alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2085 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2085

        To extend the duty suspension on Azoxystrobin Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the duty suspension on Azoxystrobin Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AZOXYSTROBIN TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.06 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Azoxystrobin Technical) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Aaliyah ZAKAT, petitioner, v. Badr AVENT.

No. 13-6523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia office, denied.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. DAAA09-02-D-0007 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59557

Jason N. Workmaster, Esq.

Covington & Burling LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Srikanti Schaffner, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthe appeal having been settled, the appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 1 September 2015

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59557, Appeal ofKellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Gerald Hayes v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 09

- 00437

- CR

Trial court case number: 1198372

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

On July 26, 2012, we abated the above

- referenced appeal for the appointment of counsel

to represent appellant. A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed, reflecting that Franklin Bynum has been appointed. Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated

. The record is complete. Appellant’s appointed counsel must file a brief no later than 30 days from the date of this order

. Because appellant is represented by counsel on appeal, we strike appellant’s pro se brief

and a ll currently pending pro se motions

. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Marshall v.

State , 210 S.W.3d 618, 620 n. 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ( stating that points raised in appellant’ s pro se brie f would not be considered because appellant had no ri ght to hybrid representation) ; Thomas v. State

, 312 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. App.

— Hou ston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d)

. Appellant’s appointed counsel may re

- file any motions he deems appropriate.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Radack
 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: November 2, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1 PHARMOS
CORPORATION
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION In connection with the quarterly report of PHARMOS
CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, ROBERT F. JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Date: May 8, 2008 By: /s/ Robert F. Johnston A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise
adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos
Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., §

ALAN S. ARMSTRONG, STEPHEN §

W. BERGSTROM, NANCY K. BUESE, §

STEPHEN I. CHAZEN, CHARLES I. §

COGUT, MICHAEL A. CREEL, VICKI §

L. FULLER, PETER A. RAGAUSS, §

SCOTT D. SHEFIELD, MURRAY D. § No. 139, 2021

SMITH, WILLIAM H. SPENCE, AND §

COMPUTERSHARE TRUST §

COMPANY, N.A., § Court Below: Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

Defendants Below, Appellants, §

§

v. § C.A. No. 2020

- 0707

§

STEPHEN WOLOSKY AND CITY OF §

ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE & FIRE §

RETIREMENT SYSTEM, §

§

Plaintiffs Below, Appellees. §

Submitted: October 20, 2021

Decided: November 3 , 2021

Before SEITZ

, Chief Justice; VALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, TRAYNOR and

MONTGOMERY

- REEVES , Justices, constituting the Court en Banc

.

O R D E R

Now this 3rd day of November, 2021 having considered this matter on the briefs

and oral arguments of the parties and the record below, a nd having concluded that the same

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery

in its Memorandum Opinion dated February 26, 2021, its Implementing Order dated March

4, 2021

, and its Final Order and Judgment dated April 23, 2021;NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decisions of the Court of Chancery

be and the same hereby are, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### YONKERS GARDEN CITY REALTY CO., Appellant, v. JACKSON BROS. REALTY CO. et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

June 20, 1913.)

Action by the Yonkers Garden City Realty Company against the Jackson Bros. Realty Company and others, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied, without costs.
(June 19, 1985)

#### In the Matter of Wayne Prospect et al., Respondents, v Peter F. Cohalan, as County Executive of the County of Suffolk, Appellant. In the Matter of the Town of Southampton et al., Respondents, v Peter F. Cohalan, as County Executive of the County of Suffolk, Appellant.

Motion by certain Suffolk County towns to vacate, pursuant to CPLR 5519 (c), a purported automatic stay of all proceedings to enforce a judgment of the Supreme Courifc, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated June 10,1985 pending appeal.

Motion granted to the extent that the subject judgment shall remain in full force and effect pending the determination of the appeal therefrom.

We note that the issues of who should properly represent the County of Suffolk in related matters involving the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant and the status, if any, in these related matters of the law firm of Kirkpatrick & Lockart, were not argued before Special Term and were not determined in the subject judgment, and we deem it inappropriate, under the circumstances, particularly in the absence of a complete record with respect thereto, to decide these issues on the appeal from the judgment. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WASHINGTON MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-MS15;

     2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information  in these  reports,  taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  servicer  under the pooling and
servicing, or similar,  agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicer
under the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement  and based  upon my
knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and
except as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its  obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The  reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating  to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting  a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:

     Litton Loan Servicing, Flagstar Bank, FSB, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp,
Greenpoint Mortgage Company, Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, each of the undersigned Gregory Pusey and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: November 12, 2010


/s/ Gregory Pusey

Gregory Pusey, President and Chief Executive Officer






Dated: November 12, 2010


/s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal

Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer


* * * * *








A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered October 17, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00416-CR

JOEY MARQUEL HINES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-60278-I

ORDER

On October 16, 2017, the State filed a First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief.

We GRANT the motion and ORDER that the State’s brief be filed on or before October 30, 

2017.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1599 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1599

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for two years the 
    higher exemption amounts under the alternative minimum tax for 
individuals and to adjust the exemption amounts and phaseout thresholds 
             in the alternative minimum tax for inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2005

 Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for two years the 
    higher exemption amounts under the alternative minimum tax for 
individuals and to adjust the exemption amounts and phaseout thresholds 
             in the alternative minimum tax for inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF HIGHER EXEMPTION AMOUNTS UNDER THE 
              INDIVIDUAL AMT; ADJUSTMENT OF AMT FOR INFLATION.

    (a) Extension.--Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 55(d)(1) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption amount for 
taxpayers other than corporations) are each amended by striking ``and 
2005'' and inserting ``, 2005, 2006, and 2007''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Subsection (d) of section 55 of such 
Code (relating to exemption amount) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning in a calendar year after 2005, each of the 
        dollar amounts set forth in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) shall 
        be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year by 
                substituting `calendar year 2004' for `calendar year 
                1992' in subparagraph (B) thereof.
If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence is not a 
multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple 
of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
WILLIAM
M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.


Worldwide
Petroleum Consultants




12770
      Coit Road, Suite 907
                Dallas,
      Texas 75251
              (972)
      385-0354
                Fax:
      (972) 788-5165
                E-Mail:
      office@wmcobb.com





March 26,
2010





Reef Oil
& Gas Income and Development Fund III, L.P.


1901 N.
Central Expressway, Suite 300


Richardson,
Texas 75080




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS




Gentlemen:




William
M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use of our name, to
references to our name, and to the inclusion of information taken from
“Estimated Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of January 1, 2010 Attributable
to Interests Owned by Reef Oil & Gas Income and Development Fund III, L.P.”,
under the section “Item 2 Properties – Proved Crude Oil and Natural Gas
Reserves”.  We also consent to the inclusion of our letter report
dated February 22, 2010 and summary reserve information in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Reef Oil & Gas Income and Development Fund III, L.P. as Exhibit
99.1.





Sincerely,WILLIAM
      M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.Texas
      Registered Engineering Firm F-84Randal
      M. Brush, P.E.Senior
      Vice President
#### HABICUST, Respondent, v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by Fanny L. Habieust, as administratrix, etc., against the United States Gypsum Company. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Q2 Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 1, 2016/s/ JENNIFER N. HARRISJennifer N. HarrisChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2413

MARCELA VANESSA SIGUENZA-DE HENRIGUEZ, a/k/a Marcela Vanessa 

Siguenza-De Henriquez; M.A.H-S; M.J.H-S,

 Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: May 17, 2019 Decided: May 23, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit 

Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nancy Pulliam Quinn, QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Papu Sandhu, Assistant Director, 

Matthew A. Connelly, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil 

Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcela Vanessa Siguenza-De Henriguez (Siguenza) and her minor children, 

natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s 

denial of Siguenza’s requests for the relief of asylum, withholding of removal and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the 

record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of 

the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 

(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Siguenza-De Henriguez (B.I.A. Nov. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
AO 450 (Rev. 10/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

LAURENTHIA BOSWELL )

V.

Plaintiff(s)

Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00700

)

)

JEFFREY CHESTER )

CITY OF SOUTH BEND, Indiana )

Defendant(s) )

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

 the plaintiff(s) LAURENTHIA BOSWELL recover from

the defendant(s) JEFFREY CHESTER; and CITY OF SOUTH BEND, Indiana the amount of

FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS dollars ($ 15,000.00 ), which includes

prejudgment interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of 0.13 %, along with costs.

the plaintiff(s) recover nothing, the action to be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant(s)

recover costs from the plaintiff(s)

.

other: Plaintiff LAURENTHIA BOSWELL has ACCEPTED the OFFER OF JUDGMENT made by defendants 

JEFFREY CHESTER; and CITY OF SOUTH BEND, Indiana wherein aforementioned plaintiff recovers FIFTEEN

THOUSAND DOLLARS from aforementioned defendants in adjudication of plaintiff's claims. SO ENTERED.

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

decided by Judge on a motion for

.

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00700-JD-CAN document 15 filed 11/26/13 page 1 of 2
Date November 26, 2013 CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

s/L. Bagley, Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00700-JD-CAN document 15 filed 11/26/13 page 2 of 2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

p0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140826

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140826 COA: 287791 Mason CC: 07-001878-FC CHRISTOPHER BRANDON LATIMER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13274]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Mental Health Initial Review Group, Psychobiology, 
Behavior, and Neuroscience Review Committee, which was published in the 
Federal Register on April 17, 1995 (60 CFR 19268).
    This committee was to have convened at 9 a.m. on June 19 at the 
Ramada Inn Rockville in Rockville, Maryland. The location has been 
changed to the Crowne Plaza Holiday Inn, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20857.

    Dated: May 24, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-13274 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M