alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.83


 


January 5,
2004


 


Michael Saunders


c/o Russ Berrie and Company,
Inc.


111 Bauer Drive


Oakland, New Jersey  07436


 


Dear Michael:


 


As you know,
the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the exploration of a
possible sale of or other major corporate transaction involving the Company,
although no decision to effect such a transaction has been made and there can
be no assurance that it will occur or as to the timing thereof.


 


The Board of
Directors believes that your continued service as an executive and effective
participation in the exploration of a possible sale is important to the
Company.  Accordingly, the Board of
Directors has determined that if the Company consummates a Change in Control,
as defined in the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan, on or before
April 30, 2004, and you remain employed by the Company through the consummation
of that Change in Control, you will be awarded a special bonus of
$100,000.  (If for any reason you are
not employed by the Company when the Change in Control is consummated, you will
not be entitled to any payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus
contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation to which you may be
entitled from the Company.  Nothing in
this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with the Company or
creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you as an
employee.  This letter supercedes the
letter to you, dated July 2, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto, which
letter shall be of no further force or effect.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly
  yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ ANGELICA
  BERRIE

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica
  Berrie

  
	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer
|ABN AMRO Series 2002 1Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders
for 200201 to 200212
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Class                                                                                                                       
|R 1                                                                                                                         
|IA 1                                                                                                                        
|IA 2                                                                                                                        
|IA 3                                                                                                                        
|IA 4                                                                                                                        
|IA P                                                                                                                        
|IB 1                                                                                                                        
|IB 2                                                                                                                        
|IB 3                                                                                                                        
|IB 4                                                                                                                        
|IB 5                                                                                                                        
|IIA 1                                                                                                                       
|IIA P                                                                                                                       
|IIA X                                                                                                                       
|IIB 1                                                                                                                       
|IIB 2                                                                                                                       
|IIB 3                                                                                                                       
|IIB 4                                                                                                                       
|IIB 5                                                                                                                       
|IIM                                                                                                                         
|IM                                                                                                                          
|R
**Exhibit 31.1**




**Certification**




I,
      Terry
      L. McCoy, in my capacity as Executive Vice President of First Horizon Asset
      Securities Inc (the Depositor) do hereby certify that:





1.    I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First
      Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-AA3 **** (the
“Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      upon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
      Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
      the
      servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5.    All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
      of
      noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
      on
      Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by The Bank of New York.




**First
                Horizon Asset Securities Inc., as Depositor**By:
            /s/
                Terry L. McCoyTerry
                L. McCoy,Executive
                Vice President
              (Senior
                Officer of the Depositor in charge of
              Securitization)




Date:
      March 28, 2008
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG   document 29-3   filed 09/19/16   page 1 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG   document 29-3   filed 09/19/16   page 2 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG   document 29-3   filed 09/19/16   page 3 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG   document 29-3   filed 09/19/16   page 4 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG   document 29-3   filed 09/19/16   page 5 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG   document 29-3   filed 09/19/16   page 6 of 6
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AGUS INDA LU,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 70711

Agency No. A088

- 121

- 759

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2019 **

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Agus Inda Lu, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration App eals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 70711

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substant ial evidence the agency’s factual findings.

Wakkary v. Holder , 558 F.3d 1049, 105 6 (9th Cir. 2009)

. We deny the petition for

review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Lu established changed or

extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untim ely asylum application

. See 8

C.F.R. § 1 208.4(a)(4). Thus, Lu’s asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the harm Lu

suffered in Indonesia did not rise to the level of persecution. See Wakkary

, 558

F.3d at 1059

- 60 (petitioner failed to establish past persecution where he was beaten

and robbed on two occasions and accosted by a mob) ; see also Halim v. Holder

,

590 F.3d 971, 975

- 76 (9 th Cir. 2009) (petitioner who was harassed, denied medical

care, arrested and detained, and beaten by a mob did not establish past

persecution)

. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that

even under a disfavored group analysis, Lu failed to show sufficient individ ualized

risk of persecution to establish a well

- founded fear

. See Halim

, 590 F.3d at 977

-

79. Thus, Lu’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, s ubstantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Lu failed to s how it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with3 14

- 70711

the consent or acquiescence of the government of Indonesia

. See A den v. Holder

,

589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

IRON WORKERS’ MID-AMERICA )

PENSION PLAN, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.:2:14-MC-21-JEM

)

SECURITY INDUSTRIES, INC., and )

DANNY S. JONES, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on an Agreed Motion to Continue Hearing on Proceedings

Supplemental [DE 8], filed by the parties on September 30, 2014. The parties request that the

Proceedings Supplemental Hearing set for October 1, 2014, be continued because Defendants

anticipate filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings within the next thirty days.

Having reviewed the Motion and finding it well-taken, and noting the agreement of the

parties, the Court hereby GRANTS the Agreed Motion to Continue Hearing on Proceedings

Supplemental [DE 8] and VACATES the Proceedings Supplemental Hearing scheduled for October

1, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. and RESETS it for November 5, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.

So ORDERED this 1st day of October, 2014.

/s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

case 2:14-mc-00021-JEM document 9 filed 10/01/14 page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,392,976
<SECURITIES>                                   546,313
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,947,302
<PP&E>                                      10,292,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,514,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          409,654
<BONDS>                                        654,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,450,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,514,982
<SALES>                                        240,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274,500
<CGS>                                           72,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            110,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.66
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason Weber, Chief Executive Officer of Alianza Minerals Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 31, 2017





/s/  Jason Weber

Jason Weber,

President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. CAUSE NO.: 1:15-CR-33-HAB 

KELLY CUSTER 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On September 3, 2019, this Court sentenced Defendant Kelly Custer to 63 months 

of imprisonment upon her conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 1343. The Defendant has since written numerous letters to the Court [ECF 

Nos. 249, 251, 252, 254]. Defendant’s husband has also submitted a letter [ECF No. 253]. 

As the Court stated previously in response to the Defendant’s letter of October 10, 2019 

[ECF No. 249], Defendant has not identified any statutory or other legal source by which 

she can obtain a new sentencing hearing [Opinion & Order, ECF No. 250]. 

The essence of her complaints remains the same, as do the limitations on the 

Court’s ability to modify her sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Accordingly, for the 

reasons stated in the Court’s previous order, the Court DENIES Defendant’s request for 

a hearing and appointment of new counsel and DENIES Defendant’s request to postpone 

the date by which she must surrender to the Bureau of Prisons as directed by the Bureau 

of Prisons. 

SO ORDERED on October 21, 2019. 

 

 s/ Holly A. Brady 

JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Membership Balance Plan for the

FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking

(1) Name: FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking (“Committee”).

(2) Authority: Discretionary committee established under agency authority.

(3) Mission/Function: The Committee is charged with providing advice and 

recommendations to the FDIC on a broad range of policy issues that have a 

particular impact on community banks throughout the United States and the local 

communities that are served by community banks. The Committee will review 

various issues that may include, but not be limited to, examination policies and 

procedures, credit/lending practices, deposit insurance assessments, insurance 

coverage, and regulatory compliance matters to promote the continued growth 

and ability of community banks to extend financial services in their respective 

local markets. 

(4) Points of View: To achieve a balanced membership, the majority of 

members of the Committee will represent community banks of various sizes from 

different areas of the country, both rural and urban, that are engaged in a variety 

of business lines. No Special Government Employees and no Regular 

Government Employees are expected to be on the Committee. However, 

membership balance is not static and may change, depending on the work of the 

Committee. The number of Committee members shall not exceed 20. 

(5) Other Balance Factors: To achieve balance on the Committee, the FDIC 

may include as Committee members other individuals with community banking 

expertise.

(6) Candidate Identification Process: Senior-level FDIC staff, including one or 

more representatives from the office of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of 

the FDIC (“Chairman”), will be involved in determining balance on the Committee

and recommending qualified individuals. The Chairman will make the final 

selections. In seeking to achieve an appropriate balance on the Committee, the 

FDIC may seek recommendations for membership on the Committee from 

banking industry representatives and other stakeholders. Committee members 

will serve for two-year terms, which may be extended or renewed by the FDIC. 

Any vacancies on the Committee will be filled as soon as practicable using the 

process noted above. 

(7) Subcommittee Balance: The process for assuring the appropriate balance 

on any subcommittee shall be the same process as for the full Committee, as 

outlined above. 
2

(8) Other: Appointments will be made without discrimination on the basis of 

race, religion, color, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual 

orientation), national origin, disability, age, and genetic information.

(9) Initially Prepared/Updated: Initially prepared on August 3, 2011; updated

on July 29, 2013, July 28, 2015, July 27, 2017, July 25, 2019, July 23, 2021, and 

July 21, 2023.
Mission

The Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation (FDIC) is an 

independent agency created by 

the Congress to maintain stability 

and public confidence in the 

nation’s financial system by:

• insuring deposits,

• examining and supervising 

financial institutions for safety 

and soundness and consumer 

protection, and

• managing receiverships.

Vision

The FDIC is a recognized leader 

in promoting sound public 

policies; addressing risks in the 

nation’s financial system; and 

carrying out its insurance, 

supervisory, consumer protection, 

and receivership management 

responsibilities.

Values

The FDIC and its employees have a tradition of 

distinguished public service. Six core values 

guide us in accomplishing our mission:

1. Integrity

We adhere to the highest ethical and 

professional standards.

2. Competence

We are a highly skilled, dedicated, and 

diverse workforce that is empowered to 

achieve outstanding results.

3. Teamwork 

We communicate and collaborate effectively 

with one another and with other regulatory 

agencies.

4. Effectiveness

We respond quickly and successfully to risks 

in insured depository institutions and the 

financial system.

5. Accountability

We are accountable to each other and to our 

stakeholders to operate in a financially 

responsible and operationally effective 

manner.

6. Fairness 

We respect individual viewpoints and treat 

one another and our stakeholders with 

impartiality, dignity, and trust.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Joseph Trafas, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed October 26, 1909.*

Appeals and *Errors—when a judgment must be affirmed for want of bill of exceptions.*Absence of a bill of exceptions from the record in a criminal case requires an affirmance of the judgment below, where the only errors assigned which are argued in the brief of the plaintiff in error are that the trial court erred in the admission of evidence and that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, as neither of such .assignments can be considered without the evidence, and the court’s rulings thereon, being preserved by a bill of exceptions and incorporated in the record.

*591Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. W. Clifford, Judge, presiding.

W. G. Anderson, (George H. Sugrue, of counsel,) for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Stead, Attorney General, John E. W. Wayman, State’s Attorney, and June C. Smith, (John E. Northup, of counsel,) for the People.

Per Curiam :

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of robbery in the criminal court of Cook county and sentenced to the penitentiary at Joliet for an indeterminate period, and he has sued out a writ of error from this court to review said judgment of conviction.

At a former term of this court the bill of exceptions, upon the motion of the Attorney General, was stricken from the transcript of the record, and that transcript, as now made up, contains no bill of exceptions, and the only errors assigned upon the transcript of the record, which are argued in the brief of plaintiff in error filed in this court, are, first, the trial court erred in the admission of evidence; and second, the verdict is contrary to the evidence. Neither of these assignments of error can be considered without the evidence heard upon the trial and the rulings of the court thereon being preserved by bill of exceptions and incorporated in the transcript of the record filed in this court. There being no questions, therefore, presented to this court upon this record for review, the judgment of the criminal court of Cook county will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

AMY CLYMER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-cv-00300-JTM-SLC

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint to Add Third Party

Defendant (DE 13) filed on March 15, 2016, in which Plaintiffs seek leave to name Triscape,

Inc., as an additional defendant. Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., has not filed a response to the

motion, and its time to do so has now passed.

This case, however, was removed to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1332 (DE 1), and Plaintiffs’ motion does not specify the citizenship of Triscape,

Inc.—that is, the state in which it is incorporated and the state in which its principal place of

business is located. See N. Trust Co. v. Bunge Corp., 899 F.2d 591, 594 (7th Cir. 1990)

(Corporations “are deemed to be citizens of the state in which they are incorporated and the state

in which they have their principal place of business.”). “When joinder of a nondiverse party

would destroy subject matter jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) applies and provides the district

court with two options: (1) deny joinder, or (2) permit joinder and remand the action to state

court.” Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Ctrs., Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 758 (7th Cir. 2009) (citation

omitted). 

Therefore, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file on or before April 18, 2016, a supplement that
identifies the citizenship of Triscape, Inc., for purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction. 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint (DE 13) remains UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

SO ORDERED. 

Enter for the 4th day of April 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2