alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 25 filed 06/17/14 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been served on

all counsel of record by the Court’s ECF filing system on this 17th day of June, 2014.

The undersigned counsel also certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the

Plaintiff by depositing a copy in the United States Mail addressed to:

Robert Holland

1120 Baker Street

Gary, IN 46404

s/ Jason R. Barclay

Jason R. Barclay

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 25 filed 06/17/14 page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 148 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 148

To require the Federal Communications Commission to report to Congress 
regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations used to serve 
              language minorities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to report to Congress 
regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations used to serve 
              language minorities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Minority Media 
Opportunities Act''.

SEC. 2. BROADCAST OWNERSHIP.

    (a) Review of License Transfer.--Section 211(b) of the 
Telecommunications Authorization Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-538; 106 
Stat. 3545) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Subsection 
(a) also applies to any person holding a broadcast license used 
primarily to serve a language minority. The hearing required by 
subsection (a) shall include record evidence, analysis, and Commission 
findings regarding the effects of the application on competition and 
diversity in the programming and distribution markets for the specific 
language minority at issue. For purposes of this subsection, the term 
`language minority' means persons who are American Indian, Asian 
American, Alaskan Natives, or of Spanish heritage.''.
    (b) Broadcast Stations Serving Language Minorities.--Section 202 of 
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104; 110 Stat. 111) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Report to Congress.--Not later than January 1, 2006, the 
Commission shall, after notice and comment, report to Congress 
regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations (including 
AM, FM, and television broadcast stations) used to serve language 
minorities. The Commission shall consider the effects, with respect to 
both competition and diversity concerns, of multiple ownership and 
undue concentration in the programming and distribution markets 
specific to a language minority. For purposes of this subsection, the 
term `language minority' means persons who are American Indian, Asian 
American, Alaskan Natives, or of Spanish heritage.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,130
<INVENTORY>                                      7,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,689
<PP&E>                                          36,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,367
<SALES>                                         21,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,603
<CGS>                                           13,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (88)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,961)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)



</TABLE>
In re Jose C. RODRIGUEZ, Jr., petitioner.

No. 12-10221.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.42

                     AMENDMENT NO 3 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         Amendment No. 3 dated as of January 1, 2004 to Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of July l, 1999 between Brightpoint, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Employer" or the "Company"), and Robert J. Laikin
(the "Employee").

         WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee have entered into an amended and
restated employment agreement dated as of July 1, 1999, as amended by those
certain amendments dated as of January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2003 (the
"Employment Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee wish to amend the section of the
Employment Agreement as provided below to reflect the increased base salary of
the Employee as recently approved by the Compensation & Human Resources
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of
the Company;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer and Employee hereby amend section 3.A of
the Employment Agreement to provide as follows:

         3.       Compensation.

                           "A.      During the term of this Agreement, the
Employer shall pay the Employee a salary (the "Salary") at a rate of $670,000
per annum in respect of each Employment Year, payable in equal monthly
installments on the first day of each month, or at such other times as may
mutually be agreed upon between the Employer and the Employee. Such Salary may
be increased from time to time at the discretion of the Board."

Except as provided above all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and
delivered this Amendment as of the date first above written.

                                       BRIGHTPOINT, INC.

                                   By: /s/ Steven E. Fivel
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Name:  Steven E. Fivel
                                       Title: Executive Vice President, General
                                              Counsel and Secretary

                                   By: /s/ Robert J. Laikin
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Name: Robert J. Laikin
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1484 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1484

               For the relief of Syan Simeonov Stoyanov.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

Mr. Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Syan Simeonov Stoyanov.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR STOYAN SIMEONOV STOYANOV.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Stoyan Simeonov Stoyanov 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Stoyan Simeonov Stoyanov enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Stoyan Simeonov Stoyanov, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Stoyan 
Simeonov Stoyanov shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11053]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Agency Information Collection Under Review by the Office of 
Management and Budget

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Southeast Region Dealer/Interview Family of Forms.
Form Number: Agency: NOAA 88-30; OMB Number 0648-0013.
Type of Request: Extension of the expiration date.
Burden: 2,268 hours; 9,170 respondents with 15,286 responses; Avg. 
Hours Per Response varies depending on requirement but ranges between 3 
to 40 minutes.
Needs and Uses: Data from dealer reporting are used to monitor mandated 
fishery quotas. Interviews with fishermen provide detailed catch, 
effort, and species composition data for stock assessments that support 
fishery management plans.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit institutions, 
individuals.
Frequency: Weekly, monthly, on occasion.
Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer: Don Arbuckle, (202) 395-7340.

    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing DOC Clearance Officer, Gerald Tache, (202) 482-
3271, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Don Arbuckle, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: April 27, 1995
Gerald Tache,
Department Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 95-11053 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-CW-M
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Shmaya Glick, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of Watchtower, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







Date: March 27, 2012
By:
/s/ Shmaya GlickName: Shmaya GlickTitle:    Treasurer, Secretary and Director

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
27V-/r

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 01-14-00737-CR OFFENSE: 22.021 (Agg Sex Assault)

Bruce Egrim Joseph v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Fort Bend

COA DISPOSITION: DISMISS TRIAL COURT: 268th District Court

DATE: 10/07/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 05-DCR-043408A

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Bruce Egrim Joseph v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: 27V-/X

PRO S£

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

ft&rus&h JUDGE:

DATE: Odkyltf SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: ftJh /C/yiAy^^C PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 33.2


                       REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation and "the Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1,
2007 through December 31, 2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for
residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the
Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider
("the Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.

FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By:  First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
     General Partner


/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
---------------------
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 12, 2008
EX-35.7
(logo) ncb

2011 Crystal Drive
Suite 800
Arlington, Virginia 22202
TEL (703) 302-8000
TOLL (800) 955-9622
FAX (703) 647-3460

March 3, 2008

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Attention: Corporate Trust Services (CMBS)- CSFB 2007 C4
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance CSFB Series 2007-C4

Dear Sir/Madam:

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement herewith is the Officer's
Certificate.

a. A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the preceding
   calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing
   Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision.

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Special Servicer has
   fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects
   throughout the year.

c. We have received no notice regarding the qualification, or challenging the
   status, of the Upper-Tier REMIC, the Lower-Tier REMIC as a REMIC or the
   Grantor Trust as a grantor trust from the IRS or any other governmental
   agency or body.

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate
cover on or before March 31, 2008.

NCB

By: /s/ Michelle Connelly
Name: Michelle Connelly
Title: Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

www.ncb.coop
Banking & Financial Services
Cooperative Expansion
Economic Development


NCB refers to National Consumer Cooperative Bank and its subsidiaries (primarily
NCB, FSB and NCB Financial Advisors, Inc.), its affiliated non-profit
corporation, NCB Capital Impact, and also NCB Community Works, which is jointly
owned by NCB and NCB Capital Impact. Each is a separate entity within the NCB
Financial Group.
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana

DARLA VENNARD;

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No. 3:13CV1037

BIOMET INC;

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC;

BIOMET US RECONSTRUCTION LLC;

DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive (term 5/27/2014)

Defendant(s)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

9 the plaintiff

recover from the defendant the amount of 

 dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus postjudgment interest at the rate of % along with costs.

9 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant

recover costs from the plaintiff .

X Other: This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). 

This action was (check one):

9tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

9tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

X decided by Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. on a motion for 

DATE: September 4, 2017 ROBERT TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

by S/ J. Darrah 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-01037-RLM-MGG document 179 filed 09/04/17 page 1 of 1
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties,Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Glorious SHAVERS, aka G, aka G-Bucks, aka Julious Colzie, aka Glorious Grand, Jermel Lewis, aka STAR, aka PR-STAR, aka P, and Andrew White, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-7525.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of *Alleyne v. United States,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2151, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).
Linda M. SEIBOLT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. William D. SEIBOLT, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michael D. BIGGS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-9979.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 120 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR A CEREMONY AS PART OF THE 
              UNVEILING OF THE STATUE OF JOHNNY CASH.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on September 24, 2024, for a ceremony as part 
of the unveiling of the

              

 statue of Johnny Cash, provided by the State of Arkansas.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the ceremony described 
in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony as part of the unveiling of the statue of Johnny Cash, 
                   provided by the State of Arkansas.
```