alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13047]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Center for Human Genome Research; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.

    Name of Committee: Genome Research Review Committee
    Date: June 27 and 28, 1995
    Time: Tuesday, June 27, 8:30 to recess; Wednesday, June 28, 8:30 
to adjournment
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, Chevy Chase Pavilion, Washington, 
D.C.
    Contact Person: Ms. Linda Engel, Chief, Office of Scientific 
Review, National Center for Human Genome Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 402-0838
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Discussions, applications, and/or contract proposals could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research)

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Anna Snouffer,
Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-13047 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony R. MarescaAnthony R. MarescaChief Financial OfficerOctober 13, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1691 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1691

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton, 
Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 
and designated as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
other paper of the United States to the facility referred to in section 
1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John H. Bradley Department 
of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1691

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
```
Frank Robert DITTO, petitioner, v. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES.

No. 12-9263.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jose Cristobal CARDONA, petitioner, v. Jeffery E. THOMAS, Warden.

No. 12-9824.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
[No. 37981-0-I.

Division One.

October 6, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Latrice L. Sanders, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-04020-5, Janice Niemi, J., entered December 4, 1995. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 2

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                   THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Arthur J.
Seidenfeld certify that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
    2002 (the "Report") of Modern Technology Corp. (the "Company"), fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

Date: February 4, 2003

                      /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                      ------------------------
                        Arthur J. Seidenfeld
               President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          I, Zong Yun Zhou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment to Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.

| June 15, 2006 | /s/ Zong Yun Zhou       |
|---------------|-------------------------|
|          |                         |
|          | Zong Yun Zhou           |
|          | Chief Financial Officer |
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1602

To provide grants for prosecutions of cases cleared through use of DNA 

backlog clearance funds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To provide grants for prosecutions of cases cleared through 

use of DNA backlog clearance funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grants for DNA Back5 log Prosecutions Act’’. 
2

•HR 1602 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR PROSECUTIONS OF CASES 

2 CLEARED THROUGH USE OF DNA BACKLOG 

3 CLEARANCE FUNDS. 

4 The Justice for All Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–

5 405) is amended by adding after section 206 the following 

6 new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 207. ASSISTANCE FOR PROSECUTIONS OF CASES 

8 CLEARED THROUGH USE OF DNA BACKLOG 

9 CLEARANCE FUNDS. 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall 

11 make grants to train and employ personnel to help pros12 ecute cases cleared through use of funds provided for 

13 DNA backlog elimination. 

14 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

15 are authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 for each 

16 of fiscal years 2006 through 2010 to carry out this sec17 tion.’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

t0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147963

- 4

COUNTY OF ALCONA and ALCONA

COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 147963

- 4

COA: 301532, 302134

Alcona CC: 08

- 001111

- NM

ROBSON ACCOUNTING, INC., d/b/a

REHMANN ROBSON

, and REHMANN

GROUP, L.L.C., d/b/a REHMANN GROUP,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Cour t, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andd. Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Company’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 2, 2010                                  /s/ Peter Tiedemann   Peter Tiedemann   Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-47-TLS 

 ) 

LUIS RAMIREZ-MUNOZ ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 46], filed on October 25, 2016. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 46] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

Five (5) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such 

offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on November 15, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[No. 39007-4-I.

Division One.

August 11, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Katye Waddilove-Garcia, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-08119-0, Richard A. Jones, J., entered June 17, 1996. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12257]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Requests Under Review by Office of Management and Budget

    Agency Clearance Officer: Michael E. Bartell, (202) 942-8800.
    Upon written request copy available from: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 450 Fifth 
Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Extension
    Rule 19d-1; File No. 270-242
    Form 10-SB; File No. 270-367
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission has submitted for OMB approval extensions for the following 
rule and form:
    Rule 19d-1 prescribes the form and content of notices required to 
be filed with the Commission by self-regulatory organizations for which 
the Commission is the appropriate regulatory agency concerning all 
final disciplinary sanctions, denial of membership and participation or 
association with a member. It is estimated that 25 respondents will 
incur a total annual burden of 2,500 hours to comply with this rule.
    Form 10-SB may be used by small business issuers for registration 
pursuant to Section 12 (b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934. It is estimated that 65 respondents will file Form 10-SB annually 
at a total annual burden of 5,980 hours.
    Direct general comments to the Clearance Officer for the Securities 
and Exchange Commission at the address below. Direct any comments 
concerning the accuracy of the estimated average burden hours for 
compliance with the Commission rules and forms to Michael E. Bartell, 
Associate Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20549 and the Clearance Officer for the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Management and Budget, Project Number 3235-0206 
(Rule 19d-1) and 3235-0419 (Form 10-SB), Room 3208, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: May 9, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12257 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 10, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01104-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.S., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 79,649



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright This is an appeal in a parental termination cas e. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence
to which two contests were filed. The trial cour t sustained the contests and, on review, this Court
affirmed the trial court’s order. In an order dated September 22, 2014, we orde red the district clerk to file, by October 2, 2014, either the clerk’s record or written verifi cation that appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. We cautioned appellant that if the Court received written verification of no payment, we may dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. On October 2, 2014, the Court received written verification from the district clerk that appe llant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b) & 42.3(b).

141104F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.S., A CHILD

No. 05-14-01104-CV On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court, Hunt County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 79,649. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellees, Richard Roberts and Ashley Roberts, recover their costs of this appeal from a ppellant, Danny Ray Schwartz.

Judgment entered October 10, 2014
Paul Andre BLANTON, petitioner, v. Patricia L. CARUSO, et al.

No. 12-8707.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### WINTER, Appellant, v. CROSS-TOWN ST. RY. CO. OF BUFFALO, Respondent.

(Supreme Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

Action by Henry Winter against the Cross-Town Street-Railway Company of Buffalo.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs.
KANG HE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9191.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:
March 15, 2011

/s/ JAMES J. MCCARTHY James J. McCarthy Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer


---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 12

INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

Restated
    
    Restated2003
    
    2002(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    119,301
    
    
    $
    115,927Add:Provision for income taxes (a)
    
    
    57,504
    
    
    
    59,437Fixed charges
    
    
    235,760
    
    
    
    209,882Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    13,100
    
    
    
    15,634Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    
    399,465
    
    
    
    369,612Preferred dividend requirements
    
    
    1,021
    
    
    
    6,139Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    148
    %
    
    
    151
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    1,511
    
    
    
    9,270Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    219,110
    
    
    
    188,186Capitalized interest
    
    
    13,100
    
    
    
    15,634Interest factor of rents
    
    
    3,550
    
    
    
    6,062Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    235,760
    
    
    
    209,882Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    237,271
    
    
    $
    219,152Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(A) divided by (B)
    
    
    1.69x
    
    
    
    1.76xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends(A) divided by (C)
    
    
    1.68x
    
    
    
    1.69x


-22-
FDIC ComE-IN

Mike Neale
• JHA Current Offerings

SMS Banking

WAP Supporting Feature Phones and Smartphones

Downloadable Applications (iPhone/iPad/Android)

• JHA Client Base

Community and mid-tier banks de novo - $18 billion

FDIC ComE-IN
• JHA Retail Application Functionality

Balance inquiry

Funds transfer

Bill Payment

Person to Person Payments

Alerts

ATM / Branch Lookup

Remote Deposit Capture

FDIC ComE-IN
• Current Day Potential Value for Unbanked and Under 

Banked

• Mobile provides immediacy of actionable financial 

information

• Mobile improves availability of financial services both 

from time and location perspectives

FDIC ComE-IN
• Future Opportunities

• Expansion of NFC payments to reduce risk of cash

• Expansion of mobile services that currently still 

require branch interactions

• Relationship creation

• Monetary account opening

• Monetary instrument purchase

• Allow the community bank to return to its role as 

educator of fiscal responsibility through digital 

content and transaction judgments

FDIC ComE-IN
• Policy Considerations

• CRA Credits for outreach

• Rebalance the risk vs. reward equation

• Provide credit for operational expenses 

including losses

• Provide regulatory consideration 

• Allow latitude regarding elevated risk 

exposure of services for the purpose of 

inclusion

FDIC ComE-IN
• Policy Considerations (cont.)

• Continue to update existing regulations to foster 

financial service innovation while maintaining the 

underlying charter of the individual regulations.

FDIC ComE-IN
#### LESTER, Appellant, v. BLOOMFIELD, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 11, 1899.)

Action by Williard -Lester, as administrator, etc., against Benjamin F. Bloomfield.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### TIFFANY, Respondent, v. ELLIS, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1907.)

Action by Henry C. Tiffany against John J. Ellis, impleaded with others.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to plead' over, upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents. ROBSON, J., not sitting.