21434 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

appropriate federal regulations

governing controlled airspace. Without

this additional provision the rule would

be incomplete and defective, and have

an adverse impact on safety. Therefore,

I find that notice and public procedure

under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) specifically

regarding the establishment of the Class

E2 airspace area are impracticable and

contrary to the public interest.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace

* * * * *

ASO KY D Louisville Bowman Field, KY

[Revised]

Louisville Bowman Field, KY

(Lat. 38°13′41′′ N, long. 85°39′48′′ W.)

Louisville Standiford Field, KY

(Lat. 38°10′29′′ N, long. 85°44′11′′ W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to but not including 2,200 feet MSL

within a 3.9-mile radius of Bowman Field,

excluding that portion within the Louisville

Standiford Field Class C Airspace Area, and

excluding that portion south of the 081°

bearing from Standiford Field, and also

excluding that portion north of the Louisville

Standiford Field Class C Airspace Area and

west of a line drawn from lat. 38°11′28′′ N,

long. 85°42′01′′ W direct thru the point

where the 030° bearing from Standiford Field

intersects the 5-mile radius from Standiford

Field to the point of intersection with the 3.9-

mile radius from Bowman Field. This Class

D airspace area is effective during the

specific days and times established in

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective

days and times will thereafter be

continuously published in the Airport/

Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as a Surface Area for an Airport

* * * * *

ASO KY E2 Louisville Bowman Field, KY

[Revised]

Louisville Bowman Field, KY

(Lat. 38°13′41′′ N, long. 85°39′48′′ W.)

Louisville Standiford Field, KY

(Lat. 38°10′29′′ N, long. 85°44′11′′ W.)

Within a 3.9-mile radius of Bowman Field,

excluding that portion within the Louisville

Standiford Field Class C Airspace Area, and

excluding that portion south of the 081°

bearing from Standiford Field, and also

excluding that portion north of the Louisville

Standiford Field Class C Airspace Area and

west of a line drawn from lat. 38°11′28′′ N,

long. 85°42′01′′ W direct thru the point

where the 030° bearing from Standiford Field

intersects the 5-mile radius from Standiford

Field to the point of intersection with the 3.9-

mile radius from Bowman field. This Class E

Airspace area is effective during the specific

days and times established in advance by a

Notice to Airmen. The effective days and

times will thereafter be continuously

published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as an Extension to a Class D

Surface Area

* * * * *

ASO KY E4 Louisville Bowman Field, KY

[Revised]

Louisville Bowman Field, KY

(Lat. 38°13′41′′ N, long. 85°39′48′′ W.)

Bowman VOR/DME

(Lat. 38°13′49′′ N, long. 85°39′53′′ W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface within 2.4 miles each side of the

Bowman VOR/DME 067° radial, extending

from the 3.9-mile radius of Bowman Field to

7 miles east of the Bowman VOR/DME. This

Class E airspace area is effective during the

specific days and times established in

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective

days and times will thereafter be

continuously published in the Airport/

Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April

20, 1995.

Stephen W. McDuffee,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 95–10770 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 94–ACE–16]

Amendment to Class E Airspace;

Monticello, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error

in the geographic coordinates of a final

rule that was published in the Federal

Register on December 28, 1994. (59 FR

66671), Airspace Docket No. 94–ACE–

16.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective on May 2,

1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy J. Randolph, Airspace

Technician, Air Traffic Operations

Branch, ACE–530c, Federal Aviation

Administration, 601 East 12th Street,

Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone

number: (816) 426–3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

Federal Register Document 94–31921,

Airspace Docket No. 94–ACE–16,

published on December 28, 1994 (59 FR

66671), established Class E airspace at

Monticello, MO. An error was

discovered in the geographic

coordinates for the Monticello-Lewis

County Regional Airport, MO, Class E

airspace area. This action corrects that

error.

Correction to Final Rule

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, the

geographic coordinates for the Class E

airspace area at Monticello-Lewis

County Regional Airport, MO as

published in the Federal Register on

December 28, 1994, (59 FR 66671),

(Federal Register Document 94–31921;

page 66672, Column 1) are corrected as

follows:

§ 71.71 [Corrected]

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Monticello, MO [Corrected]
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 21435

By removing ‘‘(lat. 40°07′47′′N., long.

91°16′44′′W.)’’ and substituting ‘‘(lat.

40°07′45′′N., long. 91°40′42′′W.)

* * * * *

Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central

Region.

[FR Doc. 95–10773 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[T.D. 7636]

Contributions to Pension, ProfitSharing, etc., Plans on Behalf of SelfEmployed Individuals and

Shareholders-Employees; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service,

Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

SUMMARY: This document contains a

correction to the final regulations (T.D.

7636), which were published in the

Federal Register Friday, August 10,

1979 (44 FR 47046), relating to

contributions to pension, profit-sharing,

etc., plans on behalf of self-employed

individuals and shareholder-employees.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brant Goldwyn (202) 622–6090, (not a

toll-free call).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The final regulations that are the

subject of this correction clarify the

applicability of the $100,000 limitation

of section 401(a)(17) to certain plans

maintained by an aggregated employer

group.

Need for Correction

As published, T.D. 7636 contains an

error which may prove to be misleading

and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

Income taxes, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is

corrected by making the following

correcting amendment:

PART 1—INCOME TAX; TAXABLE

YEARS BEGINNING AFTER

DECEMBER 31, 1953

Paragraph 1. The authority citation

for part 1 continues to read in part as

follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

§ 1.401(e)–5 [Corrected]

Par. 2. The first sentence of

§ 1.401(e)–5 (a)(1) is amended by

removing the ‘‘(1)’’ following the

paragraph heading ‘‘(a) General rules—

(1) General rule.’’.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief

Counsel (Corporate).

[FR Doc. 95–10688 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 944

Utah Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),

Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; approval of

amendment.

SUMMARY: OSM is approving a proposed

amendment to the Utah regulatory

program (hereinafter referred to as the

‘‘Utah program’’) under the Surface

Mining Control and Reclamation Act of

1977 (SMCRA). Utah proposed revisions

to its civil penalty rules with the intent

of making them consistent with recently

promulgated revisions to the Utah Coal

Reclamation Act of 1979.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas E. Ehmett, Telephone: (505)

766–1486.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Utah Program

On January 21, 1981, the Secretary of

the Interior conditionally approved the

Utah program. General background

information on the Utah program,

including the Secretary’s findings, the

disposition of comments, and the

conditions of approval of the Utah

program can be found in the January 21,

1981, Federal Register (46 FR 5899).

Subsequent actions concerning Utah’s

program and program amendments can

be found at 30 CFR 944.15, 944.16, and

944.30.

II. Submission of Proposed Amendment

By letter dated February 10, 1995,

Utah at its own initiative submitted a

proposed amendment to its program

(administrative record No. UT–1019)

pursuant to SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et

seq.). Utah proposed to amend the Utah

Coal Mining Rules at Utah

Administrative Rules (Utah, Admin. R.)

645–401–120, 410, 430, 721, 810, 830,

and 910, concerning civil penalties, and

Utah Admin. R. 645–402–120, 420, and

422, concerning individual civil

penalties. Utah did so with the intent of

making them consistent with recently

promulgated revisions to the Utah Coal

Reclamation Act of 1979 (UCA 40–10 et

seq.).

OSM announced receipt of the

proposed amendment in the February

27, 1995, Federal Register (60 FR 10531;

administrative record No. UT–1029) and

in the same document opened the

public comment period and provided an

opportunity for a public hearing on the

substantive adequacy of the proposed

amendment. The public comment

period closed on March 29, 1995. The

public hearing, scheduled for March 24,

1995, was not held because no one

requested an opportunity to testify.

III. Director’s Findings

As discussed below, the Director, in

accordance with SMCRA and 30 CFR

732.15 and 732.17, finds that the

proposed Utah program amendment

submitted by Utah on February 10,

1995, is no less effective than the

corresponding Federal regulations.

Thus, the Director approves the

proposed amendment.

1. Nonsubstantive Revision to Utah’s

Rules

Utah proposed a revision to

previously-approved Utah Admin. R.

645–401–430, concerning assessment of

violations and unabated violations, that

is nonsubstantive in nature and consists

of the addition of the acronym ‘‘UCA’’

prior to referenced provisions of Utah’s

statute.

Because the proposed revision to this

previously-approved rule is

nonsubstantive in nature, the Director

finds that the proposed revision to Utah

Admin. R. 645–401–430 is no less

effective than the corresponding Federal

regulation at 30 CFR 845.15(b)(2). The

Director approves this proposed

revision.

2. Substantive Revisions to Utah’s Rules

That Are Substantively Identical to the

Corresponding Provisions of the Federal

Regulations

Utah proposed revisions to the

following rules that are substantive in

nature and contain language that is

substantively identical to the

requirements of the corresponding

Federal regulations (listed in

parentheses). The rules include

revisions that transfer power for

assessing civil penalties from the Board

of Oil, Gas, and Mining (Board) to the

Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining

(Division). These rule revisions