25900 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Madison Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–957–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Madison Gas and Electric Company

(MGE), tendered for filing a service

agreement with LG&E Power Marketing,

Inc., under MGE’s Power Sales Tariff.

MGE requests an effective date 60 days

from the filing date.

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Madison Gas and Electric Company

Docket No. [ER95–958–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Madison Gas and Electric Company

(MGE), tendered for filing a service

agreement with Cenergy, Inc., under

MGE’s Power Sales Tariff. MGE requests

an effective date 60 days from the filing

date.

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Consumers Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–959–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Consumers Power Company

(Consumers) tendered for filing a

Transmission Service Agreement with

Alpena Power Company. The filed

Service Agreement makes available

Short-Term Non-Firm transmission

service. A copy of the filing was served

upon Alpena Power Company and the

Michigan Public Service Commission.

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Northern States Power Company

(Minnesota)

[Docket No. ER95–960–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Northern States Power Company

(Minnesota) (NSP) tendered for filing

the Construction Agreement between

NSP and the City of New Ulm (New

Ulm) dated April 11, 1995. This

agreement allows NSP to replace the

existing 4/0 ACSR sections of conductor

between the switch structure at the New

Ulm North Side Substation Tap and the

Fort Ridgely Substation (1.5 miles) with

336 26/7 ACSR.

NSP requests that the Commission

accept for filing this agreement effective

as of July 31, 1995. NSP requests that

the Agreement be accepted as a

supplement to Rate Schedule No. 398,

the rate schedule for previously filed

agreement between NSP and New Ulm.

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Green Mountain Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–978–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Green Mountain Power Corporation

(GMP) tendered for filing a revised

definition of ‘‘Additional Charges’’

contained in its FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 2 (‘‘Opportunity

Transactions Tariff’’) to provide

expressly for recovery under

appropriate circumstances of one mill

per kilowatt-hour to compensate for

difficult-to-quantify costs. GMP has

requested waiver of the Commission’s

Regulations to the extent necessary to

permit the change to become effective as

of May 1, 1995.

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. York County Energy Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF95–229–000]

On April 27, 1995, York County

Energy Partners, L.P. (York County)

tendered for filing an amendment to its

filing in this docket.

The amendment pertains to

information relating to the technical

aspects of York County’s cogeneration

facility. No determination has been

made that the submittal constitutes a

complete filing.

Comment date: May 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11865 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. ER95–976–000, et al.]

Southern Energy Marketing, Inc., et al.,

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

May 8, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Southern Energy Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–976–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Southern Energy Marketing, Inc. (SEMI)

filed an application with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission

requesting acceptance of SEMI’s

proposed Rate Schedule No. 1,

authorizing market-based rates, waiver

of certain Commission Regulations, and

the granting of certain blanket

approvals. Consistent with these

requests, SEMI seeks authority to engage

in the business of power marketing and

brokering and to sell power at marketbased rates.

SEMI is a subsidiary of The Southern

Company (Southern), a registered

holding company under the Public

Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.

SEMI is also an associate company of

Southern’s electric utility operating

companies: Alabama Power Company,

Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power

Company, Mississippi Power Company,

and Savannah Electric and Power

Company.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–910–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995, New

England Power Company tendered an

amendment to its filing in this docket.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Public Service Company of New

Mexico

[Docket No. ER95–965–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Public Service Company of New Mexico

(PNM) tendered for filing a Notice of

Termination of Service Schedule B

(Economy Energy Brokerage) and C

(Power Exchange) to the interconnection

Agreement PNM and M–S–R Public

Power Agency (‘‘M–S–R’’). Termination

of Service Schedules B and C is to be

effective as of April 30, 1995. PNM

requests waiver of the applicable

requirements.

Copies of the Notice of Termination

have been served upon M–S–R and the

New Mexico Public Utility Commission.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25901

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER95–970–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

PECO Energy Company (PECO)

tendered for filing an Agreement

between PECO and Pennsylvania Power

& Light Company (PL) dated April 17,

1995.

PECO states that the Agreement sets

forth the terms and conditions for the

sale of system energy which it expects

to have available for sale from time to

time and the purchase of which will be

economically advantageous to PL. In

order to optimize the economic

advantage to both PECO and PL, PECO

requests that the Commission waive its

customary notice period and permit the

agreement to become effective on April

28, 1995.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to PL and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–972–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Duke Power Company (Duke) tendered

for filing with the Commission

Supplement No. 8 to Supplement No. 24

to the Interchange Agreement between

Duke and Carolina Power & Light

Company (CP&L) dated June 1, 1961, as

amended (Interchange Agreement).

Supplement No. 8 changes Duke’s

monthly transmission capacity rate

under the Interchange Agreement from

$1,1409 per KW per month to $1.0908

per KW per month. Duke has proposed

an effective date of July 1, 1995, for the

revised charge.

Copies of this filing were mailed to

Carolina Power & Light Company, the

North Carolina Utilities Commission,

and the South Carolina Public Service

Commission.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. NewCorp Resources, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–973–000]

Take notice that NewCorp Resources,

Inc., (NCR), on April 28, 1995, tendered

for filing as an initial rate a Tariff for

Electric Service (Tariff).

NCR also filed a Service Agreement

and Supplement Agreement between

NCR and Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,

Inc., (Cap Rock) pursuant to which NCR

will provide wholesale firm full

requirements service to Cap Rock under

the Tariff for load located outside the

Electric Reliability Council of Texas.

NCR also requests waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations to permit the

Tariff and related agreements with Cap

Rock to become effective on May 1,

1995.

Rate Schedule WP included in the

Tariff is a formulary rate designed to

recover NCR’s cost of service by means

of periodic adjustment without further

application to the Commission. The rate

is developed using comprehensive cost

of service formula, also included in the

Tariff. The formula provides for

recovery of costs as defined and

functionalized by the Uniform System

of Accounts.

NCR has served copies of its filing on

the Cap Rock and the Public Utility

Commission of Texas.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Wisconsin Power and Light Company

[Docket No. ER95–974–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Wisconsin Power and Light Company

(WP&L) tendered for filing a signed

Service Agreement under WP&L’s Bulk

Power Tariff between itself and Cenergy,

Inc. WP&L respectfully requests a

waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements, and an effective date of

April 12, 1995.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER95–975–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

PECO Energy Company (PECO)

tendered for filing an Agreement

between PECO and Baltimore Gas and

Electric Company (BGE) dated March

24, 1995.

PECO states that the Agreement sets

forth the terms and conditions for the

sale of system energy which it expects

to have available for sale from time to

time and the purchase of which will be

economically advantageous to BGE. In

order to optimize the economic

advantage to both PECO and BGE, PECO

requests that the Commission waive its

customary notice period and permit the

agreement to become effective on May 1,

1995.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to BGE and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF89–274–012]

On April 25, 1995, Selkirk Cogen

Partners, L.P. (Applicant), submitted for

filing an amendment to its filing in this

docket.

The amendment provides additional

information pertaining to the ownership

of its cogeneration facility. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

Comment date: May 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Northern States Power Company

(Minnesota)

[Docket No. ER95–977–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Northern States Power Company

(Minnesota) (NSP) tendered for filing

Notice of Termination of Resale Electric

Service Agreements for the cities of

Anoka, Arlington, Brownton, Chaska,

North St. Paul, Shakopee and Winthrop.

Each of these cities tendered a Notice of

Termination effective July 1, 1995 (July

18, 1995 for the City of Shakopee) after

which each cities electrical

requirements will be provided by the

Minnesota Municipal Power Agency.

Comment date: May 22, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers

Cooperative, Inc.

[Docket No. ES95–31–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Oregon Trail Electric Consumers

Cooperative, Inc. (Oregon Trail) filed an

application under § 204 of the Federal

Power Act seeking authorization to

enter into and borrow funds under a

two-year, $5 million line-of-credit

agreement. Under the agreement,

Oregon Trail will be obligated to repay

any advances with interest within 360

days of the advance. Also, Oregon Trail

requests exemption from the

Commission’s competitive bidding and

negotiated placement regulations.

Comment date: May 31, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the
25902 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices

1Transwestern states that the Lefors compressor

station was originally proposed to be abandoned in

Docket No. CP94–751–000, as amended. However,

since the Lefors compressor station is now being

sold to NGC, Transwestern states that it has

amended Docket No. CP94–751–000 by removing

the compressor facilities from the abandonment

proceeding.

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11864 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–112–001, et al.]

Transwestern Gathering Company, et

al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings

May 9, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Transwestern Gathering Company

[Docket No. CP95–112–001]

Take notice that on December 5, 1994,

Transwestern Gathering Company

(TGC), P.O. Box 1188, Houston, Texas

77251–1188, filed in Docket No. CP95–

112–001 an amendment (Amendment)

to its original petition for an order

declaring that upon the completion of

the acquisition by TGC of certain

gathering and processing facilities from

Transwestern Pipeline Company

(Transwestern), such facilities will be

exempt from the Commission’s

jurisdiction.

It is stated that in response to a June

7, 1994, data request from the

Commission in the refunctionalization

proceeding in Docket No. CP94–254–

000, Transwestern conducted an indepth review and analysis of each

facility in its entire system, resulting in

a different functionalization of the

facilities from that originally filed. It is

stated that the response was filed

September 6, 1994.

On October 3, 1994, Transwestern

supplemented its data response by

making some substantial, but mostly

miscellaneous corrections and revisions

to the refunctionalization of facilities. It

is stated that on November 14, 1994,

Transwestern again supplemented its

data response with a summary on its

proposed adjustments to plant and

depreciation resulting from the

refunctionalization proposed in the data

response.

Also on November 14, 1994,

Transwestern filed an application in

Docket No. CP95–70–000 proposing to

spindown certain compression, plants,

metering, dehydration and pipeline

facilities, along with certain agreements

and services, by transfer to TGC.

Essentially, Transwestern proposed to

spindown to TGC all of its facilities

functionalized as gathering in the

refunctionalization proceeding.

On December 5, 1994, TGC filed its

Petition for Declaratory Order in Docket

No. CP95–112–000 seeking the

Commission to declare that upon

completion of the acquisition by TGC of

the facilities being spun down from

Transwestern, such facilities and the

services provided through them would

be exempt from Commission

jurisdiction.

It is stated that concurrently,

Transwestern has filed an amendment

to its application in Docket No. CP95–

70–000 to spindown certain facilities.

Because the facilities addressed in

Transwestern’s amendment are the same

facilities which will be transferred to

TGC by Transwestern, TGC proposes to

incorporate by reference the exhibits to

Transwestern’s amendment, and

requests the same revisions and

corrections be made in the instant

docket.

Comment date: May 30, 1995, in

accordance with the first paragraph of

Standard Paragraph F at the end of this

notice.

2. Transwestern Pipeline Company

[Docket No. CP95–378–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Transwestern Pipeline Company

(Transwestern), Post Office Box 1188,

Houston, Texas 77251–1188 filed an

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act for permission and

approval to abandon certain facilities

located in its Lefors transmission system

by sale to NGC Intrastate Pipeline

Company (NGC), all as more fully set

forth in the application which is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Under a Sale Agreement dated April

27, 1995, Transwestern agreed to sell to

NGC certain facilities in the Lefors

transmission system of a price of

$525,000. Transwestern proposes to sell

to NGC the Lefors compressor station 1

consisting of five compressors with a

total horsepower of 8,600 and

appurtenant facilities, 6.5 miles of 10-

inch pipeline, 17.4 miles of 8-inch

pipeline and two delivery points—the

City of Lefors 2-inch meter station and

the Westar Transmission Company

(Westar) Gray 4-inch interconnection,

all located in Gray and Wheeler

Counties, Texas. Transwestern also

seeks authorization to abandon by

reconveyance to GPM Gas Corporation

(GPM), successor in interest to Phillips

Petroleum Company (Phillips), 6 miles

of 16-inch pipeline located in Gray

County, Texas, pursuant to an exchange

agreement dated September 18, 1972.

In addition, Transwestern seeks

abandonment of the FTS–2

Transportation Service Agreement dated

March 8, 1993 between Transwestern

and the City of Lefors.

Comment date: May 30, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–482–000]

Take notice that on May 3, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314,

filed in Docket No. CP95–482–000 a

request pursuant to Sections 157.205

and 157.211 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for

authorization to construct and operate a

delivery point in Northampton County,

Pennsylvania under Columbia’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP83–

76–000 pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

Columbia proposes to construct a new

delivery point consisting of a 12-inch

tap, separation equipment, electronic

measurement, and approximately 200

feet of 16-inch pipeline that will

provide interruptible transportation

service for Pennsylvania Power and

Light Company.

Comment date: June 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

4. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation, Columbia Gulf

Transmission Company, and

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–485–000]

Take notice that on May 4, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia Gas), formerly United Fuel

Gas Company, 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

SE., Charleston, West Virginia 25314–

1599, Columbia Gulf Transmission

Company (Columbia Gulf), 1700

MacCorkle Avenue, SE., Charleston,

West Virginia 25314–1599, and

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line