alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-AR4

  I, Joshua Kelly, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage
    Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AR4 Trust (the
    "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Master
    Servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
    as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Master Servicer
    has fulfilled its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement,
     dated August 30, 2007, among Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation,
    as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as master
    servicer, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee, in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
    noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    Dated:   March 24, 2008


    /s/ Joshua Kelly
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
Exhibit 33.6.2

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The
First American Corporation and the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (the Reporting Period) with
the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (the Applicable
Servicing Criteria). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider
(the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has
concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



|                                                    |  |                                         
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
|By:                                                 |  | First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
|                                                    |  | General Partner                         
|                                                    | 
|                                                    |  | /s/ Lucy A. Przybyla                    
|                                                    |  | Lucy A. Przybyla                        
|                                                    |  | Senior Vice President                   
|                                                    |  | February 12, 2008
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 01-11-01125-CR OFFENSE: 42.07 (Harrassment)

Elisa Merrill Wilson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Fort Bend

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: County Court at Law No 2

DATE: 03/31/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 10CCR149142

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Elisa Merrill Wilson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA #: <oll*lS

/{PP£LLAh)T}*> Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

K^/c>Ttc/ JUDGE:

DATE: £*•??. /£ 'Z^/f SIGNED: PC: _

JUDGE: PC'; /jJctU y fro*//// jr**/ PUBLISH: DNP:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Michael A. SCOTT, petitioner, v. LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 12-1099.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
null

272.5868
Shane STONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9619.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1115]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS


American Folklife Center; Board of Trustees Meeting

AGENCY: Library of Congress.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Board of Trustees of 
the American Folklife Center. This notice also describes the functions 
of the Center. Notice of this meeting is required in accordance with 
Public Law 94-463.

DATES: Friday, February 10, 1994; 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Dining Room A, James Madison Building, Library of Congress, 
Washington, DC 20540.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Jabbour, Director, American Folklife Center, Washington, DC 20540-
8100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. It 
is suggested that persons planning to attend this meeting as observers 
contact Doris M. Craig at (202) 707-6590.
    The American Folklife Center was created by the U.S. Congress with 
passage of Public Law 94-201, the American Folklife Preservation Act, 
in 1976. The Center is directed to ``preserve and present American 
folklife'' through programs of research, documentation, archival 
preservation, live presentation, exhibition, publications, 
dissemination, training, and other activities involving the many folk 
cultural traditions of the United States. The Center is under the 
general guidance of a Board of Trustees composed of members from 
Federal agencies and private life widely recognized for their interest 
in American folk traditions and arts.
    The Center is structured with a small core group of versatile 
professionals who both carry out programs themselves and oversee 
projects done by contract by others. In the brief period of the 
Center's operation it has energetically carried out its mandate with 
programs that provide coordination, assistance, and model projects for 
the field of American folklife.

    Dated: January 6, 1995.
Alan Jabbour,
Director, American Folklife Center.
[FR Doc. 95-1115 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-01-M
# C_2019020EN.01000201.xml

| 16.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9194 — Sharp/Skytec UMC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 20/03)

On 4 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9194. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9194. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1542

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Build- Bedford, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Honorable al Service located at 695 Pleasant Street in New

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1542

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Honorable Judge George N. Leighton

Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1542 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachu4 setts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Honorable

5 Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office

11 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2005.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          699229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                699229
<PP&E>                                            9939
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  750371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2015
<OTHER-SE>                                      738356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    750371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9642
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1383
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3846)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50500 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL CORONA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-732-1

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel CoronaRodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Morteza N. BAKHTIARI, petitioner, v. Martin BITER, Warden.

No. 12-8970.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Tony Earl BAILENTIA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6660.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Eliot Scott GRIZZLE, petitioner, v. Greg LEWIS, Warden.

No. 12-9201.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-88

)

BRANDON S. KEISTER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on May 21, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 21st day of May 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Anthony C. DONOFRIO.

No. D-2711.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Disbarment order entered.
Phil WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. NEW ORLEANS ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENTION CENTER.

No. 12-9026.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit, denied.
Edgar Earl PATTON, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 13-6436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
Jimmie Lee NILES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7362.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

*1799Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Douglas DEMPSEY, III, petitioner, v. Willie L. EAGLETON, Warden.

No. 13-6609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

ANDRES SANCHEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:14-CV-386 RM

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Andres Sanchez, a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging ISP 13-

09-61, a prison disciplinary proceeding held at the Indiana State Prison on September 6,

2013, where the Disciplinary Hearing Body (DHB) found him guilty of Threatening in

violation of B-213 and sanctioned him with the loss of commissary for 4 weeks. He didn’t

lose any earned credit time nor was he demoted in credit class. A prison disciplinary action

can only be challenged in a habeas corpus proceeding when it results in the lengthening

of the duration of confinement. Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003). Because

this disciplinary proceeding didn’t result in the lengthening of the duration of Mr.

Sanchez’s confinement, habeas corpus relief isn’t available. Because there is no relief that

Mr. Sanchez can obtain in this habeas corpus proceeding, the petition is DENIED pursuant

to SECTION 2254 HABEAS CORPUS RULE 4 and this case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: March 3 , 2014 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United State District Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<CASH>                                  25,939
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       167,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            337,954
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  15,611
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    15,715
<LOANS>                                782,772
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,097)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,378,688
<DEPOSITS>                             824,468
<SHORT-TERM>                           273,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     70,052
<LONG-TERM>                             68,073
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                26,283
<OTHER-SE>                             115,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,378,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         18,838
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        5,412
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         2,141
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        26,391
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       7,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      12,497
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   13,894
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          76
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         10,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          6,550
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               6,550
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.39
<LOANS-NON>                              3,011
<LOANS-PAST>                               876
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         13,140
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         9,167
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              130
<RECOVERIES>                                60
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,097
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,097
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
Michael A. LEON, petitioner, v. ARIZONA, et al.

No. 12-10045.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

LAFAYETTE DIVISION

SANDRA NORTHCUTT and )

DARRELL NORTHCUTT, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 4:14-cv-00034-JVB-PRC

)

STATEWIDE CREDIT )

ASSOCIATION, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs, Sandra Northcutt and Darrell Northcutt, by counsel, and Defendant, Statewide

Credit Association, Inc., by counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) stipulate that this cause of

action is dismissed with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

ATTORNEY AT LAW KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP

/s/ Melissa Wilkes

Melissa Wilkes

ATTORNEY AT LAW

200 Ferry Street, Suite D

Lafayette, IN 47901

mwilkes@wilkes-law.com

/s/ Peter A. Velde

Peter A. Velde, Atty. I.D. No.: 949-49

KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP

One Indiana Square, Suite 300

211 North Pennsylvania Street

Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 638-4521

pvelde@k-glaw.com

140497\2410329-1

USDC IN/ND case 4:14-cv-00034-JVB-PRC document 10 filed 06/11/14 page 1 of 1