Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 1995 / Notices 22569

ANNEX A—Continued

659–H Only HTS numbers 6502.00.9030,

6504.00.9015, 6504.00.9060,

6505.90.5090, 6505.90.6090,

6505.90.7090 and 6505.90.8090.

659–S Only HTS numbers 6112.31.0010,

6112.31.0020, 6112.41.0010,

6112.41.0020, 6112.41.0030,

6112.41.0040, 6211.11.1010,

6211.11.1020, 6211.12.1010 and

6211.12.1020.

659–O All HTS numbers in Category 659

except 659–C, 659–H, and 659–S.

669–P Only HTS numbers 6305.31.0010,

6305.31.0020 and 6305.39.0000.

669–O All HTS numbers in Category 669

except 669–P.

670–L Only HTS numbers 4202.12.8030,

4202.12.8070, 4202.92.3020,

4202.92.3030 and 4202.92.9025.

670–O All HTS numbers in Category 670

except 670–L

863–S Only HTS number 6307.10.2015.

863–O All HTS numbers in Category 863

except 863–S.

Merged Categories

300/301

317/326

338/339

338–S/339–S

347/348

445/446

638/639

644/844

645/646

[FR Doc. 95–11259 Filed 5–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–F

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING

COMMISSION

Notice of Delegation of Authority

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the Commodity Futures Trading

Commission has delegated, on an

interim basis, certain authority to the

Program Coordinator of the Division of

Enforcement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan R. Cornell, Attorney, Division of

Enforcement, Commodity Futures

Trading Commission, 2033 K Street

NW., Washington, D.C. 20581.

Telephone: (202) 254–7424.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is

hereby given that the Commodity

Futures Trading Commission has

delegated to the Program Coordinator of

the Division of Enforcement all of the

authority which has been delegated to

the Director of the Division of

Enforcement, including but not limited

to the authority to conduct

investigations as set forth in Part 11—

Rules Relating to Investigations, 17 CFR

part 11, and all other delegations set

forth in that Part, and the authority set

forth in Part 140—Organization,

Functions and Procedures of the

Commission, 17 CFR part 140. This

delegation shall be in effect only until

such time as a Director of the Division

of Enforcement is appointed and

assumes office. (7 U.S.C. 4a, 9, 15, 12,

and 12a(5)).

Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 2,

1995, by the Commission.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–11172 Filed 5–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Notice of Finding of No Significant

Impact (FNSI) and Environmental

Assessment (EA) for Realignment of

Five Business Areas From Fort

Belvoir, Virginia, to Detroit Arsenal,

Michigan

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Finding of no significant

impact.

SUMMARY: The proposed action analyzed

by this document is the realignment of

the following business areas: a) Supply

Distribution, b) Bridging, c) Mechanical

Counter Mobility, d) Water Purification,

and e) Fuels and Lubricants to the

Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, as required

by the Base Closure and Realignment

Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–510).

The 1993 Defense Base Closure and

Realignment Commission recommended

certain realignment and closure actions

for military installations on July 1, 1993

(BRAC 93), including the realignment of

a portion of the Belvoir Research,

Development and Engineering Center

(BRDEC), Fort Belvoir, Virginia, to the

Tank-Automotive Research,

Development and Engineering Center

(TARDEC), Detroit Arsenal, Michigan.

Recommended actions were approved

by the President of the United States

and subsequent review by the United

States Congress did not alter any of the

BRAC 93 recommendations.

The purpose of the EA is to identify

and evaluate the anticipated effects of

the realignment of these five business

areas upon the receiving location.

Because the recommended realignment

is a statutory requirement and must be

implemented, No Action, or not

implementing the proposed action is not

currently a viable alternative. The Army

is required to move and consolidate

these activities to the maximum extent

possible. This mandate does not allow

the Army to seek off-post sites as

options for consolidation of activities.

Sufficient office space is available in

existing Building 201 which is currently

undergoing renovation to accommodate

the office functions of the realigned

Supply Distribution, and Bridging

business areas, however, existing onpost laboratory facilities are either

occupied or not configured to allow

efficient use by the Mechanical Counter

Mobility, Water Purification, and Fuels

and Lubricants business areas. There are

no feasible alternatives to the following

construction activities proposed to

execute this BRAC 93 action.

The EA studied in detail two possible

alternatives: (a) Preferred construction

site and (b) an alternative construction

site. Under the Preferred Construction

Site Alternative the Fuels and

Lubricants, Water Purification and

Mechanical Counter Mobility business

areas would be accommodated on

Detroit Arsenal in a new 38,000 square

foot facility. This facility would be built

between and connect two existing

buildings (Buildings 212 and 215) in the

north-central portion of Detroit Arsenal.

The building location was selected on

the basis of its proximity to existing

facilities and its compatibility with

current utilization.

Under the Alternative Construction

Site the Fuels and Lubricants, Water

Purification and Mechanical Counter

Mobility business areas would be

accommodated at the Detroit Arsenal in

a new 40,000 square foot facility. This

facility would be a free standing

structure built over approximately one

acre of undeveloped land just west of

Building 215 in the north-central sector

of the Detroit Arsenal. This site is

currently used as a softball field.

Regarding the preferred construction

site alternative, no significant impacts

were identified. Potential for only

minor, insignificant impacts are

anticipated regarding: Air Quality, soils,

and groundwater. Building 212 has been

recommended as being eligible for the

National Register of Historic Places.

Proposed construction plans for the new

connecting building will be coordinated

with the Michigan State Historic

Preservation Officer (SHPO) prior to

undertaking any construction activities.

If necessary, a Memorandum of

Agreement detailing the actions the

Army will take to avoid or mitigate for

any adverse effects to National Register

properties will be concluded among the

Army, the Michigan SHPO, and the

Advisory Council.

Regarding the Alternative

Construction Site, no significant

impacts were identified. Potential for

only minor, insignificant, impacts are

anticipated regarding: land use, air

quality, soils, surface drainage, and