27696 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that

order. It has been exempted from review

by the Office of Management and

Budget under that order. It is not

significant under the regulatory policies

and procedures of the Department of

Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040;

February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard

expects the economic impact of this

proposal to be so minimal that a full

Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph

10e of the regulatory policies and

procedures of DOT is unnecessary.

Although the regulation enhances

control over the harbor and promotes

the efficiency of mooring operations,

harbor access will not be reduced, nor

will vessel traffic within the harbor be

diverted or impeded.

Environment

This final rule has been thoroughly

reviewed by the Coast Guard and

determined to be categorically excluded

from further environmental

documentation in accordance with

section 2.B.2.e of Commandant

Instruction M16475.1B.

Collection of Information

This regulation contains no collection

of information requirements under the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.).

Federalism Assessment

This action has been analyzed in

accordance with the principles and

criteria contained in Executive Order

12612, and it has been determined that

it does not have sufficient federalism

implications to warrant the preparation

of a Federalism Assessment.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110

Anchorage grounds.

Final Regulation

In consideration of the foregoing, Part

110 of Title 33, Code of Federal

Regulations, is amended as follows:

PART 110—ANCHORAGE

REGULATIONS

1. The authority citation for part 110

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2030, 2035 and

2071; 49 CFR 1.46 and 33 CFR 1.05–1(g).

Section 110.1a and each section listed in

110.1a are also issued under 33 U.S.C. 1223

and 1231.

2. Section 110.159 is amended by

removing paragraph (a)(6) , by removing

‘‘(a)(3), (a)(5), and (a)(6)’’ in the note at

the end of paragraph (a) and adding in

its place ‘‘(a)(3), and (a)(5)’’and by

revising paragraph (a)(5) to read as

follows:

§ 110.159 Annapolis Harbor, Md.

(a) * * *

(5) Spa Creek Anchorage. In Spa

Creek, those waters bounded by a line

connecting the following points:

Latitude Longitude

38°58′37.3′′ N 76°28′48.1′′ W

36°58′36.1′′ N 76°28′57.8′′ W

38°58′31.6′′ N 76°29′03.3′′ W

38°58′26.7′′ N 76°28′59.5′′ W

Datum: NAD 83

* * * * *

Dated: May 16, 1995.

M.K. Cain,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting

Commander, fifth Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 95–12733 Filed 5–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD02–95–013]

RIN 2115–AA97

Safety Zone; Wolf River Chute,

Memphis, TN

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is

establishing a temporary safety zone on

the Wolf River Chute between mile

markers 0.0 and 1.0 in proximity of

Lower Mississippi River mile 735.0. The

zone is needed to control vessel traffic

during the USS WHIRLWIND’s

commissioning ceremony. Entry of

vessels or persons into this zone is

prohibited unless specifically

authorized by the Captain of the Port.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is

effective from 8 a.m. until 1 p.m. on July

1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LTJG Joel Roberts, Assistant Chief of

Port Operations, Coast Guard Captain of

the Port Memphis, 200 Jefferson

Avenue, Suite 1301, Memphis, TN,

38103, Phone: (901) 544–3941.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

At approximately 8 a.m. on July 1,

1995, the U.S. Navy will commence

preparations for the commissioning of

the USS WHIRLWIND on the Wolf River

Chute mile 0.5. The commissioning

ceremony will take place that morning

with a large contingency of public and

private spectators. The navigable

channel may be blocked by spectator

craft during the ceremony. A safety zone

is being established on the Wolf River

Chute from mile marker 0.0 to 1.0 in

order to ensure the safety of spectator

vessels observing the commissioning

ceremony. All vessels shall establish

passing arrangements with the Coast

Guard Patrol Commander on scene, or

via VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel

81, prior to transiting the zone and shall

abide by the conditions of the

arrangement. Entry of vessels or persons

into this zone without a passing

arrangement with the Coast Guard

Patrol Commander is prohibited except

as authorized by the Captain of the Port,

Memphis, TN.

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553, a

notice of proposed rulemaking was not

published for this regulation.

Publication of a notice of proposed

rulemaking would be contrary to the

public interest because immediate

action is necessary to control vessel

traffic in order to prevent vessel

collisions, loss of life and property

damage.

Regulatory Evaluation

This rule is not a significant

regulatory action under section 3(f) of

Executive Order 12866 and does not

require an assessment of potential costs

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that

order. It has not been reviewed by the

Office of Management and Budget under

that order. It is not significant under the

regulatory policies and procedures of

the Department of Transportation (DOT)

(44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979). The

Coast Guard expects the economic

impact of this proposal to be so minimal

that a full Regulatory Evaluation under

paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies

and procedures of DOT is unnecessary.

Collection of Information

This rule contains no information

collection requirements under the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.).

Federalism

The Coast Guard has analyzed this

rule under the principles and criteria

contained in Executive Order 12612 and

has determined that this rule does not

have sufficient federalism implications

to warrant the preparation of a

Federalism Assessment.

Environment

The Coast Guard considered the

environmental impact of this rule and

concluded that, under paragraph 2.B.2

of Commandant Instruction M16475.1B,

this rule is categorically excluded from

further environmental documentation.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 27697

requirements, Security measures,

Waterways.

Temporary Regulation

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, the Coast Guard amends Part

165 of Title 33, Code of Federal

Regulations as follows:

PART 165—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 165

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;

33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;

49 CFR 1.46.

2. A new temporary § 165.T02–013 is

added to read as follows:

§ 165.T02–013 Safety Zone; Wolf River

Chute, Memphis, TN.

(a) Location. The following area is a

Safety Zone: All waters within the

shoreline and boundaries of the Wolf

River Chute miles 0.0 to 1.0.

(b) Effective dates. This section

becomes effective at 8 a.m. on July 1,

1995, and terminates at 1 p.m. on July

1, 1995.

(c) Regulations. In accordance with

the general regulations in § 165.23, entry

into this zone is prohibited except as

authorized by the Captain of the Port.

The Captain of the Port will notify the

public of changes in the status of this

zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast

of VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22

(157.1 MHz).

Dated: May 4, 1995.

A.L. Thompson, Jr.,

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of

the Port Memphis.

[FR Doc. 95–12736 Filed 5–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–5209–7]

National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Contingency Plan;

National Priorities List Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of deletion of a site from

the National Priorities List.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of

Hamilton Island, located in Skamania

County, Washington from the National

Priorities List (NPL). The NPL is

Appendix B of the National Oil and

Hazardous Substances Pollution

Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA

promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of

the Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.

EPA and the State of Washington have

determined that no further cleanup

under CERCLA is appropriate.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 25, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Cora, Site Manager, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 10, 1200 6th Avenue, HW–124,

Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553–1148.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to

be deleted from the NPL is: Hamilton

Island, Skamania County, Washington.

A Notice of Intent to Delete for this

site was published April 12, 1995

Federal Register [Vol. 60, No. 70,

18565–18566]. The closing date for

comments on the Notice of Intent to

Delete was May 12, 1995. EPA received

no comments.

EPA identifies sites which appear to

present a significant risk to public

health, welfare, or the environment and

it maintains the NPL as the list of those

sites. Any site deleted from the NPL

remains eligible for remedial actions in

the unlikely event that conditions at the

site warrant such action in the future.

Deletion of a site from the NPL does not

affect responsible party liability or

impede Agency efforts to recover costs

associated with response efforts.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous

substances, Hazardous waste,

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Superfund, Water

pollution control, and Water supply.

Dated: May 16, 1995.

Chuck Clarke,

Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region 10.

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended

as follows:

PART 300—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 300

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.

9601–9657; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR,

1987 Comp., p. 193; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,

3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351.

Appendix B [Amended]

2. Table 2 of Appendix B to part 300

is amended by removing the site for

Hamilton Island Landfill (USA/COE),

North Bonneville, Washington.

[FR Doc. 95–12770 Filed 5–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

40 CFR Part 763

[OPPTS–62147; FRL–4957–3]

Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Clarification of interim final

rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is informing the general

public and the providers of asbestos

training courses approved pursuant to

Subchapter II of the Toxic Substances

Control Act (TSCA) of a clarification

regarding the training course selfcertification requirements of the

Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan

(MAP), Interim Final Rule. The Agency

recognizes upgraded training courses as

being self-certified as of the date upon

which EPA received the original selfcertification, even though one or more

approving state programs may not have

received a copy of the self-certification

until a later date, provided that all selfcertifications were received on or before

October 4, 1994. If EPA and all

approving state programs received a

proper self-certification for a course

from an approved training provider on

or before October 4, 1994, the provider

retains the approval for that course, and

a student who successfully completes a

course on or after the self-certification

date for that course will be fully

accredited. Consistent with this

clarification, EPA will adjust the selfcertification effective dates of affected

courses and publish these new dates in

its National Directory of AHERA

Accredited Courses (NDAAC). This

information will become publicly

available through the NDAAC update

scheduled for May 31, 1995.

DATES: This clarification affects MAP

training courses and persons accredited

pursuant to the MAP on or after April

4, 1994, when the MAP revisions took

effect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan B. Hazen, Director,

Environmental Assistance Division

(7408), Office of Pollution Prevention

and Toxics, Environmental Protection

Agency, Rm. E–543B, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554–1404,

TDD: (202) 554–0551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1994,

pursuant to a Congressional mandate in

Subchapter II of TSCA, EPA revised the

original MAP by increasing the

minimum number of training hours,

including hands-on training, required

for asbestos abatement workers in both

schools and pubic and commercial

buildings. In addition, EPA modified

the MAP to implement the extension of