alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**MINORITY AND WOMEN OUTREACH PROGRAM INFORMATION FORM**

The FDIC actively seeks to engage firms owned by minorities or women or both (12 C.F.R. Part 361).

Minority- or women-owned firms are at least 51% owned and controlled, through day-to-day management, by persons of one or more of the following groups:  Black American, Native American Indian, Hispanic American, Asian American, and/or Women (12 C.F.R. §361.3(a)). 

The Firm is: FORMCHECKBOX  Minority-owned, or  FORMCHECKBOX  Women-owned.

Please mark the box that indicates the ownership of the firm.  Use the above minority- or women-owned definition to determine the minority- and/or women-owned status.

Asian American Male %

Asian American Female%

Black American Male %

Black American Female %

Hispanic American Male %

Hispanic American Female %

Native American Indian Male %

Native American Indian Female %

Non-Minority Male %

Non-Minority Female %

Are one or more partners of the firm Asian American, Black American, Hispanic American, or Native American Indian?

 FORMCHECKBOX  Yes FORMCHECKBOX  No

Are one or more partners of the firm Women?

 FORMCHECKBOX  Yes FORMCHECKBOX  No

**CO-COUNSELING WITH MINORITY- AND WOMEN-OWNED FIRMS**

Co-counseling is an association between two or more attorneys or law firms for the joint provision of 

legal services. 

If your firm is majority-owned, are you willing to participate in a co-counseling arrangement with a minority- or women-owned firm? 

 FORMCHECKBOX  Yes FORMCHECKBOX  No

If your firm is minority- or women-owned, are you willing to participate in a co-counseling arrangement with a majority-owned firm? 

 FORMCHECKBOX  Yes FORMCHECKBOX  No

**Law Firm Name:**

**Fed. Tax I.D. No.:**

**Completed by:*******(Authorized Firm Representative)*

**Date:**
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER TO BRING

PRIVILEGE LOG TO

HEARING

Defense counsel shall bring to the discovery hearings today the privilege log that was

due on April 10 at 11:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 202 at 12). That log should have had no redactions

because it was to cover only items unaffected by the Fifth Amendment motion, the remainder

being due later. Waymo says in its discovery letter brief dated yesterday that the log provided

had redactions (Dkt. No. 218 at 1–2). If true, then defense counsel shall bring to the hearings

today both a version of the log that has no redactions and covers all materials unaffected by the

Fifth Amendment motion, and whatever version of the log was provided to Waymo on Monday.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 223 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 1
Miguel LAMPON, petitioner, v. Thomas LaVALLEY, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

No. 12-8436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
F OR P UB LIC AT ION 

### U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT
C AL VI N O’ N EIL J AC K S ON ,

Petitioner-Appellant , v. S T A T E O F N EV ADA ; B R I AN S ANDOVA L ; R OB E R T L E G R AND , W ARDEN , Respondents-A ppellees
. No. 09-17239

D.C. No. 3:03-cv-00257- RL H-RAM
ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 25, 2013 B e fo re : A lf

re d T . G oo dw in, Ste ph e n Re inh ard t, and Mary H. Murguia , Ci rc uit

Judg e s.

OR DE R PER CU RIAM : In acc ordanc e with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June 3, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, the district cour t’s de nia l of Jac ks on ’s ha

be a s p e tit ion

is AF F IRMED.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DELPHIX CORP.,

Appellant

v.

JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS 

AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2016-2067, 2016-2068

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-

00025, IPR2015-00026.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain 

View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAINA 

S. SHAMILOV; TODD RICHARD GREGORIAN, PHILLIP JOHN 

HAACK, San Francisco, CA.
 

 PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K.

KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, COKE MORGAN STEWART. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and 

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 December 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                     STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            March 31,
                                                                              2000
                                                                            --------
<S>                                                                         <C>
Income before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities        $ 41,439
                                                                            --------

Fixed Charges:

Interest on debt                                                              75,272

Estimated interest portion of rents                                              456
                                                                            --------
Total fixed charges                                                           75,728

                                                                            --------
Adjusted Income                                                              117,167

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                             1.55x
                                                                            ========
</TABLE>

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed charges
by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental
expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-K of China Infrastructure Construction Corporation
for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in his capacity
as an officer of the company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the company.




Date:
      September 15, 2009
              
              /s/ Rong YangRong
  YangPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer(principal
      executive officer), and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and
      accounting officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I  Andrew
Godfrey, hereby certify that:





1. The
annual report of the registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the  financial  condition  and results
of operations of the registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
the report.








/s/
Andrew Godfrey





Andrew
Godfrey


President,
Chief Executive Officer


May 14,
2009
Ronnie JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2855

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

MICHAEL S. PEDEN, )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00335-RLM-RBC

)

HENRY ELECTRIC, INC., )

Defendant. )

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

The parties, by counsel, stipulate and agree that the above cause should be dismissed with 

prejudice as to all claims made by the Plaintiff for the reason that the parties have fully 

compromised and settled the disputes and differences between them. 

Dated: October 23, 2014 Dated: October 23, 2014

/s/ Christopher C, Myers 

Christopher C. Myers, #10043-02

Ilene M. Smith, #22818-02

CHRISTOPHER C. MYERS & ASSOCIATES 

809 South Calhoun Street, Suite 400

Fort Wayne, IN 46802

Telephone: (260) 424-0600

Facsimile: (260) 424-0712

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ Linda A. Polley 

Linda A. Polley, #10897-02

Michelle K. Floyd, #29249-02

Hunt Suedhoff Kalamaros LLP

803 South Calhoun Street 

PO Box 11489

Fort Wayne, IN 46858-1489

Telephone: (260) 423-1311

Facsimile: (260) 424-5396

Counsel for Defendant

USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00335-RBC document 17 filed 10/23/14 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2









CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-150936) pertaining to the 2007 Executive Equity
Incentive Plan and the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan of FX Real
Estate and Entertainment Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2009 (except
for Note 4, as to which the date is April 14, 2010), with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, stockholders’ equity
and schedule of FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and for the period from May 11, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





/s/  
      ERNST &
      YOUNG LLPNew
      York, New York
                April 14,
      2010
Mohamed Bassem RAYESS, petitioner, v. EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES.

No. 13-6740.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

denied

NO. 15-0258

DANIEL AND ERIN PERALES

v.

CLARENCE STUMHOFFER IN HIS

CAPACITY AS HEIR TO THE

ESTATE OF ROBERT B.

STUMHOFFER, DECEASED §

§

§

§

§

§ Harris County,

1st District.

September 4, 2015

Petitioner 's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

November 13, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, DANIEL AND ERIN PERALES, pay all costs

incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 13th day of November, 2015

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Eloy Jasso CEDILLO, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8859.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ E. James Collord By __________________________________ E.  James Collord President, Director and Chief Executive Officer Date:  November 16, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11771]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Requests Under Review by Office of Management and Budget

Agency Clearance Officer: Michael E. Bartell, (202) 942-8800
Upon written request copies available from: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 450 Fifth 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549

Extension:
    Rule 19d-3--File No. 270-245
    Rule 19h-1--File No. 270-247

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (Commission ) has submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget requests for approval of extension on previously approved 
collections for the following:
    Rule 19d-3 prescribes the form and content of application to the 
Commission for review of final disciplinary sanctions, denials of 
membership, participation or association with a member or prohibitions 
or limitations of access to services imposed by self-regulatory 
organizations. it is estimated that approximately 50 respondents will 
incur an average burden of 18 hours per year to comply with this rule, 
for a total annual burden of 900 hours.
    Rule 19h-1 prescribes the form and content of notices and 
applications by self-regulatory organizations regarding proposed 
admissions to, or continuances in, membership, participation or 
association with a member of any person subject to a statutory 
disqualification. It is estimated that approximately 70 respondents 
will incur an average burden of 4.5 hours per year to comply with this 
rule, for a total annual burden of 315 hours.
    Direct general comments to the Clearance Officer for the Securities 
and Exchange Commission at the address below. Direct any comments 
concerning the accuracy of the estimated average burden hours for 
compliance with the Commission rules and forms to Michael E. Bartell, 
Associate Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20549 and the Clearance Officer for the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Management and Budget, Project numbers 3235-0204 
(Rule 19d-3) and 3235-0259 (Rule 19h-1), Room 3208, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11771 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups





	 	Exhibit 10.59


		Detroit   New
        York   Chicago   Dallas


	 	January 21, 2004


 

	 	Mr. Raymond Milchovich


	 	Chief Executive Officer


	 	Foster Wheeler Ltd.


	 	Perryville Corporate Park


	 	Clinton, NJ 08809-4000


 

	 	Re:   Interim Management and Restructuring Services — Third Amendment



Dear Mr. Milchovich:

This letter represents the Third Amendment
to the agreement dated November 22, 2002 (the “Agreement”) between AP Services,
LLC, (“APS”) and Foster Wheeler Ltd., a Bermuda corporation
(the “Company”), to provide interim management services and to assist the
Company in its restructuring. Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain intact.

The Company agrees to pay APS a “Success
Fee” of $175,000 for the month of January 2004, which is incremental to the
Success Fees reflected in the Agreement, as amended. Ken Hiltz’s and
Ryan Esko’s responsibilities will be substantially completed by February 1,
2004. Responsibilities can be extended under mutually agreeable terms.

Tom Feraco will continue his responsibilities
    assisting Bud Cherry (CEO North America Corp) and Tony Scerbo (CFO North
    America Corp)
with the North American operations. Tom Feraco’s responsibilities will be
completed
by March 31, 2004. His responsibilities will include:


	 	•	Assist management in their process
to appropriately define the size of the future business.
	 	 	 
	 	•	Assist management in identifying
    and implementing cost reductions.
	 	 	 
	 	•	Assist management with the development
    of the Company’s revised business plan.


 






		 


	 	 
	 	Mr. Raymond Milchovich


	 	January 21, 2004


	 	Page Two


 

	 	If this Third Amendment meets with your approval, please sign and return the enclosed copy. We look forward to our continuing relationship with you.


	 	 
	 	Sincerely yours,


	 	 
	 	AP SERVICES, LLC


	 	 
	 	/s/ Kenneth A. Hiltz


	 	Kenneth A. Hiltz


	 	Principal


	 	 
	 	 


	 	 
	 	Acknowledged and Agreed to:


	 	 
	 	FOSTER WHEELER LTD.


	 	 
	 	/s/ Raymond J. Milchovich
	 	Raymond J. Milchovich


	 	Its: Chairman, President & CEO


	 	Dated: 1/22/04
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11528]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether 
instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. 
Applications may be examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 95-028. Applicant: University of Rhode Island, 
Graduate School of Oceanography, Narragansett, RI 02882. Instrument: 
Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measuring System, Model PAM 101. Manufacturer: 
Heinz Walz GmbH, Germany. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to 
perform fluorescence measurements on natural and experimental 
phytoplankton to ascertain characteristics of productivity. Application 
Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 6, 1995.
    Docket Number: 95-029. Applicant: University of Minnesota, 
Department of Civil Engineering, 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, 
MN 55455. Instrument: Gyratory Compactor. Manufacturer: Invelop Oy, 
Finland. Intended Use: The instrument will be used for studies of 
typical asphalts with polymer modified binders and portions of mineral 
aggregates with such materials as recycled tire rubber, glass, and 
roofing shingles. Experiments will be conducted to determine changes in 
angle and speed of gyration, axial confinement, and sample size 
required to most closely approximate field compaction conditions, shear 
resistance and in-place volumetrics. This instrument will also be used 
for teaching purposes in the Civil Engineering Department courses on 
Bituminous Mixtures (CE 5701) and Special Topics in Research (CE 8089). 
Application Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 7, 1995.
    Docket Number: 95-031. Applicant: University of Maryland, 
Linguistics Department, 1401 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, MD 20742-
7515. Instrument: Monocular Oculometer for the Human Eye. Manufacturer: 
Dr. Bouis, Germany. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to record 
eye movements during continuous reading of individual sentences and 
text in experiments involving individual subjects tested on linguistic 
materials. Application Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 10, 
1995.


Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 95-11528 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-F
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

JESSE VARGAS, )

)

Plaintiff )

)

v. ) 2:14 CV 288

)

LAKE COUNTY POLICE )

DEPARTMENT, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff has moved to voluntarily dismiss, with prejudice, counts VII–XII

(including a duplicative eleventh count) of his complaint, DE # 36, and moved to

voluntarily dismiss paragraphs 121 and 122 of Count VI, DE # 42. Both motions are

unopposed.

“Rule 41(a)(1)(i) does not speak of dismissing one claim in a suit; it speaks of

dismissing ‘an action’—which is to say, the whole case.” Berthold Types Ltd. v. Adobe Sys.

Inc., 242 F.3d 772, 777 (7th Cir. 2001); see also Loutfy v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons, Co., 148

F.R.D. 599, 602 (N.D. Ill. 1993) (collecting cases). Nevertheless, where parties have

stipulated to dismissal of particular claims, this court and other district courts in this

circuit, see, e.g., Gatling v. Nickel, 275 F.R.D. 495, 496 (E.D. Wis. 2011), have allowed the

practice. Here, although neither motion is opposed, there is no stipulation. Cf. Sarff v.

Farmco, LLC, No. 11-3153, 2011 WL 3489842 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 10, 2011) (Gatling not

followed for unopposed motion because no stipulation). Moreover, the request to
dismiss individual paragraphs of the complaint takes that motion beyond the purview of

Rule 41. Accordingly, the court will treat both motions as motions for leave to amend

the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a). Cf. Loutfy, 148 F.R.D. at 602. 

Treated as such, both motions (DE # 36, DE # 42) are GRANTED. Plaintiff is

ORDERED to file an amended complaint in compliance with this order; that is,

omitting counts VII through XII including duplicate count XI, and omitting paragraphs

121 and 122 of Count VI.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 21, 2016

 s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Daniel E. COBBLE, petitioner, v. Brian OWENS, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections.

No. 12-9317.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia dismissed. See Rule 39.8.