alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Modern Technology Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), Anthony Welch, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Robert Churchr, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his and her knowledge,respectively, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                 | By:    | /s/ ANTHONY WELCH                       |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Dated: May  27, 2004 |   | Anthony Welch   Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                                    |
|                 |   |                                    |
|                 | By:    | /s/ Robert Church                       |
| Dated: May  27, 2004 |   | Robert Church   Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Modern Technology Corp. and will be retained by Modern Technology Corp. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
______________________AURORA LOAN SERVICES_________________________
Owner:
None
Depositor:
Structured Asset Securities Corporation

SARM 2007-8

745 7th Ave, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10019
Master Servicer:   Aurora Loan Services
Michele Olds

10350 Park Meadows Drive

Littleton, CO 80124
Trustee:
US Bank, N.A.

Structured Finance / SARM 2007-8

One Federal Street, 3rd Floor

Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Securities Administrator:

Subject:
Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:
2007
Investor Code:
H63
Investor Name:
SARM 2007-8
I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision.
2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period.



Certified by:  AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC









By:   /s/ Terry L. Gentry






Name:  Terry L. Gentry
Title:    Managing Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

HENRY KLEYWEG and CLAUDIA

KLEYWEG,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and BAC HOME

LOANS SERVICING, LP.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC

Removed from Porter Superior Court for

the State of Indiana,

Cause No. 64D01-1403-PL-002699

NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (collectively “Bank of

America”)1, by counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), hereby gives notice of an automatic

28 day initial extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, to and including May 28,

2014. In further support, Bank of America states as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in the Porter County Superior Court on March 28,

2014.

2. Bank of America was served no earlier than April 3, 2014, and Bank of America

filed its Notice of Removal to this Court on April 23, 2014.

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c), Bank of America’s responsive

pleading is currently due April 30, 2014.

4. Bank of America’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint has not yet

passed, nor has it been previously extended.

1 BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. merged with and into Bank of America, N.A. on July 1,

2011.

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 7 filed 04/24/14 page 1 of 3
2

5. Under this Automatic Extension of Time, Bank of America’s responsive pleading

will now be due May 28, 2014.

6. Plaintiffs’ counsel has been contacted regarding this request and has no objection.

WHEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and

BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. will have to and including May 28, 2014 to respond to

Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

By: /s/ Michael A. Rogers

Lucy R. Dollens, #23547-49

Michael A. Rogers, #28038-29

Attorneys for Defendant,

Bank of America, N.A.

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 7 filed 04/24/14 page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 24th day of April, 2014, a copy of the foregoing was filed

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

and

by 1st Class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on the following:

Blake N. Dahl

Fred W. Grady & Associates, PC

750 South Washington Street

Suite 1

Valparaiso, IN 46383

/s/ Michael A. Rogers

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

201 North Illinois Street, Suite 1900

P.O. Box 44961

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961

Phone: 317-237-3800

Fax: 317-237-3900

ldollens@fbtlaw.com

mrogers@fbtlaw.com

INDLibrary2 BT07586.0616308 1294816v1

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 7 filed 04/24/14 page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1391 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1391

        To suspend temporarily the duty on allyl ureido monomer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

   Mr. Holt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on allyl ureido monomer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLYL UREIDO MONOMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.02       2-                 Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Imidazolidinone,                                                   31/2007
                         1-(2-aminoethyl)-
                         , reaction
                         product with
                         oxirane, ((2-
                         propenyloxy)methy
                         l)- (CAS No.
                         90412-00-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.29.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION





I, Dennis
M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 15, 2009


By:
              /s/ Dennis M. McGrathDennis
      M. McGrathChief
      Financial Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section
906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PhotoMedex, Inc.
and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


E-32.2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1406 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the authorized weight 

allowances for the shipment of baggage and household effects of senior 

noncommissioned officers of the uniformed services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. LATHAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the 

authorized weight allowances for the shipment of baggage 

and household effects of senior noncommissioned officers 

of the uniformed services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior NCO Household 

5 Goods Shipment Equity Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 
2 

•HR 1406 IH 

1 (1) Household-goods weight allowances for a 

2 member of the uniformed services during a perma3 nent change of station move are currently set as a 

4 grade-based benefit rather than reflecting the nor5 mal accumulation of goods during the career of the 

6 member and as the member’s family grows. 

7 (2) An undeniable aspect of the life of a senior 

8 noncommissioned officer is the jettisoning of per9 sonal property prior to a permanent change of sta10 tion move in order to avoid the financial penalties 

11 that must be paid for household goods weights that 

12 exceed the permitted weight allowances. 

13 (3) Increased household goods weight allow14 ances for senior noncommissioned officers and their 

15 families would serve as a career incentive and pro16 vide fairness to those members who have made mili17 tary service a career. 

18 SEC. 3. INCREASED WEIGHT ALLOWANCES FOR SHIPMENT 

19 OF HOUSEHOLD GOODS OF SENIOR NON20 COMMISSIONED OFFICERS. 

21 (a) INCREASE.—The table in section 406(b)(1)(C) of 

22 title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking the 

23 items relating to pay grades E–7 through E–9 and insert24 ing the following new items: 

‘‘E–9 ................................................... 18,000 18,000
3 

•HR 1406 IH 

E–8 ..................................................... 16,000 17,500

E–7 ..................................................... 14,000 17,000’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2006, and 

3 apply with respect to an order in connection with a change 

4 of temporary or permanent station issued on or after that 

5 date. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Armco Metals, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kexuan Yao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Fengtao Wen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: March 31, 2010



/s/    Kexuan YaoKexuan Yao

Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 31, 2010



/s/    Fengtao WenFengtao Wen

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies this Transition Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.9


(AGCO LOGO) AGCO Corporation



         TO:     D. Millard

       FROM:     R. J. Ratliff

       DATE:     February 3, 2004

    SUBJECT:     DON MILLARD RESIGNATION AGREEMENT

This is to confirm that Don Millard has been employed by AGCO Corporation since
October 2000 under the terms and conditions of an Employment Services Agreement.
Most recently he has served in the capacity of Executive Vice president, Chief
Operating Officer and subject to a mutual agreement with the Board of Directors,
his Employment Services Agreement will be terminated. The terms and conditions
as outlined in his Employment Services Agreement shall apply except as modified
in the following severance terms:

Termination Date:        Employee agrees to waive Ninety day notice and to an
                         Effective Date of February 15, 2004

Vacation Benefit         Employee agrees to waive any paid vacation for 2004.

2004 Incentive Bonus     Employee waives any entitlement to any portion of the
                         2004 Incentive Bonus.

LTIP Stock               Company agrees to waive any restrictions on earned
                         shares of stock, except those near term restrictions
                         limited by law for insiders, which shall be withdrawn
                         as soon as practical.

Automobile/Computer      The employee is authorized to purchase his automobile
                         and or computer at the depreciated value as of February
                         15, 2004.

The above represents an agreement between Don Millard and the Company on this
date and any other claims or rights not specifically indicated in the Employment
Services Agreement are expressly invalid.



AGREED:                                          AGCO CORPORATION


         ----------------------------              -----------------------------
         Donald Millard                            Robert J. Ratliff, Chairman
         February 3, 2004                          February 3, 2004
# C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

A T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Th e C o u rt o f A p p e a l s h e re b y p a sse s t h e f o l l o w i n g o rd e r:

A 1 9 A 2 3 1 3

. C E D R IC B R A

DSH A W v

. T H E ST A T E

.

I n 2 0 0 9

, C e d r i c B

r a d s h a w w a s c o n v i c t e d o f f

a i l i n g t o r e g i st e r a s a se x o f f e n d e r

.

T h e t r i a l c o u r t se n t e n c e d h i m t o t w e n t y y e a r s, t o se r v e t

h e f i r st t e n i n c o n f

i n e m e n t a n d

t h e r e m a i n d e r o n p r o b a

t i o n

. I n 2 0 1 7

, B

r a d sh a w w a s r e l e a se d o n p r o b a t i o n

, b u t t

h e

f o l l o w i n g y e a

r t h e St a t e p e t i t i o n e d t o r e v o k e h i s p r o b a t i o n b a se d o n t

h e c o m m i ssi o n

o f a n e w o f

f e n s e

, a n d t

h e c o u r t r e v o k e d t

h e b a l a n c e o f B r a d sh a w ’ s p r o b a

t i o n

.

T h e r e a f t e r

, B r a d sh a w f i l e d a m o t i o n t o m o d i f

y h i s se n t e n c e

, a

r g u i n g t h a t t h e t r i a l c o u r t

w a s o n l y a

u t h o r i z e d t o r e v o k e t

w o y e a r s o f p r o b a t i o n

. T h e t

r i a l c o u r t d e n i e d t

h e

m o t i o n

, a n d B r a d sh a w a p p e a l s. W e l a c k j u r i sd i c t i o n

.

“ I n d e t e r m i n i n g t

h e p r o p e r p r o c e d u r e t o f o l l o w i n p u r su i n g a

n a p p e a l

, t h e

u n d e r l y i n g su b

j e c t m a t t e r g e n e r a l l y c o n t

r o l s o v e r t h e r e l i e f so u g

h t

. ” S e l f v

. B a y n e u m

,

2 6 5 G a

. 1 4

, 1 4

- 1 5 ( 4 5 3 SE 2 d 2 7 ) ( 1 9 9 5 )

. B e c a

u se t h e u n d e r l y i n g su b

j e c t m a t t e r o f t h i s

a p p e a l i s t

h e r e v o c a

t i o n o f B

r a d s h a w’ s p r o b a

t i o n

, h e w a s r e q u i r e d t o f i l e a n

a p p l i c a t i o n f o r d i sc r e t i o n a

r y a p p e a l i n o r d e r t o a

p p e a l

. Se e OC G

A § 5

- 6

- 3 5 ( a ) ( 5 )

, ( b ) ; July 11, 2019To d

d v

. S t a t e

, 2 3 6 G a

. A

p p

. 7 5 7

, 7 5 8 ( 5 1 3 SE

2 d 2 8 7 ) ( 1 9 9 9 ) ; W

h i t e v

. S t a t e

, 2 3 3 G a

.

A p p

. 8 7 3

, 8 7 4 ( 5 0 5 SE

2 d 2 2 8 ) ( 1 9 9 8 )

. H

i s f a i l u r e t o d o so d e p r i v e s t h i s C o u r t o f

j u r i sd i c t i o n o v e r t

h i s d i r e c t a

p p e a l

, w h i c h i s h e r e b y D I SM I SSE D

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t

r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t

h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/11/2019
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1649 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require staff working 

with developmentally disabled individuals to call emergency services in 

the event of a life-threatening situation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2005 

Mr. HOLT (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. SAXTON, 

Mr. OWENS, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. JEFFERSON, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 

staff working with developmentally disabled individuals 

to call emergency services in the event of a life-threatening situation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1649 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT OF STAFF WORKING WITH DE2 VELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS TO 

3 CALL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN THE EVENT 

4 OF A LIFE-THREATENING SITUATION. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 1902(a) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (66), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (2) in paragraph (67), by striking the period at 

10 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (67) the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(68) provide, in accordance with regulations of 

14 the Secretary, that direct care staff providing 

15 health-related services to a person with a develop16 mental disability or traumatic brain injury are re17 quired to call the 911 emergency telephone service 

18 or equivalent emergency management service for as19 sistance in the event of a life-threatening emergency 

20 to such person and to report such call to the appro21 priate State agency or department.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 subsection (a) take effect on January 1, 2006. 

Æ
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

MOTION TO REINSTATE

PROVISIONAL RELIEF

DEADLINE

The Court has considered plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion to reinstate the May 31

deadline for defendants to comply with the second item of the May 11 provisional relief order

(Dkt. No. 485) and defendants’ partial opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 494). The motion is

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 

Defendants shall comply with the second item of provisional relief by the original

deadline of MAY 31 AT NOON except insofar as compliance would implicate either issues raised

by non-party Anthony Levandowski’s motion to modify the May 11 provisional relief order

(Dkt. No. 466) or privilege disputes currently pending before Judge Corley, in which case the

deadline remains JUNE 23 AT NOON. This order supersedes and partially vacates the prior order

continuing the provisional relief deadline (Dkt. No. 471).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 499 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1474 

To designate certain functions performed at flight service stations of the 

Federal Aviation Administration as inherently governmental functions, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. LOBIONDO, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. PAYNE, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. 

LANTOS, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BROWN of 

Ohio, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. CLAY, Ms. HERSETH, Mr. STARK, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. 

ABERCROMBIE, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. EMANUEL, Ms. 

DELAURO, and Mr. BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate certain functions performed at flight service 

stations of the Federal Aviation Administration as inherently governmental functions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Federal Aviation 

5 Safety Security Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 1474 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATION. 

2 For purposes of section 2(a) of the Federal Inventory 

3 Activities Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2382), the functions per4 formed by air traffic control specialists at flight service 

5 stations operated by the Federal Aviation Administration 

6 are inherently governmental functions and must be per7 formed by Federal employees. 

8 SEC. 3. ACTIONS VOIDED. 

9 Any action taken pursuant to section 2(a) of the Fed10 eral Inventory Activities Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2382), 

11 or any other law or legal authority with respect to func12 tions performed by air traffic control specialists at flight 

13 service stations operated by the Federal Aviation Adminis14 tration is null and void. 

Æ
Stephen N. DAVIS, petitioner, v. Randall G. WORKMAN, Warden.

No. 13-6605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.