alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Timothy Scott HARRIMAN, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8459.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. KARLEN, Appellant, v. DALTON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 13, 1899.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York on the relation of Alfred T. Karlen against William Dalton as commissioner, etc. L. L. Kellogg, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

No opinion. Proceedings affirmed, with costs.
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Ocean Customs Brokers, 8554 Katy Freeway, Suite 123, Houston, TX 77024, 
Eldon D. Spencer, Sole Proprietor

Atlant (USA), Inc., 5777 West Century Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90045, 
Officer: Bolko Kissling, President

Amerstar Shipping Incorporated, 277 Broadway, New York, NY 10007, 
Officers: Belford Saltos, President, Madukwe E. Ukaegbu, Secretary

International Freight Systems (of Oregon), Inc., d/b/a International 
Freight Systems, 604 NE 20th Ave., Portland, Oregon 97232, Officers: 
Robert C. Hansen, President, William D. Woodward, Vice President

    Dated: May 24, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13175 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2









CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350




(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)






In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Covenant Group of China Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Justin D. Csik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date:              December 17, 2010                                                                        By:  /s/ Justin D. Csik




Name: Justin D. Csik




Title: Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FDIC Advisory Committee on 

Community Banking 

July 22, 2021 

FDIC Ombudsman Update 
REPORT 

ON 

ACTIVITIES 

2019 - 2020 

More Details Than Prior Report 

Two Years of Activities 

Variety of Topics 

OO Report on Activities 2 
Virtual Outreach 

THE Increased Stakeholder Interaction 

COVID 

EFFECT 

• 232 Pandemic-Related Discussions 

• 57% Increase in Calls From the Public 

• 82% Increase in Industry Cases 

OO Report on Activities 3 
INDUSTRY OUTREACH FEEDBACK 

BY THE CASES VISITS ITEMS 

NUMBERS 2019: 197 2019: 524 2019: 1,302 

2020: 358 2020: 529 2020: 1,295 

OO Report on Activities 4 
8 Sessions / 1 Webinar 

250 Participants 

LISTENING 

SESSIONS 

Opportunities and Barriers 

Results 

OO Report on Activities 5 
Response Rates 

PostExamination Follow-Up Calls 

Survey 

Further Enhancements 

OO Report on Activities 6 
 

SCAN ME 

You Can Also View the Report At: 

http://www.fdic.gov/about/ombud 

sman 

OO Report on Activities 7
#### LYTH et al., Appellants, v. LYTH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 13, 1912.)

Action by Sarah F. Lyth and another, individually and as executors, etc., and others, against Alfred Lyth. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT 

INSURANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL REPORT

2017
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael S. McClure, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SmartStop Self Storage, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 29,
2015 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael S. McClure                                                                                                         
|Date           |  |     |  | Michael S. McClure
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D.Adam D. Singer, M.D. Chief Executive Officer


March 2, 2009
Marie Claire WIEGAND, petitioner, v. J. Kyle BACHUS, et al.

No. 13-6804.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Roy E. HALL, petitioner, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 12-9984.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Corey N. JOHNSTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9464.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

CORY MCNAMEE, )

Plaintiff, )

) CAUSE NO. 2:14-CV-260-JTM-PRC

vs. )

)

FAMILY FOCUS, INC., )

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [DE 31], filed

by Defendant Family Focus, Inc. on November 2, 2015. Plaintiff Cory McNamee has not filed a

response, and the time to do so has passed.

Paragraphs 5.c. and 11 of the proposed Protective Order mandate procedures for handling

confidential discovery material which involve filing documents under seal without making a motion

for leave to file under seal. The Court declines to enter these provisions because the Court requires

such motions to be made as filings under seal cannot be maintained unless authorized by statute,

Court rule, or Court order. See N.D. Ind. L.R. 5-3.

Further, Paragraph 14 provides: “The terms of this Protective Order shall survive any

settlement, discontinuance, dismissal, judgment, or other disposition of this action. This Protective

Order may be modified by further Order of the Court upon application to the Court with notice and

opportunity to be heard to the parties hereto.” This provision requires the Court to retain jurisdiction

over the Protective Order after the close of the case, something the Court cannot do. “The Court is

unwilling to enter a protective order that requires the Court to retain jurisdiction . . . after the

resolution of the case.” E.E.O.C. v. Clarice’s Home Care Serv., Inc., No. 03:07-cv-601 GPM, 2008

WL 345588, at *2 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 7, 2008).
Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby DENIES without prejudice and with leave to

refile Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [DE 31] without provisions prescribing the filing

of documents under seal without the Court’s permission or requiring the Court to retain jurisdiction

over the Protective Order after the resolution of this case. Because Plaintiff filed no response to the

instant motion, if Defendant refiles the motion making changes in accordance with this Order, the

Court will not accept a response to the refiled motion.

So ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2015.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Cory McNamee, pro se

2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1611 

To modify the calculation of back pay for persons who were approved for 

promotion as members of the Navy and Marine Corps while interned 

as prisoners of war during World War II to take into account changes 

in the Consumer Price Index. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005 

Ms. HOOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To modify the calculation of back pay for persons who were 

approved for promotion as members of the Navy and 

Marine Corps while interned as prisoners of war during 

World War II to take into account changes in the Consumer Price Index. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1611 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AMOUNT OF BACK PAY FOR 

2 MEMBERS OF NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SE3 LECTED FOR PROMOTION WHILE INTERNED 

4 AS PRISONERS OF WAR DURING WORLD WAR 

5 II TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CHANGES IN CON6 SUMER PRICE INDEX. 

7 (a) MODIFICATION.—Section 667(c) of the Floyd D. 

8 Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

9 Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 

10 114 Stat. 1654A–170) is amended by adding at the end 

11 the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(3) The amount determined for a person under 

13 paragraph (1) shall be increased to reflect increases in 

14 cost of living since the basic pay referred to in paragraph 

15 (1)(B) was paid to or for that person, calculated on the 

16 basis of the Consumer Price Index (all items—United 

17 States city average) published monthly by the Bureau of 

18 Labor Statistics.’’. 

19 (b) RECALCULATION OF PREVIOUS PAYMENTS.—In 

20 the case of any payment of back pay made to or for a 

21 person under section 667 of the Floyd D. Spence National 

22 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 before the 

23 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

24 Navy shall— 
3 

•HR 1611 IH 

1 (1) recalculate the amount of back pay to which 

2 the person is entitled by reason of the amendment 

3 made by subsection (a); and 

4 (2) if the amount of back pay, as so recal5 culated, exceeds the amount of back pay so paid, pay 

6 the person, or the surviving spouse of the person, an 

7 amount equal to the excess. 

Æ
Terry Lee CONDREY, aka Jamil, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9707

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
March 24, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF M .L.G.J., T.M.J., T.L .W.JR., M.A.J., T.P. R.J., B.W.D.

III, M.R.J., L.C.J., CHILDREN

NO. 14

- 14

- 00800

- CV

__ ______________________________ This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed September 15, 2014 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 1 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 2 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 3 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 4 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 5 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 6 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 7 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 8 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 9 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 10 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 11 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 12 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 13 of 14

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00337-JD-SLC   document 1   filed 10/24/14   page 14 of 14
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas Satzman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2
to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of XpresSpa Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Dated: June 12, 2020



| | /s/ Douglas Satzman          
| | -----------------------------
| | Douglas Satzman              
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
Chadrick Evan FULKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1752 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1752

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Polyethylene HE2591.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Polyethylene HE2591.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYETHYLENE HE2591.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.41      Polyethylene        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         HE2591 (CAS No.                                                    31/2008
                         25087-43-7), with
                         l-butene as
                         comonomer
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3901.20.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 of Boeing Capital Corporation
(the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Russell A. Evans, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                                            
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|              | 
|July 26, 2006 |  | /s/ RUSSELL A. EVANS                                       
|              |  | Russell A. Evans Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DEVRA G. SHAPIRODevra G. Shapiro Chief Financial Officer


March 2, 2009
EXHIBIT 99.1

         STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Sally A. Fonner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The
Enchanted Village, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

       The Company's Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31,
       2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


                   /s/ Sally A Fonner
  -----------------------------------------------------
  Sally A. Fonner
  Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer
  Dated: September 4, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13 CV 1109

)

MURPHY ICE & KOENEMAN, LLP f/k/a )

MURPHY LAW GROUP f/k/a MILLER )

MURPHY LLP, EDWARD L. MURPHY JR., )

and BENJAMIN D. ICE, )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

 On October 23, 2013, the Court ordered Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company to

clarify why this Court has diversity jurisdiction over this dispute, specifically with respect to the

citizenship of the partners of Defendant Murphy Ice & Koeneman, LLP [DE 4]. Zurich has filed

a supplemental jurisdictional statement asserting that the three partners of Murphy Ice &

Koeneman are citizens of Indiana [DE 4 at ¶¶ 4-5]. Plaintiff Zurich is a citizen of New York and

Illinois [DE 4 at ¶ 1]. 

 Because the Defendants are diverse from the Plaintiff, the Court confirms that it has

subject matter jurisdiction over this case.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: November 13, 2013

s/ Philip P. Simon

PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#### HURST. Respondent, v. HURST, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 17, 1899.)

Action by Mary Elizabeth Hurst against Alfred Thomas Hurst.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with $10 cos'ts.