alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant
Properties I;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ Ronald PowellRonald PowellChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,184
<INVENTORY>                                     86,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,568
<PP&E>                                         261,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 154,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          544,494
<BONDS>                                         95,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        582
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (383,031)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,147
<SALES>                                        247,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,008
<CGS>                                          254,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,455<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (54,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       277
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (54,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (54,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Other SE includes Additional Paid in Capital of $335,017 and Accumulated
Deficit of $718,048.
<F3>Other Expenses include Research and Development of $26,394 and Selling,
General and Administrative costs of $15,061.
<F2>Earnings per share is not applicable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Willie B. SOUTHERN, petitioner, v. ATLANTIC INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.

No. 12-9373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
ING DIRECT Confidential

FDIC Safe Account Pilot

Todd Sandler

April 26, 2012

ING DIRECT Final Results
ING DIRECT Confidential 2

Lead Selection

Direct Mail & Email

Household income < $50K 

Modeled output was people who were more likely to: 

 Have a value score of D or E

 Rent instead of own 

 Are under 30 years old

 Are the only person in the household

Seattle Baltimore Philadelphia Atlanta

Search

Keywords surrounding underbanked 

behaviors

 Payday loans

 Money orders

 Cash advances

 Rent to own

 Fees, etc.

Display

Placement on networks with these 

criteria

 Household income < $50,000

 Lower credit scores

 Renters

Online
ING DIRECT Confidential 3

Performance

Balance Growth

25% of these Savings accounts had an 

Automatic Savings Plan in March 2011.

18% were still saving automatically March 

2012

The average monthly amount saved began at 

$42 and grew to $57.

Average savings balances grew from $243 

(opening) to $980 in March 2012. 

Customers continue to open up additional 

products.

Comparison

The Cost Per Account for the Safe Account Pilot 

was:

Less efficient than standard mail

On par with standard email

Less efficient than standard online
ING DIRECT Confidential 4

Survey Results

Collected data from survey that was sent on 4/7/11.

• Survey asked questions about underbanked services 

and previous banking relationships

• Out of 239 surveys sent, we only obtained 17 

responses.

• Only 4 of 17 (23.5%) have use any of the 

underbanked services in the past 12 months. 

• 76.5% were part of the general population 

that happened to respond to our offer, but 

are not by definition underbanked.

• For 47%, this was their first savings account in 

5+ years. 
ING DIRECT Confidential 5

Findings

Results may be best in cities where 

standard marketing is strongest

Direct Mail may not be the best 

channel for this population

Best performing Markets

Philadelphia and Baltimore 

performed best across all 

channels

Online - Despite having a 

younger under-banked 

population and our physical 

location, Seattle had the 

highest Cost Per Account 

($1,686). 

Need to explore alternative 

targeting methods in the direct 

banking model (only 23% were 

“underbanked”) 

Segmenting

Online

Search terms related to 

underbanked terms deliver low, 

inefficient volumes

Use Google contextual targeted at 

low score individuals

Email and Direct Mail

Emphasize starting with as little as 

$1 and no minimums 

Emphasize the $25 account opening 

bonus

Creative
ING DIRECT Confidential

Appendix
ING DIRECT Confidential 7

 Online Creative

 Stresses no fees, no minimums, and the feeling of having money in the bank
ING DIRECT Confidential

 Mail Creative

 Started with base creative and messaging

 Evoked the emotional aspect of saving

 Emphasized no minimums, no fees, and $25 

bonus
ING DIRECT Confidential

 Email Creative

 Used base creative and messaging

 All included $25 bonus, no minimums, and 

no fees

 Tests emphasizing the following features 

using subject line and headlines:

 $25 Bonus

 Starting with $1

 Feeling of having money in the bank
DYNAMIC TRANSIT COMPANY, et al., petitioners, v. TRANS PACIFIC VENTURES, INC., et al.

No. 13-260.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Motion of Trucking Industry Defense Association for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ *683of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
ANNUAL

REPORT

2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-6

)

TRAVON RUSSELL )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on April 15, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of Count 1 as charged in the two-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 15th day of April, 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                       439
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,717
<PP&E>                                           6,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,806
<BONDS>                                            521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        242
<COMMON>                                        42,502
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,241
<SALES>                                         36,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,960
<CGS>                                           28,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                       625
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                989
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       989
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.042
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.037
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL D. PAHUTSKI , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr
- 00211

- MR

- 1; 3:12

- cv
- 00308

- MR )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael D. Pahutski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Melissa Louise Rikard, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED S TATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Pahutski appeals the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a n unauthorized succ essive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. As we held in United States v. McRae , a certificate of appealability is not required in order for this court to address the district court’s jurisdictional categorization of a “Rule 6 0(b) motion as an unauthorized successive habeas petition.” 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015). Our review of the record confirms that Pahutski sought successive § 2255 relief, without authorization from this court, and
we therefore hold that the district court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the subject motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) (2012). Thus, we affirm the
district court’s order and grant Pahutski leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis

. Additionally, we construe Pahutski’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constituti onal law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Pahutski’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1996 AS FILED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         267,148
<SECURITIES>                                    34,736
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,615
<INVENTORY>                                    170,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               616,409
<PP&E>                                          91,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 654,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,134
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       375,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   654,181
<SALES>                                        158,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,280
<CGS>                                           92,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,932
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
MINORITY INTEREST OF $107,000 IS DEDUCTED FROM AFTER-TAX INCOME IN ARRIVING AT
NET INCOME OF $16,481,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Mobley, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Paul W. Mobley
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                                     Date: November 9, 2009
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Urban Barns Foods Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan Meikleham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 14th day of December, 2010.





/s/  Dan Meikleham


Dan Meikleham


Chief Financial Officer
Beverly Pauline Iron PIPE-BEGAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6898.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

Robert Holland, ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM

)

Plaintiff, ) Honorable Rudy Lozano

) Magistrate Judge John E. Martin

vs. )

)

Cerberus Capital Management LP, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

FOR CHRYSLER FINANCIAL LLC AND

KIMBERLY JOHNSON, ONLY

Now comes the undersigned attorney to make her entry of appearance on behalf of

Chrysler Financial LLC, n/k/a TD Auto Finance, LLC (“TDAF”) and Kimberly Johnson

(“Johnson”) only. The motion to practice pro hac vice erroneously listed Paul Davis as being

represented by the undersigned but she does not.

Pleadings, motions and documents should be served on the undersigned attorney as

counsel for Defendants TDAF and Johnson.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Rosemary Taft-Milby

Rosemary Taft-Milby

Attorney for Defendants TDAF and Johnson

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.

323 West Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200

Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone: (216) 685-1103

Fax: (216) 685-4345

E-mail: rtaftmilby@weltman.com

Dated: July 30, 2014

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 74 filed 07/30/14 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically filed with the Clerk

of Court on July 30, 2014 and served upon the following counsel of record and/or pro se parties

via United States Mail, postage prepaid:

Robert Holland

1120 Baker St.

Gary, Indiana 46404

/s/Rosemary Taft-Milby

Rosemary Taft-Milby

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA

323 W. Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200

Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone: (216) 685-1103

Fax: (216) 685-4345

E-mail: rtaftmilby@weltman.com

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 74 filed 07/30/14 page 2 of 2