alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Giữ cho bản thân, 

cùng với gia đình, 

bạn bè và cộng đồng 

an toàn bằng việc 

nhận biết và xử lý 

thông tin sai lệch.

Làm thế nào chúng ta 

có thể xác định và xử lý

THÔNG TIN SAI LỆCH

Ý chúng tôi là gì khi nói 

đến ‘thông tin sai lệch’? 

Đó là thông tin bị lan ra có chủ ý và vô tình, và 

là thông tin sai, không chính xác hoặc gây hiểu 

lầm theo bằng chứng tốt nhất có sẵn tại thời 

điểm đó. 

Làm thế nào để xác định thông tin sai lệch?

● Kiểm tra nguồn thông tin. Và kiểm tra chéo với các nguồn đáng tin cậy.

● Đọc cả phần bên dưới tiêu đề để có được ngữ cảnh đầy đủ.

● Hiểu ý định đằng sau bài đăng.

Tại sao thông tin sai lệch lan truyền nhanh như vậy? 

● Chúng ta muốn bảo vệ những người mà chúng ta quan tâm.

● Chúng ta muốn cảm thấy có sự kết nối.

● Chúng ta muốn cảm thấy chúng ta có thông tin mới mà người khác không biết.

● Chúng ta có thể đang tìm kiếm lời giải thích hoặc muốn chia sẻ thông tin giúp 

chúng ta hiểu được các sự kiện.

● Thông tin sai lệch thường gây ra một phản ứng cảm xúc.

● Thông tin sai lệch thoạt đầu có thể có vẻ như chính xác khi được đăng bên 

ngoài ngữ cảnh.

● Do những yếu tố này, người dùng có xu hướng lan truyền thông tin sai lệch 

nhanh hơn hơn sự thật trên mạng xã hội.

● Tất cả mọi người, dù là chuyên gia hay không, đều có tiếng nói quan trọng như 

nhau trên internet.
Tại sao thông tin sai lệch lại có hại?

Khi mọi người tin và hành động dựa trên thông tin sai lệch, 

thì sức khỏe cộng đồng sẽ bị ảnh hưởng. 

Tôi có thể làm gì khi nghe hoặc nhìn thấy thông tin sai lệch? 

Giúp ngăn chặn sự lan truyền của thông tin sai lệch bằng ba việc sau đây:

● Xác định thông tin sai lệch.

● Không góp phần lan truyền thông tin sai lệch.

● Hướng mọi người đến thông tin sức khỏe từ các nguồn đáng tin cậy như FDA và các đối 

tác chính phủ của chúng ta, bao gồm usa.gov/health, coronavirus.gov và vaccines.gov.

Làm thế nào để nói chuyện hiệu quả với bạn 

bè và gia đình về thông tin sai lệch? 

Khi nói chuyện với mọi người, hãy đảm bảo rằng bạn: 

● Lắng nghe ● Không chế nhạo

● Đồng cảm ● Sử dụng ngôn ngữ mang tính 

hòa nhập, không phân biệt ● Chỉ ra các nguồn đáng tin cậy

Hãy cân nhắc việc chia sẻ những điểm sau:

● Theo bản chất, khoa học được thiết kế để phát triển.

● Các khuyến nghị của chúng ta có thể thay đổi, khi khoa học phát triển.

● Điều đó không có nghĩa là chúng ta không nên tin tưởng vào khoa học. Một thay đổi trong 

khoa học là kết quả của sự hiểu biết sâu sắc hơn về một chủ đề.

● Hãy tin tưởng vào khoa học, khoa học đã mang đến cho chúng ta một số thành tựu y học vĩ đại 

nhất của nhân loại như chấm dứt bệnh đậu mùa (thông qua tiêm chủng), lý thuyết về mầm bệnh 

(giúp cho phẫu thuật an toàn hơn nhiều), và liệu pháp gen di truyền (chữa một số chứng mù).
EXHIBIT 10.76

                      FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE
                                (LINE OF CREDIT)

     WHEREAS,  Obsidian Enterprises,  Inc., a Delaware corporation,  executed as
"Maker",  a  certain  Promissory  Note  dated  January  9, 2002 in favor of Fair
Holdings, Inc, an Ohio corporation,  (the "Note"), as "Lender", in the principal
amount of Three Million and 00/100 Dollars with a Final Maturity Date of January
9, 2005 which was amended by that certain  First  Amendment To  Promissory  Note
dated January 2, 2003 and further  amended by that certain  Second  Amendment To
Promissory  Note dated April 1, 2003 and a Third  Amendment  dated  February 14,
2004.

     WHEREAS, Obsidian Enterprises,  Inc. and Fair Holdings, Inc. have agreed to
a fourth amendment to the Note so that the principal amount of the Note shall be
increased to the sum of Fifteen Million and 00/100 Dollars ($15,000,000.00).

     NOW  THEREFORE,  inconsideration  of the  recitals  set forth above and the
covenants,   conditions  and  agreements   contained  herein,  the  receipt  and
sufficiency of which are hereby  acknowledged,  the Parties consent and agree as
follows:

     1.   The  principal  balance  of the Note is hereby  increased  to  Fifteen
          Million and 00/100 Dollars ($15,000,000.00).

     Except for the  amendment  to the  principal  balance  all other  terms and
     conditions  of the Note and all  amendments  thereto  shall  remain in full
     force and effect as if fully stated herein.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  have caused  this  Fourth  Amendment  to
Promissory Note to be executed this 10th day of March, 2004.


Obsidian Enterprises, Inc.              Fair Holdings, Inc.


By: /s/ Terry G. Whitesell              By: /s/ Timothy S. Durham
    ---------------------------         ----------------------------------
    Terry G. Whitesell, President       Timothy S. Durham, Chairman
Terry Marshall CAMPIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9031.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Andrew Godfrey, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, of First Quantum Ventures, Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report  does  not  contain  any  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 4. The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and  15d-14) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls.


Date:  September 28, 2010By:
/s/Andrew GodfreyAndrew GodfreyChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10199 (Summary Calendar)

MILTON EDWARD GRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOBBY YOUNG, Sheriff of Hunt County, Et Al. Defendants, DOUG TOMLINSON, Sgt., Hunt County Jail, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:94-CV-2177-P)

- - - - - - - - - - July 25, 1996 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Milton Griggs, #558133, a ppeals from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of Sergeant Doug Tomlinson
in Griggs’ civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. Griggs argues that Tomlinson used excessive force in moving him from his jail cell. We have reviewed the record and the2

briefs of the parties and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. S ee Griggs v. Young et al. , No. 3:94-CV-2177-P (N.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.8c

                             ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
                      For Equipment Schedule No. 1 to the
              Master Lease Agreement dated as of 12/22/03 between
   The Walden Asset Group, LLC (Lessor) and Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
                                    (Lessee)
********************************************************************************

Equipment Acceptance: The Lessee hereby certifies that the following Equipment
(as set forth in the Equipment Schedule identified below) has been delivered and
installed as of the Commencement Date at the location and on the date identified
below. This Equipment has been tested and inspected by the Lessee, found to be
in good working order, and is accepted as Equipment under the Lease on the
Commencement Date indicated below.

Equipment Schedule:           No. 1

Installation Locations:       3030 Andrita St., Los Angeles, California 90065

Commencement Date:            December 22, 2003

First Basic Rent Date:        January 1, 2004

Description of Equipment:     Various Equipment as further outlined in Exhibit
                              A attached hereto

Lessor's Cost:                $14,314,971.45 ($5,516,942.16 of the equipment is
eligible for the 30% special depreciation allowance and basis adjustment under
Section 168(k)(1) of the code)

Lease Factors:                Factor Type                        Factor
--------------                -----------                        ------
                              Monthly                            1.7102%
                              Daily                              0.00293%

Basic Rent:                   $244,814.64  Monthly in Advance

Lease Term:                   60 Months commencing on the First Basic Rent Date
and preceded by a period from the Commencement Date to the First Basic Rent
Date.

Lessee hereby confirms the acceptance of the Equipment described above under the
Lease, the Lease Factor, the First Basic Rent Date, Lessor's Cost and other
information described above, and the Lessee hereby represents and warrants that
the Lease is in full force and effect, there have been no defaults thereunder,
the Equipment is in good order and repair and there are no agreements between
Lessor and Lessee other than the Lease and the Equipment Schedule which cover
the leasing of the Equipment.

Playboy Enterprises, Inc.                   Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
(Guarantor)                                 (Lessee)


By: /s/ Robert D. Campbell                  By:  /s/ Robert D. Campbell
   --------------------------------------      ---------------------------------
Title: SVP, Treasurer and Asst. Secretary   Title: Treasurer and Asst. Secretary
      -----------------------------------         ------------------------------
Date: December 22, 2003                     Date: December 22, 2003
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individualcapacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 

SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR

SABINE ROYALTYTRUST
By: /s/ Ron E. Hooper
Ron E. Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Date: November 6, 2020 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Luis GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-1186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 13, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Rodger Don HUGHES, petitioner, v. CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY LP, et al.

No. 12-6076.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until November 19, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Axcess International, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); and
 c)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and
 Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Antwan HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 18, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Shayne E. TODD, petitioner, v. Alfred BIGELOW, et al.

No. 12-7596.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In re LOI NGOC NGHIEM, petitioner.

No. 12-9330.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 1 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 2 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 3 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 4 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 5 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 6 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 7 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 8 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 9 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 10 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 11 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 12 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 13 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 14 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 15 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 16 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 17 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 18 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 19 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 20 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 21 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 22 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 23 of 24

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG   Document 15   Filed 06/07/17   Page 24 of 24
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this amended Yearly Report of Liberty Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven L. White, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Steven L. White Date: May 7, 2008 Steven L. White President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6944

M. RODNEY E. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK SANFORD, SC Governor; JON OZMINT, Director SCDC Prisons; CAPTAIN BUSH, McCormick Correctional Institution; SCOTT LEWIS, Major, McCormick Correctional Institution; COLIE RUSHTON, Warden; LEROY CARTLEDGE, Associate Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:05-cv-02664-MBS) Submitted: November 30, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. M. Rodney E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel R oy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: M. Rodney E. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Sanford , No. 3:05-cv-02664-MBS (D.S.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Welcome to today’s 

FDA/CDRH Webinar

Thank you for your patience while additional time is 

provided for participants to join the call. 

Please connect to the audio portion of the webinar 

now:

U.S. Callers Dial: 888-455-1392

International Callers Dial: 1-773-799-3847

Passcode: 7621596
FDA’s Enforcement Policy and Umbrella EUA 

for Gowns and Other Apparel for Use by 

Healthcare Personnel

Office of Health Technology 4: Surgical and Infection Control Devices

Office of Product Evaluation and Quality

Center for Devices and Radiological Health
3

Gowns

Minimal-to-Low Barrier Protection 

• ANSI/AAMI PB70 Level 1 protection or equivalent 

• ANSI/AAMI PB70 Level 2 protection or equivalent

Moderate-to-High Barrier Protection 

• ANSI/AAMI PB70 Level 3 protection or equivalent

• ANSI/AAMI PB70 Level 4 protection or equivalent
4

• Enforcement Policy for Gowns, Other Apparel, and Gloves During the Coronavirus Disease 

(COVID-19) Public Health Emergency (https://www.fda.gov/media/136540/download)

• FDA Letter for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of Gowns and Other Apparel 

(https://www.fda.gov/media/138326/download)

• Premarket Notification Requirements Concerning Gowns Intended for Use in Health Care 

Settings (https://www.fda.gov/media/92146/download)

• Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions for Surgical Gowns and Surgical 

Drapes (https://www.fda.gov/media/72369/download)

• Surgical Mask and Gown Conservation Strategies - Letter to Health Care Providers 

(https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/letters-health-care-providers/surgical-mask-and-gownconservation-strategies-letter-health-care-providers)

Resources
5

Questions?

Division of Industry and Consumer Education: DICE@fda.hhs.gov

Slide Presentation, Transcript and Webinar Recording 

will be available at

www.fda.gov/training/cdrhlearn

under Heading Specialty Technical Topics; Sub-heading:

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

Please complete a short survey about your FDA CDRH

webinar experience. The survey can be found at

www.fda.gov/CDRHWebinar

immediately following the conclusion of the live webinar.
Terry B. POTTS, petitioner, v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 12-9521.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.