Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices 26457

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR 207.2(f)).

Commerce to be sold in the United

States at LTFV.

Background

The Commission instituted these

investigations effective November 7,

1994, following preliminary

determinations by the Department of

Commerce that imports of magnesium

from China, Russia, and Ukraine were

being sold at LTFV within the meaning

of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

§ 1673b(b)). Notice of the institution of

the Commission’s investigations and of

a public hearing to be held in

connection therewith was given by

posting copies of the notice in the Office

of the Secretary, U.S. International

Trade Commission, Washington, DC,

and by publishing the notice in the

Federal Register of December 7, 1994

(59 FR 63105). The hearing was held in

Washington, DC, on March 28, 1995,

and all persons who requested the

opportunity were permitted to appear in

person or by counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determinations in these investigations to

the Secretary of Commerce on May 5,

1995. The views of the Commission are

contained in USITC Publication 2885

(May 1995), entitled ‘‘Magnesium from

China, Russia, and Ukraine:

Investigations Nos. 731–TA–696–698

(Final).’’

Issued: May 11, 1995.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12133 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Investigation No. 731–TA–699 (Final)]

Stainless Steel Angle From Japan

Determination

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject investigation, the

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. § 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an

industry in the United States is not

materially injured or threatened with

material injury, and the establishment of

an industry in the United States is not

materially retarded, by reason of

imports from Japan of stainless steel

angle, provided for in subheading

7222.40.30 of the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States, that have

been found by the Department of

Commerce to be sold in the United

States at less than fair value (LTFV).

Background

The Commission instituted this

investigation effective November 10,

1994, following a preliminary

determination by the Department of

Commerce that imports of stainless steel

angle from Japan were being sold at

LTFV within the meaning of section

733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. § 1673b(b)).

Notice of the institution of the

Commission’s investigation and of a

public hearing to be held in connection

therewith was given by posting copies

of the notice in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, Washington, DC, and by

publishing the notice in the Federal

Register of December 7 (59 FR 63106).

The hearing was held in Washington,

DC, on March 30, 1995, and all persons

who requested the opportunity were

permitted to appear in person or by

counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determination in this investigation to

the Secretary of Commerce on May 10,

1995. The views of the Commission are

contained in USITC Publication 2887

(May 1995), entitled Stainless Steel

Angle from Japan: Investigation No.

731–TA–699 (Final).

Issued: May 11, 1995.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12134 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act of

1980

Notice is hereby given that on April

28, 1995, a proposed Partial Consent

Decree in United States v. Abbott

Laboratories, et al., Civil Action No. 3–

95–1308–17, was lodged with the

United States District Court for the

District of South Carolina. The

Complaint, brought pursuant to Sections

106 and 107 of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act of

1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42

U.S.C. §§ 9606 and 9607, seeks

injunctive relief to abate an imminent

and substantial endangerment to the

public health or welfare or the

environment, and recovery of response

costs incurred or to be incurred by the

United States in connection with the

Bluff Road Superfund Site in Richland

County, South Carolina (the ‘‘Site’’). The

consent decree, which provides for

partial funding of the Remedial Design

and Remedial Action (‘‘RD/RA’’)

selected by EPA for the Site, is the final

consent decree for the Site and brings to

a conclusion the governments efforts to

secure cleanup of on-Site contamination

by private potentially responsible

parties (‘‘PRPs’’).

Under the terms of this proposed

decree, the group of settling PRPs that

implemented and completed the

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility

Study at the Site under an EPA

Administrative Order by Consent

(‘‘AOC’’), will also contribute to the

funding of the RD/RA. The terms setting

forth the responsibilities of the settling

PRPs in this proposed decree

incorporate the terms on funding as

originally set forth in the AOC.

Payments under the proposed decree,

combined with funding by other PRPs

under a consent decree entered in U.S.

v. Allied, Civ. No. 92–1108–0, on

September 28, 1992, represent 99.30%

of the total past costs incurred by EPA

at the Site, and 100% of future costs to

be incurred by EPA in overseeing

implementation of the remedy at the

Site. The responsibility of implementing

the RD/RA lies with other settling PRPs

under the Allied consent decree.

The Department of Justice will receive

for a period of thirty (30) days from the

date of this publication, comments

relating to the proposed Consent Decree.

Comments should be addressed to the

Assistant Attorney General of the

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20530. Comments

should refer to the United States v.

Abbott Laboratories, et al., D.O.J. Ref.

90–7–1–61D.

The proposed Consent Decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney for the District of South

Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Ste. 500,

Columbia South Carolina, and at the

Environmental Enforcement Section

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005, (202) 624–0892. A copy of the

proposed Consent Decree may be

obtained in person or by mail from the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005. In requesting a copy, please

enclose a check in the amount of $34.75
26458 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices

(25 cents per page reproduction cost)

payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Acting Section Chief, Environmental

Enforcement Section, Environment and

Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 95–12076 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, notice is hereby given that a

proposed partial consent decree

(‘‘Decree’’) with Chico Dairy Co.

(‘‘Chico’’) in United States of America v.

Chico Dairy Co. and David Marshall,

C.A. No. 1:94CV28 (D.N.W.Va) was

lodged on May 3, 1995 with the United

States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia. This proposed

Decree will, if entered, settle claims

filed against Chico in the above

proceeding by the United States, on

behalf of the Environmental Protection

Agency (‘‘EPA’’), pursuant to Section

113 of the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’), 42

U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., for violations of

the National Emission Standard for

Hazardous Air Pollution (‘‘NESHAP’’)

for asbestos. (The United States is not

settling its claims against David

Marshall, which were brought in the

same proceeding for violations of the

Asbestos NESHAP.)

The proposed Decree requires Chico

to pay a civil penalty of $130,000 and

to comply hereafter with the Asbestos

NESHAP. The Decree binds Chico to

detailed notification procedures, should

Chico demolish or renovate (or contract

for the demolition or renovation of) any

building containing sufficient amounts

of asbestos to cause the Asbestos

NESHAP to apply. Further, Chico must

inspect any building it seeks to

demolish or renovate (or have

demolished or renovated) to determine

the amounts of regulated asbestos

material contained therein and permit

EPA entry to any such demolition or

renovation site. In the event the

Asbestos NESHAP should apply to any

such demolition or renovation site,

Chico is bound to appoint an onsite

representative, whose qualifications and

duties are set forth in detail in the

Decree.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

Decree. Comments should be addressed

to the Assistant Attorney General for the

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20530, and should

refer to United States of America v.

Chico Dairy Co. and David Marshall,

C.A. No. 1:94CV28 (D.N.W.Va), DOJ Ref.

#90–5–2–1–1877. The proposed Decree

may be examined at the Office of the

United States Attorney for the Northern

District of West Virginia, 1125–1141

Chapline Street, Wheeling, West

Virginia 26003; the Region III Office of

the Environmental Protection Agency,

841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania 19107; and at the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202–

624–0892. A copy of the proposed

Decree may be obtained in person or by

mail from the Consent Decree Library,

1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor,

Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a

copy, please refer to the referenced case

and enclose a check in the amount of

$5.25 (25 cents per page reproduction

costs), payable to the Consent Decree

Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 95–12077 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that on May 2, 1995, a proposed

Consent Decree in United States v. J.B.

Waste Oil, Inc., Civil No. CV–90–2017,

was lodged with the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of

New York. The proposed Consent

Decree settles the United States’ claims

that the defendant had violated

provisions of the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6921 et

seq., governing hazardous waste

management, and the regulations

promulgated thereunder at 40 CFR Parts

260–279, by improperly handling and

marketing hazardous waste and/or offspecification used oil.

Under the terms of the Consent

Decree, settling defendant will pay

$20,000 in civil penalties, and

implement a detailed work plan that

contains testing, employee training, and

record-keeping requirements.

The Department of Justice will receive

for a period of thirty (30) days from the

date of this publication comments

relating to the proposed Consent Decree.

Comments should be addressed to the

Assistant Attorney General of the

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, U.S. Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20530, and should

refer to United States v. J.B. Waste Oil,

Inc., D.O.J. Ref. 90–7–1–495.

The proposed Consent Decree may be

examined at the Region II Office of the

United States Environmental Protection

Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, NY

10007 and at the Environmental

Enforcement Section Document Center,

1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor,

Washington, D.C. 20005 (202 624–0892).

A copy of the proposed Consent Decree

may be obtained in person or by mail

from the Environmental Enforcement

Section Document Center, 1120 G

Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington,

D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please

refer to the referenced case and enclose

a check in the amount of $7.50 (25 cents

per page reproduction cost) made

payable to Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 95–12078 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Water Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a proposed amendment to the

consent decree in United States v.

Ketchikan Pulp Company, Civil Action

No. A92–587, was lodged on March 21,

1995 with the United States District

Court for the District of Alaska. The

complaint in this case alleged claims

arising out of the discharge of pollutants

from Ketchikan Pulp Company’s pulp

mill into Ward Cove, near Ketchikan,

Alaska. The decree provides for

payment of a civil penalty, as well as

injunctive relief, including remediation

of Ward Cove sediments and an

environmental audit of the mill. The

Department of Justice will receive, for a

period of thirty (30) days from the date

of this publication, comments relating to

the proposed amendment. Comments

should be addressed to the Assistant

Attorney General for the Environment

and Natural Resources Division,

Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

20530, and should refer to United States

v. Ketchikan Pulp Company, DOJ Ref.

90–5–1–1–3930.

The proposed amendment may be

examined at the office of the United

States Attorney, 222 W. 7th Ave.,

Anchorage, Alaska, the Region 10 Office

of the Environmental Protection

Agency, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,

Washington and at the Consent Decree

Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor,

Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624–

0892. A copy of the proposed consent

decree may be obtained in person or by

mail from the Consent Decree Library,