alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                   --------------


                                   CERTIFICATIONS
                                   --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2007-24 (the "Exchange
            Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
            whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
            in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
            not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
            in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
            disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
            fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
            material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
            of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
            this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank
      of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2008

      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
      (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
      Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 163 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Homeland 

Security to carry out an empty shipping container sealing pilot program 

to encourage shipping container handlers to seal empty shipping containers after they have unpacked them, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out an empty shipping container sealing pilot program to encourage shipping container handlers to seal empty shipping containers 

after they have unpacked them, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Domestic Con5 tainer Partnership Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 163 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EMPTY SHIPPING CONTAINER SEALING PILOT PRO2 GRAM. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM.—Chapter 701 of 

4 title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘§ 70122. Empty shipping container sealing pilot pro7 gram 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Se9 curity shall carry out an empty shipping container sealing 

10 pilot program in accordance with this section to encourage 

11 shipping container handlers to seal empty shipping con12 tainers after they have unpacked them. 

13 ‘‘(b) PROGRAM COMPONENTS.—Under the pilot pro14 gram, the Secretary may authorize a shipper, cargo car15 rier, freight forwarder, terminal operator, port authority, 

16 or labor organization that is a qualified container handler 

17 to secure, under a seal approved by the Secretary, a ship18 ping container that is emptied by the person. 

19 ‘‘(c) QUALIFIED CONTAINER HANDLER REQUIRE20 MENTS.—The Secretary shall issue requirements for treat21 ing a person as a qualified container handler for purposes 

22 of this section. 

23 ‘‘(d) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later 

24 than July 1, 2006, the Secretary shall— 

25 ‘‘(1) ensure that shipping containers are being 

26 sealed pursuant to this section; and 
3 

•HR 163 IH 

1 ‘‘(2) report to the Congress steps that have 

2 been taken to implement this section, including the 

3 number of shipping containers that have been sealed 

4 under this section. 

5 ‘‘(e) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out this section, 

6 the Secretary shall consult with persons conducting other 

7 programs to develop industry standards for shipping con8 tainer seals. 

9 ‘‘(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To 

10 carry out this section there is authorized to be appro11 priated to the Secretary $500,000.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

13 at the beginning of chapter 701 of title 46, United States 

14 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘70122. Empty shipping container sealing pilot program.’’. 

Æ
Financial Institution 

Diversity Self-Assessment 

Office of Minority and Women Inclusion

Diversity and Business Inclusion Branch
Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment

Background

• Dodd-Frank 342(b)(2)(C) requires OMWI agencies to develop standards to assess the 

diversity policies and practices of the entities they regulate.

• OMWI agencies issued a policy statement that included Joint Standards to assess diversity 

policies and practices (June 10, 2015).

• Joint Standards are:

o Organizational commitment to diversity and inclusion;

o Workforce profile and employment practices;

o Procurement and business practices – supplier diversity;

o Practices to promote transparency of organizational diversity and inclusion; and

o Entities’ self-assessment. 

• Responsible for reviewing and analyzing self-assessment data, identifies patterns and 

shares best practices.

2
3

Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment

Benefits of Participation

• Inform discussions on what diversity means in terms of employees, 

customers, and surrounding communities. 

• Understand the critical components of a successful diversity and inclusion 

program.

• Identify successes, challenges, and gaps of an organization’s diversity, equity, 

and inclusion (DEI) program.

• Target resources to address DEI gaps and challenges.

• Share exemplary practices.
4

Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment

Annual Process

• 2021 Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessments: Voluntary Self-Assessments 

Accepted Now through June 30, 2022 – FIL Issued February 28, 2022.

• Invitation and reminder email sent to banks with 100 or more employees: 

o CEOs and Presidents;

o Diversity and Supplier Diversity Officers; 

o Registered FID-SA users (New); and

o FDICconnect Coordinators (New).

• Note: all FDIC banks are welcome to participate. 

• No impact on safety and soundness, consumer compliance, or CRA examination ratings.

• All submissions received are treated as “Confidential Commercial Information”. Individual 

assessment results are not reported.
5

Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment

Submission Options

• Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment (FID-SA) Application.

o Online electronic application;

o Accessible via FDICconnect secure portal; 

o Multiple bank users may access the form; 

o Download PDF version of completed form; and

o Copy/clone feature (streamline process).

• Submit your own diversity self-assessment form in FID-SA.

• Download a PDF version of the form, complete it, and submit it via Section342@fdic.gov

mailbox. 
6

Financial Institution Diversity Self-Assessment

Resources

• Financial Institution Diversity Program 

https://www.fdic.gov/about/diversity/dibanking.html

• FID-SA Application Demonstration Videos (New)

https://www.fdic.gov/about/diversity/fidsaportal.html

• Diversity Self-Assessment Form

https://www.fdic.gov/about/diversity/diversitytoolkit.html

• For Technical Assistance and Questions Contact: 

Angela Herring, Program Analyst

Office of Minority and Women Inclusion 

Email: Section342@fdic.gov
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28430-28431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13280]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress; Meeting

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting 
of the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. The committee 
advises NARA on the full range of [[Page 28431]] programs, policies, 
and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives in the Office of 
Special and Regional Archives.

DATES: June 19, 1995, from 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: United States Capitol Building, LBJ Room (S-211).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Gillette, Director, Center for Legislative Archives, (202) 
501-5350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Agenda

Review of Committee Activities
Five-Year Plan for the Management and Preservation of the Records of 
Congress
Update--Legislative Support Agency Task Force Online Access to 
Legislative Records
Videotaped Floor Proceedings
Other current issues and new business

    The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: May 19, 1995.
Ralph C. Bledsoe,
Acting Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 95-13280 Filed 5-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

JUDITH M. FORSYTHE, )

)

Plaintiff )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 2:14-CV-398 RLM

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant )

OPINION and ORDER

This cause is before the court on Judith Forsythe’s motion for attorney fees

and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, following the

court’s entry of final judgment remanding the case to the Commissioner of Social

Security for further proceedings. Ms. Forsythe requests an award of fees in the

amount of $5,544.42 and $400.00 in costs. The Commissioner doesn’t oppose her

request.

The EAJA permits recovery of attorney fees based on “prevailing market

rates,” but not in excess of $125 per hour “unless the court determines that an

increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of

qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2412(d)(2)(A). Ms. Forsythe requests fees for her attorney at the rate of $184.20

per hour for work performed on her case, and asserts that an hourly fee greater

than $125.00 for counsel is warranted based on inflation, a rise in the cost of

living, and rates charged for similar services in this district. 
In accordance with Section 204(d) of the Act, Ms. Forsythe has submitted

an itemized statement from her attorney showing “the actual time expended and

the rate at which fees and other expenses were computed.” 28 U.S.C. §

2412(d)(1)(B). Counsel explains that his hourly rates for work performed in 2014

and 2015 are based on the cost of living adjustments allowed by statute when

employing the Consumer Price Index for “all urban consumers for the Midwest

urban region” obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

The court finds that “given the passage of time since the establishment of

the hourly rate, a cost-of-living adjustment is warranted,” counsel’s use of the

Consumer Price Index to calculate an appropriate inflation adjustment is

reasonable. Tchemkou v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 506, 512 (7th Cir. 2008); see also

Williams v. Astrue, No. 11 C 2053, 2013 WL 250795, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 23, 2013)

(“Courts in this district have allowed claimants to use the Consumer Price Index

to adjust hourly attorneys’ rates to account for cost of living increases in EAJA

cases.”). As noted above, the Commissioner doesn’t object to the hourly rates

charged or the amount of fees requested by Ms. Forsythe.

The court GRANTS the motion for an award of fees and costs under the

Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. No.35], and awards the plaintiff fees in the

amount of $5,544.42 and costs in the amount of $400.00.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: January 25, 2016 

2
 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

3
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          I, Zong Yun Zhou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment to Quarterly Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.

| Date:  June 15, 2006 |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Zong Yun   Zhou       |   |
|                           |   |
| Zong Yun   Zhou           |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward J. Lipkus, III, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (First Commonwealth), certify that the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.



|                      |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|DATED: August 7, 2009 |  | /s/ Edward J. Lipkus, III                           
|                      |  | Edward J. Lipkus, III                               
|                      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Forrest THOMAS, III, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 12-10174.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


BOEING CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Three months ended
                                                                                 March 31,
(Dollars in millions)                                                      2001              2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>               <C>
INCOME:
    Income before provision for income taxes                        $         40.2    $         28.1
    Fixed charges                                                             73.6              57.0
                                                                    ------------------------------------
    Income before provision for income taxes and fixed charges      $        113.8    $         85.1
                                                                    ====================================

FIXED CHARGES:
    Interest expense                                                $         72.7    $         56.1
    Preferred stock dividends                                                  0.9               0.9
                                                                    ------------------------------------
                                                                    $         73.6    $         57.0
                                                                    ====================================

Ratio of income before provision for income taxes and fixed
    charges to fixed charges                                                1.55              1.49
                                                                    ====================================

</TABLE>


                                      -17-
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1407 

To provide that certain wire rods shall not be subject to any antidumping 

duty or countervailing duty order. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide that certain wire rods shall not be subject to 

any antidumping duty or countervailing duty order. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF ANTIDUMPING OR 

4 COUNTERVALING DUTIES ON CERTAIN WIRE 

5 RODS. 

6 (a) SUSPENSION.—Wire rods described in subsection 

7 (b) shall not be subject to any antidumping or counter8 vailing duty order. 

9 (b) DESCRIPTION OF WIRE RODS.— 
2 

•HR 1407 IH 

1 (1) COMPOSITION.—The wire rods referred to 

2 in subsection (a) are wire rods, produced by using 

3 either of the processes described in paragraph (2), 

4 that— 

5 (A) contain by weight .06 to .10 percent 

6 carbon, 1.40 percent to 1.60 percent man7 ganese, and .80 percent to 1.00 percent silicon; 

8 (B) are used to produce metal inert gas 

9 (mig) welding wire (also referred to as gas 

10 metal arc welding wire) meeting the American 

11 Welding Society ER 70S–6 classification; and 

12 (C) are provided for in subheading 

13 7227.20.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

14 of the United States. 

15 (2) PROCESSES.—The processes referred to in 

16 paragraph (1) are the following: 

17 (A) The electric arc furnace process with a 

18 minimum 90 percent virgin iron unit charge 

19 (using direct reduced iron or a combination of 

20 direct reduced iron and pig iron) in order to 

21 achieve the following residual maximums: phos22 phorous .020 percent; sulphur .015 percent; ni23 trogen .009 percent; copper .06 percent; nickel 

24 .10 percent; chromium .06 percent; molyb25 denum .02 percent; tin .01 percent; vanadium 
3 

•HR 1407 IH 

1 .01 percent; calcium .001 percent; mercury 

2 10ppm (except that processing must preclude 

3 mercury (Hg.) contamination); aluminum .01 

4 percent; and a total sulphur, phosphorous and 

5 nitrogen level of .034 percent, if the wire rods 

6 are cooled on a stelmore conveyer with covers to 

7 achieve retarded cooling. 

8 (B) Steel from a basic oxygen furnace 

9 which duplicates the maximum residual element 

10 levels and mechanical requirements set forth in 

11 subparagraph (A), which are achieved by using 

12 a 90 percent virgin iron unit charge. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section applies to goods 

14 entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption 

15 on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12937]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

May 15, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the focus group interviews 
described below in a timely manner, the Department of Treasury is 
requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approval of 
this information collection by May 25, 1995. To obtain a copy of this 
survey, please write to the IRS Clearance Officer at the address listed 
below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: PC:V 95-009-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1995 IRS Small Business Customer Satisfaction Survey.
    Description: The purpose of this survey to collect information from 
small businesses (owners, partners, and corporate officials) in order 
to determine their opinions about the quality of service provided by 
the IRS and to understand the relative importance they place on the 
various aspects of quality service. Information from this survey will 
be used for three major reasons: (1) to assess satisfaction with the 
IRS' performance; (2) to assess the IRS's progress against the 
benchmark 1994 survey; and (3) to guide development of strategic 
actions to improve customer satisfaction.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 500 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer
[FR Doc. 95-12937 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE: 4830-01-P