alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1527 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1527

    To remove all embargoes on food, medicine, and medical supplies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2005

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To remove all embargoes on food, medicine, and medical supplies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Humanitarian Food and Medicine 
Export Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) laws or regulations prohibiting the export of food, 
        medicine, or medical supplies to any foreign country have a 
        disproportionately negative effect on the most vulnerable 
        citizens of that country;
            (2) laws or regulations prohibiting American manufacturers 
        or farmers from exporting their products represent an unfair 
        restriction on their ability to engage in voluntary economic 
        activity;
            (3) embargoes of food, medicine, or medical supplies 
        interrupt the discourse between nations and thus promote 
        further enmity and militarism; and
            (4) embargoes of food, medicine, or medical supplies allow 
        affected foreign leaders to scapegoat the United States for the 
        failures of their domestic policy.

SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF EMBARGOES ON FOOD, MEDICINE, OR MEDICAL SUPPLIES.

    Upon the enactment of this Act, any prohibition on private 
donations or other exports from the United States to any other country 
of food, medicine, or medical supplies shall cease to be effective, and 
private donations and other exports from the United States to any other 
country of food, medicine, or medical supplies, that are intended to 
meet basic human needs, may not be prohibited.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Food.--The term ``food'' means any raw, cooked, 
        processed, or prepared edible substance, ice, or beverage, or 
        ingredient used or intended to be used for human consumption.
            (2) Medicine.--The term ``medicine'' has the meaning given 
        the term ``drug'' in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
        Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael
J. Cave, President of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                          
|------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|July 28, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. CAVE      
|              |  |  |  | Michael J. Cave
President



25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ELIZA GONZALEZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CV 207

)

HAMMOND SCHOOL CORPORATION, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

On November 6, 2013, this court referred defendant’s motion to dismiss (which

was closely related to plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint) to Magistrate Judge

John E. Martin. (DE # 20.) On February 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Martin issued an

order granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and

recommending that this court deny defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot. (DE # 21.)

In his report, Magistrate Judge Martin informed the parties that any objections to the

report and recommended finding must be made within 14 days after being served with

a copy of the report. (DE # 21 at 7.) That time has passed, and no objections have been

filed. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Martin’s report

and recommendation (DE # 21) and DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot

(DE # 10).

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 10, 2014

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12810]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16974 and #16975; Virginia Disaster Number VA-
00095]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Virginia

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of VIRGINIA 
(FEMA-4602-DR), dated 05/10/2021.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms.
    Incident Period: 02/11/2021 through 02/13/2021.

DATES: Issued on 06/10/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/09/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/10/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
VIRGINIA, dated 05/10/2021, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Chesterfield, Hanover.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-12810 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of YDI Wireless, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick L.
Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald              /s/ Patrick L. Milton
--------------------------            -------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                  Patrick L. Milton
Chief Executive Officer               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: November 15, 2004               Date: November 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28409-28410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13267]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPPTS-44617; FRL-4956-7]


TSCA Chemical Testing; Receipt of Test Data

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the receipt of test data on ethyl 
acetate (CAS No. 141-78-6) submitted pursuant to a testing consent 
order under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Publication of 
this notice is in compliance with section 4(d) of TSCA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan B. Hazen, Director, 
Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. E-543B, 401 
M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554-1404, TDD (202) 554-0551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 40 CFR 790.60(a)(10), all TSCA section 
4 consent orders must contain a statement [[Page 28410]] that results 
of testing conducted pursuant to testing consent orders will be 
announced to the public in accordance with section 4(d).

I. Test Data Submissions

    Test data for ethyl acetate were submitted by The Chemical 
Manufacturers Association Oxo Process Panel pursuant to a testing 
consent order at 40 CFR 799.5000. They were received by EPA on April 5, 
1995. The submission includes a final report entitled ``Ethyl Acetate: 
An Acute Vapor Inhalation Neurotoxicity Study in the Rat.'' This 
chemical is used as a solvent for lacquers and enamel coatings, as a 
solvent for inks, as a plastics solvent, and in chemical synthesis.
    EPA has initiated its review and evaluation process for this data 
submission. At this time, the Agency is unable to provide any 
determination as to the completeness of the submission.

II. Public Record

    EPA has established a public record for this TSCA section 4(d) 
receipt of data notice (docket number OPPTS-44617). This record 
includes copies of all studies reported in this notice. The record is 
available for inspection from 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except legal holidays, in the TSCA Public Docket Office, Rm. B-607 
Northeast Mall, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Test data.

    Dated: May 22, 1995.

Charles M. Auer,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and 
Toxics.

[FR Doc. 95-13267 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                      0000712843
<NAME>                              ELXSI CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                        USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               4,968,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  130,000
<INVENTORY>                                 9,706,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           21,501,000
<PP&E>                                     29,950,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             66,602,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,035,000
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 44,159,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               66,602,000
<SALES>                                    48,529,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           48,529,000
<CGS>                                      38,293,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              44,465,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            526,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,808,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,523,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,285,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,285,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .44
        


</TABLE>
[Nos. 35725-5-I; 35788-3-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kaai Joseph Williams, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 94-1-03582-3 and 94-1-02232-2, Norma Smith Huggins, J., entered November 28 and December 19, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Grosse and Ellington, JJ.
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

* *

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-11574

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No   

** **
Vijay K. CHHABRA, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 12-411.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RONALD LEE COUCH, JR., a/k/a D, a/k/a Diablo,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (2:98-cr-00099-HCM-1)

Submitted: February 4, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Lee Couch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael 

Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lee Couch, Jr. seeks to appeal his conviction 

and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the 

notice of appeal within fourteen days after the entry of 

judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a 

motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the 

district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to 

file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States 

v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on January 12, 

1999. The notice of appeal was filed on January 3, 2011.*

DISMISSED

 

Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

STEVE PRUITT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1215-TS

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Steve Pruitt, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition [ECF No. 1] attempting to

challenge the result of a parole revocation hearing that was held on October 7, 2013, at the

Reception and Diagnostic Center. He argues that it was wrong for the Indiana Parole Board to

have not promptly held a hearing in Lucas County, Ohio, when he was arrested and detained

there. However, before the court can consider a habeas corpus petition challenging a state

proceeding, the petitioner must have previously presented his claims to the state courts. “This

means that the petitioner must raise the issue at each and every level in the state court system,

including levels at which review is discretionary rather than mandatory.” Lewis v. Sternes, 390

F.3d 1019, 1025–26 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999)). 

There are two possible methods for challenging a parole revocation in Indiana: by filing a

post-conviction relief petition, Receveur v. Buss, 919 N.E.2d 1235 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), or by

filing a state habeas corpus petition if the inmate is seeking immediate release. Lawson v. State,

845 N.E.2d 185, 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). Furthermore, if a state habeas corpus petition is

improperly filed, it will be converted to a post-conviction petition. Hardley v. State, 893 N.E.2d

740, 743 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008); Ward v. Ind. Parole Bd., 805 N.E.2d 893 (2004). Here, Pruitt says

that he has not presented his claims to any state court in any proceeding. Therefore he has not
exhausted his state court remedies and this case must be dismissed without prejudice so that he

can exhaust these claims in the state courts. If, after he has ultimately presented his claims to the

Indiana Supreme Court, he has not yet obtained relief, then he may return to federal court and

file a new habeas corpus petition. 

For the foregoing reasons, this federal habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4. 

SO ORDERED on November 26, 2013.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1701 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 

preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 0.5 percent or greater. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2005 

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini 

prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 0.5 percent or greater. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRE4 SERVED BY VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID IN 

5 CONCENTRATIONS AT 0.5 PERCENT OR 

6 GREATER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 
2 

•HR 1701 IH 

‘‘ 9902.20.04 Pepperoncini, prepared or 

preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 

0.5 percent or greater (provided for in subheading 

2001.90.38) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                                        Exhibit 27

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<CAPTION>

<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,135,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (146,100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,285,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,599,500
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     316,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,285,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>