alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of
Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30,
2008, each of the undersigned Gregory Pusey and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge and belief:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2008          /s/ Gregory Pusey
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Gregory Pusey, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 14, 2008          /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Senior Vice President-
                                   Finance and Chief Financial Officer

                                    * * * * *

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1372

In re: ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (7:01-cr-00027-BO-1)

Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 18, 2020

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Andrews, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Andrews petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from 

this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay 

in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties V Limited Partnership 1998 first quarter 10-QSB and 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>           
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          75,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                (41,184)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,873   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,415     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,334    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,873    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,487    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,090    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 684    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       397     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.48<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit31.2     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Tracy A. Kern, as Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “registrant”), herebycertify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 14, 2006 /s/ Tracy A. Kern   Tracy A. Kern        Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>            MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                           2,495,625
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       24,013
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 2,519,638
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2,624,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              157,851
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                        (397,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2,624,826
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    30,167
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   132,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (79,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (79,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                       (79,546)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.21)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         146,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,587,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,228,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,807,039
<PP&E>                                       6,201,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,417,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,987,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       230,867
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,199,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,417,031
<SALES>                                     10,745,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,745,283
<CGS>                                        8,873,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,873,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,887,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             436,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (504,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (172,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (332,923)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (332,923)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MESA
OFFSHORE TRUST FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 9/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,455,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     380,905,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             380,868,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,515,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,944,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,515,259
<SALES>                                      2,876,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,948,955
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               419,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,529,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,529,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,529,529
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12486]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Public Buildings Service


Notice of Availability, Environmental Assessment, Port of Entry, 
Located at Point Roberts, Whatcom County, Washington

    The General Services Administration (GSA) hereby gives notice an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared in accordance with the 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended. The EA 
was prepared for the proposed expansion of the Port of Entry located in 
Point Roberts, Whatcom County, Washington.
    Written comments on the proposed action, impacts, and mitigation 
measures may be submitted to GSA's EIS subconsultant, ABAM Consulting 
Engineers, at the following address: 33301 Ninth Avenue South, Federal 
Way, Washington 98003-6395 during the 30-day public comment period, 
which begins on May 19, 1995 and concludes on June 19, 1995. It is 
anticipated a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for this project 
will be prepared, signed, and become final after completion of the 
public comment period, provided no information leading to a contrary 
finding is received or is made available during the 30-day comment 
period.
    For further information contact Donna M. Meyer, Regional 
Environmental Program Officer, General Services Administration, Public 
Buildings Service (10PT), 400 15th Street SW., Auburn, Washington 
98001-6599. Telephone: (206) 931-7675.

    Dated: May 12, 1995.
L. Jay Pearson,
Regional Administrator (10A).
[FR Doc. 95-12486 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-23-M
#### In re NEWARK & M. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 28, 1912.)

In the matter of the application of the Newark & Marion Railway Company for the appointment of commissioners to determine whether or not the railroad shall be operated under steam power.

PER CURIAM.

Report of commissioners confirmed, without passing upon the question as to whether the abutting owners are entitled to compensation for the alleged additional burden placed upon their property.

FOOTE, J., dissents, upon the ground that the special act under which this proceeding was instituted is invalid, in that it does not provide for compensation to the owners of the fee in Pearl street for the added burden due to the operation of the railroad by locomotive steam power.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1997 AS FILED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         214,642
<SECURITIES>                                    55,337
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,279
<INVENTORY>                                    221,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               641,559
<PP&E>                                         163,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 736,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       378,038
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   736,649
<SALES>                                        123,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,684
<CGS>                                           76,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,331<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>MINORITY INTEREST OF 194,000 IS DEDUCTED FROM AFTER-TAX INCOME IN ARRIVING AT
NET INCOME OF 3,331,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6805** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DANIEL EDUARDO PINEDA

- ZELAYA , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. ( 7:09

- cr - 00100

- D

- 5; 7:13

- cv - 00134

- D )

Submitted : November 20, 2014 Decided: December 2, 2014

Before W ILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Daniel Eduardo Pineda

- Zelaya, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Tobin Webb Lathan, Seth Morgan Wood, Ethan A. Ontjes , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Eduardo Pineda

- Zelaya seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U. S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitution al claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
pro cedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pineda

- Zelaya has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.

DISMISSED