alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

NATALEE RIDENOUR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-154

)

ORGANON USA, INC.; ORGANON )

INTERNATIONAL, INC.; MERCK & CO, )

INC.; SCHERING CORPORATION; N.V. )

ORGANON; and MERCK SHARP & )

DOHME CORP.; )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This case was filed in this Court on May 9, 2013, based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) Although the Complaint properly alleges the citizenship

of five of the six Defendants, it makes no allegations as to the citizenship of Defendant Organon

International, Inc.

The use of the designation “Inc.” indicates that Organon International is a corporation. 

Corporations “are deemed to be citizens of the state in which they are incorporated and of the

state in which they have their principal place of business.” N. Trust Co. v. Bunge Corp., 899 F.2d

591, 594 (7th Cir. 1990) (emphasis added); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The term “principal

place of business” refers to the corporation’s “nerve center”—the place where a corporation’s

officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation’s activities. Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 130 S.

Ct. 1181, 1192 (2010). Thus, the Court must be apprised of both facts—the state of

incorporation and the state in which the principal place of business is located—with respect to

1

case 1:13-cv-00154-JD-RBC document 3 filed 05/14/13 page 1 of 2
Defendant Organon International, Inc.

Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended

Complaint on or before May 28, 2013, properly alleging the citizenship of Defendant Organon

International, Inc.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 14th day of May, 2013.

/S/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge

2

case 1:13-cv-00154-JD-RBC document 3 filed 05/14/13 page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Patricia Cooke, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Asia Atlantic Resources;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.    Date: July 29, 2009   /s/ Patricia Cooke Patricia Cooke Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13124]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation


Requesting Documents Under the Freedom of Information Act Through 
Internet

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is accepting requests 
for documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), via 
Internet. This action is being taken to provide more accessibility for 
the public to Reclamation documents. Reclamation's Internet address for 
FOIA requests is: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d6f627f6b62646c4d787e6f7f236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6e637e6a63656d4c797f6e7e226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Rehfeld, Bureau of 
Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, Colorado 80225-0007, telephone: 
(303) 236-0305 extension 459.

    Dated: May 23, 1995.
Murlin Coffey,
Leader, Property and Office Services.
[FR Doc. 95-13124 Filed 5-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00005-CR 

MELVIN GLEN CARTER, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 251st District Court 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 22,363-C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding 

 

May 21, 2015 

 

ORDER 

 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

After a jury trial, appellant, Melvin Glen Carter, was convicted of the offense of 

assault on a public servant. On December 13, 2012, appellant was sentenced to 

incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, for a 

period of twelve years. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal of this conviction and 

was appointed counsel. Appointed counsel filed a brief on appellant’s behalf on the 

merits. However, after review, this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction See Carter v. 

State, No. 07-13-00005-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 11265, at *12 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 
2

Aug. 30, 2013, no pet.). When no petition for discretionary review was filed, mandate 

was issued on December 2, 2013. This Court’s plenary power expired 60 days after 

judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a).

On May 12, 2015, this Court received correspondence from appellant entitled 

“First Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Pro Se Response to Anders 

Brief.”1 In an enclosed letter, appellant appears to identify what he is actually 

requesting. It appears that appellant is seeking an extension to file a pro se petition for 

discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. 

This Court’s jurisdiction over this appeal expired 60 days after issuance of our 

August 30, 2013 judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a). Appellant’s filing is more than 

a year and a half past the expiration of our plenary power over this appeal. As such, no 

further action may be taken by this Court in this proceeding and the filing is hereby 

denied.

2

Per Curiam

Do not publish. 

 

1

As mentioned, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief on the merits in this appeal and raised 

an arguable ground for reversal. Thus, there was never an Anders brief or motion to withdraw for 

appellant to respond to in this case.

2 While this Court is without jurisdiction over this case, appellant may be able to obtain recourse 

by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014).
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.5

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                         CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION
                            1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

         1. Purpose. The purpose of this Second Amendment ("Second Amendment")
to the Citizens & Northern Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is
to adopt a change to the Plan as a result of a recommendation by the Executive
Committee of the Board of Directors ("Board") of Citizens & Northern
Corporation. All terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan unless
specifically modified herein are valid and enforceable.

         2. Amended Provision. Paragraph 3 of the Citizens & Northern
Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, is further amended to
increase the number of issuable shares from 180,000 to 400,000, thereby
modifying the first sentence thereof to provide as follows:

                  The shares of stock that may be issued under the Plan shall
                  not exceed in the aggregate four hundred thousand (400,000)
                  shares of the Corporation's common stock, par value $1.00 per
                  share (the "Stock"), as may be adjusted pursuant to paragraph
                  18 hereof.

         3. Effective Date. This Second Amendment shall become effective as of
the date it is adopted by the Board, so long as the stockholders of Citizens &
Northern Corporation approve it within twelve (12) months after the date of the
Board's adoption.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12105]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Applications for Permit

    The following applicants have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.):

PRT-802298

Applicant: National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C.

    The applicant requests a permit to import skin biopsy samples and/
or samples of blood and semen from cheetah (Acionyx jubatus), from 
Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa for the purpose of 
enhancement of the species through scientific research.

PRT-802458

Applicant: Arturo J. Gutierrez, Weston, MA

    The applicant requests a permit to import one male bontebok 
(Damaliscus pygarcus dorcas) culled from the captive herd maintained by 
Mr. F.W.M. Bowker, Jr., Grahamstown, Republic of South Africa, for the 
purpose of enhancement of the species.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 420(c), Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be 
received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this 
publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
420(c), Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/
358-2281).

    Dated: May 12, 1995.
Caroline Anderson,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 95-12105 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11214]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 90-651; RM-7544]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Bald Knob and Clarendon, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final Rule; Application for Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses the Application for Review filed by 
B&H Broadcasting Company. B&H sought review of the action taken by the 
Chief, Policy and Rules Division on April 12, 1993, which dismissed as 
untimely B&H's petition for reconsideration of the Commission's action 
in MM Docket No. 90-651, 57 FR 45002 published September 30, 1992. B&H 
had requested withdrawal of its application, stating that it had 
received no consideration for such withdrawal in excess of its 
legitimate and prudent expenses incurred during the course of the 
proceeding. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur D. Scrutchins, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 776-1660.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-11214 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:14-CR-67 RLM

)

CLIFTON VALENTIUS HOLIDAY )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on August 12, 2014. Accordingly,

the court ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation, ACCEPTS defendant

Clifton Holiday’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the

Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: September 2, 2014 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
Travis Sean BOYD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6767.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
In re Leroy STERLING, petitioner.

No. 12-9665.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 612**  **5**

PETE S. BRYANT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3 :0 9

- cv - 03 234

- CMC )

Submitted : July 28, 2011 Decided: August 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Pete S. Bryant , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brendan McDonald, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit
.2 PER CURIAM: Pete S. Bryant seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)( 1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distr ict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We h ave independently review ed the record and conclude that Bryant has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq uately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSE D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

HENRY KLEYWEG and CLAUDIA

KLEYWEG,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and BAC HOME

LOANS SERVICING, LP.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. _____________________

Removed from Porter Superior Court for

the State of Indiana,

Cause No. 64D01-1403-PL-2699

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record:

I, the below-signed, state that pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83.5(g), I have read and will

abide by the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, including

Appendix B: Standards for Professional Conduct Within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit. I

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Defendant, Bank of America, N.A.

Respectfully submitted,

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

By: /s/ Lucy R. Dollens

Lucy R. Dollens, #23547-49

Attorneys for Defendant,

Bank of America, N.A.

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 4 filed 04/23/14 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of April, 2014, a copy of the foregoing was filed

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

and

by 1st Class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on the following:

Blake N. Dahl

Fred W. Grady & Associates, PC

750 South Washington Street

Suite 1

Valparaiso, IN 46383

/s/ Lucy R. Dollens

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

201 North Illinois Street, Suite 1900

P.O. Box 44961

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961

Phone: 317-237-3800

Fax: 317-237-3900

ldollens@fbtlaw.com

INDLibrary2 BT07586.0616308 1294387v1

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 4 filed 04/23/14 page 2 of 2
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
 or
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File Number 000-53235
 DIGITILITI, INC.
  Delaware
    
    26-1408538(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (IRS Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 266 East 7 th Street, 4 th Floor St. Paul, Minnesota 55101   (651) 925-3200   None  Common Stock, par value $0.001
 Yes o No þ
 Yes o No þ
 Yes þ No o
 Yes
o No o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company þ(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Yes o No þ
   Class
    
    Outstanding at August 25, 2010Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
    
    64,912,999 shares




---



##### 



DIGITILITI, INC.
FORM 10-K/A
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 PageExplanatory Note
    
    
    3PART IIItem 9A(T). Controls and Procedures
    
    
    3PART IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
    
    
    4Signatures
    
    
    5Exhibit 31.1Exhibit 31.2
   2




---



##### Table of Contents



Explanatory Note
   
 PART II
 
 Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures
 Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
  Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework
     3




---



##### Table of Contents



PART IV
 
 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
  No.
    
    Description31.1
    
    
    302 Certification of CEO, Roy A. Bauer31.2
    
    
    302 Certification of CFO, William McDonald
  4




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  DIGITILITI, INC.Date: August 30, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Roy A. BauerRoy A. BauerCEO, President and Director  5
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 1350 Certification



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Armco Metals Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kexuan Yao, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Fengtao Wen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|August  11, 2014 | /s/ Kexuan Yao
Kexuan Yao, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer                 
|---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |                                                                                                 
|                 |                                                                                                 
|                 | /s/ Fengtao Wen
Fengtao Wen, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.