alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12049]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Proposed Posting of Stockyards

    The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, United 
States Department of Agriculture, has information that the livestock 
markets named below are stockyards as defined in Section 302 of the 
Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 202), and should be made subject 
to the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended 
(7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.).

FL-136  Florida Classic Horse Sales, Inc., Ocala, Florida
GA-214  Lee's Auction, Sylvania, Georgia
IN-165  Reel Livestock Center, Inc., Congerville, Indiana
MI-149  Rosebush Sale Barn, Rosebush, Michigan
NC-168  Lyman Livestock, Chinquapin, North Carolina
MS-167  Sebastopol Livestock Association, Inc., Sebastopol, Mississippi
OK-211  Prague Livestock Auction LLC, Prague, Oklahoma
PA-158  John Whiting Auction, New Wilmington, Pennsylvania
    Pursuant to the authority under Section 302 of the Packers and 
Stockyards Act, notice is hereby given that it is proposed to designate 
the stockyards named above as posted stockyards subject to the 
provisions of said Act.
    Any person who wishes to submit written data, views or arguments 
concerning the proposed designation may do so by filing them with the 
Acting Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Grain Inspection, 
Packers and Stockyards Administration, Room 3408-South Building, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250 by May 25, 1995. All 
written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made available 
for public inspection in the office of the Director of the Livestock 
Marketing Division during normal business hours.

    Done at Washington, D.C. this 10th day of May 1995.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Acting Director, Livestock Marketing Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12049 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 121 

Expressing the sense of Congress that July 22 should be designated as 

a day of recognition to recognize the unsung heroes of America in wartime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2024 

Mr. VAN DREW submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that July 22 should be 

designated as a day of recognition to recognize the unsung heroes of America in wartime. 

Whereas a great number of Americans have been overlooked 

for too many years who have contributed to the efforts 

in wartime by remaining home to work in factories and 

mills producing sails, uniforms, ammunition, and other 

essential materials; 

Whereas America has done a great job in honoring our war 

heroes, but has largely neglected to commemorate those 

behind the scenes; and 

Whereas we should take this day to remember all of those 

who supported our troops throughout American history 

off the battlefield supporting the efforts to defend our 

freedom and democracy: Now, therefore, be it 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 121 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 

3 President should designate a day of recognition to recog4 nize the unsung heroes of America in wartime. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27098-27099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12426]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-290-000]


Mid Louisiana Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 12, 1995, Mid Louisiana Gas Company (Mid 
Louisiana) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, which Mid Louisiana 
requests be made effective May 12, 1995, are:

First Revised Sheet No. 88
First Revised Sheet No. 92
First Revised Sheet No. 94
First Revised Sheet No. 95
First Revised Sheet No. 97
First Revised Sheet No. 98

    Mid Louisiana states that these tariff sheets revise Section 4 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of its tariff to conform with Order 
No. 577 capacity release provisions by: (1) Extending to one calendar 
month the exception from the advance posting and bidding requirement 
applicable to released capacity; (2) adding tariff language to require 
a 28-day hiatus during which customers that release capacity at less 
than the maximum rate are prohibited from re-releasing that capacity to 
the same replacement customer at less than the maximum tariff rate; and 
(3) adding tariff language so that Mid Louisiana's tariff will comport 
with the Commission's regulations that address bidding for prearranged 
releases for one calendar month or less at a rate less than the maximum 
rate.
    Pursuant to Section 154.51 of the Commission's Regulations, Mid 
Louisiana respectfully requests waiver of the notice requirement of 
Section 154.22 of said Regulations to permit the tendered tariff sheets 
to become effective May 12, 1995 as submitted.
    Mid Louisiana states that copies of its filing were served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and appropriate state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 23, 1995. Protests [[Page 27099]] will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this compliance filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12426 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Craig TAYLOR, Appellant, v. HANLEX DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3204

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 7, 2019

Craig Taylor, Miami, pro se.

Scott R. Rost and Jason R. Hawkins, of South Milhausen, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Craig Taylor appeals from a judgment on the pleadings entered in a quiet title action filed by Hanlex Development, LLC. We reverse.

According to Hanlex's amended complaint to quiet title, it entered into a contract to purchase a parcel of real property with a seller named in the contract as "Mobley Mattie Life Estate, RE: J G Mobley." Despite the seller being identified as holding a life estate, Hanlex pled that it "understood" that the seller held fee simple title to the property. Hanlex further alleged in its amended complaint that the property was owned by James G. Mobley until his death, intestate, in 1959 and that Taylor was one of Mobley's heirs at law. Taylor filed an answer and affirmative defenses generally denying the allegations of the amended complaint. Hanlex then filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted as to all named parties except Taylor. On the same pleadings, Hanlex then filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted.

After the pleadings are closed, a party may move for judgment on the pleadings. *See* Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140(c). The motion raises only questions of law arising on the pleadings. *See**Whitaker v. Powers*, 424 So. 2d 154, 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

*513When a plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, the motion tests the legal sufficiency of the answer and all affirmative defenses. *See* Henry P. Trawick, Jr., *Fla. Practice & Procedure*, § 10-9 (2018-19 ed.). In considering the motion, all well-pleaded allegations of the nonmoving party are taken to be true, while the moving party's allegations, which were denied in the defendant's answer, are taken as not proved. *See**Whitaker*, 424 So. 2d at 155. A judgment on the pleadings may be granted only if, on the facts as so admitted, the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment. *Williams v. Howard*, 329 So. 2d 277, 280 (Fla. 1976).

Here, Taylor's denial of the operative portions of the amended complaint had to be taken as true for purposes of the motion for judgment on the pleadings. *See**Scarborough Assocs. v. Fin. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Dade Cty.*, 647 So. 2d 1001, 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Because of this, the judgment on the pleadings was erroneously entered. Consequently, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135244 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135244 

 COA: 270464 

Macomb CC: 05-005048-AR 

41st Dist Ct: 04-009334 

LORRI ELIZABETH NICHIOWBRUBAKER,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Terabeam, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Brian J.
Sereda, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald                   /s/ Brian J. Sereda
------------------------                   -------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                       Brian J. Sereda
Chief Executive Officer                    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  November 14, 2006                   Date:  November 14, 2006
Carole L. TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Ronda WINNECOUR.

No. 12-1327.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

WEIGAND CONSTRUCTION )

COMPANY, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 1:14 CV 210

)

WORTMAN BROTHERS, LLC, et al., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Magistrate Judge Susan Collins’ Report and Recommendation (DE #25) is

adopted, and plaintiff’s unopposed motion to dismiss defendant Wortman Brothers,

LLC, without prejudice (DE #22) is GRANTED.

Defendant Wortman Brothers, LLC, is now DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Date: November 5, 2015

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Clifford Anthony JACKSON, petitioner, v. Edward R.K. HARGADON.

No. 13-5491.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Maguire, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael MaguireMichael Maguire, President & Director(Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Principal Accounting Officer)October 29, 2009

---
Lillian FISCHER, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 13-220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,169
<PP&E>                                           5,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,539
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,054
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,909
<SALES>                                         11,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            7,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (474)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
**[National City Mortgage Logo]**********National City Mortgage Co. A Subsidiary of National City Bank of Indiana 3232 Newmark Drive  Miamisburg, Ohio 45342 Telephone: (937) 910-1200 Mailing Address: P.0. Box 1820 Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820 ******Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria**National City Mortgage Co. (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, excluding the criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C) and 1122(d)(4)(ii)(xv) which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the activities it performs, either directly or through its Vendors, with respect to the residential mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this report (such criteria, the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all residential mortgage-backed securities that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as listed on Appendix A. The Asserting Party has engaged certain vendors ("Vendors") to perform specific, limited or scripted activities as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Asserting Party has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each Vendor. The Asserting Party is responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the Vendors and related criteria. The Asserting Party elects to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria or portion of the servicing criteria applicable to such Vendors for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii). The Asserting Party has obtained an assertion of management and accompanying 1122 attestation report from the Vendor performing servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv). The Asserting Party has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria during the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the Asserting Party's assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion. National City Mortgage Co., as Servicer **By: /s/ Philip D Cunningham III****Name: Philip D Cunningham III Title: Executive Vice President**Date: February 28, 2008 No one Cares More !
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12548]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology


Announcement of a Meeting to Discuss an Opportunity to Join a 
Cooperative Research and Development Consortium for Accelerated Wear 
Resistance Screening Tests for Orthopedic Joint Replacement Implant 
Materials

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 
invites interested parties to attend a meeting on July 6, 1995 to 
discuss the possibility of setting up a cooperative research consortium 
on the development of methods to accelerate the evaluation of wear 
resistance of orthopedic hip and knee implant materials. Parties 
interested in participating in the consortium should be prepared to 
invest adequate resources in the collaboration and be firmly committed 
to the goal of developing new accelerated wear evaluation technology.
    Any program undertaken will be within the scope and confines of The 
Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502, 15 U.S.C. 
3710a), which provides federal laboratories including NIST, with the 
authority to enter into cooperative research agreements with qualified 
parties. Under this law, NIST may provide ``personnel, service, 
facilities, equipment or other resources with or without reimbursement 
(but not funds to non-federal parties)''--to the cooperative research 
program.
    The meeting will be held on July 6, 1995 at 8:30 a.m., Room A315, 
Building 224 at NIST in Gaithersburg, MD, for interested parties. The 
meeting will discuss the possible formation of a research consortium 
including NIST and orthopedic industry to conduct research in this 
area. This is not a grant program.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 6, 1995. Interested parties 
should contact NIST to confirm their attendance at the address, 
telephone number or FAX number shown below no later than June 22, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will held at 8:30 a.m., Room A315, Building 224, 
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. John A. Tesk, Building 224, Room 
A143, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 
20899. Telephone: 301-975-6799; FAX: 301-963-9143; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8bffeef8e0cb81e6e2e8eda5e5e2f8ffa5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="403425332b00">[email protected]</span>
micf.nist.gov</a>.

    Dated: May 16, 1995.
Raymond G. Kammer,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-12548 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Adane KEBEDE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6600.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.