alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12053]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-287-000]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Tariff

May 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 8, 1995, Mississippi River Transmission 
Corporation (MRT) submitted for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

First Revised Sheet No. 163
First Revised Sheet No. 164
First Revised Sheet No. 167
First Revised Sheet No. 168
First Revised Sheet No. 169
First Revised Sheet No. 170

    MRT states that the tariff sheets submitted reflect revisions to 
MRT's capacity release provisions consistent with the Commission's 
Final Rule in Order No. 577, and that they also reflect other minor 
revisions to MRT's capacity release tariff provisions, including 
changing all times for posting and bidding for releases to Central 
Time.
    MRT requests waiver of the notice requirement of Section 154.22 of 
the Commission's Regulations to permit Sheet Nos. 169 and 170 
reflecting Order No. 577 changes to become effective on May 4, 1995, 
which is the date Order No. 577 became effective. MRT requests an 
effective date of June 8, 1995 for all other tariff sheets submitted.
    MRT states that copies of its tariff filing were mailed to all of 
its affected customers and the State Commissions of Arkansas, Missouri 
and Illinois.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest the subject filing 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214. All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before May 18, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12053 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ANTHONY FLETCHER, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:13-cv-368-TLS-PRC

)

UNILEVER, INC., )

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Adjudicate Purported Attorney’s Lien [DE

24], filed by Plaintiff on May 9, 2014, and Elizabeth D. Tate’s Motion to Intervene [DE 29], filed

on May 12, 2014, by non-party Elizabeth Tate.

Plaintiff represents that for the first few months of this case, he was represented by attorney

Tate. He states that he eventually became dissatisfied with her services and fired her. He then

retained Attorney Sherman. Attorney Tate has apparently contacted the attorneys for all parties,

informing them that she is entitled to a forty-percent lien on any recovery Plaintiff manages to get

in this case. Plaintiff and his present attorney deny this and ask the Court to adjudicate the validity

of the purported lien. Attorney Tate seeks to intervene, since her interests would otherwise be

unrepresented. 

The issue here sounds in contract law and involves Plaintiff and a non-party. The Court sees

no reason why this existing case is the proper forum to bring this claim. The Court accordingly

DENIES, without prejudice to the underlying claim, both the Motion to Adjudicate Purported

Attorney’s Lien [DE 24] and Elizabeth D. Tate’s Motion to Intervene [DE 29].

SO ORDERED this 19th day of May, 2014.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

NATHANIEL FLOWERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) NO. 1:13-CV-266

)

PRAIRIE FARMS DAIRY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and

Recommendation, of Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey granting

Plaintiff’s motion to amend his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) petition

and further granting that amended IFP petition, (DE # 9) filed on

October 2, 2013. No objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge

Cosbey’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court now

ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, DENIES as moot

Plaintiff’s original motion for leave to proceed IFP (DE# 3),

GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his IFP petition (DE#

6), and FURTHER GRANTS the Plaintiff’s amended IFP petition.

It appearing that the plaintiff is unable to afford to pay the

filing fee, the Court: (1) GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (DE# 6); (2) DEFERS payment of the filing fee; (3)

ORDERS the plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee from the

proceeds of any recovery that is received in this case; and (4)

case 1:13-cv-00266-RL-RBC document 10 filed 10/29/13 page 1 of 2
DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the United States

Marshals Service to effect service of process on the defendant.

DATED: October 29, 2013 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United States District Court

case 1:13-cv-00266-RL-RBC document 10 filed 10/29/13 page 2 of 2
William C. PLOUFF, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 12-8836.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/ ROBERT G. GARGUSRobert G. Gargus,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: November 3, 2010
Clinton COX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6550.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Frederick Denell GRIM, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 12-9354.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11959]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP91-1897-003]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Tariff Filing

May 10, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 5, 1995, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing certain revised 
tariff sheets to Original Volume No. 2 of its FERC Gas Tariff.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed pursuant to the Commission's March 30, 1992 ``Order Issuing 
Certificate'' in Docket No. CP91-1897-000 to reflect a revision to the 
return and tax components of the cost of service underlying the rate 
for Rate Schedule X-13 based on the final outcome of Williston Basin's 
capital structure and cost elements in Docket Nos. RP89-34-000, et al. 
The revised rate reflects a reduction of $0.70921 per Mcf per month 
from the Rate Schedule X-13 rate in effect for the period November 1, 
1992 through February 28, 1995.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests should be filed on or before May 17, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of the filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11959 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

NANCY ISLAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-845-WCL-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant, Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC (“Alaunus”), by counsel, moves to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, as to Alaunus, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(6). As fully set forth in Alaunus’s accompanying brief, simultaneously filed herewith, 

Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to set forth a viable claim for relief and must be dismissed. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC respectfully requests that 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, as to Alaunus, dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 16 filed 02/06/13 page 1 of 2
2

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical

LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 6, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, Indiana 46515

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\13 - Islas\Federal Court Action\Alaunus MTD.docx

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 16 filed 02/06/13 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12643]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,963]


Goody Products, Inc. Opti-Ray Division Farmingdale, New York; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 24, 1995 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at the Opti-Ray Division of Goody 
Products, Inc., Farmingdale, New York.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
remains in effect (TA-W-30,920I). Consequently, further investigation 
in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 12th day of May, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy, and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-12643 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Felipe Jesus VAZQUEZ, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-9206.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12596]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 743]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Merck & Co., Inc. 
(Pharmaceuticals); Dougherty County, Georgia

    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the Savannah Airport Commission, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 104, for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status at the pharmaceutical manufacturing facility of 
Merck & Co., Inc., in Dougherty County, Georgia, was filed by the Board 
on January 3, 1994, and notice inviting public comment was given in the 
Federal Register (FTZ Docket 1-94, 59 FR 1925, 1-13-94); and,
    Whereas, the Board has found that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby authorizes the establishment of a 
subzone (Subzone 104A) at the plant site of Merck & Co., Inc., in 
Dougherty County, Georgia, at the location described in the 
application, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of May 1995.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12596 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.1




Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the annual report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Miller, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
September 12, 2011

/s/ David MillerDavid Miller, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-33.4
(logo) FIS TAX SERVICES
A DIVISION OF FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES

FIS Tax Services
3100 New York Drive, Suite 100
Pasadena, CA 91107
tel: 626.345.2010 * 866-457.4112
fax: 626.398.5205


Management Compliance Statement


Management of FIS Tax Services (FIS) and formerly known as LSI Tax Services, is
responsible for assessing compliance with applicable servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission
relating to residential mortgage loans (the Platform), except for General
Servicing Consideration criteria (i) - (iv), Cash Collections and Administration
(i) - (vii), Investor Remittances and Reporting (i) - (iv), and Pool Asset
Administration (i) - (x), (xiv), and (xv), which FIS has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform.

FIS' management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. FIS has
determined the following servicing criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of Item 1122 are
applicable to the activities it performed with respect to the Platform:

(xi)   Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance payments)
       are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as
       indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided
       that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar
       days prior to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the
       transaction agreements.

(xii)  Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on
       behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged
       to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or
       omission.

(xiii) Disbursements made on behalf of an obligor are posted within two business
       days to the obligor's records maintained by the servicer, or such other
       number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007, FIS has complied in all material respects with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and
Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to management's assessment of compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007.

To the best of my knowledge and belief, based on such assessment, FIS has
fulfilled all of its applicable obligations throughout the reporting period.



/s/ Darryl A. De Bond
Darryl A. De Bond
Executive Vice President

January 05, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26883-26884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12306]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5208-6]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Settlement, 
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

[[Page 26884]] ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the document beginning on page 21210 in the issue of May 1, 
1995, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gave notice of a 
proposed settlement under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) with 
potentially responsible parties relating to the Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (erroneously named ``Tennessee Gas and Pipeline'' in the notice 
document) sites located along the Gulf Coast of Texas, Louisiana, and 
Mississippi and extending along three routes to markets in the 
midwestern and northeastern United States (Site). That notice is hereby 
corrected to clarify the scope of matters in that proposed settlement 
on which EPA will consider public comments, as required under CERCLA 
Section 122(i). EPA has offered to settle with potentially responsible 
parties with respect to their liability under CERCLA for response costs 
related to the Site and incurred and paid by the United States, and 
will consider public comments for (30) days exclusively on that cost 
recovery component of the proposed settlement. EPA may withdraw from or 
modify the cost recovery component of the proposed settlement should 
such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
cost recovery component is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor, Waste Management Division, U.S. EPA, Region IV, 345 
Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365, 404/347-5059 x6169.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor within 30 days 
of publication of this correction.

    Dated: May 4, 1995.
H. Kirk Lucius,
Chief, Waste Programs Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12306 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12465]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service
[T.D. 95-44]


Retraction of revocation Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following Customs broker license number was erroneously 
included in a list of revoked Customs brokers licenses in the Monday 
March 27, 1995, Federal Register Vol. 60, No 58. 
Tory Erickson--12605
License 12605, issued in the Los Angeles Customs district, remains a 
valid license.

    Dated: May 16, 1995.
Philip Metzger,
Director, Trade Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-12465 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
| Date:  September 27, 2011  | By:    |  /s/ Russell W. Mitchell   |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   | Russell W. Mitchell                       |   |
|                                           |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|                                           |   |                                      |   |

| Date:  September 27, 2011  | By:    | /s/ James W. Higgins      |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   | James W. Higgins                                   |   |
|                                           |   | Chief Financial and Operating Officer              |   |
|                                           |   |                                               |   |