alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

PETER FERRARO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2:14-cv-396

JOHN A HUMPHREY, AMERICAN )

NATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, )

MASCO CORPORATION, and OLD )

REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND

Plaintiff, PETER FERRARO, by counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), moves to remand

this proceedings to the Superior Court of Lake County, Indiana, which was improperly removed to

this Court by Defendants, AMERICAN NATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, stating as

follows:

1. Plaintiff commenced a declaratoryjudgment action against Defendants in the Superior Court

of Lake County, Indiana, on September 8, 2014, under original cause number 45D01-1409-

PL-95, relating to an action in the Lake Superior Court which an underlying judgment issued

on January 4, 2007, in an action for personal injury filed on June 8, 2006.

2. Secura removed those proceedings supplemental to this Court from the Lake Superior Court

on November 3, 2014.

3. Secura’s attempt at removal is improper due to procedural defects in the attempted removal.

4. Plaintiff brings this Motion within thirty days of the filing of the notice of removal, as

required by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00396-TLS document 9 filed 11/07/14 page 1 of 3
2

5. This Court should therefore remand this action to the Lake Superior Court for further

proceedings.

6. For further clarification and detail, Plaintiff concurrently submits his Brief in support of this

Motion, along with exhibits, and fully incorporates both documents into this Motion.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, by counsel, prays that this Court remand this proceeding to the

Superior Court of Lake County, Indiana, and grant all other appropriate relief.

 s/Adam J. Sedia 

Adam J. Sedia

Attorney No. 28775-45

Rubino, Ruman, Crosmer & Polen

275 Joliet Street, Suite 330

Dyer, Indiana 46311

Telephone (219) 322-8222

Fax: (219) 322-6675

Email: asedia@rubinoruman.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

.

I hereby certify that on the 7 day of November, 2014 I electronically filed the foregoing with th

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the

following: 

aaron.grant@icemiller.com

Nicholas.Reuhs@icemiller.com

michael.wukmer@icemiller.com

I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the documents to the

following non CM/ECF participants:

John Humphrey

114 Stanley Court

LaPorte, IN 46350

s/ Adam J. Sedia

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00396-TLS document 9 filed 11/07/14 page 2 of 3
3

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00396-TLS document 9 filed 11/07/14 page 3 of 3
#### ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE; Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.; Pacific Environment and Resources Center, Petitioners, v. Dirk KEMPTHORNE, et al., Respondent, Shell Offshore, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor. Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands, A Project of the Indigenous Environmental Network; Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club, Petitioners, v. Dirk Kempthorne, et al., Respondent, Shell Offshore, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor. North Slope Borough; Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission, Petitioners, v. Dirk Kempthorne, et al., Respondent, Shell Offshore, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor.

Nos. 07-71457, 07-71989, 07-72183.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 6, 2009.

Before DOROTHY W. NELSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed on November 20, 2008, and published at 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2008), are hereby vacated and withdrawn. Respondents’ petition for re*917hearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. All pending motions to file amicus briefs in support of rehearing are likewise denied as moot. The opinion vacated and withdrawn will be replaced by a new opinion. Our denial of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is made without prejudice to any party who may wish to file a petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc with regard to the new opinion.

SO ORDERED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of YDI Wireless, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick L.
Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald                  /s/ Patrick L. Milton
-------------------------                 --------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                      Patrick L. Milton
Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  November 10, 2003                  Date:  November 10, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3879-3880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1290]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32639 and Finance Docket No. 32639 (Sub-No. 1)]


Metro North Commuter Railroad Company--Acquisition Exemption--The 
Maybrook Line and Metro North Commuter Railroad Company--Exemption--
From 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IV

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10505, the Interstate Commerce 
Commission exempts: (1) from the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11343-11345, 
the acquisition by Metro North Commuter Railroad Company from Maybrook 
Properties, Inc., of the Maybrook Line, between milepost 71.2 on the 
Connecticut/New York State Line and approximately milepost 0.0<SUP>1 at 
Beacon, NY, a distance of 41.1 miles, subject to standard employee 
protective conditions and (2) Metro North Commuter Railroad 

[[Page 3880]]
Company from the requirements of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IV.

    \1\The connecting branches that form the Maybrook Line also 
retain their original milepost designations used by the former New 
York Central and New York, New Haven & Hartford, which are milepost 
12.8 and milepost 42.9.

DATES: The exemption is effective on January 13, 1995. Petitions to 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
reopen must be filed by February 8, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to Finance Docket Nos. 32639 and 
32639 (Sub-No. 1), to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control 
Branch, Interstate Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423; and (2) Petitioner's representative: John D. 
Heffner, REA, CROSS & HEFFNER, 1920 N Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5612. [TTD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance 
for the hearing impaired is available through TTD services, (202) 927-
5721.]

    Decided: January 12, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-1290 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136141(52) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

FREDERICK D. ADAMS, Justices KAREN L. ADAMS,

SARAH JO ADAMS, DAVID J. ADAMS and 

SUSAN A. ADAMS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 136141 

 COA: 275376 

Oakland CC: 2005-071418-CZ 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ORION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2008 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
EX-35.6
(logo) GMAC Mortgage


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

BSALTA 06-3

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
   Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under
   the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
   all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
   material respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 17th
day of March 2008.


By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name: Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Executive Vice President



GMAC Mortgage, LLC
1100 Virginia Drive
Ft. Washington, PA 19034
Otis McALLISTER, petitioner, v. James CROSS, Jr., Warden.

No. 12-9997.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000714286
<NAME> UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,590,802
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               350,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,234,419
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,565,252
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,565,252
<LOANS>                                     53,840,593
<ALLOWANCE>                                    907,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,039,957
<DEPOSITS>                                  56,881,908
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,785,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            467,731
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,001,499
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,903,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              69,039,957
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,115,822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              702,246
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,818,068
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,364,145
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,343
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,445,580
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  128,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,880,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                620,667
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     620,667
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   620,667
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                    170,678
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               142,575
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                440,038
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               783,143
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,600
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,129
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              907,272
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           907,272
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        467,234


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12939]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


The National Partnership Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announces the next 
meeting of the National Partnership Council (the Council). Notice of 
this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

TIME AND PLACE: The Council will meet June 13, 1995, from 1:00 to 3:00 
p.m., in the Strom Auditorium of the Richard B. Russell Federal 
Building, 75 Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303.

TYPE OF MEETING: This meeting will be open to the public. Seating will 
be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Handicapped 
individuals wishing to attend should contact OPM at the number shown 
below to obtain appropriate accommodations.

POINT OF CONTACT: Douglas K. Walker, National Partnership Council, 
Executive Secretariat, Office of Personnel Management, Theodore 
Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 5315, Washington, DC 
20415-0001, (202) 606-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council is holding meetings outside the 
Washington, DC Metropolitan area in an effort to get the labor-
management partnership message out to as many people as possible. This 
will be an interactive meeting. There will be presentations on 
partnership experiences followed by an audience participation segment. 
Persons seated in the audience will be invited to ask questions from 
the floor. The meeting will end with a discussion of various Council 
workplan items.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: We invite interested persons and organizations to 
submit written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your 
comments or recommendations to Mr. Douglas K. Walker at the address 
shown above. Comments should be received by June 9, in order to be 
considered at the June 13, meeting.

Office of Personnel Management.
James B. King,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-12939 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
EXHIBIT 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  Subsidiary
    
    Ownership
    
    State of IncorporationCape Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New Jersey
  Subsidiary
    
    Ownership
    
    State of IncorporationCape New Jersey Investment Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New JerseyCape Delaware Investment Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    DelawareCASABA Real Estate Holding Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New JerseyCape May County Savings Service Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New Jersey (Inactive)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7846

TYRONE WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER YOUNG, Police Officer; CARL MOORE,

Police Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

OFFICER HAMILTON,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-97-384-3)

Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Anton Joseph Stelly, THOMPSON,

SMITHERS, NEWMAN & WADE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
* All parties consented to the jurisdiction and authority of

the magistrate judge to enter final judgment in this action.

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Walker appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.* We

have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s oral opinion

and find no reversible error. Based on testimony adduced at trial,

the magistrate judge did not err by concluding that neither of the

named Defendants was responsible for Walker’s injuries. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the magistrate judge. See Walker v.

Hamilton, No. CA-97-384-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00195-PRC document 125 filed 03/22/17 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00195-PRC document 125 filed 03/22/17 page 2 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00195-PRC document 125 filed 03/22/17 page 3 of 3
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 6397

MY ’ KA EL

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

R. REESE, Officer

,

Defendant

- Appellee

,

and

CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; M. SULLIVAN, Officer; S. SELOGY, Officer; FNU MEYERS, Officer; FNU AGAPE, Officer; K. S. KODAD, Officer; FNU ISSAC, Officer; FNU AIRTONE, Lieutenant;
S. MOBLEY; T. MOORE; T. WILSON; J. FLETCHER, Officer; J. PARKER; P. MOORE; L.B. DIGGS; B. BUTLER; NURSE FNU GREEN, Sergeant; M. W. WOMBLE; M. T. RETORT; B. SCAREY; T. CASTANO; FNU STOUTS, Sergeant; R. MONROE; J. H. FRISON; R. BURNETT; BRADON JOLLY, North Carolina State Trooper; W. L. CANTER; COOPER JERRELL, Mecklenburg County Sheriff; FNU EASON; FNU STREET, Sergeant; FNU GANT , Sergeant;
FNU HOOD, Officer; R. CHAPMAN, Mecklenburg County Magistrate

,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

, at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv

- 00051

- RJC

- DCK )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 20172 Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

My’ Ka El , Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson , CITY ATTORNEY’ S OFFICE

, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

My’ Ka El appeals the district court’s order s denying his motion for the

appointment of counsel and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. El v. Reese

, 3:16

- cv

- 00051

- RJC

- DCK (W.D.N.C.

Aug 18, 2016 & Feb. 28, 2017)

. We deny El’s motion seeking a restraining order and the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional p rocess.

AFFIRMED
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00463-RLM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00463-RLM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00463-RLM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00463-RLM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00463-RLM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6399
JERRY BRADLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE HINKLE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge; Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-628-R) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Jerry Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Hinkle , No. CA-96-628-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 16, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED