alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.44

                     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         Amendment No. 2 dated as of January 1, 2004 to Employment Agreement
dated as of April 22, 2002 between Brightpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Employer" or the "Company"), and Frank Terence (the "Employee").

         WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee have entered into an employment
agreement dated as of April 22, 2002, as amended by that certain amendment dated
January 1, 2003 (the "Employment Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee wish to amend the section of the
Employment Agreement as provided below to reflect the increased base salary of
the Employee as recently approved by the Compensation & Human Resources
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of
the Company;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer and Employee hereby amend section III.A of
the Employment Agreement to provide as follows:

         III.     Compensation.

                           "A.      During the term of this Agreement, the
Employer shall pay the Employee a salary (the "Salary") at a rate of $410,000
per annum in respect of each Employment Year, payable in equal monthly
installments on the first day of each month, or at such other times as may
mutually be agreed upon between the Employer and the Employee. Such Salary may
be increased from time to time at the discretion of the Board."

Except as provided above all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
Amendment as of the date first above written.

                                          BRIGHTPOINT, INC.

                                          By: /s/ Robert J. Laikin
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Name:  Robert J. Laikin
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                          By: /s/ Frank Terence
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Name: Frank Terence
Rigoberto HERNANDEZ-PORTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 12M107.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 1 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 2 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 3 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 4 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 5 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 6 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 7 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 8 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 9 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 10 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 11 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 12 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 13 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 14 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 15 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 16 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 17 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 18 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 19 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 20 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 21 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 22 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 23 of 24

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 106   filed 11/19/14   page 24 of 24
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 45013 & 45014

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JUAN RODRIGUEZ, JR., aka JOHNNY RODRIGUEZ ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 685

Filed: December 28, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Bradly S. Ford , District Judge.

Judgment s of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of ten years, with minimum periods of confinement of two years, for two counts of felony driving under the influence, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , De puty Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
In these consolidated cases, Juan Rodriguez, Jr., aka Johnny Rodriguez pled guilty to two

counts of felony driving under the influence . I.C. § § 18

- 8004 and 18

- 8005

. In exchange for his
guilty plea s , additional charges including an allegation that Rodriguez was a persistent violator

were dismissed. The district court sentenced Rodriguez to concurrent unified terms of ten years,
with minimum periods of confinement of two years

. Rodriguez filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which2 the district court denied. Rodriguez appeals arguing that the district court should have retained
jurisdiction

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be consi dered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 ( Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). W hether to reta in jurisdiction is a matter within the sound

d iscretion of the district court

. State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

- 97 (Ct.
App. 1990). Probation is the ultimate goal of retained jurisdiction. State v. Jones , 141 Idaho
673, 677, 115 P. 3d 764, 768 (Ct. App. 2005). There can be no abuse of discretion if the district

court has sufficient evidence before it to conclude that the defendant is not a suitable candidate
for probation. Id.
Applying these standards, and having reviewed the reco rd in this case, we cannot say that

the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Rodriguez ’s judgments of conviction and

sentences are affirmed.
Ipolito CAMPOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9512.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT  11


<TABLE>


                               HOGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                  Weighted Average Number of Common Shares and
                      Common Share Equivalents Outstanding
                                 (In thousands)


<CAPTION>
                                                                                 1995               1994
                                                                                 ----               ----
<S>                                                                            <C>                <C>

Three-month period ended December 31:

      Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                14,510             14,383

      Exercise of share options                                                   753                  2

      Common share equivalents                                                    337                246
                                                                            ---------           --------

   Weighted average number of common
      shares and common share equivalents
      outstanding                                                              15,600             14,631
                                                                            =========           ========

Nine-month period ended December 31:

      Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                14,390             14,381

      Exercise of share options                                                   873                  3

      Common share equivalents                                                    337                453
                                                                            ---------           --------

   Weighted average number of common
      shares and common share equivalents
      outstanding                                                              15,600             14,837
                                                                            =========             ======
</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

SECOND ORDER RE

SCHEDULING OF

DEPOSITIONS

The parties have utterly failed to comply with the Court’s “Order re Scheduling of

Depositions” dated June 14, 2017 (Dkt. No. 622). Consequently, each party shall submit a list

of the top ten depositions it wishes to take, identifying each deponent by name and advising as

to whom they work for. The judge will assign dates. The lists must be filed with the Court by

TOMORROW AT 5:00 P.M. on pain of no depositions at all for any defaulting party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 21, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 679 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 1
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00156-CR

IN RE RAYMOND GILBERT

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

For the second time in a matter of months, Raymond Gilbert has petitioned this Court for 

mandamus relief. Gilbert would have us compel the trial court, the Honorable R. Scott McKee of 

the 392nd Judicial District Court of Henderson County, to rule on motions Gilbert claims to have 

filed. We will dismiss Gilbert’s petition. 

Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code provides, “Each court of appeals for a court 

of appeals district may issue all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law regulating 

those writs, against: (1) a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county 

court in the court of appeals district.” See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(1) (Supp.). As we 

noted in our previous opinion denying mandamus relief, the 392nd Judicial District Court of 

Henderson County is not located within our district. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(g) (Supp.). 

It is located within the district of the Tyler Court of Appeals. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 

§ 22.201(m) (Supp.). Although Gilbert’s underlying criminal appeal was transferred to this Court 

pursuant to the Texas Supreme Court’s docket equalization order, such transfer does not confer 

jurisdiction on this Court in a separate original proceeding. See In re Davis, 87 S.W.3d 794, 795 

(Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, orig. proceeding).
3

We, therefore, dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: July 25, 2019

Date Decided: July 26, 2019

Do Not Publish
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHNNY CASAIGNE, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-285

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Katie Salemi Ashby, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Residential Associates III, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1


<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                     1,752,000
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                     4,974,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (2,973,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             3,923,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                    2,504,000
<COMMON>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 1,104,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               3,923,000
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             864,000
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                476,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           101,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              282,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          282,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 282,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  10.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  10.44



</TABLE>
# Úradný vestník C 8/9. j

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 8 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 629. januára 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 8

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 629. januára 2019

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Oznamy |
| | ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY |
| | Európsky parlament |
| 2019/C 8/01 | Rozhodnutie | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európsky parlament

2019/C 8/01

Rozhodnutie

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

V Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európsky parlament

| 9.1.2019 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 8/1

---

ROZHODNUTIE

(2019/C 8/01)

GENERÁLNY TAJOMNÍK EURÓPSKEHO PARLAMENTU,

| — | SO ZRETEĽOM NA nariadenie Rady (EHS, Euratom, ESUO) č. 259/68 (1), naposledy zmenené nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ, Euratom) č. 1023/2013 z 22. októbra 2013, ktorým sa mení Služobný poriadok úradníkov Európskej únie a Podmienky zamestnávania ostatných zamestnancov Európskej únie (2), a najmä článok 30 tohto služobného poriadku, |
| --- | --- |

—

SO ZRETEĽOM NA nariadenie Rady (EHS, Euratom, ESUO) č. 259/68 (1), naposledy zmenené nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ, Euratom) č. 1023/2013 z 22. októbra 2013, ktorým sa mení Služobný poriadok úradníkov Európskej únie a Podmienky zamestnávania ostatných zamestnancov Európskej únie (2), a najmä článok 30 tohto služobného poriadku,

| — | SO ZRETEĽOM NA rozhodnutie Predsedníctva Európskeho parlamentu z 13. januára 2014 o delegovaní právomocí menovacieho orgánu (AIPN) a orgánu oprávneného uzatvárať pracovné zmluvy (AHCC), |
| --- | --- |

—

SO ZRETEĽOM NA rozhodnutie Predsedníctva Európskeho parlamentu z 13. januára 2014 o delegovaní právomocí menovacieho orgánu (AIPN) a orgánu oprávneného uzatvárať pracovné zmluvy (AHCC),

| — | SO ZRETEĽOM NA skutočnosť, že 31. decembra 2018 sa končí platnosť týchto rezervných zoznamov Európskeho parlamentu:
  AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S; |
| --- | --- |

—

SO ZRETEĽOM NA skutočnosť, že 31. decembra 2018 sa končí platnosť týchto rezervných zoznamov Európskeho parlamentu:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S;

| — | SO ZRETEĽOM NA stanovisko spoločného výboru prednesené na schôdzi, ktorá sa konala 24. októbra 2018, |
| --- | --- |

—

SO ZRETEĽOM NA stanovisko spoločného výboru prednesené na schôdzi, ktorá sa konala 24. októbra 2018,

ROZHODOL:

Jediný článok

Platnosť rezervných zoznamov:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S,

sa predlžuje do 31. decembra 2019.

V Luxemburgu 30. novembra 2018

Klaus WELLE

generálny tajomník

---

(1)  Ú. v. ES L 56, 4.3.1968, s. 1

1

(2)  Ú. v. EÚ L 287, 29.10.2013, s. 15.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            Section 906 Certification

         I, Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
         quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                    PHOTOMEDEX INC.


Dated: November 14, 2002                            By: /s/ Jeffrey F. O'Donnell
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Jeffrey F. O'Donnell
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                       26
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Eric T. Jones

By  __________________________________

Eric T. Jones

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 19, 2013
Alton WADDELL-EL, petitioner, v. Stan YOUNG, Warden.

No. 12-10131.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7208
<ALLOWANCES>                                       248
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9298
<PP&E>                                            5456
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   17534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7670
<BONDS>                                            521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1808
<COMMON>                                         40515
<OTHER-SE>                                      (32980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     17534
<SALES>                                           8767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8767
<CGS>                                             7421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (576)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (576)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.032)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.032)
        

</TABLE>