alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
800 State Highway 121 Bypass, Lewisville, TX 75067-4180**Mailing Address:**P.O. Box 293150, Lewisville, TX 75029-3150 I, Jenna L. Kemp, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  Prime Mortgage Trust 2007-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports''); 2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic report; 4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer (s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review (s) conducted in preparing the servicer  compliance statement (s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer (s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement (s) in all material respects and 5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, EMC Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer, EMC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services Inc, Assurant Inc and FIS Tax Services, Countrywide Home Loan Servicing L.P., Mid America FSB, and National City Mortgage Co. March _31, 2008 /s/  Jenna L. Kemp _____________                                                                                  Jenna L. Kemp                                                          Executive Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO ABREU,

Petitioner,

v.

R. BINKELE,

Respondent.

Case No. 17-cv-00870-HSG (PR) 

JUDGMENT

The Court has dismissed this action without prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

4/20/2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ANDRE ALLAN FORBES

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-CR-26 JD

OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant Andre Allan Forbes has already been sentenced, had his conviction affirmed 

on appeal, filed an unsuccessful motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255, and had a certificate of appealability denied on an appeal from that order. He then filed a 

series of motions seeking to vacate his conviction, again with no success. Now, Mr. Forbes has 

yet again filed a motion, which he labels as a Rule 60(b)(3) motion, arguing that his sentence

should be set aside.

As this Court has repeatedly explained to Mr. Forbes, this Court has no jurisdiction to 

consider a second or successive collateral attack on his conviction or sentence unless the court of 

appeals has granted authorization, which it has not. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h); Suggs v. United States, 

705 F.3d 279, 281–82 (7th Cir. 2013); see also Nunez v. United States, 96 F.3d 990, 991 (7th Cir. 

1996). Though Mr. Forbes labels it a Rule 60(b) motion, his motion does not identify a defect in 

the original § 2255 proceedings—it argues that his underlying sentence is invalid. The motion 

thus constitutes an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion, which must be dismissed. See Adams 

v. United States, 911 F.3d 397, 403 (7th Cir. 2018) (“[I]f a Rule 60(b) motion is, in its essence, 

merely asking for relief that one would ask for in a motion under § 2255, such a motion would be 

subject to the same restrictions or requirements for successive habeas petitions.”).

The Court therefore dismisses Mr. Forbes’ motion. [DE 186]. Because the Court has 

repeatedly advised Mr. Forbes that he can only file a motion attacking his conviction or sentence 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cr-00026-JD-CAN document 187 filed 08/04/20 page 1 of 2
2

if he has first received authorization from the court of appeals, the Court now cautions Mr. 

Forbes that if he files any further unauthorized successive attacks, under any label, he may be 

subject to sanctions that could include a fine or a restriction on any further filings.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: August 4, 2020

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Chief Judge

United States District Court

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cr-00026-JD-CAN document 187 filed 08/04/20 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11810]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Sensors Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Partially Closed 
Meeting

    A meeting of the Sensors Technical Advisory Committee will be held 
June 7, 1995, 9:00 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 
1617M(2), 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to sensors and related equipment 
and technology.

Agenda

General Session

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.

2. Presentation by Office of Foreign Assets Control (Treasury) on Iran 
sanctions.

3. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.

4. Old Business.
5. New Business--Working Group and Task Assignments.

Executive Session

6. Discussion of matters properly classified under Executive Order 
12356, dealing with the U.S. export control program and strategic 
criteria related thereto.

    The General Session of the meeting will be open to the public and a 
limited number of seats will be available. To the extent that time 
permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials two weeks 
prior to the meeting date to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter, OAS/EA--Room 3886C, Bureau of Export Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230.

    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on January 6, 1994, pursuant 
to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
that the series of meetings of the Committee and of any Subcommittees 
thereof, dealing with the classified materials listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in section 10 (a)(1) and (a)(3), of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. The remaining series of meetings or portions thereof 
will be open to the public.

    A copy of the Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions 
of meetings of the Committee is available for public inspection and 
copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 
6020, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. For further 
information or copies of the minutes, contact Lee Ann Carpenter on 
(202) 482-2583.

    Dated: May 9, 1995.

Lee Ann Carpenter,

Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.

[FR Doc. 95-11810 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12318]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 21064; 811-5692]


Value Line U.S. Government Securities Money Market Fund; Notice 
of Application

May 12, 1995.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice of Application for Deregistration under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPLICANT: Value Line U.S. Government Securities Money Market Fund.

RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f).

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant requests an order declaring it has 
ceased to be an investment company.

FILING DATE: The application was filed on April 3, 1995, and an 
amendment thereto on May 3, 1995.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on June 6, 1995, 
and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicant, in the 
form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing 
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason 
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
Applicants, 220 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane L. Titus, Paralegal Specialist, at (202) 942-0584, or Robert A. 
Robertson, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 (Division of Investment 
Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
the SEC's Public Reference Branch.

Applicant's Representations

    1. Applicant is an open-end, diversified management investment 
company, organized as a business trust under the laws of the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. On November 18, 1988, applicant 
registered under the Act and filed a registration statement under the 
Securities Act of 1933. Applicant's registration statement was aborted 
on October 19, 1992, and applicant has made no public offering of its 
shares.
    2. Applicant never issued any securities. Applicant has no 
shareholders, liabilities or assets. Applicant is not a party to any 
litigation or administrative proceeding.
    3. Applicant is not now engaged, nor does it propose to engage in 
any business activities.

    For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12318 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00462-PPS-JEM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 1 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00462-PPS-JEM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 2 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00462-PPS-JEM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 3 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00462-PPS-JEM document 1 filed 03/11/14 page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity
but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY
TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper
SVP, Royalty Trust Management


Date: May 9, 2016

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2



Certification

I, Robin S. McRae, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc.



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Robin S. McRae

By  ____________________________________

Robin S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer

Date:  May 15, 2006
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.30

                     SCHEDULE OF RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENTS
                           TYPE A (EXECUTIVE OFFICERS)

The following have executed Restricted Stock Agreements substantially in the
form of the agreement attached as Exhibit 10.29 (the "Exhibit") to the Valero
Energy Corporation Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Keith D. Booke
Michael S. Ciskowski
William R. Klesse

The following information sets forth the material details in which the
Restricted Stock Agreements described in this Schedule differ from the Exhibit.


<Table>
<Caption>
       name               grant date           number of shares           vesting
-------------------   -------------------    --------------------   --------------------
<S>                   <C>                    <C>                    <C>
         Booke                10-29-2003                8,000               1/5 annually

       Ciskowski              10-29-2003                8,000               1/5 annually

        Klesse                10-29-2003               10,000               1/5 annually

        Klesse                12-31-2001               20,000               1/3 annually
</Table>
Wayne SIMON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9022.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAVETTE FOSTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00684-DMR 

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

The court has been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appears that no issue 

remains for the court’s determination.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED 

with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may move to reopen the 

case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days of this 

order. All scheduled dates, including the trial and pretrial dates, are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2017

______________________________________

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge
February 20 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DONNA LYNN MORALE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00965

- CV V.

ELIZABETH WILLIAMS , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 14, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by r eason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Donna Lynn Morale. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-056 JD

)

REBECCA TURNER (02) )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on June 21, 2013 [DE 46]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Rebecca Turner’s plea of guilty, and FINDS

the defendant guilty of Count 2 of the Indictment, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 17, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court