alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, William Augustin IV, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2007-AR5
    (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC
    Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 30, 2008


    /s/ William Augustin IV
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

AMBER RAEDER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN

JUDGE: PHILIP P. SIMON 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendant Ameridose, LLC (“Defendant”), by counsel, hereby 

move this Court for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up; to and including 

March 25, 2013. Defendant’s Answer is currently due February 22, 2013. Plaintiff’s counsel 

has been consulted and has no objection to the requested extension 

WHEREFORE, Defendant, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendant up to and 

including March 25, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 2
2 

013260.000010/1629049.1 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 21, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 2 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-5 filed 10/23/14 page 1 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01984-TLS-MGG document 1-5 filed 10/23/14 page 2 of 2
Sandeep DALAL, petitioner, v. KRANTZ & BERMAN LLP.

No. 12-716.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Pages 26480-26481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12213]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 12:00 noon, Monday, May 22, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Proposals regarding a Federal Reserve Bank's building 
requirements.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

[[Page 26481]] Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. 
Coyne, Assistant to the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-
3207, beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this 
meeting, for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company 
applications scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: May 12, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12213 Filed 5-15-95; 10:16 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Leon Sylvester JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10480.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG document 63 filed 05/31/18 page 1 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG document 63 filed 05/31/18 page 2 of 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-01791-JD-MGG document 63 filed 05/31/18 page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CR-88

)

PEDRO GARZA )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on August 8, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 5 of the five-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 8th day of August, 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 21, 2013

NO. 03-13-00397-CV

Louvenia Henderson, Appellant

v.

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in the 

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that 

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said 

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32

November 14,
2008

Via
EDGAR

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mesa Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust/s/ MIKE ULRICH Mike Ulrich Vice President and Trust OfficerThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as
attorney-in-fact for the Trustee


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued our reports dated March 13, 2009, withrespect to the financial statements, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Rubicon Technology, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Rubicon Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-147552, effective November 20, 2007). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Madison,Wisconsin 

March 13, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

VICTORIA JEFFORDS, as Administrator )

of the Estate of DONALD JEFFORDS, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CV-55-TLS-JEM

)

BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA )

INC., et al., )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to

Responsive Motions Filed By Defendants as Document Numbers 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 147, and

148 [DE 149], filed by Plaintiff on January 17, 2018. Plaintiff requests an extension of time to

respond to eight briefs and motions that were filed by various Defendants at Docket Entries 141

through 148, inclusive. On January 18, 2018, Defendants BP Products North America, Inc. and MC

Industrial Inc. filed a response.

Plaintiff argues that she needs more time to respond to the eight documents, which were all

filed the same day. The Responding Defendants consent to the extension with respect to five of the

items, but argue that Plaintiffs should not be granted leave to file responses to the Defendants’

Replies at Docket Entries 141, 144, and 145, because any such briefing would constitute a sur-reply.

There is no provision in the Local Rules for a sur-reply or other additional briefing. A party

may file a sur-reply only by leave of the Court, which requires “the showing of some factor that

justifies a deviation from the rule.” Brunker v. Schwan’s Home Serv., Inc., No. 2:04-CV-478, 2006

WL 3827046, *2 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 27, 2006) (citations omitted); see also Goltz v. Univ. of Notre

Dame du Lac, 177 F.R.D. 638, 641-42 (N.D. Ind. 1997). Plaintiff has provided no reason why the
circumstances in this case justify submission of any sur-replies.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to

Respond to Responsive Motions Filed By Defendants as Document Numbers 141, 142, 143, 144,

145, 147, and 148 [DE 149]. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the motions at Docket Entries

142, 146, and 148 is extended to February 9, 2018. The deadline for Plaintiff to reply to the briefs

at Docket Entries 143 and 147 is extended to February 9, 2018. The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s

request with respect to the replies at Docket Entries 141, 144, and 145.

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2018.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: All counsel of record

2
Robert Michael ARDIS, petitioner, v. PENSACOLA STATE COLLEGE.

No. 12-10097.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is
not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:
March 16, 2010

/s/ KEVIN T. BOTTOMLEY Kevin T. Bottomley President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Marco Antonio SANCHEZ-MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7284.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Lawrence Wesley JENKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9036.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Ismael RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7217.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Order entered October 2, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01341

- CR

CHAMEL NICOLE ANDERS ON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Tria l Court Cause No. F09

- 56401

- U



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal.

On August 20, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant’s brief had not been filed. We have received appellant’s brief. Thus, we VACATE

our August 20, 2013 order.

We GRANT appellant’s September 30, 2013 motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12755]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


Proposed Advisory Circular; Continued Airworthiness Assessment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed advisory circular and 
request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of Advisory Circular 
(AC), No. 39-XX, Continued Airworthiness Assessments.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 23, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments on the proposed AC to the Federal Aviation 
Administration, Attn: Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, 
Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 12 
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803-5299.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Boudreau, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, at the 
above address, telephone (617) 238-7117, fax (617) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    A copy of the subject AC may be obtained by contacting the person 
named above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Interested persons 
are invited to comment on the proposed AC, and to submit such written 
data, views, or arguments as they desire. Commenters must identify the 
subject of the AC, and submit comments in duplicate to the address 
specified above. All communications received on or before the closing 
date for comments will be considered by the Engine and Propeller 
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, before issuance of the 
final AC.

Background

    This AC is on the subject of continued airworthiness assessments of 
turbine engines, propellers, and Auxiliary power units (APU's) for use 
on Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) part 25 certified aircraft. The 
methods presented in this AC facilitate the understanding of safety 
related problems and suggest a consistent and measured response to 
identified safety problems.

    This advisory circular, published under the authority granted to 
the Administrator by 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 
and 1423, provides guidance for these proposed requirements.

    Issued in Burlington, Mass., on May 16, 1995.
James C. Jones,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 95-12755 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>

                               GALILEO CORPORATION
                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                          1996             1995
                                                      ---------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>
Primary
  Average shares outstanding                            6,836,453      6,763,573

  Net effect of dilutive stock options - based
  on the treasury stock method using
  average market price                                         --        101,723
                                                      -----------     ----------

Total                                                   6,836,453      6,865,296
                                                      ===========     ==========

Net income (loss)                                     $(1,166,000)    $1,524,000


Per share amount                                      $      (.17)    $      .22


Fully Diluted
  Average shares outstanding                            6,836,453      6,763,573

  Net effect of dilutive stock options - based
  on the treasury stock method using the
  quarter-end market price, if higher than
  average market price                                         --        110,009
                                                      -----------     ----------
Total                                                   6,836,453      6,873,582
                                                      ===========     ==========

Net income (loss)                                     $(1,166,000)    $1,524,000


Per share amount                                      $      (.17)    $      .22
</TABLE>


                                       15
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1571 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1571

  To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil and gas 
leases on portions of the Outer Continental Shelf located off the coast 
                             of New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2005

Mr. LoBiondo (for himself, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Ferguson, 
 and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil and gas 
leases on portions of the Outer Continental Shelf located off the coast 
                             of New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OIL AND GAS LEASING OFF THE COAST OF NEW 
              JERSEY.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 
lease, permit, or license for the exploration for or extraction of oil 
or gas on or from submerged lands described in subsection (b).
    (b) Lands Described.--The submerged lands with respect to which 
subsection (a) applies are all submerged lands seaward from the 
landward boundary of the Outer Continental Shelf that lie within 125 
miles of any point of the coast line of the State of New Jersey, 
including areas with respect to which a moratorium on oil and gas 
leasing activities existed before the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
William David BURNSIDE, petitioner, v. T. WALTERS, et al.

No. 12-7892.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Motion of American Friends Service Committee, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, INC., et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, ex rel. Roger L. SANDERS and Roger L. Thacker.

No. 12-1057.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.