Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3847

wells to 24.8 mg/30 days. The project is

located in the Town of Georgetown,

Sussex County, Delaware.

7. Broad Acres, Inc. D–94–52. An

application for approval of a ground

water withdrawal project to supply up

to 48.85 mg/30 days of water to the

applicant’s agricultural irrigation system

from new Well Nos. 5 and 6, and to

increase the existing withdrawal limit of

73.52 mg/30 days from all wells to 135.7

mg/30 days. The project is located in

Kent County, Delaware.

8. Lyons Borough Municipal Authority

D–94–80 CP. A project to construct a

0.15 mgd municipal sewage treatment

plant (STP) to serve the Borough of

Lyons and provide a sanitary

connection from East Penn

Manufacturing Company in Richmond

Township, both in Berks County,

Pennsylvania. The project STP will be

located on the north side of Hunter

Street in the Borough of Lyons and will

discharge to Sacony Creek in

Maxatawny Township, just south of the

Conrail Railroad bridge. The STP will

provide secondary biological treatment

with the extended aeration activated

sludge process.

9. Sealed Air Corporation D–94–81.

An application for approval of a ground

water withdrawal project to supply up

to 8 mg/30 days of water to the

applicant’s paper mill from new Well

Nos. PW–1 and PW–2, and to limit the

withdrawal from all wells to 8 mg/30

days. The project is located in the City

of Reading, Berks County, Pennsylvania.

Documents relating to these items

may be examined at the Commission’s

offices. Preliminary dockets are

available in single copies upon request.

Please contact George C. Elias

concerning docket-related questions.

Persons wishing to testify at this hearing

are requested to register with the

Secretary prior to the hearing.

Dated: January 9, 1995.

Susan M. Weisman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1276 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6360–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

National Board of the Fund for the

Improvement of Postsecondary

Education; Meeting

AGENCY: National Board of the Fund for

the Improvement of Postsecondary

Education.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the

proposed agenda of a forthcoming

meeting of the National Board of the

Fund for the Improvement of

Postsecondary Education. This notice

also describes the functions of the

Board. Notice of this meeting is required

under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: Time: February 3, 1995 from

11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Spelman College, Manley

Conference Center, 350 Spelman Lane.

S.W., Atlanta, GA 20215.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charles Karelis, Director, Fund for the

Improvement of Postsecondary

Education, 7th & D Streets, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20202. Telephone:

(202) 708–5750.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

National Board of the Fund for the

Improvement of Postsecondary

Education (National Board) is

established under Section 1003 of the

Higher Education Act of 1965, as

amended (20 U.S.C. 1135a–1). The

National Board of the Fund is

authorized to recommend to the

Director of the Fund and the Assistant

Secretary for Postsecondary Education

priorities for funding and approval or

disapproval of grants submitted to the

Fund.

On February 3, 1995 from 11:00 a.m

to 1:30 p.m., the Board will meet in

open session. The proposed agenda for

the open portion of the meeting will

include a review of FIPSE’s operating

principles, FIPSE’s reauthorization and

budget, an overview of the

Comprehensive Program, Community

Service Program, and an orientation for

new Board members.

Records are kept of all Board

proceedings, and are available for public

inspection at the Office of the Fund for

the Improvement of Postsecondary

Education, Room 3100, Regional Office

Building #3, 7th & D Streets, W.S.,

Washington, D.C. 20202 from the hours

of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Dated: January 12, 1995.

David A. Longanecker,

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary

Education.

[FR Doc. 95–1354 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Invention Available for License

AGENCY: Office of General Counsel,

DOE.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of

Energy hereby announces that U.S.

Patent No. 4,953,191, entitled ‘‘High

Intensity X-Ray Source Using Liquid

Gallium Target,’’ is available for license,

in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207–209.

A copy of the patent may be obtained,

for a modest fee, from the U.S. Patent

and Trademark Office, Washington, D.C.

20231.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert J. Marchick, Office of the

Assistant General Counsel for

Technology Transfer and Intellectual

Property, U.S. Department of Energy,

1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20585; Telephone

(202) 586–2802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 35 U.S.C.

207 authorizes licensing of Governmentowned inventions. Implementing

regulations are contained in 37 CFR part

404. 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1) authorizes

exclusive licensing of Governmentowned inventions under certain

circumstances, provided that notice of

the invention’s availability for license

has been announced in the Federal

Register.

Issued in Washington, D.C., on December

19, 1994.

Robert R. Nordhaus,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 95–1357 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–M

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG95–14–000, et al.]

Coulonge Power & Company, Limited,

et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

January 10, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Coulonge Power and Company,

Limited

[Docket No. EG95–14–000]

On December 13, 1994, Coulonge

Power and Company, Limited (the

‘‘Applicant’’), a Que ́bec limited

partnership with its principal place of

business at 1 Rochon Road, Waltham,

Que ́bec, Province of Que ́bec, Canada,

filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

Regulations.

The Applicant is engaged exclusively

in the business of owning and operating

a hydro-electric power station on the

Coulonge River in the Province of

Que ́bec, Canada, with a capacity of

approximately 16.2 MW (the ‘‘Facility’’).
3848 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices

All of the Facility’s electricity is and

will continue to be sold at wholesale,

pursuant to a long term power sales

agreement (25 years, with a renewable

term of an additional 25 years), to

Hydro-Que ́bec, a public utility owned

by the Government of the Province of

Que ́bec, Canada.

Comment date: January 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Zhuang He Power Partners Limited

Partnership

[Docket No. EG95–23–000]

On January 5, 1995, Zhuang He Power

Partners Limited Partnership

(‘‘Applicant’’), filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations. Applicant states that it is a

Delaware limited partnership formed to

acquire indirect ownership interests in

two proposed approximately 600 MW

coal-fired electric generating facilities to

be located in the People’s Republic of

China and/or operate such facilities and

to engage in project development

activities with respect thereto.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

3. EI Power (China), Inc.

[Docket No. EG95–24–000]

On January 5, 1995, EI Power (China)

Inc. (‘‘Applicant’’), filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an application for determination of

exempt wholesale generator status

pursuant to Part 365 of the

Commission’s regulations.

Applicant is a Delaware corporation

formed to engage in project

development activities associated with

the direct or indirect acquisition of

ownership interests in one or more

eligible facilities and/or EWGs in the

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).

Applicant states that these development

activities will be limited to activities

associated with the acquisition of

ownership interests in facilities or

entities that meet the criteria for eligible

facilities and/or EWGs set out in Section

32 of the Public Utility Holding

Company Act of 1935.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

4. China Power Partners Limited

Partnership

[Docket No. EG95–25–000]

On January 5, 1995, China Power

Partners Limited Partnership

(‘‘Applicant’’), filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

Regulations.

Applicant states that it is a Delaware

limited partnership formed to engage in

project development activities

associated with the direct or indirect

acquisition of ownership interests in

one or more eligible facilities and/or

EWGs in the People’s Republic of China

(‘‘PRC’’). These development activities

will be limited to activities associated

with the acquisition of ownership

interests in facilities or entities that

meet the criteria for eligible facilities

and/or EWGs set out in Section 32 of the

Public Utility Holding Company Act of

1935.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

5. EI Power (China) III, Inc.

[Docket No. EG95–26–000]

On January 5, 1995, EI Power (China)

III, Inc. (‘‘Applicant’’), filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an application for determination of

exempt wholesale generator status

pursuant to Part 365 of the

Commission’s regulations.

According to its application,

Applicant is a Delaware corporation

formed to acquire an indirect ownership

interest in two proposed approximately

600 MW coal-fired electric generating

facilities to be located in the People’s

Republic of China and/or operate such

facilities and to engage in project

development activities with respect

thereto.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

6. Central Illinois Light Company

[Docket No. ER94–1566–000]

Take notice that Central Illinois Light

Company (CILCO), on January 5, 1995,

tendered for filing with the Commission

substitute pages to the contract

amendment to the Service Schedules

contained in CILCO’s Interconnection

Agreement with Central Illinois Public

Service Company (CILCO Rate Schedule

FERC No. 26). These substitute pages

have been filed for the purpose of

reflecting maximum prices for certain

service schedules.

CILCO proposes the revised rate

schedule changes to be effective on

October 16, 1994.

Copies of the filing were served on the

Illinois Commerce Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Industrial Gas & Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–257–000]

Take notice that on December 27,

1994, Industrial Gas & Electric Company

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Puget Sound Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER95–331–000]

Take notice that on December 23,

1994, Puget Sound Power & Light

Company (Puget), tendered for filing its

service agreement (Service Agreement)

with Associated Power Services, Inc.

(APS). A copy of the filing was served

upon APS.

The Service Agreement is for the

purchase and sale of non-firm surplus

thermal or purchased energy pursuant

to Puget’s FPC Electric Tariff Original

Volume No. 3.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER95–332–000]

Take notice that on December 23,

1994, Southern California Edison

Company (Edison), tendered for filing

the following Supplemental Agreement

(Supplemental Agreement), to the 1990

Integrated Operations Agreement (IOA)

with the City of Anaheim (Anaheim),

FERC Rate Schedule No. 246, and

associated Firm Transmission Service

Agreement (FTS Agreement):

Supplemental Agreement Between Southern

California Edison Company And City of

Anaheim, 40 Megawatt Deseret Power Sale

Agreement

Edison—Anaheim, 40 Megawatt Deseret,

Firm Transmission Service Agreement

Between Southern California Edison

Company And City of Anaheim

The Supplemental Agreement and

FTS Agreement set forth the terms and
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3849

conditions by which Edison will

integrate and provide firm transmission

service for Anaheim’s Deseret resource.

Edison seeks waiver of the 60 day prior

notice requirements and requests the

Commission to assign to the agreements

an effective date of January 1, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–350–000]

Take notice that on December 23,

1994, Northeast Utilities Service

Company, on behalf of The Connecticut

Light and Power Company, Western

Massachusetts Electric Company,

Holyoke Water Power Company, and

Holyoke Power and Electric Company

(collectively, the Companies,) filed the

Companies’ plan for refunding to their

wholesale customers credits associated

with Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs

(SNFDC) received from the United

States Department of Energy (DOE).

The Companies request exemption

from Section 35.14 of the Commission’s

Regulation under the Federal Power Act

(18 CFR 35.14), to the extent necessary,

to calculate and make these refunds

based on their wholesale customers’

energy purchases during the past

overcharge period. The Companies also

request exemption from Section 35.19a

in order to avoid paying more in interest

than the interest received from DOE for

the time DOE held these overpayments.

The Companies state that a copy of

the filing was sent to the public utility

commissions of Connecticut, New

Hampshire and Massachusetts and the

following affected wholesale customers:

Unit Entitlement Wholesale Customers:

Boston Edison Company

Canal Electric Company

Commonwealth Electric Company

Connecticut Municipal Electric Company

Fitchburg Gas & Electric

Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric

Company

Montaup Electric Company

New England Power Company

Newport Electric Corporation

Public Service Company of New Hampshire

United Illuminating Company

Unitil Power Corporation

CL&P Cost of Service Wholesale

Customers:

Bozrah Light & Power Company

Norwalk, Second District

Norwalk, Third Taxing

Town of Wallingford

WMECO Cost of Service Wholesale:

Chester Municipal Electric Light Department

R.H. Fletcher Company

Massachusetts Electric Company

New York State Electric & Gas

Russell Municipal Electric Department

Westfield Gas & Electric Department

HWP Cost of Service Wholesale:

Chicopee Municipal Light Plant

HPE Cost of Service Wholesale:

South Hadley Electric Light Department

Westfield Gas & Electric Department

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Gulf Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–351–000]

Take notice that on December 22,

1994, Gulf Power Company tendered for

filing an amendment to the

Transmission Service Agreement

between Gulf Power Company and Bay

Resource Management, Inc. The purpose

of this filing is to declare changes in

practice and amend the energy rate

contained in the foregoing agreement to

reflect the energy-related costs incurred

by Gulf Power Company to ensure

compliance with the Phase I sulfur

dioxide emissions limitations of the

Clean Air Act Amendment of 1990.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Gulf Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–352–000]

Take notice that on December 22,

1994, Gulf Power Company tendered for

filing an amendment to the

Interconnection Agreement between

Gulf Power Company and Alabama

Electric Cooperative, Inc. The purpose

of this filing is to declare changes in

practice and amend energy rates

contained in the foregoing agreement to

reflect the energy-related costs incurred

by Gulf Power Company to ensure

compliance with the Phase I sulfur

dioxide emissions limitations of the

Clean Air Act Amendment of 1990.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Southern California Edison

Company

[Docket No. ER95–354–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, Southern California Edison

Company (Edison), tendered for filing

the following Firm Transmission

Service Agreement (FTS Agreement):

Edison—Vernon Eldorado-City Gate, Firm

Transmission Service Agreement Between

Southern California Edison Company And

City of Vernon

The FTS Agreement sets forth the

terms and conditions under which

Edison shall provide firm transmission

service between Eldorado Substation

and the city limits of Vernon for the

period January 1, 1995 through April 30,

1996. The amount of firm transmission

service for Vernon to be provided by

Edison, pursuant to the FTS Agreement,

is 20 MW during the months of May

1995 through October 1995 and 35 MW

for the other months during the term of

the FTS Agreement. Edison seeks

waiver of the 60 day prior notice

requirements and requests the

Commission to assign to the FTS

Agreement an effective date of January

1, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–355–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, Northeast Utilities Service

Company (NUSCO), tendered for filing

a Service Agreement to provide nonfirm transmission service to

Commonwealth Electric Company (CES)

under the NU System Companies’

Transmission Service Tariff No. 2.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to CES.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective sixty (60)

days after receipt of this filing by the

Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–356–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, Northeast Utilities Service

Company (NUSCO), tendered for filing

a Service Agreement with Hudson Light

and Power Department (Hudson) under

the NU System Companies System

Power Sales/Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to Hudson.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on January

1, 1995.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–357–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, Northeast Utilities Service

Company (NUSCO), tendered for filing

on behalf of The Connecticut Light and

Power Company (CL&P), Western
3850 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices

Massachusetts Electric Company

(WMECO), Holyoke Water Power

Company (HWP), Holyoke Power and

Electric Company and Public Service

Company of New Hampshire (together,

the NU System Companies) a Tariff No.

1 Firm Transmission Service Agreement

and a Distribution Service Agreement

(Agreements) with Fitchburg Gas and

Electric Light Company (Fitchburg). The

Agreements provide for delivery of

Fitchburg’s purchase of the output of

the Harris Energy and Realty

Corporation’s hydro facility across the

HWP distribution system and the NU

System Companies’ transmission

facilities and will supersede service

now provided to Fitchburg under FERC

Rate Schedule Nos. CL&P–274,

WMECO–208, and HWP–33.

NUSCO requests that the Agreements

be permitted to become effective

January 1, 1995. NUSCO states that a

copy of the filing has been mailed or

delivered to the affected parties.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER95–358–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1994, PECO Energy Company (PECO),

tendered for filing an Agreement

between PECO and Dayton Power &

Light Company (DPL), dated December

21, 1994.

PECO states that the Agreement sets

forth the terms and conditions for the

sale of system energy which it expects

to have available for sale from time to

time and the purchase of which will be

economically advantageous to DPL. In

order to optimize the economic

advantage to both PECO and DPL, PECO

requests that the Commission waive its

customary notice period and permit the

agreement to become effective on

January 1, 1995.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to DPL and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER95–360–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, PECO Energy Company (PECO),

tendered for filing an Agreement

between PECO and Long Island Lighting

company (LILCO) dated December 9,

1994.

PECO states that the Agreement sets

forth the terms and conditions for the

sale of system energy which it expects

to have available for sale from time to

time and the purchase of which will be

economically advantageous to LILCO.

The Agreement supersedes an

agreement between PECO and LILCO

dated December 22, 1992, which is on

file with the Commission as PECO’s

Rate Schedule FERC No. 65. In order to

optimize the economic advantage to

both PECO and LILCO, PECO requests

that the Commission waive its

customary notice period and permit the

agreement to become effective on

January 1, 1995.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to LILCO and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

19. Southern California Edison

Company

[Docket No. ER95–361–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Southern California Edison

Company (Edison), tendered for filing

the following agreement between Edison

and the City of Colton:

Added Facilities Agreement Between the City

of Colton and Southern California Edison

Company

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

20. Stand Energy Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–362–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Stand Energy Corporation (Stand

Energy), tendered for filing pursuant to

Rules 205 and 207 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.205 and 385.207) an application

seeking a disclaimer of jurisdiction over

certain proposed electric power

brokering transactions, the assertion of

jurisdiction over certain marketing

activities, subject to the outcome of

other Commission proceedings, and the

issuance of blanket approvals and

waivers which would allow Stand

Energy to engage in the proposed

wholesale electric power transactions. If

approved, Stand Energy’s proposed Rate

Schedule No. 1 would be effective from

and after March 1, 1995.

Stand Energy intends to engage in

electric power and energy transactions

as either a broker or as a marketer. Stand

Energy’s power marketing activities will

include purchases of capacity, energy,

and/or transmission services from

electric utilities, qualifying facilities,

and independent power producers.

Stand Energy will resell such power to

other purchasers on an arms-length

basis and at mutually agreed upon rates.

Stand Energy is not in the business of

producing or transmitting electric power

and does not have title to any electric

power generation or transmission

facilities.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

21. Public Service Company of New

Mexico

[Docket No. ER95–364–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Mexico (PNM), tendered for filing

Modification Number 5 to the expiring

Contract for Electric Service, Contract

No. DE-AC04–85AL27436 (Electric

Service Agreement), between PNM and

the United States Department of Energy

(DOE). Under Modification Number 5 to

the Electric Service Agreement, PNM

agrees to continue in effect those

services presently provided to DOE and

the Incorporated County of Los Alamos

(County) pursuant to the Electric

Service Agreement (PNM Rate Schedule

FERC No. 61), which services would

otherwise terminate on December 31,

1994. Such Modification Number 5

extends the Electric Service Agreement

for a period of one year from the current

termination date.

PNM requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements to

permit Modification Number 5 to be

effective for service on and after January

1, 1995.

Copies of the Notice have been mailed

to the DOE, the County and the New

Mexico Public Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

22. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER95–365–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, PECO Energy Company (PECO),

tendered for filing an Agreement

between PECO and Public Service

Electric and Gas Company (PS) dated

December 28, 1994.

PECO states that the Agreement sets

forth the terms and conditions for the

sale of system energy which it expects

to have available for sale from time to

time and the purchase of which will be

economically advantageous to PS. The

Agreement supersedes an agreement

between PECO and PS dated August 23,

1993, which is on file with the

Commission as PECO’s Rate Schedule
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3851

FERC No. 70. In order to optimize the

economic advantage to both PECO and

PS, PECO requests that the Commission

waive its customary notice period and

permit the agreement to become

effective on January 1, 1995.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to PS and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

23. Altresco-Pittsfield, L.P.

[Docket No. QF88–21–005]

On December 30, 1994, AltrescoPittsfield, L.P. (Applicant) submitted for

filing an amendment to its filing in this

docket.

The amendment provides additional

information pertaining to the ownership

of its cogeneration facility. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

24. Morro Energy L.P., S.E.

[Docket Nos. QF95–121–000]

On December 28, 1994, Morro Energy

L.P., S.E. (Applicant), c/o NP Morro

Inc., General Partner of 2101 Webster

Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California

94612–3049, submitted for filing an

application for certification of a facility

as a qualifying small power production

facility pursuant to Section 292.207(b)

of the Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the Applicant, the

facility is located at #28, KM2 Luchetti

Industry Park, Bayamo’n, Puerto Rico

00961, and will consist of two

circulating fluidized bed boilers and a

condensing steam turbine generator.

The maximum net electric power

production capacity of the facility will

be 235 MW. The primary energy sources

will be pitch and petroleum coke, byproducts of an oil refining process.

Construction of the facility is expected

to begin in late 1996.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1237 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EG95–19–000, et al.]

LG&E-Westmoreland Hopewell, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

January 12, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. LG&E/Westmoreland Hopewell

[Docket No. EG95–19–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Hopewell (‘‘Hopewell’’),

a California general partnership with its

principal place of business at 12500 Fair

Lakes Circle, Suite 350, Fairfax, Virginia

22033–3804, filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Hopewell is engaged directly and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a coal-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 62.7 MW which

is an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Virginia

Electric & Power Company. Steam from

the cogeneration facility, which is a byproduct of electric generation, may be

sold incidental to the sale of electric

power at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. LG&E-Westmoreland Southampton

[Docket No. EG95–20–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Southampton

(‘‘Southampton’’), a California general

partnership with its principal place of

business at 12500 Fair Lakes Circle,

Suite 350 Fairfax, Virginia 22033–3804,

filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission an application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator status pursuant to Part 365 of

the Commission’s regulations.

Southampton is engaged directly and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a coal-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 62.64 MW which

is an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Virginia

Electric & Power Company. Steam from

the cogeneration facility, which is a byproduct of electric generation, and tall

oil, a supplementary fuel, may be sold

incidental to the sale of electric power

at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

3. LG&E-Westmoreland Altavista

[Docket No. EG95–21–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Altavista (‘‘Altavista’’), a

California general partnership with its

principal place of business at 12500 Fair

Lakes Circle, Suite 350, Fairfax, Virginia

22033–3804 filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination or exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Altavista is engaged directly and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, a coal-fired cogeneration

facility with a maximum net power

production capacity of 62.7 MW which

is an eligible facility. All of the facility’s

electric power net of the facility’s

operating electric power is or will be

purchased at wholesale by Virginia

Electric & Power Company. Steam from

the cogeneration facility, which is a byproduct of electric generation, and wood

may be sold incidental to the sale of

electric power at wholesale.

Comment date: January 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

4. LG&E-Westmoreland Rensselaer

[Docket No. EG95–22–000]

On January 3, 1995, LG&EWestmoreland Rensselaer