alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment of FMC Non-Qualified Savings and Investment Plan



 Exhibit 10.14.a 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 FMC CORPORATION
NON-QUALIFIED SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, FMC Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the FMC Corporation Non-Qualified Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”);
and 
  
 WHEREAS, since its spin-off of FMC Technologies,
Inc., the Company has allowed participants in the Plan to continue to hold or sell balances in the FMC Technologies, Inc. Stock Fund in the participants’ discretion, but has prohibited new investments in the FMC Technologies, Inc. Stock Fund;

  
 WHEREAS, the Company now deems necessary and desirable
to amend the Plan to eliminate the FMC Technologies, Inc. Stock Fund from the investment options offered under the Plan; and 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by Article IX of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of July 1,
2003, as follows: 
  
 Section 6.1 Deemed Investments is
here by amended by adding the following to the end thereof: 
  
 (e) “Effective July 1, 2003 the FMC Technologies Stock Fund will be eliminated as a Permitted Investment in the Plan. The Company will direct the Trustee to sell any balances remaining in the FMC Technologies Stock Fund on June 30,
2003 and reinvest the proceeds from such sale into another Permitted Investment under the Plan to be designated by the Company at the time. It is currently anticipated that any remaining balances in the FMC Technologies Stock Fund will be
transferred to the Fidelity Retirement Government Money Market Portfolio.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has executed this amendment on behalf of the Company, this 12th day of August 2002. 
  

			
	FMC CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kenneth R. Garrett

	 	 	

	 	 	 Kenneth R. Garrett
 Vice President Human Resources
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2376

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Ronald Travis Daniels, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 18, 2010 Filed: February 25, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ronald Daniels appeals from the 168-month sentence that the District Court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to receiving child pornography. Counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a br ief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In an untimely pro se supplemental brief, which we grant Daniels leave to file, he argues that (1) the District Court erred in applying a base offe nse level of 32 and a 2-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A); (2) his sentence is unreasonable; and-2- (3) the government breached its promise that he would receive a five-year sentence in exchange for his plea. We rej ect these arguments, and we affirm.
First, because Daniels did not object to the Guidelines calculations in the District Court, we review only for plain error, and we find none. See United States v. Nichols , 151 F.3d 850, 854 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review). The facts support the base offense level and th e 2-level enhancement. See U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(c) (noting that § 2G2.1 applies "[i]f the offense involved causing . . . a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct"); U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(a), (b)(2)(A) (s etting base offense level of 32 and requiring 2-level increase if offense invol ved "sexual contact"); U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1 cmt. n.2 ("'Sexual contact' has the meaning gi ven that term in 18 U.S.C. § 2246(3).").
Second, we conclude that the se ntence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en ba nc) (standard of review); United States v. Toothman , 543 F.3d 967, 970 (8th Cir. 2008) ("A sentence within the Sentencing Guidelines range is accorded a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal . . . ."). Third, the record refutes Daniels’s argument that the government induced his plea with promises of a five-year sentence. See Blackledge v. Allison , 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977) ("Solemn declara tions in open court carry a strong presumption of verity.").
Finally, having reviewed the recordindependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,028,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,028,916
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,126,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,297,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          667,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,630,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,297,849
<SALES>                                      6,792,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,840,719
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  333,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,507,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,507,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Cullen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                           Textron Financial Corporation

Date: May 6, 2005                          /s/ Thomas J. Cullen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Thomas J. Cullen
                                           Executive Vice President and Chief
                                               Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Dr. C.S. Park, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of MaxtorCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                                              /s/ Dr. C.S. Park   Dr. C.S. Park   *Chairman and Chief Executive*
Cecil R. McDONALD, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 13-6220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, denied.
女性与焦虑

什么是焦虑?

焦虑是对事件或情况的担心、紧张或恐惧的感觉。这是

对压力的正常反应。焦虑可以帮助您在工作中对具有挑

战性的情况保持警惕,为考试更加努力地学习,或者在

重要的演讲中保持专注。一般来说,它可以帮助您应对

各种情况。当情况变得难以控制并且影响到您的日常生

活时,它可能会造成能力的丧失。

什么是焦虑症?

当过度焦虑干扰到您的日常活动,比如上班或上学,与

朋友或家人共度时光时,就会发生焦虑障碍。焦虑症是

严重的精神疾病。

焦虑症是美国最常见的精神障碍。它们每年影响多达

4000 万美国成年人。女性在其一生中患上焦虑症的可

能性是男性的两倍多。焦虑症是高度可治疗的,但只有

不到 37% 的患者得到治疗。

焦虑症的主要类型有哪些?

有几种主要的焦虑症类型。他们都有自己的特点,并以

不同的方式影响人们。 

• 广泛性焦虑症 (GAD) 会导致对生活中常见的事情过

度担忧,比如家庭或收入。这种担忧可能每天都出

现,让您难以度过一天或在晚上入睡。广泛性焦虑

症和重度抑郁症经常同时发生。

• 恐慌症 涉及频繁和突然的惊恐发作,这是在没有警

告的情况下发生的意想不到的恐惧感。恐慌发作可

能在没有直接危险的情况下发生。

• 恐惧症 是对一些几乎没有威胁的东西或情况产生强

烈恐惧的情绪。这可能包括乘飞机旅行或与一大群

人在一起。

FDA 女性健康办公室 

www.fda.gov/womens 

焦虑症有哪些症状?

焦虑症伴随着多种症状。它们可以因人而异,也会根据

您所患焦虑症的类型而有所不同。症状还会影响您的生

活和与他人相处的方式。

焦虑症有很多症状。以下症状在多种类型的焦虑症中普

遍存在: 

• 焦虑的想法或信念

• 害怕和恐惧的感觉

• 心跳加快或恶心等身体症状

• 行为改变,例如避免以前的正常活动

焦虑症的成因是什么?

有几个因素会增加患焦虑症的风险。这些症状在不同的

女性之间可能会有所不同。一些常见的风险因素包括: 

• 童年或成年时期的创伤事件

• 月经周期中荷尔蒙的变化

• 焦虑或其他精神障碍的家族史

常见的治疗方案有哪些?

对于一些人来说,治疗可以帮助缓解焦虑症状。有几种

可以帮助您每天管理焦虑症状的治疗方法,例如: 

• 咨询(心理治疗或谈话治疗)

这种治疗形式包括与受过专业培训的心理健康专家

进行交谈。您们可以一起合作,共同应对和管理您

的焦虑。

• 药物

药物不能治愈焦虑症,但可以帮助缓解症状。医疗

服务提供者可以开处方给您用于治疗焦虑的药物。

用于对抗焦虑症的最常见药物类别包括抗抑郁药、

抗焦虑药(如苯二氮䓬类药物)和β受体阻滞剂。

与您的医疗保健提供者交谈,了解适合您的治疗方法。

在开始或停止药物治疗之前,您应该与医生讨论治疗的

风险、益处和副作用问题。 
女性与焦虑

我的身体健康如何影响我的心理健

康?

身体不健康的人可能难以保持心理健康。患有糖尿病或

心脏病等慢性(长期)健康问题的人通常 更有可能承受

更高水平的压力和焦虑。患有慢性病并不总是意味着您

会患有焦虑症等心理健康状况,但如果您正在为这两种

疾病而苦苦挣扎,您并不孤单。支持团体和医疗保健专

业人员可以为您提供帮助。健康饮食和其他健康习惯,

如运动、瑜伽或冥想,有助于改善身体健康并减少焦

虑。

如果您认为自己患有焦虑症,您应

该怎么办?

安排一次访问,去见一位医疗服务提供者。

在这次访问中,您的初级保健医生将为您进行初步的心

理健康检查。在那里,他们可以将您转诊给心理健康专

家

参与您的护理过程。 对您的症状持开放态度并听取您的

选择。就您认为可能适合您的选项提供您的意见。

向您信任的人寻求支持。 在应对焦虑障碍时,拥有信任

的人陪伴于您的生活之中将给予帮助。寻找知道会倾听

您的担忧并帮助您度过艰难时期的朋友和支持团体。

如果您对自己的心理健康有直接担忧,请拨打或发送短

信至自杀与危机生命线 988。

988生命线为处于困境中的人们提供 24/7 全天候免费和

保密的支持,并为您或您在美国的亲人提供预防和危机

资源。如果您或您认识的人面临直接危险,请拨打 911

或前往最近的急诊室。.

关于焦虑症和怀孕,您需要了解些

什么?

如果您正在考虑怀孕、正在怀孕或正在哺乳,您应该与

您的医疗保健提供者讨论您可能服用的任何治疗焦虑症

的药物。有些药物会影响未出生的婴儿,但未经治疗的

心理健康状况也会影响未出生的婴儿。有些药物也可能

通过母乳传给婴儿。与您的提供者讨论哪些治疗对您和

婴儿是安全的。

在怀孕期间或作为新妈妈,您有时可能会感到不知所

措。可通过全国孕产妇心理健康热线获得心理健康支

持和资源。它是免费的、保密的,并且 24/7 全天候可

用。请致电或发短信至 1-833-9-HELP4MOMS (1-833-

943-5746)。

与您的医疗保健提供者讨论所有医疗选择。讨论它们的

风险和好处。您的提供者可以回答您的所有问题,与您

共同决定哪种治疗适合您。

本情况说明书由 FDA 女性健康办公室编制。这些信息仅供教育目的,不包含所有完整内容,并不

应替代与医疗服务提供者的交谈。

要了解有关女性和焦虑的更多信息,请访问: 

www.fda.gov/womens

女性与焦虑 (Simplified Chinese) 2023年6月
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

NOTICE RE JUDGE’S EXTERN

TO WORK AT GOODWIN

PROCTER FOR SUMMER

One of the judge’s externs who has worked on this case in chambers will be spending

the summer as a summer associate at Goodwin Procter, counsel for Otto Trucking LLC. 

She has already informed the conflicts attorney in Boston that she should not be assigned

to any projects involving this case. Of course, she is aware that she will not disclose in any

way anything she learned about the case to anyone at Goodwin Procter or elsewhere. This is

satisfactory to the judge but out of an abundance of caution, this notice invites counsel to advise

if they see any problem and to do so by NOON ON MAY 9. In addition, counsel of record at

Goodwin Procter shall please take specific steps to make sure that she has nothing to do with

this case during her summer there. (Her name can be learned via Human Resources.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 344 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen M. Smith, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied MicroCircuits Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Leroy Henry COOPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9661.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# L_2017174EN.01000101.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1220

of 16 June 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Malatya Kayısısı (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey's application to register the name ‘Malatya Kayısısı’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey's application to register the name ‘Malatya Kayısısı’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Malatya Kayısısı’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Malatya Kayısısı’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Malatya Kayısısı’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 10, 13.1.2017, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of North America Frac Sand, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K Amendment #1 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Alexander, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment #1 for the year ended December 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and    
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment #1 for the period ended December 31, 2015 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                        |     |                                                                                                    | 
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: November 15, 2016 | By: | /s/: David Alexander                                                                               | 
|                        |     | David AlexanderPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial OfficerNorth America Frac Sand, Inc. |
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
DELPHIX CORP., Appellant

v.

JOSEPH MATAL, PERFOR MING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UN DER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. P ATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

______________________

2016

- 2067, 2016

- 2068

______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trad emark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2015

- 00025, IPR2015

- 00026.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J. D AVID H ADDEN , Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by S AINA S. S HAMILOV ; T ODD R ICHARD G REGORIAN
, P HILLIP J OHN H AACK
, San Francisco, CA.P HILIP J. W ARRICK , Office of the Solicitor, UnitedStates Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by N ATHAN K. K ELLEY
, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE
, C OKE M ORGAN S TEWART

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST
, Chief Judge, L OURIE and H UGHES
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court