alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, petitioner, v. NML CAPITAL, LTD.

No. 12-842.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 72 filed 07/29/14 page 1 of 5
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 72 filed 07/29/14 page 2 of 5
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 72 filed 07/29/14 page 3 of 5
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 72 filed 07/29/14 page 4 of 5
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 72 filed 07/29/14 page 5 of 5
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7745** 

JAY MIKAL BROOKS , P etitioner

- Appellant ,
v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUSSELL W. DUKE, JR. , Respondents

- Appellee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5 :1 3

- hc

- 0 21 12

- FL )

Submitted : January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jay Mikal Brooks , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jay Mikal Brooks appeals the district court ’ s order denying his self

- styl ed motion for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the North Carolina courts to release him
. Brooks allege d that North Carolina lack ed jurisdiction over him because he is a flesh and blood Moorish American. It appears that, w ithout providing notice to Brooks, the district court may have construed his motion as a n initial petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) , and dismissed it without prejudice
. Despite this possible error, see Castro v. United States , 540 U.S. 375, 383 (2003) , we may affirm the district court’s denial of relief on any basis that is apparent in the record. See MM ex rel. DM v. Sch
. Dist. of Greenville Cnty
. , 303 F.3d 523, 536 (4th Cir. 2002)
. We agree with the district court that Brooks’ claim is patently frivolous . F ederal courts do not have jurisdiction to compel state officials to act, Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cnty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) , and

m andamus relief is a drastic remedy that should be us ed only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Because Brooks did not demonstrate in the district court a clear right to the relief sought , see In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988) ,3 we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s denial of relief
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Crisanto Diego TREJOS ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9755.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.7.1a

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                   SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

         WHEREAS, the Connecticut Water Company (hereinafter referred to as
"Employer") and Marshall T. Chiaraluce (hereinafter referred to as the
"Employee") entered into a Supplement Executive Retirement Agreement dated as of
December 16, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement in accordance with the
provisions of Section 6.A. thereof;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agreement is hereby amended
effective as of the date first above written as follows:

         1.       The second paragraph of Section 1.a. and the second paragraph
of Section 1.b. of the Agreement are deleted and the following two paragraphs
are substituted in each place in lieu thereof:

         "For purposes of the foregoing, `Average Earnings' shall have the
meaning set forth in the Retirement Plan, except that in determining Average
Earnings, Annual Earnings (as defined in the Retirement Plan) shall not be
limited to the OBRA '93 annual compensation limit, the annual compensation limit
imposed under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001
("EGTRRA"), or any similar limit on annual compensation under Section 401(a)(17)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), imposed by any
future legislation.

         In determining Average Earnings, if the Employee retires under this
Agreement on or after attainment of age 62, Annual Earnings shall include the
value of all of the following: (1) Performance Shares, (2) Cash Units, and (3)
Restricted Stock awarded to a Participant under the Connecticut Water Service,
Inc. Performance Stock Program for any year in which such awards are made,
including awards made prior to the date this change in the definition of Average
Earnings is adopted. The value of such awards shall be included within Annual
Earnings in the year in which such amounts are finally determined and actually
awarded. Such amounts, if credited to a Performance Share Account, shall not be
counted a second time when payment is made from such Account."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer and the Employee have executed this
Amendment of December 17, 2003.

EMPLOYEE                                     THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY

/s/ Marshall T. Chairaluce                   /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

Marshall T. Chiaraluce                          Corporate Secretary
James S. CAUSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Causey v. State*, 110 So. 3d 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (table decision); *Harris v. State*, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; *Edwards v. State*, 765 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; *Teart v. State*, 866 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) ; *Sherwood v. State*, 745 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

MICHELLE LEAL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

Vs. ) CASE NO.: 2:13-CV-00318-WCL-PRC

)

TSA STORES, INC. d/b/a THE )

SPORTS AUTHORITY, URBAN )

EXPRESS ASSEMBLY, LLC, )

And EAST COAST CYCLE )

SUPPLY, INC., )

)

Defendants. ) 

DEFENDANT, TSA STORES, INC. d/b/a THE SPORTS AUTHORITY’S, 

APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Comes now the Defendant, TSA Stores, Inc. d/b/a The Sports Authority, by counsel, 

Daniel G. Suber & Associates, and files its Appendix in Support of its Motion for Summary 

Judgment, as follows: 

1. Exhibit 1 – Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint.

2. Exhibit 2 – Deposition of Robert Leal.

3. Exhibit 3 – Bicycle Sales/Repair Ticket No. 3126299 (also found as Exhibit 1 to 

the Deposition of Robert Leal).

4. Exhibit 4 – Delivery, Assembly and Installation Services Agreement dated 

February 1, 2011 (also attached as Exhibit A to the Affidavit of Don Schmiege).

5. Exhibit 5 – Affidavit of Don Schmiege.

Respectfully submitted:

By: /s/ Daniel G. Suber____________________

Daniel G. Suber, #21173-45

Kathryn C. Adams, #30973-64

Attorneys for Defendant, TSA Stores, Inc. 

d/b/a The Sports Authority

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00318-WCL-PRC document 95 filed 01/07/15 page 1 of 2
DANIEL G. SUBER & ASSOCIATES

259 W. Indiana Avenue, Suite A

Valparaiso, Indiana 46383

Tel: (219) 548-2880

Fax: (219) 548-2881

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on the 7th day of January, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to 

the following:

Colby Barkes

Blachly, Tabor, Bozik & Hartman

56 S. Washington Street, Suite 401

Valparaiso, IN 46383

John W. Mervilde

Meils Thompson Dietz & Berish

Two Market Square Center

251 East Ohio Street, Suite 830

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Tracy S. Wetzstein

Kopka, Pinkus, Dolin & Eads, P.C.

9801 Connecticut Drive

Crown Point, IN 46307

Jessica Williams Schnelker

Frost Brown Todd LLC

201 N. Illinois St., Suite 1900

P.O. Box 44961

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the 

following non CM/ECF participants: None.

s/ Daniel G. Suber

DANIEL G. SUBER

Attorney No. 21173-45

Daniel G. Suber & Associates

259 Indiana Avenue, Suite A

Phone: (219) 548-2880

Fax: (219) 548-2881 

Email: suberlawgroup@aol.com

Attorneys for Defendant

TSA Stores, Inc. d/b/a The Sports Authority

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00318-WCL-PRC document 95 filed 01/07/15 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22432-22433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11079]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review.

April 28, 1995.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

U.S. Customs Service (CUS)

OMB Number: 1515-0005
Form Number: CF 7512, CF 7512-A, and CF 7512-B
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Transportation Entry and Manifest of Goods Subject to Customs 
Inspection and Permit
Description: 19 USC 1552-1554 authorizes the movement of imported 
merchandise from the port of importation to another Customs port prior 
to release of merchandise from [[Page 22433]] Customs custody. The 
revised Customs Form 7512 will be used for transportation entries, 
exportation entries, transfer permits and cargo transmitting the U.S. 
to Canada.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit
Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,000
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 6 minutes
Frequency of Response: On occasion
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 86,000 hours
OMB Number: 1515-0161
Form Number: None
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Importation of Ethyl Alcohol for Non-Beverage Uses
Description: This declaration is used by Customs to ensure that the 
ethyl alcohol is actually used for the purposes declared at the time of 
entry.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or households
Estimated Number of Respondents: 300
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 5 minutes
Frequency of Response: On occasion
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 25 hours
Clearance Officer: Laverne Williams (202) 927-0229, U.S. Customs 
Service, Printing and Records Management Branch, Room 6216, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20229.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11079 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                                                              Resolutions of the
                                    Nominating and Compensation Committee of the
                                             Board of Directors of NiSource Inc.
                                                         Adopted August 25, 2003

                  WHEREAS, The Corporation and certain of its affiliates sponsor
various severance plans and policies for employees of the Corporation and its
affiliates; and

                  WHEREAS, The Corporation desires to extend the term of each
such plan and policy.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Committee hereby
extends the term of each severance plan and policy maintained for employees of
the Corporation and its affiliates to December 31, 2003.

                  FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Committee ratifies any action
heretofore taken in connection with the foregoing resolution.

                  FURTHER RESOLVED, That the appropriate officers of the
Corporation are authorized to take such other action and execute such other
documents as shall be appropriate to implement the foregoing resolution.
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 1 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 2 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 3 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 4 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 5 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 6 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 108   filed 11/19/14   page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 13, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 13, 2008     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sierra Ventures, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
Ian Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Dated: September 8, 2009

/s/    
 Ian Jackson

Ian Jackson Chief Executive Officer

---
Gregory McRAE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1141.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



QUEST ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ David E. GroseDavid E. GroseChief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FRANK H. PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:12-CV-857 

)

M. LIGHTFOOT, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Voluntary

Dismissal Without Prejudice (DE 32) filed by the plaintiff, Frank

H. Price, a pro se prisoner, on September 18, 2013, and the Motion

to Stay Discovery (DE 33) filed by the defendant, Masatra

Lightfoot, by counsel, on September 25, 2013. In the Motion to Stay

Discovery, the defendant states that she does not oppose the Motion

for Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice. 

For the reasons set forth above, the Motion to Dismiss (DE 32)

is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Motion

to Stay Discovery (DE 33) is DENIED AS MOOT. 

DATED: September 26, 2013 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United State District Court

case 3:12-cv-00857-RL-CAN document 34 filed 09/26/13 page 1 of 1
Shelley M. SANTOS, petitioner, v. Richard S. HAWKINS, et al.

No. 13-359.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1490 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1490

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the National 
 Defense University to award the degree of Master of Science in Joint 
        Campaign Planning and Strategy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2005

 Mr. Skelton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the National 
 Defense University to award the degree of Master of Science in Joint 
        Campaign Planning and Strategy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY AWARD OF DEGREE OF 
              MASTER OF SCIENCE IN JOINT CAMPAIGN PLANNING AND 
              STRATEGY.

    (a) Joint Forces Staff College Program.--Section 2163 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 2163. National Defense University: master of science degrees
    ``(a) Authority to Award Specified Degrees.--The President of the 
National Defense University, upon the recommendation of the faculty of 
the respective college or other school within the University, may 
confer the master of science degrees specified in subsection (b).
    ``(b) Authorized Degrees.--The following degrees may be awarded 
under subsection (a):
            ``(1) Master of science in national security strategy.--The 
        degree of master of science in national security strategy, to 
        graduates of the University who fulfill the requirements of the 
        program of the National War College.
            ``(2) Master of science in national resource strategy.--The 
        degree of master of science in national resource strategy, to 
        graduates of the University who fulfill the requirements of the 
        program of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
            ``(3) Master of science in joint campaign planning and 
        strategy.--The degree of master of science in joint campaign 
        planning and strategy, to graduates of the University who 
        fulfill the requirements of the program of the Joint Advanced 
        Warfighting School at the Joint Forces Staff College.
    ``(c) Regulations.--The authority provided by this section shall be 
exercised under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The item relating to section 2163 in the 
table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 of such title is 
amended to read as follows:

``2163. National Defense University: master of science degrees.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin S. McRae, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Robin S. McRae By ____________________________________ Robin S.  McRae Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer Date:  November 16, 2006
JONATHAN PEEK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4479

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 9, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Michael S. Sharrit, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, and 

Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.