alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Acie COLE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6190.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Monique CASEY, petitioner, v. Sean CASEY.

No. 12-8945.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May, 13, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance *2017with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Vincent Mark SANTANA, petitioner, v. Dwight NEVEN, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9860.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-101-JVB-PRC

 )

WALTER WOLDT, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT WALTER WOLDT

TO: THE HONORABLE JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Walter Woldt’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R.

Cherry, on August 24, 2016, with the consent of Defendant Walter Woldt, counsel for Defendant

Walter Woldt, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Walter Woldt’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule

11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the

record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Walter Woldt under

oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Walter Woldt,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Walter Woldt understands the nature of the charge against him to which

the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Walter Woldt understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea

of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Walter Woldt understands what the maximum possible sentence is,

including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Walter Woldt understands that

the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Walter Woldt has been knowingly and voluntarily

made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Walter Woldt is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Walter Woldt understands that his answers may later be used against him

in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Walter Woldt plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Walter Woldt’s plea of guilty to the offense charged

in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Walter Woldt be adjudged guilty of the offense

charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been

ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Walter Woldt be adjudged guilty,

a sentencing date before Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen will be set by separate order. Objections to

the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2016.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
#### In the Matter of Leopoldo B. Mina, Appellant, v Edward R. Hammock, as Chairman of the New York State Board of *814Parole, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent denying petitioner parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), entered February 16, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The parole board adhered to statutory requirements when it considered petitioner’s over-all record, including the severity of his crime in denying him parole *(see,*9 NYCRR 8002.3 [a], 8001.3). Its decision was both proper and rational, and as such, should not be disturbed *(Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69). Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:14-cr-00014-TLS-SLC

)

RICHARD A. COUNCIL also known as )

Richard Council )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan

Collins, on May 4, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the six-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Chief Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 4th day of May 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Annual Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc.,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ THOMAS P. BENSONThomas P. BensonChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
And Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant
Properties I;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  May 12, 2006
    /s/ Ronald PowellRonald PowellChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 35.1**
  **SERVICER
        COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**
  RE: FIRST
        HORIZON ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2007-AA3
  We,
        the
        undersigned authorized officers of First Horizon Home Loans, a division of
        First
        Tennessee Bank National Association, and First Tennessee Bank National
        Association, as successor by merger to First Tennessee Mortgage Services,
        Inc.
        (collectively, the “Servicer”), pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement,
        do hereby certify that:
  1.  A
        review
        of the Servicer’s activities during the period from September 1, 2007 and
        through December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer’s performance under the above
        described servicing agreement has been made under our supervision.
  2.  To
        the
        best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
        of
        its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
        respects throughout such period .
   Date:
        March 24, 2008
  First
        Horizon Home Loans, a
        division of First
 Tennessee
        Bank National Association
 
 By:
        /s/  Kim
        Yowell
 Name:
        Kim
        Yowell
 Title:
        SVP, Servicing Manager
 
 
 First
        Tennessee Bank National Association, as
 successor
        by merger to First Tennessee
 Mortgage
        Services, Inc.
 
 By:
        /s/ Terry
        L.
        McCoy
 Name:
        Terry L. McCoy
 Title:
        Executive Vice President
EX-34.6
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

* Ernst & Young LLP
  Suite 1000
  55 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard
  Atlanta, Georgia 30308

* Phone: (404) 874-8300
  www.ey.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report
on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that ZC Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited
('the Company' or 'ZCRETS') complied with certain servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for
the ZC Tax Source (ZCTS) Real Estate Tax Outsourcing Platform (the Platform) as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company has determined that
only certain servicing criteria Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), Item 1122(d)(4)(xi), Item
1122(d)(4)(xii) and Item 1122(d)(4)(xiii) are applicable to the activities
performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The
Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB are not
applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform
covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's assertion for the
Platform and Servicer covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the Platform. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


February 14, 2007



A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Sally A. Fonner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The
Enchanted Village, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

       The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31,
       2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


                                      /s/ Sally A Fonner
                               -----------------------------------------
                               Sally A. Fonner
                               Chief Executive Officer and
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               Dated: September 4, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        173,712
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              173,712
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                173,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      371,322 
<OTHER-SE>                                   (197,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  173,712 
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,292 
<CGS>                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,407)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,407)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
                                                      

</TABLE>
Coronado Alfredo CAMPOS-MERINO, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 12-1267.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No: 2:14 CR 23

)

RICHARD HOLIUSA )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE #30), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement (DE #27) pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offense charged in Count I of the Indictment (DE #1) is now hereby ACCEPTED, and

defendant is adjudged guilty of the offense as charged therein. A sentencing date will

be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 20, 2016

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT