alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Midland Loan Services Logo]  Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria  Midland Loan Services, Inc. ("Midland"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation AB") relating to its role in the servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions. Midland has assessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, Midland used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB. The transactions covered by this report include commercial mortgage-backed securities that were  issued on or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"). Based on such assessment, Midla nd believes that, as of and for the year ended, Midland has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB relating to its role in the servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions , except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)((B), (C), and (D)), 1122(d)(3)(ii) through (3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which Midland has determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions being serviced (the "applicable servicing criteria"). Deloitte & Touche  LLP,  an  independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Midland's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC. /s/ Steven W Smith /s/ Vincent E. Beckett /s/ Bradley J. Hauger Steven W. Smith Vincent E. Beckett Bradley J. Hauger President and Executive Vice President Senior Vice President Chief Operating Officer Chief Administrative Officer Servicing Operations  Date: February 18, 2008 A Member of the PNC Financial Services Group  10851 Mastin   P.O. Box 25965   Shawnee Mission  Kansas 66225-5965 www.midlandls.com    913  259  9000  T    913 253 9709  F
Agreement to renew Advisory Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 December 31, 2003 
  
 Mr. Alan B. Miller

 President 
 UHS of Delaware, Inc. 
 367 South Gulph Road 
 King of Prussia, PA 19406 
  
 Dear Alan: 
  
 The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at their December 1, 2003 meeting, authorized the renewal of
the current Advisory Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (“Agreement”) upon the same terms and conditions. 
  
 This letter constitutes the Trust’s offer to renew the Agreement, until December 31, 2004, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS
of Delaware’s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
  
  
 Charles F. Boyle 
 Vice President, 
 Chief Financial Officer and 
 Controller 
  
  

	cc:	 	Warren J. Nimetz, Esq. 


	    	 	Cheryl K. Ramagano 

  
 Agreed to and Accepted: 
  
 UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.

  

			
		
	 By:
	 	 
	 	 	

	 	 	Alan B. Miller, President
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

**In connection with the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 of BoeingCapital Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) andpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Steven W. Vogeding, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, that:**

 

**(1)****                                 ****the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and**

**(2)****                                 ****theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.**

 

 
| October 29, 2003 | /S/ STEVEN W. VOGEDING                     |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Steven W. Vogeding                         |
|                  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Boeing Capital Corporation and will be retained by Boeing CapitalCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QA5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the period from and including
September  12,  2007  through  and  including  September  24,  2007  and  of the
Servicer's  performance under the applicable  servicing  agreement has been made
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7512

BRET MICHAEL BARRON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RALPH S. BEARDSLEY; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-2109-8-23BI) Submitted: February 9, 2004 Decided: March 16, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Dewey Elliott, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bret Michael Barron seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barron has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Yevgeny KOMAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6814.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12267]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science 
and Engineering.
    Date and Time: June 8, 1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; June 9, 1995; 
8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Place: 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, Room 1235.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Odessa Dyson, Administrative Officer, Office of 
the Assistant Director, Directorate for Computer and Information 
Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1900.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice to the Assistant Director/
CISE on issues related to long-range planning, to advise NSF on the 
impact of policies, programs and activities on the CISE community; 
and to form ad hoc subcommittees to carry out needed studies and 
tasks.
Agenda:
    (1) Strategic Planning
    (2) Committee of Visitors Reporting (COV)

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12267 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2011, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Neal R. VerfuerthNeal R. VerfuerthChief Executive Officer




/s/ Scott R. JensenScott R. JensenChief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and TreasurerDate: June 14, 2012
Master Wahoo RAHMAAN, petitioner, v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 12-8524.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until April 22, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER REGARDING PRODUCTION 

OF LEVANDOWSKI STROZ

AGREEMENTS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 546, 577

Waymo moves to compel production of Anthony Levandowski’s March 14, 2016 and 

March 21, 2016 letter agreements with Uber’s third party forensic expert Stroz Friedman. (Dkt. 

No. 546). The Court reviewed the agreements in camera in connection with Waymo’s motion to 

compel production of the Stroz Report. After Waymo filed Docket No. 546, the Court ordered 

Uber to produce the Stroz Report, including the Levandowski agreements. (Dkt. Nos. 549.) 

Uber’s objections to that Order are currently pending with the district court. 

For the reasons stated in its Order granting the motion to compel, the Court GRANTS

Waymo’s motion to compel Uber to produce the Levandowski agreements with Stroz. It should 

be noted, however, that whereas on the motion to compel the Stroz Report Uber asserted that the 

agreements are protected by attorney-client privilege and attorney work-product privilege, Uber

has now abandoned its attorney-client privilege objection to production of the agreements. (Dkt. 

No. 577 (“Uber continues to assert attorney-work product protections over the two letter 

agreements attached as exhibits to the Due Diligence Report.”).)

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 621 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 546 and 577.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 621 Filed 06/14/17 Page 2 of 2
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00154- CV
Carolyn Barnes, Appellan t

v. Velocity Cre dit Union , Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 277 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 12- 1288 -C27 7, H ONO RAB LE K EN ANDERSON, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Caroly n Ba rnes appea ls from a final summ ary judgme nt that she take nothing on claims she asse rted a g ainst Velocity Credit Union. After

Ba rnes f ailed to timely

file her brief, the cler k of this Court wrote her at the last known addre ss she has provided this Court, advising that her brief was overdue and that if she did not file a brief or otherwise re s p o n d b y Au gu st 5, 2013, her appea l would be s ub

j ect to dismiss al for want of prosec ution. The August 5 deadline has passed, and Ba rnes has made no response . Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(a) ; 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 30, 2013
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  September-30-1997
<CASH>                        502,532
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,881
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              19,499
<PP&E>                        8,600,319
<DEPRECIATION>                5,100,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                4,026,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         244,694
<BONDS>                       6,211,102
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    (2,429,359)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,026,437
<SALES>                       980,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              992,898
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 495,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              368,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            463,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (334,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (334,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (334,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (29.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (29.86)
        

</TABLE>
Dejay BAILEY, petitioner, v. Elvin VALENZUELA, Warden.

No. 12-9162.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
10.53


 


BONUS
AGREEMENT


 


 


Silicon Valley Bank (“Bank”) agrees to pay a $15,750.00 bonus to Marc
Verissimo (“Verissimo”) each April 15th starting April 15, 2001 and
ending April 15, 2006 to cover taxes on imputed interest in connection with an
employee loan.


 


If Verissimo resigns or is involuntarily terminated from his employment
with Bank before March 1, 2006 for any reason except death, or an Involuntary
Termination or Constructive Termination following a Change in Control (all as
defined and further described in the Change and Control Severance Benefit
Policy) than the Bank shall not make any further bonus payments under this
Agreement.  If (a) Verissimo’s
employment terminates by his death prior to March 1, 2006, or (b) Verissimo’s
employment terminates by an Involuntary Termination or Constructive Termination
following a Change in Control, then all bonus payments under this agreement
will continue through April 15, 2006.


 


This Agreement is an agreement by the Bank to pay a bonus; it is not an
employment agreement or contract.


 


Silicon Valley Bank


 


	
  /s/ Chris Lutes

  	
   

  
	
  Signature

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  CFO

  	
  Chris Lutes

  	
   

  
	
  Name and Title

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  9/20/00

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Marc Verissimo

  	
   

  
	
  Marc
  Verissimo

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  9/20/00

  	
   

  
	
  Date
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −20)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 124 additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−20 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA NORTHERN

ALN 6 12−04079 Miller et al v. Biomet Inc et al

ARIZONA

AZ 2 13−00059 Mullen v. Biomet Incorporated et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 12−06346 Curry v. Biomet, Inc. et al

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 2 12−00695 Mallus v. Biomet, Inc. et al

ILLINOIS SOUTHERN

ILS 3 12−01288 Raines v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al

OKLAHOMA EASTERN

OKE 6 12−00490 Allen v. Biomet, Inc. et al

PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN

PAE 2 12−06462 CACCIA et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al

TEXAS WESTERN

TXW 5 12−01184 Rodriguez et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al

TXW 5 12−01211 Gwinn et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
COURT OF APPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

 TERRIE LIVINGSTON

JUSTICES

 LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

 ANNE GARDNER

 SUE WALKER

 BILL MEIER

 LEE GABRIEL

 BONNIE SUDDERTH

TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

CLERK 

 DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

 LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

 CLARISSA HODGES

May 13, 2015

Tim B. Copeland

PO Box 399

Cedar Park, TX 78613-3977

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Constance K. Hall

The Law Office of Constance K. Hall, 

PLLC

835 E. Lamar Blvd., Ste. 330

Arlington, TX 76011

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Dee Peavy

District Attorney

Young County Courthouse

516 Fourth Street

Graham, TX 76450

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-15-00065-CR, 02-15-00066-CR, 

02-15-00067-CR, 02-15-00068-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 08792, 08793, 08796, 08794

Style: Pablo Gonzales, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

The reporter’s record has been filed under the date of Tuesday, May 12, 

2015, in the above referenced causes. 

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

By: Karen Brown, Deputy Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon VELADOR-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50486.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 2004.

Diane D. Kirstein, Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gary Joel Hill, Law Office of Gary Hill, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Ramon Velador-Rivera appeals from his convictions for importation of less than 50 kilograms of marijuana and of possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana. Velador was sentenced to 27 months’ imprisonment and three-year terms of supervised release on each count, the terms to run concurrently.

Velador argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions because it did not show that he knowingly imported and possessed the marijuana found in the hidden compartments of the furniture that he was transporting.

In cases involving contraband found in hidden compartments in a vehicle, control over the vehicle by itself does not support an inference of guilty knowledge. *United States v. Diaz-Carreon,*915 F.2d 951, 954 (5th Cir.1990). There must be additional evidence indicating guilty knowledge. *Id.*

There was additional evidence to support an inference that Velador had knowledge that the marijuana was concealed in *955the furniture that he was transporting. Velador’s conflicting statements made to agents about the ownership of the furniture and his implausible story that he agreed to carry furniture over the border for an unknown person, despite receiving warnings of the danger of doing so, was indicative of guilty knowledge. In light of the conflicting statements and implausible story, the large quantity of drugs being carried also supported an inference of guilt. *See United States v. Ramos-Garcia,*184 F.3d 463, 466 (5th Cir.1999). Further, Velador’s statement following his arrest that his passengers knew nothing about the furniture was evidence that he was aware of the presence of the contraband.

Velador’s intent to distribute the drugs he possessed could be inferred from the large quantity of drugs that he was transporting. *See United States v. Kates,*174 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.1999).

When all the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government, and with deference to all reasonable inferences drawn by the district court, there was substantial evidence to support the finding that Velador knowingly imported marijuana into the United States and that he possessed the marijuana with the intent to distribute it. *United States v. Ybarra,*70 F.3d 362, 364 (5th Cir.1995); *United States v. Lopez,*74 F.3d 575, 577 (5th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Clarence D. SCHREANE, petitioner, v. F. SANTOES, et al.

No. 13-6704.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.