Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3861

1Order No. 497, 53 FR 22139 (June 14, 1988), III

FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶30,820 (1988); Order No. 497–

A, order on rehearing, 54 FR 52781 (December 22,

1989), III FERC Stats. & Regs. 30,868 (1989); Order

No. 497–B, order extending sunset date, 55 FR

53291 (December 28, 1990), III FERC Stats. & Regs.

¶ 30,908 (1990); Order No. 497–C order extending

sunset date, 57 FR 9 (January 2, 1992), III FERC

Stats. & Regs. ¶30,934 (1991), rehearing denied, 57

FR 5815 (February 18, 1992), 58 FERC ¶ 61,139

(1992); Tenneco Gas v. FERC (affirmed in part and

remanded in part), 969 F. 2d 1187 (D.C. Cir. 1992);

Order No. 497–D, order on remand and extending

sunset date, III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,958

(December 4, 1992), 57 FR 58978 (December 14,

1992); Order No. 497–E, order on rehearing and

extending sunset date, 59 FR 243 (January 4, 1994),

65 FERC ¶ 61,381 (December 23, 1993); Order No.

497–F, order denying rehearing and granting

clarification, 59 FR 15336 (April 1, 1994), 66 FERC

¶ 61,347 (March 24, 1994); and Order No. 497–G,

order extending sunset date, 59 FR 32884 (June 27,

1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,996 (June 17,

1994).

2Standards of Conduct and Reporting

Requirements for Transportation and Affiliate

Transactions, Order No. 566, 59 FR 32885 (June 27,

1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,997 (June 17,

1994); Order No. 566–A, order on rehearing, 59 FR

52,896 (October 20, 1994), 69 FERC ¶ 61,044

(October 14, 1994).

3 69 FERC ¶ 61,310 (1994).

1Order No. 497, 53 FR 22139 (June 14, 1988), III

FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶30,820 (1988); Order No. 497–

A, order on rehearing, 54 FR 52781 (December 22,

1989), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,868 (1989); Order

No. 497–B, order extending sunset date, 55 FR

53291 (December 28, 1990), III FERC Stats. & Regs.

¶ 30,908 (1990); Order No. 497–C, order extending

sunset date, 57 FR 9 (January 2, 1992), III FERC

Stats. & Regs. ¶30,934 (1991); rehearing denied, 57

FR 5815 (February 18, 1992), 58 FERC ¶ 61,139

(1992); Tenneco Gas v. FERC (affirmed in part and

remanded in part), 969 F. 2d 1187 (D.C. Cir. 1992);

Order No. 497–D, order on remand and extending

sunset date, III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,958

(December 4, 1992), 57 FR 58978 (December 14,

1992); Order No. 497–E, order on rehearing and

extending sunset date, 59 FR 243 (January 4, 1994),

65 FERC ¶ 61,381 (December 23, 1993); Order No.

497–F, order denying rehearing and granting

clarification, 59 FR 15336 (April 1, 1994), 66 FERC

¶ 61,347 (March 24, 1994); and Order No. 497–G,

order extending sunset date, 59 FR 32884 (June 27,

1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,996 (June 17,

1994).

2Standards of Conduct and Reporting

Requirements for Transportation and Affiliate

Transactions, Order No. 566, 59 FR 32885 (June 27,

1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,997 (June 17,

1994); Order No. 566–A, order on rehearing, 59 FR

52,896 (October 20, 1994), 69 FERC ¶ 61,044

(October 14, 1994).

3 69 FERC ¶ 61,310 (1994).

the PSE&G metering facilities; and to

construct and operate a new 8-inch tap

on Transco’s 36-inch Caldwell Loop

Line ‘‘B’’ at milepost 1831.70 and

approximately 300 feet of 8-inch

pipeline and a meter station at the

existing Clifton delivery point site.

Transco states that PSE&G would

reimburse Transco for all the cost of

these facilities estimated to be $636,532.

Transco states that Transco currently

delivers up to 10,000 Mcf of natural gas

per day (Mcf/d) to PSE&G at the Clifton

delivery point and that with the

proposed expansion would be able to

deliver up to 50,000 Mcf/d on a firm

and/or interruptible basis at the Clifton

delivery point.

Transco states that it is not proposing

to alter the total volumes authorized for

delivery to PSE&G. The addition of this

delivery point would have no impact on

Transco’s peak day deliveries and little

or no impact on Transco’s annual

deliveries, and is not prohibited by

Transco’s tariff.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFT 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1246 Filed 1–18–95:8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. MG88–54–005]

Trunkline Gas Co.; Notice of Filing

January 12, 1995.

Take notice that on January 5, 1995,

Trunkline Gas Company (Trunkline),

filed its revised standards of conduct

under Order Nos. 497 et seq.1 and Order

Nos. 566 et seq.2 Trunkline states that it

is revising its standards of conduct to

incorporate the changes required by

Order No. 566–A and the Commission’s

December 7, 1994 order.3

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules

211 or 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

or 385.214 (1994)). All such motions to

intervene or protest should be filed on

or before January 27, 1995. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1247 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. MG90–3–004]

Trunkline LNG Co.; Notice of Filing

January 12, 1995.

Take notice that on January 5, 1995,

Trunkline LNG Company (Trunkline

LNG) filed its revised standards of

conduct under Order Nos. 497 et seq.1

and Order Nos. 566 et seq.2 Trunkline

LNG states that it is revising its

standards of conduct to incorporate the

changes required by Order No. 566–A

and the Commission’s December 7, 1994

order.3

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211

or 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

or 385.214 (1994)). All such motions to

intervene or protest should be filed on

or before January 27, 1995. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1248 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER95–187–000]

Utility-2000 Energy Corp.; Notice of

Issuance of Order

January 13, 1995.

On November 14, 1994, Utility-2000

Energy Corp. (Utility-2000) submitted

for filing a rate schedule under which

Utility-2000 will engage in wholesale

electric power and energy transactions

as a marketer. Utility-2000 also

requested waiver of various Commission

regulations. In particular, Utility-2000

requested that the Commission grant

blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34

of all future issuances of securities and

assumptions of liability by Utility-2000.

On December 29, 1994, pursuant to

delegated authority, the Director,