alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.115  


EXTENSION AGREEMENT


Bank
of America, N.A.,

as Administrative Agent

231 South LaSalle Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604 



Ladies
and Gentlemen: 


        The
undersigned hereby agrees to extend, effective December 4, 2003, its Commitment and the Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2001, among
SOURCECORP, Incorporated (formerly known as F.Y.I., Incorporated), each of the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead
arranger and sole book agent (as the same has been amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement") to April 1, 2006,
pursuant to Section 2.1(d) of the Credit Agreement. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined. 



        This
Extension Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of Texas. This Extension Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 



	 	 	HIBERNIA NATIONAL BANK
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Michael R. Geissler

	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Michael R. Geissler

	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	Vice President






Agreed
and Accepted: 



	SOURCECORP, INCORPORATED	 	 
	

By:	
 	

/s/ Barry L. Edwards
	
 	

 
	 	 	Name:	 	Barry L. Edwards
	 	 
	 	 	Title:	 	EVP & CFO
	 	 
	

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Administrative Agent
	

By:	
 	

/s/ Suzanne M. Paul
	
 	

 
	 	 	Name:	 	Suzanne M. Paul
	 	 
	 	 	Title:	 	Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350,
as adopted), Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report
to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    ROBERT G. GARGUSRobert G. Gargus,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: August 3, 2007
1

CARES Act Volume reporting 

from an OTC Perspective –

Perrigo
2

Objective

• About Perrigo

• Perrigo CARES Act Project Initiation-submission

• Suggestions

• Summary
3

Perrigo

Perrigo intro
4

Insert Ron

Janish data ✓ Cosmetics

✓ NDA/ANDA OTC

Product Classifications

✓ Medical Devices

✓ Dietary Supplements

✓ Infant Formula

28 Manufacturing 

Facilities

~52 Billion Solid 

Doses/Year 

~23 Billion Liquid 

Doses/Year

~3,000 Formulations 

~14,000 SKUs

Perrigo is One of the World’s Largest OTC Companies

Perrigo Overview
5

Perrigo- Overview

Store 

Brand 

Customers

Registrations

Drug 

Listings
6

CARES Act Project

• Drug Product Volume reporting Requirements

Interpretation

• Kick-off Meeting

▪ Core Team Established

▪ Review Report Criteria
7

CARES ACT Project- Data Dive

1. WHAT system(s) contain the data?

2. WHO can extract the data?

3. HOW can a report be created in the required format with the

required data?

SAP Excel
8

CARES ACT Project- challenges and successes

Interpretation/

Translation

Timing Submission
9

CARES ACT Project- interpretation / translation

Release

Manufacturer

Contract manufacturer
10

CARES ACT 2020 Report-Timing/Submission

DAY 110

2020 Drug Volume Reporting Due Date

Day 1

Drug Volume 

Reporting Guidance 

Issues

Day 8

Perrigo Drug 

Volume Reporting 

Project Kick-off 

Day 90

Perrigo Report

Ready

Days 104-107

Perrigo Submission

of 2020 Drug 

Volume Report
11

CARES ACT -2021 Report-Timing/Submission

Day 117

2021 Drug Volume Reporting

preparation initiated

Day 117 – 195

Reviewing 2020 report results

Confirming Interpretation

Day 195-210

Submission of Perrigo Drug

Volume Reports

Day 200

Non-binding due date
12

CARES ACT Report summary

• Perrigo Report data

2020 2021

Submission dates February 9-11, 2022 May 11-26, 2022

# Reports 22 5

Total rows of data 56,174 81,198

Total # of NDCs 4,321 6,246
13

Suggestions

1. Are there future plans to align the definition of

operations among the various requirements?

2. Are there considerations being given to limit the

focus to yearly volumes for medically necessary

drug products?

3. Has there been any consideration to extend the

February due date to later in the year?
14

Summary

Was it difficult?

Did it test our systems?

Did it stretch our understanding of our internal systems and 

FDA requirements?
15

THE END
Ronald WHEELER, petitioner, v. James MORGAN, et al.

No. 12-8948.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc.







/s/ Eric T. Jones

DATE:  November 13, 2009

Eric R. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 3:12-CR-3 RM 

)

ROBERT PULLIAM )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations upon a plea of guilty issued on April 24, 2013. Accordingly, the

court ADOPTS those findings and recommendations [docket # 23], ACCEPTS

defendant Robert Pulliam’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count

3 of the Indictment, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: May 17, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court

Northern District of Indiana
**Exhibit 34.4**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of November 30, 2008, and for the period from December 1, 2007 throughNovember 30, 2008, except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)–(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)–(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i)–(ii), and 1122(d)(4)(iv)–(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable tothe activities performed by them with respect to the servicing Platform covered by this report. Refer to Appendix A of management’s assertion for the asset-backed transactions covered by this Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform,and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of November 30, 2008, and for the period from December 1, 2007 through November 30, 2008, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects. 

 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 6, 2009 

 

2
May 30, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, 
during the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress the Speaker of the House and 
the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting 
jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and 
the Minority Leader of the Senate,

              

 may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to 
assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99

           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                           FORM 10-QSB MARCH 31, 1998


Supplementary information required pursuant to section 9.4 of the partnership
agreement:

1. Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended March
   31, 1998:

      Net Income                                                 $  3,000
      Add:     Depreciation and amortization                       46,000
      Less:    Equity in income of Local Limited Partnerships     (19,000)
               Cash to reserves                                    (3,000)
                                                                 --------
      Cash Available for Distribution                            $ 27,000
                                                                 ========
      Distributions allocated to General Partners                $  2,000
                                                                 ========
      Distributions allocated to Limited Partners                $ 25,000
                                                                 ========


2. Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the General
   Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended March 31, 1998:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Entity Receiving                                      Form of
            Compensation                                     Compensation                                Amount
            ------------                                     ------------                                ------
         <S>                                    <C>                                                      <C>
         General Partners                       Interest in Cash Available for Distribution              $2,000

         WFC Realty Co., Inc.
         (Initial Limited Partner)              Interest in Cash Available for Distribution              $    5
</TABLE>


                                   12 of 12
Joseph A. DANIELS, petitioner, v. Benjamin A. WRIGHT, Warden.

No. 12-9074.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Erroll Flynn SHEPARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9820.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Howard A. MONIZ, petitioner, v. Kenneth T. McKEE, Warden.

No. 12-9765.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00476

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M., A CHILD

From the 454th Judicial District Court

, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 11

- 26159

- CV Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter ’s record is due on November 8, 2021. On November 3, 2021, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting until December 1, 2021 , to file the reporter’s record. W e GRANT IN PART the court reporter ’s requested extension and ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before November 18, 2021. The court reporter is reminded that this is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental righ ts . Consequently, each extension of the deadline to file the reporter’s record must not exceed 10 days

, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c); cumulative extensions must not exceed 30 days, absent extraordinary circumstances

, see id. R. 28.4(b)(2); and this appeal must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed

, s ee T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

__________ _______________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of November, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
Marciael OWENS, petitioner, v. Kathy SEABOLT, Warden.

No. 12-1034.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Habersham County, denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Niagara Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Scharf, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Scharf
-------------------------
Michael Scharf
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Henry ANEKWU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9768.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
case 2:13-cv-00147-RL-PRC document 6 filed 05/17/13 page 1 of 2
Atlorney or Parly wilhout Allorney: 

LEMBERG & ASSOCIATES LLC ATTORNEYS AT LA 

1100 SUMMER STREET, 3RD FLOOR 

STAMFORD, CT 06905 

Telephone No: 202, 653-2250 FAX No: 202 653-3424 

crosenstock@lemberglaw.com 

Attorneyfor: Plaintiff 

Ref No. or File No.: 

8222-001 

Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court: 

United States District Court - Northern District Of Indiana. Hammond Division 

Plaintiff: BEN KITCHENS 

Defendant: WORLDWIDE RECOVERIES, LLC 

For Court Use Only 

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVIC E 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE 

Hearing Dale: Time: Depl/Div: Case Number: 

213CV147 

/. At the time of sei'viee I was at least 18 years of age and noi a party to this action. 

2. I served copies ofthe SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION; COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; APPEARANCE OF 

COUNSEL. 

3. a. Party seiyed: 

b. Person seiyed: 

PR & ASSOCIATES 

DAN SHIELLIE, MANAGER, PERSON AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT SERVICB 

OF PROCESS 

4. Address where the party was served: 2414 S. FAIRVIEW STREET, SUITE 210 

SANTA ANA, CA 92704 

5. I seiyed the party: 

a. by personal service. I personaiiy deiivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive 

process for the party (1) on: Mon., May. 13,2013 (2) at; 1:35PM 

6. The "Notice to the Person Seiyed" (on the Summons) was completed as follows: 

on behalf of PR & ASSOCIATES 

Other: A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION, FORM UNKNOWN, under CCP 415.95. 

7. Person Who Served Papers: 

a. ALAN THOMAS 

www.kernl$gal. com 

Fee for Seiyice: $62.50 

I Declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 

INDIANA that the foregoing is true and correct. 

1614 W Temple Street, Los AnselesC A 90026 

(213) -433.4900 • Fax: (213) 483-7777 

Protesslons! Legal Services end Photocopying at an aflordaljle pticel 

(iSignalureJ 

8. STA TE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF d^S /f/^ 4 ^'^ 

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this /^'^^ day of A//^/^. J>o/_B by ALAN THOMAS 

proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. 

MICHAEL KERN 

COMM. #1877757 5 

NOTARY PUBLI C • CALIFORNI A 

L O S ANGELE S COUNT Y 

Comm. Exp. JAN. 22, 2014 

AFFIDAVIT QFSERVICET " 

SUMMONS IN A CIVI L CASK 2673.144238 

case 2:13-cv-00147-RL-PRC document 6 filed 05/17/13 page 2 of 2