alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1792 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal years 2006 through 2010 for nutrition services for older individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to authorize 

appropriations for fiscal years 2006 through 2010 for 

nutrition services for older individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Senior Hunger 

5 Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 1792 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR CON2 GREGATE AND HOME DELIVERED NUTRITION 

3 SERVICES. 

4 The Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3001 

5 et seq.) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 303(b) by striking ‘‘2001’’ each 

7 place it appears and inserting ‘‘2006’’, and 

8 (2) in section 311(e) by striking ‘‘2001’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘2006’’. 

Æ
Order entered March 3, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01402 - CR MICHAEL WAYNE RILEY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th J udi cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 17 - 70289 - M

O RDER Before the Court is court reporter Belinda Baraka ’ s March 2, 2020 second request for an exten s ion of time to file the reporter ’ s record. We GRA NT the motion and ORDER t he reporter ’ s rec ord f iled on or before April 2, 2020

. Ms. Baraka is c aution ed that further extensions are not favored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
 2008
    
    
    2007(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    149,502
    
    
    $
    119,160Add: Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    82,483
    
    
    
    68,338Fixed charges
    
    
    389,501
    
    
    
    393,716Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (8,575
    )
    
    
    (11,174
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    612,911
    
    
    $
    570,040Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    1,308
    
    
    $
    1,419Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    155
    %
    
    
    157
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    2,027
    
    
    
    2,228Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    380,113
    
    
    
    381,758Capitalized interest
    
    
    8,575
    
    
    
    11,174Interest factors of rents
    
    
    813
    
    
    
    784Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    389,501
    
    
    
    393,716Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    391,528
    
    
    $
    395,944Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ((A) divided by (B))
    
    
    1.57
    x
    
    
    1.45
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
((A) divided by (C))
    
    
    1.57
    x
    
    
    1.44
    x
 -32-
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range and Meadow Forage Management Research: Burns, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to our website


Mission


People Bates, Jonathan
                                            *- Jon* Boyd, Chad Copeland, Stella Davies, Kirk Denton, Elsie Dietrich, John Falck, Stephanie Guetling, Christie Hamerlynck, Erik Holliday, Tammi O'Connor, Rory Olsoy, Peter Puffer, Maureen
                                            *- Mo* Rios, Roxanne Runnels, Tony Sannerud, Daav Sheley, Roger Villagrana Miller, Linda Ziegenhagen, Lori


Pacific West Area   chad.boyd@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2316

___________

Larry Wayne Crites, *

*

Appellant, *

*

Doris Ann Crites, *

*

Plaintiff, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Division of Family Services; Social * [UNPUBLISHED]

Security Administration, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: August 24, 1998

 Filed: August 28, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wayne Crites and his wife, Doris Ann Crites, filed suit against the

Division of Family Services (DFS) and the Social Security Administration. They

alleged in their complaint that “General Relief denied my benefits on 07/09/1990,” and

that “Social Security has denied my benefits since Dec 5, 1988 until Sept 20, 1994”;
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

they sought a court hearing “to receive back benefits.” The district court construed

1

the complaint as contesting under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) the denial of social security

benefits to Mrs. Crites. The court concluded Mr. Crites was not a proper plaintiff and

struck him from the case. Noting there was no indication that Mrs. Crites had

exhausted her available administrative remedies, the court then dismissed the action

without prejudice.

Mr. Crites appeals, appearing to challenge only the decision to strike him from

the case. It appears from his brief that plaintiffs intended their complaint to encompass

DFS&s termination of Mr. Crites&s benefits. See Mo. Rev. Stat. § 208.015 (1994) (DFS

determines whether claimant is entitled to general relief benefits). Plaintiffs, however,

did not allege a constitutional violation or any other basis for federal jurisdiction over

a claim for benefits under Missouri statutes. See Berger Levee Dist. v. United States,

128 F.3d 679, 680 (8th Cir. 1997) (under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, federal courts have

original jurisdiction over actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of

United States); Williams v. Hopkins, 130 F.3d 333, 337 (8th Cir.) (violation of state

statute does not infringe federal Constitution), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 595 (1997). We

thus conclude the district court&s dismissal of the complaint without prejudice was

proper as to both plaintiffs. Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

May 15, 2015

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
      (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                     
|    | Annual Report on Form 20-F                          
|    |                                                     
|    | Consent of Expert                                   

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
20-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Ting Lu, P.Eng., hereby consent to the use of my name in
connection with reference to my involvement in the following technical report
(the "Technical Report"):

- 2014 Technical Report on the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska, USA,
  effective date December 31, 2014

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report related to me in the Annual
Report.

I have read the Companys Annual Report and confirm that it
documents fairly and accurately represent the information that supports the
disclosure.

Yours truly,

Ting Lu

|               
|---------------
|Ting Lu, P.Eng.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-855]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Organix Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 16, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before August 16, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on April 27, 2021, Organix Inc., 240 Salem Street, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801-2029, applied to be registered as an bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleMescaline
7381
I3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine
7390
I4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine
7392
I3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine
7400
I3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine
7405
I2-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine
7517
I2-(4-Iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine
7518
I
 
 
 The company plans to bulk manufacture small quantities of the above controlled substances for use in clinical research. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-12817 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-51

)

DARNELL BONTEMPO )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on December 30, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 30th day of December 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2031 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2031

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Tralemethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Tralemethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRALEMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.16       Cyano(3-           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         phenoxyphenyl)met                                                  31/2008
                         hyl 2,2-dimethyl-
                         3-(1,2,2,2-
                         tetrabromoethyl)-
                         cyclopropanecarbo
                         xylate (CAS No.
                         66841-25-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3803.10.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidencio MORALES-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30302.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 8, 2011.

Pamela Jackson Byerly, Assistant U.S., USSP — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew Campbell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fidencio Morales-Ramirez appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Morales-Ramirez contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the bottom-of-the-Guidelines sentence is not substantively unreasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT H 

Certified copy of Chronological Case Summary of 

State of Indiana v. Lana R. Canen, Elkhart Circuit Court, 

Cause No. 20C01-0309-MR-155 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 1 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 2 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 3 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 4 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 5 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 6 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 7 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 8 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 9 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 10 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 11 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 12 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 13 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 14 of 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-8 filed 09/10/15 page 15 of 15
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HL Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deniz Hassan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
22nd day of October, 2008.


/s/ Deniz Hassan
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 5.2

Watts, Griffis and
		McOuat

Consulting Geologists and Engineers

CONSENT



To:
			 
			 Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc.And to:
			 
			 Berns & Berns, Counselors at
				  LawAnd to:
			 
			 U.S. Securities & Exchange
				  Commission(the Securities
				  Regulator)


Gentlemen:

RE: TECHNICAL REPORTS - BONG MIEU AND
		PHUOC SON GOLD PROJECTS

Reference is made to the technical reports
		(the Technical Reports) entitled A Technical Review of the
		Phuoc Son Gold Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam for Olympus Pacific
		Minerals Inc. dated January 30, 2004, and A Technical Review
		of the Bong Mieu Gold Project in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam for Olympus
		Pacific Minerals Inc. dated September 17, 2004, by WGM which we
		prepared forOlympus Pacific Minerals
		Inc.(the Company or
		Olympus).

We hereby consent to the filing of the
		Technical Reports with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure
		of the Technical Reports and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary
		thereof in the Annual Form 20-F. We further agree to being named as an expert
		in the Annual 20F statement (Form 20-F).

Dated this 12th day of July, 2007.



Sincerely,WATTS, GRIFFIS AND McOUAT
				  LIMITEDSigned Per:
			 Joe Hinzer, M.Sc.,
				  P.Geo,JH/ls
			 
			 President




WATTS, GRIFFIS AND McOUAT EMITTED
		               Suite
		400  8 King Street East  Toronto  Canada  M5C
		1B5

Tel: (416) 364-6244  Fax: (416)864-1675  Email: wgm@wgm.on,ca
		 Web: www.wgm.on.ca





---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-87 RLM

)

LAWRENCE W. TINSMAN )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on August 29, 2013 [Doc. No. 23].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Lawrence Tinsman’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant

guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: September 18, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40575

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD I. JAMES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-96-CR-349-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Donald I. James has appealed his convictions for possession

of cocaine with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting. 

James contends that the district court failed to comply with the

requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1) & (c)(3) in accepting

James’s guilty plea. The record does not show that any such 

noncompliance affected James’s substantial rights. See United

States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 298, 302 (5th Cir. 1993) (en

banc). The appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. Counsel are 
No. 97-40575

-2-

instructed to review their duties under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738, 744 (1967).

APPEAL DISMISSED.