25704 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–11806 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Monticello

Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is

hereby given of the following Advisory

Board Committee Meeting:

Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Monticello

Site.

DATES AND TIMES: Tuesday, May 16, 1995

6:30 p.m.-8:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Monticello City Hall,

Monticello, Utah 84535.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Berry, Public Affairs Specialist,

Department of Energy Grand Junction

Projects Office, P.O. Box 2567, Grand

Junction, CO, 81502 (303) 248–7727.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of the Board

The purpose of the Board is to advise

DOE and its regulators in the areas of

environmental restoration, waste

management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

The Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Monticello

Site, will be discussing issues related to

the reorganization of the advisory board.

Public Participation

The meeting is open to the public.

Written statements may be filed with

the Committee either before or after the

meeting. Individuals who wish to make

oral statements pertaining to agenda

items should contact Audrey Berry’s

office at the address or telephone

number listed above. Requests must be

received 5 days prior to the meeting and

reasonable provision will be made to

include the presentation in the agenda.

The Designated Federal Official is

empowered to conduct the meeting in a

fashion that will facilitate the orderly

conduct of business. Each individual

wishing to make public comment will

be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to

present their comments. This notice is

being published less than 15 days before

the date of the meeting, due to

programmatic issues that had to be

resolved prior to publication.

Minutes

The minutes of this meeting will be

available for public review and copying

at the Freedom of Information Public

Reading Room, 1E–190, Forrestal

Building, 1000 Independence Avenue,

SW, Washington, DC 20585 between

9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday,

except Federal holidays. Minutes will

also be available by writing to Audrey

Berry, Department of Energy Grand

Junction Projects Office, P.O. Box 2567,

Grand Junction, CO 81502, or by calling

her at (303)–248–7727.

Issued at Washington, DC on May 9, 1995.

Rachel M. Samuel,

Acting Deputy Advisory Committee

Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–11805 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Office of Fossil Energy

[FE Docket No. 95–25–NG]

American Hunter Exploration Ltd.;

Order Granting Blanket Authorization

to Export Natural Gas to Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of

the Department of Energy gives notice

that it has issued an order granting

American Hunter Exploration Ltd.

authorization to export up to 100 Bcf of

natural gas to Canada over a two-year

term beginning on the date of the first

export delivery.

This order is available for inspection

and copying in the Office of Fuels

Programs Docket Room, 3F–056,

Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence

Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585,

(202) 586–9478. The docket room is

open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Issued in Washington, D.C., April 28, 1995.

Clifford P. Tomaszewski,

Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels

Programs, Office of Fossil Energy.

[FR Doc. 95–11804 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

[FE Docket No. 95–24–NG]

CoWest Energy; Order Granting

Blanket Authorization to Import and

Export Natural Gas From and to

Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of

the Department of Energy gives notice

that it has issued an order granting

CoWest Energy blanket authorization to

import and export up to a combined

total of 400 Bcf of natural gas from and

to Canada over a two-year term

beginning on the date of first import or

export delivery.

This order is available for inspection

and copying in the Office of Fuels

Programs docket room, 3F–056,

Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585,

(202) 586–9478. The docket room is

open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Issued in Washington, D.C., April 28, 1995.

Clifford P. Tomaszewski,

Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels

Programs, Office of Fossil Energy.

[FR Doc. 95–11803 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG95–49–000, et al.]

Southern Electric Wholesale

Generators, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate

and Corporate Regulation Filings

May 5, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Southern Electric Wholesale

Generators, Inc.

[Docket No. EG95–49–000]

On April 28, 1995, Southern Electric

Wholesale Generators, Inc. (‘‘SEWG’’),

900 Ashwood Parkway, Suite 500,

Atlanta, Georgia 30338, filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an application for determination of

exempt wholesale generator status

pursuant to Part 365 of the

Commission’s Regulations.

SEWG is a Delaware corporation that

is engaged directly, or indirectly

through one or more affiliates as defined

in Section 2(a)(11)(B) of PUHCA, and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, all or part of one or more

eligible facilities and selling electric

energy at wholesale. The Commission

previously has determined that SEWG is

an EWG.

SEWG intends to acquire 100% of the

voting securities of Southern Energy

Marketing, Inc. (‘‘SEMI’’). Concurrent

with the filing of this application, SEMI

has filed its own application for EWG

status. SEMI owns an interest in an

eligible facility consisting of a 222 MW

coal-fired cogeneration facility that is

presently under construction in King

George County, Virginia.

Comment date: May 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices 25705

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Southern Energy Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. EG95–50–000]

On April 28, 1995, Southern Energy

Marketing, Inc. (‘‘SEMI’’), 900 Ashwood

Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia

30338, filed with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission an application

for determination of exempt wholesale

generator (‘‘EWG’’) status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

Regulations.

SEMI is a Delaware corporation that is

engaged directly, or indirectly through

one or more affiliates as defined in

Section 2(a)(11)(B) of PUHCA, and

exclusively in the business of owning or

operating, or both owning and

operating, all or part of one or more

eligible facilities and selling electric

energy at wholesale.

SEMI will own 5% of the voting

securities of SEI Birchwood, Inc. (‘‘SEI

Birchwood’’). The Commission

previously has determined that SEI

Birchwood is an EWG. SEI Birchwood

owns 50% of Birchwood Power

Partners, L.P. (‘‘Birchwood Partners’’).

Birchwood Partners is an EWG formed

to own and operate an eligible facility

consisting of a 222 MW coal-fired

cogeneration facility that is presently

under construction in King George

County, Virginia.

Comment date: May 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

3. Metropolitan Edison Company and

Pennsylvania Electric Company

[Docket No. EL95–41–000]

Take notice that on May 2, 1995,

Metropolitan Edison Company (Met Ed)

and Pennsylvania Electric Company

(Penelec), electric operating subsidiaries

of General Public Utilities Corporation

(GPU) filed a Petition for Enforcement

and for a Declaratory Order requesting

that the Commission institute an

enforcement action to enjoin and

declare unlawful, the Pennsylvania

Public Utilities Commission’s

(Pennsylvania PUC) rule for

determining the existence of a QF

developer’s legally enforceable

obligation to deliver capacity and

energy to a utility; the Pennsylvania

PUC’s determination of payments to

which QFs are entitled through reliance

on the estimated cost of a single

technology; the Pennsylvania PUC’s

application of that rate prescription in

alleged disregard of competitive

procurement programs that provide

evidence that capacity and energy are

available from other sources at

substantially lower prices; and the

Pennsylvania PUC’s calculation of

avoided costs on the basis of allegedly

stale data that overstate the utility’s

need for capacity and the cost of

alternative sources of power. The

Petition also requests that the

Commission declare, and through an

enforcement petition seek a

determination, that contracts and

commitments resulting from these

procedures are void ab initio.

Comment date: June 2, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Black Hills Corporation v. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. EL95–42–000]

Take notice that on May 2, 1995,

Black Hills Corporation, (Black Hills)

which conducts its utility business

under the name Black Hills Power and

Light Company, filed a complaint

against PacifiCorp and motion for

summary disposition. Black Hills

alleges that PacifiCorp has been

misapplying a formula rate contained in

its Rate Schedule No. 236 since 1987,

and continues to do so. Black Hills

seeks an order from the Commission by

summary disposition directing

PacifiCorp to comply with the filed rate

schedule and ordering refunds and

interest.

Comment date: June 5, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Rainbow Energy Marketing Corp.

[Docket No. ER94–1061–004]

Take notice that on April 17, 1995,

Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation

tendered for filing its quarterly report

for transactions entered into for the

quarter ending March 31, 1995,

pursuant to Commission’s letter order

dated June 10, 1994 in Docket No.

ER94–1061–000.

6. NorAm Energy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–1247–004]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

NorAm Energy Services, Inc. (NES)

tendered for filing its quarterly report

for transactions entered into pursuant to

NES’s Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 for the

first quarter of 1995. In addition NES

filed an amendment to the April 14,

1995 filing on April 24, 1995.

7. Delmarva Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–521–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Delmarva Power & Light Company

(Delmarva) of Wilmington, Delaware,

filed an amendment to its filing of an

eight year power supply contract (the

Service Agreement) under which

Delmarva will provide requirements

service to the City of Seaford, Delaware

(Seaford). Delmarva states that the

Service Agreement supersedes

Delmarva’s Rate Schedule No. 62 under

which Seaford currently receives

services.

Delmarva originally filed the Service

Agreement on a confidential basis.

Pursuant to Commission order,

Delmarva in its amended filing has

refiled the Service Agreement on a nonconfidential basis.

Delmarva, with Seaford’s

concurrence, requests an effective date

of February 1, 1995.

The Service Agreement provides for

the continuation of the requirements

service previously furnished Seaford

under Rate Schedule No. 62, but

changes certain terms and conditions.

The chief differences between the

Service Agreement and Rate Schedule

No. 62 are that the Service Agreement

establishes a new rate for Seaford which

is below the level of the rate currently

charged Seaford and provides for future

adjustments to the Seaford rate based on

changes in the level of Delmarva’s retail

rates. The Service Agreement has an

eight year term.

Delmarva states that the filing has

been posted and has been served upon

the affected customer and the Delaware

Public Service Commission.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Delmarva Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–524–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995,

Delmarva Power & Light Company

(Delmarva) of Wilmington, Delaware,

filed an amendment to its filing of an

eight-year power supply contract (the

Service Agreement) under which

Delmarva will provide requirements

service to four Delaware Municipal

customers, Lewes, Milford, Newark, and

New Castle, respectively and a

Dispatchable Service Agreement

between Delmarva and Lewes. Delmarva

states that the Service Agreement

supersedes Delmarva’s Rate Schedule

Nos. 61, 66, 67, and 69 under which

each customer previously received

requirements service from Delmarva.

Delmarva originally filed the Service

Agreements and Dispatchable
25706 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices

Generation Agreement on a confidential

basis. Pursuant to Commission order,

Delmarva in its amended filing has

refiled the Service Agreements on a

non-confidential basis.

Delmarva, with Seaford’s

concurrence, requests an effective date

of February 1, 1995.

The Service Agreement provides for

the continuation of the requirements

service previously furnished the

customer, but changes certain terms and

conditions. The chief differences

between the Service Agreement and the

service currently furnished under each

customers’ currently effective rate

schedule, are that the Service

Agreement establishes a new rate for the

customer which is below the level of the

rate currently charged the customer and

establish a base rate level for production

service that is to apply when the Service

Agreement becomes effective and

provides for annual escalations in the

base rate. The Service Agreement has an

eight-year term. The dispatchable

Service Agreement between Delmarva

and Lewes provides the terms and

conditions under which Lewes will

supply a portion of its own energy

needs and implements Article V of the

Service Agreement between Delmarva

and Lewes.

Delmarva states that the filing has

been posted and has been served upon

the affected customer and the Delaware

Public Service Commission.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Ocean State Power and Ocean State

Power II

[Docket Nos. ER95–533–002, ER95–530–002]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Ocean State Power and Ocean State

Power II (collectively ‘‘Ocean State’’)

tendered for filing copies of its

compliance filing in the abovereferenced dockets in response to

Ordering Paragraph (F) of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission’s March

30, 1995 Order Accepting For Filing

Proposed Return on Equity

Computations, Establishing and

Deferring Hearing Procedures, and

Consolidating Dockets, Ocean State

Power II, 70 FERC ¶ 61,370 (1995). The

filing includes the following revised

supplements (the ‘‘Supplements’’) to its

rate schedule with the Commission:

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 17 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 1

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 14 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 2

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 13 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 3

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 15 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 4

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 16 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 5

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 16 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 6

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 15 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 7

Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 16 to

Rate Schedule FERC No. 8

Copies of the Supplements have been

served upon all parties on the

Commission’s official service list in the

above-referenced proceedings.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. PSI Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. FA92–17–001]

Take notice that on July 11, 1994, PSI

Energy, Inc. tendered for filing its

refund report in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Dayton Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. FA93–66–001]

Take notice that on January 23, 1995,

Dayton Power & Light Company

tendered for filing its refund report in

the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Gordonsville Energy, L.P. (Unit I

and Unit II)

[Docket Nos. QF92–166–005, QF92–167–005,

and EL95–32–000]

On May 2, 1995, Gordonsville Energy,

L.P. (Gordonsville) tendered for filing a

supplement to its filing in these dockets.

This supplement pertains to technical

and operational aspects of the facility

and the status of the thermal host. No

determination has been made that this

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

Comment date: May 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Southeastern Power Administration

v. The Southern Company, Southern

Company Services, Inc., Alabama

Power Company, Georgia Power

Company, Gulf Power Company,

Mississippi Power Company, Savannah

Electric & Power Company

[Docket No. TX95–5–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1995, the

Southeastern Power Administration of

the United States Department of Energy,

2 Public Square, Elberton, GA 30635

(‘‘Southeastern’’), filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

Application requesting that the

Commission order Southern Company

Services, Inc. acting on behalf of the

Southern Company, Alabama Power

Company, Georgia Power Company,

Gulf Power Company, Mississippi

Power Company, and Savannah Electric

& Power Company (collectively,

‘‘Southern’’ or ‘‘Operating Companies’’),

to provide transmission services

pursuant to Section 211 of the Federal

Power Act.

Southeastern seeks a Commission

Order directing Southern to provide

firm network transmission service on an

integrated, single-system basis for

approximately 330 MW of capacity and

energy to be delivered by Southern to

Southeastern’s customers from ten

hydro-electric projects operated by the

U.S. Army Corp of Engineers in the

States of South Carolina, Georgia, and

Alabama. Southeastern requests that

Southern provide firm network

integration transmission service on a

single-system basis that is comparable to

the Operating Companies’ own native

load use of their integrated transmission

facilities, consistent with the

Commission’s comparability standard.

Southeastern also asks the Commission

to require transmission service over the

individual Operating Companies’

distribution facilities to certain of

Southeastern’s customers which are

served at distribution voltages on the

applicable Operating Company.

Southeastern further requests that

Southern be directed by the

Commission to provide back-up and

non-firm transmission services, and

certain ancillary and coordination

services that are integral and necessary

to the delivery of the capacity and

energy allocations to the Southeastern

customers from the aforementioned

Federal hydro-electric projects.

Southeastern requests that all of the

above-described services be provided by

Southern for an initial term ending no

earlier than November 30, 2004.

Comment date: June 2, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices 25707

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11712 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EC95–11–000, et al.]

Tucson Electric Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

May 4, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Tucson Electric Power

[Docket No. EC95–11–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP)

submitted an application pursuant to

Section 203 of the Federal Power Act for

authority to effect a ‘‘disposition of

facilities’’ that would be deemed to

occur as a result of implementation of

a proposed holding company structure,

all as more fully set forth in the

application, which is on file with the

Commission and open for public

inspection.

The application states that

implementation of the holding company

structure proposed would be

accomplished through the creation of a

holding company of which TEP would

be a subsidiary. It is stated that the

proposed holding company structure is

intended to facilitate the separation of

TEP’s traditional utility operations from

its operations in other segments of the

electric energy business. Such operation

will provide the optimal structure for

participation in the various segments of

the evolving and expanding electric

energy business, and will avoid crosssubsidization and the transfer of

business risk from these other segments

of the business to traditional utility

operations. The holding company

structure, it is said, will not affect

jurisdictional facilities, rates or services.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Pennsylvania Power & Light

Company

[Docket No. ER95–720–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company

(‘‘PP&L’’), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

supplemental material relating to the

above docket.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Louis Dreyfus Electric Power

Company

[Docket No. ER92–850–011]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Louis Dreyfus Electric Power Company

tendered for filing a summary of its

activity for the quarter ending March 31,

1995.

4. Consolidated Edison Company Of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER93–568–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (‘‘Con Edison’’) tendered for

filing additional information concerning

two agreements for the interconnection

and delivery of energy between the JFK

Cogeneration Project and the JFK

International Airport.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

KIAC Partners and the Port Authority of

the New York and New Jersey.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. CRSS Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–142–005]

Take notice on April 24, 1995, CRSS

Power Marketing, Inc. tendered for

filing its quarterly informational filing

reporting no activity for the quarter

ending March 31, 1995.

6. EDC Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–1538–002]

Take notice on April 24, 1995, EDC

Power Marketing, Inc. tendered for

filing its quarterly informational filing

reporting no activity for the quarter

ending March 31, 1995.

7. Equitable Power Services Company

[Docket No. ER94–1539–003]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Equitable Power Services Company

tendered for filing its quarterly report

ending March 31, 1995, reporting no

activity during this quarter.

8. Citizens Lehman Power Sales

[Docket No. ER94–1685–002]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Citizens Lehman Power Sales tendered

for filing its quarterly report ending

March 31, 1995 reporting no activity

during this quarter.

9. Koch Power Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–218–001]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Koch Power Services, Inc. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s January 4, 1995 letter

Order in Docket No. ER95–218–000.

Copies of Koch Power Services, Inc.’s

information filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

10. Tenneco Energy Marketing

Company

[Docket No. ER95–428–001]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Tenneco Energy Marketing Company

tendered for filing its quarterly report

for the period ending March 31, 1995,

reporting no activity during this quarter.

11. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–554–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

New England Power Company tendered

for filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Washington Water Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–677–000]

Take notice that on April 19, 1995,

Washington Water Power Company

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–946–000]

Take notice that Northeast Utilities

Service Company (NUSCO) on April 24,

1995, tendered for filing, a Service

Agreement with Enron Power

Marketing, Inc. (Enron) under the NU

System Companies’ System Power

Sales/Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to Enron.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on April 1,

1995.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–950–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

New England Power Company (NEP)

tendered for filing a Notice of

Termination to the Service Agreement

between NEP and Commonwealth

Electric Company under NEP’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 3.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.