alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.36

                             AMENDMENT No. 2 TO THE
                          2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF
                                  AMETEK, INC.

                  WHEREAS, AMETEK, Inc. (the "Company") has adopted the 2002
Stock Incentive Plan of AMETEK, Inc. (the "Plan"); and

                  WHEREAS, Section 18 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors
of the Company or the Committee (as defined in the Plan) to amend the Plan; and

                  WHEREAS, the Committee now desires to amend the Plan in
certain respects;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                  1. The fourth sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby
deleted.

                  2. The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective as of
January 16, 2004.

                  3. Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly
authorized officer of the Company as of the 16th day of January, 2004.

                                        AMETEK, INC.

                                        By: /s/ John J. Molinelli
                                           ----------------------
                                           Name:  John J. Molinelli
                                           Title: Executive Vice President &
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Attest:

/s/ Kathryn E. Londra
---------------------
Kathryn E. Londra
Corporate Secretary
Etoyi Monray BLOUNT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10095.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
William WHITE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1062.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Fred John ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Carol CHAPDELAINE, Warden.

No. 12-8618.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                            31.1


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Joseph L. Castle II, certify that:

(1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Castle Energy
     Corporation for the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

(2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.

(3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

(4)  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and (15d-15e) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
          based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting and

(5)    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
       our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
       to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
       board of directors:

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, analyze and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


/S/JOSEPH L. CASTLE II
----------------------
Joseph L. Castle II
Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2004
Brian M. CASEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-9184.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Farid MOHAMMED, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9481.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Francisco Manuel VILLARRUEL, petitioner, v. Kim HOLLAND, Acting Warden.

No. 12-9222.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11685]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 050195C]


Marine Mammals and Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Receipt of application for a scientific research permit 
(P771#73).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory, has applied in due form for a permit to take the marine 
mammals listed below for the purpose of scientific research.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 12, 1995.
ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Director, Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, BIN 
C15700, Bldg 1, Seattle, WA 99115-0070 (206/526-6150);
    Written data or views, or requests for a public hearing on this 
request, should be submitted to the Chief, Permits Division, F/PR1, 
Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD 20910, within 30 days 
of the publication of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Barone, (301/713-2289).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Those individuals requesting a hearing 
should set forth the specific reasons why a hearing on this particular 
request would be appropriate.
    Concurrent with the publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, the Secretary of Commerce is forwarding copies of this 
application to the Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of 
Scientific Advisors.
    The subject permit is requested under the authority of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and 
the Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals 
(50 CFR part 216).
    The applicant seeks authorization to satellite tag 75 harbor 
porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the wild, and up to 25 captive 
rehabilitated animals including harbor porpoise, Dall's porpoise 
(Phocoenoides dalli) and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus 
obliquidens). The applicant seeks authorization to take by harassment 
up to 750 harbor porpoise incidental to the tagging. The work will be 
conducted over a 5-year period. Proposed taking will be by small boat. 
Field work will start in July, 1995 and continue through October, 1999 
in Washington and Oregon. The results of the research will provide 
information on stock boundaries.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-11685 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Don Merceleany MAXWELL, petitioner, v. Darryl GOLDEN, et al.

No. 12-9751.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
J. Gregory CARWIE, Conservator on Behalf of Emil Harris, petitioner, v. PETER KNUDSEN, A/S.

No. 12-1232.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
Charles STENSON, petitioner, v. Phillip HEATH, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9165.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 25264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11767]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board


Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on May 17, 1995, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

Portion Open to the Public

(1) Reclassification of Position of the Manager of the Washington, 
D.C. Branch Office
(2) Docketing Procedures
(3) Regulations:
    A. Parts 211 and 261, Proposed Rule--Administrative Finality and 
Finality of Returns of Compensation
    B. Part 220, Determining Disability
    C. Part 230, Reduction and Nonpayment of Annuities by Reason of 
Work
    D. Part 255, Recovery of Overpayments
    E. Part 320, Initial Determinations under the Railroad 
Unemployment Insurance Act and Reviews and Appeals from Such 
Determinations
    F. Part 345, Contributions and Contribution Report
    G. Part 366 and 367, Collection of Debts

Portion Closed to the Public

(A) Pending Board Appeals:
    1. Anderson, Sue M.
    2. Corti, Virginia E.
    3. Hedrick, Brooks J.
    4. LaCaze, Catherine
    5. Mabry, Billy R.
    6. Moor, Richard & Mary
    7. Moya, Cyril
    8 . Myers, Joseph R.
    9. Smith, Rose A.
    10. Williams, Kenneth

    The person to contact for more informaiton is Beatrice Ezerki, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11767 Filed 5-9-95; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
EXHIBIT 12








STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIOS








FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.





Return on average assets has been computed by dividing income available to common shareholders for each period presented by average total assets for the respective period.





Return on average equity has been computed by dividing income available to common shareholders for each period presented by average Stockholders’ equity for the respective period.





Dividend payout has been computed by dividing the cash dividends paid per share of common stock by income available to common shareholders for the respective period.





Leverage ratiois a ratio of equity to assets, defined as period end Tier I capital as a percent of average assets for the recent quarter adjusted for core deposit intangible and unrealized gain and losses on securities available for sale.





Book Value per common shareis common shareholders equity divided by common shares outstanding.





Efficiency ratiois computed by dividing noninterest expense by taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding securities gains (losses); this ratio measures the cost to generate revenue.
USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00006-RL-RBC document 1 filed 01/08/13 page 1 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00006-RL-RBC document 1 filed 01/08/13 page 2 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00006-RL-RBC document 1 filed 01/08/13 page 3 of 4
USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00006-RL-RBC document 1 filed 01/08/13 page 4 of 4
Lawrence George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1910

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 29, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Lawrence George Robinson raises two issues on appeal: (a) whether the trial *1289court's determination that he violated probation was based solely on hearsay, and (b) whether his sentence should be corrected to reflect an award of 104 days jail credit. We affirm as to the first issue, but reverse and remand as to the second. As the State concedes, the amended judgment and sentence did not reflect the corrected jail credit of 104 days' time served and should be corrected on remand. *See**McCool v. State* , 211 So. 3d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that a "defendant is entitled to an award of credit for all time spent in jail prior to sentencing in a violation of probation case, which includes all time spent in jail prior to original sentencing plus all time spent in jail prior to any subsequent violation sentencings.") (quoting *Jenkins v. State* , 749 So. 2d 527, 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ).

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Jonathan RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 3

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 212-3 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 3
1

Patrick Schmidt

From: Ismail Ramsey <izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com>

Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:46 PM

To: Patrick Schmidt

Cc: QE-Waymo; UberWaymo; Boies Service (BSF_EXTERNAL_UberWaymoLit@bsfllp.com); 

Amy Craig; Miles Ehrlich

Subject: RE: Deposition Subpoena to Anthony Levandowski

PatrickWe object to the document requests that are part of this subpoena. They are outside the expedited discovery that 

Judge Alsup ordered. The Court called for document production from the parties, not from non-party 

deponents. Further, Anthony Levandowski plans to assert his Fifth Amendment rights with respect to any documents 

requests served on him. And to extent that the requests ask for a review of his personal documents and production by 

Friday, we believe they are unduly burdensome. 

We’d ask you to modify your subpoena to remove the document requests. Otherwise, we will need to meet and confer 

and if necessary discuss a briefing schedule on a discovery dispute/motion to modify a subpoena that complies with 

NDCA Civil Local Rules and Standing Orders. 

Regards, 

Izzy Ramsey 

Ramsey & Ehrlich LLP 

510-548-3600 

From: Patrick Schmidt [mailto:patrickschmidt@quinnemanuel.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 9, 2017 9:00 AM 

To: Amy Craig; Ismail Ramsey; Miles Ehrlich 

Cc: QE-Waymo; UberWaymo; Boies Service (BSF_EXTERNAL_UberWaymoLit@bsfllp.com) 

Subject: Deposition Subpoena to Anthony Levandowski 

Counsel, 

Attached please find a deposition subpoena to Anthony Levandowski. 

Patrick Schmidt

Associate

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

213-443-3191 Direct 

213-443-3000 Main Office Number 

213-443-3100 Fax 

patrickschmidt@quinnemanuel.com

www.quinnemanuel.com

NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message 

may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any 

review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately 

by e-mail, and delete the original message. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 212-3 Filed 04/11/17 Page 2 of 3
2

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 212-3 Filed 04/11/17 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21982-21983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10923]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-95-015]
RIN 2115-AE46


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; the Great Chesapeake 
Bay Swim Event, Chesapeake Bay, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document implements 33 CFR 100.507 for the Great 
Chesapeake Bay Swim Event to be held on June 11, 1995. These special 
local regulations are needed to provide for the safety of participants 
and spectators on the navigable waters during this event. The effect 
will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the 
safety of participants in the swim, and their attending personnel.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.507 are effective from 
6:30 a.m. until 1 p.m., on June 11, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Phillips, Chief, Boating Affairs Branch, Fifth Coast Guard 
District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004 (804) 
398-6204, or Commander, Coast Guard Group Baltimore (410) 576-8516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The drafters of this notice are QM2 Gregory 
C. Garrison, project officer, Boating Affairs Branch, Boating Safety 
Division, Fifth Coast Guard District, and LCDR C.A. Abel, project 
attorney, Fifth Coast Guard District Legal Staff.
    Discussion: Mr. Charles Nabit, a representative of the March of 
Dimes, submitted an application to hold the Great Chesapeake Bay Swim 
Event on June 11, 1995. Approximately 600 swimmers will start from 
Sandy Point State Park and swim between the [[Page 21983]] William P. 
Lane Jr. Memorial Twin Bridges to the Eastern Shore. This is the type 
of event contemplated by these regulations and the safety of the 
participants depends upon control of vessel traffic, therefore the 
regulations in 33 CFR 100.507 are implemented and effective from 6:30 
a.m. until 1 p.m., on June 11, 1995. During the swim itself, all vessel 
traffic will have to be stopped. However, vessel traffic will be 
permitted to transit the regulated area as the swim progresses. As a 
result, commercial traffic should not be severely disrupted.

    Dated: April 14, 1995.
W.J. Ecker,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 95-10923 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11722]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2035 Colorado]


City and County of Denver; Notice of Intent to File an 
Application for a New License

May 8, 1995.
    Take notice that City and County of Denver, the existing licensee 
for the Gross Reservoir Hydroelectric Project No. 2035, also known as 
Reservoir #22, filed a timely notice of intent to file an application 
for a new license, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.6 of the Commission's 
Regulations. The original license for Project No. 2035 was issued 
effective May 1, 1950, and expires April 30, 2000.
    The project is located on South Boulder Creek in Boulder County, 
Colorado. The principal works of the Gross Project include a dam and a 
reservoir with a capacity of 41,811 acre-feet designed primarily to 
supply water to Denver for municipal purposes. Also licensed, but not 
constructed, are a conduit 18,500 feet long, a powerhouse with a 
capacity of about 10,500 horsepower, a substation and a connection to a 
transmission line owned by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.7, the licensee is required henceforth to 
make available certain information to the public. This information is 
now available from the licensee at Central Records, Denver Water, 1600 
W. 12th Ave., Denver, CO 80254.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.8, 16.9 and 16.10, each application for a new 
license and any competing license applications must be filed with the 
Commission at least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing 
license. All applications for license for this project must be filed by 
April 30, 1998.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11722 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-15-TLS

)

KU-LA LWIN )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 19] filed on April 2, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 19] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c),

the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 2 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the

Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on April 22, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT