alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11479]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget the following public information 
collection requirements for review and clearance in accordance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be submitted on or 
before July 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any aspect 
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this 
burden, to: the FEMA Information Collections Clearance Officer at the 
address below; and to Donald Arbuckle, Office of Management and Budget, 
3235 New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-
7340, within 60 days of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the above information collection request and supporting 
documentation can be obtained by calling or writing Muriel B. Anderson, 
FEMA Information Collections Clearance Officer, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
2624.

    Type: Generic clearance of a new collection.
    Title: Voluntary Customer Surveys to Implement Order 12862--
Customer Satisfaction Surveys of State, Local, other Federal agencies, 
Private sector customers, and applicants.
    Abstract: FEMA will conduct a variety of customer surveys over a 3-
year period to determine customers' perceptions and expectations of the 
services provided by FEMA as well as their satisfaction with existing 
services. The survey results will be used to establish customer service 
standards for FEMA programs and performance standards for FEMA 
employees.
    Type of Respondents: Individuals or households; business or other 
for-profit; not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; and State, 
Local, or Tribal Government.
    Estimate of Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden: 5,400 
hours.
    Number of Respondents: 13,000.
    Estimated Average Burden Time per Response: Surveys (including 
pilot tests)--15 minutes; Focus Groups--2 hours.
    Frequency of Response: One-time.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
Wesley C. Moore,
Director, Program Services Division, Operations Support Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-11479 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARAYAN PRASAD; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-73218

Agency No. A071-784-040

A071-784-041

A071-784-045

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Narayan Prasad and his family, natives and citizens of Fiji, petition for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion

to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

SEP 18 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-73218

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992

(9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely and number-barred because the successive motion was filed

over three years after the BIA’s final administrative order, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed to demonstrate changed circumstances in Fiji

to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time and number limitations, see

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 996 (requiring movant to

produce material evidence with motion to reopen that conditions in country of

nationality had changed).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MALIBU MEDIA LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIANA FARLER,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-71-JD-CAN

SCHEDULING ORDER

On August 1, 2013, this Court ordered the parties to submit written status reports by

September 3, 2013, in order that this Court could issue a corresponding scheduling order pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. Plaintiff with the Court’s order by filing its status report on September 3,

2013. As of this date, Defendant, proceeding pro se, has not filed the required status report. 

However, this Court remains obligated to fulfill its duties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 and 16. 

Therefore, the Court interprets Defendant’s silence as deference to this Court’s judgment as to

case management and now enters the following order, embodying a schedule, to control the

progress of this litigation. 

The parties shall complete their exchange of mandatory disclosures pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by October 10, 2013.

Discovery shall be completed by March 13, 2014, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 26 thru 37. 

Each party may serve up to 25 interrogatories upon any other party. Each party may serve up to

25 requests for admission and requests for production of documents upon any other party. Each

party may take up to 5 depositions. Depositions shall not exceed 7 hours, unless the parties

otherwise stipulate or the court so orders. The plaintiff shall file and serve its experts’ reports,

case 3:13-cv-00071-JD-CAN document 19 filed 09/12/13 page 1 of 2
if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) by December 12, 2013; the defendant shall file and serve

its experts’ reports, if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) by January 9, 2014.

The parties shall supplement their disclosures and discovery responses pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(e) every six weeks until trial. 

Amendments to the pleadings or joinder of parties without leave of court shall be

accomplished by November 7, 2013.

Because the presiding judge will set the deadline for dispositive motions and trial date

separately, the summary judgment deadline in Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(b) shall not apply in this case. 

Moreover, the timing of filing pretrial disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) shall be

governed by separate order. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 12th day of September, 2013.

S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein

Christopher A. Nuechterlein

United States Magistrate Judge

2

case 3:13-cv-00071-JD-CAN document 19 filed 09/12/13 page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                    626
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          626
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     108
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              673
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          450
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           299
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       299
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              299
<EPS-BASIC>                           33.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                           33.85


</TABLE>
# Euroopan unionin C 447A/12.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 447A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 61. vuosikerta12. joulukuuta 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 447A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

61. vuosikerta12. joulukuuta 2018

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan pankkiviranomainen |
| 2018/C 447 A/01 | EPV hakee puheenjohtajaa (AD 15) – Pariisi, Ranska – EBA TA 21/2018 | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan pankkiviranomainen

2018/C 447 A/01

EPV hakee puheenjohtajaa (AD 15) – Pariisi, Ranska – EBA TA 21/2018

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan pankkiviranomainen

| 12.12.2018 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 447/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 447/1

---

EPV HAKEE PUHEENJOHTAJAA (AD 15) – PARIISI, RANSKA – EBA TA 21/2018

(2018/C 447 A/01)

Euroopan pankkiviranomainen (EPV) on riippumaton Euroopan unionin elin, joka perustettiin 1. tammikuuta 2011 Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston antamalla asetuksella (EU) N:o 1093/2010 (1).

EPV:n tehtävänä on parantaa Euroopan unionin sisämarkkinoiden toimintaa huolehtimalla siitä, että sääntely ja valvonta sen toimialalla toimivat asianmukaisesti, tehokkaasti ja yhdenmukaisesti. Lisäksi EPV edistää yleisiä arvoja, joita ovat muun muassa finanssijärjestelmän vakaus, markkinoiden ja finanssituotteiden avoimuus sekä tallettajien ja sijoittajien suojaaminen.

Se pyrkii torjumaan toimijalle suotuisimman sääntelyn hyväksikäyttöä ja takaamaan tasapuoliset toimintaedellytykset, lujittamaan kansainvälistä yhteensovittamista, edistämään valvontakäytäntöjen lähentymistä ja neuvomaan unionin toimielimiä pankkitoimintaan, maksuihin, sähköisen rahan sääntelyyn ja valvontaan liittyvissä asioissa. Lisäksi sen tehtäviin kuuluvat vastaavat yritysten hyvään hallintotapaan, tilintarkastukseen ja tilinpäätösraportointiin liittyvät kysymykset.

Puheenjohtaja on kokopäivätoiminen riippumaton ammattihenkilö ja EPV:n henkilöstön jäsen. Puheenjohtaja on vastuussa EPV:n hallintoneuvostolle, jolle hän raportoi säännöllisesti EPV:n toiminnan kehittymisestä.

Lisätietoja haettavana olevasta tehtävästä ja hakumenettelystä saatte vierailemalla kotisivuillamme osoitteessa:

https://eba.europa.eu/about-us/careers

Allekirjoitetut ja päivätyt englanninkieliset hakemukset, joihin sisältyy mieluiten Europass-muodossa oleva ansioluettelo, saatekirje ja täytetty sidonnaisuusilmoitus, toimitetaan seuraavaan osoitteeseen: EBAChair-Applications@eba.europa.eu 11. tammikuuta 2019 klo 12.00 (Lontoon aikaa) mennessä.

---

(1)  Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus (EU) N:o 1093/2010, annettu 24 päivänä marraskuuta 2010, Euroopan valvontaviranomaisen (Euroopan pankkiviranomainen) perustamisesta sekä päätöksen N:o 716/2009/EY muuttamisesta ja komission päätöksen 2009/78/EY kumoamisesta (EUVL L 331, 15.12.2010, s. 12).

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-036 JD

)

RANDELL HARGROVE )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on March 27, 2013 [DE 12]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Randell Hargrove’s plea of guilty, and FINDS

the defendant guilty of Counts 1 and 2 of the Information, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: April 16, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
Rickey Lynn LEWIS, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8848.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MARY GINTHER and RICHARD 

GINTHER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-CV-822-RL-CAN

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendants Barry and Lisa Cadden, and Greg Conigliaro 

(“Defendants”), by counsel, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint, up to and including April 19, 2013. Defendants’ Answer is currently due 

February 18, 2013. Plaintiffs’ counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested 

extension. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendants up to and 

including April 19, 2013 to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendants 

case 3:12-cv-00822-RL-CAN document 10 filed 02/14/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 14, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas D. Small

FOLEY & SMALL

1002 E Jefferson Blvd

South Bend IN 46617

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\19 - Ginther\Federal Pleadings\MET.docx

case 3:12-cv-00822-RL-CAN document 10 filed 02/14/13 page 2 of 2
Edward David ROSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9131.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

               ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
     For the Quarters and Six Months Ended May 2, 1999 and April 30, 2000

                                  (Unaudited)
                     (In Thousands, Except per Share Date)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Quarter Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                                  ---------------------------       --------------------------
                                                                    May 2,          April 30,         May 2,         April 30,
                                                                     1999             2000             1999            2000
                                                                  --------         ----------       ---------        ---------
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Shares:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                      6,933              6,615           6,933            6,615

     Net common shares issuable on exercise of
        stock options                                                   80                552              27              532
                                                                  --------         ----------       ---------        ---------
Weighted average common and common equivalent
   shares outstanding                                                7,013              7,167           6,960            7,147
                                                                   =======         ==========       =========        =========

Net income                                                          $  861             $2,161          $1,365           $3,766
                                                                   =======         ==========       =========        =========

Basic and diluted net income per common and
 common equivalent share
   Basic                                                            $ 0.12             $ 0.33          $ 0.20           $ 0.57
                                                                  ========         ==========       =========        =========
   Diluted                                                          $ 0.12             $ 0.30          $ 0.20           $ 0.53
                                                                  ========         ==========       =========        =========
</TABLE>
Augustus H. EVANS, Jr., petitioner, v. Perry PHELPS, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9056.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Richard Lee GRAVELY, petitioner, v. MACY'S, et al.

No. 12-8983.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
Reginald Leon EDWARDS, aka Reginald L. Edwards, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8955.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Theron Resource Group
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the quarter ended May 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report),
I, Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Date: September 8, 2009

/s/      Jerry
  R. Satchwell

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief Financial
Officer

---
Peggy HARRISON-JENKINS, petitioner, v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 12-9437.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until June 3, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance *2382with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Paul ORSELLO, petitioner, v. Steven D. GAFFNEY, et al.

No. 12-7098.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID 

A. PERLSON 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 19 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that DAVID A. PERLSON, an attorney with the firm of Quinn 

Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, and admitted to practice before this Court, hereby appears as an 

attorney of record for Waymo LLC in the above-captioned matter. 

DAVID A. PERLSON (Cal. Bar No. 209502) 

davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 875-6600 

(415) 875-6700 facsimile 

DATED: March 1, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP 

By: /s/ DAVID A. PERLSON 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 19 Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 5, 2018

p0103

Order 

Clerk

January 5, 2018

156877

In re A. L. HENDERSON, Minor. SC: 156877

COA: 336561

Leelanau CC Family Division:

15-009455-NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.