alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 425-426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-126]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

RIN 1018-


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reopening of 
Comment Period on the 90-day Finding for the Petition to List the Queen 
Charlotte Goshawk as Endangered

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Status Review; Reopening of Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides notice 
that the comment period on the proposal is reopened. The Queen 
Charlotte goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi) is found in forested 
areas of British Columbia and southeast Alaska. All interested parties 
are invited to submit comments regarding this species' status.

DATES: The comment period, which originally closed November 25, 1994, 
now closes February 9, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Data, information, comments or questions concerning the 
status of the petitioned species described below should be submitted to 
the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological 
Services, 3000 Vintage Blvd., Suite 201, Juneau, Alaska 99801. The 
petition, findings, and supporting data are available for public 
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above 
address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Lindell, Endangered Species 
Biologist (see ADDRESSES above) (907)/586-7240).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Queen Charlotte goshawk occurs from Vancouver Island British 
Columbia, Canada, northward through insular British Columbia, insular 
and adjacent mainland Alaska west of the coastal mountain range, to the 
northern portions of the Alexander Archipelago, in southeast Alaska. 
The subspecies may be endangered by past and planned removal and 
fragmentation of mature forest habitat by clearcut logging.
    The comment period for the status review originally closed on 
November [[Page 426]] 25, 1994. Since that date many parties have 
expressed interest in submitting substantive comments. In order to 
accommodate these parties, the Service is extending the comment period 
until February 9, 1995. Written comments may be submitted to the 
Service office in the ADDRESSES section.

Author

    The primary author of this notice is John Lindell, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Field Office, Juneau, Alaska 
99801.

Authority

    The authority of this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Dated: December 23, 1994.
David B. Allen,
Regional Director, Region 7, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 95-126 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE TRUST 2007-C**

 

CapitalOne Auto Finance Trust 2007-C

 

CapitalOne Auto Finance, Inc.

c/o1680 Capital One Drive

McLean,Virginia 22102

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Auto FinanceTrust 2007-C for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 (the “Report”),the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.(the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

 

1.               A review of theactivities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 11, 2007, by and between Capital One AutoFinance Trust 2007-C, as Issuer, Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC, as Seller,Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, and the Servicer(the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.               To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the periodthat is the subject of the Report.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 27th dayof March, 2008

 

 

CAPITALONE AUTO FINANCE, INC.

(in its capacity as Serviceras of and for the period ended December 31, 2007)

 
| By:    | /s/Sanjiv  Yajnik                       |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Sanjiv  Yajnik                          |
| Title: | Executive  Vice President, Auto Finance |
|        |                                         |        |  |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

BILLY BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:14-cv-41

 )

ALERIS SPECIFICATION ALLOYS, )

INC. and WABASH ALLOYS, LLC, )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION & ORDER

The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement (DE 47).

Brown brought this matter for unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor

Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. I granted summary judgment against the plaintiff,

and Brown appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. (DE 38; DE 40.) Through

the circuit’s formal mediation process, the parties reached an agreement to resolve both

this lawsuit and the appeal. (See DE 45 at 2; DE 44.) Accordingly, I will construe their

Joint Motion to Approve the Settlement Agreement as a joint motion to set aside the

judgment and to approve the settlement agreement. 

FLSA actions for recovery of unpaid overtime compensation require either direct

supervision by the Secretary of Labor or approval by a district court. See 29 U.S.C.

§ 216 (c). When parties move for approval of a stipulated settlement of such actions, the

district court must review the settlement for fairness and, if satisfied, may enter a

stipulated judgment. Lynn Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1354 (11th Cir.
1982); see also, e.g., Burkholder v. City of Fort Wayne, 750 F.Supp.2d 990, 995 (N.D. Ind.

2010). I have undertaken such a review and find the settlement to be fair and

reasonable. The parties were represented by counsel and participated in arm’s length

settlement discussions leading to the resolution of the matter. While the defendants

continue to dispute liability, there are factual and legal issues in this matter that present

risk to both parties if they continue litigating. Instead, the parties, with the assistance of

their counsel, have reached a fair and reasonable compromise.

Accordingly, the March 28, 2016 opinion granting summary judgment to Aleris

Specification Alloys is VACATED, and the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement

Agreement (DE 47) is GRANTED. The proposed settlement agreement (DE 46) filed on

July 29, 2016 is APPROVED, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to unseal the

agreement. This cause of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: August 22, 2016.

s/ Philip P. Simon 

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-3-JTM-PRC

 )

DION COURTNEY, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON PLEAS OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT DION COURTNEY

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Dion Courtney’s request to enter pleas of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R.

Cherry, on January 23, 2015, with the consent of Defendant Dion Courtney, counsel for Defendant

Dion Courtney, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Dion Courtney’s pleas of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11,

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Dion Courtney under

oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant Dion Courtney,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Dion Courtney understands the nature of the charges against him to which

the pleas are offered;

(2) that Defendant Dion Courtney understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his pleas

of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Dion Courtney understands what the maximum possible sentences are,

including the effect of the supervised release terms, and Defendant Dion Courtney understands that the

sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the pleas of guilty by Defendant Dion Courtney have been knowingly and voluntarily

made and are not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Dion Courtney is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Dion Courtney understands that his answers may later be used against him

in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there are factual bases for Defendant Dion Courtney’s pleas; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Dion Courtney’s pleas of guilty to the offenses charged

in Counts I and II of the Felony Information and that Defendant Dion Courtney be adjudged guilty of

the offenses charged in Counts I and II of the Felony Information and have sentences imposed. A

Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Dion

Courtney be adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before Judge James T. Moody will be set by separate

order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within

fourteen days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2015.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Honorable James T. Moody
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern Technology Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, AnthonyK. Welch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the4th day of July, 2007.

Chief Executive Officer

----

 

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern Technology Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Anthony K. Welch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in              all material respects, the financial condition and result of              operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the4th day of July, 2007.

Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-cr-00022-TLS-SLC

)

BRITTNEY JOHNSON )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

October 29, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 29th day of October 2015.

s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CR-35-TLS 

 ) 

JEREMY HANDSHOE ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 54], filed on September 22, 2016. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 54] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offenses 

charged in Counts One (1) and Two (2) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant 

is adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on October 7, 2016. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Greg Jarman, the Chief Executive Officer and
Don Prest the Chief Financial Officer of Omnicity Corp. (the Company), each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 28, 2010

By: /s/Greg Jarman 
         Greg Jarman

       Chief Executive Officer, President and a director



By: /s/Don Prest 
         Don Prest

       Chief Financial Officer and a director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

__________

---
William CANNNON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9686.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Christopher Michael CLARK, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 12-10895.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EX-35.2
(logo) EMC
Mortgage Corporation

ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

The undersigned officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") as servicer
pursuant to the Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2005-8 Agreement (the "Agreement")
hereby certify that:

1. A review of EMC's activities during the period from and including January 1,
   2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the. "Reporting Period") and
   EMC's performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 12th
day of March 2008.

By: /s/ David B. Little
David B. Little
Executive Vice President
Default Administration

/s/ William Glasgow Jr.
William Glasgow Jr.
Executive Vice President
Enterprise Operations Services

/s/ Jenna Kemp
Jenna Kemp
Executive Vice President
Investor Administration


2780 Lake Vista Drive, Lewisville, Texas 75067
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1292190 Lewisville, Texas 75029-2190


(logo) MBA
Member
Mortgage Bankers Association of America
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

May 7, 2007 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677,333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189,333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507 and 333-138593; and Form S-3 No. 333-81101) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated October 25,2006, February 8, 2007 and April 23, 2007 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarters ended October 1, 2006,December 31, 2006 and April 1, 2007.
First Department,

March, 1985

(March 5, 1985)

#### In the Matter of Alexander R. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Department of Social Services, Respondent, v Alvin R., Appellant, et al., Respondent. The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alvin R., Sr., on Behalf of R. Children, Appellant, v Catholic Home Bureau and Special Services For Children, Respondent. —

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Goldfluss, J.), entered on or about February 10, 1983, and three orders of the Family Court, Bronx County (Judith Sheindlin, J.), entered on March 11,1983, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Bloom and Fein, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements as of March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,946
<PP&E>                                      12,607,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,735,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,806,248
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,250
<COMMON>                                        10,836
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,909,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,735,289
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               415,202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (392,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (392,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (392,319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TONY GARCIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0140

[May 9, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Scott Ira Suskauer, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CF012520AXXX.

Tony Garcia, Lake Worth, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.