alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


pursuant
to Section 302


of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Xiao
Ping Zhang, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.;


2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;


4. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the issuer and have:


(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986];


(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and


(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and


(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Dated:
      May 13, 2009/s/
      Xiao Ping ZhangXiao
      Ping ZhangChief
      Executive Officer
Walter FERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-7822.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. Gerald P. Peters, Esquire, of Thousand Oaks, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF**

**THE      PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| Dated:                August 13, 2008                                 |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                  |   |   |   |
| /s/                Xiao Ping Zhang                                    |   |   |   |
| Xiao                Ping Zhang Chief                Executive Officer |   |   |   |
|                                                                  |   |   |   |
|                                                                  |   |   |   |
| /s/                Zong Yun Zhou                                      |   |   |   |
| Zong                Yun Zhou                                          |   |   |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer                                |   |   |   |
|                                                                  |   |   |   |
|                                                                  |   |   |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION AT LAFAYETTE

CHRISTINE MYER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Cause No. 4:14-cv-00023-TLS-PRC

)

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Come Plaintiff, Christine Myer, and Defendant, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, by

their respective counsel, and show the Court that the above-entitled cause of action has

been fully compromised and settled and the parties hereto stipulate the dismissal

hereof, with prejudice against the refiling thereof, costs paid.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ryan C. Munden

RYAN C. MUNDEN, Attorney No. 29401-

49

REILING TEDER & SCHRIER, LLC

Renaissance Place – Sixth Floor

250 Main Street, Suite 601

P.O. Box 280

Lafayette, IN 47902-0280

(765) 423-5333

(765) 423-4564 fax

rcm@rtslawfirm.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Brian S. Jones

BRIAN S. JONES, Attorney No. 29578-49

DAVID J. JURKIEWICZ, Attorney No.

18018-53

NATHAN T. DANIELSON, Attorney No.

25542-05

BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP

111 Monument Circle, Suite 2700

Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 684-5000

(317) 684-5173 fax

b.jones@boselaw.com

djurkiewicz@boselaw.com

ndanielson@boselaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR NATIONSTAR

MORTGAGE LLC

USDC IN/ND case 4:14-cv-00023-TLS document 27 filed 10/30/15 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon the

following counsel of record by email and United States, first class mail, on October 30,

2015:

Melissa Ann Wilkes

mwilkes@wilkes-law.com

WILKES LAW FIRM

200 Ferry Street, Suite D

Lafayette, IN 47901

Ryan C. Munden

rcm@rtslawfirm.com

REILING TEDER & SCHRIER, LLC

Renaissance Place – Sixth Floor

250 Main Street, Suite 601

P.O. Box 280

Lafayette, IN 47902-0280

James R. Schrier

jrs@rtslawfirm.com

REILING TEDER & SCHRIER, LLC

Renaissance Place – Sixth Floor

250 Main Street, Suite 601

P.O. Box 280

Lafayette, IN 47902-0280

/s/ Brian S. Jones

BRIAN S. JONES

USDC IN/ND case 4:14-cv-00023-TLS document 27 filed 10/30/15 page 2 of 2
#### Elbert M. MADERA, also known as Jack Madera; Sue Madera, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-11470.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided May 2, 2006.

Andy Wade Tindel, Provost, Umphrey, Youngdahl & Sadin, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Robert M. Candee, Henslee, Fowler, Hepworth & Schwartz, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reviewing the grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee de novo, we affirm for the following reasons:

> 1. “ERISA does not preempt state law claims when the claims ‘affect only [an employee’s] employer/employee relationship with [an employer] and *not*her administrator/beneficiary relationship with the company.” *Rokohl v. Texaco, Inc.,*77 F.3d 126, 129 (5th Cir.1996) (citing cases) (emphasis in original). The distinction appellants seek to draw between 1) the unpaid ERISA benefits and 2) medical expenses which arose after the discovery of the alleged negligent procurement does not help appellant. Some, if not all, of the damages arising under the former are necessarily encompassed by the latter. The district court properly concluded that the negligence claim was conflict preempted under ERISA § 514.

> 2. ERISA § 502(a)(2) allows a beneficiary to sue for breach of fiduciary duty. ERISA also requires fiduciaries to discharge their duties “solely *396in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries[,]” using “care, skill, prudence, and diligence.” 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1). The appellants’ negligent procurement of the failed insurer allegation is covered by this language.

> 3. For the reasons stated by the district court, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the ap-pellee.

Affirmed.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE USDC Northern Indiana

HAMMOND DIVISION

Shawnye Jones

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:14−cv−00253−JD−PRC

Judge Jon E DeGuilio

National Credit Adjusters, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

 Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

National Credit Adjusters, LLC ,

for failure to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 55(a).

Date: November 25, 2014 Sincerely,

ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK

By: s/ Ruth M Nagy 

 Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00253-JD-PRC document 9 filed 11/25/14 page 1 of 1
H. R. 1728

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility 

of designating portions of Ste. Genevieve County in the State of Missouri as 

a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ste. Genevieve County National 

Historic Site Study Act of 2005’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) AREA.—The term ‘‘Area’’ means Ste. Genevieve County, 

Missouri, which includes the Bequette-Ribault, St. GemmeAmoureaux, and Wilhauk homes, and the related and supporting historical assets located in Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri. 

(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National 

Park Service. 

SEC. 3. STUDY. 

(a) In General.—Not later than 3 years after the date on 

which funds are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary 

shall, in consultation with the State of Missouri—

(1) complete a study on the suitability and feasibility of 

designating the Area as a unit of the National Park System, 

which shall include the potential impact that designation of 

the area as a unit of the National Park System is likely to 

have on land within the proposed area or bordering the proposed area that is privately owned at the time that the study 

is conducted; and 

(2) submit to the Committee on Resources of the House 

of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources of the Senate a report describing the findings of 

the study. 
H. R. 1728—2

(b) Contents.—The study under subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 

et seq.).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Solomon JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Brian V. COLEMAN, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9254.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Scott A. HOLMES, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 13-6835.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Coshocton County, denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.22    
    


 
 

SCHEDULE TO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT    
    


        The following is a list of the current directors and senior executive officers of Genzyme Corporation who are party to an Indemnification Agreement, the form of
which was filed as Exhibit 10.34 to our 1990 Form 10-K: 


        Constantine
E. Anagnostopoulos; Mara G. Aspinall; Mark R. Bamforth; Douglas A. Berthiaume; Henry E. Blair; Robert J. Carpenter; Earl M. Collier, Jr.; Charles L. Cooney; Zoltan A. Csimma;
Thomas J. DesRosier; Richard H. Douglas; Victor J. Dzau; David D. Fleming; Georges A. Gemayel; James A. Geraghty; Elliott D. Hillback, Jr.; Alison F. Lawton; Evan M. Lebson; Roger Louis; Connie Mack
III; Mary McGrane; John M. McPherson; C. Ann Merrifield; Richard A. Moscicki; Donald E. Pogorzelski; Alan E. Smith; Sandford D. Smith; Henri A. Termeer; Peter T. Traynor; G. Jan van Heek; Peter Wirth;
and Michael S. Wyzga. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.22


SCHEDULE TO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

**FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

 

INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

5310 HARVEST HILL ROAD, SUITE 275

DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 - 5805

(972) 788-1110  Telefax 991-3160

E-Mail:   forgarb@forgarb.com

 

April 13, 2011

 

**Reef Oil & Gas Income amd Development Fund III, L.P.**

1901 N. Central Expy Suite 300

Richardson TX 75080

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS**

 

Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name, to references to our name, and to the inclusion of information taken from our “Estimated Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 2011 Attributable to Interests Owned By Reef Oil and Gas Income and Development Fund 3, L.P. In Certain Properties Located in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming”, under the section “Item 2 Properties — Proved Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserves”. We also consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated April 13, 2011 and summary reserve information in the Annual report on Form 10-K of Reef Oil and Gas Income and Development Fund 3, L.P. as Exhibit 99.1.

 
|   | Yours   truly,                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
|   |                                                    |
|   | Forrest   A. Garb & Associates, Inc. |
|   | Texas   Registered Engineering Firm F-629          |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                                    |
|   | W.   D. Harris III                                 |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer                          |
|   | Forrest   A. Garb & Associates, Inc. |

 

----
Exhibit 32 (b)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-QSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 2005, I, Lisa M. Porter, Chief Financial Officer of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) | such Form 10-QSB, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Financial Banking Companies,
Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ LISA M. PORTER     
|Lisa M. Porter         
|Chief Financial Officer
Rev. 1.8.14

Fourth Court of Appeals 

 

NOTIFICATION OF LATE RECORD

Court of Appeals No., if known: 04-15-00327-CV

Trial Court Style: ADAM HURON V. ERICK LOPEZ

Trial Court No.: 2012-CI-18827

I am the official responsible for preparing the clerk’s record/reporter’s record [circle one] in the abovereferenced appeal. The approximate date of trial was: FEBRUARY 4-10, 2015

The record was originally due: JULY 2, 2015

I anticipate the length of the record to be: 1200 PAGES

I am unable to file the record by the date such record is due because [check one]:

the appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee, and the appellant has failed to pay the

fee or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing such record.

my other duties or activities preclude working on the record and include the following [attach

additional pagesif needed]:

Other. Explain [attach additional pages if needed]: I RECEIVED THE DEPOSIT ON 6/9/15 AND ALSO 

I AM ON VACATION JULY 2-6, 2015

I anticipate the record will be completed by: WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM JULY 2, 2015

I, as the undersigned court official, certifythat a copyofthisNotification of LateRecord has been served by first class

mail of fax to the partiesto the judgment or order being appealed.

Date: 7/1/2015 Signature: /s/Maria E. “Mary Helen” Vargas

Printed

Name:

Title: 224th Official Court Reporter

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/1/2015 3:37:24 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1646 

To provide for the expedited and increased assignment of spectrum for public 

safety purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2005 

Ms. HARMAN (for herself, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. FORD, Mr. 

PASCRELL, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. 

ETHERIDGE, Ms. NORTON, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. ANDREWS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Ms. LINDA

T. SA ́NCHEZ of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for the expedited and increased assignment of 

spectrum for public safety purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeland Emergency 

5 Response Operations Act’’ or the ‘‘HERO Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1646 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF DELAY IN REASSIGNMENT OF 24 

2 MEGAHERTZ FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES. 

3 Section 309(j)(14) of the Communications Act of 

4 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(E) EXTENSIONS NOT PERMITTED FOR

7 CHANNELS (63, 64, 68 AND 69) REASSIGNED FOR

8 PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES.—Notwithstanding 

9 subparagraph (B), the Commission shall not 

10 grant any extension under such subparagraph 

11 from the limitation of subparagraph (A) with 

12 respect to the frequencies assigned, pursuant to 

13 section 337(a)(1), for public safety services. 

14 The Commission shall take all actions necessary 

15 to complete assignment of the electromagnetic 

16 spectrum between 764 and 776 megahertz, in17 clusive, and between 794 and 806 megahertz, 

18 inclusive, for public safety services and to per19 mit operations by public safety services on those 

20 frequencies commencing no later than January 

21 1, 2007.’’. 

Æ
#### REID V. THE STATE.

*Grime.*

(Decided Feb. 14, 1907.)

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson.

Bilbro & Moody, for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Tyson, C. J.-

Affirmed on the authority of *Tanner v.*
      *665
      *The*State, 92 Ala.*1;Shirley v. The*State, 144 Ala. 35; Sec. 5259, Code 1896.

Haralson, Simpson and Denson, JJ., concur.
opinion). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at

sentencing, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty
J. Douglas

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A .0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                       388
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,480
<PP&E>                                           6,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,280
<BONDS>                                            440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        242
<COMMON>                                        42,401
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,691)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,672
<SALES>                                         25,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,547
<CGS>                                           19,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                       560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.065
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.058
        


</TABLE>