alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

July 23, 2021

Order 

Clerk

July 23, 2021

163290(58)(59)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 163290

v COA: 351700

Saginaw CC: 80-000118-FY

RICHARD GERALD MUSSELMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to exceed the word 

limitation for the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The application submitted 

on July 15, 2021, is accepted for filing. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion 

for the temporary admission of out-of-state attorneys Samuel Callahan, John Swanson, and 

Andrew Tutt to appear and practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 27, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00096

- CR

William Baptiste Bloys , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court

. Appellant has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows appellant to withdraw

his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Exhibit 32.3




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Date: May 28, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ RICHARD
      A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Robert Wayne INFANTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10311.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
212° F 100° C

 194 90

 176 80

 158 70

 140 60

 122 50

 104 40

 86 30

 68 20

 50 10

 32 0

Ground 

beef is 

90° F

DA NGER!

Tắt

Ca

o

Vừa

pấhT

Tại Sao Giữ Thức Ăn Nóng Lại Quan Trọng...

Thịt bò xay giữ ở 90 ̊F 

(32 ̊C) Nguy hiểm

Luôn Giữ Thức 

Ăn Nóng Ở 135 ̊F 

(57 ̊C) hoặc Cao 

Hơn!

Hãy nhớ: 

Giữ Thức Ăn

ngoài Phạm

Vi Nhiệt Độ

Nguy Hiểm 

41 ̊F - 135 ̊F 

(5 ̊C - 57 ̊C)!

Hãy Bảo Vệ Mọi Người Ở Mọi Nơi.

Luôn Giữ Thức Ăn Nóng ở 135 ̊F hoặc Cao Hơn.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sierra Ventures, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report),
I, Ian Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: October 20, 2008

/s/      Ian Jackson

Ian Jackson Chief Financial Officer

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN ANTONIO LUNA CORNEJO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72711 

Agency No. A200-943-696 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 27, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Edwin Antonio Luna Cornejo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 29 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition 

for review.

We review questions of law de novo, Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077, 

1081 (9th Cir. 2014), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s 

interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 

F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review the agency’s factual findings for 

substantial evidence. Parada v. Sessions, 902 F.3d 901, 908 (9th Cir. 2018).

The BIA did not err in holding that Luna Cornejo failed to establish 

persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of his membership in 

a cognizable social group. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); Reyes v. Lynch, 842 

F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016). Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081, 1091 

(9th Cir. 2013) (en banc) does not control our analysis of this case, for two reasons. 

First, the social group at issue in Henriquez-Rivas was “witnesses who testify 

against gang members.” Luna Cornejo did not testify in court about any of his 

problems with MS gang members. We did not hold in Henriquez-Rivas that the 

group at issue qualified as a cognizable social group. We remanded the issue to 

the BIA for a determination of that question.

Second, as held by the BIA, Luna Cornejo did not satisfy his evidentiary 

burden to demonstrate that the group to which he refers is socially distinct within 

the society in question. 
3 

Accordingly, there is no reason to remand this matter to the BIA for further 

consideration.

Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Luna Cornejo’s asylum and 

withholding of removal claims, for both of which he was not eligible.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Luna 

Cornejo failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See 8 

C.F.R. § 1208(a)(7); Ornelas-Chavez v. Gonzales, 458 F.3d 1052, 1059 (9th Cir. 

2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RSC Holdings,
III, LLC and RSC Equipment Rental Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Not applicable4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over the financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Erik OlssonErik OlssonPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,201,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,201,468
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,290,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,305,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          481,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,824,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,305,954
<SALES>                                     19,886,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,015,426
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,033,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,981,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,981,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Terry LEE, petitioner, v. Nathan DAVID.

No. 12-9096.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Idaho denied.
H. R. 126

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of free 

roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING HORSES 

PERMITTED IN CAPE LOOKOUT NATIONAL SEASHORE, 

NORTH CAROLINA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The first subsection (b) of section 5 of Public 

Law 89–366 (16 U.S.C. 459g–4) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘100 free roaming horses’’ 

and inserting ‘‘not less than 110 free roaming horses, with 

a target population of between 120 and 130 free roaming 

horses,’’; 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (B) and 

inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a plan to 

maintain the viability of the herd; or’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘100’’ and inserting ‘‘110’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF DUPLICATE SUBSECTION.—Section 5 of Public 

Law 89–366 is further amended—

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

(2) by striking the second subsection (b).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Zimri Omri SMALLER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-6916.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11826]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency Information Collection Under OMB Review

Title: ACF--535 LIHEAP Quarterly Estimates
OMB No.: 0970-0037
Description: The information collected is used to develop our 
apportionment request for appropriated Low-Income Home Energy 
Assistance Programs (LIHEAP) funds and to make grant awards based on 
the funding needs of States and Tribes.
Respondents: State and tribal governments
Annual Number of Respondents: 55 sites
Number of responses per respondent: 1
Total annual responses: 55 sites
Hours per response: .25
Total Annual Burden Hours: 14
Additional Information: Copies of the request for approval may be 
obtained from Bob Sargis of the Office of Information Resource 
Management, ACF, by calling (202) 690-7275.
OMB Comment: Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions 
received within 30 days of publication. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent 
directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork 
Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: 
Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: May 8, 1995.
Roberta Katson,
Acting Director, Office of Information Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 95-11826 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned officers of Vinyl Products, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to their knowledge:





1. the annual report on Form 10-K of
Vinyl Products, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vinyl Products,
Inc.


Date:
      March 31, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Gordon KnottName:
      Gordon KnottTitle:  
      Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      March 31, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Douglas E. WellsName:  Douglas
      E. WellsTitle:   
      Chief Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in Registration Statement No.s 333-163952 and 333-167860 on Form F-3 of our reports dated April 27, 2012, relating to the consolidated and combined financial statements of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P., and the effectiveness
of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2011.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP                   
|                                            
|Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
|Licensed Public Accountants                 
|Toronto, Canada                             
|                                            
|April 27, 2012
#### Arleigh A. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-11203.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 4, 2004.

Ronnie Dwaine Wilson, McDonald & Wilson, Richardson, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Susan L. S. Ernst, US Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Arleigh A. Miller (hereinafter Plaintiff) filed suit in October, 2001, against Donald H. Rumsfeld (hereinafter Defendant) in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense and Operator of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) by whom Plaintiff was employed. Plaintiff asserts that she was discriminated against on the basis of age and retaliated against for asserting her age discrimination claim in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621*et seq.*(“ADEA”). In March, 2003, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment which the district court granted in October, 2003, by a ten page memorandum opinion and order. Plaintiff timely filed this appeal.

We have carefully examined the briefs, the record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion and order filed on October 14, 2003, we affirm the final judgment entered by the district court in favor of Defendant entered on October 14, 2003.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.