alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|               |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                   
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                               
|               |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                     
|               |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                              
|August 6, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                           
|DATE           |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)
|August 6, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ Michael J. Tuszka                                                                                                                            
|DATE           |  | Michael J. Tuszka,
                  Vice President
                  and Chief Accounting Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer)    

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E. Rout, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (First Commonwealth), certify that the Quarterly Report of
First Commonwealth on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.



|                    |  |                                                                    
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATED: May 10, 2011 |  | /s/ Robert E. Rout                                                 
|                    |  | Robert E. Rout Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony R. MarescaAnthony R. Maresca Chief Financial Officer October 15, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION AT LAFAYETTE

NICOLAS B. MARTINEZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 4:13-CV-13 RM

)

)

JON P. PHILLIPS, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Nicolas B. Martinez, a pro se prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (DE

1.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the complaint and dismiss it if the

action is frivolous or malicious, states no claim, or seeks monetary relief against a

defendant who is immune from such relief. Courts apply the same standard under Section

1915A as when deciding a motion under FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6).

Lagerstrom v. Kingston, 463 F.3d 621, 624 (7th Cir. 2006). To survive dismissal, a complaint

must state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. Bissessur v. Indiana Univ. Bd. of

Trs., 581 F.3d 599, 602-603 (7th Cir. 2009). “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff

pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the

defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. at 603. The court must bear in mind that

“[a] document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however

inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 
According to the complaint, Mr. Martinez was convicted in state court of various

drug offenses. He is suing Jon P. Phillips, the attorney who represented him in the criminal

case. He alleges that Mr. Phillips “failed to adequately protect the Plaintiff’s Constitutional

Rights and Liberties” during the criminal case, resulting in “improper incarceration.” 

Mr. Martinez does not explain whether Mr. Phillips is a private attorney or a public

defender, but in any event, the claim against him cannot proceed. Private citizens cannot

be sued for constitutional violations, Savory v. Lyons, 469 F.3d 667, 670 (7th Cir. 2006), and

a public defender does not act under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981) (“[A] public defender does not act under

color of state law when performing a lawyer’s traditional functions as counsel to a

defendant in a criminal proceeding.”). To the extent Mr. Martinez might seek an order

declaring that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated in the criminal case such

that he is being wrongfully imprisoned, this type of relief can only be pursued in a habeas

corpus petition. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973). 

For the reasons set forth above, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 26 , 2013 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

2
2015

Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation

This Annual Report was produced by talented and dedicated staff. 

To these individuals, we would like to offer our sincere thanks and 

appreciation. Special recognition is given to the following for their 

contributions:

♦ Jannie F. Eaddy 

♦ Brian D. Aaron

♦ Barbara A. Glasby

♦ Financial Reporting Section Staff

♦ Division and Office Points-of-Contact
exv10wxaay



 





Exhibit 10(aa)




Amendment to the PartnerShares Stock Option Plan




          RESOLVED that, effective as of July 1, 2003, the second sentence of
Section 3.2 of the PartnerShares Stock Option Plan is amended to read as
follows:




“Shares used as a basis for calculating cash amounts that are used to pay
any portion of the purchase price of an Award or any portion of a
Participant’s income tax withholding resulting from an Award, will also
thereafter be available for Awards or as a basis for calculating Awards
under the Plan.”
Terrance EDWARDS, petitioner, v. Leroy CARTLEDGE, Warden.

No. 13-7097.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1576 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1576

 To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in 
   the State of Idaho as the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey 
   National Conservation Area in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an 
 international authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in the 
    establishment of this National Conservation Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2005

Mr. Otter (for himself and Mr. Simpson) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in 
   the State of Idaho as the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey 
   National Conservation Area in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an 
 international authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in the 
    establishment of this National Conservation Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of 
Prey National Conservation Area Act''.

SEC. 2. RENAMING OF SNAKE RIVER BIRDS OF PREY NATIONAL CONSERVATION 
              AREA.

    (a) Renaming.--Public Law 103-64 is amended--
            (1) in section 2(2) (16 U.S.C. 460iii-1(2)), by inserting 
        ``Morley Nelson'' before ``Snake River Birds of Prey National 
        Conservation Area''; and
            (2) in section 3(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 460iii-2(a)(1)), by 
        inserting ``Morley Nelson'' before ``Snake River Birds of Prey 
        National Conservation Area''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Snake River Birds of 
Prey National Conservation Area shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area.
    (c) Technical Corrections.--Public Law 103-64 is further amended--
            (1) in section 3(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 460iii-2(a)(1)), by 
        striking ``(hereafter referred to as the `conservation 
        area')''; and
            (2) in section 4 (16 U.S.C. 460iii-3)--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking 
                ``Conservation Area'' and inserting ``conservation 
                area''; and
                    (B) in subsection (d), by striking ``Visitors 
                Center'' and inserting ``visitors center''.
                                 <all>
```
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 1 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 2 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 3 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 4 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 5 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 6 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 7 of 8
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 77 filed 07/31/14 page 8 of 8
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties I
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
    
    November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      my knowledge:




(1)    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Anthony
                  R. MarescaAnthony
                  R. MarescaChief
                  Financial OfficerJuly
                  16, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by
      ACR
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FDIC Advisory Committee of 

State Regulators

October 18, 2023

Economic and Banking Conditions Discussion
2

Outline

• Economic Overview

• Economic Growth

• Interest Rates

• Funding and Interest Rate Risk

• NIM

• Deposits

• Funding costs

• Credit Risk
3

The economy remained resilient this year, but conditions varied across states.
4

0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Federal Funds Rate Target - Lower Bound

Percent

Sources: Federal Reserve; CME Group. Data as of Sept. 7, 2023.

Note: Data points to lower limit of Federal Funds Target Rate.

Market based 

expectations 

based on 

federal funds 

futures 

Source: CapitalIQ.

The yield curve inversion deepened this year as rates rose, though markets 

expect the federal funds rate to decrease in the coming quarters.
5

The net interest margin declined for the second consecutive quarter.
6

Liquid assets decreased and wholesale funding increased from the prior 

quarter.
7

Deposits declined for the fifth consecutive quarter and borrowings decreased.
8 *CRE-concentrated is defined as ADC loans >100% or Total CRE loans >300% of Tier 1 Cap and ALLL/ACL.

Almost 1,400 banks report a commercial real estate credit concentration. 
9

Discussion

• How are the banks you supervise being affected by rising 

interest rates?

• What concerns do you have about funding and interest rate 

risk?

• Which bank lending portfolios are of most concern to you?

• What other risks or concerns would you like to highlight?
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Red Giant Entertainment,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, the undersigned, Benny R. Powell, CEO, President, and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|Date: February 20, 2014 |  | /s/ Benny R. Powell                        
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                        |  | Benny R. Powell,                           
|                        |  | CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer    
|                        |  | (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|                        |  |
Alice M. DEANE, petitioner, v. MARSHALLS, INC., et al.

No. 12-10774.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-147290) pertaining to the OSG
America L.P. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan of OSG America L.P. of our reports dated March 4, 2009 with respect to (a) the consolidated financial statements of
OSG America L.P. and the predecessor combined carve-out financial statements of OSG America Predecessor, and (b) the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of OSG America, L.P. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
Ernst & Young

Certified
Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
March 4, 2009

---



QuickLinks
Marita HYMAN, petitioner, v. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 12-752.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Order entered November 19 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00627
- CR DEON REESE EVANS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F12
- 28191
- U



### O RDER
The Court has before it appellant’s November 8, 2013 “objection” to the record. Appellant contends the record is not complete because the clerk’s record does not contain the jury charge for punishment, including the sente nce assessed. Appellant further asserts that “there should be no deadline” for his brief until the record is supplemented. We will treat this “objection” as a motion to supplement the record and to extend time to file appellant’s brief. As such, we GRAN T the motion.
We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing the jury charge for punishment, including the punishment assessed.We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY
- FIVE DAYS of the date of this

order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 14
 CODE OF ETHICS
FOR EMPLOYEES AND DIRECTORS OF CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
  General
  a)
    
    act with honesty and integrity and in an ethical manner and seek to promote the
interests of the Company when the opportunity arises;b)
    
    conduct business honestly and in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations;c)
    
    promote ethical behavior among subordinates and peers;d)
    
    act in good faith, responsibly, with due care and diligence, without misrepresenting
or omitting material facts or allowing their independent judgment to be compromised.
 Conflicts of Interest
  a)
    
    competing, either directly or indirectly, with the Company;b)
    
    acquiring a financial interest in an entity or entering into an association that
interferes or might reasonably be expected to interfere, with the independent exercise of
judgment in the best interests of the Company;c)
    
    soliciting, directly or indirectly, from customers, suppliers or others dealing with
the Company any kind of gift, cash or other personal benefit (unsolicited gifts or business
entertainment that are of a type typically exchanged in business relationships and are of
nominal intrinsic value may be accepted.);d)
    
    engaging in a consulting, managerial, employment or investing relationship with a
competitor, customer, supplier or other third party dealing with the Company that
interferes or might reasonably be expected to interfere with the independent exercise of
judgment (other than minimal ownership of publicly traded securities as a passive
investment); ande)
    
    taking or otherwise appropriating for personal benefit, or for the benefit of any other
person or enterprise, any Company assets or resources or any opportunity or potential
opportunity that arises or may arise in any line of business in which the Company engages
or is likely to engage without first notifying and obtaining the approval of the Board of
Directors. (For example, directly or indirectly acquiring real property, leaseholds,
patents or other properties or rights in which the Company has, or is likely to have, an
interest is prohibited unless approved by the Board of Directors.)




---



##### 



Financials
  Laws and regulations
  Company assets
    Name:Title:Signature:Date:
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.

No. 12-960.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.