alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

MALIBU MEDIA LLC

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

BRIAN BERGHORN

DEFENDANT.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-071-RLM-RBC

O R D E R

A telephonic scheduling conference is hereby set for Monday, April 14,

2014 at 1:00 p.m. (E.D.T.), with the court to initiate the call. To further the

goals of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1 and 16(b) and assist the court in

preparing for the conference, the parties are directed to prepare and submit

a brief joint status report on or before April 7, 2014 informing the court of

the following:

(a) the date by which dispositive motions shall be filed;

(b) the anticipated length of trial, whether issues (for example,

liability and damages) should be bifurcated for trial, and

whether special verdict forms will be needed at trial (and if so,

the issues the verdict forms will have to address);

(c) the status of settlement negotiations; and 

(d) whether they anticipate requesting any further orders of the

court.

case 1:13-cv-00071-RLM-RBC document 30 filed 12/13/13 page 1 of 2
The attorneys of record and all unrepresented parties that have appeared

in the case are jointly responsible for attempting in good faith to agree on the

contents of the status report and for submitting the report to the court as

required by this order.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 13, 2013

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court

-2-

case 1:13-cv-00071-RLM-RBC document 30 filed 12/13/13 page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin S. McRae, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robin S. McRae

By  ____________________________________

Robin S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer

Date:  November 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Anton Prodanovic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: April 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Dr. Anton ProdanovicDr. Anton Prodanovic

Chief Executive Officer
Kenneth McKINZIE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-7949.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.7

S/M REAL ESTATE FUND VII, LTD.





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of S/M Real Estate Fund VII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
E. Hoffmann, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.


                                   S/M REAL ESTATE FUND VII, LTD.

                             BY:   SM7 APARTMENT INVESTORS INC.
                                   General Partner


Date: August 9, 2002               BY:    /s/ Richard E. Hoffmann
                                          -------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Richard E. Hoffmann
                                   Title: Director, President and Treasurer
                                          (Chief Executive Officer)
골다공증

골다공증이란 

무엇입니까?

골다공증은 뼈를 약하게 하여 쉽게 골절되게 

하는 병입니다. 

누가 걸릴 위험이 

높습니까?

누구나 골다공증에 걸릴 수 있지만 여성이 

남성보다 걸릴 위험이 높습니다. 다음에 

해당되면 걸릴 가능성이 높습니다:

• 50세 이상

• 흡연

• 저체중

• 가족 중 골다공증에 걸렸거나 골절된 

경험이 있는 사람이 있을 경우

• 운동 부족

• 음주 (하루에 세잔 이상)

• 발작약이나 스테로이트약 같은 특정 약을 

장기간 복용

골다공증에 걸렸는지 

어떻게 알 수 있습니까?

골밀도를 측정하기 위하여 엑스 레이나 

음파를 사용하는 검사들이 있습니다. 이 

검사들은 아프지 않습니다. 검사를 받아야 

하는지 담당 의사와 상의하십시오. 

• 디엑스에이 (DXA) 스캔이라 불리는 엑스 

레이 검사는 척추, 골반, 혹은 손목을 

검사합니다. 디엑스에이 (DXA) 스캔은 매우 

적은 양의 엑스 레이를 사용합니다. 

• 발뒤꿈치 검사라 불리는 새로운 초음파 

검사인 음파 검사.

어떻게 치료합니까?

골다공증을 치료할 방법은 없습니다. 발전 

속도를 늦추기 위하여 할 수 있는 것들이 

있습니다. 담당 의사와 상의하여 뼈 건강을 

지키기 위하여 계획을 세우십시오. 

미식품의약국 (FDA) 여성 보건 부서

www.fda.gov/womens
 이 정보지는 미식품의약국 (FDA) 여성 보건 부서에서 만들어졌습니다. 

다른 여성 보건 정보를 얻기 위해서는 다음을 방문하십시오

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

처방약

복용할 수 있는 처방약들이 있습니다. 이 

약들은 알약, 붙이는 약, 혹은 주사의 형태일 

수 있습니다. 약을 중단하기 전에 의사, 

간호사, 혹은 약사와 상의하십시오.

비스포스포네이트는 골손실을 늦추기 위하여 

흔히 주어지는 약입니다. 담당 의사가 다른 

약을 제공할 수도 있습니다.

• 이 약들을 얼마나 오래 복용해야 하는지 

당담 의사와 상의하십시오.

• 골반이나 대퇴골과 같은 부위에 

새로운 통증이 시작되면 담당 의사에게 

알리십시오.. 이 약들을 복용하는 어떤 

사람들은 대퇴골 골절을 경험했습니다.

• 어떤 약들은 목구멍을 자극할 수 있습니다.

• 심각한 텩뼈 문제가 생길 수 있습니다.

식품 보조제

식품 보조제는 사람들이 음식에 추가로 

섭취하는 제품들입니다. 비타민, 가루, 

에너지바, 그리고 허브가 여기에 속합니다.

식품 보조제를 복용하기 전에 담당 의사와 

상의하십시오. 이것들은 다른 약 복용에 

영향을 미칠 수 있으며 아픔을 초래할 수 

있습니다. 

생활 방식 변경

골다공증에 걸릴 위험을 낮추기 위하여 

변경할 수 있는 생활 방식들이 있습니다.

• 활동적으로 생활하십시오. 걷기와 같이 

하중이 실리는 운동을 하십시오.

• 금연하십시오.

• 음주를 제한하십시오.

• 음식에서 충분한 캴슘과 비타민 D를 

섭취하십시오. 당당 의사가 칼슘과 비타민 

알약을 복용할 것을 권할 수 있습니다.

골다공증

골다공증 (KOREAN)
Paul MAILO, Jr., petitioner, v. Adam CRAIL, et al.

No. 12-9059.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

RICHARD TALLMAN 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

 BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-CV-741-JD-CAN 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and being duly advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS 

Defendants’ Motion. Defendants are hereby granted an extension up to an including April 22, 

2013 to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 

SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2013. 

 s/Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

 Magistrate Judge, Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

U.S. Northern District Court 

Distribution: 

Douglas D. Small 

Edmond W. Foley 

FOLEY & SMALL 

1002 E. Jefferson Blvd. 

South Bend, IN 46617 

Dina M. Cox / Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

Robert M. Baker IV / Janelle P. Kilies 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

case 3:12-cv-00741-JD-CAN document 12 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry T. Cochran, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
       March 31, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Henry T. CochranHenry
      T. CochranChief
      Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-5

)

SHEILA D. ROBINSON )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

March 23, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charges against her to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 11 of the twenty-count Superseding

Indictment, and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this

Report and Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be

scheduled before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the

Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 23rd day of March 2015.

/s Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22413-22414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11102]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research 
(DMR). [[Page 22414]] 
    Dates and Times: May 24, 1995--8:00 pm-10:00 pm; May 25, 1995--
8:30 am-5:00 pm; May 26, 1995--8:30 am-5:00 pm.
    Place: PSL Large Conference Room, Synchrotron Radiation Center 
Stoughton, Wisconsin.
    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Loretta J. Inglehart, Program Director, 
Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 
306-1817.
    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for the Synchrotron Radiation Center, University 
of Wisconsin proposal.
    Agenda: Evaluation of proposal.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposal. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11102 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Bernard L. WOODS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8710.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
James SCHIBEL, et ux., petitioners, v. Leroy W. JOHNSON.

No. 12-1087.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, denied.
**[Capmark Logo]**Annual Statement as to Compliance  For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 **M o r g a n   S t a n l e y   C a p i t a l   I   I n c .****Series 2007- IQ15****Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction, I hereby attest that:****A review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Master Servicer****during the period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision.****ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark  Finance Inc. as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the period.**Capmark Finance Inc, /s/ Mark E. McCool  B y :   M a r k   E ,   M c C o o l  Title: Managing Director Date: February 20, 2008
March 21. 1975 

The Honorable Mark W. White, Jr. Opinion No. H- 561 

Secretary of State 

Capitol Building Re: Whether a contribution to 

Austin, Texas 78711 a candidate which is pledged 

and received after the election is a prohibited gift to a 

Dear Secretary White: public servant 

You have requested our opinion concerning Chapter 36 of the Penal Code. 

Specifically, you ask whether the defense provided in section 36.10(4) is 

applicable to campaign contributions made after an election. 

Sectton 36.10 provides in part: 

It is a defenre to prosecution under Section 

36.07 (Compensation for Past Official Behavior), 

36.08 (Gift to Public Servant), or 36.09 (Offering 

Gift to Public Servant) of this code that the benefit involved was: 

. . . 

(4) a contribution made under the 

election laws for the political campaign 

of an elective public servant when he is 

a candidate for nomination or election to 

public office. 

The Election Code in article 14.08(h)(l)(iii), (h)(3) and (h)(5) contemplates 

post election contributions and provides for thetr reporting. 

In our opinion, the Legislature intended to provide a defense to sections 

36.07. 36.08 and 36.09 for campaign contributions which relate to a specific 

campaign. 

p. 2525 
The Honorable Mark W. White. Jr., page 2 (H-566) 

Since the election laws provide for the reporting of post-election contributions. especially in the common instance of a campaign deficit, we believe 

it to be clear that section 36.10(4) was intended to allow such contributions. 

Accordingly, it is our opinion that the language “when he is a candidate” 

modifies the word “campaign” as contained in section 36.10(4), and merely 

limits the defense to contributions to a specific campaign, whether they be 

made before or after the election. 

SUMMARY 

Section 36.10(4) of the Penal Code provides a defense 

for campaign contributions which relate to a specific 

campaign. whether they be made before or after the election. 

Very truly yours. 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant 

Opinion Committee 

p. 2526
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11085]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

April 25, 1995 .
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. 
Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the OTS 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
OTS Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N. 
W., Washington, D.C. 20552.

OMB Number: 1550-0075
Form Number: Not Applicable
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and Principal 
Shareholders of Savings Associations
Description: The regulation requires savings associations to maintain 
detailed records of their extensions of credit to executive officers, 
directors, and principal shareholders. The regulation also requires 
that savings associations report to OTS all loans to executives and 
disclose the amount of its extensions of credit following a written 
request from the public. Indebtedness from correspondent banks must 
also be disclosed to the board of directors.
Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks
Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 1,564
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondents/Recordkeepers: 11 Hrs. Avg.
    10 Hours Average per Recordkeeping
    1 Hour Average Reporting/Disclosure
Frequency of Response: 4 per Year
Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 17,204 Hrs.
Clearance Officer: Colleen M. Devine, (202) 906-6025, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20552.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Cora Prifold Beebe,
Director of Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-11085 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)