24790 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

requestor’s contentions on each issue,

and a summary of any evidence relied

upon by the objector. 40 CFR 178.27. A

request for a hearing will be granted if

the Administrator determines that the

material submitted shows the following:

There is a genuine and substantial issue

of fact; there is a reasonable possibility

that available evidence identified by the

requestor would, if established, resolve

one or more of such issues in favor of

the requestor, taking into account

uncontested claims or facts to the

contrary; and resolution of the factual

issue(s) in the manner sought by the

requestor would be adequate to justify

the action requested. 40 CFR 178.32.

A record has been established for this

rulemaking under docket number [PP

4F4336/R2133] (including objections

and hearing requests submitted

electronically as described below). A

public version of this record, including

printed, paper versions of electronic

comments, which does not include any

information claimed as CBI, is available

for inspection from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding legal

holidays. The public record is located in

Rm. 1132 of the Public Response and

Program Resources Branch, Field

Operations Division (7506C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2,

1921 Jefferson Davis Highway,

Arlington, VA.

Written objections and requests for

hearings, identified by the document

control number [PP 4F4336/R2133],

may be submitted to the Hearing Clerk

(1900), Environmental Protection

Agency, Rm. 3708, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

A copy of electronic objections and

requests for hearings filed with the

Hearing Clerk can be sent directly to

EPA at:

opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov

A copy of electronic objections and

requests for hearings filed with the

Hearing Clerk must be submitted as an

ASCII file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

The official record for this

rulemaking, as well as the public

version, as described above will be kept

in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will

transfer any objections and hearing

requests received electronically into

printed, paper form as they are received

and will place the paper copies in the

official rulemaking record which will

also include all objections and hearing

requests submitted directly in writing.

The official rulemaking record is the

paper record maintained at the address

in ADDRESSES at the beginning of this

document.

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, Oct. 4, 1993) the Agency must

determine whether the regulatory action

is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to

review by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) and the requirements of

the Executive Order. Under section 3(f),

the order defies a ‘‘signficant regulatory

action’’ as an action that is likely to

result in a rule (1) having an annual

effect on the economy of $100 million

or more, or adversely and materially

affecting a sector of the economy,

productivity, competition, jobs, the

environment, public health or safety, or

State, local, or tribal governments or

communities (also referred to as

‘‘economically significant’’); (2) creating

serious inconsistancy or otherwise

interfering with an action taken or

planned by another Agency; (3)

materially altering the budgetary

impacts of entitlement, grants, user fees,

or loan programs or the rights and

obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)

raising novel legal or policy issues

arising out of legal mandates, the

President’s priorities, or the principles

set forth in this Executive Order.

Pursuant to the terms of the Executive

Order, EPA has determined that this

rule is not ‘‘significant’’ and is therefore

not subject to OMB review. Pursuant to

the requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat.

1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the

Administrator has determined that

regulations establishing new tolerances

or raising tolerance levels or

establishing exemptions from tolerance

requirements do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. A certification

statement to this effect was published in

the Federal Register of May 4, 1981(46

FR 24950).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: May 3, 1995.

Daniel M. Barolo,

Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is

amended as follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

2. By adding new § 180.481, to read as

follows:

§ 180.481 Prosulfuron; tolerances for

residues.

Time-limited tolerances, to expire on

December 31, 1995, are established for

residues of the herbicide prosulfuron, 1-

(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-

(3,3,3-trifluoropyl)-phenyl-sulfonyl]-

urea, in or on the following raw

agricultural commodities:

Commodity

Parts

per million

Expiration

date

Cattle, fat .............. 0.05 Dec. 31,

1995.

Cattle, kidney ........ 0.05 Do.

Cattle, liver ............ 0.05 Do.

Cattle, meat .......... 0.05 Do.

Cattle, mbyp .......... 0.05 Do.

Corn, fodder .......... 0.01 Do.

Corn, forage .......... 0.01 Do.

Corn, grain and

fresh (including

sweet kernels

plus cobs with

husks removed).

0.01 Do.

Goats, fat .............. 0.05 Do.

Goats, kidney ........ 0.05 Do.

Goats, liver ............ 0.05 Do.

Goats, meat .......... 0.05 Do.

Goats, mbyp ......... 0.05 Do.

Hogs, fat ............... 0.05 Do.

Hogs, kidney ......... 0.05 Do.

Hogs, liver ............. 0.05 Do.

Hogs, meat ........... 0.05 Do.

Hogs, mbyp ........... 0.05 Do.

Horses, fat ............ 0.05 Do.

Horses, kidney ...... 0.05 Do.

Horses, liver .......... 0.05 Do.

Horses, meat ........ 0.05 Do.

Horses, mbyp ........ 0.05 Do.

Milk ........................ 0.01 Do.

Sheep, fat ............. 0.05 Do.

Sheep, kidney ....... 0.05 Do.

Sheep, liver ........... 0.05 Do.

Sheep, meat ......... 0.05 Do.

Sheep, mbyp ......... 0.05 Do.

[FR Doc. 95–11667 Filed 5–8–95; 1:34 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL–5204–5]

Georgia; Final Authorization of

Revisions to State Hazardous Waste

Management Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Immediate final rule.

SUMMARY: Georgia has applied for final

authorization of revisions to its

hazardous waste program under the

Resource Conservation and Recovery

Act (RCRA). Georgia’s revisions consist

of the provisions contained in rules

promulgated between July 1, 1992, and

June 30, 1993, otherwise known as
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 24791

RCRA Cluster III. These requirements

are listed in Section B of this notice.

The Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) has reviewed Georgia’s

application and has made a decision,

subject to public review and comment,

that Georgia’s hazardous waste program

revisions satisfy all of the requirements

necessary to qualify for final

authorization. Thus, EPA intends to

approve Georgia’s hazardous waste

program revisions. Georgia’s application

for program revisions is available for

public review and comment.

DATES: Final authorization for Georgia’s

program revisions shall be effective July

10, 1995, unless EPA publishes a prior

Federal Register action withdrawing

this immediate final rule. All comments

on Georgia’s program revision

application must be received by the

close of business July 9, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of Georgia’s program

revision application are available during

normal business hours at the following

addresses for inspection and copying:

Georgia Department of Natural

Resources, Environmental Protection

Division, Floyd Towers East, Room

1154, 205 Butler Street, SE, Atlanta,

Georgia 30334; U.S. EPA Region IV,

Library, 345 Courtland Street, NE,

Atlanta, Georgia 30365; (404) 347–4216.

Written comments should be sent to Al

Hanke at the address listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al

Hanke, Chief, State Programs Section,

Waste Programs Branch, Waste

Management Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365; (404) 347–2234.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

States with final authorization under

Section 3006(b) of the Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act

(‘‘RCRA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’), 42 U.S.C.

6926(b), have a continuing obligation to

maintain a hazardous waste program

that is equivalent to, consistent with,

and no less stringent than the Federal

hazardous waste program. In addition,

as an interim measure, the Hazardous

and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984

(Pub. L. 98–616, November 8, 1984,

hereinafter ‘‘HSWA’’) allows States to

revise their programs to become

substantially equivalent instead of

equivalent to RCRA requirements

promulgated under HSWA authority.

States exercising the latter option

receive ‘‘interim authorization’’ for the

HSWA requirements under Section

3006(g) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6926(g), and

later apply for final authorization for the

HSWA requirements.

Revisions to State hazardous waste

programs are necessary when Federal or

State statutory or regulatory authority is

modified or when certain other changes

occur. Most commonly, State program

revisions are necessitated by changes to

EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR parts 260–

268 and 124 and 270.

B. Georgia

Georgia initially received final

authorization for its base RCRA program

effective on August 21, 1984. Georgia

has received authorization for revisions

to its program through RCRA Cluster II

on June 27, 1994, (4/26/94, 59 FR

21664). Today, Georgia is seeking

approval of its program revisions in

RCRA Cluster III in accordance with 40

CFR 271.21(b)(3).

EPA has reviewed Georgia’s

application and has made an immediate

final decision that Georgia’s hazardous

waste program revisions satisfy all of

the requirements necessary to qualify

for final authorization. Consequently,

EPA intends to grant final authorization

for the additional program

modifications to Georgia. The public

may submit written comments on EPA’s

immediate final decision up until June

9, 1995.

Copies of Georgia’s application for

these program revisions are available for

inspection and copying at the locations

indicated in the ADDRESSES section of

this notice.

Approval of Georgia’s program

revisions shall become effective July 10,

1995, unless an adverse comment

pertaining to the State’s revisions

discussed in this notice is received by

the end of the comment period.

If an adverse comment is received

EPA will publish either (1) a withdrawal

of the immediate final decision or (2) a

notice containing a response to

comments which either affirms that the

immediate final decision takes effect or

reverses the decision.

EPA shall administer any RCRA

hazardous waste permits or portions of

permits that contain conditions based

upon the Federal program provisions for

which the State is applying for

authorization and which were issued by

EPA prior to the effective date of this

authorization. EPA will suspend

issuance of any further permits under

the provisions for which the State is

being authorized on the effective date of

this authorization.

Georgia is today seeking authority to

administer the following Federal

requirements promulgated on July 1,

1992, through June 30, 1993.

Federal requirement HSWA or FR Notice Promulgation State authority

Checklist 107.—Oil filter

exclusion.

57 FR 29220 7/1/92 391–3–11–.07(1); 12–8–62(10); 12–8–64(1)(J); 12–8–65(a)(16) and (21)

OCGA.

Checklist 108.—Toxicity

characteristic revision;

correction.

57 FR 30657 7/10/92 391–3–11–.07(1); 391–3–11–.10(1); 12–8–62(10); 12–8–64(1)(D) and (E);

12–8–65(a)(16) and (21) OCGA.

Checklist 109.—Land disposal restrictions (LDR);

newly listed waste.

57 FR 37194 8/18/92 391–3–11–.02,–.07,–.08,–.10,–.11,–.05, and–.16; 12–8–62(13) and (14); 12–

8–64(1)(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) and (I); 12–8–65(a)(16)(21); 12–8–66.

Checklist 110.—Coke by–

products listings.

57 FR 37284 8/18/92 391–3–11–.07; 12–8–62(10)(20); 12–8–64(1)(J); 12–8–65(a)(16)(21).

Checklist 112.—Recycled

used oil management

standards.

57 FR 41566 9/10/92 391–3–11–.02–.07–.10–.17; 12–8–62(11)(13)(22); 12–8–

64(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(I); 12–8–65(a)(3)(16)(21); 12–8–66.

Checklist 113.—Financial

responsibility for third

party liability.

57 FR 42832 9/16/92 391–3–11–.05; 12–8–62(11)(13); 12–8–64(1)(A)(C)(D)(E)(F); 12–8–

69(2)(3)(16) and (21); 12–8–68(c); 12–8–65(a)(3)(16) and (21).

Checklist 115.—Reportable Quantity Adjustment, chlorinated toluene production wastes.57 FR 47376 10/15/92 391–3–11–.07(1); 12–8–62(10); 12–8–64(1)(D)(E); 12–8–65(a)(16)(21).
24792 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

Federal requirement HSWA or FR Notice Promulgation State authority

Checklist 118.—Liquids in

Landfills II.

57 FR 54452 11/18/92 391–3–11–.02(1) and (2) and .10(1) and (2); 12–8–64(1)(A)(B)(D)(F)(I); 12–

8–65(a)(16)(21); 12–8–66(a).

Checklist 119.—Toxicity

characteristic revision.

57 FR 55114 11/24/92 391–3–11–.07; 12–8–62(10); 12–8–64(1)(D)(E); 12–8–65(a)(16)(21).

58 FR 6854 2/2/93 391–3–11–.07(1).

Checklist 120—Wood preserving; technical

amendment.

57 FR 61492 12/24/92 391–3–11–.07(1); 391–3–11–.10(2) and (1); 12–8–62(10)(11)(13); 12–8–

64(1)(D)(E); 12–8–65(a)(16)(21)(3); 12–8–64(1)(A)(B)(C)(D)(F) and (I); 12–

8–66.

Checklist 121.—Corrective

action management

units and temporary

units.

58 FR 8658 2/16/93 391–3–11–.02(1); 391–3–11–.10(2) and (1); 391–3–11–.16; 391–3–11–

.11(12); 391–3–11–.11(7)(d); 12–8–64(1)(A)(B)(D)(F)(I); 12–8–

65(a)(16)(21); 12–8–66(e).

Checklist 122.—Recycled

used oil management

standards.

58 FR 26420 5/3/93 391–3–11–.07(1). 391–3–11–.10(2) and (1);

58 FR 33341 6/17/93 391–3–11–.17; 12–8–62(11)(13)(22); 12–8–64(1)(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) and (I);

12–8–65(a)(3)(16) and (21); 12–8–66.

NCL.—LDR amendent

third.

58 FR 14317 3/17/93 391–3–11–.16.

Checklist 123.—LDR hazardous waste debris

case–by–case capacity

variance.

58 FR 28506 5/14/93 391–3–11–.16; 12–8–62(13)(14); 12–8–64(1)(A)(B)(D)(F) and (I); 12–8–

65(a)(16)(21); 12–8–66.

Checklist 124.—LDR for

iqnitable and corrosive

characteristic wastes.

58 FR 29860 5/24/93 391–3–11–.10(2) and (1); 391–3–11–.16; 391–3–11–.11(7)(d); 12–8–

62(13)(14); 12–8–64(1)(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) and (I); 12–8–65(a)(16)(21); 12–

8–66.

Footnote: Checklist 117B—Georgia adopted 40 CFR Part 261, 1992, by reference at 391–3–11–.07(i). The wording ‘‘Toxicity Characteristic’’ is

correct in the 1992 CFR. Since Georgia did not adopt subsequent final optional rules that incorrectly changed the wording, Georgia did not cite

57 CFR 23062 specifically.

C. Decision

I conclude that Georgia’s application

for these program revisions meets all of

the statutory and regulatory

requirements established by RCRA.

Accordingly, Georgia is granted final

authorization to operate its hazardous

waste program as revised.

Georgia now has responsibility for

permitting treatment, storage, and

disposal facilities within its borders and

carrying out other aspects of the RCRA

program, subject to the limitations of its

program revision application and

previously approved authorities.

Georgia also has primary enforcement

responsibilities, although EPA retains

the right to conduct inspections under

Section 3007 of RCRA and to take

enforcement actions under Section

3008, 3013, and 7003 of RCRA.

Compliance With Executive Order

12866

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this rule from the

requirements of Section 6 of Executive

Order 12866.

Certification Under the Regulatory

Flexibility Act

Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.

605(b), I hereby certify that this

authorization will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. This

authorization effectively suspends the

applicability of certain Federal

regulations in favor of Georgia’s

program, thereby eliminating

duplicative requirements for handlers of

hazardous waste in the State. It does not

impose any new burdens on small

entities. This rule, therefore, does not

require a regulatory flexibility analysis.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

Administrative practice and

procedure, Confidential business

information, Hazardous materials

transportation, Hazardous waste, Indian

lands, Intergovernmental relations,

Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Water pollution control,

Water supply.

Authority: This notice is issued under the

authority of Sections 2002(a), 3006, and

7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as

amended (42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b)).

Dated: April 28, 1995.

Patrick M. Tobin,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–11395 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7141

[UT–942–1430–01; UTU–42967, UTU–42983]

Revocation of Secretarial Orders Dated

October 28, 1921, and February 27,

1934; Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

SUMMARY: This order revokes two

Secretarial Orders in their entireties that

withdrew 80 acres of public land for

powersite classification purposes. The

land is no longer required for powersite

purposes. The land will be opened to

surface entry. The land has been open

to mining under the provisions of the

Mining Claims Rights Restoration Act of

1955, and these provisions are no longer

required. The land has been and will

remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 9, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl

Fridberg, BLM Utah State Office, P.O.

Box 45155, Salt Lake City, Utah 84145,

801–539–4101.

By virtue of the authority vested in

the Secretary of the Interior by section

204 of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C.

1714 (1988), it is hereby ordered as

follows: