alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21023-21024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10493]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[T.D. 95-36]


Recordation of Trade Name: ``California Hipermart''

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, December 20, 1994, a notice of application for the 
recordation under Section 42 of the Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 
U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name ``CALIFORNIA HIPERMART'' used by 
California Hipermart, a Corporation organized under the laws of the 
State of California, located at 317 S. Palm Avenue, Alhambra, 
California 91803 was published in the Federal Register (59 FR 65572). 
The notice advised that before final action was taken on the 
application, consideration would be given to any relevant data, views, 
or arguments submitted in writing by any person in opposition to the 
recordation and received not later than February 21, 1995. No responses 
were received in opposition to the notice.
    Accordingly, as provided in Section 133.14, Customs Regulations (19 
CFR 133.14), the name ``CALIFORNIA HIPERMART,'' is recorded as the 
trade name used by California Hipermart, a corporation organized under 
the laws of the State of California, located at 317 S. Palm Avenue, 
Alhambra, California 91803.
    The application states that the trade name is used in connection 
with the [[Page 21024]] following merchandise descripted below:

Toys & Sporting goods: Electrical apparatus
Paper & Plastic goods: Clothing
Houseware & glass: Bicycles
Environmental control apparatus

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delois P. Johnson, Intellectual 
Property Rights Branch, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., (Franklin 
Court), Washington, D.C. 20229 (202-482-6960).

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
John F. Atwood,
Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch.
[FR Doc. 95-10493 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-M
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, petitioner, v. UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 8.

No. 12-1162.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
1























































WAYMO’S STATEMENT RE TRADE SECRETS

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502)

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887)

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886)

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S 

STATEMENT REGARDING TRADE 

SECRETS

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1720 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

WAYMO’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

At today’s hearing, Waymo indicated that it would provide its position today regarding trying 

trade secrets beyond the nine Waymo chose pursuant to this Court’s Order limiting Waymo to less 

than ten trade secrets for trial. Dkt. 563 at 10. As noted in Waymo’s Motion to Continue, considering 

the massive new disclosures in the Stroz Report and related materials and the discovery to date, 

Waymo will not agree to forgo its right to a jury trial for its claimed trade secrets not included in the 

nine currently listed for trial. Waymo has an extraordinarily strong interest in protecting its 

intellectual property and it cannot abandon numerous claims for misappropriation, especially under 

the circumstances in this case. Without a continuance and without even having the opportunity to 

review and take discovery as to the documents and devices now made available, Waymo cannot agree 

to forgo any of its trade secret claims at this time. Upon the completion of discovery concerning the 

Stroz Report and related documents, however, Waymo will promptly inform the Court on the subject 

of which trade secrets claims Waymo will assert, in addition to the nine current trade secret claims, at 

trial. As previously stated, Waymo does not intend to try 121 trade secrets in one trial. 

Waymo does not by this statement waive any patent or trade secret claims that are based on 

undiscovered or post-trial conduct. Waymo expressly reserves its right to assert trade secret claims, 

including claims based on its listed trade secrets, with respect to misappropriation it discovers post 

trial. 

DATED: September 20, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP

By /s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

Charles K. Verhoeven

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1720 Filed 09/20/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25256-25257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11654]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 09/14-0079]


Developers Equity Capital Corp.; Notice of Surrender of License

    Notice is hereby given that Developers Equity Capital Corporation, 
1880 Century Park East, Suite 211, Los Angeles, California 90067, has 
surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment 
company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(the Act). Developers Equity Capital Corporation [[Page 25257]] was 
licensed by the Small Business Administration on June 12, 1964.
    Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the 
Regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender was accepted on May 
3, 1995 and accordingly, all rights, privileges, and franchises derived 
therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
Robert D. Stillman,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 95-11654 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Kenneth ROSELLINI and Victor Mondelli, petitioners, v. JACK SILVERMAN REALTY & MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, et al.

No. 12-1304.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11377]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

[Treasury Directive 15-57]


Delegation of Authority to the Director, United States Secret 
Service, Under 31 U.S.C. 333, Misuse of Treasury Name or Symbol

May 1, 1995.
    1. Purpose. This Directive delegates to the Director, United States 
Secret Service, criminal investigatory authority and civil penalty 
enforcement authority under 31 U.S.C. 333 relating to misuse of the 
name or symbol of the Department of the Treasury or any Treasury 
component or employee thereof as specified below.
    2. Delegation. By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary 
of the Treasury by 31 U.S.C. 333, and the authority delegated to the 
Under Secretary (Enforcement) by Treasury Order (TO) 101-05, there is 
hereby delegated to the Director, United States Secret Service, the 
authority to investigate criminal violations of, and to assess civil 
penalties under, section 333.
    3. Exception. The authority delegated to the Director, United 
States Secret Service, by this Directive does not extend to violations 
of section 333 involving the misuse of the name or symbol of the Bureau 
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the United States Customs Service, or 
the Internal Revenue Service or any employee thereof; or the misuse of 
the name or symbol of the Department of the Treasury or the Secretary 
or any Treasury employee in connection with activities within the 
jurisdiction of those bureaus. See Treasury Directives (TD) 15-13, 15-
31, and 15-43.
    4. Civil Penalty Authority. The Director, United States Secret 
Service, will assess, mitigate and collect civil penalties in 
accordance with guidelines issued by the Office of the Under Secretary 
(Enforcement).
    5. Redelegation. The authority delegated by this Directive may be 
redelegated.
    6. Authorities.
    a. TO 101-05, ``Reporting Relationships and Supervision of 
Officials, Offices and Bureaus, Delegation of Certain Authority, and 
Order of Succession in the Department of the Treasury.''
    b. 31 U.S.C. 333.
    7. References.
    a. TD 15-13, ``Delegation of Authority to the Director, Alcohol, 
Tobacco and Firearms, Under 31 U.S.C. 333, Misuse of Treasury Name or 
Symbol.''
    b. TD 15-31, ``Delegation of Authority to the Commissioner, United 
States Customs Service, Under 31 U.S.C. 333, Misuse of Treasury Name or 
Symbol.''
    c. TD 15-43, ``Delegation of Authority to the Commissioner, 
Internal Revenue Service, Under 31 U.S.C. 333, Misuse of Treasury Name 
or Symbol.''
    8. Expiration Date. This Directive expires three years from the 
date of issuance unless cancelled or superseded by that date.
    9. Office of Primary Interest. Office of the Under Secretary 
(Enforcement).
Ronald K. Noble,
Under Secretary (Enforcement).
[FR Doc. 95-11377 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
希望发生在我身上的悲剧不要再次重演。

我叫大卫。一天,我正在工作时, 我感觉好了一点后,又回来继续工 我不知道手上沾满了细菌。我把细 还有黄瓜 ...... ...... 突然觉得不舒服,于是冲进了洗手 作。我需要赚钱。有客人点了一份 菌带到了西红柿上...... 间。 色拉。但我忘记洗手或佩戴手套。

......以及整盘色拉...... ......有一个名叫阿什琳的小姑娘吃了我做的色拉。 第二天,阿什琳便开始胃痉挛并

呕吐。实际上,有几十个人发生

了食物中毒,他们都是因为吃了

我生病那天准备的食物。

我本可以阻止这一切的发生。

维护众人健康:请洗手、佩戴手套

或使用器具;请不要带病工作。
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,022,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  529,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,574
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,642,890
<PP&E>                                       9,194,350
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,677,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,198,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,545
<BONDS>                                        420,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,530,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,198,059
<SALES>                                      2,231,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,253,286
<CGS>                                          872,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,610,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                602,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            602,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   602,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       20
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:13-CR-28 RLM

)

CHRISTINA GLEN )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on May 29, 2013 [Doc. No. 19].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and the recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Christina Glen’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant

guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: June 18, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
Wendell G. BLOUNT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10467.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11872]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-282-000]


Sea Robin Pipeline Company: Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 9, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 4, 1995, Sea Robin Pipeline Company (Sea 
Robin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet:

Second Revised Sheet No. 64

    Sea Robin states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the provisions of Commission Order No. 577, effective May 4, 1995, 
which has revised the Commission's Regulations governing capacity 
release transactions to extend the exemption from advance posting 
requirements to prearranged releases for one calendar month or less and 
releases at the maximum rate. Order No. 577 also decreased the number 
of days that the releasing shipper and prearranged bidder must wait 
until they can perform another non-posted release for a month or less 
to 28 days.
    Sea Robin has requested any waivers necessary to make this sheet 
effective on May 4, 1995, the implementation date of Order No. 577.
    Sea Robin states that copies of the filing will be served upon its 
shippers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before May 16, 1995. 
Protests will not be considered by the Commission in determining the 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11872 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAJOR ALEXANDER SESSION, III,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cr-00089-PJH-1 

ORDER DIRECTING APPOINTED 

COUNSEL TO FILE RESPONSE OR 

STATUS REPORT

In light of the lack of response to the Castro notice issued by the court, dkt. 37,

and the limited appointment of counsel for the purpose of representing defendant on the 

claim seeking relief under the holding of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), 

appointed counsel Gail Ivens is hereby directed to communicate with defendant Major 

Alexander Session, III, as to whether he consents to treat his pro per filing as the 

operative § 2255 motion seeking relief under Rehaif, or whether he intends to file an 

amended § 2255 motion to present the Rehaif claim and any other claims for relief that 

are timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Counsel is directed to file either a response to the 

Castro notice on defendant’s behalf or a status report within 30 days of the date of this 

order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2019

 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge
James Michael SMITH, petitioner, v. John BRYSON, Secretary of Commerce.

No. 12-9410.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Carletus WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Catherine BAUMAN, Warden.

No. 12-9329.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.3


Exhibit 10.3


 



SECOND AMENDMENT 

TO THE 

M/I HOMES, INC. 401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN 




(As Restated Effective as of January 1, 1997) 







WHEREAS , M/I Homes, Inc. (the "Employer") sponsors the M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the "Plan"); and 




WHEREAS , the Plan provides that the Employer may amend the Plan; 




WHEREAS , the Plan is amended to revise its eligibility provisions; 




NOW THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 2004, the Plan shall be amended by deleting Section 1.01 in its entirety, and replacing it with the following: 







1. 01    Eligibility Requirements 




Each Employee of the Employer will be eligible to participate in the Plan on the Entry Date coinciding with or first following the date on which he meets the following requirements: 




(a)  For purposes of making Section 401(k) Contributions only: 




(i)  For Employees classified by the Employer as full-time employees: 




A full-time Employee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan on the Entry Date coinciding with or first following the date on which he completes 90 days of service with the Employer. 




(ii)  For Employees classified by the Sponsor as part-time employees: 




A part-time Employee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan on the Entry Date coinciding with or first following the date on which he completes a Year of Eligibility Service (as defined in Section 1.02) . 




(b)  For Employer Contribution purposes only, each Employee of the Employer will be eligible to participate in the Plan on the Entry Date coinciding with or first following the date on which he is credited with a Year of Eligibility Service (as defined in Section 1.02) . 



Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Employee who was a Participant in the Plan immediately prior to the Effective Date of this amended and restated Plan will remain a Participant on the Effective Date. 




An individual who met the eligibility requirements specified above with the Employer or an Affiliate prior to becoming an Employee will be eligible to participate in the Plan on the Entry Date immediately following the date he became an Employee. 




An individual who ceases to be classified by the Employer as an Employee but who remains actively employed by the Employer or an Affiliate will not be treated as being eligible to receive a distribution from the Plan pursuant to Section 9.01 until his separation from service from the Employer and all Affiliates. 













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer. 







M/I HOMES, INC. 













Date:           By:                            







   Name:                            










   Title:
Ramiah WHITESIDE, petitioner, v. William POLLARD, et al.

No. 12-9082.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Gary ISABEL, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-9557.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6066

TITUS LEE,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v
. ANGELA MASTANDREA

- MILLER, Assistant United States Attorney; ADAM ULERY, Special Agent; DIANA C. DELUCA, United States Probation Officer, Defendants Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 00318

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Titus Lee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Titus Lee appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed eral Bureau of
Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have re viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Mastandrea

- Miller , No. 3:20

- cv - 00318

- HEH

- RCY (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-21-TLS 

)

ARTURO DELUNA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 30], filed on August 6, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 30] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on August 27, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Sergio Alejandro GAMEZ, petitioner, v. F. GONZALES, et al.

No. 12-8981.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.