alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from the third
quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 7,781,601
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         9,134,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                               14,062,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (6,525,548)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           9,134,598
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       7,018,750
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         454,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       640,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        5,922,921
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    5,922,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       10,018,558
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          15,941,479
<EPS-BASIC>                                               309.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             309.26



</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|                 |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                                          
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                                                      
|                 |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                                            
|                 |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                                                     
|November 8, 2005 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                                                  
|DATE             |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|November 8, 2005 |  | by:  /s/ H. William Willoughby                                                                                                                                               
|DATE             |  | H. William Willoughby,
                  Director, President, Secretary,
                    Principal Financial Officer and
                    Principal Accounting Officer

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 1 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 2 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 3 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 4 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 5 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 6 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:12-cv-00060-RL-CAN document 7 filed 02/01/12 page 7 of 7
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10587 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAMIRO ESQUIVEL-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CR-00003-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ramiro Esquivel-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Esquivel-Salazar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Esquivel-Salazar maintains thatNo. 03-10587 -2- he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Esquivel-Salazar acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
Ownership List as of December 31, 2007
 Jurisdiction ofCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    % HeldEl Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
    
    DelawareEl Paso Pipeline Partners Operating Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00El Paso Wyoming Gas Supply Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.
    
    Colorado
    
    50.00EPPP CIG GP Holdings, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Colorado Interstate Gas Company
    
    Delaware
    
    10.00CIG Finance Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00CIG Funding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Colorado Interstate Issuing Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00WYCO Holding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00WYCO Development LLC
    
    Colorado
    
    50.00EPPP SNG GP Holdings, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Southern Natural Gas Company
    
    Delaware
    
    10.00SNG Finance Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00SNG Funding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Southern Gas Storage Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Bear Creek Storage Company
    
    Louisiana
    
    50.00Southern Natural Issuing Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00WIC Holdings Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100.00Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.
    
    Colorado
    
    50.00
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of CorMedix Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Khoso Baluch, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
 The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








July 10,
2018
By:
/s/
Khoso
BaluchName:
Khoso
BaluchTitle:
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1548

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for collegiate housing 

and infrastructure grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for collegiate housing and infrastructure grants.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Collegiate Housing and 

5 Infrastructure Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS PERMITTED TO 

7 MAKE COLLEGIATE HOUSING AND INFRA8 STRUCTURE GRANTS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501 of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption from tax on cor-
2

•HR 1548 IH 

1 porations, certain trusts, etc.) is amended by redesig2 nating subsection (q) as subsection (r) and by inserting 

3 after subsection (p) the following new subsection: 

4 ‘‘(q) TREATMENT OF ORGANIZATIONS MAKING COL5 LEGIATE HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT

6 GRANTS.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

8 (c)(3) and sections 170(c)(2)(B), 2055(a)(2), and 

9 2522(a)(2), an organization shall not fail to be 

10 treated as organized and operated exclusively for 

11 charitable or educational purposes solely because 

12 such organization makes collegiate housing and in13 frastructure grants to an organization described in 

14 subsection (c)(7), so long as, at the time of the 

15 grant, substantially all of the active members of the 

16 recipient organization are full-time students at the 

17 college or university with which such recipient orga18 nization is associated. 

19 ‘‘(2) HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE

20 GRANTS.—For purposes of paragraph (1), collegiate 

21 housing and infrastructure grants are grants to pro22 vide, improve, operate, or maintain collegiate hous23 ing that may involve more than incidental social, 

24 recreational, or private purposes, so long as such 

25 grants are for purposes that would be permissible 
3

•HR 1548 IH 

1 for a dormitory of the college or university referred 

2 to in paragraph (1). A grant shall not be treated as 

3 a collegiate housing and infrastructure grant for 

4 purposes of paragraph (1) to the extent that such 

5 grant is used to provide physical fitness equipment. 

6 ‘‘(3) GRANTS TO CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS

7 HOLDING TITLE TO PROPERTY, ETC.—For purposes 

8 of this subsection, a collegiate housing and infra9 structure grant to an organization described in sub10 section (c)(2) or (c)(7) holding title to property ex11 clusively for the benefit of an organization described 

12 in subsection (c)(7) shall be considered a grant to 

13 the organization described in subsection (c)(7) for 

14 whose benefit such property is held.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall apply to grants made in taxable years 

17 ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Darnell RICHMOND, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 12-9381.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
Exhibit 3.3


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


OF DIGITILITI, INC.





Digitiliti, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies as follows:





1. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by changing the paragraph numbered “Fourth” so that, as amended, said paragraph shall be and read in its entirety as follows:





“The aggregate number of shares that the corporation shall have authority to issue is 135,000,000 shares, divided into two classes: 125,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. The Board of Directors has the right to set the series, classes, rights, privileges and preferences of the preferred or any class or series thereof, by amendment hereto, without shareholder approval, as provided in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or as hereafter amended.”





2. Pursuant to a resolution of its Board of Directors, a meeting of stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held, on October 14, 2010 upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.





3. The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its Secretary as of the 15th day of October, 2010.


By:/s/ William M. McDonaldTitle: SecretaryName: William M. McDonald
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

KEVIN HANSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-cv-209

)

WEAVER POPCORN COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order

filed by Defendant on March 13, 2015. (Docket # 15.) 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) allows the Court to enter a protective order for

good cause shown. But the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has made it clear that a protective

order may only issue if the order “makes explicit that either party and any interested member of

the public can challenge the secreting of particular documents.” Citizens First Nat’l Bank of

Princeton v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 178 F.3d 943, 945 (7th Cir. 1999). Language permitting an

interested member of the public to challenge the secreting of particular documents is missing

from the tendered order.

Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES approval of the proposed stipulated protective

order submitted by the parties. (Docket # 15.) The parties may, however, submit a revised

proposed protective order consistent with the requirements of Rule 26(c)(1) and Seventh Circuit

case law. SO ORDERED. Enter for March 16, 2015.

S/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Fidelity Aviation Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, John Schoenauer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/John SchoenauerJohn Schoenauer, Chief Financial Officer March 28, 2008
2022 SRAC Agenda – November 9, 2022

WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION 9:00 a.m. - 9:10 a.m.

Acting Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg

Session 1: Integration of Supervision and Resolution 9:10 a.m. – 9:45 a.m.

Session 2: Resolution Planning Update 9:45 a.m. - 11:05 a.m.

BREAK 11:05 a.m. - 11:15 a.m.

Session 3: CCP Resolution Challenges 11:15 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.

CLOSING REMARKS 12:15 p.m. - 12:30 p.m.

Acting Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg
John Lee HAMPTON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8923.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1616 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide an increased penalty 

for endangering the life of a child while illegally manufacturing a controlled substance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. 

SOUDER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Ms. FOXX, 

Miss MCMORRIS, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide an increased penalty for endangering the life of a child while 

illegally manufacturing a controlled substance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Children 

5 from Drugs Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 1616 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTY FOR ENDANGERING THE LIFE 

2 OF A CHILD WHILE ILLEGALLY MANUFAC3 TURING A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. 

4 Section 417 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

5 U.S.C. 858) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: ‘‘If the human life is that of an individual who 

7 is under the age of 18 years, the maximum term of impris8 onment for an offense under this section is 20 years. The 

9 presence of an individual under the age of 18 years at 

10 the place of manufacture or transport is prima facie evi11 dence that such individual’s life was endangered by the 

12 manufacture or transport.’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Greg Jarman,  the Chief  Executive  Officer and Don Prest the
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Omnicity  Corp.  (the  "Company"),   each  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report
on Form  10-K  for the  year  ended  July  31,  2009,  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that the  information  contained  in the Annual  Report on Form
10-K,  as  amended,  fairly  presents in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 23, 2009


By: /s/ Greg Jarman
   -------------------------------------------------
   Greg Jarman
   Chief Executive Officer, President and a director



By: /s/ Don Prest
   -------------------------------------------------
   Don Prest
   Chief Financial Officer and a director

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signatures
that  appear  in typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
Kenneth HUNT, petitioner, v. William R. WILSON, Jr., et al.

No. 12-10104.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Eugenio ARREOLA-JIMENEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6915.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-1 filed 10/23/14 page 1 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-1 filed 10/23/14 page 2 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-1 filed 10/23/14 page 3 of 4