alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         --------------------------------------------------------------


In connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Farmers Capital Bank
Corporation  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the undersigned  hereby  certifies in his capacity as officer of Farmers Capital
Bank Corporation,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.




Date:     8-5-04                        /s/ G. Anthony Busseni
      --------------                    -----------------------------------
                                        G. Anthony Busseni
                                        President and CEO



Date:     8-5-04                        /s/ C Douglas Carpenter
      --------------                    -----------------------------------
                                        C. Douglas Carpenter
                                        Vice President, Secretary, and CFO


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Farmers  Capital  Bank  Corporation  and will be retained by Farmers
Capital Bank Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1974 

To provide for protection of the flag of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. BOUCHER (for himself and Mr. SCHIFF) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for protection of the flag of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flag Protection Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF THE FLAG OF THE UNITED 

7 STATES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 700 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘§ 700. Protection of the flag of the United States 

11 ‘‘(a) ACTIONS PROMOTING VIOLENCE.—Any person 

12 who destroys or damages a flag of the United States with 
2 

•HR 1974 IH 

1 intent to provoke imminent violence or a breach of the 

2 peace, and in circumstances reasonably likely to produce 

3 imminent violence or a breach of the peace, shall be fined 

4 under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or 

5 both. 

6 ‘‘(b) DAMAGING A FLAG BELONGING TO THE

7 UNITED STATES.—Any person who steals or knowingly 

8 converts to his or her use, or to the use of another, a flag 

9 of the United States belonging to the United States and 

10 intentionally destroys or damages that flag shall be fined 

11 under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, 

12 or both. 

13 ‘‘(c) DAMAGING A FLAG OF ANOTHER ON FEDERAL

14 LAND.—Any person who, within any lands reserved for 

15 the use of the United States, or under the exclusive or 

16 concurrent jurisdiction thereof, steals or knowingly con17 verts to his or her use, or to the use of another, a flag 

18 of the United States belonging to another person and in19 tentionally destroys or damages that flag shall be fined 

20 under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, 

21 or both. 

22 ‘‘(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 

23 be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Con24 gress to deprive any State, territory, possession, or the 

25 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of jurisdiction over any of-
3 

•HR 1974 IH 

1 fense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence 

2 of this section. 

3 ‘‘(e) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 

4 ‘flag of the United States’ means any flag of the United 

5 States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any 

6 size, in a form that is commonly displayed as a flag and 

7 would be taken to be a flag by the reasonable observer.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for chapter 33 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

10 by striking out the item relating to section 700 and insert11 ing in lieu thereof the following new item: 

‘‘700. Protection of the flag of the United States.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

13 It is the sense of the Congress that the States should 

14 enact prohibitions similar to the provisions of this Act in 

15 an order to provide the maximum protection to the flag 

16 of the United States. 

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ANDRE VANCLIFF,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 422 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 14th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 171 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 171

To restore the standards used for determining whether technical workers 
   are not employees as in effect before the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore the standards used for determining whether technical workers 
   are not employees as in effect before the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Technical Workers Fairness Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TECHNICAL 
              WORKERS ARE NOT EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Repeal of Section 530(d) of the Revenue Act of 1978.--Section 
530(d) of the Revenue Act of 1978 (as added by section 1706 of the Tax 
Reform Act of 1986) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to periods ending after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 37403-6-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. John Brent Shape, *Respondent.*

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-07599-0, Marilyn R. Sellers, J., entered September 1, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per curiam.
|   | (1) | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended      September 30, 2009 (the “Quarterly Report”) complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d));  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 20, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Rodney W. Schutt    |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                              |   | Rodney      W. Schutt        |
|                              |   | Chief      Executive Officer |
#### SEELBACH et al., Appellants, v. BECKER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 18, 1899.)

Action by Rudolph Seelbach and others against Louis W. Becker and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr: Stuttgart, AR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




The dedicated personnel of the USDA-ARS Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center (SNARC)
 Aerial view of the USDA-ARS Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center (SNARC).
 Hybrid striped bass hatch as larvae and eat live foods, such as rotifers and brine shrimp.
 SNARC conducts research on novel aquaculture production methods, such as bio-floc systems.
 Research on numerous aquaculture species has been conducted at SNARC for almost 60 years.


Mission


People Barnett, Louis
                                            *- Matt* Bouscher, Jeff Brown, Jason Deshotel, Michael Farmer, Bradley Fuller, Adam Green, Bartholomew
                                            *- Bart* Harper, Paxton Huskey, George Ideker, Robert Lazenby, Teresa Lazenby, Wes Ledbetter, Cynthia
                                            *- Cindy* McEntire, Matthew
                                            *- Matt* Ray, Candis Roberts, Rebecca Straus, David
                                            *- Dave*


Southeast Area   yulin.jia@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 136 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 136

 To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, 
         and to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, 
         and to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER.

    Executive Order 13166, ``Improving Access to Services for Persons 
with Limited English Proficiency'' (August 16, 2000; 65 Fed. Reg. 
50121), is null and void and shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    No funds appropriated pursuant to any provision of law may be used 
to promulgate or enforce any executive order that creates an 
entitlement to services provided in any language other than English.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, in connection with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(i) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                           |  | 
| |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | March 31, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ H. Michael Schwartz                                   |  | 
| |  | Date           |  |  |  |     |  | H. Michael Schwartz                                       |  | 
| |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | President, CEO and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the year ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ John K. Morgan                             
|John K. Morgan                                 
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 6, 2008                               

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained
by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Joseph M. DINICOLA, petitioner, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

No. 12-1286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 4(l)







February 27, 2015

















Securities and Exchange Commission

 100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549







	
Subject:

	 	
General Electric Capital Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 – File No. 001-06461










Dear Sirs:







Neither General Electric Capital Corporation (the "Corporation") nor any of its subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed as an exhibit to the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, under which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR §229.601), the Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of such long-term debt not filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.


 







	
Very truly yours,


GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION


 


	
By:

	
/s/ Daniel C. Janki

	 	 
	 	
Daniel C. Janki

 Senior Vice President – Corporate Treasury and Global Funding Operation
#### McDONALD, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Jane McDonald against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### Roy COMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 and Local 375, Defendants-Appellees, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

No. 03-7970.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 13, 2004.

Roy Commer, Staten Island, NY, for Appellant, pro se.

Irwin Bluestein (Hanan B. Kolko), Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., New York, NY, for Appellee, of counsel.

PRESENT: FEINBERG, CABRANES, Circuit Judges and KRAVITZ,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Mark R. Kravitz, of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Roy Commer appeals from a judgment of the District Court dismissing his claim that District Council 37 violated the Labor Management and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 401*et seq.*The District Court concluded that the claim is moot.

For substantially the reasons stated by the District Court, we agree that the dispute between the parties has dissolved. Because Commer seeks only to enjoin ratification and enforcement of contracts that have already expired, it is no longer possible to grant him the relief he seeks. *See Russman v. Bd. of Educ.,*260 F.3d 114, 118-19 (2d Cir.2001). Moreover, because a subsequent dispute involving another agreement between District Council 37 and the City of New York could be fully litigated prior to the expiration of that agreement, this dispute is not capable of repetition yet evading review. *See id.*at 119.

We have considered all of plaintiffs claims on appeal and we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.
FDIC-Stats At A Glance

Total

Dollar Amounts in Billions 1st Qtr 2002 1st Qtr 2001 1st Qtr 2002 1st Qtr 2001 1st Qtr 2002

Number of FDIC-Insured 8,005 8,238 1,515 1,584 9,520

Number of FDIC-Supervised 4,932 5,055 508 525 5,440

Total Assets $ 6,505 6,316 1,318 1,255 7,823

Total Loans $ 3,893 3,831 860 848 4,753

Domestic Deposits $ 3,749 3,515 820 762 4,569

Net Income $ 21.732 19.836 3.637 2.923 25.369

Percent Profitable % 93.3 93.0 92.2 89.8 93.1

Average Return on Assets % 1.33 1.26 1.11 0.95 1.29

Assets under $1 Billion % 1.17 1.20 0.32 0.70 0.99

Assets over $1 Billion % 1.36 1.28 1.33 1.03 1.36

Average Return on Equity % 14.46 14.71 12.83 11.27 14.20

Net Interest Margin % 4.19 3.83 3.52 3.03 4.07

Equity to Assets % 9.30 8.67 8.89 8.48 9.22

Noncurrent Loans * % 1.47 1.20 0.92 0.74 1.37

Real Estate Loans % 1.00 0.87 0.89 0.69 0.96

C&I Loans % 2.61 1.82 2.21 1.66 2.59

Consumer Loans % 1.49 1.41 0.60 0.85 1.41

Coverage Ratio ** % 130.88 140.38 99.39 119.32 126.98

Net Charge-Off Rate % 1.14 0.73 0.26 0.25 0.98

Real Estate Loans % 0.15 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.12

C&I Loans % 1.45 0.90 1.39 1.37 1.44

Consumer Loans % 3.98 2.44 1.92 1.93 3.78

* Nonaccruing loans and loans past due 90+ days

** Loss reserve as a percentage of noncurrent loans

1st Qtr

All Insured Institutions 2002 YTD 2001 2000 1999 1998

Credit Card Loans

Held on Balance Sheet $ 248 233 249 212 242

Securitized and Sold $ 358 341 299 291 261

Unused Commitments $ 3,170 2,876 2,528 2,116 2,042

Total Credit Card Lines $ 3,776 3,450 3,076 2,619 2,544

Credit Card Loss Rate % 8.19 5.14 4.28 4.39 5.15

No. of Personal Bankruptcies 369,237 1,451,575 1,217,628 1,281,360 1,397,695

As of March 31, 2002

Commercial Banks Savings Institutions
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Animal Disease Center: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Food Safety and Enteric PathogensSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center AACRAC Book Library Docs Ames links





- Main Page
- Sponsored Observances
- Members
- Video Library
- Book Library
- Past Observances
- ODEO Video Library

AACRAC Book Libraryheadline bar The Ames Area Civil Rights Advisory Committee has purchased civil rights related books and has made them available for checkout at the NCAH Library. Follow the link below to the NCAH library and search the term "AACRAC" or the specific book. NCAH Library Services


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov