alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Pharmos  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Haim Aviv, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to 906 ss. of the  Sarbanes  -Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 12 (a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Haim Aviv
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Haim Aviv, Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-305-001]

Williams Power Trading Company; Errata to Notice of Filing

May 25, 1995.
    Take notice that the Notice of Filing issued in Docket No. ER95-
305-001 on May 9, 1995 (60 FR 25898, May 15, 1995), should have 
included the following sentence as the last sentence in that notice, 
``All comments and protests should be filed on or before June 8, 
1995.''
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13311 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the annual report of Excaliber Enterprises, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephanie Y. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Matthew L. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Stephanie Y. Jones


Stephanie Y. Jones


Chief Executive Officer


March 17, 2010





/s/ Matthew L. Jones


Matthew L. Jones


Chief Financial Officer


March 17, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1802 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1802

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the marking of imported 
                          live bovine animals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Rehberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the marking of imported 
                          live bovine animals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF IMPORTED LIVE BOVINE ANIMALS.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1304) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (i), (j), (k), and (l) as 
        subsections (j), (k), (l), and (m), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(i) Marking of Live Bovine Animals.--
            ``(1) Requirement.--No exception may be made under 
        subsection (a)(3) with respect to live bovine animals, each of 
        which shall be marked so as to identify the country of origin 
        by means of branding or an equally permanent method of marking.
            ``(2) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `live 
        bovine animals' means animals provided for under any subheading 
        of heading 0102 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

JACK A SHEETS 

Plaintiff(s) 

v. Civil Action No. 1:14CV265

INTERRA CREDIT UNION

 Defendant(s)

VENTURE INTERNATIONAL, LLC

(Terminated 6/18/2015)

CURT BECHLER

(Terminated 6/18/2015)

Intervenor(s)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

9 the plaintiff recover from the defendant the amount of 

dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus post-judgment

interest at the rate of % along with costs.

9 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

X Other: judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Interra Credit Union and AGAINST Plaintiff Jack 

A Sheets. 

This action was (check one):

9tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

9tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

Xdecided by Judge Jon E. DeGuilio on a motion for summary judgment. 

DATE: 1/29/2016 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00265-JD document 70-1 filed 01/29/16 page 1 of 2
by s/T. Castillo 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00265-JD document 70-1 filed 01/29/16 page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-cr-00063-TLS-SLC

)

JOHN R. BUTLER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on January 8, 2016, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America. The Defendant waived in open

Court prosecution by indictment and consented that the proceedings may be by information

rather than by indictment.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath

on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant’s waiver of indictment is knowing and voluntary;

(3) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not
guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,

and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(4) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including

the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the sentencing

guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(5) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between

the parties;

(6) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(7) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(8) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept both the Defendant’s waiver of indictment and

plea of guilty and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the

Information and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this

Report and Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will

be scheduled before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to

the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14)

days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 8th day of January 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1782 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1782

           To suspend temporarily the duty on palmitic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on palmitic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PALMITIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.53       Palmitic acid      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 57-10-3)                                                  31/2008
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2915.70.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

TO:       United States Securities
and Exchange Commission

I, C.M. Rebagliati, P.Eng., do hereby consent to the
filing of the Technical Report with the regulatory authorities referred to above
and to the written or electronic disclosure of the Technical Report entitled
Technical Report on the 2007 Program and Update on Metallurgy and Resources for
the Pebble Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Project, Iliamna Lake Area, Southwestern
Alaska, USA, March 31, 2008 and to extracts from, or a summary of, the
Technical Report as may be required by the regulatory authorities.

I have read Northern Dynastys 2007 40F, dated March 31, 2008
and confirm that it documents fairly and accurately represent the information
that supports the disclosure.

Submitted this 31st day of March, 2008.

Signed,

*/s/ C.M. Rebagliati*C.M. Rebagliati, P.Eng.Rebagliati Geological Consulting Ltd317-2200 Highbury StreetVancouver, BCV6R 4N8

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

DEBORAH GEARY, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No: 1:15-cv-00176

)

IOM HEALTH SYSTEMS, LP d/b/a )

LUTHERAN HOSPITAL OF INDIANA )

)

Defendant. )

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The Defendant, IOM Health Systems, LP d/b/a Lutheran Hospital of Indiana and Plaintiff,

Deborah Geary, by their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of the

Complaint for Damages, costs paid, for the reason that the underlying claims made by Plaintiff

Deborah Geary, have been fully resolved, compromised and settled.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Ilene M. Smith 

Ilene M. Smith, 22818-02

Christopher C. Myers & Associates

809 Calhoun Street, Suite 400

Ft. Wayne, IN 46802

Telephone: (317) 260-424-0600

Ismith@myers-law.com

/s/ Roger K. Kanne 

Roger K. Kanne, 17642-49

ZEIGLER COHEN & KOCH

9465 Counselors Row, Suite 104

Indianapolis, Indiana 46240

Telephone: (317) 844-5200

Facsimile (317) 844-7200

rkanne@zcklaw.com

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv-00176-JTM document 39 filed 01/12/17 page 1 of 1
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 14173
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
KATIE ROMANO,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus TD BANK, N.A., a.k.a. TD Bank USA, N.A., TARGET ENTERPRISE, INC., RAS LAVAR LLC, a.k.a. Robertson, Anschultz & Schneid, PL.,

Defendants

- Appellees. USCA11 Case: 23-14173 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 03/21/2024 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 23

- 14173

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:23

- cv

- 01293

- RBD

- EJK

____________________ Before J ORDAN , J ILL P RYOR , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:Upon our review of the record and the responses to the jurisdictional questions, t his appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction

. Katie Romano and her counsel, Paul Wersant, appeal from the district court’s order sanctioning Wersant and directing Appellees’ counsel to file notices regarding the amount of costs and fees incurred , as well as previous orders related to the sanctions proceedings

. None of those orders determined the specific amount of sanctions for which Wersant is responsible. We thus lack jurisdiction to consider them

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; PlayNation Play Sys., Inc. v. Velex Corp. , 939 F.3d 1205, 1212 (11th Cir. 2019 )

. Further, the district court’s January 8, 2024 order, which awarded a specific amount of monetary sanctions but was entered after the instant notice of appeal was filed, does not cure this premature appeal. See Robinson v. Tanner , 798 F.2d 1378, 1385 ( 11th Cir. 1986) ; LaChance v. Duffy’s Draft House, Inc. , 146 F.3d 832, 836

- 37 (11th Cir. 1998). Romano and Wersant also appeal from the district court’s December 10, 2023 order dismissing Romano’s action , without USCA11 Case: 23-14173 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 03/21/2024 Page: 2 of 323

- 14173 Opinion of the Court 3
prejudice, pursuant to her November 17, 2023 notice of voluntary dismissal. Wersant does not have standing to appeal that ruling because he is not a party to Romano’s action. See Marino v. Ortiz , 484 U.S. 301, 304 (1988). And Romano lacks standing to challenge th e dismissal order because it is not adverse to her, as it merely recognized the voluntary dismissal she sought by filing her notice. See Versa Prods., Inc. v. Home Depot USA, Inc. , 387 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2004 ); Ortega Trujillo v. Banco Cent. del E cuador , 379 F.3d 1298, 1301 (11th Cir. 2004). USCA11 Case: 23-14173 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 03/21/2024 Page: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1824 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1824

    To provide for the duty-free entry of certain tramway cars and 
    associated spare parts for use by the city of Portland, Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the duty-free entry of certain tramway cars and 
    associated spare parts for use by the city of Portland, Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRAMWAY CARS AND ASSOCIATED SPARE PARTS.

    (a) In General.--The Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security shall admit 
free of duty 3 tramway cars (provided for in subheading 8603.10.00 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) manufactured in 
Ostrava, Czech Republic, for the use by the city of Portland, Oregon, 
and imported pursuant to a contract with the city of Portland, Oregon, 
and associated spare parts for such tramway cars (provided for in 
applicable subheadings of heading 8607 or other headings of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) imported pursuant to 
such contract, the foregoing to be entered into the customs territory 
of the United States by not later than December 31, 2006.
    (b) Reliquidation; Refund of Amounts Owed.-- If the liquidation of 
the entry of any of the tramway cars or associated spare parts 
described in subsection (a) becomes final before the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection, notwithstanding any other provision of law, shall--
            (1) within 15 days after such date, reliquidate the entry 
        in accordance with the provisions of this Act; and
            (2) at the time of such reliquidation, make the appropriate 
        refund of any duty paid with respect to the entry.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Earl L Yager, as Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “registrant”), herebycertify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 14, 2006 /s/ Earl L. Yager   Earl L. Yager        Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7658** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ABDULLAH RASOOL SHAKOOR, a/k/a Lee McDonald , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:97

- cr - 00064

- BO

- 1 ; 7:14

- cv - 00130

- BO )

Submitted : August 4, 2015 Decided: August 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Abdullah Rasool Shakoor , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh , North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Abdullah Rasool Shakoor appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion , which sought vacatur of the court’s April 23, 2008 order construing his March 2007 letter as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion
. Although we typically review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion, MLC Auto., LLC v. Town of S. Pines , 532 F.3d 269 , 277 (4th Cir. 2008), where a motion seeks vacatur under Rule 60(b)(4), our review is de novo. Carter v. Fenner , 136 F.3d 1000 , 1005 (5th Cir. 1998); see Compton v. Alton S.S. Co., Inc. , 608 F.2d 96 , 107 (4th Cir. 1979) (stating that motions “under [Rule] 60(b) on any ground other than that the judgment i s void” are reviewed for abuse of discretion). In ruling on an appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, we may not review the merits of the underlying order, but instead “may only review the denial of the motion with respect to the
g rounds set forth in Rule 60(b).” MLC Auto., LLC , 532 F.3d at 277 (internal quotation marks omitted). Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not reversibly err in denying the Rule 60(b)(4) motion because none of the criteria for granting the motion was met in this case. See Wendt v. Leonard , 431 F.3d 410 , 412

- 13 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order
. United States v. Shakoor , No. 7:97

- cr - 00064

- BO

- 1 (E.D.N.C.3 Oct. 24, 2014)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED