alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, D.Scott Mercer, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Adaptec, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30,2005 (the “*Form 10-Q*”), thatthe Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc.for the quarterly periods covered by the Form 10-Q.
|                           | By:  /s/ D. SCOTT MERCER     |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                      | D. Scott Mercer                   |
| Date: August 8, 2005 | *Interim Chief Executive Officer* |

 

I,Marshall L. Mohr, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review ofthe Form 10-Q, that the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.
|                           | By: /s/ MARSHALL  L. MOHR |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | Marshall L. Mohr          |
| Date: August 8, 2005 | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00321-CV

TRACY S. WINN APPELLANT

V.

GINA ANN CRAIN APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. D2014-097

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 9, 2014, and October 22, 2014, we notified appellant in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $195 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $195 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 16, 2013,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: November 26, 2014

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in courts of 

appeals).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin S. McRae, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robin S. McRae

By  ____________________________________

Robin S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer

Date:  August 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Stephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



Dated: October 22, 2004



/s/ STEPHEN M. SMITHStephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer
Francisco Javier FLORES-JIMENEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6585.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 492-493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meetings of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David C. Fisher, Advisory Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 
606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on 
this matter may be obtained by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal 
on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meetings are for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meetings will consider information that is likely 
to disclose: (1) trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; or (2) 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c)(4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.

1. Date: January 23, 1995
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. [[Page 493]] 
    Room: 315
    Program: This meeting will review applications for projects in 
Interpretive Research: Humanities Studies of Medicine, submitted to 
Division of Research Programs, for projects beginning after July 1, 
1995.

2. Date: January 27, 1995
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Room: 315
    Program: This meeting will review applications for projects in 
Interpretive Research: Humanities Studies of Technology, Industry 
and Architecture, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, 
for projects beginning after July 1, 1995.

3. Date: January 30, 1995
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Room: 315
    Program: This meeting will review applications for projects in 
Interpretive Research: History and Philosophy of Science, submitted 
to the Division of Research Programs, for projects beginning after 
July 1, 1995.
David C. Fisher,
Advisory Management Committee Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-2-1999
<CASH>                                            1005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    28267
<ALLOWANCES>                                       520
<INVENTORY>                                      29902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 62079
<PP&E>                                           37770
<DEPRECIATION>                                   31635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   80789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            49561
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                       25208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     80789
<SALES>                                          43366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 43366
<CGS>                                            33325 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    33325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   717
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (857)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1344

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of the Farmington River and Salmon Brook 

in the State of Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1344 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lower Farmington 

3 River and Salmon Brook Wild and Scenic River Study 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL SEGMENT OF FARM6 INGTON RIVER AND SALMON BROOK IN CON7 NECTICUT FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDI8 TION TO NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIV9 ERS SYSTEM. 

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following: 

11 (1) The Farmington River and Salmon Brook 

12 in the State of Connecticut possess important re13 source values, including wildlife, ecological, and sce14 nic values, and historic sites and a cultural past im15 portant to America’s heritage. 

16 (2) There is a longstanding interest among 

17 State and local officials, area residents, and river 

18 and brook users in undertaking a concerted coopera19 tive effort to manage the river and brook in a pro20 ductive and meaningful way. 

21 (b) DESIGNATION.—Section 5(a) of the Wild and 

22 Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by add23 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

24 ‘‘(139) LOWER FARMINGTON RIVER AND SALMON

25 BROOK, CONNECTICUT.—The segment of the Farmington 

26 River downstream from the segment designated as a rec-
3

•HR 1344 EH

1 reational river by section 3(a)(156) to its confluence with 

2 the Connecticut River, and the segment of the Salmon 

3 Brook including its mainstem and east and west 

4 branches.’’. 

5 (c) TIME FOR SUBMISSION.—Not later than three 

6 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec7 retary of the Interior shall submit to Congress a report 

8 containing the results of the study required by the amend9 ment made by subsection (b). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1344

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desposes. and Scenic Rivers System, and for other pur- study for potential addition to the National Wild Salmon Brook in the State of Connecticut for ignate a segment of the Farmington River and
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacitybut solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 

SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR

SABINE ROYALTYTRUST
By: /s/ Ron E. Hooper
Ron E. Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Date: May 12, 2022 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Osvaldo HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8913.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Dustin L. WORTHEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7123.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
exv10w47



 



Exhibit 10.47


     Branson “Tony” M. Smith. Mr. Smith’s employment agreement was entered
into with an initial period of two years, effective July 1, 1999, and will
expire on December 31, 2004. Mr. Smith’s base salary is currently set at
$250,000 and through December 31, 2003, he received an incentive bonus,
payable quarterly, equal to 2.0% of our net earnings (before deducting the
incentive bonuses of certain executive officers) provided that our net
earnings exceed stated minimum amounts. Effective November 1, 2003, Mr. Smith
ceased being President of the Company and became President of Direct Alliance
Corporation. We are currently revising Mr. Smith’s employment agreement, and
we have agreed to the following principal terms: effective January 1, 2004,
Mr. Smith is entitled to receive a base salary of $250,0000 and an incentive
bonus, payable quarterly, equal to 2.0% of Direct Alliance’s net earnings
(before deducting the incentive bonuses of certain executive officers of
Direct Alliance).
My Name Is Mariela and My Story Could Change Your Life

Protect People Everywhere.

Stay home if you are sick.

I felt sick in the middle of the 

night, but I had to go to work the 

next day. 

I should have stay home, but I felt At work, I picked up the chips with my There was a family celebrating their son’s 

better. I didn’t know the germs from bare hands. 4th birthday. His name was Jose Antonio. 

my sickness were on my hands.

Jose Antonio loved the chips I served him. I While I was at home sick, reports started coming into the health If I could do it over again, I would have never 

went home an hour later because I felt sick department from all over. In all, over 20 people got sick from gone to work that day. Having a child myself, I 

again. I was sick for two more days. eating at our restaurant. They determined that I served all of can’t get little Jose Antonio out of my mind. He 

the people that were sick. suffered because of me.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           21,850
<SECURITIES>                                    194,987
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                216,837
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  216,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        371,322
<OTHER-SE>                                     (154,485)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    216,837
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5,626
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5,064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted October 21, 2009

Decided October 21, 2009

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

No. 08

‐ 4145

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

SERGIO NAVARRETE,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 07 CR 658

‐ 2

George W. Lindberg,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Sergio Navarrete pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess more than five kilograms of

cocaine with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and the district court

sentenced him to 151 months’ imprisonment. In his plea agreement he promised to forgo

any appeal of his conviction or sentence. Navarrete filed a notice of appeal, but his

appointed lawyers move to withdraw because they cannot identify any nonfrivolous

argument to pursue. See Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Navarrete did not respond

to counsel’s submission. See C IR

. R. 51(b). Our review is limited to the potential issues

identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief. United States v. Cano

‐ Rodriguez

, 552 F.3d 637,

638 (7th Cir. 2009); United States v. Schuh

, 289 F.3d 968, 973

‐ 74 (7th Cir. 2002). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

‐ 4145 Page 2

Counsel begin by telling us that Navarrete does not wish to challenge his guilty plea.

Counsel thus properly refrain from discussing the adequacy of the plea colloquy or the

voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Knox

, 287 F.3d 667, 671

‐ 72 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel next consider whether Navarrete has any other basis on which to challenge

his sentence. But the appeal waiver forecloses any argument challenging his sentence

except a claim that the district court relied on a constitutionally impermissible factor at

sentencing or that the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum. See United States v.

Lockwood

, 416 F.3d 604, 608 (7th Cir. 2005); United States v. Bownes

, 405 F.3d 634, 637 (7th Cir.

2005). Neither of these issues applies here. Navarrete’s appeal waiver stands with his

unchallenged guilty plea, United States v. Cole

, 569 F.3d 774, 776 (7th Cir. 2009); United States

v. Wilson

, 481 F.3d 475, 483 (7th Cir. 2007), and any challenge to his sentence would be

frivolous.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
Charles DONELSON, petitioner, v. Michael P. ATCHISON, Warden.

No. 12-8855.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.