alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-11T01:06:11Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-11T01:06:12Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-11T01:06:12Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="42492">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-11T01:06:11Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">THe ATTORNEY GENERAL —
- OF TEXAS

Grover Sellers AUSTIN, Texas
County Attorney
Beeunont, Taxes

| Dear Mr. Long: Opinion Bo, 6~6266

Res Ohbiidren of a serviese man ELLied -
in action are Aeirs of an ex-service
men, ond are entitled to the benefits
of Article 1939a, Vernon's Annotated
Civil “tetutes,

Your lotter of Petrusry 3, 1945, in wiich you ree
quest us to define whet we think the phrase “heirs at law* menns
mn Artiole 1939¢, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, has been reo
cotved, Your specifies inquiry ie “whether or not the hairs at
lew of men RiLled in action are entitled to the seme serylices os
those of ¢x-service men or men who have been in the service and.
been released therefrom end dying cahsequent thereto,*

Th Sie our opinion thet netrs at lew of the men who ;
Lanning ive thebielilyeasdhs defensecot. thelr eeantry are ‘helts aglaw lcs:

Very truly yours
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

By /s/ Geo. Y, Sargug
Oy Oy Berens
- , Asntatent.
GHB-ER: jr

Enclosure  APERGYED YER. 26, 1945
n/ Gerlos 0, Ashley
TREE AST INVAMT oe 3
AMPORHET GENERAL = ||§«&§ APPROVED OrINIOn GGmNTITYeR
| BY BYR, Cheirwen
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12508]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AD08


Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed Rule; Extension of Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the 
extension of the comment period for Service's March 15, 1995, Proposed 
Rule published in the Federal Register from April 1 to May 31, 1995.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed framework will end on May 
31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Chief, Office of 
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 10815 
Loblolly Pine Drive, Laurel, Maryland 20708-4028. Comments received 
will be available for public inspection during normal business hours in 
Building 158, 10815 Loblolly Pine Drive (Gate 4, Patuxent Environmental 
Science Center), Laurel, Maryland 20708-4028.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul I. Padding, Office of Migratory 
Bird Management, (301) 497-5980, FAX (301) 497-5981.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service announced in the March 15, 1995, 
Federal Register (60 FR 14194) the planned expansion of the Migratory 
Bird Harvest Information Program (Program) to include the States of 
Michigan, Oklahoma, and Oregon beginning in the 1995-96 hunting season, 
and minor modifications to the Program. This Program provides annually 
a nationwide sample frame of migratory bird hunters, from which 
representative samples of hunters are selected and asked to participate 
in a voluntary survey. State wildlife agencies provide a sample frame 
of hunters by annually collecting the name, address, date of birth, and 
a brief summary of migratory bird hunting activity from the previous 
year from each licensed migratory bird hunter in their State. States 
forward this information to the Service, and the Service samples 
hunters and conducts national hunter activity and harvest surveys.

    Dated: May 16, 1995.
George T. Frampton, Jr.
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks
[FR Doc. 95-12508 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-F
Sammy L. PAGE, petitioner, v. Audrey KING.

No. 12-9617.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties,Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 6, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133079 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TERRIE ABEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133079 

 COA: 263813 

Wayne CC: 03-309091-NZ

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0530 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 6, 2007 

 Clerk
G.R. HOMA, petitioner, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, et al.

No. 12-765.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report of Eco Building Products,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Tom Comery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Eco Building Products, Inc.



Date: November 9, 2015



|/s/ Tom Comery                | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Tom Comery                    | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         246,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          246,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,968
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,045,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,015,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
----

----

|                                             | PhotoMedex, Inc. |                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |             |                                                        |   |
| Date:  May 16, 2011     | By:              | /s/ Christina L. Allgeier                              |   |
|                                             |             | Name:  Christina L. Allgeier                      |   |
|                                             |             | Title:    Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|                                             |             |                                                        |   |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12255]




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility To Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. Sec. 817(d)) 
and the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 
C.F.R. part 540, as amended:


Cunard Line Limited and Crown Dynasty Inc., 555 Fifth Avenue, New 
York, N.Y. 10017-2453.

Vessel: CROWN DYNASTY

    Dated: May 15, 1995.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-12255 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
MARVIN M. BRANDT REVOCABLE TRUST, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1173.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 01, 2013.

*49Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEIL F. KEEHN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-56466

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-04733-PSG-PJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Neil F. Keehn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action seeking an injunction under the 

Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo, Serra v. Lappin, 600 F.3d 1191, 1195 (9th Cir. 2010), 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 15-56466 

and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Keehn’s action for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction because Keehn did not seek review under the APA of any 

agency decision to disclose information in violation of the Trade Secrets Act 

(“TSA”). See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317-18 (1979) (while there 

is no private right of action to enjoin the disclosure of information under the TSA, 

a district court may review, under the APA, an agency decision to disclose 

information in violation of the TSA).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Keehn’s action 

without granting further leave to amend because Keehn did not identify any basis 

upon which the court could exercise jurisdiction over his action. See Serra, 600 

F.3d at 1195, 1200 (setting forth standard of review and factors for a district court 

to consider in determining whether to grant leave to amend).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Keehn’s motion for 

reconsideration because Keehn did not set forth any basis that would warrant 

reconsideration. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 

F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds 

for reconsideration); Kona Enters., Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th 
 3 15-56466 

Cir. 2000) (explaining that “[a] Rule 59(e) motion may not be used to raise 

arguments or present evidence for the first time when they could reasonably have 

been raised earlier in the litigation”).

Because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we do not reach 

the merits of Keehn’s claims or evidentiary contentions.

Keehn’s contentions that the district court erred by not reaching the merits of 

his claims or by taking judicial notice of his proceedings in the Court of Federal 

Claims are unpersuasive. 

Keehn’s motion to stay the district court’s dismissal, filed July 12, 2016, is 

denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


               ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
    For the Quarters and Six Months Ended April 28, 1996 and April 27, 1997

                                  (Unaudited)
                     (In Thousands, Except per Share Date)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                          Quarter Ended      Six Months Ended
                                      --------------------  --------------------
                                      April 28,  April 27,  April 28,  April 27,
                                        1996      1997        1996       1997
                                      --------  ----------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                   <C>       <C>           <C>     <C>       
Shares:                                                                         
  Weighted average common shares                                                
   outstanding                           6,192      6,677      6,135     6,676  
                                                                                
  Net common shares issuable on                                                 
   exercise of stock options               421         --        541        --  
                                        ------     ------     ------   -------  
Weighted average common and common                                              
 equivalent shares outstanding           6,613      6,677      6,676     6,676  
                                        ======     ======     ======   =======  
                                                                                
Income before minority interst          $  172     $ (445)    $  246   $(2,097) 
Minority interest                          (24)        --         35        --  
                                        ------     ------     ------   -------  
Net income                              $  148     $ (445)    $  281   $(2,097) 
                                        ======     ======     ======   =======  
                                                                                
Net income per common and common                                                
 equivalent share:                                                              
  Income before minority interest       $ 0.02     $(0.07)    $ 0.03   $ (0.31) 
  Minority interest                         --         --       0.01        --  
                                        ------     ------     ------   -------  
                                                                                
Net income                              $ 0.02     $(0.07)    $ 0.04   $ (0.31) 
                                        ======     ======     ======   =======
</TABLE>
Larry D. MARVEL, petitioner, v. DELAWARE.

No. 13-6304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2



                CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Niagara Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
J. Verkruyse, as the Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Anthony J. Verkruyse
------------------------
Anthony J. Verkruyse
Vice President-Finance
Niagara LaSalle Corporation
LaSalle Steel Company
(Acting Chief Accounting Officer-Niagara Corporation)
May 15, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annaul Report on Form 10-K for the period ended Dec. 31, 2010 of International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ David RogersDavid RogersChief Executive Officer/s/ David RogersDavid RogersChief Financial OfficerDated: April 14, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to David Rogers, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

SUE KELLER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-cv-840-TLS-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant, Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC (“Alaunus”), by counsel, moves to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, as to Alaunus, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(6). As fully set forth in Alaunus’s accompanying brief, simultaneously filed herewith, 

Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to set forth a viable claim for relief and must be dismissed. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC respectfully requests that 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, as to Alaunus, dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 17 filed 02/06/13 page 1 of 2
2

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, 

LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 6, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, Indiana 46515

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\16 - Keller\Federal Court Action\Alaunus MTD.docx

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 17 filed 02/06/13 page 2 of 2