alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jurnalul Oficial C 8/9 ia

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 8 |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 629 ianuarie 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 8

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 629 ianuarie 2019

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Anunţuri |
| | PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | Parlamentul European |
| 2019/C 8/01 | Decizie | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

V   Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Parlamentul European

2019/C 8/01

Decizie

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

V Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Parlamentul European

| 9.1.2019 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

C 8/1

---

DECIZIE

(2019/C 8/01)

SECRETARUL GENERAL AL PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN,

| — | AVÂND ÎN VEDERE Regulamentul (CEE, Euratom, CECO) nr. 259/68 al Consiliului (1), modificat în special prin Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1023/2013 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 22 octombrie 2013 de modificare a Statutului funcționarilor Uniunii Europene și a Regimului aplicabil celorlalți agenți ai Uniunii Europene (2), în special articolul 30 din Statut; |
| --- | --- |

—

AVÂND ÎN VEDERE Regulamentul (CEE, Euratom, CECO) nr. 259/68 al Consiliului (1), modificat în special prin Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1023/2013 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 22 octombrie 2013 de modificare a Statutului funcționarilor Uniunii Europene și a Regimului aplicabil celorlalți agenți ai Uniunii Europene (2), în special articolul 30 din Statut;

| — | AVÂND ÎN VEDERE Decizia Biroului Parlamentului European din 13 ianuarie 2014 privind delegarea competențelor autorității împuternicite să facă numiri (AIPN) și ale autorității împuternicite să încheie contracte de muncă (AIICM); |
| --- | --- |

—

AVÂND ÎN VEDERE Decizia Biroului Parlamentului European din 13 ianuarie 2014 privind delegarea competențelor autorității împuternicite să facă numiri (AIPN) și ale autorității împuternicite să încheie contracte de muncă (AIICM);

| — | AVÂND ÎN VEDERE expirarea la 31 decembrie 2018 a următoarelor liste de rezervă ale Parlamentului European:
  AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S; |
| --- | --- |

—

AVÂND ÎN VEDERE expirarea la 31 decembrie 2018 a următoarelor liste de rezervă ale Parlamentului European:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S;

| — | AVÂND ÎN VEDERE avizul Comisiei paritare, emis în cadrul reuniunii sale din 24 octombrie 2018, |
| --- | --- |

—

AVÂND ÎN VEDERE avizul Comisiei paritare, emis în cadrul reuniunii sale din 24 octombrie 2018,

DECIDE:

Articol unic

Durata de valabilitate a listelor de rezervă:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S

se prelungește până la 31 decembrie 2019.

Luxemburg, 30 noiembrie 2018.

Klaus WELLE

Secretar general

---

(1)  JO L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  JO L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

2

---
TOWNSHIP OF MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY, et al., petitioners, v. MT. HOLLY GARDENS CITIZENS IN ACTION, INC., et al.

No. 11-1507.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-41000

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Marvin Abel Lopez-Villanueva, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-686-1

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marvin Abel 

Lopez-Villanueva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Villanueva has not filed a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 9, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-41000 Document: 00515932184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
No. 19-41000

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 19-41000 Document: 00515932184 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 8, 2009                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   |
| /s/ Al D. Ross                                |   |
| Al D. Ross, President and                     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                       |   |
|                                          |   |
|                                          |   |
| May 8, 2009                                   |   |
|                                          |   |
| /s/ Terry L. Hester                           |   |
| Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                       |   |

----
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1. |
|--------|---------------|

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, C. Eugene Gronning, Chief Executive Officer, and C. Eugene Gronning, Principal Accounting Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period December 31, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Dated:  March 31, 2008  By:  /s/ C. Eugene Gronning 

|   | C. Eugene Gronning |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

|   | Officer |
|--------|---------|

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Paramesh Gopi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ Paramesh GopiDr. Paramesh GopiPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 15, 2012
MANUFACTURED FOOD 

REGULATORY PROGRAM 

STANDARDS (MFRPS) 

Promoting Continuous Improvement For 15 Years

 ACHIEVING EXCELLENCE SINCE 2007 

As of January 2022, the FDA provides funding to 44 state programs 

enrolled in the MFRPS. 36 state programs have achieved full 

conformance with the standards.

 INTEGRATED FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT 

Due to enrollment in the MFRPS, state food safety programs have 

expanded their capacities to protect public health. Currently, 91% 

have a written inspection auditing program, 86% have a written 

compliance and enforcement review system, 98% have access to an 

ISO or other accredited laboratory and 93% have written food recall 

procedures.

 PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION 

41 MFRPS enrollees, or 93%, currently have written procedures that 

ensure collaboration with partner agencies during emergencies. 95% 

of MFRPS enrollees conduct routine outreach to partners and 

industry. 93% of MFRPS enrollees currently have formal 

agreements with the laboratory they utilize for regulatory samples.

 FOSTERING DOMESTIC MUTUAL RELIANCE 

States enrolled in the MFRPS are also more likely to enroll in other 

partnerships and agreements to enhance food safety as a whole. 

Currently states enrolled in MFRPS are dually enrolled in the 

following: 23 are enrolled in the Animal Food Regulatory Program 

Standards, 25 maintain Food Protection Task Forces, 24 have Rapid 

Response Teams, and 2 are enrolled in the new Egg Regulatory 

Program Standards. 

“The systems and regulatory foundations developed through MFRPS, have enabled a quicker shift to 

address the unique inspectional needs of our COVID-19 environment. Prior to the pandemic, MFRPS 

encouraged us to build proper networks, update contact information and develop virtual trainings. This has 

allowed for everything from virtual “teams” meetings for emergency response and illness outbreak 

discussions to virtual style inspections that include the necessary touch points. The established MFRPS 

systems have enabled us to quickly update and change our systems to account for COVID-19.” 

-- Sandra Craig, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 

January 2022
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 722 

Recognizing the importance of the blueberry industry to the United States 

and designating July 2022 as ‘‘National Blueberry Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2022 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. WARNOCK, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. 

CANTWELL, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. KING, Mr. OSSOFF, and Mr. PETERS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of the blueberry industry to the 

United States and designating July 2022 as ‘‘National 

Blueberry Month’’. 

Whereas blueberries are a native North American fruit, first 

managed and harvested as wild blueberries by the native 

Wabanaki; 

Whereas wild blueberries continue to be managed and harvested in Maine by farmers, including the Wabanaki, as 

a native, naturally occurring crop; 

Whereas the pioneering work conducted in New Jersey in the 

early 1900s by Elizabeth White and Dr. Frederick 

Coville, a botanist at the Department of Agriculture, to 

domesticate wild lowbush blueberries resulted in the deVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:30 Jul 27, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR722.ATS SR722

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 722 ATS 

velopment of the hybrid variety of cultivated highbush 

blueberries; 

Whereas because of these early efforts, highbush blueberries 

are large, sweet, juicy berries that can be commercially 

produced and shipped; 

Whereas wild blueberries— 

(1) are small and sweet; and 

(2) are not planted, but still grow and are harvested 

where they have naturally occurred for thousands of 

years; 

Whereas the blueberry industry in the United States is an 

important sector of United States agriculture with an annual economic impact of $4,700,000,000; 

Whereas highbush and wild blueberries have a total harvested 

area estimated at more than 140,000 acres and are produced in 48 States by nearly 13,185 farms; 

Whereas blueberry production in the United States has continually increased, with particular growth in the first 2 

decades of the 21st century, to reach a harvest of 

760,000,000 pounds in 2021; 

Whereas blueberries are low in fat and a source of fiber, vitamins, and minerals; 

Whereas blueberries are being studied to examine the role the 

berries may play in promoting good health in areas such 

as cardiovascular health, brain health, exercise, insulin 

response, and gut health; and 

Whereas blueberries are harvested in the United States from 

March through early September, with the harvest reaching its peak in July: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 722 ATS 

1 (1) designates July 2022 as ‘‘National Blue2 berry Month’’; 

3 (2) recognizes the contributions of blueberry 

4 growers in the United States and their families; and 

5 (3) recognizes that purchasing blueberries 

6 grown in the United States supports farmers, jobs, 

7 communities, and the economy of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
David R. STRAUB, Sr., petitioner, v. Krystal D. RICHARDSON, et al.

No. 12-772.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, denied.
Judy HOTCHKISS, petitioner, v. CLAY TOWNSHIP BOARD, et al.

No. 12-8792.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit
4.25




[Translation
of Chinese Original]




Power
of Attorney




Principal:
              
              Junming
      Wu
              
              Identification
      Card No.:
              
              110108197910135427Address:  2-8-804,
      Quarters of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Guanghui Nanli, Chaoyang
      District, BeijingAttorney-in-Fact:
              
              Jianhua
      Zhu
              
              Identification
      Card No.:
              
              110108196907128918




Scope of
Authorization:




Junming
Wu, the Principal, hereby irrecoverably authorizes Jianhua Zhu as his
Attorney-in-Fact to exercise within the term of this Power of Attorney the
following rights:




Jianhua
Zhu is authorized as the Attorney-in-Fact of Junming Wu to exercise all voting
rights enjoyed by the latter in accordance with applicable laws and the Articles
of Association in the general meeting of shareholders of Beijing Novel-Super
Digital TV Technology Co., Ltd. (“DTV Company”), including but not limited to
sale or transfer all or any shares held by Junming Wu in DTV Company, and
nomination and appointment of directors of the DTV Company as the authorized
Attorney-in-Fact of Junming Wu in the general meeting of shareholders of DTV
Company by voting.




The said
authorization and entrust are conditioned on that Jianhua Zhu is a director of
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) and WFOE agrees to such authorization and
entrust. Once Jianhua Zhu is no longer a director of WFOE, the said entrust and
authorization will be terminated automatically; by then, Junming Wu will
appoint/authorize the person who succeeds as a director of WFOE to exercise all
the voting rights enjoyed by Junming Wu in the general meeting of shareholders
of DTV Company.  Any legal liability arising from all and any
authorized activity carried out by the authorized Attorney-in-Fact within the
scope of authorization shall be assumed by Junming Wu.




The term
of this Power of Attorney is 10 years starting from the date this Power of
Attorney is executed, unless the Business Operating Agreement jointly executed
by DTV Company, WFOE, Novel-Tongfang Information Engineering Co., Ltd. and
Junming Wu, and its supplemental agreements thereto are terminated for
whatsoever reason. If the Business Operating Agreement is extended for a certain
period, this Power of Attorney shall be extended for the same period. All and
any issues in connection with this Power of Attorney shall be governed by
Chinese laws. This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese.




Principal:
/s/ Junming Wu




June 20,
2008
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM   document 1-2   filed 04/22/13   page 1 of 2

case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM   document 1-2   filed 04/22/13   page 2 of 2
Albert HAYES, petitioner, v. J.E. TILTON, Warden.

No. 12-9546.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00095-CV

Katie Bosacki and Danielle Thomas, Appellants

v.

Brandon Walter Benner, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-10-003850, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

AppellantsKatieBosacki and Danielle Thomas represent that the parties have reached

a settlement agreement and have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. Accordingly, we

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: June 27, 2012
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Thursday, July 25, 2013

No. 04-12-00358-CV

George T. Chaney and Medina County,

Appellant

v.

Simon Camacho and Felipe Camacho,

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 11-03-20524-CV

O R D E R

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges

have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and

factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral

argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Tuesday,

September 10, 2013, to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone, Justice Marion, and Justice

Alvarez. All parties will be notified of the Court’s decision in this appeal in accordance with

TEX. R. APP. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on Thursday, July 25, 2013.

______________________________

Catherine Stone, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this Thursday, July 25, 2013.

______________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

FILE COPY
PG PUBLISHING COMPANY, dba The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, petitioner, v. Carol AICHELE, in Her Capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al.

12-1197

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND RULE 26(F) REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING INITIAL 

DISCLOSURES AND RULE 26(f) 

REPORT

ORDER Order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 141 Filed 04/04/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND RULE 26(F) REPORT

WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, Plaintiff Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) and Defendants Uber 

Technologies Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and Otto Trucking LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) held an 

initial conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); 

WHEREAS, the Court scheduled the Initial Case Management Conference for May 18, 2017, 

and ordered the parties to submit the Case Management Statement by May 11, 2017 (Dkt. No. 20); 

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to file a written joint plan for further expedited 

discovery before the hearing on Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 61);

WHEREAS, the Court has set the hearing on Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration for 

April 27, 2017 (Dkt. No. 130); 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to clarify the deadlines for serving initial disclosures under Rule 

26(a)(1) and for filing their Case Management Statement under Rule 26(f); 

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows: 

1. In light of the fact that the parties held their Rule 26(f) conference on March 20, 2017, the 

parties will serve their initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) on April 3, 2017; 

2. In light of the Court’s previous Order that the parties file a written joint plan for further 

expedited discovery before April 27, 2017, the parties will submit their Case Management 

Statement -- together with that joint plan -- before April 27, 2017. 

IT IS STIPULATED. 

Order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 141 Filed 04/04/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND RULE 26(F) REPORT

DATED: April 3, 2017

/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

Charles K. Verhoeven

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

DATED: April 3, 2017

/s/ Arturo J. Gonzalez

Arturo J. Gonzalez

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Attorneys for UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, AND OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________, 2017 ___________________________________ 

 The Honorable William H. Alsup 

 

Order April 4

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 141 Filed 04/04/17 Page 3 of 3