alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1581 

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040S. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Mr. SIMMONS (for himself, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. BROWN

of Ohio, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. COX, Mr. BASS, Mr. 

BOUSTANY, Ms. CARSON, Mr. FITZPATRICK of Pennsylvania, Ms. 

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. 

BARTLETT of Maryland, and Mr. REYNOLDS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new 

Form 1040S. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simplify Tax Filing 

5 for Seniors Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORM 1040S FOR SENIORS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 

8 the Secretary’s delegate) shall make available a form, to 
2 

•HR 1581 IH 

1 be known as ‘‘Form 1040S’’, for use by individuals to file 

2 the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal 

3 Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 

4 practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that— 

5 (1) the form shall be available to individuals 

6 who have attained age 65 as of the close of the tax7 able year, 

8 (2) the form may be used even if income for the 

9 taxable year includes— 

10 (A) social security benefits (as defined in 

11 section 86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

12 1986), 

13 (B) distributions from qualified retirement 

14 plans (as defined in section 4974(c) of such 

15 Code), annuities or other such deferred pay16 ment arrangements, 

17 (C) interest and dividends, or 

18 (D) capital gains and losses taken into ac19 count in determining adjusted net capital gain 

20 (as defined in section 1(h)(3)), and 

21 (3) the form shall be available without regard 

22 to the amount of any item of taxable income or the 

23 total amount of taxable income for the taxable year. 
3 

•HR 1581 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The form required by sub2 section (a) shall be made available for taxable years begin3 ning after December 31, 2005. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



Certification

I, E. James Collord, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc.



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ E. James Collord

By  __________________________________

E.  James Collord

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 15, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12314]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 35-26290]

Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as 
Amended (``Act'')
May 12, 1995.
    Notice is hereby given that the following filing(s) has/have been 
made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules 
promulgated thereunder. All interested persons are referred to the 
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the 
proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The application(s) and/or 
declaration(s) and any amendments thereto is/are available for public 
inspection through the Commission's Office of Public Reference.
    Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the 
application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in 
writing by June 5, 1995 to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Washington, DC 20549, and serve a copy on the relevant 
applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the address(es) specified below. 
Proof of service (by affidavit or, in case of an attorney at law, by 
certificate) should be filed with the request. Any request for hearing 
shall identify specifically the issues of fact or law that are 
disputed. A person who so requests will be notified of any hearing, if 
ordered, and will receive a copy of any notice or order issued in the 
matter. After said date, the application(s) and/or declaration(s), as 
filed or as amended, may be granted and/or permitted to become 
effective.
CINergy Corp. et al. (70-8587)
    CINergy Corp. (``CINergy''), 139 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, 
Ohio 45202, a registered holding company, and certain of its 
subsidiaries, including CG&E Resource Marketing, Inc. (``Resource 
Marketing''), 139 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, filed an 
application-declaration under sections 2(a)(8), 6, 7, 9(a), 10, 12(b), 
12(f) and 13 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as 
amended (``Act''), and rules 40, 43, 45, 53, 54, and 80-95 thereunder. 
The Commission issued a notice of the filing on April 14, 1995 (HCAR 
No. 26273).
    Resource Marketing holds a one-third general partnership interest 
in U.S. Energy Partners, a gas marketing partnership with Public 
Service Electric & Gas Company. CINergy states that it does not 
``control'' U.S. Energy Partners or possess a ``controlling influence'' 
over its management or policies. In addition to the matters discussed 
in the notice referred to above, CINergy also seeks in this filing an 
order of the Commission declaring that U.S. Energy Partners is not a 
``subsidiary company'' of CINergy within the meaning of section 2(a)(8) 
of the Act.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12314 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27325-27326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12592]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Environmental Assessment for Proposed M.J. Murdock Aviation 
Center and Proposed Master Plan Amendment for Fort Vancouver National 
Historic Site, Washington

ACTION: Notice of availability of environmental assessment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 27326]] 


SUMMARY: This Notice announces the availability of an Environmental 
Assessment (EA) for the proposed M.J. Murdock Aviation Center; the site 
plan constitutes a proposed amendment of the Master Plan for Fort 
Vancouver National Historic Site. This Notice also announces a public 
meeting for the purpose of receiving public comment on the EA.

DATES: Written comments on the EA should be received no later than June 
22, 1995. The date of the public meeting is 7 June (Wednesday) 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the EA are available on request from the 
Superintendent, Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, 612 East Reserve 
Street, Vancouver, WA 98661-3811; telephone (360) 696-7655, ext. 2. 
Written comments should be submitted to the above address.
    The public meeting will be held at the Clark Public Utilities 
District (PUD) Building, 1200 Fort Vancouver Way, Vancouver, 
Washington, from 7:00-9:00 p.m. on Wednesday, 7 June 1995.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed amendment of the Master Plan 
would provide for the adaptive reuse of three historic aviation 
structures and the reconstruction of a hanger as the principal 
components of the proposed M.J. Murdock Aviation Center, an aviation 
museum to be located adjacent to Pearson Field. The proposed museum 
development would implement a provision of a 1994 Memorandum of 
Agreement between the National Park Service and the City of Vancouver. 
The proposed Center would be located within Fort Vancouver National 
Historic Site. The City of Vancouver would have the responsibility for 
the aviation museum's development, operation and maintenance.

    Dated: May 11, 1995.
William C. Walters,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region, National Park 
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-12592 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Exhibit
      32.1





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 9, 2007


By:
            /s/
              Jeffrey F. O'DonnellJeffrey
                F. O'Donnell
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





E-32.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:12-CR-1-TLS

)

SERGIO ALVAREZ-ARELLANO )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 39] filed on May 28, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 39] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment are hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on June 18, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CONVOLVE, INC., petitioner, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, et al.

No. 13-547.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-6 filed 10/23/14 page 1 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-6 filed 10/23/14 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 26771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12336]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 26771]] 




FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, May 23, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEM TO BE DISCUSSED:

    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), 
and Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, May 24, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the Public.

ITEM TO BE DISCUSSED:

    Future Meetings.
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Presidential Primary and General Election Regulations: Draft 
Final Rules and Explanation and Justification (continued from 
meeting of May 17, 1995).
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Marjorie W. Emmons,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-12336 Filed 5-16-95; 11:05 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |            |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY W FUND, LLC                         |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |            |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |            |   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |

----
Phillip Lavontae MOUNT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7662.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Derick Eugene CORDOVA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10393.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Robert R. PARKER, Jr., petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 12-10873.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
James L. WAVER, petitioner, v. Terry A. TIBBALS, Warden.

No. 12-9624.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12673]



[[Page 27559]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Automated Highway System Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 7, 1995, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), General Motors Corporation 
has filed on behalf of the National Automated Highway system Consortium 
(NAHSC) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) 
the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed 
for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery 
of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are General Motors Corporation, Detroit, MI; Parsons 
Brinckerhoff, Washington, DC; Caltrans, Sacramento, CA; Carnegie Mellon 
University--Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Bechtel, Gaithersburg, 
MD; Delco Electronics (a subsidiary of General Motors Corporation), 
Kokomo, IN; Hughes Aircraft Company (a subsidiary of General Motors 
Corporation), Fullerton, CA; Martin Marietta Technologies In., 
Littleton, CO; and University of California--Berkeley--PATH, Berkeley, 
CA. The NAHSC was established in response to a U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT) request for application initiated to implement a 
provision of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 
1991. The objective of the resultant cooperative agreement between the 
NAHSC and DOT is to make major improvements in the safety, productivity 
and environmental quality of the U.S. surface transportation system. 
The NAHSC intends to promote enhanced international competitiveness of 
U.S. industry and encourage the civilian sector to capitalize on 
decades of public investment in defense technologies, focussing on 
systems designed feasibility, definition and prototyping of a safe, 
reliable, cost-effective automated highway system capable of 
substantially improving throughput, safety and air quality along high-
demand travel corridors.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12673 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership 1983-3 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711310
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         160
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343
<PP&E>                                         16,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   990
<SALES>                                        571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               578
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                363
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            363
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  16.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  16.25
        


</TABLE>
Laura A. JENNINGS, petitioner, v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.

No. 12-10398.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.