alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-22

)

MARTIN GONZALEZ MEDINA )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on November 25, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 25th day of November 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Exhibit 23.1




Simon & Edward, LLP

Certified Public Accountants & Consultants

A PCAOB Registered CPA Firm



17700 Castleton Street, Suite 488

City of Industry, CA 91748, U.S.A

Tel: +1 (626) 854-6500

Fax: +1 (626) 854-6505

http://www.2mycpa.com





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Xodtec LED, Inc. on Form S-8, of our report dated July 15, 2010, except for note 6 and 16, as to which the date is January 26, 2011,  which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the years ended February 28, 2010 and February 28, 2009.











Simon & Edward, LLP


January 31, 2011
Exhibit 32.2





Annual Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Circle Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: January 25, 2011

/s/   GARY McHENRYChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Circle Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by Circle Entertainment Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






NY 240848850
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|                |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                                          
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                                                      
|                |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                                            
|                |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                                                     
|August 10, 2007 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                                                  
|DATE            |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|August 10, 2007 |  | by:  /s/ H. William Willoughby                                                                                                                                               
|DATE            |  | H. William Willoughby,
                  Director, President, Secretary,
                    Principal Financial Officer and
                    Principal Accounting Officer

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Digitiliti, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Amended Annual Report”), we, Jack B. Scheetz, Interim President and CEO, and William McDonald, CFO of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Amended Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Amended Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:October 4, 2011By:/s/Jack B. ScheetzRoy A. Bauer,Interim President and CEO





Date:October 4, 2011By:/s/William McDonaldWilliam McDonald, CFO





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.
In re Joan HEFFINGTON, petitioner.

No. 12-957.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 25, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00368

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.N. , A Child,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial C ourt No. 2014

- PA

- 02675

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justic e

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The State’s motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Co urt
Richard ROE, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 12-112.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

*2884Motion of petitioners for leave to file a petition for rehearing under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Petition for rehearing denied.
#### In the Matter of Bruce Raymond Auger, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

July 1, 1985

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Robert P. Guido*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 16, 1977. On April 15, 1985, respondent was convicted, after a nonjury trial in the County Court, Suffolk County, of four counts of sodomy in the first degree, a class B felony, in violation of Penal Law § 130.50. On May 28, 1985, respondent was sentenced on each of the four counts to a period of incarceration, the minimum of which was 4 years and the maximum of which was 12 years, said sentences to run consecutively.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. Respondent is disbarred and the clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                    5

<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                    386
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          386
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      71
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              386
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,788
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,648
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,648
<EPS-BASIC>                            294.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                          294.61



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of UniCapital Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kheng Siang Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Kheng Siang Lee                                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Kheng Siang Lee
Principal Executive Officer
February 26, 2009
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1462 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce from age 57 to age 

55 the age after which the remarriage of the surviving spouse of a 

deceased veteran shall not result in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to that surviving spouse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce from 

age 57 to age 55 the age after which the remarriage 

of the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran shall not 

result in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to that surviving spouse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1462 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REDUCTION FROM AGE 57 TO AGE 55 THE AGE 

2 AFTER WHICH A SURVIVING SPOUSE’S RE3 MARRIAGE SHALL NOT RESULT IN TERMI4 NATION OF DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY 

5 COMPENSATION. 

6 (a) REDUCTION IN AGE.—Section 103(d)(2)(B) of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘age 57’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘age 55’’; and 

10 (2) by striking the second sentence. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) shall take effect on— 

13 (1) the first day of the first month that begins 

14 after the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

15 (2) the first day of the fiscal year that begins 

16 in the calendar year in which this Act is enacted, if 

17 later than the date specified in paragraph (1). 

18 (c) RETROACTIVE BENEFITS PROHIBITED.—No ben19 efit may be paid to any person by reason of the amend20 ment made by subsection (a) for any period before the 

21 effective date specified in subsection (b). 

22 (d) APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS.—In the case of an 

23 individual who but for having remarried would be eligible 

24 for benefits under title 38, United States Code, by reason 

25 of the amendment made by subsection (a) and whose re26 marriage was before the date of the enactment of this Act 
3 

•HR 1462 IH 

1 and after the individual had attained age 57, the indi2 vidual shall be eligible for such benefits by reason of such 

3 amendment only if the individual submits an application 

4 for such benefits to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs not 

5 later than the end of the one-year period beginning on the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of InfoSearch Media, Inc. a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), George Lichter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
      Scott Brogi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
      their knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
                April 15, 2008
            INFOSEARCH
                MEDIA, INC./s/
                George LichterBy:
                George LichterIts:
                Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                April 15, 2008
            INFOSEARCH
                MEDIA, INC./s/
                Scott BrogiBy:
                Scott BrogiIts:
                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 10, 2011/s/ Li FuLi Fu

Co-Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)/s/ Joseph J. LongeverJoseph J. Longever

Co-Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)/s/ Craig H. StudwellCraig H. Studwell

Chief Financial Officer

(principal accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fushi Copperweld, Inc. and will be retained by Fushi Copperweld, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1734 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device (LCD) panel 

assemblies for use in LCD direct view televisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Ms. HART (for herself and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device 

(LCD) panel assemblies for use in LCD direct view 

televisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.90.14 Liquid Crystal Device 

(LCD) panel assemblies for 

use in LCD direct view televisions (provided for in subheading 9013.80.90) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1734 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Marcos Esuardo MENDIOLA, petitioner, v. Anthony HEDGPETH, Warden.

No. 12-9717.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-87-JTM-PRC

 )

LAVELLE AMMONS, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT LAVELLE AMMONS

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Lavelle Ammons’ request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R.

Cherry, on March 16, 2016, with the consent of Defendant Lavelle Ammons, counsel for Defendant

Lavelle Ammons, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Lavelle Ammons’ plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule

11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Lavelle Ammons under

oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant Lavelle Ammons,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Lavelle Ammons understands the nature of the charges against him to which

the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Lavelle Ammons understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea

of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Lavelle Ammons understands what the maximum possible sentence is,

including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Lavelle Ammons understands that

the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Lavelle Ammons has been knowingly and voluntarily

made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Lavelle Ammons is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Lavelle Ammons understands that his answers may later be used against him

in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Lavelle Ammons’ plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Lavelle Ammons’ plea of guilty to the offense charged

in the Indictment and that Defendant Lavelle Ammons be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the

Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and Lavelle Ammons be adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before Judge

James T. Moody will be set by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are

waived unless filed and served within fourteen days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

SO ORDERED this16th day of March, 2016.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: Honorable James T. Moody