alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12625]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 182; Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards (MOPS) for an Avionics Computer Resource (ACR)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special 
Committee 182 meeting to be held July 18-20, 1995, starting at 9:00 
a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 Connecticut Avenue 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (2) 
Review and Approval of Meeting Agenda; (3) Review and Approval of 
Minutes from Fifth Meeting held April 5-7; (4) Discussion of ACR 
Objectives/Benefits--Review Input from Avionics Manufacturers; (5) 
Establish ``Story Board'' Topical Sentence for Major Sections of MOPS 
Document; (6) Continue Development of ACR Functional, Operational and 
Performance Specifications; (7) Joint Session with AEEC APEX Working 
Group (Wednesday, July 19, AM); (8) Review Definition of Terms, 
``Application,'' ``Partition and Process''; (9) Other Business; (10) 
Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information, should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue NW., Suite 1020, Washington, D.C. 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, May 18, 1995.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 95-12625 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:14-CR-77 RLM

)

JEFFERY PAUL MILLER )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on attorney Fred Hains’ motion to withdraw

his appearance on behalf of the defendant Jeffery Miller [Doc. No. 42], and on Mr.

Miller’s requests to stay his transfer to another correctional facility pending

appointment of new counsel and to hold a hearing on his motion to vacate the

sentence [Doc. No. 43]. 

Mr. Miller’s case is on appeal, and his retained counsel has a continuing

obligation to represent him on appeal “unless specifically relieved by the court of

appeals upon a motion to withdraw.” Circuit Rule 51. Mr. Miller hasn’t requested

leave to proceed in forma pauperis or demonstrated an inability to pay the fees

and costs associated with his appeal, and his motion to vacate has been dismissed

(see Doc. No. 44), obviating the need for a hearing. After judgment has been

entered, only the court of appeals can allow defense counsel to withdraw or

appoint new counsel for purposes of an appeal. United States v. Flowers, 789

F.2d 569, 570 (7th Cir.1986) (per curiam ); accord Corral v. United States, 498

F.3d 470, 474 (7th Cir.2007); Circuit Rule 51. 

While the court “may recommend to the Attorney General that the defendant

be confined near the place of the trial or appeal for a period reasonably necessary
to permit the defendant to assist in preparing the appeal,” Fed. R. Crim. P.

38(b)(2), it declines to do so in this case for the reasons stated in its order of

December 11 dismissing Mr. Miller’s motion to vacate [Doc. No. 44]. 

For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Miller’s requests for a placement

recommendation and for a hearing on his motion to vacate the sentence [Doc. No.

43] are DENIED, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transfer the pending

motion to withdraw Mr. Hains’ appearance [Doc. No. 42] to the Seventh Circuit

Court of Appeals.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 11, 2014 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

2
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.16(a)    
    


 
 

AGREEMENT    
    


        For good and valuable consideration, the LIVE RACING AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") effective March 23, 1999 through January 1, 2004 by and among PENN
NATIONAL TURF CLUB, INC., MOUNTAINVIEW THOROUGHBRED RACING ASSOCIATION, the PENNSYLVANIA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. and all of its terms and conditions are
hereby extended by the mutual consent of all parties through 11:59 pm on March 31, 2004. 


        To
indicate their acceptance of this extension of the Agreement, the duly authorized agents of the parties have executed below. 



	PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL TURF

CLUB, INC.	 	 
	

By:	

/s/  RICHARD T. SCHNAARS      
	
 	

 
	Name:	Richard T. Schnaars
	 	 
	Title:	Vice Pres./Gen. Mgr.
	 	 
	Date:	12/30/03
	 	 
	

 	

 	
 	

 
	MOUNTAINVIEW THOROUGHBRED

RACING ASSOCIATION	 	 
	

By:	

/s/  RICHARD T. SCHNAARS      
	
 	

 
	Name:	Richard T. Schnaars
	 	 
	Title:	Vice Pres./Gen. Mgr.
	 	 
	Date:	12/30/03
	 	 
	

 	

 	
 	

 
	PENNSYLVANIA HORSEMEN'S

BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE

ASSOCIATION, INC.	 	 
	

By:	

/s/  JOHN J. WANES      
	
 	

 
	Name:	John J. Wanes
	 	 
	Title:	President PA HBPA
	 	 
	Date:	12/30/03
	 	 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.16(a)


AGREEMENT
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8,
No. 333-151095) pertaining to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, 2007 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ARYx
Therapeutics, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-156286) of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
March 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2009.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPPalo Alto, California
March 29, 2010


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26756-26757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12237]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2209]


United States International Telecommunications Advisory 
Committee; Standardization Sector (ITAC-T) Study Group; Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee Standardization 
Sector (ITAC-T) Study Group (formerly the USNC) will meet on June 6, 
1995, 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m., room 1207 at the U.S. 
[[Page 26757]] Department of State, 2201 C Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20520.
    This meeting of ITAC-T Study Group will include the following 
agenda items:
    1. Report of Utlaut's ad hoc group on Consortia communication with 
ITU-T Study Groups;
    2. Ad Hoc group report for TSAG preparations;
    3. Report of Fishman's TSAG correspondence group; and
    4. Update of U.S. guidelines for preparatory process.
    All of the issues relate to the upcoming 18-22 September 1995 
Telecommunications Standardization Advisory Group Meeting.
    Members of the General Public may attend the meetings and join in 
the discussions, subject to the instructions of the chair. Admittance 
of public members will be limited to the seating available. In this 
regard, entrance to the Department of State is controlled. If you are 
not presently named on the mailing list of the Telecommunications 
Standardization Sector Study Group, and wish to attend please call 202-
647-0201 not later than 5 days before the scheduled meetings. Enter 
from the ``C'' Street Main Lobby. One of the following valid photo ID's 
will be required for admittance: U.S. driver's license with picture, 
U.S. passport, U.S. government ID (company ID's are no longer accepted 
by Diplomatic Security).


    Dated: May 10, 1995.
Earl S. Barbely,
Chairman, U.S. ITAC for Telecommunication Standardization.
[FR Doc. 95-12237 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 1 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 2 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 3 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 4 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 5 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 6 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 7 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 8 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 9 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 10 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 11 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 12 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 13 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 14 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 15 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 16 of 17
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 69 filed 07/24/14 page 17 of 17
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12088]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

CNO Executive Panel; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given that the Chief of Naval 
Operations (CNO) Executive Panel will meet June 16, 1995, from 3:00 
p.m. to 4:00 p.m., at the Pentagon, room 4E630. This session will be 
closed to the public.

    The purpose of this meeting is to brief the Chief of Naval 
Operations on naval warfare innovations in the areas of joint 
operations, information warfare, naval doctrine, and research and 
development. These matters constitute classified information that is 
specifically authorized by Executive order to be kept secret in the 
interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified 
pursuant to such Executive order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the 
Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that 
all sessions of the meeting be closed to the public because they will 
be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, 
United States Code.

    For further information concerning this meeting, contact: Timothy 
J. Galpin, Assistant for CNO Executive Panel Management, 4401 Ford 
Avenue, Suite 601, Alexandria, VA 22302-0268, Phone: (703) 756-1205.

    Dated: May 4, 1995
L. R. McNees,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12088 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-F
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1560

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 

equivalent of the unified credit allowed against the estate tax to 

$7,500,000 and to establish a flat estate tax rate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the exclusion equivalent of the unified credit allowed 

against the estate tax to $7,500,000 and to establish 

a flat estate tax rate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION EQUIVALENT OF UNI4 FIED CREDIT TO $7,500,000. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 2010 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to applicable 

7 credit amount) is amended by striking all that follows ‘‘the 

8 applicable exclusion amount’’ and inserting ‘‘. For pur-
2

•HR 1560 IH 

1 poses of the preceding sentence, the applicable exclusion 

2 amount is $7,500,000.’’. 

3 (b) MODIFICATION OF ESTATE TAX RATE SCHED4 ULE.—Subsection (c) of section 2001 of such Code (relat5 ing to rate schedule) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(c) RATE.—The tentative tax on the amount with 

7 respect to which the tentative tax is to be computed is 

8 27.5 percent of such amount.’’. 

9 (c) REPEAL OF CERTAIN ESTATE AND GIFT TAX

10 PROVISIONS MADE BY EGTRRA.—

11 (1) Subtitles A and E of title V, and sub12 sections (d), (e), and (f)(3) of section 511, of the 

13 Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 

14 of 2001, and the amendments made by such provi15 sions, are hereby repealed. The Internal Revenue 

16 Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as 

17 if such provisions, and amendments, had never been 

18 enacted. 

19 (2) Section 901 of the Economic Growth and 

20 Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not 

21 apply to title V of such Act. 

22 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying, and 

24 gifts made, after December 31, 2005.

Æ
Martin FRIAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9726.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Gary Lee GILLION, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1165.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:14 CR 97

)

NATHANIEL GREEN )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY,

 ADJUDICATION OF GUILTY AND

CONFIRMATION OF SENTENCING HEARING

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

(DE # 15), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3), the Magistrate

Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the offense charged in

Count 1 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED, and defendant is adjudged guilty of

that offense. A sentencing date will be set under separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: June 19, 2015

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Terry L. GOLDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-5757.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QA5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Executive Vice President
Edna D. CARTER, petitioner, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 13-6498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
In re Timothy Vaughn BROWNELL, petitioner.

No. 12-10333.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Daniel Henderson JONES, petitioner, v. David SEXTON, Warden.

No. 12-10208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26467-26468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12082]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Application for Search of Census Records 
(Railroad Retirement Purposes Only).
    (2) Form(s) submitted: RRB Form G-256.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0106.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: July 31, 1995.
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 150.
    (8) Total annual responses: 150.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 25.
(10) Collection description: Under the Railroad Retirement Act, an 
application for benefits based on age must be supported by proof of the 
age claimed. The application obtains proof of an applicant's age from 
the Bureau of the Census when other evidence is unavailable.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive [[Page 26468]] Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12082 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E. Skowronski, President of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                        
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|April 23, 2008 |  | /s/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI Walter E. Skowronski President



22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

CHRISTOPHER RICHARDSON, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

WARDEN, 

 Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Case No. 2:14-CV-399 JD 

ORDER

The Seventh Circuit reversed the denial of petitioner Christopher Richardson’s petition 

for habeas corpus, holding that Richardson’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated at trial. 

Thus, Richardson could not remain in custody pursuant to his conviction at that trial, but the 

State could cure the error by granting him a new trial. Accordingly, the Seventh Circuit ordered 

that “unless the state initiates proceedings to retry Richardson within 120 days, he is entitled to 

issuance of the writ.” [DE 35-2]. 

The State has now filed a notice indicating that it has initiated proceedings to retry 

Richardson. In particular, it represents that the prosecutor filed a motion to initiate proceedings 

in the Lake County Superior Court, asking the court to take notice of the Seventh Circuit’s 

opinion, to transfer Richardson to the Lake County jail, to set an initial hearing, and to appoint 

counsel for Richardson. [DE 46]. The public docket for that case further reflects that the state 

court granted the motion, that Richardson has since appeared in person before that court, which 

made a finding of indigency and requested the assignment of a public defender, and that counsel 

has entered an appearance on Richardson’s behalf. In a response to the State’s notice, Richardson 

agrees that the State has complied with the condition in the Seventh Circuit’s order to avoid 

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00399-JD document 49 filed 01/29/18 page 1 of 2
2 

issuance of the writ. [DE 48]. Thus, because the State has satisfied its obligations under the 

conditional writ, Richardson is not entitled to a release from custody at this time. 

Therefore, pursuant to the mandate of the Seventh Circuit, the judgment previously 

entered in this case [DE 21] is VACATED, and Richardson’s petition is GRANTED to the extent 

that he is entitled to a new trial, for which the State has now initiated proceedings. However, 

Richardson is not entitled to the issuance of a writ releasing him from custody at this time. The 

Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a new judgment accordingly. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: January 29, 2018 

 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court 

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00399-JD document 49 filed 01/29/18 page 2 of 2
Carlos DOTSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11-9873.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Alleyne v. United States,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2151, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).