alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Cause No. 2:15-cr-68 

 ) 

BERNARD HAMILTON, SR., ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY 

TO: THE HONORABLE RUDY LOZANO 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 Upon defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11, this matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Andrew P. Rodovich, United 

States Magistrate Judge, on September 23, 2015, with the written consents of the defendant, 

counsel for the defendant, and counsel for the United States of America. 

 The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, before the 

Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record. 

 In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on 

the record, and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of Assistant United States Attorney 

Nicholas J. Padilla, and of Attorney Patrick W. Young, counsel for the defendant, 

 I FIND as follows: 

1. that the defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the 

plea is offered; 
2 

2. that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not 

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse 

witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination; 

3. that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including 

the effect of the supervised release term, and the defendant understands that the 

Probation Department will prepare a pre-sentence report based upon the 

sentencing guidelines but that the court may depart from those guidelines under 

some circumstances; 

4. that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made 

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises; 

5. that the defendant is competent to plead guilty; 

6. that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a 

prosecution for perjury or false statement; 

7. that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further, 

 I RECOMMEND that the court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A presentence report has been 

ordered. 

 ENTERED this 23rd day of September, 2015. 

 /s/ Andrew P. Rodovich 

 United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 2:15-CR-25

)

MONIQUE COLES, ) 

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Upon a Plea of Guilty by

Defendant Monique Coles (DE #50) filed on January 14, 2016. No

objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge Cherry’s findings

and recommendations upon a plea of guilty. Accordingly, the Court

now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS the guilty

plea of Defendant Monique Coles, and FINDS the Defendant guilty of

Count 1 of the Indictment. 

This matter shall be set for sentencing via separate order.

DATED: February 2, 2016 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1656 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1656

   To correct maps depicting Unit T-10 of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
                       Barrier Resources System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2005

  Mr. Ortiz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To correct maps depicting Unit T-10 of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
                       Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAPS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall, before the 
end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, make such corrections to the map described in subsection (b) as 
are necessary to ensure that depictions of areas on that map are 
consistent with the depictions of areas appearing on the map entitled 
``Corrections to Coastal Barrier Resources System Map-Unit T-10'', 
dated June __, 2004, and on file with the Secretary and the Committee 
on Resources of the United States House of Representatives.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that--
            (1) is included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System'', dated October 24, 1990; and
            (2) is subtitled ``Four Mile Hill Unit TX-16P, North Padre 
        Island Unit T10/T10P''.
    (c) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the map 
described in subsection (b) on file and available for public inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Oce of Minority Health

and Health Equity

㕭ऍଂ

է ͅ

ۓՕљପଋ௓ௐ澝଍Ԉ۪ܷͫࣁԛ

ऐ߆ԇݕ҈ৱङސה҅ऀ办َপ۪

ࡊٯ࠳ܴ֨੦ধґر࣒ͫধㆲओ哦

ङধㆲओ澞ۓӲݏ৲ђͫاٴ

ষ֡டռո哦ࢢॡݤشفࣂ

؛ԃҷ޴ٴڈոҠڈ娐Ҡݶ

г੕יޟґ㔴

www.fda.gov/healthequity

healthequity@fda.hhs.gov

1-888-INFO-FDA

(1-888-463-6332)

@FDAHealthEquity

僣⡒樴☖◡哄䎾䳶䕛ⶕ灨␆⩯

⊘12┗ὣᾉ⿟崪毡ѳ

⫗㣱ㇽ峹ᾏᾉ⿟崪毡╄剒慗╝

ㇽϪ嵌ὣㇽ䟙Ⅎ↺9.䙴峽崏ѳ

ㇽᾴ╄›⡽

www.clinicaltrials.gov㕱乷ㇽ

μl⡽⢅8.䟙ᾉ⿟崪毡ѳ

㕨ޥ燧ֹॶᇱࣩࣣъ
ьСފ燧ֹॶᇱࣣ ͅ

⣠丫ⶔ䜚㞄ὕ䬢エㇽ䟙怀

Rsὢ剒ポ⫒⢅⎋慵19点⃔

䙽剅ⷰ乵㝋┦䙴䟙䜓

䜚ѳ剅ⷰ乵㞄ὕ䬢

䚆剅勏⎋慵䟙䄕

乵Ϫ自⏾営啙丫

丫ϧ‣ㇽ╘䟙樴

䎾ᾂ愰⊺⎅ㇽ䟙

倛刳Ϫ›⎋慵剒挤ѳ

㷶㡞剅ⷰ乵Ϫ営啙丫

ⶆ⁯↱䚮⡽ㇽ䟙妕㼇ᾂ

氭妕丫ϧϪ㜵㸪⎅愓ㇽ䟙倛

刳ѳ柤䢕㝋杉䟙㓽䭐Ϫὢ┬㓼⎋䟙丫ⶔ䜚╄剒ⵑ

卉⋋‫ὺ挢䟙↺「权槭Ϫ⫗ㄘ剤䜚Ѳ刓剤䜓䜚◡

嬛⏰ὼ⪆ѳ

燧ֹॶᇱױފࣣѽࣩ࣠࠿ ͅ

丫ⶔ䜚㸐䛬䟙䡃㥜㞄ⵛㇽ䟙妕丫Ⅎ㑖⡽㲸虫㶉黃ѳ

ㇽ䟙9.䛬㡢⏶㔥⃰党ⵛ䧃⳯ㇽ䟙妕丫䡃㥜Ϫᾴⶆ㞄

ㇽ⿩ⶒ╄剒値虫Ⅎ㑖䟙员⡉Ϫ›┟⃔䙽妕丫‿19点愳

偂妕丫䠦㺠‿&*0㨕㤺妕丫䟙槦䓜ѳ

妕丫‿桕嫖ㇽⵛὕ䁉妕Ϫ

慯虫㞄‣ㇽ䟙㑜⵫䁉⊺ὕ㱶

ᄯ崪倍Ὗ䟙妕丫‿›唌レ

嵐㛅ѳ&*0⃔䙽ὕ὿営

啙丫5사➽㔧⡽ㇽ䟙䠃

凹ὠ㴤柩⌵⍛旴㺠挤

ὕ㱶丫⍛㶉黃ѳ

ὕ῰⣠丫ⶔ䜚ㇸ党╄›

慯愜慞㐾↺「䟙樴䎾◡㡉

⩯䟙愥⏽㢺㓼⎋‫⁁䟙䜓䜚ѳ

㐾↺「䟙樴䎾ѳ㓼⎋妕丫䟙⋈暃㞄⡽慗エ䟙㝋杉

╘慗エ㛅挤䟙↺「樴☖ѳὣ啺⋐犬19点丫ⶔ䜚㚮切

彡₱党╝₱Ϫ⎋⳯ὕ὿↺「䟙櫃樴島⍧ѳ

⩯┗⏵愥⏽暐䈑ѳ㺐⏽㡞⏾ΰㇽ䟙怀Rs㡞㚝⍾䙽

剅ⷰ乵Ϫ㡉⫒⢅㓼⎋ㇽ䟙妕丫㶉黃ѳⳘ愭剒枢₣

ㇽㇸㄘ剤䜚◡䪳値㒴9䟙樣枾ѳ

•

•

ٴࠫ(燦 'ݮ੭

㲸虫 ₣ΰ

丫ⶔ䜚⎢㡴 ⎅

丫ⶔ䜚 19点›Ὗ

㕭ࣩॶԖਵঀ堢ࣧ'燦)ࠫٴ

丫12妕俷堠䟒$&㺠崪㺠挤ㇽ愜┐὿㡝

䟙黃⢜妕丫㶉黃ѳⵎΰ⩼⩯㛅丫ⶔ䜚ㇸ党㢺

嵉Ϫ㺠崪倨㣱⡽19点›ὠ㞄㡕䕛㉈䟙ѳ惘

氭䟙丫12妕俷堠䟒$&㶉黃⃔ㇽ梷ᾉ丫ⶔ

䜚黹┦䜜䟙樣枾ѳ

ㇽ㴤黍午ⵦ嫖↯ό㱶$&㶉黃䟙㨕㺠⫗㣱

ㇽ䟙哄䎾㡞μl┭㡉19点㡞⋋‫↺「䐋⌊Ϫ╄›

㡉槦侖⢅㨕㺠ѳ

崍⩯⣠丫ⶔ䜚ㇸ党╄剒桕嫖㡢䙽丫ⶔ䜚哄䎾ѳ愮

῰哄䎾╄剒⑚㑁哄䎜Ѳ剅ⷰ乵19点⋋‫㸽ⵙ哄䎾ѳ

⫗㣱㚎┭䙴㺐㜎つὢ弈›㓼⎋ㇽ䟙Rs挢Ϫ⌤出cm2㢄

㞄ὕ䬢慞㐾Ϫ╄›自⏾ㇽ⌤出◡㓼⎋妕丫㶉黃ѳ

㓼⎋ㇽ䟙妕丫

↺「櫃樴

䭄㣖愥⏽↺怀

㓼⎋ㇽ䟙妕q

ὢ▍䈴

•

•

•

•

•

ॶᇱࣣո副৙Ҡڈ

ㇸ㡞丫ⶔ䜚⁯⧳⏵ㇽㇸ刓剤䜓䜚䟙樣枾ѳ慯

愜›ὠ㜎つℲ㑖ㇽ䟙刓剤↺「ѳ
#### Kassa Woldemariam LEMMA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-60448.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

DECIDED: April 27, 2004.

Elaine Veatch Morley, Morley & Morley, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Brenda M O’Malley, US Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Hipólito Acosta, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, Houston, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

John Ashcroft, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before: BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kassa Woldemariam Lemma challenges the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from *210the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his petition for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

The BIA’s finding that Lemma failed to establish eligibility for asylum is supported by the requisite substantial evidence. *See Mikhael v. INS,*115 F.3d 299, 304 (5th Cir.1997); *Faddoul v. INS,*37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir.1994). And, because Lemma is not eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. *See Faddoul,*37 F.3d at 188. Moreover, Lemma failed to exhaust his claim for relief under the CAT, therefore this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. *See Wang v. Ashcroft,*260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir.2001).

Lemma’s claim that the IJ erred in excluding evidence under 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.33 and 287.6 (certification of foreign documents and translations) fails because he has not demonstrated substantial prejudice as a result of the exclusion. *See Molina v. Sewell,*983 F.2d 676, 678 (5th Cir.1993). His claim that his due process rights were violated by such exclusion under 8 C.F.R. § 287.6(b) fails for the same reason. *See Anwar v. INS,*116 F.3d 140, 144 (5th Cir.1997).

*DENIED*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Kahzam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,J. Franklin Bradley, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial position and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
October 28, 2009
 /s/J.
      Franklin BradleyJ.
      Franklin BradleyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report
of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bruce J. Wendel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                         |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ BRUCE J. WENDEL                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | Bruce J. Wendel Chief
Executive Officer |  | 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12356]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a service to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 19, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 17, 1995, the Committee for 
Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published 
notice (60 F.R. 14427) of proposed addition to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the service, fair 
market price, and impact of the addition on the current or most recent 
contractors, the Committee has determined that the service listed below 
is suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 
46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the service.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the service to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following service is hereby added to the 
Procurement List: Recycling Service, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 
Crane, Indiana.

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-12356 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
Luanie LAMBEY, petitioner, v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, CLARK COUNTY, et al.

No. 13-428.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
Laura A. JENNINGS, petitioner, v. Chuck HAGEL, Secretary of Defense.

No. 12-9067.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### TUTTLE v. FIELD et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1913.)

Action by 0. Percy Tuttle, as trustee, against Leonard J. Field and others. W. R. Page, of New York City, for appellant. A. Benedict, of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

ALBERT ARILLOTTA, ) No. 2:15-cv-239

GLOBAL DEMOLITION AND )

RECYCLING, LLC, )

NMC METALS CORPORATION, and )

ARILLOTTA ENTERPRISES, LLC., )

)

Defendants. )

ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Plaintiff ArcelorMittal USA LLC (“ArcelorMittal”), by and through its attorneys 

Swanson, Martin & Bell, LLP, pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

respectfully moves the Court to entry a default judgment in favor of ArcelorMittal and against 

the Defendants, that the Court permanently enjoin the Defendants, their officers, agents, and 

employees from (1) forging contracts with ArcelorMittal; (2) presenting forged contracts to 

factoring companies like Versant Funding or any other company; (3) misrepresenting an 

association or affiliation with ArcelorMittal; (4) misusing ArcelorMittal’s registered trademarks; 

and (5) continuing to contact ArcelorMittal employees, and that the Court enter an award of 

damages in favor of ArcelorMittal USA LLC and against the defendants in the amount of 

$46,004.62, and that the Court enter such further relief as is just, proper, and necessary, 

including the costs of filing this action. ArcelorMittal incorporates its contemporaneously filed 

memorandum of law in support of this motion. 

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00239-PPS-JEM document 14 filed 09/22/15 page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ArcelorMittal USA LLC respectfully requests that this Court 

grant its Motion for Default Judgment against the Defendants; enjoin the Defendants conduct; 

enter an award of damages of $46,004.62 in ArcelorMittal’s favor; and enter such further relief 

as is just, proper, and necessary.

Respectfully submitted,

ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC

By: /s/ T. Allon Renfro ________________

One of its Attorneys

Matthew S. Ver Steeg

T. Allon Renfro

SWANSON, MARTIN & BELL, LLP

330 N. Wabash, Suite 3300

Chicago, IL 60611

(312) 321-9100 – phone

(312) 321-0990 – fax

mversteeg@smbtrials.com

trenfro@smbtrials.com

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00239-PPS-JEM document 14 filed 09/22/15 page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on September 22, 2015, a copy of the foregoing Motion was filed 

electronically. I hereby certify that on September 22, 2015, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Motion for Default Judgment was served by U.S. first class mail, postage prepaid, 

upon the following:

Albert Arillotta

171 Phillips Avenue

Swampscott, MA 01907

Global Demolition and Recycling LLC

c/o Albert Arillotta

171 Phillips Avenue

Swampscott, MA 01907

NMC Metals Corporation

c/o Albert Arillotta

171 Phillips Avenue

Swampscott, MA 01907

Arillotta Enterprises L.L.C.

c/o Albert Arillotta

171 Phillips Avenue

Swampscott, MA 01907

By: /s/ T. Allon Renfro

T. Allon Renfro 

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00239-PPS-JEM document 14 filed 09/22/15 page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**I, Jeffrey F. O’Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 23.4








Consent of Independent Auditors








The Board of Directors


Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.:





We consent to the use of our report dated March 31, 2014, with respect to the statements of financial condition of Kennedy Wilson Real Estate Fund IV, L.P., including the schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the related statements of operations,  partners’ capital and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements, incorporated by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-174742, No. 333-175002, No. 333-175559, No. 333-184752, and No. 333-192059) on Form S-3, the registration statement (No. 333-164928) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-164926) on Form S-1/A and the registration statement (No. 333-186690) on Form S-4 of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent auditors, which report appears in amendment no. 1 to the December 31, 2013 annual report on Form 10-K of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.








/s/ KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California


March 31, 2014
Brian David PILCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
#### Robert CASAD, Jr., Ph.D, Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellees.

No. 03-5183.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 26, 2004.

Robert Casad, Jr., Ann Arbor, MI, pro se.

Sherri Evans Harris, R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Roscoe Conklin Howard, Jr., U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EDWARDS, SENTELLE, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed June 20, 2003, be affirmed. The notice of appeal addressed only the portion of the district court’s order which granted summary judgment on count I of the complaint. *See Schrecker v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*349 F.3d 657, 661 (D.C.Cir.2003) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment in FOIA case). Because the summary statements sought by appellant are predecisional and deliberative, they were properly withheld pursuant to Freedom of Information Act *725(“FOIA”) exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege). *See Jordan v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*591 F.2d 753, 774 (D.C.Cir.1978) (en banc); *see also Casad v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Services,*301 F.3d 1247 (10th Cir.2002).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.