Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 26357

(2) An exception to the time for

submission of NRC-U special nuclear

material access authorization renewal

applications and the paperwork

required is provided for those

individuals who have a current and

active DOE-Q access authorization and

who are subject to DOE Reinvestigation

Program requirements. For these

individuals, the submission to DOE of

the SF–86 pursuant to DOE

Reinvestigation Program requirements

(generally every five years) will satisfy

the NRC renewal submission and

paperwork requirements even if less

than five years has passed since the date

of issuance or renewal of the NRC-U

access authorization. Any NRC-U

special nuclear material access

authorization renewed in response to

provisions of this paragraph will not be

due for renewal until the date set by

DOE for the next reinvestigation of the

individual pursuant to DOE’s

Reinvestigation Program.

(3) An exception to the time for

submission of NRC-R special nuclear

material access authorization renewal

applications and the paperwork

required is provided for those

individuals who have a current and

active DOE-L or DOE-Q access

authorization and who are subject to

DOE Reinvestigation Program

requirements. For these individuals, the

submission to DOE of the SF–86

pursuant to DOE Reinvestigation

Program requirements (generally every

five years) will satisfy the NRC renewal

submission and paperwork

requirements even if less than five years

has passed since the date of issuance or

renewal of the NRC-R access

authorization. Any NRC-R special

nuclear material access authorization

renewed pursuant to this paragraph will

not be due for renewal until the date set

by DOE for the next reinvestigation of

the individual pursuant to DOE’s

Reinvestigation Program.

(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of

paragraph (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this section,

the period of time for the initial and

each subsequent NRC-U or NRC-R

renewal application to NRC may not

exceed seven years. Any individual who

is subject to the DOE Reinvestigation

Program requirements but, for

administrative or other reasons, does

not submit reinvestigation forms to DOE

within seven years of the previous

submission, shall submit a renewal

application to NRC using the forms

prescribed in paragraph (c)(1) of this

section before the expiration of the

seven year period.

* * * * *

PART 25—ACCESS AUTHORIZATION

FOR LICENSEE PERSONNEL

3. The authority citation for Part 25

continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 145, 161, 68 Stat. 942,

948, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2165, 2201); sec.

201, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C.

5841); E.O. 10865, as amended, 3 CFR 1959–

1963 COMP., p. 398 (50 U.S.C. 401, note);

E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874, April 6, 1982.

Appendix A also issued under 96

Stat. 1051 (31 U.S.C. 9701.)

4. In § 25.21, paragraph (c) is revised

to read as follows:

§ 25.21 Determination of initial and

continued eligibility for access

authorization.

* * * * *

(c) (1) Except as provided in

paragraph (c)(2) of this section, NRC

‘‘Q’’ and ‘‘L’’ access authorizations must

be renewed every five years from the

date of issuance. An application for

renewal must be submitted at least 120

days before the expiration of the five

year period, and must include:

(i) A statement by the licensee or

other person that the individual

continues to require access to classified

National Security Information or

Restricted Data; and

(ii) A personnel security packet as

described in § 25.17(c).

(2) Renewal applications and the

paperwork required for renewal

applications are not required for

individuals who have a current and

active access authorization from another

Federal agency and who are subject to

a reinvestigation program by that agency

that is determined by NRC to meet

NRC’s requirements (the DOE

Reinvestigation Program has been

determined to meet NRC’s

requirements). For such individuals, the

submission of the SF–86 by the licensee

or other person to the other government

agency pursuant to their reinvestigation

requirements will satisfy the NRC

renewal submission and paperwork

requirements, even if less than five

years has passed since the date of

issuance or renewal of the NRC ‘‘Q’’ or

‘‘L’’ access authorization. Any NRC

access authorization continued in

response to the provisions of this

paragraph will, thereafter, not be due for

renewal until the date set by the other

government agency for the next

reinvestigation of the individual

pursuant to the other agency’s

reinvestigation program. However, the

period of time for the initial and each

subsequent NRC ‘‘Q’’ or NRC ‘‘L’’

renewal application to NRC may not

exceed seven years. Any individual who

is subject to the reinvestigation program

requirements of another Federal agency

but, for administrative or other reasons,

does not submit reinvestigation forms to

that agency within seven years of the

previous submission, shall submit a

renewal application to NRC using the

forms prescribed in § 25.17(c) before the

expiration of the seven year period.

Dated at Rockville, MD, this 8th day of

May 1995.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

James M. Taylor,

Executive Director for Operations.

[FR Doc. 95–12104 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. ANM–106; Special Conditions

No. 25–ANM–98]

Special Conditions; Raytheon

Corporate Jets, Inc., Model Hawker 800

Airplanes, High-Intensity Radiated

Fields

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions.

SUMMARY: These special conditions are

for the Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc.,

Model Hawker 800 airplanes equipped

with modifications that install Garrett

TFE731–5BR–1H engines and a mach

trim system. The configuration of these

airplanes will utilize new and revised

electronic systems that perform

functions critical to the safety of the

airplane. The applicable regulations do

not contain adequate or appropriate

safety standards for the protection of

these systems from the effects of highintensity radiated fields. These special

conditions contain the additional safety

standards that the Administrator

considers necessary to establish a level

of safety equivalent to that established

by the existing airworthiness standards.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Schroeder, FAA,

Standardization Branch, ANM–113,

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue

SW., Renton, Washington, 98055–4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On February 7, 1994, Raytheon

Corporate Jets, Inc., 3 Bishop Square, St.

Albans Road West, Hatfield,

Hertfordshire AL 10 9NE, England,

applied for a revision to type certificate
26358 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

number A3EU to add new engines and

a mach system to the Model Hawker 800

series airplanes currently included on

that TC. This revised Model Hawker 800

is a cruciform tail, low wing, 15

passenger business jet powered by two

Garrett TFE 731–5BR–1H turbofan

engines mounted on pylons extending

from the aft fuselage. The engines will

be capable of delivering 4,634 lbs. of

mzx continous thrust each and 4750

pounds of thrust on the operating

engine for up to 5 minutes at automatic

power reserve (APR) power.

Type Certification Basis

Under the provisions of § 21.29 of the

FAR, Raytheon must show, except as

provided in § 25.2, that the revised

Model Hawker 800 complies with the

certification basis of record shown on

TC Data Sheet A3EU for Model Hawker

800 airplanes plus, for the engine and

mach trim system installations,

§ 25.1316 as amended by Amendment

25–80, § 25.933 as amended by

Amendment 25–40, § 25.934 as

amended through Amendment 25–23,

§ 25.1309 as amended through

Amendment 25–23, parts 34 and 36 of

the FAR as amended through the latest

amendment in effect at the time of

certification of this revision to the TC

and any additional equivalent safety

findings made for this revision of the

TC. These special conditions form an

additional part of the type of

certification basis.

If the Administrator finds that the

applicable airworthiness regulations

(i.e., part 25, as amended) do not

contain adequate or appropriate safety

standards for the Model Hawker 800

because of a novel or unusual design

feature, special conditions are

prescribed under the provisions of

§ 21.16 to establish a level of safety

equivalent to that established in the

regulations.

Special conditions, as appropriate, are

issued in accordance with § 11.49 of the

FAR after public notice, as required by

§§ 11.28 and 11.29, and become part of

the type certification basis in

accordance with § 21.29(a)(1)(ii) and

§ 21.17(a)(2).

Special conditions are initially

applicable to the model for which they

are issued. Should the type certificate

for that model be amended later to

include any other model that

incorporates the same novel or unusual

design feature, or should any other

model already included on the same

type certificate be modified to

incorporate the same novel or unusual

design feature, the special conditions

would also apply to the other model

under the provisions of § 21.101(a)(1).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

The Model Hawker 800 airplanes with

TFE731–5BR–1H engines incorporate a

revised engine electronic control system

and an electronic controlled mach trim

system. These systems perform critical

to safety of flight functions and may be

vulnerable to high-intensity radiated

fields external to the airplane.

Discussion

There is no specific regulation that

addresses protection requirements for

electrical and electronic systems from

HIRF. Increased power levels from

ground based radio transmitters and the

growing use of sensitive electrical and

electronic systems to command and

control airplanes have made it necessary

to provide adequate protection.

To ensure that a level of safety is

achieved equivalent to that intended by

the regulations incorporated by

reference, special conditions are

proposed for the Model Hawker 800

with TFE731–5BR–1H engines and a

mach trim system. These special

conditions require that electrical and

electronic components that perform

critical functions and are embodied in

the mach trim system or TFE731–5BR–

1H engine electronic control system be

designed and installed to ensure that

operation and operational capabilities of

these systems to perform critical

functions are not adversely affected

when the airplane is exposed to HIRF.

High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)

With the trend toward increased

power levels from ground based

transmitters, plus the advent of space

and satellite communications, coupled

with electronic command and control of

the airplane, the immunity of critical

digital electronic systems to HIRF must

be established.

It is not possible to precisely define

the HIRF to which the airplane will be

exposed in service. There is also

uncertainty concerning the effectiveness

of airframe shielding for HIRF.

Furthermore, coupling of

electromagnetic energy to cockpitinstalled equipment through the cockpit

window apertures is undefined. Based

on surveys and analysis of existing HIRF

emitters, an adequate level of protection

exists when compliance with the HIRF

protection special condition is shown

with either paragraphs 1 or 2 below:

1. A minimum threat of 100 volts per

meter peak electric field strength from

10 KHz to 18 GHz.

a. The threat must be applied to the

system elements and their associated

wiring harnesses without the benefit of

airframe shielding.

b. Demonstration of this level of

protection is established through system

tests and analysis.

2. A threat external to the airframe of

the following field strength for the

frequency ranges indicated.

Frequency Peak

(V/M)

Average

(V/M)

10 KHz–100 KHz .......... 50 50

100 KHz–500 KHz ........ 60 60

500 KHz–2000 KHz ...... 70 70

2 MHz–30 MHz ............. 200 200

30 MHz–70 MHz ........... 30 30

70 MHz–100 MHz ......... 30 30

100 MHz–200 MHz ....... 150 33

200 MHz–400 MHz ....... 70 70

400 MHz–700 MHz ....... 4,020 935

700 MHz–1000 MHz ..... 1,700 170

1 GHz–2 GHz ............... 5,000 990

2 GHz–4GHz ................ 6,680 840

4 GHz–6 GHz ............... 6,850 310

6 GHz–8 GHz ............... 3,600 670

8 GHz–12 GHz ............. 3,500 1,270

12 GHz–18 GHz ........... 3,500 360

18 GHz–40 GHz ........... 2,100 750

As discussed above, these special

conditions are applicable initially to

certain components on Model Hawker

800 airplane with TFE731–5BR engines

and a mach trim system. Should

Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc. apply at a

later date for a change to the type

certificate to add or revise electrical or

electronic equipment that performs

critical functions or to include another

model incorporating the same novel or

unusual design feature, these special

conditions would apply to that model as

well under the provisions of

§ 21.101(a)(1).

Discussion of Comments

Notice of Proposed Special

Conditions No. SC–95–2–NM for the

Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc., Model

Hawker 800 Airplanes, was published

in the Federal Register on February 8,

1995 (60 FR 7479). No comments were

received.

Conclusion

This action affects only certain design

features on the Model Hawker 800

airplane. It is not a rule of general

applicability and affects only the

manufacturer who applied to the FAA

for approval of these features on the

airplane.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Federal

Aviation Administration, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

The authority citation for these

proposed special conditions is as

follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1344, 1348(c),

1352, 1354(a), 1355, 1421 through 1431,
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 26359

1502, 1651(b)(2), 42 U.S.C. 1857f–10, 4321 et

seq.; E.O. 11514; and 49 U.S.C. 106(g).

The Special Conditions

Accordingly, the following special

conditions are issued as part of the type

certification basis for the Raytheon

Corporate Jets, Inc., Model Hawker 800

series airplanes equipped with Garrett

TFE731–5BR–1H turbo fan engines and

electronically controlled mach trim

system. These special conditions would

apply only to electrical and electronic

components that perform critical

functions and are embodied in the mach

trim system or TFE731–5BR–1H engine

electronic control system.

1. Protection from Unwanted Effects

of High-Intensity Radiated Fields

(HIRF). Each electrical and electronic

system that performs critical functions

must be designed and installed to

ensure that the operation and

operational capability of these systems

to perform critical functions are not

adversely affected when the airplane is

exposed to high-intensity radiated

fields.

2. For the purpose of these special

conditions, the following definition

applies: Critical Functions. Functions

whose failure would contribute to or

cause a failure condition that would

prevent the continued safe flight and

landing of the airplane.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 9,

1995.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service,

ANM–101.

[FR Doc. 95–12155 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 520

Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs;

Penicillin G Potassium in Turkey

Drinking Water

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is amending the

animal drug regulations to reflect

approval of an abbreviated new animal

drug application (ANADA) filed by

Wade Jones Co., Inc. The ANADA

provides for use of penicillin G

potassium powder to make a medicated

turkey drinking water for the treatment

of erysipelas caused by Erysipelothrix

rhusiopathiae.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary

Medicine (HFV–135), Food and Drug

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,

Rockville, MD 20855, 301–594–1643.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Wade

Jones Co., Inc., Highway 71 North, 409

North Bloomington, Lowell, AR 72745,

has filed ANADA 200–122, which

provides for use of penicillin G

potassium powder to make a medicated

turkey drinking water used for the

treatment of erysipelas in turkeys

caused by E. rhusiopathiae.

Wade Jones’ ANADA 200–122 for

penicillin G potassium powder is

approved as a generic copy of Solvay’s

NADA 55–060 for the same product.

The ANADA is approved as of April 17,

1995, and the regulations are amended

in 21 CFR 520.1696b(b) to reflect the

approval. The basis for this approval is

discussed in the freedom of information

summary.

In accordance with the freedom of

information provisions of part 20 (21

CFR part 20) and § 514.11(e)(2)(ii) (21

CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii)), a summary of

safety and effectiveness data and

information submitted to support

approval of this application may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch

(HFA–305), Food and Drug

Administration, rm. 1–23, 12420

Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857,

between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday

through Friday.

The agency has carefully considered

the potential environmental effects of

this action. FDA has concluded that the

action will not have a significant impact

on the human environment, and that an

environmental impact statement is not

required. The agency’s finding of no

significant impact and the evidence

supporting that finding, contained in an

environmental assessment, may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch

(address above) between 9 a.m. and 4

p.m., Monday through Friday.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520

Animal drugs.

Therefore, under the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under

authority delegated to the Commissioner

of Food and Drugs and redelegated to

the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21

CFR part 520 is amended as follows:

PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM

NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

1. The authority citation for 21 CFR

part 520 continues to read as follows:

Authority: Sec. 512 of the Federal

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.

360b).

2. Section 520.1696b is amended by

revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:

§ 520.1696b Penicillin G potassium in

drinking water.

* * * * *

(b) Sponsors. See Nos. 017144,

047864, 050604, and 053501 in

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.

* * * * *

Dated: May 5, 1995.

Stephen F. Sundlof,

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 95–12095 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–F

21 CFR Part 522

Implantation and Injectable Dosage

Form New Animal Drugs; Zeranol

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is amending the

animal drug regulations to reflect

approval of a supplemental new animal

drug application (NADA) filed by

Mallinckrodt Veterinary, Inc. The

supplemental NADA provides for use of

a 72-milligram (mg) zeranol implant in

steers being fed in confinement for

slaughter for increased rate of weight

gain.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack

Caldwell, Center for Veterinary

Medicine (HFV–126), Food and Drug

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,

Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–0217.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Mallinckrodt Veterinary, Inc., 421 East

Hawley St., Mundelein, IL 60060, filed

supplemental NADA 38–233 to provide

for the use of Ralgro Magnum (a 72-mg

zeranol implant) in steers being fed in

confinement for slaughter for increased

rate of weight gain (i.e., use of six 12-

mg zeranol pellets). The supplemental

NADA is approved as of April 6, 1995,

and the regulations are amended in 21

CFR 522.2680(d) to reflect the approval.

The basis of approval is discussed in the

freedom of information summary.

In accordance with the freedom of

information provisions of part 20 (21

CFR part 20) and § 514.11(e)(2)(ii) (21

CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii)), a summary of

safety and effectiveness data and

information submitted to support

approval of this application may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch