alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Tracy A. Kern, as Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “registrant”), herebycertify that:[Conform to changes in Yager certificate](1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 19, 2007 /s/ Tracy A. Kern   Tracy A. Kern   Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13003]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 1995 / 
Notices

[[Page 27956]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Reel Livestock Center, Inc., Congerville, Illinois; Correction

    On May 10, 1995, a letter was sent requesting a notice be published 
in the Federal Register (47 FR 32177) giving notice of the proposed 
posting for certain stockyards listing their facility number, name, and 
location.
    This notice is to correct the posting number and the location 
assigned to Reel Livestock Center, Inc.
    The notice should have read.

IL-174  Reel Livestock Center, Inc., Congerville, Illinois.

Done at Washington, D.C., this 23rd day of May, 1995.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Acting Director, Livestock Marketing Division.
[FR Doc. 95-13003 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-20-P
No. 92-065 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1992 

ROBERT BENTON, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

-vsLORELLE ADAMS and MARY SCHULZE, 

Defendants and Respondents. 

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Third Judicial District, 

In and for the County of Powell, 

The Honorable Ted L. Mizner, Judge presiding. 

COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

For Appellant: 

Robert Benton, Pro Se, Deer Lodge, Montana 

For Respondent: 

Norman, C. Peterson, Agency Legal Services Bureau, 

Helena, Montana 

submitted on Briefs : June 4 , 19 9 2 

Filed: 

Decided: June 30, 1992 

j. 'a' 

'-' 

(:d 2i;;z ! 

CLE!-;;; CF 5:jp~"- !rh'iE COU 

STATE OF MONTANA 

Clerk 
Chief Justice J.A. Turnage delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Robert Benton (Benton) appeals an order of the Third Judicial 

District, Powell County, which dismissed his complaint for failure 

to state a claim against Lorelle Adams (Adams) and Mary Schulze 

(Schulze), employees of the Montana Department of Family Services. 

We affirm. 

We consolidate the issues presented on appeal to the 

following: 

Did the District Court err when it dismissed Benton's 

complaint alleging defamation and invasion of privacy against Adams 

and Schulze? 

On August 12, 1991, Benton filed a complaint against Adams and 

Schulze alleging defamation and invasion of privacy based on a 

letter Adams wrote to Benton's girlfriend. Benton's sole claim 

against Schulze is that she is Adams' supervisor. Following a 

review of the record, we hold that the District Court properly 

dismissed Benton's complaint for failure to state a claim. 

Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 

Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and 

shall be published by its filing as a public document with the 

Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to West 

Publishing Company. 
We concur: 
June 30, 1992 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the following order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the 

following named: 

Robert Benton 

700 Conley Lake Road 

Deer Lodge, MT 59722 

Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General 

Norman Peterson, Assistant 

215 N. Sanders 

Helena, MT 59620 

Bill Gianoulias, Chief Defense Counsel 

Department of Administration, Tort Claims 

Mitchell Building 

Helena, MT 59620 

ED SMITH 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

STATE OH MONTANA
Exhibit 99(a)





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Form 10-QSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I,
Harold C. Rauner, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:





|(7) |  | such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(8) |  | the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/  Harold C. RaunerHarold C. Rauner President and Chief Executive Officer




17
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gershom CANADY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-5141.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2006.

Decided: April 26, 2006.

Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender; Gretchen L. Taylor, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert E. Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gershom Canady appeals the 136-month sentence imposed after he pled guilty to eight drug offenses. He contends on appeal that his sentence is unreasonable in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We affirm.

Canady contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court allegedly failed to consider one of the factors identified at 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2005) in imposing sentence. Although the sentencing guidelines are no longer mandatory, *Booker*makes clear that a sentencing court “must consult [the] Guidelines and take them into account when” sentencing a defendant. 125 S.Ct. at 767 (Breyer, J., opinion of the Court). The court should consider the sentencing range along with the § 3553(a) factors, and then impose a sentence. *See United States v. Hughes,*401 F.3d 540, 546 (4th Cir.2005). The sentence must be “within the statutorily prescribed range and ... *214reasonable.” *Id.*at 546-17 (citations omitted).

In sentencing Canady, the district court considered the properly calculated advisory guideline range and specifically addressed several of the § 3553(a) factors. It is immaterial that the court did not discuss each factor. *See United States v. Scott,*426 F.3d 1324, 1329 (11th Cir.2005); *United States v. Davis,*53 F.3d 638, 642 (4th Cir.1995). Because the court sentenced Canady within the advisory guideline range and below the forty-year statutory maximum, *see*21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) (2000), we conclude that Ca-nady’s sentence is reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
S. Latoff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.














/s/ William S.
Latoff


William
S. Latoff


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer


August
14, 2008
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Peter Tiedemann, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on
		Form 20-F of Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report
		does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
		material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
		circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
		respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
		statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
		fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
		operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
		presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying
		officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
		controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
		15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and
		procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
		under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
		registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
		others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
		report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
		Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
		our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
		evaluation;

c. Disclosed in this report any change in
		the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
		during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or
		is reasonably





---



likely to materially affect the
		registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Companys other certifying
		officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal
		controls over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit
		committee of the Companys board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and
		material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
		financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
		Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
		information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
		involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
		Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 13, 2007/s/ Peter TiedemannPeter TiedemannChief Financial Officer






---
Twenty-Five Largest Banking Companies:

Second Quarter Net Income Dips Slightly; Asset Quality Worsens 

This document is based on publicly available information provided by the companies it covers. It is 

intended for informational purposes only and does not represent official policy or supervisory guidance 

from the FDIC. 

August 8, 2002 

The 25 largest banking companies (25 Largest) earned $14.7 billion in the second quarter of 2002, 

according to recently filed public data releases. High net interest margins and an increase in loan volume 

contributed to strong earnings which produced a return-on-assets of 1.25 percent for the group. Net 

income was 33 percent higher than year-ago levels, but 9.1 percent lower than reported in the first 

quarter of 2002. Credit quality problems continued at these institutions, with chargeoffs rising 9.1 percent 

in the first quarter to $7.5 billion and nonperforming assets rising 5.4 percent to $39.3 billion. A detailed 

discussion of overall results and information on individual companies are available in the FDIC’s report, 

Twenty-Five Largest Banking Companies.

D

The results indicate that overall large-bank earnings have remained strong in spite of the adverse effects 

of the recession that began in March 2001. While the signs of economic recovery suggest that overall 

credit quality may improve in future quarters, there remain several areas of concern. These include 

continued high rates of corporate bankruptcies and controversy over accounting and corporate 

governance issues, credit exposures in Latin America, and higher-than-expected losses in subprime 

portfolios. However, the resilient second-quarter financial performance of the 25 Largest bodes well for 

their ability to manage credit events that may accompany a challenging economic environment.
Chart 1

Net Income Strong Due to Favorable Interest Rate Environment

Quarterly Net Income for the 25 Largest Banking Companies, Dollars in Billions 

Quarter Quarterly Net 

Income

2001:Q2 $11.1

2001:Q3 $10.2

2001:Q4 $11.4

2002:Q1 $16.2

2002:Q2 $14.7
Osmel ALVAREZ, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

No. 12-8944.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1860 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1860

To amend the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 
 2005 to exempt from the means test in bankruptcy cases, for a limited 
 period, qualifying reserve-component members who, after September 11, 
   2001, are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense 
                  activity for not less than 60 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

     Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself and Mr. Jones of North Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 
 2005 to exempt from the means test in bankruptcy cases, for a limited 
 period, qualifying reserve-component members who, after September 11, 
   2001, are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense 
                  activity for not less than 60 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 101(a)(2)(C) of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and 
Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-8) is amended by adding 
at the end of paragraph (2) of section 707(b) of title 11 of the United 
States Code, as added by such Act, the following:
    ``(E) Subparagraphs (A) through (C) shall not apply, and the court 
may not dismiss or convert a case filed under this chapter based on any 
form of means testing--
            ``(i)(I) while the debtor is on, and during the 180-day 
        period beginning immediately after the debtor is released from, 
        a period of active duty (as defined in section 101(d)(1) of 
        title 10) of not less than 60 days; or
            ``(II) while the debtor is performing, and during the 180-
        day period beginning immediately after the debtor is no longer 
        performing, a homeland defense activity (as defined in section 
        901(1) of title 32) performed for a period of not less than 60 
        days; and
            ``(ii) if after September 11, 2001, the debtor while a 
        member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces or a member 
        of the National Guard, was called to such active duty or 
        performed such homeland defense activity.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on April 20, 2005.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendment made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code after April 20, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1897 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Flufenacet (FOE Hydroxy). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Flufenacet 

(FOE Hydroxy). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUFENACET (FOE HYDROXY). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.38 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Cesar QUINTERO-CALLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R.
French, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                           Textron Financial Corporation

Date: May 6, 2005                          /s/ Ted R. French
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ted R. French
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer