alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADDENDUM DATED OCTOBER 31, 2003 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (MCLEOD)



 EXHIBIT 10.19 
  
 

 
  
 Interoffice Memorandum

  

			
	 To:
	  	Personnel File
	 From:
	  	Christopher K. McLeod, EVP
	 Date:
	  	October 31, 2003
	 Re:
	  	Addendum to Employment Agreement

  

  
 I, Christopher K. McLeod, (“the Executive”) signed an Employment Agreement (“the Agreement”) with my employer, CuraGen
Corporation (“the Company”), on or about April 1, 2002. The Agreement provides that it shall be renewed on an annual basis unless either the Company or the Executive notifies the other party of his/her/its intent not to renew the Agreement
on or before October 31 (Section 2A. Term). 
  
 The Executive and the Company have
agreed to modify the terms of that Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 	(Section 2 Term.) 

  
 There shall be no one year term of employment and either the Executive or CuraGen may terminate employment with or without cause and with or without
notice. 
  

	 	2.	 	(Section 6. Disability or Death) 

  
 The Agreement provides that the Company may terminate the Agreement upon the Executive’s death or disability. 
  

	 	3.	 	(Section 10. Termination) 

  
 The Agreement provides that CuraGen may terminate the Agreement for performance reasons or for cause. 
  

	 	4.	 	(Section 10E and Section 12A. Benefits Upon Termination) 

  
 If the Company terminates the Executive’s employment because of performance reasons (as defined in Agreement), disability or death, or without cause,
the Executive or his/her estate shall receive benefits. The benefits are: (i) salary continuation at the salary the Executive was receiving at the time of termination; and (ii) the Executive’s continued participation (or in the case of death
the Executive’s family’s continued participation) in any employee health and welfare benefit to which the Executive was a participant prior to his termination on the same basis as the Executive had participated as an employee. The salary
continuation and continued participation in any health and welfare benefit plan shall be for twelve months from the date of termination of the Executive’s employment. Other than under Section 12 in the event of a Change of Control, the
Executive shall not be entitled to more than twelve (12) months of salary continuation and continued participation in any health or welfare benefit plan if the Executive’s employment is terminated for (1) performance reasons; (2) death; (3)
disability; or (4) without cause. 
  
 Unless explicitly changed in this Addendum,
all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

	
	
	/s/    Christopher K. McLeod
	

	Christopher K. McLeod


	
	
	/s/    Jonathan M. Rothberg
	

	Jonathan M. Rothberg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

STACY MAREK, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) NO: 3:14-cv-462-PPS-JEM 

 ) 

MARSHALL COUNTY, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

 The parties, by their respective counsel, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each 

party will bear her/its own costs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

FOR PLAINTIFF: 

 s/ Patrick F. O’Leary (by permission) 

Patrick F. O’Leary, Attorney #10274-20 

Key Bank, Suite 210 

221 N. Main St. 

P.O. Box 556 

Goshen, IN 46526 

pfolearylaw@aol.com 

 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00462-PPS-JEM document 19 filed 09/24/15 page 1 of 2
2

FOR DEFENDANT: 

 s/ Wayne E. Uhl 

Wayne E. Uhl, Attorney #14463-49

STEPHENSON MOROW & SEMLER, P.C. 

3077 E. 98th St., Ste. 240 

Indianapolis, IN 46280 

wuhl@stephlaw.com 

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on September 24, 2015, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all person(s) registered for electronic filing by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. 

Patrick F. O’Leary, pfolearylaw@aol.com 

Key Bank, Suite 210 

221 N. Main St. 

P.O. Box 556 

Goshen, IN 46526 

 s/ Wayne E. Uhl 

 Wayne E. Uhl 

STEPHENSON MOROW & SEMLER 

3077 E. 98th St., Suite 240 

Indianapolis, IN 46280 

(317) 844-3830 

Fax: (317) 573-4194 

Email: wuhl@stephlaw.com 

13-6451\stip.dismiss.federal.suit.docx\mmi 

USDC IN/ND case 3:14-cv-00462-PPS-JEM document 19 filed 09/24/15 page 2 of 2
Jose N. BETETA, petitioner, v. Ralph M. DIAZ, Warden.

No. 12-9151.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12424]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-39-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 12, 1995, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 3, the following tariff sheet:

First Revised Sheet No. 26

    On May 12, 1995, FGT filed the above tariff sheet in Docket No. 
GT95-39-000 to reflect the cancellation of Rate Schedule X-3 under 
which FGT used to transport natural gas, on an interruptible basis, for 
Sun Oil Company pursuant to an order issued by the Federal Power 
Commission in Docket No. CP61-18. The proposed effective date of the 
First Revised Sheet No. 26 is May 10, 1995. Pursuant to an order issued 
by the Federal Power Commission on August 26, 1974, in Docket No. CP74-
259, FGT received authorization, among other things, to abandon service 
under a transportation agreement dated May 30, 1959, designated as Rate 
Schedule X-3.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426 in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 23, 1995. protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12424 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1112382
<SECURITIES>                                   1019088
<RECEIVABLES>                                    34747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2166217
<PP&E>                                        16716323
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                19128162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           180054
<BONDS>                                         457768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    18465340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  19103162
<SALES>                                        1350769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1432094
<CGS>                                           240373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   240373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                341476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 50000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 800245
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             800245
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    800245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    26.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    26.41
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

        FDA Newsroom

Press Announcements Home
          News & Events
          FDA Newsroom
          Press AnnouncementsFDA Newsroom Press Announcements
  	
        Subscribe to Email Updates
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintNote:Press announcements from 2013 to 2016 and 2017 are available through the FDA.gov Archive. Some links in press announcements may no longer be active. For more information, contact FDA’s Office of Media Affairs at 301-796-4540.

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      03/26/2021Press Announcements
 Sign up to receive FDA Press Releases
                          Get regular FDA email updates delivered on this topic to your inbox.
    Enter your email address to subscribe:
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Walter Lloyd BLAIR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
## NO. 12

- 11

- 00 0 33

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

KEN AMBROSE

, § APPEAL FROM THE 115TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

CYNTHIA RIDGEWAY, MADALINE

BARBER AND BLANTON DAWSON,

APPELLEE S § UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. Because Appellant has

met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is grant ed

,

and the appeal is dismissed

.

Opinion delivered February 18 , 20 1 1

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1570

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the continuation 

of the program for revitalizing the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005

Mr. LINDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the continuation of the program for revitalizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF PROGRAM FOR REVITAL4 IZING CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND 

5 PREVENTION. 

6 (a) FACILITIES; MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING AUTHOR7 ITY.—Section 319D(c)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–4(c)(1)(A)) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘2003,’’; 
2

•HR 1570 IH 

1 (2) by striking ‘‘through 2006’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘and 2005’’; and 

3 (3) by inserting before the period the following: 

4 ‘‘, $250,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 

5 and 2007, and such sums as may be necessary for 

6 fiscal year 2008 and each subsequent fiscal year’’. 

7 (b) MISSION; IMPROVING CAPACITIES.—Section 

8 319D(c)(1)(B) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 247d–4(c)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before 

10 the period the following: ‘‘and for fiscal year 2007 and 

11 each subsequent fiscal year’’. 

12 (c) NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AND SURVEIL13 LANCE NETWORKS.—Section 319D(c)(2) of the Public 

14 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–4(c)(2)) is amended 

15 by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘and for fiscal 

16 year 2007 and each subsequent fiscal year’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 3(i)

                            CERTIFICATE of AMENDMENT
                                     of the
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE of INCORPORATION


         FIRST:  That  in  accordance  with  Section  141  (f)  of  the  General
Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware  ("DGCL"),  the Board of  Directors of
McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation, by unanimous written consent duly adopted
resolution  setting forth a proposed  amendment of the Restated  Certificate  of
Incorporation of said corporation,  declaring saidamendment to be advisable. The
resolution setting forth theproposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED,  that  the  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of this
corporation  be amended by changing the first  sentence of Section 1 so that, as
amended, said sentenceshall be and read as follows:

"The name of the corporation is Boeing Capital Corporation."

         SECOND:  That  thereafter,  pursuant to the  resolutionof  its Board of
Directors,  the  stockholders of said  corporation by unanimous  written consent
pursuant  to Section  228 ofthe  DGCL  adopted  the  amendment  to the  Restated
Certificate of Incorporation.

         THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

        FOURTH:  That the capital of said corporation shall notbe reduced under
or by reason of said amendment.

        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has caused this  certificate to be
signed by Thomas J. Motherway,  an Authorized  Officer,  this 11th day of August
11th 1997.


                              BY:     /S/  THOMAS J. MOTHERWAY
                                      ------------------------
                                      Thomas J. Motherway
#### Demetric Gray PEARSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mary Ann SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; Officer Oates; Officer Garliday; Officer Harbaugh, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-6260.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 6, 2004.

Demetric Gray Pearson, pro se. David Phelps Kennedy, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Pearson v. Saar,*No. CA-03-869-PJM (D.Md. Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

KATHLEEN J. MUMMA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 1:12CV30-PPS/RBC

)

REGENCY PLACE OF FORT WAYNE, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The parties’ joint Stipulation of Dismissal [DE 11] is SO ORDERED, and this case is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and thereby CLOSED, the parties to bear their own costs

and fees. 

ENTERED: June 29, 2012

 s/ Philip P. Simon 

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 1:12-cv-00030-PPS-RBC document 12 filed 06/29/12 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT DCT-021/03 
  

This Amendment Number 1 to Purchase Agreement DCT-021/03, dated as of November 4, 2003 (“Amendment No. 1”), relates to the Purchase Agreement
Number DCT-021/03 between EMBRAER-Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A. (“Embraer”) and US Airways Group, Inc. (“Buyer”) dated May 9th, 2003 (as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), Buyer and Embraer are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”. Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used
herein shall have the meanings set forth or referred to in the Purchase Agreement. 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 sets forth **. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Embraer and Buyer do hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	** 

  

	  	** 

  

	2.	EFFECT UPON PURCHASE AGREEMENT 

  
 All terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement that have not been specifically and expressly altered or modified hereunder shall remain in full force
and effect. In the event any conflict exists between the terms of the Purchase Agreement and the terms of this Amendment No. 1, the terms of this Amendment No. 1 shall control. 
  

	3.	COUNTERPARTS 

  
 This Amendment No. 1 may be executed by the Parties in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon
the same instrument and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed and delivered by
their proper and duly authorized officers and to be effective as of the day and year first above written. 
  

							
	US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.	  	 EMBRAER – EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE
 AERONÁUTICA S.A.

				
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Eilif Serck-Hanssen

	  	 By:
	 	 /s/ Satoshi Yokota


	 Name:
	 	 Eilif Serck-Hanssen
	  	 Name:
	 	 Satoshi Yokota

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President, Finance & Treasurer
	  	 Title:
	 	 Executive Vice-President Development and Industry

				
	 	 	 	  	 By:
	 	 /s/ Flavio Rimoli


	 	 	 	  	 Name:
	 	 Flavio Rimoli

	 	 	 	  	 Title:
	 	 Sr. Vice President Airline Marketing

				
	 Witness:
	 	 /s/ Ross Cotjanle

	  	 Witness:
	 	 /s/ Hilario Oliveira


	 Name:
	 	 Ross Cotjanle
	  	 Name:
	 	 Hilario Oliveira

				
	 Date:
	 	 November 4, 2003
	  	 Date:
	 	 November 4 , 2003

	 Place:
	 	 Arlington, VA
	  	 Place:
	 	 Sao Jose dos Campos, SP Brazil
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-40555

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

JOHN ERIC JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Chairman, Board of Pardon

and Parole; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, Transitional Planning Department,

Northern Region,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-9)

July 7, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Eric Jackson, Texas prisoner No. 658692, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

prisoner civil rights suit. Jackson alleges that the district
-2-

court abused its discretion in dismissing his claims that the Texas

Board of Pardon and Paroles improperly considered previous

convictions and writ-writing activity in denying him parole and

denied him due process of law and equal protection of the laws.

After review of the record and Jackson’s arguments on appeal, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Jackson’s claims as frivolous and accordingly affirm the

district court’s decision. See Allison v. Kyle, 66 F.3d 71, 73

(5th Cir. 1995); Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299 (5th Cir.

1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S. Ct. 559, 139 L. Ed. 2d

400 (1997). Jackson’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
Christopher A. DROTLEFF and Justin H. Cannon, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9027.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Kevin R. BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7175.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.