alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David Rickey, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofApplied Micro Circuits Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

CHARLES CHUANG and )

KAY KIM, )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Cause No.: 2:13-CV-12-PRC

)

DONALD ROSENSKI and W. OLIVER, )

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On September 5, this Court held an in-person

Rule 16(b) conference. At that conference, Plaintiffs stated on the record that they did not wish to

pursue any federal claims of racial discrimination. Plaintiffs’ remaining claims are all matters of

state law. This Court’s jurisdiction over those claims is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1367, which provides

for the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over claims based on state law that are closely related

to the federal claims in a case. When a district court has only supplemental jurisdiction over

remaining state claims, it may decline to exercise its jurisdiction if it has “dismissed all claims over

which it has original jurisdiction.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); see Whitely v. Moravec, 635 F.3d 308,

311 (7th Cir. 2011) (recognizing that § 1367(c)(3) gives the court discretion to relinquish

supplemental jurisdiction and remand once the federal claim has been resolved). 

“[T]he presumption is that the court will relinquish federal jurisdiction over any

supplemental state-law claims” when the federal claims are dismissed before trial. Al’s Serv. Ctr.

v. BP Prods. N. Am., Inc., 599 F.3d 720, 727 (7th Cir. 2010) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)). There

are three exceptions: “when the [refiling] of the state claims is barred by the statute of limitations;

where substantial judicial resources have already been expended on the state claims; and when it is
clearly apparent how the state claim is to be decided.” Williams v. Rodriguez, 509 F.3d 392, 404 (7th

Cir. 2007); see also Dargis v. Sheahan, 526 F.3d 981, 990 (7th Cir. 2008). None apply here.

Accordingly, the Court hereby declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining

state law claims and hereby REMANDS this case to the Marion County, Indiana Superior Court for

consideration.

SO ORDERED this 5th day of September, 2013.

s/ Paul R. Cherry 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record 

Plaintiffs pro se
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Joseph L. Castle II, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Castle Energy Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

 I.     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the three months ended
        March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
II.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Dated:   May 13, 2004                                  /S/JOSEPH L. CASTLE II
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Joseph L. Castle II
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Castle Energy Corporation and will be retained by Castle Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





























                                      -28-
Darlene Davis SMITH, petitioner, v. WEISER SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 12-10216.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Harvey Houtkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arbor Entech
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


DATE: March 15, 2007                    /S/ HARVEY HOUTKIN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Harvey Houtkin, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,105,389
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,371
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,650,059
<PP&E>                                       9,070,461
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,677,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,082,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          202,685
<BONDS>                                        483,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,396,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,082,838
<SALES>                                      3,500,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,528,790
<CGS>                                        1,330,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,327,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,146,251
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,146,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,146,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       38
        



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30658

SEITEL GEOPHYSICAL INCORPORATED,

doing business as Eagle Geophysical,

Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant,

versus

GREENHILL PETROLEUM CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee.

(consolidated with)

No. 96-31148

SEITEL GEOPHYSICAL INCORPORATED,

doing business as Eagle Geophysical,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GREENHILL PETROLEUM CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1648-K)
*David Folsom, Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to LocalRule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1Probo II London v. Isla Santay MV, 92 F.3d 361 (5th Cir. 1996).

2

May 5, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and FOLSOM,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

Greenhill Petroleum Corporation appeals an adverse judgment awarding

damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and prejudgment interest to Seitel Geophysical,

Inc., d/b/a Eagle Geophysical, in this contract dispute action. Having considered

the briefs, oral arguments of counsel, and pertinent parts of the record, on the facts

as found, authorities cited, and analysis made by the district court in its Order and

Reasons of June 10, 1996, the decision on the merits is affirmed. The judgment,

however, is amended to reflect that the prejudgment interest isto be computed from

the date of the loss.1 The matter is returned to the district court in order that this

compensation may properly be made a part of the judgment.

AFFIRMED as AMENDED.
FDA 是美國衛生與公眾服務部的一個機構,透過確保人藥和獸藥、疫苗和其他供人使用的生物製品以及醫療器械的安全性、有效性和保障性來保護公眾的健康。該機構還負責全國的食品、化妝品、膳食補充

劑、電子輻射產品的安全性和有效性,並負責對煙草產品進行監管。

護膚產品安全

情況說明書

含有對苯二酚或汞成分的皮膚美白產品可能會對人體造成傷害。在美國,將這些產品作為非處方產品來銷售

是非法的。請閱讀護膚產品的標籤,以識別其成分,並就您的治療選項諮詢您的醫療服務提供者。 

少數族裔健康和健康平等辦公室

什麼是皮膚美白產品? 

皮膚美白產品作為治療膚色不均勻、粉刺、老年斑、雀斑和

皺紋的產品在市場上銷售。公司可能會將皮膚美白產品描述

為皮膚漂白、褪色、色調均衡、閃亮或增白產品。

這些產品通常以霜劑、乳液、肥皂和粉末的形式在商店銷

售,迎合西班牙裔/拉丁裔、亞洲裔、非洲裔或中東裔社區的

需求。 

什麼是對苯二酚和汞? 

對苯二酚和汞是添加到皮膚美白產品中的成分,用以限制皮

膚黑色素的產生。黑色素是決定膚色的色素。當您將含有對

苯二酚或汞的護膚產品塗在皮膚上時,您的身體會吸收這些

成分。持續使用會讓對苯二酚和汞在您的體內積聚,並可能

會造成傷害。 

FDA 是否對含有對苯二酚或汞的皮膚美白產品的銷售進行監

管? 

含有對苯二酚的皮膚美白產品並未獲准在美國進行非處方銷

售。您可以從您的醫療服務提供者那裡獲得含有對苯二酚的處

方護膚產品。皮膚美白產品中禁止使用汞。 

我如何知道哪些皮膚美白產品含有對苯二酚或汞? 

當您購買皮膚美白產品時,要查閱其產品標籤,看看它是否含

有對苯二酚或汞。不要購買含有這些成分的非處方性皮膚美白

產品。請注意,汞在標籤上可能被列為氯化亞汞、甘汞、水

銀、汞或Hg 等等。 

在購買不需處方即可在櫃檯買到的美白產品時,我還應該考慮

什麼? 

一些含有對苯二酚或汞的非法皮膚美白產品可能並沒有在標籤

上列出這些成分。要避免使用貼有手工標籤、非英語標籤或根

本沒有標籤的產品。這樣的產品違反了 FDA 的規定,可能是

有害的。 

在哪裡可以瞭解更多資訊?

可透過流覽

www.fda.gov/SkinFacts來找到Get the Skin Facts! (獲取關

於護膚產品的情況說明書),瞭解護膚產品安全方面的知識。

如果您在使用護膚產品時出現不良反應,請聯繫您的醫療服務

提供者,並將事件報告給FDA,可在這個網頁

www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm 進行報告,也可打電

話 1-800-fda-1088 進行報告。 

關於健康公平性的詳細資訊,請流覽

FDA 已收到因使用對苯二酚而出現嚴重副作用的病例的報 www.fda.gov/healthequity。

告,包括皮疹、面部腫脹和永久性皮膚變色(褐黃病)。汞是一

種劇毒金屬,會損害神經、消化系統和免疫系統,也會損害

肺、腎、皮膚和眼睛。
Отправляясь на работу, спрашивайте себя: “Хорошо ли я сегодня себя чувствую?”

Оберегайте людей повсюду, воздерживаясь от работы, если вы больны.
Stephen MERRILL, petitioner, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA.

No. 12-1110.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alaska denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Machinery Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter J. Christianson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 28, 2008

| |  | /s/PETER J. CHRISTIANSONChief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Mark Anthony CLEVELAND, petitioner, v. CREDIT BASED ASSET SERVICING, et al.

No. 12-9426.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Residential Associates III, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1

       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                       1,560,000
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                       4,974,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (2,795,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               4,213,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                0
<BONDS>                                                      2,560,000
<COMMON>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   1,333,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 4,213,000
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               696,000
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  473,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             103,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            100,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   100,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     3.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     3.72
        

</TABLE>
Order entered December 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00685-CV

CITY OF HEATH, Appellant

V.

ROBERT WILLIAMSON D/B/A PCNETSYS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-19-1576

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s December 1, 2020 unopposed second motion 

for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the 

brief be filed no later than January 11, 2021. Because this is an accelerated appeal, 

we caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, HARLEYSVILLE WORCESTER 

INSURANCE COMPANY, AND 

HARLEYSVILLE PREFERRED 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioners

v.

TONY DOMIANO AUTO DEALERSHIPS, 

INC., JILL SPARKS, ANNE TRAPPER, 

ANTHONY J. BROWN, RICHARD E. 

WALLACE, AND JOHN TANIS, 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

ELEANOR TANIS, ON BEHALF OF 

THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND DENNIS 

ROSS, JESSICA LEONARD, CLYDE 

BRZENSKI, ANNA GERHARD AND 

JOSEPH SKORETS, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 527 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 31

                                                           [LOGO] IndymacBank(R)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of IndyMac IMSC Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-F3 (the "Exchange Act
      periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance-with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Newport Management Corporation.

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
#### Perry E. THORNLEY, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ruffus FLEMMING, Regional Director; Hinckle, Chief Warden GRCC; Dugger, Corporal, Corrections Officer, GRCC, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-6604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 13, 2004.

Decided: May 20, 2004.

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., Appellant pro se.

William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. *See Thornley v. Flemming,*No. CA-03-419-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).