alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

 BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

 SUE WALKER

 BILL MEIER

 LEE GABRIEL

 ELIZABETH KERR

 MARK T. PITTMAN

 J. WADE BIRDWELL

TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

CLERK 

 DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

 LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

 CLARISSA HODGES

June 14, 2018

Hon. David L. Evans

Regional Presiding Judge

Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building

100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Joseph W. Spence

Assistant District Attorney

401 W. Belknap Street

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Lance (Luke) H. Beshara

Patel Gaines, PLLC

221 West Exchange Ave., Suite 206A

Fort Worth, TX 76164

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Mollee Westfall

Judge, 371st District Court

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap St., 5th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Criminal District Clerk, Tarrant County

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 3rd Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0402

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Katherine E. Owens

Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney's

Office

401 W. Belknap Street

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mark D. Scott

Mark D. Scott & Associates, PLLC

3000 East Loop 820

Fort Worth, TX 76112

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-18-00007-CR, 02-18-00008-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 1470861DX1, 1475011DX1

Style: Mark Scott

v.

The State of Texas

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above-referenced cause. Copies of the opinion and judgment are attached and can

also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa.

FILE COPY
02-18-00007-CR

June 14, 2018

Page 2

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

FILE COPY
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

__________________________________________ 

) 

HAYAL AZIZ AHMED AL-MITHALI, ) 

) 

Petitioner, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-cv-2186 (ESH) 

) 

BARACK H. OBAMA et al., ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

__________________________________________)

ORDER

 It is hereby ORDERED that on or before February 8, 2010, respondents shall file with 

the Court ex parte and under seal a report detailing petitioner’s current status. The report shall 

inform the Court as to whether the Guantanamo Review Task Force, which is operating pursuant 

to Executive Order No. 13,492, has made any decisions regarding petitioner’s disposition. If a 

decision has not yet been made, the report shall provide an estimated timetable, based on the 

then-available information, for the decision of the Task Force. Respondents shall be under an 

affirmative and ongoing obligation to immediately notify the Court of any changes in the 

information provided in this Order. 

SO ORDERED.

 _________/s/________________

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE 

United States District Judge 

Date: January 26, 2010
Theophilus W. FRANKLIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO 

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

REQUEST FOR LITERATURE

The judge requests each side to name one (and only one) book, treatise, article or other

reference publicly available that will inform him about LiDAR, and particularly its application

to self-driving vehicles. 

Please keep in mind that the judge is already familiar with basic light and optics

principles involving lens, such as focal lengths, the non-linear nature of focal points as a

function of distance of an object from the lens, where objects get focused to on a screen behind

the lens, and the use of a lens to project as well as to focus. So, most useful would be literature

on adapting LiDAR to self-driving vehicles, including various strategies for positioning

light-emitting diodes behind the lens for best overall effect, as well as use of a single lens to

project outgoing light as well as to focus incoming reflections (other than, of course, the patents

in suit). The judge wishes to learn the prior art and public domain art bearing on the patents in

suit and trade secrets in suit. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 73 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The judge would like to read your submissions (again, only one reference per side)

before the tutorial. Please just give the reference and our court library will check it out —

unless the reference is difficult to locate, in which case please submit a hard copy. 

Please respond by NOON A WEEK BEFORE THE TUTORIAL. At the tutorial, however, you

may use multiple references to back up your presentations and you should supply the judge

with a booklet with the references copied (except for the one submitted in advance). 

Thank you.

Dated: March 24, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 73 Filed 03/24/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Aug-31-1996
<CASH>                        1,274,744
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        28,102,635
<DEPRECIATION>                10,293,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                19,261,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         569,456
<BONDS>                       8,468,418
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    10,223,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  19,261,853
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,792,044
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,100,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              801,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            562,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  327,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 3.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                 3.68
        

</TABLE>
----

----

| $126,018.25  (the “Principal Amount”) | September 1, 2010 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                                                        |              |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC. |                                            |
|--------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |             |                                            |   |
| Date   | By:              | /s/                                        |   |
|   |             | Name  Dennis M. McGrath                    |   |
|   |             | Title    Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |             |                                            |   |

----

----
Employment Agreement between Verizon and Charles R. Lee



 EXHIBIT 10v 
  

 
 Effective as of the close of business on December 31, 2003, Mr. Lee voluntarily resigned
as the non-executive Chairman and member of the Board of Directors of Verizon Communications. Mr. Lee will continue to serve as a consultant to Verizon through June 30, 2004, and all other terms of the agreement remain the same.
#### Lawrence E. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mark WARNER, Governor; Robert C. Scott, Congressman; Office of the Attorney General; Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria, Virginia; Commonwealth of Virginia; N.L. Connor, Warden, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-7969.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 4, 2004.

Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant pro se.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence E. Griffin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Griffin v. Warner,*No. CA-03-515 (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Lorenzo LEWIS, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8564.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steven W. COOPER, petitioner, v. MISSOURI, et al.

No. 12-8483.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EX-35.2
(logo) Thornburg Mortgage

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans,
Inc. a Delaware Corporation, duly certifies the following in TMST deal numbers
listed on Exhibit A:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer's
Performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fullfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects through such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
28th day of February 2008.


By: /s/ Scott Turlington
Name: Scott Turlington
Title: Vice President

1 of 1


Thornburg Mortgage, Inc.
150 Washington Avenue, Suite 302
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
505.989.1900 Telephone
505.989.8156 Facsimile
www.thornburgmortgage.com


(page)



March 11, 2008
Page 2 of 2


EXHIBIT A

TMST Deal Numbers:

TMST 2007-1
TMST 2007-2
TMST 2007-3
TMST 2007-4
TMST 2007-5
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 100   filed 11/10/14   page 1 of 3

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 100   filed 11/10/14   page 2 of 3

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 100   filed 11/10/14   page 3 of 3
James M. DAILEY, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-8921.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Cómo detectar una estafa...

Decir que un producto es “natural”

no significa que es seguro.

No crea en promesas como “pierda

peso mientras duerme”. Si parece

demasiado fácil, puede ser una

estafa.

Se llama fraude a la salud

• Muchas personas se dejan engañar y compran productos de salud que 

 parecen excelentes, pero que en realidad son falsos. 

• Algunos productos pueden ocasionar problemas graves como dolor, 

 sufrimiento, o hasta la muerte.

• Es posible que la combinación de algunos de esos productos con otros 

 medicamentos que está tomando, sea nociva para su salud. 

• Además, puede perder su dinero comprando productos fraudulentos 

 que no sirven.

Tenga cuidao con esto

sea

Es natural ¡Es tan fácil!
Por lo general, una misma

pastilla no trata ni cura muchas

enfermedades diferentes como

cáncer, diabetes, SIDA o artritis.

No se deje presionar para que

compre. Tómese el tiempo para

averiguar y conocer mejor el

producto.

ANTES

Pregúntele siempre a su médico,

enfermera o farmacéutico qué es

lo mejor para su salud.

Pague ahora y ahorre

¡Cura milagrosa!

Ellos no quieren que usted lo sepa

Es fácil inventar historias de

buenos resultados narradas por

“personas reales” o por médicos.

Me hizo efecto

¡DESPUES!  ́
PROTÉJASE Y PROTEJA A SU FAMILIA

•	 Hable con un médico, enfermera o farmacéutico o llame a la

Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA

1-888-463-6332, antes de usar cualquier producto de s

•	 Infórmese acerca de los fraudes relacionados con la salud en:

www.fda.gov/healthf

•	 Informe sobre algún problema con un producto a la Administración

de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA) en www.fda.gov/medw

o al 1-800-332-

•	 Informe sobre la publicidad falsa a la Comisión Federal de Comercio (FTC)

en www.ftc.gov o al 1-877-382-

Fraudes a la salud... 

No arriesgue su salud ni su dinero.

Es posible que vea anuncios en la televisión o en Internet que le hacen 

muchas promesas acerca de un nuevo producto para la salud. Pero, 

usted no sabe si realmente la ayudará. Hasta puede hacerle daño.

Este folleto fue preparado por:

Esta información fue preparada mediante la colaboración entre la Oficina de

Salud de la Mujer y la Oficina de Cumplimiento de la Ley de la FDA.

www.fda.gov/womens

La Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA) define el fraude 

relacionado con los productos para la salud como la promoción, publicidad, 

distribución o venta engañosa de un producto que se anuncia como 

eficaz para prevenir, diagnosticar, tratar, curar o aliviar una enfermedad 

o trastorno de salud, o que supuestamente tiene algún otro efecto 

beneficioso sobre la salud, pero cuya seguridad y eficacia para esos fines 

no se han comprobado científicamente.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.
  /s/ Scott R. JensenScott R. JensenChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8
<INVENTORY>                                     10,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,011
<PP&E>                                          58,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                          80
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,237
<SALES>                                         20,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,433
<CGS>                                           13,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (20)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
Harjit BHAMBRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10269.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1485 

For the relief of Alzoubi Muhammed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alzoubi Muhammed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALZOUBI 

4 MUHAMMED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Alzoubi Muhammed shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•HR 1485 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Alzoubi 

2 Muhammed enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Alzoubi Muhammed, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3 

•HR 1485 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Alzoubi Muhammed shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ
Curtis PITTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9539.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Fabian CONGER, petitioner, v. Richard BROWN, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9742.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Hubert ARVIE, petitioner, v. Robert C. TANNER, Warden, et al.

No. 13-6467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

NATHANIEL FLOWERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) NO. 1:13-CV-266

)

PRAIRIE FARMS DAIRY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and

Recommendation, of Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey granting

Plaintiff’s motion to amend his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) petition

and further granting that amended IFP petition, (DE # 9) filed on

October 2, 2013. No objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge

Cosbey’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court now

ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, DENIES as moot

Plaintiff’s original motion for leave to proceed IFP (DE# 3),

GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his IFP petition (DE#

6), and FURTHER GRANTS the Plaintiff’s amended IFP petition.

It appearing that the plaintiff is unable to afford to pay the

filing fee, the Court: (1) GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (DE# 6); (2) DEFERS payment of the filing fee; (3)

ORDERS the plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee from the

proceeds of any recovery that is received in this case; and (4)
DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the United States

Marshals Service to effect service of process on the defendant.

DATED: October 29, 2013 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11786]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

Amendment to Certification of Central Filing System--Oklahoma

    The Statewide central filing system of Oklahoma has been previously 
certified, pursuant to Section 1324 of the Food Security Act of 1985, 
on the basis of information submitted by the Oklahoma Secretary of 
State, for farm products produced in that State (52 FR 49056, December 
29, 1987).
    The certification is hereby amended on the basis of information 
submitted by Tom Cole, Secretary of State, for an additional farm 
product produced in that State as follows: hog embryos.
    This is issued pursuant to authority delegated by the Secretary of 
Agriculture.

    Authority: Sec. 1324(c)(2), Pub. L. 99-198, 99 Stat. 1535, 7 
U.S.C. 1631(c)(2); 7 CFR 2.18(e)(3), 2.56(a)(3), 55 F.R. 22795.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Calvin W. Watkins,
Deputy Administrator, Packers and Stockyards Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-11786 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
```
Samuel PIERCE, petitioner, v. Rona WOLDENBERG.

No. 12-1021.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jose ROMERO, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-6684.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, denied.