alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2007-QH8 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided  to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche  Bank  Trust
Company Americas.

Date:  March 24, 2008


By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00397

- CV

Natin Paul , Appellant

v.

The Roy F. & Joann Cole Mitte Foundation , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE C HIEF JUSTI CE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the post

- judgmen t injunction signed by the tr i a l court on June 10, 2022

.

Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

.

Therefore, the C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. The appellan t shall pay all

costs relating to thi s appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Key Information About the FDIC FID-SA Application

1. DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENTS FOR PREVIOUS REPORTING PERIODS (2016 – 2018)

Section 342 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (DoddFrank Act) requires OMWI agencies to report on the diversity self-assessment data received from 

their respective regulated financial institutions annually to Congress. The FDIC has developed the 

automated FID-SA application to provide its regulated financial institutions with the ease and 

efficiency to electronically complete the diversity self-assessment; work with multiple users; view 

previous submissions; attach supporting material; and print and save in pdf format. The FID-SA 

application further aids the FDIC with aggregating the self-assessment submission information to 

comply with the reporting requirements. In order to facilitate its compliance with the Dodd-Frank 

Act, the FDIC has entered self-assessment submissions received for the previous reporting periods 

in the FID-SA application for the purposes of reporting and conducting trends analysisi

. 

2. DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2019 REPORTING PERIOD (JANUARY 1 THROUGH 

DECEMBER 31, 2019)

The automated FID-SA application supports FDIC-regulated financial institutions efforts to 

complete their annual diversity self-assessment for the current, 2019 reporting year. Please note 

that in the event financial institutions opt to submit their diversity self-assessment by email using 

the pdf Form template, the FDIC will enter the emailed information into FID-SA to facilitate its 

reporting for the 2019 reporting period and to conduct trend analysis against data received for all 

reporting periods. 

3. REVISIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENTS

Revisions or modifications to diversity self-assessments entered into FID-SA cannot be made after 

July 1st of any reporting year. Therefore, changes cannot be permitted to submissions entered for 

2016 through 2018 reporting periods. After July 1st, all submissions received for the 2019 

reporting period will be considered final. 

i Note that the FDIC acknowledges that there may be data entry errors associated with the FDIC’s inputting of information 

for 2016-2018 reporting years. The impact this has to the FDIC’s reporting of aggregated data is low, however.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998 AS FILED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMVER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         122,093
<SECURITIES>                                    67,791
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,178
<INVENTORY>                                    229,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               590,935
<PP&E>                                         266,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 764,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       400,332
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   764,610
<SALES>                                        188,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,707
<CGS>                                          114,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

JARED ODEN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-195

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Petition (DE 5) under

28 U.S.C. Paragraph 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jared

Oden, a pro se prisoner, on June 3, 2015. In the petition he is

challenging the prison disciplinary hearing (WCC 14-11-262) where

the Westville Correctional Facility Disciplinary Hearing Body (DHB)

found him guilty of Trafficking in violation of prison rule A-113

on November 19, 2014, and deprived him of 120 days earned credit 

time and demoted him from Credit Class 1 to Credit Class 2. In

response, the respondent filed a motion to dismiss arguing that

“[b]ecause the conviction and sanctions at issue in the Petition 

for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this case have been vacated, the

challenged proceeding is now moot, and this Court lacks a case or

controversy or adjudicate.” DE 10 at 2. The Respondent has also

attached a letter from the Indiana Department of Correction stating

that the sanctions have been vacated. DE 10-2. Because the
sanctions have been vacated, this case must be dismissed. See

Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003).

For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss (DE 10) is

GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

DATED: November 23, 2015 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United State District Court

2
Exhibit 32(a)



TXU US Holdings Company

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO



The undersigned, T. L. Baker, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive of TXU US Holdings Company (the Company), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 12th day of August, 2005.



/s/ T. L. BakerName: T. L. BakerTitle: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU US Holdings Company and will be retained by TXU US Holdings Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.5

<PAGE>

                          DEARBORN SAVINGS ASSOCIATION

                             DIRECTOR EMERITUS PLAN

                       APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

                                ON AUGUST 8, 2002

ELIGIBILITY: A director must have a minimum of ten years of service or attain
sixty-five (65) years of age in order to be eligible to participate. Upon
attaining either of these specific qualifications, participation in the director
emeritus plan is automatic.

TERM: Upon meeting the eligibility requirements of the emeritus plan, a director
emeritus can participate for life, so long as he satisfies the service
requirements.

CONSULTING SERVICE REQUIREMENTS: The emeritus plan will require the participant
to attend a minimum of one board meeting per quarter, as continued service and
consultation, in order to receive a benefit under the plan. This requirement may
also be met by teleconferencing, if necessary.

CONSULTING BENEFITS: The emeritus plan will provide director fees for their
continued service and consultation to the board of directors equal to 50% of the
board fees paid to existing directors. The Association will include health care
coverage benefits equal to existing Directors. In addition, annual seminars and
meetings will be included the same as existing Directors.

DEATH BENEFIT: The emeritus plan does not provide a death benefit.

ACCOUNTING TREATMENt: As the director emeritus plan requires a minimum level of
service in order to receive a benefit, and that the plan provides no death
benefit, the emeritus plan will be expensed on a pay-as-you-go basis.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: The director emeritus plan requires that the director
emeritus not compete with the Association and requires that director emeritus
maintain the Association's confidential information. The emeritus plan will also
indemnify the director emeritus from any legal action that may arise during his
tenure as a director emeritus.
Marwan SNODGRASS, petitioner, v. Tim BRUNSMAN, Warden.

No. 12-8405.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          631301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    32800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                664101
<PP&E>                                            9939
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  742826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2015
<OTHER-SE>                                      734819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    742826
<SALES>                                           7200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 63169
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    39317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  23852
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              20740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     20740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12194]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 735]


Approval for Manufacturing Authority (Plastic Food/Beverage 
Containers) Within Foreign-Trade Zone 9 Honolulu, Hawaii

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:

    After consideration of the application of the Department of 
Business, Economic Development & Tourism of the State of Hawaii, 
grantee of FTZ 9, filed with the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on 
March 25, 1994, requesting authority on behalf of Pacific Allied 
Products, Ltd., to manufacture plastic food/beverage containers 
under zone procedures within FTZ 9 solely for the Hawaiian and 
export markets, the Board, finding that the requirements of the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, 
and that the proposal is in the public interest, approves the 
activity proposed in the application for a period of 5 years (until 
July 1, 2000), subject to extension upon review.
    Approval is subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of May 1995.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12194 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Lynette MARYEA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-5487.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Marlon BERRIOZ, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 13-6468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### WAGNER, Respondent, v. STACOM et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 25, 1913.)

Action by Anton Wagner against Philip Stacom and another.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Tayden TOWNSLEY, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 12-8882.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Michael D. CHAPPELL, petitioner, v. Justin JONES, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 13-6239.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
#### In re RUTLEDGE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 3, 1899.)

In the matter of the judicial settlement, etc., of Harriet Rutledge as executrix, etc., of Walter Heard, deceased.

No opinion. Decree of the surrogate’s court affirmed, with costs in favor of Helen M. Collier, and a bill of costs in favor of E. M. Morse, payable out of the estate. Also, order of January 12, 1898, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, payable1 out of the estate. See 51 N. Y. Supp. 1150.
Thomas B. STRINGER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### STATEN ISLAND MIDLAND R. CO., Respondent, v. STATEN ISLAND ELECTRIC R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 7, 1899.)

Action by the Staten Island Midland Railroad Company against the Staten Island Electric Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied. See 54 N. Y. Supp. 598.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, George Russell, the Chief Financial Officer of Here Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:   October 6, 2011Signed:/s/ George RussellName:George RussellTitle:Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial Officer     Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Mark K. Ryun, the Chief Executive Officer of Here Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:   October 6, 2011Signed:/s/ Mark K. RyunName:Mark K. RyunTitle:Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
Kyle JIGGETTS, petitioner, v. SEIU, LOCAL 32 BJ, et al.

No. 12-8737.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Mahmoud HEGAB, petitioner, v. Letitia A. LONG, Director, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, et al.

No. 13-256.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EX-35.9
(logo) Prudential Financial

Prudential Asset Resources
2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel 214-777-4500  Fax 214-777-4556



Annual Compliance Statement

To: (see attached Distribution List)

Re: Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-PWR16


I, Catherine J. Rodewald, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to
the Company's role as a Master Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of June 1, 2007 pertaining to the
above-referenced certificates, that:

     (i) a review of the activities of the Company as a Master Servicer under
the Agreement during the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and
its performance has been made under my supervision; and

     (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations, as a Master Servicer, under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

Effective Date of Certification: March 10, 2008


/s/ Catherine J. Rodewald
Catherine J. Rodewald, President &
CEO


(page)


March 10, 2008

Re: Series 2007-PWR16 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

DISTRIBUTION LIST


LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
135 South LaSalle, Suite 1625
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Pearlie.bolton@bankofamerica.com

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Karen.a.merson@wellsfargo.com

BEAR STEARNS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
383 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10179
Attention: J. Christopher Hoeffel and Joseph Jurkowski, Esq.

FITCH, INC.
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attention: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

STANDARD & POOR'S RATINGS SERVICES
a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
55 Water Street
New York, New York 10041
Attention: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

Centerline Servicing Inc.
5221 N. O'Connor Blvd.
Suite 600
Irving, TX 75039
lduggins@centerline.com