alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

Levonnda Henry,

Plaintiff,

v.

Global Travel International, Inc.,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No.: 2:14-cv-00243-JVB-PRC

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT AND VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)

Levonnda Henry (“Plaintiff”), by Plaintiff’s attorney, hereby withdraws the complaint 

and voluntarily dismisses this action, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

Dated: October 8, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

By _/s/ Amy L. Cueller__

Amy L. Cueller, Esq.

LEMBERG LAW, L.L.C.

1100 Summer Street, 3rd Floor

Stamford, CT 06905

Telephone: (203) 653-2250

Facsimile: (203) 653-3424

Attorneys for Plaintiff

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00243-JVB-PRC document 5 filed 10/08/14 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 8, 2014, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice 

of Withdrawal was served electronically by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of 

Indiana Electronic Document Filing System (ECF) and that the document is available on the 

ECF system. 

By_/s/ Amy L. Cueller______

 Amy L. Cueller

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00243-JVB-PRC document 5 filed 10/08/14 page 2 of 2
ANNUAL REPORT 

10

FDIC SENIOR LEADERS

Seated (left to right): Arleas Upton Kea, Barbara A. Ryan, Chairman Jelena McWilliams, Director Martin J. Gruenberg, and Doreen R. Eberley.

Standing 1st Row (left to right): Jay N. Lerner, Arthur J. Murton, Jason C. Cave, Diane Ellis, Mark E. Pearce, Saul Schwartz, and Andy Jiminez. 2nd Row 

(left to right): Craig R. Jarvill, Kymberly K. Copa, M. Anthony Lowe, Howard G. Whyte, Charles Yi, Bret D. Edwards, Russell G. Pittman, Ricardo Delfin, 

Zachary N. Brown, and David Barr.

Not pictured: Brandon Milhorn, Steven O. App, Chad Davis, Suzannah L. Susser, and Robert D. Harris.

FDIC SENIOR LEADERS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 11, 2009
    
    /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy

STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZYDated: May 11, 2009
    
    /S/ Alan H. Lund

ALAN H. LUND
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1775 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1775

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Thiacloprid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Thiacloprid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIACLOPRID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.54      [3-[(6-Chloro-3-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         pyridinyl)-                                                        31/2008
                         methyl]-2-
                         thiazolidinyliden
                         e]- cyanamide
                         (thiacloprid)
                         (CAS No. 111988-
                         49-9) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2934.10.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

NOTICE OF DOCKETING - Short Form

March 21, 2017

To: Robert N. Trgovich

Clerk of Court

The below captioned appeal has been docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the

Seventh Circuit:

Appellate Case No: 17-1591

Caption:

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, et

al.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, 

Defendant - Appellee

District Court No: 3:15-cv-00463-JD

District Judge Jon E. DeGuilio

Clerk/Agency Rep Robert N. Trgovich

Date NOA filed in District Court: 03/21/2017

If you have any questions regarding this appeal, please call this office.

form name: c7_Docket_Notice_short_form(form ID: 188)

Case: 17-1591 Document: 1-3 Filed: 03/21/2017 Pages: 1

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 77 filed 03/21/17 page 1 of 1
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-30646

_____________________

COREY ALTON BARTON; STARR MARIE

PRITCHARD; ANGEL DENISE WILLIAMS;

and DAWN RENÉ VINCENT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

G & N INVESTMENTS, INC.; UNIONAMERICA

INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-164-A)

_______________________________________________________

May 6, 1999

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We accept the decision of the learned trial judge on the lack of complete diversity between

the parties in the survival action. Complete diversity does exist, however, on the wrongful death

claim, and the court will probably exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the survival action.

The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the case is remanded.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Order entered October 17, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00914
- CV
RICHARD RALEY , ET AL., Appellant s

V. DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P. C. , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appe al from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 17
- 00390
- B



### O RDER The reporter’s record is past due. By letter dated October 5, 2018 counsel for appellants verified that appellants have paid the fee for the reporter’s record. Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, we ORDER Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 2, to file the reporter’s record by November 5, 2018

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Wash ington and all parties.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Kambiz HooshmandKambiz HooshmandPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 240 A 1 8

Filed 1 February 2019

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. DARREN WAYNE GENTLE

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 81 7 S.E.2d 8 33 (2018), finding no error in
part and dismissing defendant’s appeal in part from a judgment and an order for

satellite

- based monitoring entered on 6 October 2016 by Judge Lindsay R. Davis in
Superior Court, Randolph County

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 January 2019

.

Josh ua H. Stein , Attorney General, by Joseph E. Elder , Assistant Attorney General, for the State

. Richard J. Costanza for defendant

- appell ant

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KUR T JEFFREY ANGELONE, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M IC HAEL FUR ST, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-36047 D.C . No. 3:07-c v-05538-R JB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington R obe rt J. B ry a

n, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. W a shington sta

te prisone r Kurt Je ffre y

Ange lone a

ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c o urt’ s orde r de ny ing Ange lone ’ s m otions to re c onside r the volunta ry dismissa l with pre

judic e of his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion. W e have jurisdic tion 

# FIL ED NOV 25 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wfor an a buse of disc re t ion, S

c h . Dist. N

o. 1J , Multnomah C

nty ., Or. v . AC

andS, Inc ., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th C ir. 1993), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny ing Ange l one ’ s m otions to re c onside r be c a

use Ange lone fa ile d to e sta blish grounds for such re lie f unde r e ithe r Fe de ra l R

ule of C ivil Proc e dure 59(e ) or 60(b). Se eid. at 1263 (discussing c irc um s ta nc e s wa rranting re c onside ration or re lie f from judgm e nt unde r R ule 59(e ) and 60(b)); Latshaw

v . Traine r W

ortham & C o., Inc . , 452 F.3d 1097, 1103 (9th C ir. 2006) (e xpla ining tha t Fe d. R . C iv. P. 60(b)(6) “ is use d spa ringly a s a n e quita ble re m e dy

to pre ve nt m anife st injustic e ” (c ita tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d)). C ontra ry to Ange lone ’ s c onte ntions, the distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny i ng Ange lone ’ s m otions to a ppoint c o unse l a

nd m e dic a l e xpe rts and his motion to c om

pe l disc ove ry . Se ePalme r v . Valde z , 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th C ir. 2009) (se tting forth sta nda rd of re vie w a

nd re quire m e nt of “ e xc e ptiona l c irc um s ta nc e s ” for a

ppointme nt of c o unse l); Halle tt v . Morgan , 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th C ir. 2002) (providing sta nda rd of re vie w a

nd de sc ribing trial c o urt’ s broa d disc re tion to deny a m otion to c om pe l); W alk e r v . Am. Home

Shie ld Long Te rm Disability Plan , 180 F.3d 1065, 1071 (9th C ir. 1999) (ide ntify ing sta n da rd of 1 2 - 3 6 0 4 7 2re vie w for a

ppointme nt of a

n e xpe rt unde r Fe d . R . Evid. 706(a)). W e re je c t Ange lone ’ s c onte ntion c o nc e rning a lle ge d judic ia l bia s. AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 3 6 0 4 7 3
#### Romola Dyson, Respondent, v Robert C. Dyson, Appellant.

— In an action for a divorce, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered May 16,1984, as (1) granted the plaintiff wife’s motion, *inter alia,*to compel him to comply with certain provisions of a stipulation of settlement which was incorporated but not merged in a judgment of divorce between the parties, to the extent of directing him to pay the sum of $75,000 to plaintiff and granted her leave to enter a judgment for that sum if he failed to do so within a stated time and (2) denied those branches of his cross motion which sought to modify the judgment and stipulation so as to delete therefrom the direction to pay certain sums to the plaintiff and the direction to pay the monthly maintenance and mortgage payments upon a cooperative apartment occupied by the daughter of the parties, and which sought to recoup moneys paid to the wife thereunder.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The facts alleged by appellant at Special Term are insufficient to raise an issue of fraud, mistake, or lack of completeness as to the in-court, oral stipulation relating, *inter alia,*to the continued ownership by plaintiff of the cooperative apartment in which the parties’ daughter was residing. Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                       632
<INVENTORY>                                     39,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,071
<PP&E>                                          34,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,856
<SALES>                                         36,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,422
<CGS>                                           20,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (45)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                       807
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998 AS FILED IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         115,476
<SECURITIES>                                    61,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,859
<INVENTORY>                                    233,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               589,770
<PP&E>                                         291,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                 111,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 780,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       402,689
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   780,859
<SALES>                                        195,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,872
<CGS>                                          118,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<FN>
<F1>EPS PRIMARY IS USED FOR EPS BASIC.
</FN>


        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Dated: November 8, 2010
    /s/ Henri CourpronHENRI COURPRONDated: November 8, 2010
    /s/ Frederick S. CromerFREDERICK S. CROMER -79-
##### 



QUEST ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.  UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Date of Grant:
    
    , 20Number of Common Units:
    
    Common Units
 THIS AGREEMENT
 RECITALS:
    AGREEMENT:
  Section 1. Incorporation of Plan




---



##### 



Section 2. Promise to Deliver Units
   Number of Units
    
    Transfer DateCommon Units
(25% of the total number of Units)
    
    Date of GrantCommon Units
(50% of the total number of Units)
    
    First (1st) Anniversary of
Date of GrantCommon Units
(75% of the total number of Units)
    
    Second (2nd) Anniversary of
Date of GrantCommon Units
(100% of the total number of Units)
    
    Third (3rd) Anniversary of
Date of Grant
 Section 3. Forfeiture of Right to Receive Units Prior to Transfer
   2




---



##### 



Section 4. No Assignment of Rights
  Section 5. Acknowledgement of Rights of the Company in Event of Change of
Control, Reorganization, Liquidation, Etc.
      Section 6. Voting Rights and DERs
  3




---



##### 



Section 7. Adjustments
  Section 8. Amendment and Cancellation
  Section 9. Withholding of Tax
  Section 10. Entire Agreement
  Section 11. Designation of Beneficiary
  4




---



##### 



Section 12. Applicable Law
   QUEST ENERGY, GP, LLC.By:Title:RECIPIENT
 Designation of Beneficiary(Relationship
to Recipient)(Name of Beneficiary)(Street Address)(City, State, Zip Code)
 5
---

March 30, 2012

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|    |                                               
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    
|    |                                               
|    | Consent of Expert                             

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Scott Cowie, MAusIMM, hereby consent to the use of my name
in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the
following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Preliminary Assessment of the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska dated
  February 17, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

Original document signed by Scott Cowie

|                              
|------------------------------
|Scott Cowie, MAusIMM          
|                              
|Tetra Tech Australia Pty. Ltd.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1899 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Thiochloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus 

Thiochloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORUS THIOCHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.92 Phosphorus Thiochloride 

(CAS No. 3982–91–0) (provided for in subheading 

2851.00.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1899 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ