alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FDIC Academic Challenge Code of Conduct

To preserve the integrity of the academic competition and encourage broad student

participation, the FDIC sets forth the following Code of Conduct for the Academic Challenge.

• Participating students and faculty advisors assume all responsibility for meeting all

competition deadlines.

• All academic research conducted as part of this competition should be completed with 

integrity and honesty.

• A team competing in the FDIC Academic Challenge warrants that their written

submission and (if selected) live presentation are the original work of the participating

students and that all team members had substantive roles in the research and

production of the written submission and live presentation.

• Participants will not engage in plagiarism, either intentionally or unintentionally.

Participants should carefully cite and acknowledge all sources used in their work.

Judges may elect to use third-party resources to detect plagiarism.

• All participants, including students, faculty advisors, and FDIC staff, should act

professionally and considerately during all communication and interactions throughout 

the competition.

• Participants will refrain from any discriminatory, harassing, threatening, or harmful

behavior towards any other participant during all Academic Challenge activities. 

Participants who believe themselves to be the target of, or witness to, such actions 

should report their concerns to Lisa Gilmore, Assistant Director for Labor and Employee 

Relations (ligilmore@fdic.gov) or Philip Shively, Deputy Director for Research and 

Regulatory Analysis (pshively@fdic.gov).

• Violations of this Code of Conduct may result in the immediate disqualification of a

team's submission. Decisions on disqualification are at the sole discretion of the FDIC.

• Decisions of the judges, including the selection of teams to invite to the live presentation 

round, the evaluation of presentations, and any determinations of plagiarism, are final.
---

May 2, 2016

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|    |                                               
|    | Annual Report on Form 20-F                    
|    |                                               
|    | Consent of Expert                             

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
20-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2015, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Eric D. Titley, P.Geo., hereby consent to the use of my name
in connection with reference to my involvement in the following technical report
(the "Technical Report"):

- 2014 Technical Report on the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska, USA,
  effective date December 31, 2014

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report related to me in the Annual Report
and in Registration Statement No. 333-209921 on Form F-3.

I have read the Companys Annual Report and confirm that it
documents fairly and accurately represents the information that supports the
disclosure.

Yours truly,

Eric Titley



Eric D. Titley, P.Geo.

Hunter Dickinson Services Inc.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-33-TLS 

 ) 

ASHLEY CUSTER ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 160], filed on June 11, 2018. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation. 

The Court being duly advised, ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 

160] in its entirety and ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. Subject to this Court’s 

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if 

applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Count 1 of the Indictment 

are hereby ACCEPTED, and the Defendant is adjudged GUILTY of the offenses. 

 The Sentencing Scheduling Order scheduling sentencing-related deadlines and hearings 

will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on June 27, 2018. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934**

**and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, James Zierick, ChiefExecutive Officer of Aspyra, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350that:

 

(1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Quarterly Report”)complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date: November 14,  2008 | By:  | /s/  James Zierick      |
|-------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------|
|                          |      | James Zierick           |
|                          |      | Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shallnot be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
162174_61

JEFFREY FRIED, Personal Representative

of RUSSELL LOIOLA, LIP,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

SC: 162174

v COA: 348670

Washtenaw CC: 16-001044-NF

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, 

Defendant,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE 

MIDWEST, 

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________/ OK
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13051]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: Nursing Science Review Committee.
    Date: June 22-23, 1995.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. until adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, Palladian West Conference Room, 
5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Dr. Mary Stephens-Frazier, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 45, Room 3An.12, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 594-5971.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sec. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.361, Nursing 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Anna Snouffer,
Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-13051 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T W I LLI E ED W A RD S, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. B E N C U R R Y , W a r d e n ; B o a r do f P ar o le He a r i n g s ; ARNO LD S C H W A R Z E N E G G E R , G ov erno r, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16589 D. C . No . 4 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 9 2 3 - C AW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C l audi aA . W i l ke n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anua ry17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C alifo rn ia state p riso n erW il li e E d w ar d s ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED JAN 19 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16589 2 E dw a r ds c ont e nds tha tthe B oar d of P r i s on H e ar i ngs ’ s 2005 de c i s i on f i ndi ng h i m u n su i t ab l e fo r p aro l e i s n o tsup p o rt edb y so m e ev i d en ce an dw as o th erw i se im p r o p e r . T h e o n lyr ig h t a t is s u e in th e p ar o le c o n te x t is p r o c e du r a l, an dth e o n ly prop eri nq ui ryi s w hatproces s the i nm at e r ec ei ved, no tw hether the st at e c ou rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 131 S . C t . 859, 862- 63 ( 2011) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . B e c au s e E d w a r d s r a is e s n o p r o c e du r a l c h a lle n g e s , w e a f f irm . E d w a r d s ’s m o tio n to s e t o r a l ar g u m e n t an d/o rf o rd e c is io n is d e n ie da s m o o t. AF F I RME D.
Martin GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10302.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13021]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


President's Export Council Subcommittee on Export Administration; 
Notice of Partially Closed Meeting

    A partially closed meeting of the President's Export Council 
Subcommittee on Export Administration (PECSEA) will be held June 20, 
1995, 1:30 p.m., at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Herbert C. Hoover 
Building, Room 4832, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC. 
The Subcommittee provides advice on matters pertinent to those portions 
of the Export Administration Act, as amended, that deal with United 
States policies of encouraging trade with all countries with which the 
United States has diplomatic or trading relations and of controlling 
trade for national security and foreign policy reasons.

Public Session

    1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
    2. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
    3. Update on Bureau of Export Administration activities.
    4. Discussion on working group programs.

Executive Session

    5. Discussion of matters properly classified under Executive Order 
12356, dealing with the U.S. export control program and strategic 
criteria related thereto.
    A Notice of Determination to close meetings, or portions of 
meetings, of the Subcommittee to the public on the basis of 5 U.S.C. 
522(c)(1) was approved Sept. 30, 1993, in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. A copy of the Notice of Determination is 
available for public inspection and copying in the Central Reference 
and Records Inspection Facility, Room 6020, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, D.C. For further information, contact Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: May 23, 1995.

John Richards,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-13021 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the filing of the Transitional Report on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) by Creative ComputerApplications, Inc. (“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifiesthat to their knowledge:

1.                             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.                             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.

 
| Date: February 24, 2005                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |
| /S/ Anahita Villafane                                       |   |
| Anahita Villafane,  Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Creative Computer Applications, Inc. and will be furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

23

----
4 FDIC 2009 Annual Report

Insuring Deposits. Examining Institutions. 

Managing Receiverships. Educating Consumers.

In its unique role as deposit insurer of banks and savings associations, and in cooperation with the

other state and federal regulatory agencies, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) promotes

the safety and soundness of the U.S. financial system and the insured depository institutions by identifying, monitoring, and addressing risks to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).

The FDIC promotes public understanding and the development of sound public policy by providing

timely and accurate financial and economic information and analyses. It minimizes disruptive effects

from the failure of financial institutions. It assures fairness in the sale of financial products and the provision of financial services.

The FDIC’s long and continuing tradition of excellence in public service is supported and sustained

by a highly skilled and diverse workforce that continuously monitors and responds rapidly and successfully to changes in the financial environment.

At the FDIC, we are working together to be the best.

FDIC by the Numbers:

$250,000 Deposit insurance limit

699,277 Electronic deposit insurance estimator user sessions

140 Failed banks resolved

0 Insured deposit dollars lost

8,012 Insured depository institutions

560 International representatives from 56 emerging and developing markets who received 

consultation, training, or assistance from the FDIC

4,782 Written deposit insurance inquiries

2,400,000 Money Smart consumers reached since inception

72,614 New bank accounts opened through the Alliance for Economic Inclusion

30 Banks participating in the small-dollar loan pilot program

6,557 FDIC full-time-equivalent employees
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3858-3859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1299]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-74-000]


Mesquite Energy Services, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

January 13, 1995.
    On October 26, 1994 and November 21, 1994, Mesquite Energy 
Services, Inc. (Mesquite) submitted for filing a rate schedule under 
which Mesquite will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. Mesquite also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, Mesquite requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Mesquite.
    On January 4, 1995, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Mesquite should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 
north Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 
Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Mesquite is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations 

[[Page 3859]]
or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in 
respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance 
or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes 
of the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Mesquite's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is February 3, 1995.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, Room 3308, 941 North Capitol 
Street, NE. Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-1299 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Marsha G. Kissen, Appellant, and Burton L. Roslyn et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitrator’s award, with a cross application to confirm such award, petitioner appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.), dated December 19, 1983, which confirmed the arbitrator’s award and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 24, 1984, which denied her application for leave to renew and/or reargue her application to vacate the arbitrator’s award.

Appeal from so much of the order as denied reargument dismissed. The denial of reargument is not appealable.

Order and judgment otherwise affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Cohen at Special Term.

Respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 12585 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:14

- cv - 00095

- RWS ; BK

- 13

- 23492

- REB In Re: JAMES JEROME PHILLIPS, TAMARA JOHNSTON PHILLIPS, Debtors.

__________________________________________________ BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Appellant,

versus JAMES JEROME PHILLIPS, TAMARA JOHNSTON PHILLIPS, Debtors

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ (August 14, 2015)
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and COX, Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-12585 Date Filed: 08/14/2015 Page: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Appellees, James and Tamara Phillips , are Chapter 7 debtors. The y have two mortgages on their hous e secured by corresponding liens. The second lien, Bank of America’s, is completely “underwater.” The Phillipse s obtained from the bankruptcy court an order “stripping off” Bank of America’s second lien as void under 11 U.S.C. § 506(d). The district cou rt affirmed. Bank of America appealed. Bound by our prior precedent rule, we affirmed. The Supreme Court granted Bank of America’s petition for writ of certiorari, vacated this court’s judgment, and remanded the case for further proceedings in light of Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett , 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1995 (2015). Under Caulkett , § 506(d) does not permit the bankruptcy court to strip off the underwater second lien. Following the issuance of Caulkett , Bank of America filed a motion for
summary reversal in this court. We deny that motion by separate order . We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and Caulkett

. VACATED AND REMANDED. Case: 14-12585 Date Filed: 08/14/2015 Page: 2 of 2
---

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald W. Thiessen, Chief Executive Officer of Northern
Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Annual Report on Form 40-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ R. Thiessen        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Ronald W. Thiessen     
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 26, 2014         

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1691 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs 

Outpatient Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2005 

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘John H. Bradley 

Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 OUTPATIENT CLINIC, APPLETON, WISCONSIN. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic 

6 in Appleton, Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘John 

8 H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

9 Clinic’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 
2 

•HR 1691 IH 

1 regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

2 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

3 John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs Out4 patient Clinic. 

Æ