26824 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

Novel or Unusual Design Feature

The BHTI Model 222U helicopter, at

the time of the application for

modification by Heli-Dyne Systems,

Inc., was identified as incorporating one

and possibly more electrical, electronic,

or combination of electrical and

electronic (electrical/electronic) systems

that will perform functions critical to

the continued safe flight and landing of

the helicopter. The electronic flight

instrument system performs the attitude

display function. The display of

attitude, altitude, and airspeed is critical

to the continued safe flight and landing

of the helicopters for IFR operations in

Instrument Meteorological Conditions.

If it is determined that these

helicopters will incorporate other

electrical/electronic systems performing

critical functions, those systems also

will be required to comply with the

requirements of this special condition.

Discussion of Comments

Notice of Proposed Special Condition

No. SC–94–3–SW was published in the

Federal Register on December 27, 1994

(59 FR 66489). No comments were

received. Therefore, the special

condition is adopted as proposed.

Conclusion

This action affects only certain

unusual or novel design features on one

model of helicopter. It is not a rule of

general applicability and affects only

the applicant who applied to the FAA

for approval of these features on the

affected helicopter.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29

Aircraft, Air transportation, Aviation

safety, Rotorcraft, Safety.

The authority citation for this special

condition is as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1344, 1348(c), 1352,

1354(a), 1355, 1421 through 1431, 1502,

1651(b)(2); 42 U.S.C. 1857f–10, 4321 et seq.;

E.O. 11514; 49 U.S.C. 106(g).

The Special Condition

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the following special

condition is issued as part of the type

certification basis for the Bell Helicopter

Textron Model 222U helicopter:

Protection for Electrical and Electronic

Systems From High Intensity Radiated

Fields

Each system that performs critical

functions must be designed and

installed to ensure that the operation

and operational capabilities of these

critical functions are not adversely

affected when the helicopters are

exposed to high intensity radiated fields

external to the helicopters.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 10,

1995.

Eric Bries,

Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service, ASW–100.

[FR Doc. 95–12386 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95–NM–69–AD; Amendment

39–9208; AD 95–09–05]

Airworthiness Directives; British

Aerospace Model Avro 146–RJ Series

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects a

typographical error that appeared in the

applicability statement of the abovecaptioned airworthiness directive (AD)

that was published in the Federal

Register on April 28, 1995 (60 FR

20887). The typographical error in the

applicability statement of the AD

resulted in a reference to an incorrect

part number.

DATES: Effective May 15, 1995.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations was previously approved by

the Director of the Federal Register as of

April 28, 1995 (60 FR 20887).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk

Baker, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and

Equipment Branch, ANM–130L, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, Los

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,

3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,

California 90712; telephone (310) 627–

5345; fax (310) 627–5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 95–09–05,

amendment 39–9208, applicable to

certain British Aerospace Model Avro

146–RJ series airplanes equipped with a

certain Honeywell Standard Windshear

Detection and Recovery Guidance

System (WSS), was published in the

Federal Register on April 28, 1995 (60

FR 20887). As published, that AD

contained a typographical error in the

applicability statement: the applicability

statement indicated that the airplanes

subject to the requirements of the AD

were those equipped with Honeywell

WSS having part number (P/N)

4048300–902; however the correct P/N

is 4068300–902.

This document corrects the reference

to the P/N cited in the applicability

statement of AD 95–09–05, to read as

follows:

‘‘Applicability: Model Avro 146–

RJ70A, –RJ85A, and –RJ100A airplanes;

equipped with Honeywell Standard

Windshear Detection and Recovery

Guidance System (WSS), part number

4068300–902; certificated in any

category.’’

Since no other part of the regulatory

information has been changed, the final

rule is not being republished.

The effective date remains May 15,

1995.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 12,

1995.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–12206 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1000

Commission Organization and

Functions

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission is amending

its statement of organization and

functions to reflect the transfer of the

telecommunications function from the

Directorate for Administration to the

Office of Information Systems, and the

renaming of the Office of Compliance

and Enforcement to the Office of

Compliance.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph F. Rosenthal, Office of the

General Counsel, Consumer Product

Safety Commission, Washington, D.C.

20207, telephone 301–504–0980.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

sections describing the Directorate for

Administration and the Office of

Information Services have been

amended to reflect the transfer of the

telecommunications function from the

Directorate for Administration to the

Office of Information Services.

Since this rule relates solely to

internal agency management, pursuant

to 5 U.S.C. 553(b), notice and other

public procedures are not required and

it is effective immediately on the

specified effective date. Further, this

action is not a rule as defined in the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–

612 and, thus, is exempt from the

provisions of the Act.