alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxtor Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Theodore A. Hull, Vice President, Finance and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                           /s/ Theodore A. Hull
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Theodore A. Hull
                                           VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE AND
                                           ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Date: May 5, 2004

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED
BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Maxtor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Duston M. Williams, Executive Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906),
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Duston M. WilliamsDuston M. WilliamsExecutive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer Date: June 9, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Barry R. SCHOTZ, petitioner, v. Craig APKER, Warden.

No. 12-10448.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by

designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-11308

_______________

GLORIA ROBINSON and MARTHA MARIE PRESTON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

JANET RENO,

Attorney General, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CV-480-A)

_________________________

March 13, 1998

Before JONES and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and SHAW,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons

expressed in the district court's Memorandum Opinion and Order.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

RONALD H. BUTLER 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAMUEL A. KIDSTON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:14-cv-237 JD 

OPINION AND ORDER

Now before the Court is Plaintiff Ronald H. Butler’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default. 

[DE 11]. The motion is DENIED without prejudice, and the complaint is DISMISSED with 

leave to refile because it has failed to properly allege jurisdiction. Mr. Butler alleges that he is a 

resident of Arizona; that Defendant Samuel A. Kidston is a resident of Massachusetts; and that 

Defendant Chromcraft Revington, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in 

Mississippi. [DE 1 ¶¶ 2–6]. Mr. Butler thus seeks to invoke the Court’s diversity jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), which grants this Court jurisdiction over actions between “citizens of 

different States.” 

However, the “residency” of each party is meaningless for purposes of diversity 

jurisdiction, as “citizenship is what matters.” Guar. Nat’l Title Co. v. J.E.G. Assocs., 101 F.3d 

57, 58–59 (7th Cir. 1996) (explaining that statements concerning a party’s “residency” are not 

proper allegations of citizenship as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332. “It is 

well-settled that when the parties allege residence but not citizenship, the court must dismiss the 

suit.” Held v. Held, 137 F.3d 998, 1000 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citation 

omitted). Therefore, Mr. Butler must allege the parties’ citizenship, rather than their residency, 

which “[f]or natural persons . . . is determined by one’s domicile.” Dausch v. Rykse, 9 F.3d 
2 

1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993); see Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 

2012) (“But residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile—

that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”); Am.’s Best Inns, 

Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992) (“In federal law 

citizenship means domicile, not residence.”). 

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the complaint with leave to amend. Mr. Butler’s 

motion for entry of clerk’s default [DE 11] is therefore DENIED, but Mr. Butler may refile the 

motion should the defendants again fail to respond after having been properly served with the 

amended complaint. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 ENTERED: September 12, 2014 

 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

 Judge 

 United States District Court
Mary L. CORNER, petitioner, v. Thomas E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor.

No. 13-6422.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
INCLUDED IN PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                          43,845
<SECURITIES>                                       575
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,278
<PP&E>                                          12,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3402
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,344
<SALES>                                         22,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,365
<CGS>                                           13,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    $3,938
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
                 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                 EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL
                 STATEMENTS OF NIAGARA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
                 SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                 ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                          2,026,078
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  61,164,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    1,062,000
<INVENTORY>                                                    63,873,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              131,306,463
<PP&E>                                                        125,227,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 24,859,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                235,304,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          77,125,885
<BONDS>                                                        81,812,890
<COMMON>                                                            9,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     58,649,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  235,304,357
<SALES>                                                       175,466,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              175,466,448
<CGS>                                                         150,188,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 150,188,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               15,324,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              3,687,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 6,336,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    2,400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             3,936,072
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    3,936,072
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         .45


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<CASH>                                  32,277
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       176,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            348,613
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  20,633
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    20,754
<LOANS>                                808,281
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,436,641
<DEPOSITS>                             906,193
<SHORT-TERM>                           232,502
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     83,482
<LONG-TERM>                             66,601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                26,378
<OTHER-SE>                             121,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,436,641
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         19,040
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        5,644
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         1,936
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        26,620
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       7,935
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      12,384
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   14,236
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         10,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          6,670
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               6,670
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.53
<LOANS-NON>                              2,123
<LOANS-PAST>                               822
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         12,808
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         9,167
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              219
<RECOVERIES>                               109
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,057
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,057
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
Paul Howard TILLEY, petitioner, v. Jack CHOATE, Sheriff, Okfuskee County, Oklahoma, et al.

No. 12-8773.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Kavon Walter MOSLEY, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 12-9091.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Richard McDONALD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9179.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC   document 1-2   filed 04/23/14   page 1 of 2

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC   document 1-2   filed 04/23/14   page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11125]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee; Sixth Renewal

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined to renew 
again for a period of two years its advisory committee designated as 
the ``Commodity Futures Trading Commission Agricultural Advisory 
Committee.'' The Commission certifies that the renewal of the advisory 
committee is in the public interest in connection with duties imposed 
on the Commission by the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. Sec. 1, et 
seq., as amended.
    The objectives and scope of activities of the Agricultural Advisory 
Committee are to conduct public meetings and submit reports and 
recommendations on issues affecting agricultural producers, processors, 
and lenders and others interested in or affected by agricultural 
commodities markets, and to facilitate communications between the 
Commission and the diverse agricultural and agriculture-related 
organizations represented on the committee.
    Commissioner Joseph B. Dial serves as Chairman and Designated 
Federal Official of the Agricultural Advisory Committee. The 
Committee's membership represents a cross-section of interested and 
affected groups including representatives of producers, processors, 
lenders and other interested agricultural groups.
    Interested persons may obtain information or make comments by 
writing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 2, 1995, by the Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-11125 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties I
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:
    
    November 14, 2003
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 14, 2003
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the meeting of the National Cholesterol 
Education Program Coordinating Committee, sponsored by the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, from 9 a.m. 
to 3 p.m. at the Bethesda Marriott Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, 
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814 (301) 897-9400.
    The entire meeting is open to the public. The Coordinating 
Committee is meeting to define the priorities, activities, and needs of 
the participating groups in the National Cholesterol Education Program. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    For detailed program information, agenda, list of participants, and 
meeting summary, contact: Dr. James I. Cleeman, Coordinator, National 
Cholesterol Education Program, Office of Prevention, Education and 
Control; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes 
of Health, 31 Center Drive MSC 2480; Bethesda Maryland 20892, (301) 
496-1051.

    Dated: May 12, 1995.
Claude Lenfant,
Director, NHLBI.
[FR Doc. 95-12817 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
William H. THOMAS, petitioner, v. Ross A. OLSON.

No. 12M136.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.1





Annual Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Circle Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: January 25, 2011

/s/ ROBERT F.X. SILLERMANRobert F.X. Sillerman

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Circle Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by Circle Entertainment Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Joseph Anthony KENNEDY, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-5714.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, denied.