Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 31, 1995 / Notices 28431

programs, policies, and plans for the

Center for Legislative Archives in the

Office of Special and Regional Archives.

DATES: June 19, 1995, from 9 a.m. to

10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: United States Capitol

Building, LBJ Room (S–211).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael L. Gillette, Director, Center for

Legislative Archives, (202) 501–5350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Review of Committee Activities

Five-Year Plan for the Management and

Preservation of the Records of

Congress

Update—Legislative Support Agency

Task Force Online Access to

Legislative Records

Videotaped Floor Proceedings

Other current issues and new business

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: May 19, 1995.

Ralph C. Bledsoe,

Acting Archivist of the United States.

[FR Doc. 95–13280 Filed 5–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515–01–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50–499]

Houston Lighting & Power Company

City Public Service Board of San

Antonio Central Power and Light

Company City of Austin, Texas; South

Texas Project, Unit 2 Environmental

Assessment And Finding of No

Significant Impact

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (the Commission) is

considering issuance of an exemption

from Facility Operating License No.

NPF–80, issued to Houston Lighting &

Power Company (HL&P) acting on

behalf of itself and for the City Public

Service Board of San Antonio (CPS),

Central Power and Light Company

(CPL), and City of Austin, Texas (COA)

(the licensees), for operation of the

South Texas Project, Unit 2, located in

Matagorda County, Texas.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Acting

The proposed action would grant an

exemption from a requirement of

Section III.D.1.(a) of appendix J to 10

CFR part 50, which requires a set of

three type A tests (Containment

Integrated Leak Rate Test or CILRT) be

performed, at approximately equal

intervals during each 10-year service

period. This licensee request for an

exemption would delay the next

scheduled containment integrated leak

rate test for one outrage, from the fourth

refueling outage to the fifth refueling

outage.

The proposed action is in accordance

with the licensee’s application for

exemption dated March 16, 1995.

The Need for the Proposed Action

The proposed action is needed

because the licensee’s current schedule

would require the second CILRT to be

performed during the fourth refueling

outage (Fall 1995). Minimal safety

benefit would be realized by performing

the scheduled CILRT, since the majority

of primary containment leakage has

previously been identified through the

biennial performance of the Local Leak

Rate Test (LLRT). Without this

exemption, the licensee would not be

allowed to reduce a regulatory burden

that has minimal impact on safety.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed

Action

The Commission has completed its

evaluation of the proposed action and

concludes that the exemption would not

significantly increase the probability or

amount of expected containment

leakage, and that containment integrity

would thus be maintained.

The change will not increase the

probability or consequences of

accidents, no changes are being made in

the types of any effluents that may be

released offsite, and there is no

significant increase in the allowable

individual or cumulative occupational

radiation exposure. Accordingly, the

Commission concludes that there are no

significant radiological environmental

impacts associated with the proposed

action.

With regard to potential

nonradiological impacts, the proposed

action does involve features located

entirely within the restricted area as

defined in 10 CFR part 20. It does not

affect nonradiological plant effluents

and has no other environmental impact.

Accordingly, the Commission concludes

that there are no significant

nonradiological environmental impacts

associated with the proposed action.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

Since the Commission has concluded

there is no measurable environmental

impact associated with the proposed

action, any alternatives with equal or

greater environmental impact need not

be evaluated. As an alternative to the

proposed action, the staff considered

denial of the proposed action. Denial of

the application would result in no

change in current environmental

impacts. The environmental impacts of

the proposed action and the alternative

action are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

This action does not involve the use

of any resources not previously

considered in the ‘‘Final Environmental

Statement related to the operation of

South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2,’’

dated August 1986.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

In accordance with its stated policy,

on April 25, 1995, the staff consulted

with the Texas State official, Arthur C.

Tate of the Bureau of Radiation Control,

Texas Department of Health, regarding

the environmental impact of the

proposed action. The State official had

no comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

Based upon the environmental

assessment, the Commission concludes

that the proposed action will not have

a significant effect on the quality of the

human environment. Accordingly, the

Commission has determined not to

prepare an environmental impact

statement for the proposed action.

For further details with respect to the

proposed action, see the licensee’s letter

dated March 16, 1995, which is

available for public inspection at the

Commission’s Public Document Room,

The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street,

NW., Washington, DC, and at the local

public document room located at the

Wharton County Junior College, J.M.

Hodges Learning Center, 911 Boling

Highway, Wharton, TX 77488.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day

of May 1995.

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

George Kalman,

Project Manager, Project Directorate IV–1,

Division of Reactor Projects—III/IV, Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–13206 Filed 5–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application

To Withdraw From Listing and

Registration; (Pure Tech International,

Inc., Common Stock, $.01 Par Value)

File No. 1–11025

May 24, 1995.

Pure Tech International, Inc.

(‘‘Company’’) has filed an application

with the Securities and Exchange

Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant

to Section 12(d) of the Securities and