alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1761 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986 to coordinate the threshold requirement for coverage of 

domestic employees under Social Security with the amount required for 

a quarter of coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. BECERRA (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. OWENS, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of 

California, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, 

Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, and Ms. SOLIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act and the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to coordinate the threshold requirement for coverage of domestic employees under Social Security with the amount required for a quarter 

of coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retirement Security 

5 for America’s Domestic Workers Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 1761 IH 

1 SEC. 2. COORDINATION OF THRESHOLD REQUIREMENT 

2 FOR COVERAGE OF DOMESTIC EMPLOYEES 

3 WITH AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR QUARTER OF 

4 COVERAGE. 

5 (a) AMENDMENTS TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.— 

6 Section 209(a)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 409(a)(6)(B)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘is less than’’ and all that fol9 lows and inserting ‘‘is less than the greater of—’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(i) $1,400, or 

13 ‘‘(ii) the amount of wages and self-employment 

14 income which an individual must have in such year 

15 in order to be credited with a quarter of coverage in 

16 such year under section 213(a)(2)(A)(ii) (as deter17 mined under section 213(d)).’’. 

18 (b) AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE

19 CODE OF 1986.—Section 3121 of the Internal Revenue 

20 Code of 1986 (relating to definitions under FICA) is 

21 amended— 

22 (1) in subsection (a)(7)(B)— 

23 (A) by striking ‘‘is less than’’ and all that 

24 follows and inserting ‘‘is less than the greater 

25 of—’’; and 

26 (B) by adding at the end the following: 
3 

•HR 1761 IH 

1 ‘‘(i) $1,400, or 

2 ‘‘(ii) the amount of wages and self-employ3 ment income which an individual must have in 

4 such year in order to be credited with a quarter 

5 of coverage in such year under section 

6 213(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act (as 

7 determined under section 213(d) of such Act).’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking subsection (x). 

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

12 respect to remuneration paid after December 31, 2005. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32312]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
AMERICA) will hold a meeting of its Coordinating Council on January 27, 
1995. The session is expected to focus on: (1) National Intelligent 
Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Plan Approval; (2) ITS Privacy 
Principles Approval; (3) System Architecture Development Update; (4) 
Standards Requirements Process; (5) Telecommunications Strategy; and 
(6) Report of the Futures Group. ITS AMERICA provides a forum for 
national discussion and recommendations on ITS activities including 
programs, research needs, strategic planning, standards, international 
liaison, and priorities. The charter for the utilization of ITS AMERICA 
establishes this organization as an advisory committee under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 USC app. 2, when it provides 
advice or recommendations to DOT officials on IVHS policies and 
programs. (56 FR 9400, March 6, 1991).

DATES: The Coordinating Council of ITS AMERICA will meet on January 27, 
1995, from 8 a.m. to 12 noon e.t.

ADDRESSES: The Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20008, (202) 234-0700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS AMERICA, 400 Virginia Avenue, 
SW., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20024. Persons desiring further 
information or to request to speak at this meeting should contact Mr. 
Steve Hay at ITS AMERICA by telephone at (202) 484-4665, or by FAX at 
(202) 484-3483. The DOT contact is Ms. Susan Lauffer, FHWA, HTV-1, 
Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-0372. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. 
to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays.

(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: December 22, 1994.
Rodney E. Slater,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-32312 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference by China Armco Metals, Inc. in (i) Amendment No. 1 to the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 on Form S-3 (No. 333-153418), (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-162774), and (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-167168) of our report dated March 31, 2011 on the consolidated balance sheets of China Armco Metals, Inc. (collectively “Armco Metals” or the “Company”) and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended appearing in China Armco Metals, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 /s/Li & Company, PC
 Li & Company, PC
 Skillman, New Jersey
 March 31, 2011
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1583 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal provisions relating 

to qualified tax collection contracts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

provisions relating to qualified tax collection contracts, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Abuse Pre5 vention Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Taxpayers should be treated fairly in the 

9 Federal tax collection process. 
2 

•HR 1583 IH 

1 (2) Congress has repeatedly stated its opposi2 tion to overly aggressive Federal tax collection tech3 niques. 

4 (3) Section 1204 of the Internal Revenue Serv5 ice Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 specifi6 cally prevents employees of the Internal Revenue 

7 Service from being evaluated on the basis of the 

8 amount of taxes they collect in order to eliminate in9 centives to use overly aggressive tax collection tech10 niques. 

11 (4) Paying for Federal tax collection services on 

12 the basis of a commission or as a percentage of 

13 taxes collected would provide incentives for overly 

14 aggressive collection techniques. 

15 SEC. 3. QUALIFIED TAX COLLECTION CONTRACTS. 

16 (a) REPEAL OF GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 

17 6306 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is hereby re18 pealed. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) OTHER REPEALS.— 

21 (A) Sections 7433A and 7811(g) of the In22 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 are hereby re23 pealed. 
3 

•HR 1583 IH 

1 (B) Section 1203(e) of the Internal Rev2 enue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 

3 1998 is hereby repealed. 

4 (C) Section 881(e) of the American Jobs 

5 Creation Act of 2004 is hereby repealed. 

6 (2) ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (A) Section 7809(a) of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘6306,’’ before ‘‘7651’’. 

10 (B) The table of sections for subchapter A 

11 of chapter 64 of such Code is amended by strik12 ing the item relating to section 6306. 

13 (C) The table of sections for subchapter B 

14 of chapter 76 of such Code is amended by strik15 ing the item relating to section 7433A. 

16 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall take effect on the date of enact19 ment of this Act. 

20 (2) EXISTING QUALIFIED TAX COLLECTION

21 CONTRACTS.—With respect to qualified tax collection 

22 contracts that were entered into before the date of 

23 enactment of this Act, the amendments made by this 
4 

•HR 1583 IH 

1 section shall take effect 60 days after the date of en2 actment of this Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

KEVIN E. JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-113 

)

SUPERINTENDENT )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the: (1) 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Habeas Corpus Petition by a State Prisoner Challenging a Prison

Disciplinary Proceeding, filed by Kevin E. Johnson, a pro se

prisoner, on March 11, 2015; and (2) Motion to Dismiss, filed by

the respondent on June 1, 2015. For the reasons set forth below,

the motion to dismiss (DE #7) is GRANTED and the petition (DE #2)

is DISMISSED as moot.

BACKGROUND

Kevin E. Johnson filed this habeas corpus petition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his loss of 120 days earned credit

time and a demotion from credit class 1 to credit class 2. On

November 19, 2014, in case number WCC 14-11-0261, a Disciplinary

Hearing Body (“DHB”) at Westville Correctional Facility found

Johnson guilty of trafficking contraband. In his petition, Johnson
argues, among other things, that he was never in possession of any

contraband. (DE #1.) 

DISCUSSION

The respondent moves to dismiss, asserting that after the

petition was filed, Appeal Review Officer Joel Lytle, reconsidered

the case and has vacated the conviction and remanded for a new

hearing before a different DHB. (DE #7-1 at 1; Ex. A.) Accordingly,

the respondent argues that the petition is now moot. (DE #8.) 

Johnson has not responded to the motion to dismiss.

Because Johnson’s disciplinary sanction has been vacated and

the matter remanded for a new hearing, there is at present no

punishment lengthening the duration of confinement for this court

to review. See Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003)

(prisoner can challenge disciplinary determination in habeas

proceeding only when he has received punishment that lengthens the

duration of confinement). In other words, there is no longer a live

controversy and the case must be dismissed as moot. See Brown v.

Bartholomew Consol. Sch. Corp., 442 F.3d 588, 596 (7th Cir. 2006)

(“For a case to be justiciable, a live controversy must continue to

exist at all stages of review, not simply on the date the action

was initiated.”). If Johnson is dissatisfied with the outcome of

the new disciplinary hearing, he can pursue his administrative

remedies and, if necessary, seek relief in a new habeas petition.

CONCLUSION

2
For the reasons set forth above, the motion to dismiss (DE #7)

is GRANTED and the petition (DE #2) is DISMISSED as moot.

DATED: June 29, 2015 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court

3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:15 CR 52

)

CHRISTOPHER TILLMAN )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge dated April 8, 2019 (DE # 63), to which the parties have waived any objections

(id.), the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are now ADOPTED.

Defendant is ADJUDGED to have committed the violations of his supervised release

described in the May 30, 2018, Petition (DE # 47). Defendant’s term of supervised

release is REVOKED and he is hereby committed to the United States Bureau of Prisons

to serve a term of imprisonment of nine (9) months. Upon his release from the Bureau of

Prisons, defendant shall be discharged from any further term of supervision.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 15, 2019

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EXHIBIT 32.1

               STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Enchanted Village, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sally A. Fonner, the principal executive and principal financial
officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



             /s/ Sally A. Fonner
Sally A. Fonner
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
November 19, 2003
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
               10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
               this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2007-OA11 (the
               "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
               as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
               fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
               statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
               statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
               covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
               other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
               period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports;

          4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
               servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
               review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
               statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
               Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
               obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
               respects; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
               attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
               this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
               Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
               exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
               report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
               reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2008

      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
      (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of Countrywide Home
      Loans Servicing LP)
EX-35.2
(logo) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE

One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com



March 15, 2008

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attn: Pamela D. Pendarvis - Client Manager - MABS 2007-HE2
INV# 587


Re: Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2007, among Mortgage
Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer, Custodian and Trust Administrator, Option One Mortgage
Corporation as Servicer, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq
Servicing as Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee(the
"Agreement")


If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949) 727-8226 or
email: Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com


Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618



6501 Irvine Center Drive *Irvine *California *92618 *(800) 704-0800 *

(logo) Equal Housing
Lender


(page)


(logo) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE

One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com



Annual Compliance Certificate


I, Fabiola Camperi, the undersigned, the duly authorized President of Option
One Mortgage Corporation (as "Servicer"), does hereby certify the following for
the calendar year ending on December 31, 2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period
   and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement (as defined in the
   cover letter) for such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout the reporting period.



Certified By:

/s/ Fabiola Camperi
Name: Fabiola Camperi
Title: President
Date: March 14, 2008



6501 Irvine Center Drive *Irvine *California *92618 *(800) 704-0800 *

(logo) Equal Housing
Lender
#### MARSH et al. v. NASSAU SHOW-CASE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 24, 1899.)

1. Municipal Courts—Application por Adjournment.

Under Greater New York Charter, § 1377, providing that the rules of the supreme court shall apply to municipal courts, where an attorney, pursuant to rule 5 of the supreme court, applies to a municipal court for adjournment, and presents an affidavit that he is actually engaged in the supreme court, the justice errs in not granting it.

2. Same—Opening Dbpault—Error Cured.

Where the justice refuses such an application, and permits plaintiff to take judgment, the error is not cured by opening the default, where terms are imposed on defendant.

Appeal from municipal court, borough of Manhattan, first district.

Action by Marsh & McClennen against the Nassau Show-Case Company. From a judgment of inquest, and an order granting defendant’s motion to open the default conditionally, it appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and MacLEAN and LEVEN-TRITT-, JJ.

McKelvey & Mattocks, for appellant.

Wilder & Anderson, for respondents.

MacLEAN, J.

This case having been called upon the day calendar of January 19, 1899, for trial, a representative of the defendant’s attorneys applied for an adjournment, and presented and filed an affidavit, verified on that day, wherein the affiant deposed that he was one of the attorneys, and had charge of the above-entitled action; that he was actually engaged in the trial of a case (named) in the supreme court, New York county, trial term, part 7, and would be unable to-proceed with the trial of this case on that date. As there was presented to him the very affidavit contemplated in rule 5 of the rules to» regulate calendar practice in this department, including the practice in the municipal court (section 1377, Greater New York Charter), the justice erred in not granting the application, and in permitting the plaintiff to take an inquest and recover judgment. This error was not cured by opening the default upon a motion made and heard upon conflicting affidavits, with the imposition of terms upon the defendant. The judgment appealed from should be reversed, and the order vacated, with costs to the appellant.

Judgment reversed, and order vacated, with costs. All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1304]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Chittenden Corporation, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than February 13, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Robert M. Brady, Vice President) 
600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106:
    1. Chittenden Corporation, Burlington, Vermont; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of The Bank of Western Massachusetts, 
Springfield, Massachusetts.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. SunTrust Banks, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia; and Sun Banks, Inc., 
Orlando, Florida; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Peoples State Bank, New Port Richey, Florida.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Ida Grove Bancshares, Inc., Ida Grove, Iowa; to acquire 80.1 
percent of the voting shares of American National Bank, Holstein, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 12, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-1304 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F