alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12730]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title; Applicable Forms; OMB Control Number: Telecommunications Service 
Priority System; SF Forms 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, and 320; OMB Control 
Number 0704-0305
Type of Request: Revision
Number of Respondents: 94
Responses Per Respondent: 18
Annual Responses: 1,692
Average Burden Per Response: 2.16 hours
Annual Burden Hours: 3,654
Needs and Uses: The Telecommunications Service Priority (TSP) System 
identifies leased telecommunications services vital to National 
Security and Emergency Preparedness, and provides the legal basis for 
vendor priority installation and restoration. The information collected 
hereby, provides the DoD with the data necessary to make appropriate 
telecommunications service priority assignments. It is additionally 
used to maintain the currency of associated data bases.
Affected Public: State or local governments; Businesses or other for-
profit; Federal agencies or employees; and small businesses or 
organizations
Frequency: On occasion
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer 
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.

    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 19, 1995.
Patricia L. Topping,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-12730 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11707]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-9751]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Champion Enterprises, Inc., Common Stock, $1.00 Par 
Value)

May 5, 1995.
    Champion Enterprises, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex, 
the Security is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). 
The Security commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening of business 
on May 2, 1995 and concurrently therewith the Security was suspended 
from trading on the Amex.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing on the 
Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant in maintaining the dual listing of the Security on the NYSE 
and the Amex. The Company does not see any particular advantage in the 
dual trading of the Security and believes that dual listing would 
fragment the market for the Security.
    Any interested person may, on or before May 26, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Amex 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11707 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Debbie Lloyd DASH, petitioner, v. Arthur B. CHASEN, et al.

No. 13-6096.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),
Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report
to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    ROBERT G. GARGUSRobert G. Gargus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: January 9, 2007
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1585 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require Department of Veterans 

Affairs pharmacies to dispense medications to veterans for prescriptions 

written by private practitioners, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require Department of Veterans Affairs pharmacies to dispense medications to veterans for prescriptions written by private 

practitioners, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Prescription 

5 Access Improvement Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1585 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS PHARMACIES TO DISPENSE MEDICA3 TIONS TO VETERANS ON PRESCRIPTIONS 

4 WRITTEN BY PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 1712(d) of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(d) Subject to section 1722A of this title, the Sec8 retary shall furnish to a veteran such drugs and medicines 

9 as may be ordered on prescription of a duly licensed physi10 cian in the treatment of any illness or injury of the vet11 eran.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of 

13 section 1712 of such title is amended by striking the sixth 

14 through ninth words. 

15 (2) The item relating to section 1712 in the table of 

16 sections at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is 

17 amended by striking the sixth through ninth words. 

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Dr. Paramesh Gopi, ChiefExecutive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”). 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

Dated:August 6, 2010
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7898

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTONIO LAMAR COOPER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. ( 8:14

- cr - 00083

- GJH

- 1 )

Submitted : March 31, 2021 Decided: April 14, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Antonio Lamar Cooper , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Lamar Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his m otion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Kibble , ___ F.3d ___, ___, No. 20

- 7009, 2021 WL 12165 43, at *2 (4th Cir. Apr. 1, 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny Cooper’s motion to vacate the district court’s order and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cooper , No. 8:14

- cr - 00083

- GJH

- 1 (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 1 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 2 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 3 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 4 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 5 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 6 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 7 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 8 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 9 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 10 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 11 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cr-00040-JVB-APR   document 1   filed 03/25/14   page 12 of 12
Clevo SHUFF, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7216.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

*719Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
1 The Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2863

___________ William J. Politt, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 26, 2004 Filed: June 8, 2004

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William Politt appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Arkansas affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Politt’s application for supplemental security income benefits. For reversal, Politt argues the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred in not considering his impairments in combination, in discounting his subjective complaints, in not developing the record-2- further as to his past relevant work (PRW) and mental impairments, and in determining his residual functional capacity (RFC). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s findings. See Roberts v. Apfel , 222 F.3d 466, 468 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). The ALJ summarized the medical evidence and specifically determined that Politt’s impairments--alone or combined--did not meet the listing-level requirements. See Hajek v. Shalala , 30 F.3d 89, 92 (8th Cir. 1994). In rejecting Politt’s subjective complaints, the ALJ appropriately considered Politt’s daily activities, and noted that medication had helped with Politt’s depression and anxiety and that Politt had failed to seek medical treatment after May 2001. See Lowe v. Apfel , 226 F.3d 969, 972 (8th Cir. 2000) (if adequately explained and supported, credibility findings are for ALJ to make). The ALJ did not need to develop the record further as to Politt’s PRW once the ALJ determined that Politt could not return to it, and the ALJ followed the proper procedure in evaluating Politt’s mental impairments. See 20 C.F.R. § 416.920a (2004). Finally, we have found nothing in the record to contradict the ALJ’s RFC finding. Politt raises additional points in his brief. We find them to be meritless and affirm without further discussion. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Matthew KWONG, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 12-9066.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 10.1**

**ADAPTEC, INC.**

**NON-EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY**

*Cash Compensation*

The following table lists our non-employee directorcash compensation policy.  These amountsare paid quarterly.
| ** **                      | ** ** | **Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation (1)** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                      | ** ** | **Board of Directors**                                    | ** ** | **Audit Committee** | ** ** | **Compensation  Committee** | ** ** | **Governance and  Nominating Committee** | ** ** |
| **Member Annual Retainer**      |       | $                                                                   | 26,000     |   | $ | 5,000 |   | $ | 3,500 |   | $ | 2,250 |   |
| **Per-Meeting Retainer**        |       | $                                                                   | 3,000      |   | $ | 1,200 |   | $ | 1,200 |   | $ | 1,200 |   |
| **Chairperson Annual Retainer** |       | $                                                                   | 10,000     |   | $ | 10,000 |   | $ | 7,000 |   | $ | 4,500 |   |

----

(1)             Boardmembers serving on other Board committees that are not permanent Boardcommittees receive additional compensation of $400 per meeting hour.

*EquityCompensation*

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate inthe Adaptec, Inc. 2006 Director Plan (the “***Plan***”).  Awards under the Plan are discretionary andare determined by the Board.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raja M. Parvez, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William F. Weissman, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Raja M. Parvez                                  
|                     |  |     |  | Raja M. Parvez President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ William F. Weissman                             
|                     |  |     |  | William F. Weissman Chief Financial
Officer         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Barry Wayne ADAMS, petitioner, v. Willie SMITH, Warden.

No. 12-10177.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-74 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted June 29, 1996,
Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997             JUN-29-1996
<CASH>                                           1,198                   1,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,445                   4,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                       151                     128
<INVENTORY>                                      3,272                   2,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,435                   9,421
<PP&E>                                           2,173                   2,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,795                   1,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,085                  10,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,494                   3,444
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            99                     103
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,407                   6,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,085                  10,117
<SALES>                                          5,246                   6,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,246                   6,207
<CGS>                                            3,156                   3,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,642                   1,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    426                     358
<INCOME-TAX>                                       140                     143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                286                     215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       286                     215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03                     .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03                     .02
        

</TABLE>