EXHIBIT 8 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 278-9 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 5
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Case No. 5:17-cv-00551-LHK

1657209.1 - APPLE.FACETIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS 

 ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP 

Allan Steyer (State Bar No. 100318)

Jill M. Manning (State Bar No. 178849)

D. Scott Macrae (State Bar No. 104663)

One California Street, Suite 300 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-3400

Facsimile: (415) 421-2234

asteyer@steyerlaw.com

jmanning@steyerlaw.com

smacrae@steyerlaw.com

PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 

Bruce L. Simon (State Bar No. 96241) 

Daniel L. Warshaw (State Bar No. 185365) 

Alexander L. Simon (State Bar No. 305734) 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2450 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-9000 

Facsimile: (415) 433-9008 

bsimon@pswlaw.com 

dwarshaw@pswlaw.com 

asimon@pswlaw.com 

[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Christina Grace and Ken Potter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHRISTINA GRACE and KEN POTTER, 

Individually and on Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

APPLE, INC.,

 Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00551-LHK

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANT’S SECOND SET OF 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 278-9 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 5
-1-

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Case No. 5:17-cv-00551-LHK

1657209.1 - APPLE.FACETIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOUNDING PARTY: DEFENDANT Apple Inc.

RESPONDING PARTY: PLAINTIFFS

SET NUMBER: TWO

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 36, Plaintiffs Christina Grace and Ken Potter 

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) respond to Defendant Apple, Inc.’s (hereinafter “Defendant”) second

set of requests for admission as follows:

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. Plaintiffs’ investigation and development of all facts and circumstances related to this 

action is ongoing. These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a 

waiver of, Plaintiffs’ right to rely on other facts and evidence at trial.

2. Plaintiffs make the responses and objections herein without in any way implying that 

they consider the information requested by Defendant to be relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims or 

Defendant’s defenses.

3. Plaintiffs expressly reserve the right to supplement, clarify, revise and/or correct any or 

all of the responses herein, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more 

subsequent supplemental response(s). 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 9:

Admit that in order to use Your iPhone (including FaceTime), you agreed to an Apple 

iOS Software License Agreement.

RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 9:

Plaintiffs object to the term “agreed” on the ground that it calls for a legal conclusion. 

Plaintiffs further object to the term “agreed” as vague and ambiguous to the extent that the iOS 

Software License Agreements may be unenforceable, unconscionable, or unenforceable or 

unconscionable in part. Plaintiffs object to the phrase “Your iPhone (including FaceTime)” as

overly broad. Plaintiffs also object to the phrase “an Apple iOS Software License Agreement” as 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 278-9 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 5
-2-

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Case No. 5:17-cv-00551-LHK

1657209.1 - APPLE.FACETIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

vague and ambiguous because it fails to define the specific agreement or agreements Apple is 

referencing herein.

Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing objections and responses, Plaintiffs admit 

that they clicked “agree” in order to be able to use their iPhone 4 devices at issue in this lawsuit. 

Plaintiffs deny that they agreed to every term of the iOS agreements.

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 10:

Admit that you suffered only economic losses as a result of the alleged “FaceTime 

Break” You describe in paragraph 11 of Your Amended Complaint.

RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 10:

Plaintiffs deny this request for admission.

DATED: August 13, 2018 STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS 

 ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP

By: /s/ Jill M. Manning 

 Jill M. Manning

Allan Steyer (State Bar No. 100318)

Jill M. Manning (State Bar No. 178849)

D. Scott Macrae (State Bar No. 104663)

One California Street, Suite 300 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-3400

Facsimile: (415) 421-2234

asteyer@steyerlaw.com

jmanning@steyerlaw.com

smacrae@steyerlaw.com

PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 

Bruce L. Simon (State Bar No. 96241) 

Daniel L. Warshaw (State Bar No. 185365) 

Alexander L. Simon (State Bar No. 305734) 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2450 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-9000 

bsimon@pswlaw.com 

dwarshaw@pswlaw.com 

asimon@pswlaw.com 

FRIEDMAN OSTER & TEJTEL PLLC 

David F.E. Tejtel (admitted pro hac vice) 

240 East 79th Street, Suite A 

New York, NY 10075 

Telephone: (646) 661-5881 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 278-9 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 5
-3-

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Case No. 5:17-cv-00551-LHK

1657209.1 - APPLE.FACETIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

dtejtel@fotpllc.com 

CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY 

Bradley W. Caldwell (admitted pro hac vice) 

Jason D. Cassady (admitted pro hac vice) 

John Austin Curry (admitted pro hac vice) 

2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 1000 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 888-4848 

bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com 

jcassady@caldwellcc.com 

acurry@caldwellcc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Christina Grace and Ken Potter

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 278-9 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 5