alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

LAMALSIKOU LOWE, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 70262 

FILED 

JUN 1 6 2016 

C K. LINDEMAN 

au _I 

Le:F di a -A 

CMI FDEAER 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging 

the validity of a judgment of conviction. Without deciding upon the merits 

of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline 

to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRAP 22. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

.---4 Douglas 

CLE 

BY 

v u , J. 

Gibbons 

cc: Lamalsikou Lowe 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

i co-lcagap (0) 1947A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CR 133

)

CARMALITA STEWART CANNON )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 57), to which the parties have waived objection (DE # 56), the Magistrate

Judge’s findings and recommendations are now ADOPTED. Defendant Carmalita

Stewart-Cannon is ADJUDGED to have committed a violation of her supervised

release as described in the September 9, 2016 petition (DE # 43). The supervised release

of defendant Carmalita Stewart-Cannon is now revoked and defendant is ordered

committed to the United States Bureau of Prisons forthwith to serve 2 months

incarceration therein. After successful completion of the additional term of

imprisonment, defendant Carmalita Stewart-Cannon shall not continue on supervised

release. The court recommends that defendant Carmalita Stewart-Cannon be granted

credit for time served from January 13, 2017, on this supervised release revocation

matter.

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 16, 2017

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Robert E. DeLEON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-6558.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Alleyne v. United States,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2151, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).
Exhibit 10.01(a)


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                              MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


            WHEREAS, MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (the "Partnership"), DEMETER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation (the "General Partner"), and CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC., a Maryland
corporation (the "Trading Advisor"), have agreed to amend the Management
Agreement, dated as of the 31st day of August 2002 (the "Management Agreement"),
among the Partnership, the General Partner, and the Trading Advisor, to reduce
the monthly management fee payable to the Trading Advisor.

            WHEREAS, all provisions contained in the Management Agreement remain
in full force and effect and are modified only to the extent necessary to
provide for the amendment set forth below.

            NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby amend the Management
Agreement as follows:

            1. The monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 2.75% (a 2.75% annual
rate) referred to in Section 6(a)(i) of the Management Agreement is hereby
reduced to a monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 2.65%. (a 2.65% annual
rate).

            2. The foregoing change shall take effect as of the 1st day of
August 2003.



<PAGE>



            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Management Agreement has
been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the 31st day of July
2003.


                                  MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.

                                  By:  Demeter Management Corporation,
                                      General Partner


                                  By:  /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Name:  Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                     Title: President



                                  DEMETER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION


                                  By:  /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Name:  Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                     Title: President



                                  CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.


                                  By:  /s/ Theresa D. Becks
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Name:  Theresa D. Becks
                                     Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10834]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Export Administration


Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee; 
Partially Closed Meeting

    A meeting of the Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory 
Committee will be held May 23, 1995, 9:00 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 1617M-2, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. The Committee advises the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on implementation of the 
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides for continuing 
review to update the EAR as needed.

Agenda

General Session

1. Opening Remarks by the Chairman.
2. Presentation of Papers or Comments by the Public.
3. Update on Export Administration.
4. Presentation on software and technology de minimis accounting 
standards and reporting.
5. Report on Regulations Reform.
6. Discussion on Automated Export System.

Executive Session

7. Discussion of matters properly classified under Executive Order 
12356, dealing with the U.S. export control program and strategic 
criteria related thereto.

    The General Session of the meeting will be open to the public and a 
limited number of seats will be available. To the extent that time 
permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate the distribution of public 
presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials two weeks 
prior to the meeting date to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter, TAC Unit/OAS/EA, Room 3886C, Bureau of Export 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on December 
22, 1994, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, as amended, that the series of meetings or portions of meetings of 
the Committee and of any Subcommittees thereof, dealing with the 
classified materials listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) shall be exempt from 
the provisions relating to public meetings found in section 10 (a)(1) 
and (a)(3), of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The remaining series 
of meetings or portions thereof will be open to the public.
    A copy of the Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions 
of meetings of the Committee is available for public inspection and 
copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 
6020, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. For further 
information, call Lee Ann Carpenter at (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: April 27, 1995.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-10834 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
Exhibit 31.2
  Annual
    Certification Pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on
    Form 10-K
    of FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc., Inc. for the year
    ended December 31, 2008;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and  (c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  (b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.    STEPHEN
    A. JARVIS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26328-26333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11960]




[[Page 26327]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





Office of Management and Budget





_______________________________________________________________________



Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / 
Notices  
[[Page 26328]] 

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals

May 1, 1995.
    This report is submitted in fulfillment of the requirement of 
Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act 
of 1974 (Public Law 93-344). Section 1014(e) requires a monthly report 
listing all budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as 
of the first day of the month, a special message had been transmitted 
to Congress.
    This report gives the status, as of May 1, 1995, of 25 rescission 
proposals and seven deferrals contained in four special messages for FY 
1995. These messages were transmitted to Congress on October 18, and 
December 13, 1994, and on February 6, and February 22, 1995.

Rescissions (Attachments A and C)

    As of May 1, 1995, 25 rescission proposals totaling $1,067.8 
million had been transmitted to the Congress. Congress approved two of 
the Administration's rescission proposals in P.L. 104-6. A total of 
$71.6 million of the rescissions proposed by the President was 
rescinded by that measure. Attachment C shows the status of the FY 1995 
rescission proposals.

Deferrals (Attachments B and D)

    As of May 1, 1995, $2,172.1 million in budget authority was being 
deferred from obligation. Attachment D shows the status of each 
deferral reported during FY 1995.

Information from Special Messages

    The special messages containing information on the rescission 
proposals and deferrals that are covered by this cumulative report are 
printed in the Federal Register cited below:

59 FR 54066, Thursday, October 27, 1994
59 FR 67108, Wednesday, December 28, 1994
60 FR 8842, Wednesday, February 15, 1995
60 FR 12636, Tuesday, March 7, 1995
Alice M. Rivlin,
Director.

BILLING CODE 3110-01-M

[[Page 26329]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN16MY95.246



[[Page 26330]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN16MY95.247



[[Page 26331]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN16MY95.248



[[Page 26332]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN16MY95.249



[[Page 26333]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN16MY95.250



[FR Doc. 95-11960 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

LAFAYETTE DIVISION

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 4:13-CV-27-JD-JEM

)

JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned IP )

address 98.226.144.247, )

Defendant. )

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

This matter is before the Court sua sponte. This copyright infringement case involves a

Defendant originally known to Plaintiff only by an IP address of 98.226.144.247. On April 22,

2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f)

Conference in order to request from Defendant’s Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) the identity of

the subscriber assigned that IP address at the time of the alleged downloads. On May 9, 2013, this

Court granted Plaintiff’s motion. However, due to the potential for embarrassment and annoyance

to Defendant because of the sexually explicit nature of the allegedly downloaded films, the Court

also entered a Protective Order allowing Defendant to proceed anonymously and placing restrictions

on Plaintiff’s contact with anyone identified in the ISP’s response to the subpoena, stating:

Plaintiff, its counsel, and any other person or entity acting for or on

its behalf shall hereafter refrain from any direct communication with

Defendant without express leave of Court. The sole exception to this

prohibition is that counsel for Plaintiff may arrange to effect service

of a summons and the Complaint upon a putative Defendant and

following service upon a Defendant may properly serve any other

papers filed with the Court upon that Defendant. Communications

with counsel for putative Defendant are permitted. 

Plaintiff has not requested leave of Court to communicate with Defendant, and no counsel has

appeared on behalf of Defendant.

case 4:13-cv-00027-JD-JEM document 12 filed 07/29/13 page 1 of 2
On July 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement with Defendant John Doe

[DE 10]. It appears to the Court that Plaintiff has communicated with Defendant in violation of this

Court’s Protective Order of May 9, 2013.

Accordingly, the Court hereby SETS this matter for an in-person show cause hearing for

August 15, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., for counsel to SHOW CAUSE, if any, as to why he appears to have

violated the Court’s Protective Order in this case.

SO ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2013. 

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

2

case 4:13-cv-00027-JD-JEM document 12 filed 07/29/13 page 2 of 2
NO. 07-05-0340-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

FEBRUARY 10, 2006

______________________________

KERWIN GIBBS, APPELLANT

V.

ALLSUP’S CONVENIENCE STORES, INC. AND

FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

FEDERATED INSURANCE AN ASSUMED NAME

OF FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

AND/OR FEDERATED SERVICES INSURANCE COMPANY

 AND DAWN WILLEFORD, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2005-597,010; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

By opinion dated December 16, 2005, this court dismissed appellant, Kerwin Gibbs’

appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), (c) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate procedure. By motion for rehearing, appellant contends all matters in

controversy were settled between the parties prior to this court’s order. The pleadings and
2

the motion for dismissal filed with the petition for rehearing confirm this contention.

Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is granted and the case is reinstated.

Appellant has filed before this court a motion to dismiss the appeal, citing settlement

of all matters in controversy. Appellee has confirmed the settlement by a responsive

pleading. From the record it is clear that appellant does not desire to pursue the appeal.

Without passing on the merits of the appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Pursuant to the motion, costs are to be assessed against

the party incurring them. Having dismissed the appeal by agreement of the parties, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice
26810 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 1995 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

SUMMARY: In notice document 95–9820

beginning on page 19822 in the issue of

Thursday, April 20, 1995, make the

following correction:

On Page 19822, in the second column,

in the third line from the bottom should

read ‘‘Between the Upper Skagit Indian

Tribe and the State of Washington

executed on January 26, 1995.’’

DATES: This action was effective as of

publication date of April 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Indian

Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of

Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 20240,

(202) 219–4068.

Dated: May 8, 1995.

Ada E. Deer,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 95–12288 Filed 5–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–02–P
Francis BROWN, petitioner, v. Burl CAIN, Warden.

No. 12-8812.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
James I. McCABE, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 13-6283.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CR-41 RM 

)

GERMAINE B. HADLEY )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations upon a plea of guilty issued on June 4, 2013. Accordingly, the

court ADOPTS those findings and recommendations [docket # 24], ACCEPTS

defendant Germaine Hadley’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of

Count 1 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: June 24, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         390,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,274,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    914,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,869,866
<PP&E>                                      10,643,190
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,471,146)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,746,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,000,247
<BONDS>                                     16,728,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,273,722
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,256,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,746,168
<SALES>                                     16,537,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,189,593
<CGS>                                        3,369,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,758,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,933,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,345,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,216,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (753,592)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,462,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,462,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)


</TABLE>