alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes these appeals are suitable for **

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY DORAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

7-ELEVEN, INC. DBA 7-Eleven;

SOUTHLAND CORP.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Nos. 09-55119

 09-55279

D.C. No. 8:04-cv-01125-JVS-AN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jerry Doran appeals from the district court’s orders awarding costs to

defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. and denying reconsideration in his action alleging claims

under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and state law. We have

FILED

OCT 06 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-55119

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Brown

v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1187 (9th Cir. 2001) (costs); Sch. Dist. No.

1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993)

(reconsideration). We reverse and remand.

The district court dismissed Doran’s ADA claim and concluded that

defendant was not entitled to costs because the claim was not frivolous,

unreasonable, or without foundation. See Brown, 246 F.3d at 1190. The district

court then denied Doran’s request to plead diversity jurisdiction, dismissed

Doran’s state law claims without prejudice to refiling them in federal or state court,

and awarded costs to defendant on these state law claims. The state law claims are

now pending in district court. The district court abused its discretion when it

awarded costs to defendant on the state law claims, because defendant was not a

prevailing party on these claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); cf. Miles v.

California, 320 F.3d 986, 989 (9th Cir. 2003) (defendant was prevailing party

where dismissal eliminated claim from further proceedings in federal court and

thus materially altered the legal relationship of the parties).

Doran’s unopposed request for judicial notice is granted.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2530-057]


Brookfield White Pine Hydro LLC; Notice of Waiver Period for 
Water Quality Certification Application

    On March 12, 2021, Brookfield White Pine Hydro LLC submitted to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its 
application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality 
certification filed with the Maine Department of Environmental 
Protection, in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant 
to 40 CFR 121.6, we hereby notify the Maine Department of Environmental 
Protection of the following:
    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: March 12, 2021.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year.
    Date Waiver Occurs for Failure to Act: March 14, 2022.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provide 
that, if a filing deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, holiday, or 
other day when the Commission is not open for business, the filing 
deadline does not end until the close of business on the next 
business day. 18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2020). Because the end of the 
one-year time period falls on a Saturday (March 12, 2022), the 
period is extended until the close of business on Monday, March 14, 
2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Maine Department of Environmental Protection fails or 
refuses to act on the water quality certification request by the above 
waiver date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived 
pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 
1341(a)(1).

    Dated: June 17, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-13299 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 203

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to expand 

the fruit and vegetable pilot program to 5 States, including New York, 

and to include Head Start programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to expand the fruit and vegetable pilot program 

to 5 States, including New York, and to include Head 

Start programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLE 

4 PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 18(g)(1)(B) of the Richard B. Russell Na6 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769(g)(1)(B)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘in each of 4 States (including a 

8 State’’ and inserting ‘‘or Head Start programs authorized 
2

•HR 203 IH 

1 under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.), in 

2 each of 5 States (including New York and a State’’.

Æ
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




The
      Board
      of Directors


EuroBancshares,
      Inc.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-121293) on Form S-8 of EuroBancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 16,
      2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of EuroBancshares, Inc.
      as
      of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
      changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
      each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, which
      report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of
      EuroBancshares, Inc.






/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




San
      Juan,
      Puerto Rico


March
      15,
      2007
Diana LEWIS, petitioner, v. Trina D. DORSEY, et al.

No. 12-8864.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

*2024Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, denied.
Exhibit 18.1

 

June 30, 2020

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders of Kyto Technology and Life Science, Inc.

13050 La Paloma Road

Los Altos Hills, CA 94022

 

Dear Directors:

 

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

 

We have audited the financial statements of Kyto Technology and Life Science, Inc (the “Company”) included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 and issued our report thereon dated June 30, 2020. Note 1 to the financial statements describes a change in accounting policy/method for financial statement presentation in accordance with ASC 946 as an investment company. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of presentation under ASC 946 as an investment company has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management’s determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 250, *Accounting Changes and Error Corrections*.

 

Very truly yours,
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13310]



[[Page 28602]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. GP95-7-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company v. Oxy USA, Inc.; Notice of 
Complaint

May 25, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 22, 1995, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), pursuant to Rule 206, of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206(a), filed a complaint against Oxy USA Inc., 
(Oxy).
    WNG submits that Oxy has filed a lawsuit against WNG in the 
District Court of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, Case No. CJ-95-01765 
claiming the right to certain excess royalty reimbursements on two NGPA 
Section 102 wells during periods prior to 1985 when the price of 
Section 102 gas was regulated.
    WNG states that it has already paid to Oxy the maximum lawful price 
(MLP) for such Section 102 gas. WNG requests that the Commission issue 
an order finding (a) any collection of excess royalties by Oxy from WNG 
in addition to the maximum lawful price already paid for such gas would 
violate the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, 15 USC Secs. 3311-3333; and 
(b) this is an issue within the exclusive jurisdiction of the 
Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said complaint should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.214, 385.211. All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before June 26, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. Answers to this complaint shall be 
due on or before June 26, 1995.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13310 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# L_2008281EN.01003501.xml

| 24.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2008/97/EC of 30 January 2008 amending Decision 93/52/EEC as regards the declaration that certain administrative regions of Italy are officially free of brucellosis (B. melitensis) and Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration that certain administrative regions of Italy are officially free of bovine tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis and that certain administrative regions of Poland are officially free of enzootic bovine leucosis

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 32 of 6 February 2008
  )

In Annex I to Decision 2008/97/EC:

for:

‘In Annex II to Decision 93/52/EEC, the second paragraph as regards Italy is replaced by the following:

“In Italy:

| — | Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara.

| — | Region Friuli Venezia Giulia. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Friuli Venezia Giulia.

| — | Region Lazio: Provinces of Latina, Roma. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Lazio: Provinces of Latina, Roma.

| — | ...”.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

...”.’

read:

‘In Annex II to Decision 93/52/EEC, the second paragraph as regards Italy is replaced by the following:

“In Italy:

| — | Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara.

| — | Region Friuli Venezia Giulia. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Friuli Venezia Giulia.

| — | Region Lazio: Provinces of Latina, Rieti, Roma, Viterbo. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Lazio: Provinces of Latina, Rieti, Roma, Viterbo.

| — | ...”.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

...”.’

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1889 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethoprop. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethoprop. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHOPROP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.83 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terrence Dunne, Principal Accounting Officer of Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc. Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 13, 2006



By /s/  TERRENCE DUNNE

Terrence Dunne, Principal Accounting Officer
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LINNEKIN, Appellant, v. ENNIS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 15, 1898.)

Action by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Thomas J. Linnekin, against John Ennis, as commissioner, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 46 N. Y. Supp. 444.
Patricia MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. Michael MARTINEZ, et al.

No. 13-5816.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2030 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetramethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetramethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.15 (1,3,4,5,6,7-Hexahydro-1,3- 

dioxo-2H-isoindol-2- 

yl)methyl 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2- 

methylprop-1- 

enyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate 

(CAS No. 7696–12–0) (provided for in subheading 

2925.19.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2030 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 2 3 , 2020

a0318 

# Order

Clerk March 2 3 , 2020

160196

THOMAS STOWELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 160196

COA: 348157

Ingham CC: 18

- 000025

- NO

RICHARD GROVER and JOHNICK

RESTAURANTS, INC.,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the August 12, 2019

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Flow International
Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/    Stephen R. Light    
|Stephen R. Light           
|Principal Executive Officer
|April 6, 2005              



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Stephen D. Reichenbach, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    Stephen D. Reichenbach
|Stephen D. Reichenbach       
|Principal Financial Officer  
|April 6, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that on Friday, June 18, 2021, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will be closed in observance of Juneteenth National Independence Day.

On June 17, 2021, the President of the United States signed into law the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act, establishing June 19 as a federal holiday. Because June 19, 2021, falls on a Saturday, the holiday will be observed this year on June 18, 2021.

In accordance with section 385.2007 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 385.2007 (2020), all filings and documents due to be filed on Friday, June 18, 2021, will be accepted as timely on the next official business day.

Dated: June 17, 2021.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-13297 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned  officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage  Securities Corp., a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-MS15, as follows:

     1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
[Nos. 15192-1-III; 16354-7-III.

Division Three.

October 7, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Scott Benjamin Watson, *Appellant. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of*Scott B. Watson, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Douglas County, No. 95-1-00083-9, Ted W. Small, J., entered September 19, 1995, together with a petition for relief from personal restraint. Judgment *reversed*and petition *granted*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Schultheis, JJ.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD 

NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY 

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

The State, Respondent, 

v. 

Wayland Purnell, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2017-001920 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Richland County 

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge 

Opinion No. 2019-MO-032 

Heard January 31, 2019 – Filed July 24, 2019 

 CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY 

GRANTED 

Appellate Defender Lara M. Caudy, of Columbia, for 

Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan Wilson and Assistant Attorney 

General Vann Henry Gunter, Jr. and Interim Solicitor 

Heather S. Weiss, all of Columbia, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: We granted Wayland Purnell's petition for a writ of certiorari to 

review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Purnell, Op. No. 2017-UP-272 (S.C. 

Ct. App. filed July 5, 2017). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

BEATTY, C.J., HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., and Acting Justice Paul E. 

Short, concur.