alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.6
(logo) ERNST&YOUNG

Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 1000
55 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard
Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Phone:  (404) 874-8300
www.ey.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB Servicing Criteria, that ZC Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited ('the Company'
or 'ZCRETS') complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the ZC Tax Source
(ZCTS) Real Estate Tax Outsourcing Platform (the Platform) as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The Company has determined that only certain
servicing criteria Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), Item 1122(d)(2)(vi), Item
1122(d)(4)(xi), Item 1122(d)(4)(xii), and Item 1122(d)(4)(xiii) are applicable
to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by
this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by them with
respect to the Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's
assertion for the Platform and Servicers covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the Platform. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



February 14, 2008



A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
DATE: December 16, 2021

TO: All FDA employees

FROM: Janet Woodcock, M.D., Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs

SUBJECT: Policy Statement for Inappropriate Conduct and Anti-Harassment

To help fulfill our mission and to provide a workplace that ensures employees can serve in a 

positive and engaging work environment, we are committed to providing a work 

environment free of harassment, intimidation, bullying, and other inappropriate conduct. 

We believe we have an obligation to maintain a work environment in which employees are 

treated with dignity and respect. The environment must be one of mutual trust and void of 

intimidation, bullying and harassment. In addition, we are committed to promoting a work 

environment where all employees can expect to be safe and secure, free from harassment

and fear of reprisal. 

This policy establishes an Agency-wide process under which our employees, contractors, 

fellows, trainees, and visitors shall report allegations of inappropriate conduct and 

harassment. This policy also sets forth manager and supervisor responsibilities for

maintaining a harassment-free workplace and for acting promptly and effectively when 

allegations of inappropriate conduct and harassment arise. We will not tolerate unlawful 

discrimination, inappropriate conduct, or harassment of any kind. Through enforcement of 

this policy, we seek to address and correct any harassment or inappropriate conduct before it 

escalates to a severe, pervasive, and unlawful level. 

Sincerely, 

Janet Woodcock, M.D.

Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs
Edward H. PAYNE, Jr., petitioner, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

No. 12-9309.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Hector CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8166.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Steve LEDLOW, Jr., petitioner, v. Stanthony GIVENS.

No. 12-9635.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

MARY GINTHER and RICHARD 

GINTHER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-CV-822-RL-CAN

APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record:

Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Defendants Barry and Lisa 

Cadden, and Greg Conigliaro.

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendants 

case 3:12-cv-00822-RL-CAN document 9 filed 02/14/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 14, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas D. Small

FOLEY & SMALL

1002 E Jefferson Blvd

South Bend IN 46617

Counsel for Plaintiffs

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\19 - Ginther\Federal Pleadings\appear_ksd_Cadden & Conigliaro.docx

case 3:12-cv-00822-RL-CAN document 9 filed 02/14/13 page 2 of 2
Jose Rodriguez ESPINOZA, Jr., aka Junior, aka Ribs, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13-6658.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 4, 2013.

*543Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Allen WRIGHT, petitioner, v. Dr. BEARDEN, et al.

No. 13-6397.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We have issued our report dated March 20, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Restoration Robotics,Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Restoration Robotics, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-223448 and File No. 333-220993) and Form S-3(File No. 333-228562). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Denver,Colorado 

March 20, 2019 
**
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals 30677 13-SEP-2013 08:29 AM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D.C., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00719-MEJ 

ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF 

SUMMONSES

On March 3, 2017, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ Applications to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, 

and ordered them to pay the Court’s filing fee. See Order, Dkt. No. 8. Plaintiffs paid the Court’s 

filing fee. See Receipt No. 34611122996. The undersigned accordingly orders the Clerk of the 

Court to issue summonses in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2017

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 9 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. QUALITY STORES INC., et al.

No. 12-1408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 01, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision for this petition.
NUMBER 13-22-00342-CV

COURT OF APPEALS 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

IN RE K.T. 

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria1

On July 22, 2022, relator K.T.2 filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to 

compel the trial court to vacate temporary orders that “ha[d] the effect of . . . changing the 

designation[] of the person who has the exclusive right to designate the primary residence 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 

47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

2 Given the highly sensitive nature of the allegations in this original proceeding, we use initials to 

identify the parties. 
2

of the child,” and that had “the effect of . . . changing the geographic area[] within which 

a conservator must maintain the child’s primary residence.” See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 

156.006(b). Relator asserts that real party in interest, K.B., failed to meet the high 

statutory burden to show that the temporary orders were in the child’s best interest and 

the child’s present circumstances would significantly impair the child’s physical health or 

emotional development. See id. § 156.006(b)(1).

“Mandamus relief is an extraordinary remedy requiring the relator to show that 

(1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion and (2) the relator lacks an adequate 

remedy on appeal.” In re Acad., Ltd., 625 S.W.3d 19, 25 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); 

see In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Because a trial court’s temporary orders are not appealable, mandamus is an appropriate 

vehicle for review. See In re Derzapf, 219 S.W.3d 327, 334–35 (Tex. 2007) (orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam); In re Walser, No. 04-21-00291-CV, 2021 WL 4296048, at *1, 

__ S.W.3d __, __ (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 22, 2021, orig. proceeding); In re 

Strickland, 358 S.W.3d 818, 820 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2012, orig. proceeding); In re 

Ostrofsky, 112 S.W.3d 925, 928 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, orig. proceeding).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, 

the response filed by K.B., the record, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator 

has not met her burden to obtain mandamus relief. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 156.006; 

In re Walser, 2021 WL 4296048, at *2, __ S.W.3d at __; In re Strickland, 358 S.W.3d 818, 

822–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2012, orig. proceeding); see also In re Suarez, No. 13-
3

21-00379-CV, 2021 WL 6067350, at *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Dec. 22, 

2021, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]) (mem. op.) (collecting and discussing cases). We 

deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

9th day of August, 2022.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entia Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Carl J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer and of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.





Dated:  September 1, 2015








By:  /s/ Carl J. Johnson


Chief Executive Officer, President


(Principal Executive Officer)
James Michael FORNEY, petitioner, v. BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al.

No. 12-8478.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Claude L. GLASS, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE, et al.

No. 12-8605.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  -
    
    /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 839 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. WARNOCK) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is one 

of the most difficult cancers to detect in the early stages 

of the disease, which contributes to high mortality rates; 

Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in 

the lining of the stomach; 

Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most common type of 

cancer worldwide; 

Whereas, in 2022, an estimated— 

(1) 26,380 cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed 

in the United States; and 

(2) 11,090 individuals in the United States will die 

from stomach cancer; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 839 ATS 

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 32.4 percent, and when diagnosed at a late, 

or distant, stage, the 5-year survival rate is just 6 percent; 

Whereas, in the United States, stomach cancer is more prevalent among racial and ethnic minorities; 

Whereas initial diagnosis of stomach cancer is often delayed 

because up to 80 percent of patients are asymptomatic 

during early stages; 

Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer among patients and health care providers 

could improve timely recognition of stomach cancer symptoms; 

Whereas more research into early diagnosis, screening, and 

treatment for stomach cancer is needed; and 

Whereas November 2022 is an appropriate month to observe 

Stomach Cancer Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer 

3 Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, 

5 and education about, stomach cancer among the 

6 general public of the United States; 

7 (3) recognizes the need for additional research 

8 into early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for 

9 stomach cancer; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 839 ATS 

1 (4) encourages States, territories, and localities 

2 of the United States to support the goals of Stom3 ach Cancer Awareness Month. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the year ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark R. Bachmann                                
|Mark R. Bachmann                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 6, 2008                                    

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained
by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
| Date:      November 12, 2009 |                   |                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                   |                                                                                                          |
|                         | /s/      Sang-Chul Kim |
|                         | Name:                  | Sang-Chul      Kim                                                                                            |
|                         | Title:                 | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer)                                      |
| Date:      November 12, 2009 |                   |                                                                                                          |
|                         | /s/      Yeon-su Kim   |
|                         | Name:                  | Yeon-su      Kim                                                                                              |
|                         | Title:                 | Chief      Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Principal      AccountingOfficer) |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 18-cv-04241 NC 

SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL 

RE: RELATING CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GARY D. EASLEY,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF MORGAN HILL, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 5:18-cv-04241 NC

SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL 

REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF 

DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP 

OF CASES

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

above captioned case is referred to District Judge Edward J. Davila to determine whether it

is related to 17-cv-00771 EJD, Easley v. City of Morgan Hill, et al.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: July 18, 2018 _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge
Ronald BRATTON, petitioner, v. Margarita PEREZ, et al.

No. 12-9810.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.