alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |                                                                                                        |   |
| Date:  June 30, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Georges Benarroch                                                                                       |   |
|                           |   | Georges Benarroch                                                                                           |   |
|                           |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer |   |
|                           |   |                                                                                                        |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1828 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1828

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on (S)-Alpha-Hydroxy-3-
                      phenoxybenzeneacetonitrile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on (S)-Alpha-Hydroxy-3-
                      phenoxybenzeneacetonitrile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. (S)-ALPHA-HYDROXY-3-PHENOXYBENZENEACETONITRILE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.57 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-095 JD

)

DONTRELL SMITH )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on September 16, 2013 [DE 25]. The Court notes, however, that the plea

agreement [DE 20] incorrectly refers to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Count 2 of the

Indictment charges the Defendant with distributing heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 

The Report and Recommendation correctly identifies the offense as arising under Title 21. 

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations as modified, ACCEPTS

defendant Dontrell Smith’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Counts 1, 2, and 3 of

the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 111 and 922(g)(1), and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: October 9, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
**EXHIBIT 32**

August 15, 2005

Via EDGAR

Securities andExchange CommissionJudiciary Plaza450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:      Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MesaOffshore Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended  June 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of theTrust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust.

Theabove certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
|     | JPMORGAN  CHASE BANK, N.A.,  Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | /s/ MIKE ULRICH                                         |
|     | Mike Ulrich                                                  |
| * * | *Vice President and Trust Officer*                           |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1914 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1914

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
that the calculation of the duty imposed on imported cherries that are 
provisionally preserved does not include the weight of the preservative 
                       materials of the cherries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
that the calculation of the duty imposed on imported cherries that are 
provisionally preserved does not include the weight of the preservative 
                       materials of the cherries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CALCULATION OF DUTY IMPOSED ON IMPORTED 
              CHERRIES THAT ARE PROVISIONALLY PRESERVED.

    (a) Amendments.--Subheading 0812.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) in the general subcolumn of the column 1 rate of duty, 
        by inserting ``on drained weight'' after ``13.4 cents/kg''; and
            (2) in the special subcolumn of the column 1 rate of duty, 
        by inserting ``on drained weight'' after ``10 cents/kg'' and 
        ``12 cents/kg''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act and ending on the date on which the specific rate of duty involved 
is reduced to free.
                                 <all>
```
The Rise of Risk Management: Basel and Beyond

July 30, 2002 

Summary

On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, the FDIC will conduct a symposium entitled "The Rise of Risk 

Management: Basel and Beyond" co-sponsored with Credit Suisse First Boston. The focus of the 

symposium will be on bank risk management systems, including their performance, the challenges 

posed by the new Basel Capital Accord, and the issues raised by the move toward risk managementbased bank regulation. This issue of FYI outlines the agenda of the symposium and provides links to a 

live webcast of the proceedings. 

High-quality risk management 

systems are increasingly important to 

the health of financial markets and 

the macroeconomy. As banks, 

brokerage firms, government 

sponsored enterprises (GSEs), and 

other financial institutions become 

larger and more complex, their health 

and stability increasingly affect the 

global financial system. How these 

institutions manage risk will impact 

not only their own bottom lines but in 

many cases will also affect the 

performance of the domestic and 

world economies. 

With the implementation of a second Basel Capital Accord on the horizon, bank regulators are poised to 

embrace the culture of risk management in new ways. Under the proposed new Accord, regulators’ 

decisions about the capital adequacy of the largest banks would be based on their evaluations of bank 

risk management. As internal risk management systems enter the regulatory arena, the competitive 

dynamic between large banks and small, and between banks and non-banks, may change. Traditional 

notions of bank capital adequacy may be re-examined, and the disclosure of new risk-related information 

may increase the efficacy of market discipline.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will conduct a symposium on Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 

entitled "The Rise of Risk Management: Basel and Beyond." Co-sponsored with Credit Suisse First 

Boston, the symposium will address three basic questions:

1. How well have risk management systems performed in the volatile economic environment of 

recent years?

2. What are the challenges for risk management as the new Basel Capital Accord moves toward 

implementation?

3. What issues do the financial regulators need to address as they implement a risk managementdriven approach to supervision and regulation?

Participants will include a number of prominent figures in banking and finance, financial regulation, and 

the analyst community, including: Peter Fisher, Undersecretary of Treasury; Franklin D. Raines, 

Chairman and CEO, Fannie Mae; and Ken Thompson, CEO, Wachovia.
FYI readers are invited to follow the July 31 proceedings live from their desktop using links provided on 

the symposium home page at: http://www.fdic.gov/news/conferences/riseofrisk.html. A complete 

symposium agenda is available at this location, along with a link to opening remarks on risk management 

in banking by FDIC Chairman Donald E. Powell that will be posted at 10 am.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1932

To amend title 10, United States Code, to standardize the grade specified 

by law for the senior dental officer of the Air Force with that of 

the senior dental officer of the Army. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to standardize the 

grade specified by law for the senior dental officer of 

the Air Force with that of the senior dental officer 

of the Army.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STANDARDIZATION OF GRADE OF SENIOR DEN4 TAL OFFICER OF THE AIR FORCE WITH THAT 

5 OF SENIOR DENTAL OFFICER OF THE ARMY.

6 (a) AIR FORCE ASSISTANT SURGEON GENERAL FOR

7 DENTAL SERVICES.—Section 8081 of title 10, United 
2

•HR 1932 IH 

1 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘brigadier general’’ 

2 in the second sentence and inserting ‘‘major general’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the occur5 rence of the next vacancy in the position of Assistant Sur6 geon General for Dental Services in the Air Force that 

7 occurs after the date of the enactment of this Act or, if 

8 earlier, on the date of the appointment to the grade of 

9 major general of the officer who is the incumbent in that 

10 position on the date of the enactment of the Act.

Æ
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 09 0- CV I N R E DA M I E N D E M AR QUI S HU CK AB Y R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r th a s c o n s id e r e d re la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o rw r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is o f th e o p i n i o n th a t r e lie f s h o u l d b e d e n i e d a s m o o t. A c c o rd i n g l y , re l a to r’s pet i t i on f orw r i tofm and am us i s den i ed.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: L I V I N G STO N , D A U PH I N O T, an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: M a r c h 27, 2009
#### ELEMENTIS SPECIALTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon W. DUDAS, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, and Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-1239.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 3, 2006.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

*6ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
Robert Emmanuel EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10419.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 3(i)(h)


                 CERTIFICATE OF RENEWAL, RESTORATION AND REVIVAL
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           NEVADA ENERGY COMPANY, INC.

         1. The name of the corporation is Nevada Energy Company, Inc.

         2. Its registered office in the State of Delaware is located at 800
Delaware Avenue, City of Wilmington, County of New Castle 19801 and the name of
its registered agent at such address is Delaware Corporations Inc.

         3. The date of the filing of the original Certificate of Incorporation
was December 20, 1982.

         4. The date when restoration, renewal, and revival of the charter of
this company is to commence the 24th day of January, 1998 same being prior to
the date of the expiration of the charter. This renewal and revival of the
charter of this corporation is to be perpetual.

         5. This corporation was duly organized and carried on the business
authorized by its charter until the 25th day of January, 1998, at such time its
charter became inoperative and forfeited for failure to obtain a registered
agent and this certificate for renewal and revival is filed by authority of the
duly elected directors of the corporation in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and in compliance with the provisions of Section
312 of the Delaware General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as
amended, providing for the renewal, extension and restoration of charters,
Richard A. Cascarilla the last and acting authorized officer hereunto set his
hand to this Certificate this 25th day of November, 1998.


                                       By: /s/ Richard A. Cascarilla
                                          ---------------------------
                                               Authorized Officer


                                       Name: Richard A. Cascarilla
                                            -------------------------
                                                 Print or Type

                                       Title: President
                                             ------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

NICHOLAS E. KRALY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-203

)

SALIL N. RAO, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This case was filed in this Court on June 24, 2013, based on diversity jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff Nicholas E.

Kraly is a resident of the State of California and that Defendant Salil N. Rao is a resident of the

State of Florida. (Compl. ¶¶ 3-4.) 

The Complaint, however, is insufficient to establish the citizenship of both Plaintiff Kraly

and Defendant Rao because the “residency” of each party is meaningless for purposes of

diversity jurisdiction, as “citizenship is what matters.” Guar. Nat’l Title Co. v. J.E.G. Assocs.,

101 F.3d 57, 58-59 (7th Cir. 1996) (explaining that statements concerning a party’s “residency”

are not proper allegations of citizenship as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 

“It is well-settled that when the parties allege residence but not citizenship, the court must

dismiss the suit.” Held v. Held, 137 F.3d 998, 1000 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks

and citation omitted); see generally Smoot v. Mazda Motors of Am., Inc., 469 F.3d 675, 677-78

(7th Cir. 2006). 

Therefore, the Court must be advised of Kraly’s and Rao’s citizenship, rather than their

1
residency, which “[f]or natural persons . . . is determined by one’s domicile.” Dausch v. Rykse,

9 F.3d 1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993); see Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670

(7th Cir. 2012) (“But residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on

domicile—that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”); Am.’s

Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992) (“In federal law

citizenship means domicile, not residence.”). 

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended

Complaint on or before July 12, 2013, properly alleging the citizenship of Plaintiff Nicholas E.

Kraly and Defendant Salil N. Rao, which is determined by their domiciles rather than their

residences.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 27th day of June, 2013.

/S/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Order entered November 5, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01114-CV

FRISCO ATHLETIC NETWORK, INC. D/B/A/ LONESTAR VOLLEYBALL CLUB,

Appellant

V.

TRAIN KIDS NOW, INC. D/B/A DX3 ATHLETE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-00767-2018

ORDER

By order dated October 30, 2019, we ordered that this appeal be submitted without the 

reporter’s record. Before the Court is the November 1, 2019 request of Kristen Kopp, Official 

Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 2, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record. Ms. Kopp explains that the record in this case was recorded by both Denise Condran, 

Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 4, and herself. In the request, Ms. Kopp 

states that appellant has now paid the reporter’s fee. 

We GRANT the request as follows. We VACATE this Court’s October 30, 2019 order. 

The reporter’s record shall be filed by December 2, 2019.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Condran; Ms. 

Kopp; and all parties. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Mikojo Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 15, 2011





/s/ Timothy Neher





Timothy Neher


Principal Executive Officer


Principal Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MIKOJO INCORPORATED and will be retained by MIKOJO INCORPORATED and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  Certification
                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ELXSI Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 14, 2004                                /s/ ALEXANDER M. MILLEY
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Alexander M. Milley
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ELXSI Corporation and will be retained by ELXSI Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      E-6