Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices 3853

292.207(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations and Section 3(17)(E) of the

Federal Power Act. No determination

has been made that the submittal

constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the small

power production facility, which is

located in Chester, Pennsylvania,

consists of a fluidized bed boiler and a

steam turbine generator. The maximum

net electric power production capacity

of the facility will now be

approximately 52 MW. The primary

energy source of the facility will now be

waste in the form of petroleum coke and

anthracite culm. In Docket No. QF86–

557–000, the facility was granted

certification as a cogeneration facility

with a power production capacity of

55.2 MW. Thermal energy from the

facility was to be used for paper drying

purposes [35 FERC ¶ 62,326 (1986)].

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Prairie Wind Energy Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF95–198–000]

On December 30, 1994, Prairie Wind

Energy Partners, L.P. (Applicant), c/o

Prairie Wind Energy, Inc., 1221 Nicollet

Mall, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN

55403, submitted for filing an

application for certification of a facility

as a small power production facility

pursuant to Section 292.207(b) of the

Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the small

power production facility will be

located at Buffalo Ridge near Lake

Benton, Minnesota, and will consist of

approximately 167 turbines, a 34.5 Kv

switchyard and related interconnection

equipment. The maximum net power

production capacity of the facility will

be approximately 80 MW. The primary

energy source will be wind. The

installation of the facility is scheduled

to begin in late 1995.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1297 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER95–72–000, et al.]

Power Exchange Corp., et al.; Electric

Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

January 11, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Power Exchange Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–72–000]

Take notice that on December 20,

1994, Power Exchange Corporation

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Kimball Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–232–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Kimball Power Company tendered

for filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Public Service Co. of New Hampshire

[Docket No. ER95–366–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Hampshire (PSNH), tendered for filing

materials to reduce rates under the Total

Requirements Resale Service Agreement

between PSNH and Citizens Utilities

Company (Citizens). PSNH has

requested an effective date for the rate

reduction of November 1, 1994.

PSNH states that rate reduction relates

to reduced charges for post-retirement

benefits other than pensions. PSNH

further states that a copy of the filing

was served on Citizens.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Public Service Company of New

Mexico

[Docket No. ER95–368–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Mexico (PNM), tendered for filing a

Notice of Continuation of Service Under

Expiring Hazard Sharing Agreement (the

Notice). Under the Notice, PNM agrees

to continue in effect, on a month-tomonth basis (terminable subject to the

requirements of Section 35.15 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations, 18

CFR 35.15), by either party upon three

(3) months notice, those hazard sharing

services presently provided to Plains

Electric Generation and Transmission

Cooperative, Inc. (Plains) pursuant to

Service Schedule J to the PNM/Plains

Master Interconnection Agreement

(Supplement 36 to PNM Rate Schedule

FPC No. 31), which services would

otherwise terminate on January 1, 1995.

PNM requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements to

permit the Notice to be effective for

service rendered on and after January 2,

1995.

Copies of the Notice have been mailed

to Plains and the New Mexico Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Public Service Company of New

Hampshire

[Docket No. ER95–369–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of New

Hampshire (PNSH), tendered for filing

changes to rates and amendments (the

Amendments) to rate schedules with

each of its following wholesale

requirements customers (the

Customers); The Town of Ashland, New

Hampshire (Electric Light Department),

and the New Hampshire Electric

Cooperative, Inc. (the NHEC). PSNH

states that the submitted materials,

when permitted to become effective,

would decrease two separate

components of rates to the Customers,

one component reflected in the

Amendments and the other to reflect

reduced accruals for post-retirement

benefits other than pensions (PBOPs).

PSNH further states that the component

of the rate reduction contained in the

Amendments flows through to the

Customers the savings that will result

from settlements recently reached

between PSNH and two New Hampshire

independent power producers.

PNSH has requested that the rate

reduction for decreased PBOP costs be

permitted to become effective November

1, 1994, and that the Amendments be

permitted to become effective January 1,

1995. It states that copies of the filing

were served on each of the Customers

and the New Hampshire Public Utilities

Commission, which is the only State

Commission within whose jurisdiction
3854 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Notices

the Customers distribute and sell

electric energy at retail.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Public Service Company of Colorado

[Docket No. ER95–370–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Public Service Company of

Colorado (Public Service), filed the

Midway Facilities Service Agreement

Between Public Service Company of

Colorado and Tri-State Generation and

Transmission Association, Inc., dated

December 21, 1994 (Midway Facilities

Agreement).

Under the Midway Facilities

Agreement, Public Service will provide

Tri-State Generation and Transmission

Association, Inc. (Tri-State), with 55

MW of firm capacity in its Midway

Facilities, which consist of its Midway

Transmission Substation, including a

100 MVA, 230/115 Kv auto-transformer,

and associated 230 Kv and 115 Kv

power circuit breakers, switches and

bus work. Public Service requests an

effective date of April 15, 1992, and

requests waiver of the notice

requirements, for good cause shown.

Public Service states that copies of the

filing were served on Tri-State, its

customer, the Colorado Public Utilities

Commission, and the Office of

Consumer Counsel.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Commonwealth Edison Co.

[Docket Nos. ER95–371–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd), tendered for filing a Firm

Transmission Service Tariff FTS–1 and

a Network Services Tariff NTS–1. By

these Tariffs, ComEd offers to provide

firm flexible point-to-point transmission

service and network transmission

service. The FTS–1 Tariff supersedes in

its entirety ComEd’s TS–1 Tariff

currently on file, subject to refund, and

set for hearing in Docket No. ER93–777–

000. ComEd asks that this filing be

consolidated with Docket No. ER93–

777–000.

ComEd asks for an effective date of

February 28, 1995, for the FTS–1 and

NTS–1 Tariffs. ComEd has served copies

of the filing on the Illinois Commerce

Commission and all parties to Docket

No. ER93–777–000. A copy of the filing

is also available for public inspection at

ComEd’s offices in Chicago, Illinois.

Comment date: January 27, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–372–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light

Company (Fitchburg), filed a service

agreement between Fitchburg and Green

Mountain Power Corporation (Green

Mountain). The service agreement

provides for the sale by Fitchburg of

capacity and associated energy. Also

submitted is a notice of cancellation for

this service agreement. This is a service

agreement under Fitchburg’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2,

which was accepted for filing in Docket

No. ER92–88–000, and is governed by

that tariff. Fitchburg requests an

effective date of January 1, 1995, and

seeks waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements for good cause shown.

Fitchburg states that copies of the

filing were served on Green Mountain

Power and the Massachusetts

Department of Public Utilities.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Boston Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–373–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Boston Edison Company (Boston

Edison), of Boston, Massachusetts, in

connection with its adoption of

Financial Accounting Standards No. 106

to recognize Postretirement Benefits

Other than Pensions (PBOP) on an

accrual basis, tendered for filing rate

schedule supplements to its following

contracts for the sale of power from the

Pilgrim nuclear power plant.

Utility

Rate

schedule No.

Entitlement (in

percent)

Commonwealth Electric

Co .............................. 68 11.00000

Montaup Electric Co ..... 69 11.00000

Boylston ........................ 77 .07463

Holyoke ......................... 79 .89552

Westfield ....................... 81 .22388

Hudson .......................... 83 .37313

Littleton ......................... 85 .14925

Marbelhead ................... 87 .14925

North Attleboro .............. 89 .14925

Peabody ........................ 91 .22388

Shrewsbury ................... 93 .37313

Templeton ..................... 95 .04478

Wakefield ...................... 97 .14925

West Boylston ............... 99 .07463

Middleborough .............. 102 .10448

Reading ......................... 113 .74627

The supplements ask the Commission

for permission (i) to use the 1993

$27,788,000 and 1994 $24,993,000

actuarially determined PBOP costs for

purposes of its contract billings in those

years; (ii) to use the 1994 cost on an

interim basis for 1995 contract year

billing until the 1995 actuarial study is

available; (iii) to use 1993–1995 phasein amounts derived from a Boston

Edison settlement before the

Massachusetts Department of Public

Utilities (MDPU); and (iv) to create a

regulatory asset to be amortized in

future years based on the Pilgrim

customers’ share of 1993–1995 PBOP

costs which is not recovered as an

expense or capitalized as part of the cost

of plant under construction.

Boston Edison states that it has served

the filing on each affected customer and

on the MDPU.

Comment date: January 25, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–1238 Filed 1–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project 6939–059; West Virginia]

City of Jackson, Ohio and Certain Ohio

Municipalities; Notice of Availability of

Draft Environmental Assessment

January 12, 1995.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission’s)

Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order

486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Commission’s

Office of Hydropower Licensing has

reviewed a non-capacity related

amendment of license for the Belleville

Hydroelectric Project, No. 6939–059.

The Belleville Hydroelectric Project is

located on the Ohio River in Wood

county, West Virginia. The application

is for the construction of a 138–Kilovolt

transmission in Rutland, Ohio. A Draft