alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

AMBER RAEDER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-843-PSS-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF STAY BY REASON OF BANKRUPTCY

 The defendant, New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England 

Compounding Center (“NECC”), hereby notifies the Court that NECC filed a voluntary petition 

under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts (Eastern Division) No. 12-19882-HJB. 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), all actions against NECC are stayed. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Dina M. Cox 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49 

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49 

 Attorneys for Defendant, New England 

Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. 

 

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 8 filed 12/27/12 page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on December 27, 2012 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

/s/ Dina M. Cox 

 DINA M. COX 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

Phone: (317) 237-0500 

FAX: (317) 630-2790 

dcox@lewiswagner.com Q:\NECC\17 - Raeder\Federal Court Action\Notice of Stay_Bankruptcy.docx

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 8 filed 12/27/12 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12310]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-494-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 15, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 11, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. 
CP95-494-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205 of the Commission's 
Regulations to construct and operate a new delivery point to Arkla, a 
division of NorAm Energy Corp., to serve a rural residential customer 
in Coal County, Oklahoma under NGT's blanket certificate issued in 
Docket No. CP82-384-000, pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    NGT proposes to construct one 1-inch tap, valve setting and 1-inch 
regulator on NGT's Line 638 in Coal County, Oklahoma. NGT states that 
Arkla would install a meter and second cut regulator to provide service 
to a rural residential customer. The estimated volumes to be delivered 
through this tap are approximately 85 MMBtu of natural gas per year and 
1 MMBtu of natural gas per day, it is indicated. NGT states that NGT 
would transport natural gas service to Arkla within Arkla's 
entitlements under NGT's tariffs. NGT states that the establishment of 
this delivery point is not prohibited by NGT's existing tariff and NGT 
has sufficient capacity to accomplish deliveries at this new delivery 
point without detriment or disadvantage to NGT's other customers. NGT 
states that the estimated cost to install these facilities is $1,800, 
which would be reimbursed by Arkla.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12310 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In connection with the Amended Annual Report of ECO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEVE CONBOY, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Steve Conboy


Steve Conboy


President


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer





July 22 , 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-82-TLS 

 ) 

JACOB MILLER ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 38], filed on February 27, 2015. The Defendant has waived objection 

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 38] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. 

Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 2 of the Indictment is hereby 

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Further, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3143(a), that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other 

person or the community if he continues on pretrial release under the terms imposed by the Order 

Setting Conditions of Release [ECF No. 14] issued by the Magistrate Judge on November 26, 

2013. The parties report no change in circumstances since November 2013, or any issues with 

pretrial supervision. Therefore, the Court finds that continued pretrial release pending sentencing 

is appropriate under § 3143(a). 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on March 16, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-82

)

JACOB MILLER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

February 27, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the five-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 27th day of February 2015.

/s Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Matthew Evans DOWD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10407.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Terry Lee CONDREY, aka Jamil, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9707.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25731-25732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11776]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-014-05-1220-00-E-241A]


Camping Closure Order; Lower Snake River Ecosystem

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of camping closure order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective immediately, the 
undeveloped site in the Cascade Resource Area known as the Porter Creek 
Day Use Area is closed to camping. The closed area is generally 
described as follows:

    East of the Payette River, west of State Highway 55, 
approximately .2 miles north of the mouth of Porter Creek, T. 7 N., 
R. 2 E., section 11, lot 4, and section 14, lot 1.

    Past camping use of this small, undeveloped site has caused 
considerable adverse impacts to the area including vegetative damage, 
riparian area degradation, water quality impacts, [[Page 25732]] and 
sanitation problems. The intended effect of this action is to eliminate 
degradation of the area by campers. Camping closure signs will be 
posted at the site.
    The authority for this closure is 43 CFR 8364.1. The closure is in 
conformance with the Cascade Resource Management Plan. It will remain 
in effect until rescinded or modified by the authorized officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fend, Cascade Resource Area 
Manager, 3948 Development Avenue, Boise, Idaho 83705, telephone (208) 
384-3370.

    Dated: May 2, 1995.
R.E. Schmitt,
Acting Ecosystem Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-11776 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION**
  I,
        Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
        corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)
        the
        accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
        ended
        September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934,
        as amended; and
 
 (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: November
                  9, 2005
                By:
                /s/ Jeffrey
                  F. O'DonnellJeffrey
                  F. O'DonnellChief
                  Executive Officer
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
        otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
        electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
        been
        provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
Marcus Andrew BURRAGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-7515.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. Angela L. Campbell, *2844Esq., of Des Moines, Iowa, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) NO. 3:13-CV-203 PPS

)

)

HANY HABIB, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss this case

voluntarily and with prejudice. (DE 25.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the motion is

GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: November 27, 2013

 s/ Philip P. Simon 

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

case 3:13-cv-00203-PPS-CAN document 26 filed 11/27/13 page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7255

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GARY CUNNINGHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-01-10, CA-02-106)

Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 21, 2003

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Cunningham, seeks to appeal the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief

on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Cunningham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
SCWC-17-0000143

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LARINA M.K. BENITEZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000143; CASE NO. 1DTC-16-070804)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Pollack, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order Rejecting 

Application for Writ of Certiorari filed December 14, 2018, is 

corrected as follows:

In the caption, “CR. NO. 1DCT-16-070804” is changed to 

“CASE NO. 1DTC-16-070804”.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all 

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this

change. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 19, 2018.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Associate Justice

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000143

19-DEC-2018

03:21 PM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ROBERT HOLLAND )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Case No. 2:13-CV-00491-RL-JEM

)

CEREBERUS CAPITAL )

MANAGEMENT, L.P., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Defendant, Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., by counsel, hereby submits its Corporate

Disclosure Statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a):

Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., (“Cerberus”) is a limited partnership organized and

existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. There is no parent corporation of Cerberus and

no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of the ownership interests of Cerberus.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Mark D. Stuaan

Jason R. Barclay

Mark D. Stuaan

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

11 South Meridian Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Telephone: 317/236-1313

Facsimile: 317/231-7433

E-Mail: jason.barclay@btlaw.com

E-Mail: mark.stuaan@btlaw.com

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 27 filed 06/17/14 page 1 of 2
2

Howard O. Godnick (pro hac vice pending)

Joshua R. Schonauer (pro hac vice pending)

SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP

919 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Tel. (212) 756-2000

Fax (212) 593-5955

Email: howard.godnick@srz.com

Email: joshua.schonauer@srz.com

Attorneys for Defendants Cerberus Capital

Management, L.P., Stephen Feinberg and

Robert Nardelli

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 17th day of June, 2014, a copy of the foregoing was filed

electronically and has been served on all counsel of record by the Court’s ECF filing system. Additionally, a copy of the foregoing was sent to the following pro se Plaintiff by

depositing the same in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid:

Robert Holland

1120 Baker Street

Gary, IN 46404

s/ Mark D. Stuaan

Mark D. Stuaan

INDS01 1459706v1

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 27 filed 06/17/14 page 2 of 2
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Isabel Cortes and Johnny Fernandes, Appellant s

No. 06

- 17

- 00121

- CV v.
Sharon Wendl as Attorney in Fact and a/n/f for Ada Edna Hardy, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk Coun ty, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2016

- 348 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appella nt s , Isabel Cortes and Johnny Fernandes, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 20, 2018 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-117 RLM

)

WILLIAM SPEYBROECK )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on December 4, 2013. Accordingly,

the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation, ACCEPTS

defendant William Speybroeck’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of

Count 1 of the Information, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 20, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11691]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-6407]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Southern Union Company, Common Stock, $1.00 Par 
Value)

May 5, 1995.
    The Southern Union Company (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').

    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:

    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex, 
the Security is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). 
The Security commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening of business 
on February 27, 1995, and concurrently therewith the Security was 
suspended from trading on the Amex.

    According to the Company, its Board of Directors determined that 
listing on the NYSE would benefit both the Company, its shareholders 
and its utility customers by broadening the potential investment 
audience and providing greater liquidity for the Security.

    In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing on the 
Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant in maintaining the dual listing of the Security on the NYSE 
and on the Amex. The Company does not see any particular advantage in 
the dual trading of the Security and believes that dual listing would 
fragment the market.

    Any interested person may, on or before May 26, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether the 
application has been made in accordance with the rules of the exchanges 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-11691 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M