alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 10, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01104-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.S., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court 

Hunt County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 79,649 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

This is an appeal in a parental termination case. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence 

to which two contests were filed. The trial court sustained the contests and, on review, this Court 

affirmed the trial court’s order. 

 In an order dated September 22, 2014, we ordered the district clerk to file, by October 2, 

2014, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant had not paid or made 

arrangements to pay for the record. We cautioned appellant that if the Court received written 

verification of no payment, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. On October 2, 

2014, the Court received written verification from the district clerk that appellant had not paid or 

made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) & 42.3(b). 

141104F.P05 

 /Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.S., A CHILD 

No. 05-14-01104-CV 

 On Appeal from the 196th Judicial 

District Court, Hunt County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. 79,649. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellees, Richard Roberts and Ashley Roberts, recover their costs 

of this appeal from appellant, Danny Ray Schwartz. 

Judgment entered October 10, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 1:14-CR-22-HAB 

 ) 

MARTIN GONZALEZ MEDINA ) 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Return of Property (ECF No. 58), requesting 

the return of various items he alleges were seized by the DEA on April 28, 2014. In its Response 

(ECF No. 61), the Government asserts that the items were seized by the Fort Wayne Police 

Department who destroyed all the items on November 15, 2019. 

 Since the Court cannot order the return of property that no longer exists, Defendant’s 

Motion for Return of Property (ECF No. 58) is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED on October 7, 2020. 

 s/ Holly A. Brady 

JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cr-00022-HAB-RBC document 64 filed 10/07/20 page 1 of 1
United States
                       Securities and Exchange Commission
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                  Form 10-Q/A

|X| Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997

                                       OR

|_| Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934

      For the transition period from ________________ to _________________




                           BOEING CAPITAL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                           Delaware 95-2564584 0-10795
     (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer (Commission File No.)
               Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)

     4060 Lakewood Boulevard, 6th Floor o Long Beach, California 90808-1700
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (562) 627-3000
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                      McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation
                   (Former name if changed since last report)


  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months,  and (2) has been subject to such filing  requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|


Common shares outstanding at August 14, 1997:                     50,000 shares

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b)
to Form 10-Q and is  therefore  filing  this Form  with the  reduced  disclosure
format.



                                   Signatures


Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned,  its principal  financial  officer and by its principal  accounting
officer, thereunto duly authorized.



                                      Boeing Capital Corporation


August 14, 1997                        /s/ STEVEN W. VOGEDING
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Steven W. Vogeding
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial
                                      Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and
                                      Registrant's Authorized Officer




                                      /s/ MAURA R. MIZUGUCHI
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Maura R. Mizuguchi
                                      Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-81 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
In re Terence One BOYD, petitioner.

No. 12-10033.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7634
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HARRY T. KEELING, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-62-R, CA-96-622-R) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Harry T. Keeling, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Keeling , Nos.CR-93-62-R; CA-96-622-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 11, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion requesting transcripts at government expense because the appeal does not present a substantial question. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30148 Summary Calendar

JESSIE JERMAINE BELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF BATON ROUGE; ET AL.,

Defendants,
CITY OF BATON ROUGE; EUGENE SMITH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-952

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Jessi e Jermaine Bell appeals the district court’s summaryjudgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
Bell contends that his lawsuit was not time-barred because he
had been incarcerated for 10 mo nths and did not consult with a private attorney about a possible lawsuit during that time.
Louisiana does not have a tolling provision based on a plaintiff’sNo. 03-30148 -2- imprisonment. S ee Kissinger v. Foti , 544 F.2d 1257, 1258 (5th Cir. 1977). Furthermore, ignorance of the law does not toll the limitations period. See Groom v. Energy Corp. of Am. , 650 So. 2d 324, 326 (La. Ct. App. 1995).
Bell further argues that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint on statute-of-limitations grounds violated the due

process clause. Bell has not satisfied his burden of demonstrating that the legislature acted in an arbitrary and irrational manner.
See S eoane v. Ortho Pharms., Inc. , 660 F.2d 146, 151 (5th Cir. 1981). The one-year prescriptive period for filing a 42 U.S.C. §
1983 complaint does not violate Bell’s due process rights. S ee Montagino v. Canale , 792 F.2d 554, 557-58 (5th Cir. 1986) (medical malpractice case); Wayne v. Tenn. Valley Auth. , 730 F.2d 392, 404 (5th Cir. 1984) (products liability case). The district court did

not err in awarding summary judgment to the City of Baton Rouge and
Smith.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ending November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12976]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Union Planters Corporation, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions 
by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than June 19, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. Union Planters Corporation, Memphis, Tennessee; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Union Planters Bank of Central 
Misissippi, Jackson, Mississippi, a de novo bank, and to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Union Planters Bank of Southern 
Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, a de novo bank.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Andrews Bancshares, Inc., Andrews, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Andrews Delaware Financial Corporation, Dover, Delaware, and thereby 
indirectly acquire National Bank of Andrews, Andrews, Texas.
     In connection with this application, Andrews Delaware Financial 
Corporation, Dover, Delaware; has also applied to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of National Bank 
of Andrews, Andrews, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12976 Filed 05-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.
  /s/ Neal R. VerfuerthNeal R. VerfuerthChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27698-27699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12777]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

46 CFR Part 501


The Federal Maritime Commission--General

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Commission is delegating to the Bureau of 
Hearing Counsel the authority to compromise issues relating to the 
retention, suspension or revocation of ocean freight forwarder 
licenses. Concurrently, the authority of the Director, Bureau of 
Tariffs, Certification and Licensing, to determine corrective action 
with respect to such licensees is removed. Notice and public procedures 
are not necessary prior to the issuance of this rule because it deals 
solely with matters of agency organization. Neither is a delayed 
effective date required.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 25, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vern W. Hill, Acting Director, Bureau 
of Hearing Counsel, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capital 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20573-0001, (202) 523-5783.

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 501

    Administrative practice and procedure, Authority delegations 
(Government agencies), Organization and functions (Government 
agencies), Seals and insignia.

    Accordingly, chapter IV of title 46 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 501--THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION--GENERAL

    1. The authority citation for Part 501 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 551-557, 701-706, 2903 and 6304; 31 U.S.C. 
3721; 41 U.S.C. 414 and 418; 44 U.S.C. 501-520 and 3501-3520; 46 
U.S.C. app. 801-848, 876, 1111, and 1701-1720; Reorganization Plan 
No. 7 of 1961, 26 FR 7315, August 12, 1961; Pub. L. 89-56, 79 Stat. 
195; 5 CFR Part 2638.

Subpart C--Delegation and Redelegation of Authorities


Sec. 501.27  [Amended]

    2. Section 501.27(o) is removed.
    3. Section 501.28 is revised to read as follows:


Sec. 501.28  Delegation to the Director, Bureau of Hearing Counsel.

    The authority to compromise civil penalty claims has been delegated 
to the Director, Bureau of Hearing Counsel, by Sec. 502.604(g) of this 
chapter. This delegation shall include the authority to 
[[Page 27699]] compromise issues relating to the retention, suspension 
or revocation of ocean freight forwarder licenses. See also 
Secs. 501.5(i) and 501.21.

    By the Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12777 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Paul Goddard, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of ARYx
Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), and John Varian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.     The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2.     The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 26th day of March, 2009.

/s/ PAUL GODDARD Paul Goddard Chief Executive Officer

/s/ JOHN VARIAN John Varian Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1556 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the 

Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. 

Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 1556 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The parcel of land described in section 3, and located 

3 on the site of the Thomas F. Eagleton United States 

4 Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and 

5 designated as the ‘‘Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the parcel 

9 of land described in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref10 erence to the ‘‘Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park’’. 

11 SEC. 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. 

12 The parcel of land designated under section 1 is the 

13 parcel bounded by South 10th Street, Clark Avenue, 

14 South 9th Street, and Walnut Street in St. Louis, Mis15 souri. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§
1350, as adopted), Stephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 10, 2004



/s/ STEPHEN M. SMITHStephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer