alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27281-27282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12529]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-297-000]


Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Changes

May 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 15, 1995, Northwest Alaskan Pipeline 
Company (Northwest Alaskan), tendered for filing in Docket No. RP95-
297-000 to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff Original Volume No. 2, 
Thirty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5.
    Northwest Alaskan states that it is submitting Thirty-Sixth Revised 
Sheet No. 5 reflecting a decrease in total demand charges for Canadian 
gas purchased by Northwest Alaskan from Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd. (Pan-
Alberta) and resold to Northwest Alaskan's two U.S. purchasers, Pan-
Alberta Gas (U.S.), Inc. (``PAG-US'') under Rate Schedules X-1, X-2 and 
X-3, and Pacific Interstate Transmission Company (``PIT'') under Rate 
Schedule X-4.
    Northwest Alaskan states that it is submitting Thirty-Sixth Revised 
Sheet No. 5 pursuant to the provisions of the amended purchase 
agreements between Northwest Alaskan and PAG-US and PIT, and pursuant 
to Rate Schedules X-1, X-2, X-3 and X-4, which provide for Northwest 
Alaskan to file 45 days prior to the commencement of the next demand 
charge period (July 1, 1995 [[Page 27282]] through December 31, 1995) 
the demand charges and demand charge adjustments which Northwest 
Alaskan will charge during the period.
    Northwest Alaskan requests that Thirty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5 
become effective July 1, 1995.
    Northwest Alaskan States that a copy of this filing has been served 
on Northwest Alaskan's customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such petitions or protests should be 
filed on or before May 24, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12529 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KENNEDY GREEN,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent

______________________

2022-1476

______________________

Petition for review of an arbitrator’s decision in No. 

FMCS 201031-00902 by Benjamin M. Shieber.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of Kennedy Green to voluntarily dismiss his petition for review

pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The petition for review is 

voluntarily dismissed.

Case: 22-1476 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 04/26/2023
2 GREEN v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

(2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

April 26, 2023

Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 26, 2023

Case: 22-1476 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 04/26/2023
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Lukas Braunschweiler, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, andto which this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       By:
Oliver A. ROJAS, petitioner, v. Kenneth A. ANDERSON, et al.

No. 13-528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-87

)

NATHAN ARNOLD )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on February 11, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of Count 1 as charged in the two-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 11th day of February 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Exhibit-32.2 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Financial Officer of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection
with the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2009
        --------------
                                           /s/ Frank Arnone
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Frank Arnone
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION





I, Fred Zolla, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vemics, Inc;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





B. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.








/s/ Fred Zolla


Fred Zolla


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: October 13, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<CASH>                                  32,277
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       176,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            348,613
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  20,633
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    20,754
<LOANS>                                808,281
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,436,641
<DEPOSITS>                             906,193
<SHORT-TERM>                           232,502
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     83,482
<LONG-TERM>                             66,601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                26,378
<OTHER-SE>                             121,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,436,641
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         37,878
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       11,056
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         4,077
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        53,011
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      15,835
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      24,881
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   28,130
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          68
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         21,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         13,220
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              13,220
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             9,122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.46
<LOANS-NON>                              2,123
<LOANS-PAST>                               822
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         12,808
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         9,167
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              219
<RECOVERIES>                               109
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,057
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,057
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 15**

**LETTER FROM INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM REGARDING UNAUDITED**

**INTERIMFINANCIAL INFORMATION**

**LETTER IN LIEU OF CONSENT FOR REVIEW REPORT**

April 27, 2011 

BoeingCapital Corporation 

500 Naches Avenue SW, 3rd Floor 

Renton,Washington 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), theunaudited interim financial information of Boeing Capital Corporation and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, as indicated in our report dated April 27, 2011; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed noopinion on that information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2011, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-154844 on Form S-3. 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of theRegistration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

 
22
Kathryn Lovato LUCERO, petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, et al.

No. 12-9852.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
**EXHIBIT 10.1**
**Supplementary Agreement**
***on Amendment of Foreign Exchange Loan Contact*     The Borrower: Maxtor Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.     No. of Business License: 021104       Legal Representative: TEH KEE HONG     Account-opening Bank: Bank of China SIP Sub-branch     Account No: USD A/C 23865508091014     Address: Export Processing Zone, Suzhou Industrial Park     Contact: By Phone 65-68492828      By E-mail   C_S_Tiong@maxtor.com          The Lender: Bank of China SIP Sub-branch     Legal Representative: Zhang Jiawen     Address: 328 Donghan Road, Suzliou, China     Contact: By Phone 0512-67264268      BY Fax 0512-67269297      By E-mail   zhangjw@bocsip.com     The Borrower and the lender signedthe FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOAN CONTRACT (Called“Main Contract” as follows) No. YZDZ(2003)NO.197 on Oct. 10th, 2003. Since theborrower has changed the operation mode, the two parties reach thissupplementary agreement on the basis of full negotiation:    Article One Amendment on Main Contract    The related items in Main Contract shall be amended as follows after thisagreement comes into force    1    “Thefinal maturity date” shall fall on Apr 15th, 2009 instead of Apr 15th, 2013;    2    The item 8.1 in Main Contract shall be amended as: “ Subject to clause 8.2below, the Borrower shall repay USD 15 million on October 9, 2008 and repay the
 

 
           remaining USD 15 million on the final maturity date”.    Article Two Explanation    This agreement shall be anintegrated part of the Main Contract. For anyinconsistent contents between the main contract and this agreement, thisagreement shall prevail. The rest of the items in the Main Contract shall beeffective continuously except for the special provisions in this agreement.    Article Three Commencement of Agreement    This agreement shall take effect after the authorized signatories of bothparties have signed, impressed their respective official chops on and date thisagreement.    This agreement is in both Chinese and English and executed in fourcounterparts each of the borrower and the lender keeps two counterparts all with equalforce and effect.    **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27557-27558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12675]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--``Ultra-Low Emission Engine Program''

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 10,1995, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute 
(``SwRI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Isuzu Motors, Ltd. have 
withdrawn their participation; and the period of performance has been 
extended for one year to September 30, 1995.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SwRI intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 13, 1991, SwRI filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act 
December 9, 1991, 56 FR 64276.
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 13, 
1994. A notice was published in the Federal [[Page 27558]] Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 9, 1994, 59 FR 29826.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12675 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

 

AMIT SHAH, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No. 3:13-CV-103 JD-CAN 

 ) 

TERRY RODINO, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 This case stems from a business dispute between majority and minority shareholders of 

several closely held corporations. The facts of the case are more fully detailed in the Court’s 

order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Now before the Court is another pending motion, 

requesting review of Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein’s decision denying Plaintiffs’ motion to 

disqualify the law firm May Oberfell Lorber from representing four of the Defendants in this 

case. [DE 59.] 

 The parties’ briefing and the Magistrate Judge’s decision regarding disqualification were 

based on the then-operative pleadings. The Court has now granted the Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss and the Plaintiff has no currently pending claims. Without any pending claims, any 

decision by the Court on the issue of disqualification would be advisory, at best. Additionally, if 

Plaintiffs respond to the Court’s order by filing derivative claims on behalf of the Duro Entities, 

such claims may impact the analysis of the alleged conflicts of interest, both by counsel and the 

Court. See, e.g., Cutshall v. Barker, 733 N.E.2d 973, 980 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000); Wittenborn v. 

Pauly, No. 87 C 5814, 1988 WL 33723, at *3–4 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 1, 1988); Messing v. FDI, Inc., 

439 F. Supp. 776, 781 (D.N.J. 1977); Cannon v. United States Acoustics Corp., 398 F. Supp. 
2 

209, 220 (N.D. Ill. 1975), aff’d in relevant part, 532 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1976). Accordingly, the 

motion for review [DE 59] is DENIED AS MOOT. If Plaintiffs file an amended complaint, the 

parties are free to renew their motion for disqualification based on the allegations contained in 

the amended pleading. 

SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: March 24, 2014 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court
Clyde G. HOLLAND, petitioner, v. The HEAD AND NECK SPECIALTY GROUP OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al.

No. 12-8477.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 27151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12539]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 25, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Proposed acquisition of automated data processing equipment 
within the Federal Reserve System.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated; May 18, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12539 Filed 5-18-95; 10:28 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
AURORA LOAN SERVICES *A Lehman Brothers Company*Depositor: Structured Asset Securities Corporation 745 Seventh Avenue 8th Floor New York, NY 10019 Trustee:   U.S. Bank National Association  One Federal Street 3rd Floor  Boston, MA 02110 Securities Administrator: Subject: Annual Officer's Certification Fiscal Year:    2007 Securitization:  LXS 2007-17H I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the "reporting period") and of its performance under  the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period. Certified  b y :  A U R O R A LOAN SERVICES  LLC By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore N a m e :  E .   T o d d   W h i t t e m o r e  Title: Executive Vice President