alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jesus Jamie AGUILERA-GUERRA, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 13-6439.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2008022EN.01002001.xml

| 25.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 22/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 22/20

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 21 January 2008

regarding the position to be taken by the Community within the International Coffee Council on the designation of the Depository of the International Coffee Agreement 2007

(2008/75/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133(1) to (4) in conjunction with Article 300(2), second subparagraph thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The International Coffee Council at its 98th session through Resolution 431 of 28 September 2007 has adopted the text of a new International Coffee Agreement 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The International Coffee Council at its 98th session through Resolution 431 of 28 September 2007 has adopted the text of a new International Coffee Agreement 2007.

| (2) | The International Coffee Agreement of 2001 has been extended for one year from 1 October 2007 until 30th September 2008 by Resolution 432 of 28 September 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The International Coffee Agreement of 2001 has been extended for one year from 1 October 2007 until 30th September 2008 by Resolution 432 of 28 September 2007.

| (3) | Under the provisions of Article 2(10) of the International Coffee Agreement of 2007, the future Depository of the Agreement shall be designated by decision of the Coffee Council under the current International Coffee Agreement of 2001. This decision has to be taken by consensus before the 31 January 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Under the provisions of Article 2(10) of the International Coffee Agreement of 2007, the future Depository of the Agreement shall be designated by decision of the Coffee Council under the current International Coffee Agreement of 2001. This decision has to be taken by consensus before the 31 January 2008.

| (4) | The fixing of the Depository is in the interest of the European Community. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The fixing of the Depository is in the interest of the European Community.

| (5) | The European Community’s position in the International Coffee Council on this issue should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The European Community’s position in the International Coffee Council on this issue should be determined,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The European Community’s position within the International Coffee Council shall be to vote in favour of the designation of the International Coffee Organisation as the Depository of the International Coffee Agreement 2007.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2008.

For the Council

The President

I. JARC

---
**Exhibit 11**

 

**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE**

** **
|                                                          |   | **Six Months  Ended**  |     | **Three  Months Ended** |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|----------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                          |   | **February  29, 2004** |     | **February  28, 2003**  |   | **February  29, 2004** |   | **February  28, 2003** |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| AVERAGE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                                |   | $                      | 1.81     |                    | $      | 1.39 |   | $ | 1.69 |   | $ | 1.67 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| NET INCOME (LOSS)                                             |   | $                      | (181,618 | )                       | $      | 64,846 |   | $ | 72,040 |   | $ | 16,863 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic weighted average number of common  shares outstanding   |   | 3,318,900              |     | 3,269,317               |   | 3,318,900 |   | 3,272,233 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Dilutive effect of stock options                              |   | —                 |     | 192,078                 |   | 121,746 |   | 268,070 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted weighted average number of common  shares outstanding |   | 3,318,900              |     | 3,461,395               |   | 3,440,646 |   | 3,540,303 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share                               |   | $                      | (.05     | )                       | $      | .02 |   | $ | .02 |   | $ | .01 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |     |                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share                             |   | $                      | (.05     | )                       | $      | .02 |   | $ | .02 |   | $ | .01 |   |

 

----
#### STEWART, Respondent, v. AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1913.)

Action by Rosalie Stewart against the American Kennel Club. A. Benedict, of New York City, for appellant. B. C. Crowley, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to $2,500, in which event, judgment, as so modified, and order, affirmed, with costs to respondent. Settle order on notice.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 18

)

EBONY GREEN. )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY AND

 ADJUDICATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 39), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this

court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count 3 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED, and defendant

is adjudged guilty of that offense. A sentencing date will be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 5, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,372
<INVENTORY>                                     40,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,000
<PP&E>                                          64,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,396
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           149
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,847
<SALES>                                         96,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,913
<CGS>                                           56,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (332)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   186
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1534

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple fibers that are 

not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2005

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple 

fibers that are not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE 

4 FIBERS, NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR OTHER5 WISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading:
2

•HR 1534 IH 

‘‘ 9902.06.42 Synthetic staple fibers, not 

carded, combed, or otherwise 

processed for spinning: 

acrylic or modacrylic (provided for in subheading 

5503.30.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) by Aspyra,Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that to their knowledge:

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in theReport.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Steven M.Besbeck

Steven M. Besbeck,President, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aspyra, Inc. andwill be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           7,962
<SECURITIES>                                   225,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,087
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       371,322
<OTHER-SE>                                   (138,235)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,087
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,387)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         229,902
<SECURITIES>                                   788,264
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,489,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,979,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,097,901
<PP&E>                                       7,343,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,449,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,291,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       222,613
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,457,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,449,170
<SALES>                                     24,910,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       17,923,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,700,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             860,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                348,961
<INCOME-TAX>                                   221,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1






Simon & Edward, LLP

Certified Public Accountants & Consultants

A PCAOB Registered CPA Firm
17700 Castleton Street, Suite 488

City of Industry, CA 91748, U.S.A

Tel: +1 (626) 854-6500

Fax: +1 (626) 854-6505

http://www.2mycpa.com






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Xodtec LED, Inc. on Form S-8, of our report dated July 15, 2010 which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the years ended February 28, 2010 and February 28, 2009.
 
 
 
 /s/ Simon & Edward, LLP
 Simon & Edward, LLP
 December 10, 2010
**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.**

**COMPUTATIONOF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE**

**Exhibit11**

 
|                                                          | **Nine Months Ended May 31,****** | **Three Months Ended May 31,****** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                                          | **2001******                      | **2000******                       | **2001****** | **2000****** |
|                                                          |                              |                               |   |   |
| AVERAGE  MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                               | $0.57                             | $2.24                              | $0.45 | $2.08 |
|                                                          |                              |                               |   |   |
| NET  INCOME (LOSS)                                            | ($718,727)                        | ($296,482)                         | $33,225 | ($463,591) |
|                                                          |                              |                               |   |   |
| Basic  weighted average number of common shares outstanding   | 3,177,492                         | 3,141,703                          | 3,185,325 | 3,166,425 |
|                                                          |                              |                               |   |   |
| Diluted  effect of stock options                              | -                                 | -                                  | - | - |
| Diluted  weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 3,177,492                         | 3,141,703                          | 3,185,325 | 3,166,425 |
| Basic  earnings (loss) per share                              | ($.23)                            | ($.09)                             | $.01 | ($.15) |
| Diluted  earnings (loss) per share                            | ($.23)                            | ($.09)                             | $.01 | ($.15) |
#### Zeiad SALMAN, a.k.a. Zeian Issa Salmam, a.k.a. Zeiad Issa Salman, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-72120.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 7, 2011.

Zeiad Salman, Marysville, CA, pro se.

Allison Frayer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Zeiad Salman, a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence, *see Zheng v. Ashcroft,*332 F.3d 1186, 1193 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Salman did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the Jordanian government. *See id.*at 1194 (acquiescence includes “both actual knowledge and willful blindness”).

Salman’s contention that the agency did not consider all of the evidence fails, because he has not overcome the presumption the agency reviewed the record. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.2006).

To the extent Salman contends ineffective assistance of counsel, this court lacks *790jurisdiction to review the claim because it was not exhausted before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

Finally, to the extent Salman relies on letters from his family in his opening brief, we decline to consider the evidence because our review of the BIA’s order is limited to the administrative record. *See Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-130]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 612

RIN 3052-AB47


Personnel Administration; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final 
regulation under part 612 on May 13, 1994 (59 FR 24889). The final 
regulation amends 12 CFR part 612 to reflect statutory changes and the 
change in focus of the FCA's regulatory oversight of personnel matters. 
In addition, the final rule enhances and clarifies the regulations to 
ensure that they fulfill the purposes of section 514 of the Farm Credit 
Banks and Associations Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 relative to the 
reporting of financial information and potential conflicts of interest. 
In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule 
is 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register during 
which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the 
records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the 
regulations is December 31, 1994.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 612 published on 
May 13, 1994 (59 FR 24889) is effective December 31, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John J. Hays, Policy Analyst, Policy Development and Planning Division, 
Office of Examination, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 
22102-5090, (703) 883-4498, TDD (703) 883-4444, or
Dorothy J. Acosta, Assistant General Counsel, Regulatory Operations 
Division, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, 
McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TDD (703) 883-4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: December 29, 1994.
Floyd Fithian,
Acting Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 95-130 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 131

)

EDDIE PIMPTON. )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY AND

 ADJUDICATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 19), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this

court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED, and defendant

is adjudged guilty of that offense. A sentencing date will be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 5, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT