alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12761]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 620

RIN 3052-AB37


Disclosure to Shareholders; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final 
regulation under part 620 on April 24, 1995 (60 FR 20011). The final 
regulation amends its disclosure requirements for association annual 
meeting information statements including required disclosures for 
director candidates nominated from the floor. The amendments provide 
associations more flexibility in accepting floor nominations for 
director positions, clarify disclosure requirements when annual 
meetings are held in more than one session and shareholders vote by 
mail, and make other technical changes. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 
2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of 
publication in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses 
of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of 
Congress, the effective date of the regulations is May 24, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 620 published on 
April 24, 1995 (60 FR 20011) is effective May 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laurie A. Rea, Policy Analyst, Regulation Development, Office of 
Examination, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, 
(703) 883-4498, TDD (703) 883-4444,
  or
James M. Morris, Senior Attorney, Regulatory Operations Division, 
Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 
22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TDD (703) 883-4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a) (9) and (10))

    Dated: May 19, 1995.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12761 Filed 5-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Exhibit 10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
  
 This First
Amendment, dated as of March 31, 2003, to the Severance Agreement dated June 26, 2002, between US Airways, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and B. Ben Baldanza (the “Executive”) is entered into as of the date first
stated above. 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have
previously entered into the Agreement; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the following amendments are hereby made to the Agreement: 
  
 1. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language at the end thereof: 
  
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2, no
“Change of Control” or “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred in connection with transactions under the Retirement Systems of Alabama investment agreement dated September 26, 2002, as amended, or in connection with
the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy.” 
  
 2. Section
5(d)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by substituting “; or” for “, and” at the end of Section 5(d)(i)(4), and by the addition of the following as Section 4(d)(i)(5): 
  
 “(5) any relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters
outside of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area; and”. 







 3. Section 5(d)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby amended by substituting “; or” for the period at
the end of Section 5(d)(ii)(5), and by the addition of the following as Section 5(d)(ii)(6): 
  
 “(6) any relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters outside of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.” 
  

			
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ B. Ben Baldanza


	 B. Ben Baldanza

	
	US AIRWAYS, INC.
		
	 By
	 	 /s/ Jennifer C. McGarey


	 	 	 Name: Jennifer C. McGarey

	 	 	Title: Vice President, Deputy General Counsel & Secretary
Summary of Claims Paid by Medicare

for Conrado Castor's Home Health Care Referrals

For the Period May 20, 2008 through January 25, 2014

Exhibit 1 A

Home Health Care Agency Number of Claims Amount Paid

American Home Health Services, Inc. 318 $862,709.81

Adarna Home Health Care Services, Inc. 82 $211,308.46

Amore Home Health Care Services, Inc. 72 $180,471.14

Total 472 $1,254,489.41

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00145-JTM-JPK document 54-1 filed 01/09/20 page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,376
<INVENTORY>                                    128,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,215
<PP&E>                                         261,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 429,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          634,878
<BONDS>                                         95,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        582
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (429,639)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   429,905
<SALES>                                        530,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               530,102
<CGS>                                          534,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (101,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       501
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (101,594)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (101,594)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Other SE includes Additional Paid in Capital of $335,017 and Accumulated
Deficit of $764,656.
<F2>Earnings per share is not applicable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1556

To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the Thomas F. Eagleton 

United States Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Clyde S. 

Cahill Memorial Park’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate a parcel of land located on the site of the 

Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. 

Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The parcel of land described in section 3, and located 

5 on the site of the Thomas F. Eagleton United States 

6 Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and 

7 designated as the ‘‘Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park’’. 
2

•HR 1556 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the parcel 

4 of land described in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Clyde S. Cahill Memorial Park’’. 

6 SEC. 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. 

7 The parcel of land designated under section 1 is the 

8 parcel bounded by South 10th Street, Clark Avenue, 

9 South 9th Street, and Walnut Street in St. Louis, Mis10 souri.

Æ
[No. 22403-1-III.

Division Three.

January 11, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Martin Louis Podoll, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 02-1-02909-5, Salvatore F. Cozza, J., entered September 19, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, A.C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

October 15, 2014

No. 10-15-00332-CR

WILLIAM ARTHUR McINTOSH

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20379CR

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction of the appeal, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kevin R.
Millison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                             
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|April 21, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ KEVIN R. MILLISON                                       
|               |  |  |  | Kevin R. Millison Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer



26
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 71   filed 07/29/14   page 1 of 4

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 71   filed 07/29/14   page 2 of 4

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 71   filed 07/29/14   page 3 of 4

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 71   filed 07/29/14   page 4 of 4
Robert Arthur ZETROUER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
No. 95-2604

William Rendleman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Steel City Marine * Transport, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

Submitted: February 16, 1996 Filed: March 11, 1996 Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.
William Rendleman, chief engineer of a tow boat owned and operate d by Steel City Marine Transport, Inc. ("Steel City"), brought an actio n under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, to recover damages that resulted fro m a personal injury. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Steel City and the co urt entered judgment accordingly. Rendleman appeals the distric t court's ruling permitting Steel City to introduce Rendleman's complain t into evidence. We affirm.
In its de fense, Steel City asserted that Rendleman was not involved in any accident. Instead, Steel City maintained, Rendleman's knee "went out " as a result of a prior non-work-related injury and Rendlema n fabricated the story about an accident to recover from his employer. In a statement to his treating

### 2

physician, on an acci dent report form, and in his civil complaint against Steel City, Rendleman claimed that he was injure d on February 3, 1990. At trial, however, Rendl eman asserted that the accident occurred on February 5, 1990. Steel City argued that Rendleman chang ed the date of the alleged accident because he had made a record in a work log for February 3, 1990 in wh ich he made no mention of an accident but he had not completed an y work log for February 5, 1990.
Rendleman's argument on appeal--that the court abused its discretion by allowing Steel City to introduce his complaint into evidence--borders on frivolous. Statements made in pleadings constitute admissions
. Missouri Hous. Dev. C omm'n v. Brice , 919 F.2d 1306, 1314 (8th Cir. 1990). As such, they are adm issible at trial. County of Hennepin v. AFG Indus., Inc. , 726 F.2d 149, 153 (8th Cir. 1984). Although it would have bee n possible, as Rendleman urges, for the jury to have found no fundamenta l incons istency between the complaint alleging an accident "on or abou t February 3, 1990" and his later testimony that the accident occurred o n February 5, 1990, that possibility speaks to the weight and value of the evidence, not to its admissibility in the first instance.

The district court's admission of Rendleman's complaint in no wa y constitutes an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS, INC., petitioner, v. Rhonda ROSE, et al.

No. 12-240.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

*1996On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen,* 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1537, 185 L.Ed.2d 654 (2013).
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal American FinancialCorp. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Robert A.Waegelein, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: August 9, 2006  | /s/ RICHARD A.  BARASCH   |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                       | Richard A. Barasch        |
|                       | *Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date:  August 9, 2006 | /s/ ROBERT A. WAEGELEIN   |
|                       | Robert A. Waegelein       |
|                       | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

*A signed originalof this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Thiscertification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theRegistrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.*

1

----
Terrell Lamar McBRIDE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9777.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

|                            |   | Three      Months Ended |   |   | Three      Months Ended |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | March      31, 2008     |   |   | March 31, 2007          |   |
|                            |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |                    |   |   | Earnings                |   |   |   |   |   | Earnings |   |
|                            |   | Shares                  |   |   | Per Share               |   |   | Shares |   |   | Per Share |   |
|                            |   | (in      Thousands)     |   |   | (in      Thousands)     |   |
|                            |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic      Weighted Average     |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shares      Outstanding         |   |                    | 7,192  |   |                    | $      | 0.31 |   |   |   | 7,182 |   |   | $ | 0.34 |   |
|                            |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted                         |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average      Shares Outstanding |   |                    | 7,192  |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   | 7,182 |   |   |   |   |   |
| Common      Stock Equivalents   |   |                    | 0      |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   | 13 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |                    | 7,192  |   |                    | $      | 0.31 |   |   |   | 7,195 |   |   | $ | 0.34 |   |

----
Exhibit 10.8
 
 1. Annual cash retainer:
    
    $40,000 (cash or stock)1 ($10,000 paid quarterly)2. Board meeting fee:
    
    None3. Committee meeting fee
    
    None4. Annual option grant:
    
    $45,000 grant date fair market value25. Annual Chairman retainer:
    
    $20,000 (cash or stock)16. Annual Lead Independent Director retainer:
    
    $15,000 (cash or stock)17. Annual Audit Committee Chairman retainer:
    
    $15,000 (cash or stock)18. Annual Compensation and Governance
Committee Chair retainer:
    
    $10,000 (cash or stock)19. Reimburse out-of-pocket expenses:
    
    Yes10. New independent director award:
    
    TBD cash or equity-based award (but potentially significant
to attract highly-qualified additional independent
directors)
 
 1
    
    Form of compensation to be chosen by each
individual prior to each fiscal year. Number of shares to be issued on third
business day after release of annual (or quarterly, in case of quarterly
retainer payments) earnings announcement based on closing price on such date.2
    
    Annual option grant on third business day
after annual earnings announcement with exercise price equal to closing sale
price on such date  vest 1/3 each year.
UBER TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION RE CMC

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

sf-3749165

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)

AGonzalez@mofo.com

MATTHEW I. KREEGER (CA SBN 153793)

MKreeger@mofo.com

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719)

ETate@mofo.com

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426)

RudyKim@mofo.com

DANIEL P. MUINO (CA SBN 209624)

DMuino@mofo.com

WENDY J. RAY (CA SBN 226269)

WRay@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO TRUCKING LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

UBER TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

REGARDING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Honorable William H. Alsup

Complaint Filed: Feb. 23, 2017

First Am. Compl. Filed: Mar. 10, 2017

Trial Date: TBD

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 51 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 2
UBER TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION RE CMC

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3749165

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

We write to advise the Court that Judge Koh has taken the conflicting matter off calendar. 

Therefore, the parties will proceed as scheduled at 11:30 a.m. on March 16, 2017. 

Dated: March 14, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Arturo J. González

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ 

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and 

OTTO TRUCKING LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 51 Filed 03/14/17 Page 2 of 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-20   filed 07/14/15   page 1 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-20   filed 07/14/15   page 2 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-20   filed 07/14/15   page 3 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-20   filed 07/14/15   page 4 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00315-RL   document 36-20   filed 07/14/15   page 5 of 5
Marcus Deangelo JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10400.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.