28010 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 1995 / Notices

Due Date for Answers, Conforming

Applications, or Motion to Modify

Scope: June 12, 1995.

Description: Application of United

Air Lines, Inc. pursuant to 49 U.S.C.

Section 41101, and Subpart Q of the

Regulations, applies for renewal of its

Certificate of Public Convenience and

Necessity for Route 588 authorizing

services between Chicago, Illinois and

Tokyo, Japan and of the six (6) weekly

U.S.-Japan frequencies allocated to

United by Order 90–10–15.

Docket Number: 50358.

Date filed: May 18, 1995.

Due Date for Answers, Conforming

Applications, or Motion to Modify

Scope: June 15, 1995.

Description: Application of Delta Air

Lines, Inc., pursuant to 49 U.S.C.

Section 41101 and Subpart Q of the

Regulations, applies for renewal of its

Certificate of Public Convenience and

necessity for Route 586, authorizing

Delta to engage in foreign air

transportation of persons, property and

mail between the terminal point

Portland, Oregon and the terminal point

Nagoya, Japan. Delta’s certificate for

Route 586 expires on November 15,

1995. Delta requests renewal of its

certificate for a period of five years.

Docket Number: 50359.

Date filed: May 18, 1995.

Due Date for Answers, Conforming

Applications, or Motion to Modify

Scope: June 15, 1995.

Description: Application of Delta Air

Lines, Inc. pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section

41101 and Subpart Q of the Regulations,

applies for renewal of its Certificate of

Public Convenience and Necessity for

Route 585, authorizing Delta to engage

in foreign air transportation of persons,

property and mail between the terminal

point Los Angeles, California and the

terminal point Tokyo, Japan.

Docket Number: 50360.

Date filed: May 19, 1995.

Due Date for Answers, Conforming

Applications, or Motion to Modify

Scope: June 16, 1995.

Description: Application of Seaborne

Aviation, Inc., pursuant to 49 U.S.C.

Section 41101 and Subpart Q of the

Regulations, applies for a certificate of

public convenience and necessity for an

indefinite term to perform scheduled,

interstate air transportation of persons,

property and mail between the terminal

points of Ketchikan and Waterfall,

Alaska.

Paulette V. Twine,

Chief, Documentary Services Division.

[FR Doc. 95–12962 Filed 5–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–95–22]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I),

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections.

The purpose of this notice is to improve

the public’s awareness of, and

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s

regulatory activities. Neither publication

of this notice nor the inclusion or

omission of information in the summary

is intended to affect the legal status of

any petition or its final disposition.

DATE: Comments on petitions received

must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received

on or before June 15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any

petition in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC–

200), Petition Docket No. lllll

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

Comments may also be sent

electronically to the following internet

address:

The petition, any comments received,

and a copy of any final disposition are

filed in the assigned regulatory docket

and are available for examination in the

Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G,

FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A),

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)

267–3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of

Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267–7470.

This notice is published pursuant to

paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 11).

Issued in Washington, DC., on May 22,

1995.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

Docket No.: 28197

Petitioner: U.S. Department of

Agriculture (Forest Service)

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.203 and part 125

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit the USDA Forest Service to

operate its Shorts C–23A Sherpa aircraft

to transport passengers and cargo in

civil aircraft operations without

possessing a current and appropriate

airworthiness certificate. Additionally,

the request, if granted, would allow the

USDA Forest Service to operate its

Basler DC–3 aircraft, which have either

a seating configuration of 20 or more

passenger seats or a payload capacity of

6,000 pounds or more, in civil aircraft

operations, without meeting the

requirements of part 125.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 25126

Petitioner: Executive Air Fleet, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.165(b) (6) and (7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

4821, as amended, which permits

Executive Air Fleet, Inc., to operate

turbojet airplanes in extended overwater

operations with one long-range

navigation system (LRNS) and one highfrequency (HF) communication system

within certain named areas subject to

certain conditions and limitations.

GRANT, April 20, 1995, Exemption

No. 4821D

Docket No.: 27227

Petitioner: World Airways, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.434

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5640, which permits World Airways,

Inc., on certain flights, to use flight

attendants who have not completed

operating experiences under part 121 of

the FAR.

GRANT, May 9, 1995, Exemption No.

5640A

Docket No.: 27230

Petitioner: Era Aviation, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5718, which permits Era Aviation, Inc.,

to operate certain helicopters without a

TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder,

subject to certain conditions and

limitations.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 1995 / Notices 28011

GRANT, May 3, 1995, Exemption No.

5718A

Docket No.: 27345

Petitioner: Life Lion Aeromedical

Service

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.213 (a) and (b)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Life Lion

Aeromedical Service to conduct

instrument flight rule departures during

patient transport flights from 13 airports

in Pennsylvania when weather

observations from the U.S. National

Weather Service (NWS), or a source

approved by the NWS, or a source

approved by the Administrator are not

available.

DENIAL, May 3, 1995, Exemption No.

6077

Docket No.: 27822

Petitioner: Milwaukee General

Aviation, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.119

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Milwaukee

General Aviation, Inc., to conduct

flights in fixed-wing aircraft at

approximately 800 feet above ground

level over congested areas in certain

meteorological conditions, for the

purpose of conducting its aerial traffic

observation program.

DENIAL, May 5, 1995, Exemption No.

6079

Docket No.: 27874

Petitioner: The University of

Oklahoma

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

141.67(a)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit The University

of Oklahoma to recommend for issuance

of pilot’s certificates those students who

have not completed all appropriate

training at the University of Oklahoma.

GRANT, May 16, 1995, Exemption

No. 6085

Docket No.: 27907

Petitioner: American Jet International

Corporation

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

43.3(g)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow pilots employed

by American Jet International

Corporation to reconfigure company

airplane cabins as required for

particular flights.

GRANT, May 3, 1995, Exemption No.

6078

Docket No.: 28029

Petitioner: Boeing Commercial

Airplane Group

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

25.841(a) and 25.1447(c)(1)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow the Boeing

Commercial Airplane Group exemption

from the cabin pressure altitude limit

requirement of § 25.841(a), as well as

the § 25.1447(c)(1) requirement that the

passenger oxygen masks be

automatically presented before the cabin

pressure altitude exceeds 15,000 feet,

for Boeing Model 757–200 series

airplanes operating into Bamda, China.

GRANT, April 26, 1995, Exemption

No. 6076

Docket No.: 28033

Petitioner: Continental Airlines

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.433(c)(1)(iii), 121.441(a)(1),

121.441(b)(1), and appendix F of part

121

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Continental

Airlines regulatory relief to the extent

necessary to conduct a single visit

training program (SVTP) for flight

crewmembers, and eventually transition

into the Advanced Qualification

Program (AQP) codified in Special

Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 58.

GRANT, May 11, 1995, Exemption

No. 6081

Docket No.: 28092

Petitioner: B2W Corporation

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit B2W to operate

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed on its aircraft

operating under the provisions of part

135.

GRANT, May 9, 1995, Exemption No.

6083

Docket No.: 28101

Petitioner: Wings West Aviation

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Wings West

Aviation to operate without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on

its aircraft operating under the

provisions of part 135.

GRANT, May 9, 1995, Exemption No.

6082

Docket No.: 28115

Petitioner: Aero Flight Service, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Aero Flight

Service, Inc., to operate without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on

its aircraft operating under the

provisions of part 135.

GRANT, May 9, 1995, Exemption No.

6084

[FR Doc. 95–13013 Filed 5–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Federal Railroad Administration

Petition for Waivers of Compliance

In accordance with 49 CFR 211.9,

211.41 and 211.45, notice is hereby

given that the Federal Railroad

Administration (FRA) has received a

request for a waiver of compliance with

certain requirements of the Federal

safety laws and regulations. The

individual petition is described below,

including the party seeking relief, the

regulatory provisions involved, the

nature of the relief being requested and

the petitioner’s arguments in favor of

relief.

National Railroad Passenger

Corporation (Amtrak)

Docket Number H–95–1

Amtrak requests waivers of

compliance with certain provisions of

the Federal Railroad Administration

(FRA) railroad safety regulations. It is

seeking relief from sections of Railroad

Safety Appliance Standards (49 CFR

Part 231), Railroad Safety Glazing

Standards (49 CFR Part 223) and

Railroad Track Safety Standards (49

CFR Part 213). The relief is being sought

in order to demonstrate the IC3

‘‘Flexiliner’’, a three-car, articulated,

diesel hydraulic, multiple unit trainset

built by ABB Scandia A/S for the

Danish State Railway (DSB).

The demonstration is a joint project

by Amtrak and ABB Traction, Inc.

(ABB), and a number of potential

sponsors, including state departments of

transportation and commuter agencies.

Amtrak is serving as the host agency

and is acting as liaison with the FRA.

The Flexiliner which will be

demonstrated was built for the DSB and

is presently in revenue service in

Denmark. Modifications will be made to

the equipment in Denmark to ensure the

trainset meets Amtrak and FRA

requirements, where practical.

Amtrak anticipates that the Flexiliner

trainset will arrive at the Port of

Baltimore in July 1995, and be taken to

Washington, DC for commissioning

tests. After completion of the tests, it is

intended that the Flexiliner will operate

across the country and be placed in

revenue service in the Portland-Eugene,

Oregon corridor. This is contingent

upon ABB receiving a contract award

from Oregon, following a competitive

proposal evaluation. Demonstration

runs in Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor, at

a maximum speed of 110 mph, may be

scheduled for dignitaries before

shipment to Oregon. The train may also

operate in either demonstration service

or revenue service between other city

pairs in other parts of the country.