alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11334]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-185-003]


Northern Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
effective April 1, 1995 and September 1, 1995:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 101
Second Revised Sheet No. 101
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 116
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 221
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 226
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 257

    Northern is filing in compliance with the Commission's Order issued 
March 30, 1995 in Docket Nos. RP95-185-000 and RP95-185-001, and to 
request clarification on certain tariff provisions.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers, interested State Commissions and other 
parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All 
such protests must be filed on or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate proceeding. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11334 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District 1

Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 95-4117

___________

Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr., *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

Nelson McAlpine, *

 * Appeal from the United States

Plaintiff, * District Court for the

 * Northern District of Iowa.

v. *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Lt. Luensman; C/O Tope; C/O *

Sprau; C/O Dunyon; C/O Andrews; *

Hilton; Larry Brimeyer, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: August 12, 1996

 Filed: August 28, 1996 

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Lee Johnson appeals from the district court’s 28 U.S.C.

1

§ 1915(d) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging racial

discrimination and cruel and unusual punishment at the Iowa Men’s

Reformatory. After reviewing the district court file and Johnson’s brief,

we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion, and we affirm.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-89

)

CHARLES R. SEALS )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on December 9, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the four-count

Indictment, and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this

Report and Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be

scheduled before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 9th day of December 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Chesire Martinez ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9797.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
|-------------------------

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EcoBlu Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Conboy, President, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Steve Conboy
|------------

|Steve ConboyPresidentPrincipal Executive OfficerOctober 13, 2010
|----------------------------------------------------------------

---
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of YDI
Wireless, Inc., certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q of YDI
Wireless, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date: March 25, 2004                            /s/ Patrick L. Milton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick L. Milton
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
No. 85-1471.

#### Boreal Ridge Corp. *v.*Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada in and for the County of Washoe (Tietjen, Real Party in Interest).

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12316]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 21066; 811-5691]


Value Line Intermediate Bond Fund; Notice of Application

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice of Application for Deregistration under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPLICANT: Value Line Intermediate Bond Fund.

RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f).

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant requests an order declaring it has 
ceased to be an investment company.

FILING DATE: The application was filed on April 3, 1995, and an 
amendment thereto on May 3, 1995.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on June 6, 1995, 
and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicant, in the 
form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing 
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason 
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20549. Applicants, 220 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane L. Titus, Paralegal Specialist, at (202) 942-0584, or Robert A. 
Robertson, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 (Division of Investment 
Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
the SEC's Public Reference Branch.

Applicant's Representations

    1. Applicant is an open-end, diversified management investment 
company, organized as a business trust under the laws of the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. On November 18, 1988, applicant 
registered under the Act and filed a registration statement under the 
Securities Act of 1933. Applicant's registration statement was aborted 
on October 19, 1992, and applicant has made no public offering of its 
shares.
    2. Applicant never issued any securities. Applicant has no 
shareholders, liabilities or assets. Applicant is not a party to any 
litigation or administrative proceeding.
    3. Applicant is not now engaged, nor does it propose to engage in 
any business activities.

    For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12316 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12671]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, and Solon 
Consulting Group, Ltd.

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 13, 1995, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Minnesota Mining and 
Manufacturing, and Solon Consulting Group, Ltd. have filed written 
notification simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) 
the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed 
for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery 
of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, St. Paul, MN; and 
Solon Consulting Group, Ltd., Silver Spring, MD. The general area of 
planned activity is to develop technology to define espisodes of 
treatment for the diseases and conditions found in the enrolled 
population of typical managed care organizations.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12671 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26885-26886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12349]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Fifth Third Bancorp, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; and 
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than June 13, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (John J. Wixted, Jr., Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101:
    1. Fifth Third Bancorp, Cincinnati, Ohio; to acquire 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Bank of Naples, Naples, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Matenve, Ltd., Miami, Florida; to become a bank holding company 
by acquiring 25.97 percent of the voting shares of Ocean Bankshares, 
Inc., Miami, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire Ocean Bank, Miami, 
Florida.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. The Berens Corporation, Houston, Texas, and Berens Delaware, 
Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to become a bank holding companies by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First National Bank of 
Dayton, Houston, Texas.
    In connection with this application The Berens Corporation, 
Houston, [[Page 26886]] Texas, also has applied to acquire First 
National Bank of Dayton, Dayton, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 15, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-12349 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HARLEYSVILLE WORCESTER INSURANCE COMPANY, AND

HARLEYSVILLE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioners

v.

TONY DOMIANO AUTO DEALERSHIPS, INC., JILL SPARKS, ANNE TRAPPER, ANTHONY J. BROWN, RICHARD E. WALLACE, AND JOHN TANIS,

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ELEANOR TANIS, ON BEHALF OF

THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND DENNIS ROSS, JESSICA LEONARD, CLYDE BRZENSKI, ANNA GERHARD AND JOSEPH SKORETS, INDIVIDUALLY AND

ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 527 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Ruben Benito JOSLIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9233.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Forrest THOMAS, III, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 12-10174.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

*2866Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Al D.    Ross                                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Al D. Ross                                                     |   |
| President and Chief      Executive Officer                     |
|                                                           |   |
|                                                           |   |
| November 6,      2009                                          |   |
|                                                           |   |
|                                                           |   |
| /s/ Terry L.      Hester                                       |   |
| Terry L.      Hester                                           |   |
| Executive Vice      President and Chief      Financial Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12352]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title: Evaluation of the Department of Defense/Department of Education 
Career Academies
Type of Request: New collection
Number of Respondents: 1,691
Responses per Respondent: 1.71
Annual Responses: 2,891
Average Burden per Response: .475 hours
Annual Burden Hours: 1,373
Needs and Uses: In March 1993, the Junior Reserve Officers Training 
Corps (JROTC) Career Academy Program was established for at-risk 
students, as part of the President's Defense Reinvestment and 
Conversion Initiative. The information collected hereby, will be 
utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of this new program. It will 
examine the academies' impact on student behavior and attitude toward 
school, as well as work/vocational training, using data in school 
records and annual student surveys. This collection will provide vital 
information with which to determine the efficacy and merit of the JROTC 
Career Academy Program, an important part of the Department of Defense 
Civil-Military Cooperative Action Program established in accordance 
with Public Law 102-484.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; State or local governments; 
small businesses or organizations
Frequency: Annually
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.

    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.

    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-12352 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James R. HARKER-BEY, Appellant.

No. 03-3636.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 4, 2004.

Decided May 18, 2004.

Daniel Christopher Tvedt, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James R. Harker-Bey, Florence, CO, pro se.

John Broz, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BYE, MCMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James Harker-Bey appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Northern District of Iowa upon revocation of his supervised release. The district court sentenced Harker-Bey to 14 months imprisonment followed by continuation of his supervised release until its original expiration date. For reversal, Harker-Bey argues that the district court engaged in speculation in concluding that he missed his drug-testing appointments because of cocaine usage, and failed to consider his proffered reasons' — he had been having memory problems and mental-health issues — for missing his appointments. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

In July 1994 Harker-Bey pleaded guilty to distribution of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to 78 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Harker-Bey commenced supervised release in June 2000. In October 2003, the government petitioned for revocation based on Harker*441Bey’s drug and alcohol use and multiple failures to report for drug testing, all of which Harker-Bey admitted.

We reject Harker-Bey’s arguments. The 14-month prison term imposed by the district court is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines, *see*U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a) (8-14 month range), and is not an abuse of discretion, *see United States v. Grimes,*54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review). Furthermore, the district court was not obligated to credit, or to use as a basis for sentencing leniency, the explanations offered by Harker-Bey as to why he violated his supervised-release conditions. *See United States v. Hensley,*36 F.3d 39, 41 (8th Cir.1994).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.