Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 1995 / Notices 26913

for lawyers, a certificate of service.

Hearing requests should state the nature

of the writer’s interest, the reason for the

request, and the issues contested.

Persons may request notification of a

hearing by writing to the SEC’s

Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.

Applicants, 220 East 42nd Street, New

York, New York 10017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane L. Titus, Paralegal Specialist, at

(202) 942–0584, or Robert A. Robertson,

Branch Chief, at (202) 942–0564

(Division of Investment Management,

Office of Investment Company

Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

following is a summary of the

application. The complete application

may be obtained for a fee from the SEC’s

Public Reference Branch.

Applicant’s Representations

1. Applicant is an open-end,

diversified management investment

company, organized under the laws of

the State of Maryland. On November 18,

1988, applicant registered under the Act

and, on June 24, 1991, filed a

registration statement under the

Securities Act of 1933. Applicant’s

registration statement was aborted on

October 19, 1992, and applicant has

made no public offering of its shares.

2. Applicant never issued any

securities. Applicant has no

shareholders, liabilities or assets.

Applicant is not a party to any litigation

or administrative proceeding.

3. Applicant is not now engaged, nor

does it propose to engage in any

business activities.

For the SEC, by the Division of Investment

Management, under delegated authority.

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12317 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

[Investment Company Act Release No.

21066; 811–5691]

Value Line Intermediate Bond Fund;

Notice of Application

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange

Commission (‘‘SEC’’).

ACTION: Notice of Application for

Deregistration under the Investment

Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’).

APPLICANT: Value Line Intermediate

Bond Fund.

RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f).

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant

requests an order declaring it has ceased

to be an investment company.

FILING DATE: The application was filed

on April 3, 1995, and an amendment

thereto on May 3, 1995.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An

order granting the application will be

issued unless the SEC orders a hearing.

Interested persons may request a

hearing by writing to the SEC’s

Secretary and serving applicant with a

copy of the request, personally or by

mail. Hearing requests should be

received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on

June 6, 1995, and should be

accompanied by proof of service on the

applicant, in the form of an affidavit or,

for lawyers, a certificate of service.

Hearing requests should state the nature

of the writer’s interest, the reason for the

request, and the issues contested.

Persons may request notification of a

hearing by writing to the SEC’s

Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.

Applicants, 220 East 42nd Street, New

York, New York 10017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane L. Titus, Paralegal Specialist, at

(202) 942–0584, or Robert A. Robertson,

Branch Chief, at (202) 942–0564

(Division of Investment Management,

Office of Investment Company

Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

following is a summary of the

application. The complete application

may be obtained for a fee from the SEC’s

Public Reference Branch.

Applicant’s Representations

1. Applicant is an open-end,

diversified management investment

company, organized as a business trust

under the laws of the Commonwealth of

Massachusetts. On November 18, 1988,

applicant registered under the Act and

filed a registration statement under the

Securities Act of 1933. Applicant’s

registration statement was aborted on

October 19, 1992, and applicant has

made no public offering of its shares.

2. Applicant never issued any

securities. Applicant has no

shareholders, liabilities or assets.

Applicant is not a party to any litigation

or administrative proceeding.

3. Applicant is not now engaged, nor

does it propose to engage in any

business activities.

For the SEC, by the Division of Investment

Management, under delegated authority.

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12316 Filed 5–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Limestone 500-kV Substation and

Transmission Line

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Notice of no practicable

alternative to impacting wetlands.

SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley

Authority (TVA) proposes to initially

construct three transmission lines

connecting to TVA’s new 500-kV

substation (under construction) at a site

in eastern Limestone County, Alabama.

An environmental assessment, in

accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act, is being

prepared. This proposal will result in

the disturbance of about 11.8 acres of

wetlands as a result of handclearing. No

structures would be placed in the

wetlands. Consistent with the Executive

Order 11990 ‘‘Protection of Wetlands’’

and TVA’s Wetlands Procedure, it has

been determined that no practicable

alternative exists. TVA is requesting

public comment on the impact to

wetlands.

DATES: TVA will consider all relevant

comments received by June 2, 1995

before a final decision is made on the

proposal.

ADDRESSES: Any comments on this

proposal should be addressed to Dale

Wilhelm, National Environmental

Policy Act Liaison, Tennessee Valley

Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive,

Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For additional information on this

action, call Hugh S. Barger,

Transmission and Power Supply,

Tennessee Valley Authority at (615)

751–3131.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TVA

supplies power over its bulk 500-kV

system to north central Alabama

through its Madison and Trinity 500-kV

substations. Twice in the past 16 years

the Madison substation has been

virtually isolated from large portions of

the transmission network when the

Huntsville area transmission system was

devastated by tornadoes. However,

available bulk power system backup

prevented lengthy widespread

blackouts..

System contingency studies show that

by the summer of 1996 isolation or

failure of the 500-kV transformer bank at

Madison during peak demand would

result in a loss of electric service over

a wide area. Additionally, by the

summer of 1997, loss of the 500-kV

transformer bank at Trinity would result

in the loss of service to sections of the

area served by this substation. Other