alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Employment Contract of CFO



 Exhibit 10.15 
  
 Allegheny Energy Service Corporation 
 800 Cabin
Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 February 18, 2004 
  
 Jeffrey Serkes 
 c/o Allegheny Energy, Inc. 
 800 Cabin Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 Dear Jeff: 
  
 You and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation (“AESC”) for itself and as agent for its parent, Allegheny Energy, Inc. (“AEI”), the
affiliates and subsidiaries of AESC and AEI, and any successors or assigns of any of the foregoing, entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 3, 2003. Pursuant to Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement, you were
entitled to receive a grant of stock options for 550,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the AEI Long-Term Incentive Plan on January 2, 2004, or an alternative adjustment to your compensation of equivalent value and opportunity if authorization of
such stock options was not obtained under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (“PUHCA”) by such date. As you are aware, authorization of your stock option award under PUHCA was not obtained until February 10, 2004. 

 
 Accordingly, you, AESC and AEI hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby
amended as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Section 5(a)(i) of the
Agreement. Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: 
  
 “(i) Option Grant. On the fifth business day following the date that AESC obtains authorization under the Public
Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (the “Authorization Date”), AESC shall grant the Executive stock options (the “Options”) for 550,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the Allegheny Energy, Inc. 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) at a per share exercise price equal to the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock on the date of grant, as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction Listing in The Wall Street Journal. Such
grant shall be evidenced by an award agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit A.” 
  
 2. Amendments to Section 5 (c)(i) of the Agreement. The references to January 2, 2004 in clauses (1) and (2) of Section 5(c)(i) of the Agreement are hereby amended to refer to the Authorization Date and the
2004 Closing Price is defined to mean the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock on the Authorization Date as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction listing in The Wall Street Journal. 
  










 Mr. Jeffrey Serkes 
 January 18, 2004 
 Page 2 
  

 Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by signing the attached copy of this letter in the place indicated. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Allegheny Energy Service Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	

	 	 	 Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer

	
	Allegheny Energy, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	

	 	 	 Paul J. Evanson

	 	 	 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer



  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	 /s/ Jeffrey Serkes

	

	 Jeffrey Serkes
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25253-25254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11695]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee; Meeting

    The National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

    Name: Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC).
    Date and Time: Wednesday, May 31, 1995, 2-3:30 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 375, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open. The meeting is open to the public.
    Contact Person: Charles E. Myers, Office of Polar Programs, Room 
755, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 306-1031.
    Purpose of Committee: The Interagency Arctic Research Policy 
Committee was [[Page 25254]] established by Public Law 98-373, the 
Arctic Research and Policy Act, to help set priorities for future 
arctic research, assist in the development of a national arctic 
research policy, prepare a multi-agency budget and Plan for arctic 
research, and simplify coordination of arctic research.
    Proposed Meeting Agenda Items:

1. Review of U.S. Arctic Policy
2. Government-wide Arctic Research Budgets
3. Beringian Systems Initiative
4. IARPC Data Management Activities
5. Biennial Revision to U.S. Arctic Research Plan
6. Comments from Arctic Research Commission

    Public Participation: Committee meetings are not public hearings 
and will not receive verbal comments from the public unless 
specifically invited by the Committee. Persons invited to address 
the Committee will be limited to 5 minutes each. Others who want to 
address the Committee must submit a proposed statement. If the 
statement is relevant and appropriate to the agenda at that 
particular meeting, the Committee will invite you to present your 
statement. The texts of statements shall not exceed 5 double spaced 
typed pages each.
Charles E. Myers,
Head, Arctic Staff, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-11695 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Matthew Sherman PHILLIPS v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES

CR-17-0165

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018 Reh. denied February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Kenneth RICHARDSON, aka Primo, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9166.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Mark SUPANICH, Individually and as Guardian for S. S., a Minor Child, petitioner, v. Kevin RUNDLE, et al.

No. 12-8630.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Joseph B. NAIR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1940

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NUMBER: 2:13 CR 40

JOSHUA ALEXANDER ATWOOD

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING

Comes now Defendant, Joshua Alexander Atwood, by counsel, Kerry C. Connor

and submits the following Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing. 

At the time of sentencing in this matter, in light of the agreement of the parties, the 

defendant will request a sentence of 97 months incarceration. In support of this request, 

counsel states:

1. There is no dispute that the advisory sentencing guidelines result in a 

sentencing range of 97-121 months incarceration. 

2. The parties entered a pre-indictment resolution in this case which permitted 

the defendant to enter a guilty plea to possession rather than receipt of child 

pornography. Under the guideline calculation, the base offense level for possession is 

four (4) levels lower than that for receipt.
3. In addition, there are a number of mitigating factors relevant to this case:

 The defendant has previously been diagnosed with a “communication”

disability, based in part in a hearing impairment, but also influenced by a

clear deficit in social skills.

 The defendant has minimal criminal history. Most importantly, there is no 

evidence that the defendant has ever participated in any hands-on abuse of 

a child.

 The defendant seeks therapy for his problems and is motivated to 

participate in therapy.

 The defendant is likely to be a vulnerable person in the Bureau of Prisons.

 The defendant has a supportive and loving mother to return to after 

incarceration.

CONCLUSION

In light of the seriousness of the defendant’s behavior, the benefit of the parties’

plea agreement, and the other mitigating factors noted here and in the Pre-Sentence 

Report, the defendant agrees with the government that a sentence of 97 months 

incarceration is a reasonable sentence in this case. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: s/ Kerry C. Connor 

Kerry C. Connor

9013 Indianapolis Blvd., Suite C

Highland, Indiana 46322

phone: (219) 972-7111

Fax: (219) 972-7110

kcconnor@sbcglobal.net
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on July 12, 2013 , I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the 

following:

Jill Koster

Jill.Koster@usdoj.gov

and I hereby certify that I have mailed the document by U.S. Postal Service to the 

following non CM/ECF participants:

 s/ Kerry C. Connor
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0699 

TIFFANY HOUSE, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DAVID E. ORR, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

CONRAD COGGESHALL, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

FILED 

JAN 3 0 277.'t 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with the Montana Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant David E. Orr's opening brief filed 

on January 30, 2024, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with Rule 

10 and must be resubmitted. 

M. R. App. P. 10(2) requires copies of all papers filed to be served on all other 

parties to the appeal or review. The brief was not served on Tiffany House or Conrad 

Coggeshall. The brief was served on the Supreme Court of Montana, which is not a party 

to this appeal. The brief and all future papers that are filed need to be served on Tiffany 

House and Conrad Coggeshall, or, if they obtain new counsel, on their counsel of record. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellant 

shall serve copies of the brief on all parties of record and file a revised certificate of 

service with this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised certificate of service. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to David E. 

Orr. 

01/31/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0699
1,' 4

DATED this)U day ofJanuary 2024. 

For the Court, 

Justice
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

sf-3769897 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) 

AGonzalez@mofo.com 

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719) 

ETate@mofo.com 

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) 

RKim@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

KAREN L. DUNN (Pro Hac Vice) 

kdunn@bsfllp.com 

HAMISH P.M. HUME (Pro Hac Vice) 

hhume@bsfllp.com 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

1401 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington DC 20005 

Telephone: 202.237.2727 

Facsimile: 202.237.6131 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF 

NON-INFRINGEMENT 

Date: June 7, 2017 

Time: 8:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 8, 19th Floor 

Judge: The Honorable William Alsup 

Trial Date: October 2, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 465 Filed 05/18/17 Page 1 of 2
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3769897 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

On May 2, 2017, Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and Otto 

Trucking LLC (“Defendants”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement 

(“Motion”). In view of the Court’s rule on summary judgment motions stated during the hearing 

on May 3, Defendants withdrew the portions of their Motion directed to the Spider design 

(“Notice of Partial Withdrawal”) on May 12. (Dkt. 430.) 

On May 17, Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) filed its opposition to Defendants’ Motion,1 in 

which Waymo expressly represented “that Waymo will not be asserting patent claims from the 

’922, ’464 or ’273 patent against the Fuji.” (Dkt. 449.) Based on such representation by Waymo, 

Defendants hereby withdraw the entirety of their Motion. 

Dated: May 18, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/Michael A. Jacobs

MICHAEL A. JACOBS 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

 1

 In its opposition, Waymo mischaracterizes Defendants’ Notice of Partial Withdrawal by 

arguing that “Defendants do not dispute [that Spider] uses a common lens to transmit and receive 

light.” (Dkt. 449.) Contrary to Waymo’s suggestion, Defendants have not made any concessions 

or admissions regarding whether a completed Spider design would have infringed 

U.S. Patent Nos. 8,836,922, 9,285,464 and 9,086,273, and reserve their right to move for 

summary judgment of non-infringement as to the Spider design at a later time. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 465 Filed 05/18/17 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2534 JOHNNIE GRAY, widow of Henry Gray, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-1107-BLA) Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas E. Johnson, Phillip H. Snelling, JOHNSON, JONES, SNELLING, GILBERT & DAVIS, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner. Judith E. Kramer, Acting Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Patricia M. Nece, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Sarah M. Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We have considered the recent revisions to the regulations implementing the Black Lung Benefits Act, see Regulations Implementing the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended; 65 Fed. Reg. 79,919 (Dec. 20, 2000), and have determined that the revisions do not affect the outcome of this case. 2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Gray seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. * See Gray v. DOWCP, No. 99-1107-BLA (BRB Oct. 19, 2000). We grant Gray’s motion to submit this case on the briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ADDITIONAL QUESTION

FOR CONFERENCE 

RE IN LIMINE MOTIONS

Please add the following question to the list of questions to be addressed in the

memoranda and at the conference on June 29:

10. At trial, will either side introduce in evidence the privilege logs or

information gleaned therefrom? If so, what information will be presented, by

which sponsoring witness, and for what purpose?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 693 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB of Arbor EnTech Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarterended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mark Shefts, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report for the fiscal quarter endedOctober 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| December 12,  2003 |   | s/Mark  Shefts           |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Mark Shefts              |   |
|               |   | Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Rudolph TATUM, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10348.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

_________________________________________ 

_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 15, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134010 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices IN RE CONOR ASHTON SERWATOWSKI, 

DUNCAN SAWYER SERWATOWSKI, 

LOGAN KINCAID SERWATOWSKI, and 

QUENTIN DEVIN SERWATOWSKI, Minors. 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 134010 

 COA: 274395

 Oakland CC

 Family Division: 01-654430-NA 

DEBBIE SERWATOWSKI, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

ANDREW SERWATOWSKI, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0612 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 15, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3694-3695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1184]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THRIFT DEPOSITOR PROTECTION OVERSIGHT BOARD


Affordable Housing Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: Thrift Depositor Protection Oversight Board.

[[Page 3695]] ACTION: Notice of meeting locations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to announce the meeting locations for Region 2 and 
Region 5 of the Series 19 Regional Advisory Board meetings scheduled 
from January 18, through February 2 as published in the Federal 
Register, January 4, 1995, page 530.

DATES: The meetings are scheduled as follows:

    1. January 27, 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., Phoenix, Arizona, Region 5 
Advisory Board.
    2. January 31, 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., Miami, Florida, Region 2 
Advisory Board.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the following locations:

    1. Phoenix, Arizona--Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza Hotel, 111 North 
Central Avenue.
    2. Miami, Florida--Hyatt Regency Miami, 400 S.E. 2nd Avenue.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Nevius, Committee Management 
Officer, Thrift Depositor Protection Oversight Board, 808 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20232, 202/416-2626.

    Dated: January 12, 1995.
Jill Nevius,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-1184 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2221-01-M
AKIL TYMES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3654

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11140]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Citizens Investment Company, Inc.; Formation of, Acquisition by, 
or Merger of Bank Holding Companies

    The company listed in this notice has applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that application or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that 
requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing 
the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
May 30, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Citizens Investment Company, Inc., Glenville, Minnesota; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Twin Lakes State Bank, Twin 
Lakes, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 1, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11140 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F