alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |   11-3-10 |   |   /s/ Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr      |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   | Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.                     |
|   |                |   | President and CEO                         |
|   |                |   |                                      |
|   |                |   |                                      |
| Date:  |   11-3-10 |   |   /s/ Doug Carpenter            |
|   |                |   | C. Douglas Carpenter                      |
|   |                |   | Senior Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |

----
| (1) | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended      March 31, 2009 (the “Quarterly Report”) complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d));  and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 15, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Anahita Villafane   |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                         |   | Anahita      Villafane       |
|                         |   | Chief      Financial Officer |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00002-TLS-SLC

)

ERIC D. WHITE )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on June 22, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Judge Theresa

L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation

are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 22nd day of June 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges                       Exhibit 12


<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

                                                                                Nine months ended September 30,
Dollars in millions)                                                               1997                 1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income:
<S>                                                                            <C>                  <C>        
  Income before provision for income taxes                                     $      65.7          $      50.8
  Fixed charges                                                                       97.6                 89.7
                                                                           -------------------------------------------
  Income before provision for income taxes and fixed charges                   $     163.3          $     140.5
                                                                           ===========================================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                             $      95.0          $      87.1
  Preferred stock dividends                                                            2.6                  2.6
                                                                           -------------------------------------------
                                                                               $      97.6          $      89.7
                                                                           ===========================================

Ratio of income before provision for income taxes and fixed
  charges to fixed charges                                                             1.67                 1.57
                                                                           ===========================================

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                 5
<CIK>                                            0000712843
<NAME>                                    ELXSI CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                              USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      7,803,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         204,000
<INVENTORY>                                       12,112,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  26,273,000
<PP&E>                                            32,620,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    86,148,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             11,628,000
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  4,000
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                        61,408,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      86,148,000
<SALES>                                           78,748,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  78,748,000
<CGS>                                             61,949,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     72,204,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   587,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    6,487,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      11,291,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               17,778,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      17,778,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                             4.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           3.64


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY GRANDISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1297-S; CR-83-200-S)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Grandison, Nos. CR-83-200-S; CA-97-1297-S (D. Md. May 12,

and 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Sandra P. GANDY, petitioner, v. J. Harrell REID, Sheriff, Hamilton County, Florida.

No. 12-9950.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

NOTICE OF RECORD RETURN

April 19, 2018

To: Robert N. Trgovich

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 Northern District of Indiana

 South Bend , IN 46601-0000

No. 17-1683

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees

v.

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, 

Defendant - Appellant

No. 17-1591

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS,

 Defendant - Appellee

 Originating Case Information:

 District Court No: 3:15-cv-00463-JD

Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division

District Judge Jon E. DeGuilio

 Originating Case Information:

 District Court No: 3:15-cv-00463-JD

Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division

District Judge Jon E. DeGuilio

Case: 17-1683 Document: 50 Filed: 04/19/2018 Pages: 2

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 91 filed 04/19/18 page 1 of 2
Clerk/Agency Rep Robert N. Trgovich

The mandate or agency closing letter in this cause issued on April 12, 2018.

Returned herewith is the record which was transmitted to this court.

 RECORD ON APPEAL STATUS: Entire record returned consisting

of

 Other (specify items): 4 CD,s containing pleadings

Please acknowledge receipt of these documents on the enclosed copy of this notice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Received above record, if any, from the Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Date: Received by:

_________________________ ____________________________________

form name: c7_Record_Return_toDC(form ID: 205)

Case: 17-1683 Document: 50 Filed: 04/19/2018 Pages: 2

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 91 filed 04/19/18 page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1787 

To suspend temporarily the duty on t-Butyl acrylate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on t-Butyl acrylate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. T-BUTYL ACRYLATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.56 tert-Butyl acrylate (CAS No. 

1663–39–4) (provided for in 

subheading 2916.12.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1787 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flow International Corporation, a Washingtoncorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/    STEPHEN R. LIGHT 

----
#### PEOPLE, Respondents, v. MUELLER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 18, 1899.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Jacob Mueller.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of conviction modified by striking therefrom the words, “and in default of the payment thereof to be committed to the Erie county penitentiary, at hard labor, until such fine shall be paid, not exceeding one day’s imprisonment for each and every dollar so imposed as a fine,” and, as so modified, judgment affirmed. The judgment to be entered and certified to the supreme court of Erie county, pursuant to section 547 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. All concur, except WARD, J., not voting.
EX-34.9
(logo) VirchowKrause
&company


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined WestLake Settlement Services, LLC's compliance with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to
WestLake (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007:

1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance
payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as
indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that
such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior
to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.;

1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be
made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged
to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or
omission;

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with these servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, Westlake Settlement Services, LLC complied with, in all material
respects, the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007.


/s/ Virchow Krause & Company, LLP
Virchow Krause & Company, LLP
March 3, 2008


7900 Xerxes Avenue South * Suite 2400 * Minneapolis, MN 55431-1115 *
Tel 952.835.1344 * Fax 952.835.5845 * www.virchowkrause.com
Virchow Krause & Company, LLP
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants * An Independent Member of Baker
Tilly International
---

EXHIBIT 13.02

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marchand Snyman, Chief Financial Officer of Northern Dynasty
Minerals Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ M.
      Snyman    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Marchand Snyman        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | May 15, 2015           

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-893-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--City 
of Red Bud 6.9.2021 to be effective 6/9/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/21/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-894-000.
    Applicants: EQT Energy, LLC, Alta Energy Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release 
Regulations, et al. of EQT Energy, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5174.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 10, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-12699 Filed 6-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOEVAN JOSEPH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-3201

[March 2, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cymonie Rowe, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CF-008721-AXXX-MB.

Joevan Joseph, Belle Glade, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---

March 30, 2012

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|    |                                               
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    
|    |                                               
|    | Consent of Expert                             

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011, (the Annual Report)
to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Hassan Ghaffari, P.Eng., hereby consent to the use of my
name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the
following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Preliminary Assessment of the Pebble Project, Southwest Alaska dated
  February 17, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

Original document signed by Hassan Ghaffari

|                             
|-----------------------------
|Hassan Ghaffari, P.Eng.      
|                             
|Wardrop, a Tetra Tech Company

---