Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Notices 24651

Register, summarizing the issues to be

heard and setting the time for the

hearing.

The Office of Management and budget

has determined that notice of aggregate

production quotas are not subject to

centralized review under Executive

Order 12866.

Rules establishing aggregate

production quotas for controlled

substances in Schedules I and II are

required by statute, fulfill United States

obligations under the Single Convention

on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, and other

international treaties, and are essential

to a criminal law enforcement function

of the United States. Without the

periodic establishment and adjustment

of aggregate production quotas,

pharmaceutical manufacturers in the

United States could not lawfully

produce a wide variety of medically

necessary pharmaceutical drugs.

These actions have been analyzed in

accordance with the principles and

criteria contained in Executive Order

12612 and it has been determined that

this matter raises no Federalism

implications which would warrant the

preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

The Deputy Administrator hereby

certifies that this action will have no

significant impact upon small entities

whose interests must be considered

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5

U.S.C. 601, et seq. The establishment

and revision of annual production

quotas for Schedules I and II controlled

substances is mandated by law and by

the international obligations of the

United States. Such quotas impact

predominantly upon major

manufacturers of the affected controlled

substances.

Dated: May 3, 1995.

Stephen H. Greene,

Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–11370 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Surveys of the Federal Family and

Medical Leave Act

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor.

SUMMARY: The Director, Office of

Information Resources Management

Policy, invites comments on the

following proposed expedited review

information collection request as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1980, as amended.

DATES: This expedited review is being

requested in accordance with the Act,

since allowing for the normal review

period would adversely affect the public

interest. Approval by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) has

been requested by May 26, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) Office

of Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Attention: Dan Chenok, Desk Officer,

725 17th St., NW., Room 10235, New

Executive Office Building, Wash., DC

20503. Requests for copies of the

proposed information collection request

should be addressed to Kenneth A.

Mills, Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Ave., NW Room N–1301,

Wash., DC 20210.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth A. Mills, (202) 219–5095.

Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf

(TTY/TDY) may call (202) 219–4720

between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern

time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

3517 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 3517) requires

that the Director of OMB provide

interested persons an early opportunity

to comment on information collection

requests. OMB may amend or waive the

requirement for public consultation to

the extent that public participation in

the approval process would defeat the

purpose of the information collection,

violate State or Federal law, or

substantially interfere with the agency’s

ability to performs its statutory

obligations.

The Director, Office of Information

Resource Management Policy, publishes

this notice simultaneously with the

submission of this request to OMB. This

notice contains the following

information:

Type of Review: EXPEDITED

Title: Commission on Leave Survey of

Businesses on the Impact of the

Federal Family and Medical Leave

Act (and an embedded study of

employees)

Frequency of Response: One-time

Affected Public: Individuals or

households; Business or other forprofit

Survey Respondents Average time per response Total hours

Employer ........................................................................... 1,200 65 minutes ........................................................................ 1,300

Case Studies .................................................................... 6 4 hours ............................................................................. 24

Employee .......................................................................... 400 10 minutes ........................................................................ 67

Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,391

Respondents obligation to reply:

Voluntary

Description: Title III of the Federal

Family and Medical Leave Act of

1993 FMLA) established a bipartisan

Commission on Leave (the

Commission) to conduct a

comprehensive study and to submit a

report to Congress on mandatory and

voluntary policies relating to family

leave and temporary medical leave.

The Commission is to conduct a

comprehensive study and to report its

findings to Congress not later than

two years after the date the

Commission first met which was held

on November 10, 1993.

The Commission plans to survey a

random sample of employers who are

covered and not covered by the

provisions of the FMLA and a sample of

employees who are covered and not

covered by the provisions of the FMLA

and who have taken family and medical

leave. The data collected will be used

primarily for reporting to the Congress

in the Final report due November 1995.

Type of Review: EXPEDITED

Title: Commission on Leave Survey of

Employee on the Impact of the

Federal Family and Medical Leave

Act

Frequency of Response: One-time

Affected Public: Individuals or

households
24652 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Notices

Survey Respondents Average time per response Total hours

Employee Leave Takers ................................................... 260 10 minutes ........................................................................ 43.3

Employee Leave Needers ................................................ 2,600 5 minutes .......................................................................... 216.6

Total Annual Burden Hours: 260

Respondents obligation to reply:

Voluntary

Description: Title III of the Federal

Family and Medical Leave Act of

1993 FMLA) established a bipartisan

Commission on Leave (the

Commission) to conduct a

comprehensive study and to submit a

report to Congress on mandatory and

voluntary policies relating to family

leave and temporary medical leave.

The Commission is to conduct a

comprehensive study and to report its

findings to Congress not later than

two years after the date the

Commission first met which was held

on November 10, 1993.

The Commission plans to survey a

random sample of employers who are

covered and not covered by the

provisions of the FMLA and who have

taken family and medical leave. The

data collected will be used primarily for

reporting to the Congress in the Final

report due November 1995.

Dated: Signed at Washington, D.C. this 2nd

day of May 1995.

Theresa M. O’Malley,

Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–11412 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of April, 1995.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–30,785; The American Tobacco

Co., Chester, VA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–30,853; C & S Supply Co.,

Kermit, TX

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,816; Whitestone Products,

Inc., Piscataway, NJ

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,767; Fairchild Fasteners USA,

Fairchild Industry, City of Industry,

CA

The investigation revealed that

criterion (2) and (3) have not been met.

Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

TA–W–30,748; Halbar Enterprises,

Falmouth, ME

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

TA–W–30,805; I. Appel Corp., Formit

Rogers Div., McMinnville, TN

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

22, 1994.

TA–W–30,817; I. Appel Corp., Formit

Rogers Div., Lafayette, TN

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 2,

1994.

TA–W–30,742; Advanced Imaging

Technology, Inc., Toms River, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

3, 1994.

TA–W–30,927; Midessa Drilling Co.,

Midland, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

2, 1995.

TA–W–30,830; Modoc Lumber Co.,

Klamath Falls, OR

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 7,

1994.

TA–W–30,747; Kay Lunn Sportswear,

Inc., Palestine, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

2, 1994.

TA–W–30,745; Therma. Laminates

Corp., Stevenson, WA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January

22, 1994.

TA–W–30,794; Western Cabinet & Mill

Work, Inc., Woodinville, WA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

22, 1994.

TA–W–30,776; M–I Drilling Fluids Co.,

Anchorage, AK

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January

31, 1994.

TA–W–30,774; Cleveland Twist Drilling

Co., Cranston, RI

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

13, 1994.

TA–W–30,899, TA–W–30,900; Al Tech

Speciality Steel Corp., Dunkirk, NY,

Watervliet, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

7, 1994.

TA–W–30,769; A & B; Chevron Pipe Line

Co., Crane, TX & Operating at

Various Locations in the State of TX

and New Mexico