1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Re t.), Seventh C ourt of Appeal s, si tt ing by assignment. Tex. Gov’tCode An n. §7 5.00 2(a) (1) (V erno n Su pp. 2 003 ). NO. 07-02-0387-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E SEPTEMBER 22, 2003

______________________________ EDWARD REVETERIANO, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 251 ST DISTRIC T COURT O F POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 44127-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE , PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., an d BOYD, S.J. 1 Appellant Edw

ard Reveteriano appeals from a j udgment revoking his community supervis ion and sentencing him to three years im p risonment. In O ctober of 2001, appellant

ple d gu ilt

y tothe offens e of bu rglary of a habitation pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. He was sentenced to four years confinement, w hich was prob ated fo r four years. The State subseq uently filed a mo tion to re voke his pro bation . At the h earing, appellant

pled true to t he a llegat ions as alle ged in the moti on. The trial court found that2

the allegations

were tr ue and revoke d appellant’s probation. How ever, he r

edu ce d appellant’s s entence to three y ears in pri son. Appellant's counsel has now moved to w ithdraw, after filing a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and r epresenting thathe has searched the record and found n o arguable g rounds for reversa l. The motion and brief illus trate that couns el notified appell ant of his rig htto review the appellate record and file his ow n brief. So to o did we inf orm a ppe llan t tha t any pro se response or b rief he cared to file had to be filed by September 10, 2003. N o response has be en receiv ed. In compliance w ith the princ iples enunciated in Anders , appellate counsel ex plained why there e xisted no ar

guable gr

ound for appeal. For

instance, he ac knowledg ed that appellant

testified at the plea he aring that he was not aware that the burg lary w as about to b e committe d. However, appellant d id admit that he w as at “the w rong place at the wrong time ” and that his at torn ey had expla ined the l aw o f pa rties w hich he understood. Appella te counsel further pointed out that ap pellant pled g uilty and was prop erl y admonished by the trial court and that his plea was voluntary

. See Edwards v. Sta te, 921 S.W.2d 477, 481 (Tex. App.--H ouston [1 st Dist.] 1996, no pet.). We have also conducted an independent rev iew of the re cord to determine w hether there existed r

eversibl e error and found non e. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 199 1) (requi ring us to conduct an independent rev iew). No appeal was take n within 30 days from the date of ap pellant's guilty plea and order placing him o n community

supervis ion; thus, we have no jur isdiction ov er purported error arisi ng at or before that hearing

. Manuel v. Stat e , 994 S.W.2d 658, 661 (Tex. C rim. App. 1999).3

Further, the punishment assesse d was within the range pres cribed by law. T EX
. P EN
. C ODE A NN
. §30.02 (c)(2) ( Vernon 2002) (s tating the offense i s a second deg ree felony); Id

. §12.33(a) (stating the range of puni shment for a second deg ree felony is not more than 20 years or less than tw

o years)

. Acco rdin gly, we gr

ant counsel's motion to wi thdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial court Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish

.