alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

SCHEDULING ORDER

The hearing on plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion for a preliminary injunction is

rescheduled from May 4 to MAY 3. On that date, the hearing on the motion will be split up into

two separate proceedings. First, at 7:30 A.M., we will have a hearing closed to the public,

during which the parties will have an opportunity to address anything deserving to be under

seal. Counsel should limit their arguments to items that should truly be under seal and not veer

off into topics merely related to items under seal. Counsel should also provide shorthand names

for each alleged trade secret discussed in argument so that they can later be referenced to by the

short name. Second, at 9:00 A.M., we will have a public hearing to address the rest of the

motion. At this later proceeding, counsel may use the previously established shorthand to refer

to trade secrets without revealing the contents thereof.

As stated earlier, the Court remains concerned that too much information in this case is

being hidden from the public under claims of confidentiality. Please make sure that the bare

minimum remains redacted (so that delays to comb out unnecessary redactions can be avoided). 
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The public has a legitimate interest in looking over our shoulders to see the work in our courts,

which belong to the public, not to litigants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Douglas J. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. Kenneth T. McKEE, Warden.

No. 12-1220.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1



November 8, 2002


The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-28505,
33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-15179,
333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987,
333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796,
333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120,
333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097 and 333-100189; and Form S-3 Nos.
333-81101 and 333-63716) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated October
17, 2002, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 29, 2002.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a part
of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-9 RLM

)

DARRIUS D. AGNEW )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on May 22, 2013 [Doc. No. 25].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Darrius Agnew’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant

guilty of Count 2 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: June 18, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                   REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
                               FLEXIBLE STOCK PLAN

                 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998

      WHEREAS, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the "Company")
established the Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated Flexible Stock Plan
(the "Plan") to enhance the ability of the Company to reward and provide stock
based incentives to its key employees; and

      WHEREAS, the Company's shareholders previously approved the Plan and an
amendment thereto; and

      WHEREAS, on March 15, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
a second amendment to the Plan, subject to shareholder approval, to increase the
total number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by 1,500,000
shares.

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:

      1. Effective upon the date of approval of this amendment by the Company's
shareholders, Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

            3.1 Number of Shares. The number of Shares which may be issued or
            sold or for which Options, SARs or Performance Shares may be granted
            under the Plan shall be 3,486,564 Shares. Such number of Shares
            shall increase annually, effective as of the first day of each
            Fiscal Year, commencing with the Fiscal Year beginning in 2001, by
            the number of Shares equal to 5% of the number of Shares allocated
            to this Plan as of the first day of such Fiscal Year. Such Shares
            may be authorized but unissued Shares, Shares held in the treasury,
            or both.

      2. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to
them in the Plan.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated hereby
adopts the foregoing amendment this 16th day of March, 2000.

                    REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED


                    By: /s/ A. Greig Woodring
                        ---------------------
                        A. Greig Woodring, President and Chief Executive Officer

WLH:mef/Amendment to Flexible Stock Plan 31600/RGA
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12530]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-217-001]


Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 12, 1995, Trunkline Gas Company (Trunkline) 
tendered for filing revised working papers reflecting its Initial 
Stranded Transportation (IST) Cost Surcharge reconciliation to reflect 
the calculation of interest on excess recoveries in compliance with 
Ordering Paragraph (C) of the Commission's Order of April 27, 1995 in 
Docket No. RP95-217-000.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
affected customers and applicable state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.211. All such 
protests should be filed on or before May 24, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12530 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sergio GARIBALDI-IBANES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6602.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Opinion issued November 21, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 7
- 0 0 1 95
- CV

——————————— SUSAN BROMLEY, Appellant

V. L YNN BENYI, Appellee

O n Appeal from the Probate Court G a lveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR
- 0077407

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Susan Bromely, ha s filed a motion to dismiss her appeal because the parties have entered into a mediated settlement agreement

. See T EX . R. A PP . P.
42. 1( a) (1)

. Although appellant’ s motion does not contain a certificate of conference, the motion contains a certificate of service on appellee’s counsel, the motion has2

been on file with this Court for more than ten days, and no response ha s been filed

. See id. 9.5(d), (e), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). N o other party has filed a notice of appeal
and no opinion has issued

. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP
. P. 42. 1 (a) (1), 43.2(f)

. We dismiss a ll other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Brown , and Lloyd

.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12526]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-357-000]


Northeast Utilities Service Company; Notice of Filing

May 17, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1995, Northeast Utilities Service 
Company (NUSCO) tendered for filing on behalf of The Connecticut Light 
and Power Company (CL&P), Western Massachusetts Electric Company 
(WMECO), Holyoke Water Power Company (HWP), Holyoke Power and Electric 
Company and Public Service Company of New Hampshire (together, the NU 
System Companies) clarification of the formula for the determination of 
operation and maintenance expense contained in Schedule B to the 
Distribution Service Agreement previously filed by NUSCO in the above-
referenced docket.
    NUSCO renews its request that the proposed rate schedule changes be 
permitted to become effective January 1, 1995. NUSCO states that a copy 
of the filing has been mailed or delivered to the affected parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before May 26, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12526 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


          I, Dennis M. McGrath,  Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex,  Inc., a
     Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with
     18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1) the accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
              for the three  months  ended March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully
              complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d),  as
              applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and

              (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
              all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
              operations of the Company.


                                                              PHOTOMEDEX, INC.


Dated: May 10, 2004                             By: /s/ Dennis M. McGrath
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Dennis M. McGrath
                                                    Chief Financial Officer



         A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 of
the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002   ("Section   906"),   or  other   document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic  version of this written statement  required
by Section 906, has been  provided to  PhotoMedex,  Inc. and will be retained by
PhotoMedex,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7249

DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. C.O. PUCKETT, sued in individual and official capacity; C.O. OH, sued in individual and official capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. ( 7:19

- cv - 00846

- JPJ

- PMS )

Submitted : March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Destined C. M. D. George , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Destined C . M. D. George appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on George ’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion . We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. George v. Puckett , No. 7:19

- cv - 00846

- JPJ

- PMS (W.D. Va. July 22, 2021)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
Christopher CURANOVIC, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7062.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Pablo CEBALLOS, petitioner, v. Brian E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, et al.

No. 13-6453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EX-33.7
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 29, 2008
3rd Amendment to Amended & Restated Lease dtd 10/13/2003



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
  
 This Third Amendment (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 13, 2003, by and between Crystal Park Hotel and Casino
Development Company, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Landlord”), and California Casino Management, Inc., a California corporation (“Tenant”). 
  
 A. Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Amended and Restated Lease
dated as of February 14, 2000, as amended by that certain First Amendment dated as of October 1, 2001 and that certain Second Amendment dated as of December 4, 2002 (together, the “Lease”), whereby Tenant leases from Landlord that
certain real property in Compton, California upon which Tenant operates the Crystal Park Casino (the “Premises”). 
  
 B. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth below. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and
Tenant agree as follows: 
  
 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized
terms used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Lease. 
  
 2. Expiration Date. Article 2, Section 2.01, first sentence, is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 
  
 “The term of this Lease shall commence on the date upon which Tenant
opens the Card Club for business to the general public (the “Commencement Date”) and shall continue until midnight on December, 31 2004 (the “Expiration Date”) unless sooner terminated pursuant to any provision
hereof or otherwise amended pursuant to future amendments hereof, (the “Term” or “the term of this Lease”).” 
  
 3. Division of Gambling Control. The terms of this Amendment shall be subject to approval by the Division of Gambling Control. 
  
 4. Relationship to Lease. This Amendment supercedes any inconsistent
provisions contained in the Lease. Except as amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect. 
  
 5. Further Assurances. Each of the parties hereto shall execute and deliver such other and further documents and do such other and further acts as
may be reasonably required to effectuate the intent of the parties and carry out the terms of this Amendment. 
  
 6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, which, when taken together shall be one and the same instrument.

  
 (remainder of page intentionally left blank) 
  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first above written. 
  

													
	LANDLORD	 	 	 	TENANT
			
	 Crystal Park Hotel and Casino Development Company, LLC,
 a California limited liability company
	 	 	 	 California Casino Management, Inc.,
 a California corporation

					
	By:	 	 HP/Compton, Inc.
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    Leo Chu

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 Its:
	 	 sole member
	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	 President

							
	 	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    John A. Godfrey
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	 Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 	 

  

 - 2 -
Número Identificador

RES 2 0 2 3

________________

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL X

CYNTHIA A.

MATOSANTOS LEWIS

Parte Recurrida

V.

FEDERICO A. CARDONA

FIRPI

Parte Peticionaria K LCE202 300143 Certiorari

pr ocedente del

Tribunal de Primera

Instancia Sala de

Bayamón

Caso N úm.:

BY2020RF01826

Sobre:

Divorcio

(Ruptura

Irreparable)

Panel integrado por su presidente, el Juez Rodríguez Casillas

, la

Jueza Mateu Meléndez y el Juez Marrero Guerrero

.



### RESOLUCI ÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 28 de febrero de 2023.

Atendid o el “ Aviso de Desistimiento sin Perjuicio ” presentad o

el 2 4 de febrero de 20 23 por la parte peticionaria , este Tribunal

ordena el archivo y cierre del caso de epígrafe por desistimiento sin

perjuicio, conforme dispone la Regla 83 (A) del Reglamento del

Tribunal de Apelaciones , 4 LPRA Ap. XX11

- b, R.83 (A)

.

Lo acuerda el Tribunal

, y lo certifica la Secretaria del Tribunal

de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Solí s

Secreta ria del Tribunal de Apelaciones
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of First Quantum Ventures, Inc., (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:  September 28, 2010By:
/s/Andrew GodfreyAndrew GodfreyChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25209-25210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11558]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Change in Location of Southport, North Carolina, Public Hearing 
for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear 
Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor 
Spent Nuclear Fuel

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Change in Location of Southport, North Carolina, Public 
Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy public hearing in Southport, North 
Carolina, on May 23, 1995, will be held in the Southport City Hall, 201 
East Moore Street, Southport, North Carolina, 28461, (910) 457-7900. 
The public hearing will be held from 6:00 [[Page 25210]] p.m. to 10:00 
p.m. The Department had earlier announced (60 FR 19899, April 21, 1995) 
that this meeting would be held in the Carolina Power and Light 
Visitors Center, Southport, North Carolina.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 3, 1995.
Jill E. Lytle,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management, Environmental 
Management.
[FR Doc. 95-11558 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P