alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsJAMES P LeDONNE 

________________________________________

Case No. 3:14-cr-55-JD

AMENDED ORDER OF DETENTION 

FINDINGS

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing has been held. The

Court finds that no condition or combination 18 U.S.C. §3156(a)(4) of conditions of release will reasonably

assure the appearance of the defendant. This conclusion is based on the findings and analysis of the matters

enumerated in the pretrial services report and as stated on the record in open court at the detention hearing.

Accordingly, the defendant is now DETAINED and REMANDED to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designee.

DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION

Jame LeDonne is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in

a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending

appeal. James LeDonne shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a Court

of the United States or on request of an attorney for the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the

Defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court proceeding.

Date: May 22, 2014 s/CHRISTOPHER A. NUECHTERLEIN

CHRISTOPHER A. NUECHTERLEIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

case 3:14-cr-00055-JD-CAN document 14 filed 05/22/14 page 1 of 1
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11789]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mississippi River Coordinating Commission Meeting
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Mississippi 
River Coordinating Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

MEETING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, July 12, 1995; 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Saint Anthony Main Event Centre, 219 S.E. Main Street, 
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    An agenda for the meeting will be available by June 21, 1995, from 
the Superintendent of the Mississippi National River and Recreation 
Area at the address below. Public statements about matters related to 
the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area will be taken at the 
meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mississippi River Coordinating 
Commission was established by PL 100-696, November 18, 1988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent JoAnn Kyral, 
Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, 175 East Fifth Street, 
Suite 418, St. Paul, MN 55101 (612-290-4160).

    Dated: May 4, 1995.
William W. Schenk,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-11789 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza One, Inc., (the “Company”), on Form
10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the
requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), John Holcomb, the
President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the
Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Report.




Date:
      March 16, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ John HolcombJohn
      HolcombPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
                    and
      Principal Financial Officer)




* This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
|   | 2002   | 2003   | 2004   | 2005   | 2006 |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------|
| 0.258% | 0.198% | 0.186% | 0.168% | 0.152% |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1678 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1678

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
                increased expensing for small business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2005

  Mrs. Musgrave (for herself and Mr. Herger) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
                increased expensing for small business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR INCREASED EXPENSING FOR SMALL 
              BUSINESS.

    Subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 179 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to election to expense certain 
depreciable business assets) are each amended by striking ``2008'' each 
place it appears and inserting ``2010''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1566 

To provide a technical correction to the Federal preemption of State or 

local laws concerning the markings and identification of imitation or 

toy firearms entering into interstate commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Mr. ISSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide a technical correction to the Federal preemption 

of State or local laws concerning the markings and identification of imitation or toy firearms entering into interstate commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toy Gun Marking Im5 provement Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1566 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PREEMPTION OF STATE OR LOCAL LAWS CON2 CERNING THE MARKINGS AND IDENTIFICA3 TION OF IMITATION OR TOY FIREARMS. 

4 Section 4(g) of the Federal Energy Management Im5 provement Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 5001(g)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘which provide for markings’’ and all that fol7 lows through ‘‘firearm developed prior to 1898; or’’ and 

8 inserting the following: ‘‘relating to markings, identifica9 tion, or sale of toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms. No 

10 State or local subdivision shall— 

11 ‘‘(1) prohibit the sale or manufacture of any 

12 look-alike, nonfiring, toy or collector replica of an 

13 antique firearm developed prior to 1898; or’’. 

Æ
#### WALLACH et al. v. BYRNE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1913.)

Action 'by Irving J. Wallach and others against John Byrne and others.

No opinion. . - Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Kambiz Hooshmand, Chief Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    KAMBIZ HOOSHMANDKambiz Hooshmand, President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: February 9, 2006
Mission

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is an independent agency created by the Congress to maintain stability and public 

confidence in the nation’s financial system by:

★ insuring deposits,

★ examining and supervising financial institutions for safety and soundness and consumer protection, and 

★ managing receiverships.

Vision

The FDIC is a recognized leader in promoting sound public policies, addressing risks in the nation’s financial system, and carrying out its 

insurance, supervisory, consumer protection, and receivership management responsibilities.

Values

The FDIC and its employees have a tradition of distinguished public service. Six core values guide us in accomplishing our mission:

1. Integrit

We adhere to the highest ethical and professional standards.

2. Competenc

We are a highly skilled, dedicated, and diverse workforce that is empowered to achieve outstanding results.

3. Teamwor

We communicate and collaborate effectively with one another and with other regulatory agencies.

4. Effectiven

We respond quickly and successfully to risks in insured depository institutions and the financial system.

5. Accounta

We are accountable to each other and to our stakeholders to operate in a financially responsible and operationally effective manner.

6. Fairne

We respect individual viewpoints and treat one another and our stakeholders with impartiality, dignity, and trust.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          I, Xiao Ping Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment to Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.

| Date:  June 15, 2006 |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Xiao   Ping Zhang     |   |
|                           |   |
| Xiao Ping   Zhang         |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |   |

----
#### BATTALIA, Respondent, v. RICCA & SONS, Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Leo H. Battalia against Ricca & Sons. J. J. O’Connell, for appellants. G. Hamburger, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Order filed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E. Skowronski, President of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                               
|------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|July 22, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI      
|              |  |  |  | Walter E. Skowronski President



24
Anesti MARKOGLU, petitioner, v. FEDERATED FINANCIAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA.

No. 12-9480.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
----

----

| $720,000 (the “Principal Amount”) | September 1, 2009 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                                          |              |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC. |                                 |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------------------|
|   |             |                                 |   |
|   | By:              | /s/ Dennis M. McGrath           |   |
|   |             | Name:  Dennis M. McGrath        |   |
|   |             | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |             |                                 |   |

----

----
| Name                                      |   | Jurisdiction of    Incorporation |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                      |   |                             |
| Northern      Construction Holdings, Ltd. |   | Hong      Kong                   |

| Name                                              |   | Jurisdiction of    Incorporation      |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                              |   |                                  |
| Beijing      Fortune Capital Management Co., Ltd. |   | People’s      Republic of China |
|                                              |   |                                  |
| Beijing      Chengzhi Qianmao Concrete Co., Ltd.  |   | People’s      Republic of China |
|                                              |   |                                  |
| Shaanxi      Hongruida Concrete Ltd.              |   | People’s      Republic of China |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1625 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1625

To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of 
   the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and for other purposes'' to 
   clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to accept 
 donations of lands that are contiguous to the Indiana Dunes National 
                   Lakeshore, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2005

Mr. Visclosky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of 
   the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and for other purposes'' to 
   clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to accept 
 donations of lands that are contiguous to the Indiana Dunes National 
                   Lakeshore, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore 
Corrections Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONTIGUOUS LANDS.

    Section 19 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460u-19) is amended by 
designating the existing text of the section as subsection (a), and by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) For purposes of subsection (a), lands may be considered 
contiguous to other lands if the lands touch the other lands, or are 
separated from the other lands by only a public or private right-of-
way, such as a road, railroad, or utility corridor.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE LANDS BY PAYMENT OF DELINQUENT TAXES.

    Section 2(a) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460u-1(a)) is amended in the 
first sentence by inserting before the period the following: ``, 
including acquisition from units of State or local government by 
satisfaction of delinquent State or local taxes''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:14 CR 96

)

CEDRIC SHAW )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY,

 ADJUDICATION OF GUILTY AND

CONFIRMATION OF SENTENCING HEARING

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

(DE # 30), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3), the Magistrate

Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the offenses charged in

Counts 1, 4, and 5 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED, and defendant is adjudged

guilty of those offenses. A sentencing date will be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: June 19, 2015

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-86 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
No. 85-1513.

#### Edwards, Governor of Louisiana, et al. *v.*Aguillard et al.

Appeal from C. A. 5th Cir. Probable jurisdiction noted.
CFS ENTERPRISE, INC., et al., petitioners, v. David HECKADON, et ux.

No. 13-386.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1542 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1542

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the 
      ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2005

   Mr. Frank of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Neal of 
 Massachusetts, Mr. Olver, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
  Tierney, Mr. Capuano, and Mr. Lynch) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the 
      ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HONORABLE JUDGE GEORGE N. LEIGHTON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Honorable 
Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```