UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                   Form 10-QSB


(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                   For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11767


                         ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



         California                                              95-3793526
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




                         ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $   810
   Receivables and deposits                                                      266
   Restricted escrows                                                            104
   Other assets                                                                  518
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                    $ 1,984
      Buildings and related personal property                   33,528
                                                                35,512
      Less accumulated depreciation                            (28,501)        7,011
                                                                            $ 8,709

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                           $ 91
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           254
   Accrued property taxes                                                        230
   Other liabilities                                                             379
   Due to affiliates                                                             140
   Mortgage notes payable                                                     24,331

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                            $ (605)
   Limited partners (99,784 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (16,111)      (16,716)
                                                                            $ 8,709

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                         ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Three Months Ended
                                                                   March 31,
                                                               2003          2002
Revenues:
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
  Rental income                                               $1,504        $1,692
  Other income                                                    97           154
      Total revenues                                           1,601         1,846

Expenses:
  Operating                                                      597           540
  General and administrative                                      93           113
  Depreciation                                                   476           484
  Interest                                                       474           487
  Property taxes                                                 185           167
      Total expenses                                           1,825         1,791

Net (loss) income                                             $ (224)        $ 55

Net (loss) income allocated to general partners                $ (2)          $ 1

Net (loss) income allocated to limited partners                 (222)           54

                                                              $ (224)        $ 55

Net (loss) income per limited partnership unit                $(2.22)       $ 0.54

Distributions per limited partnership unit                    $ 2.06         $ --

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                         ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II

               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Limited
                                     Partnership     General      Limited
                                        Units        Partners    Partners      Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>       <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions         100,000         $ 1       $ 50,000     $ 50,001

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2002                    99,784        $ (601)    $(15,683)    $(16,284)

Distributions to partners                   --            (2)        (206)        (208)

Net loss for the three months
   ended March 31, 2003                     --            (2)        (222)        (224)

Partners' deficit at
   March 31, 2003                       99,784        $ (605)    $(16,111)    $(16,716)

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                         ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                   2003        2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (224)      $ 55
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                   476          484
     Amortization of mortgage discounts and loan costs               17           19
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       43           97
      Other assets                                                  (23)        (132)
      Accounts payable                                               38          (19)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            18           (8)
      Accrued property taxes                                         87           69
      Due to affiliates                                              35           33
      Other liabilities                                             115          111
          Net cash provided by operating activities                 582          709

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (142)        (262)
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                            44           34
          Net cash used in investing activities                     (98)        (228)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                               (135)        (125)
  Repayment of advances from affiliates                              --          (47)
  Distributions to partners                                        (208)          (9)
          Net cash used in financing activities                    (343)        (181)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                           141          300

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    669          150

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 810        $ 450

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 375        $ 467


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                         ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II

                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated financial statements of Angeles Income
Properties,  Ltd. II (the  "Partnership" or "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the  opinion of Angeles  Realty  Corporation  II (the
"Managing General Partner"),  which is wholly-owned by Apartment  Investment and
Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a publicly traded real estate investment trust,
all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)  considered necessary
for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating  results for the three
month period ended March 31, 2003, are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2003.  For further
information,  refer  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  footnotes
thereto  included  in the  Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments
to affiliates for services and  reimbursement  of certain  expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

During  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2003 and  2002,  affiliates  of the
Managing  General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of the Registrant's  residential  properties for providing  property  management
services.  The  Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $81,000 and
$92,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively,  which
is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner received reimbursement of accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $47,000 and $66,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,  which is included in
general and administrative expenses.

The Partnership Agreement provides for a fee equal to 10% of "Net cash flow from
operations," as defined in the Partnership  Agreement to be paid to the Managing
General Partner for executive and administrative  management  services.  Fees of
approximately  $35,000 were earned by the Managing  General Partner for both the
three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002. At March 31, 2003 the balance due to
the Managing General Partner for these fees is  approximately  $140,000 which is
included in "Due to affiliates" on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

In accordance with the Partnership  Agreement,  during 2001 the Managing General
Partner  loaned  the  Partnership  funds  for  operating  expenses  at  Landmark
Apartments. During the three months ended March 31, 2002 this loan was repaid in
full by the  Partnership.  Interest  was  charged  at the  prime  rate  plus 2%.
Interest expense was  approximately  $1,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2002.  There  were no loans from the  Managing  General  Partner  or  associated
interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2003.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the Managing General Partner is entitled
to receive a distribution equal to 3% of the aggregate disposition price of sold
properties.  The Partnership paid a distribution of approximately $86,000 to the
Managing General Partner related to the sale of Atlanta Crossing Shopping Center
in March 2000.  This amount is  subordinate  to the limited  partners  receiving
their original capital  contributions  plus a cumulative  preferred return of 6%
per annum of their adjusted  capital  investment,  as defined in the Partnership
Agreement.  If the limited  partners  have not received  these  returns when the
Partnership terminates,  the Managing General Partner will return this amount to
the Partnership.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing  General  Partner.  During 2003 and 2002,  the  Partnership's  cost for
insurance  coverage  and  fees  associated  with  policy  claims  administration
provided by AIMCO and its affiliates will be approximately $86,000 and $104,000,
respectively.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the trial date of January
13, 2003 (as well as the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the
case in its entirety  through November 7, 2002 so that the parties could have an
opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002,  the court entered an
order extending the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provides for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the  complaint.  Before  completing  briefing on the appeal,  the parties stayed
further proceedings in the appeal pending the Court's review of the terms of the
proposed settlement described above.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  The discussions of the  Registrant's
business  and  results  of  operations,   including  forward-looking  statements
pertaining to such matters,  do not take into account the effects of any changes
to the  Registrant's  business  and results of  operations.  Actual  results may
differ  materially  from those described in the  forward-looking  statements and
will  be  affected  by  a  variety  of  risks  and  factors  including,  without
limitation:  national and local economic  conditions;  the terms of governmental
regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations;
the competitive  environment in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks,
including the risk that cash flows from  operations may be  insufficient to meet
required  payments of  principal  and  interest;  real estate  risks,  including
variations  of real  estate  values and the  general  economic  climate in local
markets and competition for tenants in such markets; and possible  environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of three apartment  complexes.
The following table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for both
of the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002:

                                         Average Occupancy
Property                                 2003        2002

Deer Creek Apartments                     93%         93%
   Plainsboro, New Jersey
Georgetown Apartments                     94%         95%
   South Bend, Indiana
Landmark Apartments                       82%         92%
   Raleigh, North Carolina

The Managing  General  Partner  attributes the decrease in occupancy at Landmark
Apartments to increased layoffs, lower mortgage rates, and a slow rental market.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  was
approximately $224,000 compared to a net income of approximately $55,000 for the
three  months  ended March 31,  2002.  The  decrease in net income for the three
months  ended  March 31,  2003 was due to a decrease  in total  revenues  and an
increase in total expenses.

Total  revenues  decreased  for the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 due to a
decrease in rental  income and other income.  Rental  income  decreased due to a
decrease  in average  rental  rates at all of the  Partnership's  properties,  a
decrease  in  occupancy   primarily  at  Landmark   Apartments,   and  increased
concessions and bad debt expenses at Landmark and Deer Creek  Apartments.  Other
income decreased primarily due to decreases in utility  reimbursements and lease
cancellation fees at Deer Creek Apartments.

Total expenses increased for the three months ended March 31, 2003 primarily due
to  increases in operating  and  property  tax  expenses  partially  offset by a
decrease in general and  administrative  expenses.  Operating expenses increased
primarily  due to an  increase  in  maintenance  expense  partially  offset by a
decrease in administrative expense.  Maintenance expense increased primarily due
to an increase in snow removal costs at Deer Creek  Apartments and a decrease in
capitalization  of certain direct and indirect project costs,  primarily payroll
related costs at all of the  Partnership's  properties.  Administrative  expense
decreased  primarily due to a decrease in ad valorem tax service expense at Deer
Creek Apartments. Property tax expenses increased at Georgetown Apartments which
is located in Indiana.  During 2003,  Indiana is adjusting its  methodology  for
assessing  property taxable values and tax rates, which is expected to result in
a  significant  increase in property  tax  expense.  General and  administrative
expenses  decreased  primarily due to reduced costs of services  included in the
management   reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the
Partnership  Agreement and a decrease in  professional  fees associated with the
administration of the Partnership.  Also included in general and  administrative
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 are costs associated
with the  quarterly and annual  communications  with  investors  and  regulatory
agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner  monitors  the  rental  market  environment  of each  of its  investment
properties  to assess  the  feasibility  of  increasing  rents,  maintaining  or
increasing  occupancy  levels and protecting the  Partnership  from increases in
expense.  As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect
the Partnership  from the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by
increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, due to
changing market  conditions,  which can result in the use of rental  concessions
and  rental  reductions  to  offset  softening  market  conditions,  there is no
guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2003,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately $810,000 compared to approximately $450,000 at March 31, 2002. The
increase in cash and cash equivalents of  approximately  $141,000 since December
31,  2002  is due to  approximately  $582,000  of  cash  provided  by  operating
activities partially offset by approximately  $343,000 of cash used in financing
activities and approximately $98,000 of cash used in investing activities.  Cash
used in  financing  activities  consisted of  distributions  to the partners and
payments  of  principal  made on the  mortgages  encumbering  the  Partnership's
properties. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements
and  replacements  partially  offset by net withdrawals  from restricted  escrow
accounts maintained by the mortgage lenders. The Partnership invests its working
capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the various  properties  to  adequately  maintain  the
physical  assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with
Federal,  state,  and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing
General  Partner  monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory
compliance and is studying new federal laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional  compliance
measures with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light
of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses
related  to  compliance,  including  increased  legal  and audit  fees.  Capital
improvements  planned  for each of the  Partnership's  properties  are  detailed
below.

Georgetown Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $5,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Georgetown   Apartments,
consisting   primarily  of  floor  covering  and  window   replacements.   These
improvements   were  funded  from  the  property's   operating  cash  flow.  The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $79,000  in  capital
improvements  during the remainder of 2003. The additional capital  improvements
will consist primarily of appliance and floor covering replacement,  parking lot
upgrades and other building improvements. Additional capital improvements may be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Deer Creek Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $92,000  of  capital  improvements  at  Deer  Creek  Apartments,
consisting primarily of floor covering  replacements,  water heater upgrades and
structural  improvements.  These  improvements  were funded from the  property's
operating cash flow. The Partnership  evaluates the capital improvement needs of
the property  during the year and  currently  expects to complete an  additional
$134,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder of 2003.  The additional
capital  improvements  will consist  primarily of appliance  and floor  covering
replacement,  air conditioning  upgrades,  roofing  replacements,  swimming pool
improvements and structural improvements. Additional capital improvements may be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Landmark Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $45,000 of capital improvements at Landmark Apartments, consisting
primarily  of  floor  covering  and  wall  covering  replacements  and  plumbing
upgrades. These improvements were funded from the property's operating cash flow
and  replacement  reserves.  The Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement
needs of the  property  during the year and  currently  expects to  complete  an
additional  $131,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder of 2003. The
additional capital  improvements will consist primarily of floor covering,  HVAC
and roofing replacements,  exterior painting,  and other building  improvements.
Additional  capital  improvements  may be  considered  and  will  depend  on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property and replacement reserves.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering Deer Creek Apartments of approximately  $13,219,000 is
amortized  over  20  years  and  matures  on July 1,  2021 at  which  time it is
scheduled  to  be  fully  amortized.   The  mortgage  indebtedness   encumbering
Georgetown  and  Landmark  Apartments  of  approximately  $11,112,000,   net  of
discount,  is amortized  over  periods  ranging from 29 to 30 years with balloon
payments of  approximately  $11,033,000  due in October and November  2003.  The
Managing  General  Partner  intends  to  refinance  the  mortgages   encumbering
Georgetown  and Landmark  Apartments  and/or sell the  properties  prior to such
maturity date. If the  properties  cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient
amount, the Partnership may risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

The Partnership  distributed the following amounts during the three months ended
March 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                      Three Months      Per Limited      Three Months      Per Limited
                          Ended         Partnership         Ended          Partnership
                     March 31, 2003        Unit         March 31, 2002        Unit


<S>                       <C>             <C>                <C>              <C>
Operations                $ 208           $ 2.06             $ --             $ --
</TABLE>

Future  cash  distributions  will  depend on the levels of cash  generated  from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available  for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit additional distributions to its partners
during the remainder of 2003 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 61,754 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 61.89% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2003. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire additional Units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership
in  exchange  for  cash or a  combination  of cash and  units  in the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters which would include
voting on certain  amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove
the  Managing  General  Partner.  As a result of its  ownership of 61.89% of the
outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a position to control all voting decisions with
respect to the Registrant.  Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary
duties to the limited partners of the Partnership,  the Managing General Partner
also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a result,  the
duties of the Managing  General Partner,  as managing  general  partner,  to the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the Managing General Partner to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  These  factors  include  changes  in the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all balances  outstanding  over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal  executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing
General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive
officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  have, within 90 days of
the filing date of this quarterly  report,  evaluated the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) and have determined that such disclosure controls
and  procedures  are  adequate.  There have been no  significant  changes in the
Partnership's  internal  controls or in other  factors that could  significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 4.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the trial date of January
13, 2003 (as well as the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the
case in its entirety  through November 7, 2002 so that the parties could have an
opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002,  the court entered an
order extending the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provides for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the  complaint.  Before  completing  briefing on the appeal,  the parties stayed
further proceedings in the appeal pending the Court's review of the terms of the
proposed settlement described above.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 5.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3.1, Amendment Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
                  Partnership  dated  October  12,  1982 filed on Form 10K dated
                  November 30, 1983, incorporated herein by reference.

                  Exhibit 99, Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            b) Reports  on Form 8-K filed  during the  quarter  ended  March 31,
               2003:

                  None.


<PAGE>




                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II


                                    By:   Angeles Realty Corporation II
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: May 15, 2003



<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Angeles  Income
Properties Ltd. II;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  May 15, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive  Vice  President of Angeles Realty
                                    Corporation  II,  equivalent  of  the  chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Angeles  Income
Properties Ltd. II;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  May 15, 2003

                                    /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer of Angeles  Realty  Corporation  II,
                                    equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                    the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB of  Angeles  Income
Properties,  Ltd. II (the  "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Patrick  J. Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive
officer of the  Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the  equivalent of the
chief financial officer of the Partnership,  each hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  May 15, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  May 15, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.