alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
我叫玛丽。我的故事将会改变你的生活。

我半夜觉得不舒服,但是第二 我应该待在家里,但是已经感觉 工作时,我没戴手套就拿起了薯条。 有一个家庭正在为他们的儿子吉斯·

天还得继续工作。 好多了。我不知道手上也携带了 安东尼奥举办4岁生日派对。

细菌。

吉斯·安东尼奥非常喜欢我做的薯条。 当我在家养病时,各种报道涌向卫生部门。共有超过20人 如果时间能够倒退,我那天一定不会去上

一个小时之后因为再次感觉不舒服,我 在我们的餐厅用餐后生病。他们确认是我为这些生病的人 班。我自己也有孩子,小吉斯·安东尼奥在

请假回家。我病了两天多。 提供食物的。 我脑海始终挥之不去。是我害他生病。

维护众人健康:如果生病请待在家里。
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Textron Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen A. Giliotti, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                    /s/ Stephen A. Giliotti
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Stephen A. Giliotti
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  November 8, 2002


                                       29
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25246-25247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11626]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Finding of No Significant Impact for Incidental Take Permits for 
the Construction of Single Family Residences at the Specific Site 
Locations Indicted Below in Travis County, Texas

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has prepared 
Environmental Assessments for issuance of Section 10(a)(1)(B) permits 
for the incidental take of the Federally endangered golden-cheeked 
warbler Dendroica chrysoparia) during the construction and operation of 
single-family residences in Travis County, Texas.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action is the issuance of permits under Section 
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act to authorize the incidental 
take of the golden-cheeked warbler.
    The Applicant (Rex B. Rivers) plans to construct a single-family 
residence at the specific site indicated as Lot 4, Critter Canyon 
Subdivision (6.65 acre lot) aka 8402 Critter Canyon, Austin, Travis 
County, Texas (PRT-799945).
    The Applicant (Wayne Bell) plans to construct a single-family 
residence at the site indicated as Lot 22, Blue Hills Estates (3.95 
acres) aka 6500 Distant View, Austin, Travis County, Texas (PRT-
799946).
    The proposed construction and operation of the single-family 
residences will comply with all local, State, and Federal environmental 
regulations addressing environmental impacts associated with this type 
of development. Details of the mitigation are provided in the 
individual Environmental Assessment/Habitat Conservation Plans. These 
conservation plan actions ensure that the criteria established for 
issuance incidental take permits will be fully satisfied.

Alternatives Considered

    1. Proposed action,
    2. Alternate site locations,
    3. Alternative site designs,
    4. Wait for issuance of a regional Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit,
    5. No action. [[Page 25247]] 

Determination

    Based upon information contained in the Environmental Assessment/
Habitat Conservation Plans, the Service has determined that these 
actions are not major Federal actions which would significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment with the meaning of section 
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 
Accordingly, the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements on the 
proposed action is not warranted.
    It is my decision to issue the section 10(a)(1)(B) permits for the 
construction and operation of the single-family residences at the sites 
specified above in Travis County, Texas.
John E. Cross,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-11626 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Exhibit 10.31


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE


WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.


1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


This Second Amendment to the
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is made this 30th
day of June, 2002, effective June 30, 2002.


 


RECITALS


 


A.                                   The Board of Directors adopted the Western
Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).


 


B.                                     Section 4(d) of the Plan authorizes the Board
of Directors to amend the Plan.


 


C.                                     The Board of Directors desires to amend the
Plan to make the modifications set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is amended as
follows:


 


1.                                       Section 9.e. is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following:


 


e.                                       Options may be exercised, in whole or in
part, by the surrender (or delivery) to the Company of previously acquired
shares of Company common stock held for greater than six months. This method of
exercise is to include the constructive exchange (or surrendering) of Company
stock already owned and held for greater than six months (“Payment Shares”) in
payment for the shares to be received under the option exercise in lieu of
actually tendering such Company stock to the Company. If the Payment Shares are
held by a registered securities broker for the optionee in “street name,” the
optionee will provide the Company with a notarized statement attesting to the
number of shares owned that are intended to serve as Payment Shares. If the
Company stock certificates are actually held by the optionee, he shall provide
the Company with their certificate numbers. Upon receipt of a notarized
statement regarding ownership of the Payment Shares, or upon confirmation of
ownership of the Payment Shares by reference to Company records, the Company
shall treat the Payment Shares as being constructively exchanged. The Company
shall then issue to the employee a certificate for a net number of shares: the
number of shares subject to the option exercise less the number of Payment
Shares. The exchange price for the Payment Shares under the respective option
exercise will be the Fair Market Value of the Company common stock as
determined in 2.g. above as of the effective date of the exchange.


 






















 


2.                                       Except
as hereby amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Board of
Directors and its provisions shall remain in full force and effect.


 


ADOPTED by the
Board of Directors of Western Gas  Resources,
Inc. effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


	
   

  	
  WESTERN GAS
  RESOURCES, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/
  John C. Walter

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title  

  	
  Executive Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1171]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Consent Decree in Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Action

    In accordance with the Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. Ralph Riehl, et 
al., Civil Action No. 89-226, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on December 29, 
1994.
    On October 16, 1989, the United States filed a complaint against 
the owners and operator of, and certain transporters to, the Millcreek 
Dump Superfund Site (the ``Site''), pursuant to Section 107(a) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). In September 1991, the United States added 
additional defendants to the action, including Transplastics, Inc. 
(Transplastics). This proposed Consent Decree resolves Transplastics' 
liability for the response costs incurred and to be incurred by the 
United States at the Site. The proposed Consent Decree requires 
Transplastics to pay $500,000.00 in reimbursement of response costs.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication 
of this notice. Please address comments to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of 
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044 and 
refer to United States v. Ralph Riehl, et al., DOJ No. 90-11-3-519.
    Copies of the proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office 
of the United States Attorney, Western District of Pennsylvania, 
Federal Building and Courthouse, room 137, 6th and States Streets, 
Erie, Pennsylvania, 15219; Region III Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19107; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th 
Floor, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 624-0892). A copy of the proposed 
Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. When 
requesting a copy of the proposed Consent Decree, please enclose a 
check in the amount of $3.50 (twenty-five cents per page reproduction 
costs) payable to the ``Consent Decree Library.''
John C. Cruden,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-1171 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Morton BERGER, petitioner, v. Tom HORNE, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

No. 13-391.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31**CERTIFICATION**     I, Susan K. Rosburg, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kiewit Royalty Trust, for which U.S.Bank National Association acts as Trustee;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such procedures to beestablished and maintained, for the registrant and I have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant ismade known to me by others within the registrant, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on my evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent Iconsider reasonable on information provided to me by Amber Brewster, Bank of Oklahoma.Date:November 9, 2007      /s/ Susan K. Rosburg  Susan K. Rosburg Vice President and Trust Officer  U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
Anthony L. HUNT, petitioner, v. Donald BARROW, Warden.

No. 12-8916.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Telfair County, denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

CAROLYN MALONEY c/o DENNY 

MALONEY, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN

JUDGE PHILIP P. SIMON 

AMERIDOSE, LLC’S CORPORATE 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Defendant Ameridose, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, makes the 

following corporate disclosure: 

Ameridose does not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held corporation owns 

10% or more of Ameridose’s stock. 

Dated this 21st day of February, 2013 

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 3
2 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue 

Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

 

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 2 of 3
3 

013260.000011 1592823.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 21, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxtor Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul J.
Tufano, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                                  /s/ Paul J. Tufano
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Paul J. Tufano
                                                  PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                                                  OFFICER

Date: August 2, 2004
KERNEL RECORDS OY, petitioner, v. Timothy Z. MOSLEY, fka Timbaland, et al.

No. 12-950.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000212 25-JUN-2013 08:25 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO
                         YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                  SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN (SERP)

York International Corporation (the "Employer") wishes to amend the York
International Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) (the
"Plan").

Accordingly, the Plan hereby is amended, as permitted under Section 7.04 of the
Plan, as follows:

         Effective January 1, 1997, Section 2.06 of the Plan is amended to read
         as follows:

         2.06 "Compensation" shall mean the regular or base salary or wages
         received by a Member from the Employer during a calendar year for
         personal services rendered plus the lesser of (a) or (b), defined as:

                  a)       Base "EV" bonus award percentage for the calendar
                           year times the Member's annual base salary as
                           December 31 of such calendar year, or

                  b)       Total bonus earned for the calendar year;

         and excluding: (i) contributions, credits or benefits paid or accrued
         under this Plan or any other qualified or non-qualified retirement
         plan, deferred compensation plan, welfare benefit plan or fringe
         benefit plan of the Employer, (ii) compensation resulting from grant
         (if the value of such grant would otherwise be excludable from the
         Member's gross income), exercise or cancellation of or vesting or lapse
         of restrictions with respect to stock options or stock awards or
         disposition of the underlying stock, (iii) reimbursement for expenses,
         or other expense allowances, (iv) moving expenses, (v) severance
         payments, and (vi) expatriation payments. In all cases, however, not
         withstanding any exclusion specified above, Compensation shall include
         any amount which would otherwise be deemed Compensation under this
         Section 2.06 but for the fact that it is deferred pursuant to a salary
         reduction agreement under any plan described in Section 401 (k), 402(h)
         or 125 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or under any
         non-qualified deferred compensation plan or agreement.

                  In all other respects, the Plan hereby is ratified and
                  affirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment to be
executed effective January 1, 1997.

WITNESS/ATTEST:                                YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

 /s/ R. A. King                                By: /s/ Jane G. Davis
--------------------------                       -------------------------------

Print Name: R. A. King                         Print Name: Jane G. Davis

                                               Title: Vice President, Secretary
                                                      & General Counsel

                                               Date: June 30, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

JERRY J. FOWLER and )

MICHELE FOWLER, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-126

)

NEW WERNER CO. d/b/a Werner Co., a )

Delaware corporation; NEW WERNER )

HOLDING CO. (DE), LLC d/b/a Werner )

Holding Co.; LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC., )

a North Carolina corporation; and LOWE’S )

HOME CENTERS, INC., a North Carolina )

corporation; )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This case was filed in this Court on April 22, 2013, based on diversity jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) Upon reviewing the original complaint, the

Court found the allegations of Defendant New Werner Holding Co. (DE), LLC’s (“Werner

Holding”) citizenship inadequate to establish diversity jurisdiction because Plaintiffs did not

allege the citizenship of Werner Holding’s members, which determines Werner Holding’s

citizenship. (Docket # 3); see Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998) (noting

that “the citizenship of an LLC for purposes of [ ] diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its

members”). As such, Plaintiffs were directed to file an amended complaint within twenty days

(Docket # 3), which they subsequently did (Docket # 4). The Amended Complaint alleges that

“[u]pon information and belief, no member of Werner Holding is a citizen of Indiana. Upon

information and belief, the members of Werner Holding are citizens of New York, Illinois,

1
Delaware, Connecticut, and/or the United Kingdom.” (Am. Compl. ¶ 4.)

The Amended Complaint, however, is still insufficient to establish Werner Holding’s

citizenship because it is well-settled that “[a]llegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may

not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek,

No. Civ. 06-753-GPM, 2006 WL 4017975, at *10 n.1 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 2006) (citing Am.’s Best

Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992)); Ferolie Corp. v.

Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28,

2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL 187411, at *2 (N.D.

Ill. Jan. 21, 2003); Multi-M Int’l, Inc. v. Paige Med. Supply Co., 142 F.R.D. 150, 152 (N.D. Ill.

1992). Consequently, Plaintiffs must amend their complaint to allege the citizenship of Werner

Holding’s members on personal knowledge rather than information and belief. And, rather than

merely alleging that none of Werner Holding’s members are Indiana citizens, and then alleging

what those members’ citizenships are without identifying them, Plaintiffs should affirmatively

allege who Werner Holding’s members are and what their citizenship is. 

Therefore, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to supplement the record by filing a Second

Amended Complaint on or before June 7, 2013, properly alleging on personal knowledge the

members of Defendant New Werner Holding Co. (DE), LLC and their citizenship.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 24th day of May, 2013.

/S/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge

2