alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1189]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Veterans' Claims Adjudication Commission; Advisory Notice

    Pursuant to section 401(d) of Public Law 103-446, the newly 
established Veterans' Claims Adjudication Commission, chaired by the 
Honorable S.W. Melidosian, will conduct its initial meeting in 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the Adams Mark Hotel (City Avenue and 
Monument Road), commencing at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 17, 1995, 
and concluding at 12:00 noon on Thursday, January 19.
    The commission's first meeting will be introductory in nature and 
will include orientation sessions for the benefit of the commission 
members. The commission will also consider organizational matters and 
hold discussions regarding its future agenda.
    Other than periods which members are dining, the meeting is open to 
the public. However, given the nature of the initial meeting, no amount 
of time has been designated for the purpose of receiving verbal public 
comments. Any member of the public or of an organization may, however, 
submit appropriate written comments to the Commission for its 
information and consideration at the following address: Veterans' 
Claims Adjudication Commission (20C), U.S. Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, Telephone 
Number (202) 275-2142.
    Notice of future meetings of the commission will appear in the 
Federal Register.
    Contact Person: F.J. Brizzi, Jr., (202) 275-2142.
Darryl W. Kehrer,
Executive Staff.
[FR Doc. 95-1189 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Guadalupe

- Blanco River



# Four th Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00084

- CV

Vanessa Jordan HARWOOD , William Crosby Harwood, and Donna Harwood,

Appellant s

v.

GUADALUPE

- BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY

,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, G uadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 0134

- CV

- A

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the A ppellant's Motion for Re hearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on June 12, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Kambiz Hooshmand

Kambiz HooshmandPresident and Chief Executive Officer
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00095-WCL-APR document 3 filed 03/05/14 page 1 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00095-WCL-APR document 3 filed 03/05/14 page 2 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00095-WCL-APR document 3 filed 03/05/14 page 3 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00095-WCL-APR document 3 filed 03/05/14 page 4 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00095-WCL-APR document 3 filed 03/05/14 page 5 of 6
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00095-WCL-APR document 3 filed 03/05/14 page 6 of 6
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

March 21, 2003

Mr. Darryl Lustig, Vice President, Sales & Marketing
Burdick, Inc.
500 Burdick Parkway
Deerfield, WA 53531

Re:   Burdick Integration Bonus

Dear Darryl:

We are pleased to confirm your incentive bonus opportunity of $10,000 for the
achievement of the following objectives related to the integration of Burdick,
Inc. into the fold of Quinton Cardiology Systems, Inc. during 2003. Following
are the integration performance targets and financial incentives that have been
set for you:

-     Upgrade sales and marketing staff as appropriate to ensure ability to met
      corporate objectives and sales performance

-     Support Acute Care sales and integration efforts

-     Support international sales and integration efforts, to include aligning
      proper distribution channels; update distribution agreements

This incentive plan is in recognition of your ability, in your role as Vice
President Sales & Marketing, to significantly impact the success of the
integration of Quinton and Burdick. This one-time integration bonus is to
recognize the extra effort required during the first year of our combined
operations and is intended to align your interests with those of the company as
a whole and with those of our shareholders. This integration bonus is in
addition to the Management Incentive Plan, which is outlined separately, in
which you are also eligible to participate.

Payment of the bonus amount is conditioned upon successful completion of the
defined integration performance goals and continued employment through the
period ending December 31, 2003. Determination of whether the integration goals
have been accomplished will be made by the President and/or Chief Financial
Officer of Quinton Cardiology Systems, Inc. Payment of the incentive bonus will
be made in the first quarter of 2004.

This does not create any contractual rights between you and the Company. The
company reserves the right to revise, amend, and/or terminate this incentive
plan at any time without notice. Should there be a separation of employment
prior to December 31, 2003, you are ineligible, and forfeit any right or claim,
to payment of the bonus amount.

We are excited about the combination of Burdick and Quinton, your role in the
newly combined company and the prospect of our mutual success together.

                                        Respectfully,

                                        /s/ John R. Hinson
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        John R. Hinson
                                        President
                                        Quinton Cardiology Systems, Inc.

Agreed to this 21st day of March, 2003

/s/ Darryl Lustig
----------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David Rickey, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Page | 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE OF MUNSTER ) 

HIGH SCHOOL, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) No. 1:14-cv-172 TLS-RBC 

 ) 

THE SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

 Plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), file their Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of this 

action. 

 WHEREFORE, plaintiffs file their Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. 

/s/ Kenneth J. Falk 

 Kenneth J. Falk 

 No. 6777-49 

 ACLU of Indiana 

 1031 E. Washington St. 

 Indianapolis, IN 46202 

 317/635-4059 

 fax: 317/635-4105 

 kfalk@aclu-in.org 

 

Chase Strangio 

Pro Hac Vice 

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 

125 Broad Street, 18th Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

212/549-2627 

fax: 212/549-2650 

cstrangio@aclu.org 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 
Page | 2 

Certificate of Service

 I certify that a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on this 22nd day of August, 

2014. The following parties will be served by operation of the Court’s electronic system. 

Michael D. Sears 

Jacquelyn S. Pillar King 

CRIST SEARS & ZIC, LLP 

msears@cszlegal.com 

jking@cszlegal.com 

 /s/ Kenneth J. Falk

Kenneth J. Falk 

 Attorney at Law
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

WILLIAM REGADANZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-14-TLS

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of )

Social Security )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] of

United States Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey, which was filed on November 13, 2012.

In his Report and Recommendation, Judge Cosbey recommends that the Commissioner’s

decision be affirmed. Judge Cosbey also gave notice that within fourteen (14) days after being

served with a copy of this recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written

objections to the proposed findings or recommendations.

This Court’s review of a magistrate’s report and recommendation is governed by 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in part:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the

report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is

made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also

receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with

instructions.

The statute permits objections to the magistrate’s report and recommendations to be made within

fourteen days of service of a copy of the report. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (setting forth

procedures for objecting to a magistrate’s report and recommendation and the district court’s
resolution of any objections).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation submitted by Judge

Cosbey and finds that his proposed disposition is well taken. As of the date of this Order, no

objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and the time for making objections

has now passed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation prepared by Judge Cosbey,

the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] in its entirety and AFFIRMS

the Commissioner’s decision for the reasons set forth in Judge Cosbey’s analysis.

SO ORDERED on March 19, 2013.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          617185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                617185
<PP&E>                                            9939
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  719660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2015
<OTHER-SE>                                      715803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    717818
<SALES>                                           4800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (14553)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2162
<INCOME-TAX>                                       438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1724
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1724
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

/ At, petAin J. 

Hardesty 

J. 

cc: Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge 

State Public Defender/Ely 

State Public Defender/Carson City 

Attorney General/Carson City 

White Pine County District Attorney 

Attorney General/Ely 

White Pine County Clerk 

James David Ofeldt 

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 

42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus 

petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this 

order. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A
#### Judy CURRY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. The POCAHONTAS TIMES, County newspaper, business, located in Marlington, West Virginia; Pamela Pritt, personally and in her professional capacity as Managing Editor, The Pocahontas Times; William P. McNeel, personally and in his professional capacity as Editor and owner, The Pocahontas Times; Jane Price-Sharp, personally and in her capacity as Editor Emerita and owner, The Pocahontas Times, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-1076.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 4, 2004.

Judy Curry, Appellant pro se.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Judy Curry appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to proceed with*154out prepayment of fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Curry’s pending motions to proceed in forma pauperis and to expedite and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Curry v. Pocahontas Times,*CA-03-106-2 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: December 15, 2016 522475

________________________________ In the Matter of JUAN ESCOBAR, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 25, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Juan Escobar, Woodbourne, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered January 25, 2016 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner's request for parole release. Petitioner was convicted, upon his guilty plea, of murder in the second degree and sentenced to 17 years to life in prison. He is a native of El Salvador and is subject to a deportation order. In November 2014, petitioner made his first appearance before respondent seeking to be released to parole supervision. Respondent denied his request and ordered him to be held for an additional 24 months, which was upheld on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and, following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.-2- 522475

This Court has confirmed that, while this appeal was pending, petitioner reappeared before respondent and was again denied parole release. As a result, this appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Thompson v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 140 AD3d 1516, 1516 [2016]; Matter of Walker v Annucci, 138 AD3d 1334, 1334 [2016]). Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 23, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00639

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A., et al children,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01513

Honorable Charles E. Montemay or, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s

brief is due on October 30, 2014

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix ed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CR 132

)

SCHICKELL BEST )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge dated September 18, 2019 (DE # 64), to which objections have been waived, the

Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are now ADOPTED. Defendant is

ADJUDGED to have committed the violation of supervised release described on page 2

of the Agreed Disposition of Supervised Release Violations (DE # 59). Defendant’s term

of supervised release is REVOKED and defendant is hereby committed to the United

States Bureau of Prisons to serve a term of imprisonment of twelve (12) months and one

(1) day, including receipt of credit for time served while in federal custody. After

successful completion of the additional term of imprisonment, defendant shall not

continue on supervised release. This sentence shall be imposed without requiring

defendant to make an additional court appearance.

SO ORDERED.

Date: September 24, 2019

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 138

 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
                   System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
                   System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER 
              RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``GA-06P'', relating to the John 
H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as Coastal 
Barrier Resources System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P, that is included in 
the set of maps entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' and referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by another map 
relating to the unit entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
Resources System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P'' and dated _____.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```