alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008172EN.01002801.xml

| 2.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/28

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 1 July 2008

appointing members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/496/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency of 19 December 2007,

Whereas:

| (1) | Three members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, hereinafter ‘the Committee’ were appointed by the Commission Decision 2006/286/EC of 12 April 2006 (2) on the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency for a term of three years from 16 April 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Three members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, hereinafter ‘the Committee’ were appointed by the Commission Decision 2006/286/EC of 12 April 2006 (2) on the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency for a term of three years from 16 April 2006.

| (2) | The membership of two of these members ended respectively in December 2006 (Prof Gianmartino Benzi) and August 2007 (Dr Julia Dunne). It is necessary, therefore, to appoint two new members to the Committee. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The membership of two of these members ended respectively in December 2006 (Prof Gianmartino Benzi) and August 2007 (Dr Julia Dunne). It is necessary, therefore, to appoint two new members to the Committee.

| (3) | The European Medicines Agency has recommended two persons for nomination. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The European Medicines Agency has recommended two persons for nomination.

| (4) | The members of the Committee shall be appointed for a period of three years starting on 2 July 2008, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The members of the Committee shall be appointed for a period of three years starting on 2 July 2008,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

On the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency, the following are hereby appointed members of the Committee for a term of three years from 2 July 2008:

| | Dr János BORVENDÉG |
| --- | --- |

Dr János BORVENDÉG

| | Mr Bruno SEPODES |
| --- | --- |

Mr Bruno SEPODES

Done at Brussels, 1 July 2008.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 18, 22.1.2000, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 104, 13.4.2006, p. 54.

2

---
#### Daniel Tepper, Appellant, v Pericles Constantinou, Respondent.

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County *639(White, J.), entered May 1,1984, which denied plaintiff’s motion to restore this case to the Trial Calendar and to vacate the prior dismissal of this action with prejudice, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion to restore the matter to the Trial Calendar and to vacate the dismissal of the action with prejudice is granted, on condition that within 30 days after the date of this order plaintiff’s counsel pay to defendant the sum of $1,000, and in default of such payment, the order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

In denying plaintiff’s motion to restore this action to the Trial Calendar, the trial court was understandably influenced by the apparent contradiction between the court records, which disclosed dismissal with prejudice of this action because of the nonappearance of plaintiff’s counsel in the Calendar Part, and the affirmation of plaintiff’s counsel that he had in fact been present in court at the beginning of the day. Although the trial court’s evaluation was understandable, we are persuaded that there is a substantial basis for the view that the affirmation of plaintiff’s counsel may be reconciled with the apparently contrary entry in the court records.

We think there is a substantial possibility that plaintiff’s counsel in fact appeared at 9:30 at the opening of the court day, and prior to the appearance of defense counsel, he requested of the clerk an adjournment to another day and was told that there would be such an adjournment, and that the adjournment was not, through inadvertence, noted when the case was thereafter called. This seems to us on the whole more likely than the thesis that plaintiff’s counsel falsely claimed that such an event had occurred, and that he had attempted to conceal his nonappearance by having an attorney in his office appear on the later date.

This is not to say that the conduct of plaintiff’s counsel with regard to his obligations to appear on the calendar date, as he describes his conduct, is to be approved. Particularly in light of prior defaults, it was unacceptable for him to secure an adjournment of the date at 9:30 in the morning just prior to the appearance of opposing counsel. Given the apparently substantial character of the action, we believe the situation is more appropriately addressed by fixing substantial costs on plaintiff’s counsel rather than by dismissing the action. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.
#### MOORE et al., Appellants, v. BAKER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 11, 1899.)

Action by Robert H. Moore and others against Julia L. Baker.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13333]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-34; OTS No. 12336]


Community Bank & Trust, fsb, Olney, Illinois: Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 12, 1995, the Deputy Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Community Bank & Trust, fsb, Olney, Illinois, to convert 
to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are 
available for inspection at the Information Services Division, Office 
of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the 
Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 111 East Wacker 
Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: May 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 95-13333 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 23

- 2 843 LT Case No. 2020

- DP

- 000 032

_____________________________ J.W ., Mother of K.W ., a C hild , Appellant,

v. D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appe al fro m the Circuit Court for Citrus County. Edward L. Scott, Judge. Keith Peterson, of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant. Rachel Batten , of Children’s Legal Services, Department of Children and Families, Brooksville, for Appellee. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney , of Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Jamie Billotte Moses, Co -Counsel for Guardian ad Litem Program, of Holland & Knight, LLP, Orlando, for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o K.W.
February 1, 20242

P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
.
M AKAR , S OUD , and P RATT , JJ., concur .

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1594 

To require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a plan to 

provide chiropractic health care services and benefits as part of the 

TRICARE program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005 

Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire (for himself and Mr. MEEHAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a plan to provide chiropractic health care services 

and benefits as part of the TRICARE program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractic Health 

5 Parity for Military Retirees and Dependents Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHIROPRACTIC HEALTH CARE FOR RETIREES, DE7 PENDENTS, AND SURVIVORS. 

8 (a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than July 31, 2005, 

9 the Secretary of Defense shall complete development of a 
2 

•HR 1594 IH 

1 plan to provide chiropractic health care services and bene2 fits, as a permanent part of the TRICARE program, for 

3 covered beneficiaries. 

4 (b) CONTENTS OF PLAN.—The plan shall require 

5 that a contract entered into under section 1097 of title 

6 10, United States Code, for the delivery of health care 

7 services shall— 

8 (1) include the delivery of chiropractic services; 

9 (2) require that chiropractic services may be 

10 provided only by a doctor of chiropractic; and 

11 (3) provide that a covered beneficiary may se12 lect and have direct access to a doctor of chiro13 practic without referral by another health practi14 tioner. 

15 (c) IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN.—The plan developed 

16 under subsection (a) shall provide for implementation of 

17 the plan to begin no later than December 31, 2005. 

18 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

19 (1) The term ‘‘chiropractic services’’— 

20 (A) includes the diagnosis (including by di21 agnostic X-ray tests), correction, and manage22 ment of vertebral subluxations or neuro23 musculoskeletal conditions, and such other 

24 chiropractic services determined appropriate by 

25 the Secretary; and 
3 

•HR 1594 IH 

1 (B) does not include the use of drugs or 

2 surgery. 

3 (2) The term ‘‘covered beneficiary’’ has the 

4 meaning provided by section 1072(5) of title 10, 

5 United States Code. 

6 (3) The term ‘‘doctor of chiropractic’’ includes 

7 only a doctor of chiropractic who is licensed as such 

8 by the State in which chiropractic services are fur9 nished. 

10 (4) The term ‘‘TRICARE program’’ has the 

11 meaning provided by section 1072(7) of title 10, 

12 United States Code. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen R. Light, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly
report on Form 10-Q/A of Flow International Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                             |  |                       
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN R.
LIGHT                      |  | Dated February 1, 2006
|Stephen R. Light Principal Executive Officer |  |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vaughan Diego BUTLER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7920.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 27, 2006.

Decided: May 5, 2006.

Vaughan Diego Butler, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Vaughan Diego Butler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel counsel to provide discovery related to Butler’s criminal case. The district court denied the motion on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction. Although we find that the district court had jurisdiction to rule on the motion, we conclude that the denial of relief was nevertheless proper. Butler failed to demonstrate a particularized need for the documents, and he could rely on his own recollection in preparing a collateral attack on his conviction and sentence. *See United States v. Shoaf,*341 F.2d 832, 835 (4th Cir.1964) (recognizing that, if matters on which collateral attack is based are within knowledge of petitioner, there will be no need for transcript). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Bulter’s motion to compel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1881 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1881

       To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLBUTYROLACTONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.75      2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Acetylbutyrolacto                                                  31/2008
                         ne (CAS No. 517-
                         23-7) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2932.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
WI

- FI ONE, LLC, Appellant

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION , Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE , Intervenor

______________________
2015

- 1945

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Off ice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013

- 00602.

______________________
Decided: April 20, 2018

______________________
D ONALD P UCKETT , Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, for appellant. Also represented by D OUGLAS A

ARON C AWLEY , McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX; P ETER J. A

YERS , Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, Austin, TX.WI

- FI ONE , LLC v. BROADCOM CORP

. 2

D OMINIC E. M ASSA , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, for appellee. Also represented by K EVIN G OLDMAN , K ATIE S AXTON

.
N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by K AKOLI C APRIHAN , B ENJAMIN T. H ICKMAN , T HOMAS W. K RAUSE , F RANCES L YNCH ; J OYCE R. B RANDA , M ARK R. F REEMAN , M ELISSA N. P ATTERSON , N ICHOLAS R ILEY , Appell ate Staff, Civil Div ision, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

______________________
Before D YK , B RYSON , and R EYNA , Circuit Judges.
R EYNA , Circuit Judge
, dissents

. P ER C URIAM

. The judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is
AFFIRM ED
R EYNA , Circuit Judge
, dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Wi

- Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp. , No. 2015

- 1944 (Fed. Cir. April 20, 2018)

.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1663

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

15-year recovery period for the depreciation of certain leasehold improvements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2005

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. FORD, Mr. 

ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. HOLT, and Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the 15-year recovery period for the depreciation 

of certain leasehold improvements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1663 IH 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF 15-YEAR RECOV2 ERY PERIOD FOR DEPRECIATION OF CER3 TAIN LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS. 

4 Section 168(e)(3)(E)(iv) of the Internal Revenue 

5 Code of 1986 (defining 15-year property) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘placed in service before January 1, 2006’’.

Æ
#### SWEENEY V. TRITSCH.

*Motion to Vacate Judgment.*

(Decided June 6, 1907.)

Appeal from Jackson Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. W. I-I. Simpson.

Virgil Bouldin, and Lawrence E. Brown, for appellant.

J. B. Talley, and Bilbro & Moody, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *Sweeney v.*Tritsch, 151 Ala. 243, 44 South. 184.
FDIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTION DIVERSITY 

SELF-ASSESSMENT 

WHERE CAN I FIND THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION DIVERSITY 

SELF-ASSESSMENT? 

f You can view the Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment by clicking on 

the following link: 

Diversity Self-Assessment of FDIC Regulated Financial Institutions (2710/05) Form. 

NOTE: The form link does not open with the following browsers: Chrome, Firefox, or Internet 

Explorer. If using these browsers, 

1. Right-click on the link to select “Save link as”; 

2. Save as Adobe PDF file; and 

3. Open the file in Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Reader from the location where it is saved. 

WHERE CAN I LEARN? 

f You can visit the FDIC’s Financial Institution Diversity webpage. 

f You can read the Interagency Policy Statement Establishing Joint Standards for 

Assessing the Diversity Policies and Practices of Entities Regulated by the Agencies. 

f You can become familiar with the Standards identified in the Policy Statement 

which offer guidance and a framework to enable financial institutions to voluntarily 

assess its diversity and inclusion practices. 

f You can access free resources offered in the Diversity Toolkit. 

WHERE CAN I COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION 

DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT? 

f There are two ways to complete and submit the Diversity Self-Assessment of FDIC 

Regulated Financial Institutions (2710/05) Form. 

PREFERRED METHOD: 

The FDIC has automated Form 2710/05, Diversity Self-Assessment of FDIC Regulated 

Financial Institutions. It is accessible in the FDICconnect portal by clicking the 

following link: FID-SA Application via FDICconnect. Please click HERE for a user guide 

and click HERE to watch submission demonstration videos. 

NOTE: Contact your institution’s FDICconnect Coordinator to obtain access. For technical 

assistance, or if you do not know who the FDICconnect Coordinator is for your Institution, 

please call 1-877-275-3342 (1-877-ASK-FDIC) and select Option 4, or call direct to 

703-516-1069, or email: FDICconnect@fdic.gov. 

ALTERNATE METHOD: 

Download a PDF version of the Diversity Self-Assessment of FDIC Regulated Financial 

Institutions (2710/05) Form, complete it, and email it to BankDiversity@fdic.gov.

1

2