alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                      42
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   1,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   8,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                     111
<PP&E>                                               0                   1,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  11,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   4,139
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     100
<COMMON>                                             0                  19,215
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                (15,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  11,184
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,121                   9,174
<CGS>                                            3,267                   7,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,267                   7,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97                     271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    108                   (251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                108                   (251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       108                   (251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02                  (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02                  (0.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2025 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2025

           To extend the suspension of duty on Fenpropathrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2005

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the suspension of duty on Fenpropathrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FENPROPATHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.22 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Fenpropathrin) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michael Defonte BERNARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-5.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### BOHNHOFF, Respondent, v. FISCHER, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 21,1912.)

Action by August Bohnhoff against Henry C. Fischer, impleaded with others. No opinion. Motion to resettle order granted, without costs. See, also, 147 App. Div. 904, 131 N. Y. Supp. 1105; 147 App. Div. 672, 132 N. Y. Supp. 603; 134 N. Y. Supp. 28.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1542 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1542

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the 
      ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1542

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the 
      ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 695 
Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Honorable Judge George N. 
Leighton Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-151165on Form S-8 of our report dated June 25, 2008 (which report expressesan unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to theconvenience translation of Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollar amounts in thefinancial statements, the adoption of fair value accounting for share-basedcompensation under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, “Share-BasedPayment”, effective on January 1, 2006, and the adoption of therecognition and measurement methods under Financial Accounting Standards BoardInterpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- AnInterpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, effective on January 1,2007), relating to the consolidated financial statements and the relatedfinancial statement schedule of ChinaEdu Corporation, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

/s/Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.

 

DeloitteTouche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.

Beijing,the People’s Republic of China

June 25,2008

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,175
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     93,387
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,475
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,650
<LOANS>                                        194,818
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,627
<DEPOSITS>                                     250,688
<SHORT-TERM>                                    32,713
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,037
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,505
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 328,627
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,460
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,148
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    11
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,619
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,437
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,182
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,186
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,186
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        969
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,318
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    367
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      314
<RECOVERIES>                                       216
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,246
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,114
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,132
        

</TABLE>
---

CONSENT OF AUTHOR

John Payne, PhD, P.Geo.
  7846 160th Street,
  Surrey, British Columbia, V3S 3T3
  Phone 604-597-1080, jgpayne@telus.net

US Securities and Exchange Commission

I, John G. Payne, PhD, P.Geo, certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or that the written
disclosure in the Form 40F of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in 2006 Summary Report on the Pebble Copper-Gold Molybdenum Deposit, Alaska, USA dated March 31, 2007.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory authorities.

Dated this 1 day of April, 2007.

/s/ John Payne

John G. Payne, PhD, P.Geo.

---
# Chart

# Data

# Notes
Chris CHAPMAN, petitioner, v. Sonya TROUTT, et al.

No. 12-8888.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### In re WALSH et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1913.)

In the matter of the judicial settlement of the account of proceedings of Josephine Walsh and another, as executrixes, etc., of Silas Post, deceased, in which Sarah Jane Ellis appeals.

No opinion. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 15

LETTER FROM INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

LETTER IN LIEU OF
CONSENT FOR REVIEW REPORT

July 21, 2009

Boeing Capital Corporation

500 Naches Avenue SW, 3rdFloor

Renton, Washington

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of
Boeing Capital Corporation and subsidiaries for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated July 21, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, is incorporated
by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-154844 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule
436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|Seattle, Washington      



21
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1936 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1936

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Flonicamid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Flonicamid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLONICAMID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.03      N-(Cyanomethyl)-4-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (trifluoromethyl)                                                  31/2008
                         -3-
                         pyridinecarboxami
                         de (Flonicamid)
                         (CAS No. 158062-
                         67-0) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2933.59.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-151-JTM-JEM

)

BRANDY K. HERO, )

Defendant. )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT BRANDY K. HERO

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Brand K. Hero’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge John E.

Martin on March 15, 2016, with the consent of Defendant Hero, counsel for Defendant Hero, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Hero’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Federal Rule

of Criminal Procedure 11 before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Hero under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant Hero,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Hero understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea

is offered;

(2) that Defendant Hero understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and her
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Hero understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Hero understands that the sentencing guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Hero has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Hero is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Hero understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Hero’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Brandy K. Hero’s plea of guilty to the offenses

charged in Count 2 and Count 8 of the Indictment and that Defendant Hero be adjudged guilty of

the offenses charged in Count 2 and Count 8 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A

Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and

Defendant Hero be adjudged guilty, sentencing before Senior Judge James T. Moody will be set at

a later date by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless

filed and served within fourteen (14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2016.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Honorable James T. Moody
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         113,304
<SECURITIES>                                       600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,250
<PP&E>                                       4,001,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,683,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,475,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,459,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,475,634
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.05
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1140

SHARON THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS E. WHITE, Secretary, Department of the

Army,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-01-988-5-H3)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sharon Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole, Jerri

Ulrica Dunston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Thompson appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thompson

v. White, No. CA-01-988-5-H3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED