alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,934
<PP&E>                                           4,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                     840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,820
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,475
<SALES>                                          5,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            2,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                       538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### CUPPY v. STOLLWEROK BROS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Hazlitt A. Cuppy against Stollwerck Bros. No opinion. Motion granted, on compliance by appellant with the terms stated in order. Order filed.
Francisco Javier MONREAL, petitioner, v. NEW YORK, et al.

No. 13-114.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### NATHAN, Respondent, v. WOOLVERTON, Appellant. .

.(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by Siegmund Nathan against William H. Woolverton, as President of the New York Transfer Company. No opinion. Motions denied, without costs. See, also, 134 N. Y. Supp. 469.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1599

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for two years 

the higher exemption amounts under the alternative minimum tax for 

individuals and to adjust the exemption amounts and phaseout thresholds 

in the alternative minimum tax for inflation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005

Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for two years the higher exemption amounts under the 

alternative minimum tax for individuals and to adjust 

the exemption amounts and phaseout thresholds in the 

alternative minimum tax for inflation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF HIGHER EXEMPTION 

4 AMOUNTS UNDER THE INDIVIDUAL AMT; AD5 JUSTMENT OF AMT FOR INFLATION. 

6 (a) EXTENSION.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of sec7 tion 55(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat-
2

•HR 1599 IH 

1 ing to exemption amount for taxpayers other than cor2 porations) are each amended by striking ‘‘and 2005’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘, 2005, 2006, and 2007’’. 

4 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (d) of 

5 section 55 of such Code (relating to exemption amount) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the case of 

9 any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 

10 2005, each of the dollar amounts set forth in para11 graphs (1), (2), and (3) shall be increased by an 

12 amount equal to—

13 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

14 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter15 mined under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar 

16 year by substituting ‘calendar year 2004’ for 

17 ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 

18 thereof. 

19 If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence 

20 is not a multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded 

21 to the nearest multiple of $100.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2005.

Æ
No. 12

- 14

- 00335

- CR

DONNIE CARR § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Appellant § §

vs. § 12 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee § § AT TYLER , TEXAS

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF LATE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
Now comes Austin Reeve Jackson, counsel for Appellant in the abo ve entitled and
numbered cause, and makes this Motion , and for good cause shows the following:

I.
Appellant’s brief in this matter was due on 2 3 March 2015

. No prior extensions
have been requested.

II.

This case presented a potential issue that was unique to counsel and, as a result,
required additional time to research

. Additionally, w hile working on this case counsel has also been working on
approximately 50 open appellate cases in this and other courts to which he has been
appointed by Smith County. This has included investigating motions for new trials
(looking for and talking with potential witnesses, jail and office visits with new appellate
appointments, trial court appearances for the same), requests for and reviews of reporter’s
and clerk’s records, research, briefing, review of opinions, investigation of potential PDR
issues, etc. While not all of these seventy or so c ases have required significant attention ACCEPTED 12-14-00335-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/9/2015 11:47:02 AM CATHY LUSK CLERKfrom counsel during this time, many of them have which ahs resulted form counsel
having been able to devote the full attention necessary to this case prior to today’s date.
Because of this, counsel was delayed in c ompleting his brief in this matter.

II.

No prior extension s have been requested and is respectfully prayed that the in the
interest of justice, the Court grant this motion

. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , undersigned counsel respectfully
prays that, in accordance with the applicable law, the Court grant this Motion and accept
the brief filed in today in this matter.
Respectfully submitted,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson Texas Bar No. 240461 39 112 East Line, Suite 310 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 595

- 6070 Facsimile: (866) 387

- 0152

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document

was served on counsel for the State by efile concurrently with its filing.

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1645 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1645

To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2005

 Mr. Gerlach (for himself, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Holden, Mr. 
    Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Platts, Ms. Hart, Mr. English of 
  Pennsylvania, and Mr. Gene Green of Texas) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
Commemoration Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior may provide a grant to the Franklin 
Institute to--
            (1) rehabilitate the Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
        (including the Franklin statue) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 
        and
            (2) develop an interpretive exhibit relating to Benjamin 
        Franklin, to be displayed at a museum adjacent to the Benjamin 
        Franklin National Memorial.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $10,000,000.
    (b) Required Match.--The Secretary of the Interior shall require 
the Franklin Institute to match any amounts provided to the Franklin 
Institute under this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1863 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1863

To amend the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965 to make available additional funds to increase access to the arts 
                   through the support of education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

 Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico (for herself and Mr. Peterson of Minnesota) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965 to make available additional funds to increase access to the arts 
                   through the support of education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Arts Education Advancement Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Use of Funds for Elementary and Secondary Education.--Section 
5A(b) of the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 954a(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (8) by striking ``and'' at the end,
            (2) in paragraph (9) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) increase accessibility to the arts through art 
        education in formal systems of elementary and secondary 
        education.''.
    (b) Availability of Funds.--Section 11(f)(1) of the National 
Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
960(f)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$175,000,000, 50 percent'' and inserting 
        ``$98,000,000, 100 percent'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following ``Of the aggregate 
        amount made available to carry out section 5A in any fiscal 
        year, 50 percent shall be made available for the use specified 
        in section 5A(b)(10).''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

     This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the 1st day of the 1st fiscal year that begins after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  411,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (61,200)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,739,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,613,600
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,739,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

NYKAZA GEE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-CAN

)

ERIC PARRISH and BRADY JANOVITZ, )

)

Defendants. )

APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

I, the below-signed, state that pursuant to N. D. Ind. L.R. 83-5, I have read and will abide 

by the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, including 

Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit. I 

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Defendants Eric Parrish and Brady 

Janovitz, in the above-referenced matter.

Respectfully Submitted,

GREGORY F. ZOELLER

Indiana Attorney General

Atty. No. 1958-98

Date: June 3, 2016 By: /S/Matthew K. Phillips

Matthew K. Phillips

Deputy Attorney General

Atty. No. 28724-49

Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor

302 W. Washington Street

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2770

(317) 234-2415; (317) 232-7979 (fax)

Matthew.Phillips@atg.in.gov

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 20 filed 06/03/16 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 3, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the registered 

attorneys:

I also certify that a copy was mailed, by first class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and 

properly addressed to the following non-CM/ECF participant:

Nykaza Gee

DOC # 127839

Indiana State Prison

One Park Row

Michigan City, IN 46360

/s/ Matthew K. Phillips

Matthew K. Phillips

Deputy Attorney General

Office of Attorney General

Indiana Government Center South – 5th Floor

302 West Washington Street

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2770

Telephone: (317) 234-2415

Fax: (317) 232-7979

Email: Matthew.Phillips@atg.in.gov

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00442-JVB-MGG document 20 filed 06/03/16 page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1918 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 80% 2,3-Dimethylbutylnitrile and 20% 

toluene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 80% 2,3- 

Dimethylbutylnitrile and 20% toluene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 80% 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTYLNITRILE AND 20% TOL4 UENE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•HR 1918 IH 

‘‘ 9902.05.63 80% 2,3- 

Dimethylbutylnitrile (CAS 

No. 13893–53–3) (provided 

for in subheading 

3824.90.91) and 20% toluene ...................................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

RICCO STARMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:14-CV-1730-TLS

)

VIRTUOSO SOURCING GROUP, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

On December 4, 2015, this Court referred the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment

and all other default judgment proceedings to Magistrate Judge Christopher Neuechterlein to

review, to conduct any and all necessary evidentiary hearings, and to issue a report and

recommendation that includes proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition

of this matter. 

On June 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein issued a Report and Recommendation

[ECF No. 26] setting forth a recommendation that the Court grant the Plaintiff’s Motion, direct

the entry of default judgment against the Defendant on Counts I, II, III, and IV of the Plaintiff’s

First Amended Complaint, and Order the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff a total of $15, 366.50.

This Court’s review of the Magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is governed

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) which provides in part:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the

report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is

made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the

findings and recommendations made by the magistrate. The judge may also

receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate with

instructions.

Objections to the Magistrate’s Judge’s Report and Recommendations must be made within

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01730-TLS-CAN document 27 filed 07/07/16 page 1 of 2
fourteen days of service of a copy of the Report. Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party has filed an

objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

Upon review of the Plaintiff’s submissions and the Report and Recommendation, the

Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 26] in its entirety and thereby:

(1) GRANTS the Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [ECF No. 19] with respect

to Counts I, II, III, and IV of the First Amended Complaint; and

(2) DIRECTS the Clerk to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Ricco Starms

and against Defendant Virtuoso Sourcing Group, LLC, in the sum of $15,366.50,

which includes:

(a) $10,000 in actual damages for four violations of the FDCPA;

(b) $1,000 in statutory damages for four violations of the FDCPA;

(c) $3,917.50 in attorney’s fees;

(d) $400 in court costs; and

(e) $49 in process server costs.

SO ORDERED on July 7, 2016.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

2

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01730-TLS-CAN document 27 filed 07/07/16 page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1466 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1466

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pimientos (capsicum anuum), 
    prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pimientos (capsicum anuum), 
    prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PIMIENTOS, PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VINEGAR OR 
              ACETIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.20.03      Pimientos           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (capsicum anuum),                                                  31/2008
                         prepared or
                         preserved
                         otherwise than by
                         vinegar or acetic
                         acid, not frozen,
                         in containers
                         holding not more
                         than 227 g.
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2005.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```