alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Почему важно правильно охлаждать пищу

Температура крытых/ уложенных друг над другом

противней с пищей сохраняется на уровне 78 ̊F 

(25,5 ̊F) даже спустя 24 

часа. 

Я не хотел, чтобы кто-нибудь пища в нашем ресторане охлдолжным образом.Способы правильного охлажПомещение пищи на неглубометаллические противни в лехолодильнике Помещение пищи в емкости размера для охлаждения Использование оборудованиохлажденияПеремешивание пищи в емкопомещенной в водно-ледянуДругие эффективные способ

Защищайте людей повсюду.

Правильно охлаждайте пищу.
Andrena D. CROCKETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9071.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Cedric B. JENKINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Exhibit 27.1
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711425
<NAME>                        NetOptix Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         408
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                   507
<INVENTORY>                                    1,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,694
<PP&E>                                         25,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,033
<BONDS>                                        2,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       114
<OTHER-SE>                                     29,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,106
<SALES>                                        4,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,695
<CGS>                                          2,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (82)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                659
<INCOME-TAX>                                   40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            619
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   619
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.05


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:12-CR-130 RM 

)

ROBERT DUFF )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations upon a plea of guilty issued on January 17, 2013. Accordingly,

the court ADOPTS those findings and recommendations [docket # 9], ACCEPTS

defendant Robert Duff’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count

1 of the Information, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(2). 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 5, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana
EXHIBIT 9

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-10 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 3
Years Out of Law School *

Year

Adjustmt

Factor**

Paralegal/

Law

Clerk 1-3 4-7 8-10 11-19 20 +

6/01/18- 5/31/19 1.0350 $202 $371 $455 $658 $742 $894

6/01/17- 5/31/18 1.0463 $196 $359 $440 $636 $717 $864

6/01/16- 5/31/17 1.0369 $187 $343 $421 $608 $685 $826

6/01/15- 5/31/16 1.0089 $180 $331 $406 $586 $661 $796

6/01/14- 5/31/15 1.0235 $179 $328 $402 $581 $655 $789

6/01/13- 5/31/14 1.0244 $175 $320 $393 $567 $640 $771

6/01/12- 5/31/13 1.0258 $170 $312 $383 $554 $625 $753

6/01/11- 5/31/12 1.0352 $166 $305 $374 $540 $609 $734

6/01/10- 5/31/11 1.0337 $161 $294 $361 $522 $589 $709

6/01/09- 5/31/10 1.0220 $155 $285 $349 $505 $569 $686

6/01/08- 5/31/09 1.0399 $152 $279 $342 $494 $557 $671

6/01/07-5/31/08 1.0516 $146 $268 $329 $475 $536 $645

6/01/06-5/31/07 1.0256 $139 $255 $313 $452 $509 $614

6/1/05-5/31/06 1.0427 $136 $249 $305 $441 $497 $598

6/1/04-5/31/05 1.0455 $130 $239 $293 $423 $476 $574

6/1/03-6/1/04 1.0507 $124 $228 $280 $405 $456 $549

6/1/02-5/31/03 1.0727 $118 $217 $267 $385 $434 $522

6/1/01-5/31/02 1.0407 $110 $203 $249 $359 $404 $487

6/1/00-5/31/01 1.0529 $106 $195 $239 $345 $388 $468

6/1/99-5/31/00 1.0491 $101 $185 $227 $328 $369 $444

6/1/98-5/31/99 1.0439 $96 $176 $216 $312 $352 $424

6/1/97-5/31/98 1.0419 $92 $169 $207 $299 $337 $406

6/1/96-5/31/97 1.0396 $88 $162 $198 $287 $323 $389

6/1/95-5/31/96 1.032 $85 $155 $191 $276 $311 $375

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-10 Filed 09/06/18 Page 2 of 3
6/1/94-5/31/95 1.0237 $82 $151 $185 $267 $301 $363

The methodology of calculation and benchmarking for this Updated Laffey Matrix has been

approved in a number of cases. See, e.g., McDowell v. District of Columbia, Civ. A. No. 00-

594 (RCL), LEXSEE 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8114 (D.D.C. June 4, 2001); Salazar v. Dist.

of Col., 123 F.Supp.2d 8 (D.D.C. 2000).

* “Years Out of Law School” is calculated from June 1 of each year, when most law

students graduate. “1-3" includes an attorney in his 1st, 2nd and 3rd years of practice,

measured from date of graduation (June 1). “4-7" applies to attorneys in their 4th, 5th, 6th

and 7th years of practice. An attorney who graduated in May 1996 would be in tier “1-3"

from June 1, 1996 until May 31, 1999, would move into tier “4-7" on June 1, 1999, and tier

“8-10" on June 1, 2003.

** The Adjustment Factor refers to the nation-wide Legal Services Component of the

Consumer Price Index produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States

Department of Labor. 

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-10 Filed 09/06/18 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Rockies Region 2007 Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 /s/ Richard W. McCullough

March 31, 2010Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

March 31, 2010Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00879-TLS-CAN   document 1-2   filed 08/26/13   page 1 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00879-TLS-CAN   document 1-2   filed 08/26/13   page 2 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00879-TLS-CAN   document 1-2   filed 08/26/13   page 3 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00879-TLS-CAN   document 1-2   filed 08/26/13   page 4 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 3:13-cv-00879-TLS-CAN   document 1-2   filed 08/26/13   page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11335]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-264-000]


Southern Natural Gas Co.; Notice Of GSR Revised Tariff Sheets

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 28, 1995, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern), submitted for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to reflect a 
slight increase in its May 1, 1995, FT and FT-NN GSR surcharge:

Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 15
Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 17

    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Southern's intervening customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
Southern's filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11335 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Walter CORDELL, petitioner, v. Jeffrey BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

No. 12-8787.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Scott C. WADSWORTH, petitioner, v. UTAH.

No. 12-9239.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.
Cody DAVIS, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-9216.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

BERNICE THARP, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-61

)

FRANCK’S LAB, INC., Individually and )

d/b/a Franck’s Compounding Lab and/or )

Franck’s Pharmacy, Inc.; WELLS )

PHARMACY NETWORK, L.L.C.; )

PAUL W. FRANCK, R.Ph.; and )

ANTHONY JAMES CAMPBELL, R.Ph., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This case was filed in this Court on March 4, 2013, based on diversity jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) The Complaint alleges that Defendant Paul W.

Franck was a principal and shareholder of Franck’s Lab, Inc., and a licensed pharmacist in

Florida and that Defendant Anthony James Campbell was a lead chemist with Franck’s Lab, Inc. 

(Compl. ¶¶ 6-7.) The Complaint further states that “Defendant Wells Pharmacy Network,

L.L.C., is a Florida limited liability corporation, not registered but doing business in the State of

Indiana . . . .” (Compl. ¶ 5.) 

The Complaint, however, is inadequate for two reasons. First, regarding Defendants Paul

Franck and Anthony Campbell, the Complaint contains no allegations concerning their

citizenship. “For natural persons, state citizenship is determined by one’s domicile.” Dausch v.

Rykse, 9 F.3d 1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993); see also Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671

F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012) (“But residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which

1
depends on domicile—that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long

run.”); Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992)

(“In federal law citizenship means domicile, not residence.”). Therefore, the Court must be

advised of the citizenship of Defendants Paul Franck and Anthony Campbell, which is based on

their domicile.

As to Defendant Wells Pharmacy Network, L.L.C., a limited liability company’s

citizenship “for purposes of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members.” 

Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Therefore, the Court must be advised

of the citizenship of all the members of Wells Pharmacy Network, L.L.C. to ensure that none of

its members share a common citizenship with Plaintiff. Hicklin Eng’g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d

346, 347 (7th Cir. 2006). Moreover, citizenship must be “traced through multiple levels” for

those members of Wells Network Pharmacy, L.L.C. who are a partnership or a limited liability

company, as anything less can result in a dismissal or remand for want of jurisdiction. Mut.

Assignment & Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004).

Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended

Complaint on or before March 19, 2013, properly alleging the citizenship of Defendant Paul W.

Franck, Defendant Anthony James Campbell, and Defendant Wells Pharmacy Network, L.L.C.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 5th day of March, 2013.

/S/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1330 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1330

   To provide that Social Security contributions are used to protect 
Social Security solvency by mandating that Trust Fund monies cannot be 
                  diverted to create private accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2005

 Mr. Salazar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that Social Security contributions are used to protect 
Social Security solvency by mandating that Trust Fund monies cannot be 
                  diverted to create private accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Trust Funds 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY.

    Those amounts, equal to taxes imposed under sections 1401 and 3101 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and taxes imposed under chapter 1 
of such Code to the extent attributable to section 86 of such Code, 
which are made available to the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 
Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund under the 
applicable provisions of law as in effect on the date of the enactment 
of this Act, shall be available solely for the purposes of the old-age, 
survivors, and disability insurance program under title II of the 
Social Security Act, as in effect on such date, and shall not be 
available for the establishment or funding of private accounts.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1391 

To suspend temporarily the duty on allyl ureido monomer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on allyl ureido monomer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLYL UREIDO MONOMER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.06.02 2-Imidazolidinone, 1-(2- 

aminoethyl)-, reaction product with oxirane, ((2- 

propenyloxy)methyl)- (CAS 

No. 90412–00–3) (provided 

for in subheading 

2933.29.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
2 

•HR 1391 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-12-00095- CV Kat ie Bosacki and Danielle Thomas, Appellants

v. Brandon Walter Benner, Appellee F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 2 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 10- 0038 50, H ONO RAB LE ERIC SH EP P ERD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N A p p e ll a nts K a ti e B o s a cki and Danielle Thomas repr esent that th e p a r ti e s h a v e r e a c h e d a settlement ag ree ment and have filed an unopposed m o t i o n t o d i smiss appea l. Acc ording ly , we g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: June 27, 2012
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’

PRIVILEGE LOG AND DUE

DILIGENCE REPORT

A prior order dated April 10 set certain deadlines pertaining to defendants’ privilege log

and briefing concerning the production of a due diligence report (Dkt. No. 202 at 12–13). After

non-party Anthony Levandowski appealed from that order, the Federal Circuit temporarily

stayed those portions of the April 10 order pending consideration of the appeal. Today, the

Federal Circuit denied Levandowski’s petition for writ of mandamus and lifted the temporary

stay. Accordingly, this order SETS the following revised deadlines:

1. By APRIL 27 AT NOON, defendants shall serve a privilege

log complete as to all items, including those affected by

Levandowski’s Fifth Amendment motion (Dkt. No. 147).

2. By MAY 1 AT NOON, plaintiff shall move, if it wishes to do

so at all, to compel production of the due diligence report that was

the subject of Levandowski’s motion. Defendants and

Levandowski shall have until MAY 8 AT NOON to oppose, shall

submit a proper sworn record as to all necessary predicates, and

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 271 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

shall submit the full report (with attachments) for in camera

review. Plaintiff may reply by MAY 12 AT NOON. The briefs

should address the possibility that discovery into the predicates for

any privilege may be allowed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 271 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 2
Gabriel MARQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9689.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Charron BUTTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9402.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-13-TLS 

)

JAMISON A. GUDORF )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 32], filed on October 31, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 32] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment IS hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on November 18, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices of meetings published under

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (Pub.

L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register

21028

Vol. 60, No. 82

Friday, April 28, 1995

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, May

2, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW., Washington DC,

8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202–254–6314.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–10657 Filed 4–26–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May

5, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW., Washington, DC

8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance

Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202–254–6314.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–10658 Filed 4–26–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday,

May 9, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington,

D.C. 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202–254–6314.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–10659 Filed 4–26–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May

12, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington,

D.C. 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance

Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202–254–6314.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–10660 Filed 4–26–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May

19, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington,

D.C. 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance

Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202–254–6314.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–10661 Filed 4–26–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May

26, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington,

D.C. 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance

Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202–254–6314.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–10662 Filed 4–26–95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
Jeffery L. CARPENTER, petitioner, v. Gary BECKSTROM, Warden.

No. 12-9629.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.