alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1757 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1757

  To provide that a person who brings a product liability action in a 
 Federal or State court for injuries sustained from a product that is 
not in compliance with a voluntary or mandatory standard issued by the 
Consumer Product Safety Commission may recover treble damages, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that a person who brings a product liability action in a 
 Federal or State court for injuries sustained from a product that is 
not in compliance with a voluntary or mandatory standard issued by the 
Consumer Product Safety Commission may recover treble damages, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAMAGE RECOVERIES.

    (a) Treble Damages.--Any person who brings a product liability 
action in a Federal or State court for injuries sustained from the use 
of a product that is not in compliance with a voluntary or mandatory 
standard issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall recover 
treble damages.
    (b) Notice.--Within 90 days of the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall reissue each voluntary and 
mandatory standard the Commission has for a product with a notice 
notifying manufacturers of such products of the treble damage provision 
of subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Michael W. BRYANT, petitioner, v. James E. DONALD, et al.

No. 12-9720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11164]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 94-91-LNG]


Ecoelectrica, L.P.; Order Granting Long-Term Authorization To 
Import Natural Liquefied Natural Gas

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has granted EcoElectrica, L.P. (EcoElectrica) 
authorization to import to Puerto Rico, from various countries, up to 
130 Bcf per year of liquefied natural gas (LNG) beginning on October 1, 
1997, and continuing through December 31, 2037. EcoElectrica plans to 
import these volumes of LNG near Ponce, Puerto Rico, at LNG facilities 
to be constructed at Guayanilla Bay.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., April 19, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-11164 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
February 20, 2015



Scandium International Mining Corp. (formerly EMC Metals Corp.)
1430 Greg Street, Suite 501
Sparks, NV 89431



|Re: | Scandium International Mining Corp. (the “Company”)
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 10K                          



Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”).



We hereby consent to the references to our
firm and to the summary of the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 F1 Technical Report on the Feasibility of the Nyngan
Scandium Project”, dated October 10, 2014 prepared by Larpro Pty Ltd., which appear in the Annual Report and the incorporation
therein of such references to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-179657).



Yours truly,

/s/ Stuart Hutchin
Stuart Hutchin, MAusIMM MAIG
Geology Manager, Mining One Consultants
EX PARTE Henry MARSHALL II

CR-17-0147

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-064 JD

)

KELLY ANN NORRIS )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on May 28, 2013 [DE 10]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Kelly Ann Norris’ plea of guilty, and FINDS

the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Information, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 1, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DEON LAMAR FLETCHER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1817

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed November 7, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee

County; Maria E. Gonzalez, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Megan Olson, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1791 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax 

on distilled spirits to its pre-1985 level. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. TANNER, Mr. 

HENSARLING, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. TERRY, Mrs. JO ANN

DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. PETRI, Mr. NEY, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, 

Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. COBLE, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. PAUL, 

Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHAW, Mr. TOWNS, 

Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. 

ROGERS of Michigan, and Mr. CULBERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the rate of tax on distilled spirits to its pre-1985 level. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN RATE OF TAX ON DISTILLED 

4 SPIRITS TO PRE-1985 LEVELS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 5001(a) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposi-
2 

•HR 1791 IH 

1 tion, rate, and attachment of tax) is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘$13.50’’ and inserting ‘‘$10.50’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) Subsection (a) of section 5010 of such Code 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘$13.50’’ each place it ap6 pears and inserting ‘‘$10.50’’. 

7 (2) Subsection (f) of section 7652 of such Code 

8 is hereby repealed. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall take effect on the first date that the Di11 rector of the Office of Management and Budget projects 

12 that— 

13 (1) there is a Federal budget surplus (deter14 mined without regard to the income and expendi15 tures of the social security trust funds) for the fiscal 

16 year that includes such date, and 

17 (2) such surplus is not less than the aggregate 

18 revenue reductions during such period resulting from 

19 the amendments made by this Act. 

Æ
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

KIMBERLY A. HIVELY )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:14-CV-1791-JD-MGG

)

IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE, )

)

Defendant. )

JOINT MEDIATION SUMMARY STATEMENT

The Parties, Plaintiff Kimberly Hively and Defendant Ivy Tech Community College, 

mediated on July 25, 2018, before Judge Nuechterlein in South Bend, Indiana, and settled the case. 

Appropriate papers to document the settlement and remove the case from the Court’s docket are 

now being prepared.

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG document 68 filed 08/01/18 page 1 of 2
2

Attorneys for 

Plaintiff Kimberly Hively

By: /s/ Danielle J. Healey

Danielle J. Healey

healey@fr.com

TBA No. 09327980

Karrie E. Wheatley

wheatley@fr.com

TBA No. 24098605

Raisa Ahmad

ahmad@fr.com

TBA No. 24101437

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800

Houston, Texas 77010

Telephone: 713-654-5300

Facsimile: 713-652-0109

Daniel H. Pfeifer

dpfeifer@pilawyers.com

53600 North Ironwood Road 

South Bend, IN 46635

Telephone: 574-272-2870

Facsimile: 574-271-4329

Ivy Tech Community College

Attorneys for 

Defendant Ivy Tech Community College

By: /s/ Adam L. Bartrom

Jason T. Clagg

jason.clagg@btlaw.com

Adam L. Bartrom

adam.bartrom@btlaw.com

Barnes & Thornburg LLP

888 South Harrison Street, Suite 600

Fort Wayne, IN 46802

Telephone: 260-423-9440

Facsimile: 260-424-8316

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG document 68 filed 08/01/18 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12933]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

May 19, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1318.
    Regulation ID Number: INTL-0018-92 NPRM.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Earnings and Profits of Foreign Corporations.
    Description: Application of the proposed regulations may result in 
accounting method changes which ordinarily require the filing of Form 
3115. However, the proposed regulations waive this filing requirement 
if certain conditions are met, with the net result that no burdens are 
imposed.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1 hour.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12933 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-M
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

SECOND NOTICE RE

FURTHER HEARING ON

MOTION TO STRIKE

ASSERTED TRADE SECRET

NUMBER 96

At the hearing today, counsel for both sides should be prepared to compare the details of

the specific transmit lenses used by each side, including but not limited to the manufacturers,

apertures, focal lengths, and differences in Petzval surfaces. If possible, please bring examples

of the lenses to court.

Dated: September 6, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1475 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 1
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1686 

To require United States assistance for the repair, maintenance, or construction of the transportation infrastructure of Iraq to be provided in the 

form of loans subject to repayment in full to the United States Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2005 

Mr. CUMMINGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL 

To require United States assistance for the repair, maintenance, or construction of the transportation infrastructure of Iraq to be provided in the form of loans subject 

to repayment in full to the United States Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR 

4 THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE OF 

5 IRAQ IN THE FORM OF LOANS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts 

7 made available after the date of the enactment of this Act 

8 for the repair, maintenance, or construction of the trans-
2 

•HR 1686 IH 

1 portation infrastructure of Iraq shall be provided in the 

2 form of loans subject to repayment in full to the United 

3 States Government. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Betancourt, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered November 29,1982, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

*763The evidence in this case, which was wholly circumstantial, established inferentially that defendant backed his auto against the garage door of a service station in Queens County for the purpose of dislodging the heavy wooden door, thereby allowing his accomplice entry to the service station. As defendant was sitting in his car just outside the station, he was approached by the police, during which time his accomplice strolled out of the station and entered defendant’s auto. Inside the garage, the officers discovered that a fenced tool storage area had been forcibly entered and two large tool boxes and other auto service equipment had been removed and piled near the dislodged door.

The station manager testified that when he locked the premises that evening, the tools in question had been locked within the fenced enclosure and that the outside garage door had been operable and in good condition.

Those elements of circumstantial evidence which were pivotal involved the testimony by the arresting officer that he found brown paint on the rear bumper of the defendant’s auto and that said rear bumper corresponded in height to the damaged area of the painted brown garage door. This evidence was sufficient to allow a reasonable inference that defendant used his automobile, equipped with hand controls due to his disability, to dislodge the garage door and thereby aid his accomplice in gaining entry to the station.

Contrary to defendant’s contention that we must exercise the fact-finding function and utilize the test that every hypothesis save that of guilt has been excluded by the evidence, appellate review of a wholly circumstantial evidence case requires only that the court determine that the jury did not indulge in any unwarranted inferences in applying the reasonable hypothesis standard and that the jury reached a reasonable determination of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, e.g., People v Barnes,*50 NY2d 375; *People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196). In so doing, the People are entitled to the benefit of every inference that may be reasonably deducted from the evidence *(People v Way,*59 NY2d 361, 365; *People v Marin,*102 AD2d 14, 28). In that context, we find that the evidence adduced at defendant’s trial was legally sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13163]



[[Page 28086]]


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service


Pioneer Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Finding of No Significant 
Impact

AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) 
has made a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) with respect to the 
potential environmental impact related to the construction of a new 
headquarters facility proposed by Pioneer Electric Cooperative, Inc. 
(Pioneer), of Ulysses, Kansas. The proposed project will be located on 
a site 0.5 miles west of the City of Ulysses near the intersection of 
State Highway 160 and County Road I in Grant County, Kansas.
    RUS has concluded that the environmental impacts from the proposed 
project would not be significant and that the proposed action is not a 
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact 
statement is not required.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lawrence R. Wolfe, Chief, Environmental Compliance Branch, Electric 
Staff Division, room 1246, Ag Box 1569, South Agriculture Building, 
RUS, Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720-1784.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RUS, in accordance with its environmental 
policies and procedures, required that Pioneer prepare a Borrower's 
Environmental Report (BER) reflecting the potential impacts of the 
proposed facilities. The BER, which includes input from Federal, State 
and local agencies and the public, has been adopted as RUS' 
Environmental Assessment for the project in accordance with 7 CFR 
1794.61. RUS has concluded that the BER represents an accurate 
assessment of the environmental impacts of the project. The proposed 
project should have no impact on cultural resources, floodplains, 
wetlands, important farmland, and federally listed or proposed for 
listing threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat.
    Alternatives considered to the project included no action, 
expansion of Pioneer's existing headquarters facility, and alternative 
construction sites. RUS has considered these alternatives and concluded 
that the project as proposed meets the needs of Pioneer to reduce 
overcrowding at the present facility and provide increased space for 
equipment storage.
    Copies of the BER and FONSI are available for review at RUS at the 
address provided herein; or can be reviewed at or obtained from the 
offices of Pioneer, West Highway 160, Ulysses, Kansas 67880, telephone 
(316) 356-1211, during normal business hours.

    Dated: May 22, 1995.
Adam M. Golodner,
Deputy Administrator, Program Operations.
[FR Doc. 95-13163 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rodolfo SANDOVAL-VALENCIA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-10429.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 13, 2004.*

Decided April 23, 2004.

Beverly K Anderson, Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. DeConcini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, *AZ,*for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas Jacobs, Esq., Law Offices of Thomas Jacobs, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rodolfo Sandoval-Valencia appeals the district court’s imposition of a sixteen-level increase in the range prescribed by the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on his Washington State conviction for third-degree rape. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and we affirm. We see no meaningful distinction between this case and *United States v.*Pereira-Salmeron-1 Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. 337 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir.2003).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1730 

To reinstate the authority of the Federal Communications Commission and 

local franchising authorities to regulate the rates for cable television service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reinstate the authority of the Federal Communications 

Commission and local franchising authorities to regulate 

the rates for cable television service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 The Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cable Consumer Rights 

5 Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 Subsection (b) of section 301 of the Telecommuni8 cations Act of 1996 is repealed. 
2 

•HR 1730 IH 

1 SEC. 3. REINSTATEMENT OF PRIOR LAW. 

2 Section 623 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

3 U.S.C. 543) shall be effective as if section 301(b) of the 

4 Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not been enacted. 

5 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The provisions of this Act shall take effect 90 days 

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DNB Financial Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
F. Sopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.














/s/ Gerald F.
Sopp


Gerald F.
Sopp


Chief
Financial Officer


May 15,
2009