alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael SPATARO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7163.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 23, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Altounian, President, Chief Operating Officer & Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

April 15, 2009

/s/ Brian Altounian

Brian AltounianPresident, Chief Operating Officer& Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

1

---
# Službeni list C 8/9. s

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 8 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 62.9. siječnja 2019. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 8

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 62.9. siječnja 2019.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | V.   Objave |
| | ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI |
| | Europski parlament |
| 2019/C 8/01 | Odluka | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

V.   Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europski parlament

2019/C 8/01

Odluka

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

V. Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europski parlament

| 9.1.2019 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 8/1

---

ODLUKA

(2019/C 8/01)

GLAVNI TAJNIK EUROPSKOG PARLAMENTA,

| — | UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Uredbu Vijeća (EEZ, Euratom, EZUČ) br. 259/68 (1), izmijenjenu Uredbom (EU, Euratom) br. 1023/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. listopada 2013. o izmjeni Pravilnika o osoblju za dužnosnike Europske unije i Uvjeta zaposlenja ostalih službenika Europske unije (2), a posebno članak 30. tog Pravilnika, |
| --- | --- |

—

UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Uredbu Vijeća (EEZ, Euratom, EZUČ) br. 259/68 (1), izmijenjenu Uredbom (EU, Euratom) br. 1023/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. listopada 2013. o izmjeni Pravilnika o osoblju za dužnosnike Europske unije i Uvjeta zaposlenja ostalih službenika Europske unije (2), a posebno članak 30. tog Pravilnika,

| — | UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Odluku Predsjedništva Europskog parlamenta od 13. siječnja 2014. o delegiranju ovlasti tijela za imenovanje i tijela ovlaštenog za zaključivanje ugovora o radu, |
| --- | --- |

—

UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Odluku Predsjedništva Europskog parlamenta od 13. siječnja 2014. o delegiranju ovlasti tijela za imenovanje i tijela ovlaštenog za zaključivanje ugovora o radu,

| — | UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR da će 31. prosinca 2018. prestati važiti sljedeće rezervne liste Europskog parlamenta:
  AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S; |
| --- | --- |

—

UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR da će 31. prosinca 2018. prestati važiti sljedeće rezervne liste Europskog parlamenta:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S;

| — | UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR mišljenje Zajedničkog odbora izneseno na sjednici od 24. listopada 2018., |
| --- | --- |

—

UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR mišljenje Zajedničkog odbora izneseno na sjednici od 24. listopada 2018.,

ODLUČIO JE:

Jedini članak

Rok valjanosti rezervnih lista:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S,

produžuje se do 31. prosinca 2019.

U Luxembourgu, 30. studenoga 2018.

Klaus WELLE

Glavni tajnik

---

(1)  SL L 56, 4.3.1968., str. 1.

1

(2)  SL L 287, 29.10.2013., str. 15.

2

---
1 The Hon. Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 99-2469MN

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the District of * Minnesota. Efrain Guzman-Villacana, also known * as Jose Franco Mendoza, also known * [Not To Be Published] as Piedad Ramirez-Reynoso, Jr., * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 31, 2000 Filed: August 7, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Efrain Guzman-Villacana pleaded guilty of illegally re-entering the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). The District Court 1 sentenced him to five years and-2-

three months (sixty-three months) imprisonment, and two years supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and with our permission, Guzman-Villacana has filed a pro se supplemental brief. Counsel argues that U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2 (1998) conflicts with 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The Guidelines punishment ratio is much higher than the statutory punishment ratio for offenders with aggravated-felony convictions relative to offenders without aggravated-felony convictions, the argument goes, and the Guideline is therefore invalid. We conclude that this challenge is foreclosed by the plea agreement, in which Guzman-Villacana agreed to the application of section 2L1.2 and the resulting punishment. See UnitedStates v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995). Even had the issue been preserved, counsel’s argument lacks merit.
Inhis pro se supplemental brief, Guzman-Villacana argues that his counsel shouldhave requested, and the District Court should have granted, a downward departure based on certain disadvantages he suffers due to his alienage and deportable status. We conclude that the Court did not plainly err in failing to grant an unrequested downward departure, see UnitedStates v. Montanye , 996 F.2d 190, 192 (8th Cir. 1993) (en banc) (standard of review), and that counsel’s failure to request such a departure should be presented in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings, see United States v. Martin , 59 F.3d 767, 771 (8th Cir. 1995).
We have reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.-3-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern Technology Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Anthony K. Welch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Sect.1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the20th  day of February, 2007.

________________________

Chief Executive Officer

----

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern Technology Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Anthony K. Welch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the20th day of February, 2007.

_________________________

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10670

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

MATTHEW JASON MILLER,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 4:17-CR-260-1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Matthew Miller appeals his 84-month below-guidelines sentence for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 28, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10670 Document: 00514811361 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2019
No. 18-10670

2

receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). He contends

that the child pornography guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 et seq., lack an empirical basis, so his sentence is unreasonable. He recognizes that this theory is

foreclosed by United States v. Miller, 665 F.3d 114, 121−22 (5th Cir. 2011), but 

he raises the issue to preserve it for possible further review.

The government has filed an opposed motion for summary affirmance, 

agreeing that the issue is foreclosed by Miller. Because the parties are correct, 

summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 

406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file its brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-10670 Document: 00514811361 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2019
Whitney WHISMAN, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 12-9955.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
Siale ANGILAU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-7257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

p0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139895 

LESLIE SHANKSTER, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139895 

 COA: 284850 

St. Clair CC: 07-001562-NF 

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

YOUNG, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider whether ORV’s are “motor 

vehicles” under the prior version of the no-fault statute in effect at the time plaintiff’s 

claim arose.
In re Leddell LEE, petitioner.

No. 12-8435.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement of Discover
Bank and Discover Card Execution Note Trust (Registration Numbers 333-141703, 333-141703-01 and 333-141703-02) on Form S-3 of our Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 13, 2008, relating to Managements
Assertions on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Discover Card Execution Note Trust for the year ended November 30, 2007, and to the reference to us under the heading Experts in
the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP          
|                                   
|Chicago, Illinois February 20,
2008
# L_2017177EN.01000601.xml

| 8.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/6

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2017/1229

of 3 May 2017

correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 laying down marketing standards for bananas, rules on the verification of compliance with those marketing standards and requirements for notifications in the banana sector

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 75(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Dutch, Maltese and Slovenian language versions of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 (2) contain an error in recital (3), in the first paragraph of Article 1, in Article 3 and in point I of Annex I, concerning the varieties of bananas subject to the marketing standards established in that Regulation. Therefore, a correction of the Dutch, Maltese and Slovenian language versions is necessary. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Dutch, Maltese and Slovenian language versions of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 (2) contain an error in recital (3), in the first paragraph of Article 1, in Article 3 and in point I of Annex I, concerning the varieties of bananas subject to the marketing standards established in that Regulation. Therefore, a correction of the Dutch, Maltese and Slovenian language versions is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.

| (2) | Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 should therefore be corrected accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 should therefore be corrected accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2017.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 of 19 December 2011 laying down marketing standards for bananas, rules on the verification of compliance with those marketing standards and requirements for notifications in the banana sector (OJ L 336, 20.12.2011, p. 23).

2

---
Will Moses PALMER, petitioner, v. Nurse LEMOY.

No. 13-6531.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 30 filed 06/17/14 page 1 of 1
Lee Vang LOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1412.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony R. MarescaAnthony R. Maresca Chief Financial Officer July 15, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Filed 7/19/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 150

Jan Reiser and Auto-Owners 

Insurance Company, Plaintiffs and Appellants

v.

Roger Thorpe d/b/a Roger’s 

Staining, and Roger’s Staining, Inc., Defendants and Appellees

No. 20120137

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lisa K. Fair McEvers, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Bradley J. Ayers (argued), 5125 County Road 101, Suite 202, Minnetonka, MN 55345, and Corey J. Quinton (appeared), P.O. Box 657, Moorhead, MN 56561- 0657, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Scott K. Porsborg, P.O. Box 460, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0460, for defendants and appellees.

Reiser v. Thorpe

No. 20120137

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jan Reiser and Auto-Owners Insurance Company (collectively “Reiser”) appeal from a judgment awarding Roger Thorpe, doing business as Roger’s Staining and Roger’s Staining, Inc. (collectively “Thorpe”), $98,543.84 in costs and disbursements incurred in Thorpe’s defense of Reiser’s unsuccessful lawsuit.  Reiser argues the district court erred in awarding Thorpe approximately $91,000 in expert witness fees and in approving other miscellaneous expenses because the fees and expenses were not reasonable.  We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2]Daniel J. Crothers, Acting C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Everett Nels Olson, S.J.

[¶3]The Honorable Everett Nels Olson, S.J., sitting in place of VandeWalle, C.J., disqualified.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11666]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Docket No. AB-423 (Sub-No. 1X)]


Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company--Discontinuance 
Exemption--in Harris County, TX

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10505, exempts from the 
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903-10904 the discontinuance 
of Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company's lease and operation of the 
Settegast Yard between mileposts 0.0/3.99 and mileposts 3.34/3.56 in 
Houston, Harris County, TX, subject to standard labor protective 
conditions.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on June 10, 1995. Petitions to 
stay must be filed by May 22, 1995. Petitions to reopen must be filed 
by May 31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Docket No. AB-423 (Sub-No. 1X) 
to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20423. In addition, one copy must be served on Joseph D. Anthofer, 
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 830, 
Omaha, NE 68179-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5610. (TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Interstate 
Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 
2229, Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359.

(Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD 
services (202) 927-5721)

    Decided: April 26, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11666 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P