alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HL Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deniz Hassan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
22nd day of October, 2008.


/s/ Deniz Hassan
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Alex Trevino, Jr.Alex Trevino, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerJuly 15, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



- 24 -
Dated:  3/27/2008                                                                       By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore                                                                   Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Lehman XS Trust, Series 2007-17H (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications**(Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:LaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWestlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1228]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement; Blue Earth, Steele and Waseca 
Counties, Minnesota

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
Environmental Impact Statement is being prepared as part of the U.S. 14 
Corridor Study for a transportation improvement project in Blue Earth, 
Steele and Wasceca Counties, Minnesota.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. James McCarthy, Design Engineer, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Federal Highway Administration, Suite 490 Metro Square Building, Saint 
Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone number (612) 290-3241. Mr. Curt 
Fakler, Project Manager, Minnesota Department of Transportation, 
District 7, 501 South Victory Drive, P.O. Box 4039, Mankato, Minnesota 
56001-4039, telephone number (507) 389-6011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed project is identified as State 
Project (SP) 8837-81003 and involves improvements to the existing two-
lane roadway in Blue Earth, Steele and Waseca Counties. The corridor 
limits are on U.S. 14 from the east junction of the T.H. 60 to I-35 in 
Owatonna. The total length of the corridor study is 50 Kilometers. The 
proposed improvements are considered necessary to meet current and 
projected traffic volumes on the U.S. 14 Corridor. Build alternatives 
being considered include reconstruction along the present U.S. 14 with 
the upgraded 2-Lane roadway, divided 4-Lane reconstruction of the U.S. 
14 with bypasses of the Cities of Janesville and Waseca, and a new 4-
Lane alignment between Waseca and Owatonna approximately four 
kilometers south of the present U.S. 14.
    The Minnesota Department of Transportation held a Public Scoping 
Meeting on May 20, 1993, and a Public Information Meeting on August 5, 
1993. The Scoping Document/Draft Scoping Decision (April 1993) and 
Scoping Decision (March 1994) documents have been sent to Federal, 
State and local agencies that may have an interest in the project to 
inform them of the proposed project and scoping meeting, to solicit 
their comments and concerns, and to inform them of the alternatives 
being considered in the Environmental Impact Statement. During the 
initial scoping process three alternate new alignments for U.S. 14 were 
eliminated due to impacts or inadequate performance. The Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be available for review 
in the Spring of 1995.

    Issued on: January 6, 1995.
James A. Cheattham,
Acting Division Administrator, St. Paul, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 95-1228 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
#### In re FENNELLY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 13, 1912.)

In the matter of Philip V. Fennelly, an attorney and counselor at law.

PER CURIAM.

Matter referred to Vernon Cole, Esq., an attorney residing at Buffalo, N. Y., to take the proofs concerning the matters alleged in the petition and report the same to the court, with his opinion thereon.
Roberto Cardona GUILLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6782.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-18   filed 07/14/15   page 1 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-18   filed 07/14/15   page 2 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-18   filed 07/14/15   page 3 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-18   filed 07/14/15   page 4 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-18   filed 07/14/15   page 5 of 5
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-10032

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. DAVID CANO-HERNANDEZ Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas, Amarillo

2:04-CR-57-ALL

---------------------
Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to vacate
the sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties

to remand the case to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas, for the Amarillo Division for resentencing is GRANTED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D April 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Roy Allen MELANSON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 13-6932.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: December 15, 2016 522475 

________________________________

In the Matter of JUAN ESCOBAR,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: October 25, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Juan Escobar, Woodbourne, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M.

Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.),

entered January 25, 2016 in Sullivan County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying

petitioner's request for parole release.

Petitioner was convicted, upon his guilty plea, of murder

in the second degree and sentenced to 17 years to life in prison. 

He is a native of El Salvador and is subject to a deportation

order. In November 2014, petitioner made his first appearance

before respondent seeking to be released to parole supervision.

Respondent denied his request and ordered him to be held for an

additional 24 months, which was upheld on administrative appeal.

Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and,

following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition. 

Petitioner now appeals.
-2- 522475 

This Court has confirmed that, while this appeal was

pending, petitioner reappeared before respondent and was again

denied parole release. As a result, this appeal is now moot and

must be dismissed (see Matter of Thompson v Department of Corr. &

Community Supervision, 140 AD3d 1516, 1516 [2016]; Matter of

Walker v Annucci, 138 AD3d 1334, 1334 [2016]).

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without

costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-31-TLS 

)

MANUEL HERRERA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 103], filed on May 9, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 103] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment is hereby

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on May 30, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Don BOYD, petitioner, v. KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 12-9398.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Dennis M. McGrath certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of PhotoMedex, Inc.;

(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



(5)

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 24, 2004

By: /s/ Dennis M. McGrath



Dennis M. McGrath

Chief Financial Officer
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-9 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
    Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12923]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG92-3-002]


Pacific Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Filing

May 22, 1995
    Take notice that on May 12, 1995, Pacific Gas Transmission Company 
(PGT) submitted revised standards of conduct to incorporate the changes 
required by Order Nos. 566 et seq.\1\ and the Commission's Order issued 
April 19, 1995 in Docket No. MG92-3-001.

    \1\Standards of Conduct and Reporting Requirements for 
Transportation and Affiliate Transactions, Order No. 566, 59 FR 
32885 (June 27, 1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. para.30,997 (June 17, 
1994); Order No. 566-A, Order on rehearing, 59 FR 52896 (October 20, 
1994), 69 FERC para.61,044 (October 14, 1994); Order No. 566-B, 
order on rehearing, 59 FR 65707, (December 21, 1994); 69 FERC 
para.61,334 (December 14, 1994): appeal docketed sub nom. Conoco, 
Inc. v. FERC, D.C. Cir No. 94-1745 (December 13, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PGT states that all parties of record in the above-referenced 
docket have been served with copies of this filing, as well as all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC, 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214 (1991)). All such 
motion to intervene or protest should be filed on or before June 6, 
1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12923 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Chris A. PANNELL, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 12-9696.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130656 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ARNOLD SODEN, DONALD TURNBULL, Robert P. Young, Jr. MARION TURNBULL, SHAR LEEN CARRELL, Stephen J. Markman, Justices GLADYS RICE, DONALD RICE, A. GAGNE, BARBARA BINKLEY, LARRY BINKLEY, FRED BRANT, JUDITH BRANT, FRED BRANT, MARY BRANT, JOSEPH BRANT, KENNETH ALLEN, ANN ALLEN, GERALD TORSCH, JANET TORSCH, EMILY TAYLOR, RICHARD HARTMAN, DAYNE-ANN HELD, JAMES SCHNIERS, JUDI SCHNIERS, RALPH LEVELY, DONNA LEVELY, RICHARD DEMARIA, NANCY DE MARIA, MARLENE HINCHLIFFE, TED HOINKA, ELIZABETH
SPALTENSPERGER and GEORGE SPALTENSPERGER, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 130656 COA: 263459 Antrim CC: 04-008070-CH LAKES OF THE NORTH ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
Gabriel Lucian ROMAN, aka Gabriel L. Roman, petitioner, v. JEFFERSON AT HOLLYWOOD LP, dba Jefferson at Hollywood Apartments, et al.

No. 12-9178.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Evyn Delayne MACK, petitioner, v. Martin BITER, Warden.

No. 12-9869.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAMONT FOSTER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4572 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 30, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Jeffrey DAWKINS, petitioner, v. Jerome W. WALSH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

No. 12-9737.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.