alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.2
 
  Shareholders
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings
      Adjournments
 1




---



##### 



Quorum
 Organization
 Voting; Proxies
  Inspectors
   2




---



##### 



Fixing Date for Determination of Shareholders of Record
 List of Shareholders Entitled to Vote.
 Consent of Shareholders in Lieu of Meeting
  Board of Directors
 Powers; Number; Qualifications
 Election; Term of Office; Resignation; Removal; Vacancies
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Participation in Meetings by Conference Telephone Permitted
 Quorum; Vote Required for Action
 Organization
 4




---



##### 



Action by Directors Without a Meeting
 Compensation of Directors
  Executive and Other Committees
 Executive and Other Committees of Directors
            Officers
 Officers; Election
 5




---



##### 



Term of Office; Resignation; Removal; Vacancies
 Powers and Duties
  Forms of Certificates; Loss and Transfer of Shares
 Forms of Certificates
 Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Stock Certificates; Issuance of New
Certificates
  Records and Reports
 Shareholder Records
 6




---



##### 



By-laws
 Minutes and Accounting Records
 Inspection by Directors
 Annual Report to Shareholders
  Financial Statements
 7




---



##### 



Form of Records
  Miscellaneous
 Principal Executive or Business Offices
 Fiscal Year
 Seal
 Waiver of Notice of Meetings of Shareholders, Directors and Committees
  8




---



##### 



Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Employees
 Interested Directors; Quorum
 Amendment of By-Laws
 9
<PAGE>


                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                SIX MONTHS ENDED                            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                FEBRUARY 28 & 29,                            FEBRUARY 28 & 29,

                                                          2000              1999                     2000                   1999
                                                          ----              ----                     ----                   ----

<S>                                                  <C>                 <C>                     <C>                   <C>
AVERAGE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                       $        2.36       $         .91           $        2.37         $        .99
                                                     =============       =============           =============         ============

NET INCOME                                           $     167,109       $     333,530           $       9,777         $    290,388
                                                     =============       =============           =============         ============

Basic weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                                  3,129,342           2,920,740               3,135,758            2,920,740
                                                     -------------       -------------           -------------         ------------

Diluted effect of stock options                            396,522               5,045                 398,417              59,432
                                                     -------------       -------------           -------------         ------------

Diluted weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                                  3,525,864           2,925,785               3,534,175           2,980,172

Basic earnings per share                             $         .05       $         .11           $         .00         $       .10
                                                     =============       =============           =============         ============

Diluted earnings per share                           $         .05       $         .11           $         .00         $       .10
                                                     =============       =============           =============         ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


     Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Richard E. Staedtler, the Chief Executive Officer of Castle Energy
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

I.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the three months ended
     December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

II.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 10, 2006                           /S/RICHARD E. STAEDTLER
       ---------------------                       ---------------------------
                                                   Richard E. Staedtler
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Castle Energy Corporation and will be retained by Castle Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7397** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v.
PAUL A. LEE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:89

- cr - 00273

- FPS

- 1 )

Submitted : January 13, 2014 Decided: January 17, 2014

Before KING and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul A. Lee appeals the district court ’ s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Lee , No. 5:89

- cr - 00273

- FPS

- 1 (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 28, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), David Rickey, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant,
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: July 29, 2003 |  | /s/ DAVID RICKEY                     
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  | David Rickey, Chief Executive Officer
Charles Allen HALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8306.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN DREAS J OH N W ES LE Y S I L I T ON GA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74697 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 360- 229 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A ndr e a s J ohn W e s l e yS i l i t onga , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and p rot ec t i on un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture 

# FI LED JU N 08 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74697 2 (“ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e , W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and w e de ny th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the IJ ’ s f i nd i ng thatS i l i t on ga do es no thave a w el l -f ou nd ed fe arof future pers ec ut i on because, even i f he i s am em ber of a di s f a vor e d gr oup, he f

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e the r e qui s i t e i ndi vi dua l i z e d r i s k of p e r s e c u tio n . C

f. Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 8 6 F .3 d9 2 2 , 9 2 7 - 2 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , S ilito n g ad idn o t e s tab lis h e lig ib ilityf o ra s y lu m . S i l i t ongaha s f

a i l e d t o s e tf

orth anys ubs t ant i ve ar gum e nt s r e gar di ng the a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f

w ith h o ld in g an dC A T r e lie f . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 12 56 , 12 59 -60 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notsupp ort ed by ar gu m entar e dee m ed w ai ved). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
# L_2008056EN.01006401.xml

| 29.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/64

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION CHAD/1/2008

of 13 February 2008

on the acceptance of third States’ contributions to the European Union military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic

(2008/172/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP of 15 October 2007 on the European Union military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic (1) (Operation EUFOR Tchad/RCA), and in particular Article 10(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | At the request of the Political and Security Committee and in accordance with the tasking by the European Union Military Committee (EUMC), the EU Operation Commander and EU Force Commander held the Force Generation Conferences on 9, 14 and 21 November 2007, 19 December 2007 and 11 January 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

At the request of the Political and Security Committee and in accordance with the tasking by the European Union Military Committee (EUMC), the EU Operation Commander and EU Force Commander held the Force Generation Conferences on 9, 14 and 21 November 2007, 19 December 2007 and 11 January 2008.

| (2) | Following recommendations on a contribution from Albania by the EU Operation Commander and the EUMC, the contribution from Albania should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following recommendations on a contribution from Albania by the EU Operation Commander and the EUMC, the contribution from Albania should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Third States’ contributions

Following the Force Generation Conferences, the contribution from Albania shall be accepted for the EU military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2008.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

M. IPAVIC

---

(1)  
  OJ L 279, 23.10.2007, p. 21.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingAugust 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE CO., )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) CIVIL NO. 2:13cv212

)

HOWARD C. KINGKADE, et al. )

)

 Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

On January 27, 2014, this court entered an order directing the plaintiff, Minnesota Life

Insurance Co. (“Minnesota Life”) to file an accounting of fees and costs. On January 31, 2014,

Minnesota Life filed its “Statement of Fees and Costs”. The defendant, Howard Kingkade

(“Kingkade”) filed a response on February 13, 2014, objecting to the award of any fees and costs

to Minnesota Life.

On February 25, 2014, this court entered an order awarding Minnesota Life its request for

fees and costs and directing the remaining balance of the funds with the Clerk of Court. On

February 28, 2014, Minnesota Life deposited the balance of the funds with the Clerk of Court. 

Therefore, as Minnesota Life is no longer an interested party in this action, the court will grant

their requested dismissal [DE 14].

Conclusion

On the basis of the foregoing, Minnesota Life’s motion to dismiss [DE 14] is hereby

case 2:13-cv-00212-WCL-PRC document 26 filed 03/05/14 page 1 of 2
GRANTED.

 

 Entered: March 5, 2014.

 s/ William C. Lee 

 William C. Lee, Judge

 United States District Court

2

case 2:13-cv-00212-WCL-PRC document 26 filed 03/05/14 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 26853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12294]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 146

[Docket No. 94N-0452]
RIN 0905-AC48


Canned Fruit Nectars; Proposal to Revoke the Stayed Standard of 
Identity; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a 
proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register of April 21, 1995 
(60 FR 19866). The document proposed to revoke the standard of identity 
for canned fruit nectars. The document was published with an 
inadvertent error in the preamble section. This document corrects that 
error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nannie H. Rainey, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-158), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5099.
    In FR Doc. 95-9949, appearing on page 19866 in the Federal Register 
of Friday, April 21, 1995, the following correction is made:
    1. On page 19867, in the third column, under ``IV. Request for 
Comments'', line 2, ``June 20'' is corrected to read ``July 5''.

    Dated: May 10, 1995.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 95-12294 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
No. 06-17-0229-CR

ANTHONY WILSON, JR., § IN THE SIXTH DISTRICT

Ap p e llan t §

§

VS. § COURT OF APPEALS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

Ap p e lle e § OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Appellant, Anthony Wilson, Jr., designates Troy Hornsby as his counsel on appeal

to the Sixth District Court of Appeals.

1. Appellant, Anthony Wilson, Jr., filed a notice of appeal on December 20,

2017.

2. The Trial court appointed Troy Hornsby as appellate counsel in this matter

on January 4, 2018. A copy of that order is attached hereto as exhibit "A."

3. Appellant, under the authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1(c)

designates Troy Hornsby as counsel for this appeal.

4. The necessary information for Troy Hornsby is as follows:

Texas Bar No. 00790919

Miller, James, Miller & Hornsby, L.L.P.

1725 Galleria Oaks Drive

Texarkana, Texas 75503

troy.hornsby@gmail.com

Telephone: 903-794-2711

Facsimile: 903-792-1276

5. For these reasons, Appellant, Anthony Wilson, Jr., asks the Court to

instruct the clerk of this court to change the records to reflect that Troy Hornsby is

counsel for Appellant, Anthony Wilson, Jr., in this case on appeal.

DATED this 5 day of January, 2018. th

ACCEPTED

06-17-00229-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

1/5/2018 2:19 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/5/2018 2:19:59 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Notice of Appearance Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

Mille r, Jam e s , Mille r & Ho rn s b y , L.L.P.

By: ________________________________

 Troy Hornsby

 Texas Bar No. 00790919

1725 Galleria Oaks Drive

Texarkana, Texas 75503

troy.hornsby@gmail.com

903.794.2711, f. 903.792.1276

Attorneys for Appellant

Anthony Wilson, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance has this

5th day of January, 2018, been forwarded by the United States Postal Service regular mail

to the following:

Appellant

Anthony Wilson, Jr.

Bi-State Justice Building

100 N. State Line Ave.

Texarkana, Texas 75501

Trial Court Judge

Honorable Bobby Lockhart

102nd District Court

100 N. State Line Ave.

Texarkana, Texas 75501

State’s Attorney

Kelley Crisp

Bowie County District Attorney’s Office

601 Main Street

Texarkana, Texas 75501

Defendant’s Trial Attorney

Derric S. McFarland

McFarland Law Office

P.O. Box 1048

Texarkana, Texas 75504-1048

_______________________________

Troy Hornsby
NO: 16F0386-102

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT

VS OF

ANTHONY WILSON, JR. BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY ON APPEAL

On this the day of January, 2018, it is ORDERED that TROY HORNSBY, 1725

GALLERIA OAKS DRIVE. TEXARKANA, TEXAS 75503, practicing attorney of this Court

be and he is hereby appointed to represent the Defendants in the above referenced causes for the

purpose of APPEAL.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this 4th day of January 4'^ 2018.

JUDGB^RE^SIDING

Filed 1/4/2018 1:49 PM

Jill Harrington

District Clerk

Bowie County, Texas

Teresa Tipps, Deputy
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-cr-00044-TLS-SLC

)

CORY S. CASTETTER a/k/a )

Corey Castetter )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

September 10, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 the three-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 10th day of September 2015.

s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
#### SEROTA et al., Respondents, v. KIENDL, Appellant

(Appeal No. 1).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 6, 1913.)

Action by Charles Serota and others against Adolph ICiendl.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See, also, 142 N. Y. Supp. 1144.