alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Premier Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alexey Goleshev,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      April 30, 2009
              By:
              /s/Alexey GoleshevAlexey
      Goleshev
                Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26873-26874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12334]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Minority Business Development Agency


Business Development Center Applications: Brooklyn, New York

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency.

ACTION: Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On page 24839, in the issue dated Wednesday, May 10, 1995, 
solicitation to operate the Brooklyn Minority Business Development 
Center is amended to include: PRE-AWARD CONFERENCE: June 2, 1995, at 
10:00 a.m., at 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3305, New York, New York.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND AN APPLICATION PACKAGE, CONTACT: Heyward 
Davenport, Regional Director at (212) 264-3262.
    The closing date for applications is June 19, 1995.
    Proper identification is required for entrance into any Federal 
building.

11.800 Minority Business Development Center
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) [[Page 26874]] 
May 15, 1995.
Frances B. Douglas,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business 
Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-12334 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-M
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cinnabar Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephanie Wood,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of July, 2009.


/s/ Stephanie Wood
-----------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AU GU S T I NE P E NA - S I L VA , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. K . P R O S P E R , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 17637 D. C. No . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 6 8 2 - ALA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A rthurL . A l a r c ón, C i r c ui tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an d N . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner A ug ust i ne P ena- S i l va appeal s f rom the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f irm . 

# FI LED SEP 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17637 2 P e na - S i l vac ont e nds tha thi s S i xth A m e ndm e ntr i ght s w e r e vi ol a t e d pur s ua nt t o B lake l y v . W as hi ngton , 542 U . S . 296 ( 2004) , a nd C u n n in g h a m v . Ca lifo rn ia , 549 U . S . 27 0 (20 07 ), w hen the st at e tri al courtengaged i n fac t -f i nd i ng t o i m po se an u p p e r - te rm s e n te n c e . A ts e nt e nc i ng, the tr i a l c ourtm a de the f i ndi ngs tha tP e na - S i l vaw a s on pa r ol e a tthe t i m e of

the c r i m e s a nd tha thi s pr i ora dul tc onvi c t i ons w e r e num e r ous and o f i ncre as i ng se ri ou snes s. T he C al i forni a C ou rtof A pp ea l ’ s r ej ec t i on of P enaS i l va’ s S i xth A m endm entcl ai m base d o n the pri or conv i ct i on exce pt i on un der A lm enda rez- T

orres v . U

ni ted Stat es , 5 2 3 U .S . 2 2 4 ( 1 9 9 8 ) , w a s n o t “c o n tr a ry to , or . . . an un re as on abl e app l i ca t i on of, cl earl y e st abl i shed F eder al l aw , as det erm i ned b y the S up re m e C ou rt . ” 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(d)(1). See Kes se e v . Men do za -P o w ers , 57 4 F . 3d 67 5, 67 8-79 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). B ec ause , un der Kes se e , the s t a t e c ourt ’ s i nt e rpr e t a t i on of the pr i orc onvi c t i on exce pt i on “ do es no tcontra vene A E D P A st andards, ” i d. at 6 7 8 , P en a- S il v a’s c h a lle n g e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s h a rm le s s e rr o ra n a ly s is is m o o t. AF F I RME D.
Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issued February 9, 2000

In The 

### toitrt of Appeals 

### Jfftftij Btatrtct of Qtexas at Dallas
No. 05-99-02057-CR No. 05-99-02067-CR

GARY LAWRENCE WHITE, Appellant
V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee OnAppealfrom the 292nd District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F98-02694 & F97-47650
OPINION PER CURIAM 

### Before ChiefJustice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill 

## Appellanthas filed a motionto withdrawthe appeal. Appellant's counselhas approved

the motion. 

## This Courthereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERSthe appeal withdrawn and that this decision be certifiedbelow for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
PER CURIAM Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47 

# 'ftFifth Court ofAppeals Case Attorney Address List Page: 1 Date Printed: 02/09/2000 Case Number: 05-99-02067-CR Date Filed: 12/08/1999 Style: White, GaryLawrence

v. The State ofTexas Trial Judge: Wade, Henry Jr. Trial Court Reporter: 

### Trial Court: 292ND DISTRICT COURT Trial County: DALLAS APP JoanneMontagueHurtekant ATT 010320300 5956 Sherry Lane #1000 Dallas, TX 75225 Phone 214/346-2946 Fax 214/748-8339 STA William T. (Bill) Hill, Jr. ATT 009669000 ATTN: APPELLATE SECTION Frank Crowley Courts Bldg., 10th FL 133 N. Industrial Blvd. LB 19 Dallas, TX 75207 Phone 214/653-3845 Fax
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus REGINALD EUGENE HAYDEN, a/k/a Bubba, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-78, CA-97-409-R) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Eugene Hayden, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hayden , Nos. CR-94-78; CA-97-409-R (W.D. Va. February 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXCESS International Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “***Report***”),I, Allan Griebenow, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN GRIEBENOW                                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan Griebenow                                                     |
| President, Chief Executive  Officer and Principal Executive Officer |
|                                                                |
| Dated:  May 15, 2003                                           |

 

1

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXCESS Inc. (the “***Company***”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Allan L.Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Principal Accountingand Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN L. FRANK                                                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan L. Frank                                                                                     |
| Vice President, Chief  Financial Officer, Secretary and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer |

 

Dated: May 15, 2003

 

2

----
Michael A. SCOTT, petitioner, v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 13-362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Raja M. Parvez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rubicon Technology, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 20, 2008
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The
Members
Alaska Tanker Company, LLC:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-147290 on Form S-8 of OSG America L.P. of our report dated February 25, 2009, with respect to
the balance sheets of Alaska Tanker Company, LLC as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations, members' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, included herein.

As
discussed in note 8 to the financial statements, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions and the measurement provisions of Statement of Accounting Standards
No. 158,Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R), as of December 31, 2007.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Portland,
Oregon
March 6, 2009

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 21850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10943]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


National Science Foundation

National Science Board

DATE AND TIME:

May 11, 1995, 8:30 a.m. Open Session
May 11, 1995, 3:30 p.m. Closed Session
May 12, 1995, 9 a.m. Closed Session
May 12, 1995, 11 a.m. Open Session

PLACE: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1235, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. Part of this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Thursday, May 11, 1995

Open Session (8:30 a.m.-3:20 p.m.)

--Long Range Planning and Priorities
--Swearing in Ceremony of New NSB Members--Public invited
--Long Range Planning and Priorities: Continued

Thursday, May 11, 1995

Closed Session (3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m.)

--Planning and Budget

Friday, May 12, 1995

Closed Session (9 a.m.-11 a.m.)

--Minutes, March 1995 Meeting
--Election of Executive Committee Members
--Planning and Budget: Continued

Friday, May 12, 1995

Open Session (11 a.m.-11:45 a.m.)

--Minutes, March 1995 Meeting
--Closed Session Agenda Items for June 1995 Meeting
--Chairman's Report
--Director's Report
--Executive Committee Annual Report
--Calendar of Meetings
--Reports from Committees
--Other Business/Adjourn

[FR Doc. 95-10943 Filed 5-1-95; 9:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., petitioners, v. EME HOMER CITY GENERATION, L.P., et al.

No. 12-1182.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 26, 2013.

Motion of respondents for divided argument granted.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 1995 / Notices 27373

6. Office of Primary Interest. Office of

the Commissioner, Financial

Management Service.

Gerald Murphy,

Fiscal Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12549 Filed 5–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–25–P

Internal Revenue Service

[Delegation Order No. 175 (Rev. 3)]

Delegation of Authority

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),

Treasury.

ACTION: Delegation of authority.

SUMMARY: The authority to determine

that a plan amendment is reasonable

and provides for only de minimis

increases in the liabilities of the plan in

accordance with section 412(f)(2)(A) of

the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and

section 304(b)(2)(A) of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

(ERISA) has already been delegated to

the Director, Employee Plans Division,

with authority to redelegate. There is

now delegated to the Director, Employee

Plans Division, the additional authority

to determine that a plan amendment is

reasonable and provides for only de

minimis increases in the liabilities of

the plan in accordance with section

401(a)(3–3)(B)(ii) of the Code and

section 204(i)(2)(A) of ERISA, with

authority to redelegate, but not below

Branch Chiefs, Employee Plans

Division.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

H. Turner, CP:E:EP:P:2, Room 6702,

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20224, (202) 622–6214

(not a toll-free number).

Effective Date: May 19, 1995,

Authority to Determine if Plan

Amendment is Reasonable and Has De

Minimis Effect on Plan Liability in

Accordance with Section 412(f)(2)(A) of

the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and

Section 304(b)(2)(A) of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act

(ERISA), or Section 401(a)(33)(B)(ii) of

the Code and Section 204(i)(2)(A) of

ERISA.

Pursuant to authority vested in the

Commissioner of Internal Revenue by

Treasury Department Order 150–10,

there is hereby delegated to the Director,

Employee Plans Division, the authority

to determine that a plan amendment is

reasonable and provides for only de

minimis increases in the liabilities of

the plan in accordance with section

412(f)(2)(A) of the Code and section

304(b)(2)(A) of ERISA or in accordance

with section 401(a)(33)(B)(ii) of the

Code and section 204(i)(2)(A) of ERISA.

The authority delegated herein may

be redelegated, but not below Branch

Chiefs, Employee Plans Division.

To the extent that the authority

previously exercised consistent with

this Order may require ratification, it is

hereby affirmed and ratified.

Delegation Order No. 175 (Rev. 2),

effective October 31, 1987, is

superseded.

Dated: April 13, 1995.

Phil Brand,

Chief Compliance Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–12515 Filed 5–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),
Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report
to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    ROBERT G.
GARGUSRobert G. Gargus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: January 9, 2007
Andy J. MARTINEZ-MELENDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9794.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.