alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 17-20561

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Oscar Segura-Romero, also known as Oscar Romero 

Sequra, also known as Oscar Segura, also known as 

Oscar R. Segura Romero, also known as Oscar R. 

Segura, also known as Romero Segura, also known as 

Oscar Romero, also known as Oscar Segura Romero, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:17-CR-00112-1

ON REMAND FROM 

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before Higginbotham, Ho, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 22, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 17-20561 Document: 00516249506 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/22/2022
No. 17-20561

2

Oscar Segura-Romero pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United 

States after having been previously convicted of an aggravated felony in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). He was sentenced to 20 months in prison. 

On appeal, he argued that his underlying felony conviction for familyviolence assault under Texas Pen. Code §§ 22.01(a)(1) and (b)(2) did not 

constitute an aggravated felony under § 1326(b)(2).1 We affirmed, 

concluding that argument was foreclosed by our precedent.2 Segura-Romero

petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.

While his petition was pending, the Supreme Court decided in Borden 

v. United States that a crime capable of commission with “a less culpable 

mental state than purpose or knowledge,” such as “recklessness,” cannot 

qualify as a “violent felony” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Armed 

Career Criminal Act (ACCA).3 After Borden, the Court granted SeguraRomero’s petition, vacated our judgment, and remanded for “further 

consideration in light of Borden.”4

As in United States v. Fuentes-Rodriguez, Segura-Romero’s 

“underlying Texas conviction qualifies as an aggravated felony only through 

18 U.S.C. § 16(a), which defines a ‘crime of violence’ almost identically to 

the ACCA’s ‘violent felony’ provision at issue in Borden.”5

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 22.01(a)(1), 22.01(b)(2).

2 United States v. Segura-Romero, 776 F. App’x 851 (5th Cir. 2019) (per curiam)

(citing United States v. Gracia-Cantu, 920 F.3d 252, 254 (5th Cir. 2019)), cert. granted, 

judgment vacated sub nom. Segovia-Lopez v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2781 (2021).

3 ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 1817, 1821-22, 210 L.Ed.2d 63 (2021) (plurality opinion).

4 Segovia-Lopez v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 2781, 2781, ––– L.Ed.2d 

–––– (2021).

5 United States v. Fuentes-Rodriguez, 22 F.4th 504, 505 (5th Cir. 2022).

Case: 17-20561 Document: 00516249506 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/22/2022
No. 17-20561

3

We REMAND to the district court for consideration consistent with 

Borden v. United States.

Case: 17-20561 Document: 00516249506 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/22/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         493,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,679,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    357,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,337,634
<PP&E>                                       1,982,220
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,429,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,216,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,001,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,092,144
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,877,336)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,216,352
<SALES>                                      5,876,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,892,349
<CGS>                                        3,417,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,178,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (296,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (296,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (296,482)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
Timmy Ray TYSON, aka Muwakkil D.S. Al-Hizbullahi, petitioner, v. Jeanne S. WOODFORD, et al.

No. 12-8717.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### VANDEGRIFT v. COWLES ENGINEERING CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 13, 1899.)

Action by Frederick B. Vandegrift against Cowles Engineering Company and others.

No opinion. Motion granted. See 55 N. Y. Supp.
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002 
  Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Colin Hall, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Solanex
  Management Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I, the registrants certifying officer, am responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
  such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
  case of an annual report) that has affected, or is reasonably likely to affect,
  the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I, the registrants certifying officer, based on my most
  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, have disclosed
  to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All deficiencies and weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
  and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
  control over financial reporting.

August 8, 2008
  /s/Colin Hall 
  Colin Hall 
  Acting Chief Executive Officer

---
# L_2008342EN.01004101.xml

| 19.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/41

---

Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Training Foundation for the financial year 2008

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 2 April 2008
  )

On page 20, the table Establishment plan is replaced by the following table:

Establishment plan

| Function group and grade | 2008 | 2007 | Situation posts used on 31 December 2007 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Permanent | Temporary | Permanent | Temporary | Permanent | Temporary |
| AD 16 | | | | | | |
| AD 15 | | | | 1 | | |
| AD 14 | | 1 | | 2 | | 1 |
| AD 13 | | 3 | | 1 | | |
| AD 12 | | 7 | | 7 | | 8 |
| AD 11 | | 13 | | 15 | | 13 |
| AD 10 | | 5 | | 11 | | 2 |
| AD 9 | | 12 | | 4 | | 11 |
| AD 8 | | 10 | | 11 | | 5 |
| AD 7 | | 3 | | 2 | | 8 |
| AD 6 | | | | | | 1 |
| AD 5 | | | | | | 1 |
| Sub total AD | — | 54 | — | 54 | — | 50 |
| AST 11 | | | | | | |
| AST 10 | | 1 | | 1 | | |
| AST 9 | | 8 | | 2 | | 5 |
| AST 8 | | 4 | | 6 | | 3 |
| AST 7 | | 8 | | 11 | | 8 |
| AST 6 | | 11 | | 12 | | 9 |
| AST 5 | | 10 | | 10 | | 3 |
| AST 4 | | | | 4 | | 3 |
| AST 3 | | | | | | 4 |
| AST 2 | | | | | | 5 |
| AST 1 | | | | | | 1 |
| Sub total AST | — | 42 | — | 46 | — | 41 |
| Total | — | 96 | — | 100 | — | 91 |

Function group and grade

2008

2007

Situation posts used on 31 December 2007

Permanent

Temporary

Permanent

Temporary

Permanent

Temporary

AD 16

AD 15

1

AD 14

1

2

1

AD 13

3

1

AD 12

7

7

8

AD 11

13

15

13

AD 10

5

11

2

AD 9

12

4

11

AD 8

10

11

5

AD 7

3

2

8

AD 6

1

AD 5

1

Sub total AD

—

54

—

54

—

50

AST 11

AST 10

1

1

AST 9

8

2

5

AST 8

4

6

3

AST 7

8

11

8

AST 6

11

12

9

AST 5

10

10

3

AST 4

4

3

AST 3

4

AST 2

5

AST 1

1

Sub total AST

—

42

—

46

—

41

Total

—

96

—

100

—

91

Additional information on European Training Foundation’s 2008 budget can be found on the Foundation’s website: (http://www.etf.europa.eu) under ‘About ETF’ menu ‘Register of Documents’ section.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6296

DEONTE STEVEN BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SAMUEL WISE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:21-cv-01890-HMH)

Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: February 29, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Reginald Geel, GEEL & GENTRY, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for 

Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6296 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Deonte Steven Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6296 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2007 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief  Executive
Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

August 8, 2007

/S/ Scott A. Haire
------------------
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3.1 (12/31/2014)






AMENDMENT No. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT No. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 1”), is entered into as of November 10, 2014, by and between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda company (the “Company”), and J. Robert Bredahl (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 26, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth below and for other good and valuable consideration given by each party to this Amendment No. 1 to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
1.     Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“2. Extent of Employment.
(a)Duties. , During the Employment Term and from and after November 10, 2014, the Executive shall serve as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. In his capacity as President and Chief Operating Officer, the Executive shall perform such duties, services, and responsibilities on behalf of the Company consistent with such position as may be reasonably assigned to the Executive from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In performing such duties hereunder, the Executive shall report directly to the Chief Executive Officer.”
1.Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
 “3.  Compensation and Benefits
(a)     Base Salary. During the Employment Term and from and after November 10, 2014, in full consideration of the performance by the Executive of the Executive’s obligations hereunder (including any services as an officer, director, employee, or member of any committee of any affiliate of the Company, or otherwise on behalf of the Company), the Executive shall receive from the Company a base salary (the “Base Salary”) at an annual rate of $750,000 per year, payable in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Company then in effect.”
2.    The parties hereto agree that except as specifically set forth in this Amendment No. 1, each and every provision of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as set forth therein.
[Signature Page Follows]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed, and the Executive has hereunto set his hand, in each case effective as of the day and year first above written.
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
By: /s/ John R. Berger    
Name:  John R. Berger 
Title:   Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer




By: /s/ Tonya L. Marshall     
Name: Tonya L. Marshall  
Title:   EVP, General Counsel & Secretary




EXECUTIVE
/s/ J. Robert Bredahl ________________________________________ 
J. Robert Bredahl
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 17, 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00724

- CR

Lee Ray Medina, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND S MITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appellant is indige nt and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1781 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1781

         To suspend temporarily the duty on para-Benzoquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on para-Benzoquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARA-BENZOQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.51      1,4-Benzoquinone    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 106-51-                                                   31/2008
                         4) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2914.69.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00321

- CV

TRACY S. WINN APPELLANT

V.

GINA ANN CRAIN APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 355TH DISTR ICT COURT OF HOOD CO UNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. D201 4

- 097

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 9, 2014

, and October 22, 2014, we notified appellant in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $1 9 5 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appell ant has not paid the $1 9 5 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 16 , 20 13

, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. Ap p. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: November 2 6 , 2014

2 See S upreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals

, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- district Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127 (Aug. 16 , 20 13 ) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
#### MARKS, Appellant, v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 20, 1912.)

Action by Jennie Marks, as administratrix, etc., against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the plaintiff madé out a prima facie case, and that the nonsuit was improperly granted.
______________________AURORA LOAN SERVICES_________________________
Owner:
None
Depositor:
Structured Asset Securities Corporation

Attention: Mortgage Finance LXS 2007-17H

745 7
th
Ave, 7
th
Floor

New York, NY 10019
Master Servicer:   Aurora Loan Services
Michele Olds

10350 Park Meadows Drive

Littleton, CO 80124
Trustee:
US Bank, N.A.

Structured Finance / LXS 2007-17H

One Federal Street, 3
rd
Floor

Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Securities Administrator:

Subject:
Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:
2007
Investor Code:
H62
Investor Name:  LXS 2007-17H I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period.



Certified by:  AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC








By:   /s/ Terry L. Gentry






Name:  Terry L. Gentry
Title:    Managing Director
F E D E R A L D E P O S I T I N S U R A N C E C O R P O R A T I O N

2O1O

A N N U A L R E P O R T