Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 1995 / Notices 21807

Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of April 6, 1995, for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

10. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–910–000]

Take notice that New England Power

Company, on April 14, 1995, tendered

for filing Amendments to FERC Electric

Tariff, Original Volume No. 5.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

11. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–911–000]

Take notice that New England Power

Company, on April 14, 1995, tendered

for filing a contract with the

Massachusetts Bay Transportation

Authority for construction, operation

and maintenance of distribution

facilities in Revere, Massachusetts.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10911 Filed 5–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–329–000, et al.]

Northwest Pipeline Corp., et al.;

Natural Gas Certificate Filings

April 26, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Northwest Pipeline Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–329–000]

Take notice that on April 17, 1995,

Northwest Pipeline Corporation

(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake

City, Utah 84108 filed a request with the

Commission in Docket No. CP95–329–

000 pursuant to Sections 157.205,

157.211 and 157.216(b) of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (NGA) for approval to

construct and operate modified

metering facilities, authorized in blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

433–000, all as more fully set forth in

the request on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Northwest proposes to construct and

operate modified metering facilities at

the Grace and East Raft River Meter

Stations. Northwest states that by

partially abandoning existing obsolete

meter facilities and appurtenances and

constructing and operating replacement

facilities, it would more efficiently

accommodate an existing firm

transportation agreement with

Intermountain Gas Company

(Intermountain) and Intermountain’s

affiliate, IGI Resources, Inc. (IGI

Resources). Northwest further states that

it intends to remove and retire the

existing obsolete 2-inch positive

displacement meter at the Grace Meter

Station. At the East Raft River Meter

Station, Northwest proposes to remove

and retire the existing obsolete 4-inch

positive displacement meter. The retired

meters from each meter station would

be scrapped and replaced with updated

facilities. The total estimated cost of

upgrading the Grace Meter Station

would be approximately $42,328, and

the total estimated cost of upgrading the

East Raft River Meter Station would be

approximately $38,143 which would

make a grand estimated total of $80,471.

Comment date: June 12, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (G)

at the end of this notice.

2. Texas Gas Transmission Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–341–000]

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation

(Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street,

Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301, filed in

Docket No. CP95–341–000 an

application pursuant to Section 7(c) of

the Natural Gas Act for authorization to

construct, install and operate

approximately 0.93 mile of 8-inch

pipeline paralleling the existing 6-inch

portion of Texas Gas’s HerbertCannelton system located in Ohio and

Hancock Counties, Kentucky, all as

more fully set forth in the application

on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

Texas Gas states it is requesting

authority to construct, install and

operate approximately 0.93 mile of 8-

inch pipeline paralleling the existing 6-

inch portion of Texas Gas’s HerbertCannelton pipeline system. The cost

associated with such facilities is

approximately $413,000. Texas Gas

proposes to have the facilities

constructed and in service by November

1, 1995.

Texas Gas states that it is proposing

the additional 0.93 mile of pipeline, as

a result of the request by one of Texas

Gas’s existing customers located in Zone

3 and served off of the HerbertCannelton system, Ohio Valley Gas

Corporation (Ohio Valley), for 500

MMBtu per day of firm transportation

service under Texas Gas’s FT Rate

Schedule, effective November 1, 1995.

Texas Gas states that such firm service

is needed by Ohio Valley in order to

accommodate additional residential and

industrial growth on its system. A

portion of the proposed loop is

necessary, according to Texas Gas, to

accommodate these firm transportation

volumes for Ohio Valley.

Texas Gas also explains that the 0.93

mile of pipeline will serve to loop the

existing 6-inch portion of the HerbertCannelton system providing added

security for that portion of the system

and those customers served off the

Herbert-Cannelton system.

Comment date: May 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (F)

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation, National Fuel Gas Supply

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–343–000]

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia, 25314,

and National Fuel Gas Supply

Corporation (National Fuel), 10

Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York

14203, filed in Docket No. CP95–343–

000 a joint application pursuant to

Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for

permission and approval to abandon

certain exchange services between

Columbia and National Fuel, all as more

fully set forth in the application on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.
21808 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 1995 / Notices

The rate schedules for which these

companies are seeking abandonment

authority are as follows:

Docket No. Order issued Company Rate

schedule

CP64–67 Mar. 25, 1964 ....................................................................... Columbia ...................................................... X–25

CP64–67 Mar. 25, 1964 ....................................................................... National Fuel ................................................ X–4

CP64–67 Mar. 25, 1964 ....................................................................... Columbia ...................................................... X–26

CP76–316 July 20, 1976 ....................................................................... Columbia ...................................................... X–42

CP76–316 July 20, 1976 ....................................................................... National Fuel ................................................ X–7

CP78–323 Apr. 10, 1979 ....................................................................... Columbia ...................................................... X–88

CP78–323 Apr. 10, 1979 ....................................................................... National Fuel ................................................ X–35

CP76–19 Oct. 10, 1980 ....................................................................... Columbia ...................................................... X–101

CP76–19 Oct. 10, 1980 ....................................................................... National Fuel ................................................ X–39

Columbia also requests abandonment

authorization of the Thomas Corners

temporary arrangement which was

initiated by a Letter Agreement dated

May 13, 1975, for which certificate

authorization was not obtained. The

companies state that the exchange

agreements have been terminated.

Comment date: May 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (F)

at the end of this notice.

4. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–348–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia, 25314,

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation

(National Fuel) 10 Lafayette Square,

Buffalo, New York 14203, and Texas

Eastern Transmission Corporation

(Texas Eastern) Post Office Box 1642,

Houston, Texas 77251–1642, filed in

Docket No. CP95–348–000 a joint

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act for permission and

approval to abandon exchange services

between the companies, all as more

fully set forth in the application on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

The companies request permission

and approval to abandon the following

exchange services which are no longer

required:

Docket No. Company

Rate

schedule

CP74–9–004 Columbia ................. X–37

CP74–9–004 National Fuel ........... X–6

CP74–9–004 Texas Eastern ......... X–68

Comment date: May 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (F)

at the end of this notice.

5. CMS Gas Transmission and Storage

Company

[Docket No. CP95–331–000]

Take notice that on April 18, 1995,

CMS Gas Transmission and Storage

Company (CMS) located at Fairlane

Plaza South, 330 Town Center Drive,

Suite 1100, Dearborn, Michigan 48126,

filed in Docket No. CP95–331–000 an

application pursuant to Executive Order

No. 10485 and § § 153.10–153.12 of the

Commission’s Regulations for a

Presidential Permit to operate and

maintain natural gas facilities at the

International Boundary between the

State of Michigan, and the Province of

Ontario, Canada, in order to export and

import gas to and from Canada, all as

more fully set forth in the application

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

It is stated that CMS seeks a

Presidential Permit in order to operate

and maintain, as a natural gas pipeline,

the U.S portion of an existing 12-inch

diameter natural gas liquids pipeline

(the ‘‘Polysar Pipeline’’) that crosses the

St. Clair River between the United

States and Canada at Maryville,

Michigan. The Polysar Pipeline will

interconnect with the Bluewater

Pipeline, a 3.1-mile, 20-inch diameter

natural gas pipeline that CMS will be

constructing and operating as part of its

intrastate pipeline system.

Comment date: May 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (F)

at the end of this notice.

6. CMS Gas Transmission and Storage

Company

[Docket No. CP95–332–000]

Take notice that on April 18, 1995,

CMS Gas Transmission and Storage

Company (CMS) located at Fairlane

Plaza South, 330 Town Center Drive,

Suite 1100, Dearborn, Michigan 48126,

filed in Docket No. CP95–332–000 an

application pursuant to Section 3 of the

Natural Gas Act and Sections 153.1–

153.8 of the Commission’s Regulations

for Section 3 authorization to site and

operate natural gas facilities at the

United States-Canadian border for

importation and exportation of natural

gas to and from Canada, all as more

fully set forth in the application which

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

It is stated that CMS seeks

authorization to site and operate the U.S

portion of an existing 12-inch diameter

natural gas liquids pipeline (the

‘‘Polysar Pipeline’’) that crosses the St.

Clair River between the United States

and Canada at Maryville, Michigan and

proposes to operate that pipeline as a

natural gas transmission facility. The

Polysar Pipeline will interconnect with

the Bluewater Pipeline, a 3.1 mile, 20-

inch diameter natural gas pipeline that

CMS will be constructing and operating

as part of its intrastate pipeline system

as soon as practicable after the receipt

of all necessary governmental approvals.

It will be the responsibility of the

individual shippers to obtain the

appropriate import and export authority

to transport natural gas through the

facilities.

Comment date: May 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (F)

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 1995 / Notices 21809

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to

§ 157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10913 Filed 5–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5201–7]

Underground Injection Control

Program, Hazardous Waste Injection

Restrictions; Petition for Exemption—

Class I Hazardous Waste Injection;

Rollins Environmental Services of

Louisiana, Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Final Decision on

Petition Reissuance.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

reissuance of an exemption to the land

disposal restrictions under the 1984

Hazardous and Solid Waste

Amendments to the Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act has

been granted to Rollins, for the Class I

injection well located at Plaquemine,

Louisiana. As required by 40 CFR Part

148, the company has adequately

demonstrated to the satisfaction of the

Environmental Protection Agency by

petition and supporting documentation

that, to a reasonable degree of certainty,

there will be no migration of hazardous

constituents from the injection zone for

as long as the waste remains hazardous.

This final decision allows the

underground injection by Rollins, of the

specific restricted hazardous waste

identified in the exemption reissuance,

into the Class I hazardous waste

injection well at the Plaquemine,

Louisiana facility specifically identified

in the reissued exemption, for as long as

the basis for granting an approval of this

exemption remains valid, under

provisions of 40 CFR 148.24. As

required by 40 CFR 124.10, a public

notice was issued February 16, 1995.

The public comment period closed on

April 5, 1995. EPA received no

comments. This decision constitutes

final Agency action and there is no

Administrative appeal.

DATES: This action is effective as of

April 13, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the reissued

petition and all pertinent information

relating thereto are on file at the

following location: Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 6, Water

Management Division Water Supply

Branch (6W-SU), 1445 Ross Avenue,

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil

Dellinger, Unit Leader, State Programs/

Land Ban, EPA—Region 6, telephone

(214) 665–7142.

Richard G. Hoppers,

Acting Director, Water Management Division

(6W).

[FR Doc. 95–10879 Filed 5–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6565–50–P

[FRL–5201–6]

Availability of FY 94 Grant

Performance Reports for Alabama,

Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,

Mississippi, North Carolina, South

Carolina, and Tennessee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability of grantee

performance evaluation reports.

SUMMARY: EPA’s grant regulations (40

CFR 35.150) require the Agency to

evaluate the performance of agencies

which receive grants. EPA’s regulations

for regional consistency (40 CFR 56.7)

require that the Agency notify the

public of the availability of the reports

of such evaluations. EPA recently

performed end-of-year evaluations of

eight state air pollution control

programs (Alabama Department of

Environmental Management, Florida

Department of Environmental

Regulation, Georgia Environmental

Protection Division, Kentucky

Department for Environmental

Protection, Mississippi Bureau of

Pollution Control, North Carolina

Department of Environment, Health,

and Natural Resources, South Carolina

Department of Health and

Environmental Control and Tennessee

Department of Conservation and

Environment), and 16 local programs

(Knox County Department of Air

Pollution Control, Tn—ChattanoogaHamilton County Air Pollution Control

Bureau, Tn—Memphis-Shelby County

Health Department, Tn—NashvilleDavidson County Metropolitan Health

Department, Tn—Jefferson County Air

Pollution Control District, Ky—Western

North Carolina Regional Air Pollution

Control Agency, NC—Mecklenburg

County Department of Environmental

Protection, NC—Forsyth County

Environmental Affairs Department,

NC—Palm Beach County Public Health

Unit, Fl—Hillsborough County

Environmental Protection Commission,

Fl—Dade County Environmental

Resources Management, Fl—

Jacksonville Air Quality Division, Fl—

Broward County Environmental Quality

Control Board, Fl—Pinellas County

Department of Environmental

Management, Fl—City of Huntsville