alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NeighborWorks® America 

Creating Hope: Promoting Foreclosure Solutions

National Partners 

ABN-AMRO Mortgage Group 

American General Financial Services 

Bank of America 

Barrett Burke Wilson Castle Daffin & Frappier, L.L.P. 

Citi 

Countrywide 

EMC Mortgage Corporation 

Fannie Mae 

Freddie Mac 

GE Money 

GMAC ResCap 

Homeownership Preservation Foundation 

Housing Policy Council 

HSBC 

JPMorgan Chase 

Mortgage Bankers Association 

National City 

Ocwen 

Option One Mortgage 

SunTrust 

State Farm Insurance 

Washington Mutual 

Wells Fargo 

Monday, June 25, 2007 • J.W. Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7621

EMORY STEVENS REDFEAR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LEWIS SMITH, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00073-GCM)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emory Stevens Redfear, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Emory Stevens Redfear seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Redfear has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties,Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 12, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 12, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0100. QUEST DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. v. DAVID 

CURRY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE 

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV333585
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12136]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA--00293, 00293A, 00293B]


Wirekraft Industries, Inc. Mishawaka, Indiana; et. al Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance on December 29, 1994, applicable to all workers at the 
subject firm. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
January 20, 1995 (60 FR 4196).
    The certification was subsequently amended March 17, 1995. The 
amended notice was published in the Federal Register on March 27, 1995 
(60 FR 15793).
    New information received from the company show that the Wirekraft 
workers in Lakeville, Indiana also produce wire harnesses.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include the Wirekraft workers in Lakeville, Indiana.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00293 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Wirekraft Industries, Inc., Mishawaka, Indiana 
and Wirekraft Industries' Burcliff Industries, in Marion, Ohio and 
Lakeville, Indiana who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after December 8, 1993 are eligible to apply for 
NAFTA-TAA Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 1st day of May 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-12136 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the 

Northern District of Indiana 

THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY OF 

FORT WAYNE, INDIANA, 

Plaintiff 

v. Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-357 HAB 

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY 

LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant 

AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

The court has ordered that (check one): 

 the plaintiff 

recover from the defendant the amount of 

 dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus postjudgment interest at the rate of % along with costs. 

 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff . 

 X Other: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff The Medical Protective Company of Fort Wayne, 

Indiana and against the Defendant American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company in the amount 

of Six Million Nine Hundred Seventy Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars and Seventy-Four Cents 

($6,970,567.74) equaling the remaining policy limit (net of prior exhaustion) plus statutory prejudgment 

interest at eight percent (8%) per annum from October 13, 2013 to the date of judgment and post-judgment 

interest at 1.55 %. 

This action was (check one): 

 X tried to a jury with Judge Holly A. Brady presiding, 

and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was 

reached. 

 decided by Judge 

DATE: February 12, 2020 ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT 

By s/C. Reed 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00357-HAB document 178 filed 02/12/20 page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 25768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11849]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 17, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: May 10, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11849 Filed 5-10-95; 12:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26463-26464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12029]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Collection of Information Submitted for OMB Review

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act and OMB Guidelines, 
the National Science Foundation is posting a notice of information 
collection that will affect the public. Interested persons are invited 
to submit comments by June 16, 1995. Copies of materials may be 
obtained at the NSF address or telephone number shown 
below. [[Page 26464]] 
    (A) Agency Clearance Officer. Herman G. Fleming, Division of 
Contracts, Policy, and Oversight, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, or by telephone (703) 306-1243.
    Comments may also be submitted to:
    (B) OMB Desk Officer. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
ATTN: Jonathan Winer, Desk Officer, OMB, 722 Jackson Place, Room 3208, 
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503.

Title: NSF Informal Science Education Survey
Affected Public: Individuals, Business or other for-profit, Not for 
profit
Respondents/Reporting Burden: 965 respondents: average 40 minutes per 
response.
Abstract: The National Science Foundation needs this information to 
assess the impact of its Informal Science Education Program on three 
diverse populations: grantees, grantee organizations, and individuals 
who work in the sciences. These data, in aggregate statistical form, 
serve as a database for a program evaluation.

    Dated: May 11, 1995.
Herman G. Fleming,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12029 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Susan V. KLAT, petitioner, v. MITCHELL REPAIR INFORMATION COMPANY, LLC, et al.

No. 13-6428.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey
      Markin ,
      as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Jeffrey MarkinJeffrey
                MarkinPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
                14, 2008





This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 14 - 00041 - CR

________________________ ROY DOWELL BRITT , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 181st District Court Randall County, Texas Tri a l Court No. 24,078 - B ; Honorable John B. Board , Presiding

February 27 , 201 4 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Roy Dowell Britt, was convicted of aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury 1 and sentenced to ten years confinement. The Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right to Appeal filed in the case reflects that Appellant's case is a plea bargained case with no right of appeal and that Appellant waived the right of appeal .

1 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.02(a)(1) (West 20 11 ).2

The certification notwithstanding, Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal challenging his conviction. By letter dated February 13, 201 4 , this Court notified Appellant of the consequences of the certification and invited him to either file an amended certification showing a right to appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal on or before February 24, 2014 . On February 21, 2014, Appellant filed a response requesting to “halt all process on this appeal ” and indicated he has documents pending in the trial court and is seeking appointment of counsel to assist him . Appellant’s response notwithstanding, he has not file d an amended certification reflecting a right of appeal nor established good cause for continuing this appeal . Consequently, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal based on the certification signed by the trial court . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 25.2(d). Patrick A. Pirtle Justice Do not publish.
Exhibit 10.36


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.


2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This First Amendment to the
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan is made this 30th
day of June, 2002, effective June 30, 2002.


 


RECITALS


 


A.                                   The Board of Directors adopted the Western
Gas Resources, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).


 


B.                                     Section 4(d) of the Plan authorizes the Board
of Directors to amend the Plan.


 


C.                                     The Board of Directors desires to amend the
Plan to make the modifications set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan is amended
as follows:


 


1.                                       Section 7(c)(v) is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following:


 


(v)                                 Options may be exercised, in whole or in part,
by the surrender (or delivery) to the Corporation of previously acquired shares
of Corporation common stock held for greater than six months.  This method of exercise is to include the
constructive exchange (or surrendering) of Corporation stock already owned and
held for greater than six months (“Payment Shares”) in payment for the shares
to be received under the Option exercise in lieu of actually tendering such
Corporation stock to the Corporation. If the Payment Shares are held by a
registered securities broker for the Participant in “street name,” the
Participant will provide the Corporation with a notarized statement attesting
to the number of shares owned that are intended to serve as Payment Shares. If
the Corporation stock certificates are actually held by the Participant, he
shall provide the Corporation with their certificate numbers. Upon receipt of a
notarized statement regarding ownership of the Payment Shares, or upon
confirmation of ownership of the Payment Shares by reference to Corporation
records, the Corporation shall treat the Payment Shares as being constructively
exchanged. The Corporation shall then issue to the employee a certificate for a
net number of shares: the number of shares subject to the Option exercise less
the number of Payment Shares. The exchange price for the Payment Shares under
the respective Option exercise will be the Fair Market Value of the Corporation
common stock as determined in 2.i. above as of the effective date of the
exchange.


 






















 


2.                                       Except
as hereby amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Board of
Directors and its provisions shall remain in full force and effect.


 


ADOPTED by the
Board of Directors of Western Gas Resources, Inc. effective as of the date
first set forth above.


 


	
   

  	
  WESTERN GAS
  RESOURCES, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  John C. Walter

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title  

  	
  Executive Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1542 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1542

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the 
      ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 695 
Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Honorable Judge George N. 
Leighton Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11858]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-424-OLA-3; 50-425-OLA-3]


Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Evidentiary Hearing

    Before Administrative Judges: Peter B. Bloch, Chairman, Dr. 
James H. Carpenter, Thomas D. Murphy.

Re: License Amendment (Transfer to Southern Nuclear)

ASLBP No. 93-671-01-OLA-3

May 9, 1995.
    In the matter of: Georgia Power Company, et al. (Vogtle Electric 
Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2).

    An evidentiary hearing will be held in Augusta, Georgia beginning 
on May 22 from 1 pm to 5 pm. Thereafter, ordinary times for the hearing 
are from 9 am to 5 pm. The principal location of the hearing is:

Savannah Rapids Pavilion, 3300 Evans-to-Locks Road, Martinez, Georgia 
30907, (706) 868-3349 or 3431.

The week of May 22-26 the proceeding will be in the Loblolly Pine Room. 
On May 31-June 2 and June 6-9, we will be located in the White Oak 
Room. On June 3, we will be in the Red Cedar Room. On June 5 we will be 
located at:

The Summerville Ballroom, The Partridge Inn, 2110 Walton Way, Augusta, 
GA 30904, (706) 737-8888.

There will be no hearing on May 29-30. Evening sessions are expected on 
May 24, June 1 and June 7. All dates and times are subject to revision 
in order to meet the needs of the proceeding.

    For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
Peter B. Bloch,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 95-11858 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Guy E. URCIUOLI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10246.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Fernando Gabriel IRAZU, petitioner, v. Margarita Oliva SAINZ DE AJA.

No. 12-1014.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Fero Industries, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Leigh-Ann Squire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fero Industries, Inc., and will be retained by Fero Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: February 18, 2011  /s/Leigh-Ann Squire Leigh-Ann Squire Chief Financial Officer
abr € tar a areft fant or daar, fe Wer wt wea en

R aad Agere oF ga ar sik cet on We Baik Te aA aa Or we GT et gat AY awe wer oT |e aT!

HST CATS SLT Vet! aTe YE FET TA GT aT]

oS OT Rae sreet oT fers AY at oR eT A oraroT at er 2 fort cit at ator odher, weF orret fea geet afk wet
fe ae ar aT vel aft Uae eh #1 feerad BT

Ese Hl CLOSED FOR
2 j BUSINESS
g Sd by order of
a tr the County
qi c Health
5 L
~ Department.
4, forrar fee da are en, aga de os 7a ee feat are ANT wy ofrearer woreft oe wet TAT] 25 ¥ fat of dre wat Het sect ar! aia AR eel A Herp
ait sed) sik cet 8 da og Ta) Ree TE a OR BIE AK WHA eT!

fear aren aie ART Atel sell aE |

BAe abil Ot Yar we | de ra ue ao ere aed) ave U
Te | we ot ee ator of a4 a4 sel @ a wa