alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of CorMedix Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-170498) of our report dated March 11, 2011, on our audits of the financial statements of CorMedix Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the years then ended, and for the period from July 28, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/ J. H. Cohn LLP





Roseland, New Jersey


March 11, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:14-CR-32-JTM

 )

KEITH SODERQUIST, )

Defendant. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT KEITH SODERQUIST

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Keith Soderquist’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of

the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul

R. Cherry, on January 20, 2016, with the consent of Defendant Keith Soderquist, counsel for

Defendant Keith Soderquist, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Keith Soderquist’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule

11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the

record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Keith Soderquist

under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Keith Soderquist,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Keith Soderquist understands the nature of the charge against him to

which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Keith Soderquist understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea
of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,

and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Keith Soderquist understands what the maximum possible sentence is,

including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Keith Soderquist understands that

the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Keith Soderquist has been knowingly and voluntarily

made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Keith Soderquist is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Keith Soderquist understands that his answers may later be used against

him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Keith Soderquist’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Keith Soderquist’s plea of guilty to the offense

charged in Count III of the Indictment and that Defendant Keith Soderquist be adjudged guilty of

the offense charged in Count III of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report

has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Keith Soderquist be

adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before Judge James T. Moody will be set by separate order.

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen

days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

SO ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2016.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

DIANA ROHRER, Individually and 

DIANA ROHRER and DAWN 

CUBBERNUSS as co-Administrators of 

The ESTATE OF DANIEL RICHARD 

ROHRER, Deceased, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 12-cv-00749-JVB-CAN

JUDGE: JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN 

AMERIDOSE, LLC’S CORPORATE 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Defendant Ameridose, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, makes the 

following corporate disclosure: 

Ameridose does not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held corporation owns 

10% or more of Ameridose’s stock. 

Dated this 22nd day of February, 2013 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 23 filed 02/22/13 page 1 of 2
2 

013260.000021/1630522.1 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue 

Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 22, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 23 filed 02/22/13 page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, StephenLinehan, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Auto Finance Trust 2007-C(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the ExchangeAct periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-Dfor the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodicreports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and theservicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, FirstData Resources, Inc., REMITCO, LLC. and FDI Computer Consulting, Inc.

 

Date: March 27,2008

 
|                                                                                                        | By:  /s/Stephen Linehan |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                                                                                        | Name:                   | Stephen  Linehan |
|                                                                                                        | Title:                  | Treasurer |
|                                                                                                        |                    | Capital One  Auto Receivables, LLC. |
|                                                                                                        |                    |
|                                                                                                             |
| *Stephen  Linehan is the senior officer in charge of 

securitization  of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC |                    |

 

----
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted July 20, 2011 *

Decided July 20, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE

, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 11

‐ 1413

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

LATONYA ROBINSON,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Illinois

No. 3:10

‐ CR

‐ 30142

‐ WDS

William D. Stiehl,

Judge

.

O R D E R

LaTonya Robinson pleaded guilty to mail fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud,

and false statements, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001(a), 1349, 1341, after she was caught defrauding

the Federal Emergency Management Agency and other organizations in St. Clair County,

Illinois from roughly 2005 until 2008–in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Robinson was

sentenced to a within

‐ guidelines term of 21 months ʹ imprisonment. In calculating

Robinson’s guidelines range, the district court followed our decision in United States v. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P.

34(a)(2).No. 11

‐ 1413 Page 2

Demaree

, 459 F.3d 791 (7th Cir. 2006), and used the version of the guidelines in effect on the

date of sentencing; as a result, the court applied a 2

‐ level upward adjustment under U.S.S.G.

§ 2B1.1(b)(11), which was introduced into the 2008 version of the guidelines to address

fraudulent schemes taking advantage of disaster relief. If the court had used the guidelines

manual in effect when Robinson committed her crimes, however, her offense level, and

consequently her guidelines range, would have been lower.

On appeal Robinson contends that applying the later guidelines manual violated the

Ex Post Facto Clause because the application resulted in a higher guidelines range, thereby

creating a “significant risk of increased punishment.” She asks us to overrule Demaree

, which held not only that the district court must use the guidelines manual in effect on the

date of sentencing but also that the Ex Post Facto Clause poses no obstacle. This is not the

first time we have been invited to abandon Demaree

, but we have yet to be offered a

compelling reason. See, e.g.

, United States v. Favara

, 615 F.3d 824, 829 (7th Cir. 2010), cert.

denied

, Custable v. United States

, 131 S.Ct. 1812 (2011); United States v. Nurek

, 578 F.3d 618,

625

‐ 26 (7th Cir. 2009), cert. denied

, 130 S.Ct. 2093 (2010) ; United States v. Patterson

, 576 F.3d

431, 444 (7th Cir. 2009), cert. denied

, 130 S.Ct. 1284, (2010). Robinson does not offer a new

argument but simply asks us to reconsider our position.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MESA
OFFSHORE TRUST FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 03/31/00 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,237,379
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     380,905,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (380,881,354)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,294,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,270,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,023,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,294,341
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,347,739
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,270,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,270,695
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.19.4 
  
 AMENDMENT No. 1 to 
 AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION 
 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 The Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”),
and as approved by the stockholders on April 24, 2003, is hereby amended effective December 4, 2003, as follows: 
  
 1. The first paragraph of Article 12.4 “Amendment, Suspension, or Termination of this Plan” is amended to read as follows: 
  
 “The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time prior to
a Change of Control, but no such amendment, suspension or termination shall impair the rights of Awardees under Awards previously granted without the Awardee’s consent, and provided further that no material amendments will be made to the terms
of the Plan without the approval of the Company’s stockholders.” 
  
 2.
All other terms and conditions of the Plan remain in full force and effect. 
  

 1
Allen LOBLEY, petitioner, v. Michael BAENEN, Warden.

No. 12-10112.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
FDIC Advisory Committee on 

Community Banking

October 28, 2020

MDI Subcommittee Update
• The FDIC released “Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks” 

and an MDI and CDFI bank locator mapping system. These resources 

are available on the FDIC public website at the MDI Program web 

page: FDIC.gov/mdi. 

• These resources assist private companies, philanthropic 

organizations, and other banks with ways to invest in mission-driven 

banks.

• “Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks” provides 

information about investment options and partnerships including 

grants, equity investments, the creation of an investment fund, 

deposits, technology support, as well as other partnership 

opportunities. 

• The MDI and CDFI Bank locator includes every FDIC-insured missiondriven bank and branch in the country.

• There are approximately 250 FDIC-insured MDIs and CDFI banks with 

combined capital of less than $40 billion. Consequently, a modest 

investment at any one of these institutions can have an enormous 

impact on the bank’s operations and its communities. 

MDI Subcommittee Update: Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks 

Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks
MDI Subcommittee Update: Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks 

Find at FDIC.gov/MDI

Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks
MDI Subcommittee Update: Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks Contents

Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks
MDI Subcommittee Update: Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks 

Impact Stories 

Investing in the Future of 

Mission-Driven Banks
MDI Subcommittee Update: Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks 

MDI and CDFI Bank Locator

Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks
MDI Subcommittee Update: Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks 

Bank Information

Investing in the Future of Mission-Driven Banks
Chairman McWilliams’ speech

Speeches and Testimony

FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams on 

“Creating a Financial System of Inclusion and Belonging”. 

Keynote Speech before The University of Chicago Law 

School and American Financial Exchange Webinar on 

“The Role of Minority Depository Institutions and 

Innovation in the Age of COVID-19”

MDI Subcommittee Update: Creating a Financial System of Inclusion and Belonging
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12634]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. PR95-8-001]


Arkansas Western Gas Co.; Notice of Amended Petition for Rate 
Approval

May 18, 1995.
    Take notice that on may 5, 1985, Arkansas Western Gas Company (AWG) 
filed pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's 
regulations, an amended petition for rate approval requesting that the 
Commission approve as fair and equitable a maximum rate of $0.1596 
MMBtu, plus 3.1 percent for compressor fuel and lost and unaccounted 
for gas, for transportation services performed under section 311(a)(2) 
of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA). this amendment represents 
a prospective increase from the rate of $0.1300 per MMBtus AVG 
requested in this docket on March 3, 1985.
    AWG states that it is an intrastate pipeline within the meaning of 
section 2(16) of the NGPA and it owns and operates an intrastate 
pipeline system in the State of Arkansas. AWG proposes and effective 
date of March 3, 1995.
    Pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2)(ii), if the Commission does not 
act within 150 days of the filing date, the rate will be deemed to be 
fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount which interstate 
pipelines would be permitted to charge for similar transportation 
service. The Commission may, prior to the expiration of the 150-day 
period, extend the time for action or institute a proceeding to afford 
parties an opportunity for written comments and for the oral 
presentation of views, data, and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene in accordance with section 385.211 and 
385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All 
motions must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission on or before 
June 1, 1995. The petition for rate approval is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection.
Lois D. Chashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12634 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Fero industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Schlosser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/Kyle Schlosser By: Kyle Schlosser Chief Executive Officer  Dated: December 13, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Qualo Martez LOWERY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10387.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-84 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services