alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

January 29, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appe llate Court C lerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

JANUARY 1999 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) NO. 02C01-9810-CC-00301

Appellee )

) HENRY COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. JULIAN P. GUINN,

TONY BERNARD WILLIAMS, ) JUDGE

 )

Defendant )

 )

IN RE: ALLEGHENY MUTUAL )

 CASUALTY CO. ) (Bond Forfeiture)

 )

Appellant )

FOR THE APPELLANT:

VICTORIA L. DIBONAVENTURA

104 W. Washington Street, Ste. A

P. O. Box 1231

Paris, TN 38242

FOR THE APPELLEE:

PAUL G. SUMMERS

Attorney General and Reporter

ELIZABETH T. RYAN

Assistant Attorney General

Cordell Hull Building, 2nd Floor

425 Fifth Avenue North

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

ROBERT "GUS" RADFORD

District Attorney General

STEVEN L. GARRETT

Assistant District Attorney General

P. O. Box 94

Paris, TN 38242

OPINION FILED: 

REVERSED

JOE G. RILEY,
JUDGE
3

O P I N I O N

This is an appeal by Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company as a result of a

bond forfeiture ordered by the Circuit Court of Henry County. The state concedes

the trial court erred in ordering the forfeiture. We agree and reverse the judgment

of the trial court. 

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant, Tony Bernard Williams, made a $5,000 bond with Allegheny

Mutual Casualty Company on charges of selling cocaine. Subsequently, the

defendant entered a guilty plea to selling cocaine and received a sentence of three

years with six months to be served in the county jail and the balance on supervised

probation. 

Probation violation warrants were subsequently issued with bonds set;

however, defendant did not make bond on these warrants. The trial court revoked

probation and ordered the defendant to serve the remainder of the sentence. The

trial court also ordered that judgment be taken on the original appearance bond for

the cost of transporting the defendant from Illinois on the probation violation

warrants. The amount of the claim was $324.93. 

Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company filed a motion to set aside the bond

forfeiture. The trial court denied the motion, and this appeal followed. 

ANALYSIS

This Court has previously determined that when Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-11-

130 and 138 are read together, a surety’s obligation on the original appearance

bond does not continue after sentencing while the defendant is serving an

alternative sentence. State v. Sharon Melton, C.C.A. No. 01C01-9612-CC-00497,

Franklin County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed March 12, 1998, at Nashville). Pursuant to
4

the express language of Tenn. Code Ann. §40-11-138(b), the surety is relieved of

its liability on the original bond upon the trial court’s acceptance of the defendant’s

guilty plea and the announcement of the sentence. Id. We continue to adhere to

this statutory interpretation. 

The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

___________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

_______________________________

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
Lawrence RICE, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 13-5100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EMPLOYEE RESOURCE GROUPS (ERGs)

Association of African American Professionals

Supports the career growth and development for FDIC African American employees, their recruitment, hiring and 

advancement in the FDIC. Supports the public image and presence of the FDIC through participation in outreach 

activities to educational institutions and organizations that support equal opportunity for African Americans.

A

3

P

Corporate Advocacy Network for Disability Opportunities

Provides a forum and space for any and all FDIC employees who have an interest in issues affecting employees 

with disabilities. Supports FDIC efforts to recruit and retain employees with disabilities.

Heritage of Asian American Pacific Islanders

Promotes dialogues on issues affecting Asian American and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) issues and raises awareness 

about AAPI culture and history. Provides members with resources to develop and advance their careers through 

training, mentorship, and information on various opportunities and assignments.

Hispanic Organization for Leadership and Advancement

Supports and assists in the recruitment, retention, and advancement of Hispanics and encourages professional 

mentorship. Supports regional and national diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Innovation Meetup

Encourages employees to discover, share, and deploy creative practices that increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the FDIC. Shares information about best practices across sectors.

Networking Inclusion and Advancement for African American Women

Supports opportunities to educate and provide activities to attract, retain, empower, and inspire African American 

women. Helps African American women employees achieve their fullest potential across the spectrum of 

professional development.

Partnership of Women in the Workplace

Provides support to women to facilitate a more inclusive workplace and understanding among genders by providing 

an arena for: discussion, encouragement, support, education, serving broader communities, and empowerment.

PRIDE

Conducts programs/activities to educate FDIC employees about sexual orientation/gender identity, including LGBT 

employee issues and concerns. Serves as a resource to management to identify potential strategies to eliminate 

barriers/disadvantages faced by employees and/or their families, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Veterans Employee Resource Group

Provides a forum and space for education and discussion to any and all FDIC employees who have an interest in 

issues affecting veterans of the United States Armed Forces, to include the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, 

Coast Guard, and National Guard, including veterans, their families, friends, and allies. Operates as a support 

community and network among FDIC veterans and their families, friends, and allies as well as a liaison with 

other veteran resource groups in the federal government.

NIA

WOMEN

POWW

CAN DO

HAAPI

HOLA

IM

PRIDE

VERG

Scan the QR code for more 

information about the FDIC’s 

employee resource groups.
Harry Louis HARGROVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9819.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1344 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 

Farmington River and Salmon Brook in the State of Connecticut for 

study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

SIMMONS, Ms. DELAURO, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of the Farmington River and Salmon Brook 

in the State of Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lower Farmington 

5 River and Salmon Brook Wild and Scenic River Study 

6 Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1344 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL SEGMENT OF FARM2 INGTON RIVER AND SALMON BROOK IN CON3 NECTICUT FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDI4 TION TO NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIV5 ERS SYSTEM. 

6 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) The Farmington River and Salmon Brook 

8 in the State of Connecticut possess important re9 source values, including wildlife, ecological, and sce10 nic values, and historic sites and a cultural past im11 portant to America’s heritage. 

12 (2) There is a longstanding interest among 

13 State and local officials, area residents, and river 

14 and brook users in undertaking a concerted coopera15 tive effort to manage the river and brook in a pro16 ductive and meaningful way. 

17 (b) DESIGNATION.—Section 5(a) of the Wild and 

18 Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by add19 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(139) LOWER FARMINGTON RIVER AND SALMON

21 BROOK, CONNECTICUT.—The segment of the Farmington 

22 River downstream from the segment designated as a rec23 reational river by section 3(a)(156) to its confluence with 

24 the Connecticut River, and the segment of the Salmon 

25 Brook including its mainstem and east and west 

26 branches.’’. 
3 

•HR 1344 IH 

1 (c) TIME FOR SUBMISSION.—Not later than three 

2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec3 retary of the Interior shall submit to Congress a report 

4 containing the results of the study required by the amend5 ment made by subsection (b). 

6 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

7 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

8 necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL, 

# FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS EUGENE FORREST, III NO. 2021 KW 1307 

### DECEMBER 30, 2021 In Re: Eugene Forrest, III, applying for supervisory writs,



### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 3934- F- 2019. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. VGW AHP CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

r 

### DEL' TfLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
John P. BAKER, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-10259.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer of YDI Wireless, Inc.,
certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of YDI Wireless,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: May 12, 2005                          /s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                          Chief Executive Officer
Patrick LANG, petitioner, v. Cindi CURTIN, Warden.

No. 12-8863.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  311,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (58,600)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,729,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,652,500
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,729,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
Lisa WEATHERBY, petitioner, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS.

No. 12-637.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0657

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANIEL E. NEWBY,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Daniel E. Newby, to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Nicko las C. Murnion , Dist rict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2023

02/22/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0657
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1606 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 211
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1606

                          [Report No. 109-389]

     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude 
    communications over the Internet from the definition of public 
                             communication.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2005

Mr. Hensarling introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

                             March 13, 2006

 Additional sponsors: Mr. Paul, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Flake, Mr. Ryan of 
 Ohio, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, 
                         and Mr. Bishop of Utah

                             March 13, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude 
    communications over the Internet from the definition of public 
                             communication.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Online Freedom of Speech Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.

    Paragraph (22) of section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(22)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new sentence: ``Such term shall not include communications 
over the Internet.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 211

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1606

                          [Report No. 109-389]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude 
    communications over the Internet from the definition of public 
                             communication.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 13, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12585]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. 9271]


B.A.T Industries p.l.c., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order permits, among other things, B.A.T Industries and Brown & 
Williamson Tobacco Corporation to consummate the acquisition of 
American Tobacco Company, but requires them to divest, within twelve 
months, six American Tobacco discount cigarette brands and to divest to 
the purchaser of these brands three American Tobacco full-revenue 
brands, as well as the American Tobacco manufacturing facility in 
Reidsville, N.C. If the required divestitures are not completed on 
time, the consent order permits the Commission to appoint a trustee to 
complete the transactions. In addition, the consent order requires the 
respondents, for ten years, to obtain Commission approval before 
acquiring any interest in a cigarette manufacturer or any assets used 
to manufacture or distribute cigarettes in the United States.

DATES: Complaint issued November 28, 1994. Order issued April 19, 
1995.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Krauss, FTC/H-324, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2713.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, January 11, 1995, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 60 FR 2751, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of B.A.T Industries p.l.c., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to 
divest, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12585 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

MARY J. DOWNING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-22-TLS

)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH )

AND HUMAN SERVICES, sued as )

Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The Plaintiff Mary J. Downing, proceeding pro se, appealed a final decision of the

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) denying her Medicare

Part B coverage for six ambulance transports. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-1, the District Court referred this case to

Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey for the issuance of a Report and Recommendation. On March

6, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 32],

recommending that the final decision of the Secretary be affirmed.

This Court’s review of a magistrate’s report and recommendation is governed by 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in part:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the

report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is

made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also

receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with

instructions.

The statute permits objections to the magistrate’s report and recommendations to be made within

fourteen days of service of a copy of the report. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (setting forth
procedures for objecting to a magistrate’s report and recommendation and the district court’s

resolution of any objections). 

As of the date of this Order, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been

filed, and the time for making objections has now passed. The Court has reviewed the Report

and Recommendation submitted by Judge Cosbey and finds that his proposed disposition is well

taken in that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge and the Medicare Appeals Council,

which became the final decision of the Secretary, is supported by substantial evidence and does

not contain legal error. 

The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 32] in its entirety and

ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. The Secretary’s decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED on March 26, 2013.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2