alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Joseph L. Castle II, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Castle Energy Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

I.       The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30,
         2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

II.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:   August 13, 2003                            /S/ JOSEPH L. CASTLE II
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Joseph L. Castle II
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Castle Energy Corporation and will be retained by Castle Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
[No. 21082-7-II.

Division Two.

August 22, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare of*E.L.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 95-7-00174-2, M. Karlyn Haberly, J., entered July 29, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Hunt, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 10(f)(iii)

                         AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT
                         ----------------------------

     THIS AMENDMENT TO THE TRUST AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), effective as of
the 25th day of October, 1999, by and between QMS, INC. (hereinafter referred to
as "Company") and SOUTH ALABAMA TRUST COMPANY, INC. (hereinafter referred to as
the "Trustee").

                             W I T N E S S E T H :
                             - - - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, Company and Trustee, executed a Trust Agreement, effective as of
September 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, Company and Trustee now desire to amend the Trust Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises the
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Company and Trustee hereby amend
the Trust Agreement as follows:

     1.   Company and Trustee hereby amend the Trust Agreement by deleting and
striking therefrom any and all references to the Executive Services Agreement by
and between QMS, Inc. and Edward E. Lucente, with an effective date of August 1,
1999, and substituting
<PAGE>

in lieu thereof the Agreement, by and between QMS, Inc. and Edward E. Lucente,
with an effective date of September 1, 1999.

     2.   Company and Trustee hereby amend the Payment Schedule to Trust
Agreement by deleting therefrom the following text:

          (iii)  Edward E. Lucente's involuntary termination other than for
                 Cause (as such term is defined in the Executive Services
                 Agreement), or

     and substituting in lieu thereof the following:

          (iii)  Lucente ceases to be an employee of QMS, or

     3.   In all other respects, Company and Trustee hereby ratify and confirm
the Trust Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed and delivered this Amendment
as of the day and year indicated above.


                    COMPANY:
                              QMS, INC.

                              By: /s/ Albert A. Butler
                                 --------------------------------
                              As Its: Vice Pres - CFO
                                     ----------------------------


                    TRUSTEE:
                              SOUTH ALABAMA TRUST COMPANY, INC.

                              By:________________________________
                              As Its:____________________________

                                     -16-
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc., (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric
      L.
      Moe, Chief Executive Officerof Daybreak Oil and
      Gas, Inc. Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







Date:  September
      20, 2007







By:
      /s/  ERIC L
      MOE


Eric
      L. Moe,Chief Executive
      Officer
#### In re MAIRES.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 7, 1899.)

In the matter of the application of Samuel Evans Maires for admission to practice as attorney and counselor at law in all the courts of the state of New York.

No opinion. Application granted.
#### In the Matter of Jerome Jainchill, Petitioner, v Cornell University, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated April 29, 1983, which (1) determined that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent employer engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices resulting in the termination of petitioner’s employment, and (2) dismissed petitioner’s complaint.

Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the determination of the State Division of Human Rights was supported by substantial evidence *(see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). There is nothing to suggest that the respondent terminated petitioner from his position because of unlawful discriminatory practices. Accordingly, the proceeding is dismissed. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. James Alvin CASTLEMAN.

No. 12-1371.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 01, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of Media 100 Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies to my
knowledge that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: October 15, 2003 |  |  |  | Signed:
|                       |  |  |  |        
|                       |  |  |  |        



|                       |  |  |  |        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: October 15, 2003 |  |  |  | Signed:
|                       |  |  |  |        
|                       |  |  |  |
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
              DIVIDENDS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
                                      AND 1998
                               (Dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     1999             1998
                                               ----------      -----------
                                                       (Unaudited)
<S>                                            <C>             <C>
Earnings:
Net Income                                     $   197,075     $   174,801
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes                     108,822          96,263
    Fixed charges                                  395,540         383,272
  Less:
    Capitalized interest                            23,159          28,418
                                                ----------      ----------
  Earnings as adjusted (A)                      $  678,278      $  625,918
                                                ----------      ----------
Preferred dividend requirements                 $    7,827      $    8,494
Ratio of income before provision
    for income taxes to net income                    155%            155%
                                                ----------      ----------
  Preferred dividend factor on pretax
    basis                                           12,132          13,166
                                                ----------      ----------
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                                 335,471         312,051
  Capitalized interest                              23,159          28,418
  Interest factor of rents                          36,910          42,803
                                                   -------         -------
  Fixed charges as adjusted (B)                    395,540         383,272
                                                   -------         -------

Fixed charges and preferred stock
    dividends (C)                               $  407,672      $  396,438
                                                ----------      ----------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    (A) divided by (B)                               1.71x           1.63x
                                                   -------         -------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    and preferred stock dividends
    (A) divided by (C)                               1.66x           1.58x
                                                   -------           -----
<PAGE>
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Russell A. Evans, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                                            
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|July 25, 2007 |  | /s/ RUSSELL A. EVANS                                       
|              |  | Russell A. Evans Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer



22
IB 

Union Calendar No. 137 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1400 

[Report No. 109–250] 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for aiming 

laser pointers at airplanes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. KELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 18, 2005 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. KUHL of 

New York, Mr. COBLE, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, and Mr. SCOTT of 

Virginia 

OCTOBER 18, 2005 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties 

for aiming laser pointers at airplanes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1400 RH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Aircraft 

3 Cockpits Against Lasers Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST AIMING A LASER POINTER 

5 AT AN AIRCRAFT. 

6 (a) OFFENSE.—Chapter 2 of title 18, United States 

7 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘§ 39. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft 

9 ‘‘Whoever knowingly aims a laser pointer at an air10 craft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United 

11 States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall be 

12 fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, 

13 or both.’’. 

14 (b) AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The 

15 table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 18, 

16 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

17 following new item: 

‘‘39. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft.’’. 

18 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

19 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Aircraft Cock20 pits Against Lasers Act of 2005’’. 

21 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST AIMING A LASER POINTER 

22 AT AN AIRCRAFT. 

23 (a) OFFENSE.—Chapter 2 of title 18, United States 

24 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
3 

•HR 1400 RH 

1 ‘‘§ 39. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft 

2 ‘‘Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer 

3 at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the 

4 United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall 

5 be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 

6 years, or both.’’. 

7 (b) AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table 

8 of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 

10 new item: 

‘‘39. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft.’’. 
Union Calendar No. 137 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1400 

[Report No. 109–250] 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide 

and for other purposes. penalties for aiming laser pointers at airplanes, 

OCTOBER 18, 2005 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,
Thais Y. THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9346.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NUMBER: 2:14-CR-71

SAMUEL BRADBURY

Defendant.

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Comes now the defendant, Samuel Bradbury, by counsel, moves the Court for an 

Order continuing the trial and pretrial conference for a period of no less than 30 days. In 

support of this motion, the defendant would show the following:

1. An Indictment was filed on July 16, 2014, charging the defendant in Count 

1 with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e).

2. The defendant is in pretrial detention at Lake County Jail.

3. The trial in this matter is set for September 22, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. before 

Chief Judge Philip P. Simon. The pretrial conference is scheduled for September 12, 

2014 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich.

4. The defendant and the undersigned counsel need additional time to 

properly investigate the allegations contained in the Indictment, review the 

government's discovery, and effectively prepare for trial. The defense expects to receive 

additional discovery in this case.

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR document 18 filed 08/21/14 page 1 of 3
5. The defendant agrees that the delay in proceeding to trial, occasioned by a 

continuance granted in response to this request, will be excluded for purposes of 

calculating a trial setting under the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)) 

and the U.S. Constitution.

6. The ends of justice served by granting this request for continuance 

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

7. The government, by Assistant United States Attorney Susan Collins has 

no objection to this motion.

WHEREFORE, the defendant, Samuel Bradbury by counsel, moves the Court for 

an order continuing the trial currently set for September 22, 2014, for a period of no less 

than thirty (30) days, and resetting the pretrial conference.

Respectfully submitted,

Northern District of Indiana

Federal Community Defenders, Inc.

By: S/ Ashwin Cattamanchi 

Ashwin Cattamanchi

31 East Sibley Street

Hammond, IN 46320

Phone: (219) 937-8020

Fax: (219) 937-8021

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR document 18 filed 08/21/14 page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on August 21, 2014 , I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such 

filing to the following:

Susan L. Collins

Susan.l.Collins@usdoj.gov

 S/ Ashwin Cattamanchi 

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR document 18 filed 08/21/14 page 3 of 3
1

165(d) Living Will Planning Update

April 14, 2016
2

Dodd-Frank Act and Resolution Planning

 Dodd Frank Act: Firms must submit plans for their rapid 

and orderly resolution under U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

 2011: Joint Agency Resolution Plan Rule

 2012: First plans received

 2013: Joint Guidance identifies 5 obstacles to resolution

 2014: Both Agencies find shortcomings and provide 

significant feedback to firms

 2015: New plans filed, including Public Sections
3

Resolution Plan Review Process

 Heightened engagement with firms following release of 

2014 letters

 Resolution Plan Review Program:

 Training

 Vertical Review Teams

 Horizontal Review Teams

 Oversight Group

 Coordination with the Federal Reserve
4

Joint Determinations and Feedback

 Five firms receive joint determination

 Deficiencies: October 1, 2016

 Shortcomings: July 1, 2017

 Three firms without joint determination

 Shortcomings: July 1, 2017
5

Key Elements of Review

 Core Components of Plans

 Specific needs of each plan dependent upon 

specific features of firm and strategy

 Key Elements Identified

 Resources: Liquidity and Capital

 Governance Mechanisms

 Legal Entity Rationalization/Separability

 Operational

 Derivatives and Trading Activities
6

Conclusion

 GAO Recommendations

 Next Steps
Gabriel Juvenal ARCEO, petitioner, v. Greg LEWIS, Warden.

No. 12-9245.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### TRUE, Respondent, v. LEHIGH VAL. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 11, 1899.)

Action by Josephine True, as administratrix, etc., against the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except HERRICK, J., dissenting.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1813 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1813

To require the payment of interest on amounts owed by the United States 
   pursuant to the reliquidation of certain entries under the Tariff 
   Suspension and Trade Act of 2000 and the Miscellaneous Trade and 
                   Technical Corrections Act of 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the payment of interest on amounts owed by the United States 
   pursuant to the reliquidation of certain entries under the Tariff 
   Suspension and Trade Act of 2000 and the Miscellaneous Trade and 
                   Technical Corrections Act of 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON AMOUNTS OWED PURSUANT TO THE 
              RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

    (a) Amendments.--Sections 1404(b), 1405(b), and subsection (c) of 
each of sections 1408 through 1411 of the Tariff Suspension and Trade 
Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-476; 19 U.S.C. 1654 note) and subsection 
(c) of each of sections 1517 through 1536 of the Miscellaneous Trade 
and Technical Corrections Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-429; 19 U.S.C. 
1654 note) are amended by inserting ``, with interest provided for by 
law on the liquidation or reliquidation of the entries,'' after ``under 
subsection (a)''.
    (b) Reliquidation and Payment of Interest.--Not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of the 
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland 
Security shall--
            (1) reliquidate each of the entries specified in the 
        provisions of law amended by subsection (a); and
            (2) provide payment of interest owed by the United States 
        by reason of the amendments made by subsection (a) for the 
        period beginning on the date of deposit of estimated duties and 
        ending on the date of reliquidation under paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
H H H

H H H

550 17th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20429-9990

www.fdic.gov

FDIC-003-2017