alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of North Shore Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
March 10, 2009


/s/ Barry J. GordonName:
                  Barry
      J. GordonTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal
                    Executive
      Officer)





Date:
March 10, 2009


/s/ Marc H. KleeName:
            Marc H. KleeTitle:
            Chief Financial Officer (Principal
              Accounting Officer and Principal
              Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORETTA LITTLE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PFIZER INC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-01177-EMC 

RELATED TO

Case No. 14-cv-01195-EMC 

Case No. 14-cv-01196-EMC 

Case No. 14-cv-01204-EMC 

Case No. 14-cv-01488-EMC 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSES

TO PFIZER’S RESPONSE TO ORDER 

TO SHOW CAUSE

(Docket No. 135)

Previously, the Court ordered Pfizer to show cause as to why the Court should not remand 

the instant case and related cases back to state court. The Court also stated that Plaintiffs could 

file a response to Pfizer’s brief.

In accordance with the above, Pfizer filed a response to the order to show cause (which 

McKesson joined). Plaintiffs then filed their responses to Pfizer’s brief. Plaintiffs’ responses

simply incorporate by reference the two orders issued by Judge Carney of the Central District of 

California and briefs filed by Plaintiffs in conjunction with Judge Carney’s cases (both at the trial 

and appellate level). The Court hereby strikes Plaintiffs’ filings. Incorporating by reference 

hundreds of pages is not a true, substantive response to Pfizer’s current brief. Plaintiffs have leave 

to file a substantive response to Pfizer’s current brief within three days of the date of this order.

///

///
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

Plaintiffs’ response shall be no longer than twenty-five (25) pages. The Court strongly prefers that 

Plaintiffs in the above and related cases file a joint brief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2017

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KN/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLENDA YAMILETH GUTIERREZ DE

LA O, a.k.a. Glenda Y Gutierrez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72855

Agency No. A094-330-199

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Glenda Yamileth Gutierrez De La O (“Gutierrez”), a native and citizen of

Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her

FILED

FEB 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KN/Research 2 07-72855

application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502

U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992), we deny the petition for review.

The agency denied Gutierrez’s asylum claim as time-barred and denied her

withholding of removal claim based on an adverse credibility determination. 

Gutierrez, who is counseled, does not raise any arguments in her opening brief

challenging the BIA’s time-bar finding or its adverse credibility determination. 

See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

supported by argument are deemed waived). Accordingly, we deny her petition for

review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Por lo general, las mujeres se ocupan de sus

medicamentos y de los de toda la familia. 

Por eso, es importante leer las etiquetas, 

evitar problemas, hacer preguntas y llevar 

un registro.

1. LEA LA ETIQUETA

Antes de tomar cualquier medicamento 

lea la etiqueta. La etiqueta debe indicar lo

siguiente:

Lista de ingredientes: Si sabe que es 

alérgica a cualquiera de los ingredientes, no

use el medicamento. Pídale a su médico o 

farmacéutico que le recete otro.

Advertencias: Léalas con mucho

cuidado.

2. EVITE PROBLEMA

Los medicamentos pueden 

o efectos secundarios, com

vómitos, sangrado, dolore

erupciones de la piel. Preg

los efectos secundarios de 

mentos que toma. Hable c

farmacéutico o enfermera

Para evitar estos problem

que:

• mantenga los medicamen

• tome el medicamento en 

 y la frecuencia indicadas 

 instrucciones del médico

• no comparta los medica

 sirve para una persona pu

 para otra); y

• nunca tome medicamento

todas las organizaciones participantes que 

han contribuido a su reproducción y 

distribución.

http://www.fda.gov/womens

Salud De La Mujer:

Tiempo Para Cuidar

Su Salud

por usted... y por los que la necesitan
 Medicamentos para alergias

 Antiácidos

 

 Medicamentos para resfriados

 Medicamentos para la tos

 Píldoras para adelgazar

 Laxantes

 Píldoras para dormir

 

 Vitaminas

 Minerales

 Hierbas medicinales

 Otros

 alcohólicas?

• Si me olvido de tomarlo, ¿qué hago?

• ¿Cuánto debo tomar?

• ¿Por cuánto tiempo tengo que tomarlo?

• ¿Hay problemas que deba prever?

Si está embarazada o amamantando a su bebé, 

pídale consejo a un profesional de la salud 

antes de tomar cualquier medicamento o 

suplemento vitamínico. Hable con su médico,

farmaceútico o enfermera. Ellos le ayudarán 

con agrado.

Alergias (haga una lista)

Médico

Teléfono

GUARDE ESTA LISTA EN SU CARTERA Y ENSÉÑELA A SU MÉDICO, FARMACÉU

ENFERMERA.

Pídale a su médico, farmaceútico, o enfermera que informe sobre problemas grave

los medicamentos a la FDA al 1-800-332-1088.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David William TEREAULT, Appellant.

No. 03-2075.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2004.

Decided May 5, 2004.

*431Christian S. Wilton, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David William Tereault, Waseca, MN, pro se.

Robert D. Miller, Robert D. Miller & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David William Tereault pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute Roxanol (morphine), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(C). The district court1 sentenced him to 168 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Mr. Tereault has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

After careful review, we find no merit in counsel’s argument that the court should have used the weight of actual morphine in determining the base offense level instead of using the entire weight of the Roxanol solution. *See United States v. Young,*992 F.2d 207, 209 (8th Cir.1993).

The arguments Mr. Tereault raises are also unavailing. First, his ineffective-assistance claims are not properly before us. *See United States v. Jackson,*204 F.3d 812, 815 (8th Cir.2000). Next, the district court adequately informed Mr. Tereault of, and assured he understood, the nature of the conspiracy charge, and adequately elicited a factual basis for the plea. *See United States v. Rea,*300 F.3d 952, 958 (8th Cir.2002) (factual basis supporting guilty plea exists where there is sufficient evidence to allow district court to be subjectively satisfied that defendant committed offense); *United States v. Marks,*38 F.3d 1009, 1011 (8th Cir.1994) (where appellant argued trial court failed to inform him of nature of charge, question was whether under totality of circumstances appellant understood nature of charge), *cert. denied,*514 U.S. 1067, 115 S.Ct. 1700, 131 L.Ed.2d 562 (1995). Further, Mr. Tereault’s acknowledgment at the plea hearing that he and his cohorts split up the Roxanol after they obtained it, and that he gave his share to other people and traded it for things, sufficiently established a conspiracy to distribute. *See United States v. Hester,*140 F.3d 753, 760-61 (8th Cir. 1998). Finally, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 does not require the district court to state explicitly that it accepts a guilty plea.

Having found no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
COURT OF APPEALS 

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-17-00460-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L., 

A CHILD 

---------- 

FROM THE 233RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NO. 233-614335-17 

---------- 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

---------- 

D.R. (Mother) attempts to appeal from the “Temporary Orders” entered in a 

suit affecting the parent-child relationship. On January 2, 2018, we notified the 

parties that we were concerned that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal because 

the “Temporary Orders” did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable 

interlocutory order. We informed them that we could dismiss the appeal for want 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 
2 

of jurisdiction unless Mother or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a 

response on or before January 12, 2018, showing grounds for continuing the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. Mother filed a response 

acknowledging that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. 

We have jurisdiction to consider appeals only from final judgments or from 

interlocutory orders made immediately appealable by statute. See Bally Total 

Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Lehman v. Har-Con 

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Temporary orders entered in suits 

affecting the parent-child relationship are not appealable interlocutory orders. 

See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e) (West 2014); Hubert v. Hubert, No. 01-

11-00438-CV, 2012 WL 4739952, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st District] Oct. 4, 

2012, no pet.) (mem. op) (noting that section 105.001(e) “expressly precludes an 

interlocutory appeal from a temporary order in a suit affecting the parent-child 

relationship”); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (West 

Supp. 2017) (listing types of appealable interlocutory orders). Because the 

“Temporary Orders” are neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory 

order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 

43.2(f); Hubert, 2012 WL 4739952, at *1 (dismissing appeal from temporary 

orders for want of jurisdiction). 
3 

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr 

ELIZABETH KERR 

JUSTICE 

PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ. 

DELIVERED: February 15, 2018
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. R OB ER T EAR

L C UNNINGHAM , De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt. No. 14-30259

D.C . No. 3:13-c r-00122-SLG
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ala ska Sharon L. Gle a son, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 27, 2016 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , SILVER M AN, a nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. R obe rt Ea rl C unningha

m a p pe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd
c ha lle nge s the 600-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for six c ounts of se xu a l e xploita tion of a c hild, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C
.



# FIL ED OCT 04 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§§ 2251(a), (b), an d (e ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we
a ffirm
. C unningha

m c onte nds tha

t the se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

b le . The distric t c o urt did not a

buse its disc re tion in im

posing C unningha

m ’ s se nte nc e . Se e Gall v . Unite d State

s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The a bove -Guide line s se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) fa c tors a nd the tota lity of the c irc um sta

n c e s, inc luding thenature of the offe nse an d the ne e d to prote c t the public
. Se e G all , 552 U.S. a t 51. AFFIRM E D.

1 4
- 3 0 2 5 9 2
Exhibit
3.1





ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION OF


PURAMED
BIOSCIENCE, INC





For the
purpose of forming a corporation under Chapter 302A of Minnesota Statutes, the
following articles of incorporation are hereby adopted:





ARTICLE
I





The name
of this corporation is PuraMed Bioscience, Inc.





ARTICLE
II





The
registered office of this corporation in the State of Minnesota, County of
Hennepin, is 9372 Creekwood Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347.





ARTICLE
III





This
corporation shall have the authority to issue up to an aggregate total of forty
five million (45,000,000) shares of capital stock, $.001 par value, and five
million (5,000,000) shares of undesignated stock.





ARTICLE
IV





The name
and address of the incorporator of this corporation is Robert O. Knutson, 9372
Creekwood Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347.





ARTICLE
V





There
shall be no cumulative voting by the holders of common stock for the election of
directors or any other matter.





ARTICLE
VI





The
holders of capital stock of this corporation shall have no preemptive rights to
subscribe for or otherwise acquire any new or additional shares of stock of this
corporation of any class whether now authorized or authorized hereafter, or any
options or warrants or other derivative rights to purchase or otherwise acquire
any new or additional shares of any class of capital stock.





ARTICLE
VII





This
corporation shall indemnify all of its officers and directors against any
liability asserted against them and incurred in any capacity related to their
status or position as a director or officer to the fullest extent permissible
under the provisions of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, as now enacted
or hereafter amended.





In
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned incorporator has executed these Articles of
Incorporation on the 9th day of
May, 2006.





/s/ Robert O.
Knutson_________





(SEAL)                      Mary
Kiffmeyer


Minnesota Secretary of State Business
Services


Retirement Systems of Minnesota
Building


60 Empire Drive Ste 100


St. Paul, MN 55103





On May 9,
2006, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert O. Knutson, to me
known to be the person named as Incorporator, and who executed the foregoing
document and acknowledged he executed the same as his free act and
deed.





/s/ Rachel E.
Julius____________


Rachel E. Julius


Notary Public
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

January 28, 2004


Hollingsworth 2000 Children's Trust
950 Echo Lane, Suite 100
Houston, TX 77024

Mr. and Mrs. B. B. Hollingsworth, Jr.
3416 Ella Lee Lane
Houston, Texas 77027


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         As you know, on January 23, 2002, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (the
"Company") entered into a Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement with Leslie
Hollingsworth and Leigh Hollingsworth Copeland, as Trustees of the Hollingsworth
2000 Children's Trust (the "Arrangement"). When it was entered into, the Company
and the other parties thereto understood the Arrangement to constitute the
Company's legally binding commitment to pay the entire premium in annual
payments (the "Premium Payments") beginning in 2002 through 2008 on the split
dollar life insurance policy referred to in the Arrangement.

         In accordance with the Arrangement, the Company paid the entire
$299,697 premium due on the split dollar life insurance policy for 2002 with a
payment made in January 2002 and a second payment made in April 2002. At this
time, due to the uncertainty surrounding the applicability of Section 402 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to split dollar life insurance arrangements,
including ones that were implemented prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act on July 30, 2002, the Company believes that it is in the best interest of
both the Company and you to continue to defer the Company's obligation to pay
the Premium Payments required under the Arrangement for 2003 and 2004.
Accordingly, with the consent of each of you (as acknowledged below), the
Company's obligation to pay the Premium Payments due in 2003 and 2004 is
deferred until January 2005 or such earlier time as we have mutually determined
that such payments are not prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This letter is
not in any way intended to (i) amend or limit your rights, the rights of the
Trust or the rights of the Company under the Arrangement or (ii) modify the
terms of the Arrangement in any way.

                                         Sincerely yours,

                                         /s/ Michael J. Poppe
                                         --------------------
                                         Michael J. Poppe,
                                         Vice President and Corporate Controller



<PAGE>


The foregoing is accepted and agreed to
as of the date first above written:


/s/ B. B. Hollingsworth, Jr.
----------------------------
B. B. Hollingsworth, Jr., Employee


/s/ Starlett W. Hollingsworth
-----------------------------
Starlett W. Hollingsworth


Hollingsworth 2000 Children's Trust

/s/ Leslie Hollingsworth
------------------------
By:  Leslie Hollingsworth, as Trustee

/s/ Leigh Hollingsworth Copeland
--------------------------------
By:  Leigh Hollingsworth Copeland, as Trustee
Jesus Sanchez LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10277.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Curtis Lee MACK, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-1880

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

Michael Graves, Public Defender, and Joshua Woodard, Assistant Public Defender, Ocala, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the March 11, 2019 judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2018-CF-1487, in the Circuit Court in *828and for Marion County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.43

                              [Company Letterhead]

January 21, 2004


                                LETTER AGREEMENT

Marian Sanfilippo, Trustee
Jeffrey T. Sanfilippo Irrv Trust Agreement Dated 10/08/96
2299 Busse Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007


        In connection with a public offering of the Common Stock of John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (the "Company"), you have indicated a desire to include
in such offering 111,200 shares of the Common Stock of the Company owned or
controlled by you, plus an additional number of shares to be determined pursuant
to the underwriters' over-allotment option. All such shares you wish to include
in the public offering are presently held in the form of Class A Common Stock of
the Company ("Class A Stock") and would have to be converted into shares of
Common Stock to be included in the offering.

        By signing this Letter Agreement, you agree that, simultaneously upon
the purchase of the Company Common Stock by the underwriters in connection with
the public offering, you shall convert into shares of Company Common Stock (1)
111,200 shares of Class A Stock, plus (2) the number of shares of your Class A
Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock the underwriters
elect to purchase from you pursuant to their over-allotment option.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you and the Company agree that such conversion
will not in any way be deemed effective (including, without limitation, for
purposes of Part 4 of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation)
unless the underwriters purchase our Common Stock. If the underwriters do not
purchase your shares, none of your Class A Stock shall have been converted
pursuant hereto.

        Under no circumstances shall this Letter Agreement be deemed to
constitute a written notice of conversion under Part 4(f) of the Company's
Restated Certificate of Incorporation.


                            Very truly yours,

                            /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE

                            Michael J. Valentine
                            John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
                            Executive Vice President Finance, Chief
                               Financial Officer and Secretary





                                            /s/ MARIAN SANFILIPPO
                               ---------------------------------------------
                                  Marian Sanfilippo, Trustee of the Jeffrey T.
                                   Sanfilippo Irrv Trust Agreement Dated
                                                   10/08/96