alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1556 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1556

  To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the Thomas F. 
   Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, as the 
                   ``Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2005

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the Thomas F. 
   Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, as the 
                   ``Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The parcel of land described in section 3, and located on the site 
of the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, 
Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ``Clyde S. Cahill 
Memorial Park''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the parcel of land described in section 
3 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clyde S. Cahill Memorial 
Park''.

SEC. 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.

    The parcel of land designated under section 1 is the parcel bounded 
by South 10th Street, Clark Avenue, South 9th Street, and Walnut Street 
in St. Louis, Missouri.
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of All American Gold Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-KA for the year ended May 31, 2013, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
Gaspar R. Gonzalez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: November 6, 2013

/s/ Gaspar R. Gonzalez
  Gaspar R. Gonzalez 
  Chief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to All American
Gold Corp. and will be retained by All American Gold Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Charles NDHLOVU, aka Soul, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6854.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Gabriel RIVERA, petitioner, v. CARY PLACE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION.

No. 12-10158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998     
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                         157,855    
<SECURITIES>                                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,118    
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,600    
<INVENTORY>                                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,142    
<PP&E>                                               0    
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,142    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,142    
<BONDS>                                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0    
<PREFERRED>                                          0    
<COMMON>                                             0    
<OTHER-SE>                                           0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   240,142    
<SALES>                                        113,474    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,359    
<CGS>                                           84,565    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,632    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,960    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,899    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (91,132)    
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (91,132)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0    
<CHANGES>                                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                                   (91,132)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (3)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (3)    
                                                           


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10894]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigations Nos. 731-TA-726-729 (Preliminary)]


Polyvinyl Alcohol From China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan

Determinations

    On the basis of the record<SUP>1 developed in the subject 
investigations, the Commission unanimously determines, pursuant to 
section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)), that 
there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States 
is materially injured by reason of imports from China, Japan, and 
Taiwan of polyvinyl alcohol,<SUP>2 provided for in subheading 
3905.20.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that 
are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value 
(LTFV). Investigation No. 731-TA-728 (Preliminary) concerning Korea is 
terminated on the basis of the unanimous determination that imports 
from Korea are negligible.

    \1\The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\The product covered by these investigations is polyvinyl 
alcohol. Polyvinyl alcohol is a dry, white to cream-colored, water-
soluble synthetic polymer, usually prepared by hydrolysis of 
polyvinyl acetate. This product includes polyvinyl alcohols 
hydrolyzed in excess of 85 percent, whether or not mixed or diluted 
with defoamer or boric acid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    On March 9, 1995, a petition was filed with the Commission and the 
Department of Commerce by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, 
PA, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially 
injured or threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV imports of 
polyvinyl alcohol from China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Accordingly, 
effective March 9, 1995, the Commission instituted antidumping 
investigations Nos. 731-TA-726 through 729 (Preliminary).
    Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigations and of 
a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register of March 17, 1995 (60 F.R. 14448). The 
conference was held in Washington, DC, on March 30, 1995, and all 
persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in 
person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these 
investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on April 24, 1995. The 
views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 2883 (April 
1995), entitled ``Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, Korea, and 
Taiwan: Investigations Nos. 731-TA-726-729 (Preliminary).''

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 25, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10894 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-21-TLS 

 ) 

MONTELL HAIR ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 35], filed on September 15, 2015. The Defendant has waived 

objection to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the 

Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 35] in its entirety and accepts the recommended 

disposition. Subject to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the 

Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on October 1, 2015. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

 THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00261-CR

DAVID GONZALEZ-ESTRADA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-1530-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Gonzalez-Estrada was convicted of online solicitation of a minor. See TEX.

PENAL CODE ANN. § 33.021 (West 2016). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Gonzalez-Estrada’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders

brief in support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate 

record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967). Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and 
Gonzalez-Estrada v. State Page 2

compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has 

performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 

319-320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2008).

In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, “after a full examination of all the 

proceedings, . . . decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; see

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any 

basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 (1988). After a 

review of the entire record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly 

frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, 

we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Gonzalez-Estrada is 

granted.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice
Gonzalez-Estrada v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Affirmed; motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed February 26, 2020

Do not publish

[CR25]
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11457]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice

AGENCY: Board of Visitors, United States Military Academy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) announcement is made of the following 
meeting:

    NAME OF COMMITTEE: Board of Visitors, Untied States Military 
Academy.

    DATE OF MEETING: 19 May 1995.

    START TIME OF MEETING: 8:00 a.m.

    PLACE: West Point, New York.

    PROPOSED AGENDA: Annual Program Review; West Point Child 
Development Center and West Point School Briefing; Class of 1999 
Admission Status; Presentation on Alternate Funding; and Selection 
of Dates for Visits to Summer Training. All proceedings are open.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Colonel John J. Luther, United States Military Academy, West 
Point, NY 10996-5000, (914) 938-5870.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11457 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
# L_2018221EN.01000401.xml

| 31.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 221/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 221/4

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1109 of 1 August 2018 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 59122 (DAS-59122-7) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 203 of 10 August 2018
  )

On the cover and on page 7:

for:

‘
  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1109 of 1 August 2018 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 59122 (DAS-59122-7) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  ’,

read:

‘
  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1109 of 3 August 2018 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 59122 (DAS-59122-7) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  ’;

on page 10:

for:

‘Done at Brussels, 1 August 2018.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 3 August 2018.’.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1469 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior shall make full payment to each 

unit of general local government in which entitlement land is located 

as set forth in chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. OTTER (for himself and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior shall make full payment to each unit of general local government in which 

entitlement land is located as set forth in chapter 69 

of title 31, United States Code, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR ENTITLEMENT LAND. 

4 Not later than 2 years after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, to the extent that funds are made avail6 able through Acts of appropriation, the Secretary of the 

7 Interior shall make full payment to each unit of general 
2 

•HR 1469 IH 

1 local government in which entitlement land is located, as 

2 set forth in chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code. 

3 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN LIEU OF PAYMENT. 

4 (a) CONVEYANCE OF LAND.—If funds are not appro5 priated in amounts required for the Secretary of the Inte6 rior to make full payment to a local entity as required 

7 under section 1, the Secretary shall convey to that local 

8 government entity Federal land with a fair market value 

9 equal to the deficiency in the payment required under sec10 tion 1. 

11 (b) CHOICE OF LAND.—A local government to which 

12 land is conveyed under subsection (a) may choose the Fed13 eral land to be conveyed from Federal land within the geo14 graphic boundary of that local government. Federal land 

15 may not be chosen for conveyance under this section if 

16 such land is within one of the following: 

17 (1) A unit of the National Park System. 

18 (2) A National Wilderness Area. 

19 (3) A unit of the National Wildlife Refuge Sys20 tem. 

21 (c) CONVEYANCE WITHIN 90 DAYS.—Conveyances 

22 under this section shall be completed not more than 90 

23 days after the Secretary of the Interior receives written 

24 notification of the selection from the local government. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         164,344
<SECURITIES>                                       600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,839
<PP&E>                                       4,001,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,770,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,443,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,389,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,443,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,429
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,232
<EPS-BASIC>                                    11.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.68


</TABLE>
Gregory P. NESSELRODE, petitioner, v. MONTANA.

No. 12-10146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00252-TLS-SLC document 1 filed 08/18/14 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00252-TLS-SLC document 1 filed 08/18/14 page 2 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00252-TLS-SLC document 1 filed 08/18/14 page 3 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00252-TLS-SLC document 1 filed 08/18/14 page 4 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00252-TLS-SLC document 1 filed 08/18/14 page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1558 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1558

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain computer-
            assisted remote hunting, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2005

  Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain computer-
            assisted remote hunting, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Computer-Assisted Remote Hunting 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPUTER-ASSISTED REMOTE HUNTING FACILITIES.

    (a) Offense.--Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 49. Computer-assisted remote hunting
    ``(a) Prohibition.--Whoever, using any instrumentality of 
interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly makes available a computer-
assisted remote hunt shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 
more than 5 years, or both.
    ``(b) Exception.--Providing an instrumentality of commerce, such as 
equipment or access to the Internet, is not a violation of this section 
unless the provider intends the use of the equipment or access for a 
computer-assisted remote hunt.
    ``(c) Construction With Other Law.--Nothing in this section limits 
the power of State and local authorities to enact laws or regulations 
concerning computer-assisted remote hunting facilities.
    ``(d) Definitions.--In this section--
            ``(1) the term `computer-assisted remote hunt' means any 
        use of a computer or any other device, equipment, or software, 
        to allow a person remotely to control the aiming and discharge 
        of a weapon so as to kill or injure an animal while not in the 
        physical presence of the targeted animal; and
            ``(2) the term `instrumentality of interstate commerce' 
        means any written, wire, radio, television, or other form of 
        communication in, or using a facility of, interstate 
        commerce.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``49. Computer-assisted remote hunting.''.
                                 <all>
```