alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

RICHARD SPINNENWEBER, )

Plaintiff )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:14-CV-101-JEM

)

ROBERT LADUCER and )

RED RIVER SUPPLY INCORPORATED, )

Defendants. )

VERDICT

We, the jury, award damages in favor of Plaintiff Richard Spinnenweber and against Defendants

Robert Laducer and Red River Supply Incorporated in the amount of $1,000,000.00.

December 4, 2018 /s Foreperson___________

Date Signature of Jury Foreperson

USDC IN/ND case 2:14-cv-00101-JEM document 146 filed 12/04/18 page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11955]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-173-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Technical Conference

May 10, 1995
    In the Commission's order issued on March 31, 1995, in the above-
captioned proceeding, the Commission held that the filing raises issues 
for which a technical conference is to be convened.
    The conference to address the issues has been scheduled for 
Wednesday, May 31, 1995, at 10:00 a.m. in a room to be designated at 
the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11955 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Terry CLINE, et al., petitioners, v. OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE, et al.

No. 12-1094.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma granted. This Court, pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Okla. Stat., Tit. 20, § 1601 *et seq.* (West 2002), respectfully certifies to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma the following question: Whether H.B. No. 1970, Section 1, Chapter 216, O.S.L. 2011 prohibits: (1) the use of misoprostol to induce abortions, including the use of misoprostol in conjunction with mifepristone according to a protocol approved by the Food and Drug Administration; and (2) the use of methotrexate to treat eptopic pregnancies. Further proceedings in this case are reserved pending receipt of a response from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

21 NO. 3 Westlaw Journal Health Law 4
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Koko, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Gregory Ruff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 13th day of April, 2011.








GREGORY RUFFGregory RuffChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin S. McRae, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robin S. McRae

By  ____________________________________

Robin S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer

Date:  May 14, 2004

























#
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Pax Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Leslie Hammond,
      President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
                7, 2008
            /s/
                Paul Leslie HammondPaul
                Leslie HammondPresident,
                Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
              Principal
                Accounting Officer and Director
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6872** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHIRLENE REESE BOONE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Elizabeth City
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00054

- F

- 1; 2:12

- cv - 00081

- F )

Submitted : September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shirlene Reese Boone, Appellant Pro Se. William Miller Gilmore, Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney s , Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, Nor th Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shirlene Reese Boone seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on h er 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unl ess a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U. S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a d ebatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Boone’s motion for a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12388]



[[Page 26845]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 95020640-5040-01; I.D. 051595D]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Greenland 
Turbot in the Aleutian Islands Subarea

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for Greenland turbot in 
the Aleutian Islands subarea (AI) of the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands management area (BSAI). This action is necessary to prevent 
exceeding the Greenland turbot total allowable catch (TAC) in that 
subarea.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), May 19, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    In accordance with Sec. 675.20(a)(7)(ii), the Greenland turbot TAC 
for the AI was established by the 1995 final specifications (60 FR 
8479, February 14, 1995) as 1,981 metric tons (mt).
    In accordance with Sec. 675.20(a)(8), the Director of the Alaska 
Region, NMFS (Regional Director), has established a directed fishing 
allowance of 681 mt, with consideration that 1,300 mt will be taken as 
incidental catch in directed fishing for other species in the AI. The 
Regional Director has determined that the directed fishing allowance 
has been reached. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing 
for Greenland turbot in the AI.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under Sec. 675.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 15, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-12388 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1524 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1524

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 12433 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Ed Eilert Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2005

 Mr. Moore of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, and 
Mr. Moran of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 12433 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Ed Eilert Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ED EILERT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 12433 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ed Eilert Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Eilert 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules 26559

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 72 and 75

[FRL–5203–8]

Acid Rain Program: Permits

Regulation and Continuous Emission

Monitoring

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to amend

the Continuous Emission Monitoring

(CEM) provisions and the Permits

Regulation General Provisions of the

Acid Rain Program for the purpose of

making the implementation of the

program more efficient. Elsewhere in

this issue of the Federal Register, EPA

is amending the CEM and General

provisions as a direct final rule without

prior proposal because the Agency

views these revisions as

noncontroversial and anticipates no

significant adverse comments. A

detailed list of the revisions is set forth

in the direct final rule. If no significant

adverse comments are received in

response to that direct final rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this proposed rule. The EPA

believes that these revisions are

noncontroversial because these are

technical corrections and other

amendments that address various

implementation issues without major

changes in policy. Elsewhere in this

issue of the Federal Register, EPA has

published an interim final rule

addressing additional Acid Rain

monitoring issues that may be

controversial.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received on or before June 16,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Any written comments on

this proposed rule (companion to the

direct final rule) must be identified with

the Docket No. A–94–16, must be

identified as comments on this

proposed rule (companion to the direct

final rule), and must be submitted in

duplicate to: EPA Air Docket (6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

401 M Street SW, Washington, DC

20460. The docket is available for public

inspection and copying between 8:30

a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the address given above. A

reasonable fee may be charged for

copying.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margaret Sheppard, Acid Rain Division

(6204J), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington,

DC 20460, telephone number (202) 233–

9180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA

believes that these revisions are

noncontroversial; however, if EPA does

receive significant adverse comments,

EPA will publish a document in the

Federal Register withdrawing the

portions of the direct final rule receiving

significant adverse comment. All

significant adverse comments received

will be addressed in a subsequent final

rule based on this proposed rule. The

EPA will not institute a second

comment period on this document. Any

parties interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

For additional information, see the

direct final rule published in the Final

Rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: April 28, 1995.

Carol M. Browner,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–11496 Filed 5–10–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27291-27292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12540]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27292]]

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Edward N. Barol, Trustee for the Irrevocable Trust and Travel 
One, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of 
Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 6, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105:
    1. Edward N. Barol, Trustee for the Irrevocable Trust and Travel 
One, Narberth, Pennsylvania; to acquire an additional 18.43 percent, 
for a total of 21.44 percent, of the voting shares of First Bank of 
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Mr. Bernard D. Cooper, Marion, Iowa; to acquire 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Delhi Bancshares, Inc., Delhi, Iowa, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Delhi Savings Bank, Delhi, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 17, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-12540 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Modern Technology
Corp (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, being, Arthur J. Seidenfeld, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



                                  /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                                 --------------------------
                                   Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                           President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: January 28, 2004
Amendment to Employment Contract of CEO



 Exhibit 10.8 
  
 Allegheny Energy Service Corporation 
 800 Cabin
Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 February 18, 2004 
  
 Paul J. Evanson 
 c/o Allegheny Energy, Inc. 
 800 Cabin Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 Dear Paul: 
  
 You and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation (“AESC”) for itself and as agent for its parent, Allegheny Energy, Inc. (“AEI”), the
affiliates and subsidiaries of AESC and AEI, and any successors or assigns of any of the foregoing, entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 9, 2003. Pursuant to Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement, you were
entitled to receive a grant of stock options for 1,500,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the AEI Long-Term Incentive Plan on January 2, 2004. However, as you are aware, such grant could not be made without obtaining authorization under the Public
Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935, and such authorization was not obtained until February 10, 2004. 
  
 Accordingly, you, AESC and AEI hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement. Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows: 
  
 “(i) Option
Grant. On the fifth business day following the date that AESC obtains authorization under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (the “Authorization Date”), AESC shall grant the Executive stock options (the
“Options”) for 1,500,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the Allegheny Energy, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) at a per share exercise price equal to the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock
on the date of grant, as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction Listing in The Wall Street Journal. Such grant shall be evidenced by an award agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit A.” 
  
 2. Amendments to Section 5 (c)(i) of the Agreement. The references to
January 2, 2004 and January 1, 2004 in clauses (1) and (2) of Section 5(c)(i) of the Agreement are hereby amended to refer to the Authorization Date and the 2004 Closing Price is defined to mean the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock on the
Authorization Date as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction listing in The Wall Street Journal. 
  










 Mr. Paul J. Evanson 
 January 18, 2004 
 Page 2 
  

 Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by signing the attached copy of this letter in the place indicated. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Allegheny Energy Service Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David B. Hertzog

	 	 	

	 	 	 David B. Hertzog

	 	 	 Vice President & General Counsel

	
	Allegheny Energy, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David B. Hertzog

	 	 	

	 	 	 David B. Hertzog

	 	 	 Vice President & General Counsel



  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	 /s/ Paul J. Evanson

	

	 Paul J. Evanson
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence Butler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A-1 of Alpha Technologies Group,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



/s/ Lawrence Butler
-----------------------
Lawrence Butler
Chief Executive Officer
July 28, 2004