alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          713982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                721360
<PP&E>                                            9939
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  779792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            19082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2015
<OTHER-SE>                                      758695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    779792
<SALES>                                           1600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 75077
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    26257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  48820
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              32691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     32691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, RyanRhodes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Restoration Robotics, Inc., certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form10-K/A of Restoration Robotics, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 26, 2019  By:  /s/ Ryan Rhodes   Ryan Rhodes   
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
**
#### MALTBY, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Eva L. Maltby against the city of New York.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
| (1) | The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: June 28, 2013 | By:    |  /s/ Georges Benarroch                                                                                 |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Georges Benarroch                                                                                           |   |
|                |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer |   |
|                |   |                                                                                                        |   |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles M. GILMORE, Appellant.

No. 03-3205.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 23, 2004.

Decided April 28, 2004.

John Daniel Patterson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Springfield, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David R. Mercer, Federal ■ Public Defender’s Office, Springfield, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.

- Charles M. Gilmore, Memphis, TN, pro se.

*425Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Gilmore appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm having been convicted of a felony robbery offense and a misdemeanor domestic-violence crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), (9) and 924(a)(2), and making a false written statement in connection with the acquisition of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced Gilmore to 77 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release on both counts, to be served concurrently. Gilmore’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court erred by finding that the shotgun Gilmore possessed was stolen, and thereby enhancing his sentence 2 levels under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4).

The district court did not clearly err in concluding that Gilmore stole the shotgun, based upon the testimony presented at sentencing. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4); *United States v. Sarabia-Maiiinez,*276 F.3d 447, 450 (8th Cir.2002) (sentencing judge’s determination of witness credibility is virtually unreviewable on appeal); *United States v. Martinez,*339 F.3d 759, 761 (8th Cir.2003) (clear-error review).

Having reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, David Mathieson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of RSC HoldingsIII, LLC and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not Applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: March 14, 2008         /s/ David Mathieson   David Mathieson                    Senior Vice President, and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-cr-00045-TLS-SLC

)

RUFUS THOMAS JONES )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan

Collins, on November 9, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath

on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including

the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing

Guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between

the parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the Count 2 of the two-count

Indictment, and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this

Findings and Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will

be scheduled before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to

the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14)

days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 9th day of November 2015.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Stephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: July 29, 2003 |  | /s/ STEPHEN M. SMITH                     
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                     |  | Stephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,639,000
<SECURITIES>                                33,721,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,227,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   395,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,710,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,082,000
<PP&E>                                       4,396,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,054,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,331,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,900,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,347,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,331,000
<SALES>                                     36,677,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,677,000
<CGS>                                       14,508,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,508,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,975,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,725,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   945,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,780,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               4,722,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (942,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>

     In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Development Partners,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Report"),  Jack Jie Qin, the
Principal  Executive  Officer,  and William E. Sluss,  the  Principal  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


March 31, 2011                      By: /s/ Jack Jie Qin
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Jack Jie Qin, Principal
                                        Executive Officer



March 31, 2011                      By: /s/ William E. Sluss
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        William E. Sluss, Principal Financial
                                        Officer
Exhibit 32 (a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2006, I, Harold C. Rauner,
President and Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) | such Form 10-QSB, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Financial Banking Companies,
Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ HAROLD C. RAUNER                 
|Harold C. Rauner                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 22, 2006
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1571 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil and gas leases 

on portions of the Outer Continental Shelf located off the coast of 

New Jersey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. FERGUSON, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil 

and gas leases on portions of the Outer Continental 

Shelf located off the coast of New Jersey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OIL AND GAS LEASING OFF 

4 THE COAST OF NEW JERSEY. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall not issue a lease, permit, or license for the explo7 ration for or extraction of oil or gas on or from submerged 

8 lands described in subsection (b). 
2 

•HR 1571 IH 

1 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The submerged lands with 

2 respect to which subsection (a) applies are all submerged 

3 lands seaward from the landward boundary of the Outer 

4 Continental Shelf that lie within 125 miles of any point 

5 of the coast line of the State of New Jersey, including 

6 areas with respect to which a moratorium on oil and gas 

7 leasing activities existed before the date of enactment of 

8 this Act. 

Æ
Motion Granted and Order filed Ma y 12 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00622

- CV

____________ ANSON DISTRIBUTING, LLC , Appellant

V.
STARCO IMPEX, INC. AND USA MILLENNIUM, LP , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 151st Di st rict Court

Harri s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 42352



### ORDER

App ellants h a ve filed an unopposed mot ion for an extension if time to file
their brief. The motion is granted. In accordance with our order of November 18, 2021, setting a briefin g s ch edule :

• Appellant ’ s combined respo nse and reply brief is due June 6 , 2022 (word count 22,500) ; and

• Appellee s ’ rep ly brief is due June 2 7 , 2022 (word count 7,500)

.

PER C URIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell

.
Damon Darrell FLORES, petitioner, v. Jeffrey BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 13-6947.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties V Limited Partnership 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000712753
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          75,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                (41,914)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,220   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,315     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,622    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,220    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,001    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,316    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,369    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       685     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.90<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>