alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-74,376-02; WR-74,376-03

EX P ARTE MELVIN W. RICHARDSON, Applicant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. F06- 68662-N & F 06-62371-N IN THE 195 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of h ab ea s co rp u s . Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance in both cause numbers and sentenc ed to twenty-five year s’ imprisonment in one ca use and f orty year s’ imprisonment in the other. Applicant contends that his counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use h e fa iled to timely file a notice of appe al. The trial court has deter

mined that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. We find2

that Appl i ca n t i s entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of convictions in Cause No s . F0668662- N & F06- 62371-N from the 195 District Court of Dallas t h County
. Applicant is or dere d returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l
so that he may then, with the aid of couns el , o b t ai n a meaning ful appea l. Within ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall i m m ed i at el y appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative s teps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment o f Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Novembe r 19, 2014 Do not publish
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                   REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
                               FLEXIBLE STOCK PLAN

                 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998

      WHEREAS, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the "Company")
established the Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated Flexible Stock Plan
(the "Plan") to enhance the ability of the Company to reward and provide stock
based incentives to its key employees; and

      WHEREAS, the Company's shareholders previously approved the Plan and an
amendment thereto; and

      WHEREAS, on March 15, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
an amendment to the Plan, subject to shareholder approval, to increase the total
number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by 1,500,000 shares; and

      WHEREAS, the Company's shareholders approved the amendment on May 24,
2000; and

      WHEREAS, on January 29, 2003, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company approved a second amendment to the Plan, subject to
shareholder approval, to increase the total number of shares authorized for
issuance under the Plan by 1,500,000 shares.

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:

      1. Effective upon the date of approval of this amendment by the Company's
shareholders, Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

            3.1 Number of Shares. The number of Shares which may be issued or
            sold or for which Options, SARs or Performance Shares may be granted
            under the Plan shall be 6,260,077 Shares. Such number of Shares
            shall increase annually, effective as of the first day of each
            Fiscal Year, by the number of Shares equal to 5% of the number of
            Shares allocated to this Plan as of the first day of such Fiscal
            Year. Such Shares may be authorized but unissued Shares, Shares held
            in the treasury, or both.

      2. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to
them in the Plan.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated hereby
adopts the foregoing amendment this 28th day of May, 2003.

                        REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED


                        By: /s/ A. Greig Woodring
                            ---------------------
                        A. Greig Woodring, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31**CERTIFICATION**I, Ted L. Hall, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kiewit Royalty Trust, for which U.S.Bank National Association acts as Trustee;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such procedures to beestablished and maintained, for the registrant and I have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant ismade known to me by others within the registrant, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on my evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent Iconsider reasonable on information provided to me by Amber Brewster, Bank of Oklahoma.Date: November 9, 2005 /s/ Ted L. HallTed L. HallVice President and Trust Officer U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: September 17, 2015 520296

________________________________ In the Matter of THOMAS J. KRUPA, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 10, 2015 Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Thomas J. Krupa, Rome, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough, J.), entered November 25, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Judgment affirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.-2- 520296

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133747 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133747 COA: 275604 Kent CC: 04-012396-FC FAROD KARRIEM WESTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
Terrence MILLSAPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8248.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Charles JUDD, et al., petitioners, v. LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 13-231.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JUMEL FILIAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2444

[January 13, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-586CFA.

Jumel Filias, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 12**

 

**BoeingCapital Corporation and Subsidiaries**

Computation of Ratio of Incometo Fixed Charges

 
| ** **                                                                             | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended  September 30,** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|
| **(Dollars in millions)**                                                              | ** ** | **2004**                                  | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** |
| Income from continuing operations before  provision for income taxes                   |       | $                                         | 148        |   | $ | 28 |   |
| Fixed charges                                                                          |       | 262                                       |       | 269 |   |
| Income from continuing operations before  provision for income taxes and fixed charges |       | $                                         | 410        |   | $ | 297 |   |
|                                                                                   |       |                                      |       |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                                                                         |       |                                      |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                                                                       |       | $                                         | 262        |   | $ | 269 |   |
|                                                                                   |       |                                      |       |   |   |
| Ratio of income from continuing operations  to fixed charges                           |       | 1.56                                      |       | 1.10 |   |

 

----
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1490 

AN ACT 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorPlanning and Strategy, and for other purposes. degree of Master of Science in Joint Campaign ize the National Defense University to award the 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1490 

AN ACT 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

National Defense University to award the degree of Master of Science in Joint Campaign Planning and Strategy, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1490 EH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVER2 SITY AWARD OF DEGREE OF MASTER OF 

3 SCIENCE IN JOINT CAMPAIGN PLANNING 

4 AND STRATEGY. 

5 (a) JOINT FORCES STAFF COLLEGE PROGRAM.— 

6 Section 2163 of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

7 to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘§ 2163. National defense university: master of 

9 science degrees 

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO AWARD SPECIFIED DEGREES.— 

11 The President of the National Defense University, upon 

12 the recommendation of the faculty of the respective college 

13 or other school within the University, may confer the mas14 ter of science degrees specified in subsection (b). 

15 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZED DEGREES.—The following degrees 

16 may be awarded under subsection (a): 

17 ‘‘(1) MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NATIONAL SECU18 RITY STRATEGY.—The degree of master of science in 

19 national security strategy, to graduates of the Uni20 versity who fulfill the requirements of the program 

21 of the National War College. 

22 ‘‘(2) MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NATIONAL RE23 SOURCE STRATEGY.—The degree of master of 

24 science in national resource strategy, to graduates of 

25 the University who fulfill the requirements of the 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1490 EH 

1 program of the Industrial College of the Armed 

2 Forces. 

3 ‘‘(3) MASTER OF SCIENCE IN JOINT CAMPAIGN

4 PLANNING AND STRATEGY.—The degree of master 

5 of science in joint campaign planning and strategy, 

6 to graduates of the University who fulfill the re7 quirements of the program of the Joint Advanced 

8 Warfighting School at the Joint Forces Staff Col9 lege. 

10 ‘‘(c) REGULATIONS.—The authority provided by this 

11 section shall be exercised under regulations prescribed by 

12 the Secretary of Defense.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to 

14 section 2163 in the table of sections at the beginning of 

15 chapter 108 of such title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘2163. National Defense University: master of science degrees.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (3) of section 

17 2163(b) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by 

18 subsection (a), shall take effect for degrees awarded after 

19 May 2005. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 2005. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<CASH>                                  41,708
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        27,475
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            450,436
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   3,630
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     3,618
<LOANS>                              1,052,051
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,935)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,623,388
<DEPOSITS>                           1,018,780
<SHORT-TERM>                           282,555
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     69,904
<LONG-TERM>                             64,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                29,624
<OTHER-SE>                             157,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,623,388
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         48,302
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       14,771
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           906
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        63,979
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      18,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      29,509
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   34,470
<LOAN-LOSSES>                            1,090
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         23,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         18,601
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              18,601
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            13,177
<EPS-BASIC>                             1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                             1.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.55
<LOANS-NON>                              1,576
<LOANS-PAST>                             2,635
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           773
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         11,178
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         9,854
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            1,138
<RECOVERIES>                               129
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,935
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,935
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-01239-PPS-MGG document 1-1 filed 11/27/13 page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8
<INVENTORY>                                     10,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,821
<PP&E>                                          58,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,047
<SALES>                                         20,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,040
<CGS>                                           13,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (20)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-119 RLM

)

SILVINO ALONSO-PINEDA )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on January 14, 2014. Accordingly,

the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation, ACCEPTS

defendant Silvino Alonso-Pineda’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty

of Counts 5 and 6 of the Indictment, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: January 30, 2014 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-147157) pertaining to the Employees’ Savings Plan of Zep Inc. of our reports dated November 5, 2008, with respect to the consolidated and combined financial statements and schedule of Zep Inc., and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Zep Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

November 5, 2008
Anthony CEPARANO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 12-9403.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.
MEDTRONIC INC., petitioner, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, et al.

No. 12-1128.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”), I, Manuel Sánchez Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2014/s/ Manuel Sánchez RodriguezManuel Sánchez RodriguezChief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.