alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

JEREMIAH MICHAEL BURGESS, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0105 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201800673

The Honorable Billy K. Sipe Jr., Judge Pro Tempore

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Mohave County Attorney’s Office, Kingman

By Matthew J. Smith

Counsel for Respondent

Jeremiah Michael Burgess, Eloy

Petitioner

FILED 1-17-2023
STATE v. BURGESS

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Brian Y. Furuya, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, and Judge 

Paul J. McMurdie delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Jeremiah Burgess seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Burgess’ first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden 

to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find the petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
Anthony CONLEY, petitioner, v. Keith ANGLIN, Warden, et al.

No. 13-6762.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of Seven Arts Entertainment, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: September
11, 2013 | By: | /s/ Kate Hoffman        | 
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                         |     | Kate Hoffman            | 
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer | 





|Date: September
11, 2013 | By: | /s/ Candace Wernick     | 
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                         |     | Candace Wernick         | 
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer | 





|Date: September 11, 2013 | By: | /s/ Candace Wernick          | 
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------- | 
|                         |     | Candace Wernick              | 
|                         |     | Principal Accounting Officer | 



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CR-130 RM 

)

ABRAHAM DELUNA-ESPARZA )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations upon a plea of guilty issued on December 10, 2013.

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS those findings and recommendations [docket # 6],

ACCEPTS defendant Abraham Deluna-Esparza’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the

defendant guilty of Counts 1 and 2 of the Information, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §

841(a)(1) and 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 30, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11767

 

 

ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD.II

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26018-26019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11977]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-62, RM-8601]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Linden, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Cass 
[[Page 26019]] County Radio proposing the allotment of Channel 257C3 to 
Linden, Texas, as the community's first local aural transmission 
service. Channel 257C3 can be allotted to Linden without the imposition 
of a site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 257C3 at Linden are 
33-00-44 and 94-21-55.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 3, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before July 18, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: William 
J. Pennington, III, 5519 Rockingham Road-East, Greensboro, North 
Carolina 27407 (Counsel for petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-62, adopted May 3, 
1995, and released May 11, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-
3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-11977 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Brandon C. CLARK, et ux., petitioners, v. William J. RAMEKER, Trustee, et al.

No. 13-299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 26, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.
Joseph FRANKLIN, applicant, v. George A. LOMBARDI, et al.

No. 13A512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 20, 2013.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied.

Justice SCALIA took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
                       
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                      35,582  
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              105,153
<ALLOWANCES>                               (5,096)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           155,281
<PP&E>                                     132,188
<DEPRECIATION>                            (73,231)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             350,524     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      100,701
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 226,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               350,524
<SALES>                                    301,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           301,415
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              291,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,702
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.44)
        
                                  




</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

                              BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

                                November 12, 2003

Callaway Golf Company
2180 Rutherford Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7328

      Re:   Credit Agreement dated as of June 16, 2003 (the "Bi-Lateral Credit
            Agreement") between Callaway Golf Company (the "Borrower") and Bank
            of America, N.A. (the "Lender")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

           At the request of the Borrower indicated by its signature below, the
Lender acknowledges that its Commitment under the Bi-Lateral Agreement was
terminated on November 10, 2003 (prior notice of such request being waived by
the Lender) concurrently with the effectiveness of the Credit Agreement dated as
of November 10, 2003 among the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, L/C
Issuer and Swing Line Lender and the Lenders party thereto.

           Please execute and return a copy of this letter to the undersigned by
telefacsimile transmission to (619) 515-7524.

                                                Sincerely yours,

                                                BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

                                                By   /s/ Susan J. Pepping
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                     Susan J. Pepping
                                                     Senior Vice President

Confirmed and agreed:
CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

By:      /s/ Bradley J. Holiday
   -----------------------------------
Name: Bradley J. Holiday
Title:  Sr. Exec. VP, CFO
Ronald Edgar TAYLOR, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8818.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                Exhibit 27

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          38,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,042,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (148,100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,128,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,621,300
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     295,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,128,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20979

c/w No. 03-20966

Summary Calendar

SONIA MARIE MCMORRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CARSEY WERNER; KODA-FM; MAGIC 102 KMJQ; NOBLE BROADCAST GROUP; 

PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY; CHANNEL 26 KRIV; HARPO PRODUCTIONS; 

ARSENIO HALL COMMUNICATIONS; PAULA ABDUL/VIRGIN RECORDS; 

KHOU-TV CHANNEL 11; CHANNEL TWO;

PARAMOUNT STATIONS, doing business as KTXH-Channel 20;

CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY-WCLK,

Defendants-Appellees.

----------------------------------

SONIA MARIE MCMORRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PHILIP MICHAEL THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-91-CV-3234)

(H-01-MC-173)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

PER CURIAM:*

Sonia Marie McMorris has filed appeals from a district court

order to pay filing fees. Because both appeals stem from the same

petition for declaratory relief, we consolidate the appeals. FED.

R. APP. P. 3(b)(2).

The district court's order is not a final order appealable

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Askanase v. Livingwell, Inc., 981 F.2d

807, 810 (5th Cir. 1993). Nor is the order in the class of

interlocutory orders subject to appeal under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(a)(1)-(3). The district court did not certify the order as

final pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) or as appealable pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The order also is not appealable pursuant to

the collateral order doctrine. See, e.g., Brinar v. Williamson,

245 F.3d 515, 517-18 (5th Cir. 2001). Therefore, we lack

jurisdiction over these appeals. See id. at 518.

McMorris has been cautioned that continued frivolous filings

will not be tolerated. See McMorris v. Thomas, No. 01-20687 (5th

Cir. 11 April 2002). In light of McMorris’s continued frivolous

filings, we impose monetary sanctions against McMorris in the

amount of $500, payable to the clerk of this court for deposit into

the Treasury of the United States in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 711(c). See Farguson v. MBank Houston, N.A., 808 F.2d 358, 360
3

(5th Cir. 1986). The clerk of this court is instructed to refuse

to accept any further filings from McMorris in this or any other

appeal until such monetary sanction is paid in full. Id. “This

court and the involved district courts may grant relief from this

requirement in a proper case.” Id.

MOTION TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 

OTHER MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
Christopher SMITH, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Terabeam, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Brian J.
Sereda, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald                   /s/ Brian J. Sereda
-----------------------------------        -------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                       Brian J. Sereda
Chief Executive Officer                    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  August 14, 2006                     Date:  August 14, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12599]



      
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 1995 / Proposed 
Rules

[[Page 27240]]

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 704 and 741


Corporate Credit Unions; Requirements for Insurance

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 13, 1995, the NCUA Board issued a proposed rule 
revising its regulations governing corporate credit unions and 
requirements for insurance. 60 FR 20438 (April 26, 1995). Comments were 
requested by June 26, 1995.
    The supplementary section of the proposed rule indicated that NCUA 
would be conducting analytical assessments of the proposed regulation's 
effect on corporate credit union earnings and capital accumulation. 60 
FR at 20443. NCUA has been working with an outside firm to provide such 
assessments, using simulation modeling techniques. The process has 
proved to be more time-consuming than envisioned, due to the need to 
tailor existing modeling programs to the specifics of corporate credit 
union balance sheets.
    The NCUA Chairman indicated at the April 13, 1995, Board meeting 
that the comment period would be extended if additional time were 
needed because of unanticipated circumstances. The Board has determined 
that additional time is necessary to allow NCUA and the public 
sufficient opportunity to analyze the results of the modeling process 
and the implications for the proposed regulation. Accordingly, the 
comment period is being extended 60 days to August 25, 1995.

DATES: The comment period is extended from June 26, 1995, to August 25, 
1995.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314-3428. Send comments to Ms. Baker via the bulletin board by 
dialing 703-518-6480.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Allen Carver, Director, Office of 
Corporate Credit Unions (703) 518-6640, at the above address.

    Authority: The authority for this action is the general 
rulemaking authority of the NCUA Board.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on May 17, 
1995.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12599 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M