alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2007-QO5 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided  to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche  Bank  Trust
Company Americas.

Date:  March 24, 2008


By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Managing Director
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
# 2011-MSA-Summary-AcctType

2011 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households

2011 Technical Notes

2011 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households

2011 Technical Notes

2011 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40974 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MONTECARLO JACKSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 297

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Montecarlo Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jackson h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40974 Document: 00512751189 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 40974

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40974 Document: 00512751189 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
James Alton PRICE, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-10778.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Tony James Edwards v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00342

- CR

Trial court case number: 1189878

Trial court: 228th District Court of Harris Count y

Appellant’s counsel in this case has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief stating there

are no arguable grounds for appeal, based on Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Appellant has a right to respond to counsel’s motion. Pursuant to Kelly v. State , No. PD

0702

- 13, 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014), we direct the Clerk of this Court

to send, at no cost to appellant, a complete copy of the appellate record so that appellant may

respond to the Anders brief.

Appellant has 30 day s from the date of this order to file a pro se response, if any, to the

Anders brief and motion to withdraw filed by appellate counsel on July 15, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 31, 2014
Second Amendment Personal Investment Plan



 Exhibit 10.41 
  
 MATTEL, INC. 
 PERSONAL INVESTMENT PLAN 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE OCTOBER 1, 2001 RESTATEMENT 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) sponsors the Mattel, Inc. Personal
Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Mattel
desires to amend the Plan to (i) reflect recent legislative and regulatory changes in the federal pension laws and (ii) meet other current needs; and 
  
 WHEREAS, in Section 16.1 of the Plan, Mattel reserved the right to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in order to effect the foregoing, Mattel does hereby declare
that the Plan be, and it hereby is, amended as follows: 
  
 1.
Section 2.13(a) of the Plan is amended effective as of January 1, 2003 by deleting the parenthetical “(including overtime, shift differential and holiday, vacation and sick pay)” and by substituting in lieu thereof the parenthetical
“(including overtime, shift differential, tips and holiday, vacation and sick pay).” 
  
 2. Section 4.1(b) of the Plan is amended effective as of January 1, 2003 by adding the following new sentence to the end thereof: 
  
 The Committee shall provide Participants with such alternative investment election options and such information regarding
the investment alternatives available under the Plan as shall be necessary to comply with the regulations issued by the Department of Labor pursuant to ERISA Section 404(c). 
  
 3. Section 8.6(d)(ii) of the Plan is amended effective as of January 1, 2001 by adding the following new sentence to the end
thereof: 
  
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the limitation of
clause (C) above shall not apply to hardship distributions made on and after January 1, 2001. 
  
 4. Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mattel has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer this
20th day of December, 2002. 
  

			
	MATTEL, INC.
		
	By:	  	/s/    Alan Kaye         
	 	 	

	 Name:
	  	 Alan Kaye

	 Title:
	  	 Senior Vice President—Human Resources



  

 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Samuel, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered June 3, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree (three counts), and robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial, which included testimony by three prosecution witnesses on the identification issue, viewed in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196; *People v Benzinger,*36 NY2d 29; *People v Herbert,*100 AD2d 883), was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the crimes of which he was convicted.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EF/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RICK MENDOZA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-30238

D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00124-LRS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Rick Mendoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to

distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable

FILED

DEC 23 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EF/Research 2 08-30238

amount of methamphetamine and 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance

containing a detectable amount of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mendoza’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. Mendoza has filed a pro se supplemental brief,

and the government has filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. However, we REMAND to the district court for

the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to clarify that Mendoza was

convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.
Exhibit 10.8
 Williams Pipeline GP LLC
Director Compensation Policy
Adopted August 19, 2008
Revised January 23, 2009
 Compensation of Directors
  I. Annual Compensation Package
  1.
    
    $75,000 cash; and2.
    
    $5,000 cash each for service on the
conflicts and audit committees of the Board.
  II. Conflicts Committee Fees
   III. Other Compensation
  1




---



##### 



1.
    
    for a person first elected as a Non-Employee Director, a one-time payment of $25,000
cash on the date of election to the Board; and2.
    
    reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with
attending Board and committee meetings and attending education programs relevant to their
duties as members of the Board.
 IV. Interim Payment and Grant Dates and Proration
 1.
    
    Interim Payment and Grant Dates.A person who first becomes a Non-Employee Director after January 24 and prior to May 1
shall receive the full Annual Compensation Package for such Annual Compensation Period paid
as of May 15.A person who first becomes a Non-Employee Director on or after May 1 and on or before July
31 shall receive a prorated Annual Compensation Package for such first Annual Compensation
Period paid as of August 15.A person who first becomes a Non-Employee Director on or after August 1 and prior to
January 24 shall receive a prorated Annual Compensation Package for such first Annual
Compensation Period paid as of January 24.2.
    
    Proration.The amount of cash compensation for a prorated Annual Compensation Package shall be the
product of the aggregate annual cash compensation amount applicable to such Non-Employee
Director as set forth in Section I above multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which
is the number of full and fractional calendar months elapsing between the date such person
first becomes a Non-Employee Director and the following January 23 and the denominator of
which is 12.
 V. Other Provisions
  2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1331 

To provide for a fair and equitable resolution of claims relating to the 

work opportunity credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mr. WELLER (for himself and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for a fair and equitable resolution of claims 

relating to the work opportunity credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYER CLAIMS FOR THE 

4 WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT. 

5 Not later than July 1, 2005, the Secretary of the 

6 Treasury shall issue regulations to provide for the settle7 ment of employer claims for the work opportunity credit 

8 under section 51(d)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 

9 of 1986 which previously were not granted but should have 

10 been granted consistent with Revenue Ruling 2003–112. 
2 

•HR 1331 IH 

1 Such settlement shall be national in scope, provide for a 

2 fair and equitable resolution of such claims, and rely on 

3 statistical sampling on a national level. 

Æ
Insuring Deposits. Examining Institutions. 

Managing Receiverships. Educating Consumers.

4

Publi

An

with Suz

1,552,210 Elect

Estima

25

Fai

Re

0

I

D

D

L

8,305I

Dep

I

250,000New Dep

7I

As

Dep

Confeen

18,953 

in

1,800,000 Money smar

con

90,000

New Ban Acc

Alian

5,034

FDIC Employ

C

Pro

I

n its unique role as deposit insurer of banks and 

savings associations, and in cooperation with 

the other state and federal regulatory agencies, 

the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) 

promotes the safety and soundness of the U.S. 

financial system and the insured depository 

institutions by identifying, monitoring and 

addressing risks to the deposit insurance fund.

The FDIC promotes public understanding and the 

development of sound public policy by providing 

timely and accurate financial and economic 

information and analyses. It minimizes disruptive 

effects from the failure of financial institutions. It 

assures fairness in the sale of financial products and 

the provisions of financial services.

The FDIC’s long and continuing tradition of 

excellence in public service is supported and 

sustained by a highly skilled and diverse workforce 

that continuously monitors and responds rapidly and 

successfully to changes in the financial environment. 

At FDIC, we are working together to be the best. 

FDIC by the Numbers

 2 0 0 8 A n n u l R e p or
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11914]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects in the 
exhibit, ``Culture and Power in France: Treasures from the Bibliotheque 
Nationale'' (see list \1\) imported from abroad for the temporary 
exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign lender. I also determine that the temporary exhibition 
of the objects at the Library of Congress, Jefferson Building, 
Washington, D.C. from on or about September 5, 1995, to on or about 
December 56, 1995, is in the national interest.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan of the Office of the General Counsel of USIA. The telephone 
number is 202/619-5030, and the address is Room 700, U.S. 
Information Agency, 301 4th St. S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Public notice of this determination is ordered to be published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 10, 1995.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-11914 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Allan Tracy GILMORE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-8780.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, denied.
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

* *

For thequarterly period ended March 31, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-11574

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAMON PENA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 028

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140C07272 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until July 10

, 201 6

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Veronica Teresa Lerma , the Appel lant ’s Attorney,

prepare the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 10 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13 th day of June , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties I
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
    
    August 13, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. Moriarty
Kevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    August 13, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. Terrano
Robert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.3.1  


 
 

RESOLUTION OF THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.
  DIRECTORS' HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
  AMENDMENT TO THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.
  2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN    
    


WHEREAS, Washington Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Washington Mutual, Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan) for the
benefit of its eligible employees; and 



WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Plan authorizes the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") amend the Plan to the
extent permissible under applicable laws, regulations or stock exchange rules; and 


WHEREAS, the Company agreed to amend the Plan as set forth in the Attachment in order to obtain Institutional Shareholder Services' recommendation that
the Plan be approved; 


NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED, that effective July 15, 2003, the Plan is amended as set forth in Attachment A. 







ATTACHMENT A  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.
  2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
  (AMENDMENT NO. 1)    
    


Section 4.3(b)
is replaced in its entirety by the following: 


        (b)   Subject
to adjustment as provided in Section 15.1 and without regard to Options or Stock Appreciations Rights: (i) the maximum aggregate number of shares
that may be issued pursuant to Awards shall not exceed 13,000,000, and (ii) the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to Awards that either contain no restrictions or
are subject to restrictions based solely on continuous employment or services for less than three years (except where Termination of Service occurs by reason of death, Retirement, or Disability) shall
not exceed 4,350,000. 











QuickLinks


RESOLUTION OF THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. DIRECTORS' HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AMENDMENT TO THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. 2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


AMENDMENT TO THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. 2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (AMENDMENT NO. 1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-1-TLS 

 ) 

JUAN ROSALES-SUAREZ ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 105], filed on April 16, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 105] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 2 of the Indictment is hereby 

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on May 1, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT