alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11862]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-581-000]


Tennessee Power Co.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 10, 1995.
    On February 8 and March 13, 1995, Tennessee Power Company (TPCO) 
submitted for filing a rate schedule under which TPCO will engage in 
wholesale electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. TPCO 
also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
TPCO requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR 
Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by TPCO.
    On April 28, 1995, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by TPCO should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, TPCO is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of TPCO's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 30, 1995.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, Room 3308, 941 North Capitol 
Street NE., Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11862 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1605

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude 

communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005

Mr. HENSARLING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

exclude communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PUBLIC 

4 COMMUNICATION. 

5 Paragraph (22) of section 301 of the Federal Elec6 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(22)) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Such 

8 term shall not include communications over the Internet.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Jeff Peterson, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period December 31, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated:  March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Jeff PetersonJeff PetersonChief Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2202, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signal original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

| |  | Date: March 28, 2008                                                                      
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JAMES J. MCCARTHYJames J. McCarthy Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1535 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1535

  To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic synthetic 
                             filament tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic synthetic 
                             filament tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC FILAMENT TOW.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.41       Synthetic          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         filament tow:                                                      31/2008
                         acrylic or
                         modacrylic
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         5501.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is 

not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

04-7112 

FRANK L. HENDERSON, 

 Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

 Respondent-Appellee. 

 __________________________ 

 DECIDED: January 14, 2005 

 __________________________ 

Before NEWMAN, MAYER*, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

Frank L. Henderson (“Henderson”) appeals the judgment of the Court of Appeals 

for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”), which affirmed the Board of Veterans Appeals’ 

(“board”) decision denying Henderson’s allegations of clear and unmistakable error 

(“CUE”). Henderson v. Principi, No. 02-907 (Vet. App. Mar. 10, 2004). We dismiss for 

want of jurisdiction. 

________________________ 

* Haldane Robert Mayer vacated the position of Chief Judge on December 24, 2004. 
We review the judgment of the Veterans Court pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a), 

which limits our reconsideration to questions of law. See Herndon v. Principi, 311 F.3d 

1121, 1123-24 (Fed. Cir. 2002). We may review a challenge to a factual determination 

or a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of Henderson’s appeal only

to the extent that it presents a constitutional issue. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2) (2000); 

Helfer v. West, 174 F.3d 1332, 1335 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Henderson, a Korean War 

veteran, has pursued a claim for compensable disability resulting from a burn sustained 

to the back of his right hand in 1951. In 1960, the Regional Office (“RO”) granted 

service connection for his burn. The RO and the board have repeatedly denied his

appeals for a compensable disability rating. Henderson now asserts that the decisions

were the result of CUE because the RO and board did not properly consider his medical

records, and that the board’s evidentiary determinations violated his right to due 

process. Henderson’s claim is purely factual, raises no cognizable due process issue, 

and, therefore, is not appropriate for disposition by this court. See Helfer, 174 F.3d at 

1335-36. 

04-7112 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xiao Ping Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC.



                                        By:
                                            -------------------------------
                                        Name:     Xiao Ping Zhang
                                        Title:    Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACR GROUP,
INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         154,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,725,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   926,021
<INVENTORY>                                 17,379,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,224,437
<PP&E>                                       6,801,546
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,248,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,052,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,968,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,343
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,863,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,052,769
<SALES>                                     92,670,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,670,721
<CGS>                                       73,406,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,406,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,645,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               209,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,508,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,116,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,345
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,981,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,981,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Dick SKY, petitioner, v. Bruno STOLC, Warden.

No. 12-9366.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0000711310
<NAME>                      May Drilling Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         233
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               425
<PP&E>                                         16,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,120
<SALES>                                        753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               760
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                510
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            510
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  23.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  23.56
        


</TABLE>
Union Bank Access Account

LMI Product Strategy

Rogger LaCruz

VP, Senior Product Manager

April 24, 2014
About UnionBanCal Corporation & Union Bank, N.

 Headquartered in San Francisco, UnionBanCal Corporation

is a financial holding company with assets of $105.9 billion

at December 31, 2013.

Its primary subsidiary, Union Bank, N.A., provides an array

of financial services to individuals, small businesses, middle‐

market companies, and major corporations.

 The bank operated 415 branches in California, Washington,

Oregon, Texas, Illinois, and New York as well as two

international offices, on December 31, 2013.

UnionBanCal Corporation is a wholly‐owned subsidiary of

The Bank of Tokyo‐Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., which is asubsidiary of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.

Union Bank is a proud member of the Mitsubishi UFJ

Financial Group (MUFG, NYSE:MTU), one of the world’s

largest financial organizations.

 In July 2013, American Banker Magazine and the

Reputation Institute ranked Union Bank #1 for reputation

among its customers.

Visit www.unionbank.com for more information.

2
Introduction to Union Bank Access Account

 In an effort to demonstrate its commitment to responsible ban

response to customer needs, Union Bank, N.A., has developed 

Bank Access Account.

 One of the first of its kind, the new account helps illustrate the 

commitment to providing products that serve the needs of the 

moderate income (LMI) segment and other consumers who ma

for a traditional bank account.

 The Union Bank Access Account is a low‐cost product that offer

functionalities to allow customers easier access to their accoun

minimizing the likelihood of fees, such as overdraft or non‐suff

fees.

 Consumers currently on ChexSystems may also qualify for a Un

Access Account.

3
Union Bank Access Account Features

Key Features: No Direct Deposit Requirement

 No Service Fee with Direct

Deposit

 No Minimum Balance

Requirement

 Discounted Money Order Fees

 No Overdraft or NSF Fees

 ChexSystems Record Allowed

4
Market Opportunity

The Union Bank Access Account Option: 8.2 percent of US households are unbanked. This

represents 1 in 12 households in the nation, or nearly 10million in total.*

 20.1 percent of US households are underbanked. This

represents one in five households, or 24 million

households with 51 million adults.*

 According to the FDIC study; the leading reasons the

underserved do not have a bank account are:

• Don’t see the value

• Service charges are too high

• Don’t write enough checks• Minimum balance requirements are high

• Bounce checks and too many overdrafts

• Couldn’t manage or balance the account

 The new Union Bank Access Account overcomes most of

the main reasons why the underserved do not have a bank

account.

Reasons: Do Not have 

*Source: 2011 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households

5
Union Bank Access Account Brochure

6
Union Bank Access Account Simply Stated

7
Marketing Support
Arthur GIANELLI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8840.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Douglas Satzman, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of XpresSpa Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Dated: April 30, 2019







| | /s/ Douglas Satzman                                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Douglas Satzman                                                                                       
| | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
        Accounting Officer)
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26904-26905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12297]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical 
Sciences.
    Date and time: June 3, 1995, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: Office of the Conference Board of the Mathematical 
Sciences, 1529 Eighteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Keith Crank, Program Officer, Room 1025, 
National Science [[Page 26905]] Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1885.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate NSF-CBMS Regional Research 
Conferences in Mathematical Sciences proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12297 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```