alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Earl L Yager, as Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “registrant”), herebycertify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Earl L. Yager Earl L. Yager    Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT Sep tember 2 5, 2008 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 08- 1191 4 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 05-00720 -CV -CG -M BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,
ve rs us CITY OF ATMORE, a m unicipal corporation of the State of Ala bam a, ALLEN NIX, as Building Inspector of the City of A tm ore, TROY KING, as Attorney

Ge neral of the S tate of A labam a, D ef en dants -Appe lle es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court f o r th e S o u t h e rn D i s t r i c to f

A l ab a ma

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ( Se pt em be r 25, 200 8) Be fo re MA RC U S, W IL SO N a nd C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

T he P la int if

f, Bi ll Sa lte r A dve rt isi ng, I nc . ( "B SA ") appe al s, c ha lle ngi ng the dis tr ic t c ourt' s de nia l of

BS A ' s m oti on f

or sum m ar y j udgm en t and the gr an t of
sum m ar y j udgm en t i n f

av or of the D ef en dants
. At issue on this app eal ar e BSA 's challenges to § 9.521 and Note 7 of an
or din an ce pr om

ulg at ed by the Ci ty of A tm or e in 1 998. W e ha ve c ar ef

ull y c onsi de re d B SA ' s arg um en ts and r el ev an t part s of the record. W e conclude that the district court properly determ ined that BSA' s constitu tional attacks on § 9.521 and Note 7 we re w ithou t m erit. Sum m ary j udgm ent in favor of the D efendants wa s proper. AFFIR MED.
Raul PARRA, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-6904.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
#### Ruperto GUTIERREZ-MORALES, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-60655.

SUMMARY CALENDAR

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 26, 2004.

William Jay Munter, San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner.

David V. Bernal, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, US Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, John Ashcroft, Barry Joseph Pettinato, US Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, Kenneth L. Pasquarell, Acting District Director, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, San Antonio, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.1

In this appeal, we review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying Ruperto Gutierrez-Morales’ motion to reopen his removal proceedings and refusing to accept his untimely application for cancellation of removal.

Gutierrez-Morales argues that the Immigration Judge violated his due process rights by refusing to accept his untimely application for cancellation of *207removal and by denying his motion to reopen. Gutierrez-Morales also argues that the arrest which prompted his removal was illegal.

Gutierrez-Morales waived the opportunity to submit his application for cancellation of removal when he missed the imposed filing deadline. 8 C.F.R. § 3.31(c) (2003). His motion to reopen was properly denied because he was informed of his right to apply for cancellation of removal, and he was provided an opportunity to do so. 8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(3) (2002). Thus, the Immigration Judge did not violate Gutierrez-Morales’ due process rights.

Gutierrez-Morales’ challenge to his arrest does not warrant relief because even if he could demonstrate that his arrest was illegal, it would have no bearing on the validity of his subsequent removal. *I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza,*468 U.S. 1032, 1040, 104 S.Ct. 3479, 82 L.Ed.2d 778 (1984).

Gutierrez-Morales' petition for review is therefore denied.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




BROADCOM CORPORATION

NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTION




     Notice is hereby given of the following option grant (the “Option”) to purchase shares of the
Common Stock of Broadcom Corporation (the “Corporation”):



	 	 	 
	Optionee:
	 	 
	Grant Date:
	 	 
	Vesting Commencement Date:
	 	 
	Exercise Price:

	 	$  per share
	Number of Option Shares:
	 	 
	Expiration Date:
	 	 
	Type of Option:

	 	Incentive Stock Option or
Non-Statutory Stock Option







Exercise Schedule: The Option shall become exercisable in forty-eight (48) successive equal
monthly installments upon Optionee’s completion of each additional month of Service over the
forty-eight (48) month period measured from the first anniversary of the Vesting Commencement
Date. In no event shall the Option become exercisable for any additional Option Shares after
Optionee’s cessation of Service.



     Optionee understands and agrees that the Option is granted subject to and in accordance with
the terms of the Broadcom Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the
“Plan”). Optionee further agrees to be bound by the terms of the Plan and the terms of the Option
as set forth in the Stock Option Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. Optionee hereby
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the official prospectus for the Plan in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit B. A copy of the Plan is available upon request made to the Corporate Secretary at the
Corporation’s principal offices. The Option shall also be governed by the terms of the special
officer severance program to which the Optionee is a party that will provide Optionee with certain
additional benefits in the event Optionee’s employment with the Corporation terminates under
certain prescribed circumstances.



     No Employment or Service Contract. Nothing in this Notice or in the attached Stock Option
Agreement or in the Plan shall confer upon Optionee any right to continue in Service for any period
of specific duration or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the
Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing or retaining Optionee) or of Optionee, which
rights are hereby expressly reserved by each, to terminate Optionee’s Service at any time for any
reason, with or without cause.



     Definitions. All capitalized terms in this Notice shall have the meaning assigned to them in
this Notice or in the attached Stock Option Agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Broadcom Corporation	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Optionee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Address	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 




Attachments: A — Stock Option Agreement; B — Plan Summary and Prospectus
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:14-CR-89 RM 

)

MATTHEW EASH )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations upon a plea of guilty entered on January 6, 2015. Accordingly,

the court ADOPTS those findings and recommendations [docket # 18], ACCEPTS

defendant Matthew Eash’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of

Counts 1 and 4 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: January 26, 2015 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana
Flora GJURA, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 12-1147.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0657

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

DANIEL E. NEWBY,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Daniel E. Newby, to all counsel of 

record and to the Honorable Nickolas C. Murnion, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2023

02/22/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0657
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12739]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1051-DR]


Mississippi; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

action: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Mississippi (FEMA-1051-DR), dated May 12, 1995, and related 
determinations.

effective date: May 17, 1995.

for further information contact: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

supplementary information: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective May 17, 1995.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Richard W. Krimm,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-12739 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                     EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL
                     STATEMENTS OF NIAGARA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
                     THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998    
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998    
<CASH>                              2,892,653      
<SECURITIES>                        0              
<RECEIVABLES>                       20,513,969     
<ALLOWANCES>                        779,000    
<INVENTORY>                         33,888,120     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    59,326,628     
<PP&E>                              99,983,765     
<DEPRECIATION>                      10,228,024     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      152,811,031    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               31,026,306     
<BONDS>                             44,997,324     
<COMMON>                            9,998          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0              
<PREFERRED>                         0              
<OTHER-SE>                          56,310,231     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        152,811,031    
<SALES>                             118,020,443    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    118,020,443    
<CGS>                               100,588,556    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       100,588,556    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    8,279,149      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  2,301,153      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     7,123,827      
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,800,000      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 4,323,827      
<DISCONTINUED>                      0              
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0              
<CHANGES>                           0              
<NET-INCOME>                        4,323,827      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .43            
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .41            
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             627
<SECURITIES>                                       110
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             636
<DEPRECIATION>                                     635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (215)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,074
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    137
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MICHAEL MILES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) No. 3:14-cv-1752

)

SHAFFNER & SHAFFNER )

ENTERPRISES INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the: (1) “Agreed Motion for

Leave to File Confidential Settlement Agreement Under Seal,” filed

by Plaintiff, Michael Miles, on April 17, 2015 (DE #22); and (2)

“Stipulated Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice,” filed by the

parties on May 4, 2015 (DE #24). Upon due consideration, the

motion for leave to file the settlement agreement under seal (DE

#22) is GRANTED. Additionally, the Court GRANTS the motion for

dismissal without prejudice (DE #24) and ORDERS the Clerk to

DISMISS this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without costs or attorney

fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. 

Additionally, this Court will RETAIN JURISDICTION over this matter

to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides, in relevant part, that an

action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court by

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01752-RL-CAN document 25 filed 05/06/15 page 1 of 2
filing “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have

appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The stipulation of

dismissal without prejudice is signed by all parties who have

appeared in the action. The Court therefore approves same. 

DATED: May 6, 2015 /s/ RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court 

2

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01752-RL-CAN document 25 filed 05/06/15 page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000521

17-JAN-2019

09:48 AM
Exhibit 10.29d

               AMENDMENT TO OCTOBER 8, 2003 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      WHEREAS Playboy Enterprises, Inc. ("Playboy") and James F. Griffiths
("Griffiths") have entered into an employment relationship where Griffiths has
been named Senior Executive Vice President of Playboy,

      WHEREAS Playboy has changed Jim English's reporting requirements as of
January 20, 2004 so that English reports to Griffiths,

      WHEREAS this change in reporting requirements by Playboy constitutes a
"Constructive Termination Without Cause," as defined by Playboy's October 8,
2003 employment agreement ("Agreement") with Jim English,

      WHEREAS English has the immediate right to invoke the "Constructive
Termination Without Cause" provisions of that Agreement and receive the benefits
and protections thereof,

      THIS AMENDMENT SHALL PROVIDE as follows:

      (1) English shall have a period of six months, up to July 20, 2004, to
elect to declare the January 20, 2004 reporting change as a Constructive
Termination Without Cause;

      (2) If at any time up to July 20, 2004, English elects to declare the
January 20, 2004 Constructive Termination Without Cause, he shall notify Playboy
by written notice delivered to Playboy's CEO or its General Counsel;

      (3) On receipt of notice, English will be immediately entitled to receive
and Playboy shall pay a lump sum payment equal to twelve months base salary at
the salary he was receiving as of January 20, 2004;

      (4) If English has not elected to declare a Constructive Termination
Without Cause by July 20, 2004, he waives the right as to the reporting
relationship to Jim Griffiths.

      (5) Thereafter, if English is not employed full-time after twelve months
of his Notice, he will also be entitled to receive immediately at that twelve
month anniversary and Playboy shall pay an additional lump sum payment equal to
six months base salary at the salary he was receiving at the time of the
Constructive Termination Without Cause;

      (6) No other rights or provisions are affected or limited by this
Amendment.

Playboy Enterprises, Inc.


By /s/ Howard Shapiro                   /s/ James L. English
   ---------------------------          ------------------------------
Title: Executive Vice President         James L. English
Dated: Feb. 6, 2004                     Dated: Feb. 10, 2004
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1273 

To require any amounts remaining in a Member’s Representational Allowance 

at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury and used 

for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2005 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require any amounts remaining in a Member’s Representational Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be 

deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction 

or to reduce the Federal debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEM4 BERS’ REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCES TO 

5 BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO RE6 DUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, any amounts appropriated for Members’ Rep-
2 

•HR 1273 IH 

1 resentational Allowances for the House of Representatives 

2 for a fiscal year which remain after all payments are made 

3 under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited in 

4 the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that 

5 in the case of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal 

6 budget deficit, such amounts shall be used to reduce the 

7 Federal debt (in such manner as the Secretary of the 

8 Treasury considers appropriate). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

10 respect to fiscal year 2005 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) Case No. 3:14-CV-1575 JD

)

SERGEANT MYERS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION

Demajio Jerome Ellis, a pro se prisoner, filed a document captioned “Response to Opinion

and Order” which the court construes as a motion to reconsider the screening order (DE 5) dated

June 3, 2014. Based on this filing, it appears that there is confusion about what claims Ellis is

presenting, who was involved, what they said or did, and what times various events occurred.

Therefore he will be permitted to file an amended complaint. In it, he needs to clearly explain what

each defendant did which makes that defendant financially liable to him. He needs to explain what

happened, who was involved, and how he was injured. 

For the foregoing reasons, the court:

(1) CONSTRUES the response (DE 7) as a motion to reconsider;

(2) GRANTS the motion to reconsider (DE 7);

(3) VACATES the screening order (DE 5);

(4) GRANTS Demajio Jerome Ellis leave to file an amended complaint;

(5) DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Complaint 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 form and send it to Demajio Jerome Ellis; and

(6) GRANTS Demajio Jerome Ellis until July 24, 2014, to submit an amended complaint.
SO ORDERED:

ENTERED: June 16, 2014

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court

2