Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices 27103

The DOE issued a Decision and Order

granting the Motion for Reconsideration

filed by International Paper Company

(IP), an end-user of Texaco Inc.

products. In an earlier Decision, the

DOE had granted the Application for

Refund filed in the Texaco Inc. refund

proceeding by IP for purchases of

6,846,812 gallons of motor gasoline. In

its Motion for Reconsideration, IP

requested that it be granted an

additional refund for purchases of

99,278,000 gallons of residual fuel oil by

one of its paper mills. Based on the

compelling reasons that the DOE had

not originally investigated IP’s

statement on its application that it was

applying for purchases of # 6 (residual)

fuel oil and because IP quickly filed a

sufficiently documented Motion for

Reconsideration, the DOE exercised its

discretion to consider IP’s Motion. IP’s

gallonage claim was found to be well

documented, and where necessary,

conservatively estimated. Accordingly,

IP’s Motion for Reconsideration was

granted for an additional $159,703

refund.

Texaco Inc., La Villa Service Station,

Eladio Rivera, Gasolinera

Melendez, Inc., Jesus Ramirez

Ramirez, Villas de Navarra Service

Station, 4/18/95, RF321–21016,

RF321–21028, RF321–21029,

RF321–21034, 4/18/95, RF321–

21035

The DOE issued a Decision and Order

regarding five Applications for Refund

filed in the Texaco Inc. refund

proceeding by retailers located in Puerto

Rico. Each of the applications was

postmarked and received more than four

months after the February 28, 1994 final

deadline for filing applications in the

Texaco proceeding. Four of the

applicants requested that their

applications be accepted because they

did not have notice of the Texaco

proceeding until after the February 28

deadline. Additionally, one of these

applicants further asserted that retailers

in Puerto Rico had not been effectively

informed about the proceeding and that

neither Texaco nor the DOE made an

effort to notify Puerto Rican retailers

about the proceeding. Consequently,

this applicant argued that equity

required the DOE to process its late

application. The DOE found that some

notice had been given in Puerto Rico

and noted that, in consideration of the

lack of Texaco’s notification to potential

Puerto Rican applicants, the DOE

previously had agreed to accept for

possible consideration all Texaco

applications submitted from Puerto Rico

in the month of March 1994. The DOE

found that the extreme length of time

which the Texaco proceeding has lasted

and the need for finality outweighed the

claimed inequity. Consequently, the

DOE found that none of the applicants

had presented an equitable

consideration or compelling reason to

excuse its lateness in filing its

application. Accordingly, the

applications were dismissed.

Refund Applications

The Office of Hearings and Appeals

issued the following Decisions and

Orders concerning refund applications,

which are not summarized. Copies of

the full texts of the Decisions and

Orders are available in the Public

Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals.

Gulf Oil Corporation/American Hoechst Corp .................................................................................................. RF300–19970 04/21/95

Hoechst Celanese Chemical Grp ......................................................................................................................... RF300–21699 .......................

Gulf OIl Corporation/Dick’s Sacramento Gulf Rentals et al ............................................................................. RF300–21300 04/21/95

Gulf Oil Corporation/Livingston Gulf ................................................................................................................ RF300–21826 04/21/95

Gulf Oil Corporation/Simmons Pole & Piling .................................................................................................... RR300–262 04/21/95

Texaco Inc./Vanguard Petroleum Corp .............................................................................................................. RF321–13015 04/18/95

Dismissals

The following submissions were dismissed:

Name Case No.

Agway Petroleum Corp .................................................................................................................................................................... RF345–30

American Freight System, Inc .......................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20215

Apac-Tennessee, Inc ....................................................................................................................................................................... RF272–98242

Boston Gas Company ...................................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20357

Camellia Food Stores, Inc ................................................................................................................................................................ RF272–98866

Carl’s Texaco ................................................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20353

Coyier’s Texaco ................................................................................................................................................................................ RF321–20356

East Store Material ........................................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20279

Ernie’s Texaco .................................................................................................................................................................................. RF321–20354

Marvin V. Templeton & Sons, Inc .................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20262

Morgan Adhesives Company ........................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20358

Par-Co Drilling, Inc ........................................................................................................................................................................... RF272–98983

Paraco Gas Corp ............................................................................................................................................................................. RF321–20588

Schwan’s Sales Enterprises, Inc ...................................................................................................................................................... RF321–20366

Tap Air Portugal ............................................................................................................................................................................... RF272–92485

Tungsten Products Corp .................................................................................................................................................................. RF272–92490

Van Dusen Airport Service Company .............................................................................................................................................. RF272–92151

Copies of the full text of these

decisions and orders are available in the

Public Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals, Room 1E–234,

Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence

Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585,

Monday through Friday, between the

hours of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except

federal holidays. They are also available

in Energy Management: Federal Energy

Guidelines, a commercially published

loose leaf reporter system.

Dated: May 15, 1995.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

[FR Doc. 95–12495 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
27104 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[OPPT–59345; FRL–4957–2]

Certain Chemicals; Approval of a Test

Marketing Exemption

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA’s

approval of an application for test

marketing exemption (TME) under

section 5(h)(1) of the Toxic Substances

Control Act (TSCA) and 40 CFR 720.38.

EPA has designated this application as

TME–95–4. The test marketing

conditions are described below.

DATES: This notice becomes effective

May 10, 1995. Written comments will be

received until June 6, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments,

identified by the docket number [OPPT–

59345] and the specific TME number

should be sent to: TSCA

nonconfidential center (NCIC), Office of

Pollution Prevention and Toxics,

Environmental Protection Agency, Rm.

NEB–607 (7407), 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554–1404,

TDD (202) 554–0551.

Comments and data may also be

submitted electronically by sending

electronic mail (e-mail) to:

ncic@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic

comments must be submitted as an

ASCII file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Comments and data will also be

accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1

file format or ASCII file format. All

comments and data in electronic form

must be identified by [OPPT–59345]. No

CBI should be submitted through e-mail.

Electronic comments on this notice may

be filed online at many Federal

Depository Libraries. Additional

information on electronic submissions

can be found under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shirley Howard, New Chemicals

Branch, Chemical Control Division

(7405), Office of Pollution Prevention

and Toxics, Environmental Protection

Agency, Rm. E–447, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 260–

3780.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

5(h)(1) of TSCA authorizes EPA to

exempt persons from premanufacture

notification (PMN) requirements and

permit them to manufacture or import

new chemical substances for test

marketing purposes if the Agency finds

that the manufacture, processing,

distribution in commerce, use and

disposal of the substances for test

marketing purposes will not present an

unreasonable risk of injury to health or

the environment. EPA may impose

restrictions on test marketing activities

and may modify or revoke a test

marketing exemption upon receipt of

new information which casts significant

doubt on its finding that the test

marketing activity will not present an

unreasonable risk of injury.

EPA hereby approves TME–95–4. EPA

has determined that test marketing of

the new chemical substance described

below, under the conditions set out in

the TME application, and within the

time period and restrictions specified

below, will not present an unreasonable

risk of injury to health or the

environment. Production volume, use,

and the number of customers must not

exceed that specified in the application.

All other conditions and restrictions

described in the application and in this

notice must be met.

Inadvertently, notice of receipt of the

application was not published.

Therefore, an opportunity to submit

comments is being offered at this time.

EPA may modify or revoke the test

marketing exemption if comments are

received which cast significant doubt on

its finding that the test marketing

activities will not present an

unreasonable risk of injury.

The following additional restrictions

apply to TME–95–4. A bill of lading

accompanying each shipment must state

that the use of the substance is restricted

to that approved in the TME. In

addition, the Company shall maintain

the following records until five years

after the date they are created, and shall

make them available for inspection or

copying in accordance with section 11

of TSCA:

1. The applicant must maintain

records of the quantity of the TME

substance produced and the date of

manufacture.

2. The applicant must maintain

records of dates of the shipments to

each customer and the quantities

supplied in each shipment.

3. The applicant must maintain

copies of the bill of lading that

accompanies each shipment of the TME

substance.

T–95–4

Date of Receipt: March 29, 1995. The

extended comment period will close

(insert date 15 days after date of

publication in the Federal Register).

Applicant: Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.

Chemical: (G) Polyurethane

adhesives.

Use: (G) Industrial Adhesive.

Production Volume: Confidential.

Number of Customers: Confidential.

Test Marketing Period: One year,

commencing on first day of commercial

manufacture.

Risk Assessment: EPA identified no

significant environmental concerns for

the test market substance. EPA

identified potential lung toxicity and

oncogenicity from the TME substance,

however exposures will be mitigated by

the substances low vapor pressure and

by adequate ventilation. Therefore, the

test market activities will not present

any unreasonable risk of injury to

human health and the environment.

The Agency reserves the right to

rescind approval or modify the

conditions and restrictions of an

exemption should any new information

come to its attention which casts

significant doubt on its finding that the

test marketing activities will not present

an unreasonable risk of injury to health

or the environment.

A record has been established for this

notice under docket number [OPPT–

59345] (including comments and data

submitted electronically as described

above). A public version of this record,

including printed, paper versions of

electronic comments, which does not

include any information claimed as

confidential business information (CBI),

is available for inspection from 12 noon

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The public

record is located in the TSCA

Nonconfidential Information Center,

Rm. NEB–607, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20460.

Electronic comments can be sent

directly to EPA at:

ncic@epamail.epa.gov

Electronic comments must be

submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the

use of special characters and any form

of encryption.

The official record for this notice, as

well as the public version, as described

above will be kept in paper form.

Accordingly, EPA will transfer all

comments received electronically into

printed, paper form as they are received

and will place the paper copies in the

official record which will also include

all comments submitted directly in

writing. The official record is the paper

record maintained at the address in

‘‘ADDRESSES’’ at the beginning of this

document.

List of Subjects

Enviornmental protection, Test

marketing exemptions.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 1995 / Notices 27105

Dated: May 10, 1995.

Paul J. Campanella,

Chief, New Chemicals Branch, Office of

Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

[FR Doc. 95–12472 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Financial Trust Corp.; Acquisition of

Company Engaged in Permissible

Nonbanking Activities

The organization listed in this notice

has applied under § 225.23(a)(2) or (f)

of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR

225.23(a)(2) or (f)) for the Board’s

approval under section 4(c)(8) of the

Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C.

1843(c)(8)) and § 225.21(a) of Regulation

Y (12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or

control voting securities or assets of a

company engaged in a nonbanking

activity that is listed in § 225.25 of

Regulation Y as closely related to

banking and permissible for bank

holding companies. Unless otherwise

noted, such activities will be conducted

throughout the United States.

The application is available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the

application has been accepted for

processing, it will also be available for

inspection at the offices of the Board of

Governors. Interested persons may

express their views in writing on the

question whether consummation of the

proposal can ‘‘reasonably be expected to

produce benefits to the public, such as

greater convenience, increased

competition, or gains in efficiency, that

outweigh possible adverse effects, such

as undue concentration of resources,

decreased or unfair competition,

conflicts of interests, or unsound

banking practices.’’ Any request for a

hearing on this question must be

accompanied by a statement of the

reasons a written presentation would

not suffice in lieu of a hearing,

identifying specifically any questions of

fact that are in dispute, summarizing the

evidence that would be presented at a

hearing, and indicating how the party

commenting would be aggrieved by

approval of the proposal.

Comments regarding the application

must be received at the Reserve Bank

indicated or the offices of the Board of

Governors not later than June 5, 1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of

Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior

Vice President) 100 North 6th Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105:

1. Financial Trust Corp., Carlisle,

Pennsylvania; to acquire Financial Trust

Services Company, Carlisle,

Pennsylvania, and thereby engage in

trust activities, pursuant to §

225.25(b)(3) of the Board’s Regulation Y.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, May 16, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–12446 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

Fulton Financial Corporation;

Formation of, Acquisition by, or

Merger of Bank Holding Companies

The company listed in this notice has

applied for the Board’s approval under

section 3 of the Bank Holding Company

Act (12 U.S.C. 1842) and § 225.14 of the

Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to

become a bank holding company or to

acquire a bank or bank holding

company. The factors that are

considered in acting on the applications

are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act

(12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).

The application is available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the

application has been accepted for

processing, it will also be available for

inspection at the offices of the Board of

Governors. Interested persons may

express their views in writing to the

Reserve Bank indicated for that

application or to the offices of the Board

of Governors. Any comment on an

application that requests a hearing must

include a statement of why a written

presentation would not suffice in lieu of

a hearing, identifying specifically any

questions of fact that are in dispute and

summarizing the evidence that would

be presented at a hearing.

Comments regarding this application

must be received not later than June 15,

1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of

Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior

Vice President) 100 North 6th Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105:

1. Fulton Financial Corporation,

Lancaster, Pennsylvania; to merge with

Delaware National Bankshares Corp.,

Georgetown, Delaware, and thereby

indirectly acquire Delaware National

Bank, Georgetown, Pennsylvania.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, May 16, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–12447 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

Shirley A. Reynolds, et al.; Change in

Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of

Shares of Banks or Bank Holding

Companies

The notificants listed below have

applied under the Change in Bank

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and §

225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on the notices are

set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12

U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the

notices have been accepted for

processing, they will also be available

for inspection at the offices of the Board

of Governors. Interested persons may

express their views in writing to the

Reserve Bank indicated for that notice

or to the offices of the Board of

Governors. Comments must be received

not later than June 5, 1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of

Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior

Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street,

Richmond, Virginia 23261:

1. Shirley A. Reynolds, Huntington,

West Virginia; Marshall T. Reynolds,

Huntington, West Virginia; Robert L.

Shell, Jr., Barboursville, West Virginia;

Robert H. Beymer, Huntington, West

Virginia; Barbara W. Beymer,

Huntington, West Virginia; Deborah P.

Wright, Flatwoods, Kentucky; Thomas

W. Wright, Flatwoods, Kentucky; and

Jeanne D. Hubbard, Huntington, West

Virginia; all to acquire a total of 71.3

percent of the voting shares of Abigail

Adams National Bancorp, Inc.,

Washington, D.C., and thereby

indirectly acquire The Adams National

Bank, Washington, D.C.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, May 16, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–12488 Filed 5–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

Sierra Tahoe Bancorp; Notice of

Application to Engage de novo in

Permissible Nonbanking Activities

The company listed in this notice has

filed an application under § 225.23(a)(1)

of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR

225.23(a)(1)) for the Board’s approval

under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank

Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C.

1843(c)(8)) and § 225.21(a) of Regulation

Y (12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to

engage de novo, either directly or

through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking

activity that is listed in § 225.25 of