alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven M. Besbeck, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Creative ComputerApplications, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent first fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  January 12, 2004 | /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                                                         |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |  Steven M. Besbeck                                                       |
|                         |  President, Chief  Executive Officer, and Chief Financial   Officer |

 

----
Opinion issued August 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00724-CR

———————————

IN RE BLAISE ALLEN JOHNSON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Blaise Allen Johnson, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, 

seeking to have the trial court appoint and pay for expert witnesses and to grant his 

motion to suppress.

1

 

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Blaise Allen Johnson, cause number 

1529282, pending in the 174th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Hazel B. Jones presiding.
2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 3(i)(b)


                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                     OF THE
                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               POWERTEL USA, INC.


         POWERTEL USA, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certifies
pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware that:

         1. The Company filed on January 2, 1997, a Certificate of Amendment to
the Certificate of Incorporation of POWERTEL USA, INC., (SRV number 971000916)
(the "Certificate of Amendment").

         2. The Certificate of Amendment was an inaccurate record of the
corporate action and is null and void AB INITIO as confirmed by an ORDER
APPROVING AND CONFIRMING DEBTOR'S FIRST AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, AS
REVISED AND AMENDED of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Nevada, Case
No: 97-30265-BMG, dated September 15, 1998.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Correction to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 25th day of
November, 1998.

                                            POWERTEL USA, INC.


                                       By:     /s/ Richard A. Cascarilla
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Richard A. Cascarilla, President
ERORENTALS, LLC T/A Trump 2208, Appellant, v. Qofa W. YU, Appellee.

No. 3D18-54

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 12, 2019

Shaked Law Firm, P.A., and Sagi Shaked, Joel Roth, Aventura, Loretta Guevara and Javiera Aguilera, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Garcia-Menocal & Perez, P.L., and Anthony J. Perez, for appellee.

Before SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and LEBAN, Senior Judge.

LEBAN, Senior Judge.

*747It is well-settled that attorney's fees are not recoverable absent a statute or a contract that specifically authorizes their recovery. *See**Hampton v. Fairchild-Florida Constr. Co.*, 341 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1976) ; *see also**Civix Sunrise, GC, LLC v. Sunrise Road Maint. Assn, Inc.*, 997 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Appellant herein, Erorentals, LLC T/A Trump 2208 ("Erorentals"), sued the appellee, Qofa Yu, in tort. The record is devoid of any contract between the parties and the pleadings include no such claim. The record reflects, and Qofa concedes, that he never sought attorney's fees as a sanction1 under Section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes. There is similarly no proposal for settlement or offer of judgment of record. Lastly, and most importantly, Qofa presents no support for his argument that attorney's fees are warranted under section 57.105 (7). Subpart (7) applies specifically to *contracts* with unilateral fee provisions. Because no such contract exists here, subpart (7) is inapplicable.

Consistent with the above, we reverse the trial court's order to the extent that it awards attorney's fees.

1

Qofa likewise concedes that the trial court made no findings under *Kozel v. Ostendorf*, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1993), which outlines the six factors used to determine whether sanctions are warranted.
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00406-RL-CAN document 2 filed 07/29/15 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00406-RL-CAN document 2 filed 07/29/15 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00406-RL-CAN document 2 filed 07/29/15 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00406-RL-CAN document 2 filed 07/29/15 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00406-RL-CAN document 2 filed 07/29/15 page 5 of 5
#### WARD, Appellant, v. TEXTILE COMMISSION CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1913.)

Action by Charles M. R. Ward against the Textile Commission Company. P.- S. Dudley, of New York City, for appellant. J. B. Doyle, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of this court on the former appeal. 139 App. Div. 109, 123 Ñ. Y. Supp. 918. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, P. J., dissents, on the dissenting opinion on the same appeal.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

MATTHEW D. CLAUSSEN, et al., )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:15-CV-52-PPS-PRC

)

MICHAEL R. PENCE, as Governor of )

the State of Indiana, et al., )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second

Amended Complaint [DE 26], filed on May 15, 2015. No response has been filed, and

the time to do so has passed. Two of the plaintiffs in this case (John McDaniel and

Donald Huddleston) ask to be dropped from this case as they believe their claims are now

moot. 

While most circuits recognize amendment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

15 as an acceptable means of adding or dropping parties, see Galustian v. Peter, 591 F.3d

724, 730 (4th Cir. 2010) (collecting cases); 6 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur Miller,

Federal Practice and Procedure § 1479 (3d ed.), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

has held that a court order under Rule 21 is required “to add or drop parties.” Ed Miniat,

Inc. v. Globe Life Ins. Grp., Inc., 805 F.2d 732, 736 (7th Cir. 1986) (footnotes omitted);

see also Rauner v. Am. Fed’n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees, Council 31, AFL-CIO,

No. 15 C 1235, 2015 WL 2385698, at *3 (N.D. Ill. May 19, 2015). The Court thus

construes this motion as seeking relief under both Rule 15 and Rule 21. The Court finds

the matter well taken and thus GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second

Amended Complaint [DE 26], DROPS Plaintiffs McDaniel and Huddleston, and
ORDERS the remaining Plaintiffs to file their Second Amended Complaint no later than

June 12, 2015. 

Moreover, it now appears that the Court improvidently denied Plaintiffs’ first

Motion to Amend Complaint [DE 14] insofar as a court order was needed in order for

Plaintiffs to swap Defendants. No party has objected to that amendment, however, and

the Court, pursuant to Rule 21 now ORDERS that the two original Defendants (the State

of Indiana and the Indiana State Board of Accounts) are DROPPED and that the new

Defendants (Michael R. Pence, Paul Joyce, Mike Bozymski, and Tammy White) are

ADDED to this case. This substitution applies retroactively to April 22, 2015. 

SO ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2015.

s/ Paul R. Cherry f

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1783 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisidine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisidine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. O-ANISIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.58 o-Anisidine (CAS No. 90– 

04–0) (provided for in subheading 2922.22.10) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1783 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP,
INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    ALEX TREVINO,
JR.Alex Trevino, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerJanuary 14, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Edward P. SEMULKA, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 13-6601.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
FDII 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION 

FDIC Advisory Committee on 

Community Banking 

June 1, 2023 

Deposit Insurance Fund Update 
DIF Reserve Ratio and Balance, 2008 Ql-2023 Ql 

$ Billions Percent 

160 - - 1.6 

140 1.4 

120 

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

-

-

- ~ 

-~ 

nr 

J 

- DIF Balance ($116. 1B) 

(Left Axis) _,,,,-,./' -

- DIF Reserve Ratio (1.11) ./ ~ ~ 

-

- .- -- (Right Axis) - --- -- - - - - - --

v-- l// -- -- -

/ - - --

-

- - - - -

j - - -

/4nln 

LJLIL , 

,., ~---

1 

~ 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

- \r -

1.2 

100 1.0 

80 0.8 

60 0.6 

40 0.4 

20 0.2 

0 0.0 

-20 -0.2 

-40 -0.4 

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 

Source: FDIC. 

Note: The reserve ratio is calcu lated as the ratio of the DIFto insured deposits and is calculated as of quarter end.
No. 76-5096.

#### Olsen *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease
Finance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: October 30, 2003

/S/ Alan H. Lund
ALAN H. LUND
Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
**Average Outstanding TLGP Debt**

| **Month Year** | **Amount**          |
|----------------|---------------------|
| Oct-08         | $7,233,114,612.55   |
| Nov-08         | $55,626,743,501.03  |
| Dec-08         | $182,562,961,074.10 |
| Jan-09         | $236,480,969,753.36 |
| Feb-09         | $262,900,857,542.07 |
| Mar-09         | $298,389,116,667.84 |
| Apr-09         | $337,867,778,081.90 |
| May-09         | $345,109,977,384.71 |
| Jun-09         | $344,689,934,394.17 |
| Jul-09         | $331,988,112,718.58 |
| Aug-09         | $313,310,819,767.39 |
| Sep-09         | $303,845,965,944.97 |
| Oct-09         | $309,506,461,531.77 |
| Nov-09         | $313,574,892,222.50 |
| Dec-09         | $311,317,454,077.10 |
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Lease FinanceCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 11, 2006/S/ Alan H. Lund
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,089
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     95,434
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,415
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,500
<LOANS>                                        214,935
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,798
<DEPOSITS>                                     248,406
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,950
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,994
<LONG-TERM>                                     34,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,011
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 344,798
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,702
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,755
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,457
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,860
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,493
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,964
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 133
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,877
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,877
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.95
<LOANS-NON>                                        874
<LOANS-PAST>                                       392
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    447
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,071
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       21
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,102
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,025
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,077
        

</TABLE>