alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 1564

HARRY LAWRENCE QUIGLEY
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
STEVE WILLIAMS; SCOTT DAMRON; JOYCE CLARK; CHARLES MCCOMAS; ALEX VENCE; JENNIFER WHEELER; TONIA PAGE; MARK BATES; MIKE SHOCKLEY; TOM MCGUFFIN; TINA BROOKS; REBECCA HOWE; CAROL POLAN, each and all in both their official and individual capacities; CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA; DENVER C. OFFUTT, JR.; STEVEN K. NORD; RYAN Q. ASHWORTH, each and all in both thei r official and individual capacities; ROBERT C. CHAMBERS; CHERYL A. EIFERT; OMAR ABOULHOSN, each and all in their individual, non

- judicial capacities
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Thomas E. Johnston
, Chief District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv

- 01323 )

Submitted : June 30, 2020 Decided: July 13, 2020

Before THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Harry Lawrence Quigley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Harry Lawrence Quigley appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistra te judge in part and dismissing Quigley ’s civil action filed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2018) . We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Quigley v. Will iams , No. 3:18

- cv

- 01323 (S.D.W. Va., Apr. 25, 2019) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Le Bon Bruce WALKER, petitioner, v. Neil SELDMAN, et al.

No. 12-1130.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 9, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20979 c/w No. 03-20966 Summary Calendar

SONIA MARIE MCMORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CARSEY WERNER; KODA-FM; MAGIC 102 KMJQ; NOBLE BROADCAST GROUP; PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY; CHANNEL 26 KRIV; HARPO PRODUCTIONS; ARSENIO HALL COMMUNICATIONS; PAULA ABDUL/VIRGIN RECORDS;

KHOU-TV CHANNEL 11; CHANNEL TWO; PARAMOUNT STATIONS, doing business as KTXH-Channel 20;

CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY-WCLK, Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------------------- SONIA MARIE MCMORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus PHILIP MICHAEL THOMAS, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-91-CV-3234) (H-01-MC-173)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 2 PER CURIAM: * Sonia Marie McMorris has filed appeals from a district court order to pay filing fees. Because both appeals stem from the same petition for declaratory relief, we consolidate the appeals. F E D . R. A PP . P. 3(b)(2). The distr ict court's order is not a final order appealable
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. S ee Askanase v. Livingwell, Inc. , 981 F.2d 807, 810 (5th Cir. 1993). Nor is the order in the class of interlocutory orders subject to appea l under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292(a)(1)-(3). The district court did not certify the order as final pursuant to F ED . R. C IV . P. 54(b) or as appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The order also is not appealable pursuant to
th e collateral order doctrine. S ee, e.g., Brinar v. Williamson , 245 F.3d 515, 517-18 (5th Cir. 2001). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals. See id . at 518. McMorris has been cautioned that continued frivolous filings will not be tolerated. See McMorris v. Thomas , No. 01-20687 (5th Cir. 11 April 2002). In light of McMorris’s continued frivolous filings, we impose monetary sanctions against McMorris in the
amount of $500, payable to the clerk of this court for deposit into the Treasury of the United States in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 711(c). See Farguson v. MBank Houston, N.A. , 808 F.2d 358, 3603

(5th Cir. 1986). The clerk of this court is instructed to refuse
to accept any further filings from McMorr is in this or any other appeal until such mone tary sanction is paid in full. I d

. “This court and the involved district courts may grant relief from this requirement in a proper case.” Id

.

MOTION TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED;

OTHER MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED
.
J.D. Kim-Corneil ROBINSON, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 12-9295.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Amendment to Employment Contract of CFO



 Exhibit 10.11 
  
 Allegheny Energy Service Corporation 
 800 Cabin
Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 February 18, 2004 
  
 Jeffrey Serkes 
 c/o Allegheny Energy, Inc. 
 800 Cabin Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 Dear Jeff: 
  
 You and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation (“AESC”) for itself and as agent for its parent, Allegheny Energy, Inc. (“AEI”), the
affiliates and subsidiaries of AESC and AEI, and any successors or assigns of any of the foregoing, entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 3, 2003. Pursuant to Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement, you were
entitled to receive a grant of stock options for 550,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the AEI Long-Term Incentive Plan on January 2, 2004, or an alternative adjustment to your compensation of equivalent value and opportunity if authorization of
such stock options was not obtained under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (“PUHCA”) by such date. As you are aware, authorization of your stock option award under PUHCA was not obtained until February 10, 2004. 

 
 Accordingly, you, AESC and AEI hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby
amended as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Section 5(a)(i) of the
Agreement. Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: 
  
 “(i) Option Grant. On the fifth business day following the date that AESC obtains authorization under the Public
Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (the “Authorization Date”), AESC shall grant the Executive stock options (the “Options”) for 550,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the Allegheny Energy, Inc. 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) at a per share exercise price equal to the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock on the date of grant, as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction Listing in The Wall Street Journal. Such
grant shall be evidenced by an award agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit A.” 
  
 2. Amendments to Section 5 (c)(i) of the Agreement. The references to January 2, 2004 in clauses (1) and (2) of Section 5(c)(i) of the Agreement are hereby amended to refer to the Authorization Date and the
2004 Closing Price is defined to mean the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock on the Authorization Date as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction listing in The Wall Street Journal. 
  










 Mr. Jeffrey Serkes 
 January 18, 2004 
 Page 2 
  

 Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by signing the attached copy of this letter in the place indicated. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Allegheny Energy Service Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	

	 	 	 Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer

	
	Allegheny Energy, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	

	 	 	 Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer



  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	 /s/ Jeffrey Serkes

	

	 Jeffrey Serkes
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-81-TLS 

)

BRYANT DAVIS )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 24], filed on March 20, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 50] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Counts 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on April 4, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Talecris BiotherapeuticsHoldings Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Dated:  February 23, 2010                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |
|   | /s/  John M. Hanson                                   |
|   | John  M. Hanson                                       |
|   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Trayvon GUY, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 12-7858.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 1 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 2 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 3 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 4 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 5 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 6 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 7 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 8 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 9 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 10 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 11 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 12 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 13 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 14 of 15

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-28   filed 07/14/15   page 15 of 15
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12346]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



[AZ-025-05-1430-01; AZA 241, AZA 17944, AZA 17945, AZA 27967, AZAR 
034355]


Arizona: Termination of Classification and Opening of Lands to 
Entry in Mohave County, Arizona

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice will open 67.86 acres to location and entry under 
the public land laws and general mining laws.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 19, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Wadsworth, or Joyce Bailey, 
Realty Specialists, Kingman Resource Area, 2475 Beverly Avenue, 
Kingman, Arizona 86401-3629, telephone (520) 757-3161.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following described lands were 
classified on various dates under the provisions of the Recreation and 
Public Purposes Act, as amended (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.). The 
classifications are no longer needed:

AZA 241. Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona

T. 16 N., R. 13 W.,
    Sec. 28, W\1/2\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\NE\1/
4\, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\.

    Containing 17.5 acres.

AZA 17944. Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona,

T. 25 N., R. 19 W.,
    Sec. 10, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    Containing 10 acres.

AZA 17945. Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona,

T. 25 N., R. 19 W.,
    Sec. 10, that portion of SE\1/4\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\ lying North of 
Pierce Ferry Road.
    Containing 7.54 acres.

AZA 27967. Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona,

T. 25 N., R. 19 W.,
    Sec. 10, W\1/2\SW\1/4\SW\1/4\.

    Containing 20 acres.

AZAR 034355. Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona,

T. 23 N., R. 18 W.,
    Sec. 4, lot 17.

    Containing 12.82 acres.

    At 9 a.m. on June 19, 1995, the classification on the lands 
described above will be terminated and the land will be open to 
location and entry under the United States mining laws and public land 
laws.

    Dated: May 4, 1995.
Mary Jo Yoas,
Chief, Lands and Minerals Operations.
[FR Doc. 95-12346 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /S/ THOMAS WIGGANSThomas Wiggans,Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11081]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

April 26, 1995.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the customer satisfaction 
survey described below in May 1995, the Department of the Treasury is 
requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approval of 
this information collection by May 8, 1995. To obtain a copy of this 
survey, please write to the IRS Clearance Officer at the address listed 
below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545-1432
Project Number: PC:V 95-008-G
Type of Review: Revision
Title: 1995 IRS Customer Satisfaction Survey
Description: The purpose of this survey is to collect information to 
determine taxpayer opinions about the quality of service provided by 
the IRS; to determine the relative importance of the various aspects of 
quality service; and to Executive Order 12862 which requires federal 
agencies to survey their customers about their satisfaction with 
existing services and to identify services that these customers desire, 
the IRS made a commitment to continue to seek customer input through 
customer surveys. This survey will provide crucial information needed 
by the IRS to develop and implement effective customer satisfaction 
measures that meet the Agency's mandate to improve quality service.
Respondents: Individuals or households
Estimated Number of Respondents:
    Long Form--1,000
    Short Form--3,200
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:
    Long Form--15 minutes
    Short Form--10 minutes
Frequency of Response: Other
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 783 hours
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11081 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10(s)

ENESCO GROUP, INC.
ROA INCENTIVE PROGRAM 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The ROA Incentive Plan provides bonus opportunities for all exempt and
non-exempt employees. The ROA Incentive Plan is based entirely on company
profitability. The two financial measures that will be used are:

<TABLE>
<S>                                       <C>
-  Operating Income as a % of Sales       50%
-  Return on Assets                       50%
</TABLE>

If Enesco meets its financial goals in these two categories, employees will earn
a bonus that is calculated as a % of their W-2 base earnings. Employee's bonus
opportunity amount depends on the employee's position in the company and
Enesco's attainment of goals.

Eligibility:      To be eligible for the award you must be employed by September
                  30 of the current year. If hired during the calendar year, the
                  incentive award will be pro-rated based on months employed. If
                  salary adjustments occur during the calendar year, the award
                  will be pro-rated. Employees must be active full-time through
                  the end of the year to be eligible for the annual incentive
                  award.

                  ROA payouts will be made during the lst quarter of the
                  following year.

Enesco may at anytime and from time to time, amend, modify or suspend this plan
with/without prior notice.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor Entech Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Shefts, Chief
Financial Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/ MARK SHEFTSMark
      SheftsChief
      Financial Officer andActing
      Chief Executive OfficerDecember
      15, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26721-26722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12240]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26722]]

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title; Applicable Forms; and OMB Control Number: DoD FAR Supplement, 
Part 204, Administrative Matters, and Related Clause and Provision at 
252.204; DD Forms 2051 and 2051-1; OMB Control Number 0704-0225
Type of Request: Revision
Number of Respondents: 92,120
Responses per Respondent: 1
Annual Responses: 92,120
Average Burden per Response: 43 minutes
Annual Burden Hours: 66,635
Needs and Uses: DoD FAR Supplement, Part 204.404-70(a) prescribes use 
of the clause at 252.204-7000, which requires contractors to submit a 
request for approval to release unclassified information outside of the 
contractor's organization. The information provided by the contractor 
is reviewed to determine if the specific contract information proposed 
for release is sensitive or otherwise inappropriate for release for the 
purposes the contractor has indicated. DoD FAR Supplement 204.603-70 
prescribes use of the provision at 252.204-7001, Commercial and 
Government Entity (CAGE) Code Reporting, which requires a contractor to 
provide its CAGE code to the Government with submission of its offer, 
or to advise the Government if it doesn't have a CAGE code, so that one 
can be provided. The CAGE codes are used by the Government to identify 
contractors for the purposes of developing computerized acquisition 
systems or solicitation mailing lists. Use of the CAGE codes permits 
the Government to exchange data with other contracting activities.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit; Non-profit 
institutions; Small businesses or organizations
Frequency: On occasion
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Peter N. Weiss.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Weiss at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.

    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-12240 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-P