24964 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Notices

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge

(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC

Approvals and Disapprovals. In March

1995, there were four applications and

five amendments approved.

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly

notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals

and disapprovals under the provisions

of 49 U.S.C. 40117 (Pub. L. 103–272)

and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). This

notice is published pursuant to

paragraph d of § 158.29.

PFC Applications Approved

Public Agency: City of Bangor, Maine.

Application Number: 95–01–C–00–

BGR.

Application Type: Impose and use

PFC revenue.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Approved Net Use PFC

Revenue: $8,742,415.

Charge Effective Date: June 1, 1995.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

May 1, 2005.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to

Collect PFC’s: None.

Brief Description of Project Approved

for Collection and Use: Reconstruct

domestic terminal ramp, reconstruct

international ramps (north and south),

reconstruct ramp movement areas, and

reconstruct and expand commuter

apron area.

Decision Date: March 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Priscilla Soldan, New England Region

Airports Division, (617) 238–7614.

Public Agency: Clark County

Department of Aviation (Clark County),

Las Vegas, Nevada.

Application Number: 94–04–C–00–

LAS.

Application Type: Impose and use

PFC revenue.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Approved Net Use PFC

Revenue: $510,808,093.

Estimated Charge Effective Date:

February 1, 2016.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

November 1, 2024.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to

Collect PFC’s: Carriers who exclusively

file FAA Form 1800–31 and enplane

less than 2,500 passengers annually at

McCarran International Airport (LAS).

Determination: Approved. Based on

information submitted in Clark County’s

application, the FAA has determined

the proposed class accounts for less

than 1 percent of LAS’s total annual

enplanements.

Brief Description of Projects Approved

for Collection and Use: Ticketing and

baggage handling improvement,

Concourse D construction, phase I,

Automated transit system, On airport

roadway modification, Runway 1L–19R

upgrade.

Brief Description of Projects Approved

for Use: Runway 7R–25L extension,

Runway 1L–19R air carrier upgrade—

design, Charter/international terminal

apron expansion, Land acquisition—

portions of Park 2000, Land

acquisition—runway 19R protection

zone, Land acquisition—Swenson

Street, airport-related ground

transportation.

Decision Date: March 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Rodriguez, San Francisco

Airports District Office, (415) 876–2805.

Public Agency: County of Kern,

Bakersfield, California.

Application Number: 95–01–C–00–

BFL.

Application Type: Impose and use

PFC revenue.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Approved Net Use PFC

Revenue: $888,700.

Charge Effective Date: June 1, 1995.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

January 1, 2000.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To

Collect PFC’s: None.

Brief Description of Projects Approved

for Collection and Use: Acquire land—

Airport Surveillance Radar critical area,

Overlay runway 12L/30R, Overlay

taxiway Alpha, Stabilize shoulders,

runway 12L/30R, Renovate airfield

signage, Remove obstruction—runway

12L obstacle free zone, Acquire land—

runway 12L runway protection zone,

Purchase American with Disabilities Act

boarding device.

Brief Description of Project Approved

for Collection Only: Construct aircraft

rescue and firefighting station.

Decision Date: March 30, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Milligan, Western Pacific Region

Airports Division, (310) 297–1029.

Public Agency: San Luis Obispo

County (County), California.

Application Number: 95–03–C–00–

SBP.

Application Type: Impose and use

PFC revenue.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Approved Net PFC Revenue:

$671,439.

Charge Effective Date: June 1, 1995.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

May 1, 1997.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to

Collect PFC’S: Unscheduled Part 135 air

taxis.

Determination: Approved. Based on

information submitted in the County’s

application, the FAA has determined

that the proposed class accounts for less

than 1 percent of San Luis Obispo

County Airport—McChesney Field’s

total annual enplanements.

Brief Description of Project Approved

for Collection and Use: Airport

development—runway overlay.

Brief Description of Project Approved,

in Part, for Collection and Use: Airport

development—holding bays, lighting,

and equipment.

Determination: Approved in part. The

approved amount has been reduced

from that requested. The County states

that the PFC revenue is intended to

provide the local matching share for the

Airport Improvement Program grants

associated with this project. Therefore,

the PFC approval is limited to the

amount necessary to provide the local

match.

Decision Date: March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Rodriguez, San Francisco

Airports District Office, (415) 876–2805.

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No. City, State

Amendment

approved

date

Amended approved net PFC

revenue

Original approved net

PFC revenue

Original estimated

charge exp.

date

Amended

estimated

charge exp.

date

91–01–C–04–LAS Las Vegas, NV ................................................. 03/15/95 $1,074,430,407 $944,028,500 09/01/14 02/01/16

93–01–C–02–CLM Port Angeles, WA ............................................ 03/17/95 121,524 116,504 04/01/95 05/01/95

92–01–C–01–COS Colorado Springs, CO ..................................... 03/17/95 9,306,557 5,622,000 02/01/96 08/01/96

93–01–C–01–MFR Medford, OR ................................................... 03/22/95 882,999 1,066,142 11/01/95 11/01/95

93–01–C–91–ORD Chicago, IL ..................................................... 03/28/95 500,418,285 504,489,228 10/01/99 10/01/99
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Notices 24965

Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 3,

1995.

Donna Taylor,

Manager, Passenger Facility Charge Branch.

[FR Doc. 95–11489 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration

[Docket No. 95–18; Notice 2]

Decision That Nonconforming 1991

Yamaha FJ1200 (4CR) Motorcycles Are

Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA

that nonconforming 1991 Yamaha

FJ1200 (4CR) motorcycles are eligible

for importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

decision by NHTSA that 1991 Yamaha

FJ1200 (4CR) motorcycles not originally

manufactured to comply with all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards are eligible for importation

into the United States because they are

substantially similar to a vehicle

originally manufactured for importation

into and sale in the United States and

certified by its manufacturer as

complying with the safety standards

(the U.S.-certified version of the 1991

Yamaha FJ1200 (4CR)), and they are

capable of being readily altered to

conform to the standards.

DATES: This decision is effective May

10, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle

Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–

5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i) of the

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle

Safety Act (the Act)), a motor vehicle

that was not originally manufactured to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards shall be refused

admission into the United States unless

NHTSA has decided that the motor

vehicle is substantially similar to a

motor vehicle originally manufactured

for importation into and sale in the

United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.

30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act),

and of the same model year as the

model of the motor vehicle to be

compared, and is capable of being

readily altered to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and

affords interested persons an

opportunity to comment on the petition.

At the close of the comment period,

NHTSA decides, on the basis of the

petition and any comments that it has

received, whether the vehicle is eligible

for importation. The agency then

publishes this decision in the Federal

Register.

Champagne Imports, Inc. of Lansdale,

Pennsylvania (Registered Importer R–

90–009) petitioned NHTSA to decide

whether 1991 Yamaha FJ1200 (4CR)

motorcycles are eligible for importation

into the United States. NHTSA

published notice of the petition on

March 16, 1995 (60 FR 14318) to afford

an opportunity for public comment. The

reader is referred to that notice for a

thorough description of the petition. No

comments were received in response to

the notice. Based on its review of the

information submitted by the petitioner,

NHTSA has decided to grant the

petition.

Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject

Vehicles

The importer of a vehicle admissible

under any final decision must indicate

on the form HS–7 accompanying entry

the appropriate vehicle eligibility

number indicating that the vehicle is

eligible for entry. VSP 113 is the vehicle

eligibility number assigned to vehicles

admissible under this decision.

Final Determination

Accordingly, on the basis of the

foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that a

1991 Yamaha FJ1200 (4CR) motorcycle

not originally manufactured to comply

with all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards is substantially

similar to a 1991 Yamaha FJ1200 (4CR)

motorcycle originally manufactured for

importation into and sale in the United

States and certified under 49 U.S.C.

30115, and is capable of being readily

altered to conform to all applicable

Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and

(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority

at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: May 5, 1995.

Marilynne Jacobs,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–11466 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–M

[Docket No. 95–14; Notice 2]

Decision That Nonconforming 1985

Suzuki GS850 Motorcycles Are Eligible

for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA

that nonconforming 1985 Suzuki GS850

motorcycles are eligible for importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

decision by NHTSA that 1985 Suzuki

GS850 motorcycles not originally

manufactured to comply with all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards are eligible for importation

into the United States because they have

safety features that comply with, or are

capable of being altered to comply with,

all such standards.

DATES: The decision is effective May 10,

1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle

Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–

5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle

Safety Act (the Act)), a motor vehicle

that was not originally manufactured to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards shall be refused

admission into the United States unless

NHTSA has decided that the motor

vehicle is substantially similar to a

motor vehicle originally manufactured

for importation into and sale in the

United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.

30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act),

and of the same model year as the

model of the motor vehicle to be

compared, and is capable of being

readily altered to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards. Where there is no

substantially similar U.S.-certified

motor vehicle, 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(II) of

the Act, 15 U.S.C. 1397(c)(3)(A)(i)(II))

permits a nonconforming motor vehicle

to be admitted into the United States if

its safety features comply with, or are

capable of being altered to comply with,

all applicable Federal motor vehicle

safety standards based on destructive

test data or such other evidence as

NHTSA decides to be adequate.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register