26428 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices

United Cities, as owner of the

Barnsley Storage Field in Kentucky,

indicates that it was issued a limited

jurisdiction certificate by order issued

September 20, 1994, in Docket No.

CP94–753–000 to lease capacity in the

storage field to Sonat. United Cities

indicates that, by letter dated October

20, 1994, it had accepted the

authorization but also notified the

Commission that the operations

authorized in the order had not yet

commenced and may not commence in

the future, and that Sonat may choose

not to pursue the transaction authorized

in the certificate. United Cities states

that by letter dated February 1, 1995,

Sonat advised that it was not interested

in pursuing further the lease

arrangement. United Cities also states

that by letter dated April 13, 1995,

Woodward indicated that it would like

to lease the storage capacity under the

same conditions previously approved

for Sonat. United Cities requests that its

authorization be amended to substitute

Woodward for Sonat as the potential

lessee of the storage capacity. United

Cities proposes no other modifications

to the authorization.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application to amend should on or

before May 26, 1995, file with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to take but will not

serve to make the protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

petition if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, If

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

amended application is required by the

public convenience and necessity. If a

motion for leave to intervene is timely

filed, or if the Commission on its own

motion believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for United Cities to appear

or be represented at the hearing.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12061 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–190–002]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas

Tariff

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG)

tendered for filing as part of its FERC

Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No.

1, with a proposed effective date of

March 31, 1995:

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 9

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 10

WNG states that this filing is being

made in compliance with Commission

order issued March 31, 1995 in docket

No. RP95–190. Ordering Paragraph (B)

of the order directed WNG to file

revised tariff sheets within 30 days of

the order to reflect revised billings using

the applicable jurisdictional percentages

to calculate the various ad valorem costs

represented in this proceeding. WNG is

filing Revised Schedule D1, Code 1 and

Revised Schedule D1, Code 8,

Workpapers 001 and 002 to reflect the

change in methodology for computing

the jurisdictional percentages in

compliance with the order.

WNG states that Attachment 1 shows

the calculation of the revised amounts

using jurisdictional percentages

applicable to the ad valorem tax year.

The ad valorem payments were evenly

spread over the twelve months to which

they apply, since the payments are

applicable to the annual period and not

to particular months. This change

results in a reduction of approximately

$97,000 in the direct bill amount.

WNG states that a copy of the filing

was served on all participants listed on

the service lists maintained by the

Commission in the dockets referenced

above and on all of WNG’s jurisdictional

customers and interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with § 385.211 of the Commission’s

Rules and Regulations. All such protests

should be filed on or before May 18,

1995. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12055 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. EF95–1021–000, et al.]

Alaska Power Administration, et al.,

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

May 10, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Alaska Power Administration

[Docket No. EF95–1021–000]

Take notice that on May 3, 1995, the

Deputy Secretary of the Department of

Energy, by Rate Order No. APA–13,

confirmed and approved on an interim

basis effective May 1, 1995, Rate

Schedules SN-F–5, SN-NF–8, SN-NF–9,

and SN-NF–10 applicable to power from

Alaska Power Administration’s (APA)

Snettisham Project. The rate schedules

which are being adjusted were

previously confirmed and approved by

FERC on December 23, 1991, for a

period of five years, Docket No. EF92–

1021–000.

Current rates in effect are 32.1 mills

per kilowatt-hour for firm energy, a

variable rate for non-firm energy based

on the cost of heating oil, currently 12.1

mills per kilowatthour, and a rate of

27.1 mills per kilowatt-hour for energy

used in place of wood burning. APA

proposes to increase the rate for firm

energy to 34.7 mills per kilowatthour,

an increase of 6.1 percent. Rates for nonfirm energy would remain the same.

The Department requests the approval

of the Commission of the adjusted rates

for a period not to exceed five years

with the understanding that the rates

can be adjusted at an earlier date if

needed to comply with the cost recovery

criteria. The rate schedules are

submitted for confirmation and

approval of a final basis pursuant to

authority vested in the Commission by

Amendment No. 3 to Delegation Order

No. 0204–108.

Comment date: May 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.