27116 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health

Services Administration

Center for Substance Abuse Treatment

and Center for Substance Abuse

Prevention; Notice of Meetings

Pursuant of Public Law 92–463,

notice is hereby given of the meetings of

the Center for Substance Abuse

Treatment (CSAT) National Advisory

Council and the Center for Substance

Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Drug Testing

Advisory Board in June 1995.

The meeting of the CSAT National

Advisory Council will include a

discussion of Center policy issues and

current administrative, legislative, and

program developments. The Council

will also conduct a review of grant

applications and procurement plans;

therefore a portion of this meeting will

be closed to the public as determined by

the Administrator, SAMHSA, in

accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3) and

(6) and 5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(d).

Attendance by the public at the open

portion of the meeting will be limited to

space available.

A summary of the meeting and roster

of council members may be obtained

from: Ms. D. Winstead, Committee

Management Specialist, CSAT,

Rockwall II Building, Suite 840, 5600

Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland

20857; (301) 443–8448.

Substantive program information may

be obtained from the contact whose

name and telephone number is listed

below.

Committee Name: Center for Substance

Abuse Treatment, National Advisory

Council.

Meeting Dates: June 26 and 27, 1995.

Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520

Wisconsin Avenue, Chase Room, Chevy

Chase, Maryland 20815.

Open: June 26, 8:30 a.m.–2:00 p.m., June

27, 8:30 a.m.–3:00 p.m.

Closed: June 26, 2:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m.

Contact: Marjorie Cashion, Rockwall II

Building, Suite 840; Telephone (301) 443–

3821.

The meeting of the Drug Testing Advisory

Board will include discussion of

announcements and reports of

administrative, legislative, and program

developments. It will also include reviews of

sensitive National Laboratory Certification

Program (NLCP) internal operating

procedures and program development issues.

Therefore, a portion of this meeting will be

closed to the public as determined by the

Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2),(4), and (6) and 5 U.S.C.

App 2 10(d).

A summary of this meeting and roster of

committee members may be obtained from:

Ms. Vera Hunter, Acting Committee

Management Officer, CSAP, Rockwall II

Building, Suite 7A–140, 5600 Fishers Lane,

Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: (301) 443–

9540.

Substantive program information may be

obtained from the contact whose name, room

number and telephone number is listed

below.

Committee Name: Drug Testing Advisory

Board.

Meeting Dates: June 29, 1995.

Place: Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza, 1750

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20857.

Open: June 29, 8:30 a.m.–11:00 a.m.

Closed: June 29, 11:00 a.m.-Adjournment.

Contact: Donna M. Bush, Ph.D.; Parklawn

Building, Room 13A–54; Telephone (301)

443–6014.

Dated: May 16, 1995.

Jeri Lipov,

Committee Management Officer, Substance

Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–12452 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Housing-Federal Housing

Commissioner

[Docket No. FR–3911–N–01]

Mortgagee Review Board

Administrative Actions

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing

Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with Section

202(c) of the National Housing Act,

notice is hereby given of the cause and

description of administrative actions

taken by HUD’s Mortgagee Review

Board against HUD-approved

mortgagees.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Heyman, Director, Office of

Lender Activities and Land Sales

Registration, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202)

708–1515. The Telecommunication

Device for the Deaf (TDD) number is

(202) 708–4594. (These are not toll-free

numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

202(c)(5) of the National Housing Act

(added by Section 142 of the

Department of Housing and Urban

Development Reform Act of 1989

(Pub.L. 101–235), approved December

15, 1989) requires that HUD ‘‘publish in

the Federal Register a description of

and the cause for administrative action

against a HUD-approved mortgagee’’ by

the Department’s Mortgagee Review

Board. In compliance with the

requirements of Section 202(c)(5), notice

is hereby given of administrative actions

that have been taken by the Mortgagee

Review Board from January 1, 1995

through March 31, 1995.

1. Randall Mortgage, Inc., Maitland,

Florida

Action: Proposed Settlement

Agreement that includes

indemnification to the Department for

any claim losses in connection with

seven improperly originated loans;

payment to the Department of a civil

money penalty in the amount of $2,500;

and corrective action by the company to

assure compliance with HUD–FHA

requirements.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review that

disclosed violations of HUD–FHA

requirements that included: Failure to

maintain an adequate Quality Control

Plan for the origination of HUD–FHA

insured mortgages; failure to verify

borrowers’ source of funds used for

downpayment; failure to ensure that

borrowers made the minimum required

investment in the property; requiring a

borrower to deposit excess escrow funds

at closing; inadequate or lack of face-toface interviews with borrowers; and

failure to properly complete HUD Form

92900 Applications.

2. West Star Financial Corporation,

Centennial Park, Arizona

Action: Settlement Agreement that

includes payment to the Department of

a civil money penalty in the amount of

$35,000; indemnification for any claim

loss in connection with an improperly

originated loan; corrective action to

assure compliance with HUD–FHA

requirements; and submission of a

report to the Board compiled by an

independent Certified Public

Accountant at the end of a six-month

period with respect to the company’s

compliance with HUD–FHA

requirements.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review

which disclosed violations of HUD–

FHA loan servicing and origination

requirements that included: Failure to

maintain an adequate Quality Control

Plan for the servicing and origination of

HUD–FHA insured mortgages; failure to

maintain staff trained in HUD–FHA

requirements; failure to properly service

delinquent mortgages; failure to

properly administer the assignment

program; failure to comply with

property inspection, preservation and

protection requirements; failure to

refund excess escrow funds to

mortgagors; failure to establish controls

to ensure timely mortgagor escrow

payments; failure to remit accurate
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices 27117

mortgage insurance premiums; failure to

enter into reasonable forebearance

agreements; failure to meet the reporting

requirements of the Single Family

Default Monitoring System; failure to

timely remit One-Time Mortgage

Insurance Premiums; payment of loan

origination fees not proportionate to the

value of work performed; and failure to

ensure that borrowed funds were not

used to close a HUD–FHA insured

mortgage.

3. F.C. Chadwick Financial, Cerritos,

California

Action: A Settlement Agreement that

includes indemnification to the

Department for any claim losses in

connection with six improperly

originated Title I loans; and corrective

action to assure compliance by the

company with HUD–FHA Title I

program requirements.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review that

cited violations by the company of

HUD–FHA Title I property

improvement loan program

requirements which included:

Operating an unapproved branch office;

payment of ineligible referral fees;

failure to verify the source of borrowers’

initial payment; and failure to meet

program requirements for the

promissory note.

4. First Financial Funding Group,

Mission Viejo, California

Action: Settlement Agreement that

includes indemnification to the

Department for any claim losses in

connection with five improperly

originated Title I loans; payment to the

Department of a civil money penalty in

the amount of $1,000; and corrective

action to assure compliance with HUD–

FHA Title I program requirements.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review that

cited violations by the company of

HUD–FHA Title I property

improvement loan program

requirements that included: Failure to

document the source of funds required

for the borrowers’ initial payment;

failure to ensure that borrowers

provided detailed descriptions of work

improvements; and failure to comply

with HUD–FHA reporting requirements

under the Home Mortgage Disclosure

Act (HMDA).

5. Magna Financial Corporation, Irvine,

California

Action: Proposed Settlement

Agreement that includes

indemnification to the Department for

any claim losses in connection with five

improperly originated Title I loans;

payment to the Department of a civil

money penalty in the amount of $1,000;

and corrective action to assure

compliance with HUD–FHA

requirements.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review that

disclosed violations by the company of

HUD–FHA Title I property

improvement loan program

requirements that included: Failure to

verify borrowers’ source of funds

required for initial payment; failure to

property verify borrower’s income;

requiring a minimum loan amount;

failure to meet program requirements for

the promissory note; failure to ensure

that detailed descriptions of

improvements were provided by

borrowers; and failure to comply with

HUD–FHA reporting requirements

under the Home Mortgage Disclosure

Act (HMDA).

6. Greystone Servicing Corporation,

Inc., New York, New York

Action: Proposed Settlement

Agreement that includes a payment to

the Department and assurance by the

company of compliance with the

requirements of the Government

National Mortgage Association (GNMA).

Cause: Violation of GNMA

requirements resulting from the

improper termination of 57 GNMA

mortgage-backed securities pools.

7. Whitehall Funding, Inc., Davenport,

Iowa

Action: Proposed Settlement

Agreement that includes a payment to

the Department and assurance by the

company of compliance with the

requirements of the Government

National Mortgage Association (GNMA).

Cause: Violation of GNMA

requirements resulting from the

improper termination of 13 GNMA

mortgage-backed securities pools.

8. Washington Credit Union, Lynwood,

Washington

Action: Proposed Settlement

Agreement that includes the payment of

a civil money penalty to the Department

in the amount of $10,000;

indemnification for one improperly

originated Title I loan; and corrective

action to assure compliance with HUD–

FHA Title I program requirements.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review that

disclosed violations of HUD–FHA Title

I property improvement loan program

requirements that included: Failure to

comply with HUD–FHA reporting

requirements under the Home Mortgage

Disclosure Act (HMDA); failure to

comply with dealer approval

requirements; failure to report to HUD–

FHA borrowers’ uncompleted property

improvements; failure to resolve a

borrower complaint against a dealer;

and failure to verify a borrower’s source

of funds for the required initial

payment.

9. Indigo Mortgage Services, Inc., Santa

Ana, California

Action: Withdrawal of HUD–FHA

mortgagee approval.

Cause: Failure by the company to

comply with the terms and conditions

of a Settlement Agreement with the

Department and to indemnify HUD in

the amount of $49,724 for its claim loss

in connection with an improperly

originated HUD–FHA insured mortgage.

10. Beacon Mortgage Company, Dallas,

Texas

Action: Letter of Reprimand and

proposed civil money penalty in the

amount of $2,000.

Cause: Failure by the company to

comply with HUD–FHA requirements

and to submit to the Department

physical inspection reports with respect

to two HUD–FHA insured multifamily

projects.

11. Mortgage Systems, Inc., d/b/a

Associated Mortgage Bankers, Las

Vegas, Nevada

Action: Withdrawal of HUD–FHA

mortgagee approval and proposed civil

money penalty in the amount of

$75,000.

Cause: A HUD monitoring review that

cited the company for violations of

HUD–FHA program requirements which

included: Failure to comply with

conditions of probation previously

imposed by the Board; failure to

implement an adequate Quality control

Plan; failure to remit mortgage

insurance premiums within l5 days after

loan closing; failure to submit closed

loans for endorsement within 60 days

after loan closing; failure to meet annual

recertification requirements regarding

amount of liquid assets; submission of

false information; failure to document

the borrower’s source of funds for

downpayment and closing costs; failure

to correctly calculate the borrower’s

income for loan approval; failure to

ensure that the borrower made the

minimum required investment; use of

mortgage brokers to originate loans and

payment of ‘‘kickbacks’’ to such brokers;

non-compliance with HUD’s conflict-ofinterest prohibited payments provisions;

failure to conduct face-to-face

interviews; and allowing loan

correspondents to improperly close

loans in the name of the company.
27118 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices

Dated: May 16, 1995.

Nicolas P. Retsinas,

Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal

Housing Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 95–12460 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–27–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WO–350–09–1430–00]

Information Collection Submitted to

the Office of Management and Budget

for Review Under the Paperwork

Reduction Act

The proposal for the collection of

information listed below has been

submitted to the Office of Management

and Budget for approval under

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of the

proposed collection of information and

related forms and explanatory material

may be obtained by contacting the

Bureau’s Clearance Officer at the phone

number listed below. Comments and

suggestions on the requirement should

be made to the Bureau Clearance Office

and to the Office of Management and

Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project

(1004–0009), Washington, D.C. 20503,

telephone number 202–395–7340.

Title: Land Use Application and Permit

OMB Approval Number: (1004–0009)

Abstract: The regulations at 43 CFR

2920 provide for non-Federal use of

bureau administered land via lease or

permit. Uses include agriculture,

trade or manufacturing concerns and

business uses such as outdoor

recreation concession. BLM will

determine the validity of uses

proposed by private individuals and

other qualified proponents from

information provided by the

proponent on the Land Use

Application and Permit form

Bureau Form Number: 2920–1

Frequency: Once

Description of Respondents:

Individuals, State and local

government entities, and other

qualified proponents apply for use of

Bureau administered land via lease or

permit

Estimated Completion Time: 9.60 hours

Annual Responses: 620

Annual Burden Hours: 5955

Bureau Clearance Officer: Wendy

Spencer 303–236–6642

Dated: April 15, 1995.

W. Hord Tipton,

Assistant Director, Resource Use and

Protection.

[FR Doc. 95–12415 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–84–M

[WO–350–09–1430–00]

Information Collection Submitted to

the Office of Management and Budget

for Review Under the Paperwork

Reduction Act

The proposal for the collection of

information listed below has been

submitted to the Office of Management

and Budget for approval under

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of the

proposed collection of information and

related forms and explanatory material

may be obtained by contacting the

Bureau’s Clearance Officer at the phone

number listed below. Comments and

suggestions on the requirement should

be made to the Bureau Clearance Officer

and to the Office of Management and

Budget, Interior Department Desk

Officer, Washington, D.C. 20503,

telephone number 202–395–7340.

Title: Application for Transportation

and Utility Systems and Facilities on

Federal Lands, P.L. 96–487 (Also

applicable for 43 CFR 2800 and 2880)

OMB Approval Number: (1004–0060)

Abstract: Respondents supply

information as to their identity and

address and the nature, location and

potential impacts of the proposed

facility. The information enables the

using agency to identify and

communicate with the applicant and

to locate and evaluate the effect of the

proposed facility on the environment

and other land uses

Bureau Form Number: SF–299

Frequency: On occasion

Description of Respondents: Applicants

for rights-of-way on Federal lands

Estimated Completion Time: 2 hours

Annual Responses: 4,300

Annual Burden Hours: 8,600

Bureau Clearance Officer: Wendy

Spencer 303–236–6642

Dated: May 1, 1995.

W. Hord Tipton,

Assistant Director, Resource Use and

Protection.

[FR Doc. 95–12414 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–84–M

[NV–930–1430–01; N–59025]

Notice of Realty Action: Lease/

conveyance for Recreation and Public

Purposes

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Recreation and public purpose

lease/conveyance.

SUMMARY: The following described

public land in Las Vegas, Clark County,

Nevada has been examined and found

suitable for lease/conveyance for

recreational or public purposes under

the provisions of the Recreation and

Public Purposes Act, as amended (43

U.S.C. 869 et seq.). The City of Las

Vegas proposes to use the land for

public park to include a soccer complex.

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 20 S., R. 60 E., M.D.M.

Sec. 10: S1⁄2S1⁄2NW1⁄4NE1⁄4NW1⁄4, S1⁄2SW1⁄4

NE1⁄4NE1⁄4NW1⁄4, SE1⁄4NE1⁄4NE1⁄4NW1⁄4,

SE1⁄4NE1⁄4NE1⁄4NW1⁄4, S1⁄2NE1⁄4NW1⁄4,

SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SW1⁄4.

Containing 106.250 acres, more or less.

The land is not required for any

federal purpose. The lease/conveyance

is consistent with current Bureau

planning for this area and would be in

the public interest. The lease/patent,

when issued, will be subject to the

provisions of the Recreation and Public

Purposes Act and applicable regulations

of the Secretary of the Interior, and will

contain the following reservations to the

United States:

1. A right-of-way thereon for ditches

or canals constructed by the authority of

the United States, Act of August 30,

1890 (43 U.S.C. 945).

2. All minerals shall be reserved to

the United States, together with the

right to prospect for, mine and remove

such deposits from the same under

applicable law and such regulations as

the Secretary of the Interior may

prescribe.

and will be subject to:

1. An easement 40.00 feet in width

along the east boundary for Tenaya

Way, and an easement 30.00 feet in

width along the south boundary for

Buckskin Avenue, and a 40.00 foot

easement along the south boundary of

the SE1⁄4NW1⁄4 for Gowan Road, and a

40.00 foot easement along the north

boundary of the NE1⁄4SW1⁄4 for Gowan

Road, and a 30.00 easement along the

west boundary of the NE1⁄4SW1⁄4 of

Section 10 for Pioneer Way, in favor of

the City of Las Vegas for roads, public

utilities and flood control purposes.

2. Those rights for flood detention

basin purposes which have been granted

to the City of Las Vegas by Permit No.

N–37220 the under the Act of October

21, 1976 (47USC1761).

3. Those rights for water well

purposes which have been granted to

the Las Vegas Valley Water District by

Permit No. N–53362–D and N–53362–E

the under the Act of October 21, 1976

(43USC1761).