alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entia Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Carl J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer and of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.





Dated:  August 31, 2015








By:  /s/ Carl J. Johnson


Chief Executive Officer, President


(Principal Executive Officer)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION

FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGE

CORLEY’S ORDER RE DUE

DILIGENCE REPORT

Defendant Otto Trucking LLC has filed a motion for relief from Judge Corley’s order

granting plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion to compel production of Stroz Friedberg’s due

diligence report (Dkt. No. 572). Waymo may respond by JUNE 12 AT NOON. Otto Trucking

may reply by JUNE 13 AT NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 573 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 1
Corine CARR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9567.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Franky JOSEPH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 12, 2019.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Franklin v. State*, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018) ; *State v. Michel*, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-11297

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DILLARD DERRICK RICHARDSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-275-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dillard Derrick 

Richardson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Richardson has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-11297 Document: 00513242602 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 14-11297

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-11297 Document: 00513242602 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10800]



[[Page 21803]]

Office of Hearings and Appeals

[Docket No. RP95-249-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 27, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 24, 1995, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) submitted for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, effective May 4, 1995, the 
following revised tariff sheet:

First Revised Sheet No. 650

    Algonquin states that the purpose of this filing is to revise the 
capacity release provisions of its tariff to conform to changes in 
Sec. 284.243(h) of the Commission's regulations pursuant to Order No. 
577.
    Algonquin states that copies of its filing were mailed to all 
affected customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before May 4, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10800 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN A. INDIVERI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RICHARD MACK, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 17-00595 BLF (PR) 

JUDGMENT 

The Court has dismissed all claims against Defendants and granted their motion for 

summary judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ________________________ 

BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

United States District Judge 

Judgment 

PRO-SE\BLF\CR.17\00595Indiveri_judgment
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 1 of 7
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 2 of 7
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 3 of 7
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 4 of 7
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 5 of 7
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 6 of 7
case 3:13-cv-00163-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/05/13 page 7 of 7
Irma MOTEN, petitioner, v. BROWARD COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER AND TRAUMA SERVICES.

No. 12-1198.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Curtis Tony CLARK, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 12-8645.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Frank Lane COON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-6897.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Calvin THOMAS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 12-8881.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MARY LAMBERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and

GREGORY CONIGLIARO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-CV-821-RL-CAN

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and being duly advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS

Defendants’ Motion. Defendants are hereby granted an extension up to an including April 19, 2013

to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2013.

S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein

Magistrate Judge, Christopher A. Nuechterlein

U.S. Northern District Court

Distribution:

Douglas D. Small

FOLEY & SMALL

1002 E. Jefferson Blvd.

South Bend, IN 46617

Dina M. Cox / Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

Robert M. Baker IV / Janelle P. Kilies

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

C:\Users\marylou\AppData\Local\Temp\notes2068C1\ORDER_MET.wpd

case 3:12-cv-00821-RL-CAN document 11 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alexey Goleshev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: April 15, 2010
By:
/s/  Alexey GoleshevAlexey Goleshev

Chief Financial Officer
Mar-Lin MINATEE, petitioner, v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 12-9051.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Charles A. FIELDS, petitioner, v. David C. MILLER, Warden

No. 12-8480.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

NOTICE RE PRE-SCREENING

FOR JUROR AVAILABILITY

The Court is pre-screening a venire for a trial starting October 10 and lasting up to four

weeks (through the verdict), and will excuse prospective jurors for hardship (or not) according

to conventional criteria. Appended hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the notice

sent to prospective jurors.

Dated: September 12, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1529 Filed 09/12/17 Page 1 of 1
Edson E. VERGARA, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12M108.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 US.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Veridicom International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         /s/ Paul Mann
         --------------------------------------
         Paul Mann
         President (Principal Executive Officer)

         /s/ Bashir Jaffer
         --------------------------------------
         Bashir Jaffer
         Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

June 18, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Veridicom International, Inc. and will be retained by Veridicom
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Ron Hooper, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Bank of America, N.A. acts as Trustee;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trustcorpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or forcausing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for theregistrant and I have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed undermy supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed undermy supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the of financial statements for external purposes;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this reportmy conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors:
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date: May 6, 2005By:  /s/ Ron Hooper    Ron Hooper    Senior Vice President andTrust AdministratorBank of America, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-030 JD

)

GILBERTO GALINDO-LOPEZ a/k/a )

GABRIEL RAMIREZ (02) )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on May 2, 2013 [DE 31]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Gilberto Galindo-Lopez a/k/a Gabriel

Ramirez’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: May 31, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11803]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 95-24-NG]


CoWest Energy; Order Granting Blanket Authorization to Import and 
Export Natural Gas From and to Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting CoWest Energy blanket 
authorization to import and export up to a combined total of 400 Bcf of 
natural gas from and to Canada over a two-year term beginning on the 
date of first import or export delivery.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs docket room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., April 28, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-11803 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

***CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO***

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ARBOR ENTECH CORPORATION (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-QSB”),I, Mark Shefts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, as of the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my****knowledge,that the Company’s Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated September 16, 2005 | s/ Mark Shefts                        |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Mark Shefts, Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ E. James Collord By __________________________________ E.  James Collord President, Director and Chief Executive Officer Date:   May 14, 2007
Allen THOMPSON, petitioner, v. Henry DOERING, et al.

No. 12-8730.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
In re HIEN ANH DAO, petitioner.

No. 12-9749.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Antwain Lamar DENNIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9109.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey Markin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jeffrey MarkinJeffrey
      MarkinPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2009




This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.