alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR LITERATURE

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) 

AGonzalez@mofo.com 

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719) 

ETate@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO TRUCKING LLC 

KAREN L. DUNN (Pro Hac Vice) 

kdunn@bsfllp.com 

HAMISH P.M. HUME (Pro Hac Vice) 

hhume@bsfllp.com 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

1401 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington DC 20005 

Telephone: 202.237.2727 

Facsimile: 202.237.6131 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO 

REQUEST FOR LITERATURE 

Trial Date: October 2, 2017 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 156 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 2
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR LITERATURE

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

In response to the Court’s request for literature “about LiDAR, and particularly its 

application to self-driving vehicles” (Dkt. 73), Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto 

LLC, and Otto Trucking LLC identify the 2009 book published by Springer Tracts in Advanced 

Robotics (“STAR”) entitled “The DARPA Urban Challenge – Autonomous Vehicles in City 

Traffic,” edited by Martin Buehler, Karl Iagnemma, and Sanjiv Singh. 

In particular, Defendants direct the Court to the Preface and pages 169-186, 237-238, 242-

244, 397-398, 518-521, and 561-564 of the book. 

Dated: April 5, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Arturo J. González 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO TRUCKING LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 156 Filed 04/05/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at September 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         457,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  621,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (21,934)
<INVENTORY>                                    769,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,376,496
<PP&E>                                       1,449,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                 935,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,979,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,845,366
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 40,867,666
<COMMON>                                        34,083
<OTHER-SE>                                 (38,757,438)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,979,418
<SALES>                                      2,044,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,044,150
<CGS>                                        1,515,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,114,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             786,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (15,831,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,077,374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,831,503)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.73)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11683]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. TA-201-64]


Fresh Winter Tomatoes

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 4, 1995, the Commission received a letter from the 
petitioner in the subject investigation (Florida Tomato Exchange, 
Orlando, FL) withdrawing its petition. Accordingly, the investigation 
concerning fresh winter tomatoes (investigation No. TA-201-64) is 
terminated. Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigation 
was published in the Federal Register of April 3, 1995 (60 FR 16883).

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Seiger (202-205-3183), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
Information can also be obtained by calling the Office of 
Investigations' remote bulletin board system for personal computers at 
202-205-1895 (N,8,1).

    Authority: This investigation is being terminated under the 
authority of section 202 of the Trade Act of 1974.

By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 8, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11683 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Gary L. SMITH, petitioner, v. Wendy J. ROAL, Warden.

No. 12-9460.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 4, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00519

- CV

EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC. and Lar edo Marine, L.L.C.,

Appellant s

v.

GRACE RIVER RANCH, L.L.C.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 00108

- CVL

Russel Wilson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The clerk ’ s notificati on of late record is this date GRANTED. The clerk ’ s record is due

on September 8, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th da y of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23.2




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-163866) on Form S-3 and Registration Statement (No. 333-170692) on Form S-8 of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. of our reports dated March 11, 2010, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
 New York, New York
 
 February 25, 2011
Dean BOLAND, petitioner, v. Jane DOE, et al.

No. 12-987.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11726]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

East Walker Watershed, Nevada

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Deauthorization of Federal Funding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, 
Public Law 83-566, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR 622), the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
gives notice of the deauthorization of Federal funding for the East 
Walker Watershed Project, Lyon County, Nevada, effective on April 17, 
1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William D. Goddard, State Conservationist, Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, 5301 Longley Lane, Building F, Suite 201, Reno, 
Nevada 89511, telephone: (702) 784-5863.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 10.904, 
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention. Office of Management and 
Budget Circular A-95 regarding State and local clearinghouse review 
of Federal and federally assisted programs and projects is 
applicable.)

    Dated: May 4, 1995.
William D. Goddard,
State Conservationist.

[FR Doc. 95-11726 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
1

Office of Global Policy and Strategy 

OGPS STATEMENT

April 4, 2023

FDA Meets with Nigerian Delegation

Today, FDA officials, led by Associate Commissioner for Global Policy and Strategy Mark Abdoo,

hosted a delegation from the Nigerian National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and 

Control (NAFDAC), the Nigerian Senate Committee on Health, and the Nigerian House of 

Representatives Committee on Healthcare Services. Among the topics discussed during the 

meeting, which was held at the FDA’s headquarters in White Oak, Maryland, were the FDA’s 

strategic priorities for Africa, the agency’s ongoing collaboration with NAFDAC, and NAFDAC’s 

own regulatory priorities. 

The Nigerian delegation also met with experts from the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and 

Research (CDER) and the FDA’s Office of Financial Management (OFM) to learn about the FDA’s 

user fees programs.

Leading the Nigerian delegation was NAFDAC Director General Mojisola Christianah Adeyeye; 

Dr. Ibrahim Yahaya Oloriegbe, Chairman of the Nigerian Senate Committee on Health; and Dr. 

Yusuf Tanko Sununu, Chairman of the Nigerian House of Representatives Committee on 

Healthcare Services. Other members of the delegation included Dr. Fortune Amezhinim IhuaMaduenyi, Clerk of the Senate Committee on Health; and Dr. Mufutau Bolaji Yahaya, Chairman 

of the NAFDAC Council.

Other FDA officials participating in the meetings included Ravi Bharwani, Principal Policy 

Advisor, Office of Global Policy and Strategy (OGPS); Anna Ferus, International Policy Analyst, 

OGPS; Sema Hashemi, Senior International Policy Advisor, OGPS; Douglas Shaffer, Senior 

Advisor, OGPS; Lauren Paulos, Legislative Director – Drugs, Office of Legislation, Office of Policy, 

Legislation, and International Affairs; Harinder Chahal, Senior Public Health Advisor and 

Researcher, Office of Public Health Strategy and Analysis; Theresa Mullin, Associate Center 

Director - Strategic Initiatives, CDER; Andrew Kish, Director, Office of Program and Strategic 
2

Analysis, CDER; Benjamin Moncarz, Chief Financial Officer, Office of Finance, Budget, 

Acquisition, and Planning; and Olufunmilayo Ariyo, Acting Director of User Fees, OFM. 

###
John Ray Edward TERRELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9045.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Auditor**

 

The Members

Alaska Tanker Company,LLC:

 

We consent to the use ofour report dated February 18, 2008, with respect to the balance sheets ofAlaska Tanker Company, LLC as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the relatedstatements of operations, members’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 includedherein.

 

As discussed in note 8 tothe financial statements, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosureprovisions of Statement of Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and OtherPostretirement Plans,* as of December 31, 2007.

 
|                | /s/ KPMG LLP |
|---------------------|--------------|
| Portland, Oregon    |         |
| March 11, 2008 |         |

 

----
James D. KNOX, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9247.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-163-TLS

)

HAI NGUYEN, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss the Case With

Prejudice [ECF No. 22]. The Plaintiff requests that the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(2), allow the Plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice. It is

within the court’s sound discretion in deciding whether to permit a plaintiff to voluntarily

dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 177 (7th

Cir. 1994); Tyco Labs., Inc. v. Koppers Co., 627 F.2d 54, 56 (7th Cir. 1980). 

Finding that the Defendant has not pleaded a counterclaim nor filed a motion for

summary judgment, and that no other plain legal prejudice would result from a dismissal with

prejudice, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 22]. The Plaintiff’s claims are

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the cause will be termed.

SO ORDERED on May 2, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS document 23 filed 05/02/14 page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of Scandium
International Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









Dated: February
20, 2015	                    /s/ Edward Dickinson

Edward Dickinson

Principal Financial
Officer
#### Joseph GWATHNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and Howard Redmond, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-0122.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 7, 2004.

On submission (Joseph Gwathney, Hudson, NY, on the brief), for Appellant, pro se.

On submission (Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel for the City of New York and Edward F.X. Hart, City of New York Law Dep’t, on the brief), for Appellee.

Present: CARDAMONE, JACOBS, and B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*58Joseph Gwathney appeals from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Garaufís, /.), granting defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.CivP. 12(b)(6). Familiarity is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

This Court “review[s] *de novo*a district court’s decision to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim, taking all factual allegations in the complaint as true and construing all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” *Friedl v. City of New York,*210 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.2000). Dismissal is “appropriate only if ‘it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.’ ” *Harris v. City of New York,*186 F.3d 243, 250 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting *Conley v. Gibson,*355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).

In order to bring a § 1983 claim for malicious prosecution, the accused “must establish that the state prosecution terminated in his favor.” *Singer v. Fulton County Sheriff,*63 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 1995) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Because Gwathney does not allege that his state court conviction has been rendered invalid, his claim for malicious prosecution must be dismissed.

A § 1983 claim for false arrest cannot be maintained if probable cause existed for the arrest. *Id.*“If, following the arrest, the plaintiff was convicted of the charges against him, that conviction normally ‘would be conclusive evidence of probable cause’ ” so long as “the conviction ‘survives appeal.’ ” *Weyant v. Okst,*101 F.3d 845, 852 (2d Cir.1996) (citation omitted). Gwathney’s state court conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division and leave to appeal was denied by the New York Court of Appeals; his habeas petition challenging the conviction was denied by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and this Court denied his motion for a certificate of appealability. The survival of Gwathney’s conviction is sufficient evidence of probable cause to arrest, and his claim for false arrest is therefore dismissed.

Gwathney’s remaining motions are dismissed as moot.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 25, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), Lawrence
Butler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James J. Polakiewicz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2004       By: /s/ Lawrence Butler
                              ----------------------
                              Lawrence Butler
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: June 14, 2004       By: /s/ James J. Polakiewicz
                              ------------------------
                              James J. Polakiewicz
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       25
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 25768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11845]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Operations and Regulations Committee Meeting; Changes

CITATION OF PREVIOUS ``FEDERAL REGISTER'' NOTICE: 60 FR 22437-22439.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE: May 11, 1995 at 1:30 p.m.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED LOCATION OF MEETING: Legal Services Corporation, 
750 1st Street, N.E., Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20002, (202) 336-
8800.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

TIME OF MEETING: The meeting will commence at 10:30 a.m. on May 11, 
1995.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open, except that a portion of the meeting may be 
closed pursuant to a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors, such 
vote to be taken prior to the meeting. Subject to the aforementioned 
vote, the Committee may discuss matters related to current litigation 
involving the Corporation. The closing will be authorized by the 
relevant sections of the Government in the Sunshine Act [5 U.S.C. 
Section 552b(c)(10)], and the corresponding regulation of the Legal 
Services Corporation [45 C.F.R. Section 1622.5(h)]. The closing will be 
certified by the Corporation's General Counsel as authorized by the 
above-cited provisions of law. A copy of the General Counsel's 
certification will be posted for public inspection at the Corporation's 
headquarters, located at 750 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 
20002, in its eleventh floor reception area, and will otherwise be 
available upon request.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: A new item number ``3'' has been added 
regarding the approval of minutes of a joint meeting. In addition, a 
closed session has been added to the agenda and now appears as item 
number ``6.'' The amended agenda is presented below.

OPEN SESSION:

    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Approval of Minutes of March 17, 1995 Meeting.
    3. Approval of Minutes of March 17, 1995 JOINT Meeting.
    4. Consider and Act on Public Comment on Proposed Changes to 
Part 1604 of the Corporation's Regulations.
    5. Consider an Act on Proposed Changes to Part 1621 of the 
Corporation's Regulations.

CLOSED SESSION:

    6. Discussion of Matters Related to Current Litigation.

OPEN SESSION: (Resumed)

    7. Consider and Act on Other Business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Patricia Batie (202) 336-8800.
    Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate 
formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments.
    Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to 
attend the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated Issued: May 5, 1995
Patricia D. Batie,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11845 Filed 5-10-95; 9:31 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-M