alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22074-22075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10932]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Grand Canyon National Park, AZ Environmental Impact Statement

Agency: National Park Service, Interior.

Action: General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement; Grand 
[[Page 22075]] Canyon National Park, Arizona; Extension of Time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The National Park Service announced the availability for public 
review of the Draft General Management Plan/Environmental Impact 
Statement for Grand Canyon National Park on March 13, 1995 (60 Federal 
Register 13450). At that time a public review period was announced and 
scheduled to end no later than April 24, 1995. This notice extends the 
comment period to May 11, 1995.

Addresses: Comments should be sent to Planning Team Leader, Grand 
Canyon General Management Plan, National Park Service, Denver Service 
Center-TWE, P.O. Box 25287, Denver, CO 80225-0287.

For Further Information Contact: Larry Norris at the above address or 
telephone (303) 969-2210.

    Dated: April 26, 1995.
Denis P. Galvin,
Associate Director, Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 95-10932 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
22.569843
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1343 

To require reimbursement for non-TRICARE health insurance premiums paid 

by certain members of reserve components during the period the members 

were not eligible for TRICARE coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Ms. HERSETH (for herself, Mr. ROSS, Mr. FORD, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. PAYNE, 

Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. HASTINGS of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require reimbursement for non-TRICARE health insurance premiums paid by certain members of reserve components during the period the members were not eligible 

for TRICARE coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1343 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR NON-TRICARE HEALTH 

2 INSURANCE PREMIUMS PAID BY CERTAIN 

3 MEMBERS OF RESERVE COMPONENTS DUR4 ING PERIOD NOT ELIGIBLE FOR TRICARE 

5 COVERAGE. 

6 Section 701 of the Ronald W. Reagan National De7 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 

8 108–375; 118 Stat. 1980) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(c) REIMBURSEMENT FOR NON-TRICARE HEALTH

11 INSURANCE PREMIUMS PAID BY CERTAIN MEMBERS OF

12 RESERVE COMPONENTS DURING PERIOD NOT ELIGIBLE

13 FOR CERTAIN TRICARE COVERAGE.— 

14 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of De15 fense shall reimburse any member of a reserve com16 ponent of the Armed Forces who enters into an 

17 agreement described in section 1076d(a)(2) of title 

18 10, United States Code, pursuant to subsection 

19 (b)(2)(A) of this section, in the amount and for the 

20 period described in paragraphs (2) and (3). 

21 ‘‘(2) AMOUNT.—The amount that a member of 

22 a reserve component may be reimbursed under para23 graph (1) is— 

24 ‘‘(A) the amount (if any) paid by the mem25 ber for health insurance premiums during the 

26 period described in paragraph (3), reduced by 
3 

•HR 1343 IH 

1 ‘‘(B) the amount the member would have 

2 paid in premiums for TRICARE Standard for 

3 coverage of the same persons during the same 

4 period if the member had been covered by 

5 TRICARE Standard under section 1976d of 

6 title 10, United States Code. 

7 ‘‘(3) PERIOD OF REIMBURSEMENT.—The period 

8 for which a member of a reserve component may be 

9 reimbursed under paragraph (1) is the period— 

10 ‘‘(A) beginning on the date of the expira11 tion of the member’s entitlement to care and 

12 benefits under section 1145(a) of title 10, 

13 United States Code, as described in section 

14 1076d of such title; and 

15 ‘‘(B) ending on the date when TRICARE 

16 Standard coverage begins pursuant to sub17 section (b)(2)(A) of this section.’’. 

Æ
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., petitioners, v. Karen GOLINSKI.

No. 12-16.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
STATE of Louisiana v. Paul N. HOFF

No. 2019-KK-0475

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 2019

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

I additionally concur with the per curiam and write separately to acknowledge the critical nature of the constitutional issue presented here, particularly given the split in the federal circuit courts on what is a *res nova* issue for both the Louisiana Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. Accordingly, I urge the court and counsel to take extreme care in developing a clear record, and that the State and the defense make contemporaneous objections as appropriate. Moreover, I note the paramount importance of the trial judge articulating well-considered rulings such that a record is perfected for possible appellate review. *See**State v. Jones* , 16-088 (La. 3/4/16), 185 So.3d 746 (writ denied) (Crichton, J., additionally concurring, emphasizing the "importance of perfecting a record when seeking to invoke exceptions to Constitutional rights and guarantees"; and *State v. Carter* , 16-1433 (La. 7/29/16), 195 So.3d 1207 (stay denied, writ denied) (Crichton, J., additionally concurring, citing *Jones, supra* , urging attorneys to develop solid records "capable of withstanding appellate scrutiny.")1 Whether or not the witness is unavailable for trial and, if unavailable, whether or not the trial judge correctly finds that there has been compliance with the Sixth Amendment and *Crawford v. Washington* , 541 U.S. 36; 57, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 1367, 158 L.Ed. 2d 177 (2004) are both questions for another day - just as this *res nova* issue may be a question to be answered by an appellate court, this Court, and perhaps the United States Supreme Court in the future. A well-developed record will greatly aid in the important function of appellate review, should it become necessary, and the administration of justice.

1

*See also**State ex. Rel. Calvin Hayes v. State* , 15-KH-1789 (La. 9/23/16), 200 So.3d 364 (writ denied) (Crichton, J., additionally concurring, noting the importance of perfecting a record in a guilty plea), and *State v. Johnson* , 18-1661 (La. 11/5/18), 255 So.3d 1006 (writ denied) (Crichton, J., voting to grant and docket, citing *Hayes, supra* , again noting the importance of making a record, as "scrupulously adhering to these procedures in the district courts prevents the extensive expenditure of appellate resources later.").

--------
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Ricky Tejada, : Appellant :

:

v. : No. 484 C

. D

. 2021

: Sue Dowd, Rene Styka and : Jonathan Simpson :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW

, September 2 3 , 2022

, upon consideration of Ricky Tejada’s

(Appellant) Motion for Reconsideration (Motion), which requests that this Court

stay its August 4, 2022 Order vacat ing the October 20, 2020 order of the Court of

Common Pleas of Schuylkill County (tr ial court) and remand ing the matter to the

trial court for further proceedings because Appellant is temporarily incarcerated at

the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center in Smyna, Delaware and does not have

access to his legal materials related to this litig ation, to which no response was filed,

the Motion is GRANTED

. The Court’s August 4, 2022 Order is stayed until further

order of the Court . Appellant is directed to file a status report within 10 days of his

return to Pennsylvania or on or before December 22 , 2022, whichever is sooner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties Ltd. II 1999 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES LTD II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          37,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         17,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,203)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,480
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,506
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,776
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (1)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,153
<EPS-BASIC>                                      11.43<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, R. Scott Murray, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    R. Scott Murray                         
|                      |  |  |  | R. Scott Murray                                
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 10.5


 


AMENDMENT TO THE


CARLISLE COMPANIES INCORPORATED


DIRECTOR RETIREMENT PLAN


 


The Carlisle Companies Incorporated Director Retirement Plan (“Plan”)
is hereby amended, effective as of December 31, 2003, as follows.


 


(1)                                 Explanation
of Amendment


 


The Plan is amended (i) to freeze the accrual
of all future benefits, (ii) to waive the requirement that a participant serve
on the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Carlisle Companies Incorporated
(“Company”) for five years in order to be eligible for a benefit and (iii) to
provide each participant who is currently serving on the Board with a one-time
opportunity to elect, in lieu of all other benefits to which he or she would
otherwise be entitled under the Plan, to receive his or her previously-earned
benefits in one of four forms.


 


(2)                                 Amendment


 


The Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:


 


“Freeze and Amendment of the Plan.


 


A.                                   No benefits shall be
earned under the Plan for service after December 31, 2003.  The amount of all benefits earned under the
Plan prior to January 1, 2004 is frozen effective as of December 31,
2003.


 


B.                                     The requirement
that a non-employee director serve on the Board for a minimum of five years in
order to be entitled to receive a benefit under the Plan is hereby waived for
any non-employee director who is serving on the Board as of December 31,
2003.


 


C.                                     Each non-employee
director who is serving on the Board as of December 31, 2003 shall have a
one-time irrevocable opportunity to elect, in lieu of all other benefits to
which he or she would otherwise be entitled under the Plan, to receive his or
her previously-earned benefits in one of the following four forms, which
benefits shall be payable in accordance with the terms of his or her Pension
Election Agreement: (i) an immediate lump sum, (ii) installment payments
commencing in February 2004, (iii) installment payments commencing on a
date selected by the non-employee director (but no later than the date on which
he or she attains age 70) and (iv) a credit to his or her account under the
Carlisle Companies Incorporated Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors.  An eligible director’s
election is subject to two conditions: (i) he or she must remain as an active
member of the Board until January 15, 2004 and (ii) his or her election is
subject to the approval of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  Elections must be in accordance with
procedures specified by the Company.”


 


1

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused the Plan to be amended
effective as of December 31, 2003.


 


 


	
   

  	
  CARLISLE COMPANIES INCORPORATED

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Steven J. Ford

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Steven J. Ford, Secretary

  



 


2
Juan Francisco MARTINEZ-MUNOZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9234.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW   Document 1-4   Filed 02/15/17   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW   Document 1-4   Filed 02/15/17   Page 2 of 2
Oscar A. BLANCO, petitioner, v. Elvin VALENZUELA, Warden.

No. 12-8556.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Horace Frazier HUNTER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA STATE BAR.

No. 12-1379.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc.







/s/ Eric T. Jones                                   DATE:  August 14, 2008

Eric R. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer and

Chief Financial Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1217]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 
Scientific Advisory Board

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee meeting:

    Date of Meeting: February 7-9, 1995 from 0830 to approximately 
1730.
    Place: Tyndall Air Force Base, Tyndall Conference Center, Panama 
City, FL.
    Matters To Be Considered: Research and Development proposals and 
continuing projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and 
Development Program funds in excess of $1M will be reviewed. This 
meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, 
appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board 
at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.
    For Further Information Contact: Ms. Ann Maxwell, 2200 
Clarendon, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201, 703-525-9400.

    Dated: January 12, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-1217 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Patricia L. WOODS, petitioner, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 12-8766.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                       GALILEO ELECTRO-OPTICS CORPORATION
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                   ----------------------------

                                                   Dec. 31, 1995  Dec. 31, 1994
                                                   -------------  -------------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>
Primary
 Average shares outstanding                          6,493,660      6,473,654

 Net effect of dilutive stock options - based
 on the treasury stock method using average
 market price                                          101,723             --
                                                    ----------     ----------
 Total                                               6,595,383      6,473,654

 Net income (loss)                                  $1,088,000      $(476,000)
                                                    ==========     ==========
 Per share amount                                         $.16          $(.07)
                                                    ==========     ==========

Fully Diluted
 Average shares outstanding                          6,493,660      6,473,654

 Net effect of dilutive stock options - based
 on the treasury stock method using the quarter-
 end market price, if higher than average
 market price                                          110,009             --
                                                    ----------     ----------
 Total                                               6,603,669      6,473,654

 Net income (loss)                                  $1,088,000      $(476,000)
                                                    ==========     ==========
 Per share amount                                         $.16          $(.07)
                                                    ==========     ==========
</TABLE>


                                       14
Patricia L. WOODS, petitioner, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 12-8766.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-27

)

JUAN CORONA )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on September 23, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the two-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 23rd day of September, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Dennis R. BROCK, petitioner, v. Timothy BRUNSMAN, Warden.

No. 12-9744.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.