alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE OR GE C OS I O, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. A. P. KA NE, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 15474 D . C. N o . CV - 0 5 - 0 1 9 6 6 - CRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C ha r l e s R . B r e y e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner G eorge C osi o app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU N 04 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e c e rt i f yf orappe a l , on ourow n m ot i on, the i s s ue of w he the rthe 2004 1 d e c is io n o f

th e C a lif

o rn iaB o a r do f

P r is o n T e rm s ( “th e B o a r d ” ) to d e n yp a r o le v i o l at eddu e p ro cess. 07- 15474 2 u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 1 C os i o c ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d’ s 2004 de c i s i on t o de nyhi m pa r ol e w a s not s up p o rte db y“s o m e e v id e n c e ” a n dth e r e f o r e v io la te dh is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . F o llo w in g a n in d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e r e c o r d , s e e Hi m es v . T hom ps on , 336 F . 3d 8 4 8 , 8 5 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) , w e c o n c l u d e th a tth e s t a t e c o u rt ’ s c o n c l u s i o n th a ts o me e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B o a r d ’s d e c is io n w a s n o t o b je c tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . See 28 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; s e e a ls o H a y w a rd v . M a rs h a ll , N o . 0 6 - 5 5 3 9 2 , 2 0 1 0 WL 16 64 97 7, at*1 1, *1 7 (9th C i r. A pr. 22 , 20 10 ). AF F I RME D.
# Eiropas Savienības C 447A/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 447A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 61. gadagājums2018. gada 12. decembris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 447A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

61. gadagājums2018. gada 12. decembris

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Eiropas Banku iestāde |
| 2018/C 447 A/01 | Paziņojums par izsludināto vakanci uz EBI priekšsēdētājs amatu (pakāpe AD 15) – Parīze, Francija – EBA TA 21/2018 | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas Banku iestāde

2018/C 447 A/01

Paziņojums par izsludināto vakanci uz EBI priekšsēdētājs amatu (pakāpe AD 15) – Parīze, Francija – EBA TA 21/2018

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas Banku iestāde

| 12.12.2018 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 447/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 447/1

---

PAZIŅOJUMS PAR IZSLUDINĀTO VAKANCI UZ EBI PRIEKŠSĒDĒTĀJS AMATU (PAKĀPE AD 15) – PARĪZE, FRANCIJA – EBA TA 21/2018

(2018/C 447 A/01)

Eiropas Banku iestāde (EBI) ir neatkarīga Eiropas Savienības iestāde, kas izveidota 2011. gada 1. janvārī ar Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (ES) Nr. 1093/2010 (1).

Lai uzlabotu Eiropas Savienības iekšējā tirgus funkcionēšanu, EBI dod savu ieguldījumu, nodrošinot augstas kvalitātes efektīvu un saskaņotu uzraudzību un regulējumu savas kompetences jomās. Tā arī sekmē tādas sabiedrības vērtības kā finanšu sistēmas stabilitāte, tirgu un finanšu produktu pārredzamība un noguldītāju un ieguldītāju aizsardzība.

Tā strādā, lai novērstu regulatīvo arbitrāžu un garantētu līdzvērtīgus konkurences apstākļus, stiprina starptautiskās uzraudzības saskaņošanu, sekmē uzraudzības konverģenci un konsultē Savienības iestādes banku, maksājumu un e-naudas regulējuma un uzraudzības jomās, kā arī par saistītajiem uzņēmumu pārvaldības, revīzijas un finanšu ziņošanas jautājumiem.

Priekšsēdētājs ir pilnas slodzes neatkarīgs profesionālis, EBI darbinieks. Viņš ir pakļauts EBI Uzraudzības padomei un regulāri ziņo Uzraudzības padomei par EBI darbības attīstību.

Lūdzu, apmeklējiet mūsu tīmekļa vietni, lai iegūtu detalizētu informāciju par vakanci un pieteikšanās nosacījumiem:

https://eba.europa.eu/about-us/careers

Pieteikumi, ietverot dzīves aprakstu (vēlams, Europass formātā), motivācijas vēstuli un aizpildītu deklarācijas veidlapu, kas datēta un parakstīta, jānosūta angļu valodā uz šādu adresi:

EBAChair-applications@eba.europa.eu līdz 2019. gada 11. janvārim pulksten 12.00 dienā pēc Londonas laika.

---

(1)  Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2010. gada 24. novembra Regula (ES) Nr. 1093/2010, ar ko izveido Eiropas Uzraudzības iestādi (Eiropas Banku iestādi), groza Lēmumu Nr. 716/2009/EK un atceļ Komisijas Lēmumu 2009/78/EK (OV L 331, 15.12.2010., 12. lpp.).

---
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Daniel J. WaibelDaniel J. WaibelChief Financial Officer
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

5 , 2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00325

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF JOSEPHINE WALKER, DECEASED

O n Appeal from the County Court at Law

Waller Count y, Texas Trial Court Cau s e No. P86

- 027

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from an order signed June 1, 2021 . On September 23, 2021, appellant Nancy Ashley Walker filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
We dismiss the appeal

.
PER CU R IAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, B ourliot, and Zimmerer.
NO. 07-06 -047 2-CV IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D MA Y25, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ TOMM YPAR KER , Appel lan t
v. RO N MC LAU RI N, JE SSE ME ND EZ, and VILSE N SALIN AS, Appel lee s

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 72 DIS T RI CTCOU RTOF L UB BO CKCOU NT Y; ND NO. 200 0-50 8,8 67; HON. RU BEN REYES, PRESI DING

_________

_________

_________

____ Memorandum Opinion

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. Tommy Par ker

( Par ker ) appeal s from orders g ra nti ng summary judg ment in fav or of appell ees Ron M cLaur in, Je ss e M endez , and Vi ls en Sal ina s ( col lecti v ely referred to as the a ppel lee s)and adj udi cat ing hi m to b e a vexati ous li ti g ant. H istwo i ss ues conc er n the deci si on to deny his moti on to str ik e the summar y jud g ment ev ide nce of appell ees, and 2) decla re him a vex atiou s litig ant . W e overrule the issue s.2

T he p rocee ding arises f rom a not her of Parker’s num erou s suits (since the 199 0's) against on e or m ore of

t he app ellees. T he latte r sou ght to dispo se of this one v ia sum ma ry j u d g me n tal l e g i n g g ro u n d s o f re s judicat a , col la te ra l e st o p p e l, a n d lim it a ti o n s. An d , t h o u gh Par ker i ncl uded a len g thy

reci tati on of facts i n his b rief, he did not attac k a ny of the aforementi oned s ummary j udg ment g ro unds. Nor di d he ex pla in w hy

the tr ial co urt er re d i n refu s i ng t o s tr i k e th e ap pe l l ee s ’ summ aryju dg me nte v i de nc e or i n de s i g na ti ng h i m a
v exati ous li ti g ant. One a ppeal ing a s umm a ry judgmenthas the burden t o neg ate a ll g ro unds upon whic h su m m a ry jud gm e n t c o u ld be ba se d , whi ch grou n d s a t b a r in clu d e d th a t o f be in g a
v e x a t i o u s l it ig ant. Se e St ate F ar mF ir e & Cas . Co. v

. S. S. , 8 5 8 S

. W

. 2 d 3 7 4 , 3 8 1 (T e x. 1993) ; Lewis

v. Adam s, 979 S.W .2 d 8 3 1 , 8 33 ( Tex . Ap p.–H oust on [1 4 D is t.] 1998, no th pet.)

. Si nce Par ker

di d not satis fy hi s burd en, w e hav e no basi s o n w hic h to re v erse the jud g ment. Acc ordin g ly , we ov er ru le the i ss ues and affirm the s ummary j udg ment.

Br ian Qui nn Chief Justice
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 **SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION**
  I,
        Dennis
        M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware corporation
        (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
        the
        accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
        ended
        September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934,
        as amended; and
 
 (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: November
                9, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Dennis
                M. McGrathDennis
                M. McGrathChief
                Financial Officer
   A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
          otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
          electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
          been
          provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
          furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
          request.
case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 33   filed 06/19/14   page 1 of 3

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 33   filed 06/19/14   page 2 of 3

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 33   filed 06/19/14   page 3 of 3
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1472

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 167 East 124th Street in New York, New 

York, as the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1472 EH

1 SECTION 1. TITO PUENTE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 167 East 124th Street in New 

4 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1472

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. New York, New York, as the ‘‘Tito Puente Post al Service located at 167 East 124th Street in
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

ROBERT HOLLAND, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Cerberus Management, LP., et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM 

Honorable Rudy Lozano 

Magistrate Judge John E. Martin 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) Defendant TD Auto Finance LLC, successor in interest to 

Chrysler Financial, LLC (“TDAF”) states that TDAF is a limited liability company organized in the 

State of Michigan. TDAF is an indirect but wholly owned subsidiary of the Toronto-Dominion Bank. 

The Toronto-Dominion Bank is a publically held company which is traded on the New York and 

Toronto Stock Exchanges under the ticker symbol “TD”. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ James J. Todd 

James J. Todd (30453-15) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. 

525 Vine Street, Suite 800 

Cincinnati, OH 45202 

 Phone: (513) 723-2200 

 Fax: (513) 723-2239 

 Email: jtodd@weltman.com

Dated: June 23, 2014 

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 41 filed 06/23/14 page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service 

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically filed with the Clerk of 

Court on June 23, 2014 and served upon the following counsel of record and/or pro se parties via 

United States Mail, postage prepaid: 

 Robert Holland 

 1120 Baker St. 

 Gary, IN 46404 

 /s/ James J. Todd 

 James J. Todd 

 

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. 

525 Vine Street, Suite 800 

Cincinnati, OH 45202 

Phone: (513) 723-2200 

Fax: (513) 723-2239 

Email: jtodd@weltman.com

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 41 filed 06/23/14 page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the nine month  period  ended
January 1, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements:
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Apr-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       Jan-1-2000
<CASH>                                              1,423,441
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         2,240,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    3,921,084
<PP&E>                                              3,049,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (1,844,090)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      5,325,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               3,935,861
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                           500,000
<COMMON>                                              397,813
<OTHER-SE>                                            (78,901)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        5,325,716
<SALES>                                            11,701,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   11,701,838
<CGS>                                               6,845,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       6,845,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    4,919,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (42,700)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (96,925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (96,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (96,925)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0




</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

SHED TREVEL WOODS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1228 WL

)

SUPERINTENDENT, )

)

Respondent. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Shed Trevel Woods, a pro se prisoner, filed this habeas corpus petition challenging the

prison disciplinary hearing (IYC 13-08-100) which was held on August 24, 2013. At that hearing

the Disciplinary Hearing Body (DHB) found him guilty of Unauthorized Financial Transactions in

violation of B-220. He was sanctioned with the loss of 90 days earned credit time and demoted from

Credit Class Two to Credit Class Three. The Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss arguing that

“[b]ecause the conviction and sanctions challenged in the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this

case have been vacated, there is no longer a case or controversy for this Court to adjudicate

regarding the original Petition, and the case is moot.” DE 9 at 2. The Respondent has also filed a

letter from the Legal Services Division of the Indiana Department of Correction stating that the

sanctions have been vacated. DE 9-1. Woods has not responded and the time for doing so has now

passed. 

For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss (DE 9) is GRANTED, and this case is

DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 8, 2014 s/William C. Lee 

William C. Lee, Judge
United States District Court

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12222]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Wildcat River Advisory Commission

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Wildcat River Advisory Commission will meet at the Jackson 
Town Hall in Jackson, New Hampshire, on June 14, 1995. The purpose of 
the meeting is to continue with the development of a Draft River 
Management Plan for administration of the designated Wild and Scenic 
Wildcat River. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act requires the 
establishment of an advisory commission to advise the Secretary of 
Agriculture on administration of the river. The public is encouraged to 
attend the meeting and may provide written comment on the plan to the 
commissioners c/o the district office.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 14, 1995, at 7:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Jackson Town Hall, Route 
16B, Jackson, New Hampshire.
    Send written comments to David Pratt III, Saco Ranger District, 
White Mountain National Forest, 33 Kancamagus Highway, Conway, NH 
03818.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Pratt III, Saco Ranger District, 
(603) 447-5448.

    Dated: May 9, 1995.
Charles L. Myers,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 95-12222 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 1 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 2 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 3 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 4 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 5 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 6 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 7 of 8
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00158-RL document 1 filed 05/22/14 page 8 of 8
Amendment No. 3 to Custom Sales Agreement No. 000569



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Execution Version 
 AMENDMENT 3 TO CUSTOM SALES AGREEMENT NO. 000569 
 This Amendment to Custom Sales Agreement No. 000569 (“Amendment 3”) is made and entered into between Microtune, Inc. (“Customer”) and
International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”). This Amendment 3 will be effective on the date identified below by the second party to sign this Amendment; however, if Customer fails to identify a date of signing, this Amendment will
be effective on the date of signing identified by IBM. 
 WHEREAS IBM and Customer are parties to Custom Sales Agreement No. 000569 having an effective
date of June 13, 2000 (the “Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS IBM and Customer desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; 
 NOW THEREFORE the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Extension of the
term of the Agreement. The expiration of the term of the Agreement, including Attachment No. 1, is extended from December 31, 2008 to January 31, 2010. 
 2. No Other Amendment or Modification. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment 3, the Agreement, as amended, remains in full force and effect without further modification. The terms and conditions of
the Agreement will not be further modified or amended except by a writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties, it being understood that this requirement of written form may only be waived in writing by both parties. 
 Accepted and Agreed To: 
  

									
	Microtune, Inc.	 		 	International Business Machines Corporation
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Albert H. Taddiken
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Gary D. Russell

	Name:	 	Albert H. Taddiken	 		 	Name:	 	Gary D. Russell
	Title:	 	Chief Operating Officer	 		 	Title:	 	 Executive Manager, WW C&BP, IBM
 Microelectronics Division

					
	Date:	 	January 27, 2009	 		 	Date:	 	January 28, 2009

  

 Page 1 of 1
Jamal Martin WALTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
BIRTH FATHER, et al., applicants v. ADOPTIVE COUPLE, et al.

No. 13A115.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 2, 2013.

Application for stay of judgment presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court denied. Motion of Guardian ad Litem for leave to file a response with exhibits under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.

*33Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would grant the application for stay.