alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc.    /s/ E. James Collord DATE:  August 16, 2010 E. James Collord, President and Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 48   filed 06/26/14   page 1 of 5

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 48   filed 06/26/14   page 2 of 5

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 48   filed 06/26/14   page 3 of 5

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 48   filed 06/26/14   page 4 of 5

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 48   filed 06/26/14   page 5 of 5
BARBARA C. BATTISTA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5446

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 10, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Don H. Lester, Judge.

Barbara C. Battista, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.
  /s/ Scott R. JensenScott R. JensenChief Financial Officer
C.E.R. v. J.L.D.

2170355

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2018

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-77-TLS 

)

JOSE NOE PEREA CASTENEDA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 8], filed on November 25, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 8] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on December 26, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         728,144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 728,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,441
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     532,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   728,144
<SALES>                                        559,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               646,975
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  369,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               221,412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,283,184
<EPS-BASIC>                                      90.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    90.48


</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: September 17, 2015 520296 

________________________________

In the Matter of THOMAS J. 

KRUPA,

Appellant, 

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections 

and Community Supervision,

et al., 

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: August 10, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Thomas J. Krupa, Rome, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondents. 

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough,

J.), entered November 25, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner

of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner

guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 520296 

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
YI MIA ZHENG, aka Yi Mei Zhen, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 12-1054.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Frederick C. FERMIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-890.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Robert HOARD, IV, petitioner, v. Paul KLEE.

No. 12-9973.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Gerald Carl LIBERACE.

No. D-2716.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Gerald Carl Liberace, of Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:14-CR-7-TLS 

)

CHRISTOPHER R. SMITH )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 20], filed on April 8, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 20] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on May 2, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. II 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          35,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,920   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,919   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,149     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,019)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,919    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,838    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,612    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 361    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       210     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.08<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

PATRICK McDONALD, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:13-CV-306-PRC

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Petition for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to

Justice Act [DE 32], filed by Plaintiff on January 20, 2015. The Commissioner filed a response on

January 23, 2015. Plaintiff did not file a reply, and the time to do so has passed.

After a final decision by the Agency that he was not disabled, Plaintiff filed an appeal with

this Court. Upon reviewing Plaintiff’s opening brief, the Commissioner agreed that remand was

warranted, and the parties signed a stipulation asking for remand pursuant to Sentence Four of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g). The Court accordingly reversed the Agency’s decision and remanded this case for

further consideration. That Order was issued on May 30, 2014. Plaintiff now asks for attorney fees

and costs incurred in litigating this case.

The EAJA allows a prevailing plaintiff to recoup reasonable attorney fees incurred in

litigation against the Commissioner of Social Security provided, among other things, that the request

is timely. United States v. Hallmark Constr. Co., 200 F.3d 1076, 1078–79 (7th Cir. 2000) (citing 28

U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), (B); Commissioner, I.N.S. v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 154 (1990)). The deadline

to file an EAJA request falls thirty days after the judgment becomes “not appealable.” See Shalala

v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302 (1993) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G)). In civil cases

where a federal officer is a party, the time for appeal does not end until sixty days after judgment
was entered. Id. (citing Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), (7)). Thus, a plaintiff has a total of ninety days after

the Court enters judgment to file an EAJA application. 

Judgment in this case was entered on May 30, 2014, and the deadline to file a timely request

was accordingly August 28, 2014. Plaintiff’s January 20, 2015 motion is late. Plaintiff doesn’t

discuss timeliness or provide any reasons why his motion was filed nearly five months after the

deadline. The Court sees no reason why the delay should be excused and accordingly DENIES the

Petition for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act [DE 32]. 

SO ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2015.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. II 1999 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      561
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          36,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         17,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,816)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,621
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (1)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       840
<EPS-BASIC>                                     8.34<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
귀하의 피부 제품에

무엇이 함유되어 있는지 알아보십시오.

자세한 내용은 다음을 방문하세요.

www.fda.gov/healthequity

healthequity@fda.hhs.gov

1-888-INFO-FDA

(1-888-463-6332)

@FDAHealthEquity









www.fda.gov/SkinFacts를 방문하여 

피부 제품 안전에 대한 피부 관련 

사실을 얻으십시오!

피부 제품 사용으로 인해 안좋은 

반응이 나타나면 의료 서비스 

제공자에게 문의하십시오.

다음의 사이트 혹은 번호를 통해 

FDA에 보고하십시오. 

www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.

htm 또는 1-800-FDA-1088. 로 

문의하십시오.

알고 계셨

습니까?

피부 제품의 라벨에서 건강상의 

위험을 초래할 수 있는 성분을 

확인하는 것이 가장 좋습니다. 

수제 라벨, 영어 이외의 언어로 

된 라벨 또는 라벨이 전혀 없는 

제품은 사용하지 마십시오. 

이와 같은 제품은 FDA 규정을 

위반하고 유해할 수 있습니다.

FDA 소수 민족 건강 및 의료 형

평성 사무소

ૺࢼ؏ײْ଑

ଡۉଜߛ߂߇лଢ߻
피부 미백 제품이란 무엇입니까?

“피부 미백”은 피부의 색소 침착(색상)을 밝게 

하기 위해 판매되는 제품에 대한 용어입니다. 

일부 대체 이름으로는 다음이 포함될 수 

있습니다.

• 피부 브라이트너 또는 

화이트너

• 피부 탈색제 

• 스킨 이브닝 제품 

• 스팟 교정제

• 페이딩 크림

• 화학 박피

피부 미백 제품은 피부 변색/과다 색소침착(기미), 

노화 반점 또는 기미, 주근깨, 여드름 및 주름과 

하이드로퀴논의 건강 위험 요소는 

무엇입니까?

FDA는 발진, 안면 부종 및 영구적인 피부 변색 (

조직흑갈병)을 포함하여 하이드로퀴논을 함유한 

피부 미백 제품의 사용으로 인한 심각한 부작용에 

대해 보고를 받았습니다.

수은의 건강 위험 요소는 

무엇입니까? 

수은은 신경, 소화 및 면역 체계와 폐, 신장, 피부 

및 눈을 손상시킬 수 있는 매우 독성이 강한 

금속입니다. 제품을 사용하지 않는 다른 가족 

구성원조차도 공기 중 수은 증기를 호흡하거나 

오염된 표면을 만지는 경우 수은에 노출될 수 

있습니다. 수은은 특히 어린 아이들의 두뇌와 

신경계에 유해합니다.

수은 중독의 징후에는 과민성, 떨림, 시력 또는 

청력 변화, 기억력 문제, 우울증, 손, 발 또는 입 

주변의 무감각 및 따끔거림이 포함됩니다.

수은 중독은 혼수 상태 또는 심지어 죽음을 

초래할 수 있습니다.

FDA는 피부 미백 제품의 이러한 

성분으로부터 대중을 보호하기 

위해 무엇을 하고 있습니까?

하이드로퀴논 또는 수은을 함유한 처방전 없이 

살 수 있는 피부 미백 제품의 판매는 불법입니다. 

FDA는 처방전 없이 이러한 제품을 판매하는 모든 

판매자에 대해 조치를 취할 수 있습니다.

의료 서비스 제공자로부터 하이드로퀴논을 

포함하는 피부 제품의 처방전을 받을 수 

있습니다. FDA는 안전하고 효과적인 대안이 없는 

경우 특정 화장품에 매우 소량의 수은을 방부제로 

사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 그러나 피부 

미백 화장품에 수은을 사용하는 것은 금지되어 

있습니다.

처방전 없이 구입할 수 있는 피부 

미백 제품을 구입할 때 무엇을 

확인해야 합니까?

제품 라벨을 읽고 하이드로퀴논 또는 수은을 

확인하십시오. 연방법에 따라 업체들은 미국에서 

판매되는 화장품 또는 비처방(처방전 없이 구입할 

수 있는) 제품의 라벨에 성분을 기재해야 하며, 

수은은 수은 염화물, 칼로멜, 수은, 머큐리오, 또는 

Hg로 표시될 수 있습니다.

하이드로퀴논 또는 수은을 함유한 일부 불법 피부 

미백 제품은 라벨에 이러한 성분을 기재하지 않을 

수 있습니다. 수제 라벨, 영어 이외의 언어로 된 

라벨 또는 라벨이 전혀 없는 제품은 사용하지 

마십시오. 이와 같은 제품은 FDA 규정을 위반하고 

유해할 수 있습니다.

수은 중독의 증상이 나타나면 

1-(800)-222-1222로 중독 관리청에 

연락하여 즉시 의료 서비스 제공자와 

상담하십시오.

같은 다양한 피부 

상태를 치료하기 위한 

제품으로 홍보됩니다.

피부 미백 

제품에 유해한 

성분이 있습니까?

하이드로퀴논과 수은은 크림, 로션, 비누 또는 

파우더의 형태로 판매되는 불법 피부 미백 

제품에서 때때로 발견되는 두 가지 성분입니다. 

이러한 성분을 피부에 사용하면 몸에 흡수되어 

계속 사용하는 경우 축적되어 해로울 수 

있습니다.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11622]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 97

[PR Docket No. 93-267; FCC 95-165]


Temporary Operating Authority for New Amateur Operators

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the proposal published at 58 FR 59701, 
November 10, 1993 to amend the Commission's Rules to provide temporary 
operating authority to a person who passes the examination for a new 
amateur operator license and terminates the proceeding. The 
implementation of the electronic filing of applications in the amateur 
service has made the proposed temporary operating authority 
unnecessary.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maurice J. DePont, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless 
Telecommunications Bureau, Washington DC 20554, (202) 418-0690.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopted April 19, 1995, and released May 
2, 1995. The complete text of this Commission action is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Reference Center (Room 230), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this Memorandum Opinion and Order may also be ordered 
from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription 
Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037, 
telephone (202) 857-3800.

Summary of Memorandum Opinion and Order

    1. The commenters generally opposed the concept of a temporary 
operating authority for new amateur operators because they feared that 
it would be abused by persons who would fabricate false call signs and 
operate without any license.
    2. Subsequent to the issuance of the proposal in this proceeding, 
the amateur service rules were amended to permit electronic filing of 
applications by the volunteer-examiner coordinators. This recent 
development has made the proposed temporary operating authority 
unnecessary. Hence, the proposal is withdrawn and the proceeding is 
terminated.
    3. This Memorandum Opinion and Order is issued pursuant to the 
authority contained in 47 U.S.C. 154(i).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 97

    Radio, Temporary operating authority.

Federal Communications Commission.
LaVera F. Marshall,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11622 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Matthew Robert DESCAMPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11-9540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Russell K. SHOWERS, petitioner, v. John KERESTES, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.

No. 12-9699.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the Date hereof (the Report), James D. Minix, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 7, 2005

|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ James D. Minix                           
|James D. Minix                               
|Chief Executive Officer                      
|                                             
|November 7, 2005                             
|/s/ Terry L. Hester                          
|Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer                      



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



55