Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3851

FERC No. 70. In order to optimize the

economic advantage to both PECO and

PS, PECO requests that the Commission

waive its customary notice period and

permit the agreement to become

effective on January 1, 1995.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to PS and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

23. Altresco-Pittsfield, L.P.

[Docket No. QF88–21–005]

On December 30, 1994, AltrescoPittsfield, L.P. (Applicant) submitted for

filing an amendment to its filing in this

docket.

The amendment provides additional

information pertaining to the ownership

of its cogeneration facility. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

24. Morro Energy L.P., S.E.

[Docket Nos. QF95–121–000]

On December 28, 1994, Morro Energy

L.P., S.E. (Applicant), c/o NP Morro

Inc., General Partner of 2101 Webster

Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California

94612–3049, submitted for filing an

application for certification of a facility

as a qualifying small power production

facility pursuant to Section 292.207(b)

of the Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the Applicant, the

facility is located at #28, KM2 Luchetti

Industry Park, Bayamo’n, Puerto Rico

00961, and will consist of two

circulating fluidized bed boilers and a

condensing steam turbine generator.

The maximum net electric power

production capacity of the facility will

be 235 MW. The primary energy sources

will be pitch and petroleum coke, byproducts of an oil refining process.

Construction of the facility is expected

to begin in late 1996.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1237 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EG95–19–000, et al.]

LG&E-Westmoreland Hopewell, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

January 12, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. LG&E/Westmoreland Hopewell

[Docket No. EG95–19–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Hopewell (‘‘Hopewell’’),

a California general partnership with its

principal place of business at 12500 Fair

Lakes Circle, Suite 350, Fairfax, Virginia

22033–3804, filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Hopewell is engaged directly and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a coal-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 62.7 MW which

is an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Virginia

Electric & Power Company. Steam from

the cogeneration facility, which is a byproduct of electric generation, may be

sold incidental to the sale of electric

power at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. LG&E-Westmoreland Southampton

[Docket No. EG95–20–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Southampton

(‘‘Southampton’’), a California general

partnership with its principal place of

business at 12500 Fair Lakes Circle,

Suite 350 Fairfax, Virginia 22033–3804,

filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission an application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator status pursuant to Part 365 of

the Commission’s regulations.

Southampton is engaged directly and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a coal-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 62.64 MW which

is an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Virginia

Electric & Power Company. Steam from

the cogeneration facility, which is a byproduct of electric generation, and tall

oil, a supplementary fuel, may be sold

incidental to the sale of electric power

at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

3. LG&E-Westmoreland Altavista

[Docket No. EG95–21–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Altavista (‘‘Altavista’’), a

California general partnership with its

principal place of business at 12500 Fair

Lakes Circle, Suite 350, Fairfax, Virginia

22033–3804 filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination or exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Altavista is engaged directly and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a coal-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 62.7 MW which

is an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Virginia

Electric & Power Company. Steam from

the cogeneration facility, which is a byproduct of electric generation, and wood

may be sold incidental to the sale of

electric power at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

4. LG&E-Westmoreland Rensselaer

[Docket No. EG95–22–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Rensselaer
3852 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices

(‘‘Rensselaer’’), a California general

partnership, with its principal place of

business at 12500 Fair Lakes Circle,

Suite 350, Fairfax, Virginia 22033–3804,

filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission an application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator status pursuant to Part 365 of

the Commission’s regulations.

Rensselaer is engaged indirectly,

through one or more affiliates, and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a gas-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 79 MW which is

an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Niagara

Mohawk Power Corporation. Steam

from the cogeneration facility, which is

a by-product of electric generation, and

natural gas supplies and transportation

services, which were contracted for

based on the facility’s expected fuel

supply requirements, may be sold or

reassigned incidental to the sale of

electric power at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

5. Boston Edison Company

[Docket No. ER94–1135–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Boston Edison Company (Edison)

tendered for filing an amendment to the

Transmission Facilities Support

Agreement between Edison and New

England Power Company (NEP), dated

May 25, 1988. The purpose of the

amendment is to adjust the return on

equity provision of the facilities Support

Agreement.

Edison states that it has served the

filing on NEP and on the Massachusetts

Department of Public Utilities.

Edison requests that the amendment

become effective on January 7, 1995.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Puget Sound Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER94–1506–000]

Take notice that Puget Sound Power

& Light Company on January 5, 1995,

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Louisville Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–50–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Louisville Gas and Electric

Company tendered for filing an

amendment in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Minnesota Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER95–163–000]

Take notice that on December 8, 1994,

Minnesota Power & Light Company

tendered for filing amendments to its

November 4, 1994 filing in the above

referenced docket.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Robbins Resource Recovery

Partnership, L.P.

[Docket No. ER95–307–000]

Take notice that on December 20,

1994, Robbins Resource Recovery

tendered for filing a Notice of

Succession in FERC Rate Schedule No.

1.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Arizona Public Service Company

[Docker No. ER95–359–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, Arizona Public Service Company

(APS) tendered for filing a Notice of

Cancellation of FERC Rate Schedule No.

165 between APS and San Diego Gas &

Electric Company.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Arkansas Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER95–363–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Arkansas Power & Light Company

tendered for filing revisions to the rate

formulas contained in the agreements

with the City of Conway, West Memphis

Osceola, Jonesboro and Hope, Arkansas

and the Cities of Campbell and Thayer,

Missouri.

Comment date: January 26, 1995 in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Century Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–367–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Century Power Corporation

(Century Power) tendered for filing a

Notice of Cancellation of the following

Rate Schedules:

Rate Schedule FERC No. 1

Rate Schedule FERC No. 2

Rate Schedule FERC No. 7

Rate Schedule FERC No. 10

Rate Schedule FERC No. 11

Rate Schedule FERC No. 12

Rate Schedule FERC No. 13

Rate Schedule FERC No. 14

Rate Schedule FERC No. 15

Rate Schedule FERC No. 18

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Peak Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–379–000]

Take notice that on January 3, 1995,

Peak Energy, Inc. (Peak), tendered for

filing a petition for waivers and blanket

approvals under various regulations of

the Commission and for an order

accepting its FERC Electric Rate

Schedule No. 1 to be effective February

27, 1995.

Peak intends to engage in electric

power and energy transactions as

marketer and a broker. In transactions

where Peak sells electric energy it

proposes to make such sales on rates,

terms, and conditions to be mutually

agreed to with the purchasing party.

Neither Peak nor any of its affiliates are

in the business of generating,

transmitting, or distributing electric

power. Rate Schedule No. 1 provides for

the sale of energy and capacity at agreed

prices.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. UtiliCorp. United Inc.

[Docket No. ES95–19–000]

Take notice that on January 6, 1995,

UtiliCorp United Inc. (UtiliCorp), filed

an application under § 204 of the

Federal Power Act seeking authorization

to enter into a loan purchase agreement

and to provide a corporate guaranty in

an amount not to exceed $112.5 million

to guarantee payment by UtiliCorp

South Pacific, Inc. (USP), on a three to

five year line of credit. Also, UtiliCorp

requests a waiver of the competitive

bidding and negotiated placement

requirements. USP is a wholly-owned

subsidiary of UtiliCorp.

Comment date: February 6, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Scott Paper Company

[Docket No. QF86–557–001]

On December 30, 1994, Scott Paper

Company of Scott Plaza One,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, submitted

for filing an application for certification

of a facility as a qualifying small power

production facility pursuant to Section
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3853

292.207(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations and Section 3(17)(E) of the

Federal Power Act. No determination

has been made that the submittal

constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the small

power production facility, which is

located in Chester, Pennsylvania,

consists of a fluidized bed boiler and a

steam turbine generator. The maximum

net electric power production capacity

of the facility will now be

approximately 52 MW. The primary

energy source of the facility will now be

waste in the form of petroleum coke and

anthracite culm. In Docket No. QF86–

557–000, the facility was granted

certification as a cogeneration facility

with a power production capacity of

55.2 MW. Thermal energy from the

facility was to be used for paper drying

purposes [35 FERC ¶ 62,326 (1986)].

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Prairie Wind Energy Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF95–198–000]

On December 30, 1994, Prairie Wind

Energy Partners, L.P. (Applicant), c/o

Prairie Wind Energy, Inc., 1221 Nicollet

Mall, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN

55403, submitted for filing an

application for certification of a facility

as a small power production facility

pursuant to Section 292.207(b) of the

Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the small

power production facility will be

located at Buffalo Ridge near Lake

Benton, Minnesota, and will consist of

approximately 167 turbines, a 34.5 Kv

switchyard and related interconnection

equipment. The maximum net power

production capacity of the facility will

be approximately 80 MW. The primary

energy source will be wind. The

installation of the facility is scheduled

to begin in late 1995.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1297 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER95–72–000, et al.]

Power Exchange Corp., et al.; Electric

Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

January 11, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Power Exchange Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–72–000]

Take notice that on December 20,

1994, Power Exchange Corporation

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Kimball Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–232–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Kimball Power Company tendered

for filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Public Service Co. of New Hampshire

[Docket No. ER95–366–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Hampshire (PSNH), tendered for filing

materials to reduce rates under the Total

Requirements Resale Service Agreement

between PSNH and Citizens Utilities

Company (Citizens). PSNH has

requested an effective date for the rate

reduction of November 1, 1994.

PSNH states that rate reduction relates

to reduced charges for post-retirement

benefits other than pensions. PSNH

further states that a copy of the filing

was served on Citizens.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Public Service Company of New

Mexico

[Docket No. ER95–368–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Mexico (PNM), tendered for filing a

Notice of Continuation of Service Under

Expiring Hazard Sharing Agreement (the

Notice). Under the Notice, PNM agrees

to continue in effect, on a month-tomonth basis (terminable subject to the

requirements of Section 35.15 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations, 18

CFR 35.15), by either party upon three

(3) months notice, those hazard sharing

services presently provided to Plains

Electric Generation and Transmission

Cooperative, Inc. (Plains) pursuant to

Service Schedule J to the PNM/Plains

Master Interconnection Agreement

(Supplement 36 to PNM Rate Schedule

FPC No. 31), which services would

otherwise terminate on January 1, 1995.

PNM requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements to

permit the Notice to be effective for

service rendered on and after January 2,

1995.

Copies of the Notice have been mailed

to Plains and the New Mexico Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Public Service Company of New

Hampshire

[Docket No. ER95–369–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Hampshire (PNSH), tendered for filing

changes to rates and amendments (the

Amendments) to rate schedules with

each of its following wholesale

requirements customers (the

Customers); The Town of Ashland, New

Hampshire (Electric Light Department),

and the New Hampshire Electric

Cooperative, Inc. (the NHEC). PSNH

states that the submitted materials,

when permitted to become effective,

would decrease two separate

components of rates to the Customers,

one component reflected in the

Amendments and the other to reflect

reduced accruals for post-retirement

benefits other than pensions (PBOPs).

PSNH further states that the component

of the rate reduction contained in the

Amendments flows through to the

Customers the savings that will result

from settlements recently reached

between PSNH and two New Hampshire

independent power producers.

PNSH has requested that the rate

reduction for decreased PBOP costs be

permitted to become effective November

1, 1994, and that the Amendments be

permitted to become effective January 1,

1995. It states that copies of the filing

were served on each of the Customers

and the New Hampshire Public Utilities

Commission, which is the only State

Commission within whose jurisdiction