alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Ted L. Hall, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kiewit RoyaltyTrust, for which U.S. Bank National Association acts as Trustee;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trustcorpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such procedures tobe established and maintained, for the registrant and I have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchcontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant is made known to me by otherswithin the registrant, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors:
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
     In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied tothe extent I consider reasonable on information provided to me by AmberBrewster, Bank of Oklahoma.
Date: November 14, 2003
By: /s/ Ted L. Hall
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1523

ANDREW CHIEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VA; MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY; KARL S. LEONARD, Sheriff of Chesterfield County; FREDERICK G. ROCKWELL, III, Judge of Chesterfield Circuit Court; JUDY L. WORTHINGTON, former Clerk of Chesterfield Circuit Court; MARY E. CRAZE, Deputy Clerk of Chesterfield Circuit Court; WENDY S. HUGHES, Clerk of Chesterfield Circuit Court; DONAL D W. LEMONS, Chief Justice of VA Supreme Court; GLEN A. HUFF, Chief Judge of VA Court of Appeals; W. ALLAN SHARRETT, Hon., Chief Judge, Prince George Circuit Court; DENNIS S. PROFFITT , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O ’ Grady , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 00677

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judge s , and SHEDD , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Andrew Chien , Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Snead Gregor , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia; Jeffrey Lee Mincks, County Attorney, Emily Claire Russell , COUNTY ATTORNEY’ S OFFICE , Chesterfield, Virginia ; John P. O ’ Herron , THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC , Richmond, Virginia ; William Fisher Etherington, BEALE, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & MORRIS, PC , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
A ndrew Chien appeals an order of the district court ruling on two postjudgment motions. First, the district court denied Chien’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider its judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We review
this order for an abuse of discretion, Aikens v. Ingram , 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc), and we perceive no such abuse in the district court’s ruling. Chien also seeks to challenge the court’s denial of an extension of time to file an appeal. As Chien has filed a timely appeal, this portion of the appeal is moot. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and deny Chien’s motion to disqualify the district court judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Rafael Fernandez, Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent dated February 14, 1984, which, after a hearing, found *756petitioner in violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, assessed a penalty of cancellation of petitioner’s liquor license and imposed a $1,000 bond claim.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs (see, *300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176; *Matter of Dumbarton Oaks Rest. & Bar v New York State Liq. Auth.,*58 NY2d 89). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-48-TLS 

)

JUAN PEREZ )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 10], filed on December 11, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 10] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in the single count of the Information is hereby

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on December 28, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-3-TLS 

)

DEANDRE BANKS )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 55], filed on May 29, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 55] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on June 17, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 99.4
Annual Administrator's Certificate
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services55 Water StreetNew York, New York 10041Attention: Asset-Backed Surveillance Group
Fitch RatingsOne State Street PlazaNew York, New York 10004Attention:  Structured Finance
Moody's Investors Service Inc.99 Church StreetNew York, New York 10007Attention:  Structured Finance
Wachovia Bank, National Association401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28288Attention:  Structured Finance Trust Services
SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1c/o Wilmington Trust CompanyRodney Square North, 1100 North Market StreetWilmington, Delaware 19890-0001Attention:  Corporate Trust Administration
 As an officer of The Student Loan Corporation, the Administrator of SLC Student LoanTrust 2004-1 (the Administrator) pursuant to a certain Administration Agreement dated as of November 23, 2004 between the SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1and The Student Loan Corporation (the Administration Agreement), I hereby certify that:(a)a review of the activities of the Administrator during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Administration Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (b)to the best of my knowledge, based on such a review, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its  obligations under the Administration Agreement throughout the period ended December 31, 2004, and  there have been no known defaults in the fulfillment of such obligations.    
/s/ Daniel P. McHugh                                                                             March 31, 2005   Daniel P. McHugh                                                                                         DateChief Financial OfficerThe Student Loan Corporation, as Administrator
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1728 Engrossed in House (EH)]

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1728

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
  feasibility of designating portions of Ste. Genevieve County in the 
State of Missouri as a unit of the National Park System, and for other 
                               purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1728

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
  feasibility of designating portions of Ste. Genevieve County in the 
State of Missouri as a unit of the National Park System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ste. Genevieve County National 
Historic Site Study Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Area.--The term ``Area'' means Ste. Genevieve County, 
        Missouri, which includes the Bequette-Ribault, St. Gemme-
        Amoureaux, and Wilhauk homes, and the related and supporting 
        historical assets located in Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National 
        Park Service.

SEC. 3. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which 
funds are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary shall, in 
consultation with the State of Missouri--
            (1) complete a study on the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the Area as a unit of the National Park System, 
        which shall include the potential impact that designation of 
        the area as a unit of the National Park System is likely to 
        have on land within the proposed area or bordering the proposed 
        area that is privately owned at the time that the study is 
        conducted; and
            (2) submit to the Committee on Resources of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
        Resources of the Senate a report describing the findings of the 
        study.
    (b) Contents.--The study under subsection (a) shall be conducted in 
accordance with Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-1 et seq.).

            Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Mark Ryland DOWDY, petitioner, v. Samuel V. PRUETT, Warden.

No. 13-6547.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Schedule



 EXHIBIT 10p6 
  
 Schedule identifying substantially identical agreement, among Fortune Brands, Inc. (“Fortune”) and each of the following persons, to the Amendment constituting
Exhibit 10p5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fortune for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. 
  
 Name 
  
 Mark Hausberg
Ellis Harley BARBER, petitioner, v. Barack H. OBAMA, President of the United States, et al.

No. 13-6956.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  I,
        Steven
        B. Solomon certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
        CDSS
        Wind Down Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents
        in all
        material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CDSS
        Wind
        Down Inc.
 
 
 By:/s/
                  STEVEN B. SOLOMONName:
                  Steven B. SolomonTitle:
                  President and Chief Executive OfficerApril
                  2, 2007
 
 
 I,
        Richard Connelly certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
        Report of CDSS Wind Down Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
        2006
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
        presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
        operations of CDSS Wind Down  Inc.
 
 
 By:/s/
                  RICHARD CONNELLYName:
                  Richard ConnellyTitle:
                  Chief Financial OfficerApril
                  2, 2007
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Company’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: March 30, 2009 /s/ Peter Tiedemann   Peter Tiedemann   Chief Financial Officer
#### TRAITEL MARBLE CO. v. BROWN BROS., Inc.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 11, 1913.)

Action by the Traitel Marble Company against Brown Bros., Incorporated.

No opinion. Application grapted. Order signed. See, also, 135 N. Y. Supp. 12.
EX-34.4
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
JPMorgan Chase Tower
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201-6778
USA

Tel: +1 214 840 7000
www.deloitte.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors
Centerline Servicing Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Centerline Servicing Inc. (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as
servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the "Platform") as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)-l122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and
1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform.
Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer
involving first lien commercial mortgage loans is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 28, 2008

Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.55

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                        COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                              ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Countrywide Financial Corporation (the "Company") desires to amend the
Countrywide Financial Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (the "Plan") to modify
the amount of maximum Award that a Participant can receive for any Plan Year;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended to read as follows February 11, 2003

         1.       Section 4.3, MAXIMUM AWARDS, is hereby amended by deleting
         Section 4.3 in its entirety and inserting in its place new Section 4.3
         as follows:

         "4.3 MAXIMUM AWARDS. The maximum Award payable to a Participant for any
         plan year is eight million dollars ($8,000,000).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed
by its duly authorized officer as of this 24th day of June, 2003.

                                              Countrywide Financial Corporation

                                              By: /s/  Thomas H. Boone
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                    Thomas H. Boone
Attest:                                                 Managing Director,
                                                    Chief Administrative Officer

/s/ Gerard A. Healy
------------------------------
Gerard A. Healy
Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 10.62 NSE FORM 10-K 2003 Robert Conlee Employment Agreement







November 22, 2003 



Mr. Robert Conlee
 Via Email 



      RE:
Employment Terms



Dear Robert: 



        This
letter will confirm our understanding with respect to your new position and the terms of
engagement. 



        Your
titles will be President, Nu Skin Japan, and President of the North Asia Region, which
will include Japan and South Korea. 



        Effective
November 26, 2003 your base annual salary will increase from $250,000 to $300,000. Your
foreign annual service premium will increase from $35,000 to $50,000. 



        In
addition to the ex pat benefits you already receive, you will be entitled to a total of
two home leaves/year. The company will pay for business class travel for you and your
spouse and for coach fare travel for your children in connection with these two home
leaves. 



        You
will receive an option grant of 100,000 shares, vesting 25% per year, on the same vesting
dates as the 100,000 share option grant issued to you in July 2003. So the initial 25,000
shares will vest in July 2004. The exercise price will be the closing price on November
26, 2003, the date of grant. 



        For
calendar year 2004, you will also be entitled to receive an annual cash bonus payment
equal to the greater of (a) the actual bonus earned by you under the terms of the
Company’s standard cash incentive plan, or (b) $125,000. The $125,000 minimum cash
bonus payment will be received, however, only if local currency revenue of Nu Skin Japan
does not decline over the prior year’s revenue. After calendar year 2004, your cash
bonuses will be paid in accordance with the company’s standard incentive plan. 



        Upon
execution of this agreement, you will receive a “signing bonus” of $100,000.
Half of this bonus will be paid in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the remainder in the
first quarter of 2004. 









        These
employment terms are offered with the expectation that you will reside in and work from
Tokyo at least until June 2007. In the event you relocate to the U.S. during this period
of time for any reason other than the company’s request, the terms above will be
renegotiated. In addition, a relocation to the U.S. for any reason other than the
company’s request will require that you reimburse the company a prorated portion of
the signing bonus referenced above. 



        You
will also be subject to all other key employee covenants to which all of the
Company’s senior management members are subject. 



Sincerely, 



/s/  Truman Hunt
Truman Hunt 
President and Chief
Executive Officer 



Agreed as of December 12,
2003: 




/s/  Robert Conlee

Robert Conlee