25692 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices

States is materially injured by reason of

imports of pure magnesium from the

PRC, the Russian Federation and

Ukraine. (The ITC also determined that

imports of alloy magnesium from the

PRC and the Russian Federation did not

materially injure, or threaten material

injury to, an industry in the United

States.)

Therefore, all unliquidated entries of

pure magnesium from the People’s

Republic of China, the Russian

Federation and Ukraine that are entered,

or withdrawn from warehouse for

consumption, on or after November 7,

1994, the date of publication of the

Department’s preliminary

determination, are liable for the

assessment of antidumping duties.

In accordance with section 736(a)(1)

of the Act, the Department will direct

Customs officers to assess, upon further

advice by the administering authority,

antidumping duties equal to the amount

by which the foreign market value

exceeds the United States price for all

relevant entries of pure magnesium from

the People’s Republic of China, the

Russian Federation, and Ukraine.

Customs officers must require, at the

same time as importers would normally

deposit estimated duties on this

merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the

estimated weighted-average

antidumping duty margins as noted

below. The ‘‘PRC-wide,’’ ‘‘Russia-wide’’

and ‘‘Ukraine-wide’’ rates apply to all

exporters of PRC, Russian and

Ukrainian pure magnesium not

specifically listed below.

The ad valorem weighted-average

dumping margins are as follows:

Manufacturer/producer/exporter

Weightedaverage

margin percentage

The People’s Republic of

China: PRC-wide Rate .......... 108.26

The Russian Federation:

AIOC/Avisma ......................... 0.00

AIOC/SMW ............................ 0.00

AIOC/Other ........................... 100.25

Gerald Metals/Avisma ........... 0.00

Gerald Metals/SMW .............. 0.00

Gerald Metals/Other .............. 100.25

Greenwich Metals/Avisma .... 0.00

Greenwich Metals/SMW ....... 0.00

Greenwich Metals/Other ....... 100.25

Hochschild Partners/Avisma . 0.00

Hochschild Partners/SMW .... 0.00

Hochschild Partners/Other .... 100.25

Hunter Douglas/SMW ........... 0.00

Hunter Douglas/Other ........... 100.25

Interlink/Avisma ..................... 0.00

Interlink/Other ........................ 100.25

MG Metals/Avisma ................ 0.00

MG Metals/SMW ................... 0.00

MG Metals/Other ................... 100.25

Razno Alloys/SMW ............... 0.00

Razno Alloys/Other ............... 100.25

Manufacturer/producer/exporter

Weightedaverage

margin percentage

SMW/SMW ............................ 0.00

SMW/Other ........................... 100.25

Russia-wide Rate .................. 100.25

Ukraine:

Gerald Metals ........................ 103.27

MG Metals ............................. 79.87

Hochschild Partners .............. 92.21

Ukraine-wide Rate ................ 104.27

This notice constitutes the

antidumping duty orders with respect to

pure magnesium from the PRC, the

Russian Federation and Ukraine.

Interested parties may contact the

Central Records Unit, Room B–099 of

the Main Commerce Building, for copies

of an updated list of antidumping duty

orders currently in effect.

These orders are published in

accordance with section 736(a) of the

Act and 19 CFR 353.21.

Dated: May 8, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–11808 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–834–802]

Agreement Suspending the

Antidumping Investigation on Uranium

From Kazakhstan

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Amendment to the

Agreement Between the United States

Department of Commerce and the

Republic of Kazakhstan Suspending the

Antidumping Investigation on Uranium

from Kazakhstan.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) and the Republic of

Kazakhstan (Kazakhstan) have signed an

Amendment (the Amendment) to the

Agreement Suspending the

Antidumping Investigation on Uranium

from Kazakhstan (the Agreement).

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth

Chalecki or Maureen Price, Office of

Agreements Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–2312 or (202) 482–

0159, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On October 16, 1992, the Department

and Kazakhstan signed the Agreement

and, on October 30, 1992, the

Agreement was published in the

Federal Register (57 FR 49220, 49222).

On November 9, 1994, the Department

and Kazakhstan initialed an

Amendment to modify the Appendix A

price-tied quota contained in the

original Agreement. The Amendment

was then released to interested parties

for comment. The Department carefully

considered these comments and held

further consultations with Kazakhstan.

Subsequently, the Department and

Kazakhstan negotiated an Amendment

based upon a different concept than the

one previously initialed. This

Amendment modifies the original pricetied quota mechanism by lowering the

threshold price from $13 to $12, and

redefines Kazakhstani-origin uranium to

include uranium mined in Kazakhstan

and enriched in a third country. On

March 24, 1995, the Department and

Kazakhstan signed a final Amendment,

which was to take effect when the final

signature was added on March 27, 1995.

The text of the final Amendment

follows this notice.

Dated: April 25, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

Amendment to the Agreement

Suspending the Antidumping

Investigation on Uranium From

Kazakhstan, as Amended

Pursuant to Section X.B. of the

Agreement Suspending the

Antidumping Investigation on Uranium

from Kazakhstan, as amended on

February 7, 1995 (‘‘Amended

Agreement’’), the parties have consulted

to ensure that exports of Kazakhstani

ore enriched in U235 in another country

prior to direct or indirect importation

into the United States do not undermine

the Amended Agreement. As a result of

these consultations, and to ensure that

such exports do not undermine the

Amended Agreement, the parties agree

as follows:

1. The following definitions are added

to Section II:

(e) ‘‘For consumption’’ means for

further processing (as necessary) and

use as nuclear fuel. Consumption may

include such uses as swaps or

exchanges of material, only where such

swaps or exchanges are documented to

be conducted solely for the purpose of

facilitating the further processing and

use as nuclear fuel by the end-user. The

material shall not be loaned. The
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices 25693

material shall not be resold by or on

behalf of the end-user except as a result

of force majeure.

(f) ‘‘End-user’’ means an entity, such

as an electric utility, hospital, or

scientific institution, which consumes

uranium.

(g) The natural feed component for 1

KgU of enriched uranium product

(‘‘EUP’’) shall be determined using the

feed to product factor calculated with

the following formulae:

[(PA–TA)/(FA–TA)]=XA

where:

PA=Actual Product Assay of the

imported low enriched uranium

(‘‘LEU’’) as found in the import

documents

TA=For enrichment contracts, the actual

tails assay selected by the customer

pursuant to the contract; for other

contracts calling for the delivery of

LEU, 0.3 weight percent U235.

During the anniversary month of

this Amendment, the tails assay for

other contracts calling for the

delivery of LEU will be amended as

appropriate, based on the optimum

tails assay.

FA=0.711 weight percent U235 (feed

assay)

XA=Feed-to-Product Factor.

The feed-to-product factor shall then be

multiplied by 2.61283 to reach the

lbs. U308 equivalent of the

imported LEU.

2. Section III, ‘‘Product Coverage,’’ is

amended as follows:

The following language replaces the

second paragraph, beginning, ‘‘Uranium

ore * * *’’

Further, uranium ore from Kazakhstan

that is milled into U308 and/or

converted into UF6 and/or enriched in

U235 in another country prior to direct

and/or indirect importation into the

United States is considered uranium

from Kazakhstan and is subject to the

terms of this Agreement. When

imported as enriched uranium

(excluding highly enriched uranium),

the full amount of the natural uranium

equivalent required to produce the

enriched product will be counted

against the existing quota under this

Agreement. For the purposes of

calculating this amount of natural

uranium, the terms of definition II (g)

shall apply unless otherwise reported.

The third paragraph of Section III,

beginning, ‘‘For purposes of this

Agreement, uranium enriched * * *’’ is

replaced by:

If applicable, for purposes of this

agreement, uranium enriched in U235

or compounds of uranium enriched in

U235 in Kazakhstan are covered by this

agreement, regardless of their

subsequent modification or blending.

Thus, Section III, as amended,

provides as follows:

The merchandise covered by this

Agreement are the following products

from Kazakhstan:

Natural uranium in the form of

uranium ores and concentrates; natural

uranium metal and natural uranium

compounds; alloys, dispersions

(including cermets), ceramic products,

and mixtures containing natural

uranium or natural uranium

compounds; uranium enriched U235

and its compounds; alloys, dispersions

(including cermets), ceramic products,

and mixtures containing uranium

enriched in U235 or compounds of

uranium enriched in U235, and any

other forms of uranium within the same

class or kind.

Further, uranium ore from Kazakhstan

that is milled into U308 and/or

converted into UF6 and/or enriched in

U235 in another country prior to direct

and/or indirect importation into the

United States is considered uranium

from Kazakhstan and is subject to the

terms of this Agreement. When

imported as enriched uranium

(excluding highly enriched uranium),

the full amount of the natural uranium

equivalent required to produce the

enriched product will be counted

against the existing quota under this

Agreement. For the purposes of

calculating this amount of natural

uranium, the terms of definition II (g)

shall apply unless otherwise reported.

If applicable, for purposes of this

agreement, uranium enriched in U235

or compounds of uranium enriched in

U235 in Kazakhstan are covered by this

agreement, regardless of their

subsequent modification or blending.

Highly enriched uranium (‘‘HEU’’) is

within the scope of this investigation,

and HEU is covered by this agreement.

For the purpose of this agreement, HEU

means uranium enriched to 20 percent

or greater in the isotope U235.

Imports or uranium ores and

concentrates, natural uranium

compounds, and all forms of enriched

uranium are currently classified under

Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTS’’)

subheadings: 2612.10.00, 2844.10.20,

and 2844.20.00, respectively. Imports of

natural uranium and forms of natural

uranium other than compounds are

currently classified under HTS

subheadings: 2844.10.10 and

2844.10.50. HTS subheadings are

provided for convenience and customs

purposes. The written description of the

scope of these proceedings is

dispositive.

3. The following language replaces

Paragraph D of Section VII,

‘‘Anticircumvention,’’:

D. In addition to the above

requirements, the Department shall

direct the U.S. Customs Service to

require all importers of uranium into the

United States, regardless of stated

country of origin, to submit at the time

of entry written statements certifying

the following:

(A) The country(ies) in which the ore

was mined and, if applicable, converted,

enriched, and/or fabricated, for all

imports; and

(B) That the uranium being imported

was not obtained under any

arrangement, swap, or other exchange

designed to circumvent the export limits

for uranium of Kazakhstani origin

established by this agreement.

Where there is reason to believe that

such a certification has been made

falsely, the Department will refer the

matter to Customs or the Department of

Justice for further action.

4. The price levels of Appendix A of

the Agreement are hereby amended as

follows:

Appendix A: Kazakhstan

Price level

Quota in

millions

of pounds

U308

$12.00–$13.99 .............................. 1.0

14.00–14.99 .................................. 1.2

15.00–15.99 .................................. 1.4

16.00–16.99 .................................. 1.8

17.00–17.99 .................................. 2.5

18.00–18.99 .................................. 3.5

19.00–19.99 .................................. 4.0

20.00–20.99 .................................. 5.0

21.00 and up ................................ (1)

1 Unlimited U308.

5. The parties further agree that their

intention is, consistent with Section

IV.J. of the Agreement, that Kazakhstan

be accorded treatment no less favorable

than any other republic of the former

Soviet Union that also has a suspension

agreement with the United States with

respect to trade in uranium.

Accordingly, if U.S. law, regulation,

administrative practice, or policy

should change in any manner that

would result in relatively less favorable

treatment for Kazakhstan, or if the

United States should enter into any

agreement or understanding or take any

action that would cause that result, the

parties will promptly enter into

consultations with a view to amending

this Agreement so as to eliminate such

less favorable treatment.

6. The Parties agree that this

Amendment constitutes an integral part

of the Amended Agreement.

Furthermore, the Parties agree that this

Amendment supersedes and replaces
25694 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices

the amendment initialled on November

9, 1994.

7. The English language version of

this Amendment shall be controlling.

8. This amendment is effective as of

March 27, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

Bulat D. Utemuratov,

First Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade.

Victor G. Yazikov,

President, Katep.

[FR Doc. 95–11809 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–D5–M

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 050895B]

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management

Council; Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council and its Atlantic

Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish

Committee and Demersal Species

Committee will hold public meetings on

May 23–25, 1995, at the Sheraton

Atlantic City West, 6821 Black Horse

Pike, West Atlantic City, NJ 08232,

telephone 609–272–0200.

ADDRESSES: Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council, 300 S. New

Street, Dover, DE 19901.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David R. Keifer, Executive Director,

telephone: 302–674–2331.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

May 23, the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid,

and Butterfish Committee will meet

from 1:00 p.m. until 4:00 p.m.

May 24, the Council will meet from

8:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. The Demersal

Species Committee will meet from 1:30

p.m. until 4:30 p.m.

May 25, the Council will meet from

8:00 a.m. until approximately 12:00

p.m. There may be a Large Pelagics/

Shark Committee meeting during this

Council meeting to discuss proposed

tuna regulations.

The following topics may be

discussed:

(1) Review comments for Supplement

1 for Amendment 5 for the Atlantic

Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP.

(2) Adopt final version of Amendment

5 for the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and

Butterfish FMP.

(3) Review alternative fishing rate

mortality reduction strategies for

summer flounder.

(4) Adopt hearing draft of

Amendment 7 to the Summer Flounder

FMP.

(5) Other fishery management matters.

The Council meeting may be revised,

lengthened or shortened based on the

progress of the meeting. The Council

may go into closed session to discuss

personnel or national security matters.

This meeting is physically accessible

to people with disabilities. Requests for

sign language interpretation or other

auxiliary aids should be directed to

Joanna Davis at 302–674–2331 at least 5

days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: May 9, 1995.

Richard W. Surdi,

Acting Director, Office of Fisheries

Conservation and Management, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 95–11811 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM

PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR

SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From

People Who Are Blind or Severely

Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement

List.

SUMMARY: This action adds to the

Procurement List a commodity and

services to be furnished by nonprofit

agencies employing persons who are

blind or have other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 12, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase

From People Who Are Blind or Severely

Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403,

1735 Jefferson Davis Highway,

Arlington, Virginia 22202–3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Beverly Milkman (703) 603–7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July

29, August 12, November 4, 1994,

March 17 and 24, 1995, the Committee

for Purchase From People Who Are

Blind or Severely Disabled published

notices (59 FR 38585, 55526, 60 FR

14427, 41434 and 15535) of proposed

additions to the Procurement List. After

consideration of the material presented

to it concerning capability of qualified

nonprofit agencies to provide the

commodity and services, fair market

price, and impact of the additions on

the current or most recent contractors,

the Committee has determined that the

commodity and services listed below

are suitable for procurement by the

Federal Government under 41 U.S.C.

46–48c and 41 CFR 51–2.4.

I certify that the following action will

not have a significant impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

The major factors considered for this

certification were:

1. The action will not result in any

additional reporting, recordkeeping or

other compliance requirements for small

entities other than the small

organizations that will furnish the

commodity and services to the

Government.

2. The action does not appear to have

a severe economic impact on current

contractors for the commodity and

services.

3. The action will result in

authorizing small entities to furnish the

commodity and services to the

Government.

4. There are no known regulatory

alternatives which would accomplish

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in

connection with the commodity and

services proposed for addition to the

Procurement List.

Accordingly, the following

commodity and services are hereby

added to the Procurement List:

Commodity

Gaiter, Neck

8440–01–387–8509

Services

Janitorial/Custodial, United States Mint,

Denver, Colorado

Janitorial/Custodial, Veterans Administration

Medical Center, Outpatient Clinic,

Orlando, Florida

Janitorial/Custodial, Department of Veterans

Affairs Medical Center, 1500 East

Woodrow Wilson Drive, Jackson,

Mississippi

Janitorial/Custodial, U.S. Post Office, Federal

Courthouse and Annex, Camden, New

Jersey

Janitorial/Custodial, Trenton Federal

Building and U.S. Courthouse, 402 East

State Street, Trenton, New Jersey

This action does not affect current

contracts awarded prior to the effective

date of this addition or options

exercised under those contracts.

Beverly L. Milkman,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 95–11763 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–33–P

Procurement List; Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From

People Who Are Blind or Severely

Disabled.