alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Office of Global Policy and Strategy 

OGPS STATEMENT

August 29, 2023

FDA Meets with South African Health Products Regulatory Authority

Today, FDA officials led by Associate Commissioner for Global Policy and Strategy Mark Abdoo 

hosted a delegation from the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) at 

the FDA’s headquarters in White Oak, Maryland. Among the topics discussed were the FDA’s 

strategic priorities for Africa, the agency’s ongoing collaboration with SAHPRA, and SAHPRA’s 

own regulatory priorities.

The South African delegation also met with the FDA’s Chief Medical Officer and experts from 

the FDA’s Office of Security and Emergency Management to learn about the FDA’s emergency 

operations management and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. The delegation 

also met with the FDA’s Chief Information Officer to discuss each other’s digital transformation 

initiatives.

Leading the South African delegation was SAHPRA Chief Executive Officer Boitumelo SemeteMakokotlela and Portia Nkambule, Chief Regulatory Officer. Other members of the delegation 

included Silverani Padayachee, Senior Manager, Pharmaceutical Evaluation Management;

Dimakatso Mathibe, Senior Manager, Medical Devices; Tohlang Sehloho, Senior Manager, 

Clinical Evaluation Management; Mukona Mphidi, Office Manager; Gontse Moutloatse, Office 

Manager; Bongani Ngcobo, Legal Advisor; and Simphiwe Matsabe, Financial Manager.

Other FDA officials participating in the meetings included Douglas Shaffer, Senior Advisor, 

OGPS; Ravi Bharwani, Principal Policy Advisor, OGPS; Kristan Callahan, Public Health Advisor, 

OGPS; Anna Ferus, International Policy Analyst, OGPS; Azada Hafiz, Team Lead, International 

Arrangements, OGPS; Sema Hashemi, Senior International Policy Advisor, OGPS; Barr Weiner, 

Senior Program Advisor, OGPS; Jessica Stewart, Program Advisor, OGPS; Harinder Chahal, 

Senior Public Health Advisor and Researcher, Office of Public Health Strategy and Analysis; 

Lionel Carter, Director, Office of Security and Emergency Management; Mark Russo, Director, 

Office of Emergency Management, OEM; Valerie Hall, Director, Program Operations and 

Coordination Staff, OEM; Joshua Simms, Program Manager, Office of Emergency Operations, 

OEM; Hilary Marston, Chief Medical Officer: and Vid Desai, Chief Information Office, Office of 

Digital Transformation.

###
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00420
- CR

Sean Patrick Bunker , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR
- 17
- 0391
- C , THE HONORABLE DAVID JUNKIN , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Sean Patrick Bunker ’ s brief was originally due November 16 , 20 20

. On Feb ruary 23, 202 1 , this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a
failure to f

i le a satisfactory response by March 18, 2021 , would result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38 .8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. T o date, no appellant ’ s brief has be en filed.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this ap peal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make

approp r iate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court s h all order the appropriate2

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records

— including all findings and orders

— to be prepared
and forwarded to this Court no later than April 2 1 , 20 21

. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered March 19 , 20 21

.

Before Chief Justice Byrne , Justices Bake r and Smith
Abated and Remanded
Filed: March 19, 2021
Do Not Publish
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1448

To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to convey the Coast Guard 

Cutter MACKINAW, upon its scheduled decommissioning, to the City 

and County of Cheboygan, Michigan, to use for purposes of a museum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to convey 

the Coast Guard Cutter MACKINAW, upon its scheduled 

decommissioning, to the City and County of Cheboygan, 

Michigan, to use for purposes of a museum.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF DECOMMISSIONED COAST 

4 GUARD CUTTER MACKINAW. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Upon the scheduled decommis6 sioning of the Coast Guard Cutter MACKINAW, the Com7 mandant of the Coast Guard shall convey all right, title, 

8 and interest of the United States in and to that vessel 
2

•HR 1448 IH 

1 to the City and County of Cheboygan, Michigan, without 

2 consideration, if—

3 (1) the recipient agrees—

4 (A) to use the vessel for purposes of a mu5 seum; 

6 (B) not to use the vessel for commercial 

7 transportation purposes; 

8 (C) to make the vessel available to the 

9 United States Government if needed for use by 

10 the Commandant in time of war or a national 

11 emergency; and 

12 (D) to hold the Government harmless for 

13 any claims arising from exposure to hazardous 

14 materials, including asbestos and poly15 chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), after conveyance 

16 of the vessel, except for claims arising from the 

17 use by the Government under subparagraph 

18 (C); 

19 (2) the recipient has funds available that will be 

20 committed to operate and maintain the vessel con21 veyed in good working condition, in the form of 

22 cash, liquid assets, or a written loan commitment, 

23 and in an amount of at least $700,000; and 

24 (3) the recipient agrees to any other conditions 

25 the Commandant considers appropriate. 
3

•HR 1448 IH 

1 (b) MAINTENANCE AND DELIVERY OF VESSEL.—

2 Prior to conveyance of the vessel under this section, the 

3 Commandant shall, to the extent practical, and subject to 

4 other Coast Guard mission requirements, make every ef5 fort to maintain the integrity of the vessel and its equip6 ment until the time of delivery. If a conveyance is made 

7 under this section, the Commandant shall deliver the ves8 sel at the place where the vessel is located, in its present 

9 condition, and without cost to the Government. The con10 veyance of the vessel under this section shall not be consid11 ered a distribution in commerce for purposes of section 

12 6(e) of Public Law 94–469 (15 U.S.C. 2605(e)). 

13 (c) OTHER EXCESS EQUIPMENT.—The Commandant 

14 may convey to the recipient any excess equipment or parts 

15 from other decommissioned Coast Guard vessels for use 

16 to enhance the vessel’s operability and function for pur17 poses of a museum.

Æ
Exhibit 10(iii)28


AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


          The
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008 between CH Energy
Group, Inc. and ___________________ (the “Agreement”) is amended, effective as
of December 31, 2008, as follows: 


          1.          Section
2(c) of the Agreement is hereby replaced and superseded in its entirety as
follows: 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
              “(c)     “Effective
 Date” means the first date during the Change of Control Period (as defined in
 Section 2(d)) on which a Change of Control occurs. Notwithstanding anything
 in this Agreement to the contrary, if (i) the Executive’s employment with
 Energy Group is terminated by Energy Group, (ii) the Date of Termination is
 prior to the date on which a Change of Control occurs, and (iii) it is
 reasonably demonstrated by the Executive that such termination of employment
 (A) was at the request of a third party that has taken steps reasonably
 calculated to effect a Change of Control or (B) otherwise arose in connection
 with or anticipation of a Change of Control, then for all purposes of this
 Agreement, the “Effective Date” means the date immediately prior to such Date
 of Termination, and the Executive shall be entitled to all payments and
 benefits under this Agreement as though the Executive had been terminated
 without Cause (as defined herein) during the Employment Period.”


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.           Except
 as explicitly set forth herein, the Agreement will remain in full force and
 effect.








	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.

	
 

	
EXECUTIVE


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	


	
 

	



	
               Steven
 V. Lant

	
 

	
 


	
               Chairman
 of the Board, President & 

	
 

	
 


	
               Chief
 Executive Officer
Thomas W. MORRIS, et al., petitioners v. GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION.

No. 12-1022.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 2 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 3 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 4 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 5 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 6 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 7 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00937 Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 8 of 8
Pierre ALMOND, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 12-8491.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Michigan, Wayne County, Criminal Division, denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK NICHOLSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NAPA COUNTY,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00596-HSG (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On February 6, 2017, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights action, 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The same day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that he had not paid the 

filing fee, nor had he filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The 

Clerk also notified Plaintiff that he had failed to sign his complaint. Along with the deficiency 

notices, Plaintiff was provided with a new IFP application, and instructions for completing it. 

Plaintiff was further cautioned that his failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay the 

filing fee within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this action. In addition, 

Plaintiff was advised that his failure to submit a signed complaint within twenty-eight days would 

result in the dismissal of this action. To date, Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, filed a 

completed IFP application, or filed a signed complaint. 

Accordingly, the instant case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter 

judgment and close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

3/31/2017

Case 4:17-cv-00596-HSG Document 8 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1440 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1440

    To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from imposing 
  penalties for indecent broadcasts on providers of video over cable 
television systems, satellite carriers, the Internet, or non-broadcast 
                               providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

 Mr. Sanders (for himself, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Paul, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
  McDermott, and Ms. Watson) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from imposing 
  penalties for indecent broadcasts on providers of video over cable 
television systems, satellite carriers, the Internet, or non-broadcast 
                               providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stamp Out Censorship Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    Section 503 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 503) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Indecency Authority Available Only With Respect to 
Broadcasting.--This section shall be construed to permit the Commission 
to impose a forfeiture penalty under this section with respect to any 
indecent utterance only if that utterance is broadcast by a radio or 
television broadcasting station.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11069]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950206040-5040-01; I.D. 042195B]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Yellowfin 
Sole

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for yellowfin sole by 
vessels using trawl gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
management area (BSAI). This action is necessary to prevent exceeding 
the first seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned to 
the trawl yellowfin sole fishery category in the BSAI.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), May 1, 1995, until 
12 noon, A.l.t., August 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    The first seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut for the 
BSAI trawl yellowfin sole fishery, which is defined at 
Sec. 675.21(b)(1)(iii)(B)(1), was established as 280 metric tons by the 
final 1995 initial specifications (60 FR 8479, February 14, 1995).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.21(c)(1)(iii), that the first seasonal bycatch allowance 
of Pacific halibut apportioned to the trawl yellowfin sole fishery in 
the BSAI has been caught. Therefore, NMFS is prohibiting directed 
fishing for yellowfin sole by vessels using trawl gear in the BSAI.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 675.21 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-11069 Filed 5-1-95; 4:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
|   | **Exhibit 21.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**Subsidiaries of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners LP as of December 31, 2008**

 

 

|  

**Name of Subsidiary**                  |   | **State or other Jurisdiction of**

**Incorporation or Organization** |   |  

**Ownership** |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners USA LLC       |   | Texas                                                                 |   | 100%                  |
| Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners Midstream LLC |   | Delaware                                                              |   | 100%                  |
|                                            |   |                                                                  |   |                  |
Joseph H. LAVIGNE, Jr., petitioner, v. Thomas McBRIDE, Warden

No. 12-9516.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
Linda SECREST, petitioner, v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION.

No. 12-1318.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 for May Drilling  Partnership  1983-1 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711308
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         191
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228
<PP&E>                                         7,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   461
<SALES>                                        124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  67
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                60
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            60
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  5.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  5.94
        



</TABLE>
Regulatory Procedures Manual March 2009 Chapter 7 Recall Procedures 

___________________________________________________________________________

7-62

Exhibit 7-6 

MODEL RECALL ENVELOPE 

 

 FIRST CLASS MAIL

 

JOHN DOE 

Somewhere, U.S.A. 12345 

 

 

 

A. B. C. Pharmacy 

Anywhere, U. S. A. 

 

 

(red print) URGENT: DRUG RECALL
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, petitioner, v. Naiel NASSAR.

No. 12-484.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 12, 2013.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

DIANA ROHRER, Individually and )

DIANA ROHRER and DAWN )

CUBBERNUSS as co-Administrators of )

The ESTATE OF DANIEL RICHARD )

ROHRER, Deceased, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC., aka NEW ENGLAND )

COMPOUNDING CENTER, AMERIDOSE)

LLC, ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL )

LLC, BARRY CADDEN, individually, )

LISA CADDEN, individually, and )

GREGORY CONIGLIARO, individually, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC, by counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.1, makes the following corporate disclosure: Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC does 

not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of 

Alaunus’s stock.

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 1 of 2
2

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

Attorneys for Defendants New England 

Compounding Pharmacy Inc., Alaunus 

Pharmaceutical, LLC; Barry Cadden; Lisa Cadden; 

and Gregory Conigliaro

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 4, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Richard W. Crowder

211 S Third St

Goshen IN 46526

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\9 - Rohrer\CAPTION.doc

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 127 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
         for the unveiling of a statue of Martha Hughes Cannon.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR THE UNVEILING OF MARTHA HUGHES 
              CANNON STATUE.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an 

              

event on December 11, 2024, to unveil a statue of Martha Hughes Cannon.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```