alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 2000 AS FILED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         126,612
<SECURITIES>                                    46,734
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,177
<INVENTORY>                                    209,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               560,572
<PP&E>                                         380,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 769,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,141
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,976
<COMMON>                                       410,136
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   769,392
<SALES>                                        179,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,801
<CGS>                                          104,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,825
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
EX-33.14
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of
and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 29, 2008
[Cite as State v. Acy , 2022

- Ohio

- 3316.]

COURT OF APPEALS

STARK COUNTY, OHIO

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO JUDGES : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr.

, P.J

. Plaintiff

- Appell ee Hon. William B. Hoffman

, J.

Hon. Craig R. Baldwin

, J.

- vs

Case No. 2022CA00021

STEPHEN ACY

Defendant

- Appell ant O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Appeal from the Stark County Court of
Common Pleas, Case No. 2021

- CR

- 0898

JUDGMENT: Affirmed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: September 20, 2022

APPEARANCES:

For Plaintiff

- Appell ee For Defendant

- Appell ant

KYLE L. STONE D. COLEMAN BOND Prosecuting Attorney 116 Cleveland Avenue, S.W. Stark County, Ohio Suite #600
Canton, Ohio 44702

VICKI L. DESANTIS

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Appellate Division 110 Central Plaza, South

– Suite #510
Canton, Ohio 44702

- 1413Stark County , Case No. 2022CA00021 2

Hoffman , J.

{¶1} Defendant

- appellant Stephen Acy appeals the judgment entered by the

Stark County Common Pleas Court convicting him following his plea of guilty to felonious

assault (R.C. 2903.11(A)(1)) and sentencing him to an indefinite term of incarceration of

two to three years. Plaintiff

- appellee is the state of Ohio.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

{¶2} On April 6, 2021, Appellant was a resident at the Indian River Juvenile

Correctional Facility for a misdemeanor offense of obstructing official business. Appellant

struck A.G., breaking A.G.’s jaw, whi ch required surgery. Appellant was indicted by the

Stark County Grand Jury on one count of felonious assault.

{¶3} Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charged offense on January 26,

2022. Over Appellant’s objection, the trial court sentenced Appellant p ursuant to the

Reagan Tokes Act to an indefinite term of incarceration of two to three years.

{¶4} It is from the February 2, 2022 judgment of the trial court Appellant

prosecutes this appeal, assigning as error:

THE MODIFICATIONS TO SENTENCING FOR FIRST

- AND

SECOND

- DEGREE FELONIES MADE BY THE REAGAN TOKES ACT

VIOLATE THE APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL, AS PROTECTED

BY THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED

STATES CONSTITUTION, AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS

DOCTRINE EMBEDDED IN THE OHIO CO NSTITUTION.

{¶5} Appellant argues the Reagan Tokes Act is unconstitutional, as it violates

separation of powers and his right to trial by jury.Stark County , Case No. 2022CA00021 3

{¶6} For the reasons stated in this Court's opinion in State v. Householder , 5th

Dist. Muskingum No. CT2021

- 0026, 2022

- Ohio

- 1542, we find the Reagan Tokes act is

constitutional. The assignment of error is overruled.

{¶7} The judgment of the Stark County Common Pleas Court is affirmed.

By: Hoffman, J.

Wise, Earle, P. J. and

Baldwin, J. concur
#### COONAN, Respondent, v. HAMBURG-AMERICAN PACKET CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by William H. Coonan against the Hamburg-American Packet Company. (Appeal No. 3.) No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer within 20 days. See, also, 133 N. Y. Supp. 1116; supra.
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

DB Servicing Corporation

Discover Card Master Trust I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of DB Servicing Corporation (DBSC), hereby certifies that:



|(a) | A review of the activities of DBSC for (i) the one-month transition period ended December 31, 2012 and of its performance under the Amended and Restated
Servicing Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, by and between DBSC and Discover Bank (the Transition Period Agreement) and (ii) the year ended December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Master Services Agreement,
between Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank, DBSC, Discover Products Inc. and other affiliated entities, dated as of January 1, 2013, as amended and restated by the Amended and Restated Services Addendum, between DBSC and Discover Bank,
dated as of August 15, 2013 (together with the Transition Period Agreement, the Agreements), was made under my supervision.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, DBSC has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Agreements for the one-month transition
period ended December 31, 2012 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 21stday of March 2014.



By:

/s/ Roger C. HochschildRoger C. Hochschild,
President
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00145-JD-CAN document 15 filed 01/08/15 page 1 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00145-JD-CAN document 15 filed 01/08/15 page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000714286
<NAME> UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,060,916
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         200,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,886,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,497,062
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,048,890
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,103,419
<LOANS>                                     32,554,194
<ALLOWANCE>                                    611,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,213,132
<DEPOSITS>                                  40,938,528
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            345,791
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,276,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,808,201
<OTHER-SE>                                    (155,945)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              45,213,132
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,411,844
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              221,036
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,043
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,638,923
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             747,202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          891,721
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   97,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,067
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                936,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,024)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (19,024)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.40
<LOANS-NON>                                    105,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                20,698
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               584,106
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   75,940
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,020
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              611,286
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           611,286
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        602,784
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1499 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1499

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction to 
members of the Armed Forces serving in a combat zone for contributions 
to their individual retirement plans even if the compensation on which 
such contribution is based is excluded from gross income, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2005

   Ms. Foxx introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction to 
members of the Armed Forces serving in a combat zone for contributions 
to their individual retirement plans even if the compensation on which 
such contribution is based is excluded from gross income, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Heroes Earned Retirement 
Opportunities Act''.

SEC. 2. COMBAT ZONE COMPENSATION TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING LIMITATION AND DEDUCTIBILITY OF CONTRIBUTIONS 
              TO INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) Special rule for compensation earned by members of 
        the armed forces for service in a combat zone.--For purposes of 
        paragraph (1)(B), gross income shall be determined without 
        regard to section 112.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
34.3
 
 logo
              Ernst
      & Young LLP
                220
      South Sixth Street, Ste 1400
                Minneapolis,
      MN 55402-4509
                Tel:
      612 343 1000
                www.ey.com
 
 
 Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board
of Directors
 U.S. Bank
National Association
 
 We have
examined management’sassertion,
included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the
Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securitiesplatform(thePlatform) as of June 30,
2008, and for the period fromJuly
1, 2007 through June 30, 2008, except forservicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-(vi), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(ii), and
1122(d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on
our examination.
 
 Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.
  In our opinion, management’s assertion
that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of June
30, 2008, and for the periodfrom July 1, 2007 through June 30,
2008, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.
 
 /s/
      Ernst & Young LLPAugust
      18, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

APPEARANCE 

CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE ) 

COMPANY, CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE ) 

INSURANCE COMPANY ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2:15-cv-00253-JD-PRC 

 ) 

NORTHWEST REGIONAL SURGERY CENTER, LLC, ) 

ADVANCED REGIONAL SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

CARMEL SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

COLUMBUS SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

INDIANA SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

METRO SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

MIDWEST SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

MUNSTER SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

RIVERVIEW SURGERY CENTER LLC, SOUTH ) 

BEND SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

SYCAMORE SPRINGS SURGERY CENTER LLC, ) 

SURGICAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT,, INC. D/B/A ) 

SURGCENTER DEVELOPMENT, SURGICAL ) 

CENTER DEVELOPMENT #3 LLC ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: 

I, the below-signed, state that I have read the Standards of Professional Conduct within 

the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83-5(e) and will faithfully adhere 

to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for the following Defendants: 

Northwest Regional Surgery Center, LLC 

Advanced Regional Surgery Center LLC 

Carmel Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

Columbus Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

Indiana Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

Metro Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

Midwest Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

Munster Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00253-JD-PRC document 12 filed 08/03/15 page 1 of 2
2 

Riverview Surgery Center LLC 

South Bend Specialty Surgery Center LLC 

Sycamore Springs Surgery Center LLC 

Surgical Center Development, Inc. d/b/a Surgcenter Development 

Surgical Center Development #3LLC 

Date: August 3, 2015 

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 

By /s/ Brian E. Casey 

 Brian E. Casey (23263-71) 

 brian.casey@btlaw.com 

700 1st Source Bank Center 

100 North Michigan Street 

South Bend, Indiana 46601-1632 

Telephone: (574) 233-1171 

Facsimile: (574) 237-1125 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: 

Daniel K. Ryan 

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 

222 North LaSalle Street, Suite 300 

Chicago, IL 60601-1081 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Joshua B. Simon (PHV) 

Warren Haskel (PHV) 

Kirkland & Ellis LLP 

601 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10016 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 

By /s/ Brian E. Casey 

USDC IN/ND case 2:15-cv-00253-JD-PRC document 12 filed 08/03/15 page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000521 17-JAN-2019 09:48 AM
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Angel GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-41505.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 21, 2004.

James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Miguel Angel Gallegos, Houston, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Miguel Angel Gallegos, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Galle*189gos has not filed a response to the motion. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.4


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Charles O. Garner, certify that:


1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report of Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K; and


2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


/s/ Charles O. GarnerCharles O. GarnerChief Financial OfficerDate: April 27, 2018
Shawn Bernard DOBY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10157.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.