alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-53-TLS-1 

 ) 

ISRAEL BONILLA ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 55], filed on April 20, 2016. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 55] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Counts One (1) and Three (3) of the 

Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on May 5, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00586

- CV

Juan Gar cia MORENO,

Appellant

v.

Juan Garcia MORENO,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1988

- CI

- 17672

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief

is due February 20, 2018.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of January, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Mikojo Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 22, 2010





/s/ Timothy NeherTimothy
      NeherPrincipal
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to MIKOJO INCORPORATED and will be retained by
MIKOJO INCORPORATED and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32271-32272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Asthma Education Prevention Program Coordinating Committee, July 09, 
2021,

[[Page 32272]]

11:00 a.m. to July 09, 2021, 02:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 
6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in 
the Federal Register on June 09, 2021, FR Doc 2021-12092, 86 FR 30611.
    There is a correction to the committee link. The link for NAEPPC 
is: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/advisory-and-peer-review-committees/national-asthma-education-and-prevention-program-coordinating.
    The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: June 11, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12739 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2   PHARMOS CORPORATION SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, S. COLIN NEILL, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Date: May 10, 2007  By:/s/ S. COLIN NEILL   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
  ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS
  ------------------------
     PCAOB REGISTERED


         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
         --------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of No Show, Inc., of our
report dated September 16, 2008 on our audit of the financial statements of
No Show, Inc. as of July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years
ended July 31, 2008, July 31, 2007 and inception on August 23, 2005 through
July 31, 2008, and the reference to us under the caption "Experts."


/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered
---------------------------------
    Moore & Associates Chartered
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    September 19, 2008



               2675 S. Jones Blvd. Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146
                       (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501

<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-48-TLS 

)

DEYANTE STEPHENS )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 44], filed on April 17, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 44] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on May 2, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
April 30, 2008
 
 
 
 John
Stickel, Attorney Advisor
 Division
of Corporate Finance
 United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth
Street, N.W.
 Washington,
D.C. 20549
   RE: Amendment No, 10, Seven
Arts Pictures plcDear Mr. Stickel:
  Enclosed
please find Amendment No. 10 plus attached new exhibits for Seven Arts Pictures
plc. Obviously our current 20-F filing is effective, but we are sending on
these
  amendments
to you in event the Commission wishes to review anything in these materials. We
will shortly be filing these also on the EDGAR system to supplement Amendment
No. 9 which is the current effective Amendment for the Company.
 
 We look forward to any
comments.
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
   /s/
 PMH/ls
  Exhibit
1, p1 of 1
Wayne M. BEATON, petitioner, v. M.T. BLUE, et al.

No. 12-9228.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12241]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary


Defense Information School Board of Visitors Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant to the Secretary 
of Defense for Public Affairs, American Forces Information Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Information School Board of Visitors will hold its 
semi-annual meeting at the Defense Information School, Indianapolis, 
IN. Board members will review issues related to the status of the 
Defense Information School consolidation and joint-Service training 
facility under development. The meeting is open to the public.
    Dates and Times: June 1, 1995--8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. (first 
session); 12:15 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. (second session); 1:30 p.m. to 3:55 
p.m. (third session); June 2, 1995--8:30 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. (fourth 
session).

ADDRESSES: All. sessions will be conducted in the main conference room, 
Defense Information School, Building 400, located on the corner of 
Wheeler and Rising Roads, Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Wallace N. Guthrie, Jr., Training Directorate, American Forces 
Information Service, 601 North Fairfax Street, Room 225, Alexandria, VA 
22314. Telephone (703) 274-4897.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-12241 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04--M
#### Oscar Rolendio ANZUETO-VELIZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-60614.

SUMMARY CALENDAR.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 17, 2004.

Elizabeth M. Mendoza Macias, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, US Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, David Michael McConnell, Lisa M. Arnold, US Department of Justice, Civil Division Immigration Litigation, John Ashcroft, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Hipólito Acosta, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, Houston, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, Attn. Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.1

In this appeal, we review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of Oscar Rolendio Anzueto-Veliz’s requests for asylum and withholding of removal.

An alien must file an application for asylum within one year of his arrival in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B). Anzueto-Veliz does not challenge the immigration judge’s finding that he failed to file his application within one year of his arrival. Thus, he has waived his claim for asylum. See *Rodriguez v. INS,*9 F.3d 408, 414 n. 15 (5th Cir.1993).

We also conclude that the immigration judge’s decision denying withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence. Anzueto-Veliz alleges that he got into a fight with gang members in Guatemala because he refused to join their gang; however, he admits that he had no further direct contact with any gang members after the initial altercation. Anzueto-Veliz merely alleges that he left Guatemala *262because the gang members continued to inquire about his whereabouts after he had moved several times within Guatemala. Anzueto-Veliz’s isolated encounter with gang members did not constitute persecution and was not indicative of the likelihood of future persecution upon his return to Guatemala. *See Efe v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir.2002); *Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994).

Anzueto-Veliz’s petition for review is therefore denied.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28164-28165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13044]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Isle Royale National Park; Notice

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession permit authorizing continued operation 
of boat transportation services between Grand Portage National Monument 
and Isle Royale National Park, Michigan for the public at Isle Royale 
National Park for a period of approximately five (5) years from date of 
execution through December 31, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact the Superintendent, Isle 
Royale National Park, 800 East Lakeshore Drive, 
[[Page 28165]] Houghton, Michigan 49931 to obtain a copy of the 
prospectus describing the requirements of the proposed permit.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This permit renewal has been determined to 
be categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the 
National Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared. The existing concessioner has performed its obligations to 
the satisfaction of the Secretary under an existing permit which 
expired by limitation of time on December 31, 1994, and therefore 
pursuant to the provision of section 5 of the Act of October 9, 1965 
(79 Stat. 969; 16 U.S.C. Sec. 20), is entitled to be given preference 
in the negotiation of a new proposed permit providing that the existing 
concessioner submits a responsive offer (a timely offer which meets the 
terms and conditions of the Prospectus). This means that the permit 
will be awarded to the party submitting the best offer, provided that 
if the best offer was not submitted by the existing concessioner, then 
the existing concessioner will be afforded the opportunity to match the 
best offer. If the existing concessioner agrees to match the best 
offer, then the permit will be awarded to the existing concessioner.
    If the existing concessioner does not submit a responsive offer, 
the right of preference in renewal shall be considered to have been 
waived, and the permit will then be awarded to the party that has 
submitted the best responsive offer.
    The Secretary will consider and evaluate all proposals received as 
a result of this notice. Any proposal, including that of the existing 
concessioner, must be received by the Superintendent not later than the 
sixtieth (60th) day following publication of this notice to be 
considered and evaluated.

    Dated: May 23, 1995.
Robert K. Yearout,
Chief, Concessions Division.
[FR Doc. 95-13044 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1771 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that a NADBank 

guarantee is not considered a Federal guarantee for purposes of determining the tax-exempt status of bonds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. GONZALEZ (for himself, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. 

REYES, and Mr. DOGGETT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that a NADBank guarantee is not considered a Federal 

guarantee for purposes of determining the tax-exempt 

status of bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GUARANTEES NOT CONSIDERED FED4 ERAL GUARANTEES FOR PURPOSES OF DE5 TERMINING TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF BONDS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 149(b)(3)(A)(i) of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain insur-
2 

•HR 1771 IH 

1 ance programs) is amended by inserting ‘‘the North Amer2 ican Development Bank,’’ after ‘‘Corporation,’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply with respect to any bond issued 

5 before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Wayne Anderson VANCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10304.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.17





CANCELLATION OF JUNE 10, 2010 BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE








THIS CANCELLATION OF JUNE 10, 2010 BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of December 23, 2010 (the “Effective Date”) by and between COVENANT GROUP OF CHINA INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Maker"), and WALSTON DUPONT GLOBAL ADVISORS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Payee" and, collectively with Maker, the “Parties”).




BACKGROUND




A.           On June 10, 2010, Maker and Payee executed a Promissory Note (the "Original Note"), whereby Maker promised to repay the principal sum of $130,000 in connection with a Bridge Loan Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) entered into by the Parties of even date.




B.           On October 28, 2010 Maker and Payee sought to amend the Original Note and entered into a First Amendment to Promissory Note (“First Amendment”).




C.           Maker and Payee now desire to cancel the Loan Agreement and Original Note, as amended (the “Amended Note”), in exchange for consideration as set forth herein.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:





The Loan Agreement and the related Amended Note by and between Maker and Payee is hereby cancelled as of the Effective Date.  Accordingly, Payee hereby forgives Maker’s obligation under the Amended Note to repay to Payee the principal sum of one hundred thirty thousand dollars ($130,000) (the “Principal Sum”).  Maker hereby relinquishes any and all right, title and interest in and to the Principal Sum.





As set forth in the First Amendment and in addition to the warrant set forth above, Payee shall retain full right and title in and to the warrant to purchase up to Fifteen-Thousand Six-Hundred (15,600) shares of restricted common stock of Maker given to Payee as consideration for entering into the Loan Agreement and Amended Note.





Except as expressly set forth herein, the parties hereby release each other from any further obligations and waive any further rights under the Loan Agreement or Amended Note.





This Amendment shall be governed under Pennsylvania law without regard to its choice of law rules and may be executed in counterparts.




1 of 2





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.











COVENANT GROUP OF CHINA INC.





By /s/ Justin D. Csik______________


Name:  Justin D. Csik


Title:  CFO and General Counsel








WALSTON DUPONT GLOBAL ADVISORS LLC





By /s/ James Wilent______________


Name:  James Wilent


Title:  President












2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13048]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of a Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Behavioral Interventions for Control of 
Tuberculosis.
    Date: June 12-13, 1995.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, Maryland.
    Contact Person: Louise Corman, Ph.D., 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7180, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7924, (301) 435-0270.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sec. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-13048 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0594

_________________

KIRK B. REISBECK,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

 Defendant and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Mike Menahan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 21 2022

09/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0594
Exhibit 32.2





Annual Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Circle Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 31, 2011
By:
/s/   GARY McHENRYChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Circle Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by Circle Entertainment Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.