alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 25, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00044

- CR

Alberto Torres , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parti es’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Michael BROCKINGTON, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 12-9961.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
**Exhibit 32**

August 11, 2004

Via EDGAR

Securities and ExchangeCommissionJudiciary Plaza450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:      Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MesaOffshore Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely asthe trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that toits knowledge:

(1)The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Theabove certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed aspart of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
|        | JPMorgan Chase Bank,

Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                   | /s/ Mike  Ulrich |
|   |                                                  | **Mike Ulrich**

***Vice President and Trust Officer*** |

 

----
Richard Wesley BRYAN, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 12-9804.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2, denied.
#### In re YOUNG.

(Supreme Court Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 28, 1913.)

In the matter of the applic!ation of Frances Elisa Young, as administratrix, etc., for authority to mortgage, lease, or sell, etc.

No opinion. Order afifrmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Joel Christopher HOLMES, petitioner, v. Daniel T. SATTERBERG, et al.

No. 12-9583.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Glenn A. HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7085.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
AUSTAL USA, LLC, petitioner, v. Earaton ADAMS, et al.

No. 12-1340.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### CONWAY v. CITY OF ROCHESTER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by John Conway against the city of Rochester and others.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted, and questions certified and filed with the clerk. See 49 Ñ. Y. Supp. 244.
Julio CHAVEZ, aka Flecha, aka Flechita, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9660.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-cr-00052-TLS-SLC

)

DARIUS D. PURYEAR )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

November 17, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the three-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and

Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 17th day of November 2015.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12672]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 1, 1995, pursuant to the 
National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 
4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the participants in the Petroleum 
Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') Project No. 93-19 have filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties 
and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties and the general area of planned activity are: Amoco Oil 
Company, Naperville, IL; Marine Spill Response Corporation, Washington, 
DC; and University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL.
    The nature and objectives of the research program performed in 
accordance with PERF Project No. 93-19 is to determine the effect of 
bioemulsifers on the bioremediation of open water oil spills.
    Information about participation in Project 93-19 may be obtained by 
contacting David E. Fritz, Amoco Oil Company, Naperville, IL.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12672 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
CERTIFICATIONS  I, John Schoenauer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Fidelity Aviation Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 28, 2008 /s/ John SchoenauerJohn Schoenauer, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned officer of G REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to hisknowledge, that:
     (i)the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.          /s/  SCOTT D. PETERS    Scott D. Peters   *Chief Financial Officer*   
Date: April 28, 2005
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provide tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
     Theforegoing certification is being furnished with the Company’sForm 10-K/A for the periodended December 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general information language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Israel Morgenstern, the President, Treasurer, and Director of World of Tea Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 7, 2008

By:


/s/ Israel MorgensternName:


Israel MorgensternTitle:


Acting Principal Executive, Financial, and
Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 16, 2010
    /s/ Michael D. DevlinMichael D. DevlinChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:  March 16, 2010
    /s/ Guy HackneyGuy HackneyChief Financial Officer
Welcome to Houstonville...

Where... You Earn It

&

We Save It!!!

Sam Houston Elementary School

Let’s meet the Mayor and IBC Bank President at Houstonville...

IBC Bank in Houstonville...

IBC Houstonville Bank 

The Teller Line at Houstonville

*

Their Customers

IRS at Houstonville...

Teaching How To Save

Other Businesses at Houstonville

Target 

Store

Post 

Office

And More...

Channel 5

KSHE Radio 

Station

Thank You 

for Visiting Houstonville...
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1684

To amend the Internet Tax Freedom Act to make permanent the moratorium 

on certain taxes relating to the Internet and to electronic commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2005

Mr. COX (for himself, Mr. CANNON, Mr. UPTON, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. 

FOSSELLA, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. MACK, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. OTTER, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. PAUL, Mr. HERGER, Mr. 

MILLER of Florida, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. DREIER, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. WELLER, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. 

TERRY, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. KIRK, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. 

GILLMOR, Mr. ADERHOLT, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Miss 

MCMORRIS, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. WALSH, Mr. 

MANZULLO, and Mr. HOSTETTLER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Internet Tax Freedom Act to make permanent 

the moratorium on certain taxes relating to the Internet 

and to electronic commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1684 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Tax Non3 discrimination Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE INTERNET TAX FREEDOM 

5 ACT. 

6 The Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) 

7 is amended in section 1101(a) by striking ‘‘during the pe8 riod beginning November 1, 2003, and ending November 

9 1, 2007’’.

Æ
Sandra DELANCEY, as Personal Representative of the Estate and on Behalf of All Survivors of Kimberly Delancey, Deceased, petitioner, v. CARLTON ARMS OF MAGNOLIA VALLEY.

No. 13-378.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Ten Largest Thrift Companies: 

Interest-Rate Environment Supports Strong Earnings

August 15, 2002

Since the onset of recession in early 2001, economic conditions have been less than ideal for many households, 

businesses, and commercial lenders. However, the interest-rate environment accompanying the recession has 

been generally supportive of high earnings for the nation's 10 largest thrift institutions (hereafter, the "10 

Largest"), which specialize in mortgage lending. Earnings for the 10 Largest rose in the second quarter to $1.7 

billion, a $24 million increase from first-quarter results. The weighted average return on assets (ROA) was 1.34 

percent, up from 1.27 percent in the first quarter (Chart 1). A detailed discussion of overall results and 

information on individual companies are available in the FDIC's report, Ten Largest Thrift Companies.

D

The yield curve remained relatively steep in the second quarter, limiting declines in net interest margins, while 

falling long-term interest rates helped produce large gains on sales of securities for the 10 Largest. The fact that 

long-term, fixed mortgage rates again approached 30-year lows during the quarter helped to support high volumes of 

home sales and mortgage refinancing. The result has been continued strong originations of mortgage loans 

accompanied by a reduction in the value of mortgage servicing rights. However, today's report shows that the 10 

Largest were somewhat successful in buffering themselves from the adverse effects of mortgage prepayments 

through the use of hedging strategies.

Current economic trends appear to point to continued high volumes of mortgage origination for the 10 Largest in the 

third quarter. With 30-year Treasury yields falling below 5.0 percent this week, long-term mortgage rates could at 

least briefly dip to their lowest levels in a generation. Meanwhile, mixed signals about the pace of the apparent 

economic recovery give no sign that short-term interest rates will rise dramatically in the near-term, which implies 

that net interest margins should also remain relatively strong during the third quarter.
Chart 1

Return on Assets for the 10 Largest Thrifts Rises with a Decline in Total Assets

Quarter Quarterly Net 

Income

2001:Q2 1.23

2001:Q3 1.2

2001:Q4 0.72

2002:Q1 1.27

2002:Q2 1.34

Source: SNL DataSource; FDIC
#### Robert J. Belvin, Respondent, v Diane Belvin, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Dier, J.), entered June 27, 1984 in Fulton County, which granted plaintiff’s motion to relieve him of his obligation to pay temporary child support so long as defendant withholds visitation.

This court has consistently held that the most effective remedy to alleviate an allegedly inequitable temporary support order is a prompt trial of the divorce action *(see, e.g., Baranyk v Baranyk,*73 AD2d 1004; *Dreyfus v Dreyfus,*72 AD2d 522). Here, this case is currently on the Trial Calendar.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

BARBARA LAHMAN, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No. 3:14-cv-1430-WCL-JEM 

 ) 

THE CARSWELL GROUP, INC. ) 

d/b/a Independent Management Services ) 

and MELISSA BLOCK, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

This Court, having examined the Parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, now 

hereby dismisses this cause of action and all claims herein against Defendants, The Carswell 

Group, Inc. d/b/a Independent Management Services and Melissa Block, with prejudice. All 

parties are to bear their own costs. 

SO ORDERED this 12th day of March, 2015. 

 s/William C. Lee_____________ 

 Honorable Judge William C. Lee 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01430-WCL-JEM document 18 filed 03/12/15 page 1 of 1
`
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the annual report of Excaliber Enterprises, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephanie Y. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Matthew L. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

      Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

      and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Stephanie Y. Jones

     Stephanie Y. Jones

     Chief Executive Officer

     March 6, 2008

 

/s/ Matthew L. Jones

      Matthew L. Jones

      Chief Financial Officer

      March 6, 2008

 

 

 
`