alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 23, 2010



/S/    CHARLES J. SCHREIBER,
JR.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-23-TLS 

 ) 

ROBERT LEE ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 26], filed on August 19, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 26] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby 

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on September 3, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         488,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                    72,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,114,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,830,716
<PP&E>                                         418,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                 205,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,396,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,751,988
<BONDS>                                        292,559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,957
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,269,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,396,774
<SALES>                                      1,795,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,890,578
<CGS>                                        1,214,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,214,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,181,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             418,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,919,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,919,551)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,919,551)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
"

„ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0425
JAY DONALD WITKOWSKI,

Petitioner and Appellant,
v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. 11. 

### SEP 02 2021 Br•vv n Greenwood r3f •-' N".4, n'e Court ORDER

Jay Donald Witkowski moves this Court for appointment ofcounsel in his appeal. As grounds, Witkowski provides that he is incarcerated and indigent. Witkowski appeals the June 10, 2021 Valley County District Court's dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief. There is no right to the appointment ofcounsel in a postconviction proceeding for relief, although a court may order the assignment ofcounsel under the circumstances outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA. Witkowski represented himselfin his postconviction proceeding before the District Court. He has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist tojustify appointment of counsel, pursuant to § 46-8- 104(3), MCA. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Witkowski's "Application for Court Appointed Attorney," deemed a Motion for Appointment ofCounsel, is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and toJay Donald Witkowski along with a copy ofthis Court's Appellate Handbook. DATED this 1-.-54 day ofAugust, 2021. p4-crk•40."

For the Court,

ChiefJustice 09/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0425
|                                 |   |                                  |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |                                  |   |
| Date:  March      31, 2008 | By:    | /s/  Laura Lee Stewart      |   |
|                                 |   | Laura Lee Stewart                     |   |
|                                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |   |                                  |   |

|                                 |   |                                                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |                                                 |   |
| Date:  March      31, 2008 | By:    |  /s/  Matthew P. Deines               |   |
|                                 |   | Matthew P. Deines                                    |   |
|                                 |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                 |   |                                                 |   |
In re Harold Joe BLACK, petitioner.

No. 12-9811.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-17

)

KELVIN B. WALKER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on November 3, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the six-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 3rd day of November 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Zong
      Yun Zhou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.




Dated:May
                8, 2007/s/
              Zong Yun
              ZhouZong
                Yun ZhouChief
                Financial Officer
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      8, 2008                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/      Al D. Ross                                |   |
| Al D. Ross,      President and           |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer                       |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| May      8, 2008                                   |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/      Terry L. Hester                           |   |
| Terry      L. Hester, Executive Vice President and |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer                       |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Raja M. Parvez, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William F. Weissman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Raja M. Parvez                                  
|                     |  |     |  | Raja M. Parvez
President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 15, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ William F. Weissman                             
|                     |  |     |  | William F. Weissman
Chief Financial Officer         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2007-HY6
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HY6


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer of No Show, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K
of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 and filed with the U. S.
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 27, 2009
        ----------------
                                           /s/ Doreen E. Zimmerman
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Doreen E. Zimmerman
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
#### VALVO, Respondent, v. WEBSTER CITIZENS' CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 28, 1913.)

Action by Mary Valvo, as administratrix, etc., against the Webster Citizens' Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

LAMBERT, J., not sitting.
Timothy Joelette HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6624.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

*541Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties,Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Patrick PERRY, petitioner, v. Bruce YELICH, Superintendent, Bare Hill Correctional Facility.

No. 12-7460.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7701

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilson. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (8:78-cr-00017-F-1)

Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Joseph Owens appeals the district court’s orders directing amendment of the presentence report and denying Owens’

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Owens , No. 8:78-cr-00017-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 26 & Aug. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Chad NOBLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Jenna L. Kemp, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
    10-K of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-AC6 (the "Exchange
    Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
    do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
    respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
    by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and
    based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the
    servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of
    Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
    the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
    agreements in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
    provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Jenna L. Kemp
    Signature

    Executive Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)