has already sentenced Defendant. This Court has limited 

authority to modify a defendant’s sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (“The court may not 

modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except” upon motion of the 

Director of the BOP or the defendant after exhaustion of administrative rights where 

certain factors are present, “to the extent otherwise expressly permitted by statute or by 

Rule 35,” or in accordance with a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered 
2 

by the Sentencing Commission). Defendant’s Letter does not invoke any of the bases for 

modification set forth in § 3582(c). 

 Defendant has not yet reported to the Bureau of Prisons to begin serving her 

sentence, so subsection (c)(1)(A) is inapplicable. Rule 35(a) permits correction of a 

sentence that “resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error” if the district 

court acts “[w]ithin 14 days after sentencing.” Rule 35 also allows a court, upon motion 

of the government, to reduce a sentence to reward post-sentencing substantial assistance 

to the prosecution in investigating or prosecuting another person. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). 

The sentence was imposed more than fourteen days ago, and the Government has not 

moved for a reduction due to substantial assistance. Accordingly, subsection (c)(1)(B) 

provides no grounds to modify the imposed term of imprisonment. Finally, Defendant’s 

term of imprisonment was not based on a sentencing range that has been subsequently 

lowered by the Sentencing Commission, making subsection (c)(2) inapplicable. 

For these reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s request for a hearing and 

appointment of new counsel and DENIES Defendant’s request to postpone the date by 

which she must surrender to the Bureau of Prisons as directed by the Bureau of Prisons. 

SO ORDERED on October 16, 2019. 

 

 s/ Holly A. Brady 

JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------



                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,   Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
               10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
               this report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust
               2007-16 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
               as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
               fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
               statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
               statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
               covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
               other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
               period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports;

          4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
               servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
               review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
               statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
               Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
               obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
               respects; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
               attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
               this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
               Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
               exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
               report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
               reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
          Bank of New York, as Trustee.

     Date: March 25, 2008

          /s/ Steve Bailey
          ----------------
          Steve Bailey
          Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
          (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
          Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12838]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11448]


Clean Energy Resources Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of intent to establish an advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Secretary of State announces an intent to establish the 
Department of State Clean Energy Resources Advisory Committee (the 
Committee), in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Nature and Purpose: The Committee will provide input and advice on 
major issues and problems in regard to energy minerals, their supply 
chains, and end uses, including with respect to:
    (a) The energy resources market and how it affects overall foreign 
policy;
    (b) Development of trade policy and negotiations impacting the 
competitiveness of U.S. energy minerals and associated goods and 
services;
    (c) Formulation of U.S. government policies and programs that 
directly impact the competitiveness of U.S. energy minerals and 
associated goods and services;
    (d) Identification of priority export markets for and barriers to 
trade in U.S. energy minerals and associated goods and services, both 
in the short- and long-term;
    (e) Assessing diplomatic policies and practices of foreign 
governments that impact U.S. energy minerals and associated goods and 
services;
    (f) Design of U.S. government policies and programs that support 
the development of new markets for U.S. energy minerals and associated 
goods and services in countries with high potential but that currently 
lack effective policy and market mechanisms necessary to create demand 
for energy minerals and associated goods and services; and
    (g) Responsible sourcing of energy minerals and preventing supply 
chain vulnerabilities and bottlenecks.
    Other information: It is anticipated that the Commission will meet 
at least once per year and at such other times and places as are 
required to fulfill the objectives of the Commission. The Department of 
State affirms that the advisory committee is necessary and in the 
public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Sara Ferchichi, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99fffcebfaf1f0faf1f0eaf4d9eaedf8edfcb7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d6b687f6e65646e65647e604d7e796c7968236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 436-1904.

Sara Ferchichi,
Senior Energy Officer, Bureau of Energy Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-12838 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1963 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1963

        To reduce temporarily the duty on Mesotrione Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reduce temporarily the duty on Mesotrione Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MESOTRIONE TECHNICAL.

    (a) Calendar Year 2006.--
            (1) In general.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the 
        Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by 
        inserting in numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.07.01       Mesotrione         6.04%        No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Technical - 1,3-                                                   31/2006
                         cyclohexanedione,
                         2-[4-
                         (methylsulfonyl)-
                         2-nitrobenzoyl]-
                         1,3-
                         cyclohexanedione
                         (CAS No. 104206-
                         82-8) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2930.90.10)......

            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
    (b) Calendar Year 2007.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.07.01, as added by subsection 
        (a), is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``6.04%'' and inserting ``6.08%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/
                31/2007''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2007.
    (c) Calendar Year 2008.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.07.01, as added by subsection 
        (a) and amended by subsection (b), is further amended--
                    (A) by striking ``6.08%'' and inserting ``6.11%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``12/31/2007'' and inserting ``12/
                31/2008''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

ORDER

September 21, 2017

Before

 MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Nox. 17-1683 and 17-1591

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION,

INCORPORATED, et al.,

Plaintiffs - Appellees

Cross - Appellants

v.

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellant

Cross - Appellee

 Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 3:15-cv-00463-JD

Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division

District Judge Jon E. DeGuilio

The following are before the court: 

1. VERIFIED MOTION TO RETURN DOCUMENT TO THE DISTRICT COURT

OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO MAINTAIN DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL, filed

on September 19, 2017, by counsel for the plaintiffs.

Case: 17-1591 Document: 46 Filed: 09/21/2017 Pages: 2

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 89 filed 09/21/17 page 1 of 2
Nos. 17-1683 and 17-1591 Page 2

2. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT’S RESPONSE TO MOTION, filed on 

September 21, 2017, by counsel for the defendant.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The clerk of this court shall remove

document 15 from this court's docket. The document shall be maintained under seal

in the district court. 

form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)

Case: 17-1591 Document: 46 Filed: 09/21/2017 Pages: 2

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 89 filed 09/21/17 page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FELIX GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CAUSE NO. 1:15-CV-146 WL

v. )

)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Felix Guzman Rivadeneira, a pro se detainee confined in the McHenry County Jail in

Woodstock, Illinois, filed a lawsuit in this court. This is not the first time he has filed this lawsuit

in a federal court. 

[S]ince June 10, 2015, Plaintiff has filed fifty-one nearly identical complaints in

other federal district courts throughout the United States. See

http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov. (PACER Case Locator) (last visited June 30, 2015).

Each of these courts will expend considerable time and resources to determine

how best to deal with Plaintiff’s pleading to promote justice. While making no

determination on this issue at this time, the sheer numbers and similarity of these

filings, as well as their mass mailing to fifty-two different federal courts, is at best

frivolous, at worst, malicious. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2

(9th Cir. 1995) (complaint with the same allegations as in an earlier complaint

that had been dismissed was properly dismissed under section 1915 as frivolous

or malicious); Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988)

(duplicative or repetitious litigation of virtually identical causes of action is

subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as malicious).

Rivadeneira v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 1:15-cv-231 (D. Hawaii filed June 15, 2015) order

entered July 6, 2015. 

Rivadeneira had no basis for filing this case here in the Northern District of Indiana.

Though the District Court in Hawaii found four other reasons why it was appropriate to dismiss
the lawsuit he filed there, it is sufficient here that the filing of this case in this District was

frivolous and malicious. 

For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because it is frivolous and malicious. 

SO ORDERED.

 ENTERED: July 10, 2015

 s/William C. Lee 

William C. Lee, Judge

United States District Court

2
[No. 35873-1-I.

Division One.

August 4, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stanley Ray Fagans, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-04918-2, George T. Mattson, J., entered December 22, 1994. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41007 Conference Calendar

TOMMY ALEXANDER, SR., Petitioner-Appellant,

versus R.D. MILES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CV-296-MAC-ESH

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tommy Alexander, Sr., federal prisoner # 07193-035, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his 1990 convictions on multiple drug and firearm counts that resulted in a sentence that includes concurrent terms of life imprisonment. He argues that he is entitled to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective. He also argues the merits of several claims for relief.No. 04-41007 -2- Alexander has not met his burden of showing that he meets the requirements for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He has neither pointed to a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that he may have been imprisoned for conduct that was not prohibited by law nor shown that his claims were foreclosed by circuit law at the time of his conviction, appeal, or first 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 903-04 (5th Cir. 2001).
AFFIRMED.
|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |                *August 1, 2007* |   | *               /s/ G. Anthony Busseni*             |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |   | G.                Anthony Busseni,                       |
|   |                                 |   | President                and CEO                         |
|   |                                 |   |                                                     |
| Date:  | *               8-2-07*         |   | *               /s/ Doug Carpenter*                 |
|   |                                 |   | C.                Douglas Carpenter,                     |
|   |                                 |   | Senior                Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |

----
James Watkins

Deputy Director, Risk Management Supervision

Kristie Elmquist

Regional Director, Risk Management Supervision, Dallas Region

An Online Tool to Assist in Tailoring Pre-Exam Information Requests
Why ePREP?

Bankers have expressed that request lists are too long and some items 

requested are not used during the examination

In response, FDIC developed a national tool to help examiners generate 

a tailored request list

New approach starts with a community bank focus and utilizes filters during scoping to 

ensure only necessary items are requested

Approach reinforces the need to “know your bank”

Banker contact is strongly encouraged during the pre-exam process

As a result, a significant reduction in request items was achieved during 

the pilot phase of the tool and banker feedback indicated:

The request list was tailored to their bank

The request list was shorter or (in many responses) much shorter

2
Select Exam Types

3
Sample Scoping Questions for 

Safety and Soundness

4
Sample Scoping Questions for 

Safety and Soundness

5
Sample Scoping Questions for Bank 

Security Act Examinations

6
Sample Entry Day Letter

7
Sample Safety and Soundness 

Request List

8
Selection of Attachments

9
Sample Attachment

Officer’s Questionnaire

10
An Online Tool to Assist in Tailoring Pre-Exam Information Requests

Questions?
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00361-JVB-JEM   document 5   filed 09/25/15   page 1 of 1
1 

### NUMBER 13
- 1 3
- 00 604
- CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ROY LYNN MCDAVID JR. , APPELLANT ,

v. JOHN DOE LAND AND STRUCTURE OWNER, 5701 COUGAR DRIVE, APT
- D, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78745 , APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 261st District Court of Travis County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ MEMORA NDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza , and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued b y the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C .S .).2

Appellant, Roy Lynn McDavid Jr., proceeding pro se, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 261st District Court of Travis County, Texas, in cause number

D

- 1

- GN

- 11

- 003724. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on grounds that he no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant request s that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appel lant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 1 4 th day of August , 20 1 4

.