alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Kenneth B. Liebscher, hereby
certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(a) |  | the annual report on Form 10-K of National Graphite Corp. for the year ended May 31,
2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of National Graphite Corp.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 29, 2012



|/s/ Kenneth B. Liebscher                        | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|Kenneth B. Liebscher                            | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   |
Terry DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10 (t)

       AMENDMENT NO. THREE TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of January 22, 2004, by and between Union Planters
Corporation ("Employer") and Jackson W. Moore ("Participant"), amends that
certain Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement, dated as of February 23,
1995, as previously amended April 17, 1997, and August 31, 1999, by and between
Employer and Participant (the "SERP").

WHEREAS, Employer and Participant desire to amend the SERP as provided herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants
and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agrees as follows:

1.       There is hereby added to the end of Section 2.1 following sentence:

         "Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article II or any other
         provision of this Agreement, the Normal Retirement Benefit or Reduced
         Retirement Benefit determined under any Section of this Article II
         shall be subject to the limitation provided for in Section 2.10 of this
         Agreement."

2.       There is hereby added a new Section 2.10 to the SERP to read as
         follows:

         "2.10 MAXIMUM SERP PRESENT VALUE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
         Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article II or any other
         provision of this Agreement, the maximum present value that may be paid
         to the Participant or his beneficiary under any Section of this Article
         II, and regardless of the circumstances that cause such payment, shall
         be Twenty Five Million Dollars ($25,000,000). For this purpose, (i)
         "maximum present value" shall mean the present value of the payment or
         payments to the Participant or his beneficiary, as determined under the
         applicable section of this Article II; (ii) the Cost of Funds
         Reimbursement under Section 2.9 shall not be subtracted from the
         maximum present value; instead, the maximum present value shall be
         determined after application of the Cost of Funds Reimbursement, if
         any, under Section 2.9, and (iii) any payments or benefits under this
         Agreement, other than payments under this Article II (such as payment
         of attorney's fees, court costs and loss of benefits under Section
         5.13, payment of taxes under Section 5.14, and continuation of medical
         plan coverage under Article VI), shall be in addition to the maximum
         present value provided for in this Section 2.10."

The terms of the SERP not hereby amended shall be and remain in full force and
effect and are not affected by this Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Participant and Employer have duly executed this Amendment
as of the day and year first above written.



/s/ Jackson W. Moore
-------------------------
Jackson W. Moore
Participant



UNION PLANTERS CORPORATION

By: Bobby L. Doxey
Its: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Kambiz Hooshmand, Chief Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    KAMBIZ
HOOSHMANDKambiz Hooshmand, President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: August 3, 2005
[No. 53603-6-I.

Division One.

January 24, 2005.]

#### Dorothy Smith, *Appellant,*v. University Used and Rare Books, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-21065-1, Douglass A. North, J., entered September 19, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Chulhie KIM, petitioner, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.

No. 13-6742.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −24)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 142 additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−24 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 13−00534 Haywood et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 2 13−00098 Milo v. Biomet, Inc. et al

FLM 2 13−00103 Cavanaugh v. Biomet, Inc. et al

GEORGIA SOUTHERN

GAS 2 12−00206 Bignault et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al

ILLINOIS NORTHERN

ILN 1 13−00983 Bermes v. Biomet, Inc et al

NEVADA

NV 2 13−00212 Gardberg v. Biomet, Inc. et al

NV 2 13−00213 Krom v. Biomet, Inc. et al

PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN

PAE 5 13−00714 PARSONS v. BIOMET, INC. et al

TEXAS SOUTHERN

TXS 4 13−00322 Tucker v. Biomet, Inc. et al

WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN

WVN 1 12−00178 Dunson v. Biomet, Inc. et al

WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN

WVS 6 13−02217 West, et al v. Biomet, Inc., et al
Patsy L. CAMPBELL, et al., petitioners, v. COMMERCIAL SERVICE OF PERRY, INC.

No. 12-1262.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1463 

To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 2100 Jamieson 

Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United 

States Attorney’s Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mrs. 

DRAKE, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. FORBES, Mr. GOODE, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. WOLF, 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER, and Mr. COBLE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 

2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the 

‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The building and structure de5 scribed in subsection (b) shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s 

7 Building’’. 
2 

•HR 1463 IH 

1 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The building and structure to be 

2 designated under subsection (a) is that portion of the Fed3 eral building located at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexan4 dria, Virginia, that is attached to the Federal building’s 

5 main tower structure, described as A-Wing in the architec6 tural plans, and currently occupied by the Office of the 

7 United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Vir8 ginia, Alexandria Division. 

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

12 and structure described in section 1(b) shall be deemed 

13 to be a reference to the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States 

14 Attorney’s Building’’. 

15 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

16 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

17 as may be necessary for appropriate identifying designa18 tions to be affixed to the building and structure described 

19 in section 1(b) and for an appropriate plaque reflecting 

20 the designation and honoring Justin W. Williams and his 

21 service to the Nation to be affixed to or displayed in such 

22 building and structure. 

Æ
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT 

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 

ARGENT TRUST COMPANY,

TRUSTEE
FOR SABINE ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. HooperSVP, Royalty Trust Services
Date: May 8, 2023 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1487 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1487

               For the relief of Praveen SitaRama Bobba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

 Mr. Hinojosa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Praveen SitaRama Bobba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR PRAVEEN SITARAMA BOBBA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Praveen SitaRama Bobba 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Praveen SitaRama Bobba enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Praveen SitaRama Bobba, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Praveen 
SitaRama Bobba shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of GreenHunter Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer, in his capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 16, 2014 |  | /s/                                            | Ronald McClung
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------- | --------------
|                       |  |                                                | Ronald McClung
|                       |  | Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
exv10wew1



 




Exhibit 10-E-1


     
In 2002, the Board of Directors amended the
Company’s Benefit Equalization plan (“BEP”) to
provide that William Clay Ford, Jr. and Carl E. Reichardt,
who are eligible to participate in the Company’s General
Retirement Plan (“GRP”) only on a non-contributory
basis because they do not receive a cash salary, accrue an
equalization benefit under the BEP. The equalization benefit
provides, in combination with the GRP non-contributory benefit,
an amount equal to the amount Mr. Ford and
Mr. Reichardt would have received under the GRP using the
notional base annual salary and assuming that Mr. Ford and
Mr. Reichardt would have been contributing members.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 00-40934

Summary Calendar

____________________

GARRY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(5:99-CV-226)

____________________________________________________________

April 16, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Pursuant to a certificate of appealability granted by the

district court, Garry Williams (TDCJ # 512111) appeals the district

court’s determination that his habeas corpus petition should be

dismissed as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Williams

asserted in his petition that his calendar time and good-time

credits unconstitutionally were forfeited after he was

reincarcerated on a parole violation. He contends that he is in
2

the custody of an administrative agency; and that, therefore, §

2244(d) does not apply. He also contends that a parole revocation

is not the equivalent of a conviction. 

 Williams’ contentions are without merit; his challenge to the

denial of sentencing credit for the time he spent on parole,

“although directly arising from an order of the pardon and parole

board, nevertheless also is one arising” from the judgment of a

state court. See Newby v. Johnson, 81 F.3d 567, 569 (5th Cir.

1996). Section 2244(d), by its terms, applies to “an application

for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the

judgment of a State court”. See § 2244(d)(1) (emphasis added). In

Alexander v. Johnson, 163 F.3d 906, 907 n.1 (5th Cir. 1998), this

court noted that a petition, which challenged the revocation of

parole, was “timely filed” under § 2244(d). 

 We do not consider the contentions raised for the first time

by Williams in his reply brief. See Stevens v. C.I.T. Group/Equip.

Fin., Inc., 955 F.2d 1023, 1026 (5th Cir. 1992); see also Knighten

v. C.I.R., 702 F.2d 59, 60 n.1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S.

897 (1983).

AFFIRMED
Kaveh KAMYAB, petitioner, v. Domingo URIBE, Jr., Warden.

No. 12-9293.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                    DESCRIPTION OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

         Park National Corporation ("Park") adopted the Park National
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or "SERP" in December 1996.
The SERP currently benefits 31 officers of Park and its subsidiaries, including
William T. McConnell, C. Daniel DeLawder and John W. Kozak. Harry O. Egger has
not participated in the SERP but has been provided with supplemental retirement
benefits under the terms of his employment agreement with The Security National
Bank and Trust Co. David L. Trautman does not participate in the SERP. The SERP
is a non-qualified benefit plan designed to restore benefits lost due to
limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on the amount
of compensation covered by and the benefits payable under a defined benefit plan
such as the Park National Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Park has
purchased life insurance contracts to fund the SERP. The SERP is designed to
provide a monthly retirement benefit of approximately $5,000, $10,500 and $500
for Messrs. McConnell, DeLawder and Kozak, respectively. These additional
benefits are not guaranteed and are dependent upon the earnings from the related
life insurance contracts compared to the average yield on three-month Treasury
bills. The SERP also provides a life insurance benefit for officers of Park and
its subsidiaries participating in the SERP who die before age 86.
EXHIBIT B

REDACTED VERSION

OF SEALED DOCUMENT

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1002-1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 865-2 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 3
From Anthony Levandowski anthonylgooglecom

To Larry Page pagegooglecom

Sent Mon 25 Jan 2016 115807 -0800

Subject Re Chauffeur Plan of action for next 342 days

Sweet Ill be near by Thanks

On Mon Jan 25 2016 at 1157 AM Larry Page /1i ic wrote

Thanks looks like very good start am seeing him at 330 will try to call you before that

On Jan 25 2016 1205 AM Anthony Levandowski wrote

Steps

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY WAYMO-UBER-0001 1779

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1002-1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 865-2 Filed 07/10/17 Page 2 of 3
Tick tock 342 days left lets go

Illbeinat7andwouldreallyliketochatfor5minbeforeyoutalkwithJohn.Mycell

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATrORNEYS EYES ONLY WAYMO-UBER-0001 1780

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1002-1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 865-2 Filed 07/10/17 Page 3 of 3