alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jeffrey D. BAKER, petitioner, v. Terry TIBBALS, Warden.

No. 12-9243.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Steven L. White, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Alliance, Inc.(the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and     March 15, 2008/s/ Steven L. WhiteSteven L. WhiteChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
ESCOGER COMIDA SEGURA 

AL COMER FUERA

ALIMENTOS DE 

ALTO RIESGO

OPCIONES 

MÁS SEGURAS

Al comer fuera, ciertos alimentos son más seguros que otros.

A continuación hay una lista de alimentos a evitar y algunas 

alternativas a los mismos. 

Hamburguesas o bistecs 

poco cocidos, carne de res 

o de aves poco hecha

Sushi, sashimi, ceviche y 

boles de poke

Huevos pasados por agua 

o huevos fritos con la 

yema suave o líquida

Queso blando no 

pasteurizado, como brie, 

camembert, feta y queso 

fresco

Productos agrícolas 

marchitos, color marrón 

o sin lavar

Sidra de manzana o jugos frescos 

sin pasteurizar

Carne de res bien cocida, 

pollo cocido hasta que la 

carne esté blanca, y pavo 

cuyo jugo no esté rojo* 

Rollos de tempura o verduras, 

pescado o mariscos al horno o a 

la parrilla hasta estar opacos o 

empiecen a deshacerse 

Huevos con yema y clara 

duras

Queso pasteurizado

Verduras frescas y 

crujientes o ensaladas 

hechas a pedido

Jugos procesados o 

embotellados pasteurizados

*Para garantizar la seguridad de los alimentos, pida que cocinen las hamburguesas hasta alcanzar 160 °F, el 

pescado y los mariscos hasta alcanzar 145 °F, los bistecs y los asados hasta alcanzar 145 °F, con un 

tiempo de reposo de 3 minutos, y el pollo y el pavo hasta alcanzar 165 °F. 

julio de 2018

SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA CADA DÍA
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, 
during the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress the Speaker of the House and 
the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting 
jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and 
the Minority Leader of the Senate,

              

 may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to 
assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
```
In re Marcus Doran BARLEY, petitioner.

No. 12-10408.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10399]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial 
Innovation; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and 
Industrial Innovation (#1194).
    Date and Time: May 18, 1995 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 390, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. George Hazelrigg, Program Director, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, 
(703) 306-1330.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Academic Research Infrastructure 
(ARI) proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10399 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
妥善處理

「我沒有清洗、沖洗

並消毒流理台。」

「我已清洗、沖洗並消毒流

理台。」

為維護大眾健康。 請務必在料理設備使用前後確實清洗、沖洗並消毒。
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

SANDRA RHODES, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-841-JVB-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Defendants, ALAUNUS 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; and GREGORY 

CONIGLIARO. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Dina M. Cox 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 10 filed 01/09/13 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 9, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

Stutsman & Mulvaney 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

/s/ Dina M. Cox 

 DINA M. COX 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

Phone: (317) 237-0500 

FAX: (317) 630-2790 

dcox@lewiswagner.com Q:\NECC\18 - Rhodes\Federal Court Action\appearance_DMC_Alaunus.docx

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 10 filed 01/09/13 page 2 of 2
Wendall J. HALL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8894.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
0802-0910920-1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors  U.S. Bank National Association We have examined management's  assertion, included in the accompanying  Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007,  except for  servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), and 1122(d)(4)(iv)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing  platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform,  and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures  were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts  calculated or  reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota February 12, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26460-26461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12135]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,204]


Smith Corona Corporation, Cortland, New York; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    Various field offices in the following states:

TA-W-30,205A  California
TA-W-30,205B  Connecticut
TA-W-30,205C  Florida
TA-W-30,205D  Georgia [[Page 26461]] 
TA-W-30,205E  Illinois
TA-W-30,205F  Kentucky
TA-W-30,205G  Maryland
TA-W-30,205H  Michigan
TA-W-30,205I  New Jersey
TA-W-30,205J  New York
TA-W-30,205K  Ohio
TA-W-30,205L  Pennsylvania
TA-W-30,205M  Puerto Rico
TA-W-30,205N  Texas
TA-W-30,205O  Wisconsin

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
October 6, 1994, applicable to all workers of Smith Corona Corporation 
engaged in employment related to the production of typewriters and word 
processors in Cortland, New York. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on October 21, 1994 (59 FR 53211).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The findings show that 
the support workers (sales, service and administrative) of the subject 
firm, located in various States, should have been included. The intent 
of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Smith 
Corona Corporation who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,205 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Smith Corona Corporation, Cortland, New York, and 
at various field offices in California, Connecticut, Florida, 
Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New 
York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Texas, and Wisconsin engaged 
in employment related to the production of typewriters and word 
processors who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after October 2, 1994 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 9th day of May 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-12135 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.19

                      AMENDMENT TO CHARLES C. PEARSON, JR.
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


AND NOW this 21st day of January, 2004, comes Charles C. Pearson, Jr., Resident
of Pennsylvania, Executive and Waypoint Financial Corp., a Pennsylvania
Corporation, a company with principal offices in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; and

WHEREAS, Waypoint Financial Corp. is a party to an Employment Agreement dated 17
October, 2000, by and between Waypoint Financial Corp. and Charles C. Pearson,
Jr. Agreement); and

WHEREAS, Waypoint Financial Corp. Board of Directors acting through its
Compensation and Benefits Committee on September 17, 2003 resolved and the full
Board ratified on October 22, 2003 that Change in Control Agreements entered
into with its Executive and Senior Officers should be amended and restated to
remove reduction provisions under the Change in Control payment paragraph; and

WHEREAS, Agreements with all other Executives having a Change in Control
Agreement have been restated.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound hereby agree as
follows:

         1.       That paragraph 6.6 Certain Reductions in Payments is hereby
                  deleted in its entirety.

         2.       That the parties reaffirm that all other terms and conditions
                  of the above-referenced Employment Agreement remain in full
                  force and effect as of the date hereof except as previously
                  modified.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned intending to be legally bound have executed
this Agreement as of the date first above written.


---------------------------                 ----------------------------
Attest:                                     Waypoint Financial Corp.



---------------------------                 ----------------------------
Witness:                                      Charles C. Pearson, Jr.
Peter Allen ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 31, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Не позволяйте случиться с собой тому, что случилось со мной

Меня зовут Дэвид. Однажды, Потом я почувствовал себя Я не знал, что на моих руках . . . на огурцы, 

будучи на работе, я ощутил лучше, и вернулся, чтобы микробы. Так что они перешли 

недомогание и побежал в закончить смену. Я нуждался на помидоры,

туалет. в деньгах. Поступил заказ на 

салат. Я забыл помыть руки или 

надеть перчатки.

. . . на весь салат, . . . и попали в желудок к маленькой девочке Эшлин, съевшей желудочными спазмами, с 

приготовленный мною салат. рвотой... Вообще, десятки 

человек заболели - оттого, 

что я продолжал делать 

салаты в тот день.

Я мог это предотвратить...

Оберегайте людей повсюду. 

Мойте руки, используйте перчатки

и кухонную посуду, и никогда не 

работайте, если вы больны.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN DULBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00850-JCS (INT)

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable William H. Alsup in the San

Francisco division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall 

bear the initials WHA immediately after the case number.

All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing 

schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge 

to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior 

briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also 

remain unchanged. 

Dated: February 27, 2017 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties.

Case 3:17-cv-00850-WHA Document 14 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 1
Mario A. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. PEEL, et al.

No. 12-9205.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
case 1:12-cv-00452-PPS-RBC document 7 filed 12/21/12 page 1 of 1
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 

Marketing Orders for 

VERVE® Discs Blue Mint, VERVE® Chews Blue Mint, 

VERVE® Discs Green Mint and VERVE® Chews Green Mint 

Marketed by U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company LLC 

The Center for Tobacco Products of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has carefully considered 

the potential environmental impact of these actions and has concluded that these actions will not have 

significant effects on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, environmental impact 

statements are not required. 

U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company LLC wishes to introduce two nicotine-containing discs and two 

nicotine-containing chews into interstate commerce for commercial distribution in the United States 

and submitted to FDA premarket tobacco product applications to obtain marketing orders under the 

provisions of section 910 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

FDA prepared the programmatic environmental assessment (PEA), dated August 4, 2020, in accordance 

with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) implementing the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FDA’s NEPA regulations (21 CFR 25.40). The PEA concluded that the 

marketing orders would have no significant impact and is available to the public upon request. 

The PEA evaluates potential environmental effects due to manufacturing, use, and disposal of the new 

products. No increased or new types of environmental impacts due to manufacturing the new products 

are anticipated. FDA does not foresee that use of the new products would result in new or different 

environmental impacts. FDA believes that the disposal of the new products is the same as the disposal 

conditions of other nicotine-containing chews and discs that are currently marketed in the United 

States. Therefore, FDA does not foresee significant adverse impacts to the environment due to the 

proposed actions from manufacturing, use, and disposal of the new products. 

Digitally signed by Luis G. Valerio -S 

Date: 2020.08.04 12:04:23 -04'00' Approved by 

Luis G. Valerio Jr., Ph.D., ATS 

Associate Director 

Division of Nonclinical Science 

Office of Science 

Center for Tobacco Products 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         197,923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,157
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,764,222
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,733,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>