alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
 June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2009
    
    
    2008(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    439,882
    
    
    $
    363,565Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    239,417
    
    
    
    200,630Fixed charges
    
    
    717,427
    
    
    
    763,236Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (7,216
    )
    
    
    (15,095
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    1,389,510
    
    
    $
    1,312,336Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    2,560
    
    
    $
    2,601Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    154
    %
    
    
    155
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    3,942
    
    
    
    4,032Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    708,607
    
    
    
    746,533Capitalized interest
    
    
    7,216
    
    
    
    15,095Interest factors of rents
    
    
    1,604
    
    
    
    1,608Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    717,427
    
    
    
    763,236Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    721,369
    
    
    $
    767,268Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ((A) divided by (B))
    
    
    1.94
    x
    
    
    1.72
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
((A) divided by (C))
    
    
    1.93
    x
    
    
    1.71
    x
 -45-
#### BERGER, Respondent, v. BARCLAY CONST. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by Morris Berger against the Barclay Construction Company and others. (Appeal No. 2). No opinion. Order of the County Court of Kings County, dated January 26, 1912, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  Certification
                             Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                  (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Jinchuan Zhao, President and Chief Financial Officer of Newfield Acquisition
Corp. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Jinchuan Zhao
 -------------------------------------------------
Jinchuan Zhao, President & Chief Financial Officer


April 28, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12528]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-416-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

May 17, 1995.
    In the Commission's order issued February 15, 1995, the Commission 
held that the filing in the above captioned proceeding raises issues 
that should be addressed in a technical conference.
    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Thursday, 
May 25, 1995, at 2:00 p.m., Room 2402-A at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C. 20426. All interested parties and Staff are permitted 
to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12528 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC., a
Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the quarter ended June
30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
James Watts, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to their knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/
James Watts

James
Watts President and Chief Executive Officer

Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



October 10, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Capital Resource Alliance Inc. and will be retained by Capital Resource Alliance Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2027 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2027

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Deltamethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Deltamethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.12       (S)-a-cyano-3-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         phenoxybenzyl                                                      31/2008
                         (1R,3R)-3-(2,2-
                         dibromovinyl)-2,2-
                         dimethylcycloprop
                         anecarboxylate
                         (CAS No. 52918-63-
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2926.90.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

March 27th, 2013

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
      (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                     
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                          
|    |                                                     
|    | Consent of Expert                                   

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2012, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Tysen Hantelmann, P.Eng , hereby consent to the use of my
name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the
following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

                     
Preliminary Assessment of the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska dated February
17, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

|Original
      document signed and sealed by Tysen Hantelmann
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Tysen Hantelmann                                               

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MESA
OFFSHORE TRUST 1997 SECOND QUARTER REPORT AND FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 1997 SECOND QUARTER REPORT AND FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                 3,756,153
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,791,954
<PP&E>                                     380,905,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             379,987,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,708,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,791,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,917,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,708,956
<SALES>                                      2,898,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,951,553
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               650,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,301,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,301,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,301,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .032
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .032
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

p0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

143050 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 14 3050 

 COA: 302279 

 Saginaw CC: 09-032424-FC 

CLIFFORD JERRY HARDER, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Lilian Maribel TORRES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72801.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2011.*

Filed June 1, 2011.

*745Lilian Maribel Torres, Jackson Heights, NY, pro se.

Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esquire, OIL U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lilian Maribel Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Torres’ motion to reopen on the ground that she failed to show that personal service of an Order to Show Cause was insufficient to provide her with notice of her responsibility to notify the immigration court of her changes of address. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1229(a)(l)(F)(ii). Nor did the agency abuse its discretion in finding unpersuasive Torres’ contention that she could not have received adequate notice because she did not provide any address to immigration officials, because where an alien fails to provide an address, no written notice of hearing is required. 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(2) (repealed 1996).

It follows that Torres has not established a due process violation. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (petitioner must show error to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Jackie Lee BIBBS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-8122.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Giannetti, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), rendered May 9, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

*932Judgment affirmed and this case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Defendant’s written statement, coupled with Detective Lissenden’s testimony regarding defendant’s statements made at the police precinct, suffice to show that defendant entered the house in question with the intent to take food from the refrigerator. The fact that defendant offered another explanation for his actions does not require a different finding. The trial court, sitting as the trier of facts, was entitled to accept the testimony which it found credible, and could, in its role as fact finder, disregard defendant’s explanation *(People v Bigelow,*106 AD2d 448).

Defendant’s remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**
**AUSTIN**

Ronambl4 Omrr G. Mowerr **County Attorney**  

### oahi10cw G0unty Perrytoa, 

### Texer



### l tantially

thefollovlng

pF0p4Fty 488484eu land to 8 pumh*r the 

### amount4f aollrotar ?4qu 448444*d 4galn 

### tioatotheao I the **puraharer** o? thr ~a1 pmpmanal pr~p4rtt owaet? br hir rrnhanarrd**by** the vrnd44 **of** the real



### realeatatcyxw4ha44d and that he Ia sat 40 on the 

### per8on8.1 property whioh havr b44n Y4 b4lLeve ttmt you 

### are aorraat in the

ft 

### Ianowdefinltcl~ 44t4l>lirhod

that th4 It419



### pro**vLd4d in**  **Artlul4 VIft,**  **ekathn** 16 of our Oonrtftubioa ati ht¶alO 7172, R~vS44d 

### CivilBtatu$er,attaahooonly

## to 4aah ewaFtkt4 **tract** 

### orparcelof 1anB **for** t4rcr arrr*red qainet it. Mhh4J V8. #aor &rLB 3.x. 172 (F&p. Gt.)$ brrlr va. w44t, **5 8.W.**  tea) **970;** State Wot-tgago GOrpoF8tlO#l v4. **L&u 55**  **3.w. (aa)**  **257** 

### (Revorsml**on OEher**  **Qrt~unhr) 48**  **8.W. (Zd)**  **9 50.**  **FMI** thw ~~inlofaHonorable 0848r 0. ~lOWOr8, pllgr 2

of thr Texarkma Court of Civil Appe4le In the aoee of State VI. Hunt, SZO76.H. 6S6, we q,uote RS follove: Wut w4 egrenvith the tri41 oourt that ths rtatr, did not have e lien on the lmd to 8eoure the payment of rlther **the** poll taxer arreesed 8gRin8t the Wllli4mree 

### or the **t8X84** 8888484d q8inSt them **On** 804OUnt Of their omerehlp of perrorul property. The general rule is **that** tar48 

### ere never 8 klen on prop4rty unlesr expr4erlJ mede 80. Gooley, **Tax ’** **n,** p. 885. The lien oreated by reotlon **15** of utlale 8 o? the ConrtltutionUQon @14&r& prop4rty' is anlr far taxes *4844- ed 4gaInet l

uah property; end so o? the lien upon 2~81 property provided for br Artisle **7628,** Vernoníl **Statutee.** ***** It 18 our opinion th8t the pWaha8Sr **of 88id**  real property lr entitled **to** p4y the tax vbloh ha& been areerr4d **4gdnrt that**  **prop4rt7** alons without b4Ing required **to** 947 the tax which had been 18vI& yainrt the pereonxl pWXWty of the vendor. **Yours** very truly &TTORWEY

OmENALOFPEltA

**@U.:Jr** 41enn R. LewIe Aerlstxnt
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1463 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1463

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 2100 Jamieson 
  Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ``Justin W. Williams United 
                     States Attorney's Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--The building and structure described in subsection 
(b) shall be known and designated as the ``Justin W. Williams United 
States Attorney's Building''.
    (b) Description.--The building and structure to be designated under 
subsection (a) is that portion of the Federal building located at 2100 
Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, that is attached to the 
Federal building's main tower structure, described as A-Wing in the 
architectural plans, and currently occupied by the Office of the United 
States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria 
Division.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building and structure described in 
section 1(b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Justin W. 
Williams United States Attorney's Building''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary for appropriate identifying designations to be affixed to the 
building and structure described in section 1(b) and for an appropriate 
plaque reflecting the designation and honoring Justin W. Williams and 
his service to the Nation to be affixed to or displayed in such 
building and structure.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1463

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 2100 Jamieson 
  Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ``Justin W. Williams United 
                     States Attorney's Building''.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00010-TLS-SLC

)

)

DEWAYNE LEWIS )

OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Dewayne Lewis’s “Motion for Ruling/Order” (DE 173), in

which he requests that the Court rule on his previously filed motion (DE 146) seeking

reconsideration of the Court’s prior decision denying Lewis a Franks hearing. Because the Court

ruled on Lewis’s motion for reconsideration prior to Lewis filing the instant motion requesting a

ruling, the instant motion is moot. (DE 172). 

Accordingly, Lewis’s”Motion for Ruling/Order” (DE 173) is DENIED as MOOT. 

SO ORDERED.

Entered this 1st day of August 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00194-JTM-JEM   document 1   filed 06/05/13   page 1 of 4

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00194-JTM-JEM   document 1   filed 06/05/13   page 2 of 4

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00194-JTM-JEM   document 1   filed 06/05/13   page 3 of 4

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00194-JTM-JEM   document 1   filed 06/05/13   page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0000714256
<NAME>        MB Software Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         135,451
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,828,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                   541,394
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,177,732
<PP&E>                                         422,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 32,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,129,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,616,150
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       68,580
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,129,996
<SALES>                                        984,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               984,297
<CGS>                                          630,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,239,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             68,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (307,162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (307,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,905)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (146,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

  

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Paul Russo, Chief Executive Officer of Kyto Technology and Life Science, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

  

(1)The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

  

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.