alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11445]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Requests Under Review by Office of Management and Budget

Agency Clearance Officer: Michael E. Bartell, (202) 942-8800
Upon written request copies available from: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 450 Fifth 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549

Extension:

Regulation 12B--File No. 270-70
Form 8-A--File No. 270-54

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (Commission) has submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget requests for approval of extension on previously approved 
collections for the following:
    Regulation 12B sets forth instructions and procedures to be 
followed by persons filing registration statements under Section 12 of 
the Exchange Act or reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. This 
regulation has been designated as imposing an administrative burden of 
one hour, because the actual regulatory burdens are established by the 
individual forms that refer to the items in the regulation.
    Form 8-A elicits material information concerning securities to be 
registered on national securities exchange or other publicly-traded 
securities in order that investors may make informed and knowledgeable 
investment decisions. It is estimated that Form 8-A is filed by 1,940 
respondents at an estimated 7.5 burden hours per response for a total 
annual burden of 14,550 hours.
    Direct general comments to the Clearance Officer for the Securities 
and Exchange Commission at the address below. Direct any comments 
concerning the accuracy of the estimated average burden hours for 
compliance with the Commission rules and forms to Michael E. Bartell, 
Associate Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20549 and the Clearance Officer for the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Management and Budget, Project numbers 3235-0062 
(Regulation 12B) and 3235-0056 (Form 8-A), Room 3208, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11445 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Regulatory Procedures Manual March 2009 Chapter 7 Recall Procedures 

___________________________________________________________________________

7-60

Exhibit 7-5 

MODEL RECALL RETURN RESPONSE FORM 

<COMPANY LETTERHEAD> 

<insert product> 

<insert lot numbers> 

Please check ALL appropriate boxes. 

ڤ I have read and understand the recall instructions provided in the <date> letter. 

ڤ I have checked my stock and have quarantined inventory consisting of _____ <units or 

cases>. 

ڤ Indicate disposition of recalled product: 

ڤ returned (specify quantity, date and method)/held for return; 

ڤ destroyed (specify quantity, date and method); 

 ڤ relabeled (specify quantity and date); 

 ڤ quarantined pending correction (specify quantity); 

 ڤ transfused – Blood or blood products (specify date and quantity); 

 ڤ implanted (specify date and quantity) 

ڤ I have identified and notified my customers that were shipped or may have been 

shipped this product by (specify date and method of notification); <or> 

 Attached is a list of customers who received/may have received this product. Please 

notify my customers. 

Any adverse events associated with recalled product? ڤ Yes ڤ NO 

If yes, please explain: _____________________________________________________ 

Please check the appropriate box(es) to describe your business 

ڤ wholesaler/distributor ڤ retailer 

ڤ grocery corporate headquarters ڤ food service/restaurant 

 repacker ڤ

 manufacturer ڤ

ڤ pharmacy - retail ڤ hospital/medical facility 

ڤ hospital pharmacies ڤ medical laboratory 

 __________________________________________________________ :Other ڤ

Name: ____________________________________ 

Title: ____________________________________ 

Tel. number: ( ) ______________________________
 Regulatory Procedures Manual March 2009 Chapter 7 Recall Procedures 

___________________________________________________________________________

7-61

Firm name: __________________________________________ 

address: __________________________________________ 

city/state: __________________________________________ 

PLEASE FAX COMPLETED RESPONSE FORM TO Tel. # < >, ATTN: < > 

OR MAIL TO: FIRM NAME AND ADDRESS 

NOTE: This MODEL is intended to serve as guidance for recalling firms. It may not 

conform to your firm's recall strategy. Please make any appropriate modifications to the 

response form. IT IS ADVISABLE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSED RECALL LETTER 

AND RESPONSE FORM TO YOUR LOCAL FDA RECALL COORDINATOR FOR 

REVIEW, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE.
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust
(the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Trust.  BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FORSABINE ROYALTY TRUST  By:
    /s/ Ron E. Hooper Ron E. HooperSenior Vice President, Royalty Management Date: April 28, 2011 A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and
will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Peter Piero SOLOMON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-910.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
Ricky Lee ALLSHOUSE, Jr., petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 11-1407.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District, denied.
Corine CARR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9807.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until July 1, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EX-10.1







Exhibit 10.1




Haights Cross Communications, Inc.

Annual Management / Employee Bonus Plan




     Haights Cross Communications, Inc. (together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
“Haights Cross”) provides its managers and employees, including its named executive officers, with
an opportunity to earn cash bonuses pursuant to an incentive bonus plan in effect for each fiscal
year known as the “Annual Management / Employee Bonus Plan” (the “Bonus Plan”). Compensation
payouts to participants under the Bonus Plan are based on a participant’s achievement of defined
objectives and such participant’s applicable Bonus Percentage (as defined below). Qualification to
receive a payout under the Bonus Plan for is generally based 70% on the achievement of certain
pre-defined business profit and cash flow goals, and 30% on the completion of pre-defined,
non-quantitative strategic initiatives. The factors on which the bonuses
are based are recommended by Haights Cross senior management and approved by the board of
directors. The annual bonus payable to our Chief Executive Officer and President, Paul J. Crecca,
is subject to the minimum bonus amount payable as provided in his employment agreement dated
January 31, 2007 and amended on December 11, 2007, as previously filed.



     The amount of a participant’s payout under the Bonus Plan is determined as a percentage of the
participant’s annual base compensation (“Bonus Percentage”). Target bonus participation for
employees range from 50% to 150% of the Bonus Percentage, based on achieving the stated objectives
of the Bonus Plan.
If 100% of the stated objectives are achieved, the payout will be 100%
of the Bonus Percentage. The amount of a participant’s payout under the Bonus Plan is subject to
proportional adjustment in the event actual results are at least 75% of the stated objectives or in
the event actual results exceed the stated objectives (with a maximum payout of 1.5 times an
employee’s Bonus Percentage). A participant will not receive a payout if at least 75% of the stated
objectives are not achieved.




     Determination of goal achievement and payouts under the Bonus Plan are made upon completion of
the fiscal year audit, generally March following the end of the applicable fiscal year. Bonus
calculations and payouts may be accelerated if sale events occur. In certain cases, new employees
hired during a fiscal year must wait until the following fiscal year before participating in the
Bonus Plan.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11716]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-273-000]


Petal Gas Storage Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

May 8, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 3, 1995, Petal Gas Storage Company (Petal), 
tendered for filing proposed changes in its FERC Gas Tariff, Volume No. 
1.
    Petal states that the proposed changes are intended to allow Petal 
to provide its firm customers to use the more flexible capacity release 
procedures set forth by the Commission in Order No. 577. Since Order 
No. 577 has an effective date of May 4, 1995, Petal requests a waiver 
from the Commission of Section 154.22 of its Regulations, so that the 
revisions to Petal's Tariff may also be made effective May 4, 1995.
    Petal states that copies of the filing were served on the company's 
firm customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with 385.214 and 285.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on or 
before May 15, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11716 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11739]




-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Applications for Permit

    The following applicants have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.):

PRT-799715

Applicant: The Living Desert, Palm Desert, CA

    The applicant requests a permit to import 1 female captive born 
cheetah (Acionyx jabatus) from the National Zoological Gardens, 
Pretoria, South Africa to the Living Desert for enhancement of the 
species through breeding.

PRT-802008

Applicant: M. William Boller, Elma, NY

    The applicant requests a permit to import one male bontebok 
(Damaliscus pygargus dorcas) culled from the captive herd maintained by 
Mr. M. Weinand, Bedford, Republic of South Africa, for the purpose of 
enhancement of the species.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 420(c), Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be 
received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this 
publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
420(c), Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/
358-2281).

    Dated: May 8, 1995.

Caroline Anderson,

Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.

[FR Doc. 95-11739 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00519-CV

EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC. and Laredo Marine, L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

GRACE RIVER RANCH, L.L.C.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-04-00108-CVL

Russel Wilson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The clerk’s notification of late record is this date GRANTED. The clerk’s record is due 

on September 8, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WARREN CHRISTENSEN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. /

No. C 05-01961 WHA

ORDER

This case was reassigned to the undersigned judge after the parties had submitted their

cross-motions for summary judgment. According to the Court’s records, the parties have not

submitted any opposition briefing following the reassignment. This order therefore requests

that the parties either submit their opposition papers, correct the Court’s records, or notify the

Court that the case has been dismissed by no later then JULY 31, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2006 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01961-WHA Document 14 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 1
ex10_03.htm




EXHIBIT 10.03





Amendment No. 2 to that certain Secured Note dated as of July 29, 2004 in the principal sum of $750,000, as amended by Amendment 1, dated March 27, 2008 (“Note”).





For good and valuable consideration, the parties to the Note amend the Note (i) to extend the Maturity Date from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010 and (ii) to increase the accrued interest rate by 2% so that the Note accrues interest from and after January 1, 2009 at the prime rate of Citibank in effect from time to time plus 2%.





Except as set forth above, the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.





Dated: February 12, 2009






	
Colonial Commercial Corp.
	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:
	
/s/ William Pagano
	  
	  	
Name:
	
William Pagano, Chief Executive Officer
	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	
Subsidiaries that are “Grantors of a Security Interest” under the Note:
	  
	  	  	  	  
	
Universal Supply Group, Inc.
	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:
	
/s/ William Pagano
	  
	  	
Name:
	
William Pagano, President
	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	
The RAL Supply Group, Inc.
	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:
	
/s/ William Pagano
	  
	  	
Name:
	
William Pagano, Executive Vice President
	  
	  	  	  	  
	
Confirmed:
	  
	  	  	  	  
	
Goldman Associates of New York, Inc.
	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:
	
/s/ Michael Goldman
	  
	  	
Name:
	
Michael Goldman, President
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                         FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 2001


Supplementary information required pursuant to section 9.4 of the partnership
agreement:

1.    Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended
      September 30, 2001:

          Net Loss                                             $(48,000)
          Add: Depreciation                                      50,000
               Cash from reserves                                25,000
                                                               --------
          Cash Available for Distribution                      $ 27,000
                                                               ========
          Distributions allocated to General Partners          $  2,000
                                                               ========
          Distributions allocated to Limited Partners          $ 25,000
                                                               ========


2.    Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
      General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
      September 30, 2001:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Entity Receiving                           Form of
            Compensation                          Compensation                       Amount
      -------------------------     -------------------------------------------    ----------
   <S>                            <C>                                             <C>
      General Partners              Interest in Cash Available for Distribution      $2,000

      WFC Realty Co., Inc.
      (Initial Limited Partner)     Interest in Cash Available for Distribution      $    5
</TABLE>
Charles BLUNT, petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 12-8727.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS IGLESIAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

FERRARA CANDY CO.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00849-VC 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 28

For the reasons below, the motion is denied.

1. Applying the primary jurisdiction doctrine is not warranted. Existing FDA

regulations define "nonfunctional slack-fill." 21 C.F.R. § 100.100. This case therefore does not 

involve a question for which courts lack a "clear indication of how FDA would view the issue," 

or "require[] resolution of an issue of first impression." Hood v. Wholesoy & Co., No. 12-cv05550-YGR, 2013 WL 3553979, at *5 (N.D. Cal. July 12, 2013); see Astiana v. Hain Celestial 

Grp., Inc., 783 F.3d 753, 760 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Clark v. Time Warner Cable, 523 F.3d 

1110, 1114 (9th Cir. 2008)). Whether empty space is required by the machines used to seal the 

container, to protect the contents of the package, or to fulfill some specific function required of 

the packaging, etc., are not "particularly complicated" questions requiring agency "expertise" in 

administration. See Astiana, 783 F.3d at 760. 

2. The complaint adequately alleges that the defendant's candy products contain 

nonfunctional slack-fill, for exactly the reasons described by Judge O'Connell in Escobar v. Just 

Born, Inc. Order re Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, No. 17-cv-01826-BRO, at *19-21 (C.D. Cal. 

June 12, 2017) (Dkt. No. 25).

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 40 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Also for the reasons stated by Judge O'Connell, the complaint adequately alleges 

that the packaging is likely to deceive a reasonable consumer. Id. at *12-18. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2017

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 40 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of
Fero Industries Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Kyle Schlosser, Chief Executive Officer and Leigh-Ann Squire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/
Kyle Schlosser

Kyle
Schlosser, President  and Chief Executive Officer



/s/
Leigh-Ann Squire,

Leigh-Ann Squire, Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



October 13, 2009



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Fero Industries Inc. and will be retained by Fero Industries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jason LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9518.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.