alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253 

To extend a certain high priority corridor in the States of Colorado, Nebraska, 

South Dakota, and Wyoming. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To extend a certain high priority corridor in the States 

of Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR 

4 IN COLORADO, NEBRASKA, SOUTH DAKOTA, 

5 AND WYOMING. 

6 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor7 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2031; 112 Stat. 

8 191; 115 Stat. 871) is amended by striking paragraph 

9 (14) and inserting the following: 
2 

•HR 1253 IH 

1 ‘‘(14) Heartland Expressway from Denver, Col2 orado, through Scottsbluff, Nebraska, to Rapid City, 

3 South Dakota as follows: 

4 ‘‘(A) In the State of Colorado, the Heart5 land Expressway Corridor shall generally fol6 low— 

7 ‘‘(i) Interstate 76 from Denver to 

8 Brush; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) Colorado Highway 71 from 

10 Limon to the border between the States of 

11 Colorado and Nebraska. 

12 ‘‘(B) In the State of Nebraska, the Heart13 land Expressway Corridor shall generally fol14 low— 

15 ‘‘(i) Nebraska Highway 71 from the 

16 border between the States of Colorado and 

17 Nebraska to Scottsbluff; 

18 ‘‘(ii) United States Route 26 from 

19 Scottsbluff to the intersection with State 

20 Highway L62A; 

21 ‘‘(iii) State Highway L62A from the 

22 intersection with United States Route 26 

23 to United States Route 385 north of 

24 Bridgeport; 
3 

•HR 1253 IH 

1 ‘‘(iv) United States Route 385 to the 

2 border between the States of Nebraska and 

3 South Dakota; and 

4 ‘‘(v) United States Highway 26 from 

5 Scottsbluff to the border of the States of 

6 Nebraska and Wyoming. 

7 ‘‘(C) In the State of Wyoming, the Heart8 land Expressway Corridor shall generally follow 

9 United States Highway 26 from the border of 

10 the States of Nebraska and Wyoming to the 

11 termination at Interstate 25 at Interchange 

12 number 92. 

13 ‘‘(D) In the State of South Dakota, the 

14 Heartland Expressway Corridor shall generally 

15 follow— 

16 ‘‘(i) United States Route 385 from 

17 the border between the States of Nebraska 

18 and South Dakota to the intersection with 

19 State Highway 79; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) State Highway 79 from the 

21 intersection with United States Route 385 

22 to Rapid City.’’. 

Æ
**Exhibit 33.4**

**Management’s Assertion on**

**Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria**

BancTec, Inc. (“BancTec” or the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing its compliance, as ofand for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 (the “Reporting Period”), with certain servicing criteria applicable to it in connection with the Services Agreement dated as of September 30, 2008 (the “ServicesAgreement”) between BancTec, Inc. (“BancTec”) and DFS Services LLC, an affiliate of Discover Bank. The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and (d)(4)(iv) (such applicable criteria, as discussed below,the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), to assess such compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed securities transactions involving credit card receivables conducted by Discover Card Master Trust I andDiscover Card Execution Note Trust that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or were not required to be registered where the related asset-backed securities were outstandingduring the Reporting Period (the “Platform”). 

BancTec does not have sole responsibility for either of theApplicable Servicing Criteria, but instead provides support services to DFS Services LLC and Discover Bank that are necessary to their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Specifically, BancTec is responsible for (a) capturingdata with respect to cardmember payments and associated checks, (b) transmitting such data to DFS Services LLC and Discover Bank on a timely basis consistent with their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, and (c) deliveringcertain of such checks to a third party financial institution for deposit into a bank account held in the name of Discover Bank. BancTec is not responsible for (x) ensuring that deposits are posted to Discover Bank’s bank accounts,(y) following up with regard to unposted deposits, and (z) posting payments to any cardmember’s account. BancTec has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, to the extent it is responsible for such aspects ofsuch compliance, and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with those aspects of the Applicable Servicing Criteria for which it is responsible for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as awhole. 

Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for thePlatform on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

 

Date: February 15, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Byron Elton, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








March 30, 2011





/s/ Byron Elton





Byron Elton


Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
[PROPOSED] ORDER

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NIKKI BELL, an individual, on 

behalf of herself and all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs. 

DEPARTMENT STORES 

NATIONAL BANK, a South Dakota 

Entity; FDS BANK, an Ohio 

Corporation; MACY’s 

INCORPORATED, an Ohio 

Corporation; and DOES 1 through 

50, inclusive, and each of them,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00102-VC

CLASS ACTION

[Proposed] ORDER

[Fed. R. Civ. Proc., Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i)]

Assigned to Hon. Vince Chhabria

Complaint filed January 9, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00102-VC Document 17 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff NIKKI BELL’s (“Plaintiff” or 

“Bell”) Request for Dismissal with Prejudice of Her Individual Claims Only, 

along with the corresponding Declaration of John P. Kristensen submitted in 

support thereof, hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Request for Dismissal. 

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

Plaintiff Bell’s individual claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice, 

while the claims of the putative Class members are dismissed without prejudice.

Because the dismissal of Plaintiff’s individual claims will not affect the interests 

of the Putative Class members, it is FURTHER ORDERED that notice of this 

dismissal need not be provided to the Putative Class members.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April _____, 2017

Hon. Vince Chhabria

Judge of the United States District 

Court

19

Case 3:17-cv-00102-VC Document 17 Filed 04/19/17 Page 2 of 2
Samuel GUADALUPE, aka Jose Santos, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9226.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1



                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Niagara Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Scharf, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Scharf
------------------------
Michael Scharf
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Termination Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 October 17, 2008 
 NAIRI, Inc. 
 P.O. Box 9126 
 Dedham, MA 02027-9126 
 Fax: (781) 461-1412 
 Attention: Richard
J. Sherman 
 National Amusements, Inc. 
 P.O. Box 9126 
 Dedham, MA 02027-9126 
 Fax: (781) 461-1412 
 Attention: Richard J. Sherman 
  

	 	Re:	 Termination Agreement 


 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to the Agreement dated as of December 21, 2005, as amended by the
First Amendment dated as of June 20, 2007, among Viacom Inc. (formerly known as New Viacom Corp.), a Delaware corporation (“Viacom”), NAIRI, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“NAIRI”), and National Amusements, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (“NAI,” and together with Viacom and NAIRI, the “Parties”) (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement. Pursuant to
Section 7.1(a) of the Agreement, the Parties hereby agree to terminate the Agreement, effective October 10, 2008, and the Agreement shall have no further force and effect. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, the
Parties further agree that, for all purposes under the Agreement, October 9, 2008 shall be deemed to be the last trading day of the Applicable Month of October 2008, and any outstanding settlements of Acquired Shares in respect of any trading
activity which has occurred during any period prior to the termination of the Agreement shall be effectuated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement no later than November 11, 2008. 
 This letter agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 







 This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be
considered one and the same agreement. Copies of executed counterparts transmitted by telecopy or other electronic transmission shall be considered original executed counterparts. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 If the foregoing accurately sets forth our understanding, please so indicate in the space
below and return one signed copy to the undersigned. 
  

					
	 Sincerely,

	
	 VIACOM INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Michael D. Fricklas

		 	 Name:
	 	 Michael D. Fricklas

		 	 Title:
	 	 Executive Vice President,
 General Counsel and Secretary



  

					
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO AS
 OF THE DATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:

	
	 NAIRI, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Richard J. Sherman

		 	 Name:
	 	 Richard J. Sherman

		 	 Title:
	 	 Vice President

	
	 NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Richard J. Sherman

		 	 Name:
	 	 Richard J. Sherman

		 	 Title:
	 	 Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1260 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1260

 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 
 contracts for national dairy market loss payments through fiscal year 
2007, to increase the payment quantity authorized under such contracts, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2005

   Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. Sanders, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Obey, Mr. 
    Blunt, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Walsh, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. 
    McNulty, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. McGovern, Mr. English of 
 Pennsylvania, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Towns, Mr. Etheridge, Ms. Slaughter, 
Mr. Olver, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Kuhl 
of New York, Mr. Nadler, and Mr. Holden) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 
 contracts for national dairy market loss payments through fiscal year 
2007, to increase the payment quantity authorized under such contracts, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL DAIRY MARKET LOSS PAYMENTS.

    (a) Program Extension and Changes.--Section 1502 of the Farm 
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7982) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(2)(A), by striking ``$16.94'' and 
        inserting ``$17.10'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``2,400,000'' and inserting 
                ``4,800,000''; and
                    (B) by striking the second sentence; and
            (3) in subsections (f) and (g)(1), by striking ``2005'' 
        both places it appears and inserting ``2007''.
    (b) Period of Effectiveness.--Notwithstanding section 257 of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
907)--
            (1) the amendments made by paragraphs (1) and (2) of 
        subsection (a) shall be effective only during the period 
        beginning October 1, 2005, and ending September 30, 2007; and
            (2) the amendments made by paragraph (3) of such subsection 
        shall be effective only during the period beginning on the 
        first day of the first month beginning after the date of 
        enactment of this Act and ending September 30, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
William Dale GOLDIE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7012.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Ismael GONZALEZ-ARENAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9584.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                        INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED QUARTERLY
                        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NIAGARA CORPORATION AND
                        SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                        2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                        TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                              5,412,046
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       64,958,544
<ALLOWANCES>                        981,000
<INVENTORY>                         62,958,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    138,943,569
<PP&E>                              124,707,684
<DEPRECIATION>                      23,606,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      243,699,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               83,887,300
<BONDS>                             84,790,943
<COMMON>                            9,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                          57,418,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        243,699,627
<SALES>                             89,999,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    89,999,423
<CGS>                               76,896,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       76,896,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    7,889,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,867,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,413,689
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,278,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,135,689
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,135,689
<EPS-BASIC>                         .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .24




</TABLE>
In re Salvatore LETIZIA, petitioner.

No. 12-6478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit 10.6


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

THE PIPER IMPACT 401(K) PLAN


 


THIS AGREEMENT by
Quanex Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (the “Sponsor”),


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, on December
30, 2002, the Sponsor executed the amendment and restatement of the plan agreement
known as the “Piper Impact 401(k) Plan” (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Sponsor
retained the right in Section 10.31 of the Plan to amend the Plan from time to
time; and


 


WHEREAS, the Sponsor
desires to amend the Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the
Sponsor agrees that effective as of the date hereof Section 3.04 is amended and
restated in its entitety to provide as follows:


 


3.04         Matching
Contributions.  Each Employer
will make a Matching Contribution on behalf of each of its Employees who is a
Participant in an amount equal to 25 percent of the first six percent of
such Participant’s Considered Compensation for the Plan Year contributed to the
Plan pursuant to such Participant’s Salary Deferral Contributions and/or After-Tax
Contributions.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Sponsor has caused this Agreement to be executed this
                    
day of September, 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  QUANEX CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-6-TLS

)

SCOT D. SILVERS )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 27] filed on April 16, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 27] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c),

the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the Indictment are hereby accepted,

and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on May 1, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECILIA F. INFANTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00793-MMC 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 37

Before the Court is defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC’s Motion for

Summary Judgment, filed December 8, 2017. Plaintiff Cecilia Infante has filed 

opposition, to which defendant has replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on 

January 12, 2018. Laszlo Ladi, Jr. of Severson & Werson appeared on behalf of 

defendant. Mark F. Anderson of Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer LLP appeared on behalf of 

plaintiff. 

Having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the arguments 

of counsel at the hearing, the Court, for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, 

hereby DENIES the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 16, 2018

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge
Kenneth Dean FENDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9760.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.