Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices 27499

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

general information on the DARHT

project, interested parties may contact

Ms. Webb at the address and phone

number above. For general information

on the DOE NEPA process, please

contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom,

Director, Office of NEPA Policy and

Assistance, EH–42, Department of

Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW,

Washington, DC 20585. Ms. Borgstrom

may be contacted by leaving a message

at (800) 472–2756 or by calling (202)

586–4600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft

EIS was prepared pursuant to the

National Environmental Policy Act of

1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the

Council on Environmental Quality

NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1500) and the

DOE NEPA regulations [10 CFR 1021].

The Department proposes to provide

enhanced high-resolution radiography

(x-ray) capability for the purpose of

performing hydrodynamic tests and

dynamic experiments in support of its

national defense mission. The enhanced

radiography facility would be a key

component of the Department’s nearterm science-based stockpile

stewardship and management program.

These hydrodynamic tests and dynamic

experiments are required to assist DOE

in ensuring the continued safety,

security, and reliability of existing

nuclear weapons as they age.

The Draft DARHT EIS analyzes the

environmental consequences of

alternative ways to accomplish the

proposed action. The DOE’s preferred

alternative would be to complete and

operate the DARHT facility at LANL in

northern New Mexico. Radiographic

hydrodynamic testing is now conducted

in two existing facilities within the DOE

complex—a 30-year-old facility at

LANL, and a 10-year-old facility at the

DOE’s Lawrence Livermore National

Laboratory in California. The Draft

DARHT EIS compares the

environmental impacts that would be

expected to occur from continuing to

operate existing facilities (the No Action

Alternative) with the consequences that

would be expected to occur if DOE

implemented the Preferred Alternative

or one of four other operational

alternatives. The Draft EIS has a

classified supplement that provides

additional information and analysis.

DOE has distributed copies of the Draft

DARHT EIS to appropriate

Congressional members and

committees, the State of New Mexico,

American Indian tribal governments,

local county governments, other federal

agencies, and other interested parties.

DOE expects to complete the Final EIS

in August 1995, and reach a Record of

Decision in September 1995.

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 17th day

of May, 1995, for the United States

Department of Energy.

Victor H. Reis,

Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–12626 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER93–523–003, et al.]

Western Resources, Inc. et al.; Electric

Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

May 17, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Western Resources, Inc.

[Docket No. ER93–523–003]

Take notice that on March 14, 1995,

Western Resources, Inc. tendered for

filing its compliance filing in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: May 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation,

Indeck-Olean Limited Partnership

[Docket No. EL95–45–000; Docket No. QF90–

154–005]

On May 15, 1995, Niagara Mohawk

Power Corporation (Niagara Mohawk)

filed a petition for declaratory order

requesting that the Commission revoke

the qualifying status of the cogeneration

facility operated by Indeck-Olean

Limited Partnership (Indeck Olean).

Indeck-Olean filed notices of selfcertification for the facility in Docket

Nos. QF90–154–000, QF90–154–001,

QF90–154–002 and QF90–154–003.

In Docket Nos. EL95–11–000 and

QF90–154–004 Indeck-Olean filed a

petition for waiver of the Commission’s

operating and efficiency standards for

calendar years 1993 and 1994. See 59

FR 64401 (Dec. 14, 1994) and 60 FR

2578 (Jan. 10, 1995). Niagara Mohawk

has opposed waiver. Niagara Mohawk

states that copies of its petition for

declaratory order have been provided to

Indeck-Olean and to other participants

in Docket Nos. EL95–11–000 and QF90–

154–004.

Niagara Mohawk states that waiver of

the Commission’s operating and

efficiency standards is not warranted for

the Indeck-Olean facility. Niagara

Mohawk asks that the Commission

declare that Indeck-Olean’s QF

certification is revoked effective June 8,

1994; that Indeck-Olean is obligated to

refund any amounts collected in excess

of the market value of electricity at the

time of delivery; and, that Indeck-Olean

must cease the sale of electricity at

wholesale until such time as it has

complied with Section 205 of the

Federal Power Act or recertified its

plant as a ‘‘qualifying facility.’’

Comment date: June 1, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. North American Energy

Conservation, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–152–005]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

North American Energy Conservation,

Inc. tendered for filing a summary of its

activity for the quarter ending March 31,

1995.

4. Citizens Utilities Company

[Docket No. ER94–1561–001]

Take notice that on April 18, 1995,

Citizens Utilities Company tendered for

filing its compliance filing in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: May 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Gulfstream Energy, LLC

[Docket No. ER94–1597–002]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Gulfstream Energy, LLC tendered for

filing a summary of its activity for the

quarter ending March 31, 1995,

pursuant to the Commission’s letter

order issued November 21, 1994 in

Docket No. ER94–1597–000.

6. J. Aron & Company

[Docket No. ER95–34–003]

Take notice that on April 11, 1995, J.

Aron & Company tendered for filing a

letter reporting that it did not engage in

any electric power purchases and sales

during the calendar quarter ended

March 31, 1995.

7. Mesquite Energy Services Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–74–001]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Mesquite Energy Services Inc. tendered

for filing a quarterly informational filing

for the calendar quarter ended March

31, 1995, indicating no transactions

occurred.

Such filing was made pursuant to the

Commission’s letter order dated January

4, 1995, in Docket No. ER95–74–000.

8. Florida Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–457–001]

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Florida Power Corporation tendered for

filing a revised fuel adjustment clause

for service to Reedy Creek Improvement
27500 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 1995 / Notices

District, Inc. in compliance with the

Commission’s order of March 21, 1995.

As directed by the Commission, the

revised fuel adjustment clause

eliminates the provision for imputation

of fossil fuel costs incurred by

Qualifying Facilities.

Comment date: June 1, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Union Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–744–000]

Take notice that on May 5, 1995,

Union Electric Company (UE) submitted

a request to withdraw the filing of the

Agreement for Maintenance Energy

dated March 10, 1995 between the City

of Sikeston, Missouri and UE and

terminate this docket.

Comment date: June 1, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–951–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Northeast Utilities Service Company

(NUSCO) tendered for filing a Service

Agreement with PECO Energy Company

under the NU System Companies’

System Power Sales/Exchange Tariff No

6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to PECO Energy

Company.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on May 1,

1995.

Comment date: May 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Southern California Edison

Company

[Docket No. ER95–999–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

(Edison) tendered for filing the

following Supplemental Agreement

(Supplemental Agreement) to the 1990

Integrated Operations Agreement (IOA)

with the City of Riverside (Riverside),

FERC Rate Schedule No. 250, and

associated Firm Transmission Service

Agreement:

Supplemental Agreement Between Southern

California Edison Companyand City of

Riverside for the integration of the

Washington Water Power-Riverside Power

Sale Agreement

Edison Riverside Washington Water Power

Firm Transmission Agreement

The Supplemental Agreement and

FTS Agreement set forth the terms and

conditions by which Edison will

integrate Riverside’s Washington Water

Power resource and provide bidirectional firm transmission service.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: May 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–1001–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy

Services), as agent for Arkansas Power

and Light Company (AP&L), Gulf States

Utilities Company (GSU), Louisiana

Power & Light Company (MP&L) and

New Orleans Public Service Inc.

(NOPSI) (collectively, the Entergy

Operating Companies) filed revisions to

the rates under the network service tariff

(NST) and the point-to-point

transmission service tariff (TST) filed in

Docket No. ER95–112 on October 31,

1994 and revised on January 24, 1995.

Entergy Services requests that the

revised rates become effective June 1,

1995, subject to refund, in accordance

with the provisions of the NSI and TST.

Comment date: May 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12709 Filed 5–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project Nos. 2225–008, et al.]

Hydroelectric Applications [Public

Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille

County, et al.]; Notice of Applications

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric applications have been

filed with the Commission and are

available for public inspection:

1 a. Type of Application: Amendment

of License.

b. Project No.: 2225–008.

c. Date Filed: December 2, 1994.

d. Applicant: Public Utility District

No. 1 of Pend Oreille County.

e. Name of Project: Sullivan Creek.

f. Location: On Sullivan Creek, in

Pend Oreille County, Washington.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Michael V.

Stimac, HDR Engineering, Inc., 500–

108th Avenue, NE., Suite 1200,

Bellevue, WA 98004, (206) 453–1523.

i. FERC Contact: Regina Saizan, (202)

219–2673.

j. Comment Date: June 23, 1995.

k. Description of the Request: The

licensee proposes to re-establish

generation at the project by constructing

a new intake structure at the southwest

corner of Mill Pond, placing a buried

16,340-ft., 90-inch diameter steel

pipeline and penstock along the original

flume right-of-way, enlarging the

existing powerhouse to accommodate

the installation of new electrical

generating equipment, and upgrading

the road surface of an existing access

road to the intake site. The proposed

project would have a total installed

capacity of 11.2 MW.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C2,

and D2.

2 a. Type of Application: Transfer of

License.

b. Project No: 4316–011.

c. Date Filed: April 21, 1995.

d. Applicant: Trans Mountain Hydro

Corp.

e. Name of Project: Blue Valley

Ranch.

f. Location: On the Blue River, Grand

County, Colorado, near Heeney.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: David Bailey,

Esq., Parcel Mauro Hultin & Spaanstra,

P.C., 1801 California, Suite 3600,

Denver, CO 80202, (303) 292–6400.

i. FERC Contact: Mark Hooper, (202)

219–2680.

j. Comment Date: June 26, 1995.

k. Description of Transfer: Applicant

proposes to transfer the license to

Galloway, Inc.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

and D2.

3 a. Type of Application: Transfer of

License.

b. Project No: 4444–013.

c. Date Filed: April 21, 1995.

d. Applicant: Trans Mountain Hydro

Corp.