alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.B****CERTIFICATION**I, John R. Sult, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 6, 2008         */s/ John R. Sult*   John R. Sult   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 32277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. AA1921-167 (Fifth Review)]


Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy; Termination of Five-
Year Review

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission instituted the subject five-year review in 
March 1, 2021 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on pressure sensitive plastic tape from Italy would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On June 7, 2021, 
the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the 
order effective April 14, 2021, because no domestic interested party 
filed a timely notice of intent to participate. Accordingly, the 
subject review is terminated.

DATES: April 14, 2021 (effective date of revocation of the order).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andres Andrade (202-205-2078), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).

    Authority:  This review is being terminated under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). This notice is 
published pursuant to Sec.  207.69 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 
207.69).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 11, 2021.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-12730 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Byron Elton, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








April 15, 2010





/s/ Byron Elton


_________________________________




Byron Elton


Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 10

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 23-17 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13058]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2213]


United States International Telecommunications Advisory Committee 
(ITAC): Study Group B; Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC), Study Group 
B Group will meet on Thursday, June 22, 1995 at 9:30 a.m., Room 1912 of 
the Department of State.
    The Agenda for Study Group B will include a review of the results 
of the ITU-T Study Group 11 meeting (May 1995) as well as the results 
of the June Study Group 9 meeting. Consideration of contributions to 
upcoming meetings of ITU-T Study Group 13 in July, 1995 and the ITU-T 
Study Group 10 meeting, in September of 1995 will also be considered on 
the agenda of this meeting. Other matters within the purview of Study 
Group B may be raised at the meeting. Persons presenting contributions 
to the meeting of Study Group B should bring 35 copies to the meeting.
    Members of the General Public may attend the meetings and join in 
the discussions, subject to the instructions of the chair. Admittance 
of public members will be limited to the seating available. In this 
regard, entrance to the Department of State is controlled. If you are 
not presently named on the mailing list of the Telecommunications 
Standardization Sector Study Group, and wish to attend please call 202-
647-0201 not later than 5 days before the scheduled meetings. Enter 
from the ``C'' Street Main Lobby. One of the following valid photo ID's 
will be required for admittance: U.S. driver's license with picture, 
U.S. passport, U.S. Government ID (company ID's are no longer accepted 
by Diplomatic Security).

    Dated: May 16, 1995.
Earl S. Barbely,
Chairman, U.S. ITAC for Telecommunication Standardization.
[FR Doc. 95-13058 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
#### In the Matter of Amy Lifson, Appellant, v Board of Education of the Nanuet Public Schools et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner as a teacher with tenure nunc pro tunc as of June 27, 1983, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), entered June 7, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner did not begin teaching until February 15, 1980 of the spring 1980 term, which commenced on January 28, 1980. She did not, therefore, complete the full spring 1980 term, and is not entitled to credit for this service *(Matter of Motak,*16 Ed Dept Rep 358; *Matter of Matera,*17 Ed Dept Rep 459). Consequently, petitioner’s dismissal at the end of the spring 1983 term, which was the end of her probationary period, was proper. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur. [124 Misc 2d 483.]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

h0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144364

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144364

COA: 305534

St. Clair CC: 77

- 122539

- FC

SAMUEL LEMAR MANNINA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13106]



FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Aspen Bancshares, Inc.; Formation of, Acquisition by, or Merger 
of Bank Holding Companies

    The company listed in this notice has applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that application or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that 
requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing 
the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
June 23, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198
    1. Aspen Bancshares, Inc., Aspen, Colorado; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Val Cor Bancorporation, Inc., Cortez, Colorado, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Valley National Bank, Cortez, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 23, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-13106 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 21
 El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
Ownership List as of December 31, 2009
 Jurisdiction ofCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    % HeldEl Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
    
    DelawareEl Paso Pipeline Partners Operating Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00El Paso Wyoming Gas Supply Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.
    
    Colorado
    
    
    50.00EPPP CIG GP Holdings, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Colorado Interstate Gas Company
    
    Delaware
    
    
    58.00CIG Finance Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00CIG Funding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Colorado Interstate Issuing Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00WYCO Holding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00WYCO Development LLC
    
    Colorado
    
    
    50.00EPPP SNG GP Holdings, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Southern Natural Gas Company
    
    Delaware
    
    
    25.00SNG Finance Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00SNG Funding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C.
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    50.00Southern Natural Issuing Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00WIC Holdings Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.
    
    Colorado
    
    
    50.00
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

NOVEMBER 4, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100928 CYNTHIA SCHUENKE, RES V COMMUNITY FIRE, ET AL, 

APP
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1702 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations less 

than 0.5 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2005 

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini 

prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic 

acid in concentrations less than 0.5 percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRE4 SERVED OTHERWISE THAN BY VINEGAR OR 

5 ACETIC ACID IN CONCENTRATIONS LESS 

6 THAN 0.5 PERCENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
2 

•HR 1702 IH 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.20.07 Pepperoncini, prepared or 

preserved otherwise than by 

vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations less than 0.5 

percent (provided for in subheading 2005.90.97) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

5 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 10.20

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ADVISORY AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to Advisory Agreement is executed this 25thday of March, 2009 by and between Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., a
Maryland corporation (the Company) and Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Advisor).

WHEREAS, the Advisor and the Company are parties to that certain Advisory Agreement dated March 17, 2008, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference (the Agreement);

WHEREAS, the Advisor and the Company, by mutual consent, have renewed the Agreement on March 24, 2009, effective until March 17, 2010;

WHEREAS, the Advisor and the Company desire to amend the Agreement to revise the definition of Capped O&O Expenses,
in order to incorporate the original intention of the Advisor and the Company;

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



|1. | Effective as the date hereof, the definition of Capped O&O Expenses in Article I of the Agreement entitled Definitions is hereby amended in its entirety
as follows:
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capped O&O Expenses means all Organizational and Offering Expenses (excluding Sales Commissions
and the dealer manager fee) in excess of 3.5% of the Gross Proceeds raised in a completed Offering other than Gross Proceeds from Stock sold pursuant to the Distribution Reinvestment Plan.



|2. | Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect, and are ratified and
confirmed by this reference.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Advisory
Agreement to be effective for all purposes as of the date first above written.



THE COMPANY:  STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.By:

/s/ H. Michael SchwartzH. Michael Schwartz President




THE ADVISOR:  STRATEGIC STORAGE ADVISOR, LLCBy:

/s/ H. Michael SchwartzH. Michael Schwartz President
case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 1 of 7

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 2 of 7

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 3 of 7

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 4 of 7

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 5 of 7

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 6 of 7

case 2:14-cr-00071-PPS-APR   document 1-1   filed 06/24/14   page 7 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

OSCAR MARTINEZ, JR., )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 2:15-CV-62-JVB-PRC

)

JOHN BUNCICH, individually and in his official )

capacity as Lake County, Indiana, Sheriff, )

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve Additional

Interrogatories on the Defendants [DE 31], filed by Plaintiff on January 20, 2016. Defendant filed

a response on January 28, 2016, and Plaintiff filed a reply on January 29, 2016.

In the Motion, Plaintiff asks for the Court’s leave to file a second set of interrogatories on

Defendant. The additional interrogatories, if allowed, will cause Plaintiff to exceed the interrogatory

maximum set by the Court in accordance with the parties’ report from their planning meeting held

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).

Plaintiff as the movant, bears the burden to show the necessity of the additional

interrogatories. See Duncan v. Paragon Publ’g, Inc., 204 F.R.D. 127, 128 (S.D. Ind. 2001). Plaintiff

argues he has met this burden by attaching the proposed interrogatories to his motion. The proposed

interrogatories make no legal argument of necessity. Furthermore, the Court does not know the

content of the previous interrogatories served on Defendant, and consequently, cannot discern

whether these interrogatories are necessary. Plaintiff has not shown, or even asserted, that the

additional interrogatories are necessary. Because Plaintiff has not met his burden, his motion is

denied.

Additionally, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended effective December 1,
2015, and both Rules 26 and 33 have changed. Both of the parties refer to the old standard,

previously found in Rule 26(b)(1), that “[r]elevant information need not be admissible at the trial

if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” Rule

26(b)(1) no longer includes the “reasonably calculated” language. The new standard is that

“[i]nformation within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be

discoverable.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). Defendant also quotes the old version of Rule 33(a)(1),

which provided that “(l)eave to serve additional interrogatories may be granted to the extent

consistent with Rule 26(b)(2),” whereas the amended rule now requires additional interrogatories

to be consistent with Rule 26(b)(1) and (2). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(1)

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby DENIES the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve

Additional Interrogatories on the Defendants [DE 31].

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2016.

 s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12112]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant(s) have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.)

PRT-802451

Applicant: Dr. Steven W. Carothers, SWCA, Inc., Flagstaff, Arizona.

    The applicant requests a permit to take the southwestern willow 
flycatcher (Empidonax trailii extimus) and Mexican spotted owl (Strix 
occidentalis lucida) at specific site locations in Arizona, for the 
purpose of scientific research and enhancement of propagation and 
survival of the species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.
Addresses: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days for 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See Addresses above.)
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-12112 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M