alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            6425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       76
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6501
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               85
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6501
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    390
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                390
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, petitioner, v. Edward Harold SCHAD.

No. 12-1084.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 14, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-0408 Lower Tribunal No. F08-26805

________________ 

### Ibrain Diaz, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge. Ibrain Diaz, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. McKenzie, 331 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2021); Ruiz v.2

State, 351 So. 3d 93, 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022); Alvarez v. State, 345 So. 3d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022); Bellicourt v. State, 745 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                         805
<SECURITIES>                                                   126
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   18
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     7
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                         284
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               1,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (64)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 1,180
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               127
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   35
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 92
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             92
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    92
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 14 , 2022.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00915

- CV

IN RE GOOD HEARTS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERIVCES, INC., TAELOR HARMON, ANGELA FACCIPONTE, AND JOYCE WATSON , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDIN G

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- DCV

- 271311



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 , relator s Good Hearts Youth and Family Serivces, Inc., Taelor Harmon, Angela Faccip ont e, and Joyce W atso n filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221;
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this Court to compel the
Honorable O ’ Neil Willi ams, presiding judge of the 268th Distri ct Court of Fo rt2 B end County
, to vacate the trial court ’ s December 8, 2022, oral denial of relators ’
motion for continuance
, order the trial court to continue trial for an adequate time
to allow r elators to conduc t t he requested depositions made necessary by the facts

revea led in the September 2022 Innova records, or alternatively order the trial court to compel the depositions before the current trial setting of December 14,

2022

.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamu s relief.

A ccordingly, we den y relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices J ewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.

Justice Jew ell would grant temporary relief and request a r esponse to the petition.
Kevaris Cornelius EDGECOMB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9640.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Kevin Tyrone WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9818.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                         118,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,222,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                   959,346
<INVENTORY>                                 22,489,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,886,294
<PP&E>                                      10,095,484
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,201,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,494,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,492,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,813
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,837,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,494,369
<SALES>                                    107,037,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           107,388,369
<CGS>                                       84,118,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,118,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,599,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               404,049
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,810,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                456,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                   137,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            319,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   319,123
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
Advisory Committee on 

Community Banking

Minority Depository 

Institution/Community Development 

Financial Institution Program
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Minority Depository Institution/Community Development Financial Institution Bank Program 

1. FIRREA Section 308 Goals:

 Preserve the number of minority depository 

institutions; 

 Preserve the minority character in cases of mergers 

or acquisition;

 Provide technical assistance to prevent insolvency of 

institutions;

 Promote and encourage creation of new minority 

depository institutions; and 

 Provide for training, technical assistance, and 

educational programs

MDI Program Overview

2
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Minority Depository Institution/Community Development Financial Institution Bank Program 

2. FDIC Policy Statement

 Definition of MDI

 Program organization structure: 

Washington/Regions

 Supervision\Risk Management; Consumer 

Protection; Resolutions

 Activities: technical assistance, training, DRR 

solicitations of MDI bids

MDI Program Overview

3
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-OA11
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-OA11


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Stuart Wooldridge, President of Orca International Language
Schools Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Orca International Language
      Schools Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Orca International Language Schools Inc.                                                              

Dated: July 14, 2008

*/s/ Stuart
Wooldridge*Stuart
WooldridgePresident and Director(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)Orca International Language Schools Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Orca
International Language Schools Inc. and will be retained by Orca International
Language Schools Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
Elizabeth M. HARVEY, petitioner, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.

No. 12M112.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CR 53

)

ANTONIO WILSON )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge dated March 13, 2019 (DE # 55), to which the parties have waived any objections

(id. at 3), the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are now ADOPTED.

Defendant is ADJUDGED to have committed the violations of his supervised release

described in the September 4, 2018, Petition (DE # 39). Defendant’s term of supervised

release is REVOKED and he is hereby committed to the United States Bureau of Prisons

to serve a term of imprisonment of seven months. Upon his release from the Bureau of

Prisons, defendant shall be discharged from any further term of supervision.

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 14, 2019

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1428 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 198
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1428

                          [Report No. 109-127]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2005

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                            August 31, 2005

 Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 29, 2005, 
                    by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize appropriations for the National Fish and Wildlife 
                  Foundation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Fish and Wildlife 
Foundation Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 10(a)(1) of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 
Establishment Act (16 U.S.C. 3709(a)(1)) is amended by striking 
``fiscal years 2001 through 2005'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2006 
through 2010''.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF NOTICE REQUIREMENT LIMITED TO GRANTS MADE WITH 
              FEDERAL FUNDS.

    Section 4(i) of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 
Establishment Act (16 U.S.C. 3703(i)) is amended by striking ``grant of 
funds'' and inserting ``grant of Federal funds in an amount greater 
than $10,000''.

SEC. 4. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FEDERAL FUNDS TO MATCH 
              CONTRIBUTIONS MADE TO RECIPIENTS OF NATIONAL FISH AND 
              WILDLIFE FOUNDATION GRANTS.

    Section 10(a)(3) of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 
Establishment Act (16 U.S.C. 3709(a)(3)) is amended by inserting ``, or 
to a recipient of a grant provided by the Foundation,'' after ``made to 
the Foundation''.

SEC. 5. REPEAL.

    Effective September 30, 2015, section 10(a)(1) of the National Fish 
and Wildlife Foundation Establishment Act (16 U.S.C. 3709(a)(1)) is 
hereby repealed.
                                                       Calendar No. 198

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1428

                          [Report No. 109-127]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize appropriations for the National Fish and Wildlife 
                  Foundation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 31, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 1 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 2 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 3 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 4 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 5 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 6 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 7 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 8 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 9 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 10 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 11 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 12 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 13 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 14 of 15
case 2:13-cv-00097-JD-JEM document 26 filed 10/03/13 page 15 of 15
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1497 

To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the heads of other 

appropriate departments and agencies, to conduct an economic impact 

study on the dual gateway policy of the Government of Ireland before 

the United States takes any action that could lead to the discontinuation 

of the policy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2005 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. LINCOLN DIAZBALART of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the 

heads of other appropriate departments and agencies, 

to conduct an economic impact study on the dual gateway policy of the Government of Ireland before the 

United States takes any action that could lead to the 

discontinuation of the policy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dual Gateway Policy 

5 Review Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1497 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DUAL GATEWAY POLICY REVIEW REQUIRED. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall re3 view the dual gateway policy and determine the effects the 

4 discontinuation of the policy might have on the United 

5 States economy and the Western Ireland economy before 

6 the United States takes any action that could lead to the 

7 discontinuation of the policy. 

8 (b) ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY.—In determining the 

9 effects that the discontinuation of the dual gateway policy 

10 might have on the United States economy, the Secretary 

11 of State, in consultation with the heads of other appro12 priate departments and agencies, shall consider the effects 

13 the discontinuation of the policy might have on United 

14 States businesses operating in Western Ireland, Irish busi15 nesses operating in and around Shannon Airport, and 

16 United States air carriers serving Ireland. 

17 (c) REPORT.—The Secretary of State shall submit a 

18 report describing the determinations made under sub19 section (a), together with any recommendations for United 

20 States action, to Congress not later than 180 days after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

22 (d) DUAL GATEWAY POLICY.—The term ‘‘dual gate23 way policy’’ means the policy of the Irish Government 

24 which requires certain air carriers serving Dublin Airport 
3 

•HR 1497 IH 

1 to undertake equal numbers of flights to Shannon Airport 

2 and Dublin Airport during each calendar year. 

Æ
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 1 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 2 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 3 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 4 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 5 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 6 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 7 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 8 of 9
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 63 filed 07/21/14 page 9 of 9
Gregory HILL, petitioner, v. Thomas C. GRADY, Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, City of St. Louis, et al.

No. 12-8472.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.