alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Form 10-Q of Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the Report), Al D. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








August 13, 2010




______________________________________


Al D. Ross, President and


Chief Executive Officer








August 13, 2010




______________________________________


Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1524 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1524

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  12433 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Ed Eilert Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 12433 
Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Ed Eilert Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Eilert Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Modern Technology
Corp (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, being, Arthur J. Seidenfeld, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



                          /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                          ------------------------
                          Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                          President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: November 3, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11779]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    Each Friday the Public Health Service (PHS) publishes a list of 
information collection requests under review, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of 
these requests, call the PHS Reports Clearance Office on (202) 690-
7100.
    The following requests have been submitted for review since the 
list was last published on May 5.
    1. Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the Public 
Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research 
Subjects--0925-0404--Revision--The evaluation of the performance of the 
system of protections for human subjects of research will update 
information on outcome, output, process and resources to develop 
comprehensive and systematic data on effectiveness of protections and 
possible recommendations for improvement by means of survey, interview, 
and review of records and data of awardee institutions. Respondents: 
Individuals or households; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or 
Tribal Government; Number of Respondents: 2,358; Number of Responses 
per Respondent: 1; Average Burden per Response: 0.513 hour; Estimated 
Annual Burden: 1,210 hours. Send comments to Shannah Koss, Human 
Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.
    2. National Nursing Home Expenditure Survey: National Medical 
Expenditure Survey, Pretest, Rounds 2 and 3--0935-0095--Revision--
Nursing home staffs and community respondents will provide data on a 
sample of facilities and a sample of residents of those facilities. 
Data will be collected on the use of nursing homes, expenditures for 
care, resident characteristics, and services provided. This survey is a 
pretest of instruments and procedures for the nursing home component of 
the 1996 National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES-3). Respondents: 
Individuals or households; Business or other for-profit; Number of 
Respondents: 495; Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.2; Average 
Burden per Response: 1.46 hours; Estimated Annual Burden: 866 hours. 
Send comments to Shannah Koss, Human Resources and Housing Branch, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.
    Written Comments and recommendations concerning the purposed 
information collections should be sent within 30 days of this notice 
directly to the individual designated.

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
James Scanlon,
Director, Data Policy Staff, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 
Health and PHS Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11779 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-M
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 21 filed 06/13/14 page 1 of 1
Shontonio L. WITHERSPOON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10410.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Randy Lynn ATKINS, petitioner, v. Kenneth E. LASSITER, Warden.

No. 12-9163.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Quincy CHILDRESS, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 12-9715.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, denied.
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Discover Products Inc.

Discover Card Master Trust I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Discover Products Inc. (DPI), hereby certifies that:



|(a) | A review of the activities of DPI for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, dated January 1, 2007, as
amended, by and between DPI and Discover Bank (the Agreement) was made under my supervision.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, DPI has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2010.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 7th
day of February 2011.



By:

/s/ Carlos MinettiCarlos Minetti,Executive Vice
President
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27105-27106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12449]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sierra Tahoe Bancorp; Notice of Application to Engage de novo in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of [[Page 27106]] Regulation Y as closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
June 5, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Sierra Tahoe Bancorp, Truckee, California; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, Sierra Tahoe Bancorp, Truckee, California, in 
acquiring, making, or servicing loans or other extensions of credit, 
pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y. These 
activities will be conducted throughout the States of California and 
Nevada.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 16, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12449 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11951]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice that a meeting of 
the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation, authorized by 38 
U.S.C., Section 3121, will be held on June 13, 14, and 15, 1995 in 
Seattle, Washington. The committee will meet from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each 
day. The purpose of the meeting will be to review the administration of 
veterans' rehabilitation programs and to provide recommendations to the 
Secretary. The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating 
capacity of the meeting room. Due to changes in the location of the 
meeting area each day, it will be necessary for those wishing to attend 
to contact Theresa Boyd at 202-273-7412 prior to June 6, 1995. 
Interested persons may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the Committee. Statements, if in written form, may be filed before or 
within 10 days after the meeting. Oral statements will be heard at 1:30 
p.m. on June 15, 1995.

    Dated: May 8, 1995.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11951 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Darrell C. EDMOND, petitioner, v. Marty ALLEN, Warden.

No. 12-9495.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of All American Gold Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
Gaspar R. Gonzalez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: August 26, 2011

/s/     Gaspar R.
Gonzalez

Gaspar R. Gonzalez Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to All
American Gold Corp. and will be retained by All American Gold Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WAYMO’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF THE 

COURT’S ORDER REGARDING 

QUESTIONS FOR HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

PROVISIONAL RELIEF (DKT. 329)

 Plaintiff Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) has filed an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 

Portions of the Court’s Order Regarding Questions for Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Provisional Relief (Dkt. 329) (the “Administrative Motion”). 

 Having considered the Administrative Motion, and good cause to seal having been shown, 

the Court GRANTS Waymo’s Administrative Motion and ORDERS sealed the documents listed 

below: 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 414 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WAYMO’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2017 

HON. WILLIAM ALSUP 

United States District Court Judge 

May 10

Document Portions to Be Filed 

Under Seal 

Designating Party 

Court’s Order (Dkt. 329) Highlighted Portions Waymo (green 

highlighting) 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 414 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 2
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1472 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Received 

NOVEMBER 13, 2006 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 167 East 124th Street in New York, New 

York, as the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 1472 RFS

1 SECTION 1. TITO PUENTE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 167 East 124th Street in New 

4 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EFRAIN ARIZA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARTHA SUE SKINNER,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00546-MMC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION; REMANDING 

ACTION TO STATE COURT; 

GRANTING APPLICATION TO 

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation, filed February 16, 2017, in 

which Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu recommends that the Court remand the abovetitled action to state court, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No party has filed an 

objection or other response to the Report and Recommendation. Having read and 

considered the Report and Recommendation, and having considered the matter de novo, 

the Court rules as follows:

1. As it appears defendant lacks the financial resources to pay the filing fee, 

defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby GRANTED.

2. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds it 

lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint, and, accordingly, the above-titled 

action is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for 

the County of Marin.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2017

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00546-MMC Document 12 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 1
Frank D'ANTUONO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 12-8161.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

143 

KA 14-00068 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES H. SCHOLZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 4.)

 

ADAM H. VAN BUSKIRK, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H.

Fandrich, A.J.), rendered May 28, 2013. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Same memorandum as in People v Scholz ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d

___ [Feb. 13, 2015]).

Entered: February 13, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1458 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1458

  To require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization 
made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where 
   the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects 
                          interstate commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization 
made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where 
   the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects 
                          interstate commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN FEDERAL COURTS.

    Each Federal court shall recognize any notarization made by a 
notary public licensed under the laws of a State other than the State 
where the Federal court is located when such notarization occurs in or 
affects interstate commerce.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN STATE COURTS.

    Each court that operates under the jurisdiction of a State shall 
recognize any notarization made by a notary public licensed under the 
laws of a State other than the State where the court is located when 
such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce.
                                 <all>
```
Phillip J. EDWARDS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8856.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.