27552 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–12633 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–C
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices 27553

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Final Rock Creek Tennis Stadium

Environment Impact Statement,

Washington, DC

AGENCY: National Park Service (Interior).

ACTION: Notice to distribute the final

environmental impact statement.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Council on

Environmental Quality regulations and

National Park Service policy, the

National Park Service (NPS) announces

the release of the Final Environmental

Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Rock

Creek Tennis Stadium. The FEIS

presents the NPS preferred alternative

for future management and use of the

Rock Creek Tennis Stadium. The

preferred alternative, Alternative 2,

allows for only one professional tennis

tournament a year, in addition to

amateur and league tennis events.

Mitigation to relieve the park and

surrounding neighborhood of parking

and traffic congestion will be required

for every professional tennis

tournament. At a minimum, mitigation

will include elimination of parking on

turf areas in the park, measures to

prevent tournament related parking on

neighborhood streets, use of remote

parking and shuttle buses, and

dedication of some existing paved

parking areas in the park for shuttle bus

loading and storage. No major physical

alterations to the park for buses or

parking are proposed.

ADDRESSES: For copies of the FEIS,

please contact: Superintendent Rock

Creek Park, 3545 Williamsburg Lane,

Washington, DC 20008. Copies can also

be reviewed at the Rock Creek Park

Nature Center.

The responsible official is Mr. Robert

G. Stanton, Regional Director, National

Capitol Region, National Park Service,

1100 Ohio Drive, SW., Washington, DC

20242.

A final public record of decision will

be released stating the NPS selected

alternative, environmental mitigation

strategies adopted, and the rationale for

the decisions no sooner than 30 days

from the publication of this notice.

Dated: May 18, 1995.

Terry R. Carlstrom,

Acting Regional Director, National Capital

Region.

[FR Doc. 95–12624 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–M

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

Investigation No. 337–TA–375

Certain Clog Style Articles of

Footwear; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

April 18, 1995, under section 337 of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19

U.S.C. § 1337, on behalf of R. G. Barry

Corporation, 13405 Yarmouth Road,

N.W., Pickerington, Ohio 43147. A

supplement to the complaint dated May

8, 1995 was filed on May 10, 1995. The

complaint, as supplemented, alleges a

violation of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, and the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain clog style articles of footwear by

reason of alleged infringement of claims

1–5 of U.S. Letters Patent 5,392,532, and

that there exists an industry in the

United States as required by subsection

(a)(2) of section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a full investigation, issue a

permanent exclusion order and

permanent cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–1802. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven A. Glazer, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2577.

AUTHORITY: The authority for institution

of this investigation is contained in

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, and in § 210.10 of the

Commission’s Final Rules of Practice

and Procedure, 59 Fed. Reg. 39020,

39043 (August 1, 1994).

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

May 16, 1995, Ordered That —

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain clog style articles

of footwear by reason of alleged

infringement of claims 1–5 of U.S.

Letters Patent 5,392,532, and whether

there exists an industry in the United

States as required by subsection (a)(2) of

section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—R. G. Barry

Corporation, 13405 Yarmouth Road,

N.W., Pickerington, Ohio 43147

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Mervyn’s, Inc., 25001 Industrial Blvd.,

P.O. Box 5020, Hayward, CA 94545–

2801

S. Goldberg & Co., Inc., 20 E. Broadway,

Hackensack, NJ 07601.

(c) Steven A. Glazer, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street SW., Room 401K, Washington,

D.C. 20436, who shall be the

Commission investigative attorney,

party to this investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

Janet D. Saxon, Chief Administrative

Law Judge, U.S. International Trade

Commission, shall designate the

presiding Administrative Law Judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with § 210.13 of the

Commission’s Final Rules of Practice

and Procedure, 59 FR 39020, 39045

(August 1, 1994). Pursuant to 19 CFR

201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s Final Rules, 59 FR at

39045, such responses will be

considered by the Commission if

received not later than 20 days after the

date of service by the Commission of the

complaint and notice of investigation.

Extensions of time for submitting

responses to the complaint will not be

granted unless good cause therefor is

shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this