alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1700 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1700

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers preserved by vinegar 
                            or acetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2005

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers preserved by vinegar 
                            or acetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAPERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.20.03       Capers, prepared   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         or preserved by                                                    31/2008
                         vinegar or acetic
                         acid, in
                         containers
                         holding more than
                         3.4 kg (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2001.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
2004 Stock Appreciation Rights Grant



 EXHIBIT 10.22 
  
 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES INC. 
 2004 STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS GRANT TO DIRECTORS 
  

			
	TO:	  	 Marvin J. Herb

		
	DATE:	  	 February 2004


  
 1. Grant of Stock Appreciation
Rights. You are hereby awarded 7,500 stock appreciation rights (“2004 SARs”) by Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (“the Company”). Each of your 2004 SARs are equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of a share of the
Company’s common stock on the date the notice of exercise is received by the Company, over (ii) the exercise of $23.61, the fair market value of the Company’s stock on February 26, 2004, the “Grant Date.” 
  
 For purposes of this grant, “fair market value” of the Company’s stock is
equal to the average of the high and low trading prices, on the applicable trading day or on the next proceeding trading day, if such date is not a trading day, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions listing. 

 
 2. Vesting of SARs. One-third of your 2004 SARs becomes exercisable, or vests, on
the first, second, and third anniversaries of the Grant Date. 
  
 3. Effects of
Termination on Exercise of SARs. Any 2004 SARs that have not vested as of the date you terminate service as a director shall be forfeited unless your service terminates on account of your death, disability or at the completion of your term after
attaining age 70. In the event of one of these circumstances occurring, any unvested 2004 SARs shall become vested. 
  
 4. Duration of SARs. Any vested 2004 SARs may be exercised at any time until February 26, 2014, ten years from the Grant Date, except as follows: 
  
 (a) In the event your service as a director terminates on account of your
disability or at the completion of your term after attaining age 70, your right to exercise any vested 2004 SARs shall expire upon the earlier of five years from the date of such termination or February 26, 2014; 
  
 (b) In the event your service as a director terminates on account of your
death, the right of the executor or administrator of your estate, or of a transferee by will or by laws of descent and distribution, your right to exercise any vested 2004 SARs shall terminate upon the earlier of one year from the date of your death
or February 26, 2014. 
  
 (c) In the event your service as a
director terminates on account of any reason other than those described in paragraphs a. and b., above, your right to exercise any vested 2004 SARs shall expire upon the earlier of one year from the date of such termination or February 26, 2014.

  
 5. Exercise of SARs. You may exercise your 2004 SARs by giving written
notice to the Office of the General Counsel, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., P.O. Box 723040, Atlanta, Ga 31139-0040, (Facsimile 770-989-3619.) Your exercise of the SARs specified in the written notice will be deemed accomplished as of the
Company’s receipt of your written notice, and the proceeds of your award will be delivered to you within fifteen business days thereafter.
# L_2008008EN.01000901.xml

| 11.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 6 December 2007

appointing a French alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2008/31/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the French Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has fallen vacant, following the resignation of Ms MORIN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has fallen vacant, following the resignation of Ms MORIN,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Jean-Jacques FRITZ, conseiller régional de la région Alsace, is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2007.

For the Council

The President

A. COSTA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0591

VERSUS

DEBORAH ANN SOLLBERGER August 3, 2023

In Re: Deborah Sollberger, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. - Tan-ffnany, 

No. 3572F2022. 

BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

FM

Holdridge, J., dissents in part and would grant the writ

as to the charges of money laundering and theft of over $ 25, 000. 

Until a civil court declares that the power of attorney is

invalid or was fraudulently obtained, the defendant was

authorized to act under the power of attorney.
Rasbian M. WARD, petitioner, v. Leeposey DANIELS, Warden, et al.

No. 12-10996.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### HENG QIU RUAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,1 United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-40315-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 25, 2006.

*67Thomas V. Massucci, New York, New York, for Petitioner.

Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Steven Kim, Keisha-Ann G. Gray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Brooklyn, New York, for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. WALKER, Jr., Chief Judge, Hon. JON O. NEWMAN, and Hon. ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges.

1

*.*Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is automatically substituted for former Attorney General John Ashcroft as the respondent in this case.

SUMMARY ORDER

Heng Qiu Ruan, though counsel, petitions for review of the July 2003 BIA decision denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *Kaur v. BIA*413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). An abuse of discretion may be found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” *Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice,*265 F.3d 83, 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted).

The BIA denied Ruan’s motion as untimely. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), a motion to reopen “must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened.” Ruan’s sole argument in his brief to this Court is that the BIA abused its discretion in calculating the 90-day filing deadline from its August 28, 2002 denial of his appeal, rather than from its December 13, 2002 denial of his motion to reconsider. We need not address which of these dates constitutes the “final administrative decision,” because the BIA did not receive Ruan’s motion to reopen until March 17, 2003, and therefore it was filed beyond the 90-day deadline under either calculation. Moreover, Ruan has not argued to the BIA or to this Court than any exceptions should have applied in his case. Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ruan’s motion as untimely. *See Ke Zhen Zhao,*265 F.3d at 93.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Corut previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).
Samuel PIERCE, petitioner, v. Rona WOLDENBERG.

No. 12-1021.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21829-21830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10891]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION


Availability of Environmental Assessments

    Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332, the Commission has prepared and made 
available environmental assessments for the proceedings listed below. 
Dates environmental assessments are available are listed below for each 
individual proceeding.
    To obtain copies of these environmental assessments contact Ms. 
Tawanna Glover-Sanders, Interstate Commerce Commission, Section of 
Environmental Analysis, Room 3219, Washington, DC 20423, (202) 927-
6203.
    Comments on the following assessment are due 15 days after the date 
of availability:

AB-1 (Sub-No. 259X), Chicago and North Western Railway Company--
Abandonment Exemption--Cannon Falls, Minnesota, Spur. EA available 4/
21/95.
AB-1 (Sub-No. 261X), Chicago and North Western Railway Company--
Abandonment Exemption--Mankato, Minnesota, Spur. EA available 4/21/95.
AB-1 (Sub-No. 262X), Chicago and North Western Railway Company--
Abandonment Exemption--Albert Lea Spur in Freeborn County, Minnesota. 
EA available 4/25/95.
AB-55 (Sub-No. 505X), CSX Transportation, Inc. Abandonment In Lee 
County, North Carolina. EA available 4/28/95.

    Comments on the following assessment are due 30 days after the date 
of availability:

AB-1 (Sub-No. 260), Chicago and North Western Railway Company--
Abandonment Exemption--Hayward, [[Page 21830]] Wisconsin Spur. EA 
available 4/21/95.
AB-1 (Sub-No. 258X), Chicago and North Western Railway Company--
Abandonment Exemption--Central Soya Spur Near Madison, Wisconsin.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10891 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-134-JTM-PRC

 )

JOSE M. DURAN-HERNANDEZ, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT JOSE M. DURAN-HERNANDEZ

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate

Judge Paul R. Cherry, on January 6, 2016, with the consent of Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez,

counsel for Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez’s plea of guilty was in full compliance

with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and

on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Jose M. DuranHernandez under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant

United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez understands the nature of the charge against

him to which the plea is offered;
(2) that Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez understands his right to trial by jury, to persist

in his plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse

witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez understands what the maximum possible

sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Jose M. DuranHernandez understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from

those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez has been knowingly and

voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez understands that his answers may later be used

against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Jose M. Duran-Hernandez’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count I of the Indictment and that Defendant Jose M. Duran-Hernandez be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count I of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A

Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Jose

M. Duran-Hernandez be adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before Judge James T. Moody will be

set by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and

served within fourteen days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

2
SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2016.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
[No. 37867-8-I.

Division One.

September 22, 1997.]

#### Gragg Miller, et al., *Respondents,*v. Joel Douglas, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 90-2-01288-0, Steven J. Mura, J., entered November 17, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, A.C.J., concurred in by Cox, J., and Allendoerfer, J. Pro Tern.
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31,
2007, each of the undersigned Gregory Pusey and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge and belief:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  February 8, 2008            /s/ Gregory Pusey
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Gregory Pusey, President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  February 8, 2008            /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Senior Vice President-
                                    Finance and Chief Financial Officer


                                    * * * * *


A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Alejandro MAYORKAS, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al., petitioners, v. Rosalina CUELLAR DE OSORIO, et al.

No. 12-930.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32038-32039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 1, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Michael Waldo, Alma, Nebraska; and Dwight Waldo, Republican 
City, Nebraska; to establish the Waldo Family Group, a group acting in 
concert to retain voting shares of Commercial State Holding Company, 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Commercial State Bank, 
both of Republican City, Nebraska.


[[Page 32039]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 11, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-12686 Filed 6-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### CROSBY, Respondent, v. WOLEBEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 27, 1912.)

Action by Charles R. Crosjpy against Delos A. Woleben. No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals (from 134 N. Y. Supp. 328) denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Tropical Plant Genetic Resources and Disease Research: Hilo, HI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Whole pineapple, breadfruit and starfruit
 Nursery greenhouse
 Backup of crops by tissue culture
 Mauna Kea as seen from our field
 Litchi tree with fruit


Mission


Repository Home Page Information Our Current Crops:  Ananas comosus (pineapple)  Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit)  Averrhoa carambola (starfruit)  Bactris gasipaes (peach palm)  Canarium ovatum (pili nut)  Carica papaya (papaya) and Vasconcellea  Dimocarpus longan (longan)  Litchi chinensis (lychee)  Macadamia integrifolia (macadamia nut)  Malpighia glabra (acerola)  Nephelium lappaceum (rambutan) and N. ramboutan-ake (pulasan)  Psidium guajava (guava)


Pacific West Area   tracie.matsumoto@ars.usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00 736

- CV

IN RE CARIBBEAN COWBOY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 27, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On October 15, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a “motion to stay
proceedings.” The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of
mandamus and the motion to stay the trial court proceedings are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV

- 10

- 082 , styled Jim Rymes, et al. v. Caribbean Cowboy, LLC d/b/a Caribbean Cowboy RV Resort
, pending in the 216 th Judicial District Court
, Bandera County, Texas, the Honorable Stephen B. Ables presiding.