alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6727 CLINTON BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR SMITH; JOHN HAIGWOOD; EVER ETTE PYE; DEBBIE KEITH, Defendants - Appellees, and ROBERT PHILLIPS; JOHN DOE, II; JOHN DOE, III, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-123-5-F) Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: July 24, 1996 Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brooks v. Smith , No. CA-93-123-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ E. James Collord

By  __________________________________

E.  James Collord

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 13, 2005
#### Francis P. SERRA, Claimant-Appellee, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 03-7143.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: April 21, 2004.

Clark C. Evans, Principal Attorney, Judsonia, AR, for Claimant-Appellee.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Principal Attorney, David M. Cohen, Of Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All pending motions are moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Carmen J. Carbona, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2019 of Cannonau Corp. 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

Date:May 12 2020*/s/Carmen J. Carbona* 

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Norman Lashawn WEAVER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7742.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-11-TLS 

)

RONALD C. BODLEY )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 51], filed on September 27, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 51] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment IS hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on October 15, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11169]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Food Advisory Committee; Cancellation

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is cancelling the 
subcommittee meeting of the Food Advisory Committee scheduled for May 8 
and 9, 1995, to provide time for the agency to expand its ongoing 
research review. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register of 
April 21, 1995 (60 FR 19949). It is anticipated that the meeting will 
be rescheduled in the future, to be announced at a later date in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Lynn A. Larsen, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-
5), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 
202-205-4727,
    Catherine M. DeRoever, Advisory Committee Staff (HFS-22), 200 C St. 
SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-4251, or
    FDA Advisory Committee Information Hotline, 1-800-741-8138 (301-
443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), Food Advisory Committee, code 
10564.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
 Linda A. Suydam,
 Interim Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 95-11169 Filed 5-2-95; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Dave Silvester PIERRE, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 13-6792.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cannonau Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Craig Burton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 5th day of May 2022.

 

/s*/Carmen J. Carbona*

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cannonau Corp., and will be retained Cannonau Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-042 JD

)

CHARLES HARTSELL, JR. )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on July 12, 2013 [DE 24]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Charles Hartsell, Jr.’s plea of guilty, and

FINDS the defendant guilty of Counts 1, 2 and 3 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 641

and 1001, and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: August 6, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                               
<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>                         
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited  financial  statements  for the quarter ended March 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                        
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                     
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                     234
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          234
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      78
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              364
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           91
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              71
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            20
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        20
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               20
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.31
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Beauty Brands Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Altucher, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:  March
31, 2009





/s/
      James
      AltucherJames
      Altucher, President




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-83-TLS 

 ) 

ROBERT D. PEARL, JR. ) 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 25], filed on March 28, 2017. The Defendant has waived objection to 

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation [ECF No. 25] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject 

to this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 

Two (2) of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such 

offense. 

 The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate 

order.

SO ORDERED on April 13, 2017. 

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50395

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RANULFO ESQUIVEL-GUTIERREZ, also known

as Omar Aguila Otero, also known as

Francisco Ruiz Castillo,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1993-ALL-PM

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Ranulfo Esquivel-Gutierrez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Esquivel contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been
No. 03-50395

-2-

alleged in his indictment. Esquivel maintains that he pleaded

guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for

that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Esquivel acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Ron COLLINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6861.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Master Wahoo RAHMAAN, petitioner, v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 12-8524.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Order entered January 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00486-CR

JOSE MAYA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-34710-T

ORDER

Appellant’s December 31, 2014 motion to accept the brief tendered is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on December 31, 2014 is DEEMED timely 

filed on the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
즉석 섭취 식품을 취급할 때 장갑을 착용하거나 기구를 사용하면, 식품

과 고객의 안전을 지킬 수 있습니다.

 

✘

 

사람이 질병에 걸리지 않도록 보호하십시오. 즉석 섭취 식품을 취급할



때는 항상 장갑을 착용하거나 기구를 사용하십시오.
Daniel Eric COBBLE, petitioner, v. Shevondah FIELDS, et al.

No. 12-9318.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 28, 2022

NO. 03-21-00622-CV

Appellant, Adolfo Gallela// Cross-Appellant, Lauren Heather McMahan

v.

Appellee, Lauren Heather McMahan// Cross-Appellee, Adolfo Gallela

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on August 18, 2021. Having reviewed 

the record, the Court holds that Appellant Adolfo Gallela and Cross-Appellant Lauren Heather 

McMahan have not prosecuted their appeals and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of 

this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeals for want of prosecution. McMahan shall 

bear her own costs relating to her appeal, both in this Court and the court below. Because 

Gallela is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made as to Gallela.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1480 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1480

 To require that a conversion to contractor performance of an activity 
  or function of the Federal Government may not result in the loss of 
 employment of any Federal worker with a severe disability employed in 
                       that activity or function.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

Mr. Van Hollen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that a conversion to contractor performance of an activity 
  or function of the Federal Government may not result in the loss of 
 employment of any Federal worker with a severe disability employed in 
                       that activity or function.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employees with Disabilities 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TERMINATING EMPLOYMENT OF FEDERAL WORKERS WITH 
              DISABILITIES EMPLOYED IN ACTIVITY OR FUNCTION CONVERTED 
              TO CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE.

    (a) Prohibition.--In the case of a conversion to contractor 
performance of any activity or function of an executive agency under 
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 or any other policy, 
directive, or regulation, including any Most Efficient Organization 
plan, the head of the executive agency may not terminate the employment 
of any employee in that activity or function if--
            (1) the employee is an individual with a disability (as 
        defined in section 7(20)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 
        (29 U.S.C. 705(20)(A)); and
            (2) the employee was hired under a plan or program 
        designated for hiring individuals with such disability.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to an activity or 
function that is planned to be changed to performance by a qualified 
nonprofit agency for the blind or by a qualified nonprofit agency for 
other severely handicapped persons in accordance with the Javits-
Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-48c), if each employee covered by 
subsection (a) is offered another position with the Federal Government, 
or with the nonprofit agency that will perform the activity or 
function, that is equivalent to the position previously held by the 
employee before the change to performance by the nonprofit agency.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6628

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LOMUS GRACE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-94-109-V, CA-97-240-3-

V)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lomus Grace, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lomus Grace appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Grace, Nos. CR-94-109-V; CA-97-240-3-V

(W.D.N.C. filed May 28, 1999; entered June 1, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED