alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T Sept. 10, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 8- 15 53 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock et No. 0 7- 80 06 2- CR-KAM UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,

ve rs us CHARLIE W YNE, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Sep te m be r 10 , 20 09 ) Befo re CARNES, WILSON and COX, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: Ch arl ie W y ne ap pe al s hi s co nv ic ti on s fo r po ss es si on o f a f i rear m an d

am m un it io n by a co nv ic te d fel on ; po ss es si on wit h in te nt to di st rib ut e a t l e a s t fiv egr am s or m or e of co cai ne ba se ; an d kn owi ng ly carr y in g a fir ear m an d am m un it io n du rin g a n d in rel at io n to a dr ug tra ffi ck in g cri m e. W y ne arg ue s th e di st ric t co ur t ab us ed it s di sc ret io n whe n it de ni ed hi s req ue st fo r a r e c es s, whi ch pr ev en te d hi m fro m pre se nt in g t es ti m on y

fro m a de fen se wit ne ss . The pa rti es ag ree th e di st ric t co ur t’s de ni al of t h i s mo t i o n fo r a rece ss is

rev ie wed fo r an ab us e of di sc ret io n. Howev er, we are pr ecl ud ed “ fro m rev ie win g an is su e rai se d on ap pe al if it ha s be en waiv ed th ro ug h th e do ct rin e o f in vi te d erro r.”
Uni te d St at es v. Bra nn an , 56 2 F.3 d 1 3 0 0 , 1 3 0 6 (1 1t h Ci r. 20 09 ) (em ph as is an d ci ta ti on om it te d) . The “ do ct rin e of in vi te d erro r is im pl ic at ed whe n a pa rty in du ces

or in vi te s th e di st ric t co ur t in to m ak in g an erro r.” Id ( qu ot in g Uni te d St at es v. St on e , 13 9 F .3d 82 2, 8 38 (11 th Cir . 19 98 ).
W e do no t fin d th e co ur t ab us ed it s di sc ret io n whe n it refu se d W y ne ’s req ue st fo r a r e c e ss . Bu t ev en if th e co ur t erre d, W y ne in vi te d th e erro r of whi ch he no w

co m pl ai ns . Dur in g tri al , a de fen se wit ne ss fai le d to ap pe ar at he r sc he du le d ti m e of
9: 00 a.m . W y ne to ld th e co ur t th at he wou ld ex cl ud e h er as a wit ne ss if sh e di d no t arri ve by 10 :0 0 a.m . (R.6 -1 14 at 21 .) Afte r W y ne ’s de fen se wit ne ss fai le d to arri ve by hi s se lf- im

po se d de ad li ne , th e di st ric t co ur t pr oc eed ed wit h th e tri al

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm W y ne ’s con vi ct io ns an d s en te nc es . AFFIR MED.

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1231]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Crown Crafts, Inc., Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value) 
File No. 1-7604

January 11, 1995.
    Crown Crafts, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex, 
the Security is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). 
The Security commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening of business 
on December 16, 1994 and concurrently therewith the Security was 
suspended from trading on the Amex.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing on the 
Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant in maintaining the dual listing of its Security on the NYSE 
and on the Amex. The Company does not see any particular advantage in 
the dual trading of the Security and believes that dual listing would 
fragment the market for the Security.
    Any interested person may, on or before February 2, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Amex 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Marketing Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-1231 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Sunni ALI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9439.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Howard A. MONIZ, petitioner, v. Kenneth T. McKEE, Warden.

No. 12-9765.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12008]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ended May 
5, 1995

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: 50320
Date filed: May 2, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: MV/PSC/102 dated March 15, 1995, MVS068--Assignment of Airline 
Code Numbers
Proposed Effective Date: June 1, 1995

Docket Number: 50323
Date filed: May 4, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: CAC/Reso/181 dated April 28, 1995, Finally Adopted Resolutions 
r-1 to r-9
Proposed Effective Date: October 1, 1995
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-12008 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
John Wentzell DOWNS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10319.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE DOCUMENTS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

sf-3755783 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, AND OTTO 

TRUCKING LLC’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

REMOVE DOCUMENTS 

Trial Date: October 2, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 226 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE DOCUMENTS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3755783 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Having reviewed and considered Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, 

and Otto Trucking LLC’s Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents, Docket Nos. 133-1, 

133-3, 134-1, and 134-3, which Defendants filed on April 4, 2017, and good cause appearing 

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion shall be granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April ___, 2017 

HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP 

United States District Court Judge 

12

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 226 Filed 04/12/17 Page 2 of 2
In re Michael R. SHEMONSKY, petitioner.

No. 12-9576.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Exhibit
        32.1
  Certification*
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Lynn Two, Inc., (the “Company”), on Form
        10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”) pursuant to the
        requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
        of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Hilary Davis, the
        principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company,
        hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:
  1. The
        Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
  2. The
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
        for
        the period covered by the Periodic Report.
 
 Date:
                  April 12, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Hilary
                  DavisHilary
                  DavisPrincipal
                  Executive Officer andPrincipal
                  Financial Officer
 
 *  This
        certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not
        deemed
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
        by reference into any filing of Lynn Two, Inc. under the Securities Act of
        1933,
        as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
        before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any general
        incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. II 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       57
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          35,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,384)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,649
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (10)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


<PAGE>


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-HY9
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HY9


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                         Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11323]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. TQ95-3-23-000 and TM95-9-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1995, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company 
(ESNG) tendered for filing an Out-Of-Cycle Quarterly Purchased Gas 
Adjustment for certain revised tariff sheets included in Appendix A 
attached to the filing. Such sheets are proposed to be effective May 1, 
1995.
    ESNG states that the tariff sheets are being filed pursuant to 
section 154.308 of the Commission's Regulations and Sections 21 and 23 
of the General Terms and Conditions of ESNG's FERC Gas Tariff to 
reflect changes in ESNG's jurisdictional rates. The sales rates set 
forth thereon reflect an overall decrease of ($0.0163) per dt in the 
Demand Charge, and an overall increase of $0.2022 per dt in the 
Commodity Charge as measured against ESNG's regularly scheduled 
Quarterly PGA, Docket No. TQ95-2-23-000, et. al., with rates in effect 
as of May 1, 1995.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of the filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11323 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Jose Luis GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-71786, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Reynold E. Finnegan, Esq., Finnegan *&*Diba, A Law Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC — District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Janice K Redfern, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance, without opinion, of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination, *see Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir. 2003). We review de novo both constitutional claims, *Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267,1271 (9th Cir.2001), and the IJ’s legal determinations, *Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft,*277 F.3d 1137, 1145 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition.

Gonzalez’s contention that the BIA’s decision to streamline his appeal was incorrect because the IJ erred in finding the period of his continuous physical presence ended when the Notice to Appear was served lacks merit. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(l); *Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291*F.3d 594, 598 (9th Cir.2002). Gonzalez’s due process challenge to the BIA’s summary affirmance of the IJ’s decision is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche. See*350 F.3d at 849-52.

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), Gonzalez’s motion for a stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the motion for stay of removal was continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, *nunc pro tunc,*to the filing of the motion for stay of removal, and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12063]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2772]


New York (and Contiguous Counties in Connecticut and New Jersey); 
Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    Westchester County and the contiguous counties of Bronx, Putnam, 
and Rockland in the State of New York; Fairfield County in the State of 
Connecticut; and Bergen County in the State of New Jersey constitute a 
disaster area as a result of damages caused by a fire which occurred on 
April 25 in the City of Mount Vernon. Applications for loans for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster may be filed until the 
close of business on July 10, 1995 and for economic injury until the 
close of business on February 12, 1996 at the address listed below: 
U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow 
Blvd. South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303, or other locally 
announced locations.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere..............      4.000
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere.......................................      4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere.......................................      7.125
For Economic Injury                                                     
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere................................      4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damage are 
277205 for New York; 277305 for Connecticut; and 277405 for New Jersey. 
For economic injury the numbers are 851100 for New York; 851200 for 
Connecticut; and 851300 for New Jersey.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: May 10, 1995.
Cassandra M. Pulley,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-12063 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of All American
Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), I, JBrent Welke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: January 6, 2011

/s/ Brent Welke

Brent WelkeChief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to All American
Gold Corp. and will be retained by All American Gold Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---