alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1469 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1469

To direct the Secretary of the Interior shall make full payment to each 
 unit of general local government in which entitlement land is located 
  as set forth in chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

Mr. Otter (for himself and Mr. Simpson) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior shall make full payment to each 
 unit of general local government in which entitlement land is located 
  as set forth in chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR ENTITLEMENT LAND.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
to the extent that funds are made available through Acts of 
appropriation, the Secretary of the Interior shall make full payment to 
each unit of general local government in which entitlement land is 
located, as set forth in chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN LIEU OF PAYMENT.

    (a) Conveyance of Land.--If funds are not appropriated in amounts 
required for the Secretary of the Interior to make full payment to a 
local entity as required under section 1, the Secretary shall convey to 
that local government entity Federal land with a fair market value 
equal to the deficiency in the payment required under section 1.
    (b) Choice of Land.--A local government to which land is conveyed 
under subsection (a) may choose the Federal land to be conveyed from 
Federal land within the geographic boundary of that local government. 
Federal land may not be chosen for conveyance under this section if 
such land is within one of the following:
            (1) A unit of the National Park System.
            (2) A National Wilderness Area.
            (3) A unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
    (c) Conveyance Within 90 Days.--Conveyances under this section 
shall be completed not more than 90 days after the Secretary of the 
Interior receives written notification of the selection from the local 
government.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12871]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Curagen Corporation and Soane Technologies, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 9, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), CuraGen Corporation and 
Soane Technologies, Inc. have filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are 
CuraGen Corporation, Branford, CT; and Soane Technologies, Inc., 
Hayward, CA. The general area of planned activity is to develop, and 
subsequently commercialize, a prototype microfabricated device for 
analysis of DNA, and more particularly, the characterization of complex 
genetic disorders.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12871 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 1 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 2 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 3 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 4 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 5 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 6 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 7 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 8 of 9

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00107-RL   document 1   filed 04/04/14   page 9 of 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION 

No. 04-08-00440-CR 

Adam Alexander MARTINEZ, 

Appellant 

v. 

The STATE of Texas, 

Appellee 

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-4151W 

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding 

PER CURIAM 

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice 

 Rebecca Simmons, Justice 

 Steven C. Hilbig, Justice 

Delivered and Filed: August 6, 2008 

DISMISSED 

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case is a “plea-bargain case, and 

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right 

of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

Appellant’s counsel filed a written notice with this court that counsel reviewed the record 

and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that 
04-08-00440-CR 

appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the right of 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s 

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is 

dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

DO NOT PUBLISH 

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

TYRONE FRAZIER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1335-TS

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Tyrone Frazier, a pro se prisoner, filed this habeas corpus petition attempting to

challenge his guilty plea for Possession of Marijuana and his sentence of two years probation by

the Marion Superior Court on March 10, 1988. To obtain habeas corpus relief, a petitioner must

be “in custody.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). This requires that the “habeas petitioner be ‘in custody’

under the conviction or sentence under attack at the time his petition is filed.” Maleng v. Cook,

490 U.S. 488, 490–91 (1989). Here, Frazier’s probation on this conviction ended decades ago

and— though he is currently in prison—he is not “in custody” on this charge. Because he is not

“in custody” on the conviction he is attempting to challenge, this court lacks subject matter

jurisdiction. See Id. at 493. 

For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED for want of subject matter

jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED on December 23, 2013.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

case 3:13-cv-01335-TLS document 3 filed 12/23/13 page 1 of 1
Interim Decision #1362 

MATTER OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY 

In VISA PETITION Proceedings 

DET—N-1605 

Decided by Acting Regional Commissioner June 14,1963 

A distinguished scholar coining to a university to teach (70% of time) and do 

research in mathematics for an academic year is eligible for nonimmigrant 

status under section 101(a) (15) (H) (1), Immigration and Nationality Act, 

since the position is not permanent in nature ; the courses to be taught, although 

listed in the university catalogue under an open number for credit purposes, 

are special seminars which are taught only by distinguished visiting professors 

or other qualified personnel and are not a permanent part of the curriculum. 

This is a petition to import for a temporary period under section 

101(a) (15) (H) (i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a distinguished scholar to teach and do research in mathematics for the 1963-

1964 school year. The petition was denied by the District Director on 

the grounds that the beneficiary will be teaching a full load of courses 

that are listed in the University Catalogue, and the position is therefore permanent in nature.' The petition is before this office on appeal 

from that decision. 

The beneficiary, according to the petition, is to teach and do research 

in mathematics for the 1963-1964 school term. The courses to be 

taught by the beneficiary are listed in the catalogue of the institution 

under an open number, for credit purposes, and are given when there 

is a demand or when a visiting professor is available. The beneficiary 

will teach for about seventy per cent of his time, the remainder will be 

on research. 

The petitioner stated in his brief on appeal that the beneficiary 

would teach courses which are special and temporary in nature, which 

could legitimately be called Special Seminars; that the courses are 

listed under open number in the catalogue in order that the student 

may benefit creditwise. Only distinguished visiting professors or staff 

members with special ability give courses under this number. 

1Matter of 11— S — 8 I. & N. Dec. 400. 

640 
Interim Decision #1362 

It is concluded that the petitioner seeks the 'Services of the beneficiary 

to do research and to teach a special seminar in mathematics. This is 

a course that is not a permanent part of the curricula. It is given 

occasionally by visiting professors or other qualified personnel to 

advanced students in mathematics. The appeal will be sustained. 

ORDER! It is ordered that the appeal in the above cited case be 

and the same is hereby sustained. 

641 

703-45G-C1---42
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNVERFERTH MFG CO INC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:13-CV-97-TLS

)

PAR-KAN CO, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________________________________________________

PAR-KAN CO, )

)

Counter Claimant, )

)

v. )

)

UNVERFERTH MFG CO INC, )

)

Counter Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss Par-Kan Co.’s Inequitable

Conduct Counterclaim and to Strike Par-Kan Co.’s Inequitable Conduct Affirmative Defense

[ECF No. 25] filed by the Plaintiff, Unverferth Mfg. Co., Inc., on April 22, 2013. In its Motion,

the Plaintiff requests that the Court dismiss both the counterclaim of inequitable conduct and the

affirmative defense of inequitable conduct asserted by the Defendant, Par-Kan Co., in its

Counterclaim [ECF No. 12] and its Answer [ECF No. 13]. The Plaintiff states that dismissal of

the inequitable conduct counterclaim and affirmative defense is appropriate because the

Defendant failed to state the facts required to plead inequitable conduct. The Defendant entered a

Response [ECF No. 28] to the Motion to Dismiss on May 9. In its Response, the Defendant

stated that the Plaintiff’s Motion is “well-taken.” (Resp. 2, ECF No. 28.) The Defendant asked
for leave to file amended pleadings in accordance with the May 28 deadline for filing amended

pleadings without leave of the Court, entered by Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein on April 23.

Accordingly, on May 28 the Defendant entered an Amended Counterclaim [ECF No. 31] and an

Amended Answer [ECF No. 32]. 

Because the Defendant has already filed an Amended Counterclaim and an Amended

Answer, the Court DENIES AS MOOT the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 25] relating to the

original Counterclaim and Answer. 

SO ORDERED on June 11, 2013.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141097

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141097 COA: 296994 Kent CC: 05-007793-FC LEE DANIEL WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 21, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12081]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Cooperative Agreement for Technical and Administrative Support 
for Professional Development Activities

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts requests proposals leading 
to the award of a Cooperative Agreement to provide administrative and 
technical assistance services that will support professional 
development activities for the State arts agency arts education 
coordinators. These activities may include, but are not limited to: 
Regional and national leadership institutes, coordinator exchanges, 
consultant assistance, a network newsletter, and other means of 
disseminating information. Responsibilities will include: Communicating 
effectively with the coordinators regarding support for professional 
development assistance; disbursing payments and reimbursements for 
allowable costs; arranging for meeting facilities; producing and 
distributing any network publications; and subcontracting with special 
consultants and others as necessary. Funding is anticipated to be 
$100,000. Those interested in receiving the Solicitation should 
reference Program Solicitation PS 95-06 in their written request and 
include two (2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the 
Solicitation will not be honored.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 95-06 is scheduled for release 
approximately June 8, 1995 with proposals due on July 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to 
National Endowment for the Arts, Contracts Division, Room 217, 1100 
Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William I. Hummel, Contracts Division, 
National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20506 (202/682-5482).
William I. Hummel,
Director, Contracts and Procurement Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12081 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
ex10_09.htm






EXHIBIT 10.09





Amendment No. 2 to that certain Convertible Note dated as of July 29, 2004 in the principal sum of $100,000, as amended by Amendment 1, dated March 27, 2008 (“Note”).





For good and valuable consideration, the parties to the Note amend the Note (i) to extend the First Maturity Date and the Final Maturity date to January 1, 2010 so that the entire Principal Sum is due and payable on January 1, 2010 and (ii) to decrease the accrued interest rate so that the Note accrues interest from and after January 1,
2009 at the prime rate of Citibank in effect from time to time plus 2%.





Except as set forth above, the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.





Dated: February 12, 2009

 


Colonial Commercial Corp.


 


	
By:
	
/s/ William Salek
	  	
/s/ William Pagano

	
Name:
	
William Salek, Chief Financial Officer
	  	
William Pagano
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12078]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that on May 2, 1995, a proposed Consent Decree in United 
States v. J.B. Waste Oil, Inc., Civil No. CV-90-2017, was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 
The proposed Consent Decree settles the United States' claims that the 
defendant had violated provisions of the Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 6921 et seq., governing hazardous waste 
management, and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 40 CFR Parts 
260-279, by improperly handling and marketing hazardous waste and/or 
off-specification used oil.
    Under the terms of the Consent Decree, settling defendant will pay 
$20,000 in civil penalties, and implement a detailed work plan that 
contains testing, employee training, and record-keeping requirements.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. J.B. Waste Oil, Inc., D.O.J. Ref. 90-7-1-495.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Region II Office 
of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New 
York, NY 10007 and at the Environmental Enforcement Section Document 
Center, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 (202 
624-0892). A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in 
person or by mail from the Environmental Enforcement Section Document 
Center, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In 
requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $7.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) made 
payable to Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12078 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Thomas PACCHIOLI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-571.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT L 

Certified copy of State’s Exhibit 46 at the criminal trial of Lana 

Canen in State of Indiana v. Lana R. Canen, Elkhart Circuit Court, 

Cause No. 20C01-0309-MR-155 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-12 filed 09/10/15 page 1 of 3
äo@3-//&-rf y@g

/r0

ffiur¡rr' P-0. W

Lab H: Ø3F-1574 Item B: ØØI

Elkhart Pol ice DePartment

Tïil[ffi ffi ffirffi ffirffiilffi illïilrilffi ilffi illilil

\å\ ffi,,,

#æl

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-12 filed 09/10/15 page 2 of 3
jj^\

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF ELKHART

) IN THE ELKHART CIRCUIT COURT

) SS:

) CAUSE NO: 20C01-0409-MR-00118

CERTIFICATE

I, Ann S. Hunsberger, do hereby certify that I

am the Official Court Reporter of the Elkhart Circuit

Court in the above matter, and the foregoing pages

constitute a true and accurate transcript of the

testimony given at said time and place.

I certify that the same was reduced to

typewritten form from my original stenograph notes and/or

electronically recorded equipment by Computer-Aided

Transcription.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand

and seal this 12th day of December, 2005.

Ann S. Hunsberger

Official Court Reporter

Circuit Court

101 North Main Street

Goshen, Indiana 46526

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL document 42-12 filed 09/10/15 page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26741-26742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12265]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26742]]

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Astronomical Sciences; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Astronomical Sciences.
    Date and Time: June 8 and 9, 1995, 9 am-5 pm
    Place: Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201, Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Jane Russell, Program Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703/306-1827.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations on 
proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation for financial 
support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Global Oscillation Network Group 
(GONG) proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12265 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M