alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDC IN/ND case 1:16-cv-00220-TLS document 2 filed 11/14/17 page 1 of 1

AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

CHRISTOPHER R. SEALS,

Petitioner

v. Civil Action No. 1:20-CV-211

arising out of 1:13-CR-46

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

 the plaintiff 

recover fromthe defendant the amount of 

dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus post-judgment 

interest at the rate of % along with costs.

 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

 X Other: The court DENIES the Petitioner’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set aside,

 or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody and DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

This action was (check one):

tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has 

rendered a verdict.

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was 

reached.

 X decided by Judge Holly A. Brady on a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence.

DATE: December 2, 2020 ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/ L. Higgins-Conrad

Signature of Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cr-00046-HAB-MGG document 173 filed 12/02/20 page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2017

p0125

Order 

Clerk

February 1, 2017

153110 & (84)

NL VENTURES VI FARMINGTON, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 153110

COA: 323144

Wayne CC: 13-004863-CZ

CITY OF LIVONIA,

Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 28, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing: (1) whether 1939 PA 178, MCL 123.161 et seq., MCL 141.121(3), or any 

other statute authorized the method by which defendant sought to enforce collection of 

the disputed liens; and if there was statutory authority (2) whether defendant is prohibited 

from collecting the disputed liens because defendant failed to place them on the tax roll 

each year as required by Livonia Ordinance, § 13.08.300. The parties should not submit 

mere restatements of their application papers. The application for leave to appeal as 

cross-appellant remains pending.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Jenna L. Kemp, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2007-AR4
    (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Jenna L. Kemp
    Signature

    Executive Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Northern District of Indiana

RICHARD SPINNENWEBER, 

 Plaintiff 

 v. Civil Action No. 2:14-CV-101 

ROBERT LADUCER, and RED 

RIVER SUPPLY INCORPORATED 

Defendants

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one): 

X The Plaintiff, Richard Spinnenweber, recover from the Defendants, Robert Laducer, and Red 

River Supply Incorporated, damages in the amount of One Million Dollars, ($1,000,000.00) plus 

post-judgment interest at the rate of 2.7 %. 

☐ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff . 

☐ Other: 

This action was (check one): 

X Tried to a jury with Magistrate Judge John E. Martin presiding, and the jury has rendered a 

verdict. 

☐ tried by Judge 

without a jury and the above decision was reached.

☐ decided by Judge on a 

DATE: 12/4/2018 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT 

 by /s/Susan Brown Nickerson 

 Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00101-JEM document 147 filed 12/04/18 page 1 of 1
Mitchell WOJTANEK, petitioner, v. PACTIV, LLC, fka Pactiv Corporation.

No. 12-9187.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Annual Report 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CR-2

)

ANNA DECK )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on April 4, 2012, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 4th day of April, 2012.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kerstin Zerbst, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW FS Securities LLC and BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2007-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);



2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects;



5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.







Date: March 26, 2008

By:   /s/ Kerstin Zerbst

Kerstin Zerbst

Chief Financial Officer
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CHRISTOPHER J. OLSON, ESQ. (SBN 192689)

RACHAEL E. BINDER, ESQ. (SBN 286634)

SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON & BOSOMWORTH

A Professional Law Corporation

983 University Avenue, Suite 104C

Los Gatos, CA 95032-7637

Telephone: (408) 356-3000

Facsimile: (408) 354-8839

colson@smwb.com

reb@smwb.com

Attorneys for Defendants

FELIPE’S MARKET, INC.; 

CALA SHOPPING CENTER, LP

dba CALA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONNY-MARIE WILSON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FELIPE’S MARKET, INC.; CALA 

SHOPPING CENTER, LP dba CALA 

SHOPPING CENTER, LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 17-CV-00594-HRL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES

WHEREAS, the parties have complied with the Court’s Scheduling Order entered on 

February 6, 2017, including a joint inspection of the premises on May 9, 2017, and an in-person 

meet and confer must accordingly be completed by June 6, 2017 pursuant to General Order 56;

WHEREAS, the parties are in settlement negotiations and require additional time to 

finalize the terms;

WHEREAS, defendants are unavailable to conduct the required in-person meet and 

confer by the June 6, 2017 deadline;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to conduct the in-person meet and confer on June 21, 

2017 at 2:30 p.m.;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel 

that the deadline to conduct the meet and confer required by General Order 56 be continued to 

Re: Dkt. 16
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

June 21, 2017, and that Plaintiff Ronny-marie Wilson shall file a notice of need for mediation 

within 14 days thereafter if the matter does not settle. No prior extension has been requested or 

granted.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 7, 2017 SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON &

BOSOMWORTH

By: /s/ Rachael E. Brown

RACHAEL E. BROWN, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendants

FELIPE’S MARKET, INC. and

CALA SHOPPING CENTER, LP 

dba CALA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC

Dated: June 7, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, APC

By: /s/ Zachary M. Best

ZACHARY M. BEST, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff

RONNY-MARIE WILSON

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June _____, 2017

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

HOWARD R. LLOYD 

7
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Urban Barns Foods Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob Benne,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of December, 2009.


/s/ Jacob Benne
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E. Skowronski, President of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                               
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------
|               | 
|April 25, 2007 |  | /s/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI      
|               |  | Walter E. Skowronski President



22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

CRAIG C. LADYMAN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) 

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:14CV2038-PPS

)

NICHOLAS MEADE, et al., )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Craig Ladyman brings this case alleging various violations of 

his constitutional rights in connection with a traffic stop, the subsequent search of

his vehicle, his arrest and his prosecution. In his ruling on a motion to dismiss, the

district judge who previously presided over this case dismissed with prejudice

Ladyman’s claims against prosecutor Shelley Gupta, Elkhart Superior Court Judge

Charles C. Wicks, and Magistrate Dean O. Burton. [DE 20 at 9.] Despite this ruling,

Ladyman thereafter filed an amended complaint in which he again named Gupta,

Wicks and Burton as defendants and reiterated his claims against them. Because the

claims had been dismissed with prejudice, the inclusion of them in the amended

complaint constitutes redundant, immaterial and impertinent matter subject to being

stricken under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f)(1). 

ACCORDINGLY:

The claims against defendants Shelley Gupta, Charles C. Wicks, and Dean O.

Burton are stricken from the amended complaint as redundant, immaterial and
impertinent in light of the prior ruling of September 29, 2016 [DE 20 at 9] dismissing

plaintiff Ladyman’s claims against these defendants with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: June 20, 2017.

 /s/ Philip P. Simon 

United States District Court Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11749]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been sent the 
following collection(s) of information proposals for review under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) and 
the Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act since the last list was 
published. Entries are grouped into submission categories, with each 
entry containing the following information:
    (1) The title of the form/collection;
    (2) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of 
the Department sponsoring the collection.
    (3) Who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief 
abstract;
    (4) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond;
    (5) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection; and,
    (6) An indication as to whether section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-
511 applies.
    Comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this 
notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to the OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on 
(202) 395-7340 and to the Department of Justice's Clearance Officer, 
Mr. Robert B. Briggs, on (202) 514-4319. If you anticipate commenting 
on a form/collection, but find that time to prepare such comments will 
prevent you from prompt submission, you should notify the OMB reviewer 
and the Department of Justice Clearance Officer of your intent as soon 
as possible. Written comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collection may be submitted to Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Department of 
Justice Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/Information Resources 
Management/Justice Management Division Suite 850, WCTR, Washington, DC 
20530.

New Collection

    (1) OJP Budget Worksheet.
    (2) Form 7150/1. Office of Justice Programs, United States 
Department of Justice.
    (3) Primary: State, local or Tribal Government, Business or other 
for-profit, Not-for-profit institutions. Others: None. Form 7150/1 
request significantly less information and provides clearer guidance on 
the budget information needed. This form will be used in lieu of SF 
424A and reduce the burden on the public.
    (4) 900 annual respondents at .75 hours per response.
    (5) 675 annual burden hours.
    (6) Not applicable under section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511.
    Public comment on this item is encouraged.

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
Robert B. Briggs,
Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-11749 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

NANCY ISLAS )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1, Plaintiff Nancy Islas by counsel, hereby moves this Court for an 

extension of time to respond to Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC's Motion to Dismiss 

through and including April 5, 2013. Plaintiff's response is currently due March 6, 23013. 

Defendant's counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested extension. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, by counsel prays for an Order allowing Plaintiff up to and 

including April 5, 2013 to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for all relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Douglas A. Mulvaney __________

Douglas A. Mulvaney, # 10263-20

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, IN 46515-1337

(574) 266-8500

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 19 filed 02/18/13 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 18, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to all 

counsel of record.

/s/ Douglas A. Mulvaney____________ 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 19 filed 02/18/13 page 2 of 2