alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT LEWIS FALLS, a/k/a Robert Falls, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at R oanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-5, CA-96-945-R) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: October 29, 1997 Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lewis Falls, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Falls seeks to appeal the district court's order and order on reconsideration denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Falls , Nos. CR-93-5; CA-96-945-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 1997; Jan. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             3,091,885
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        435,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                        2,079,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   6,230,730
<PP&E>                                             2,692,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (1,541,166)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     7,919,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,946,964
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                           1,330,264
<OTHER-SE>                                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       7,919,062
<SALES>                                            2,024,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   2,024,329
<CGS>                                                564,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      4,842,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (95,642)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    21,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (3,308,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (3,308,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (3,308,461)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.08)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


pursuant
to Section 302


of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Xiao
Ping Zhang, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.;


2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;


4. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the issuer and have:


(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986];


(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and


(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and


(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Dated:
      May 14, 2010/s/
      Xiao Ping ZhangXiao
      Ping ZhangChief
      Executive Officer
WEN LIU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 12-10928.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 1 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 2 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 3 of 7
DANIEL I. MACH FEDERAL COURT ADMISSIONS

 COURT YEAR ADMITTED STATUS 

United States Supreme Court 2001 Active 

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia 1999 Active 

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 2013 Active 

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan 2014 Active 

First Circuit Court of Appeals 2009 Active 

Third Circuit Court of Appeals 2003 Active 

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals 2003 Active 

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals 2008 Active 

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals 2001 Active 

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals 2009 Active 

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 2006 Active 

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 2004 Active 

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals 2006 Active 

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals 2007 Active 

U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2006 Active 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 1999 Active 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 4 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 5 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 6 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 7 filed 10/07/15 page 7 of 7
**Exhibit11**

 

**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE**

 

 

 
| ** **                                                   | ** ** | **Four Months Ended December 30,** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                   | ** ** | **2004**                           | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| AVERAGE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                               |       | $                                  | 1.91       |   | $ | 1.89 |   |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| NET LOSS                                                     |       | $                                  | (264,127   | ) | $ | (485,880 | ) |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding   |       | 3,319,650                          |       | 3,318,900 |   |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| Dilutive effect of stock options                             |       | —                             |       | — |   |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding |       | 3,319,650                          |       | 3,318,900 |   |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| Basic loss per share                                         |       | $                                  | (.08       | ) | $ | (.15 | ) |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |
| Diluted loss per share                                       |       | $                                  | (.08       | ) | $ | (.15 | ) |
|                                                         |       |                               |       |   |   |

 

19

----
EXHIBIT 32


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Newfield Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gary Huang, President of Newfield Acquisition Corp.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:  March 19, 2004


/s/ Gary Huang
--------------------
Gary Huang, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         18,210,378
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  958,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,429,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,277,608
<PP&E>                                         3,186,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,808,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,889,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,784,397
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,580,135
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,140,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,889,585
<SALES>                                        2,078,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,078,417
<CGS>                                          757,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,500,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               431,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,745,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,745,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,745,076)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1886 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1886

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylic acid, 
                            dimethyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylic acid, 
                            dimethyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPROPANE-1,1-DICARBOXYLIC ACID, DIMETHYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.80      Cyclopropane-1,1-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         dicarboxylic                                                       31/2008
                         acid, dimethyl
                         ester (CAS No.
                         6914-71-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2917.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 19-11383 

consolidated with 

No. 19-11384 

Conference Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Sergio Fuentes, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:19-CR-164-1 

USDC No. 4:19-CR-251-1 

Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Fuentes 

in appeal No. 19-11383 has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

September 23, 2020 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 19-11383 Document: 00515575636 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2020
No. 19-11383 

c/w No. 19-11384 

2 

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United 

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). The same Federal Public 

Defender also has moved to withdraw and filed an Anders brief in appeal 

No. 19-11384. Fuentes has filed a response that addresses both appeals. We 

exercise our authority to sua sponte consolidate the appeals, which implicate 

common facts and issues. See United States v. Rodriguez, 564 F.3d 735, 737 

(5th Cir. 2009); Fed. R. App. P. 3(b)(2). 

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Fuentes’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motions for leave to withdraw are 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeals are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 19-11383 Document: 00515575636 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2020
Charles RAWLINGS, petitioner, v. CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, et al.

No. 12M120.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 for May Drilling Partnership  1983-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711310
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         187
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384
<PP&E>                                         16,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   954
<SALES>                                        418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                262
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            262
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  11.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  11.61
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1780 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1780

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclanilide Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclanilide Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLANILIDE TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.50      1-(2,4-             Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dichlorophenyl-                                                    31/2008
                         aminocarbonyl)cyc
                         lo-
                         propanecarboxylic
                         acid
                         (cyclanilide)
                         (CAS No. 113136-
                         77-9) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2924.29.47)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

L. H. H., a minor, by and through his )

mother and next friend, ESMERALDA )

HOLMAN HERNANDEZ, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:13-CV-452-PRC

)

GERALD HORTON, ANGELO BRADSHAW, )

CITY OF GARY, INDIANA, and GARY )

COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Written

Discovery [DE 27], filed on November 4, 2014. Defendants have not filed a response, and the time

to do so has passed. Plaintiff represents that Defendants have not served him with responses to his

written discovery requests despite having been given extensions of time in which to do so. Plaintiff

now asks that this Court compel Defendants to serve him with their responses. 

The matter is well taken. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 governs failures to cooperate

in discovery. Specifically, it provides that motions to compel may be made if a party fails to respond

to various types of discovery requests. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(3). Defendants have failed to provide

discovery responses. And they have not responded to this motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery [DE 27] and ORDERS Defendants

to serve Plaintiff with complete written discovery responses by December 12, 2014. 

Rule 37 also provides that if a motion to compel is granted, “the court must, after giving an

opportunity to be heard, require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion, the

party or attorney advising that conduct, or both to pay the movant’s reasonable expenses incurred
in making the motion, including attorney’s fees.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). This issue has not been

briefed. Any objection to the award of attorney fees incurred by Plaintiff in the litigation of this

motion must be filed by December 8, 2014. Any response by Plaintiff must be filed by December

29, 2014. If a response is filed, replies may be filed by no later than January 8, 2015.

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2014.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

2