alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of G REIT, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Annual Report on
    Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
    December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                           



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DIANA M. LAING     
| |                        
| | Diana M. Laing         
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 22, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document. The signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to G REIT, Inc. and
will be retained by G REIT, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Richard KEARNEY, petitioner, v. Harold GRAHAM, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility.

No. 12-10843.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

RONALD H. BUTLER 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAMUEL A. KIDSTON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:14-CV-237 JD 

OPINION AND ORDER

Now before the Court is Plaintiff Ronald H. Butler’s second amended motion for entry of 

default against the Defendants. [DE 18]. The motion and attachments show that the Plaintiff 

properly served the amended complaint on both Defendants by certified mail sent on November 

6, 2014 and received on November 10, 2014. The Defendants’ time to answer or respond to the 

amended complaint has now passed, but neither Defendant has appeared in this action. Under 

Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “When a party against whom a judgment for 

affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by 

affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion [DE 

18] is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default as to both Defendants. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: December 11, 2014 

 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12687]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Health Information Infrastructure Joint Venture

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 27, 1995, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act), Health Information Infrastructure 
Joint Venture has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recover of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are: Andersen Consulting LLP, 
Chicago, IL; Automation Engineering, Garland, TX; Enigma Logic, Inc., 
Concord CA; Expersoft Corporation, San Diego, CA; MedicaLogic, Inc., 
Beavertron, OR; and Medical Records Corporation, Cleveland OH. The 
general area of planned activity is to design, develop, and the 
demonstrate key technologies and components of an integrated medical 
information system, pursuant to a Cooperative Agreement with the 
Advanced Technology Program administered by the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12687 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION AT LAFAYETTE

WAYNE FENDER and DONNA PELOUS, )

 Plaintiffs, )

 )

 v. ) CAUSE NO.: 4:14-CV-24-RL-JEM

 )

SARAH SAILORS, SALLY HERNANDEZ, )

ASHLEY PETERS, PATRICK MANAHAN, )

CHRISTIN BRAMLAGE, KURTIS FOUT, )

DCS, and STATE OF INDIANA, )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a State Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate Pursuant to F.R.C.P.

42(a) and Local Rule 42-2 [DE 38], filed by Defendants Sarah Sailors, Sally Hernandez, Ashley Peters,

Kurtis Fouts, Department of Child Services, and State of Indiana (the “State Defendants”) on September

22, 2014. State Defendants request that this matter be consolidated with a case filed by Plaintiffs and

additional Plaintiff Heather Mock against State of Indiana, Ashley Peters, Abigail Diener, Samantha

Dagenais, Christin Bramlage, and Analei Whitlock, cause number 4:14-CV-61-WCL-APR. None of the

other parties have responded to the motion.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) provides that “[i]f actions before the court involve a common

question of law or fact, the court may . . . consolidate the actions.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). Consolidation

is appropriate for “cases that share the same questions of law or fact and where consolidation would not

result in prejudice to any party.” Back v. Bayh, 933 F. Supp. 738, 748 (N.D. Ind. 1996) (citing

Fleishman v. Prudential-Bache Sec., 103 F.R.D. 623, 624 (E.D. Wis. 1984)). Courts “consider such

factors as judicial economy, avoiding delay, and avoiding inconsistent or conflicting results” as well as “as
the possibility of juror confusion or administrative difficulties.” Habitat Educ. Ctr., Inc. v. Kimbell, 250

F.R.D. 390, 394 (E.D. Wis. 2008). 

The Court finds that the cases involve common issues of law and fact relating to the removal of a

child from the care of Plaintiffs Fender and Pulous. Trying the cases separately would require duplication

of efforts, both on behalf of the parties and of the Court, and might result in inconsistent results.

Accordingly, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court hereby GRANTS the State Defendants’

Motion to Consolidate Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 42(a) and Local Rule 42-2 [DE 38] and ORDERS

consolidation of cause numbers 4:14-CV-24-RL-JEM and 4:14-CV-61-WCL-APR.

All future filings shall be made in 4:14-CV-24-RL-JEM only.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2014.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Plaintiffs pro se

2
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2014-3





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2014 (as amended and supplemented, or
otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2014-3, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has
been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 30th day of March, 2016.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                       2,724,060 
<SECURITIES>                   249,985 
<RECEIVABLES>                1,314,120 
<ALLOWANCES>                      0    
<INVENTORY>                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             4,288,165 
<PP&E>                       9,277,123 
<DEPRECIATION>                    0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              13,725,818 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       55,121,801 
<BONDS>                      1,570,710 
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                 (47,211,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>13,725,818 
<SALES>                      2,535,201 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             3,038,562 
<CGS>                             0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                2,438,523 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               547,092 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           2,463,757 
<INCOME-PRETAX>             (2,410,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         (2,344,085)
<DISCONTINUED>               5,365,511 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                 3,021,426 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     8.36 
<EPS-DILUTED>                     8.36 

        


</TABLE>
John M. HARDIMON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9532.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
---

---

Exhibit 4.2

GUILDHALL MINERALS
LTD.
320  1100 Melville Street
Vancouver, B.C. V6E 4A6
phone: (604) 688-3931; fax:
(604) 688-2921

Nicoya
Explorations Ltd.
6237
Nelson Avenue
West Vancouver, BC
V7W 2A2

EXTENSION AGREEMENT

We are
parties to an Option Agreement dated February 20, 2007 (Agreement) pursuant
to which
you have optioned to this company British Columbia mineral claim Bridge 
Tenure No. 374400 (Claim). Clauses 2 and 3 of the Agreement provide that
Guildhall is to issue certain shares to you and expend minimum amounts of money on the Claim
on or before various dates, the
first of which was February 15, 2008. We acknowledge that we have not issued
the shares to you, nor done the minimum required work on the Claim and we have
mutually agreed to an extension of the
deadline for the fulfillment of those obligations as hereinafter provided.

In
consideration of the sum of $1,000 paid to you by Guildhall (the receipt of
which you hereby acknowledge)
we mutually agree that each of the dates contained in sub-clauses (c), (d) and
(e) of Clause 2, and (b) and (c) of Clause 3, are extended by one year so that
the first of such dates shall now hereafter
be February 15, 2009.

DATED
at Vancouver, BC effective March 20, 2008.

| |                           |            
| | ------------------------- | -----------
| | GUILDHALL
  MINERALS LTD.
| |                           |            
| |                           | (SIGNATURE)
| | Per:                      |            

AGREED:
NICOYA
EXPLORATIONS LTD.

|     |            
|---- | -----------
|     | (SIGNATURE)
|Per: |            

---

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12702]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-920-05-1320-10; WYW136504]


Invitation for Coal Exploration License; Campbell County, WY

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Invitation for Coal Exploration License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cordero Mining Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Kennecott 
Energy and Coal Company, hereby invites all interested parties to 
participate on a pro rata cost sharing basis in its coal exploration 
program concerning federally-owned coal underlying the following 
described land in Campbell County, Wyoming:

T. 46 N., R. 71 W., 6th P.M., Wyoming,
    Sec. 1: Lots 5 thru 20;
    Sec. 11: Lot 16;
    Sec. 12: Lots 4, 5, and 9 thru 16;
    Sec. 13: Lots 1 thru 4, 7 and 8;
    Sec. 14: Lot 1.

    Containing 1,376.20 acres.

    All of the coal in the above land consists of unleased Federal coal 
within the Powder River Basin Known Coal Resource Area. The purpose of 
the exploration program is to conduct exploration drilling on the above 
listed land.

ADDRESSES: A detailed description of the proposed drilling program is 
available for review during normal business hours in the following 
offices (under serial number WYW136504): Bureau of Land Management, 
Wyoming State Office, 4th Floor Public Room, 2515 Warren Avenue, P.O. 
Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003; and, Bureau of Land Management, 
Casper District Office, Branch of Solid Minerals, 1701 East ``E'' 
Street, Casper, Wyoming 82601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of invitation will be published 
in the News-Record of Gillette, Wyoming, once each week for two (2) 
consecutive weeks and is expected to be published beginning no later 
than the week of May 22, 1995, and in the Federal Register. Any party 
electing to participate in this exploration program must send written 
notice to both the Bureau of Land Management and the Cordero Mining 
Co., no later than thirty (30) days after publication of this 
invitation in the Federal Register. The written notice should be sent 
to the following addresses: Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State 
Office (WSO 925-9), Home Base Chief, Mineral/Lands Authorization Group, 
Division of Land and Minerals Authorization, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, 
WY 82003-1828 and to Cordero Mining Co., Attn: Mr. John Trummel, 
Kennecott Energy Co., 505 S. Gillette Avenue, Gillette, WY 82716.
    The foregoing is published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Title 43 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 3410.2-1(c)(1).
Pamela J. Lewis,
Supervisory Land Law Examiner, Wyoming State Office.
[FR Doc. 95-12702 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
Estelle SINGLETARY, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES/NC INFANT TODDLER PROGRAM.

No. 12-9524.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EX-35.3
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The servicing agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 (as amended, the
"Agreement"), among Washington Mutual Bank, as Servicer and Bank of America,
National Association as Owner the following with respect to Banc of America
Funding Corporation, Series 2007-8 ("BAFC 2007-8") (the "Securitization").


I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (formerly
known as Washington Mutual Bank, FA) (the "Servicer"), certify to the Owner,
the Depositor and the Master Servicer under the Securitization, the following
for the 2007 fiscal year (the "Relevant Year"):


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.


Dated as of March 1, 2008


/s/ H. John Berens
Name: H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Cambridge
Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the
undersigned Jeffrey G. McGonegal, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








November
      16, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Jeffrey G. McGonegalJeffrey
      G. McGonegalSenior
      Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
    Director




*****






A signed
original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas Satzman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of XpresSpa Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Dated: April 30, 2019





| | /s/ Douglas Satzman          
| | -----------------------------
| | Douglas Satzman              
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1  Certification I, E. James Collord, certify that:  (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc.  (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. /s/ E. James Collord By __________________________________ E.  James Collord President, Director and Chief Executive Officer Date:  August 14, 2007