alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10236

 

In The Matter of: JERRY W. BIESEL; ELIZABETH S. BIESEL

Debtors

* * * * * * * * * *

JERRY W. BIESEL; ELIZABETH S. BIESEL,

Appellants,

v.

KARL BILLINGS,

Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas, Dallas

 

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:*

Jerry W. Biesel and Elizabeth S. Biesel (Biesels) appeal from

the orders of the bankruptcy court which denied their claim that a

contract with Karl Billings (Billings) was terminated. Because of

the finding by the bankruptcy court that the contract was not
2

terminated, the bankruptcy court found the contract to be executory

at the time of the filing of the Chapter 11 case and awarded

damages to Billings resulting from the Biesels’ rejection of the

contract. On appeal, the Biesels claim that the bankruptcy court

erred in the following respects:

1) in finding that the Biesels waived the July 29, 1994

deadline for termination of the contract;

2) in finding the Biesels are estopped from asserting that

title-related problems excused performance of the

contract or was grounds for terminating the contract; and

3) in applying a higher standard to Jerry Biesel’s conduct

because he was an attorney.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record and

considered the arguments presented at oral argument and conclude

that no error requiring reversal of the bankruptcy court judgment

has been shown. We affirm essentially for the reasons set forth in

the two orders entered by the district court in the appeals of the

bankruptcy court orders at issue. See Orders of Judge Sidney

Fitzwater dated January 28, 2003 and April 24, 2002.

AFFIRMED.
---

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

TO: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

I, Eric Titley, P.Geo., do hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Report with the regulatory authorities referred to above and to the written or electronic disclosure of the Technical Report entitled Technical Report on the 2007 Program
and Update on Metallurgy and Resources for the Pebble Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Project, Iliamna Lake Area, Southwestern Alaska, USA, March 31, 2008 and to extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report as may be required by the regulatory
authorities.

I have read Northern Dynastys 2007 40F, dated March 31, 2008 and confirm that it documents fairly and accurately represent the information that supports the disclosure.

Submitted this 31st day of March, 2008. Signed,

/s/ E. TitleyEric Titley, P.Geo.Hunter Dickinson Inc.1020-800 West Pender StreetVancouver, V6C 2V6

---
Matthew John KWONG, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

No. 12-9296.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE THIRD QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,160,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,444,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     44,153,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (34,820,292)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,444,719
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (135,114)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               434,442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,052,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,622,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,622,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,803,902
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,818,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (54.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (54.67)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE
CORPORATION (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies
that:



| | (i) |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 19, 2004
    
    /S/ Steven F. Udvar-HazySTEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZYDated: February 19, 2004
    
    /S/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUND


-25-
[No. 20000-7-II.

Division Two.

October 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Corrine Pearl Lucus, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 95-1-00299-4, Robert L. Harris, J., entered October 18, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
#### ELINE, Respondent, v. ELINE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 22, 1912.)

Action by May Eline against Charles Eline. D. C. Myers, for appellant. J. V. Rooney, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1127.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                  1,739
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,739
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      23
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            (1,195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,739
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          158
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              91
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            67
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        67
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.90
        

</TABLE>
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. F. W. DEVOE *&*C. T. RAYNOLDS *CO.,*Respondent.

(Supreme court Appellate Division, Second Department,

June 6 1913.)

Action b’y Thomas Smith, an ’b Michael Smith, his guardian ad lit-em> a¿ai¿st the W. DeVoe & C. T. Raynolds Qompany.

No opinion. Order setting aside verdict unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 2

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Arthur J.
Seidenfeld certify that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
    2002 (the "Report") of Modern Technology, Corp. (the "Company"), fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

Date: October 24, 2002

                       /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                       ------------------------
                         Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                 President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, James J. Polakiewicz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A-1 of Alpha Technologies Group,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally left blank)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



/s/ James J. Polakiewicz
-----------------------------
James J. Polakiewicz
Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2004
[No. 38030-3-I.

Division One.

June 16, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jason Michael Turner, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-8-07088-6, Marsha J. Pechman, J., entered January 17, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### In re LENT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

In the matter of Smith Lent. No opinion. Reference ordered to official referee. Settle order on notice.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40575 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DONALD I. JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-96-CR-349-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Donald I. James has appealed his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting. James contends that the district court failed to comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1) & (c)(3) in accepting James’s guilty plea. The record does not show that any such noncompliance affected James’s substantial rights. See United States v. Johnson , 1 F.3d 296, 298, 302 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). The appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. Counsel areNo. 97-40575 -2- instructed to review their duties under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald F. Sopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.














/s/ Gerald F. Sopp


Gerald F. Sopp


Chief Financial Officer


August 14, 2009
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 18 , 2023.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00678

- CV

IN RE RICHARD ALAN HAASE , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 458th District Court Fort Bend County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17

- DCV

- 240399



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 14, 2023 , relato r Richard Alan Haase filed a petition for writ

of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R.
App. P. 52. In the petition, relato r a sks this Court to compel the Honorable Chad
Bridges, presiding judge of the 458th District Court of Fort Bend County

, to2 enforce a settlement agreement an d, alternatively, to continue t he trial setting, to

or der defense counsel to complete citation serv i ce, and to transfer venue.

Relator ha s not esta blished that he is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator ’ s petitio n for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Wilson.
Mission

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is an independent agency created by the Congress 

to maintain stability and public confidence in the nation’s financial system by:

■ insuring deposits,

■ examining and supervising financial institutions for safety and soundness and consumer 

protection, and 

■ managing receiverships.

Vision

The FDIC is a recognized leader in promoting sound public policies, addressing risks in the nation’s 

financial system, and carrying out its insurance, supervisory, consumer protection, and receivership 

management responsibilities.

Values

The FDIC and its employees have a tradition of distinguished public service. Six core values guide us in 

accomplishing our mission:

1. Int

We adhere to the highest ethical and professional standards.

2. C

We are a highly skilled, dedicated, and diverse workforce that is empowered to achieve 

outstanding results.

3. Team

We communicate and collaborate effectively with one another and with other regulatory agencies.

4. E

We respond quickly and successfully to risks in insured depository institutions and the 

financial system.

5. Acc

We are accountable to each other and to our stakeholders to operate in a financially responsible 

and operationally effective manner.

6. Fa

We respect individual viewpoints and treat one another and our stakeholders with impartiality, 

dignity, and trust.
Ada GARCIA-DIAZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6710.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**DIF Insurance Fund Reserve Ratio Fund Balance as a Percent of Insured Deposits**

|      | 6/05 | 9/05 | 12/05 | 3/06 | 6/06 | 9/06 | 12/06 | 3/07 | 6/07 | 9/07 | 12/07 | 3/08 | 6/08 | 9/08 | 12/08
|----- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- | -----
|1.28% | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.23  | 1.23 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.20  | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.19  | 1.01 | 0.76 | 0.40
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11619]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

 Eastside Holding Corporation, et al.; Formations of; 
Acquisitions by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than June 5, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Eastside Holding Corporation, Snellville, Georgia; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
The Eastside Bank & Trust Company, Snellville, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Keene Bancorp, Inc., 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan & 
Trust, Keene, Texas; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 27.3 
percent of the voting shares of Keene Bancorp, Inc., Keene, Texas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire 98.9 percent of the voting shares of First 
State Bank, Keene, Texas, and 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Itasca State Bank, Itasca, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 5, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11619 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Motion Granted and Order filed May 12, 2022. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00622-CV

____________

ANSON DISTRIBUTING, LLC, Appellant

V.

STARCO IMPEX, INC. AND USA MILLENNIUM, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-42352

ORDER

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion for an extension if time to file

their brief. The motion is granted. In accordance with our order of November 18, 

2021, setting a briefing schedule:

• Appellant’s combined response and reply brief is due June 6, 2022

(word count 22,500); and

• Appellees’ reply brief is due June 27, 2022 (word count 7,500).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 28437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13348]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


United States International Trade Commission

TIME AND DATE: June 2, 1995, at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Agenda for future meeting.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-700 (Final) (Disposable Lighters from the 
People's Republic of China)--briefing and vote.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: May 25, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13348 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M