alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CR-4

)

FRANCISCO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on April 2, 2012, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 10 of the 10-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 2nd day of April, 2012.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-30-TLS 

)

ARMANDO GONZALES-GUTIERREZ )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 30], filed on October 8, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 30] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment IS hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on October 23, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Gary Thomas SMITH, petitioner, v. Kenneth T. McKEE, Warden.

No. 12-9697.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10496]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[T.D. 95-38]


Recordation of Trade Name: ``Weighpack International, B.V.''

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, December 20, 1994, a notice of application for the 
recordation under Section 42 of the Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 
U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name ``WEIGHPACK INTERNATIONAL, B.V.,'' used 
by Weighpack International, B.V., a corporation organized under the 
laws of The Netherlands, located at Stevinstraat 31 A, 2587 EA Den 
Haag, The Netherlands was published in the Federal Register (59 FR 
65573). The notice advised that before final action was taken on the 
application, consideration would be given to any relevant data, views, 
or arguments submitted in writing by any person in opposition to the 
recordation and received not later than February 21, 1995. No responses 
were received in opposition to the notice.
    Accordingly, as provided in Section 133.14, Customs Regulations (19 
CFR 133.14), the name ``WEIGHPACK INTERNATIONAL, B.V.,'' is recorded as 
the trade name used by Weighpack International, B.V., a corporation 
organized under the laws of The Netherlands, located at Stevinstraat 31 
A, 2587 EA Den Haag, The Netherlands.
    The application states that the trade name is used in connection 
with weighing, counting packaging and orienting equipment for fasteners 
and hardware items, including the following equipment:

automatic packaging systems
carton erectors and carton closers
labeling systems
lifting and tipping units
mechanical and magnetic orienters
high speed hardware counters
furnace feeders
pelletizing systems
soft drop systems
fibre packaging and dosage systems
conveyor and transfer systems
vibration tables
universal counters
bulk storage hoppers
form, fill and seal bagmakers
counting/weighing tables and systems

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delois P. Johnson, Intellectual 
Property Rights Branch, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., (Franklin 
Court), Washington, D.C. 20229 (202-482-6960).

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
John F. Atwood,
Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch.
[FR Doc. 95-10496 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6429

CHRIS A. JONES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. T. MCKOY, Superintendent; MR. JOHNSON, Superintendent; CAPTAIN SOUTHHALL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:16

- ct

- 03199

- D )

Submitted : August 20, 2019 Decided: August 23, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chris A. Jones , Appellant Pro Se. Alan Dale McInnes , NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees

.
Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Chris A. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that
relief be denied and advised Jones that failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jones has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Lester L. WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL SYSTEM, et al.

No. 12-10127.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.4.1  


 
 

THE MACERICH COMPANY
  1994 ELIGIBLE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN, AS AMENDED    
    


        WHEREAS, The Macerich Company (the "Company") maintains The Macerich Company 1994 Eligible Directors' Stock Option
Plan, as amended (the "Plan"); 


        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has the authority to amend the Plan, and has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of
the stockholders of the Company to amend the Plan as set forth herein. 


        RESOLVED, that the Plan be and hereby is amended, as follows: 


        (1)   Section 4.1(a)
of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 



"Beneficiary"
shall mean the person, persons, trust, or trusts designated by a Participant or, in the absence of a designation, entitled by will or the laws of descent and distribution, to receive the
benefits specified in the Award Agreement and under this Plan in the event of a Participant's death, and shall mean the Participant's executor or administrator if no other Beneficiary is designated
and able to act under the circumstances." 




        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to confirm the adoption of this Amendment by the Board as of the
29th day of October, 2003. 



	 	 	/s/  RICHARD A. BAYER      
 Richard A. Bayer

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary











QuickLinks


THE MACERICH COMPANY 1994 ELIGIBLE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN, AS AMENDED
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161169) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Participation Plan, the 2002 Equity Participation Plan, the IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 2007 Equity Participation Planand the IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated February 22, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

February 22, 2010
Donald Wayne STROUTH, petitioner, v. Roland COLSON, Warden.

No. 12-7720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Indiana

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF 

ATTORNEY INFORMATION

TO: THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND ALL OTHER PARTIES

G I have no pending cases in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana.

X I have pending case(s) in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana.

) 3:12-cv-00474-JTM-CAN

) 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN

) 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN

Pending Case No(s). ) 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN

) 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN

) 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN

) 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN

)

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-3, the undersigned counsel notifies the Clerk=s Office of the following changes:

Previous Information: Current Information:

Name: Douglas A. Mulvaney Douglas A. Mulvaney

Law Firm, Stutsman & Mulvaney Stutsman & Mulvaney

Company,

and/or Agency:

Address: 1300 Cassopolis Street 1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337 P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, IN 46515-1337 Elkhart, IN 46515-1337

Primary E-mail: dmulvaney@smd-law.com dmulvaney@smspilawyers.com

Secondary e-mail: dmulvaney@smspilawyers.com

Telephone Number: (574) 266-8500 (574) 266-8500

Facsimile: (574) 206-9215 (574) 206-9215

Date: January 15, 2013 s/ Douglas A. Mulvaney 

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 15 filed 01/15/13 page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<CASH>                                           12759
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1546
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 11325
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      93816
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         224446
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  358970
<DEPOSITS>                                      315920
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3593
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       31957
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  358970
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   4786
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1318
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   199
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  6303
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2513
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2513
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3790
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2150
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2150
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1447
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.85
<LOANS-NON>                                       1015
<LOANS-PAST>                                       194
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   434
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3718
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4155
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      475
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3850
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1091
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           2759


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

SUE KELLER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-840-TLS-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF STAY BY REASON OF BANKRUPTCY

 The defendant, New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England 

Compounding Center (“NECC”), hereby notifies the Court that NECC filed a voluntary petition 

under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts (Eastern Division) No. 12-19882-HJB. 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), all actions against NECC are stayed. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Dina M. Cox 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49 

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49 

 Attorneys for Defendant, New England 

Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. 

 

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 8 filed 12/27/12 page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on December 27, 2012 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

/s/ Dina M. Cox 

 DINA M. COX 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

Phone: (317) 237-0500 

FAX: (317) 630-2790 

dcox@lewiswagner.com Q:\NECC\16 - Keller\Federal Court Action\Notice of Stay_Bankruptcy.docx

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 8 filed 12/27/12 page 2 of 2
[davidson16fletter001.jpg]





January 29, 2016





Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C.

20549-7561



Dear Sirs/Madams:



We were previously the independent registered public accounting firm for Alianza Minerals Ltd. (formerly Tarsis Resources Ltd.) (the "Company") and reported on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. We have read the Company's statements under Item 16F of the Annual Report on Form 20-F dated January 29, 2016, and we agree with the statements made therein concerning the change in accountants. However, we are not in a position to agree or disagree with the Company's statement that newly engaged accountants were not consulted regarding any of the matters or events set forth in the second paragraph of Item 16F.



Sincerely,



[davidson16fletter003.gif]



DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP







[davidson16fletter004.jpg]
David SEAGROVES, petitioner, v. Bob BURRELL, et al.

No. 12-9372.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.
exv4w2



 



EXHIBIT 4.2



December 31, 2003


Brookfield Homes Corporation

12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200

Del Mar, CA 92014


Dear Sirs:


The following terms will highlight the conditions under which Brookfield Homes
Corporation may from time to time deposit funds with Trilon International Inc.



	 	 	 
	DEPOSIT
ENTITY:	 	
Trilon International Inc. will open appropriate
accounts for Brookfield Homes Corporation to receive
funds.
	 	 	 
	CURRENCY:	 	
Deposits will be made in United States dollars.
	 	 	 
	MATURITY
DATE:	 	
This will be a demand deposit facility.
	 	 	 
	INTEREST
RATES:	 	
Deposit amounts will earn interest as follows:
	 	 	
3 Month Libor + 50 basis points
	 	 	 
	DEPOSITS:	 	
Notice of any deposit amounts should be made One
business day prior to deposit.
	 	 	 
	WITHDRAWAL
OF
FUNDS:	 	
Brookfield Homes Corporation will notify Trilon
International Inc. of deposit withdraws in accordance
with the following notice timelines:

4 USD10 million or greater: One business day prior to
withdrawal of funds.

4 Less than USD10 million: Notice must be received by
10am EST on the day of withdrawal.



For your information enclosed is a copy of our most recent audited financial
statements.


Yours very truly,



	 	 	 
	 	 	
Trilon International Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/ GEORGE GLEADALL

George Gleadall
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/ ANDRE PROCOPE

Andre Procope



Agreed and Accepted


Brookfield Homes Corporation


/s/ IAN G. COCKWELL


Ian G. Cockwell



/s/ PAUL G. KERRIGAN


Paul G. Kerrigan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:14-cr-00013-TLS-SLC

)

LAURA A. PLUMB )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on February 2, 2017, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and

her right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the four-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and

Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 2nd day of February 2017.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2