alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24627-24628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11330]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-269-000]


Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a division of MDU Resources Group, 
Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice on March 20, 1995, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a 
division of MDU Resources Group, Inc. (Montana-Dakota) tendered for 
filing an amendment to its original filing in this docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before May 15, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
[[Page 24628]] Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11330 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

07-0141-cv 

Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to summary orders

filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 32.1 and this court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document

filed with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database

(with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it

on any party not represented by counsel. 

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the

Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York,

on the ninth day of June, two thousand and ten.

PRESENT:

JOSÉ A. CABRANES,

ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

ROBERT A. KATZMANN,

Circuit Judges.

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

SHADY GROVE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES, P.A., on behalf of

itself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SONIA E. GALVEZ,

Plaintiff,

 -v.- No. 07-0141-cv

 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: JOHN S. SPADARO, John Sheehan

Spadaro, LLC, Hockessin, DE.
2

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE: ANDREW T. HAHN, SR., Seyfarth 

 Shaw LLP, New York, NY.

 

On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. 

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND

DECREED that the judgment be VACATED and the cause be REMANDED to the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of New York for further proceedings consistent with the opinion

of the Supreme Court of the United States.

After our decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs., P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 549 F.3d 137 (2008),

plaintiffs Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A., petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of

certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari and then reversed the decision of this

Court. See 556 U.S. — , 2010 WL 1222272 (2010). 

We now VACATE the judgment of the District Court and REMAND for further proceedings

consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

FOR THE COURT,

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
FDIC by th

INSURING DEPOSITS. EXAMININ

MANAGING RECEIVERSHIPS. EDUCATING CONSUMERS. In its unique role as deposit insurer of banks and savings associations, and in cooperatio

state and federal regulatory agencies, the FDIC promotes the safety and soundness of the U.S. financia

system and insured depository institutions by identifying, monitoring, and addressing risks to the Deposit 

Insurance Fund (DIF)

The FDIC promotes public understanding and the development of sound public policy by providing timely 

and accurate financial and economic information and analyses. It minimizes disruptive effects from the

failure of financial institutions. It assures fairness in the sale of financial products and the provision of

financial services

The FDIC’s long and continuing tradition of excellence in public service is supported and sustained by a 

highly skilled and diverse workforce that continuously monitors and responds rapidly and successfully 

to changes in the financial environment

At the FDIC, we are working together to be the be

FDIC by the

DEPOSIT INSURANCE LIMIT

$250,000

ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

ESTIMATOR USER SESSIONS

277,000

FAILED BANKS 

RESOLVED

92 INSURED 

DEPOSIT 

DOLLARS 

LOST 0

INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS

7,357 DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

COVERAGE INQUIRIES 

ANSWERED

121,800

LANGUAGES FOR 

MONEY SMART

CURRICULUM 9

CONSUMER COMPLAINTS 

AND INQUIRIES ANSWERED

21,684

NEW BANK ACCOUNTS OPENED THROUGH 

THE ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION

171,591

BANKS PARTICIPATING IN THE MODEL 9SAFE ACCOUNT PILOT PROGRAM

FDIC AUTHORIZED FULL-TIMEEQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES

9,269

106INTERNATIONAL VISITS 

TO THE FDIC

825 WITH OVER VISITORS

48 REPRESENTING JURISDICTIONS

FDIC by th
Gary John BOWERS, et al., petitioners v. Donna FRANKS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph James Franks, Sr., Deceased.

No. 13-338.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28165-28166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13148]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-731 (Preliminary)]


Bicycles From China; Import Investigation

Determination

    On the basis of the record <SUP>1 developed in the subject 
investigation, the [[Page 28166]] Commission determines, pursuant to 
section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)), that 
there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States 
is threatened with material injury by reason of imports from China of 
bicycles,<SUP>2 provided for in subheadings 8712.00.15, 8712.00.25, 
8712.00.35, 8712.00.44, and 8712.00.48 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the 
United States at less than fair value (LTFV).

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
rules of practice and procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Carol T. Crawford determines that there is a 
reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is 
materially injured by reason of imports from China of bicycles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    On April 5, 1995, a petition was filed with the Commission and the 
Department of Commerce by Huffy Bicycle Co., Dayton, OH; Murray Ohio 
Manufacturing Co., Brentwood, TN; and Roadmaster Corp., Olney, IL, 
alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured 
and threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV imports of 
bicycles from China. Accordingly, effective April 5, 1995, the 
Commission instituted antidumping investigation No. 731-TA-731 
(Preliminary).
    Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigation and of 
a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register of April 12, 1995 (60 FR 18611). The 
conference was held in Washington, DC, on April 26, 1995, and all 
persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in 
person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on May 22, 1995. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 2893 (May 1995), entitled 
``Bicycles from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-731 (Preliminary).''

    Issued: May 23, 1995.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13148 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: August 13, 2008  
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: August 13, 2008  





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Samson B. SLEWION, petitioner, v. Norman WEINSTEIN, et al.

No. 12-10802.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15




TXU Electric Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Electric Company and
subsidiaries (TXU Electric) for the periods ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, as
indicated in our report dated May 11, 2001; because we did not perform an audit,
we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU
Electric's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-69554, 333-53296,
333-53296-01, 333-53296-02 and 333-53296-03 on Form S-3, of TXU Electric.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



Dallas, Texas
May 11, 2001
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

***CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO***

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of ARBOR ENTECH CORPORATION (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended July 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-QSB”), I, HarveyHoutkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as of the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my****knowledge,that the Company’s Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: September 16, 2005 | s/ Harvey  Houtkin                     |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Harvey  Houtkin,                       |
|                           | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.79

                    [Spanish Broadcasting System, inc. Logo]

December 10, 2003

Marko Radlovic
24949 Normans Way
Calabasas, CA 91302

Dear Marko Radlovic:

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
1999 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") and/or your Employment Agreement, if
applicable, you have been granted a Nonqualified Stock Option, to purchase
72,682 shares (the "Option") of Class A common stock as outlined below.

           Granted To:     Marko Radlovic

           Granted Date:   November 6, 2003

         Option Granted:   76,682

Option Price per Share: $9.44              Total Cost to Exercise:   $686,118.08

        Expiration Date:     November 6, 2013, unless terminated earlier.

       Vesting Schedule:   Special Vesting as follows:

                           24,239 on 11/06/2003
                           24,239 on 11/06/2004
                           24,239 on 11/06/2005


        Transferability:    Not transferable except in accordance with the Plan.

                                             Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

                                             By: /s/ Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                                 ---------------------

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Option granted on
the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions
of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to
conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the Plan.

Signature:  /s/ Marko Radlovic                  Date:   12/29/03
           ----------------------                       --------
                 Marko Radlovic
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor Entech Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad Houtkin, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: December 10, 2009 /s/ Brad Houtkin. Brad Houtkin President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARBOR ENTECH CORPORATION (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 (the "Form
10-QSB"), I, Harvey Houtkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as
of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge,
that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 8, 2006          /s/ Harvey Houtkin
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               Harvey Houtkin,
                               President and Chief Executive Officer





                                       17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:15-CR-27 RLM

)

WILLIAM J. HERROON )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on August 3, 2015 [Doc. No. 19].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant William Herroon’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant

guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a), as charged in the Indictment.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: August 18, 2015 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −85)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See 896 F.Supp.2d 1339 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 362 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−85 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 14−01717 McPherson v. Biomet Inc. et al

CAN 3 14−01719 Broadnax v. Biomet Inc. et al

KENTUCKY EASTERN

KYE 5 14−00147 Centers v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al

LOUISIANA EASTERN

LAE 2 14−00846 Brown v. Biomet Orthopedics, L.L.C.

MINNESOTA

MN 0 14−01135 Cannon v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al

MISSOURI WESTERN

MOW 6 14−03157 Lambert et al v. Biomet Inc et al

MOW 6 14−03171 Burchfield v. Biomet, Inc. et al

NEW YORK EASTERN

NYE 2 14−02367 Pasquale et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al

NEW YORK WESTERN

NYW 6 14−06151 Sauer et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al

OHIO SOUTHERN

OHS 1 14−00284 Lawson et al v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al

OKLAHOMA WESTERN

OKW 5 14−00289 Sissenstein v. Biomet Inc et al
OKW 5 14−00290 Riley v. Biomet Inc et al

OKW 5 14−00324 Doerge v. Biomet Inc et al

OKW 5 14−00328 Lamb v. Biomet Inc et al

SOUTH CAROLINA

SC 9 14−01327 Libby et al v. Biomet Inc et al

Case MDL No. 2391 Document 680 Filed 04/25/14 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12956]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management


Notice for Publication, AA-6986-A and AA-6986-C Alaska Native 
Claims Selection; Alaska

[AK-962-1410-00-P]
    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 16(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1615(b), will be issued to the Cape 
Fox Corporation for certain lands in the vicinity of Ketchikan, Alaska.

Copper River Meridian, Alaska

Tps. 74 S., Rs. 90 and 91 E.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Ketchikan Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until June 26, 1995 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, 
Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Jerri E. Sansone,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of Gulf Rim Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 95-12956 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
Exhibit 35.5

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Re: The issuing entities listed on Exhibit A hereto (each, an Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wachovia Mortgage Corporation as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by each Issuing Entitys relevant report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of February, 2008.

Wachovia Mortgage Corporation



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Kendal A. Leeson
|Name:  |  | Kendal A. Leeson    
|Title: |  | Vice President      



---

Exhibit A:

RALI
SERIES 2006-QS6 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2006-QS10 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2006-QS11 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2006-QS13 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2006-QS16 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2006-QS18 TRUST

RAMP SERIES 2006-RS5 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2006-S3 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2006-S4 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2006-S6
TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2006-S7 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES
2006-S10 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2006-S12 TRUST

RALI
SERIES 2007-QS4 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2007-QS8 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2007-QS10 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2007-QS11 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2007-S4 TRUST

RFMSI SERIES 2007-S5 TRUST

RFC SERIES 2007-WH3 TRUST

RFMSI SERISE 2007-S8 TRUST

RALI SERIES 2007-QS3 TRUST
Javier de Jesus BARRAGAN-MALFABON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7176.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.