alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Anto nio, Texas

April 2, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00149

- CV

EX PARTE RUBEN RIOS

,

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- W

- 0521 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A copy of appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on March 14, 2019 . The clerk of the court notified the appellant in writing that our records did not reflect that the filing fee in the amount of $20 5 was paid. In addition, our record contains no evidence that appellant is excused by statute or rule from paying the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, 20. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days of the date of this order that either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the filing fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, 42.3(c ).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 2nd day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
13.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Cell Kinetics Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Asaf Ben-Arye, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
June 30, 2008




/s/
      Asaf Ben-Arye
              Name:
      Asaf Ben-Arye
              Title:
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------


           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
           ----------------------------------------------------------
                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2002
                            -------------------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential
Associates III, A Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB or
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  August 13, 2002              /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael L. Ashner
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 13, 2002              /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Thomas C. Staples
                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                    14 of 14
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Parallel Technologies, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Parallel  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A. Little,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 16, 2004                               By:    /s/ Glenn A. Little
      -------------                                  ---------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Parallel  Technologies,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Parallel
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1239 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1239

To require notice of exceptions applied by the Department of Defense to 
    certain requirements to procure items made in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2005

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require notice of exceptions applied by the Department of Defense to 
    certain requirements to procure items made in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Berry Amendment Notification Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO DOMESTIC SOURCE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Notice.--Section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(k) Notification Required Within 7 Days After Contract Award If 
Certain Exceptions Applied.--In the case of any contract for the 
procurement of an item described in subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) 
of subsection (b)(1), if the Secretary of Defense or of the military 
department concerned applies an exception set forth in subsection (c) 
or (e) with respect to that contract, the Secretary shall, not later 
than 7 days after the award of the contract, post a notification that 
the exception has been applied on the Internet site maintained by the 
General Services Administration known as FedBizOps.gov (or any 
successor site).''.
    (b) Clothing Materials and Components Covered.--Subsection (b) of 
section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, is amended in paragraph 
(1)(B) by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``and the 
materials and components thereof, other than sensors, electronics, or 
other items added to, and not normally associated with, clothing (and 
the materials and components thereof)''.
                                 <all>
```
Walter J. BRZOWSKI, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 12-8872.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01980-00104/9053641.1

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939 

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL JANOSKO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL 

JANOSKO 

ENTIRE DOCUMENT FILED UNDER 

SEAL
Office of Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Operations 

Investigations

Operations Manual 

2023

FO

O

D

AND

DRUG ADMINISTRATION

INVESTIGATOR

F D A

D• EPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERV CI ES • USA

PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Investigations

Operations Manual 

2023

Office of Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Operations
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25255-25256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11689]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-5590]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Fluke Corporation, Common Stock, $.25 Par Value; 
Common Stock Purchase Rights With Respect to Common Stock, $.25 Par 
Value)

May 5, 1995.
    Fluke Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
securities (``Securities'') from listing and 
[[Page 25256]] registration on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. 
(``Amex'') and Pacific Stock Exchange Incorporated (``PSE'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the 
Securities from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex 
and PSE, the Securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 
(``NYSE''). The Securities commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening 
of business on April 10, 1995 and concurrently therewith the Securities 
were suspended from trading on the Amex and PSE.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Securities from listing on 
the Amex and PSE, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs 
and expenses attendant in maintaining the listing on such exchanges in 
addition to the listing on the NYSE. The Company does not see any 
significant advantage in the trading of the Securities on three 
exchanges and believes that such additional listings would cause 
confusion and fragment the market for the Securities.
    Any interested person may, on or before May 26, 1995 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether the 
application has been made in accordance with the rules of the exchanges 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11689 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### Robert VIZZINI, Petitioner—Appellant, v. WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-7825.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 28, 2004.

Decided May 6, 2004.

Mark Lawrence Gitomer, Law Office of Mark Gitomer, Owings Mills, Maryland, for Appellant. Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Robert Vizzini, a Maryland inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for reconsideration and dismissing as untimely Vizzini’s petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 *158U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certifícate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vizzini has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Jose Garcia RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. K. PEARSON, et al.

No. 12-8590.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1157]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-2; RM-8502]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Charlotte Amalie, Virgin Islands

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Virgin 
Islands Youth Development Radio, Inc., proposing the allotment of 
Channel 275A at Charlotte Amalie, Virgin Islands, and its reservation 
for noncommercial educational use. Channel 275A can be allotted to 
Charlotte Amalie in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance 
separation requirements with the imposition of a site restriction of 
10.6 kilometers (6.6 miles) northwest. The coordinates for Channel 275A 
at Charlotte Amalie are North Latitude 18-21-20 and West Longitude 64-
01-45.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 6, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before March 21, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Leo 
Morone, President, Virgin Islands Youth Development Radio, Inc., P.O. 
Box 2477, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00803 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 634-6530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-2, adopted January 4, 
1995, and released January 12, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 
140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-1157 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Ramon Deshawn BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9511.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Romona Uvalle IBARRA and Maribel I. Rodriguez, petitioners, v. CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS, et al

No. 12-9259.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, denied.
Richard Dale MONTGOMERY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9607.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00040-RL-APR   document 1   filed 03/18/13   page 1 of 2

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00040-RL-APR   document 1   filed 03/18/13   page 2 of 2
Marshall Lee GORE, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 12-8829.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Edward Ronald STAMPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10293.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Dwayne BALLINGER, Jr., petitioner, v. John PRELESNIK, Warden.

No. 12-10210.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 18 

FILED UNDER SEAL

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1528-18 Filed 09/12/17 Page 1 of 1
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Donna PING, Executrix of the Estate of Alma Calhoun Duncan, Deceased.

No. 12-652.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

*1997Motion of Extendicare Health Services, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 14, 2005

Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Chief Judge

 Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

 Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

Thomas J. Moriarty, Trustee on Behalf of the Local ]

Union No. 727, I.B.T. Pension Trust, and the ]

Teamsters Local Union No. 727 Health and ] Appeals from the United

Welfare Trust, ] States District Court for 

] the Northern District of

Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, ] Illinois, Eastern Division.

]

Nos. 03-1699 and 03-1743 v. ] No. 96-C-7392

]

JAMES F. SVEC, individually and doing business as ] George W. Lindberg,

SVEC & SONS FUNERAL HOME and doing business as ] Judge.

WEST SUBURBAN LIVERY, ]

]

Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. ]

O R D E R

The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on November 21, 2005, is hereby amended

as follows:

On Page 8, the last paragraph, lines 5-7 should be replaced with:

requested in prior relevant arguments before this Court

and the district court. Svec may not now reverse course

and adopt a contrary position. The...
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1393 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

make volunteer members of the Civil Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety 

Officer death benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Ms. HOOLEY (for herself, Mr. MCCOTTER, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, 

Mr. CUMMINGS, and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to make volunteer members of the Civil 

Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety Officer death benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Air Patrol Home5 land Security Benefits Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1393 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CIVIL AIR PATROL FOR PUBLIC 

2 SAFETY OFFICER DEATH BENEFITS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1204(8) of the Omnibus 

4 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

5 3796b(8)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

7 (B); 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(C) a volunteer civilian member of the 

13 Civil Air Patrol who is engaged in— 

14 ‘‘(i) active service, rendered in per15 formance or support of operational mis16 sions of the Civil Air Patrol under the di17 rection of the Department of the Air 

18 Force, if such service has, and is per19 formed consistent with, written authoriza20 tion from competent authority that speci21 fies a finite assignment and a finite period 

22 of time for such assignment; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) travel to or from such service.’’. 

24 (b) CONSULTATION.—Section 1205 of such Act (42 

25 U.S.C. 3796c) is amended by adding at the end the fol26 lowing new subsection: 
3 

•HR 1393 IH 

1 ‘‘(d) In making determinations under section 1201 

2 with respect to the eligibility of a volunteer civilian mem3 ber of the Civil Air Patrol, the Bureau may consult with 

4 the Secretary of the Air Force and, if so, the Secretary 

5 of the Air Force shall provide to the Bureau such assist6 ance and information as the Bureau considers necessary.’’. 

Æ