alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 2:14 CR 19

)

HULIAN TERRELL III )

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY AND

 ADJUDICATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 15), to which the defendant has waived objection, and subject to this

court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(3), the

Magistrate Judge’s findings are now ADOPTED, defendant’s plea of guilty to the

offenses charged in Counts 1-10 of the Indictment is now hereby ACCEPTED, and

defendant is adjudged guilty of those offenses. A sentencing date will be set under

separate order.

SO ORDERED.

Date: June 16, 2014

s/James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Robert T. ALMY, petitioner, v. KICKERT SCHOOL BUS LINE, INC.

No. 13-6897.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Barns Foods Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Urban Barns Foods Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: November 15, 2010 |   | /s/Daniel Meikleham                                            |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Daniel Meikleham                                               |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer and Director                           |
|                     |   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                     |   | Urban Barns Foods Inc.                                         |
NUMBERS 13-23-00580-CV, 13-23-00582-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE 

OF ROXANNA HERNANDEZ AND ALEX HERNANDEZ JR.

 

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Alex Hernandez Jr. filed a “Motion for Interlocutory Appeal[,] Notice of 

Mandamus[,] and Motion to Stay” in this Court on December 14, 2023. We construed this 

pleading as both a notice of appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus and docketed it 

in two cause numbers: 13-23-00580-CV for the petition for writ of mandamus, and 13-23-

00582-CV for the appeal. On December 15, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified 

Hernandez that it appeared that there was not a final, appealable order, that there was 

no statutory basis for an interlocutory appeal, and that a notice of interlocutory appeal 
2

would be untimely. The Clerk advised Hernandez that the appeal would be dismissed if 

these defects were not corrected within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1. The Clerk 

further advised Hernandez that the petition for writ of mandamus failed to comply with the 

appellate rules and directed him to file an amended petition within five days. See id. R. 

9.4(i)(3), 52.3, 52.7. And finally, the Clerk informed Hernandez that the motion for stay 

failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 10.1, 52.10(a). 

Hernandez has not responded to the Clerk’s directives and has not otherwise corrected

any of these defects.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 

applicable law, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed and the petition for 

writ of mandamus should be denied. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in cause number 

13-23-00582-CV and we deny the petition for writ of mandamus in cause number 13-23-

00580-CV. We dismiss the motion to stay as moot in both cases.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

11th day of January, 2024.
Order entered January 24, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00142 - CV DARREN MELTON, Appellant

V. 601 JEALOUSE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cour t at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 06444 - B



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 21, 2020 second motion for an extension of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion as follows. We SUSPEND the deadli ne for appellant’s brief pending this Court’s resolution of appellee’s motion to dismiss. Appellant shall file any response to appellee’s motion by January 31, 2020

. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Ronald ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 12-8725.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit, denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MARY LAMBERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-CV-821-RL-CAN

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendants Barry and Lisa Cadden, and Greg Conigliaro 

(“Defendants”), by counsel, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and including April 19, 2013. Defendants’ Answer is currently due 

February 18, 2013. Plaintiff’s counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested 

extension. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendants up to and 

including April 19, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendants 

case 3:12-cv-00821-RL-CAN document 10 filed 02/14/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 14, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas D. Small

FOLEY & SMALL

1002 E Jefferson Blvd

South Bend IN 46617

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\20 - Lambert\Federal Pleadings\MET.docx

case 3:12-cv-00821-RL-CAN document 10 filed 02/14/13 page 2 of 2
Thomas Darmel THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8819.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RFMSI Series 2007-S8 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of August 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2007 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Funding Mortgage Securities I, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys
report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.57


                   AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
                   ------------------------------------------

     The  Executive  Severance  Agreement  between  MILACRON  INC.,  a  Delaware
Corporation  (the "Company") and  [___________]  (the  "Executive")  dated as of
_______,  2003 (the  "Agreement") is hereby amended effective as of February 10,
2004.

                                   AMENDMENTS

1.   Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new
     subsection (f) at the end thereof:

     "(f)   Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the
            contrary, a financial restructuring or recapitalization of the
            Company that may occur during 2004 (the "2004 Restructuring")
            shall not result in a "Change in Control" solely for purposes of
            determining the Executive's benefits under Section 3(a) of this
            Agreement (but only with respect to equity based awards granted to
            the Executive on or after February 10, 2004) and Section 3(b) of
            this Agreement."

2.   Section 5(d) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new
     subsection (viii) at the end thereof:

     "(viii) if the Executive's Qualifying Termination occurs in the 2004
            calendar year and on or after the occurrence of the 2004
            Restructuring (as defined in Section 2(f)), a lump sum cash payout
            of the Executive's annual bonus under the Company's Annual Bonus
            Program (as defined in Section 3(b)) for such year, the amount of
            which shall be equal to the Executive's target or base incentive
            bonus possible under the Annual Bonus Program for that year."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have caused this
Amendment to the Agreement to be executed as of the date first specified above.

                                        MILACRON INC.



                                        By:___________________________________



                                        EXECUTIVE_____________________________
PFIZER INC., et al., petitioners, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC., et al.; Pfizer Inc., et al., petitioners, v. Harden Manufacturing Corporation, et al.; and Pfizer Inc., et al., petitioners, v. Aetna, Inc.

No. 13-289.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12131]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Intent to Grant Exclusive Patent License; Biocompatibles Limited

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant Biocompatibles Limited, a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive 
license in the United States to practice the Government owned 
inventions described in U.S. Patents Nos. 4,867,917, ``Method for 
Synthesis of Diacetylenic Compounds,'' patented 19 September 1989; 
4,877,501, ``Process for Fabrication of Lipid Microstructures,'' 
patented 31 October 1989; 4,911,981, ``Metal Clad Lipid 
Microstructures,'' patented 27 March 1990; 5,049,382, ``Coating and 
Composition Containing Lipid Microstructure Toxin Dispenses,'' patented 
17 September 1991; and Patent Application Serial No. 08/077,503, 
``Method of Controlled Release and Controlled Release 
Microstructures,'' filed 17 June 1993 in the field of lipid derived 
controlled release systems for non-medical biofouling applications.
    Anyone wishing to object to the granting of this license has 60 
days from the date of this notice to file written objections along with 
supporting evidence, if any. Written objections are to be filed with 
the Office of Naval Research, ONR, 00CC, Ballston Tower One, Arlington, 
Virginia 22217-5660.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. R.J. Erickson, Staff Patent 
Attorney, Office of Naval Research, ONR 00CC, Ballston Tower One, 800 
North Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia 22217-5660, telephone (703) 
696-4001.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
L.R. McNees,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12131 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-AE-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-16-TLS 

)

HENRY C. PURIFOY, III )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 22], filed on September 16, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection

to the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 22] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on October 10, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

HENRY KLEYWEG and CLAUDIA

KLEYWEG,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and BAC HOME

LOANS SERVICING, LP.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. _____________________

Removed from Porter Superior Court for

the State of Indiana,

Cause No. 64D01-1403-PL-2699

BANK OF AMERICA’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Defendant Bank of America, National Association makes

the following disclosures:

Bank of America, National Association is successor by merger to BAC Home Loans

Servicing, LP. Bank of America, National Association is 100% owned by BANA Holding

Corp., which is 100% owned by BAC North America Holding Company. BAC North America

Holding Company is 100% owned by NB Holdings Corp., which is in turn 100% owned by Bank

of America Corp., whose shares are publicly traded. No public company has an ownership

interest of 10% or more in Bank of America, National Association. Bank of America

Corporation does not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held company has an

ownership interest of 10% or more in Bank of America Corporation.

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

By: /s/ Michael A. Rogers

Lucy R. Dollens, #23547-49

Michael A. Rogers, #28038-29

Attorneys for Defendant,

Bank of America, N.A.

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 3 filed 04/23/14 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of April, 2014, a copy of the foregoing was filed

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

and

by 1st Class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on the following:

Blake N. Dahl

Fred W. Grady & Associates, PC

750 South Washington Street

Suite 1

Valparaiso, IN 46383

/s/ Michael A. Rogers

FROST BROWN TODD LLC

201 North Illinois Street, Suite 1900

P.O. Box 44961

Indianapolis, IN 46244-0961

Phone: 317-237-3800

Fax: 317-237-3900

ldollens@fbtlaw.com

mrogers@fbtlaw.com

INDLibrary2 BT07586.0616308 1294390v1

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 3 filed 04/23/14 page 2 of 2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00446

- CV

In re David O ’ Connor

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

R elat or ’ s motion for emergency stay is also denied.

_______________________ ___________________

Chari L. Kelly , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: September 10, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kevin R. Millison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                                                             
|------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|July 22, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ KEVIN R. MILLISON                                       
|              |  |  |  | Kevin R. Millison Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer



25
[No. 22533-0-III.

Division Three.

February 10, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Marjorie Jean Mulvey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 02-1-02418-2, Maryann C. Moreno, J., entered October 10, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Kurtz, J.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, in connection with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                    
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 30, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael S. McClure                                             
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Michael S. McClure                                                 
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Nouhad Rached El HAJJAOUI, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-60165.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 2004.

Karen Harder Pennington, Law Office of Karen H Pennington, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Anne M. Estrada, US Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Dallas, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

John Ashcroft, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Nouhad Rached El Hajjaoui (“Hajjaoui”) filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus in district court challenging his detention without bond while the Immigration and Naturalization Service conducted removal proceedings. In his petition he asserted, *inter alia,*a claim that he was a national of the United States. The district court denied Hajjaoui’s habeas corpus petition and transferred Hajjaoui’s nationality claim to this court.

28 U.S.C. § 1631 permits a transfer if this court would have been able to exercise jurisdiction on the date that the case was filed in the district court, the district court lacked jurisdiction over the case, and the transfer is in the interest of justice. Hajjaoui filed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the district court prior to the date that the immigration judge issued the removal order and he did not appeal the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Therefore, this court could not have exercised jurisdiction over the petition on the date that Hajjaoui filed the petition in district court. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date *244of the final order of removal); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (a court may review a final order of removal only if the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies as of right); *Emejulu v. INS,*989 F.2d 771, 771 (5th Cir.1993) (noting that this court would not assume original jurisdiction over habeas corpus claim).

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0234 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMESON THOMAS WOODS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 27, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 24 2021

11/24/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0234
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ROBERT HOLLAND, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) No. 2:13-cv-00491

)

CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the “ Motion to Correct

Errors and Set Aside,” filed by pro se Plaintiff, Robert Holland,

on December 16, 2014 (DE #117). Plaintiff previously filed a

Motion to Reconsider (DE #112) and a Motion to Correct Errors and

Set Aside the Judgment (DE #113), and this Court addressed and

rejected these motions in its order dated December 8, 2014 (DE

#115.) Nothing in the instant motion provides any basis to correct

or set aside a court order. Consequently, the motion (DE #117) is

DENIED.

DATED: December 23, 2014 /s/ RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 122 filed 12/23/14 page 1 of 1