alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12558]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-10968]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Section 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h), will be issued to 
Chugach Alaska Corporation for 0.10 acre. The land involved is in the 
vicinity of Long Bay, Alaska.

U.S. Survey No. 6935, Alaska.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until June 22, 1995 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, 
subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Margaret J. McDaniel,
Acting Chief, Branch of Gulf Rim Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 95-12558 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1247]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. MG88-54-005]


Trunkline Gas Co.; Notice of Filing

January 12, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 5, 1995, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline), filed its revised standards of conduct under Order Nos. 
497 et seq.\1\ and Order Nos. 566 et seq.\2\ Trunkline states that it 
is revising its standards of conduct to incorporate the changes 
required by Order No. 566-A and the Commission's December 7, 1994 
order.\3\

    \1\Order No. 497, 53 FR 22139 (June 14, 1988), III FERC Stats. & 
Regs. para.30,820 (1988); Order No. 497-A, order on rehearing, 54 FR 
52781 (December 22, 1989), III FERC Stats. & Regs. 30,868 (1989); 
Order No. 497-B, order extending sunset date, 55 FR 53291 (December 
28, 1990), III FERC Stats. & Regs. para.30,908 (1990); Order No. 
497-C order extending sunset date, 57 FR 9 (January 2, 1992), III 
FERC Stats. & Regs. para.30,934 (1991), rehearing denied, 57 FR 5815 
(February 18, 1992), 58 FERC para.61,139 (1992); Tenneco Gas v. FERC 
(affirmed in part and remanded in part), 969 F. 2d 1187 (D.C. Cir. 
1992); Order No. 497-D, order on remand and extending sunset date, 
III FERC Stats. & Regs. para.30,958 (December 4, 1992), 57 FR 58978 
(December 14, 1992); Order No. 497-E, order on rehearing and 
extending sunset date, 59 FR 243 (January 4, 1994), 65 FERC 
para.61,381 (December 23, 1993); Order No. 497-F, order denying 
rehearing and granting clarification, 59 FR 15336 (April 1, 1994), 
66 FERC para.61,347 (March 24, 1994); and Order No. 497-G, order 
extending sunset date, 59 FR 32884 (June 27, 1994), III FERC Stats. 
& Regs. para.30,996 (June 17, 1994).
    \2\Standards of Conduct and Reporting Requirements for 
Transportation and Affiliate Transactions, Order No. 566, 59 FR 
32885 (June 27, 1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. para.30,997 (June 17, 
1994); Order No. 566-A, order on rehearing, 59 FR 52,896 (October 
20, 1994), 69 FERC para.61,044 (October 14, 1994).
    \3\69 FERC para.61,310 (1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214 (1994)). All such 
motions to intervene or protest should be filed on or before January 
27, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-1247 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) No. 3:13 CV 1182

)

DAVID L. CANELL, Deceased, )

ESTATE OF DAVID L. CANELL, )

)

Defendant / Counter-Plaintiff, )

)

and )

)

ANGELA CAMPOLI, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

On July 30, 2015, this court referred Estate’s motion for order of contempt (DE # 58)

to Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein. (DE # 67.) On August 5, 2015, Magistrate

Judge Nuechterlein issued an order recommending that this court strike the Estate’s motion

and grant the Estate leave to refile its petition after Phase I of this action is completed. (DE

# 70.) In his report, Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein informed the parties that any objections

to the report and recommended finding must be made within 14 days after being served

with a copy of the report. (Id. at 2.) That time has passed, and no objections have been filed.

Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein’s

report and recommendation (DE # 70); STRIKES the Estate’s motion for order of contempt

(DE # 58); and GRANTS the Estate leave to refile its petition after Phase I of this action is

completed.

SO ORDERED.

Date: August 31, 2015

s/ James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Osprey Ventures, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
James Yiu Yeung Lung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: September 9, 2009

/s/ James Yiu Yeung Lung

James Yiu Yeung Lung Chief
Executive Officer

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FT. WAYNE DIVISION 

JENNIFER COWAN, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CV-166-RL 

 ) 

EAGLE CARE, LLC, and ) 

AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, ) 

LLC ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, Jennifer Cowan, has decided to voluntarily dismiss her lawsuit with prejudice. 

Defendants, EagleCare, LLC, and American Senior Communities, LLC, do not object and agree 

that Plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal is appropriate. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a), Plaintiff, Jennifer Cowan, and Defendants, EagleCare, LLC, and American Senior 

Communities, LLC, all parties who have appeared in this action, by counsel, hereby stipulate to 

the dismissal of this action with prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs, including 

attorneys’ fees. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Rachel Guin-Lowry /s/ Craig M. Borowski 

Christopher C. Myers (#10043-02) Craig M. Borowski (#22280-49) 

Rachel Guin-Lowry Ryann E. Ricchio (#30076-53) 

CHRISTOPHER C. MYERS & ASSOCIATES FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP 

809 South Calhoun Street, Suite 400 300 N. Meridian St., Suite 2700 

Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Indianapolis, IN 46204 

Tel: 260-424-0600; Fax: 260-424-0712 Tel: 317-237-0300; Fax: 317-237-1000 

cmyers@myers-law.com craig.borowski@FaegreBD.com 

rguin-lowry@myers-law.com ryann.ricchio@FaegreBD.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00166-RL document 25 filed 04/24/15 page 1 of 1
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-25   filed 07/14/15   page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 8, 2007 
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 8, 2007 



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Jesus GONZALES-HINOJOSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7008.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steven L. REED, petitioner, v. JOB COUNCIL OF the OZARKS, et al.

No. 12-10243.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1699 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1699

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
          preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2005

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
          preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRESERVED OTHERWISE THAN BY 
              VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.20.06       Pepperoncini,      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         prepared or                                                        31/2008
                         preserved
                         otherwise than by
                         vinegar or acetic
                         acid (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2005.90.55)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

 SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 3:14-CR-00069 JD

)

)

ROBERT OFCKY ) 

 

UNITED STATES’ SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

Comes now the United States of America by Thomas L. Kirsch II,

United States Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana, by 

Frank Schaffer, Assistant United States Attorney, and submits the following 

Memorandum in preparation for the Sentencing Hearing in this case.

History of the Defendant and Circumstances of the Offense

Robert Ofcky has three (3) felony convictions and two (2) misdemeanor 

convictions. Mr. Ofcky has twelve (12) other contacts with the law.

 In this matter, Mr. Ofcky was possessing firearms and bomb making 

materials. Several assault weapons and numerous high capacity magazines 

were recovered in the home (the government will show pictures confirming 

this to the court). 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cr-00069-JD-MGG document 52 filed 01/25/18 page 1 of 2
2

United States’ Sentencing Recommendation

The government and the defendant submitted a plea agreement 

capping the sentence to be imposed in this matter at 48 months. Due to the 

age of the defendant, the government believes a downward departure to 

48 months in this matter followed by a term of Supervised Release is 

appropriate.

Dated: January 25, 2018 

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS L. KIRSCH II

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/ Frank E. Schaffer 

Frank E. Schaffer 

Assistant United States Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 25, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system that sent notification 

of such filing to defense counsel.

s/ Chris Carson 

United States Attorney=s Office

204 S. Main Street, Room M01

South Bend, IN 46601

(574) 236-8287

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cr-00069-JD-MGG document 52 filed 01/25/18 page 2 of 2
FEDERAL

DEPOSIT

INSURANCE

CORPORATION

ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Supplementary
Agreement to

    The
Plant Transfer Contract

    Dated
September 26, 2008

     

    Party A:
Tianjin Mengyang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

    Business
License No.: 120223000009884

    Address:
Jinhai Road, Jinghai Economic Development Area,
Tianjin  301600

    Tel:
022-27984733

    


    Party B:
Tianjin Yayi Industrial Co., Ltd.

    Business
License No.: 120193000003231

    Address:
Unit C, 4th floor,
D1 Building, Xinmao Technology Park, Huayuan 

    Industrial
Park Area, Tianjin  300384

    Tel :
022-27984058

    


    Since
party A and B had signed the Plant Transfer Contract on September 26, 2008, both
parties have negotiated and achieved the following agreement on the above
mentioned Plant Transfer Contract on the basis of the relevant laws and
regulations of the People’s Republic of China:

    
       

      A.
The
Completion Deadline of the Construction of the Plant

    

     

    As party
A proposed to change the completion deadline of the plant construction from
“before June 1, 2009” to December 31, 2009, party B agreed on the proposal after
negotiation. The related deadline will be subject to this Supplementary
Agreement.


    
      
         


      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    
      B.
Payment

    

     

    Party B
had followed the Plant Transfer Contract dated September 26, 2008 to pay
RMB40,000,000.00 to party A before January 1, 2009. Therefore, the total
outstanding payment from party B to party A is RMB46,091,000.00

     

    From the
month party A and B have signed the Supplementary Agreement, party B should pay
party A RMB3,000,000 per month until the end of November 2009. And by December
31, 2009, party B should pay off the balance. If party A will adjust its
completion date of the construction of the plant after it has signed the
Supplementary Agreement, party B will adjust its payment term
accordingly.

    
       

      C.
Others

    

     

    If party
B has not received capital by April 20, 2009 according to its financing plan,
party A will agree to extend the time limit for party B to pay off the balance
to March 31, 2010.

    
       

      D.
Other
clauses remain the same as the above mentioned Plant Transfer
Contract.

    

     

    The
agreement should be in duplicate, with each of party A and B holding one
original copy.

     

    The
agreement is valid after both parties have stamped or signed on it°

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    Party
      A (stamp): ______________________

                  	
                    Party
      B (stamp): ______________________

                  
	 	 
	
                    Signature:
      ______________________

                  	
                    Signature:
      ______________________

                  
	 	 
	
                    Date:
      January 20, 2009

                  	
                    Date:
      January 20, 2009
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2007-17
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-17


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                          Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Benjardi Batucan VIRAY, petitioner, v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, CLARK COUNTY, et al.

No. 13-6845.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
CERTIFICATION





I, Joseph Bucci, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Coastal Pacific Mining Corp.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;




(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date: August 31, 2012




By:           /s/ Joseph Bucci


Joseph Bucci


Principal Executive Officer
Donnell HURT, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, et al.

No. 12-8464.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
#### COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY CO., Limited, v. DONOHUE, et al. (two cases).

(Supreme ■Court, Appellate Division, First Department

April 12, 1912.)

Actions by the Color Photography Company, Limited, against John J. Donohue, impleaded with others. No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeals granted, with $10 ■costs. Order filed. See, also, 133 N. Y. Supp. 1116.
Peter CHIKA ECHE, et al., petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

No. 12-998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.