alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

        Clinical Trials and Human Subject Protection

Report Problems to FDA Home
          Science & Research
          Science and Research Special Topics
          Clinical Trials and Human Subject Protection
          Report Problems to FDAClinical Trials and Human Subject Protection Report Problems to FDA
  	
        Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintReporting Complaints Related to FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials
	Mandatory IRB Reporting: FDA Contacts

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      03/13/2018Report Problems to FDA
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12014]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1995 / 
Notices

[[Page 26020]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. CN-95-003]


Advisory Committee on Universal Cotton Standards; Meeting

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) announces a 
forthcoming meeting of the Advisory Committee on Universal Cotton 
Standards.
DATES: June 15, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. through June 16, 1995.

PLACE: June 15, Peabody Hotel, 149 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 
38103. Phone (901) 529-4000.
    June 16 at USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Cotton Division 
offices at 3275 Appling Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38133. Phone (901) 
384-3000. The meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harmon H. Ramey, Jr., Fiber 
Technology Branch, Cotton Division, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling Road, 
Memphis, Tennessee 38133; (901) 384-3040.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The committee includes representatives of 
all segments of the U.S. cotton industry and the twenty-one overseas 
associations that are signatories to the Universal Cotton Standards 
Agreement. The purpose of the meeting is: (1) to recommend to the 
Secretary of Agriculture any changes considered necessary to the 
Universal Standards; and (2) to review freshly prepared sets of 
Universal Cotton Standards for conformity with existing standards.
    Written comments may be submitted in advance or following the 
meeting to Dr. Ramey. Notice of this meeting is provided in accordance 
with section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public 
Law No. 92-463).

    Dated: May 10, 1995.
Lon Hatamiya
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-12014 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-15-TLS 

)

BEAU A. ELDRIDGE )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 26], filed on June 3, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 26] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on August 26, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EX-33.2
(logo) First American
Real Estate Tax Service


LUCY PRZYBYLA
PRESIDENT
ESCROW SERVICING
PRODUCTS


REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation and "the Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1,
2007 through December 31, 2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for
residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the
Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider
("the Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
    General Partner


/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 12, 2008


1 First American Way, Westlake, TX 76262

817.699.6511 * 800.229.8426 * FAX 817.699.6513

lprzybyla@firstam.com * www.firstam.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CR-84

)

ALEX R. WHITE )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on April 17, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 17th day of April, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Michael Byron ABRAHAMSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is
not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: March 16, 2009/s/ L. MARK PANELLA L. Mark Panella Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: 

DOCKET NO. 1272

Re: Dkt. No. 1314

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Stipulation re: Depositions re: Waymo’s 

Investigation After the Discovery Cut-off. (Dkt. No. 1314.) The Court declines to sign the 

stipulation and instead rules as follows. Waymo shall produce documents responsive to the 

Court’s Order at Docket No. 1272 by August 24, 2017. Any motion to quash regarding the 

subpoenas already served on Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP with a return date of August 24, 2017

shall be fully briefed by midnight August 27, 2017. The parties shall confer with the Special 

Master to set a briefing schedule to meet this deadline. The Court will hear oral argument 

regarding any such motion at 1:30 p.m. on August 28 in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San 

Francisco, California. It is too late for Otto Trucking to issue any subpoenas with a response date 

after August 24. The Court shall discuss scheduling of any previously-noticed depositions at the 

hearing on August 28.

This Order disposes of Docket No. 1314.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1319 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 1
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Renaissance Mortgage Acceptance Corp.
1000 Woodbury Road
Woodbury, NY 11797


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008


/s/ Christina Hatfield
CHRISTINA HATFIELD
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Servicing Agreement for RENAISSANCE2006-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

2 Servicing Agreement for RENAISSANCE2006-2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

3 Servicing Agreement for RENAISSANCE 2006-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

4 Servicing Agreement for Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-2, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

5 Servicing Agreement for Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-1, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

6 Servicing Agreement for Renaissance Mortgage Acceptance Corp. Home Equity Loan
Asset Backed Notes, Series 2006-4, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer
and Securities Administrator, as applicable

7 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Renaissance Mortgage Acceptance Corp. Home
Equity Loan Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          463642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                463642
<PP&E>                                        12460841
<DEPRECIATION>                                   17271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13220152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2217328
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       2250
<COMMON>                                         10836
<OTHER-SE>                                     5982775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13220152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 22111
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                340570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (319087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (319087)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (319087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
Ron BRYANT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

**In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 of BoeingCapital Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) andpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E. Skowronski, President and Directorof the Company, certify, that:**

 

**(1)****                                 ****the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**

**(2)****                                 ****the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.**

 

 
| July 28, 2004 | /S/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|               | Walter E. Skowronski     |
|                    | President  and Director  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Boeing Capital Corporation and will be retained by Boeing CapitalCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, petitioner, v. Sean Bernard RUNNINGEAGLE.

No. 12-894.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jermaine HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Richard O’Neill, Appellant, v Maureen O’Neill, Respondent.

— In a matrimonial action, plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), dated February 28,1984, as denied that branch of his cross motion which sought downward modification of his child support obligation under the divorce decree to $100 per week.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties were divorced by judgment dated June 17, 1983. Pursuant to the final judgment of divorce and the stipulation entered into between the parties which survived the judgment, the defendant wife was given custody of the couple’s two infant children. Plaintiff was to pay child support in the amount of $115 per week. When infant son Michael became emancipated, this amount was to be decreased to $100 per week. In November 1983, plaintiff began to pay $100 per week, alleging that Michael had a job and was, therefore, emancipated. Defendant moved, *inter alia,*for a money judgment for arrears, and plaintiff cross-moved, *inter alia,*for downward modification of his support obligations.

Plaintiff’s affidavits, containing conclusory statements as to Michael’s status, failed to create a genuine issue of fact as to *830Michael’s alleged emancipation *(Levinson v Levinson,*97 AD2d 458). Therefore, Special Term properly denied plaintiff’s cross motion for a downward modification of his support obligation without an evidentiary hearing *(Gagliardi v Gagliardi,*18 AD2d 788). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
Christopher MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6638.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.