alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership 1983-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711310
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         184
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294
<PP&E>                                         16,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   966
<SALES>                                        354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               359
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                233
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            233
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  10.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  10.40
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12650]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Naval Research Advisory Committee; Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given that the Naval Research Advisory 
Committee Panel on Reduced Manning will meet on May 23 and 24, 1995. 
The meeting will be held at the Office of Naval Research, 800 North 
Quincy Street, Room 915, Ballston Center Tower One, Arlington, 
Virginia. The first session will commence at 10:00 a.m. and terminate 
at 5:00 p.m. on May 23; the second session will commence at 8:00 a.m. 
and terminate at 5:00 p.m. on May 24, 1995. All sessions of the meeting 
will be open to the public.

    The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Navy with an 
assessment of the force structure and ship concepts which would require 
a minimum manning level with a goal of 25% reduction of current 
manning.

    The meeting will include briefings and discussions relating to ship 
systems automation, shipboard manning, manpower planning, damage 
control, and lessons learned.

    This Notice is being published late because of administrative 
delays which constitute an exceptional circumstance, not allowing 
Notice to be published in the Federal Register at least 15 days before 
the date of the meeting.

    For further information concerning this meeting contact:Ms. Diane 
Mason-Muir, Office of Naval Research, Ballston Center Tower One, 800 
North Quincy Street, Arlington, VA 22217-5660, Telephone Number: (703) 
696-4870.

    Dated: May 11, 1995
M. D. SCHETZSLE,
LT, JAGC, USNR, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12650 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-AE-F
EX-35.1
TMST 2007-4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
22nd day of February 2008.

By:/s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name: Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
Director of Loan Administration
USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 1 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 2 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 3 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 4 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 5 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 6 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 7 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 8 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 9 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 10 of 11

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 119   filed 12/22/14   page 11 of 11
EX-35.1
(logo) EMC
Mortgage Corporation


ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION


The undersigned officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") as servicer
pursuant to the Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-AC6 Agreement
(the "Agreement") hereby certify that:

1.   A review of EMC's activities during the period from and including January
     1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period")
     and EMC's performance under the Agreement has been made under my
     supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 12th
day of March 2008.

By: /s/ David B. Little
David B. Little
Executive Vice President
Default Administration

/s/ William Glasgow Jr.
William Glasgow Jr.
Executive Vice President
Enterprise Operations Services

/s/ Jenna Kemp
Jenna Kemp
Executive Vice President
Investor Administration


(logo) MBA Member
Mortgage Bankers
Association of America

2780 Lake Vista Drive, Lewisville, Texas 75067
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1292190 Lewisville, Texas 75029-2190
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         165,285
<SECURITIES>                                       684
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,623
<PP&E>                                       4,001,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,748,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,464,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,657
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,433,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,464,349
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                330,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            330,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   330,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                      37.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    37.43


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

KEITH E. BAILEY, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) CIVIL NO. 1:14cv390

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, )

ACTING COMMISSIONER OF )

SOCIAL SECURITY, )

)

 Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on a remand from the United States Court of Appeals for

the Seventh Circuit. On August 30, 2016, the Seventh Circuit granted the parties’ “Joint Motion

to Remand Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1 and Circuit Rule 57". On

October 24, 2016, this court received the Mandate from the Seventh Circuit.

The parties in this case have agreed that, in light of recent opinions issued in the Seventh

Circuit, that this matter should be remanded to the Social Security Administration for further

administrative proceedings. 

Therefore, in accordance with the Mandate, and the parties’ agreement, this matter is

hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security.

 

 Entered: November 29, 2016.

 s/ William C. Lee 

 William C. Lee, Judge

 United States District Court
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 11

- 00701

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 11DCV187301

Style: Glenn Blair

v Angela McClinton

Date motion filed * : July 17, 2013

Type of motion: M otion to supplement the reco rd

Party filing motion: A ppellant, Glenn Blair

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ E vel yn V

. K eyes

Acting individually Acting f or the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.

Date: O c tober 1, 2013
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES L. STEVENSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRATT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00336-SI 

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE AND COUNSEL

Re: Dkt. No. 27

Plaintiff has filed a document in which he requests appointment of counsel to do discovery 

for him and a continuance of defendants’ summary judgment motion until such discovery is 

completed. Docket No. 27.

A district court has the discretion under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(1) to designate counsel to 

represent an indigent civil litigant in exceptional circumstances. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 

F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). This requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on 

the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of 

the legal issues involved. See id. Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed 

together before deciding on a request for counsel under § 1915(e)(1). Here, exceptional 

circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel are not evident. The claims presented do not 

appear to have a high likelihood of success on the merits and plaintiff has not shown a difficulty 

articulating his claims. Like many other unrepresented prisoner-plaintiffs, plaintiff appears 

capable of prosecuting his own action and doing his own discovery. The motion for appointment 

of counsel is DENIED. Docket No. 27.

The court will not indefinitely continue the motion for summary judgment for discovery. 

Plaintiff has not described his discovery efforts, if any, in the eight months since the court 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

authorized the parties to engage in discovery, see Docket No. 9 at 8, or in the two months since 

defendants filed their motion for summary judgment. He also has not identified any particular 

evidence that he believes he will find in discovery to enable him to withstand defendants’ motion 

for summary judgment. The motion for a continuance is DENIED. Docket No. 27. 

The court now extends the deadline for plaintiff to file his opposition to the motion for 

summary judgment. Plaintiff must file and serve his opposition to the motion for summary 

judgment no later than August 13, 2018. No further extensions of this deadline should be 

expected because, by the time it arrives, plaintiff will have had four months to prepare his 

opposition. Defendants must file and serve their reply brief, if any, no later than September 10, 

2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2018

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

 

 Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

 APPLICANT 

 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 



WAYMO LLC, 3:17-cv-00939

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.

Michael A. Brille

Michael A. Brille

the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

see Attachment 1

Meredith R. Dearborn

1401 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005

425 Tasso Street, Suite 205

Palo Alto, CA 94307

(202) 237-2727 (650) 445-6400

mbrille@bsfllp.com mdearborn@bsfllp.com

459049

06/13/17 /s/ Michael A. Brille

June 13, 2017.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 620 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony K. Welch, the Chief Executive Officer of Modern Technology Corp.(the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that theCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: ***  June 7, 2006           ****               /s/ Anthony K. Welch***
                                                           Anthony K. Welch, CEO

 

 
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Robert Church, the Chief Financial Officer of Modern Technology Corp. (the"Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Company'sQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   ***June 7, 2006               ******           /s/ Robert Church   ***

                                                           Robert Church, CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<CASH>                                  34,895
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        30,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            128,922
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 185,409
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   186,602
<LOANS>                                719,592
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,138,802
<DEPOSITS>                             738,159
<SHORT-TERM>                           139,340
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     56,625
<LONG-TERM>                             76,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                24,479
<OTHER-SE>                             103,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,138,802
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         16,966
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        4,551
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           586
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        22,103
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       7,433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      10,484
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   11,619
<LOAN-LOSSES>                            5,718
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         (18)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         11,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (2,423)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              (2,423)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.17)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.43
<LOANS-NON>                             14,774
<LOANS-PAST>                             6,336
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         18,072
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         7,045
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            3,881
<RECOVERIES>                               189
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of YDI
Wireless, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and
Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald                /s/ Patrick L. Milton
--------------------------------        --------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                    Patrick L. Milton
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  March 25, 2004                  Date:  March 25, 2004
Darlene Davis SMITH, petitioner, v. WEISER SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 12-10216.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Larone GRAHAM, aka Abgod Graham, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-7274.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of *Alleyne v. United States,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2151, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).