alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12249]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

May 11, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545-0927
Form Number: IRS Form 8390
Type of Review: Revision
Title: Information Return for Determination of Life Insurance Company 
Earnings Rate Under Section 809
Description: Life insurance companies are required to provide data so 
the Secretary of the Treasury can compute the: (1) stock earnings rate 
of the 50 largest stock companies; and (2) average mutual earnings 
rate. These factors are used to compute the differential earnings rate 
which will determine the tax liability for mutual life insurance 
companies.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit
Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 150
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:
    Recordkeeping--56 hours, 41 minutes
    Learning about the law or the form--3 hours, 28 minutes
    Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--4 hours, 34 minutes
Frequency of Response: Annually
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 9,706 hours
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building,Washington, DC 20503
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12249 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Jonathan Lee GENTRY, petitioner, v. Stephen D. SINCLAIR, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.

No. 12-10321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc.







/s/ Eric T. Jones

DATE:  November 18, 2010

Eric R. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Rachelle Lynette CARLOCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Elena STRUJAN, petitioner, v. MERCK AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED.

No. 13-6591.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
MERCK & CO., INC., petitioner, v. LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 12-245.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of *FTC v. Actavis, Inc.,* ---U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2223, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Jeffrey L. REAGLE, petitioner, v. Justin JONES, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

No. 13-5189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO. 13-10529 )

ZACHARIA DUANE BOLEN and )

BETHANI LEERIN HINDERLAND-BOLEN )

)

Debtors, )

)

DUSTIN M. ROACH, )

Plaintiff )

)

v. ) 1:15-cv-00044

)

STEVEN E. BARCUS, KARI J. ROMEY, )

and DOUGLAS P. ROMEY, )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Defendants Kari Romey and Douglas Romey want this Court to withdraw the

reference of this case to the bankruptcy court. (Docket Entry 1.) I have reviewed the

motion and briefing, as well as Bankruptcy Judge Grant’s recommendation that the

motion for withdrawal of the reference be denied. (DE 2-1 at 6.) Judge Grant’s reasoning

is sound, so I will adopt his recommendation and DENY Defendants’ motion to

withdraw the reference. (DE 1.) Because time is of the essence in order to maintain the

existing litigation schedule a fuller opinion explaining my reasoning will follow this

Order.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 13, 2015

/s/ Philip P. Simon

PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-cr-00001-TLS-SLC

)

GISELA LEYVA-GAMEZ )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on January 4, 2016, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath

on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including

the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing

Guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between

the parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the 8-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 4th day of January 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Marc
Byron, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Polaris Acquisition
Corp.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
March 30, 2009




/s/ Marc ByronMarc
      ByronChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer
                  and
      Principal Accounting and
                  Financial
      Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen M. Smith, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofApplied Micro Circuits Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Alex GU, petitioner, v. Aney ABRAHAM, et al.

No. 13-6350.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Carmen J. Carbona, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2019 of Cannonau Corp. 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

 

Date:May 12, 2020*/s/Carmen J. Carbona* 

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Kent LATTIMORE, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 12-1092.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-50700 Conference Calendar

GUADALUPE M. GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RUSSELL WALES, Badge #5362, SAPD, ET AL, Defendants, RODOLFO GOMEZ, JR., Badge #303, SAPD, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-91-CA-281

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Texas prisoner Guadalupe Gutierrez, No. 584485, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit following a jury trial. Gutierrez argues that the jury’s verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence and that he should be granted a new trialNo. 94-50700 - 2 - because his trial attorney performed ineffectively. The evidence supports the jury’s verdict. See Martin v. Thomas , 973 F.2d 449, 453 (5th Cir. 1992). There is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil trial. Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv. , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<CASH>                                  39,289
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       120,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            299,625
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   4,028
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     4,031
<LOANS>                                913,822
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,335)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,421,470
<DEPOSITS>                             922,295
<SHORT-TERM>                           207,074
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     51,879
<LONG-TERM>                             78,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                27,525
<OTHER-SE>                             134,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,421,470
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         42,020
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        9,705
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         3,832
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        55,557
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      17,162
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      26,091
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   29,466
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          27
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         24,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         16,351
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              16,351
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            11,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                             1.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.50
<LOANS-NON>                              2,190
<LOANS-PAST>                             1,106
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                          3,806
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         9,209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              459
<RECOVERIES>                                85
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,335
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,335
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12560]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Settlement Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that on May 15, 1995 a proposed Joint Stipulation And 
Order of Dismissal in United States v. Jeffrey M. Kanter and Kanter 
Cars, Inc. Civil Action No. 1:95 CV 1073 was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. This Joint 
Stipulation And Order of Dismissal represents a settlement of claims 
against Jeffrey M. Kanter and Kanter Cars, Inc. for violations of the 
Clean Air Act.
    On May 15, 1995, the United States filed a Complaint pursuant to 
Sections 204 and 205 of the Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or ``the Act''), 42 
U.S.C. 7523 and 7524, for injunctive relief and assessment of civil 
penalties against Jeffrey M. Kanter and Kanter Cars, Inc. The Complaint 
alleged that Jeffrey M. Kanter and Kanter Cars, Inc. violated CAA 
Section 203(a)(1), 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(1), by manufacturing and selling 
Citroen 2CV based automobiles which were not covered by certificates of 
conformity issued under CAA Section 206(a), 42 U.S.C. 7525(a). The 
United States, Jeffrey M. Kanter, and Kanter Cars, Inc. have reached a 
settlement which resolves the issues set forth in the Complaint. Under 
this settlement, Jeffrey M. Kanter and Kanter Cars, Inc. will pay the 
United States a civil penalty of $4800.00.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Joint Stipulation And Order of Dismissal. Comments should be 
addressed to the Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and 
Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 
20530, and should refer to United States v. Jeffrey M. Kanter and 
Kanter Cars, Inc., D.J. ref. 90-5-2-1-1870A.
    The proposed Joint Stipulation And Order of Dismissal may be 
examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District 
of Ohio, 1800 Bank One Center, 600 Superior Ave, Cleveland, OH 44114-
2600 and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20005. A copy of the proposed Joint Stipulation And 
Order of Dismissal may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 
20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of 
$2.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs) payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12560 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Corine CARR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9567.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.