alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2   CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  I, S. Colin Neill, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmos Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ S. COLIN NEILL S. Colin Neill Chief Financial Officer Date: May 10, 2007
Grace LIU, petitioner, v. Gordon W. SPENCER.

No. 12-8801.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          408621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1610620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     668058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3238136
<PP&E>                                         1592824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1005640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5114643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1701120
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       5720495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2407256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5114643
<SALES>                                        1734571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1735790
<CGS>                                           915288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1623858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 106134
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              99784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     99784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
[No. 38469-4-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### Declan Boyle, *Appellant,*v. Sunrise Healthcare Co., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-20719-9, Jim Bates, J., entered March 12, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Cox, J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs.

v.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00755-CW 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 184

( ) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have 

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

(x) Decision by Court. This action came to a hearing before the Court. The issues have been

heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 

Dated: 2/8/2021

Susan Y. Soong, Clerk

Aris Garcia

Deputy Clerk

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 185 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          766319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2784765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     586867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4790137
<PP&E>                                         1959867
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1354646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7870812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3543333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5981067
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1653588)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7870812
<SALES>                                        6460467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6467767
<CGS>                                          3261977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5819580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               34435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 613752
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             611352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    611352
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 7, 2012 |   | /s/ Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.                    |
|--------|----------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |           |   | Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.                        |
|   |           |   | President and CEO                            |
|   |           |   |                                         |
|   |           |   |                                         |
| Date:  | 8-7-12         |   | /s/ Doug Carpenter                      |
|   |           |   | C. Douglas Carpenter                         |
|   |           |   | Executive Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1715 

To reduce until December 31, 2008, the duty on PDCB (p-Dichlorobenzene). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce until December 31, 2008, the duty on PDCB 

(p-Dichlorobenzene). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY REDUCTION OF DUTY ON PDCB. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.81 p-Dichlorobenzene (CAS No. 

106–46–7) (provided for in 

subheading 2903.61.30) ...... 1.0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or 
2 

•HR 1715 IH 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

Ubiquitech Software Corp.

7435 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 5

Las Vegas, Nevada 89123

 

January 6, 2010

 

Navitas Land and Mineral Corp.

876 W. Everly Brothers Blvd

Central City, KY 42330

Attention: Dan Williams

 

**RE:  Oakley Lease**

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Further to our recent discussions regarding the deadlines set out in our Letter of Intent (“LOI”) dated December 23, 2009, this correspondence will confirm that we have each agreed to amend the earlier document by extending the date for delivery of a mutually satisfactory Definitive Agreement, as that term is defined in the LOI. Delays in the ordinary course, exacerbated by the holidays, rendered the original deadline unfeasible.

 

This document will evidence in writing our joint decision to extend the original deadline by three weeks, or until January 27, 2010. As a consequence of such modification, the earlier specified time frame for agreement to final terms or rescission of the LOI, as set out in the penultimate paragraph of the third page of the LOI, will additionally be extended by three weeks. In all other respects the general terms and conditions, representations and restrictions of the original LOI remain in full force and effect. 

 

In the event the above is consistent with the modified terms as agreed we would ask that you indicate your agreement and acceptance by signing the duplicate copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning same to our offices at your first convenience. Should you have any questions in connection with this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your earliest convenience.

 

Yours truly,

 

**Ubiquitech Software Corp.**

 

Per:  s/Young Yuen

 

Young Yuen 

President

 

We hereby indicate our agreement and acceptance of the modifications to the terms of the LOI dated December 23, 2009 as set out above.

 

**Navitas Land and Mineral Corp.**

 

Per:  s/Dan Williams

 

_______________________ 

Dan Williams
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1888 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiromesifen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiromesifen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPIROMESIFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.82 2-oxo-3-(2,4,6- 

trimethylphenyl)–1- 

oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-4-yl 

3,3-dimethylbutanoate (CAS 

No. 283594–90–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

2932.29.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1888 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005            /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy         STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1842

To suspend temporarily the duty on a mixture of Poly[[6-[(1,1,3,3-

tetramethylbutyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl][(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-

piperidinyl)imino]-1,6-exanediyl[(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-

piperidinyl)imino]]) and Bis(2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)sebaceate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2005

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on a mixture of Poly[[6-

[(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-

diyl][(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)imino]-1,6-

exanediyl[(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)imino]]) and 

Bis(2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)sebaceate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1842 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURE OF POLY[[6-[(1,1,3,3-

2 TETRAMETHYLBUTYL)AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZINE3 2,4-DIYL][(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-

4 PIPERIDINYL)IMINO]-1,6-EXANEDIYL[(2,2,6,6-

5 TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDINYL)IMINO]]) AND 

6 BIS(2,2,6,6,-TETRAMETHYL-4-

7 PIPERIDYL)SEBACEATE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

9 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

10 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

11 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.04.71 Mixture of Poly[[6-[(1,1,3,3-

tetramethylbutyl)amino]-

1,3,5-triazine-2,4-

diyl][(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-

piperidinyl)imino]-1,6-

exanediyl[(2,2,6,6-

tetramethyl-4-

piperidinyl)imino]]) and 

Bis(2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4-

piperidyl)sebaceate (CAS 

Nos. 71878–19–8 and 

52829–07–9) (provided for 

in subheading 3812.30.90) .. Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

14 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 197 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 197

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a State to charge in-
    State tuition rates to active-duty members of the Armed Forces 
    domiciled or stationed on active duty in that State and to the 
                      dependents of such members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

Mr. Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a State to charge in-
    State tuition rates to active-duty members of the Armed Forces 
    domiciled or stationed on active duty in that State and to the 
                      dependents of such members.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military In-State Tuition Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. IN-STATE TUITION RATES FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ON 
              ACTIVE DUTY AND DEPENDENTS.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 49 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 982 the following new section
``Sec. 982a. In-State tuition rates
    ``(a) Requirement.--A member of the armed forces on active duty for 
a period of more than 30 days whose domicile or permanent duty station 
is in a State, and the dependents of such a member, may not be charged 
tuition for attendance at a public institution of higher education in 
that State at a rate that is greater than the rate charged for 
residents of that State.
    ``(b) Continuation.--If a member of the armed forces, or a 
dependent of a member, pays tuition at a public institution of higher 
education in a State at a rate determined by reason of subsection (a), 
the provisions of subsection (a) shall continue to apply to such member 
or dependent while continuously enrolled at that institution, 
notwithstanding a subsequent change in permanent duty station of the 
member to a location outside the State.
    ``(c) State Defined.--In this section, the term `State' has the 
meaning given that term in section 982 of this title.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 982 the 
following new item:

``982a. In-State tuition rates.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 982a of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a)(1), shall take effect with respect to 
tuition payments required to be paid for periods beginning on or after 
August 1, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
Monica MERCADO, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 13-6990.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
FDIC 90TH ANNIVERSARY

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2023 24 

June 16, 2023, marked the 90th year since the signing 

of the Banking Act of 1933. This Act established the 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as the world’s 

first national deposit insurance system. Since the 

creation of the FDIC, depositors have never lost a 

penny of insured deposits.

 President Franklin D. Roosevelt signing the Banking Act of 1933.