alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN H. TODD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

GALE A. McMAHON; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-36022 

D.C. No. 1:15-cv-01091-MC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

John H. Todd appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from the 

seizure of neglected cats pursuant to a search warrant. We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. United States v. Luk, 859 F.2d 667, 670 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 6 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-36022 

(9th Cir. 1988). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Gordon v. 

Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm. 

Summary judgment on Todd’s Fourth Amendment claim was proper 

because Todd failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether 

defendant McMahon was not authorized to obtain the warrant. See Or. Rev. Stat. 

§ 167.345(2) (“[A] peace officer, after obtaining a search warrant . . . may enter the 

premises or motor vehicle where the animal is located to provide the animal with 

food, water and emergency medical treatment and may impound the animal.”); Or. 

Rev. Stat. § 161.015 (defining a “[p]eace officer” as a member of the Oregon State 

Police, sheriff, or reserve officer); Or. Rev. Stat. § 204.635 (providing that sheriff 

may appoint deputies and may also by special written appointment authorize any 

other person to do any particular act).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Todd’s motions for 

sanctions and to strike because Todd failed to establish grounds for relief. See 

Dunn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 589 F.2d 408, 415 (9th Cir. 1978) (“The 

sanctions available to a trial judge under [the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] are 

discretionary and the imposition of such sanctions will not be reversed unless there 

has been an abuse of discretion.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 687

   Amending rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to include 
  amendments of the House of Representatives in the requirements for 
          identifying spending items, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2022

Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, and Mr. Daines) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 
                           and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to include 
  amendments of the House of Representatives in the requirements for 
          identifying spending items, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph 2(a)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``Senate''; and
                            (ii) by inserting ``or a message from the 
                        House of Representatives'' after ``by 
                        committee''; and
                    (B) in clause (1),
                            (i) by striking ``or joint resolution'' 
                        each place it appears and inserting ``, joint 
                        resolution, or message''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``Senator'' and inserting 
                        ``Member of Congress'';
            (2) in paragraph 3, by striking ``Senator'' and inserting 
        ``Member of Congress'';
            (3) in paragraph 5(a), by striking ``Senator'' and 
        inserting ``Member of Congress''; and
            (4) in paragraph 7, by striking ``or conference report'' 
        and inserting ``conference report, or message from the House''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF MATTHEW I. KREEGER

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

pa-1778190 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) 

AGonzalez@mofo.com 

MATTHEW I. KREEGER (CA SBN 153793) 

MKreeger@mofo.com 

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719) 

ETate@mofo.com 

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) 

RudyKim@mofo.com 

DANIEL P. MUINO (CA SBN 209624) 

DMuino@mofo.com 

WENDY J. RAY (CA SBN 226269) 

WRay@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO TRUCKING LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF 

MATTHEW I. KREEGER 

Honorable William H. Alsup 

Complaint Filed: Feb. 23, 2017 

First Am. Compl. Filed: Mar. 10, 2017 

Trial Date: TBD 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 45 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF MATTHEW I. KREEGER

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

pa-1778190 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that attorney Matthew I. Kreeger of Morrison & Foerster LLP, a 

member of the State Bar of California (CA SBN 153793) and admitted to practice before this 

Court, and whose contact information appears below, hereby enters an appearance as attorney of 

record for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and Otto Trucking LLC in the 

above-captioned case. 

Matthew I. Kreeger 

Morrison & Foerster LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 

Phone: (415) 268-7000 

Fax: (415) 268-7522 

Email: MKreeger@mofo.com 

Dated: March 13, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Matthew I. Kreeger 

MATTHEW I. KREEGER 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, and 

OTTO TRUCKING LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 45 Filed 03/13/17 Page 2 of 2
William E. CLARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9478.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Vernell DEWS, et al., petitioners, v. Buck J. MILLER, et al.

No. 12-1091.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Bank of America, N.A. acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 12, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25852-25853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11821]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-135; RM-8541]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Atkins, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots FM Channel 257A to Atkins, Arkansas, as 
that community's first local aural transmission service, in response to 
a petition for rule making filed on behalf of Atkins Broadcasting. See 
59 FR 60947, November 29, 1994. Coordinates used for Channel 257A at 
Atkins are North Latitude 35-14-49 and West Longitude 92-52-53. With 
this action, the proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective June 23, 1995. The window period for filing 
applications on Channel 257A at Atkins, Arkansas, will open on June 23, 
1995, and close on July 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the window application filing process 
for Channel 257A at Atkins, Arkansas, should be addressed to the Audio 
Services Division, FM Branch, (202) 418-2700.

[[Page 25853]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the 
Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 94-135, adopted May 3, 
1995, and released May 9, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, located at 1919 M Street, 
NW, Room 246, or 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments underArkansas, is 
amended by adding Atkins, Channel 257A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-11821 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 21

  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
    Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Syria.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2023

  Mr. Gaetz submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
    Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Syria.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1544(c)), Congress directs the President to remove the United States 
Armed Forces from Syria by not later than the date that is 180 days 
after the date of the adoption of this concurrent resolution.
                                 <all>
```
David GARCIA, petitioner, v. Mark BRADT, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

No. 12-8892.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Amendment to William D. Larsson agreement, dated November 13, 2008



 Exhibit 10.2 
 

 
 MEMORANDUM 
 OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  

			
	TO:	  	Bill Larsson
	FROM:	  	Mark Donegan
	DATE:	  	November 13, 2008
	SUBJECT:	  	Stock Option Agreement Amendment

 Bill, 
 Reference is
made to the Notices of Grant of Stock Options effective November 16, 2004, November 15, 2005 and November 14, 2006. In connection with your retirement from Precision Castparts Corp., it is agreed that Section 2.5(b) of the Nonstatutory Stock Option
Agreements that govern the grants made to you in 2004, 2005 and 2006 shall be deemed amended to provide that if your employment is terminated by retirement on or after December 31,2008, (a) all outstanding options will become exercisable in full and
(b) all outstanding options that are vested or unvested as of December 31, 2008 will remain exercisable for the remainder of their full ten year term or until the expiration of one year after the date of your death following termination of
employment, whichever period is shorter. The provisions of the referenced Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreements not superseded by this memo shall remain in effect. 
 This memo replaces the memo dated as of June 26, 2008 relating to your option awards. 
  

	
	
	/S/ MARK DONEGAN
	Mark Donegan

  

			
		
	Accepted:	 	/S/ WILLIAM D. LARSSON
		 	William D. Larsson
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, et al., petitioners, v. 1ST MEDIA, LLC.

No. 12-1086.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIL' MAN IN THE BOAT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00904-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Re: ECF No. 13

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that, the deadline for Plaintiff

to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from April 13, 2017 until April

27, 2017, the deadline for Defendants to file a reply shall be continued from April 20, 2017 until

May 11, 2017. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is continued from May 4, 2017 to June 15, 

2017 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2017

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.02   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Fero industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leigh Anne Squire, I, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/Leigh Anne Squire By: Leigh Anne Squire Chief Financial Officer  Dated: December 13, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Lisa Gopalakrishnan, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (this report) of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (registrant);
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 5,
2008



/S/ LISA
GOPALAKRISHNANLisa GopalakrishnanChief Financial Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Jeffery Keith THURMAN

No. 2018-KH-1673

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LINCOLN**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, his sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. His claims are also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Applicant has now fully litigated another application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.
James CROW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9395.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Technologies Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 26, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"),
I, Lawrence Butler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Lawrence Butler
-------------------

Lawrence Butler
Chief Executive Officer
March 11, 2003
David M. SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Warden.

No. 12-8637.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James A. NELSON, petitioner, v. Richard BROWN, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9336.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Sherman BALCH, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D17-3797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*