alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3342

___________

G. Yvonne Stephens, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

John A. Hedback, Trustee of Chapter *

7 Bankruptcy Estate of G. Yvonne * [UNPUBLISHED]

Stephens; Mary Jo A. Jensen-Carter, *

Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of *

Larry Kenneth Alexander, Bankruptcy *

98-33694, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 17, 2009

Filed: April 21, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

2

The Honorable Dennis D. O’Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

-2-

Georgina Stephens appeals an order of the district court1 which (1) affirmed a

partial-summary-judgment order of the bankruptcy court,2

 holding that Stephens does

not have an ownership interest in a residence at 875 Laurel Avenue in St. Paul,

Minnesota, and (2) denied Stephens’s “Motion for the Withdrawal of the Bankruptcy

Court’s Reference.” In addition, the district court imposed restrictions on future

filings by Stephens related to the property. 

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, we find no

basis for reversal. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) (courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction

of appeals from all final decisions, judgments, orders, and decrees entered by district

courts sitting as appellate court in bankruptcy matter); In re Farmland Indus., Inc., 397

F.3d 647, 650 (8th Cir. 2005) (order entered before conclusion of complex bankruptcy

case is not appealable under § 158(d) unless it finally resolves discrete segment of

proceeding); see also In re M & S Grading, Inc., 526 F.3d 363, 367 (8th Cir. 2008)

(appellate court reviews bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error and its

legal conclusions de novo); Lemonds v. St. Louis County, 222 F.3d 488, 492 (8th Cir.

2000) (de novo review of jurisdictional challenges); In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1290-

95 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (courts have discretion to place reasonable restrictions

on litigant who generally abuses judicial process; affirming district court’s order

limiting inmate to single monthly filing in district court because of inmate’s flagrant

and repeated abuse of judicial process).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25897-25898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11863]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-378-000]


Westcoast Power Marketing Inc., Notice of Issuance of Order

May 10, 1995.
    On January 3, and February 21, 1995, Westcoast Power Marketing Inc. 
(Westcoast Power) submitted for filing a rate schedule under which 
Westcoast Power will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. Westcoast Power also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Westcoast Power 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Westcoast Power.
    On April 20, 1995, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Westcoast Power should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 
North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
[[Page 25898]] Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Westcoast Power is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Westcoast Power's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 22, 1995.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, Room 3308, 941 North Capitol 
Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11863 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:14-CR-48 RLM

)

MATTHEW MOBLEY )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on May 21, 2014. Accordingly, the

court ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation, ACCEPTS defendant

Matthew Mobley’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the

Information, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: June 5, 2014 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
Herbert A. PIERRE, Jr., petitioner, v. Burl CAIN, Warden.

No. 12-9251.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Order entered October 30 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00564
- CR ROGER ALLEN STULCE, JR, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. 380
- 82427
- 2012



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whethe r appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
tria l court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure ef fective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13052]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
advisory committee meetings of the National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences.
    These meetings will be open to the public as indicated below with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify Mrs. Ann Dieffenbach, 
Public Information Officer, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Building 45, Room 3AS-43, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 495-7031, in advance of the meeting.
    Mrs. Dieffenbach will provide a summary of each meeting and a 
roster of committee members upon request. Substantive program 
information may be obtained from the contact listed below:

Committee Name: Minority Access to Research Careers Review 
Subcommittee, Minority Programs Review Committee
Meeting Date: June 15-16, 1995
Place: 45 Center Drive, Conference Room C, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200
Open: June 15, 8:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m.
Agenda: Special reports related to committee activities
Closed: June 15, 9:30 a.m.-5 p.m.; June 16, 8:30 a.m.--adjournment
Agenda: Review and evaluation of grant applications
Contact: Dr. Richard Martinez, Scientific Review Admin., Building 
45, Room 1AS-19G, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
Telephone (301) 594-2849.

Committee Name: Minority Biomedical Research Support Review 
Subcommittee, Minority Programs Review Committee
Meeting Date: July 15-16, 1995
Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5522 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, 
MD 20815
Open: July 15, 8:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m.
Agenda: Special reports related to committee activities
Closed: July 15, 9:30 a.m.-5 p.m.; July 16, 8:30 a.m.--adjournment
Agenda: Review and evaluation of grant applications
Contact: Dr. Michael Sesma, Building 45, Room 1AS-19H, National 
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, Telephone (301) 594-2048.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal property.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, 93.862, 
93.863, 93.880, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Anna Snouffer,
Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-13052 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12844]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a public 
meeting of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefits Plans will be held on Wednesday, June 14, 1995, in Suite S-
2508, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Third and Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.
    The purpose of this meeting, which will begin at 1:00 p.m., is to 
receive status reports of the council's 1995 work groups and to invite 
public comment on any aspect of the administration of ERISA.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before June 8, 1995 to Linda R. Jackson, Acting Executive Secretary, 
ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory 
Council should forward their request to the Acting Executive Secretary 
or telephone on (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to 
ten (10) minutes, but witnesses may submit an extended statement for 
the record.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statement should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before June 8, 1995.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 19th day of May, 1995.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-12844 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Covenant Group of China Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 20010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kenneth Wong, President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date : April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Kenneth WongName: Kenneth WongTitle: President
 This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 1 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 2 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 3 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 4 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 5 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 6 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 7 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 8 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00001-RL-PRC   document 1   filed 01/02/14   page 9 of 9
#### GURIAN et al., Appellants, v. BLUMBERG, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Phillip Gurian and others against Isaac Blumberg.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
**O F F I C E R ' S   C E R T I F I C A T E****Centerline Servicing Inc.**The undersigned, Keith Crandall, Servicing Officer of  Centerline Servicing Inc., (f/k/a ARCap Servicing, Inc.), the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of August 1, 2007, relating to the  Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-IQ15, hereby certifies as follows: 1.a review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and of the performance of the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision; and 2.to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, or portion thereof commencing from the Transaction Closing Date. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as of the 7th day of March, 2008, I have hereunto signed my name. /s/ Keith Crandall Keith Crandall Servicing Officer of  Centerline Servicing Inc.,  a Delaware corporation
Chase SHARPE, DOC #T86728, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nicole Joanne Martingano and Elba Caridad Martin-Schomaker (substituted as counsel of record), Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-15

)

KU-LA LWIN )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on April 2, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the 2-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 2nd day of April, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13087]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP94-119-000, et al.]


Texas Gas Transmission Corp.; Informal Settlement Conference

May 23, 1995.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in the above-captioned proceeding on May 25, 1995, at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of 
the above-referenced dockets.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information please contact Michael D. Cotleur, (202) 
208-1076, or Russell B. Mamone (202) 208-0744.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13087 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-171264) pertaining to the
2001 Equity Incentive Plan, 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, and 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2011, with respect to the
financial statements of Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPPalo Alto, California
March 29, 2011


---



QuickLinks