alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Coastal Pacific Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending April 30, 2008, and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Taylor, Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: _/s/ Larry Taylor__________

Name: Larry Taylor

Title: Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer









Date:

October 21, 2008
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1026

LT Case Nos. 2022-CF-009661-A

 2022-CF-004474-A

_____________________________

KEITH MAGEE MCDONALD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian A. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

October 3, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, HARRIS, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties V Limited Partnership (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### WILKERSON V. THE STATE.

*Bending Threatening Letter.*

(Decided Feb. 14, 1907.)

Appeal from Geneva County Court.

Heard before Hon. P. N. Hickman.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion by

Simpson, J.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., I-Iaralson and Denson, JJ., concur.
# L_2008131EN.01001301.xml

| 21.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 131/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 131/13

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 May 2008

appointing two Italian members and an Italian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2008/382/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | Two seats as members of the Committee of the Regions have fallen vacant as a result of the resignations of Mr Bruno MARZIANO and Mr Paolo FONTANELLI. A seat as an alternate member of the Committee has fallen vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr CARRAZZA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two seats as members of the Committee of the Regions have fallen vacant as a result of the resignations of Mr Bruno MARZIANO and Mr Paolo FONTANELLI. A seat as an alternate member of the Committee has fallen vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr CARRAZZA,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, ending on 25 January 2010:

| (a) | as members:






  — | Mr Graziano MILIA, Presidente della Provincia di Cagliari (change of position), |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

—

Mr Graziano MILIA, Presidente della Provincia di Cagliari (change of position),

| — | Mr Leonardo DOMENICI, Sindaco del comune di Firenze; |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Leonardo DOMENICI, Sindaco del comune di Firenze;

and

| (b) | as an alternate member:






  — | Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI, Consigliere comunale del Comune di Gerace. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as an alternate member:

—

Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI, Consigliere comunale del Comune di Gerace.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2008.

For the Council

The President

A. BAJUK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000714286
<NAME> UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,456,231
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         100,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,968,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,298,543
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,697,369
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,701,842
<LOANS>                                     35,866,773
<ALLOWANCE>                                    739,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,485,118
<DEPOSITS>                                  46,422,470
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            379,813
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,590
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,876,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              51,485,118
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,685,456
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              287,926
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,871
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,976,253
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             912,948
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,062,497
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   95,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,129,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,645)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (41,645)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.15
<LOANS-NON>                                    111,946
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               715,399
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   71,516
<RECOVERIES>                                       393
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              739,274
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           739,274
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        461,895
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

CHAD McKINNEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-677 PS

 )

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the habeas corpus petition (DE 1) filed by Chad

McKinney, a pro se prisoner, challenging his prison disciplinary proceeding at the Indiana State

Prison on May 31, 2011, where he was found guilty of Possessing Unauthorized Property in

violation of B-215. The respondent filed a motion to dismiss (DE 4) and informed the petitioner

“in the spirit of Lewis v. Faulkner, 689 F.2d 100 (7th Cir. 1982), that he had . . . twenty-three

(23) days from the date on the certificate of service to file [his] reply with the Clerk.” DE 4 at 3.

This was incorrect. Pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.Cr.R. 47-2, he had 28 days – plus the 3 days for

mailing provided for by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d) – for a total of 31 days. Thus, the

deadline was October 7, 2013. Nevertheless, I have waited even longer for a response from the

petitioner and none has arrived. 

The respondent argues that these claims are unexhausted because McKinney did not

appeal to the Final Reviewing Authority and has provided the administrative record which

proves that McKinney did not appeal beyond the Superintendent of the Indiana State Prison. In

Indiana, prison disciplinary cases cannot be appealed to the state courts, so “to exhaust a claim,

and thus preserve it for collateral review under § 2254, a prisoner must present that legal theory

case 3:13-cv-00677-PPS document 6 filed 11/08/13 page 1 of 2
to the . . . Final Reviewing Authority . . ..” Moffat v. Broyles, 288 F.3d 978, 982 (7th Cir. 2002).

Here, because McKinney did not file an administrative appeal to the Final Reviewing Authority

and has not provided any explanation for not doing so, all of these claims are procedurally

defaulted. See Lewis v. Sternes, 390 F.3d 1019, 1025-1026 (7th Cir. 2004).

For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss (DE 4) is GRANTED, and the habeas

corpus petition (DE 1) is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: November 8, 2013.

s/ Philip P. Simon 

PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

case 3:13-cv-00677-PPS document 6 filed 11/08/13 page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine,N,N′′′-[1,2-ethane-diyl-bis [[[4,6-bis-[butyl (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl4-piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] imino]-3,1-propanediyl] ] 

bis[N′,N′′-dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)- and 

Butanedioic acid, dimethylester polymer with 4-hyroxy-2,2,6,6-

tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2005

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine,N,N′′′-[1,2-ethane-diyl-bis [[[4,6-bis-

[butyl (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-

triazine-2-yl] imino]-3,1-propanediyl] ] bis[N′,N′′-dibutylN′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)- and 

Butanedioic acid, dimethylester polymer with 4-hyroxy2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1833 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4,6-TRI2 AMINE,N,N′′′-[1,2-ETHANE-DIYL-BIS [[[4,6-BIS3 [BUTYL (1,2,2,6,6-PENTAMETHYL-4-

4 PIPERIDINYL)AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2-YL] 

5 IMINO]-3,1-PROPANEDIYL] ] BIS[N′,N′′- 

6 DIBUTYL-N′,N′′-BIS(1,2,2,6,6-PENTAMETHYL-4-

7 PIPERIDINYL)- AND BUTANEDIOIC ACID, 

8 DIMETHYLESTER POLYMER WITH 4-HYROXY9 2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-1-PIPERDINE ETHANOL. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

11 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

12 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

13 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.52 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine,N,N′′′-[1,2-ethanediyl-bis [[[4,6-bis-[butyl 

(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-

piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] imino]-3,1-

propanediyl] ] bis[N′,N′′- 

dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-

pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)- 

(CAS No. 106990–43–6) 

and Butanedioic acid, 

dimethylester polymer with 

4-hyroxy-2,2,6,6-

tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol (CAS No. 65447–77–0) 

(provided for in subheading 

3812.30.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

16 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|                 |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                   
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                               
|                 |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                     
|                 |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                              
|November 4, 2003 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                           
|DATE             |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)
|November 4, 2003 |  | by:  /s/ Michael J. Tuszka                                                                                                                            
|DATE             |  | Michael J. Tuszka,
                  Vice President
                  and Chief Accounting Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer)    

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

* *

For thequarterly period ended June 30, 2010

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-11574

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSHUA SADAT WASHINGTON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-372

D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00279-JAD-PAL-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Joshua Sadat Washington appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying compassionate release 

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-372

The district court denied Washington’s motion because he had not addressed

any of the compassionate release factors or identified any grounds for 

reconsideration of the court’s prior order. On appeal, Washington contends that he 

is entitled to compassionate release in light of the extreme stress that he is 

experiencing. This contention does not demonstrate that the district court abused 

its discretion in denying Washington’s motion. See United States v. Lopez-Cruz, 

730 F.3d 803, 811 (9th Cir. 2013) (stating standard of review). Washington’s 

reconsideration motion and arguments on appeal fail to identify any basis for 

revisiting the district court’s prior order denying compassionate release. See 

School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th 

Cir. 1993) (discussing when reconsideration is appropriate). 

We do not address in these proceedings Washington’s arguments concerning 

appointment of counsel for his 28 U.S.C § 2255 motion. In Appeal No. 23-3297 

this court will determine whether a certificate of appealability should issue as to 

the district court’s order denying Washington’s § 2255 motion.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1844

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Bronate Advanced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Graves introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Bronate Advanced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRONATE ADVANCED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.17      2,6-dibromo-4-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         cyanophenyl                                                        31/2008
                         octanoate/
                         heptanoate 2-
                         ethylhexyl (4-
                         chloro-2-
                         methylphenoxy)ace
                         tate (CAS Nos.
                         1689-99-2, 56634-
                         95-8, and 29450-
                         45-1) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```