alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Kerry J. McCullagh, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Contact Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Kerry J. McCullagh     
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | KERRY J. MCCULLAGH         
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | October 29, 2008           

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Presidential Documents

25841

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 93

Monday, May 15, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Presidential Documents

Proclamation 6798 of May 11, 1995

National Safe Boating Week, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Recreational boating has become one of this Nation’s most popular leisuretime activities. It is estimated that in 1995, more than 76 million Americans

will enjoy our country’s scenic waterways, engaging in pastimes from fishing

and cruising to waterskiing, sailing, and sightseeing. Most Americans will

act responsibly in these activities, ensuring the safety of their families and

friends. Yet much work remains to be done if we are to make boating

safe for all of us.

Studies indicate that in more than 85 percent of the fully documented

recreational boating fatalities, the victim was not wearing any type of life

jacket. This tragic statistic highlights a simple fact: personal flotation devices

can help prevent more than 600 fatalities annually. I urge all Americans

to wear them regularly when on our waterways.

The United States Coast Guard, the National Safe Boating Council, and

the many State and local recreational boating organizations and governmental

agencies are working with volunteer organizations across the country to

educate the boating public about the importance of wearing life jackets.

This advice applies not only to boat operators but also to passengers and

all individuals participating in sporting activities on the waterways. Falling

overboard and capsizing are the leading causes of boating fatalities, and

more than half of all boating accidents are alcohol-related. But with responsible behavior and the proper precautions, families and friends can experience the joys of boating for years to come.

In recognition of the importance of safe boating practices, the Congress,

by joint resolution approved June 4, 1958 [36 U.S.C. 161], as amended,

has authorized and requested the President to proclaim annually the seven

day period prior to the Memorial Day Weekend, as ‘‘National Safe Boating

Week.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, do hereby proclaim May 20 through May 26, 1995, as National

Safe Boating Week. I encourage the Governors of the 50 States and the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and officials of other areas subject to the

jurisdiction of the United States, to join in observing this week. I urge

all Americans to practice safe recreational boating during these days and

throughout the year.
25842 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day

of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–12039

Filed 5–11–95; 3:14 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KUSHAL SHAH f/k/a GERRON M.

LINDSEY

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 154

, 2019

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 0002019767 ( N )

§

§

§

§

Submitted: June 10, 2019

Decided: July 12 , 2019

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice ; VALIHURA and VAUGHN

, Justices.

ORDER

A fter careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal

, we conclude that the Superior Court’s

order, 1 dated March 7, 2019 , adopting the Commissioner’ s report and

recommendation

, 2 dated December 5, 2018

, and denying Shah’s twelfth motion for

postconviction relief should be affirmed

. Shah was not convicted after trial and did

1 State v. Shah , 2019 WL 1077274 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 7, 2019).

2 State v. Shah , 2018 WL 6432979 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 5, 2018).2

not satisfy the requirements of Sup erior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)( 2 ). 3 The

Superior Court did not err in denying Shah relief.

NOW, T HEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED

and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

3 Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2) ( providing that a second or subsequent Rule 61 motion “shall

be summarily dismissed, unless the movant wa s convicted after a trial and the motion” pleads with

particularity new evidence creating a strong inferenc e that the movant was actually innocent or a

new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review ).
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00092-CV

RAMONA ROGERS, M. D., MODESTO ZAMBRANO, STEPHANIE CUMPIAN, 

ROLANDO FLORES, HECTOR ONTIVEROS, PRISCILLA NIETO, SONIA 

HERNANDEZ-KEEBLE, BLAS ORTIZ, JR., DAVID MORON, M. D., JAIME FLORES 

AND RIO GRANDE STATE CENTER

v.

DAVID SAXON BAGLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF JEREMIAH RAY BAGLEY

On Appeal from the

444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2017-DCL-00875-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 13, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          704324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                704324
<PP&E>                                            9939
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  762756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            18775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2015
<OTHER-SE>                                      741966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    762756
<SALES>                                           3200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 86605
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 53333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  33272
<INCOME-TAX>                                     17310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              15962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Frederick Eldred RENNEKE, petitioner, v. FLORENCE COUNTY, WISCONSIN.

No. 12-10109.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District III, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE USDC Northern Indiana

HAMMOND DIVISION

Henry Kleyweg, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:14−cv−00138−JD−PRC

Judge Jon E DeGuilio

Bank of America NA, et al.

Defendant.

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO EXERCISE

JURISDICTION

 In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C.§636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72−1 you

are hereby notified that a United States Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or

all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order the entry of a final judgment.

Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all parties voluntarily

consent.

 Because of the dramatic increase in the number of criminal cases in recent years, the district judges give

priority to the criminal docket as required by law. Under these circumstances, your case can experience

delay, which can result in cost increases, before it can be tried by the district judge. Congress' enactment of

the Civil Justice Reform Act requires the Court to give increased attention to addressing costs and delays in

resolving civil disputes. The Judicial Conference of the United States encourages the designation of

magistrate judges to conduct all proceedings in civil cases, both jury and non−jury. Trial before a

magistrate judge, in addition to an earlier trial date, will also enable the Court to give counsel and the

parties a firm trial setting. Therefore, the parties are encouraged to file a Consent to Jurisdiction by United

States Magistrate Judge.

 You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the

court's jurisdiction from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity

of the parties consenting or withholding consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the

district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

 An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United States

Court of Appeals for this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a

district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.§636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72−1 the parties

in this case hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further

proceedings in this case, including trial, entry of a final judgment, and all post−judgment proceedings.

Print and Sign List all Parties Represented Date

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT.

case 2:14-cv-00138-JD-PRC document 14 filed 06/02/14 page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.1





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**








I,
      Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
                  August 9,
                  2007
              By:
              /s/
                Jeffrey F. O'DonnellJeffrey
                F. O'DonnellChief
                  Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




E-32.1
Darius Mark KIMBROUGH, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 13-7259 (13A474).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Mario Tico MARLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4836

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION





I, Fred
Zolla, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vemics, Inc;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a.  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;





b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.  
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





6.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.








/s/Fred Zolla


Fred
Zolla


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


Date:
October 14,
2008
Exhibit 32.1


                     Certification of the CEO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Niagara
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Scharf, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Scharf
------------------
Michael Scharf
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12547]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

National Assessment Governing Board; Meeting

AGENCY: National Assessment Governing Board; Education.

AGENCY: Notice of Achievement Levels Committee Teleconference meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming teleconference meeting of the Achievement Levels Committees 
of the National Assessment Governing Board. This notice also describes 
the functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under 
Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This document 
is intended to notify the general public of their opportunity to 
attend.

DATES: June 12, 1995.

TIME: 2:00 P.M. (e.t.), until adjournment, approximately, 3:30 p.m., 
(open).

LOCATION: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 825, Washington, D.C.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Wilmer, Operations Officer, 
National Assessment Governing Board, Suite 825, 800 North Capitol 
Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20002-4233, Telephone: (202) 357-6938.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Assessment Governing Board is 
established under section 412 of the National Education Statistics Act 
of 1994 (Title IV of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994), 
(Pub. L. 103-382).
    The Board is established to formulate policy guidelines for the 
National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Board is responsible 
for selecting subject areas to be assessed, developing assessment 
objectives, identifying appropriate achievement goals for each grade 
and subject tested, and establishing standards and procedures for 
interstate and national comparisons.
    On June 12, the Achievement Levels Committee will hold a 
teleconference meeting beginning at 2:00 p.m. The purpose of this 
meeting is to select (1) exemplar items for the 1994 U.S. history and 
world geography reports, and (2) exemplar items for the 1994 reading 
report. Other agenda items include consideration of a report from NCES 
on technical issues in performance assessments, and discussion of the 
Advisory Council on Education Statistics document on standards.
    Records are kept of all Board proceedings and are available for 
public inspection at the U.S. Department of Education, National 
Assessment Governing Board, Suite 825, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Roy Truby,
Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12547 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M