alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION





I, Joseph Bucci, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Coastal Pacific Mining Corp.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;




(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date: August 31, 2012




By:           /s/ Joseph Bucci


Joseph Bucci


Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Kambiz Hooshmand, Chief Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    KAMBIZ HOOSHMANDKambiz Hooshmand, President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: November 7, 2005
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Barfield, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-4824.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2018-OHIO-4824

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BARFIELD, APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Barfield, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-4824.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Carnes.

(No. 2017-1623―Submitted August 31, 2018―Decided December 7, 2018.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, 

No. C-160768, 2017-Ohio-8243. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 

State v. Carnes, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-3256, ___ N.E.3d ___. 

O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, DEWINE, and DEGENARO, JJ., concur. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., dissents. 

FISCHER, J., not participating. 

_________________ 

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Alex Scott 

Havlin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

Raymond T. Faller, Hamilton County Public Defender, and Joshua A. 

Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, Willie Barfield. 

_________________
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  October      28, 2008 | By:    |        /s/ Armando Garcia                                                           |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Armando      Garcia                                                                      |
|                                   |   | President,      Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive and Financial      Officer) |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12057]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP92-226-005]


Kern River Gas Transmission; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 5, 1995, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective on May 1, 1995:

Third Revised Sheet No. 5
Third Revised Sheet No. 6
First Revised Sheet No. 125
Original Sheet No. 126
Original Sheet No. 127 through 199

    Kern River states that the revised tariff sheets implement the 
October 19, 1994 Stipulation and Agreement in this proceeding, approved 
by Commission orders dated January 25, 1995 and April 4, 1995, to 
reflect the Post-Restructuring Settlement Rates and the changes to Kern 
River's interruptible transportation revenue crediting provision, as 
provided for in the Settlement. Kern River requests that the Commission 
grant any and all waivers necessary to make the revised tariff sheets 
effective on May 1, 1995.
    Kern River states that copies of the filing were served upon Kern 
River's jurisdictional customers, all affected state commissions, and 
the parties to this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before May 18, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12057 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Peter C. DeGENNARO, petitioner, v. MAINE.

No. 12-5793.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
Exhibit 10.3



Exhibit 10.3


 

DECLARATION OF TRUST


 

This declaration of trust is made by Slavko (Steve) Bebek (the "Trustee") in favour of Adera Mines Limited (the "Beneficiary").  The Trustee solemnly declares that he hold a 100% interest in the mineral claim known as the Gold Ledge, Tenure Number 407574 (the "Property") located in the Lillooet Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada, in trust solely for the benefit of the Beneficiary.


The Trustee further promises the Beneficiary not to deal with the property in any way, except to transfer the Property to the Beneficiary, without written instructions, direction and consent of the Beneficiary.


Given at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada on the ____ day of January, 2004.


 

	
SIGNED SEALED AND DELIVERED by
	

)

)

)
	

 

	
Slavko (Steve) Bebek in the presence of:
	

 

	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Maryna Bilynska
	
)
	

/s/ Slavko (Steve) Bebek

	

SIGNATURE OF WITNESS
	

)

)

)
	

SLAVKO (STEVE) BEBEK

	

 
	
)
	

 

	
Maryna Bilynska
	

)

)
	

 

	
NAME OF WITNESS
	

 

	
 
	
)
	

 

	
1160 - 1040 West Georgia Street
	

)
	

 

	
ADDRESS OF WITNESS
	

)
Paul H. EVANS, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-1134.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         378,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,792
<PP&E>                                       8,661,234
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,489,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,588,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          222,415
<BONDS>                                      6,148,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,781,967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,588,969
<SALES>                                      1,003,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,011,168
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               370,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             459,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (269,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (269,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (269,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (24.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (24.09)
        

</TABLE>
Anthony DeCIANTIS, petitioner, v. James VIERRA, Warden.

No. 13-6616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-8

)

LUTHER W. VANHOOSIER )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on May 3, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and counsel

for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Michael Humberto MUNGUIA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 13-6410.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Saúde Alimentar em Casa

1. Limpeza

Lave sempre os alimentos, mãos, bancadas e utensílios.

• Lave e ensaboe as mãos com água morna por pelo menos 20 segundos. Faça isso antes e depois

de tocar os alimentos.

• Lave suas tábuas de corte, pratos, garfos, colheres, facas e bancadas com sabão e água quente.

Faça isso depois de trabalhar com cada alimento.

• Enxágue frutas e legumes.

• Não lave carne, aves, peixes ou ovos. Caso a água espirrar da pia no processo de lavagem, poderá

espalhar bactérias.

• Limpe as tampas dos produtos enlatados antes de abrir.

2.Separe (Mantenha Separado)

Mantenha os alimentos crus separados. Os germes podem passar de um alimento ao

outro. 

• Mantenha a carne crua, aves, frutos do mar e ovos longe dos outros alimentos. Faça isso em seu

carrinho de compras, sacos e geladeira.

• Não reutilize molhos usados em alimentos crus, a menos que você os ferva. 

• Use uma tábua ou prato especial de corte somente para alimentos crus.

3. Cozinhe

Foods need to get hot and stay hot. Heat kills germs.

• Cozinhe a temperaturas seguras

‐ Carne bovina, suína, cordeiro 63 °C 

‐ Peixe 63 °C 

‐ Carne moída bovina, suína, cordeiro 72 °C 

‐ Peru, Frango, Pato 74 °C

• Use um termômetro de alimentos para

garantir que estejam bem cozidos. Nem

sempre é possível saber olhando.

4. Refrigere

Coloque os alimentos na geladeira imediatamente.

• Regra das 2 horas: Coloque os

alimentos no congelador 2 horas

após cozinhar ou comprar na loja.

Em 1 hora se estiver a 32 graus ou

mais quente fora da geladeira.

• Nunca descongele os alimentos

simplesmente tirando‐os do congelador.

Descongele os alimentos:

‐ Na geladeira 

‐ Com água fria 

‐ No micro‐ondas 

• Marinando os alimentos na geladeira.
Saúde Alimentar em Casa

Por que se preocupar com segurança alimentar?

A cada ano milhões de pessoas adoecem devido a intoxicações alimentares. As intoxicações alimentares podem 

fazer com que você se sinta gripado. Elas podem também causar sérios problemas de saúde, levando até mesmo à 

morte.

Você pensa que tem uma intoxicação alimetar?

Chame seu médico e peça atendimento imediato.

• Guarde a embalagem dos alimentos, lata ou caixa de papelão.

• Ligue para o USDA no número 1-888-674-6854 para carne, aves ou ovos.

• Ligue para o FDA no 1-866-300-4374 para todos os outros alimentos.

• Ligue para seu departamento de saúde local se você acha que adoeceu com a comida que comeu em um 

restaurante ou outro vendedor de alimentos..

Quem está correndo este risco?

Qualquer pessoa pode adoecer por comer alimentos estragados. Algumas pessoas são mais propensas a adoecer a 

causa de intoxicações alimentares.

• Mulheres grávidas

• Adultos mais velhos

• Pessoas com certas condições de saúde como câncer, HIV/AIDS, diabetes e doenças renais

Alguns alimentos são mais arriscados para essas pessoas. Fale com seu médico ou outro profissional de saúde 

sobre quais alimentos são seguros para você comer.

 Esta ficha foi desenvolvida pelo Serviço de Saúde da Mulher do FDA.

Para obter mais materiais de saúde da mulher, consulte: 

www.fda.gov/womens

Saúde Alimentar em Casa (PORTUGUESE) 2021
Wilhelmina MOORE, petitioner, v. WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 12-1097.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

FORTINO ELENES, Jr.,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 14

- 501 56

D.C. No. 3:13

- cr

- 03962

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015 **

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N

. R

. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Fortino Elenes, Jr., appeals from the district court’ s judgment and challenges

the 70

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for importation

of methamphetamine , in vio lation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 50156

Elenes contends that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in

denying his request for a minor

- ro le adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 and

improperly concluded that he was not entitled to the adjustment. We review de

novo the district court’s interpretation of the guidelines and for clear error the district

court’s factual determination that a defendant is not a minor participant. See United

States v. Hurtado , 760 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 2014)

. Contrary to Elenes’s

contention , the record reflects that the court properly consider ed his culpability

relative to that of the average participant

. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A)

.

Further , in light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court did not clearly

e rr in determining that Elenes failed to prove that he was entitled to the adjustment

.

See id . § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C ); Hurtado , 760 F.3d at 1069.

AFFIRMED.
Joseph HUGGINS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3423

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.

Belated appeal is denied.

Denied as moot.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT COPE a/k/a ROBERT A. COPE; ROBERT COPE,

SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF BETTY J. MARKS REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MAY 4, 2004, Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF

THE J.P. MORGAN ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007

- SI MORTGAGE

PASS

- THROUGH CERT IFICATES, Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 1336

[ May 18, 2023 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Andre a Gundersen

, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 18

- 21891

.

Michal Slavik of The Ticktin Law Group, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

William L. Grimsley and Kimberly Held Israel of McGlinchey Stafford, Jacksonville, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, F ORST a nd A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Said GSSIME, petitioner, v. NASSAU COUNTRY COURTHOUSE, et al.

No. 12-9991.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.