alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1277]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[PRT-797427]


Receipt of Applicant(s) for Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531, et seq.)

Applicant: Brita H. Cantrell, Executive Director, The Nature 
Conservancy, Tulsa, OK

    The applicant requests a permit to include take activities for the 
Black-capped vireo for the purpose of scientific research and 
enhancement of propagation and survival of the species as prescribed by 
Service recovery documents.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days for 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See ADDRESSES above.)
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM.
[FR Doc. 95-1277 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China
Infrastructure Construction Corporation (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
August 30, 2010




/s/ Rong YangRong
      Yang
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                (principal
      executive officer)





/s/ Yiru ShiYiru
      Shi
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                (principal
      financial officer
                and
      principal accounting officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Infrastructure Construction Corporation and will be retained by China
Infrastructure Construction Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         149,074
<SECURITIES>                                       767
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,440
<PP&E>                                       4,001,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,737,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,458,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,490
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,425,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,458,109
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                206,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            206,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   206,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                      23.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.34


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ChinaEdu Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Julia Huang, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Julia HuangJulia HuangChairman and Chief Executive OfficerJune 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-615
In Re: JOHN RAGIN, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-72-2-23AJ) Submitted: August 12, 1997 Decided: August 28, 1997 Before HALL, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Ragin, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:John Ragin petitions this court for a Writ of Mandamus granting the relief sought in his previously filed habeas corpus petition. Ragin asserts the right to this relief based on the districtcourt's delay in ruling on his request for habeas relief. Subsequent, however, to the filing of this petition for mandamus relief, the district court issued an order dismissing Ragin's habeas action without pre judice. Therefore, to the extent that the petition before this court complains of delay in the district court, that complaint is now moot. To the extent that Ragin requests relief onthe merits of his habeas petition, mandamus relief is only available if Ragin can show that no other remedy is available to him. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). Ragin's petition asserts no reason why he could not seek review through the normal appeals process. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but the petition for a Writ of Mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





The undersigned, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief
Executive Officer of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC., and Zong Yun Zhou, Chief Financial
Officer of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.


Dated: November 18,
      2010/s/
      Xiao Ping ZhangXiao Ping
Zhang
              Chief Executive
      Officer/s/
      Zong Yun ZhouZong Yun
    ZhouChief Financial
      Officer
Emma D'ANGELO, petitioner, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 13-6884.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RFMSI Series 2007-SA4 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of August 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2007 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Funding Mortgage Securities I, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys
report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          13,496
<SECURITIES>                                   218,161
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,657
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       371,322
<OTHER-SE>                                   (139,665)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,657
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   485
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

RONI AIZIGOV 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JEH JOHNSON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Case No. 3:15-CV-047 JD 

OPINION AND ORDER

Now before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Default Judgment under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Under that rule, “[w]hen a party against whom a 

judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure 

is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” For a party to have 

an obligation to plead or otherwise defend an action, though, it must first be properly served. The 

defendants here are four individuals sued in their official capacities as officers or employees of 

the Department of Homeland Security, a United States agency. “To serve a United States agency 

or corporation, or a United States officer or employee sued only in an official capacity, a party 

must serve the United States and also send a copy of the summons and of the complaint by 

registered or certified mail to the agency, corporation, officer, or employee.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 

4(i)(2) (emphasis added). 

The record indicates that the Plaintiff has only completed the latter requirement, in that 

he has sent the summons to each of the individuals. To properly complete service, however, he 

must also serve the United States according to the procedures specified under the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1), to properly serve the United States, a plaintiff must 

do each of the following: 
2 

(A)(i) deliver a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United States 

attorney for the district where the action is brought—or to an assistant United 

States attorney or clerical employee whom the United States attorney designates 

in a writing filed with the court clerk—or (ii) send a copy of each by registered or 

certified mail to the civil-process clerk at the United States attorney’s office; 

(B) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of 

the United States at Washington, D.C.; and 

(C) if the action challenges an order of a nonparty agency or officer of the United 

States, send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the agency or officer. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1). 

Because the Plaintiff has not yet completed all of those steps, the Defendants have not yet 

been properly served, and have no obligation to plead or otherwise defend in this action, so entry 

of default is not warranted. Therefore, the Court DENIES the motion for entry of default. [DE 

10].

 SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: May 11, 2015 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court
Torrence S. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General.

No. 13-6942.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Velma Jean RICHARDS, petitioner, v. BRITISH PETROLEUM, et al.

No. 13-5335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2

•iuim.yjMJWimi^MUHMimin Ej5^ 53? New Offender Search

%3,^%-C>

Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number: 08707052

TDCJ Number: 01938775

Name: JOHNSON.ANTHONYJR

Race: B

Gender: M

DOB: 1990-07-15

Maximum Sentence Date: 2015-12-22

Current Facility: TELFORD

Projected Release Date: 2015-12-22

Parole Eligibility Date: 2014-05-12

Offender Visitation Eligible: NO

The offender is temporarily ineligible for visitation. Please call the offender's unit for any

additional information.

The visitation information is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day

on visitation days.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release Location:

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Parole Review Information

Offense History:

Offense Date Offense Sentence Date County Case No. Sentence (YY-MM-DD)

http://offender.tdcj .texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=08707052 6/30/2015
Francisco HERNANDEZ-SALAZAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9498.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EX-34.11
(logo) Grant Thornton

Accountants and Business Advisors


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that Land America Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential and
commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company served as
third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria
1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x)
and 1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to
the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Land America Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Diego, CA
February 6, 2008


12340 El Camino Real
Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92130
T 858.704.8000
F 858.704.8099
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US Member of Grant Thornton International
Wayne NORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

EDWARDS, J.

*830Wayne Norris appeals the order denying his postconviction motion, in which he sought additional credit against his prison sentence for the period of time he had been at liberty after being erroneously released from prison. We agree with the postconviction court's finding that under the present circumstances, Norris appears to be entitled to credit against his sentence for time spent at liberty when he was prematurely released from prison through no fault of his own. *See* *Drumwright v. State* , 572 So. 2d 1029, 1031 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (holding the sentence of a prisoner who is discharged without contributing fault continues to run while he is at liberty).

However, we also agree with the postconviction court that it is up to the Department of Corrections to afford Norris that credit. *See* *State v. Mendiola* , 919 So. 2d 471, 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding the trial court's order awarding defendant credit for time spent at liberty when he was prematurely released from prison violated separation of powers doctrine).

Accordingly, we affirm the postconviction court's order denying Norris' postconviction motion without prejudice to Norris to pursue administrative remedies by appropriate application to the DOC. Should Norris not obtain the relief he believes he is entitled to, after exhausting his administrative remedies, he may seek judicial relief. *See* *Bostrom v. State* , 732 So. 2d 1228, 1229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (holding defendant seeking post-sentence credit must exhaust administrative remedies available to him before he seeks relief from the courts).

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, J., concurs.

EISNAUGLE, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

EISNAUGLE, J., concurring specially.

I concur that the trial court did not err because Appellant has not exhausted his administrative remedies. However, I would not reach the merits of Appellant's entitlement to credit.