27802 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Notices

Percent

Businesses with credit available

elsewhere .............................. 8.000

Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere ...................... 4.000

Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere ...................... 7.125

For Economic Injury

Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without

credit available elsewhere ..... 4.000

The number assigned to this disaster

for physical damage is 277506. For

economic injury the numbers are

851900 for Louisiana and 852000 for

Mississippi.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.)

Dated: May 17, 1995.

Bernard Kulik,

Associate Administrator for Disaster

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–12892 Filed 5–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–M

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2776]

Mississippi; Declaration of Disaster

Loan Area

As a result of the President’s major

disaster declaration on May 12, 1995, I

find that Hancock, Harrison, and Pearl

River Counties in the State of

Mississippi constitute a disaster area

due to damages caused by severe

storms, tornadoes, and flooding

beginning on May 8, 1995 and

continuing. Applications for loans for

physical damages may be filed until the

close of business on July 10, 1995, and

for loans for economic injury until the

close of business on February 12, 1996,

at the address listed below: U.S. Small

Business Administration, Disaster Area

2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite

300, Atlanta, GA 30308, or other locally

announced locations. In addition,

applications for economic injury loans

from small businesses located in the

contiguous counties of Forrest, Jackson,

Lamar, Marion, and Stone in the State

of Mississippi may be filed until the

specified date at the above location.

The interest rates are:

Percent

For Physical Damage:

Homeowners with credit available elsewhere ...................... 8.000

Homeowners without credit available elsewhere .......................... 4.000

Businesses with credit available

elsewhere .............................. 8.000

Percent

Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere ...................... 4.000

Other (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere ...................... 7.125

For Economic Injury:

Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without

credit available elsewhere ..... 4.000

The number assigned to this disaster

for physical damage is 277606 and for

economic injury the number is 852000.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.)

Dated: May 17, 1995.

Bernard Kulik,

Associate Administrator for Disaster

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–12893 Filed 5–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–-01–17

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Approval of Noise Compatibility

Program Bishop International Airport

Flint, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) announces its

findings on the noise compatibility

program submitted by Bishop

International Airport Authority,

Michigan, under the provisions of Title

I of the Aviation Safety and Noise

Abatement Act of 1979 (Public Law 96–

193) and 14 CFR Part 150. These

findings are made in recognition of the

description of Federal and nonfederal

responsibilities in Senate Report No.

96–52 (1980). On March 1, 1993, the

FAA determined that the noise exposure

maps submitted by Bishop International

Airport Authority under Part 150 were

in compliance with applicable

requirements. On July 25, 1994, the

Assistant Administrator for Airports

approved the Bishop International

Airport noise compatibility program.

All but one of the recommendations

of the program were approved; Noise

Abatement Item 1b was disapproved

pending submittal of additional

information. The approved program

consists of two (2) noise abatement

measure and five (5) land use measures.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the

FAA’s approval of the Bishop

International Airport noise

compatibility program is July 25, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ernest Gubry, Federal Aviation

Administration, Detroit Airports District

Office, Willow Run Airport, East, 8820

Beck Road, Belleville, Michigan 48111,

313–487–7280. Documents reflecting

this FAA action may be reviewed at this

same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

notice announces that the FAA has

given its overall approval to the noise

compatibility program for Bishop

International Airport, effective July 25,

1994.

Under section 104(a) of the Aviation

Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979

(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’), an

airport operator who has previously

submitted a noise exposure map may

submit to the FAA a noise compatibility

program which sets forth the measures

taken or proposed by the airport

operator for the reduction of existing

noncompatible land uses and

prevention of additional noncompatible

land uses within the area covered by the

noise exposure maps. The Act requires

such programs to be developed in

consultation with interested and

affected parties including local

communities, government agencies,

airport users, and FAA personnel.

Each airport noise compatibility

program developed in accordance with

Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part

150 is a local program, not a Federal

program. The FAA does not substitute

its judgment for that of the airport

proprietor with respect to which

measures should be recommended for

action. The FAA’s approval or

disapproval of FAR Part 150 program

recommendations is measured

according to the standards expressed in

Part 150 and the Act, and is limited to

the following determinations:

a. The noise compatibility program

was developed in accordance with the

provisions and procedures of FAR Part

150;

b. Program measures are reasonably

consistent with achieving the goals of

reducing existing noncompatible land

uses around the airport and preventing

the introduction of additional

noncompatible land uses;

c. Program measures would not create

an undue burden on interstate or foreign

commerce, unjustly discriminate against

types or classes of aeronautical uses,

violate the terms of airport grant

agreements, or intrude into areas

preempted by the Federal Government;

and

d. Program measures relating to the

use of flight procedures can be

implemented within the period covered

by the program without derogating