alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4496** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ELVIN ARTURO VALLADARES

- BONILLA , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins
. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00023

- JPB

- JSK

- 1 )

Submitted : October 28, 2011 Decided: November 3, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un pub lished per curiam opinion
. Kristen Leddy, Research and Writing Specialist, Martinsburg, West Virginia; L. Richard Walker, Senior Litigator, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Ihlenfeld, II, United States Attorney, Stephen D. Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Elvin Arturo Valladares

- Bonilla, a native and citizen of Honduras, was con victed of one count of illegal reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(2) (2006). He was sentenced to a term of time served and one year of supervised release. Prior to trial, Valladares

- Bonilla sought to advance a defense of ju stification, asserting that he returned illegally to the United States in order to escape enemies in Honduras who sought to kill him for reasons that were not justified. In response to Valladares

- Bonilla’s pretrial proffer, the Government filed a motion i n limine to prohibit evidence at trial regarding the justification defense. Valladares

- Bonilla’s sole contention on appeal is that the district court erred in granting the Government’s motion in limine to prohibit him from advancing a defense of justifica tion. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the district court properly granted the motion in limine because Valladares

- Bonilla failed to meet the four

- prong test set forth in United States v. Crittendon , 883 F.2d 326, 330 (4th Cir. 198 9) , for establishing entitlement to a justification defense. Specifically, we agree with the district court’s finding that Valladares

- Bonilla, who paid a “coyote” to take him through Mexico illegally to the United States, did not demonstrate that he had n o legal3 alternative to both the criminal act and the avoidance of the threatened harm. Id. We accordingly affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mater ials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13277]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications
    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: June 22, 1995.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge II, Room 5154, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Alec Liacouras, Scientific Review Admin., 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5154, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1740.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: June 28, 1995.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Contact Person: Ms. Josephine Pelham, Scientific Review Admin., 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4106, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1786.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.829, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 24, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-13277 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### In the Matter of Richard Pikna.

Motion for reconsideration denied. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Carro, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Olympus Pacific Minerals Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:





(i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),


as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 30, 2012


/s/ John A. G. Seton


Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q, of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”),for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert J. McCormack, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Tomy knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of and for the periods covered by the Report.

 
|   | /s/ Robert  J. McCormack                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | President  & Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                     |
| Date:  | May 15, 2003                             |   |   |
|        |                                          |        |  |  |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**      I, T. Wilson Eglin, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of The Lexington Master Limited Partnership;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter,    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  T.    Wilson Eglin    T. Wilson Eglin    Chief Executive Officer the Registrant’s General Partner     Date: March 30, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PAUL CALLAHAN,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

AND BUCKS COUNTY COMMON PLEAS 

COURT,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 194 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2019, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12724]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Record of Decision for the B-21 Main Operating Base 1 Beddown at 
Dyess AFB, Texas or Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota Environmental Impact 
Statement

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of availability of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 3, 2021, the Department of the Air Force (DAF) signed 
the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Environmental Impact Statement B-
21 Main Operating Base (MOB) 1 Beddown at Dyess AFB, Texas or Ellsworth 
AFB, South Dakota.

ADDRESSES: Ms. Julianne Turko, AFCEC/CZN, 2261 Hughes Avenue, Suite 
155, JBSA-Lackland Air Force Base, Texas 78236-9853, (210) 295-3777, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#016b746d68606f6f642f7574736a6e2f304174722f60672f6c686d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3359465f5a525d5d561d474641585c1d027346401d52551d5e5a5f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DAF will beddown the B-21 MOB 1 under 
the USAF Global Strike Command at Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota. The B-21 
MOB 1 beddown will include construction, demolition, and renovation of 
various facilities and infrastructure projects on Ellsworth AFB, 
including the construction of a Weapons Generation Facility (WGF) at 
the South WGF Site location. The DAF decision documented in the ROD was 
based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
inputs from Native American Tribes, members of the public, and 
regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final 
Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on 
March 19, 2021 through a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register 
(Volume 86, Number 52, pages 14908-14909) with a waiting period that 
ended on April 19, 2021.

    Authority: This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to 
the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of 
the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) and 
the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 
989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).

Adriane Paris,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-12724 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
because parole is an act of grace of the State and there is no cause of

action when parole has been denied. See NRS 213.10705; Niergarth v. Warden, 105 Nev. 26, 28, 768 P.2d 882, 883 (1989). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this claim. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Pickering Q 1 0 Pdrra „, tuteiC-- J. Saitta cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Lausteveion Delano Johnson Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-853]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Andersonbrecon Inc. DBA PCI of Illinois has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
                        **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**
                         listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before July 19, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before July 19, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All request for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on May 17, 2021, Andersonbrecon Inc. DBA PCI of Illinois, 5775 Logistics Parkway, Rockford, Illinois 61109-3608 applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols
7370
I
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for clinical trial studies only. No other activity for these drug codes is authorized for this registration. Approval of permit applications will occur only when the registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import of the Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-12819 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Kimo S. DAVID, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, O/B/O JANICE DAVID-CROUCH, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-5105

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

----

|                                       | PhotoMedex, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |             |                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
| Date:  May 16, 2011    | By:              | /s/ Dennis M. McGrath                          |   |
|                                       |             | Name:  Dennis M. McGrath                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                                       |             | Title:    Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                                       |             |                                                                                                                                                                             |   |

----

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2016

No. 04-16-00053-CV

IN RE R.M.M.,

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-02913

Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file her brief is granted. We order 

appellant to file her brief by April 14, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1805 

To establish the position of Northern Border Coordinator in the Department 

of Homeland Security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself and Mr. MCHUGH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To establish the position of Northern Border Coordinator 

in the Department of Homeland Security. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title IV of the Homeland Secu5 rity Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–296) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 402, by redesignating paragraph 

7 (8) as paragraph (9) and by inserting after para8 graph (7) the following: 

9 ‘‘(8) Increasing the security of the border be10 tween the United States and Canada and the ports 
2 

•HR 1805 IH 

1 of entry located along that border, and improving 

2 the coordination among the agencies responsible for 

3 maintaining that security.’’; and 

4 (2) in subtitle C, by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 431. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATOR. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be within the Direc8 torate of Border and Transportation Security the position 

9 of Northern Border Coordinator, who shall be appointed 

10 by the Secretary and who shall report directly to the 

11 Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security. 

12 ‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Northern Border Co13 ordinator shall be responsible for— 

14 ‘‘(1) increasing the security of the border, in15 cluding ports of entry, between the United States 

16 and Canada; 

17 ‘‘(2) improving the coordination among the 

18 agencies responsible for the security described under 

19 paragraph (1); 

20 ‘‘(3) serving as the primary liaison with State 

21 and local governments and law enforcement agencies 

22 regarding security along the border between the 

23 United States and Canada; and 

24 ‘‘(4) serving as a liaison with the Canadian gov25 ernment on border security.’’. 
3 

•HR 1805 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1(b) of such 

2 Act is amended in the table of contents by inserting after 

3 the item relating to section 430 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 431. Northern Border Coordinator.’’. 

Æ
[No. 16253-2-III.

Division Three.

October 7, 1997.]

#### George Duncan, *Appellant,*v. Tree Top, Inc., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 95-2-01147-0, Susan L. Hahn, J., entered November 1, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Schultheis, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

MICHAEL MILES, 

Plaintiff,

v.

LAXMI HOSPITALITY, INC., an Indiana 

Corporation,

And 

HHPSHIRE INVESTMENT, INC., an 

Indiana Corporation,

DBA

“Days Inn Plymouth”

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-00525-WCL-CAN 

Judge William C Lee 

Magistrate Judge Christopher A 

Nuechterlein

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS PARTY DEFENDANT

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Michael Miles, individually, and hereby file the following 

Motion to Dismiss Party Defendant and state as follows:

1. Plaintiff wishes to dismiss the unserved Defendant, Laxmi Hospitality, Inc., as a 

party defendant.

2. Upon discovery between the parties, and ultimately a complete resolution of the 

matter, it is Plaintiff’s belief it is appropriate to dismiss all claims for relief against Laxmi 

Hospitality, Inc., without prejudice against being refilled.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests an ORDER dismissing all claims for relief against

Laxmi Hospitality, Inc., without prejudice against being refilled.

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00525-WCL-CAN document 16 filed 05/02/16 page 1 of 2
Dated: May 2, 2016

Submitted for entry by: 

By: /s/ Owen B. Dunn, Jr.

Owen B. Dunn, Jr. Esq. 

OH Bar No. 0074743

Law Offices of Owen B. Dunn, Jr.

4334 W. Central Avenue, Suite 22

Toledo, OH 43604

Telephone: (419) 241-9661

Facsimile: (419) 241-9737

Attorney for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was on this 2nd day of May 2016 served 

electronically to:

Counsel for Defendant

Janilyn Brouwer Daub (#15993-71)

700 1st Source Bank Center 

100 North Michigan Street 

South Bend, IN 46601-1632 

Telephone: (574) 237-1139

Facsimile: (574) 237-1125

Email: Janilyn.daub@btlaw.com

By: /s/ Owen B. Dunn, Jr. _

Owen B. Dunn, Jr.

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00525-WCL-CAN document 16 filed 05/02/16 page 2 of 2
ie TP otUl cca sleet Hie cet pet OF Slee tee 2 OF 0-4

FDIC

Stability Sound Policy Stewardship