alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27545-27546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12701]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-920-05-1320-01; WYW136447]


Invitation for Coal Exploration License; Campbell County, WY

May 15, 1995.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of invitation for coal exploration license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: .Pursuant to section 2(b) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 
February 25, 1920, as amended by section 4 of the Federal Coal Leasing 
Amendments Act of 1976, 90 Stat. 1083, 30 U.S.C. 201 (b), and to the 
regulations adopted as Subpart 3410, Title 43, Code of Federal 
Regulations, all interested parties are hereby invited to participate 
with Antelope Coal Company on a pro rata cost sharing basis in its 
program for the exploration of coal deposits owned by the United State 
of America in the following-described lands in Campbell County, 
Wyoming:

T. 41 N., R. 71 W., 6th P.M., Wyoming,
    Sec. 22: Lots 2, 10;
    Sec. 23: Lots 11, 12, 14, 15;
    Sec. 27: Lots 6, 11;

    Containing approximately 33.60 acres.

    All of the coal in the above-described land consists of unleased 
Federal coal within the Powder River Basin Known Recoverable Coal 
Resource Area. The purpose of the exploration program is to conduct 
off-lease exploration by drilling.

ADDRESSES: The proposed exploration program is fully described and will 
be conducted pursuant to an exploration plan to be approved by the 
Bureau of [[Page 27546]] Land Management. Copies of the exploration 
plan are available for review during normal business hours in the 
following offices (serialized under number WYW136447): Bureau of Land 
Management, Wyoming State Office, 2515 Warren Avenue, P.O. Box 1828, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003; and, Bureau of Land Management, Casper 
District Office, 1701 East `E' Street, Casper, Wyoming 82601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of invitation will be published 
in the The News-Record of Gillette, Wyoming, Once each week for two 
consecutive weeks beginning the week of May 22, 1995, and in the 
Federal Register. Any party electing to participate in this exploration 
program must send written notice to both the Bureau of Land Management 
and Antelope Coal Company no later than thirty days after publication 
of this invitation in the Federal Register. The written notice should 
be sent to the following addresses: Antelope Coal Company, Attn: Tom 
Suchomel, Caller Box 3009, Gillette, Wyoming 82717, and the Bureau of 
Land Management, Wyoming State Office, Home Base Chief, Minerals and 
Lands Authorization Group, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY 82003.

    The foregoing is published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Title 43 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 3410.2-1(c)(1).
Michael J. Madrid,
Chief, Minerals/Lands Authorization Group, Wyoming State Office.
[FR Doc. 95-12701 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000712843
<NAME>                        ELXSI CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3,670,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        181,000
<INVENTORY>                                      11,376,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 22,407,000
<PP&E>                                           31,891,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   67,735,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10,313,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 5,000
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       46,282,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     67,735,000
<SALES>                                          23,512,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 23,512,000
<CGS>                                            18,909,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22,217,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  176,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,259,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        512,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 747,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        747,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .15
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FRIST QUARTER 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,325,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,200,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     39,284,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (29,167,117)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,200,182
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,622,833
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               155,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             430,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,036,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,036,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                524,994
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,561,612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    30.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    30.30
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael Dewayne HAYNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John W. HAVILAND, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-17755.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 7, 2011.

Gene Vorobyov, Law Office of Gene Vo-robyov, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Michael Dewayne Haynes, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Justain Riley, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael Dewayne Haynes appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2258, and we affirm.

The district court dismissed the petition because Haynes did not offer a persuasive explanation for the 18-month delay between his state habeas filings. In his opening brief, Haynes argues the petition should not have been dismissed because California’s timeliness rule is not an independent and adequate state procedural rule. That contention is foreclosed by *Walker v. Martin,*— U.S. -,- -, 131 S.Ct. 1120, 1128-31, 179 L.Ed.2d 62 (2011).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Koerner v. Grigas,*328 F.3d 1039, 1048 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 1 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 2 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 3 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 4 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 5 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 6 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 7 of 8
case 3:13-cv-01405-PPS-CAN document 1 filed 12/26/13 page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xiao Ping Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.



                                        By: /s/ Xiao Ping Zhang
                                            -------------------------------
                                        Name:     Xiao Ping Zhang
                                        Title:    Chief Executive Officer
November 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12811]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Eisenhower Professional Development Federal Activities Program--
Initial Teacher Professional Development Projects

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice of final priority for (FY) fiscal year 1995; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 1, 1995, the Secretary of Education published in the 
Federal Register (60 FR 21396) an absolute priority for a FY 1995 
competition under the Dwight D. Eisenhower Professional Development 
Federal Activities Program. On May 10, the Office of the Federal 
Register published a notice to correct errors made in that notice. The 
notice published on May 1 omitted teacher preparation from the required 
activities in the absolute priority. This document corrects that error 
on page 21396, column 3, in the paragraph labeled ``Initial Teacher 
Professional Development Projects,'' Line 13, by inserting 
``preparation,'' following the word ``teacher.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trudy Turner or Annora Dorsey, U.S. Department of Education, 555 New 
Jersey Avenue NW., Room 502, Washington, D.C. 20208-5645. Fax: (202) 
219-2106; Telephone: (202) 219-2206. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.168, Dwight D. 
Eisenhower Professional Development Federal Activities Program)

    Dated: May 17, 1995.
Sharon P. Robinson,
Assistant Secretary for Educational Research and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 95-12811 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
Exhibit 23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have
issued our report dated March 2, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of American Realty Capital
Trust, Inc. and subsidiary on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Post-effective amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement and
Prospectus of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. on Form S-11 (File No.
333-145949).
 
 /s/ Grant
Thornton LLP
 
 Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
 March 2,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 16, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 2, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 704 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-96, CP2021-
99.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-12651 Filed 6-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 (As of the date of this annual report)
 Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
 Place of Incorporation1. Global Ring Limited
    
    Hong Kong2. Well Profit Creation Limited
    
    Hong Kong3. Bright Sound Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands4. Win Bright Creation Limited
    
    Hong Kong5. Noah Education Development (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC6. Changsha Little Star Cartoon Digital Technology Ltd
    
    PRC7. Changsha High-Tech Industrial Development Zone Xingya
Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC8. Changsha Little New Star Stationery Development Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC9. Shanxi Datong Little New Star Foreign Languages School
    
    PRC10. Changsha Tianxin District Little New Star School
    
    PRC11. Changsha Tianxin District New Star English Training School
    
    PRC12. Xiangtan Yuetang District Little New Star English School
    
    PRC13. Innovative Noah Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC14. New Noah Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC15. Noah Education Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC16. Bright Sound Electronic Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC17. Shenzhen New Noah Education Investment Development Co.,
Ltd.
    
    PRC18. Beijing Haidian New Noah School
    
    PRC19. Chengdu New Noah School
    
    PRC20. Chongqing New Noah School
    
    PRC21. Beijing Noah Zhi Yuan Education Consulting Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC22. Beijing Xicheng New Noah School
    
    PRC23. Chengdu Innovative Noah Electronic Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC24. Chengdu Shidai Noah Education Software Co. Ltd.
    
    PRC25. Chengdu Zhiyuan Noah Education Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    PRC26. Chengdu Shidai Noah Information Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    PRC
 Consolidated Affiliated Entities
 Place of Incorporation1. Shenzhen Zhi Yuan Noah Internet Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC2. Changsha Leisen Education Software Co.,
Ltd.
    
    PRC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-47

)

MAURICE V. WATTS )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on December 15, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America. The Defendant waived in open Court prosecution by

indictment and consented that the proceedings may be by information rather than by indictment.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant’s waiver of indictment is knowing and voluntary;
(3) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and

his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(4) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the sentencing guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(5) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(6) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(7) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(8) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept both the defendant’s waiver of indictment and plea

of guilty and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the Information and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 15th day of December 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 20, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0246. GARY H. FISCHER v. SOUTHCOAST MEDICAL GROUP, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015V001
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Pharmos Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Haim Aviv, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906  of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1)
  The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
  The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Haim
  AvivHaim Aviv,
  Chief Executive OfficerMay 4,
  2005 24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) NO. 2:00-CR-171

) 

JASON BEST, )

)

Defendant/Petitioner. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the “Motion to Recuse Judge

Under 28 U.S.C. 144,” filed by Petitioner, Jason Best, on September

7, 2007. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED.

Best filed the instant motion to recuse pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

section 144, along with an affidavit in support. Best argues that

this Judge was biased and unfair in the handling of Best’s trial

and post-trial issues, and criticizes this Judge for making sure

that the decisions are “almost un-appealable.” In his affidavit in

support of the motion, Best criticized this Judge’s demeanor at

trial and at post-trial hearings, and the rulings on his motion to

suppress and sentencing. 

Section 144 provides that whenever a party files a “timely and

sufficient affidavit” that the judge of the party’s case has a

“personal bias or prejudice,” the case shall be assigned to a

USDC IN/ND case 2:00-cr-00171-RL-APR document 599 filed 09/19/07 page 1 of 2
2

different judge. 28 U.S.C. § 144. The bias must be personal

rather than judicial, and “[t]he facts averred must be sufficiently

definite and particular to convince a reasonable person that bias

exists; simple conclusions, opinions, or rumors are insufficient.”

United States v. Sykes, 7 F.3d 1331, 1339 (7th Cir. 1993). The

affidavit must show a personal bias “and that it stems from an

extrajudicial source- some source other than what the judge has

learned through the participation in the case.” United States v.

Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191, 1199 (7th Cir. 1985) (citation

omitted). “[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a

valid basis for a bias or partiality recusal motion.” Liteky v.

United States, 510 U.S. 540, 541 (1994). 

Best has not met the statutory requirements. First, Best’s

affidavit was not filed until well after the disposition of the

entire case, thus it is not timely. Even if it had been filed

properly, however, the affidavit exhibits no personal bias. 

Best claims that Judge Lozano must be biased because of the rulings

he has made during this case and argues it is “clear that Judge

Lozano is bending over backwards just to make sure Best don’t have

a fighting chance.” (Aff., p. 4.) The affidavit falls fart short

of showing any extrajudicial contacts, much less any personal bias.

Therefore, the Motion to Recuse is DENIED. 

DATED: September 19, 2007 /s/ RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court

USDC IN/ND case 2:00-cr-00171-RL-APR document 599 filed 09/19/07 page 2 of 2