26424 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below of your

intention to do so as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Stacey

Ungerleider, Energy Information

Administration, EI–421, Forrestal

Building, U.S. Department of Energy,

Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586–

5130.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the form and instructions

should be directed to Stacey

Ungerleider at the address listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

II. Current Actions

III. Request for Comments

I. Background

In order to fulfill its responsibilities

under the Federal Energy

Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. No.

93–275) and the Department of Energy

Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 95–91),

the Energy Information Administration

is obliged to carry out a central,

comprehensive, and unified energy data

and information program. As part of this

program, EIA collects, evaluates,

assembles, analyzes, and disseminates

data and information related to energy

resource reserves, production, demand,

and technology, and related economic

and statistical information relevant to

the adequacy of energy resources to

meet demands in the near and longer

term future for the Nation’s economic

and social needs. The Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, 511, 44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq. requires the EIA to conduct

these presurvey consultation programs.

The Petroleum Supply Reporting

System collects information needed for

determining the supply and disposition

of crude oil, petroleum products and

natural gas liquids. These data are

published by the Energy Information

Administration in the Weekly Petroleum

Status Report, Winter Fuels Report,

Petroleum Supply Monthly and the

Petroleum Supply Annual. Respondents

to the surveys are producers of

oxygenates, operators of petroleum

refining facilities, blending plants, bulk

terminals, crude oil and product

pipelines, natural gas plant facilities,

tanker and barge operators and oil

importers.

II. Current Actions

EIA will request a one year extension

to the existing collections to collect data

in 1996.

In anticipation of the 1997 OMB

clearance package, the Petroleum

Supply Division is conducting a

Business Process Re-engineering effort

to review the collection, validation and

dissemination of petroleum supply data.

Changes to these processes will focus on

reducing respondent burden and

making data more accessible and timely.

The changes will begin with the

collection of the petroleum supply data

in 1997. Requests for comments on

these changes will be made in 1996.

III. Request for Comments

Prospective respondents and other

interested parties should comment on

the actions discussed in item II. The

following general guidelines are

provided to assist in the preparation of

responses. Please indicate to which

form(s) your comments apply.

As a potential respondent:

A. Are the instructions and

definitions clear and sufficient? If not,

which instructions require clarification?

B. Can the data be submitted using the

definitions included in the instructions?

C. Can data be submitted in

accordance with the response time

specified in the instructions?

D. Public reporting burden for this

collection is estimated to average per

submission: EIA–800—1 hour 10

minutes; EIA–801—40 minutes; EIA–

802—40 minutes; EIA–803—25 minutes;

EIA–804—1 hour 10 minutes; EIA–

807—50 minutes; EIA–810—3 hours 10

minutes; EIA–811—1 hour 40 minutes;

EIA–812—2 hours; EIA–813—1 hour 30

minutes; EIA–814—1 hour 5 minutes;

EIA–816—40 minutes; EIA–817—1 hour

30 minutes; EIA–818—2 hours; EIA–

819M—30 minutes; EIA–819A—1 hour

15 minutes; EIA–820—2 hours; EIA–

825—30 minutes. How much time,

including time for reviewing

instructions, searching existing data

sources, gathering and maintaining the

data needed, and completing and

reviewing the collection of information,

do you estimate it will require you to

complete and submit the required form?

E. What is the estimated cost of

completing this form, including the

direct and indirect costs associated with

the data collection? Direct costs should

include all costs, such as administrative

costs, directly attributable to providing

this information.

F. How can the form be improved?

G. Do you know of any other Federal,

State, or local agency that collects

similar data? If you do, specify the

agency, the data element(s), and the

means of collection.

As a potential user:

A. Can you use data at the levels of

detail indicated on the form?

B. For what purpose would you use

the data? Be specific.

C. How could the form be improved

to better meet your specific needs?

D. Are there alternate sources of data

and do you use them? What are their

deficiencies and/or strengths?

E. For the most part, information is

published by EIA in U.S. customary

units, e.g., cubic feet of natural gas,

short tons of coal, and barrels of oil.

Would you prefer to see EIA publish

more information in metric units, e.g.,

cubic meters, metric tons, and

kilograms? If yes, please specify what

information (e.g., coal production,

natural gas consumption, and crude oil

imports), the metric unit(s) of

measurement preferred, and in which

EIA publication(s) you would like to see

such information.

EIA is also interested in receiving

comments from persons regarding their

views on the need for the information

contained in the Petroleum Supply

Reporting System.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of the form; they also will

become a matter of public record.

Statutory Authorities: Section 2(a) of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L.

No. 96–511), which amended Chapter 35 of

Title 44 of the United States Code [See 44

U.S.C. 3506(a) and (c)(1)].

Issued in Washington, D.C. May 10, 1995.

Yvonne M. Bishop,

Director, Office of Statistical Standards,

Energy Information Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–12040 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP92–237–016]

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company; Notice of Filing of a

Corrected Refund Report

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on April 4, 1995,

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company (Alabama-Tennessee),

tendered for filing a corrected refund

report in compliance with ordering

paragraph (F) of the Commission’s

March 20, 1995 order in Docket No.

RP92–237–013, et al.

Consistent with ordering paragraph

(E) of the March 20 order AlabamaTennessee states that it sent letters on

March 27, 1995, offering each of its

customers that had an effective

Operational Balancing Agreement

(OBA) the option of receiving refunds

for fuel retainage either in-kind, or as a

credit to the customer’s OBA account.

Alabama-Tennessee further states that it

has calculated interest at the rates
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices 26425

mandated by Commisison regulations,

and has applied the resulting percentage

figures to the retained gas volumes for

each customer, thereby paying the

interesting as volumes.

All parties that have already filed

comments or protests regarding the

subject corrected refund report need not

file in response to this notice.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with 385.211 of the Commission’s Rules

and Regulations. All such protests

should be filed on or before May 18,

1995. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12056 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. GT95–34–000]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) a Capacity Access

Program Refund Report. The report

indicates that Columbia flowed through

to customers that had utilized

Columbia’s Firm Transportation

Capacity on Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation (Docket Nos. RP90–119 and

RP88–67) and Texas Gas Transmission

Corporation (Docket No. RP90–104) via

Columbia’s Capacity Access Program,

the portion of Texas Eastern and Texas

Gas’s refund, which was applicable to

the quantities transported on Texas Gas

and Texas Eastern by each customer

under Columbia’s Capacity Access

Program.

Columbia states that it flowed through

these refunds in the form of credits to

invoices issued on or around April 10,

1995, which were payable to Columbia

on or before April 20, 1995. Interest was

included in the amount refunded to

each customer, calculated through April

19, 1995, in accordance with Section

154.67(c)(2) of the Commission’s

Regulations. The total amount credited

was $160,179.26.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.

All such motions or protests should be

filed on or before May 18, 1995. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12059 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. TM95–5–34–001]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on May 10, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT) tendered for filing to become part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revision

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets:

Substitute 4th Revised Eighth Revised Sheet

No. 8A

Substitute 3rd Revised Original Sheet No.

8A.02

On May 1, 1995, FGT filed tariff

sheets in Docket No. TM95–5–34–000 to

make out-of-cycle adjustments to both

the Current Fuel Reimbursement Charge

and the Annual Fuel Surcharge (Fuel

Filing) proposed to become effective

June 1, 1995. Contained in this filing

were tariff sheets including 4th Revised

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A and 3rd

Revised Original Sheet No. 8A.02. The

revisions to these tariff sheets were

redlined from 3rd Revised Eighth

Revised Sheet No. 8A and 2nd Revised

Original Sheet No. 8A.02, which were

also filed on May 1, 1995 in Docket Nos.

TM94–4–34–006 and RP95–259–000

and also proposed to become effective

on June 1, 1995. Subsequently, FGT has

become aware that it inadvertently

failed to revise 3rd Revised Eighth

Revised Sheet No. 8A and 2nd Revised

Original Sheet No. 8A.02 to reflect the

elimination of the Annual Unit Take-OrPay Surcharge from the maximum usage

charges and associated footnotes.

Therefore, concurrent with the instant

filing, FGT is filing Substitute 3rd

Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A

and Substitute 2nd Revised Original

Sheet No. 8A.02 in Docket Nos. TM94–

4–34–007 and RP95–259–001 to correct

this oversight. In the instant filing, FGT

is making conforming changes to the

referenced tariff sheets filed herewith.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a motion protest with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 in

accordance with § 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests should be filed on or

before May 18, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 94–12051 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. TM94–4–34–007 and RP95–

259–001]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on May 10, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT) tendered for filing to become part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revision

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets:

Substitute 3rd Revised Eighth Revised Sheet

No. 8A

Substitute 2nd Revised Original Sheet No.

8A.02

On May 1, 1995, FGT filed in Docket

Nos. TM94–4–34–006 and RP95–259–

000 to replace the Annual Unit Take-OrPay Surcharge (TOP Surcharge)

mechanism by modifying Section 25 of

the General Terms and Conditions of

FGT’s Tariff to reflect that recovery of

remaining Southern Fixed Charge

balances will be pursuant to

arrangements which have been mutually

agreed to between FGT and the

customers with remaining balances. In

the May 1 filing, FGT inadvertently

failed to reduce the maximum usage

charges to reflect the elimination of the

volumetric TOP Surcharge.

FGT states that in the instant filing,

FGT is correcting this oversight by