alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

26975

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 97

Friday, May 19, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6801 of May 17, 1995

Labor History Month, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Among the most insistent themes in the history of American democracy

has been the determination of our workers to find dignity in their work

and meaning in their citizenship. The labor movement has long given voice

to these aspirations. American trade unionists have fought for and achieved

benefits for all of us by strengthening citizens’ roles in the workplace and

by expanding their participation in the political lives of their communities.

Gone is the time when the average American worker made about ten dollars

for a 60-hour week, and more than 2 million children worked similarly

long hours for even less pay. The national labor movement has helped

ensure safe working conditions, regular hours, decent living wages, and

paid holidays and vacations. And in 1993 we moved a step further, affording

hard-working Americans the right to emergency family leave.

Workers have been leaders in the efforts to establish the 8-hour day, the

40-hour week, security in unemployment and old age, protection for the

sick and injured and for children, equal employment opportunity, and health

and safety standards. And the labor movement has strived to make public

education available for every child. American workers have helped to make

this progress possible, and our country is immeasurably stronger because

of it.

As we observe Labor History Month this year, we understand that our

work is not yet finished. Today’s global marketplace demands that we establish and strengthen partnerships between employers and unions, cooperate

to achieve safe, high-performance work environments, improve the skills

of American workers and the competitiveness of American businesses, and

further enhance human dignity in the workplace. The challenges we face

are many, but the history of our accomplishments assures us that the future

looks bright indeed.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 1995, as ‘‘Labor

History Month.’’ I call upon the people of the United States to observe

this period with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth

day of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–12533

Filed 5–17–95; 4:33 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report of Nobilis Health Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry Fleming, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Harry Fleming Harry Fleming Chief Executive
Officer April 29, 2016

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert J. Terrano, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant Properties I;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date:
    
    May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
Keith JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Paul CHAPPIUS, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility.

No. 12-10000.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1748 

To require labor organizations to guarentee members the opportunity to 

vote on contracts prior to work stoppage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. NORWOOD (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. LINDER, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. AKIN, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require labor organizations to guarentee members the 

opportunity to vote on contracts prior to work stoppage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Union Member Free5 dom From Strikes Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP RIGHT TO VOTE ON CONTRACTS. 

7 Section 8(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 158(b)) is amended— 
2 

•HR 1748 IH 

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

2 (6); 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of the 

4 paragraph (7) and inserting a semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) to strike an employer unless the employees 

7 of the collective bargaining unit engaged in the 

8 strike have voted by secret ballot to reject the last 

9 contract offer proposed by such employer; and’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 4.31






STATE BANK OF VIETNAM
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAMNo. 98/NHNN-QLNH
Independence - Freedom – Happiness


Ha Noi, 09 January , 2012





To:BONG MIEU GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED
 Re: Gold export
 
 Regarding the Application No. 470-11/BGM dated 22 November 2011 fromBong Mieu Gold Mining Company Limited for gold export, the State Bank ofVietnam hereby respond as below:
 
 1. We approve Bong Mieu Gold Mining Company Limited to export 410 kg(four hundred and ten kilograms) of gold bullion bars (with gold contentranging from 60.00% to 99.99%) produced by the Company in year 2012 tobe refined and traded overseas.
 
 2. Bong Mieu Gold Mining Company Limited is only permitted to export thetype of gold specified in Article 1 of this letter and is requested to conform toregulations on gold export and import as well as relevant stipulations.
 
 3. This approval shall take effect until the end of 31 December 2012.
 
 Distribution:

- As above

- Le Minh Hung, the DeputyDirector (to report)

- General Department ofCustoms

- The State Bank of Vietnam -Danang

- File
For the Director of the State Bank

For Director of Foreign Exchange ControlDepartment



(signed and sealed)

Dao Xuan Tuan
 
 
 
 Graphic
   
 
  STATE BANK OF VIETNAM
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAMNo. 99/NHNN-QLNH
Independence - Freedom – Happiness
 Ha Noi, 09 January , 2012
 To:PHUOC SON GOLD COMPANY LIMITED
 Re: Gold export
  Regarding the Application No. 657-11/PSGC dated 22 November 2011 from Phuoc Son Gold Company Limited for gold export, the State Bank of Vietnam hereby respond as below:
  1. We approve Phuoc Son Gold Company Limited to export 600 kg (six hundred kilograms) of gold bullion bars (with gold content ranging from 60.00% to 99.99%) produced by the Company in year 2012 to be refined and traded overseas.
 
 2. Phuoc Son Gold Company Limited is only permitted to export the type of gold specified in Article 1 of this letter and is requested to conform to regulations on gold export and import as well as relevant stipulations.
  3. This approval shall take effect until the end of 31 December 2012.
   Distribution:

- As above

- Le Minh Hung, the DeputyDirector (to report)

- General Department ofCustoms

- The State Bank of Vietnam -Danang

- File
For the Director of the State Bank

For Director of Foreign Exchange ControlDepartment



(signed and sealed)

Dao Xuan Tuan
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6407
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ENRIQUE ACOSTA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-317, CA-96-1862-6) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall Scott Hiller, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant.David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Acosta , Nos. CR-92-317; CA-96-1862-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

----

|   | a. | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | c. | presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | a. | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July 24, 2009 | By:    | /s/ John Kenney Berscht                                                            |   |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Name: John Kenney Berscht                                                          |   |
|                |   | Title: President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director |   |
|                |   |                                                                                    |   |

----
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 144 V

UNPUBLISHED

CYNTHIA THOMAS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: April 3, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder

Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On January 29, 2019, Cynthia Thomas filed a petition for compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq., (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to

Vaccine Adm inistration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her November 1, 2017 influneza (“flu”)

vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the

Office of Special Masters.

On April 3, 2020

, a ruling on entitlement was issued , finding P etitioner entitled to

compensation for SIRVA . On April 1, 2020

, R espondent filed a Rule 4(c) R eport

Recommending Compensation and Proffer of Compensation (“Proffer”) indicating

P etitioner should be awarded $60,187.79

. Of this total amount, $60,000.0 0 represents

an award for past pain and suffering, and $187.79 represents an award for past

unreimbursed expen ses. Proffer at 4

. In the Proffer, R espondent represented that

P etitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access

to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure o f which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.2 Based on the record as a whole, I find that P etitioner is entitled to an award as

stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, I award P etitioner a lump sum

payment of $ 60,187.79 ( representing $60,000.00 awarde d for past pain and

suffering, and $187.79 award ed for past unreimburs ed expenses ) in the form of a

check payable to P etitioner

. This amount represents compensation for all damages

that w ould be available under § 15 (a)

.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-3072 

WILLIAM D. DELOACH, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 

Respondent. 

Robert E. Bergman, Law Office of Robert E. Bergman, of Warner Robins, 

Georgia, argued for petitioner. 

John J. Todor, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on 

the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, 

Director, and Kirk T. Manhardt, Assistant Director. 

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-3072 

WILLIAM D. DELOACH, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 

 Respondent. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

in CASE NO(S). AT0752070675-B-1 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (SCHALL, PLAGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges.) 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED August 11, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1342 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1560 Union Valley Road in West Milford, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Brian 

P. Parrello Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. LOBIONDO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1560 Union Valley Road in West Milford, 

New Jersey, as the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIAN P. PARRELLO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1560 Union Valley Road in West 

6 Milford, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 1342 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12409]




[[Page 27203]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





Department of Justice





_______________________________________________________________________



Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention



Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 
Meeting; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices 
 
[[Page 27204]] 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention


Meeting of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention

May 11, 1995.
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A meeting of the Coordinating Council on 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention will take place in the 
District of Columbia, beginning at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 21, 
1995, and ending at 4:00 p.m. on June 21, 1995. This advisory 
committee, chartered as the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice 
and Delinquency Prevention, will meet at the United States Department 
of Justice, located at 10th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Conference 
Room 5111, Washington, D.C. 20530. The Coordinating Council, 
established pursuant to section 3(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), will meet to carry out its advisory 
functions under section 206 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 
Prevention Act of 1974, as amended. This meeting will be open to the 
public. The public is advised that it must enter the building via the 
Constitution Avenue Visitors' Center. For security reasons, members of 
the public who are attending the meeting must contact the Office of 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) by close of 
business June 14, 1995. The point of contact at OJJDP is Lutricia Key 
who can be reached at (202) 307-5911. The public is further advised 
that a pictured identification is required to enter the building.
Shay Bilchik,
Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
[FR Doc. 95-12409 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P