alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Terabeam, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
      undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick L.
      Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to
      the
      best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or


15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







s/
                Robert E. Fitzgerald
            
            /s/
                Patrick L. MiltonRobert
                E. Fitzgerald
            
            Patrick
                L. MiltonChief
                Executive Officer
            
            Chief
                Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:
                May 12, 2006
            
            Date:
                May 12, 2006
#### MALLETTE, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER & KETTLE FALLS LAND CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by James Mallette against the Rochester & Kettle Falls Land Company.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
**Exhibit 11**

 

**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.**

** **

**COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE**

** **
| ** **                                                    | ** ** | **Six Months Ended**   | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                    | ** ** | **June 30, 2005** | ** ** | **June 30, 2004** | ** ** | **June 30, 2005** | ** ** | **June 30, 2004** | ** ** |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| AVERAGE MARKET  PRICE PER SHARE                               |       | $                      | 2.26       |                   | $          | 1.58 |   | $ | 2.07 |   | $ | 1.54 |   |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| NET INCOME  (LOSS)                                            |       | $                      | (425,502   | )                      | $          | 136,811 |   | $ | (238,538 | ) | $ | 10,114 |   |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| Basic weighted  average number of common shares outstanding   |       | 3,368,567              |       | 3,318,900              |       | 3,383,233 |   | 3,318,900 |   |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| Dilutive effect  of stock options                             |       | —                 |       | 104,340                |       | — |   | 99,209 |   |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted weighted  average number of common shares outstanding |       | 3,368,567              |       | 3,423,240              |       | 3,383,233 |   | 3,418,109 |   |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings  (loss) per share                              |       | $                      | (.13       | )                      | $          | .04 |   | $ | (.07 | ) | $ | .00 |   |
|                                                          |       |                   |       |                   |       |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings  (loss) per share                            |       | $                      | (.13       | )                      | $          | .04 |   | $ | (.07 | ) | $ | .00 |   |

 

1

----
J

- S77009

- 18

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

KARNELL DAVIS

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 2582 EDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence July 12, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0001149

- 2013

BEFORE: OTT, J., DUBOW, J., and STRASSBURGER  , J.

MEMORANDUM BY OTT, J.: FILED MARCH 0 7 , 2019

Karnell Davis appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed on July

12, 2017, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following the

revocation of his probation. Davis contends, and both the Commonwealt h and

trial court agree, that he was improperly sentenced while he was not present

in the courtroom. 1 Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of sentence and

remand this matter for resentencing.

As all the parties to the matter are well aware of the factual and

procedural history, and are in agreement regarding the resolution of this

appeal, we will simply refer to the record in that regard. We add only that it

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

 Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1 This appeal is related to the appeal at 3 932 EDA 2017; trial court docket 51

- CR

- 0008343

- 2016. The related case involves the charges that led to the revocation of probation. He was sentenced on both matters at the same time.J

- S77009

- 18

- 2

-

is well settled that a criminal defendant has both the federal and state

constitutional right to b e present during all critical phases of the proceedings.

See Snyder v. Massachusetts , 54 S.Ct. 330 (1934); Commonwealth v.

Ressler , 798 A.2d 221 (Pa. Super. 2002). This right has been included in the

Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure at Pa.R.Crim. P. 602(A), which

states:

The defendant shall be present at every stage of the trial including the impaneling of the jury and the return of the verdict, and at the imposition of sentence , except as otherwise provided by this rule. The defendant’s absence without cause shall not preclude proceeding with the trial including a return of the verdict and the imposition of sentence.

Pa.R.Crim.P. 602(A) (emphasis added).

All parties agree that the authorities did not bring Davis into the

courtroom; Davis bore no responsibility for his absence.

Judgment of sentence vacated. This matter is remanded for

resentencing, which is to take place within 45 days of the return of the certified

record. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 3/7/19
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-0687

LT Case No. 2017-CF-000996-A

_____________________________

RYAN PAUL THORNHILL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County.

G. Richard Singeltary, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M. 

Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

February 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, C.J., SOUD, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
[No. 15567-6-III.

Division Three.

October 23, 1997.]

#### Kenneth Gamache, et al., *Appellants,*v. Gerald L. Groenig, et al., *Defendants,*John E. Borton, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 94-2-00421-1, Robert N. Hackett, J., entered February 16, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11953]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum Services

Information Collection Submitted to OMB for Review

AGENCY: Institute of Museum Services.

ACTION: Notice of information submitted to OMB for review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum Services (IMS) is submitting an 
information collection for review by the Office of Management and 
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The collection is entitled 
``US. Museums on the Internet 1995--A Survey for the Institute of 
Museum Services.'' IMS has requested that review be completed by May 
19, 1995.
    IMS recently established a connection to the Internet. We would 
like to enhance our service to the museum community by providing IMS 
information through the Internet. Currently, no body of data exists to 
determine how many museums have Internet connections or, if they do, 
what level of service museums have. Therefore, we propose to survey the 
museum community on a voluntary-response basis with a brief 
questionnaire to ask museums to give us the information we need to know 
to be able to provide information most efficiently. IMS distribution 
plan for the survey will assure a broad collection of data. A 
statistical analysis is not warranted due to the cost of such analysis 
and the limited usefulness of this data collect which, due to the 
rapidly changing use of the Internet, will become obsolete.
    For this collection, the estimated average burden hours is .05 and 
the frequency of response is once. The number of respondents is 1000.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Mr. Dan Chenok, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 3002 NEOB, 
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Submit requests for more information, 
including copies of the proposed collection of information and 
supporting documentation, to IMS Internet Policy Committee, Institute 
of Museum Services, Room 609, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 
DC 20506.
Diane Frankel,
Director, Institute of Museum Services.
[FR Doc. 95-11953 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-M
```
#### In re MYERS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 13, 1899.)

In the matter ’of Bertha K. Myers. E. W. Hatch, for appellant. E. J. Myers, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 55 N. Y. Supp. 168.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease
Finance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 29, 2004


                                /S/ Alan H. Lund
                                ----------------
                                  ALAN H. LUND
       Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer



                                      -27-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000714256
<NAME>                        MB SOFTWARE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         72,597
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,499,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,595,052
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,064,821
<PP&E>                                         341,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 436,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,912,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,116,862
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,400,000
<COMMON>                                       69,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,077,025)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,912,346
<SALES>                                        168,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               707,515
<CGS>                                          538,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  298,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (135,064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                85,000
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (220,064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May 27,
2009




By /s/  JAMES F.
WESTMORELAND


James F. Westmoreland, President,Chief Executive Officer


andinterim principal finance
and accounting officer


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE OF MUNSTER )

HIGH SCHOOL, an unincorporated association; )

DESTINY SABO; R.B., a minor child by her )

mother and next friend, Karolyn Bishop, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO.: 1:14-cv-172

)

THE SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER; )

PRINCIPAL OF MUNSTER HIGH SCHOOL, )

in his official capacity, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Come now Defendants SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER and PRINCIPAL OF MUNSTER 

HIGH SCHOOL in his official capacity, by counselCrist, Sears & Zic, LLP, and notify the Court that 

the parties have tentatively resolved all issues in this case and anticipate filing the appropriate 

documentation with the Court within forty-five (45) days. As a result, the parties respectfully request 

that all dates and deadlines be vacated.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jacquelyn S. Pillar King

Michael D. Sears, #2108-45

Jacquelyn S. Pillar King, #25051-64

Crist, Sears & Zic, LLP

9245 Calumet Avenue, Suite 200

Munster, Indiana 46321

(219) 836-0200 phone

(219) 836-2544 fax

Attorneys for Defendants School Town of Munster and 

Principal of Munster High School, in his official capacity
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the 23

rd day of July, 2014, service of a complete copy of this filing was made 

upon each party or attorney of record herein either via the ECF system or by depositing the same in 

the United States Mail, first class mail, with sufficient postage affixed.

/s/ Jacquelyn S. Pillar King
#### RYDER, Plaintiff, v. BROOKLYN EL. R. CO., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 7, 1899.)

Action by Stephen Ryder against the Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company.

No opinion. Notice must be given of this application.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136010 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136010 COA: 273485 Macomb CC: 2 006-001701-FH DAVID BRIAN BINIENDA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0910 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 17, 2008

Clerk
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q, of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”),for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wilmer D. Leinbach, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Tomy knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Wilmer  D. Leinbach                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Exec. VP  & Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                    |
| Date:  | May 15, 2003                            |   |   |
|        |                                         |        |  |  |

 

----