alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27975-27976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-00410; FRL-4956-5]

State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) Working 
Committee on Water Quality & Pesticide Disposal; Open Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) 
Working Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal will hold a 
2-day meeting, beginning on Monday, June 5, 1995, and ending on 
Tuesday, June 6, 1995. This notice announces the location and times for 
the meeting and sets forth tentative agenda topics. The meeting is open 
to the public.

DATES: The SFIREG Working Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide 
Disposal will meet on Monday, June 5, 1995, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m., and Tuesday, June 6, 1995, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: The DoubleTree Hotel, National 
Airport - Crystal City, 300 Army-Navy Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202, 703-
892-4100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shirley M. Howard, Office of 
Pesticide Programs (7506C), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., 
SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 
1101, Crystal Mall No. 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 
22202, 703-305-5306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The tentative agenda of the SFIREG Working 
Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal includes the 
following:
    1.   Reports from the SFIREG Working Committee members on State 
Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal projects. [[Page 27976]] 
    2.   Discussion on the guidelines for prospective groundwater 
studies.
    3.   Update on the State Management Plan (SMP) rule.
    4.   Status of the groundwater SMP program, review and 
teleconferences.
    5.   Discussion of the United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) 
groundwater and surface water monitoring for pesticides and 
metabolites.
    6.   Update on Amber registration.
    7.   Discussion of cross contamination of bulk pesticides.
    8.   Status of the part 165 regulations.
    9.   Other topics as appropriate.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

    Dated: May 18, 1995.

William L. Jordan,
Acting Director, Field Operations Division, Office of Pesticide 
Programs.

[FR Doc. 95-13138 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
```
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Winnie Wong, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Alianza Minerals Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   February 16, 2016





/s/  Winnie Wong

Winnie Wong,

Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         616,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               616,164
<PP&E>                                           9,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 718,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,015
<OTHER-SE>                                     495,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   718,339
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    841
<INCOME-TAX>                                       164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-cr-50-TLS-SLC

)

KYOMBE D. BOLDEN )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

July 21, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and counsel

for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 21st day of July 2015.

s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

KIMBERLY A. HIVELY, ) 

) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG 

) 

IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ) 

) 

 Defendant. ) 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

The parties hereby stipulate that any and all claims asserted by Plaintiff Kimberly A. 

Hively against Defendant be dismissed with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that costs 

and fees shall be borne by the respective parties. 

s/ Daniel H. Pfeifer 

Danielle J. Healey (TBA #09327980) 

(healey@fr.com) 

Karrie H. Wheatley (TBA #24098605) 

(wheatley@fr.com) 

Raisa Ahmad (TBA #24101437) 

(ahmad@fr.com) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800 

Houston, TX 77010 

Telephone: (713) 654-5300 

Facsimile: (713) 652-0109 

Daniel H. Pfeifer 

(dpfeifer@pilawyers.com) 

PFEIFER MORGAN & STESIAK 

53600 North Ironwood Road 

South Bend, IN 46635 

Telephone: (574) 272-2870 

Facsimile: (574) 271-4329 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

s/ Adam L. Bartrom 

Jason T. Clagg (#24123-02) 

(jason.clagg@btlaw.com) 

Adam L. Bartrom (#27019-02) 

(adam.bartrom@btlaw.com) 

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 

888 South Harrison Street, Suite 600 

Fort Wayne, IN 46802 

Telephone: (260) 423-9440 

Facsimile: (260) 424-8316 

 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

DMS 13156737v1 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG document 70 filed 08/22/18 page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  381,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    881,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,263,200
<PP&E>                                         706,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                 430,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,024,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,111,211
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,926
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,487,919)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,024,485
<SALES>                                        937,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               937,368
<CGS>                                          649,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  649,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               532,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (375,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (375,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009 on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K (the
Annual Report) of HUGHES Telematics, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Craig J. Kaufmann, Senior Vice President Finance and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/    CRAIG J.
KAUFMANNName:

Craig J. KaufmannTitle:

Senior Vice President Finance and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:

July 19, 2010
#### JACKSON BROS. REALTY CO., Respondent, v. PHILLIPS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action brought by the Jackson Bros. Realty Company against R. Oliver Phillips. No Opinion. Judgment affirmed, with cost. See, also, 147 App. Div. 913, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1133.
Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 16, 2009
    /s/ Michael D. DevlinMichael D. DevlinChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:  March 16, 2009
    /s/ Guy HackneyGuy HackneyChief Financial Officer
[No. 53659-1-I.

Division One.

January 10, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Mario M. Suggs, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 03-8-01329-3, Gerald L. Knight, J., entered January 5, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 161 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1721 

[Report No. 109–292] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize programs 

to improve the quality of coastal recreation waters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself, Mr. SIMMONS, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

NOVEMBER 14, 2005 

Additional sponsors: Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. LOBIONDO, and Mr. ISRAEL

NOVEMBER 14, 2005 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize programs to improve the quality of coastal recreation waters, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1721 RH 

1 SECTION 1. COASTAL RECREATION WATER QUALITY MONI2 TORING AND NOTIFICATION. 

3 Section 406(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1346(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 Section 8 of the Beaches Environmental Assessment 

8 and Coastal Health Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 877) is amend9 ed by striking ‘‘2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

Union Calendar No. 161 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1721 

[Report No. 109–292] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

coastal recreation waters, and for other purposes. to reauthorize programs to improve the quality of 

NOVEMBER 14, 2005 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
848 F.2d 232

#### INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Appellant.

Nos. 87-5092, 87-5093 and 87-5176.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 1, 1988.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, by the Court, *sua sponte,*that the Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Sentelle on February 19, 1988 (839 F.2d 809) be, and hereby is, amended as follows:

> Page 811, second column, line 9, delete the sentence beginning “The” and ending “representation.” in its entirety and insert in lieu thereof:

> “The total number of eligible voters was 4,330 so that 51.96% voted in favor of representation.”
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 11, 2020

s0909 

# Order

Clerk September 11, 2020

161430 & (26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161430

COA: 352614

St. Joseph CC: 16

- 020735

- FH;

16

- 020705

- FH; 16

- 020706

- FH

LEANDRA LYNNE TRACY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, th e request for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of MCL 771.4

and People v Vanderpool , ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 158486, decided July 13, 2020). In

all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

remaining questions presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court. The motion for appeal

bond is DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Emilio CASTRO, petitioner, v. Gary RODEN, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk.

No. 12-9727.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Maurice R. Ferré, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MAKO Surgical Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     March 31, 2008 /s/ Maurice R. Ferré, M.D.   Maurice R. Ferré, M.D.   President, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)