C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

S ECOND O RDER OF C ONTINUING A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Bartolo Cardenas Perez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 06 1

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 846057

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 1 3 of Harris County

T his case was abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing and findings regarding

the reporter’s record filed in this Court on November 9, 2015

. On April 11, 2016, appellant’s

counsel notified the Clerk of this Court that additional time was ne eded “to conclude the matter

. ”

The trial court clerk has filed supplemental clerk’s record s that include , among other documents, the trial court’s April 15, 2016 order denying the “ State’s Motion to Have the Honorable Don Smyth Preside over the Abatement Hearing ” and an “Affidavit of Judge Don Smyth.” 1

However, t he Clerk of this Court has not r eceived a supplemental clerk’s record containing findings, recommendations, or orders regarding the court reporter’s record filed on November 9, 2015, or a reporter’s record or supplemental reporter’s record as directed in this Court’s orders

issued on Mar ch 22 and June 16, 2016

.

Accordingly, we continue the abatement of this appeal and remand to the trial court to immediately conduct any additional hearing at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s appointed counsel, Sarah V. Wood, shall be present. Appellant also shall be present for the hearing in person or, if appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing by use of a closed

- circuit video

teleconferenci ng. 2 As set out in the March 22 and June 16 , 2016 abatement order s , the trial court

is directed to:

1 Documents filed in this Court reflect that the Honorable S herman Ross presided over an April 7, 2016 abatement hearing.

2 If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such

teleconference must use a closed

- circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On reques t, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the State.1) d etermine whether any portions of the December 18, 2013 hearing have been inaccurately recorded in the reporter’s record filed in this Court and whether the court reporter is able to prepare, certify, and file a transcription of those portions in a supplemental reporter’s record to be filed in this appeal;

2) determine whether any portion of the recording of the December 18, 2013 hearing is lost, destroyed, or inaudible;

3) if any portions of the recording are lost, destroyed, or inaudible, determine whether those portions are necessary to the appeal’s resolution and whether the parties can replace those portions by agreement;

4) determine whether the exhibits f rom the December 18, 2013 hearing are lost or destroyed.

a) if any of the exhibits are lost or destroyed, determine whether those exhibits are necessary to the appeal’s resolution; b) determine whether any lost or destroyed exhibits can be replaced by

agreement of the parties, and if the exhibits cannot be replaced by agreement, determine whether those exhibits can be replaced by copies determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the exhibits from the December 13, 2013 hearing ;

5) make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate;

and

6) issue written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as to these issues, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations.

If any portion of the trial proceedings has been inaccurately recorded in the reporter’s record on file with this Court but can be prepared, certified, and filed by the court reporter, the court reporter shall prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter’s record containi ng the missing or inaccurate portions of the trial proceedings no later than 30 days from the date of this order. If any of the exhibits are able to be located or have been lost or destroyed but can be replaced by agreement of the parties or the trial cour t, the court reporter shall file a supplemental exhibit volume to the reporter’s record containing the located or replaced exhibits no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record a ny hearing. The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings, recommendations, and orders with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. The court reporter is directed to file the re porter’s record of the hearings within 30 days of the date of this

order.The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when records that com ply

with our order are filed with the Clerk of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually

Date: A ugust 16, 2016