alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.3
(logo)WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
One Belvedere Place
Suite 330
Mill Valley, CA 94941


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer, Securities
Administrator and/or Trust Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed
on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my
supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008

/s/ Diane Courtney
DIANE COURTNEY
Vice President


(page)


(logo)WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2007-1, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for SEQUOIA 2006-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2007-4, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for SQALT 2006-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable

5 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2007-2, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

6 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2007-3, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable
Janine GORDON, petitioner, v. Ryan McGINLEY, et al.

No. 12-9436.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Raul ORTIZ-MIRANDA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9006.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
James Ryan CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8481.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Malibu Media, LLC,

Plaintiff Case No. 3:13-CV-00165

vs.

John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 

24.12.128.129

Defendant

Notice of Appearance

 Notice is hereby given that William L. Wilson, Anderson • Agostino & Keller, P.C., 

131 South Taylor Street, South Bend, Indiana, 46601, (574) 288-1510 appears as counsel 

for Defendant John Doe.

 I certify that I have read the Standards of Professional Conduct for federal courts in 

the Seventh Circuit and will abide by them at all times.

 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ William L. Wilson 

 William L. Wilson, Atty. No. 16245-71

 Anderson, Agostino & Keller, P.C.

 131 South Taylor Street

 South Bend, IN 46601

 (574) 288-1510 Tel.

 (815) 550-9947 Fax

 wilson@aaklaw.com

Certificate of Service

 I certify that a copy of this notice was served upon Paul J. Nicoletti, Esq., counsel 

for the Plaintiff, by way of electronic mail notice generated by the Court’s ECF system on 

May 20, 2013.

 /s/ William L. Wilson 

 William L. Wilson

case 3:13-cv-00165-RLM-CAN document 7 filed 05/20/13 page 1 of 1
Llewelen Fernando SMITH, aka Louie, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8908.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Case 4:05-cr-00307-SBA Document 32 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-61-TLS 

)

DAMION D. ALEXANDER )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 27], filed on May 7, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 27] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on May 30, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION IN LAFAYETTE

KEVIN OSBORN, )

)

Plaintiff )

)

v. ) CIVIL NO. 4:12-CV-67 RM

)

CINTEMP, INC., d/b/a CTI PERSONNEL )

)

Defendant )

OPINION and ORDER

On February 19, 2014, the court conducted a hearing on the defendant’s

summary judgment motion. The court opened the hearing by outlining its

tentative view that the motion should be denied and why. The parties’ oral

argument demonstrated that the court’s tentative view was based on a

misunderstanding about when Ms. McBride provided Mr. Osborn with the letter

explaining his asserted termination. The court reserved ruling to allow

consideration of the corrected understanding of the facts of record. 

The court still believes genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to

Ms. McBride’s apparent authority to terminate Mr. Osborn’s employment. Setting

aside the letter (since it wasn’t produced until a week later, it tells us nothing

about what Ms. McBride’s authority appeared to be on September 19), it remains

that CTI gave Ms. McBride the title of “staffing specialist.” A reasonable juror

could find it reasonable to think that “staffing” authority includes the authority

to hire, and (since CTI provided temporary employees to businesses like Subaru)

to fit its temps to the business’s needs. From that, a juror could find reasonable
a belief that a “staffing specialist” could terminate the employment of a temp who

no longer fit the business’s needs.

Accordingly, the court DENIES the defendant’s motion for summary

judgment [Doc. No. 20].

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 20, 2014 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

2
David YEPEZ and Audenago Acosta-Montes, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9440.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1041

VICTOR OSAYANDE, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-887-141) Submitted: November 16, 2005 Decided: December 29, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond D. Kline, Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Victor Osayande petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. In his petition for review, Osayande challenges the immigration judge’s determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Osayande fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Osayande’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Osayande fails to show that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.- 3 - We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Osayande fails to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We find that Osayande failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 659 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 659

               Honoring the memory of Aden Spencer Perry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2022

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
               Honoring the memory of Aden Spencer Perry.

Whereas Aden Spencer Perry was born on December 11, 2004;
Whereas Aden was a junior at Western High School in Davie, Florida, where he 
        excelled academically;
Whereas Aden received the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Award for Mathematics 
        and Science and achievement awards in Advanced Placement Calculus AB, 
        Advanced Placement English Literature, and Advanced Placement Capstone 
        Research and was accepted into the National Honor Society;
Whereas Aden was set to graduate at the top of his class;
Whereas, on April 19, 2022, while walking with his mother in Sunrise, Florida, 
        Aden witnessed a car crash into a lake and, without concern for his own 
        safety, jumped into the water to assist the driver;
Whereas Aden exhibited honor in this selfless act for a stranger;
Whereas the lives of both Aden and the driver of the vehicle were tragically cut 
        short;
Whereas Aden brought joy to all who knew him;
Whereas Aden was a skilled pianist and aspired to become a neurosurgeon;
Whereas, in recognition of Aden's selfless and heroic act, on May 10, 2022, 
        Mayor Michael Udine posthumously awarded Aden with the Broward County 
        Medal of Valor; and
Whereas May 10 will now be Aden Perry Day in Broward County: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the life and memory of Aden Spencer Perry; and
            (2) offers heartfelt condolences to the family, loved ones, 
        and friends of Aden Perry, and recognizes that Aden's spirit 
        lives on through them and selfless acts towards strangers in 
        need.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11766]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-930-05-1430-01]


Termination of Classification and Opening Order; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice terminates a small tract classification and opens 
certain lands near Rawlins, WY, that were classified for lease and sale 
under he Small Tract Act of June 1, 1938 (52 Stat. 609), as amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet Booth, Wyoming State Office, 2515 Warren Avenue, P.O. Box 1828, 
Cheyenne, WY 82003, 307-775-6124.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Classification Order No. 14 dated February 
23, 1954, segregated the lands from all forms of appropriation under 
the public land laws, including location under the mining laws, except 
as to application under the mineral leasing laws and the Small Tract 
Act. The Small Tract Act was repealed by Section 702 of the Federal 
Land Policy and Management Act of October 21, 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701). 
Accordingly, the classification is no longer applicable
    Pursuant to the regulations contained in 43 C.F.R. 2091.7-1(b)(2), 
at 9 a.m. on May 12, 1995, Classification Order No. 14 dated February 
23, 1954, is hereby terminated insofar as it affects the following 
described land:

Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

T. 21 N., R. 88 W.,
    Sec. 24, Lot 53 (formerly Lot 19).

    The area described contains 4.82 acres in Carbon County, WY.

    At 9 a.m. on May 12, 1995, the lands will open to the operation of 
the public land laws generally, and to location under the U.S. mining 
laws, subject to valid existing rights, the provisions of existing 
withdrawals and the requirements of applicable law. This notice serves 
as a record clearing action only.
Melvin Schlagel,
Realty Specialist.
[FR Doc. 95-11766 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
VOTER VERIFIED, INC., petitioner, v. ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, INC.

No. 12-1228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
February 20, 2015



Scandium International Mining Corp. (formerly EMC Metals Corp.)
1430 Greg Street, Suite 501
Sparks, NV 89431



|Re: | Scandium International Mining Corp. (the “Company”)
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 10K                          



Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”).



We hereby consent to the references to our
firm and to the summary of the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 F1 Technical Report on the Feasibility of the Nyngan
Scandium Project”, dated October 10, 2014 prepared by Larpro Pty Ltd., which appear in the Annual Report and the incorporation
therein of such references to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-179657).



Yours truly,



/s/ Maxel Rangott

____________________________

Maxel Rangott, FAusIMM
Director, Rangott Mineral Exploration
Patrick BERRY, petitioner, v. WEBLOYALTY.COM. INC., et al.

No. 13-239.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Bernard KALILIKANE, aka Benny, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9232.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Stephen B. Waters certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. II;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 8, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Angeles Realty Corporation II, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
Damond Undray MOSLEY, petitioner, v. Dee ANDERSON, Sheriff, Tarrant County, Texas, et al.

No. 12-9005.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,959,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,959,615                    
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,864,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,490,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          589,834
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,900,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,490,532
<SALES>                                      5,162,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,186,659
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,811,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,811,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1373

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide leave for members of 

the Armed Forces in connection with adoptions of children, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005

Mr. CARDOZA (for himself and Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide leave 

for members of the Armed Forces in connection with 

adoptions of children, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADOPTION LEAVE FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

4 ARMED FORCES ADOPTING CHILDREN. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 701 of title 10, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(i)(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

9 of Defense, a member of the armed forces adopting a child 
2

•HR 1373 IH 

1 in a qualifying child adoption is entitled to 21 days of 

2 leave to be used in connection with the adoption. 

3 ‘‘(2) For the purpose of this subsection, an adoption 

4 of a child by a member is a qualifying child adoption if 

5 the member is eligible for reimbursement of qualified 

6 adoption expenses for such adoption under section 1052 

7 of this title. 

8 ‘‘(3) In the event that two members of the armed 

9 forces who are spouses of each other adopt a child in a 

10 qualifying child adoption, only one such member shall be 

11 entitled to leave under this subsection. Such members 

12 shall elect which such member shall be entitled to such 

13 leave. 

14 ‘‘(4) Leave under paragraph (1) is in addition to 

15 other leave provided under other provisions of this sec16 tion.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (i) of section 701 

18 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection 

19 (a)), shall take effect on October 1, 2005.

Æ