alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, Elkan R. Gamzu, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmos Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ ELKAN R. GAMZU Elkan R. Gamzu Chief Executive Officer Date: May 10, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Haim Aviv, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmos Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; 4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions): (a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and (b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Dated: May 12, 2006



/s/ Haim AvivHaim AvivChief Executive Officer  28
Jodie A. PENNINGTON, petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al.

No. 13-503.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

*798Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-43

)

ASHLEY M. TAYLOR )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on December 2, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America. The Defendant waived in open Court prosecution by

indictment and consented that the proceedings may be by information rather than by indictment.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant’s waiver of indictment is knowing and voluntary;
(3) that the defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and

her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(4) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the sentencing guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(5) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(6) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(7) that the defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(8) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept both the defendant’s waiver of indictment and plea

of guilty and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the Information and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 2nd day of December 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

2
United States Magistrate Judge

3
HIE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 13-540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

* *

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-11574

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
#### In re HODGE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Second Department.

January 31, 1899.)

In the matter of the application of Thomas R. Hodge for a mandamus to the board of county canvassers of Westchester county, etc.

No opinion. Order reversed on argument, and proceedings remitted to the justice sitting at special term in Westchester county for a rehearing, with costs to abide the final award of costs.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, David
W. Kalish, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 of
One Liberty Properties, Inc. (“the Registrant”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      May 7, 2010
                /s/ David W.
KalishDavid
      W. KalishSenior
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer
Cora M. HILL, petitioner, v. James C. HAWKS, Judge, Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, et al.

No. 13-5207.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1251]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5141-3]


Proposed Settlement; Acid Rain Core Rules Litigation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act 
(``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed third partial 
settlement of Environmental Defense Fund v. Carol M. Browner, et al., 
No. 93-1203 (and consolidated cases) (D.C. Cir.).
    The case involves challenges by several parties to the acid rain 
core rules published in the Federal Register on January 11, 1993, at 58 
FR 3590 (January 11, 1993). The proposed settlement relates primarily 
to the issue of how ownership of a jointly owned unit is apportioned 
with respect to defining a dispatch system and to clarification of the 
definition of a ``sulfur-free generation.''
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to 
the settlement from persons who were not named as parties to the 
litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withhold 
or withdraw consent to the proposed settlement if the comments disclose 
facts or circumstances that indicate that such consent is 
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the 
requirements of the Act. Copies of the settlement are available from 
Phyllis Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent 
to Patricia A. Embrey at the above address and must be submitted on or 
before February 21, 1995.

    January 12, 1995.
Jean C. Nelson,
General Counsel
[FR Doc. 95-1251 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-068 JD

)

DAVID M. LANDRUM )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on June 17, 2013 [DE 10]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant David M. Landrum’s plea of guilty, and

FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Information, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 9, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BRENDA WOODS, Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 3098

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT

- 0353

- 12

- 0684 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Brenda Woods moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court notes that this case was dismissed on May 13, 2014 for failure to pay the fee and for failure to submit the Federal Circuit Rule 15(c) statement. The Rule 15(c) statement was filed on May 22, 2014 . We treat Woods’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as a motion to reinstate the petition

. Case: 14-3098 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/2014WOODS v. USPS 2

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1 ) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The mandate is r ecalled, the court’s dismissal order is vacated, and the petition is reinstated.

(3) The United States Postal Service’s informal brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-3098 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 06/05/2014
EX-35.11
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc.
245 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10167

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has
been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2008
/s/ William Augustin
WILLIAM AUGUSTIN
Vice President


(page)



(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A
List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust, Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-9, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
Servicer
John NIEMIEC, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 12-8950.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998 AS FILED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         116,754
<SECURITIES>                                    42,969
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,641
<INVENTORY>                                    236,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               556,874
<PP&E>                                         311,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 756,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,828
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       402,856
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   756,794
<SALES>                                        116,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,385
<CGS>                                           78,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,540)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
<FN>
<F1> EPS Primary is used for EPS Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 27, 2009



/s/ David E. SnyderDavid E. Snyder Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 

AT KNOXVILLE 

BROADBENT WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, INC., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) No.: 3:14-CV-109-TAV-HBG 

 ) 

BUDDY GREGG MOTOR HOMES, LLC, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

ORDER

This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the 

“R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on June 29, 2015 

[Doc. 57]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends that the Court enter an 

order granting in part and denying in part Newmar Corporation’s Motion to Stay, 

Transfer or Consolidate [Doc. 41] and transferring this action to the Northern District of 

Indiana, South Bend Division, to allow it to be consolidated with Broadbent Wildlife 

Sanctuary, Inc. v. Newmar Corporation, et al., No. 3:14-cv-542, as that court deems 

appropriate. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has 

passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate 

Judge Guyton’s recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its 

ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 57]. Therefore, 
2 

the Motion to Stay, Transfer or Consolidate [Doc. 41] is GRANTED in part and 

DENIED in part, and the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the 

Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, to allow it to be consolidated with 

Broadbent Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc. v. Newmar Corporation, et al., No. 3:14-cv-542, as 

that court deems appropriate. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Thomas A. Varlan 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE