alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-1722

Lower Tribunal No. 2021CT-004877-BA

_____________________________

JAVARES TAWANN BLACK,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the County Court for Polk County.

Robert E. Griffin, Judge.

August 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Stephania A. Valantasis, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Javares Tawann Black, Tampa, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-6

)

SCOT D. SILVERS )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on April 16, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the 5-count

Indictment, and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this

Report and Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be

scheduled before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 16th day of April, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) HAYAL AZIZ AHMED AL-MITHALI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-cv-2186 (ESH) ) BARACK H. OBAMA et al. , ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that on or before February 8, 2010, respondents shall file with

the Court ex parte and under seal a report detailing petiti oner’s current status. The report shall

inform the Court as to whether the Guantanamo Review Task Force, which is operating pursuant
to Executive Order No. 13,492, has made any decisi ons regarding petitioner’s disposition. If a
decision has not yet been made, the report shal l provide an estimated timetable, based on the
then-available information, for the decision of the Task Force. Respondents shall be under an
affirmative and ongoing obligation to immediat ely notify the Court of any changes in the
information provided in this Order.

SO ORDERED.

_________/s/________________ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge

Date: January 26, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12872]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Development Venture Called ``Versit''

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 26, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.  (``the Act''), a Joint Development 
Venture called ``versit'' has filed written notifications on behalf of 
Siemens Rolm Communications Inc.; AT&T Corp.; International Business 
Machines Corporation; and Apple Computer, Inc., simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Siemens 
Rolm Communications Inc., Santa Clara, CA; AT&T Corp., Basking Ridge, 
NJ; International Business Machines Corporation, Somers, NY; and Apple 
Computer, Inc., Cupertino, CA.
    The Joint Development Venture called ``versit'' was formed pursuant 
to an Agreement effective on November 21, 1994. The venture's 
objectives are to define, develop and promote open specifications that 
will enable interoperability among diverse and competing communications 
and computing products and network services and to make such 
specifications available to all interested parties.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12872 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF the UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, petitioner, v. Nancy GILL, et al.

No. 12-13.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
32.2
            CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.





I, Chet
Gutowsky, the Chief Financial Officer of Southfield Energy Corporation, hereby
certify that to my knowledge, Southfield Energy Corporation’s annual report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-K and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Southfield
Energy Corporation.




Date:
April 8, 2010




/s/ Chet GutowskyChet
      Gutowsky
Mirwais MOHAMADI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-7388.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12429]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-31-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Informal 
Settlement Conference

May 16, 1995.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in these proceedings on May 26, 1995 at 9:30 a.m. at the offices of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, NW., 
Washington, DC, 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the issues in this proceeding.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Marc G. Denkinger (202) 208-
2215 or Arnold H. Meltz (202) 208-2161.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12429 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1490 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the National Defense 

University to award the degree of Master of Science in Joint Campaign 

Planning and Strategy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2005 

Mr. SKELTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

National Defense University to award the degree of Master of Science in Joint Campaign Planning and Strategy, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1490 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVER2 SITY AWARD OF DEGREE OF MASTER OF 

3 SCIENCE IN JOINT CAMPAIGN PLANNING 

4 AND STRATEGY. 

5 (a) JOINT FORCES STAFF COLLEGE PROGRAM.— 

6 Section 2163 of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

7 to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘§ 2163. National Defense University: master of 

9 science degrees 

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO AWARD SPECIFIED DEGREES.— 

11 The President of the National Defense University, upon 

12 the recommendation of the faculty of the respective college 

13 or other school within the University, may confer the mas14 ter of science degrees specified in subsection (b). 

15 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZED DEGREES.—The following degrees 

16 may be awarded under subsection (a): 

17 ‘‘(1) MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NATIONAL SECU18 RITY STRATEGY.—The degree of master of science in 

19 national security strategy, to graduates of the Uni20 versity who fulfill the requirements of the program 

21 of the National War College. 

22 ‘‘(2) MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NATIONAL RE23 SOURCE STRATEGY.—The degree of master of 

24 science in national resource strategy, to graduates of 

25 the University who fulfill the requirements of the 
3 

•HR 1490 IH 

1 program of the Industrial College of the Armed 

2 Forces. 

3 ‘‘(3) MASTER OF SCIENCE IN JOINT CAMPAIGN

4 PLANNING AND STRATEGY.—The degree of master 

5 of science in joint campaign planning and strategy, 

6 to graduates of the University who fulfill the re7 quirements of the program of the Joint Advanced 

8 Warfighting School at the Joint Forces Staff Col9 lege. 

10 ‘‘(c) REGULATIONS.—The authority provided by this 

11 section shall be exercised under regulations prescribed by 

12 the Secretary of Defense.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to 

14 section 2163 in the table of sections at the beginning of 

15 chapter 108 of such title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘2163. National Defense University: master of science degrees.’’. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1236 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1236

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the ``Mayor Tony Armstrong 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 750 4th 
Street in Sparks, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ``Mayor 
Tony Armstrong Memorial Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Tony Armstrong 
Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Danvers Bancorp, Inc.'s Registration Statement
Nos. 333-148592 and 333-156874 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-163680 on Form S-3 of our report
dated March 14, 2011 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and internal control over financial reporting of Danvers Bancorp, Inc.
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
Wolf & Company, P.C.

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 14, 2011

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1




Section 1350 Certification




The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-K of Bridgeton Global Directional Fund, LP pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).




The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bridgeton Global Directional Fund, LP




March 31, 2011




/s/ Stephen J. Roseme Stephen J. Roseme
Chief Executive, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Bridgeton Fund Management, LLC
the general partner of 
Bridgeton Global Directional Fund, LP
Virginia Diepheal WHITAKER, petitioner, v. NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 13-122.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Commercial Lending

March 19, 2008

FDIC Advisory Committee on  Economic Inclusion 

*

Opening Remarks
        - Artisans’ Bank History & Structure 	
        - Keys to a Successful Asset Building Program 	
        - Asset Building Products at Artisans’		

Commercial Lending

Commercial Lending

Keys to Success
        - Senior Management Commitment 
        - Work For Your Non Profit Agencies
        - IT & Staff Support 
        - Champion Your Results 

Commercial Lending

Commercial Lending

IDA’s 
        - Individual Development Accounts
        - Delawareans’ Save IDA Program 
        - 	3rd Round of Matching Funds
        - 5 Participating Local Agencies   
        - YWCA Delaware IDA Program 

Commercial Lending

Commercial Lending

Credit Builder Loan
        - How it Works
        - Types of Customers
        - Participating Agencies  
        - What Comes Next

Commercial Lending

Commercial Lending

*

 Deposit Products
        - Free Savers Accounts 
        - Low Min to Open 6 Month CD
        - Participating Agencies 
        - 	EITC Program
        - YWCA Delaware
        - First State Saves 

Commercial Lending

Commercial Lending

Summary
        - Summarize Key Points
        - Questions
        - Thanks

Commercial Lending

Commercial Lending
JEFFREY K., petitioner, v. David BALLARD, Warden.

No. 13-6338.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                         CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                           1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
                                   SUITE 2902
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036


                                  CERTIFICATION


                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Chimera Investment
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008 to be filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew Lambiase, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the
          Report.

     It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                        /s/ Matthew Lambiase
                                        --------------------
                                        Matthew Lambiase
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
                                        February 27, 2009
Order entered September 15, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01060-CR

No. 05-15-01061-CR

No. 05-15-01062-CR

DANNY RICHARD MINOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 416-82236-2014, 416-82237-2014 & 416-82238-2014

ORDER

We GRANT the State’s motion for extension of time to file its brief. We ORDER the 

State’s brief filed no later than October 13, 2016.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant Properties I;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2007
    
    /s/ Steven L. Brake

Steven L. Brake
Treasurer
Filed 12/2/97 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1997 ND 220

Helen B. Vetter,                         Plaintiff and Appellee

       v.

Anton B. Vetter,Defendant and Appellant

Civil No. 970208

Appeal from the District Court for Emmons County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Dennis A. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Donavin L. Grenz, P.O. Box 637, Linton, N.D. 58552-0637, for defendant and appellant.

Sherry Mills Moore, of Foss and Moore, P.O. Box 2216, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2216, for plaintiff and appellee.

Vetter v. Vetter

Civil No. 970208

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Anton B. Vetter appealed from a district court judgment granting Helen B. Vetter a divorce from him on the grounds of irreconcilable differences, and dividing the marital property.  He argues the district court's division of property is clearly erroneous.  We affirm the judgment under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Herbert L. Meschke

Dale V. Sandstrom