alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33.10
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of
and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 29, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JAMES M. MCMASTER AND MARY ELLEN MCMASTER, H/W,

Petitioners

v.

THE TOWNSHIP OF BENSALEM,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 351 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
case 4:13-cv-00027-JD-JEM document 19 filed 08/26/13 page 1 of 1
M.L., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and James A. Odell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Oregon v. Elstad*, 470 U.S. 298, 310, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11327]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2609 New York]


International Paper Company and Curtis/Palmer Hydroelectric 
Company L.P.; Notice of Intent to File an Application For a New License

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that International Paper Company and Curtis/Palmer 
Hydroelectric Company L.P., the existing co-licensees for the Curtis/
Palmer Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2609, filed a timely notice of 
intent to file an application for a new license, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.6 of the Commission's Regulations. The original license for Project 
No. 2609 was issued effective May 1, 1980, and expires April 30, 2000.
    The project is located on the Hudson River in Warren and Saratoga 
Counties, New York. The principal works of the Curtis/Palmer Falls 
Project include two dam and reservoir developments (No. 1 & 2): (No. 1) 
Curtis with a concrete gravity dam about 25 feet high and 743 feet long 
with spillway, flashboards and sluice gate; a 390-acre reservoir at 
elevation 548.8 ft USGS; and a powerhouse with an installed capacity of 
10.8 MW: (No. 2) Palmer Falls with a concrete arch dam 37 feet high and 
486 feet long with spillways, flashboards and minimum flow gate; a 28-
acre reservoir at elev 522.9 ft USGS; a forebay and powerhouse with an 
installed capacity of 48 MW: Both developments have transmission line 
connections and appurtenant facilities.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.7, the licensee is required henceforth to 
make available certain information to the public. This information is 
now available from the licensees at International Paper Company, Hudson 
River Mill, 15 Pine Street, Corinth, New York 12822.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.8, 16.9 and 16.10, each application for a new 
license and any competing license applications must be filed with the 
Commission at least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing 
license. All applications for license for this project must be filed by 
April 30, 1998.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11327 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Marcus Deangelo JONES, petitioner, v. Juan D. CASTILLO, Warden.

No. 12-6925.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
In re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS NO. 4-10.

No. 12M128.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Fred SMITH, petitioner, v. Henry STEWARD, Warden.

No. 12-9874.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division, denied.
case 3:13-cv-00072-JVB-CAN document 9 filed 05/29/13 page 1 of 2
case 3:13-cv-00072-JVB-CAN document 9 filed 05/29/13 page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc.







/s/ E. James Collord

DATE:  November 14, 2008

E. James Collord, President and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











1
<PAGE>



                                                               EXHIBIT 10.10(b)


                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                             ABINGTON BANCORP, INC.
                1997 INCENTIVE AND NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN



         ABINGTON BANCORP, INC., a Massachusetts corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby adopts the following Amendment to the Abington Bancorp,
Inc. 1997 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, effective as of December
18, 2003:

                           1. Section 10.2 is amended by deleting the last
                  sentence of the first paragraph and deleting in their entirety
                  paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d).

         Executed effective as of the date set forth above.

                                      ABINGTON BANCORP, INC.


                                      By:  /s/ JAMES K. HUNT
                                           -----------------------------
                                           James K. Hunt
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Finanical Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Robert G. GargusRobert G. Gargus,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Cornelius C. CANADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3589

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Cornelius C. Canady, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Machinery Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David J. Meyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 18, 2011

/s/ DAVID J. MEYER David J. Meyer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11349]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Norwest Corporation; Notice of Application to Engage de novo in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
May 23, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, Norwest Ventures, Inc., Des Moine, Iowa, in a 
joint venture with Conerstone Mortgage, Ho-Ho-Kus, New Jersey, and 
engage in the residential mortgage lending business, including 
activities such as prequalification, mortgage loan origination and 
processing and closing loans, pursuant Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the 
Board's Regulation Y. The georgraphic scope of this activity is 
Paramus, New Jersey, and the surrounding area.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 3, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11349 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40283

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ESPARZA-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:17-CR-644-1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Esparza-Salazar appeals the below-guidelines sentence of 84 

months of imprisonment for his conviction of illegal reentry after deportation, 

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(1). After Esparza-Salazar pleaded guilty 

and the district court accepted the plea, he and the Government entered a socalled “plea agreement” that contained, in part, a sentencing recommendation. 

The agreement also contained an appeal waiver, which the Government now 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 25, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40283 Document: 00514887206 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2019
No. 18-40283

2

seeks to enforce. Esparza-Salazar argues that the appeal waiver is ineffective 

because the district court failed to review its terms with him, as required by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(N). Because the appeal waiver is 

ineffective, Esparza-Salazar argues, this court can consider the merits of his 

appeal. As to the merits, Esparza-Salazar argues that the district court 

improperly sentenced him to more than two years of imprisonment because the 

§ 1326(b) statutory enhancement is unconstitutional, particularly where, as 

here, it was not pleaded in the indictment and proven beyond a reasonable 

doubt. Esparza-Salazar correctly concedes that the issue is foreclosed by 

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve 

the argument for possible Supreme Court review. 

In the interest of judicial efficiency, we pretermit the non-jurisdictional 

appeal waiver issue and proceed to the merits. See United States v. Story, 439 

F.3d 226, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006). In Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 239-47, 

the Supreme Court held that for purposes of a statutory sentencing 

enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in the 

indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We have held that 

subsequent Supreme Court decisions did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See 

United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. 

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). 

Because Esparza-Salazar’s sole argument on the merits is foreclosed, we 

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 

 Case: 18-40283 Document: 00514887206 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/25/2019
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UBIQUITI NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED’S MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00561-WHO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI 

NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 

CHING-HAN TSAI, and DOES 1-20,

inclusive

Defendants.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00561-WHO

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING DEFENDANT 

UBIQUITI NETWORKS 

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR 

LACK OF PERSONAL 

JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 

RULE 12(b)(2) 

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 25-2 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UBIQUITI NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED’S MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00561-WHO 1

On March 16, 2017, Defendant Ubiquiti Networks International Limited filed a Notice of 

Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to 

Rule 12(b)(2). 

Having considered the motion, the declaration in support thereof, and the entirety of the 

record, and finding good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Ubiquiti Networks 

International Limited’s Motion to Dismiss be granted. Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant 

Ubiquiti Networks International Limited is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________, 2017

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 25-2 Filed 03/16/17 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99

           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                         FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 1999

Supplementary information required pursuant to section 9.4 of the partnership
agreement:

1. Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended
   September 30, 1999:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                                   <C>
             Net Income                                                               $ 1,007,000
             Add:     Depreciation and amortization                                        45,000
                      Equity in loss of Local Limited Partnerships                         15,000
                      Distribution received from Local Limited Partnership                 27,000
             Less:    Cash to reserves                                                 (1,067,000)
                                                                                      -----------
             Cash Available for Distribution                                          $    27,000
                                                                                      ===========
             Distributions allocated to General Partners                              $     2,000
                                                                                      ===========
             Distributions allocated to Limited Partners                              $    25,000
                                                                                      ===========
</TABLE>

2.  Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
    General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
    September 30, 1999:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Entity Receiving                          Form of
         Compensation                         Compensation                              Amount
       ----------------                       ------------                              ------
<S>                              <C>                                                   <C>
General Partners                 Interest in Cash Available for Distribution           $ 2,000

WFC Realty Co., Inc.
(Initial Limited Partner)        Interest in Cash Available for Distribution           $     5
</TABLE>

                                    13 of 13
Tyrese JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Rafil DHAFIR, aka Sealed Defendant # 1, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-418.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.