alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00042-TLS-SLC

)

AUTUMN J. CARTER, also known as )

Autumn Carter, )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on July 13, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 3 of the five-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 13th day of July 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-7-TLS 

)

JARED E. HOCHSTEDLER )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 14], filed on February 26, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 14] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in the Information is hereby accepted, and the

Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on March 16, 2015.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Ronald G. BROCK, petitioner, v. P.D. BRAZELTON, Acting Warden.

No. 12-10852.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxtor
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul J. Tufano, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Section 906), that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                                
|
| | (2)     The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



| |                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ PAUL J. TUFANO                               
| |                                                  
| | Paul J. Tufano                                   
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and
    Acting
| | Chief Financial Officer                          

Date: August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
William James CLARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6700.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010 on Form 10-K (the Annual Report) of HUGHES Telematics, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey A. Leddy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/    JEFFREY A.
LEDDYName:

Jeffrey A. LeddyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:

March 16, 2011
Vincent Sharnee JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-5032.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of YDI
Wireless, Inc., certify that:

      1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of YDI Wireless,
Inc.;

      2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: August 14, 2003                              /s/ Patrick L. Milton
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Patrick L. Milton
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00001-TLS-SLC

)

EDUARDO MARTINEZ )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan

Collins, on February 1, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 2, 4, and 8 of the eight-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 1st day of February 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,819)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,226
<PP&E>                                         194,972
<DEPRECIATION>                               (120,358)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 374,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,010
<BONDS>                                             70
<COMMON>                                           290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   374,490
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,582
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony K. Welch, the Chief Executive Officer of Modern Technology Corp.(the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that theCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 13, 2005                   ***/s/ Anthony K. Welch                   ***

                                                           Anthony K. Welch, CEO

----

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Church, the Chief Financial Officer of Modern Technology Corp. (the"Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Company'sQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 13, 2005                     ***/s/ Robert Church                       ***

                                                           Robert Church, CFO
HOME BUYERS WARRANTY CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. Alon FRUMER, et ux.

No. 12-990.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion of National Risk Retention Association for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
Phillip PITNEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 13-6413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ellen Cohl, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vringo, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: March 31, 2011
• 

• 

Financial Institution Letter 

FDIC’s Rapid Phased Prototyping Initiative 

M a r c h 2 6 , 2 0 2 1 | F I L- 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 

Summary: 

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is providing information and clarification for

FDIC-supervised financial institutions on the FDIC’s Rapid Phased Prototyping (RPP) initiative. 

The RPP initiative is a competition designed to accelerate the adoption of modern technological 

solutions to help the FDIC fulfill its mission. In particular, the solutions explore new ways to 

receive, manage, and analyze data from individual institutions, particularly community banks, 

without increasing compliance burdens. The lessons learned from this competition, and future

FDIC tech sprints, will promote the safe and sound adoption of these technologies, helping banks 

and supporting consumers in the process. More information on the RPP initiative and a full list 

of current competitors and solutions can be found on the FDiTech website. 

Statement of Applicability: This Financial Institution Letter (FIL) applies to all FDICsupervised financial institutions. 

Highlights: 

RPP competitors were selected through an FDIC-approved and -controlled competitive 

procurement process. The agreements are between the FDIC and the RPP competitors and do 

not extend to any financial institution. 

Some FDIC-supervised financial institutions have inquired about the FDIC’s expectations for 

them to partner with RPP contestants. RPP competi tors will independently determine 

whether they will seek to collabora te with FDIC-supervised financial institutions to receive 

feedback and input on proposed prototype designs. Financial institutions are not obligated to 

collabora te with any RPP competi tors. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• 

• 

• 

• 

If financial institutions collabora te with any RPP competitor, they will be responsible for 

complying with the appropriate consumer protection laws, privacy laws, and other legal 

requirem ents. 

Any information collected by competitors in connection with the current RPP is not collected 

on behalf of or for the FDIC. 

During the course of any demonstra tions or negotiations of prototype capabilities, the FDIC 

will work with the RPP competi tors to ensure compliance with applicable consumer protection 

laws, privacy laws, and other legal requirements. 

The solutions or reporting systems produced by the RPP initiative are voluntary and banks will 

not be required to adopt them. 

Distribution: 

FDIC-Supervised Institutions 

Suggested Routing: 

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Information/Technology Officer

General Counsel 

Chief Compliance Officer

Related Topics: 

Press Releases: 

FDIC Launches Competition to Modernize Bank Financial Reporting 

June 30, 2020

FDIC Selects 14 Companies in Tech Sprint to Modernize Bank Financial Reporting. 

October 15, 2020

FDIC Selects 11 Companies to Compete in Final Phase of Tech Sprint 

January 11, 2021

Press Releases: 

FDIC Chief on Why Call Reports are Getting a Makeover by Jelena Mc Williams (American Banker) 

July 1, 2020