alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended February 29, 2004 (the “Report”) by Creative ComputerApplications, Inc. (“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifiesthat to their knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.

 

 

Date: April 14, 2004

 

 
| /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven M. Besbeck, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Creative Computer Applications, Inc. andwill be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
(June 7, 1985)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joanne R. Purdy, Respondent, v Savin Corp. et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs *(see, Matter of Donovan v Knickerbocker Warehousing*
      *979
      *Corp.,*72 AD2d 870). Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
#### KAYSER, Appellant, v. KAHN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 24, 1899.)

Action by Max Kayser against Henrietta Kahn.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on argument.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION )

 FOUNDATION ET AL., )

 )

Plaintiff(s), )

)

 v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:15cv463 JD

)

CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, )

)

Defendant(s). )

ORDER

In accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this cause is now set

for a Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference before Magistrate Judge Christopher A.

Nuechterlein to be held on January 7, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. (E.S.T.) in Room 201, Robert A.

Grant Courthouse, 204 S. Main Street, South Bend, Indiana. Trial Counsel are required to attend

this conference. 

Counsel shall indicate whether their clients are willing to consent to transfer this

case to a Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including trial, by either executing and

submitting the consent form or orally inform the court at the Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial

Conference to consent. 

At the conference, counsel shall be prepared to address the following:

1. A proposed Discovery Plan under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) to be filed no later than

December 15, 2015. Counsel are directed to the Court’s website for a suitable form of report

and discovery plan (“Report of the Parties Planning Meeting”). At the conference, the Court

will address those topics listed at Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and (c). Failure to timely file the report

and proposed discovery plan may result in the imposition of sanctions in accordance with Fed.

R. Civ. P. 16(f). At the conference, it is anticipated that the Court will approve or modify the

Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting.

2. Consideration of the various forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”)

available1

 to include mediation. If mediation is selected, the parties shall identify the mediator

and in the event counsel cannot agree on a mediator, then the Court will make the selection. 

Counsel may review the list of mediators located on the Court’s website at innd.uscourts.gov,

under Info/Forms, prior to the preliminary pretrial conference.

 1The attention of counsel is specifically directed to the Court’s ADR Pamphlet (1/96) located

at the Court’s website.

1

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 38 filed 11/30/15 page 1 of 2
If counsel is outside of St. Joseph County, you may appear telephonically by filing a

motion electronically at least 48 hours before the hearing. If you have any questions, contact our

case management deputy, Sharon Macon at 574-246-8l00.

SO ORDERED.

Dated November 30, 2015.

 s/Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

Christopher A. Nuechterlein

United States Magistrate Judge

2

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00463-JD document 38 filed 11/30/15 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13337]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-29; OTS No. 06278]


Redwood Falls Federal Savings and Loan Association, Redwood 
Falls, Minnesota; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 28, 1995, the Deputy Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Redwood Falls Federal Savings and Loan Association, 
Redwood Falls, Minnesota, to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection at the 
Information Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20552, and the Central Regional Office, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 111 Wacker Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, 
Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: May 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 95-13337 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12393]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-4723-2]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared April 10, 1995 Through April 
14, 1995 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under 
Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA 
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities AT (202) 
260-5076.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 14, 1995 (72 
FR 19047).

Draft EISs

    ERP No. D-BLM-K08018-CA Rating EC2, Alturas 345 Kilovolt (KV) 
Electric Power Transmission Line Project, Construction, Operation and 
Maintenance, Right-of-Way Grant Approval, Special-Use-Permit and COE 
Section 404 Permit, Susanville District, Modoc, Lassen and Sierra 
Counties, CA and Washoe County, NV.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding air quality 
conformity issues, biological resources, and project description 
information. In addition, further mitigation for cultural resources 
impacts are recommended.
    ERP No. D-COE-E35083-NC Rating EO2, Buckhorn Reservoir Expansion, 
Construction of a Dam to Impound Water on the Contentnea Creek, COE 
Section 404 Permit, City of Wilson, Wilson County, NC.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections over the potential 
loss of 1,300 acres of wetlands, and questioned whether the proposed 
mitigation for the losses was appropriate. In addition, EPA expressed 
concerns over maintenance of water quality at the proposed reservoir.
    ERP No. D-COE-G36146-LA Rating LO, Amite River and Tributaries 
Flood Control Project, Implementation, East Baton Rouge Parish 
Watershed, Florida Parishes, LA.
    Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections to the proposed project, 
and supported the identified mitigation measures.
    ERP No. D-DOE-E06015-SC Rating EC1, Savannah River Site Interim 
Management of Nuclear Materials, Implementation, Aiken and Barnwell 
Counties, SC.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern regarding the 
discussion of waste minimization, pollution prevention and spent 
nuclear fuel. EPA recommended additional information on these issues be 
included in the final document.

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-USA-E11034-NC, Military Ocean Terminal Navigation Basins 
and Entrance Channels Improvements, Implementation, Sunny Point, 
Brunswick and New Hanover Counties, NC.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about whether 
potential adverse impacts to water quality/biological resources 
resulting from the deepened navigation features have been adequately 
addressed.

    Dated: May 16, 1995.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 95-12393 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

MATTRESS WAREHOUSE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO: 1:15-cv-91

)

JOHN DOE, AMERICAN MATTRESS, )

and GOOGLE, INC., )

 )

 Defendants. )

OPINION and ORDER

This case was removed to this Court from the Allen County Superior Court by Defendant

Google, Inc., based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) The

Notice of Removal alleges, among other things, that Defendant American Mattress is a trade

name for American Mattress of Fort Wayne, LLC, which is a “limited-liability corporation

incorporated under the laws of the State of Illinois” and “has one member, who resides in the

State of Illinois.” (Not. of Removal ¶ 7(b).) 

 But the Notice of Removal is inadequate because it fails to properly allege the citizenship

of American Mattress. The state in which a limited liability company (“LLC”) is organized is

immaterial for purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction; an LLC’s citizenship “for purposes

of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members.” Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d

729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Therefore, the Court must be advised of the identity of each member

of American Mattress of Fort Wayne, LLC, and such member’s citizenship. Hicklin Eng’g, L.C.

v. Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 347 (7th Cir. 2006); see generally Guar. Nat’l Title Co. v. J.E.G.

1
Assocs., 101 F.3d 57, 59 (7th Cir. 1996) (explaining that the court would “need to know the

name and citizenship(s)” of each partner for diversity jurisdiction purposes). 

Moreover, citizenship must be “traced through multiple levels” for those members who

are a partnership or an LLC, as anything less can result in a remand for want of jurisdiction. Mut.

Assignment & Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004). And

residency of an individual is meaningless for purposes of diversity jurisdiction; an individual’s

citizenship is determined by his or her domicile. Dakuras v. Edwards, 312 F.3d 256, 258 (7th

Cir. 2002); see Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012) (“But

residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile–that is to say, the

state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”); Guar. Nat’l Title Co., 101 F.3d at 58-

59 (explaining that statements concerning a party’s “residency” are not proper allegations of

citizenship as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332). 

Accordingly, Defendant Google, Inc., is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing

an amended notice of removal on or before May 4, 2015, that properly alleges the citizenship of

Defendant American Mattress.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 20th day of April 2015.

/s Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge 

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ASHLEE K. LEEPER, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CV-414-RL-PRC

)

A.J. LINES, INC., BALTIC FREIGHT CORP., )

and ABINET E. KEBEDE, )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Amend Complaint [DE 70], filed by Plaintiff

Ashlee K. Leeper on April 25, 2017. In the motion, Plaintiff seeks leave to amend her complaint to

add BNSF Logistics, LLC as a defendant.

The Court must continuously police its subject matter jurisdiction. Hay v. Ind. State Bd. of

Tax Comm’rs, 312 F.3d 876, 879 (7th Cir. 2002). As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity

jurisdiction, Plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity

is met. Chase v. Shop’n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). The

jurisdictional allegations of the proposed Amended Complaint are deficient. There is insufficient

information to determine the citizenship of BNSF Logistics, LLC.

A limited liability company is analogous to a partnership and takes the citizenship of its

members. Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Mkt. Place, LLC, 350 F.3d 691, 692 (7th Cir. 2003).

If the members of the limited liability company are themselves limited liability companies, the

plaintiff must also plead the citizenship of those members. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d

531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007). The proposed Amended Complaint alleges, without more, that BNSF

Logistics, LLC is “a Delaware Limited Liability Company.” The proposed Amended Complaint is

silent as to the members of BNSF Logistics, LLC. Therefore, Plaintiff must advise the Court of the
identity and citizenship of each member of BNSF Logistics, LLC. If any of those members are

themselves limited liability companies, the identity and citizenship of the members of each member

limited liability company must also be provided.

Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby DENIES without prejudice the Motion to Amend

Complaint [DE 70]. Plaintiff may refile the motion with the appropriate allegations of citizenship

for BNSF Logistics, LLC. 

SO ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2017.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
## NUMBER S 13 - 2 3 - 00 5 80 - C V, 13 - 23 - 00582 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
– EDINBURG

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ROXANNA HERNANDEZ AND ALEX HERNANDEZ JR.

On appeal from the 117th District C ourt o f Nueces C ounty, Texas.


## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides Alex Hernandez Jr. filed a “Motion for Interlocutory Appeal[,] Notice of Mandamus[,] and Motion to Stay” in this Court on December 14, 2023. We construe d this pleading as both a notice of appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus and docketed it in two cause numbers: 13

- 23
- 00580
- CV for the petition for writ of mandamus, and 13

- 23
- 00582
- CV for the appeal. On December 15, 2023, th e Clerk of this Court notif ied Hernandez that it appeared that there was not a final, appealable order, that there was no statutory basis for an interlocutory appeal, and that a notice of interlocutory appeal2

would be untimely. The Clerk advised Hernandez that the appeal would be di smissed if the se defect s w ere not corrected within ten days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.1. The Clerk further advised Hernandez that the petition for writ of mandamus failed to comply with the appellate rules and directed him to file an amended petition within five days

. See id. R. 9.4(i)(3), 52.3, 52.7. And finally, the Clerk informed Hernandez that the motion for stay failed to comply with the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure

. See id. R. 10.1, 52.10(a). Hernandez has not responded to the Clerk’s directives and has not otherwise corrected any of these defects

. The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Accordingly, w e dismiss th e appeal in cause number 13
- 23
- 00582
- CV and we deny the petition for writ of mandamus in cause number 13

- 23
- 00 580
- CV. We dismiss the motion to stay as moot in both cases

.
GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice Delivered and filed on the 11 th day of January , 202 4

.
---



##### 



STATE BANK OF VIETNAM
    
    SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAMIndependence  Freedom  HappinessNo. 10464/NHNN-QLNH
 Ha Noi, 31 December, 2009
 BONG MIEU GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED
 Re: Doré gold export
  1.
    
    We approve Bong Mieu Gold Mining Company Limited to export 600 kg
(six hundred kilograms) of gold dore bar (75% gold) mined by the Company
in year 2010 to be refined and traded overseas.2.
    
    Bong Mieu Gold Mining Company Limited is only permitted to export the
type of gold specified in Article 1 of this letter and is requested to conform to
regulations on gold export and import as well as relevant stipulations.3.
    
    This approval shall take effect until the end of 31 December 2010.
 Distribution:
    
    For the Director of the State Bank-   As above
    
    Director of Foreign Exchange Control-   Nguyen Van Binh, the Deputy Director (to report)
-   General Department of Customs
-   Market Control Department
(Ministry of Industry & Trade)
    
    Department-   File
    
    (signed and sealed)Nguyen Quang Huy




---



##### 








---



##### 



STATE BANK OF VIETNAM
    
    SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAMIndependence  Freedom  HappinessNo. 10463/NHNN-QLNH
 Ha Noi, 31 December, 2009
 PHUOC SON GOLD COMPANY LIMITED
 Re: Doré gold export
  1.
    
    We approve Phuoc Son Gold Company Limited to export 1,000 kg (One
thousand kilograms) of gold dore bar (75% gold) mined by the Company in
year 2010 to be refined and traded overseas.2.
    
    Phuoc Son Gold Company Limited is only permitted to export the type of
gold specified in Article 1 of this letter and is requested to conform to
regulations on gold export and import as well as relevant stipulations.3.
    
    This approval shall take effect until the end of 31 December 2010.
 Distribution:
    
    For the Director of the State Bank-   As above
    
    Director of Foreign Exchange Control-   Nguyen Van Binh, the Deputy Director (to report)
-   General Department of Customs
    
    Department-   Market Control Department
(Ministry of Industry & Trade)
-   File
    
    (signed and sealed)Nguyen Quang Huy
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Citadel Security Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Connelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
--------------------
Richard Connelly
Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2003


<PAGE>
Exhibit 21
  Subsidiary
    
    Ownership
    
    
    State of IncorporationCape Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New Jersey
  Subsidiary
    
    Ownership
    
    
    State of IncorporationCape New Jersey Investment Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New JerseyCape Delaware Investment Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    DelawareCASABA Real Estate Holding Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New JerseyCape May County Savings Service Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New Jersey (Inactive)
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
each of the undersigned Gregory Pusey, the President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, the Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2005              /s/ Gregory Pusey
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Gregory Pusey, President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Dated: June 16, 2005              /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Senior Vice President-
                                  Finance and Chief Financial Officer



                                    * * * * *



A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12421]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ES95-8-001]


Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc; Notice of Amended 
Application

May 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 15, 1995, Central Louisiana Electric 
Company, Inc. (CLECO) filed an amendment to its application in Docket 
No. ES95-8-000, under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act. By letter 
order dated November 29, 1994 (69 FERC para. 62,173), CLECO was 
authorized to issue not more than $123 million of short-term 
indebtedness during the period January 1, 1995 through December 31, 
1996, with final maturities not later than one year from the date of 
issuance. CLECO requests that the authorization issued in Docket No. 
ES95-8-000 be amended to authorize CLECO to issue and incur short-term 
indebtedness aggregating not more than $123 million principal amount 
outstanding at any one time, in connection with commercial paper 
issuances and commercial bank borrowings, and to enter into a new 
revolving credit agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426 in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before May 24, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12421 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M