alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          10,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  283,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (42,800)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,922,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,211,600
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,922,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
James POTEETE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### MATTERN, Appellant, v. MANSON et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 20, 1899.)

Action by Sophia L. Mattern against May G. Manson and others. D. B. Luckey, for appellant. J. B. Gleason, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 14.1





CITADEL SECURITY SOFTWARE INC.





CODE OF ETHICS FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS





In my role at Citadel Security Software Inc. (the “Company”) as chief executive officer, a senior finance professional, or in such other position to which the Company has applied this code, I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.





To the best of my knowledge and ability:





1. I act with honesty and integrity and use due care and diligence in performing my responsibilities to the Company.





2. I avoid situations that represent actual or apparent conflicts of interest with my responsibilities to the Company, and I disclose promptly to the Board of Directors and/or the Company’s counsel any transaction or personal or professional relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such an actual or apparent conflict.





3. I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable, including information for inclusion in the Company’s submissions to governmental agencies or in public statements.





4. I comply with applicable laws, rules, and regulations of federal, state and local governments, and of any applicable public or private regulatory and listing authorities.





5. I respect and safeguard the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my work except when I am authorized or legally obligated to disclose such information. Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is not used for personal advantage.





6. I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the performance of my duties.





7. I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers in my work environment.





8. I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources entrusted to me.





9. I work cooperatively with the Company’s independent auditors in their review of the Company’s financial statements and disclosure documents.





10. I promptly report violations of this code to the Board of Directors and/or the Company’s counsel.





11. I recognize that the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the Company’s independent auditors.





12. I understand that I am accountable for compliance with this code by myself and all those under my supervision to whom the code applies, and that deviations from this code may result in disciplinary action against me by the Company, including termination.







(Signature)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE THIRD QUARTER 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      12,991,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,579,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     49,854,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (31,406,586)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,579,923
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,229,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               505,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,891,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,831,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,831,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,831,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    35.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    35.54
        

</TABLE>
Jeffrey Thomas MAEHR, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 12-6169.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed *571until November 19, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10670 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

− Appellee ,

v ersus
MATTHEW JASON MILLER , Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 4:17

- CR

- 260

- 1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Matthew Miller appeals his 84

- month below

- guidelines sentence for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 28, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10670 Document: 00514811361 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2019No. 18

- 10670

2 receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) . He contends that the child pornography g uidelines, U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 et seq. , lack an empir

i cal basis , so his sentence is unreasonable. He re cognizes that this theory is foreclosed by United States v. Miller , 665 F.3d 114, 121

− 22 (5th Cir. 2011), but
he raises the issue to preserve it for possible further review.

The g overnment has filed an opposed motion for summary affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed by Miller

. Because the parties are correct , summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2 d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).
Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the gov

ern ment ’s alternative motion for an extension of time t o file its brief is DENIED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 18-10670 Document: 00514811361 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2019
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on 10-K of PRINCIPLE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the Company) for the period ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Payne, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.



CHARLES PAYNECharles PayneChief Executive and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 5th, 2008

















---
550 17th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20429-9990

www.fdic.gov

FDIC-003-2023
EX-33.3
(logo) First American
Real Estate Tax Service


LUCY PRZYBYLA
PRESIDENT
ESCROW SERVICING
PRODUCTS


REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation and "the Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1,
2007 through December 31, 2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for
residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the
Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider
("the Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
    General Partner


/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 12, 2008


1 First American Way, Westlake, TX 76262

817.699.6511 * 800.229.8426 * FAX 817.699.6513

lprzybyla@firstam.com * www.firstam.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-cr-00049-TLS-SLC

)

TYWAN CHURCH )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on January 11, 2016, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for

the Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath

on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including

the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing

Guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made

and is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between

the parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 11th day of January 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
#### WARD et al., Appellants, v. SIRE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 10, 1899.)

Action by Martin J. Ward and Walter G. Weston against Meyer L. Sire.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on argument.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

IN THE MATTER OF THE SUPPORT OF: )

JASMIERE RA’JEAN MAYNOR-WILLIAMS )

)

SHANETTE DEVAE MAYNOR, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-137 RM

v. )

)

DELL DEVLON WILLIAMS, JR., )

 )

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Dell Devlon Williams, Jr., a/k/a Dell Eli Delvon Williams Ali, a pro se party, tried

to remove his child support case, 02C01-1102-RS-25, from the Allen Circuit Court without

paying the filing fee. First, the removal is late. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) (notice of removal

must be filed within 30 days). Mr. Williams says he appeared in the Allen Circuit Court on

November 7, 2012. ECF 1 at 4. Thus, his attempt to remove this case on April 29, 2013 is

untimely. Moreover, “[a] civil action may only be removed where the district courts of the

United States have original jurisdiction . . ..” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). Federal courts don’t have

jurisdiction over child support and other family law matters, not even diversity

jurisdiction. See Hickey v. Duffy, 827 F.2d 234, 238-239 (7th Cir. 1987) (“[Q]uestions of

family law should be settled in state court.”). Thus, even had the notice of removal been

timely filed, this case still could not have been properly removed. 

case 1:13-cv-00137-RLM-RBC document 3 filed 05/01/13 page 1 of 2
For the foregoing reasons, this case is REMANDED to the Allen Circuit Court. The

clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to the Allen Circuit Court and the Allen

County Prosecuting Attorney. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: May 1 , 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

2

case 1:13-cv-00137-RLM-RBC document 3 filed 05/01/13 page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QA5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
September 1, 2007,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of September 1, 2007 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC, as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee,
does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1331 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1331

 To provide for a fair and equitable resolution of claims relating to 
                      the work opportunity credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2005

Mr. Weller (for himself and Mr. Rangel) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a fair and equitable resolution of claims relating to 
                      the work opportunity credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYER CLAIMS FOR THE WORK OPPORTUNITY 
              CREDIT.

    Not later than July 1, 2005, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
issue regulations to provide for the settlement of employer claims for 
the work opportunity credit under section 51(d)(2)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 which previously were not granted but should have 
been granted consistent with Revenue Ruling 2003-112. Such settlement 
shall be national in scope, provide for a fair and equitable resolution 
of such claims, and rely on statistical sampling on a national level.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11687]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
12 CFR Chapter XVII

RIN 2550-AA02


Risk-Based Capital

AGENCY: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, HUD.

ACTION: Extension of Public Comment Period for Advance Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 8, 1995 (60 FR 7468), the Office of Federal 
Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) published an advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking (ANPR) entitled ``Risk-Based Capital.'' This ANPR 
is a significant step in the process of developing a regulation to 
establish risk-based capital standards for the Federal National 
Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. To 
ensure that the public has ample opportunity to participate in the 
rulemaking process by commenting on a variety of technical and policy 
issues involved in the development of the risk-based regulation and the 
risk-based capital stress test, today's notice extends the public 
comment period from May 9, 1995 through June 8, 1995.

DATES: The comment period is extended until June 8, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Anne E. Dewey, General Counsel, 
Office of General Counsel, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise 
Oversight, 1700 G Street, NW., Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20552.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David J. Pearl, Director, Research, 
Analysis and Capital Standards; or Gary L. Norton, Deputy General 
Counsel, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20552, telephone (202) 414-3800 (not 
a toll-free number).

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
Aida Alvarez,
Director, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
[FR Doc. 95-11687 Filed 5-8-95; 3:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 4220-01-P
EX-35.1
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 7, 2008


RE: RMAC 2007-3


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance
statement pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance
with the servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set
forth in Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB").
In this regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the
best of my knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1. A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
   and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
   of August 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my
   supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.


By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name: Ronald M. Faris
Title: President



Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Marc David SHINER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-21.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.