alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jacob Goldston, March 2017

Jacob Goldston

550 17th Street NW, Washington DC 20429

Telephone: 202.898.7128

Email: jgoldston@fdic.gov

 

EDUCATION 

Ph.D., Economics, Brown University, May 2013

M.A., Economics, Brown University, May 2008

B.A., Economics, Princeton University, May 2005

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Washington DC May 2016-present

Financial Economist 

University of Maryland, College Park, Washington DC Sept. 2015-May 2016

Adjunct Professor

The World Bank, Washington DC August 2013-May 2016

Consultant

University of South Carolina, Columbia SC August 2012-May 2015

Assistant Professor

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia PA June 2005-June 2007

Research Associate

WORKING PAPERS

“Two Credibility Problems Are Better Than One: Credit and Local Politics in Rural India”, September 2016.

WORLD BANK PROJECTS

Syrian Refugee & Host Community Survey, Core Team Member

Egypt Systematic Country Diagnostic, Core Team Member

Egypt Labor Market Report, Core Team Member

PRESENTATIONS

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, January 2016

Bureau of Economic Analysis, February 2016

Abt Associates, January 2015

World Bank Development Research Group, June 2014

World Bank Labor and Poverty Practice Group, May 2014

New England University Development Consortium, November 2012

Colorado College, September 2012

University of South Carolina, March 2012

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, February 2012

Brown University, November 2011

REFEREE SERVICES

Journal of Development Economics, Journal of Public Economics, World Bank Economic Review, World 

Development, Journal of Financial Services Research

AWARDS

Brown University Hazeltine Fellowship, 2011-2012

Brown University Summer Dissertation Writing Fellowship, 2011

National Institutes of Health NICHID T32 Traineeship, 2009-2011

National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant, 2010-2011

Brown University Economics Department Dissertation Grant, 2010-2011

Brown University Population Studies and Training Center Dissertation Grant, 2010-2011
 Jacob Goldston, March 2017

Brown University Rhodes Center for International Economics & Finance Grant, 2010-2011

Brown University Center for Race and Inequality Dissertation Grant, 2010-2011

Princeton University Economics Thesis Grant, 2004

Princeton University Program in Latin American Studies Thesis Grant, 2004

Princeton University Woodrow Wilson School Thesis Grant, 2004

Princeton University Schultz Fund Thesis Grant, 2004
Said GSSIME, petitioner, v. Daniel MARTUSCELLO, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9534.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Clifford Anthony JACKSON, petitioner, v. Samuel CURRY.

No. 13-5232.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131684 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

LONNY S. SMITH, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 131684 Justices 

 COA: 267781 

WCAC: 04-000421 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

t1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2006 

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

DAMARIS JUNE RHODES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1:15-CV-133

)

Linda, Clerk of Court, John Doe, Jane Doe, )

and Joseph Van Bokkelen )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

On May 28, 2015, Damaris June Rhodes filed a complaint against various defendants in

this Court but failed to pay the filing fee as the same constitutes “extortion” or seek leave to proceed

without prepayment of the filing fees as that would require her to proceed as a “non-natural People.” 

Instead, she asks that the Court rescind its procedures for filing a civil case.

Ms. Rhodes is misguided. She may not proceed with her complaint unless she files the

$400 fee, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914 and the District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, or is excused

by the Court from paying such fee as set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Mindful of her pro se status,

the Court grants Ms. Rhodes until July 20, 2015, to either pay the filing fee or to petition the

Court to proceed without the prepayment of such fee. Failure to abide by this order will result in

dismissal of this case without further notice.

SO ORDERED. This 19th day of June, 2015.

s/ William C. Lee

United States District Court
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

H H H

H H H

550 17th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20429-9990

www.fdic.gov

FDIC-003-2019
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

NYKAZA GEE;

Plaintiff(s) 

v. Civil Action No. 3:15cv442

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (term 1/11/16);

OFFICER JARVARISH, Indiana State Correctional Officer (term 3/7/16);

OFFICER BRADY JANOVITZ, Indiana State Correctional Officer (term 3/7/16);

KEN YOUNG, Sergeant Indiana State Correctional Officer (term 3/14/1);

OFFENDERS, Several State Offenders (term 3/14/16);

ERIC PARRISH, Officer Indiana State Correctional Officer;

BRADY JANOVITZ, Officer Indiana State Correctional Officer;

Defendant(s)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

9 the plaintiff 

recover from the defendant the amount of 

 dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus postjudgment interest at the rate of % along with costs.

9 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

X Other: This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). 

This action was (check one):

9tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

9tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

X decided by Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen on a motion for Summary Judgment 

DATE: November 21, 2016 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

by S/ J. Darrah 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 34 filed 11/21/16 page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27730-27731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12845]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Wachovia Corporation; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 95-12098) published on page 
26436 of the issue for Wednesday, May 17, 1995.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond heading, the entry for 
Wachovia Corporation, is revised to read as follows:
    1. Wachovia Corporation, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; to engage 
de novo through its subsidiary, Wachovia Capital Markets, Inc., 
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, in making, acquiring, or servicing loans 
or other extensions of credit (including issuing letters of credit and 
accepting drafts) for the company's account or the account of others, 
[[Page 27731]] pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation 
Y, and leasing real and personal property or acting as agent, broker, 
or adviser in leasing such property, pursuant to Secs.  225.25(b)(5)(i) 
and 225.25(b)(5)(ii) of the Board's Regulation Y.
    Comments on this application must be received by May 31, 1995.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 19, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12845 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.76

                    [Spanish Broadcasting System, inc. Logo]

September 8, 2003

William B. Tanner Jr.
4180 Lyber Ave.
Coconut Grove, FL 33133-6154

Dear William B. Tanner Jr.:

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
1999 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), you have been granted an Incentive Stock
Option, subject to limitations set forth by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended from time to time, to purchase 12,820 shares (the "Option") of Class
A common stock as outlined below.

             Granted To:   William B. Tanner Jr.

           Granted Date:   August 31, 2003

         Option Granted:   12,820

Option Price per Share: $7.80               Total Cost to Exercise:   $99,996.00

        Expiration Date:     August 31, 2008, unless terminated earlier.

       Vesting Schedule:   100% immediately as follows:

        Transferability:    Not transferable except in accordance with the Plan.

                                               Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

                                               By: /s/ Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                                   ---------------------

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Option granted on
the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions
of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to
conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the Plan.

Signature:  /s/ William B. Tanner                Date:   9/8/03
           -----------------------                       ------
            William B. Tanner Jr.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID OMAR MENDOZA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1098

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Opinion filed August 30, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Hillsborough County; 

Christopher C. Nash, Judge.

Julianne M. Holt, Public Defender, Tampa, 

for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION AT LAFAYETTE

BRENDA MATSON, personal representative of )

the ESTATE OF ROBERT LINTNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 4:14-cv-79 RL-PRC

)

TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA, )

SHERIFF TRACY BROWN, in his official )

capacity, JUDY CLERGET in her individual and )

official capacities, LORETTA L. WHITE NP, )

in her individual and official capacities, )

DR. JACQUES LECLERC, in his individual and )

official capacity, DR. MICHAEL MITCHEFF, )

in his individual and official capacities, )

DR. KEVIN KREMBS in his individual and )

official capacities, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS

Comes now the Plaintiff, Brenda Matson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of 

Robert Lintner and hereby moves this Court to dismiss this matter with each party to bear its own 

costs and attorneys’ fees.

1. At this time, the Plaintiff no longer wishes to prosecute this action. 

2. As such, the Plaintiff is seeking for this matter to be dismissed against all defendants. 

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court to dismiss this matter with 

against all parties and for all other relief just and proper.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Scott L. Barnhart 

Scott L. Barnhart, 25474-82

Keffer Barnhart LLP

USDC IN/ND case 4:14-cv-00079-RL-PRC document 49 filed 05/03/17 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 3

rd day of May, 2017, a copy of the foregoing Motion was filed 

electronically. Service of this filing will be made on all ECF-registered counsel by operation of 

the court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the court’s system.

/s/ Scott L. Barnhart 

Scott L. Barnhart, #25474-82

Keffer Barnhart LLP

230 East Ohio Street, Suite 400

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

(317) 857-0160

USDC IN/ND case 4:14-cv-00079-RL-PRC document 49 filed 05/03/17 page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,339
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     95,047
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,395
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,588
<LOANS>                                        220,746
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,591
<DEPOSITS>                                     257,583
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,942
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,233
<LONG-TERM>                                     34,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,011
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 351,591
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,609
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,518
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,128
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,748
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,130
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,998
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 141
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,802
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,802
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.93
<LOANS-NON>                                        954
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,190
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    391
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,071
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       71
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,106
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,319
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,787
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**








I,
      Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              May 10, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Jeffrey
              F. O'DonnellJeffrey
              F. O'DonnellChief
              Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 15**

**LETTER FROM INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION**

**LETTER IN LIEU OFCONSENT FOR REVIEW REPORT**

October 20, 2006 

Boeing Capital Corporation

500 Naches Avenue SW, 3rd Floor 

Renton, Washington 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Boeing Capital Corporation and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report datedOctober 20, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

We are aware that our report referred toabove, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-55846 and 333-83208 on Form S-3. 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statementprepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Seattle, Washington
1

December 6, 2018

G-SIB Resolution – Making Bankruptcy Work
2

Title I:

Progress Since Previous SRAC 

(April 2016)
3

U.S. G-SIB Feedback Letters

1) April 2016: FDIC and FRB announced findings 

of previous Title I plan review

 Individual feedback letters

 Firms with deficiencies  October 2016

 Firms with shortcomings  July 2017

 Letters included description of findings and proposed 

remediation

 After letters, agency staff held regular “office hours” to 

address firm questions

 Majority single-point-of-entry (SPOE) strategies
4

U.S. G-SIBs: Framework Document
5

U.S. G-SIBs: Framework Document

2) April 2016: FDIC and FRB issued an 

accompanying Narrative Framework Document

 Title I statutory standard described: orderly resolution in 

bankruptcy 

 Description of plan review framework and summary of 

findings included

 Explained review process 

 Letters, Guidance, and Framework Document all made 

public
6

Single Point of Entry in Bankruptcy
U.S. G-SIB Guidance

7
8

U.S. G-SIB Guidance

for 2017 Plan Filings

3) FDIC and FRB Issue Title I Guidance for U.S. 

G-SIBs

 Focus on Key Vulnerabilities in Resolution

 Capital; Liquidity; Governance Mechanisms; Legal; Shared 

Services; Legal Entity Rationalization; Payments, Clearing, and 

Settlement; Derivatives and Trading Activities

 Title I public sections

 2017 Review: Joint agency training, review teams, firm 

engagement, and Board level coordination
U.S. G-SIB

2017 Plan Review Findings

 Significant progress made by firms in financial, 

structural, and operational capabilities

 No deficiencies; fewer shortcomings identified 

compared to 2015 Plans 

 Common areas of continued work 

 Intra-group liquidity; internal loss-absorbing capacity; derivatives; 

and payment, clearing, and settlement activities

 Capabilities testing

 2018 Agencies Updated Guidance for Public Comment

9
10

Large Foreign Bank Organizations

 Agencies’ Title I Guidance for FBOs Issued April 2017 

and made public

 Joint Agency Engagement, Vetting, Review Process

 FBO Guidance and Reviews Specific to FBO firms’ U.S. 

operations

 Plans Received July 1, 2018

 Staffs completing reviews
11

Title I:

Bankruptcy
12

Bankruptcy

 Lessons and Experiences from Lehman

 Complex claims litigation

 Importance of bankruptcy preparedness

 Outreach events

 Wharton: December 7, 2016

 Wharton and NYU: October 2017

 Federal Judicial Center

 Next Steps
13

Complementary Regulatory Developments
14

Complementary Regulatory 

Developments

 External Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity(TLAC)/ Clean 

Holding Company

 International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) 

Rules and U.S. Protocol
15

Next Steps

 Title I U.S. GSIB Final Guidance

 Title I FBO Findings (July 2018 Plans)

 Resolution Plan Rule Tailoring

 U.S. GSIB Title I Plans – July 2019
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CAWAJALIN KAVIN MCNEIL, a/k/a WaWa , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr - 00198

- BR

- 1 ; 5:16

- cv - 00419

- BR )

Submitted : March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Cawajalin Kavin McNeil , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cawajalin Kavin McNeil s eeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (201 8 ) motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (201 8 ). A certificate of a ppealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable ju rists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 5 65 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNeil has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties I
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
    
    May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer