alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Brian
Altounian, certify that:





1.       I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Platinum Studios, Inc. for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007;





2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.       Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.       The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)      designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)      evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's  disclosure controls
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)      disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and





5.        The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);





(a)      all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b)      any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





March 31,
2008







/s/ Brian
Altounian




Brian
Altounian


President,
Chief Operating Officer


&
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anastasia Nyrkovskaya, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of XpresSpa Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Dated: April 30, 2018



| | /s/ Anastasia Nyrkovskaya                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Anastasia Nyrkovskaya                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer                                       
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

Robert Holland, ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM

)

Plaintiff, ) Honorable Rudy Lozano

) Magistrate Judge John E. Martin

vs. )

)

Cerberus Capital Management LP, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

FOR CHRYSLER FINANCIAL LLC AND

KIMBERLY JOHNSON, ONLY

Now comes the undersigned attorney to make her entry of appearance on behalf of

Chrysler Financial LLC, n/k/a TD Auto Finance, LLC (“TDAF”) and Kimberly Johnson

(“Johnson”) only. The motion to practice pro hac vice erroneously listed Paul Davis as being

represented by the undersigned but she does not.

Pleadings, motions and documents should be served on the undersigned attorney as

counsel for Defendants TDAF and Johnson.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Rosemary Taft-Milby

Rosemary Taft-Milby

Attorney for Defendants TDAF and Johnson

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.

323 West Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200

Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone: (216) 685-1103

Fax: (216) 685-4345

E-mail: rtaftmilby@weltman.com

Dated: July 30, 2014

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 73 filed 07/30/14 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically filed with the Clerk

of Court on July 30, 2014 and served upon the following counsel of record and/or pro se parties

via United States Mail, postage prepaid:

Robert Holland

1120 Baker St.

Gary, Indiana 46404

/s/Rosemary Taft-Milby

Rosemary Taft-Milby

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA

323 W. Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200

Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone: (216) 685-1103

Fax: (216) 685-4345

E-mail: rtaftmilby@weltman.com

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 73 filed 07/30/14 page 2 of 2
Kenneth Tyler SCOTT, et al., petitioners, v. SAINT JOHN'S CHURCH IN the WILDERNESS, et al.

No. 12-1077.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13099]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2775 Amendment #1]

Louisiana; Declaration of Disaster Loan Area
    The above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended, effective May 17, 
1995, to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
on May 8, 1995 and continuing through May 16, 1995.
    All other information remains the same i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is July 10, 1995, and for 
loans for economic injury the deadline is February 12, 1996.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: May 22, 1995.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-13099 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Cool Food Properly to Prevent Illnesses and Save Your Job

Protect People Everywhere. eople Everywhere.Cool Food Properly.
In re Carl Marion WELLS, petitioner.

No. 12-9728.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000710983
<NAME> QMS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                             554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    25186
<ALLOWANCES>                                       401
<INVENTORY>                                      35516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 70974
<PP&E>                                           61834
<DEPRECIATION>                                   39456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  104570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            56036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                       43751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    104570
<SALES>                                          37345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 37345
<CGS>                                            24928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   609
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 574 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    619
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1099** 

RONALD LUBER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND; LAURA A. NEWMAN, County Executive, In Her Official Capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00001

- JKB )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ronald Luber, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Luber appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S .C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the court’s memorandum and the record and affirm for the reasons stated by
the court. See Luber v. Anne Arundel Cnty., Md. , No. 1:14

- cv 00001

- JKB (D. Md. entered Jan. 13, 2014, filed Jan. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12794]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; Visual Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Visual Arts Advisory Panel (Overview Section) to the National 
Council on the Arts will be held on June 28-29, 1995, from 9:00 a.m. to 
6:00 p.m. This meeting will be held in Room 714, at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20506.
    This meeting will be open to the public on a space available basis.
    Any interested person may observe meetings or portions thereof, 
which are open to the public, and may be permitted to participate in 
the discussions at the discretion of the meeting chairman and with the 
approval of the full-time Federal employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability please 
contact the Office of Special Constituents, National Endowment for the 
Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-
5532, TYY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne M. Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: May 19, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-12794 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32324]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 94-97-NG]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Order Granting Blanket 
Authorization To Export and Import Natural Gas To and From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Northern Natural Gas 
Company (Northern) authorization to export to Canada up to 16 Bcf of 
natural gas and to import back into the U.S. up to 16 Bcf of natural 
gas, over a two-year term, beginning on the date of first export or 
import.
    Northern's order is available for inspection and copying in the 
Office of Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., December 15, 1994.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 94-32324 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         155,967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,944,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,051,345
<INVENTORY>                                 18,687,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,614,399
<PP&E>                                       7,709,242
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,903,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,858,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,182,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,706
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,941,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,858,460
<SALES>                                    100,511,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           100,765,818
<CGS>                                       78,378,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               78,378,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,604,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               426,207
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,482,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,874,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                   226,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,647,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,647,596
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

JOSHUA B. SMITH, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CAUSE NO. 3:14-CV-1802 RM 

vs. )

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Joshua B. Smith, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding. (DE 1.) On October 29, 2013, Mr. Smith was

found guilty of Class A offense 102, assault and battery, in cause number WCC 13-13-0246.

(DE 7-2.) The hearing officer imposed sanctions including one year of disciplinary

segregation, loss of 365 days of earned credit time, a demotion from credit class 1 to credit

class 3, a 42 day loss of telephone privileges and restitution of $200 or less for “part of cost

of medical bills.” (DE 1, p. 4.)

Mr. Smith has filed this habeas petition concerning only the restitution sanction. 

(DE 1, p. 2.) While the sanction imposed on the disciplinary hearing report indicated Mr.

Smith would be responsible for restitution of $200 or less, (DE 1, p. 4), his portion of the

medical bills has now been calculated at $5,729.96. (DE 1, p. 5.) Mr. Smith has filed this

habeas petition seeking the court to reduce his restitution from $5,729.96 to the amount

indicated on the disciplinary report; $200 or less. (DE 10.) Because the restitution order

imposed by the hearing officer didn’t lengthen the duration of Mr. Smith’s confinement,
he can’t challenge it in a habeas proceeding. Washington v. Smith, 564 F.3d 1350, 1351 (7th

Cir. 2009); Moran v. Sondalle, 218 F.3d 647, 650 (7th Cir. 2000); See also Hah Qawi v.

Martin, No. 3:07-CV-0057, 2007 WL 1119298, at *1 (N.D. Ind. April 12, 2007)(recognizing

that restitution is not actionable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254).

For the foregoing reasons, the court DISMISSES this habeas corpus petition.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 2, 2015. /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

2
EX-35.1
(logo) EMC
Mortgage Corporation

ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

The undersigned officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") as servicer
pursuant to the Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2007-AR6 (the
"Agreement") hereby certify that:

1. A review of EMC's activities during the period from and including January 1,
2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and EMC's
performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
12th day of March 2008.


By: /s/ David B. Little
David B. Little
Executive Vice President
Default Administration

/s/ Jenna Kemp
Jenna Kemp
Executive Vice President
Investor Administration

/s/ William Glasgow Jr.
William Glasgow Jr.
Executive Vice President
Enterprise Operations Services

(logo) MBA
Member
Mortgage Bankers
Association of America

2780 Lake Vista Drive, Lewisville, Texas 75067
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1292190, Lewisville, Texas 75029-2190
|                                   | 2003  | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
|----------------------------------------|-------|------|------|------|------|
| Assessment Base in Trillions (Average) | $5.10 | 5.4  | 5.9  | 6.4  | 6.8  |
**[FIS Tax Services Logo]********FIS Tax Services 3100 New York Drive, Suite 100****Pasadena, CA 91107****tel 626 345 2010  866-****457.4112  fax 626.398.5205****Management Compliance Statement**Management of FIS Tax Services (FIS) and formerly known as LSI Tax Services, is responsible for assessing compliance with applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to residential mortgage loans (the Platform), except for General Servicing Consideration criteria (i) - (iv), Cash Collections and Administration (i) - (vii),  Investor Remittances and Reporting (i) - (iv), and Pool Asset Administration (i) - (x), (xiv), and (xv), which FIS has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. FIS' management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. FIS has determined the following servicing criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of Item 1122 are applicable to the activities it performed with respect to the Platform: (xi)Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements. (xii)Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or omission. (xiii)Disbursements made on behalf of an obligor are posted within two business days to the obligor's records maintained by the servicer, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements. Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, FIS has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform. KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007. To the best of my knowledge and belief, based on such assessment, FIS has fulfilled all of its applicable obligations throughout the reporting period. /s/ Darryl A. De Bond****Darryl A. De Bond Executive Vice President January 05, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Quevedo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx *134County (John Collins, J.), rendered on May 22, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviéwed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Fein, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.