alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E. Rout, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (First Commonwealth), certify that the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.



|                    |  |                                                                    
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATED: May 10, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert E. Rout                                                 
|                    |  | Robert E. Rout Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00065-CR

EX PARTE CHESTER SINCLAIR

On Appeal from the

227th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 1997CR3391W1

JUDGMENT

This Court’s judgment issued on December 16, 2021, is hereby withdrawn and 

the following is substituted therefor.

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 3, 2022
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark T. Brown, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tarsis Resources Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   January 30, 2015





/s/  Mark T. Brown

Mark T. Brown

Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-14-TLS 

) 

DERRICK L. THOMAS ) 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 288], filed on September 21, 2017. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 288] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense 

charged in Counts One (1) and Two (2) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant 

is adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on October 11, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 27, 2007 

133488 

KENNETH DANIELS, #138536 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

 SC: 133488 

 CoA: 264527 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of March 27, 2007, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 27, 2007 

Clerk
Derek TODD, petitioner, v. LAN WANG, et al.

No. 12-9079.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual report of Osage Exploration and Development, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Kim Bradford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Osage Exploration and Development, Inc. and will be retained by
Osage Exploration and Development, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: March
      19, 2010
            By:
            /s/ 
      Kim
      BradfordKim
      BradfordChief
      Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Michelle Roberts Bartolic, State Bar No. 

239092 

Email: mroberts@robertsbartolic.com 

ROBERTS BARTOLIC LLP 

1050 Marina Village Pkwy., Suite 105 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Tel: (510) 992-6130 

Fax: (510) 280-7564 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THIERRY LEBEAU 

Anna M. Martin (State Bar No. 154279) 

Email: amartin@mmhllp.com 

Grant Ingram (State Bar No. 242785) 

Email: gingram@mmhllp.com 

MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 

800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 

Los Angeles, CA 90017-2611 

Tel: (213) 620-0300 

Fax: (213) 625-1930 

Attorneys for Defendant 

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

NORTH AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THIERRY LEBEAU, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH 

AMERICA, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case Number: 4:17-cv-00728-HSG 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND 

ORDER 

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) 

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. 

GILLIAM, JR., ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: 

In execution of a settlement and release agreement between the parties, it is hereby 

stipulated by and between Plaintiff THIERRY LEBEAU and Defendant LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, through their respective attorneys of record, that the 

above-captioned action shall be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear 

its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: S

Dated: S

I,

has been 

Dated: Se

 

PURSUA

T

party sha

Dated: Se

September 1,

September 1,

, Michelle R

obtained fro

eptember 1, 

 

ANT TO ST

This action is

all bear its ow

eptember 1, 20

, 2017 

, 2017 

S

Roberts Barto

om the other

2017 

 

TIPULATIO

s hereby dism

wn attorneys

017 

Pa

SIGNATUR

olic, hereby a

r signatory o

 

 

ON, IT IS S

missed with 

s’ fees and c

age 2 of 2

ROBERTS

By: /s/ M

Miche

Attorn

THIER

MESERVE

By: /s/ An

Anna 

Attorn

LIFE 

NORT

RE ATTEST

attest that co

n this docum

 By: /

 Mic

O ORDERE

prejudice. A

osts. 

UNITE

HA

BARTOLIC

Michelle Robe

elle Roberts 

neys for Plai

RRY LEBEA

E, MUMPER

nna M. Mar

M. Martin 

neys for Def

INSURANC

TH AMERIC

TATION 

oncurrence in

ment. 

/s/Michelle R

chelle Rober

ED. 

All case dead

ED STATES

AYWOOD S

C LLP 

erts Bartolic

Bartolic 

intiff 

AU 

R & HUGHE

rtin 

fendant 

CE COMPA

CA 

n the filing o

Roberts Bart

rts Bartolic 

dlines shall b

S DISTRICT

S. GILLIAM

c 

ES LLP 

 

ANY OF 

of the docum

tolic 

be vacated. 

T JUDGE 

M, JR. 

 

 

ment 

Each
Lee Arthur LOGAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3090

___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee ,

v. Joshua Humbach, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant .

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________ Submitted: February 28, 2024 Filed: March 8, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Joshua Humbach appeals a sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm as a felon. Humbach signed a plea

1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. On de novo review, we will enforce the appeal waiver. Humbach knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement. A challenge to his sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver. No miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the appeal waiver. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 74612
<PP&E>                                        15871457
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                15982814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4789950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    3225000
<COMMON>                                      19422457
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  15982814
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   544931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 72151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               63746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (627082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (627082)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (627082)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-25-TLS 

 ) 

MICHAEL TRESSLER ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 28], filed on February 19, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 28] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby 

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on March 6, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<PAGE>

                     TREMISIS ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION




                                                     ______________, 2004
Coqui Capital Partners, L.P.
1775 Broadway
Suite 604
New York, New York 10019


Gentlemen:

         This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the
effective date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial
public offering ("IPO") of the securities of Tremisis Energy Acquisition
Corporation ("TEAC") and continuing until the consummation by TEAC of a
"Business Combination" (as described in TEAC's IPO prospectus), Coqui Capital
Partners L.P. shall make available to TEAC certain office and secretarial
services as may be required by TEAC from time to time, situated at 1775
Broadway, Suite 604, New York, New York 10019. In exchange therefore, TEAC shall
pay Coqui Capital Partners L.P. the sum of $3,500 per month on the Effective
Date and continuing monthly thereafter.


                                          Very truly yours,


                                          TREMISIS ENERGY
                                          ACQUISITION CORPORATION




                                          By:  ________________________________
                                               Name: Lawrence S. Coben
                                               Title: Chairman of the Board

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

COQUI CAPITAL PARTNERS L.P.


By:   _________________
      Name: Isaac Kier
      Title: General Partner
|                         | 2003    | 2004   | 2005   | 2006   | 2007   |
|------------------------------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Spending per Assessment Base | 0.0198% | 0.0186 | 0.0168 | 0.0152 | 0.0147 |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1287 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1287

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 332 South Main Street in Flora, Illinois, as the ``Robert T. 
                    Ferguson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2005

 Mr. Shimkus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 332 South Main Street in Flora, Illinois, as the ``Robert T. 
                    Ferguson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT T. FERGUSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 332 South Main Street in Flora, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Robert T. Ferguson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert T. 
Ferguson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
2001 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-26-2001

Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 00-2373

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 248.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/248
Filed October 26, 2001 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 00-2373 

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Appellant 

v. 

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of New Jersey 

D.C. Civil Action No. 96-cv-03153 

(Honorable Jerome B. Simandle) 

Argued April 5, 2001 

Before: SCIRICA, AMBRO and GIBSON,* 

Circuit Judges 

_________________________________________________________________ 

* The Honorable John R. Gibson, United States Circuit Judge for the 

Eighth Judicial Circuit, sitting by designation. 
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the slip opinion in the 

above case, filed October 19, 2001, be amended as follows: 

 Page 48, lines 20-21, the sentence which reads: 

 "In its limited discussion of the reverse 

 discrimination claim, the court stated," 

 shall read: 

 "In its limited discussion of the reverse confusion 

 claim, the court stated," 

 BY THE COURT, 

 /s/Anthony J. SciricaCircuit Judge 

DATED: October 26, 2001 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 12, 2015 520932 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

 KATHERINE ROSE, 

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 22, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

__________

Katherine Rose, Newburgh, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City

(Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed December 8, 2014, which ruled that claimant's

request for a hearing was untimely. 

Decision affirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.
-2- 520932 

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-148950) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Participation Plan, the 2002 Equity Participation Plan, the IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 2007 Equity Participation Plan and the IPC The Hospitalist Company,Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofIPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

February 27, 2009