alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12594]



[Order No. 741]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Merck, Sharp & Dohme 
Quimica de Puerto Rico, Inc. (Pharmaceuticals); Arecibo, Puerto Rico

    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment *** of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;

    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;

    Whereas, an application from the Commercial and Farm Credit and 
Development Corporation of Puerto Rico, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 
61, for authority to establish special-purpose subzone status at the 
pharmaceutical manufacturing facility of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Quimica 
de Puerto Rico, Inc., in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, was filed by the Board 
on August 9, 1993, and notice inviting public comment was given in the 
Federal Register (FTZ Docket 39-93, 58 FR 44492, 8-23-93); and,

    Whereas, the Board has found that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;

    Now, therefore, the Board hereby authorizes the establishment of a 
subzone (Subzone 61D) at the plant site of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Quimica 
de Puerto Rico, Inc., in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, at the location 
described in the application, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of May 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

[FR Doc. 95-12594 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11

- 691 V

Filed: March 28, 2013

Not for Publication

*************************************

TIMOTHY MATTHEWS

, *

*

Petitioner, * Attorneys’ Fees & Costs Decision

v. * Based on Stipulation of Fact

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respon dent. *

*

*************************************

Diana L. Stadelnikas

, Sarasota, FL , for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On March 28 , 2013 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner ’s counsel asserts that

petitioner did not incur any costs in pursuit of h is petition

.

On M arch 22 , 2013 , p etitioner informally provided respondent with a draft Application for

Attorneys’ Fees and C osts. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master's action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims's website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitut e a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

items. Based on these objec tions, petitioner now amends h is request for attorneys’ fees and costs

and requests $ 2 0,176.93 in attorneys’ fees and costs . Respondent does not object to the reduced

amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonab le. Accordingly, the court awards

$ 2 0,176.93

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the

form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and M aglio Christopher & Toale, P.A. in the amount

of $ 2 0,176.93

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

c ourt is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2013 /s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party = s filing a notice

renouncing the right to seek review.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12778]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Correction

    In the Federal Register (FR Doc. 95-8920) Vol. 60, No. 70 at page 
18618, dated April 12, 1995, the listing of controlled substances 
should have included Oxycodone (9143), Hydromorphone (9150), 
Diphenoxylate (9170) and Noroxymorphone (9668) for Mallinckrodt 
Chemical, Inc., Mallinckrodt & Second Streets, St. Louis, Missouri 
63147.

    Dated: May 17, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-12778 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11446]


Notice of Department of State--Delisting Sanctioned Entities

SUMMARY: The Secretary of State has determined to terminate the 
sanctions that were imposed, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13846, 
on Aoxing Ship Management (Shanghai) Ltd and Sea Charming Shipping 
Company Limited and remove those entities from the List of Specially 
Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) maintained by the 
Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

DATES: The Secretary of State's determination and selection of certain 
sanctions to be imposed upon the two entities identified in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section was effective as of March 18, 2020. 
The Secretary of State's subsequent termination of sanctions with 
respect to those entities was effective as of June 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor Ruggles, Director, Office of 
Economic Sanctions Policy and Implementation, Bureau of Economic and 
Business Affairs, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, tel.: 
(202) 647 7677, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56042331313a3325020016252237223378313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d587a0b2b2b9b0a6818395a6a1b4a1b0fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 10, 2021, the Secretary of State 
determined that the sanctions that had been imposed with respect to 
Aoxing Ship Management (Shanghai) Ltd and Sea Charming Shipping Company 
Limited on March 18, 2020 pursuant to section 3(a)(iii) of E.O. 13846 
were terminated as of June 10, 2021. Accordingly, Aoxing Ship 
Management (Shanghai) Ltd and Sea Charming Shipping Company Limited are 
being removed from the SDN List.

Peter Haas,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-13241 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 108



		

			Exhibit 10.8

		




		
			 
		

		
			Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation for 2015 
		

		
			 
		

		
			At its regularly scheduled meeting on December 2, 2014, the Board of Directors of Aqua America, Inc., upon the recommendation of its Corporate Governance Committee and its Executive Compensation Committee, approved the following directors’ compensation for 2015 for the non-employee directors of Aqua America, Inc.: (1) an annual cash retainer of $50,000; (2) an annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Executive Compensation Committee of $12,500; (3) an annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee of $12,500; (4) an annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee of $10,000; (5) an annual cash retainer for the Independent Lead Director of $25,000; (6) a meeting fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors; (7) a meeting fee of $1,500 per meeting for meetings of the Board Committees; and (8) an annual stock grant to directors of $60,000, rounded to the nearest 100 shares payable on the first of the month following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders; and, (9) in the event the Board of Directors establishes the position of non-executive Chairman of the Board, the non-executive Chairman shall be paid a retainer in the amount of $200,000 per year, the normal Director equity award as set forth above, and shall receive no separate meeting fees as compensation for his role as non-executive Chairman of the Board. All Directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board or Committee meetings.
Robbie Dean FETTERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10309.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1721 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1721

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize 
 programs to improve the quality of coastal recreation waters, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COASTAL RECREATION WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND 
              NOTIFICATION.

    Section 406(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1346(i)) is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2011''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 8 of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal 
Health Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 877) is amended by striking ``2005'' and 
inserting ``2011''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1721

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize 
 programs to improve the quality of coastal recreation waters, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 12


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Six Months Ended
                                                                                        June 30,
(Dollars in millions)                                                             2002              2001
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income:
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>
   Income before provision for income taxes                                $        138.4    $        127.6
    Fixed charges                                                                   191.8             168.4
                                                                           ------------------------------------
    Income before provision for income taxes and fixed charges             $        330.2    $        296.0
                                                                           ====================================

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                                       $        189.1    $        165.6
    Preferred stock dividend requirement(1)                                           2.7               2.8
                                                                           ------------------------------------
                                                                           $        191.8    $        168.4
                                                                           ====================================

Ratio of income before provision for income taxes and fixed
    charges to fixed charges                                                       1.72              1.76
                                                                           ====================================

     (1) Reflects a pre-tax basis.

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12703]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-68, RM-8629]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Berlin, MD

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by John P. 
Gillen, proposing the allotment of Channel 235A to Berlin, Maryland, as 
that community's second FM Broadcast service. The coordinates for 
Channel 235A are 38-13-45 and 75-10-58. There is a site restriction 
10.8 kilometers (6.7 miles) southeast of the community.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 10, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before July 25, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: John P. Gillen, 12314 Dixie Drive, 
Bishopville, Maryland 21813.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-68, adopted May 11, 1995, and 
released May 18, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, 
D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-12703 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Clyde HARVEY, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 12-8876.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Order entered February 12, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01068-CR

No. 05-18-01069-CR

ROBERT HOWARD GREEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-76425-T & F16-76426-T

ORDER

On February 4, 2019, we ordered court reporter Trashuna Salaam to file the complete 

reporter’s record. Three days later, Ms. Salaam filed a request for extension of time to file the 

reporter’s record and stated (1) she was not the court reporter who reported the appeals, and (2) 

appellant had not requested the reporter’s record and had not paid or made arrangements to pay 

for the record.

We first note that the trial court appointed counsel for these appeals because appellant is 

indigent; thus, he is not required to pay or make arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. 

Nevertheless, appellant is required to request the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b); 35.3(b). 

Therefore, we ORDER appointed counsel Bruce Kaye to provide this Court, within TEN DAYS
of the date of this order, with written proof he has requested the reporter’s record. The failure to 

do so will result in these appeals being submitted without a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3 (c).

Because Ms. Salaam is not the court reporter in these appeals, we DENY her request for 

additional time.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Lela Lawrence 

Mays, Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Trashuna Salaam, court reporter; Debi 

Harris, court reporter; Sharina Fowler, court reporter; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Maxtor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Duston M. Williams, Executive Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906),
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Duston M. WilliamsDuston M. WilliamsExecutive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer Date: June 9, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
A photo of Martin J. Gruenberg
#### HYLAND, Respondent, v. MARK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1912.)

Action by John Hyland against Josephine Mark.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

FOOTE, J., not sitting.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0249. STEVEN COLLINS v. THE STATE. 

In 2015, Steven Collins pleaded guilty to 11 counts of theft by taking, and the

trial court sentenced him as a recidivist. In 2017, he filed a “Motion to Correct Void

Sentence,” challenging his recidivist sentence. On August 31, 2017, the trial court

denied Collins’s motion, and he filed the instant appeal on October 3, 2017. 

Pretermitting whether the trial court’s order is directly appealable, we lack

jurisdiction because this appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within

30 days after the entry of the trial court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and

timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction

upon this Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). 

Here, Collins filed his notice of appeal 33 days after the trial court’s order was

entered. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and which is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 03, 2019

09/03/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       8,260
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              113,784
<ALLOWANCES>                               (4,202)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           122,732
<PP&E>                                     147,336
<DEPRECIATION>                            (87,507)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             340,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       82,929
<BONDS>                                     13,712
<COMMON>                                       278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 230,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               340,506
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           297,933
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              275,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,038
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,685)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,995)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.07) 
        
                                  

</TABLE>