alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary )

of Labor, United States Department )

of Labor, )

Plaintiff, ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CV-467-TLS-JEM

)

v. )

)

ACCESSABILITIES, INC., et al., )

 Defendants. ) 

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On October 12, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion

to Compel Interrogatory Answers or for Leave to Issue Interrogatories in Excess of 25 [DE 28]. On

October 14, 2016, Plaintiff filed an Objection to Defendants’ Request for an Expedited Briefing

Schedule Regarding Their Motion to Compel (DKT #28) [DE 31]. 

In their Motion to Compel, Defendants requested that the Court order an expedited briefing

schedule. Plaintiff objects to the expedited briefing schedule and represents that the attorneys

working on the case will be unable to complete the briefing on time under the proposed schedule. 

To allow Plaintiff the time necessary to respond to Defendants’ Motion and in the interests

of justice, the Court ORDERS that the briefing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel [DE 28] shall

comply with the standard briefing deadlines under Local Rule 7-1.

SO ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2016.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

t0128

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147318

STEFFAN GAYDOS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147318

COA: 312725

Wayne CC: 10-013834-CK

CITY OF ALLEN PARK,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and

CITY OF ALLEN PARK PENSION BOARD,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration, as on leave granted, of the plaintiff’s age discrimination claim. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31-2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Annual Report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Annual Report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: April 14, 2011
    By:
    /s/ William McDonaldWilliam McDonald, CFO
case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 14   filed 07/16/14   page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

AMERICAN GUARANTY AND LIABILITY )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. )

)

CROSBY TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., )

)

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, )

) Case No. 3:13-CV-00147

***************************************** )

) Judge Aleta A. Trauger

CROSBY TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., )

)

Third-Party Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC., )

BENTELER AUTOMOTIVE )

CORPORATION, and BENTELER GOSHEN, )

INC., )

)

Third-Party Defendants. )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the court hereby finds as

follows:

• Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Crosby Trucking Service, Inc.’s (“Crosby

Trucking”) Motion for Leave to File a Third-Party Complaint Against

Martinrea Industries, Inc. (Docket No. 44) is DENIED.

 

• Plaintiff American Guaranty and Liability Insurance Company’s Motion

for Oral Argument (Docket No. 62) is DENIED. 

• Crosby Trucking’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 29) is

1
GRANTED.

• This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Indiana.

It is so ORDERED.

Enter this 26th day of July 2013.

_____________________________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

United States District Judge

2
CAUSE NO,

LEROY FLORES ALANIZ

vs .

THE STATE OF TEXAS

APPEAL NO. 11-12-00352-CR

TRIAL NO. D-37.921

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTINREe^

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPELLANT'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISRECTIONARY REVIEW j|j^ p7 2015

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND JUDGES THEREOF: AbeS Aciosta, Clerk

COMES NOW, Leroy Flores Alaniz, Appellant pro se, and requests

a 60-day extension of the time period for filing petition for

discretionary review. In support thereof, Apge^nj^^^^w^^^

the following: JUL 27 2015

1• Abel Acosta, Cierk

Appellant was convicted in the 358th District Court of Ector

County, Texas, on November 1, 2012, and timely appeal was filed.

II.

The Eleventh Court of Appeals issued its opinion affirming

the conviction on July 9, 2015.

III.

Appellant's request is not made to delay the administration

of justice but to allow the pro se layman adequate time to have

fair opportunity in a meaningful way to present to the Court

a proper petition for discretionary review and research grounds

that have merit as the appellant is also currently awaiting

attorney-client files related to the direct appeal and trial

court in transit via standard mail.
IV.

No previous order granting extension of the deadline for

filing petition for discretionary review has been entered in

this case.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays the honorable

Court grants the relief requested herein and extends the deadline

for filing petition for discretionary review up to and including

October 9, 2015.

UNSWORN DECLARATION

I, Leroy Flores Alaniz, TDCJ No. 1826767,, being currently

incarcerated at the French M. Robertson Unit of the Texas Depart

ment of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division,

located in Jones County, Texas, hereby declare under penalty

of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and placed

in the outgoing prison mailbox on this the ^j / day of (—(^x\Ki

, 2015, to be mailed U.S. Mail, first-class

postage prepaid, addressed to:

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

c/o Abel Acosta, Clerk

P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Executed on this the M day of 2. UJi u 2015.

</ Leroy F./Alaniz #18267(

French M. Robertson Unit

12071 FM 3522

Abilene, TX 79601

Appellant, pro se
#### OTTO v. McCAFFREY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 13, 1899.)

Action by Eiise Otto against Catherine T. McCaffrey and others.

No opinion. Upon payment of $10 costs, motion denied, in order to give appellant an opportunity to move in court below for an extension.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1796 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1796

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route of the 
Mississippi River from its headwaters in the State of Minnesota to the 
Gulf of Mexico for study for potential addition to the National Trails 
 System as a national scenic trail, national historic trail, or both, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mississippi River Trail Study Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ROUTE OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER FOR STUDY FOR 
              POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM.

    (a) Designation.--Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the first paragraph after paragraph 
        (40) as paragraph (41) and, in such paragraph, by striking 
        ``The'' and inserting ``Long Walk Trail.--The'';
            (2) by redesignating the second paragraph after paragraph 
        (40) as paragraph (42); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(43) Mississippi River Trail.--The route of the Mississippi River 
from its headwaters in the State of Minnesota to the Gulf of Mexico.''.
    (b) Relation to Other Studies.--The study required by the amendment 
made by this section is intended to complement, and not duplicate, 
other studies of the scenic or historical importance of the Mississippi 
River that may be underway or undertaken.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1796

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route of the 
Mississippi River from its headwaters in the State of Minnesota to the 
Gulf of Mexico for study for potential addition to the National Trails 
 System as a national scenic trail, national historic trail, or both, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties V Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   |      /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2201
WALTER J. BENNETT, Merchant Mariner’s License No. 776593, Petitioner, versus NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the United States Department of Transportation. (EM-187) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 23, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter J. Bennett, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel D. Campbell, NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Walter J. Bennett filed a petition for review of the National Transportation Safety Board’s (“Board”) order dismissing his appealfrom the administrative law judge’s decision suspending his merchant mariner’s license for six months based on a charge of misconduct and placing him on a twelve month probationary period. Parties are accorded sixty days to file a petition for review in the appropriate court of appeals after the Board issues its final order. 49 U.S.C. § 1153(a) (1994). The Board’s order is dated July 10, 2000, and was served on July 12, 2000. Bennett did not file his petition for review until September 14, 2000. We therefore deny the petition for lack of jurisdiction because Bennett’s petition was not timely filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
VINCENT JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1750

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie M. Kinsey, Judge.

Vincent Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

 WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13334]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-30; OTS No. 00029]


First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Texarkana, 
Texarkana, Arkansas; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 11, 1995, the Deputy Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Texarkana, 
Texarkana, Arkansas; to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection at the 
Information Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, 
Irving, Texas 75039.

    Dated: May 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 95-13334 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas P. Fletcher, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly
report on Form 10-Q/A of Flow International Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                |  |                       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P.
FLETCHER                      |  | Dated February 1, 2006
|Douglas P. Fletcher Principal Financial Officer |  |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                         The Bank of Nova Scotia
                                         10 Collyer Quay
                                         #15-01 Ocean Building
October 22, 2002                         Singapore 049315

Maxtor Peripherals (S) Pte Ltd           Tel: (65) 535-8688
No. 2 Ang Mo Kio Street 63               Fax: (65) 438-3314 (Credit & Marketing)
Ang Mo Kio Street Park 3
Singapore 569111


Attention:        Mr. Tiong Chi Sieng, Vice President - Finance
                  Ms. Tan Hui Yah, Director - Finance

Dear Sirs:

REVOLVING BANK GUARANTEE FACILITY OF SGD666,000
WAIVER OF THE CONSOLIDATED TANGIBLE NETWORTH COVENANT FOR 3RD
QUARTER ENDED 28 SEPTEMBER 2002


1.     We refer to the Revolving Bank Guarantee Facility of up to SGD666,000
("the Facility") granted under our Facility Letter of 24 December 2001 as
amended by our Amendment Letters dated 15 February 2002 and 20 June 2002
(hereinafter collectively called the "the Facility Letter") and the Charge Over
Cash Deposits (First Party) document dated 2 January 2002.

2.     Subject to your Company's acceptance of this letter, we are pleased to
advise that at your request, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Singapore Branch ("the
Bank"), shall waive the event of default which arose from the breach of the
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant under Covenant (e) of the Facility
Letter for the 3rd quarter ended 28 September 2002. The foregoing waiver is
limited to the specific circumstance set forth in the foregoing sentence, and
for the specific date referred to therein, and is not intended to be, nor shall
it be deemed to be, a waiver of any other Event of Default or breach of terms
and conditions, whether now existing or thereafter occurring.

3.     Save for the above, all other terms and conditions stipulated in the
Facility Letter and security document stated in Paragraph 1 above shall remain
unchanged.

4.     If the above are acceptable, please sign and return to us the enclosed
copy of this Amendment Letter together with your Company's Board Resolution
accepting this Amendment Letter by 30 October 2002, after which this offer shall
lapse unless an extension is granted by the Bank in writing.


Yours faithfully,
/s/  Wah Sun Seong Koon
Wah Sun Seong Koon
Country Head, VP & Branch Manager

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We hereby accept and further undertake to observe all the terms and conditions
set out and incorporated in this letter.

We also hereby confirm that the existing charges over cash deposits under the
Charge Over Cash Deposits (First Party) document dated 2 January 2002 shall
continue to secure the aforesaid all monies payable in connection with the
Facility notwithstanding the waiver set out above.


/s/  Thong Chi Seing
---------------------------------------------           ------------------------
Company Stamp & Authorized Signatory(ies)               Date
for and on behalf of Maxtor Peripherals (SO Pte Ltd.