alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 35.1**




**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**




RE: FIRST
      HORIZON ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2007-FA5




We,
      the
      undersigned authorized officers of First Horizon Home Loans, a division of
      First
      Tennessee Bank National Association, and First Tennessee Bank National
      Association, as successor by merger to First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.
      (collectively, the “Servicer”), pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement,
      do hereby certify that:




1.  A
      review
      of the Servicer’s activities during the period from September 1, 2007 and
      through December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer’s performance under the above
      described servicing agreement has been made under our supervision.




2.  To
      the
      best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      of
      its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
      respects throughout such period .






Date:
      March 24, 2008




First
      Horizon Home Loans, a
      division of First


Tennessee
      Bank National Association






By:
      /s/  Kim
      Yowell


Name:
      Kim
      Yowell


Title:
      SVP, Servicing Manager






First
      Tennessee Bank National Association,


as
      successor by merger to First Tennessee


Mortgage
      Services, Inc.






By:
      /s/ Terry
      L. McCoy


Name:
      Terry L. McCoy


Title:
      Executive Vice President
---

Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Murphy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Asia Atlantic Resources, for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Asia Atlantic Resources

Date: July 28, 2008

/s/ Christopher Murphy
Christopher Murphy President, C.E.O.
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

---
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00246-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 06/26/15 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00246-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 06/26/15 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00246-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 06/26/15 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00246-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 06/26/15 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00246-JTM-PRC document 1 filed 06/26/15 page 5 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 1 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 2 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 3 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 4 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 5 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 6 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 7 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 8 of 9
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00415-PPS-APR document 1 filed 11/15/13 page 9 of 9
#### WEEKS v. O'BRIEN. EARLY, Respondent, v. O'BRIEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1899.)

Action by Benjamin Weeks and Daniel J. Early against James O’Brien. A. King, for appellant. B. Tolies, for respondent Early.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28411-28412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13211]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

The Berens Corporation; Notice of Application To Engage de Novo 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise [[Page 28412]] noted, such 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
June 13, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. The Berens Corporation, Houston, Texas; To engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, Berens Credit Corporation, Houston, Texas, in 
making and arranging loans and other extensions of credit, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.25(b)(1); and leasing activities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(5) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 24, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-13211 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### Eileen Sorkin, Appellant, v Harvey Sorkin, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Eileen Sorkin, Appellant, v Harvey Sorkin, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

In two interrelated actions, *inter alia,*to recover for moneys expended on necessaries and to recover arrears under an order of temporary support, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered April 30, 1984, as dismissed her first cause of action in action No. 1 and dismissed the complaint in its entirety in action No. 2.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In July of 1980, a judgment of divorce was obtained by the plaintiff dissolving the marriage between the parties by reason of the defendant husband’s cruelty. Prior to the entry of the judgment of divorce, in August of 1979 an order was obtained in that action directing defendant to pay temporary alimony and support to plaintiff. In February of 1984, plaintiff instituted these two separate actions to obtain, *inter alia,*reimbursement for necessaries purchased in 1978 and 1979, and the recovery of arrears purportedly due and owing under the 1979 order of temporary support.

With respect to the claim for necessaries, we see no reason why the issues raised in action No. 1 could not have been raised years earlier in the matrimonial action. That was the appropriate forum in which to raise and adjudicate the question of necessaries expended in 1978 and 1979. The parties had the right, moreover, to expect that any such claims not there considered were not to be litigated. Plaintiff’s commencement of action No. 1, outside the framework of the matrimonial action, severely impairs this right and cannot be sanctioned *(Marinelli v Marinelli,*88 AD2d 635, 636; *Rakowski v Rakowski,*109 AD2d 1). Moreover, the entry of the judgment of divorce in plaintiff’s favor in July of 1980 terminated the matrimonial action, and *846thereupon any right that plaintiff had to enforce the temporary order of support was lost *(Weaver v Weaver,*72 AD2d 221, 223). We have reviewed plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

s0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141097 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141097 

 COA: 296994 

Kent CC: 05-007793-FC 

LEE DANIEL WHITE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1535

To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic synthetic filament 

tow. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2005

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic 

synthetic filament tow.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC FILA4 MENT TOW. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.06.41 Synthetic filament tow: 

acrylic or modacrylic (provided for in subheading 

5501.30.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 1535 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
CONTINUING 

TO ADDRESS THE 

IMPACT OF COVID- ̨ 

Throughout 2021, the FDIC continued to respond to economic disruptions and global financial 

market volatility as a result of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Following the declaration 

of a global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, the FDIC quickly 

implemented strategies to address challenges related to COVID-19 and focused on providing 

necessary flexibility to both banks and their customers — particularly the most heavily 

affected individuals and businesses — while maintaining the overall safety and soundness of 

the banking system. The FDIC also undertook a robust policy response to ensure that financial 

institutions could continue to serve the needs of households and small businesses. These 

efforts continued throughout 2021. 

In January 2021, the FDIC, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), Office of 

the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) and the 

Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) hosted a webinar for bankers to discuss recent 

changes to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). As part of the webinar, officials from the 

Small Business Administration (SBA) 

and the U.S. Department of Treasury 

(Treasury) provided an overview of the 

new features of the PPP associated 

with the recently passed Economic 

Aid to Hard-Hit Small Business, NonProfits and Venues Act. 

During 2021, the FDIC developed a 

Return to the Office Plan (RTO) in 

conjunction with guidelines released 

by the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention. The RTO is a threephased approach to ensure employees 

remain safe and healthy when 

returning to physical offices and facilities. FDIC employees remained in a mandatory telework 

status throughout 2021, with only designated, essential personnel returning to FDIC facilities 

on a voluntary, as-needed basis. 

The FDIC also created an intranet website dedicated to COVID-19 to keep employees abreast of 

the latest developments internally and externally related to the pandemic. The site includes 

information on FDIC Guidelines, Prevention/Treatment, the RTO Plan, FDIC Resources, FAQs, 

and other resources. 

FDIC developed a Return to the O⁄ce Plan. 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

OSCAR JIMENEZ, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CV-333

)

WILLIAMS, WHITE & COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION and ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed

on March 30, 2015, seeking to name Paragon Die & Engineering Company as an additional

defendant in this negligence case. (DE # 22.) Plaintiffs assert that they learned through limited

discovery that Paragon manufactured the Mold 772 that, when operated concurrently with the

hydraulic press, allegedly contributed to cause Plaintiffs’ injuries. (Pls.’ Mot. for Leave ¶ 2.) 

Defendant has not filed a response to the motion, and the time to do so has now passed. 

Plaintiffs’ deadline for any amendments to the pleadings was March 31, 2015 (DE # 11,

12); therefore, their motion is timely. The Court should “freely give leave when justice so

requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). 

But this case was removed to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1332 (DE # 5), and the proposed First Amended Complaint does not adequately allege the

citizenship of Paragon, merely reciting that it is a “manufacturer . . . with its primary place of

business located in Grand Rapids, Michigan.” (First Am. Compl. ¶ 3.) Before granting leave to

amend, the Court must assure that the joinder of Paragon would not destroy diversity

jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) (“If after removal the plaintiff seeks to join additional
defendants whose joinder would destroy subject matter jurisdiction, the court may deny joinder .

. ..”).

Therefore, Plaintiff should file a revised proposed First Amended Complaint that recites

whether Paragon is a corporation and adequately alleges its citizenship for purposes of diversity

jurisdiction. If Paragon is a corporation, the Court must be apprised of its state of incorporation

and the state in which it has its principal place of business. See N. Trust Co. v. Bunge Corp., 899

F.2d 591, 594 (7th Cir. 1990) (Corporations “are deemed to be citizens of the state in which they

are incorporated and the state in which they have their principal place of business.”). 

Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (DE # 22) is

TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Plaintiffs are directed to filed a revised proposed First

Amended Complaint on or before April 24, 2015. 

SO ORDERED. 

Enter for April 17, 2015.

S/Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
A photo of Sheila C. Bair
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13323]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE DOCKET No. 95-27-NG]


Koch Gas Services Co.; Order Granting Blanket Authorization to 
Export Natural Gas to Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Koch Gas Services Company 
blanket authorization to export up to 50 Bcf of domestic natural gas to 
Canada over a period of two years beginning on the date of first export 
delivery.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs Docket Room, Room 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., May 10, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-13323 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-42-TLS 

 ) 

TYLER M. McCARTHY ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 133], filed on September 22, 2016. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 133] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses 

charged in Counts Two (2), Three (3), and Five (5) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the 

Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on October 7, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
II 

Calendar No. 649 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1463 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 

2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the 

‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The building and structure de5 scribed in subsection (b) shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s 

7 Building’’. 

mmaher on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1463 RS

1 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The building and structure to be 

2 designated under subsection (a) is that portion of the Fed3 eral building located at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexan4 dria, Virginia, that is attached to the Federal building’s 

5 main tower structure, described as A-Wing in the architec6 tural plans, and currently occupied by the Office of the 

7 United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Vir8 ginia, Alexandria Division. 

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

12 and structure described in section 1(b) shall be deemed 

13 to be a reference to the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States 

14 Attorney’s Building’’. 

15 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

16 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

17 as may be necessary for appropriate identifying designa18 tions to be affixed to the building and structure described 

19 in section 1(b) and for an appropriate plaque reflecting 

20 the designation and honoring Justin W. Williams and his 

21 service to the Nation to be affixed to or displayed in such 

22 building and structure. 

mmaher on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

mmaher on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

Calendar No. 649 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1463 

AN ACT 

To designate a portion of the Federal building loStates Attorney’s Building’’. Virginia, as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United cated at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Reported without amendment 

mmaher on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13085]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-4-25-002]


Mississippi River Transmission Corp.; Refund Report

May 23, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 11, 1995, Mississippi River Transmission 
Corporation (MRT), tendered for filing a refund report reflecting the 
distribution of refund amounts by MRT to its affected customers 
pursuant to section 17.1(b) of MRT's tariff. The amounts being refunded 
are the flowthrough of excess revenues derived from providing services 
under Rate Schedules ITS and ISS and certain revenues derived from 
authorized overrun service (AOS) received during the twelve month 
period ended October 31, 1994, including interest from November 1, 
1994, through April 12, 1995.
    MRT states that the refunds were paid on April 13, 1995. MRT states 
that the total refunds covered by the instant filing amount to 
$333,462.07, inclusive of principal and interest.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street 
NE., Washington DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's regulations. All such protests should be filed on or 
before May 31, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13085 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12355]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Intelligence Agency, Scientific Advisory Board Closed 
Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Scientific Advisory 
Board has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: June 20-21, 1995 (830 to 400).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence Agency, Bolling AFB, Washington, DC 
20340-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. W.S. Williamson, Executive Secretary, DIA Scientific Advisory 
Board, Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 373-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(I), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-12355 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M