alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Haim Aviv, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmos Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ HAIM AVIV
-------------
Haim Aviv
Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 13, 2003


                                       17
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GIGI STETLER
, Appellant,

v.

SUNTRUST BANK
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1076

[ April 11, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Sandra Pearlman , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16015531 (04)

.

Alexander E. Borell

, Vanessa Jaleh Bravo and Ana

- Maria Carnesoltas of the Law Office of Alexander E. Borell, P.A., Miami Lakes, for appellant.

Robert J. Lindeman of Marcadis Singer P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, C IKLIN and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12862]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-067-1050-00]


Proposed Closure and Restrictions on Public Land in Imperial 
County, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of closure to camping and vehicular traffic and 
designation for day use only of certain public lands in the Tumco 
Historic Townsite of Imperial County, CA.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with title 43 Code of Federal Regulations, 
section 8364.1, notice is hereby given that all roads and lands in the 
below listed area will be closed to camping and vehicular traffic. 
Additionally, the area will be designated for day use only. The 
affected area is managed by the El Centro Resource Area of the Bureau 
of Land Management and is known as the Historic Townsite of Tumco. The 
closure area includes T. 15 S., R. 20 E., section 1, SW\1/4\; section 
12, N\1/2\; and those portions of section 2, SE\1/4\, and section 11, 
NE\1/4\, SBBM, that are east of the designated fence line. The closure 
is necessary to prevent undue degradation of National Register of 
Historic Places eligible cultural resources. An official parking area 
will be established adjacent to the townsite and a self-guided walking 
tour developed.
    The action does not apply to BLM operation and maintenance 
vehicles, law enforcement vehicles and other vehicles specifically 
authorized by the authorized officer of BLM.

DATES: The closure becomes effective June 30, 1995 and remains in 
effect until revoked by the authorized officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Weller, Archaeologist, of the 
El Centro Resource Area, phone (619-337-4424).
G. Ben Koski, Area Manager,
El Centro Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 95-12862 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Fero Industries, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kyle Schlosser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fero Industries, Inc., and will be retained by Fero Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: February 15, 2011  /s/Kyle Schlosser Kyle Schlosser Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Dowdell, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered October 1,1982, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

*183We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Isabel RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-5860.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, denied.
---




STATE BANK OF VIETNAMSOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAMIndependence - Freedom – HappinessNo. 07/GP-NHNNHa Noi, 04 January, 2013





MATERIAL GOLD EXPORT LICENSE





THE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE BANK OF VIETNAM





Pursuant to the Decree no. 24/2013/ND-CP dated 03April 2012 of the


Government on gold trading activities;


Pursuant to the Circular no. 16/2013/TT-NHNN dated 25 May 2013 providing


guidelines for the Decree no. 24/2013/ND-CP dated 03April 2012 of the


Government on gold trading activities


In response to the Application for gold export from Phuoc Son Gold Company





DECIDES





1.    To approve of the export by PSGC of 1,200 kg (one thousand two hundred


kilograms) of material gold (from 60% to 99.99 % gold) mined by the


Company in year 2013 through Danang International Airport and Tan Son


Nhat International Airport, Hochiminh city to be refined and traded overseas.





2.    Phuoc Son Gold Company Limited is only permitted to export the type of


gold specified in Article 1 of this letter and is requested to conform to the


regulations on gold export and import as well as other relevant stipulations.





3.    This approval shall take effect until the end of 31 December 2013





Distribution:For the Director of the State Bank-Phuoc Son Gold CompanyFor the Director of Foreign Exchange-Director of SBV (to report)Control Department-Deputy Director SBV (to report)Deputy Director-General Department of Customs(for coordination)-Vietnam State Bank – DanangBranch (for coordination)(signed and sealed)-Office FilingDao Xuan Tuan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

JOHN B. FLETCHER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

 v. ) Case No. 3:14-CV-686 JD

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

John B. Fletcher, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition attempting to challenge the

revocation of his parole on March 17, 2014, in connection with his 1986 conviction and 50 year

sentence for rape by the Lake Superior Court under cause number 3CR-115-786-459. However,

before the court can consider a habeas corpus petition challenging a State proceeding, the petitioner

must have previously presented his claims to the State courts. “This means that the petitioner must

raise the issue at each and every level in the state court system, including levels at which review is

discretionary rather than mandatory.” Lewis v. Sternes, 390 F.3d 1019, 1025-1026 (7th Cir. 2004). 

There are two possible methods for challenging a parole revocation in Indiana: by filing a

post-conviction relief petition, Receveur v. Buss, 919 N.E.2d 1235 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), or by filing

a State habeas corpus petition if the inmate is seeking immediate release. Lawson v. State, 845

N.E.2d 185, 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). Furthermore, if a state habeas corpus petition is improperly

filed, it will be converted to a post-conviction petition. Hardley v. State, 893 N.E.2d 740, 743 (Ind.

Ct. App. 2008) and Ward v. Ind. Parole Bd., 805 N.E.2d 893 (2004). Here, Fletcher’s habeas corpus

petition indicates that he has not presented his claims to any State court in any proceeding. Therefore

he has not exhausted his State court remedies and this case must be dismissed without prejudice so
that he can exhaust these claims in the State courts. If, after he has ultimately presented his claims

to the Indiana Supreme Court, he has not yet obtained relief, then he may return to federal court and

file a new habeas corpus petition. 

Pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 11, the court must consider whether to grant

or deny a certificate of appealability. To obtain a certificate of appealability when the court

dismisses a petition on procedural grounds, the petitioner must show that reasonable jurists would

find it debatable (1) whether the court was correct in its procedural ruling and (2) whether the

petition states a valid claim for denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000). As previously explained, the claim presented by Fletcher are unexhausted. Because there

is no basis for finding that jurists of reason would debate the correctness of this procedural ruling

or find a reason to encourage him to proceed further, a certificate of appealability must be denied. 

For the foregoing reasons the court DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE

pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4 because the claim is unexhausted and DENIES a

certificate of appealability pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 11. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 1, 2014

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1518 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1518

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the exclusion for 
    employer-provided educational assistance to include educational 
            assistance provided to dependents of employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2005

 Mr. Keller (for himself, Mr. Foley, and Mr. English of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the exclusion for 
    employer-provided educational assistance to include educational 
            assistance provided to dependents of employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Friendly Employers Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED 
              TO DEPENDENTS OF EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 127(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining educational assistance) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or a dependent of the employee'' after 
        ``education of the employee'' in subparagraph (A), and
            (2) by inserting ``or dependent'' after ``employee'' in 
        subparagraph (B) and in the material following subparagraph 
        (B).
    (b) Separate Limitation for Dependents.--Subsection (a) of section 
127 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(3) Maximum exclusion for assistance furnished to 
        dependents.--If, but for this paragraph, this section would 
        exclude from gross income more than $2,500 of educational 
        assistance furnished to the dependents of an employee (in the 
        aggregate) during a calendar year, this section shall apply 
        only to the first $2,500 of such assistance so furnished.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (2) of section 127(a) of such 
Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``an individual'' and inserting ``the 
        employee'', and
            (2) in the heading thereof by striking ``maximum 
        exclusion'' and inserting ``maximum exclusion for assistance 
        furnished to employee''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Gregory Charles KRUG, petitioner, v. John G. ROBERTS, Jr., Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

No. 12-8660.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7872
<ALLOWANCES>                                       247
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10316
<PP&E>                                            5412
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7928
<BONDS>                                            523
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1808
<COMMON>                                         40516
<OTHER-SE>                                     (32425)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18350
<SALES>                                          19214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19214
<CGS>                                            15318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    15318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    148
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .002
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,835,731
<SECURITIES>                                   825,282
<RECEIVABLES>                                  525,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,986,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          252,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,258,030
<OTHER-SE>                                     475,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,986,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,792
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                232,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                    74,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

28834

Vol. 60, No. 106

Friday, June 2, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service

9 CFR Part 3

[Docket No. 93-076-3]

Marine Mammal Negotiated

Rulemaking Advisory Committee;

Establishment

Correction

In proposed rule document 95–12434

beginning on page 27049 in the issue of

Monday, May 22, 1995, make the

following corrections:

On page 27050, in the first column, in

the second full paragraph, in the fifth

line, and in the third full paragraph, in

the third line, ‘‘human’’ should read

‘‘humane’’ each time it appears.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 23-95]

Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone—Ocala/

Marion County, Florida; Application

and Public Hearing

Correction

In notice document 95–12498

beginning on page 27077 in the issue of

Monday, May 22, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 27078, in the first column, in

the third full paragraph, beginning in

the second line from the bottom, ‘‘(to

[75 days from date of publication])’’

should read ‘‘(to August 7, 1995)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 164

[CGD 83-043]

RIN 2115-AB41

Incorporation of Amendments to the

International Convention for Safety of

Life at Sea, 1974

Correction

In rule document 95–10921 beginning

on page 24767 in the issue of

Wednesday, May 10, 1995, make the

following correction:

§ 164.35 [Corrected]

On page 24771, in the third column,

in § 164.35(o), in the fifth line, ‘‘1991’’

should read ‘‘1995’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on

Applications To Impose and Use the

Revenue From a Passenger Facility

Charge (PFC) at John F. Kennedy

International Airport, Jamaica, NY; La

Guardia Airport (LGA), Flushing, NY,

and Newark International Airport

(EWR), Newark, NJ

Correction

In notice document 95– 12754

appearing on page 27592 in the issue of

Wednesday, May 24, 1995, make the

follwing corrections:

1. In the second column, in the

twenty-first and twenty-second lines,

‘‘July 9, 1995’’ should read ‘‘July 29,

1995’’.

2. In the third column, in the file line,

‘‘FR Doc. 95-1754’’ should read ‘‘FR

Doc. 95-12754’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D