Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices 25707

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11712 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EC95–11–000, et al.]

Tucson Electric Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

May 4, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Tucson Electric Power

[Docket No. EC95–11–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP)

submitted an application pursuant to

Section 203 of the Federal Power Act for

authority to effect a ‘‘disposition of

facilities’’ that would be deemed to

occur as a result of implementation of

a proposed holding company structure,

all as more fully set forth in the

application, which is on file with the

Commission and open for public

inspection.

The application states that

implementation of the holding company

structure proposed would be

accomplished through the creation of a

holding company of which TEP would

be a subsidiary. It is stated that the

proposed holding company structure is

intended to facilitate the separation of

TEP’s traditional utility operations from

its operations in other segments of the

electric energy business. Such operation

will provide the optimal structure for

participation in the various segments of

the evolving and expanding electric

energy business, and will avoid crosssubsidization and the transfer of

business risk from these other segments

of the business to traditional utility

operations. The holding company

structure, it is said, will not affect

jurisdictional facilities, rates or services.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Pennsylvania Power & Light

Company

[Docket No. ER95–720–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company

(‘‘PP&L’’), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

supplemental material relating to the

above docket.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Louis Dreyfus Electric Power

Company

[Docket No. ER92–850–011]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Louis Dreyfus Electric Power Company

tendered for filing a summary of its

activity for the quarter ending March 31,

1995.

4. Consolidated Edison Company Of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER93–568–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (‘‘Con Edison’’) tendered for

filing additional information concerning

two agreements for the interconnection

and delivery of energy between the JFK

Cogeneration Project and the JFK

International Airport.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

KIAC Partners and the Port Authority of

the New York and New Jersey.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. CRSS Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–142–005]

Take notice on April 24, 1995, CRSS

Power Marketing, Inc. tendered for

filing its quarterly informational filing

reporting no activity for the quarter

ending March 31, 1995.

6. EDC Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94–1538–002]

Take notice on April 24, 1995, EDC

Power Marketing, Inc. tendered for

filing its quarterly informational filing

reporting no activity for the quarter

ending March 31, 1995.

7. Equitable Power Services Company

[Docket No. ER94–1539–003]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Equitable Power Services Company

tendered for filing its quarterly report

ending March 31, 1995, reporting no

activity during this quarter.

8. Citizens Lehman Power Sales

[Docket No. ER94–1685–002]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Citizens Lehman Power Sales tendered

for filing its quarterly report ending

March 31, 1995 reporting no activity

during this quarter.

9. Koch Power Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–218–001]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Koch Power Services, Inc. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s January 4, 1995 letter

Order in Docket No. ER95–218–000.

Copies of Koch Power Services, Inc.’s

information filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

10. Tenneco Energy Marketing

Company

[Docket No. ER95–428–001]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Tenneco Energy Marketing Company

tendered for filing its quarterly report

for the period ending March 31, 1995,

reporting no activity during this quarter.

11. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–554–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

New England Power Company tendered

for filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Washington Water Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–677–000]

Take notice that on April 19, 1995,

Washington Water Power Company

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–946–000]

Take notice that Northeast Utilities

Service Company (NUSCO) on April 24,

1995, tendered for filing, a Service

Agreement with Enron Power

Marketing, Inc. (Enron) under the NU

System Companies’ System Power

Sales/Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to Enron.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on April 1,

1995.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–950–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

New England Power Company (NEP)

tendered for filing a Notice of

Termination to the Service Agreement

between NEP and Commonwealth

Electric Company under NEP’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 3.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.
25708 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices

1Mississippi River Transmission Corporation’s

application was filed with the Commission under

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of

the Commission’s regulations.

15. Northeast Utilities Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–952–000]

Take notice that Northeast Utilities

Service Company (NUSCO), on April

26, 1995, tendered for filing, a Service

Agreement and a Certificate of

Concurrence with Vermont Public

Power Supply Authority (VPPSA) under

the NU System Companies’ System

Power Sales/Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to VPPSA.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on May 1,

1995.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Maine Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–954–000]

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Maine Public Service Company (Maine

Public), tendered for filing an agreement

providing for short-term interim

transmission for Central Maine Power

Company.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Robert Mehrabian

[Docket No. ID–2878–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1995,

Robert Mehrabian (Applicant) tendered

for filing an application under Section

305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold

the following positions:

Outside Director: Duquesne Light

Company

Outside Director: Mellon Bank

Corporation

Outside Director: Mellon Bank, N.A.

Comment date: May 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. Air Products Hycal Company, L.P.

[Docket No. QF95–260–000]

On April 25, 1995, Air Products Hycal

Company, L.P., (Applicant), of 7201

Hamilton Boulevard, Allentown,

Pennsylvania 18195–1501, submitted

for filing an application for certification

of a facility pursuant to Section

292.207(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations. No determination has been

made that the submittal constitutes a

complete filing.

According to the Applicant, the

bottoming-cycle cogeneration facility

will be located adjacent to Ultramar

Inc.’s Wilmington Refinery, in

Wilmington, California, and will consist

of a steam-methane hydrogen reformer,

heat recovery boilers, a doubleextraction/condensing steam turbine

generator, and a substation. Heat

captured from the hydrogen production

process will be used for power

production. The maximum net electric

power production capacity will be 20.9

MW. The facility is expected to begin

commercial operation in January of

1996.

Comment date: June 12, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

19. Central Hudson Gas & Electric

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–945–000]

Take notice that Central Hudson Gas

and Electric Corporation (Central

Hudson) on April 24, 1995, tendered for

filing its development of actual costs for

1994 related to substation service

provided to Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. (Con

Edison) in accordance with the

provisions of its Rate Schedule FERC

No. 43.

Central Hudson indicates that the

actual cost amounted to $253,028 for

1994 and will be the basis on which

estimated charges for 1995 will be

billed.

Central Hudson requests waiver of the

notice requirements to permit charges to

become effective January 1, 1995 as

agreed by the parties.

Central Hudson states that a copy of

its filing was served on Con Edison and

the State of New York Public Service

Commission.

Comment date: May 18, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11710 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–228–000]

Mississippi River Transmission Corp.;

Notice of Intent to Prepare an

Environmental Assessment for the

Proposed Main Line System 1995 and

1996 Modernization Project and

Request for Comments on

Environmental Issues

May 8, 1995.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) will prepare an

environmental assessment (EA) that will

discuss the environmental impacts of

the construction and operation of the

facilities proposed in the Main Line

System 1995 and 1996 Modernization

Project.1 This EA will be used by the

Commission in its decision-making

process to determine whether an

environmental impact statement is

necessary and whether to approve the

project.

Summary of the Proposed Project

Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation (MRT) proposes to

modernize and improve the reliability of

its Main Line System under a 16-year

plan. The 16-year plan would address

safety, system reliability, and rising

operating cost. MRT is not seeking

authority to implement its entire 16-year

modernization plan. MRT seeks

authority to implement only changes it

proposes for 1995 and 1996. MRT

indicates that its proposal would not

affect the capacity of its Main Line

System and service to any of its existing

customers.

MRT’s Main Line System consists of

three pipelines which run roughly

parallel from Perryville, Louisiana to the

vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri. Main

Line No. 1 is the oldest of the three

lines. MRT proposes to abandon in

place 93 miles of its Main Line No. 1,

and as a consequence, MRT also

proposes to make certain changes on its

Main Line System. MRT requests

Commission authorization in Docket

No. CP95–228–000, for the following:

• Abandon in place about 93 miles of

its Main Line No. 1 from milepost 214

in Jackson County, Arkansas to milepost

307 in Butler County, Missouri.

• Cut and cap existing Main Line No.

1 within the Poplar Bluff Compressor

Station yard at milepost 307 in Butler

County, Missouri.

• Retire one 1,000-horsepower (hp)

compressor unit and replace it with a

5,850-hp compressor unit at the Biggers