Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 1995 / Proposed Rules 425

discussed on page 66601 of the

December 24, 1991, Federal Register, 40

CFR Part 300 which states sites should

not be retained on the NPL which are

otherwise eligible to be deleted simply

because they haven’t had a five year

review. Of course, state-funded O&M

and EPA-funded five-year reviews will

continue in the future, but site deletion

should proceed since applicable

deletion criteria have been satisfied.

EPA, with concurrence of the State of

Texas, has determined all appropriate

Fund-financed responses under

CERCLA at the Crystal City Airport

Superfund site have been completed,

and no further cleanup by responsible

parties is appropriate. Moreover, EPA

and the State of Texas have determined

remedial actions conducted at the site to

date are protective of public health,

welfare, and the environment.

Dated: November 1, 1994.

Approved By:

Allyn Davis,

Regional Administrator.

• After Action Report, Crystal City

Airport Site, Environmental Protection

Agency, Region VI Emergency Response

Branch, June 1984.

• Hazard Ranking System package for

the Crystal City Airport Site,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region VI, April 1984.

• Site Review and Update, Crystal

City Airport, Agency for Toxic

Substances and Disease Registry,

February 18, 1994.

• Health Assessment for the Crystal

City Airport Site, Agency for Toxic

Substances and Disease Registry, May

1988.

• Remedial Investigation, Final

Report, Crystal City Airport Site,

prepared by Ebasco Services

Incorporated for the Texas Water

Commission in cooperation with the

Environmental Protection Agency, June

1987.

• Feasibility Study, Final Report,

Crystal City Airport Site, prepared by

Ebasco Services Incorporated for the

Texas Water commission in cooperation

with the Environmental Protection

Agency, July 1987.

• Record of Decision, Crystal City

Airport Site, Environmental Protection

Agency, Region VI, September 28, 1987.

• Revised Community Relations Plan,

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., August

1989.

• Remedial Design, Final Report,

Crystal City Airport Site, prepared by

Ebasco Services Incorporated for the

Texas Water Commission in cooperation

with the Environmental Protection

Agency, December 1988.

• Remedial Design, Bid

Specifications, Crystal City Airport Site,

prepared by Ebasco Services

Incorporated for the Texas Water

Commission in cooperation with the

Environmental Protection Agency,

December 1988.

• Operations and Maintenance Plan,

Crystal City Airport Site, Prepared by

Ebasco Services Incorporated for the

Texas Water Commission in cooperation

with the Environmental Protection

Agency, December 1988.

• Remedial Action Report, Crystal

City Airport Site, prepared by Ebasco

Services Incorporated for the Texas

Water Commission in cooperation with

the Environmental Protection Agency,

December 1990.

• First Operations and Maintenance

Quarterly Report, Crystal City Airport

Site, prepared by Ebasco Services

Incorporated for the Texas Water

Commission, December 17, 1990.

• Second Operations and

Maintenance Quarterly Report, Crystal

City Airport Site, prepared by Ebasco

Services Incorporated for the Texas

Water Commission, March 19, 1991.

• Third Operations and Maintenance

Quarterly Report, Crystal City Airport

Site, prepared by Ebasco Services

Incorporated for the Texas Water

Commission, July 9, 1991.

• Fourth Operations and Maintenance

Quarterly Report, Crystal City Airport

Site, prepared by Ebasco Services

Incorporated for the Texas Water

Commission, November 7, 1991.

• Superfund Site Close Out Report,

Crystal City Airport, Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 6, December

1991.

• Crystal City Airport Federal

Superfund Site, Quarterly State Funded

O & M Sampling and Inspection

Reports, Texas Natural Resource

Conservation Commission, November

1991 through June 1994.

• Cooperative Agreements:

Description No. Date

(1) Forward

Planning (FP).

V–006461–

01–7

5–14–86

(2) RI/FS ........... V–006461–

01–7

5–14–86

(3) FP (increase) V–006461–

01–9

3–31–87

(4) RI/FS (increase).V–006461–

01–9

3–31–87

(5) RD ............... V–006461–

01–13

3–31–88

(6) RD (transfer) V–006461–

01–M

3–06–91

(7) RA ................ V–006567–

01–0

12–29–88

(8) O&M ............ V–006567–

01–2

6–19–90

Other documents related to site

activities are also available for review in

the site repositories,

[FR Doc. 95–4 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

RIN 1018–

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

and Plants; Reopening of Comment

Period on the 90-day Finding for the

Petition to List the Queen Charlotte

Goshawk as Endangered

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,

Interior.

ACTION: Status Review; Reopening of

Comment Period.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service (Service) provides notice that

the comment period on the proposal is

reopened. The Queen Charlotte goshawk

(Accipiter gentilis laingi) is found in

forested areas of British Columbia and

southeast Alaska. All interested parties

are invited to submit comments

regarding this species’ status.

DATES: The comment period, which

originally closed November 25, 1994,

now closes February 9, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Data, information,

comments or questions concerning the

status of the petitioned species

described below should be submitted to

the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, Ecological Services,

3000 Vintage Blvd., Suite 201, Juneau,

Alaska 99801. The petition, findings,

and supporting data are available for

public inspection, by appointment,

during normal business hours at the

above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Lindell, Endangered Species Biologist

(see ADDRESSES above) (907)/586–7240).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Queen Charlotte goshawk occurs

from Vancouver Island British

Columbia, Canada, northward through

insular British Columbia, insular and

adjacent mainland Alaska west of the

coastal mountain range, to the northern

portions of the Alexander Archipelago,

in southeast Alaska. The subspecies

may be endangered by past and planned

removal and fragmentation of mature

forest habitat by clearcut logging.

The comment period for the status

review originally closed on November
426 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 1995 / Proposed Rules

25, 1994. Since that date many parties

have expressed interest in submitting

substantive comments. In order to

accommodate these parties, the Service

is extending the comment period until

February 9, 1995. Written comments

may be submitted to the Service office

in the ADDRESSES section.

Author

The primary author of this notice is

John Lindell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, Ecological Services Field

Office, Juneau, Alaska 99801.

Authority

The authority of this action is the

Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Dated: December 23, 1994.

David B. Allen,

Regional Director, Region 7, Fish and Wildlife

Service.

[FR Doc. 95–126 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P