alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1556 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1556

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the Thomas F. 
   Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, as the 
                   ``Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The parcel of land described in section 3, and located on the site 
of the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, 
Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ``Clyde S. Cahill 
Memorial Park''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the parcel of land described in section 
3 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clyde S. Cahill Memorial 
Park''.

SEC. 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.

    The parcel of land designated under section 1 is the parcel bounded 
by South 10th Street, Clark Avenue, South 9th Street, and Walnut Street 
in St. Louis, Missouri.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1556

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the Thomas F. 
   Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, as the 
                   ``Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park''.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:14-CR-30

)

DERRELL L. HAYES )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on September 18, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 18th day of September, 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12911]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Networking and Communications Research 
and Infrastructure (NCRI); Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Networking and Communications 
Research (#1207).
    Date and Time: June 12-14, 1995; 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: Room 1175, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Aubrey Bush, NCRI, National Science 
Foundation, Room 1175, Arlington, VA 22230 (703 306-1949).
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review & evaluate proposals submitted for Networking 
and Communications Program.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b. (c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 22, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12911 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1564 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain 

buildings and lands of the Yakima Project, Washington, 

to the Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 1564 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yakima-Tieton Irriga3 tion District Conveyance Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN BUILDINGS AND LANDS 

5 OF THE YAKIMA PROJECT, WASHINGTON. 

6 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the 

7 Interior shall convey to the Yakima-Tieton Irrigation Dis8 trict, located in Yakima County, Washington, all right, 

9 title, and interest of the United States in and to the build10 ings and lands of the Yakima Project, Washington, in ac11 cordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the 

12 agreement titled ‘‘Agreement Between the United States 

13 and the Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District to Transfer 

14 Title to Certain Federally Owned Buildings and Lands, 

15 With Certain Property Rights, Title, and Interest, to the 

16 Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District’’ (Contract No. 5–07– 

17 10–L1658). 

18 (b) LIABILITY.—Effective upon the date of convey19 ance under this section, the United States shall not be 

20 held liable by any court for damages of any kind arising 

21 out of any act, omission, or occurrence relating to the con22 veyed buildings and lands, except for damages caused by 

23 acts of negligence committed by the United States or by 

24 its employees or agents before the date of conveyance. 

25 Nothing in this section increases the liability of the United 

26 States beyond that provided in chapter 171 of title 28, 
3 

HR 1564 RFS 

1 United States Code (popularly known as the Federal Tort 

2 Claims Act), on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

3 (c) BENEFITS.—After conveyance of the buildings 

4 and lands to the Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District under 

5 this section— 

6 (1) such buildings and lands shall not be con7 sidered to be a part of a Federal reclamation 

8 project; and 

9 (2) such irrigation district shall not be eligible 

10 to receive any benefits with respect to any buildings 

11 and lands conveyed, except benefits that would be 

12 available to a similarly situated person with respect 

13 to such buildings and lands that are not part of a 

14 Federal reclamation project. 

15 (d) REPORT.—If the Secretary of the Interior has not 

16 completed the conveyance required under subsection (a) 

17 within 12 months after the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that 

19 explains the reason such conveyance has not been com- 
4 

HR 1564 RFS 

1 pleted and stating the date by which the conveyance will 

2 be completed. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Kahzam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Weiner, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial position and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
October 28, 2009
 
 /s/
      Richard C. WeinerRichard
      C. WeinerChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Pablo Salinas BRITO, petitioner, v. Mark S. MARTIN, Warden.

No. 12-9670.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
TOTAL ACTIONS – 1,212

836 

69%

376 

31%

NON MWOB MWOB

TOTAL DOLL

$1,809.1 

68.0%

NON MWOB 

FDIC Contracting Awar

January 1 – December 31, 20

MWOB PARTICIPATION (DOLLARS IN MILLIO
TOTAL ACTIONS – 1,212

1,003 

83%

209 

17%

NON MO MO

TOTAL DOLL

$2,154.0 

81.0%

NON MO 

FDIC Contracting Awar

January 1 – December 31, 20

MINORITY OWNED (MO) PARTICIPATION (DOLLARS 
TOTAL ACTIONS – 1,212

162

13.4%

33

2.7%

1,003 

82.8%

14 

1.2%

Non MinorityAsian AmericanBlack AmericanHispanic American

TOTAL DOLL

$2,154.0 

81.0%

Non MinAsian AmBlack AmHispanic 

FDIC Contracting Awar

January 1 – December 31, 20

MINORITY OWNED PARTICIPATION BY ETHNICITY (DO
TOTAL ACTIONS – 1,212

1,036 

85%

176 

15%

NON WO WO

TOTAL DOLL

$2,291.4 

86.2%

NON WO 

FDIC Contracting Awar

January 1 – December 31, 20

WOMEN OWNED (WO) PARTICIPATION (DOLLARS I
Contractor Number of Awards Total Dollar Value 

PRAGMATICS 9 $ 30,007,435 

DEVA & ASSOCIATES 2 $ 3,390,927 

AHMAD ASSOCIATES 3 $ 105,000 

PRESCIENT, INC 131 $ 238,733,171 

QUANTUM/G&A JOINT VENTURE 27 $ 122,301,150 

SUPPLYSOURCE INC 2 $ 2,308,033 

DEVAL LLC 1 $ 5,000,000 

RER SOLUTIONS 1 $ 5,000,000 

TOMPSON, COBB, BAZILIO & ASSOC. 22 $ 73,837,600 

BRACE MANAGEMENT 1 $ 4,049,821 

T. CURTIS & COMPANY 7 $ 12,529,000 

CORVUS GROUP 3 $ 7,536,942 

CAREER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE 1 $ 900,000 PREFERRED TEMPORARY SERVICES 1 $ 600,000 ASG MORTGAGE SERVICES 1 $ 111,500 JANE LEWIN 1 $ 50,000 

MIR MITCHELL & COMPANY 32 $ 202,463,910 

IMPRIMIS GROUP INC 49 $ 94,284,738 

FIRST FINANCIAL NETWORK 6 $ 13,863,245 

WORLEY AUCTIONEERS 55 $ 14,669,990 

J.M. NEIL 10 $ 5,029,799 

PENTALPHA 1 $ 4,634,000 

DATA LISTING SERVICE 7 $ 5,228,000 

ARBEE ASSOCIATES 1 $ 341,163 

OPUS CAPITAL MARKETS CONSULTANTS 1 1,500,000 $ 

GMG JANITORIAL 1 1,230,700 $ 

26 CONTRACTORS 376 AWARDS 849,706,125 $ 

2009 AWARDS (THROUGH 4TH QUARTER) - MWOB C
**EXHIBIT31**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Mike Ulrich, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Mesa Offshore Trust, forwhich JPMorgan Chase Bank acts as Trustee;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for theregistrant and have:

a)           designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)          evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)           disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    I havedisclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors:

a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves any persons who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

In givingthe foregoing certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5, I have relied to the extentI consider reasonable on information provided to me by the working interestowners and the managing general partner of the Mesa Offshore Trust Partnership,in which the registrant owns a 99.99% interest.
| Date: May 6, 2004 |   |                                                               |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Mike Ulrich*Vice President and Trust Officer  JPMorgan Chase Bank* |

 

 

----
TEXAS, appellant, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 12-496.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

On appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Shelby County v. Holder,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2612, ---L.Ed. ---- (2013), and the suggestion of mootness of appellees Wendy Davis, et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) No. 1:15-cr-00010-TLS-SLC

)

)

DEWAYNE LEWIS )

OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Dewayne Lewis’s motion for hearing transcripts (DE 99),

in which Lewis requests that the Court order the Court Reporter to produce transcripts from the

hearings held on May 29, 2015, August 17, 2015, September 3, 2015, and December 9, 2015. 

As the Seventh Circuit has made clear, “there can be no doubt that the State must provide

an indigent defendant with a transcript of prior proceedings when that transcript is needed for an

effective defense or appeal.” United States v. Jonas, 540 F.2d 566, 573 (7th Cir. 1976) (quoting

Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. 226, 227 (1971)). Here, however, the hearings for which Lewis

requests transcripts were not evidentiary in nature, but rather were hearings to establish the

procedure and timeline for the case going forward. Such procedural and status hearings are not

the sort for which transcripts would be necessary to an effective defense, and Lewis has done

nothing to show or explain his need for these transcripts. Additionally, Lewis is not indigent, as

he has used his own funds to retain stand-by counsel to assist in his pro se representation. Thus,

Lewis would not be entitled to entitled to free transcripts of these hearings, even if the transcripts

he requested were the sort that were necessary to presenting a defense. 
Accordingly, Lewis’s motion for hearing transcripts (DE 99) is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

Entered this 2nd day of February 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Margaret A. PAPES, petitioner, v. CITIMORTGAGE INC.

No. 13-6670.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
RENAISSANCE ART INVESTORS, LLC, petitioner, v. AXA ART INSURANCE CORPORATION.

No. 13-438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.
Sunni ALI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9439.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Maxtor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. C.S. Park, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Dr. C.S. ParkDr. C.S. ParkChairman and Chief Executive
Officer Date: May 12, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Michael A. SALAZAR, petitioner, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY.

No. 12-9365.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. II 1995 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES LTD II
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,602,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (17,056)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      34,412,641
<DEPRECIATION>                            (20,848,093)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,677,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     16,788,689
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     980,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,677,482
<SALES>                                              0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,275,301
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,641,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,379,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,540,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,540,739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,540,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>
The Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         131,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,981,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                   823,867
<INVENTORY>                                 20,497,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,682,226
<PP&E>                                       7,340,146
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,489,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,119,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,918,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,593
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,939,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,119,749
<SALES>                                     33,205,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,285,309
<CGS>                                       26,010,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,010,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,887,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               184,692
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             491,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                711,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            651,945
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   651,945
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>