Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 1995 / Notices 26881

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12335 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project No. 516–176 South Carolina]

South Carolina Electric and Gas

Company; Notice of Availability of

Environmental Assessment

May 15, 1995.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s Regulations, 18 CFR Part

380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47910), the

Office of Hydropower Licensing (OHL)

has reviewed the application for the

lease of 117 acres of project lands for the

development of a county park (Saluda

Shoals Park) on the Saluda River below

the dam at Lake Murray. The park

would provide multi-use, land-based

recreation facilities and would be

operated by the Irmo-Chapin Recreation

Commission.

The staff of OHL’s Division of Project

Compliance and Administration has

prepared an Environmental Assessment

(EA) for the proposed action. In the EA,

the staff concludes that the licensee’s

proposals would not constitute a major

federal action significantly affecting the

quality of the human environment.

Copies of the EA are available for

review in the Reference and Information

Center, Room 3308, of the Commission’s

Offices at 941 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12308 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project No. 3188–000]

Joseph M. Keating; Notice of Filing

May 15, 1995.

Please take notice that on October 18,

1988, Mr. Tom Camp, a member of the

Commission’s staff from Washington,

DC, prepared a video tape of the project

site for the proposed Pyramid Creek

Project in the El Dorado National Forest,

California. The video tape has been filed

by the staff as a part of the record in the

above-captioned proceeding. The tape

was made on a clear day and depicts the

reaches of Pyramid Creek along which

project facilities would be located,

remains of certain facilities of a now

inoperable hydroelectric project at the

same site, some of the geologic features

of the area, U.S. Highway 50 where it

runs past the proposed project site, an

the surrounding landscape.

The video tape is available for

viewing upon request by contacting the

Commission’s Public Reference Room in

941 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, telephone

(202) 208–1371.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12309 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

[Docket No. CP95–494–000]

NorAm Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

May 15, 1995.

Take notice that on May 11, 1995,

NorAm Gas Transmission Company

(NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston,

Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. CP95–

494–000 a request pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Commission’s

Regulations to construct and operate a

new delivery point to Arkla, a division

of NorAm Energy Corp., to serve a rural

residential customer in Coal County,

Oklahoma under NGT’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

384–000, pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

NGT proposes to construct one 1-inch

tap, valve setting and 1-inch regulator

on NGT’s Line 638 in Coal County,

Oklahoma. NGT states that Arkla would

install a meter and second cut regulator

to provide service to a rural residential

customer. The estimated volumes to be

delivered through this tap are

approximately 85 MMBtu of natural gas

per year and 1 MMBtu of natural gas per

day, it is indicated. NGT states that NGT

would transport natural gas service to

Arkla within Arkla’s entitlements under

NGT’s tariffs. NGT states that the

establishment of this delivery point is

not prohibited by NGT’s existing tariff

and NGT has sufficient capacity to

accomplish deliveries at this new

delivery point without detriment or

disadvantage to NGT’s other customers.

NGT states that the estimated cost to

install these facilities is $1,800, which

would be reimbursed by Arkla.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12310 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[5207–7]

Proposed Settlement; Acid Rain Core

Rules Litigation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement;

Request for Public Comment.

SUMMARY: In accordance with section

113(g) of the Clean Air Act (‘‘Act’’),

notice is hereby given of a proposed

fourth partial settlement of

Environmental Defense Fund v. Carol

M. Browner, et al., No. 93–1203 (and

consolidated cases) (D.C. Cir.)

The case involves challenges by

several parties to the acid rain core rules

published in the Federal Register on

January 11, 1993, at 58 FR 3590 (January

11, 1993). The proposed settlement

relates to the monitoring issues raised

by the petitioners in the case and

provides for a number of revisions to 40

CFR part 75.

For a period of thirty (30) days

following the date of publication of this

notice, the Agency will receive written

comments relating to the settlement

from persons who were not named as

parties to the litigation in question. EPA

or the Department of Justice may

withhold or withdraw consent to the

proposed settlement if the comments

disclose facts or circumstances that

indicate that such consent is

inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or

inconsistent with the requirements of

the Act. Copies of the settlement are

available from Phyllis Cochran, Air and

Radiation Division (2344), Office of