alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22411-22412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11151]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and Training


Secretary of Labor's Advisory Committee for Veterans' Employment 
and Training; Meeting

    The Secretary's Advisory Committee for Veterans' Employment and 
Training was established under Section 4110 of title 38, United States 
Code, to bring to the attention of the Secretary, problems and issues 
relating to veterans' employment and training.
    Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of Labor's Advisory 
Committee for Veterans' Employment and Training will meet on May 25 and 
26 in C-5515 Seminar Room 1 A&B at the Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting on Thursday, May 
25, 1995, will be from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and on 
Friday, May 26, 1995 will be from approximately 8:30 a.m. to Noon.
    Written comments are welcome and may be submitted by addressing 
them to: Mr. Thomas S. Keefe, Special [[Page 22412]] Assistant, Office 
of the Secretary for Veterans' Employment and Training, U.S. Department 
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S1316, Washington, DC. 
20210.
    The primary items on the agenda are:
    <bullet> Adoption of minutes of previous meeting.
    <bullet> DOL to report on veterans status for employment.
    <bullet> DOL and GAO to report on the duplication of services 
across agencies in the hope of establishing collaborative efforts.
    <bullet> ESA of DOL to provide a briefing on OFCCP.
    <bullet> A legislative update on veterans programs.
    <bullet> Task Force Reports (if any).
    <bullet> Any other business.
    Persons with disabilities, needing special accommodations, should 
contact Thomas S. Keefe at telephone number 202-219-9116 no later than 
Friday, May 19, 1995.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of May, 1995.
Preston M. Taylor Jr.,
Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. 95-11151 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-79-M
Liky DESIRE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9306.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Felicia Nicole JONES, petitioner, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et al.

No. 12-5106.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 31****CERTIFICATION**I, **David F. Sand,**certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Access Capital Strategies CommunityInvestment Fund, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation;  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (inthis 10-K, the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.   Date: August 12, 2005  /s/ David F. Sand  David F. Sand  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  
34
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHUNG KAO,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. SORIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00873-HSG (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Re: Dkt. No. 12

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file an opposition to 

Defendants’ motion for stay is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition no later than 

October 5, 2017. Defendants shall file their reply no later than fourteen (14) days after the date 

of service of the opposition.

This order terminates Docket No. 12.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

8/22/2017
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., OTTOMOTTO LLC, 

OTTO TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants

ANTHONY LEVANDOWSKI,

Defendant-Appellant

STROZ FRIEDBERG, LLC, LYFT, INC., LIOR RON,

Movants

______________________ 

2017-2235, -2253

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:17-cv-00939-

WHA, Judge William H. Alsup.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 972 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 3 Case: 17-2235 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 07/20/2017
2 WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Anthony Levandowski files a “notice of correction to 

appendix to opening brief and statement of compliance 

with Federal Circuit Rules 11(d) and 30(h)(1)(B),” which 

the court construes as a motion to file a corrected appendix to his opening brief. Mr. Levandowski separately 

moves unopposed to file a nonconforming appendix to his 

reply brief. 

In the appendix to his reply brief, Mr. Levandowski

included a public, redacted version of the district court’s

“Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Provisional Relief.” Mr. Levandowski states 

that because he “is not a party” to the action, “but only an 

intervenor, he does not have access to an unredacted 

version” of the order to put in the appendix. He further 

states that Waymo LLC has objected to providing him a 

copy of the non-public version of the order in question. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motion to file a corrected appendix to the 

opening brief is granted. Mr. Levandowski’s corrected 

confidential and non-confidential versions of the appendix 

to the opening brief are accepted for filing.

 (2) The motion to file a nonconforming appendix to 

the reply brief is granted to the extent that the appendix 

will be accepted as filed. 

 (3) No later than July 21, 2017, Waymo is directed to 

provide this court with a copy of the sealed version of the 

district court order for in camera review. Any further 

action will be considered separately, at the request of any 

party or the intervenor. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 972 Filed 07/21/17 Page 2 of 3 Case: 17-2235 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 07/20/2017
WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s32

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 972 Filed 07/21/17 Page 3 of 3 Case: 17-2235 Document: 42 Page: 3 Filed: 07/20/2017
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 1 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 2 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 3 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 4 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 5 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 6 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 7 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 8 of 9

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 695   Filed 06/22/17   Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         512,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    282,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               905,740
<PP&E>                                         100,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 951,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          308,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     636,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   951,763
<SALES>                                        844,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               856,642
<CGS>                                          430,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  764,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (53,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (53,059)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:12-CR-81-TLS 

)

JUAN OLIVO )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 24] filed on July 2, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 24] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 2 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on July 17, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Douglas CARL, et ux., petitioners, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP.

No. 12-1082.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

NANCY ISLAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-845-WCL-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC, by counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.1, makes the following corporate disclosure: Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC does 

not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of 

Alaunus’s stock.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

Attorneys for Defendants New England 

Compounding Pharmacy Inc.; Alaunus 

Pharmaceutical, LLC; Barry Cadden; Lisa Cadden; 

and Gregory Conigliaro

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 4, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, Indiana 46515

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\13 - Islas\caption.docx

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11709]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-5590]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Fluke Corporation, Common Stock, $.25 Par Value; 
Common Stock Purchase Rights With Respect to Common Stock, $.25 Par 
Value)

May 5, 1995.
    Fluke Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
securities (``Securities'') from listing and registration on the 
American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'') and Pacific Stock Exchange 
Incorporated (``PSE'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the 
Securities from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex 
and PSE, the Securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 
(``NYSE''). The Securities commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening 
of business on April 10, 1995 and concurrently therewith the Securities 
were suspended from trading on the Amex and PSE.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Securities from listing on 
the Amex and PSE, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs 
and expenses attendant in maintaining the listing on such exchanges in 
addition to the listing on the NYSE. The Company does not see any 
significant advantage in the trading of the Securities on three 
exchanges and believes that such additional listings would cause 
confusion and fragment the market for the Securities.
    Any interested person may, on or before May 26, 1995 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11709 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
# L_2018097EN.01001301.xml

| 17.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/13

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/580

of 12 April 2018

appointing three members of the Committee established according to Article 11.3 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 11.3 thereof,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following persons are hereby appointed as members of the Committee established according to Article 11.3 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank:

| — | Mário CENTENO, Minister for Finance of Portugal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Mário CENTENO, Minister for Finance of Portugal;

| — | Peter KAŽIMÍR, Minister for Finance of Slovakia; |
| --- | --- |

—

Peter KAŽIMÍR, Minister for Finance of Slovakia;

| — | Edward SCICLUNA, Minister for Finance of Malta. |
| --- | --- |

—

Edward SCICLUNA, Minister for Finance of Malta.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 April 2018.

For the Council

The President

T. DONCHEV

---
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount (the “Contract”) Entered into by and between BAK International
(Tianjin) Limited and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank (the
“Creditor”) on December 3rd, 2008

    
      
        


        
          
            Main
contents:

            Ø           Guaranty
Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Ebaozi 20081203001-2;

            Ø           BAK
International (Tianjin) Limited undertakes to assume joint and several
liabilities for Shenzhen Bak Battery Co., Ltd (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness
towards Shenzhen Development Bank under the Comprehensive Credit Facility
Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: Shenfa Longgang ZongZi
20081203001) from December 8th, 2008
to December 8th, 2009,
and the maximum amount secured is RMB150 million.

            Ø           Guaranty Responsibility: The
guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several
liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the
obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt
becomes mature in advance to its original expiry date due to default of the
obligor or the guarantor).

            Ø           Scope of Guaranty: The
guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest,
breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the
expenses such as litigation cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost
and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing
its creditor’s right.

            Ø           Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

            


            Headlines
of the articles omitted:

            Ø           Termination
and explanation

            Ø           Payment
on demand

            Ø           Declaration
and guaranty

            Ø           Independent
guaranty

            Ø           Fulfillment
of the responsibility and giving up of the right

            Ø           Amendment
of the Contract

            Ø           Effectiveness
and Disputation settlement

            Ø           Contract
period

            Ø           Supplement
articles