# Patent

## Title
Supporting version negotiation for positioning for terminals in a wireless network

## Abstract

Techniques for supporting positioning for terminals in a wireless network are described. In an aspect, a message is prepared and transmitted with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. In another aspect, a message is received with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The compatibility level included in the received message is compared to an internal compatibility level and a response message is prepared and transmitted with a message segment including the internal compatibility level.

## Background
CLAIM OF PRIORITY
The present Application is a Continuation Application of a Continuation-In-Part application Ser. No. 13/090,142, entitled, “Supporting Version Negotiation For Positioning For Terminals In A Wireless Network”, filed Apr. 19, 2011, which claims priority to Provisional U.S. Application Ser. No. 61/372,031, entitled “Version Negotiation,” filed Aug. 9, 2010, which is assigned to the assignee hereof and expressly incorporated herein by reference, and is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 12/763,962, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Supporting Positioning For Terminals In A Wireless Network”, filed Apr. 20, 2010, which is also assigned to the assignee hereof and expressly incorporated herein by reference and claims priority to the following Provisional U.S. Applications: Application Ser. No. 61/171,398, entitled “LPP Generic Capabilities,” filed Apr. 21, 2009; Application Ser. No. 61/172,719, entitled “LPP Stage 2,” filed Apr. 25, 2009; Application Ser. No. 61/218,929, entitled “LPP,” filed Jun. 20, 2009; Application Ser. No. 61/234,282, entitled “LPP,” filed Aug. 15, 2009, and Application Ser. No. 61/247,363, entitled “LPP,” filed Sep. 30, 2009, all of which are assigned to the assignee hereof and expressly incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND
1. Field
The present disclosure relates generally to communication, and more specifically to techniques for supporting positioning for terminals in a wireless network.
2. Background
It is often desirable, and sometimes necessary, to know the location of a terminal, e.g., a cellular phone. The terms “location” and “position” are synonymous and are used interchangeably herein. For example, a location services (LCS) client may desire to know the location of the terminal and may communicate with a network server in order to request for the location of the terminal. The network server and the terminal may then exchange messages, as necessary, to obtain a location estimate for the terminal. The network server may then return the location estimate to the LCS client.
Different terminals may operate in different scenarios and may have different capabilities with regard to positioning. Positioning refers to a functionality that determines a geographical location of a target terminal. It may be desirable to flexibly support positioning for terminals with different capabilities—for example, for terminals that support different versions of a positioning protocol.
SUMMARY
Techniques for supporting positioning for terminals in a wireless network are described herein. In an aspect, a message is prepared with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The message is transmitted with the message segment including the version and the compatibility level. The message may be an LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) or an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU and the message segment may be a header of the LPP or LPPe PDU. A response message may be returned that may include an error message and a different compatibility level. Alternatively, a response message may include a message segment including the same or a different version of a protocol used to encode the response message and the same compatibility level.
In another aspect, an apparatus for wireless communication includes at least one processing unit configured to prepare a message with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions, and to transmit the message with the message segment including the version and the compatibility level.
In another aspect, an apparatus for wireless communication includes a means for preparing a message with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The apparatus further includes a means for transmitting the message with the message segment including the version and the compatibility level.
In yet another aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium including program code stored thereon includes program code to cause at least one computer to prepare a message with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The non-transitory computer-readable medium further includes program code to transmit the message with the message segment including the version and the compatibility level.
In another aspect, a message is received with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The compatibility level included in the message that was received is compared to an internal compatibility level and a response message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level is prepared. The response message is sent with the message segment including the internal compatibility level. The message may be a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and the message segment may be a header of the LPP PDU. Alternatively, the message may be an LTE Extensions (LPPe) PDU contained within an LPP message and the message segment may be a header of the LPPe PDU. The compatibility level included in the message that was received may be different than the internal compatibility level, and the response message is an error message. Alternatively, the compatibility level included in the message that was received may be the same as the internal compatibility level and the version included in the message that was received is compared to an internal version of a protocol used to encode the response message, wherein the response message includes the internal version.
In another aspect, an apparatus for wireless communication includes at least one processing unit configured to receive a message with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The at least one processing unit is further configured to compare the compatibility level included in the message that was received to an internal compatibility level, to prepare a response message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level, and to transmit the response message with the message segment including the internal compatibility level.
In another aspect, an apparatus for wireless communication includes a means for receiving a message with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The apparatus further includes a means for comparing the compatibility level included in the message that was received to an internal compatibility level and means for preparing a response message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level. The apparatus further includes a means for transmitting the response message with the message segment including the internal compatibility level.
In yet another aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium includes program code stored thereon, including program code to cause at least one computer to receive a message with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions. The non-transitory computer-readable medium further includes program code to compare the compatibility level included in the message that was received to an internal compatibility level and program code to prepare a response message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level. The non-transitory computer-readable medium further includes program code to transmit the response message with the message segment including the internal compatibility level.
Various aspects and features of the disclosure are described in further detail below.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows a diagram of an exemplary deployment supporting positioning.
FIG. 2A shows a configuration supporting terminal-assisted and terminal-based positioning methods.
FIG. 2B shows a configuration supporting network-based positioning methods.
FIGS. 2C and 2D show two configurations supporting peer-to-peer positioning.
FIG. 3 shows a hierarchical structure for a positioning protocol.
FIG. 4A shows a design of a positioning message.
FIG. 4B illustrates a positioning message that includes the version level and the compatibility level within the positioning protocol version field.
FIG. 4C shows a design of a positioning message with multiple parts defined by different organizations.
FIG. 5 shows a message flow for a mobile-originated location request service.
FIG. 6 shows a message flow for a location session with multiple transactions.
FIGS. 7 to 11 show various processes for supporting positioning.
FIG. 12 shows a process for sending a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions.
FIG. 13 shows a process for receiving a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions.
FIG. 14 shows a block diagram of a target device, a base station, and a location server.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 shows a diagram of an exemplary deployment 100 supporting positioning. A target device (TD) 110 is an entity whose location is to be determined Target device 110 may be stationary or mobile and may also be referred to as a terminal, a mobile station, a user equipment (UE), an access terminal, a SUPL enabled terminal (SET) in Secure User Plane Location (SUPL) from Open Mobile Alliance (OMA), a subscriber unit, a station, etc. Target device 110 may be a cellular phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a wireless device, a wireless modem, a wireless router, a laptop computer, a telemetry device, a tracking device, etc. Target device 110 may communicate with one or more base stations in a wireless network. Target device 110 may also communicate peer-to-peer with other terminals.
A reference source (RS) 140 is an entity that transmits a signal (e.g., a radio signal) that can be measured to support positioning. Reference source 140 may be a satellite in a Satellite Positioning System (SPS), which may be the United States Global Positioning System (GPS), the European Galileo system, the Russian GLONASS system, or some other SPS. Reference source 140 may also be a base station in a wireless network. A base station may also be referred to as an access point, a Node B, an evolved Node B (eNB), etc. A wireless network may be a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) network, a Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) network, a General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) access network, a Long Term Evolution (LTE) network, a CDMA 1× network, a High Rate Packet Data (HRPD) network, an Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB) network, a wireless local area network (WLAN), etc. GSM, WCDMA, GPRS, and LTE are different radio technologies defined by an organization named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP). CDMA 1×, HRPD and UMB are different radio technologies defined by an organization named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2). Reference source 140 may also be a broadcast station in a broadcast network, which may be a television network, a digital broadcast network, etc. Reference source 140 may also be part of a terminal, e.g., target device 110. In general, one or more signals from one or more reference sources may be measured to determine the location of target device 110. Only one reference source 140 is shown in FIG. 1 for simplicity. The location of a reference source may be known or can be ascertained and may be used for positioning of target device 110.
A positioning unit (PU) 120 is an entity that can measure signals from one or more reference sources, such as reference source 140. Positioning unit 120 may also be able to compute a location estimate for target device 110 based on measurements obtained by positioning unit 120. Positioning unit 120 may be part of target device 110, or a separate device, or part of some other entity. The other entity may be another terminal, a base station, a specialized location measurement unit (LMU) in a wireless network, etc.
A location server (LS) 130 is an entity that can receive positioning information for a target device and determine location information for the target device. In general, positioning information may be any information used to support positioning. For example, positioning information may comprise measurements, a coarse location estimate, etc. Location information may be any information related to the location of a target device. For example, location information may comprise assistance data for making measurements of signals for positioning, a final location estimate for the target device, etc. Location server 130 may communicate with positioning unit 120, receive positioning information from positioning unit 120, and provide location information (e.g., assistance data) to positioning unit 120. Location server 130 may also compute a location estimate for target device 110 based on measurements received from positioning unit 120 and provide the location estimate to positioning unit 120. Location server 130 may reside in any one of a plurality of entities. For example, location server 130 may be a Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC), a Standalone SMLC (SAS), an Evolved SMLC (E-SMLC), a SUPL Location Platform (SLP), a Position Determining Entity (PDE), etc. Location server 130 may also be part of a terminal, e.g., part of target device 110. In one design, location server 130 may communicate with other entities (e.g., positioning unit 120) via a common positioning protocol regardless of where location server 130 resides. The common positioning protocol may be LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) used in LTE or some other positioning protocol.
FIG. 1 shows four generic entities that can support positioning for target device 110. Various configurations may be supported by the entities shown in FIG. 1. In one design, target device 110 and positioning unit 120 may be co-located. In this design, target device 110 may measure one or more signals from one or more reference sources for positioning of target device 110. In another design, target device 110 and reference source 140 may be co-located. In this design, target device 110 may transmit a signal that may be measured and used for positioning of the target device. In yet another design, target device 110 may be co-located with location server 130. In this design, target device 110 may receive measurements from positioning unit 120 and may perform positioning for target device 110 based on the measurements. In general, target device 110 may support positioning unit 120 and/or reference source 140 in order to measure other signals or have its own signal measured. Other configurations may also be supported by the entities shown in FIG. 1. For example, positioning unit 120 and location server 130 may be co-located. As another example, reference source 140 and location server 130 may be co-located.
FIG. 2A shows a configuration supporting terminal-assisted and terminal-based positioning methods. In this configuration, positioning unit 120 is co-located with target device 110. Positioning unit 120 may measure signals from reference sources such as a satellite 140a, a base station 140b, etc. Positioning unit 120 may send measurements and/or other information (e.g., a coarse or a fine location estimate) to location server 130. Location server 130 may determine location information (e.g., assistance data) and may send the location information to positioning unit 120 (e.g., to assist positioning unit 120 to measure signals and possibly obtain a location estimate). Location server 130 may also determine a location estimate for target device 110 based on measurements and/or other information received from positioning unit 120. Location server 130 may forward the location estimate to some external client (not shown in FIG. 2A) and/or to target device 110. The configuration in FIG. 2A may be used for terminal-assisted and terminal-based positioning methods such as assisted GNSS (A-GNSS), observed time difference (OTD), enhanced observed time difference (E-OTD), observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA), advanced forward link trilateration (A-FLT), etc.
FIG. 2B shows a configuration supporting network-based positioning methods. In this configuration, reference source 140 is co-located with target device 110, and positioning unit 120 is external to target device 110. Positioning unit 120 may measure a signal from target device 110. Positioning unit 120 may also receive measurements made by target device 110 for other reference sources (not shown in FIG. 2B). The measurements from target device 110 may be used to support handover of target device 110 and/or for other purposes. Positioning unit 120 may send the measurements and/or other information to location server 130. Location server 130 may determine location information (e.g., assistance data) and may send the location information to positioning unit 120 (e.g., to assist positioning unit 120 to measure signals from reference source 140). Location server 130 may also determine a location estimate for target device 110 based on measurements and/or other information received from positioning unit 120. Location server 130 may forward the location estimate to some external client (not shown in FIG. 2B) and/or to target device 110. The configuration in FIG. 2B may be used for network-based positioning methods such as enhanced cell identity (E-CID), uplink time difference of arrival (U-TDOA), etc.
For simplicity, FIGS. 2A and 2B show one positioning unit 120 and one or more reference sources 140. In general, any number of positioning units may measure signals from any number of reference sources and may send their measurements to location server 130. Target device 110 may act as a reference source for some measurements and/or as a positioning unit for other measurements.
FIGS. 2A and 2B show two configurations supporting non peer-to-peer (P2P) positioning. Non-P2P positioning may occur when reference source 140, positioning unit 120, and location server 130 are not co-located with (e.g., are not part of) any terminal that is not target device 110. For non-P2P positioning, location server 130 may be a network entity or part of target device 110, positioning unit 120 may be part of either target device 110 or a network entity, and reference source 140 may be part of either target device 110 or an external entity (e.g., a satellite, a base station, a broadcast station, etc.)
In one design, P2P positioning may be supported by the entities shown in FIG. 1. P2P positioning may occur when a first terminal assumes the role of location server 130, or positioning unit 120, or reference source 140, or any combination thereof, in order to help position a second terminal that assumes the role of target device 110. Different types of P2P positioning may be supported depending on where location server 130, positioning unit 120, and reference source 140 reside, or whether the first or second terminal assumes the role of each of the location server, the positioning unit, and the reference source.
FIG. 2C shows a configuration supporting P2P positioning. In this configuration, a first terminal 102 is target device 110 and also assumes the roles of location server 130 and reference source 140. A second terminal 104 communicates peer-to-peer with first terminal 102 and assumes the role of positioning unit 120. Positioning unit 120 in terminal 104 may measure a signal from reference source 140 in terminal 102 and may send measurements and possibly other information to location server 130 in terminal 102. Location server 130 may determine location information (e.g., assistance data) and may send the location information to positioning unit 120 (e.g., to assist positioning unit 120 to measure signals from reference source 140). Location server 130 may also determine a location estimate for target device 110 based on measurements and/or other information received from positioning unit 120. Location server 130 may forward the location estimate to some external client (not shown in FIG. 2C) and/or pass the location estimate to some entity (e.g., an application) in target device 110.
For simplicity, FIG. 2C shows terminal 102 communicating with one peer terminal 104. In general, terminal 102 may communicate with any number of peer terminals and may request measurements from one or more peer terminals. Each peer terminal may act as a positioning unit and may measure the signal from terminal 102. Each peer terminal may send measurements and its location to terminal 102. The location of terminal 102 may be determined based on the measurements from all peer terminals and their reported locations.
FIG. 2D shows another configuration supporting P2P positioning. In this configuration, a first terminal 106 is target device 110 and also assumes the roles of positioning unit 120 and location server 130. A second terminal 108 communicates peer-to-peer with first terminal 106 and assumes the role of reference source 140. Positioning unit 120 in terminal 106 may measure a signal from reference source 140 in terminal 108 and may send measurements and/or other information to location server 130 in terminal 106. Location server 130 may also receive the location of terminal 108. Location server 130 may determine location information (e.g., assistance data) and may transfer the location information to positioning unit 120 (e.g., to assist positioning unit 120 to measure signals from reference source 140) in terminal 108. Location server 130 may also determine a location estimate for target device 110 based on measurements and/or other information received from positioning unit 120. Location server 130 may forward the location estimate to some external client (not shown in FIG. 2D) and/or pass the location estimate to some entity (e.g., an application) in target device 110.
For simplicity, FIG. 2D shows terminal 106 communicating with one peer terminal 108. In general, terminal 106 may communicate with any number of peer terminals and may make measurements for one or more peer terminals. Each peer terminal may act as a reference source whose signal may be measured by terminal 106. Each peer terminal may send its location to terminal 106. The location of terminal 106 may be determined based on the measurements for all peer terminals and their reported locations.
For P2P positioning, the role of positioning unit 120 and location server 130 may be assumed by different terminals. To avoid ambiguity, a terminal initiating a location transaction may specify which end/terminal of the transaction will assume the role of each of the location server and the positioning unit. Each terminal may then assume the role specified by the initiating terminal.
P2P positioning may be used to position a terminal, as described above. P2P positioning may also be used to help position an access point for a femto cell, which may also be referred to as a home Node B (HNB), a home eNB (HeNB), etc. In this case, the access point may be treated like a terminal.
In one design, generic positioning methods (GPMs) may be used to support positioning of target devices. A generic positioning method is a positioning method that supports positioning for a target device with different types of reference sources using the same type of measurements and location computation procedure.
Table 1 lists some generic positioning methods that may be supported and provides a short description for each generic positioning method.







TABLE 1







Generic Positioning Methods








GPM
Description





Uplink or
Employ time of arrival differences between either (i) signal of the


Downlink
same reference source/target device measured at different positioning


Time
units (for uplink) or (ii) signals of different reference sources measured


Difference
by a positioning unit/target device (for downlink). Use trilateration method


Based GPM
to compute location of target device.


Propagation
Employ measurements of propagation delay from a reference source to


Time Based
a positioning unit with one of these entities being at a known location


GPM
and the other entity being co-located with a target device. Use



trilateration method to compute location.


Direction
Employ measurements of signal direction from a reference source to a


Based GPM
positioning unit, where the reference source may be part of the target



device and the positioning unit may be part of a network. Use



triangulation methods to compute location.


Path Loss
Employ measurements of signal strength of a reference source at a


Based GPM
positioning unit to estimate distance between the reference source and



the positioning unit based on signal attenuation. Can use trilateration



method to compute location.


RF Pattern
Employ measurements of signal strength of either (i) the same


Matching
reference source co-located with a target device at different


GPM
positioning units or (ii) different network-based reference sources at



the same positioning unit co-located with the target device. Employ



predetermined RF signal strength patterns over small geographic areas



to determine the most likely location of the target device based on



pattern matching.









Detection of the presence of a particular reference source, without measurement of a signal from the reference source, may also be included in one or more generic positioning methods listed in Table 1 to support cell ID or WLAN-based positioning. A combination of generic positioning methods may also be used for positioning, e.g., to improve accuracy.
In one design, a set of positioning method classes (PMCs) may be defined. A PMC may include a set of positioning methods defined by applying one or more generic positioning methods to a given type of reference source. Different types of reference sources may be used for positioning and may include LTE eNBs, LTE-capable terminals, CDMA 1× base stations, 1×-capable terminals, etc. For a given type of reference source, one or more specific positioning methods may be defined by applying one or more generic positioning methods to this reference source. For example, A-GPS may be obtained by applying downlink time difference based GPM to GPS reference sources, U-TDOA may be obtained by applying uplink time difference based GPM to a GSM reference source, E-CID may be obtained by applying direction based and/or RF pattern matching GPM to an LTE reference source, etc.
Each PMC may include one or more positioning methods. The positioning methods in each PMC may be related because they employ measurements of the same type of reference source. These measurements may overlap, and the same measurements may be usable for different positioning methods within the PMC. Assistance data used to enable measurements and/or location computation for positioning methods in the same PMC may also overlap (e.g., if the measurements also overlap). Overlapping measurements and assistance data may be used to more efficiently support several positioning methods within a PMC using a reduced set of measurements and assistance data. For example, measurements and assistance data that apply to multiple positioning methods may be transferred only once instead of for each positioning method.
FIG. 3 shows a hierarchical structure 300 for a positioning protocol, which may be used by location server 130. The positioning protocol may support a set of PMCs, which may be defined for different types of reference sources as described above. Each PMC may include a set of one or more positioning methods defined for a particular type of reference source. For example, an A-GNSS PMC may include A-GPS and A-Galileo positioning methods, a downlink LTE PMC may include OTDOA and E-CID positioning methods, an uplink LTE PMC may include E-CID positioning method, etc. Other PMCs may be defined for downlink WCDMA, uplink WCDMA, downlink CDMA 1×, uplink CDMA 1×, downlink WiMAX, uplink WiMAX, 802.11 Wi-Fi, sensors, etc.
A positioning method (PM) may be used to determine the location of a target device and may be associated with a particular generic positioning method and/or a particular reference source type. Each positioning method may support all or a subset of all measurements and assistance data applicable for its PMC. The set of measurements and assistance data supported by a given positioning method may be mandatory, or optional, or conditional for any positioning unit or location server supporting that positioning method.
A positioning unit or a location server that supports a given PMC may support at least one positioning method in that PMC. A positioning unit or a location server that supports a given positioning method may support all mandatory (and possibly optional and/or conditional) measurements and assistance data for that positioning method.
In one design, a set of measurement data units (MDUs) may be defined for all supported positioning methods. An MDU may be a collection of one or more items of data that may be used to report measurements and their attributes. An MDU may be applicable for one or more positioning methods within a particular PMC. An MDU may apply to multiple positioning methods and may be efficiently sent once to provide measurement data to these positioning methods (instead of separately for each positioning method). For example, MDU 2 in FIG. 3 may apply to positioning methods PMa and PMb and may be sent once for these two positioning methods. An MDU may apply to one reference source and may be repeated for multiple reference sources of the same type, e.g., to provide or request pseudo-ranges for multiple satellites, timing differences for multiple base stations, etc.
MDUs may enable capabilities of location servers and positioning units to be defined, e.g., in terms of which MDUs a location server or positioning unit supports. MDUs may also enable location server 130 to request and positioning unit 120 to provide measurement data in a flexible and precise manner. Location server 130 may indicate certain characteristics (e.g., accuracy and response time) of an MDU when requesting it from positioning unit 120. Positioning unit 120 may indicate the characteristics (e.g., accuracy) of an MDU that it is able to provide (e.g., via its capabilities).
In one design, a set of assistance data units (ADUs) may be defined for all supported positioning methods. An ADU may be a collection of one or more items of data that may be used to assist measurements. An ADU may be applicable for one or more positioning methods within a particular PMC. An ADU may apply to multiple positioning methods and may be efficiently sent once to provide assistance data to these positioning methods (instead of separately for each positioning method). For example, ADU d in FIG. 3 may apply to positioning methods PMd and PMe and may be sent once for these two positioning methods. An ADU may apply to one reference source and may be repeated for multiple reference sources of the same type, e.g., to provide or request ephemeris data for multiple satellites within the same SPS, real time differences (RTDs) for multiple base stations of the same access type, etc.
ADUs may enable capabilities of location servers and positioning units to be defined, e.g., in terms of which ADUs a location server or positioning unit supports. ADUs may also enable positioning unit 120 to request and location server 130 to provide assistance data in a flexible and precise manner. Positioning unit 120 may indicate certain characteristics of an ADU (e.g., lifetime or accuracy for GPS ephemeris data) when requesting it from location server 130.
In one design, PMCs, positioning methods, MDUs, and/or ADUs may be individually identified. This identification may facilitate capabilities, specific measurements, and specific assistance data to be requested and provided. Identification may also be useful to identify the presence of a particular MDU or ADU in a positioning message, to identify a message segment related to a specific positioning method or PMC, etc. The identities of PMCs may be unique across the positioning protocol whereas the identities of positioning methods, MDUs, and ADUs may be unique only for a particular PMC. Different ranges of IDs may be used for identification. For example, PMC ID of 0 may be reserved for possible future signaling applicable to all PMCs, PMC IDs of 1 to 63 may be used for network-based (uplink) PMCs, PMC IDs of 64 to 127 may be used for terminal-assisted and terminal-based (downlink) PMCs, PMC IDs of 128 to 191 may be used for operator specific positioning methods, PMC IDs of 192 to 254 may be used for vendor specific positioning methods, and PMC ID of 255 may be used to indicate PMC IDs greater than 255, if needed. In general, IDs may be defined in any suitable manner for PMCs, positioning methods, MDUs, and/or ADUs.
In one design, calibration PMCs may be used to provide calibration data to a location server for one or more reference sources. Calibration data may be for (i) signal timing and/or signal strength for base stations, access points, and/or other reference sources, (ii) timing and navigation data for GNSS systems, and/or (iii) other signals and data. Calibration data may be used by a location server to obtain assistance data that can be provided later to a positioning unit to assist it in making measurements to locate a target device. As an example, calibration data that includes transmission timing differences between nearby base stations may be used by a location server to derive assistance data (e.g., including approximate time differences between nearby base stations that a target device would be expected to measure) for downlink time difference positioning methods such as OTDOA. Such assistance data may then be sent later to a position unit co-located in the target device. A calibration PMC (or a calibration positioning method) may support a corresponding normal PMC (or normal positioning method) as described in the example above by helping obtain assistance data for the normal PMC (or normal positioning method) and by helping to compute a location estimate for any positioning method in the normal PMC. For example, a calibration PMC for inter-eNB timing measurement may support a downlink LTE PMC including OTDOA and E-CID positioning methods.
The use of calibration PMCs as part of a common positioning protocol that also supports normal PMCs may allow the common positioning protocol to be used to calibrate reference sources and thereby avoid the need for additional protocols for this purpose. A calibration PMC may not directly support any positioning methods, any ADUs, and positioning of target devices. A calibration PMC may support MDUs, which may be provided by positioning units (e.g., base stations or LMUs) for reference sources applicable to the corresponding normal PMC. The MDUs may be used by the location server to help obtain ADUs for the corresponding normal PMC as well as to help compute a location estimate for the position methods in the corresponding normal PMC.
In one design, location server 130 and target device 110 (or location server 130 and positioning unit 120) may engage in a location session in order to obtain measurements or location, to provide assistance data, and/or for other purposes. A location session may also be referred to as an LPP session, a positioning session, etc. A location session may include one or more transactions, which may also be referred to as LPP transactions, etc. Each transaction may cover a particular operation such as exchange of capabilities, transfer of assistance data, transfer of location information, etc. Each transaction may be assigned a transaction ID, and all messages for that transaction may include the transaction ID in order to link the messages to the same transaction.
In one design, a set of positioning messages may be defined and used for communication between location servers and other entities. The positioning messages may also be referred to as LPP messages, LPP protocol data units (PDUs), etc.
FIG. 4A shows a design of a positioning message 400. In this design, positioning message 400 includes a positioning protocol version field 410, a transaction ID field 412, a transaction end flag field 414, a message type field 416, and N information elements 420a through 420n, where N may be zero or greater. Field 410 may indicate which version of the positioning protocol is used for a location session and may be included to negotiate the use of the same positioning protocol version by two entities engaging in the location session. An originating entity may set field 410 to the highest version that it supports. A receiving entity may return the highest version that it supports. The negotiated version may be the lower of the two highest versions supported by the two entities.
For example, LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) is a positioning protocol for both E-UTRAN control plane and SUPL user plane that has been defined by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) in 3GPP Technical Specification (TS) 36.355 that is publicly available. LPP is used point-to-point between a Location Server (E-SMLC or SLP) and a target device (UE) in order to position the target device using position-related measurements obtained for one or more reference sources. FIG. 1, by way of example, illustrates an LPP configuration for control plane positioning in E-UTRAN and for user plane positioning using any access network. An LPP session is used between a Location Server and the target device in order to obtain location related measurements or a location estimate or to transfer assistance data. The instigator of an LPP session will always instigate the first LPP transaction, but subsequent transactions may be instigated by either end. LPP transactions within a session may occur serially or in parallel. LPP transactions are indicated at the LPP protocol level with a transaction ID in order to associate messages with one another (e.g., request and response). Each transaction comprises a single operation (capability exchange, assistance data transfer, or location information transfer).
Another positioning protocol that has been defined by the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) to extend LPP is LPP Extensions (LPPe) defined in OMA-TS-LPPe-V1_0 that is publicly available. LPPe is defined to be used in combination with LPP but is defined in a different specification. This means that different versions of LPPe may be used with different versions of LPP—i.e. versions do not necessarily map one to one.
As protocols, such as LPP, LPPe and others, evolve, a key problem is backward compatibility. Both ends in a transaction must use compatible versions of a protocol in order to communicate and perform the same procedures. Ideally, a later version of a protocol is backward compatible with earlier versions. In this case, an entity that is using an earlier version of the protocol can communicate with an entity that is using a later version without being aware of or supporting the additional features (or possibly reduced features) defined for the later version. This may be achieved by encoding messages for the later version so that they appear the same as messages for the earlier version with some additional parameters that can be ignored by the entity supporting the earlier version. In addition any new messages for the later protocol version that are not defined for the earlier version may be likewise ignored by the entity supporting the earlier protocol version. The procedures defined for the later protocol version need to take into account this possible difference and ensure that the entity supporting the later protocol version can adapt to the reduced (or increased) capabilities of the entity supporting the earlier protocol version. The entity supporting the later protocol version then becomes backward compatible with the entity supporting the earlier protocol version. However, sometimes later protocol versions are not backward compatible with earlier versions. This may happen when some new feature needs to be added to the protocol for which support is critical or it may happen when the message encoding needs to change such that an entity supporting an earlier protocol version will not always be able to correctly decode a new message. Thus, it is necessary for messages to identify the version of the protocol used to encode the message. Identification of only the version of the protocol, however, would require the receiving unit to determine whether the version in the received message is compatible with the protocol versions available to the receiving unit, which is problematic. For example, if the sending unit uses a later protocol version than the receiving unit, the receiving unit may not be able to identify whether the two different versions are compatible since the receiving unit may have been implemented before the later protocol version was defined.
Accordingly, a compatibility level that is associated with inter-operable protocol versions is used. The compatibility level stays the same in higher versions of a protocol provided they remain backward compatible with lower versions. Thus, the receiving unit can determine whether the protocol version of a sending unit is compatible with a different protocol version of the receiving unit by comparing the compatibility level included in the received message with the internal compatibility level or compatibility levels supported by the receiving unit. Where the compatibility level included in the received message is different than the internal compatibility level or any of the internal compatibility levels supported by the receiving unit, the protocol versions between the receiving and sending units are non-compatible. FIG. 4B illustrates an example of positioning message 430, which is similar to positioning message 400, shown in FIG. 4A, but includes the protocol version level 410v1 and the compatibility level 410c1 within the positioning protocol version field 410. While FIG. 4B shows the compatibility level 410c1 as a parameter internal to the positioning protocol version field 410, the compatibility level 410c1 could be a parameter in positioning message 430 that is separate from the positioning protocol version field 410.
The compatibility level for any new protocol version that is non-backward compatible with a previous protocol version is incremented. Table 2, below, for example, illustrates a number of protocol versions (x.y), which may include a major version number (or major version level) x which may vary from 0-255, and a minor version number (or minor version level) y, which may also vary 0-255. The compatibility level associated with each version is also illustrated in Table 2. Thus, for example, versions 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, and 2.1 are all compatible and have a compatibility level of 1. Version 3.0, however, is non-compatible with the previous versions and is therefore given a new compatibility level 2. As can be seen, versions 3.0, 4.0, and 4.1 all have the same compatibility level 2 and are therefore inter-operable. Similarly versions 5.0 and 5.1 are inter-operable, but are non-compatible with prior versions and thus have a higher compatibility level 3.







TABLE 2







Protocol Version Compatibility










Protocol Versions (x.y)
Compatibility Level







1.0
1



1.1



1.2



2.0



2.1



3.0
2



4.0



4.1



5.0
3



5.1










A receiving unit that receives a message that indicates a compatibility level different to the receiving unit's own supported compatibility level or compatibility levels may return an error message to the sending unit indicating the highest compatibility level that is supported. The sending unit may then restart the session with the receiving unit using the compatibility level indicated by the receiving unit and a version of the protocol associated with this compatibility level. If the receiving unit supports the compatibility level indicated in the received message but supports a higher major and/or minor version than indicated in the message, the receiving unit may either use the higher major/minor version in subsequent messages that it sends and allow for the possibility that not all information will be understood or use the lower major/minor version if that is supported. If the receiving unit supports the compatibility level indicated in the received message but supports only a lower major and/or minor version than indicated, the receiving unit may use the highest major/minor version that it supports for this compatibility level in subsequent messages. If the receiving unit supports both the compatibility level and protocol version indicated in the received message, the receiving unit may use the same compatibility level and protocol version in subsequent messages. Once either end has sent a message to the other end, it may continue to use the same major/minor version in subsequent messages belonging to the same session. Version adaptation within a session is thus applicable only to a receiving unit that has not yet sent a message on any new session.
Returning to FIG. 4A, field 412 may identify a transaction for which the positioning message applies. Field 412 may be especially pertinent when multiple transactions occur concurrently during the location session. Each transaction may be assigned a unique transaction ID. In one design, an originating entity that initiates a transaction may assign a transaction ID for that transaction. A responding entity may use the same transaction ID when responding to the originating entity. For example, location server 130 may assign transaction IDs to transactions initiated by location server 130, and positioning unit 120 may assign transaction IDs to transactions initiated by positioning unit 120. When more than one location servers are used to position target device 110, each location server may be allocated a different range of transaction IDs that can be assigned by that location server.
Field 414 may indicate whether the sending entity has terminated the transaction. Field 416 may indicate the type of message being sent. A set of message types may be supported as described below, and positioning message 400 may be of the type indicated by field 416.
Fields 420a through 420n may include information that may be dependent on the message type. Each field 420 may carry a positioning data component (PDC) for one PMC or positioning method. Positioning message 400 may include multiple PDCs to efficiently convey information for more than one PMC at a time and to invoke combined/hybrid positioning.
A positioning message may also include different and/or other fields besides the fields shown in FIG. 4A. For example, a positioning message may include a field for session ID, a field to indicate whether the sender is acting as a location server or a positioning unit, etc.
Table 3 lists a set of positioning message types that may be supported in accordance with one design.







TABLE 3







Positioning Message Type








Message Type
Description





Request Capabilities
Message to request for capabilities of an entity



for positioning protocol and positioning



methods.


Provide Capabilities
Message to provide capabilities of an entity for



positioning protocol and positioning methods.


Request Assistance Data
Message to request for assistance data.


Provide Assistance Data
Message to provide assistance data.


Request Location
Message to request for location information.


Information


Provide Location
Message to provide location information.


Information









Location server 130 may provide its capabilities when requested by positioning unit 120 or may send its capabilities unilaterally without receiving any request. Similarly, positioning unit 120 may provide its capabilities when requested by location server 130 or may send its capabilities unilaterally without receiving any request. The capabilities of an entity (e.g., location server 130 or positioning unit 120) may include the PMCs and positioning methods supported by that entity and the capabilities of the entity for each supported positioning method (e.g., a list of MDUs that can be sent or received by the entity and/or a list of ADUs that can be sent or received by the entity).
Location server 130 may provide assistance data when requested by positioning unit 120 or may send the assistance data unilaterally without receiving any request. The assistance data may assist positioning unit 120 to make measurements that may be used for positioning of target device 110 or for calibration of reference source 140. Location server 130 may also provide assistance data when the data changes for an ongoing positioning method. This automatic update of assistance data may enable the positioning method to be reset without having to explicitly abort and restart it. For example, target device 110 may change serving cell (e.g., due to handover) during an OTDOA positioning method, and location server 130 may send new assistance data applicable for the new serving cell in order for positioning unit 120 (in target device 110) to obtain and transfer measurements of different neighbor base stations associated with the new serving cell. As another example, positioning unit 120 (e.g., an LMU) may measure data and/or signaling channels transmitted by target device 110 in a particular serving cell for U-TDOA positioning, and target device 110 may change serving cell (e.g., due to handover). Location server 130 may then send new assistance data to positioning unit 120 to enable it to measure different data and/or signaling channels associated with the new serving cell. Having automatic update may be useful in these scenarios.
Positioning unit 120 may send positioning information to location server 130 to support positioning of target device 110 (e.g., for a normal PMC) or determination of assistance data for future positioning (e.g., for a calibration PMC). The positioning information may comprise (i) measurements made by positioning unit 120 within target device 110 for other reference sources (e.g., as shown in FIG. 2A), (ii) measurements made by positioning unit 120 external to target device 110 for reference source 140 in target device 110 (e.g., as shown in FIG. 2B), (iii) a location estimate for target device 110 obtained by positioning unit 120, and/or (iv) other information related to the location of target device 110. Location server 130 may send location information comprising a location estimate for target device 110 to positioning unit 120, e.g., if positioning unit 120 is part of target device 110 and target device 110 is the intended final recipient of the location estimate. For calibration of a reference source, positioning information may comprise measurements made by positioning unit 120 for network-based reference sources (e.g., base stations) and other resources (e.g., satellites).
A positioning message may also include a field for common parameters applicable for all PMCs supported by the positioning message. The common parameters for a Request Capabilities message and a Provide Capabilities message may include a list of supported PMC IDs, PMC versions, etc. The common parameters for a Request Assistance Data message may include an approximate location of a target device, an indication of whether periodic or triggered assistance data is requested and associated parameters, primary access (e.g., a serving cell ID), secondary accesses (e.g., neighboring cell IDs), etc. The common parameters for a Provide Assistance Data message may include an approximate location of a target device, current time, etc. The common parameters for a Request Location Information message may include required quality-of-service (QoS) (e.g., for location, measurement accuracy, and/or response time), an indication of whether periodic or triggered location information is requested and associated parameters, location type for terminal-assisted and/or terminal-based positioning methods, a list of required or preferred PMC IDs and PMC versions, etc. The common parameters for a Provide Location Information message may include a location estimate and accuracy, time, velocity, etc.
FIG. 4C shows a design of a positioning message 450 that includes multiple parts defined by different organizations. Positioning message 450 may include a positioning protocol version field (which may include a version level and compatibility level as in FIG. 4B), a transaction ID field, a transaction end flag field, a message type field, and N information elements, as described above for FIG. 4A. In one design, one part may be sent in each information element. For example, a first part may comprise first information for positioning defined by a first organization, a second part may comprise second information for positioning defined by a second organization, etc. An organization may be 3GPP, 3GPP2, OMA, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), a network operator, an equipment vendor, etc. The multiple parts may be for a particular transaction type, e.g., capability transfer, assistance data transfer, location information transfer, etc. This design may allow an external organization to enhance an existing positioning method or support new positioning methods by defining additional capabilities that may be carried in one or more additional parts of a positioning message.
Each part in FIG. 4C may support a distinct positioning protocol that extends the positioning protocol for the message 450 but is defined by a separate organization. For example, the positioning protocol for the overall message 450 may be defined by 3GPP (e.g. may be LPP) whereas the positioning protocol for the part 420a in Information Element 1 may be defined by OMA (e.g. may be LPPe). In that case, the part 420a in Information Element 1 may carry its own header and parameters and include (e.g. in the header) a protocol version parameter that may further include a version level and compatibility level as for the positioning protocol version field 410 in FIG. 4B. Alternatively, the part 420a may contain (e.g. in the header) a Protocol version parameter (e.g. comprising a major and minor version) and a separate compatibility level. A receiver of message 450 may then determine whether it supports the overall message 450 excluding the part 420a from positioning protocol version field 410 as described earlier for FIG. 4B. Possibly the positioning protocol for message 450 may be designed so that all versions are compatible in which case a compatibility level may not be needed for message 450. In addition to determining whether it supports message 450, a receiver of message 450 may also determine whether it supports the positioning protocol associated with the part 420a. This may be accomplished if the sender of message 450 includes a protocol version (e.g. comprising a major and minor version) and a compatibility level within part 420a (e.g. in the header for part 420a). If the receiver supports the compatibility level it can then determine whether it supports the protocol version included within part 420a or a later or earlier protocol version as described earlier for FIG. 4B. If the receiver does not support the compatibility level included by the sender for part 420a but does support the protocol version or compatibility level for message 450, then the receiver may return to the sender the highest compatibility level that it does support for the protocol associated with part 420a—e.g. in an Error message—thereby allowing the sender to restart the session using this compatibility level for part 420a if supported. Alternatively, the receiver may ignore the presence of part 420a and continue communication with the sender using only the protocol associated with message 450.
In one design, several related transactions may be invoked in parallel. For example, positioning unit 120 may be co-located with target device 110 (e.g., as shown in FIG. 2A) and may request for its own location from location server 130, request for assistance data from location server 130, and provide its capabilities to location server 130 to enable location server 130 to obtain its location. As another example, positioning unit 120 may be co-located with target device 110 and may request for its own location from location server 130 and may provide measurements for one or more positioning methods (e.g., E-CID and/or A-GNSS) to location server 130 to enable location server 130 to derive a location estimate. The messages sent by positioning unit 120 to location server 130 in both examples above may also be combined. As yet another example, location server 130 may request for positioning information from positioning unit 120, which may be co-located with target device 110, and may provide assistance data to positioning unit 120 to help obtain the positioning information.
In one design, multiple positioning messages for multiple transactions may be transported together in one message transaction/exchange. In one design, a single container message may include the multiple positioning messages. For example, the container message may be a predefined positioning message that can carry the multiple positioning messages in multiple information elements, one information element for each individual positioning message. In another design, the multiple positioning messages may be linked and sent separately, either serially or in parallel. A common identifier may be included in each message to enable the separate messages to be associated at a receiving entity. The multiple positioning messages may also be transported together in other manners. The format and content of each positioning message may not be dependent on whether that positioning message is sent alone or with other positioning messages.
A sending entity may send a container message including multiple positioning messages for multiple transactions. A recipient entity may generate individual replies for the multiple transactions and may use the association of the multiple positioning messages to provide more appropriate responses, e.g., by making use of the information contained in all received positioning messages to generate the reply to each received message. The recipient entity may return a container message including multiple positioning messages for the individual replies. Transporting multiple positioning messages together may provide various advantages such as (i) reduce delay and avoid problems due to delivery of positioning messages out of order if sent separately and (ii) ensure that a receiving entity is in possession of the most information needed to process and reply to each received message.
FIG. 5 shows a message flow 500 for a mobile-originated location request (MO-LR) service in LTE. An LCS client in a UE 510 or a user of UE 510 may request for location service, e.g., to retrieve the location of UE 510 or to transfer the UE location to a third party. UE 510 may send an MO-LR request message to a Mobility Management Entity (MME) 540 via a serving eNB 520 (step 1). The MO-LR request message may be used as a container message to carry one or more positioning messages to instigate one or more procedures. For example, the MO-LR request message may include a positioning message to provide capabilities of UE 510, a positioning message to request for assistance data, a positioning message to provide measurements, etc. MME 540 may send a location request message to an E-SMLC 530 (step 2). The location request message may include any positioning message received by MME 540 in step 1.
E-SMLC 530 and UE 510 may engage in a location session and may perform one or more transactions (step 3). For this location session, UE 510 may be a target device and a positioning unit, and E-SMLC 530 may be a location server. E-SMLC 530 may instigate one or more transactions to obtain positioning capabilities of UE 510, provide assistance data to UE 510, and/or obtain positioning information from UE 510. After the first positioning message is received from E-SMLC 530, UE 510 may instigate one or more transactions to request for assistance data, to request for further assistance data, etc.
E-SMLC 530 and eNB 520 may engage in a location session and may perform one or more transactions (step 4). For this location session, eNB 520 may be a positioning unit, and E-SMLC 530 may be a location server. E-SMLC 530 may obtain positioning information for UE 510 from eNB 520 via the location session. Steps 3 and 4 may occur in any order or in parallel. E-SMLC 530 may return a location response message to MME 540 (step 5). The location response message may include any location estimate obtained from steps 3 and 4 and/or a final positioning message, which may provide a location estimate if requested by UE 510 in step 1. If UE 510 requested location transfer to a third party, then MME 540 may transfer the location estimate received from E-SMLC 530 to the third party (step 6). MME 540 may send to UE 510 an MO-LR response message that may carry any final positioning message received in step 5 and/or a separate location estimate (step 7).
For control plane location solution, a network entity (e.g., MME 540) may need to request for location service from a location server (e.g., E-SMLC 530) before a location session can occur. For MO-LR service, a target device (e.g., UE 510) may first send an MO-LR request message to the network entity to request for location service. The target device may then wait for a response from the network entity and may thereafter send a first positioning message to the location server. This extra delay may be avoided by having the target device include the first positioning message in the MO-LR request message sent to the network entity. The network entity may then transfer this first positioning message to the location server in the location request message. Subsequent positioning messages may be sent more directly between the target device and the location server without making use of a Non Access Stratum (NAS) layer in which the MO-LR request message belongs. A final positioning message from the location server may be sent either directly to the target device or via an MO-LR response message, which may reduce the total number of messages to transfer.
FIG. 6 shows a message flow 600 for a location session with multiple transactions. Message flow 600 may be used for the location session in step 3 and/or the location session in step 4 in FIG. 5. Target device 110 may send an MO-LR request message to location server 130 (step 1). The MO-LR request message may carry one or more positioning messages to instigate one or more procedures. A positioning message may include the required QoS, whether triggered or periodic location is requested, and/or other information. Location server 130 may send a positioning message to request for positioning capabilities of target device 110, if the positioning capabilities are not received in step 1 (step 2). Target device 110 may return a positioning message with its positioning capabilities, e.g., supported positioning methods (step 3).
Location server 130 may send a positioning message to a request for positioning information, e.g., location-related measurements for the positioning methods supported by target device 110 (step 4). Target device 110 may send a positioning message to request for assistance data (step 5). Location server 130 may return a positioning message with the requested assistance data (step 6). Location server 130 may also send one or more follow on positioning messages with updated assistance data (not shown in FIG. 6), e.g., when triggered by changes or at a periodic interval. Target device 110 may obtain the positioning information (e.g., measurements) and may send a positioning message with the positioning information (step 7). Target device 110 may also send one or more follow-on positioning messages with updated location information (not shown in FIG. 6), e.g., when triggered by changes or at a periodic interval. Location server 130 may compute a location estimate for target device 110 using the positioning information received in step 7. Location server 130 may then send an MO-LR response message, which may include a positioning message and/or the location estimate, to target device 110 (step 8). Location server 130 may also send one or more follow on positioning messages with updated location estimates (not shown in FIG. 6), e.g., when triggered by certain events, or at a periodic interval, or after receiving further positioning information from the target device, etc.
FIG. 6 shows an exemplary location session with three explicit transactions A, B and C. In general, a location session may include any number of transactions and any type of transaction. Multiple transactions of the same type may also be performed. For example, a transaction to obtain positioning information from a target device to support E-CID positioning may be performed to obtain an approximate location, and a separate A-GNSS associated transaction may be performed in parallel or subsequently to obtain an accurate location.
FIG. 6 shows a message flow for an MO-LR service. A message flow for a mobile-terminated location request (MT-LR) service may be defined with steps 2 through 7 in FIG. 6.
As shown in FIG. 6, a number of transactions may be performed. A transaction may involve a pair of positioning messages exchanged between a positioning unit in a target device 110 and location server 130, as shown in FIG. 6. A transaction may also involve a single positioning message sent unilaterally by one entity. For example, a positioning unit in target device 110 may unilaterally provide its capabilities without receiving a request for capabilities, and location server 130 may unilaterally provide assistance data without receiving a request for assistance data. Multiple positioning messages for multiple transactions may be aggregated and transferred together. For example, the positioning messages in steps 2 and 4 may be transferred together, the positioning messages in steps 3 and 5 may be transferred together, etc.
FIG. 7 shows a design of a process 700 for supporting positioning by a location server. The location server may obtain positioning information for a target device via a common positioning protocol, which may be LPP or some other positioning protocol (block 712). The location server may reside at one of a plurality of possible entities, and the target device may be one of these entities. For example, the location server may reside in a network entity or may be co-located with the target device. The location server may use the common positioning protocol regardless of where it resides and may communicate with other entities via the common positioning protocol. The common positioning protocol may simply mean that the same positioning protocol is used regardless of where the location server resides. The location server may determine location information for the target device (block 714).
In one design, the positioning information may comprise measurements for at least one reference source. For example, the location server may obtain measurements for at least one signal from at least one satellite, or at least one base station, or at least one terminal, or the target device, or some other entity, or a combination thereof. The location information may comprise a location estimate for the target device, which may be determined by the location server based on the measurements. In another design, the positioning information (i) may be indicative of the location of the target device, e.g., may comprise a coarse or a fine location estimate, or (ii) may comprise measurements of references sources that can be received at the location of the target device. The location information may comprise assistance data determined by the location server based on the positioning information. In yet another design, the location information may comprise assistance data, and the positioning information may comprise measurements made based on the assistance data. In general, the positioning information may comprise measurements, a location estimate, etc. The location information may comprise a location estimate, assistance data, etc. The two steps in FIG. 7 may be performed in the order shown in FIG. 7, or in the opposite order. The location information may be determined based on the positioning information, or vice versa.
In one design, a positioning unit for the target device may determine the positioning information, e.g., make measurements. The positioning unit may reside at one of a second plurality of possible entities, and the target device may be one of these entities. The location server may communicate with the positioning unit via the common positioning protocol. For example, the location server may exchange capabilities, or assistance data, or location information, or a combination thereof with the positioning unit via the common positioning protocol.
FIG. 8 shows a design of a process 800 for supporting positioning by an entity, which may be a target device, or a positioning unit, or some other entity. The entity may send positioning information for a target device to a location server via a common positioning protocol (block 812). The location server may reside at one of a plurality of possible entities and may use the common positioning protocol regardless of where it resides. The target device may be one of the plurality of possible entities. The entity may receive location information for the target device from the location server (block 814).
In one design, the positioning information may comprise measurements for at least one reference source, and the location information may comprise a location estimate for the target device determined by the location server based on the measurements. In another design, the positioning information may comprise measurements of references sources that can be received at the location of the target device, and the location information may comprise assistance data determined by the location server based on the positioning information. In yet another design, the location information may comprise assistance data, and the positioning information may comprise measurements made based on the assistance data. In this design, block 812 may occur after block 814.
In one design, the entity may measure at least one signal from at least one reference source to obtain the measurements. In one design, the at least one reference source may comprise at least one satellite, or at least one base station, or at least one terminal, or a combination thereof. In this design, the measurements may be made at the target device. In another design, the at least one reference source may comprise the target device and possibly other reference sources. In this design, the measurements may be made at a positioning unit that is external to the target device.
FIG. 9 shows a design of a process 900 for supporting positioning by an entity, which may be a location server, a positioning unit, a target device, or some other entity. The entity may exchange (e.g., send or receive) a plurality of positioning messages transported together in one message transaction (block 912). In one design, the entity may send the plurality of positioning messages as linked messages or in a single container message. In another design, the entity may receive the plurality of positioning messages, which may be sent as linked messages or in a single container message. The entity may perform positioning based on the plurality of positioning messages (block 914).
In one design, the plurality of positioning messages may be sent with an MO-LR message by the target device to initiate positioning. In another design, the plurality of positioning messages may be sent by a location server and may comprise (i) a first positioning message carrying assistance data and (ii) a second positioning message requesting for location information. In yet another design, the plurality of positioning messages may be sent to the location server (e.g., by the positioning unit or the target device) and may comprise (i) a first positioning message requesting for assistance data and (ii) a second positioning message carrying measurements. The plurality of messages may also include some other combination of messages.
In one design, each of the plurality of positioning messages may be of one of a plurality of message types, which may include a request capabilities message type, a provide capabilities message type, a request assistance data message type, a provide assistance data message type, a request location information message type, and a provide location information message type. The plurality of positioning messages may include positioning messages of at least two message types.
FIG. 10 shows a design of a process 1000 for supporting positioning by an entity, which may be a location server, a positioning unit, a target device, or some other entity. The entity may exchange a positioning message comprising a first part and a second part for a particular transaction type (block 1012). The first part may comprise first information for positioning defined by a first organization, and the second part may comprise second information for positioning defined by a second organization. For example, the first organization may comprise 3GPP or some other organization. The second organization may comprise 3GPP2, OMA, IETF, IEEE, a network operator, an equipment vendor, or some other organization. The entity may perform positioning based on the positioning message (block 1014).
In one design of block 1012, the entity may be a target device sending the positioning message to, or receiving the positioning message from, a location server. In another design, the entity may be a location server sending the positioning message to, or receiving the positioning message from, a target device.
In one design of block 1014, the entity may determine assistance data or a location estimate based on the first information (e.g., measurements) in the first part and the second information (e.g., more measurements, or a coarse location estimate) in the second part. In another design, the entity may make measurements based on the first information (e.g., assistance data for satellites) in the first part and the second information (e.g., assistance data for base stations) in the second part.
FIG. 11 shows a design of a process 1100 for supporting positioning by an entity, which may be a location server, a positioning unit, a target device, or some other entity. The entity may exchange a measurement data unit applicable for a first plurality of positioning methods, with each of the first plurality of positioning methods being associated with a different set of applicable measurement data units (block 1112). For example, the exchanged measurement data unit may be MDU 2 in FIG. 3, the first plurality of positioning methods may include PMa and PMb, positioning method PMa may be associated with a first set of MDUs 1, 2 and 3, and positioning method PMb may be associated with a second set of MDUs 2 and 3. The entity may perform positioning based on the exchanged measurement data unit and in accordance with a positioning method, which may be one of the first plurality of positioning methods (block 1114).
Alternatively or additionally, the entity may exchange an assistance data unit applicable for a second plurality of positioning methods, with each of the second plurality of positioning methods being associated with a different set of applicable assistance data units (block 1116). The entity may perform positioning based on the exchanged assistance data unit and in accordance with the positioning method, which may be one of the second plurality of positioning methods (block 1118).
In general, only shared measurement data units may be supported, or only shared assistance data units may be supported, or both shared measurement and assistance data units may be supported. If only shared measurement data units are supported, then blocks 1112 and 1114 may be performed, and blocks 1116 and 1118 may be omitted. If only shared assistance data units are supported, then blocks 1116 and 1118 may be performed, and blocks 1112 and 1114 may be omitted. If both shared measurement and assistance data units are supported, the blocks 1112 to 1118 may be performed.
FIG. 12 shows a design of a process 1200 for sending a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, as discussed above in reference to FIG. 4B and FIG. 4C. A sending unit prepares a message (which may be self-contained or may be contained within another protocol message) with a message segment that includes a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions (block 1202), as illustrated in Table 2, above. In one design, the message may be an LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and the message segment may be a header of the LPP PDU. In another design, the message may be an LTE Extensions (LPPe) PDU contained within an LPP message and the message segment may be a header of the LPPe PDU. The sending unit then transmits the message with the message segment including the version and the compatibility level to the receiving unit (block 1204). In response, the sending unit may receive a response message including an error message and including a different compatibility level. Alternatively, the sending unit may receive a response message with a message segment including a different version of a protocol used to encode the response message and the same compatibility level. The different version may be a higher version or lower version than the version included in the message that was transmitted by the sending unit. Alternatively, the sending unit may receive a response message with a message segment including the same version of a protocol used to encode the response message and the same compatibility level.
FIG. 13 shows a design of a process 1210 for receiving a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, as discussed above in reference to FIG. 4B and FIG. 4C. A receiving unit receives a message (which may be self-contained or may be contained within another protocol message) with a message segment including a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions (block 1212). In one design, the message may be an LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and the message segment may be a header of the LPP PDU. In another design the message may be an LTE Extensions (LPPe) PDU contained within an LPP message and the message segment may be a header of the LPPe PDU. The receiving unit compares the compatibility level included in the message that was received to an internal compatibility level (block 1214) and prepares response message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level (block 1216). The receiving unit transmits the response message with the message segment including the internal compatibility level (block 1218). By way of example, the compatibility level included in the message that was received may be different than the internal compatibility level and, thus, the response message is an error message. Alternatively, the compatibility level included in the message that was received may be same as the internal compatibility level, and in one design, the receiving unit compares the version included in the message that was received to an internal version of a protocol used to encode the response message, wherein the response message includes the internal version. The internal version may be a higher version or lower version than the version included in the message that was received or it may be the same version.
FIG. 14 shows a block diagram of a design of target device 110, a base station 122, and location server 130. Target device 110 may be a UE, a SET, etc. Location server 130 may be an SMLC, an E-SMLC, an SLP, etc. Positioning unit 120 may reside in target device 110, base station 122, or some other entity. Reference source 140 may be part of base station 122, or a satellite, or some other entity. For simplicity, FIG. 14 shows only one controller/processor 1220, one memory 1222, and one transmitter/receiver (TMTR/RCVR) 1224 for target device 110, only one controller/processor 1230, one memory 1232, one transmitter/receiver 1234, and one communication (Comm) unit 1236 for base station 122, and only one controller/processor 1240, one memory 1242, and one communication unit 1244 for location server 130. In general, each entity may include any number of processing units (processors, controllers, etc.), memories, transmitters/receivers, communication units, etc.
On the downlink, base station 122 may transmit data, signaling, and pilot to terminals within its coverage area. These various types of information may be processed by processing unit 1230, conditioned by transmitter 1234, and transmitted on the downlink. At target device 110, downlink signals from base station 122 and other base stations may be received and conditioned by receiver 1224 and further processed by processing unit 1220 to obtain various types of information. Processing unit 1220 may perform process 800 in FIG. 8, process 900 in FIG. 9, process 1000 in FIG. 10, process 1100 in FIG. 11, and/or other processes for the techniques described herein. Memories 1222 and 1232 may store program codes and data for target device 110 and base station 122, respectively. On the uplink, target device 110 may transmit data, signaling, and pilot to base station 122. These various types of information may be processed by processing unit 1220, conditioned by transmitter 1224, and transmitted on the uplink. At base station 122, the uplink signals from target device 110 and other terminals may be received and conditioned by receiver 1234 and further processed by processing unit 1230 to obtain various types of information from the terminals. Base station 122 may directly or indirectly communicate with location server 130 via communication unit 1236.
Within location server 130, processing unit 1240 may perform processing to support location services and positioning for terminals. For example, processing unit 1240 may perform process 700 in FIG. 7, process 800 in FIG. 8, process 900 in FIG. 9, process 1000 in FIG. 10, process 1100 in FIG. 11, and/or other processes for the techniques described herein. Processing unit 1240 may also compute location estimates for target device 110, provide location information, etc. Memory 1242 may store program codes and data for location server 130. Communication unit 1244 may allow location server 130 to communicate with base station 122 and/or other network entities. Location server 130 and target device 110 may exchange positioning messages via base station 122 and other network entities (not shown).
Positioning unit 120 may reside in terminal 110, or base station 122, or location server 130. In this case, the processing by positioning unit 120 may be performed by processing unit 1220, 1230, or 1240, respectively. Positioning unit 120 may also be external to the entities shown in FIG. 14. In this case, positioning unit 120 may include one or more processing units (processors, controllers, etc.), memories, transmitters/receivers, communication units, etc., that can perform the required functions.
Those of skill in the art would understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the disclosure herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present disclosure.
Position determination techniques described herein may be implemented in conjunction with various wireless communication networks such as a wireless wide area network (WWAN), a wireless local area network (WLAN), a wireless personal area network (WPAN), and so on. The term “network” and “system” are often used interchangeably. A WWAN may be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) network, a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) network, a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) network, an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) network, a Single-Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) network, a Long Term Evolution (LTE) network, a WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) network and so on. A CDMA network may implement one or more radio access technologies (RATs) such as cdma2000, Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA), and so on. Cdma2000 includes IS-95, IS-2000, and IS-856 standards. A TDMA network may implement Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone System (D-AMPS), or some other RAT. GSM and W-CDMA are described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP). Cdma2000 is described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2). 3GPP and 3GPP2 documents are publicly available. A WLAN may be an IEEE 802.11x network, and a WPAN may be a Bluetooth network, an IEEE 802.15x, or some other type of network. The techniques may also be implemented in conjunction with any combination of WWAN, WLAN and/or WPAN.
A satellite positioning system (SPS) typically includes a system of transmitters positioned to enable entities to determine their location on or above the Earth based, at least in part, on signal received from the transmitters. Such a transmitter typically transmits a signal marked with a repeating pseudo-random noise (PN) code of a set number of chips and may be located on ground based control stations, user equipment and/or space vehicles. In a particular example, such transmitters may be located on Earth orbiting satellite vehicles (SVs). For example, a SV in a constellation of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) such as Global Positioning System (GPS), Galileo, Glonass or Compass may transmit a signal marked with a PN code that is distinguishable from PN codes transmitted by other SVs in the constellation (e.g., using different PN codes for each satellite as in GPS or using the same code on different frequencies as in Glonass). In accordance with certain aspects, the techniques presented herein are not restricted to global systems (e.g., GNSS) for SPS. For example, the techniques provided herein may be applied to or otherwise enabled for use in various regional systems, such as, e.g., Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) over Japan, Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS) over India, Beidou over China, etc., and/or various augmentation systems (e.g., an Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)) that may be associated with or otherwise enabled for use with one or more global and/or regional navigation satellite systems. By way of example but not limitation, an SBAS may include an augmentation system(s) that provides integrity information, differential corrections, etc., such as, e.g., Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS), Multi-functional Satellite Augmentation System (MSAS), GPS Aided Geo Augmented Navigation or GPS and Geo Augmented Navigation system (GAGAN), and/or the like. Thus, as used herein an SPS may include any combination of one or more global and/or regional navigation satellite systems and/or augmentation systems, and SPS signals may include SPS, SPS-like, and/or other signals associated with such one or more SPS.
The methodologies described herein may be implemented by various means depending upon the application. For example, these methodologies may be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. For an implementation involving hardware, the processing units may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, electronic devices, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
For an implementation involving firmware and/or software, the methodologies may be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. Any machine-readable medium tangibly embodying instructions may be used in implementing the methodologies described herein. For example, software codes may be stored in a memory and executed by a processing unit. Memory may be implemented within the processing unit or external to the processing unit. As used herein the term “memory” refers to any type of long term, short term, volatile, nonvolatile, or other memory and is not to be limited to any particular type of memory or number of memories, or type of media upon which memory is stored.
If implemented in firmware and/or software, the functions may be stored as one or more instructions or program code on a non-transitory computer-readable medium. Examples include computer-readable media encoded with a data structure and computer-readable media encoded with a computer program. Computer-readable media can take the form of an article of manufacture. Computer-readable media includes physical computer storage media. A storage medium may be any available medium that can be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage, semiconductor storage, or other storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer; disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and Blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
In addition to storage on computer-readable medium, instructions and/or data may be provided as signals on transmission media included in a communication apparatus. For example, a communication apparatus may include a transceiver having signals indicative of instructions and data. The instructions and data are configured to cause one or more processing units to implement the functions outlined in the claims. That is, the communication apparatus includes transmission media with signals indicative of information to perform disclosed functions. At a first time, the transmission media included in the communication apparatus may include a first portion of the information to perform the disclosed functions, while at a second time the transmission media included in the communication apparatus may include a second portion of the information to perform the disclosed functions.
The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

## Claims

1. A method comprising, with a processor:
obtaining a first message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the first message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
in response to a determination that the compatibility level is different than the internal compatibility level, initiating transmission of an error message with a message segment indicating the internal compatibility level; and
obtaining a second message with a second message segment indicating the internal compatibility level and a second version of the protocol used to encode the second message that is associated with the internal compatibility level.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first message and the second message are selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the second message is received as part of a new session.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the version of the protocol comprises a major version number and a minor version number.

5. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a transmitter and a receiver;
at least one processing unit coupled to the transmitter and the receiver and configured to receive by the receiver a first message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the first message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions, to compare the compatibility level to an internal compatibility level, wherein the compatibility level is different than the internal compatibility level, to prepare an error message with a message segment indicating the internal compatibility level, to cause the transmitter to transmit the error message, and to receive by the receiver a second message with a second message segment indicating the internal compatibility level and a second version of the protocol used to encode the second message that is associated with the internal compatibility level.

6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the first message and the second message are selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the second message is part of a new session.

8. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the version of the protocol comprises a major version number and a minor version number.

9. An apparatus for wireless communication comprising:
a means for receiving a first message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the first message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
a means for preparing an error message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level, in response to a determination that the compatibility level is different than the internal compatibility level;
a means for transmitting the error message; and
a means for receiving a second message with a second message segment including the internal compatibility level and a second version of the protocol used to encode the second message that is associated with the internal compatibility level.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including program code stored thereon, comprising:
program code to cause at least one computer to receive a first message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the first message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
program code to cause the at least one computer to prepare an error message with a message segment including the internal compatibility level, in response to a determination that the compatibility level included in the first message is different than the internal compatibility level;
program code to cause the at least one computer to transmit the error message; and
program code to cause the at least one computer to receive a second message with a second message segment indicating the internal compatibility level and a second version of the protocol used to encode the second message that is associated with the internal compatibility level.

11. A method comprising:
receiving a message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
comparing with a processor the compatibility level to an internal compatibility level, wherein the compatibility level included in the message that was received is the same as the internal compatibility level;
comparing with the processor the version of the protocol to a supported version of the protocol;
selecting with the processor a version of the protocol to use in subsequently transmitted messages;
preparing with the processor a response message using the selected version of the protocol to encode the response message; and
transmitting the response message.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the message is selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the version of the protocol comprises a major version number and a minor version number.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the supported version of the protocol is higher than the version of the protocol included in the message that was received and the supported version of the protocol is selected to be used in the subsequently transmitted messages.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the supported version of the protocol is higher than the version of the protocol included in the message that was received and the version of the protocol included in the message is selected to be used in the subsequently transmitted messages.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein the supported version of the protocol is lower than the version of the protocol included in the message that was received and the supported version of the protocol is selected to be used in the subsequently transmitted messages.

17. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a transmitter and a receiver;
at least one processing unit coupled to the transmitter and the receiver and configured to receive with the receiver a message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions, to compare the compatibility level included in the message that was received to an internal compatibility level, wherein the compatibility level is the same as the internal compatibility level, to compare the version of the protocol included in the message to a supported version of the protocol, to select a version of the protocol to use in subsequently transmitted messages, to prepare a response message using the selected version of the protocol to encode the response message, and to cause the transmitter to transmit the response message.

18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the message is selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

19. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the version of the protocol comprises a major version number and a minor version number.

20. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the supported version of the protocol is higher than the version of the protocol included in the message that was received and the supported version of the protocol is selected to be used in the subsequently transmitted messages.

21. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the supported version of the protocol is higher than the version of the protocol included in the message that was received and the version of the protocol included in the message is selected to be used in the subsequently transmitted messages.

22. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the supported version of the protocol is lower than the version of the protocol included in the message that was received and the supported version of the protocol is selected to be used in the subsequently transmitted messages.

23. A apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a means for receiving a message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
a means for comparing the compatibility level to an internal compatibility level, wherein the compatibility level is the same as the internal compatibility level;
a means for comparing the version of the protocol to a supported version of the protocol;
a means for selecting a version of the protocol to use in subsequently transmitted messages;
a means for preparing a response message using the selected version of the protocol to encode the response message; and
a means for transmitting the response message.

24. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including program code stored thereon, comprising:
program code to cause at least one computer to receive a message with a message segment indicating a version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
program code to cause the at least one computer to compare the compatibility level to an internal compatibility level, wherein the compatibility level is the same as the internal compatibility level;
program code to cause the at least one computer to compare the version of the protocol to a supported version of the protocol;
program code to cause the at least one computer to select a version of the protocol to use in subsequently transmitted messages;
program code to cause the at least one computer to prepare a response message using the selected version of the protocol to encode the response message; and
program code to cause the at least one computer to transmit the response message.

25. A method comprising:
preparing with a processor a first message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a first compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions; and
transmitting the first message with the message segment;
receiving an error message indicating a second compatibility level that is different than the first compatibility level;
preparing with the processor a second message with a message segment indicating a second version of the protocol used to encode the message and the second compatibility level which is associated with the second version of the protocol; and
transmitting the second message.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the first message and the second message are selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

27. The method of claim 25, further comprising restarting a session prior to transmitting the second message.

28. The method of claim 25, wherein the first version and the second version of the protocol comprises a major version number and a minor version number.

29. The method of claim 25, wherein the second compatibility level is lower than or higher than the first compatibility level.

30. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a transmitter and a receiver; and
at least one processing unit coupled to the transmitter and the receiver and configured to prepare a first message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a first compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions, to transmit with the transmitter the first message; to receive with the receiver an error message indicating a second compatibility level that is different than the first compatibility level; to prepare a second message with a message segment including a second version of the protocol used to encode the message and the second compatibility level which is associated with the second version of the protocol; and to transmit with the transmitter the second message.

31. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the first message and the second message are selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

32. The apparatus of claim 29, the least one processing unit further configured to restart a session prior to causing the transmitter to transmit the second message.

33. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the first version and the second version of the protocol comprises a major version number and a minor version number.

34. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the second compatibility level is lower than or higher than the first compatibility level.

35. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a means for preparing a first message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a first compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions; and
a means for transmitting the first message;
a means for receiving an error message indicating a second compatibility level that is different than the first compatibility level;
a means for preparing a second message with a message segment including a second version of the protocol used to encode the message and the second compatibility level which is associated with the second version of the protocol; and
a means for transmitting the second message.

36. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including program code stored thereon, comprising:
program code to cause at least one computer to prepare a first message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a first compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions; and
program code to cause the at least one computer to transmit the first message;
program code to cause the at least one computer to receive an error message indicating a second compatibility level that is different than the first compatibility level;
program code to cause the at least one computer to prepare a second message with a message segment indicating a second version of the protocol used to encode the message and the second compatibility level which is associated with the second version of the protocol; and
program code to cause the at least one computer to transmit the second message.

37. A method comprising:
preparing with a processor a message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
transmitting the message; and
receiving a response message indicating a second version of the protocol used to encode the response message and the compatibility level, wherein the second version of the protocol is different than the first version of the protocol.

38. The method of claim 35, wherein the message is selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

39. The method of claim 35, wherein the second version is a higher version than the first version.

40. The method of claim 35, wherein the second is a lower version than the first version.

41. The method of claim 35, wherein the first version and the second version of the protocol comprises major version numbers and minor version numbers.

42. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a transmitter and a receiver; and
at least one processing unit coupled to the transmitter and the receiver and configured to prepare a message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions, to cause the transmitter to transmit the message, and to cause the receiver to receive a response message indicating a second version of the protocol used to encode the response message and the compatibility level, wherein the second version of the protocol is different than the first version of the protocol.

43. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the message is selected from a group consisting essentially of: a LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) and an LPP Extensions (LPPe) PDU.

44. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the second version is a higher version than the first version.

45. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the second is a lower version than the first version.

46. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the first version and the second version of the protocol comprises major version numbers and minor version numbers.

47. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
a means for preparing a message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
a means for transmitting the message; and
a means for receiving a response message indicating second version of the protocol used to encode the response message and the compatibility level, wherein the second version of the protocol is different than the first version of the protocol.

48. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including program code stored thereon, comprising:
program code to cause at least one computer to prepare a message with a message segment indicating a first version of a protocol used to encode the message and a compatibility level associated with inter-operable protocol versions, wherein different compatibility levels indicate non-compatibility between protocol versions;
program code to cause the at least one computer to transmit the message; and
program code to cause the at least one computer to receive a response message indicating a second version of the protocol used to encode the response message and the compatibility level, wherein the second version of the protocol is different than the first version of the protocol.