alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27097-27098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12423]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-38-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 12, 1995, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 3, the following tariff sheet:

First Revised Sheet No. 15

    On May 12, 1995, FGT filed the above tariff sheet in Docket No. 
GT95-38-000 to reflect the cancellation of Rate Schedule E-3 which was 
an emergency exchange agreement by and between FGT and Texas Eastern 
Transmission Company pursuant to an order issued by the Federal Power 
Commission in Docket No. CP65-124. The proposed effective date of the 
First Revised Sheet No. 15 is May 10, 1995. Pursuant to an order issued 
by the Federal Power Commission on December 27, 1973, in Docket No. 
CP74-56, the exchange agreement dated September 1, 1964 under Rate 
Schedule E-3 was canceled and superseded by a new exchange agreement 
dated May 24, 1973 under Rate Schedule E-9.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426 in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 23, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the [[Page 27098]] Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12423 Filed 5-19-95;8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FOUR MILE BAY LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:15CV63-PPS/MGG

)

ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal. [DE 106.] Plaintiff Four Mile

Bay LLC and Defendant Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. have agreed to the dismissal of this

case with prejudice.

ACCORDINGLY:

The parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal [DE 106] is GRANTED. Plaintiff Four Mile Bay

LLC’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

The Clerk is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 2, 2018.

/s/ Philip P. Simon 

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv-00063-PPS-MGG document 107 filed 07/02/18 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


I, Dennis M. McGrath,  Chief Financial  Officer of PhotoMedex,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  do hereby certify,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as created  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

              (1) the accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
              for the  three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2003 (the
              "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
              15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as
              amended; and

              (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
              all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
              operations of the Company.


                                                       PHOTOMEDEX INC.


Dated: November 14, 2003
                                                    By:/S/ DENNIS M. MCGRATH
                                                        ---------------------
                                                        Dennis M. McGrath
                                                        Chief Financial Officer





         A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 of
the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002   ("Section   906"),   or  other   document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic  version of this written statement  required
by Section 906, has been  provided to  PhotoMedex,  Inc. and will be retained by
PhotoMedex,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JILL KORNAK,

Plaintiff, No. C 05-0123 PJH

v. ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the court will conduct a further case management

conference in the above-entitled action on Thursday, November 10, 2005, at 2:30 p.m. 

Counsel for both plaintiff and defendants must attend. 

The deadline to complete mediation, previously set for November 10, 2005, is

VACATED. The court will set a new date at the case management conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2005 

______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00123-PJH Document 40 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 1
Steve JEFFERSON, petitioner, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION.

No. 12-9208.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 1 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 2 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 3 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 4 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 5 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 6 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 110   filed 11/19/14   page 7 of 7
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12345]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf, Central and Western Gulf of Mexico Oil 
and Gas Lease Sales 157 and 161

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Availability of the proposed notices of sale.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS); Notice of 
Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for proposed Oil and Gas 
Lease Sales 157 in the Central Gulf of Mexico, and proposed Oil and Gas 
Lease Sale 161 in the Western Gulf of Mexico. This Notice of 
Availability is published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c), as a matter of 
information to the public.
    With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the 
Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, as amended, 
provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed 
Notice of Sale.
    The proposed Notices of Sale of proposed Sales 157 and 161 may be 
obtained by written request to the Public Information Unit, Gulf of 
Mexico Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park 
Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394, or by telephone at (504) 
736-2519.
    The final Notices of Sale will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 30 days prior to the date of the bid opening.
    Bid opening is scheduled for early 1996 for proposed Sale 157, and 
mid-1996 for proposed Sale 161.

    Dated: May 2, 1995.
Cynthia Quarterman,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-12345 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11641]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Intent To Grant a Limited Exclusive Patent License

    Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal 
Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, the Department of the 
Air Force announces its intention to grant Clinical Instruments 
International, Inc., a corporation of the State of Connecticut, a 
limited exclusive license under: United States Patent No. 5,337,730 
filed in the name of Michael D. Maguire for an ``Endoscope Cleansing 
Catheter and Method of Use''.
    The license described above will be granted unless an objection 
thereto, together with a request for an opportunity to be heard, if 
desired, is received in writing by the addressee set forth below within 
sixty (60) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Copies of 
the patent application(s) may be obtained, on request, from the same 
addressee.
    All communications concerning this Notice should be sent to: Mr. 
Samuel B. Smith, Jr., Chief, Intellectual Property Branch, Commercial 
Litigation Division, Air Force Legal Services Agency, HQ AFLSA/JACNP, 
1501 Wilson Blvd. Suite 805, Arlington, VA 22209-2403, Telephone No. 
(703) 696-9050.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11641 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-P
```
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Indiana 

THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY 

OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA,

Plaintiff 

 v. Civil Action No. 1:13cv357

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY 

LINES INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

 the plaintiff _______________________________________________________________________ 

recover from the defendant the amount of 

dollars $ , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of % plus post-judgment

interest at the rate of % along with costs.

 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant 

recover costs from the plaintiff .

 X Other: Judgment is entered in favor of defendant American International Specialty Lines Insurance 

Company and against plaintiff The Medical Protective Company of Fort Wayne, Indiana, who shall

take nothing by way of its complaint.

This action was (check one):

 tried to a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has 

rendered a verdict.

 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was 

reached.

 X decided by Judge James T. Moody.

DATE: March 12, 2018 ROBERT N. TRGOVICH, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/ L. Higgins-Conrad 

 Signature of Deputy Clerk

USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00357-HAB document 86 filed 03/12/18 page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 4, 2012

p0927

Order 

October 4, 2012

144872

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144872

COA: 301497

Wayne CC: 10-001736-FC

CAROL ETCHIE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
M. Lee JENNINGS, petitioner, v. Holly BROOME.

No. 12-831.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Re: MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust 2007-HE2

  I, Melissa Loiselle, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust 2007-HE2
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
     by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
     and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in
     preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report
     under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
     Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance
     with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
     15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
     otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
     noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
     report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: HomEq
    Servicing Corporation as Servicer and Option One Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Melissa Loiselle
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12005]



[[Page 26069]]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 1-8831]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Fedders Corporation, Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value)

May 10, 1995.
    Fedders Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the 
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    The Company desires to remove the listing of the Security from the 
Phlx because its Security and its Class A Stock are listed on the New 
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''), and now that certain debentures 
of the Company's subsidiary, RTXX Corporation (formerly Rotorex 
Corporation) that were listed on the Phlx have been redeemed and paid 
in full, there is no longer any need or advantage to the Company to 
continue listing the Security on the Phlx.
    Any interested person may, on or before June 1, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12005 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Johnnie H. BEASLEY, petitioner, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 12-1419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

TRACY KLEMM, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS N/B/F OF K.K., A MINOR,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-cv-739-RL-CAN

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendants Barry and Lisa Cadden, and Greg Conigliaro 

(“Defendants”), by counsel, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint, up to and including April 22, 2013. Defendants’ Answer is currently due 

February 21, 2013. Plaintiffs’ counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested 

extension. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendants up to and 

including April 22, 2013 to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendants

case 3:12-cv-00739-RL-CAN document 11 filed 02/14/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 14, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas D. Small

Edmond W. Foley

FOLEY & SMALL

1002 E. Jefferson Blvd.

South Bend, IN 46617

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\7 - Klemm\Federal Court Pleadings\2nd MET.docx

case 3:12-cv-00739-RL-CAN document 11 filed 02/14/13 page 2 of 2
GENERAL

March 24, 1939

Ron.-Thos. R. Chandler coiintg Attoflley Robertson CoMitg Franklin, Texas' Dear Sir: _i . ~~ Qpinioii Noa, Q-glQ "Re: **Are** @at oicaun~y~~ltnesees'en; ~tltledto fees ana &p&nses for. appearingbefors,a:&Ourt‘of Inquiry Investigating a felony case? Your'tibquestforan 6plnlbn on then %~bovti stated question has~beenreceived by this office.

Your'Gtter.r&aas~ in’ p&&t 6s~foll6wal

__ "A short time ago 1% was nec&ssa+y for me to determinewhether or not certaln.pu~- portedwltne&3es~,weM Ln poasess,i,on of lnfor- &iatlon ~thatwas~tiery~lmpbrtant‘ln a felony matte&In this Coutitg and I request&l our~' JustI& of the Peace In the Ptieclnct‘nearest to this County to'hola a court of Inquiry ana subpoenaed salauitnesses and he issued a subpobna'&ummonlng said witnesses~ beford him at '~ that date and saidwitnesses were summon'ed by the Sheriff of the adj,olnlng County and'said witnesses appearing and testifiedunder Oath and their testimonywas reduced to writing." Articles 886 and 887, Code of Crimlnal,Procedureread as follows:

**“ Art.**  886. When a justlee of the peace has.good cause t.o believe that an offense tia~s been, 6r Is about to be, committea against the laws of this State, he may tiummon and examine any witness in relation, thereto. If It appears from the statement Of any witness that an offense has b,eencommitted, the justice shall reduce said statementsto writing and cause ,thesame to be sworn to,by each witness making the same; andi issue & w&rant for the arrest Of the offender, the same as if complaint had been made and filed."\-.--..-

Hon. Thos. R. Chandler, March 24, 1939, page 3 O-510

,, hW:AW:wc Very truly yours ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS .~ By s/drcIell

Wlllliims Ardel~~Wllllams Assistant

APPROvEDi ~' s/W.F.Moore fwroRRxY GErwuL OF 

### TExAs (FIRSTASSISTANT)

., :
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

HENRY KLEYWEG, 

CLAUDIA KLEYWEG, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BAC HOME 

LOANS SERVICING, LP, 

Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00138-JD-PRC 

Removed from the Porter Superior 

Court 1 for the State of Indiana 

Case No. 64D01-1403-PL-2699

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY & DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION DEADLINES 

Plaintiff’s Henry & Claudia Kleyweg, by Counsel, file their first motion to extend the 

discovery and dispositive motion deadline, and in support thereof states as follows: 

1. That on July 30th 2015 this Honorable Court granted the Defendant’s third motion for 

extension of time to conduct discovery until August 19th 2015 and extension of time to file 

dispositive motions until September 19th 2015. 

2. That depositions in this matter were held on August 14th 2015 in Valparaiso Indiana and 

revealed the need to obtain additional documentation related to this cause of action, including (but 

not limited to) documents from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, documents from SISTAR mortgage 

(which suffered a fire loss at their original building) and possible documentation from Bank of 

America subsidiaries. 

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 38 filed 08/14/15 page 1 of 3
2 

3. That a sixty (60) day extension of time in this matter should provide sufficient time to 

obtain the additional documents and information needed in this matter as well as provide time for 

possible negotiation between the parties. 

4. That Counsel for the Defendant has been contacted and has no objection to the motion. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court GRANT this Motion and 

grant the parties an additional 60 days to conduct discovery up to and including October 19, 2015 

to conduct discovery and an additional 60 days to file dispositive motions up to and including, 

November 18, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted by: 

FRED W. GRADY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

By: /s/ Blake N. Dahl _________ 

 Blake N. Dahl ∴ (30576-64) 

 750 S. Washington St. Suite 1 

 Valparaiso, IN 46383 

 Phone: (219) 462-2460 

 Fax: (866) 462-6197 

 Email: bdahl@fwgpc.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 38 filed 08/14/15 page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 14th day of August, 2015, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the 

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 

FROST BROWN TODD LLC 

201 North Illinois Street, Suite 1900 

P.O. Box 44961 

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961 

317-237-3800 

Fax: 317-237-3900 

nalexander@fbtlaw.com 

awill@fbtlaw.com

 /s/ Blake N. Dahl _________ 

 

Blake N. Dahl ∴ (30576-64) 

750 S. Washington St. Suite 1 

Valparaiso, IN 46383 

Phone: (219) 462-2460 

Fax: (866) 462-6197 

Email: bdahl@fwgpc.com 

 

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 38 filed 08/14/15 page 3 of 3