alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                             INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
                             QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NIAGARA
                             CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE
                             MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
                             IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                             STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1998    
<CASH>                                      1,310,516      
<SECURITIES>                                0              
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,751,815     
<ALLOWANCES>                                753,000        
<INVENTORY>                                 37,188,798     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,595,642     
<PP&E>                                      97,879,442     
<DEPRECIATION>                              8,662,416      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              160,746,233    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,441,297     
<BONDS>                                     47,997,322     
<COMMON>                                    9,998          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0              
<PREFERRED>                                 0              
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,555,104     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                160,746,233    
<SALES>                                     62,770,679     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,770,679     
<CGS>                                       53,324,976     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,324,976     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            4,208,338      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,278,359      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,210,700      
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,642,000      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,568,700      
<DISCONTINUED>                              0              
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0              
<CHANGES>                                   0              
<NET-INCOME>                                2,568,700      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .26            
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .25            
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Textron Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas J. Cullen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Thomas J. Cullen
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Thomas J. Cullen
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Date: May 6, 2003


                                       25
Alejandro DeJesus HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9590.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### Joseph V. PURANDA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director V.D.O.C., Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-6371.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2004.

Decided May 20, 2004.

Joseph V. Puranda, Appellant pro se. Amy L. Marshall, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Joseph V. Puranda seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).* An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Puranda has not made the requisite showing.

*920Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 1 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 2 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 3 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 4 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 5 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 6 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 7 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 8 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 9 of 10
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 1 filed 08/10/12 page 10 of 10
PLAINSCAPITAL CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1025.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 1 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 2 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 3 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 4 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 5 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 6 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 7 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 8 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 9 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 10 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 11 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 12 of 13

USDC ND/IN case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM   document 120   filed 12/22/14   page 13 of 13
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Eric T. Jones By ____________________________________ Eric T. Jones Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer Date:  November 14, 2007
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, petitioner, v. Jarl ABRAHAMSEN, et al.

No. 12-997.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26762-26763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12246]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

May 12, 1995
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
[[Page 26763]] information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review 
and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-
511. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the 
Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this 
information collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed 
and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the 
Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

OMB Number: 1510-0055
Form Number: SF 5805
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Request for Funds
Description: Information is required to fund respondents who are 
recipients of Federal Grants and program benefits. The respondents 
consist of State and local government agencies, municipalities, 
universities, and health organizations. The information is used solely 
to direct requested funds to the respondent's accounts at its financial 
institutions.
Respondents: Federal Government, Business or other for-profit, State, 
Local or Tribal Governments
Estimated Number of Respondents: 160
Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 15 minutes
Frequency of Response: On occasion
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 9,600 hours
Clearance Officer: Jacqueline R. Perry, (301) 344-8577, Financial 
Management Service, 3361-L 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12246 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES T. HANNON, et al.,

Appellant,

v.

ZHIJUN MAO AND ASIAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CONSULTING, 

LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-406

[September 20, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; David Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 17-004870.

Tino Gonzalez of the Law Office of Tino Gonzalez, for appellant.

Jordan A. Shaw & Kimberly Slaven of Zebersky Payne, LLP, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
FLORIDA, petitioner, v. Randall T. DEVINEY.

No. 13-264.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1377

Defendant Otto Trucking’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Its 

Opposition to Motions to Quash and Exhibits is now ripe for review. (Dkt. Nos. 1377.) Plaintiff 

has a submitted a Declaration in support of sealing, narrowing the portions it requests to be sealed. 

(Dkt. No. 1433.) The Court has carefully considered the narrowed redactions and the motion is 

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is DENIED as to the redactions in the letter 

brief itself (Dkt. No. 1433-2) and as to the redactions in Exhibit 10 (Dkt. No. 1433-16) except for 

the email addresses, the technical information on the first and sixth pages (id. at 2, 7), and the IP 

address on the third page (id. at 4). This information is not properly sealable as it contains neither 

trade secret information nor information otherwise subject to sealing. Plaintiff has, however, 

established good cause for the remainder of the proposed redactions and the administrative 

motion to seal is otherwise GRANTED.

This Order disposes of Docket No. 1377.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge
Dwayne HARRIS, petitioner, v. Harry HAGEMAN, et al.

No. 12-8929.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of GreenHunter Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer, in his capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 16, 2014 |  | /s/                                  | Gary C. Evans
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | -------------
|                       |  |                                      | Gary C. Evans
|                       |  | Chairman and Interim Chief Executive
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Walter FERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-7822.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) No. 2:13 CR 48

)

JOSEPH JAMAL SMITH, )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (DE # 60), to which the parties have no objection (id. at 4), the Magistrate Judge’s

findings and recommendations are now ADOPTED. Defendant Joseph Smith is

ADJUDGED to have committed each of the violations of his supervised release as

described on Page 2 of the Summary Report of Violations. (DE # 53.) Defendant’s term

of supervised release is REVOKED and he is hereby committed to the United States

Bureau of Prisons to serve 12 months and one day of additional imprisonment. Upon

his release from the Bureau of Prisons, defendant shall be discharged from any further

term of supervision. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: December 13, 2016

s/ James T. Moody 

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

ATLANTA DIVISION

IN RE: CONAGRA PEANUT )

BUTTER PRODUCTS LIABILITY ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

LITIGATION ) 1:07-MD-1845-TWT

)

******************** ) *********************

)

KRYSTINA BRUGH, et al., )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

Plaintiffs, ) 1:08-CV-2932-TWT

)

v. )

)

CONAGRA FOODS, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

)

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE DEADLINE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for 

Defendant and counsel for the Plaintiffs that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their 

response to ConAgra’s motion for summary judgment shall be July 27, 2012.

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00296-JVB-APR document 31 filed 06/19/12 page 1 of 3
2

This 19th day of June, 2012.

Attorney for Plaintiff:

/s/ Robert D. Brown w/permission

Robert D. Brown

Kenneth J. Allen & Associates, Inc.

1109 Glendale Boulevard

Valparaiso, Indiana 46383

(219) 465-6292

Attorneys for Defendant:

/s/ James F. Neale

James H. Walsh

VSB No. 15113

Bethany G. Lukitsch

VSB No. 42859

McGUIREWOODS LLP

901 East Cary Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

(804) 775-4356

(804) 698-2200 (Facsimile)

James F. Neale

VSB No. 43060

McGUIREWOODS LLP

310 Fourth Street, N.E., Suite 300

Charlottesville, Virginia 22902

(434) 977-2582

(434) 980-2263 (Facsimile)

Angela M. Spivey

GA Bar No. 672522

McGUIREWOODS LLP

1230 Peachtree Street, NE

Promenade II, Suite 2100

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3534

(404) 443-5720

(404) 443-5792 (Facsimile)

SO ORDERED, this _____ day of June, 2012.

Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.

Judge, United States District Court

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00296-JVB-APR document 31 filed 06/19/12 page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

ATLANTA DIVISION

IN RE: CONAGRA PEANUT )

BUTTER PRODUCTS LIABILITY ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

LITIGATION ) 1:07-MD-1845-TWT

)

******************** ) *********************

)

KRYSTINA BRUGH, et al., )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

Plaintiffs, ) 1:08-CV-2932-TWT

)

v. )

)

CONAGRA FOODS, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, FONT AND MARGINS

I hereby certify that June 19, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing Joint 

Stipulation Extending Summary Judgment Response Deadline with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF System, which sent notification of such filing to all 

counsel of record.

I further certify that I prepared this document in 14 point Times New Roman 

font and complied with the margin and type requirements of this Court.

/s/ James F. Neale

James F. Neale

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00296-JVB-APR document 31 filed 06/19/12 page 3 of 3
William GAWRONSKI, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7354.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Sheryl R. BOURNE, petitioner, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY.

No. 12-10032.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 9 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk October 9 , 2020

16 1 50 6 ( 5 9 )

CITY OF BAD AXE, CITY OF BAD AXE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, and

CITY OF BAD AXE WASTEWATER

T REATMENT FACILITY

,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 161 50 6

v COA: 34 5810

Huron CC: 16

- 105392

- CK

PAMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., and SECURA

SUPREME INSURANCE COMPANY

,

Defendant s

- Appellant s

.

_________ ____________________ ________ _ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendant s

- appellant s to extend the

time for filing t he i r reply is GRANTED. The reply submitte d on October 5 , 2020 , is

accepted as timely filed

.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1454 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for 

increasing research activities permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2005 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

the credit for increasing research activities permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESEARCH CREDIT MADE PERMANENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for increasing re6 search activities) is amended by striking subsection (h). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 

8 section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub9 paragraph (D). 
2 

•HR 1454 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

3 December 31, 2005. 

Æ