alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13091]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1979), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to the 
included in the exhibit ``MINGEI: Japanese Folk Art from the Montgomery 
Collection'' (see list*), imported from abroad for the temporary 
exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with a foreign lender. I also determine that the temporary exhibition 
or display of the listed exhibit objects at The Frick Art Museum, 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, beginning on or about June 15, 1995, to on or 
about August 27, 1995; at the Cincinnati Art Museum, Cincinnati, Ohio, 
beginning on or about October 1, 1995, to on or about January 1, 1996; 
at the Meadows Museum, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, 
beginning on or about August 22, 1996, to on or about October 6, 1996; 
at the Flint Institute; Fling, Michigan, beginning on or about October 
20, 1996, to on or about December 8, 1996; at the Society of Four Arts, 
Palm Beach, Florida, beginning on or about January 10, 1997, to on or 
about February 10, 1997; at the Fresno Metropolitan Museum, Fresno, 
California, beginning on or about September 13, 1997, to on or about 
November 30, 1997, and at other locations as yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest.

    *A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Lorie J. 
Nierenberg of the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Information 
Agency. The telephone number is 202/619-6084; the address is 
U.S.I.A., 301-4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Public notice of this determination is ordered to be published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 23, 1995.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-13091 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

Order 

 

January 17, 2007 

 

132507 

TIMOTHY MCCLAIN, #195462 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132507 

 CoA: 268783 

WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of December 5, 2006, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 17, 2007 

jm
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12868]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Department policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Barsotti's Inc. Civil Action No. C-95-20310 RMW (PVG), was lodged on 
May 10, 1995 with the United States District Court for the Northern 
District of California. The compliant seeks civil penalties and 
injunctive relief for violations of the Clean Air Act and National 
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (``NESHAP'') for 
asbestos. 40 C.F.R. Part 61, Subpart M (1991). The compliant alleges 
that Barsotti violated the Asbestos NESHAP's Standard for Demolition 
and Renovation, 40 C.F.R. 61.145, during the renovation of Pacific Gas 
and Electric Co.'s Moss Landing Power Plant in Moss Landing, California 
in September 1992. Barsotti violated 40 C.F.R. 61.145(b) by: (1) 
Failing to adequately wet the regulated asbestos-containing material 
(``RACM'') during the stripping operation, (2) failing to keep the RACM 
wet prior to disposal and (3) failing to carefully lower the RACM to 
the ground to prevent releases of asbestos. The consent decree requires 
Barsotti to pay a penalty of $68,000, which will be shared equally with 
the Monterey Unified Air Pollution Control District, and requires 
Barsotti to implement an asbestos management program and an asbestos 
training program if it should engage in future asbestos abatement 
activities.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Barsotti's, Inc. DOJ Ref. #90-5-21-1905.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office if the 
United States Attorney Nothern District of California, 450 Golden Gate 
avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102; Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94102; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A Copy of the proposed consent decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $5.50 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12868 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
7.3.2-53 Certification Regarding Fair Inclusion of Minorities and Women 

(November 2014)

Prescription:

Per PGI 3.112 and PGI 3.218, insert provision 7.3.2-53, Certification Regarding Fair 

Inclusion of Minorities and Women, in all solicitations for awards over $100,000, except 

Task Orders issued under FDIC BOAs/RBOAs/BPAs.

Provision:

(a) The Contractor certifies to the following: [ ] Yes [ ] No

(1) It is committed to equal opportunity in employment and contracting.

(2) It has made and will continue to make, or will make during the course of this 

contract, a good faith effort to ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair 

inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce and in the workforces of its 

applicable subcontractors,

(3) For purposes of this certification, 

“minority” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 342 (g) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 

124 Stat. 1376 (2010); and

“Applicable Subcontractor” refers to all tiers of subcontractors under this 

contract whose subcontract exceeds $100,000 in value; and 

“Good faith effort,” may include actions by the contractor intended to identify 

and, if present, remove barriers to minority and women within its workforce or 

expand employment opportunities for minorities and women within its workforce. 

Efforts to remove such barriers or expand employment opportunities may 

include, but are not limited to, recruiting minorities and women, providing jobrelated training, or other activity that could lead to those results. 

(b) If the Contractor answers “No” to paragraph (a) above, an explanation must be 

provided:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Urban Barns Foods Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Daniel Meikleham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                
| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification as of the 14thday of November, 2011.

/s/ Daniel Meikleham

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer

---
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. STORK et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Ernst Smith against Emilie C. Stork and Reba Tyler Jackson, as administratrix of Susan M. Van Namee, deceased.

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with costs, unless the appellant perfect the appeal within 20 days and pay the respondents §10 costs. On compliance, motion to dismiss the appeal will be denied, and the case placed at the foot of the present calendar.
EX-34.2
(logo)KPMG

KPMG LLP
Suite 2000
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568


Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
Countrywide Financial Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management
assertion, that Countrywide Financial Corporation and subsidiaries, including
its wholly owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (CHL), and Countrywide
Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of CHL, (collectively, the
Company) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP), for residential mortgage-backed securities (securities
collateralized by residential mortgage loans, including prime, alternative loan
products, subprime, HELOC, and closed seconds) publicly issued prior to January
1, 2006, publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity,
all nonpublicly issued transactions, and loans held in portfolio at Countrywide
Bank, FSB for which the Company provides servicing functions as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Financial Corporation
and subsidiaries, including its wholly owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc. (CHL), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary
of CHL, complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KMPG

February 28, 2008




KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00574-WCL-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00574-WCL-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 2 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00574-WCL-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 3 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00574-WCL-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 4 of 4
Johnny Brett GREGORY, petitioner, v. Robert B. ADAMS, Judge, Superior Court of Georgia, Whitfield County, et al.

No. 13-5280.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32

November 13,
2003

Via
EDGAR

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mesa Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

| |  | JPMorgan Chase Bank,
Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29

                      THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE NISOURCE INC.
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

                (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2002)

         WHEREAS, NiSource Inc. (the "Company") maintains the NiSource Inc.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective June
1, 2002 and further amended effective March 1, 2003 and August 25, 2003 (the
"Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.5 of the Plan, the Company deems it
desirable to amend the Plan as described below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4.6 of the Plan is hereby amended, effective
August 25, 2003, to read as follows:

         "4.6 Form of Payment. Notwithstanding Sections 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, a
         Participant shall receive distribution of his Supplemental Retirement
         Pension in the same form as his distribution under the NiSource Pension
         Plan, computed in the same manner as in the NiSource Pension Plan, or
         under any other Qualified Pension Plan, computed in the same manner as
         in such Qualified Pension Plan. Any election under the NiSource Pension
         Plan or any other Qualified Pension Plan shall apply to his
         Supplemental Retirement Pension pursuant to the preceding sentence only
         if it is made by written instrument delivered to the Committee at least
         30 days prior to the date of such distribution. If such election is not
         so made at least 30 days prior to the date of distribution of his
         Supplemental Retirement Pension, the Participant's Supplemental
         Retirement Pension shall be paid as a 50% joint and survivor Pension if
         such Participant is married, or as a single-life Pension if such
         Participant is unmarried. If a Participant who makes an election
         pursuant to this Section 4.6 at least 30 days prior to the date of
         distribution dies prior to distribution pursuant to such election, such
         election shall be revoked and the other provisions of this Article IV
         shall apply."

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be
executed on its behalf, by its officer duly authorized, this 1st day of December
2003.

                                           NISOURCE INC.

                                           By: /s/ S. LaNette Zimmerman

                                           Its: Executive Vice President, Human
                                           Resources and Communications

                                        2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12781]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Importer of Controlled Substances; Application Withdrawal for 
Nycomed Incorporated

    By letter dated April 17, 1995, Nycomed Inc., 33 Riverside Avenue, 
Rensselaer, New York 12144, withdrew their request to be registered as 
an importer of Meperidine (9230).
    Therefore, the Notice dated February 14, 1995, in Federal Register 
(FR Doc. 95-3627), Vol. 60, No. 30 at page 8414 is hereby withdrawn.

    Dated: May 17, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-12781 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### Fred M. Schmidt, Doing Business as Fred Schmidt Plumbing and Heating, Respondent, v Dutch Builders, Inc., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated October 25, 1983, which denied its motion to vacate a default judgment entered on October 6,1983 in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the sum of $34,354.88.

Order modified, as a matter of discretion, and motion granted to the extent of vacating defendant’s default in appearing and answering. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant’s time to appear and answer is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Pending final determination of the action in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, the default judgment entered October 6, 1983 shall stand as security.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant by serving the Secretary of State. The defendant defaulted in appearing and answering and judgment was entered against it on October 6, 1983. Upon acquiring notice of the default judgment, the defendant moved to vacate, claiming no actual notice of the action was ever received. Special Term denied the motion.

*800The plaintiff failed to contest defendant’s allegation that actual notice of the summons and complaint w as not received in time to defend, and defendant may have a meritorious defense. Given the particular circumstances of this case, opening the default is warranted *(see, Taieb v Hilton Hotels Corp.,*60 NY2d 725). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
#### TWEEDIE TRADING CO. v. CARIG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 6, 1913.)

Action by the Twee-die Trading Company against George F. Carig and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Order filed.
Frederick MASON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6868.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Miguel CARRANZA, et ux., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6819.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12074]



[[Page 26453]]


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

[MT-921-05-1320-01-P; MTM 83997]


Coal Exploration License Application; Notice of Invitation

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Invitation; Coal Exploration License Application MTM 
83997.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Members of the public are hereby invited to participate with Spring 
Creek Coal Company in a program for the exploration of coal deposits 
owned by the United States of America in the following-described lands 
located in Big Horn County, Montana:

T. 8 S., R. 39 E., P.M.M.
    Sec. 13: SW\1/4\NE\1/4\, NW\1/4\, N\1/2\SW\1/4\, SW\1/4\SW\1/4\, 
N\1/2\SE\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\
    Sec. 14: E\1/2\NE\1/4\, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\
    Sec. 21: NE\1/4\SW\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\
    Sec. 23: NE\1/4\NE\1/4\ SE\1/4\NW\1/4\
    Sec. 24: NW\1/4\NW\1/4\
    Sec. 25: SW\1/4\SW\1/4\
    Sec. 35: SE\1/4\NE\1/4\
T. 8 S., R. 40 E., P.M.M.
    Sec. 29: SW\1/4\SW\1/4\
    Sec. 30: SE\1/4\
    Sec. 31: Lots 1, 3, 4, NE\1/4\SW\1/4\
T. 9 S., R. 39 E., P.M.M.
    Sec. 1: Lot 1
T. 9 S., R. 40 E., P.M.M.
    Sec. 6: Lots 1, 3, 7, S\1/2\NE\1/4\, NE\1/4\SW\1/4\, NE\1/
4\SE\1/4\.

    1,508.32 acres.

    Any party electing to participate in this exploration program shall 
notify, in writing, both the State Director, Bureau of Land Management, 
P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800; and Spring Creek Coal 
Company, P.O. Box 67, Decker, Montana 59025. Such written notice must 
refer to serial number MTM 83997 and be received no later than 30 
calendar days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register 
or 10 calendar days after the last publication of this Notice in the 
Sheridan Press, whichever is later. This Notice will be published once 
a week for 2 consecutive weeks in the Sheridan Press.
    The proposed exploration program is fully described and will be 
conducted pursuant to an exploration plan to be approved by the Bureau 
of Land Management. The exploration plan, as submitted by Spring Creek 
Coal Company, is available for public inspection at the Bureau of Land 
Management, Montana State Office, Granite Tower Building, 222 North 
32nd Street, Billings, Montana, during regular business hours (9 a.m. 
to 4 p.m.) Monday through Friday.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Larry E. Hamilton,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 95-12074 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
#### TISMER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EDISON CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department.

June 6, 1913.)

Action by Paul 0. Tismer against the New York Edison Company. T. H. Beardsley, of New York City, for appellant. H. ID. Brown, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order modified, by striking out items Nos. 1 and 2 of the particulars required to be furnished, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party. Settle order on notice.
Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., petitioners, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al.

No. 12-231.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment denied.
Edwin DISLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6953.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Paul Ray DESILETS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-6297

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, denied.