alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WAYMO’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF THE 

COURT’S ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART 

AND DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR PROVISIONAL RELIEF 

(DKT. 426)

 

 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WAYMO’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

 Plaintiff Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) has filed an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 

Portions the Court’s Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Provisional Relief (Dkt. 426) (“Administrative Motion”). 

 Having considered the Administrative Motion, and good cause to seal having been shown, 

the Court GRANTS Waymo’s Administrative Motion and ORDERS sealed the documents listed 

below: 

Document Portions to Be Filed 

Under Seal 

Designating Party 

Court’s PI Order (Dkt. 426) Redacted and 

Highlighted Portions 

Waymo (yellow 

highlighting) 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2017 

 

 HON. WILLIAM ALSUP 

United States District Court Judge
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ASIAN TRENDS MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Asian Trends Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Huang Jian Nan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:  1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/ HUANG JIAN NAN Huang Jian Nan Chief Financial Officer August 19, 2009 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22376-22377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11165]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Fossil Energy
[FE DOCKET NO. 95-22-NG]


Progas U.S.A., Inc.; Order Granting Blanket Authorization To 
Import and Export Natural Gas From and To Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting ProGas U.S.A., Inc. 
authorization to import up to 800 Bcf and to export up to 200 Bcf of 
natural gas from and to Canada. The term of the authorization is 
[[Page 22377]] for a period of two years, beginning on April 1, 1995.
    ProGas U.S.A., Inc.'s order is available for inspection and copying 
in the Office of Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal 
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 
586-9478. The docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., April 24, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-11165 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Walter BABB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9138.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Johnnie Bradley v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00713-CR

Trial court case number: 1308876

Trial court: 338th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c) and 44.3, the trial court clerk is 

ordered to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental record containing a bill of costs. If no bill of 

costs currently exists, the trial court clerk or an officer of the court is ordered to prepare a bill of 

costs for inclusion in the supplemental record. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 103.006 (West 

2001) (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and 

sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of costs to the court to which 

the action . . . is . . . appealed.”). 

The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals no later than

March 26, 2014. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 11, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * DOCKET NO. 17-CR-93

 

VERSUS *

 

MARCUS ETIENNE AND * JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

ELIZABETH GOBERT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

STIPULATION

NOW INTO COURT, comes defendant, ELIZABETH GOBERT through undersigned 

counsel, who respectfully represents to this Honorable Court the following:

1.

A Status Conference is set for Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. for this matter.

2.

Undersigned Counsel has a recently occurring scheduling conflict the resetting of which 

would be difficult, if at all possible.

3.

The proposed continuance of the aforementioned Status Conference has been discussed 

with Assistant U. S. Attorney William Frentzen and Mr. Darryl Stallworth, counsel for Marcus 

Etienne, and they both agree to the conference being continued.

 4.

Undersigned Counsel requests this matter be rescheduled to May 16, 2017 as agreed upon 

by all parties, and with the understanding that said date is available, and amenable, to the Court.

 5. 

Order re:
2

This motion is not meant to unduly delay the proceedings, and will have no such affect.

Respectfully submitted,

DORAN & CAWTHORNE, PLLC

 /s/ Pride J. Doran, # 25035

 pride@doranlawfirm.com

521 East Landry Street (70570)

Post Office Box 2119

Opelousas, LA 70571

Phone: (337) 948-8008

Fax: (337) 948-0098

Attorney for Elizabeth Gobert 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of this pleading was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court 

using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all counsel of record by operation of 

the Court’s electronic filing system this 10

th

day of April, 2017.

/s/ PRIDE J. DORAN, # 25035

 pride@doranlawfirm.com
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * DOCKET NO. 17-CR-93

 

VERSUS *

 

MARCUS ETIENNE AND * JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

ELIZABETH GOBERT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER

Considering the foregoing Stipulation: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Status Conference previously scheduled for 2:00 p.m., on April 25, 

2017 is hereby upset and rescheduled for 2:00 p.m. on May 16, 2017. 

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at ________________, California on this _____ day of 

_______________, 2017.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

San Francisco 12 April
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0186

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT D. MAXIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until July15, 2020 to prepare, 

file, and serve his response to Ms. Jackson’s Anders brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 16 2020

06/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0186
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11769]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board; Meeting

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
monthly meeting of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will 
be held on Thursday, May 25 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in room 7C13 of the 
General Accounting Office, 441 G St., NW., Washington, DC.
    The agenda for the meeting includes discussions of issues related 
to the Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment, Accounting for 
Liabilities of the Federal Government, and Supplemental Stewardship 
Reporting Exposure Drafts.
    We advise that other items may be added to the agenda; interested 
parties should contact the Staff Director for more specific information 
and to confirm the date of the meeting. Any interested person may 
attend the meeting as an observer. Board discussions and reviews are 
open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald S. Young, Executive Staff Director, 750 First St., NE., Room 
1001, Washington, DC 20002, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
Ronald S. Young,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-11769 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21064-21065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10649]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Control of Unwanted Vegetation, Diseases, Insects, and Animals in 
the Pacific Southwest Region Nurseries and Tree Improvement Center

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

[[Page 21065]] ACTION: Cancellation to notice of intent to prepare 
environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service is cancelling 
preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for pest 
management at the Humboldt Nursery, McKinleyville, California; 
Placerville Nursery, Camino, California; and Chico Tree Improvement 
Center, Chico, California (Federal Register of September 7, 1990, 55 FR 
36844, and (Federal Register of August 25, 1988, 53 FR 32417).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fiske, Program Manager, 
Reforestation, Pacific Southwest Region, 630 Sansome Street, San 
Francisco, California 94111. Telephone (415) 705-2697.

    Date: April 24, 1995.
Gilbert J. Espinosa,
Acting Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 95-10649 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1436 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1436

   To remove certain use restrictions on property located in Navajo 
                            County, Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

  Mr. Renzi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To remove certain use restrictions on property located in Navajo 
                            County, Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN USE RESTRICTIONS ON PROPERTY.

     Notwithstanding section 6(f)(3) of the Land and Water Conservation 
Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-8(f)(3)), the approximately 123 acres 
of land located in the City of Winslow, Navajo County, Arizona, and 
designated as the ``Winslow Hospitality Park'', may be disposed of or 
used for purposes other than public recreation.
                                 <all>
```
Description of Long-Term Disability Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.11(1) 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF LONG-TERM DISABILITY ARRANGEMENTS 
  
 The Registrant makes available an Executive Disability Coverage program to provide disability benefits to approximately 120
officers and management employees. The Executive Disability Coverage is designed to replace 66 2/3% of the base
salary, bonuses and incentive compensation of the employee up to a maximum of $25,000 per month benefit. Under the Executive Disability Coverage, the employee pays for the premiums.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:13-CR-116-JTM-PRC

 )

JEANETTA BROWN, )

Defendants. ) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT JEANETTA BROWN

TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY, JUDGE,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Jeanetta Brown’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R.

Cherry, on March 4, 2014, with the consent of Defendant Jeanetta Brown, counsel for Defendant

Jeanetta Brown, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Jeanetta Brown’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule

11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the

record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Jeanetta Brown under

oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States

Attorney and of counsel for Jeanetta Brown,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Jeanetta Brown understands the nature of the charge against her to which

the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Jeanetta Brown understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea
of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,

and her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Jeanetta Brown understands what the maximum possible sentence is,

including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Jeanetta Brown understands that

the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some

circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Jeanetta Brown has been knowingly and voluntarily

made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Jeanetta Brown is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Jeanetta Brown understands that her answers may later be used against

her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Jeanetta Brown’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Jeanetta Brown’s plea of guilty to the offense

charged in Count 4 of the Indictment and that Defendant Jeanetta Brown be adjudged guilty of the

offense charged in Count 4 of the Incictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has

been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Jeanetta Brown be adjudged

guilty, a sentencing date before Senior Judge James T. Moody will be scheduled. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen days. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 5th day of March, 2014.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

Honorable James T. Moody
STATE of Louisiana v. Louis HANDY

NO. 2019-KK-0705

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

*574Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership 1983-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711309
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         194
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               303
<PP&E>                                         16,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   837
<SALES>                                        364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               369
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                243
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            243
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  12.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  12.31
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1537 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1537

           To suspend temporarily the duty on nitrocellulose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2005

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on nitrocellulose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NITROCELLULOSE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.13      Cellulose nitrate   Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (nitrocellulose,                                                   31/2009
                         including
                         collodions)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3912.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30202

MERCATO ELISIO, L.L.C., 

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

JOHN J. DEVENEY, III, improperly named John Deveney; 

DEVENEY COMMUNICATION CONSULTING, L.L.C.;

CHRIS COSTELLO, individually and as employee of Deveney 

Communication Consulting, L.L.C., 

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:15-CV-563

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, 

oral argument and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we 

conclude that the claims appellant asserts against these appellees accrued, 

under either federal or state law, as early as August 2012 or April 2013, 

triggering the commencement of the one-year Louisiana prescription 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30202 Document: 00514271082 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2017
No. 17-30202

2

period. Piotrowski v. City of Houston, 51 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir. 1995); 

Elzy v. Roberson, 868 F.2d 793, 794 (5th Cir. 1989); Ziegler v. Hous. Auth. 

Of New Orleans, 118 So.3d 442, 452 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2013). Appellant’s suit, 

filed on February 20, 2015, is well outside this period. Further, there was 

no basis for equitable tolling of prescription because appellees’ actions did 

not amount to the level of active concealment necessary to implicate the 

jurisprudential exception, contra non valentem. F.D.I.C. v. Barton, 96 F.3d 

128, 135 (5th Cir. 1996) (to suspend the running of the prescriptive period 

there must be evidence of “fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or concealment 

by the defendants that led to the plaintiff’s failure to file the claim within 

the statutory period”). These conclusions were well stated in the district 

court’s opinion, with which we essentially agree. JUDGMENT 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-30202 Document: 00514271082 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/13/2017
Joseph LEGRANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10438.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Dominic M. FRANZA, petitioner, v. Michael SHEAHAN.

No. 12-9975.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Hector CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10320.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.