alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1788 

To suspend temporarily the duty on propyl gallate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on propyl gallate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPYL GALLATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.52 Benzoic acid 3,4,5- 

trihydroxy-, propyl ester 

(CAS No. 121–79–9) (provided for in subheading 

2918.29.75) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 1788 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

RICCO STARMS 

Plaintiff(s) 

v. Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-1730

VIRTUOSO SOURCING GROUP, LLC.

 Defendant(s)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

X the plaintiff RICCO STARMS recover from the defendant VIRTUOSO SOURCING GROUP, LLC.

the amount of Fifteen thousand three hundred sixty six dollars and fifty cents $15,366.50, which includes

$10,000 in actual damages for four violations of the FDCPA; $1,000 in statutory damages for four

violations of the FDCPA; $3,917.30 in attorney’s fees; $400 in court costs and $49 in process server costs.

Post Judgment Interest Rate 0.45%

9 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

9 Other: 

 

This action was (check one):

9tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

9tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was

reached.

9decided by Judge Theresa L. Springmann on a motion for default judgment.

DATE: 7/8/2016 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ RMNagy

by 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01730-TLS-CAN document 28 filed 07/08/16 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Fritz
L. LaPorte, in his capacity as Senior Vice President of Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MAKO Surgical Corp.,
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)  | the
 Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
 December 31, 2009 to which this Certification is attached as
 Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements
 of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the
 information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of MAKO Surgical
 Corp.                                                                                          

|                |                                                            | 
|--------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|March 10,
 2010 | /s/ Fritz L.
 LaPorte                                      | 
|                | Fritz L.
 LaPorte                                         
|                | Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief
|                | Financial Officer and Treasurer                           
|                | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)              

This
certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which it relates,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of MAKO Surgical Corp. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12972]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

The Bank of New York Company, Inc.; Acquisition of Company 
Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
June 9, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (William L. Rutledge, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045:
    1. The Bank of New York Company, Inc., New York, New York; to 
acquire Continental Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois, and thereby 
engage in trust activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.25 (b)(3) of the 
Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12972 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 141

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a permanent 

extension of the credit for producing electricity from wind. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for a permanent extension of the credit for producing 

electricity from wind.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR PRO4 DUCING ELECTRICITY FROM WIND. 

5 Section 45(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

6 1986 (relating to wind facility) is amended by striking

7 ‘‘, and before January 1, 2006’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Everest Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Mohan Singh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 10thday of October, 2008.



MOHAN SINGHMohan SinghChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer














---
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of YDI
Wireless, Inc., certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of YDI Wireless,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: May 14, 2004                        /s/ Patrick L. Milton
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Patrick L. Milton
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26912-26913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12317]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 21067; 811-6339]


Value Line International Fund; Notice of Application

May 12, 1995.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice of Application for Deregistration under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPLICANT: Value Line International Fund.

RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f).

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant requests an order declaring it has 
ceased to be an investment company.

FILING DATE: The application was filed on April 3, 1995, and an 
amendment thereto on May 3, 1995.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on June 6, 1995, 
and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicant, in the 
form of an affidavit or, [[Page 26913]] for lawyers, a certificate of 
service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's 
interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons 
may request notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's 
Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
Applicants, 220 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane L. Titus, Paralegal Specialist, 
at (202) 942-0584, or Robert A. Robertson, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-
0564 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company 
Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
the SEC's Public Reference Branch.

Applicant's Representations

    1. Applicant is an open-end, diversified management investment 
company, organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. On November 
18, 1988, applicant registered under the Act and, on June 24, 1991, 
filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. 
Applicant's registration statement was aborted on October 19, 1992, and 
applicant has made no public offering of its shares.
    2. Applicant never issued any securities. Applicant has no 
shareholders, liabilities or assets. Applicant is not a party to any 
litigation or administrative proceeding.
    3. Applicant is not now engaged, nor does it propose to engage in 
any business activities.

    For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12317 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

December 14, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00915-CV

IN RE GOOD HEARTS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERIVCES, INC., 

TAELOR HARMON, ANGELA FACCIPONTE, AND JOYCE WATSON, 

Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-271311

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Tuesday, December 13, 2022, relators Good Hearts Youth and Family 

Serivces, Inc., Taelor Harmon, Angela Facciponte, and Joyce Watson filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; 

see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the 

Honorable O’Neil Williams, presiding judge of the 268th District Court of Fort 
2

Bend County, to vacate the trial court’s December 8, 2022, oral denial of relators’

motion for continuance, order the trial court to continue trial for an adequate time 

to allow relators to conduct the requested depositions made necessary by the facts 

revealed in the September 2022 Innova records, or alternatively order the trial 

court to compel the depositions before the current trial setting of December 14, 

2022.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.

Justice Jewell would grant temporary relief and request a response to the petition.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28356-28357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13215]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-142; RM-8546]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Knoxville, IL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulation 
[[Page 28357]] document which was published Monday, April 24, 1995 (60 
FR 20052).

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Shifflett, Publications Branch, (202) 418-0310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need of Correction

    As published, the final regulation document contains an error in 
the effective date, the window period and closing date.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on April 24, 1995 of the final 
regulations, which were the subject of FR Doc. 95-10026 is corrected as 
follows:
    On page 20052, in the second column, in the DATES section, the 
effective date, the window period for filing applications should be 
June 5, 1995 in lieu of May 29, 1995.
    The closing date for filing applications should be July 6, 1995 in 
lieu of June 13, 1995.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13215 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00455-RL-PRC   document 22   filed 03/27/15   page 1 of 1
GERALD C. MANN ~.1\ GST3 s ('1. T.r?;rA~ 

A'CT"KaNmcY ~~Nm!xaAE. 

AZ 

w,ki776/ 

Hon. Walker Carson 

County Attorney 

HudspGth County 

Sierra Blanca, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-1967 

Re: May the Commissioners' Court legally 

expend county funds for the hospitalization of Deputy Sheriff shot 

while in line of duty? 

Your request for opinion upon the above stated 

question has been received and carefully considered by this 

department. 

"Counties, being component parts of the 

State, have no powers or duties except those 

which are clearly set forth and defined in the 

Constitution and statutes, The statutes have 

clearly defined the powers, prescribed the 

duties, and imposed the liabilities of the commissioners' courts, the medium through which 

the different counties act, and from these 

statutes must come all the authority vested in 

the counties. 

"The grants of power to such governmental 

agencies as counties, townships and school distrlcts are generally more strictly construed 

than those to incorporated municipalities. The 

Commissioners' Court is not vested with any 

general police power......" (Texas Jurisprudence, Vol. 11, Sec. 36, p. 563) 

"Commissioners' courts are courts of llmitea jurisdiction, in that their authority extends 

only to matters pertaining to the general welfare of their respective counties, and that their 

powers are only those expressly or lmpliedlg conferred upon theti by law, - that Is, by the Constitution and statutesof the State."~ (Texas 

Jurisprudence, Vol. 11, Sec. 37, pp. 564-565) 

Also see the following cases: 
Hon. Walker Carson, page 2 o-1967 

Edwards County vs. Jennings, 33 SW 585; Seward 

vs. Falls County, 246 SW 728; Dun Vapor Electric Company vs. Reenan, 30 SW 868; City of 

Breckenridge vs. Stephens County, 26 SW (2nd) ,405; 

Scaling vs. Williams, 284,SW 310; 

Moore vs. McLennan County, 255 SW 478; 

Hill County vs. Hamilton, 273 SW 292; 

Temple Lumber~Co. vs. Commissioners' Court of 

Sabine County, 239 SW 668; 

Commissioners' Court vs. Wallace, 15 SW (2nd) 535. 

After a most careful and exhaustive study of this 

question we have been unable to find any authority, express 

or implied, which would authorize the commissioners' court 

of your county to expend county funds for the hospitalization 

of a deputy sheriff shot while in line of duty. 

You .are, therefore, respectfully advised that it 

is the opinion of this department that your question should 

be answered in the negative and it is so answered. 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By s/Wm. J. Fanning 

Wm. J. Fanning 

Assistant 

WJF:AW;wc 

APPROVED FEE 20, 1940 

s/W. F. Moore 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

Approved Opinion Comm$ttee Bs s/BwB Chairman