alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                                                        March 31,
(Dollars in millions)                                                             2002              2001
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income:
   Income before provision for income taxes                                $         65.6    $         40.2
    Fixed charges                                                                    89.8              74.1
                                                                           ------------------------------------
    Income before provision for income taxes and fixed charges             $        155.4    $        114.3
                                                                           ====================================

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                                       $         89.8    $         72.7
    Preferred stock dividend requirement(1)                                           -                 1.4
                                                                           ------------------------------------
                                                                           $         89.8    $         74.1
                                                                           ====================================

Ratio of income before provision for income taxes and fixed
    charges to fixed charges                                                       1.73              1.54
                                                                           ====================================

(1) Reflects a pre-tax basis.
```
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Presidential Documents 27663

Memorandum of May 19, 1995

Delegation of Responsibilities Under Section 509 of the

Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and

1995 (Public Law 103–236)

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United

States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States

Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense the functions conferred

upon the President by section 509 of the Foreign Relations Authorization

Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236), to transfer, with

the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to the Republic of Korea, in

return for concessions to be negotiated by the Secretary of Defense, any

or all of the items described in paragraph (2) of section 509 of that Act,

subject to the conditions, requirements and limitations set forth in section

509 of said Act.

Any reference in this delegation of authority to any Act shall be deemed

to be a reference to such Act as amended from time to time.

The authority delegated to the Secretary of Defense may be redelegated

within the Department of Defense.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 95–13041

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, May 19, 1995.

.

œ–

Filed 5–23–95; 4:00 pm]

Billing code 5000–04–M
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan
    Trust 2007-WF2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities
    Administrator and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    E. Todd Whittemore

    Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
### WR-83,345-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 5/22/2015 3:17:22 PM Accepted 5/27/2015 2:39:27 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
Lease
Agreement

     

    Lessor
(hereinafter
referred to as Party A):Changzhou CTS
Fashion Co., Ltd.

     

    Lessee
(hereinafter
referred to as Party B):Shanghai Baby-Fox
Fashion Co., Ltd.

     

    Through
both parties’ friendly negotiation, they agree:

     

    1. Party
A is the lawful owner and in lawful possession of The Third Floor, No.7
Building, 88# Hu Bin North Road, Wujin District, Changzhou. Party B will take
the area as the storehouse of ready-to-wear clothes. The floor takes averagely
1300 square meters.

    2. Party
A lets Party B take the demised premises for a period from Jan. 1, 2007 to Dec.
30, 2009.

    3. The
rent of the DEMISED PREMISES will be RMB150,000 per year. Party B will pay the
rent of six months each time.

    4. By the
end of this agreement, Party B has the preferential releting right.

    5. Within
10 days after this agreement is signed, Party B should pay Party A RMB 20,000
deposit which should be returned to Party B within one month after the agreement
is dismissed.

    6. For
outstanding issues, the two parties will resolve through
negotiation.

    


    
      
        	
                Party
      A: Changzhou CTS Fashion Co., Ltd.

              	
                Party
      B: Shanghai Baby-Fox Fashion Co., Ltd.

              
	 	 
	
                Signed
      By:

              	
                Signed
      By:

              
	 
      	 
      
	
                Date:

              	
                Date:
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 1 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 2 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 3 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 4 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 5 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 6 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 7 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 8 of 9
case 3:14-cv-01724-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/11/14 page 9 of 9
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6240**

JAMES ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR. , P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Dept. of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1 :1 1

- cv - 0 1 166

- JCC

- TRJ )

Submitted : May 30 , 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Allen Williams, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Allen Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas Satzman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of XpresSpa Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Dated: June 12, 2020



| | /s/ Douglas Satzman                                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Douglas Satzman                                                                                       
| | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
        Accounting Officer)
EX-35.4
(logo) EMC
Mortgage Corporation

ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

The undersigned officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") as servicer
pursuant to the Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2005-10 Agreement (the "Agreement")
hereby certify that:

1. A review of EMC's activities during the period from and including January 1,
   2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and
   EMC's performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in ail material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 12th
day of March 2008.

By: /s/ David B. Little
David B. Little
Executive Vice President
Default Administration

/s/ William Glasgow Jr.
William Glasgow Jr.
Executive Vice President
Enterprise Operations Services

/s/ Jenna Kemp
Jenna Kemp
Executive Vice President
Investor Administration



2780 Lake Vista Drive, Lewisville, Texas 75067
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1292190 Lewisville, Texas 75029-2190


(logo) MBA
Member
Mortgage Bankers Association of America
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-41-TLS 

)

MATTHEW L. VANSCHOICK )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 74], filed on March 21, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 74] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Counts 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on April 8, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Robert G. Gargus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    ROBERT G. GARGUSRobert G. Gargus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: November 7, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12341]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Docket No. AB-307 (Sub-No. 2X)]


Wyoming and Colorado Railroad Company, Inc.--Abandonment 
Exemption--Jackson County, CO

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10505, exempts from the 
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903-04 the abandonment by 
Wyoming and Colorado Railroad Company, Inc. of a 27.03-mile segment of 
the Coalmont Branch between milepost 67.47, at the Colorado/Wyoming 
State line, and the end of the line at milepost 94.5, near Walden, in 
Jackson County, CO, subject to standard labor protective conditions, an 
historical condition, and environmental conditions.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file a financial 
assistance offer has been received, this exemption will be effective on 
June 18, 1995. Formal expressions of intent to file financial 
assistance offers<SUP>1 under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) must be filed by May 
30, 1995. Petitions to stay must be filed by June 5, 1995. Requests for 
a public use condition must be filed by June 8, 1995. Petitions to 
reopen must be filed by June 13, 1995.

    \1\See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 4 
I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Docket No. AB-307 (Sub-No. 2X) 
to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20423; and (2) Petitioner's representative: Karl Morell, Suite 1035, 
1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Interstate 
Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 2229, 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: May 12, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12341 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Russell A. Evans, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                           
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                 | 
|October 24, 2007 |  | /s/ RUSSELL A. EVANS                      
|                 |  | Russell A. Evans                          
|                 |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



23
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 106 (Friday, June 2, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12754]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Applications To Impose and Use the 
Revenue From a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at John F. Kennedy 
International Airport, Jamaica, NY; La Guardia Airport (LGA), Flushing, 
NY, and Newark International Airport (EWR), Newark, NJ

Correction

    In notice document 95- 12754 appearing on page 27592 in the issue 
of Wednesday, May 24, 1995, make the follwing corrections:
    1. In the second column, in the twenty-first and twenty-second 
lines, ``July 9, 1995'' should read ``July 29, 1995''.
    2. In the third column, in the file line, ``FR Doc. 95-1754'' 
should read ``FR Doc. 95-12754''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32

August
14, 2003

Via
EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mesa Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.

| |  | JPMorgan Chase Bank,
Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                 

---

QuickLinks
DENNIS MELANCON, INC., et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, et al.

No. 12-1142.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.