alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

LONNIE D. SEWELL, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) NO. 1:14-CV-174

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Petition under 28

U.S.C. Paragraph 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lonnie D.

Sewell, on June 23, 2014. For the reasons set forth below, the

petition (DE 1) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DISCUSSION

Lonnie D. Sewell, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus

petition attempting to challenge his August 9, 2011, parole

revocation hearing. However, before a petitioner can challenge a

State proceeding, he must have previously presented his claims to

the State courts. “This means that the petitioner must raise the

issue at each and every level in the state court system, including

levels at which review is discretionary rather than mandatory.”

Lewis v. Sternes, 390 F.3d 1019, 1025-1026 (7th Cir. 2004).

There are two possible methods for challenging a parole

revocation in Indiana: by filing a post-conviction relief petition,
Receveur v. Buss, 919 N.E.2d 1235 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), or by

filing a state habeas corpus petition if the inmate is seeking

immediate release. Lawson v. State, 845 N.E.2d 185, 186 (Ind. Ct.

App. 2006). Furthermore, if a state habeas corpus petition is

improperly filed, it will be converted to a post-conviction

petition. Hardley v. State, 893 N.E.2d 740, 743 (Ind. Ct. App.

2008) and Ward v. Ind. Parole Bd., 805 N.E.2d 893 (2004). Here,

Sewell says that he has not presented any of his claims to any

State court in any proceeding. Therefore he has not exhausted his

State court remedies and this habeas corpus petition must be

dismissed without prejudice. If, after he has ultimately presented

his claims to the Indiana Supreme Court, he has not yet obtained

relief, then he may return to this court and file a new habeas

corpus petition. 

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, the petition (DE 1) is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DATED: July 8, 2014 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court

2
#### KRUG, Respondent, v. BOUTON MOTO*R*CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Frank P. Krug against the Bouton Motor Company.

PER CURIAM.

It was error to submit to the jury evidence of damage to the realty owned by plaintiff’s wife. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted; costs to abide the event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          15,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  294,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (46,300)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,404,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,566,300
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,404,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Daniel SOLIS, petitioner, v. Mary Solis GRIEGO, et al.

No. 13-6369.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1208]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Challenge and Advancement Advisory Panel; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Challenge and Advancement Advisory Panel (Museum Advancement 
Section) to the National Council on the Arts will be held on February 
13, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. This meeting will be held in room 
714, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506.
    Portions of this meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. 
to 10:00 a.m. for opening remarks and introductions and from 4:30 p.m.-
5:30 p.m. for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portion of this meeting from 10:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of February 8, 1994 this session will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of title 5, United 
States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-
5532, TYY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5439.


    Dated: January 10, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-1208 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-53-TLS 

)

JODECI ROWLAND-SMITH )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 20], filed on February 13, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 20] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on March 2, 2015.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Torrey V. BANKS, petitioner, v. John DOE, et al.

No. 13-6623.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Gene Dale GUERRERO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9190.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian
Altounian, President, Chief Operating Officer & Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer


of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.










March 31,
2008




/s/ Brian
Altounian






Brian
Altounian


President,
Chief Operating Officer


&
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,683,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,693,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,693,208
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,693,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,914
<BONDS>                                        964,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,677,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,693,208
<SALES>                                        138,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               854,793
<CGS>                                           67,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                763,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            763,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   763,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    25.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    25.19
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of YDI Wireless, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick L.
Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald               /s/ Patrick L. Milton
----------------------------------     -----------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                   Patrick L. Milton
Chief Executive Officer                Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  May 12, 2005                    Date:  May 12, 2005
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Fund. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | March      23, 2010 |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY W FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                | By:    |   | /s/    | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |                |   |   | Name:  | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                |   |   | Title: | Chief      Executive Officer                              |
|   |                |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated: | March      23, 2010 |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                | By:    |   | /s/    | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                |   |   | Name:  | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                |   |   | Title: | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |

----
Ramon RAMOS, petitioner, v. Paul CHAPPIUS, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility.

No. 13-6551.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E. Skowronski, President of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                         
|---------------- |  | ------------------------
|                 | 
|October 24, 2007 |  | /s/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI
|                 |  | Walter E. Skowronski    
|                 |  | President               



22
Emilie D. DIAZ, et al, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1431

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-29   filed 07/14/15   page 1 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-29   filed 07/14/15   page 2 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-29   filed 07/14/15   page 3 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-29   filed 07/14/15   page 4 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-29   filed 07/14/15   page 5 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-29   filed 07/14/15   page 6 of 6
George WRIGHT, petitioner, v. Cliff ALLENBY, Acting Director, California Department of Mental Health, et al.

No. 13-6314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dutch
Oven Gold Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ G.J. de Klerk                                                          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|G.J. de Klerk
        Principal Financial Officer
        February 10, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Q2 Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 1, 2016/s/ MATTHEW P. FLAKEMatthew P. FlakeChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 1 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 2 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 3 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 4 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 5 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 6 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 7 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 8 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 9 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 10 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 11 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 12 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 13 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 14 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 15 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 16 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 17 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 18 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 19 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 20 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 21 of 22
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00383-DRL document 52-1 filed 12/26/18 page 22 of 22
Roger Bruce BUGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9361.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11721]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-276-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 8, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 3, 1995, East Tennessee National Gas 
Company (East Tennessee), tendered for filing its First Revised Sheet 
Nos. 139, 140, and 143 in compliance with Order No. 577, issued by the 
Commission in the above-referenced docket on April 4, 1995.
    East Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been served to 
all affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a petition to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214. All such petitions or protests should be filed on or 
before May 15, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11721 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M