alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |                                
|---------------------- | -------------------------------
|Dated:  April 15, 2010 | By: /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.
|                       | Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.        
|                       | Chief Executive Officer        



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________
No. 23-50859 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Blanca Estela Maldonado,
Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:18-CR-1935-3

______________________________
Before Barksdale, Engelhardt, and Wilson, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Blanca Estela Maldonado pleaded guilt y to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 gram s of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 (prohibiting conspira cy), 841(a)(1) (prohibiting possession with intent to distribute), 841(b)(1)(A) (outlining penalty). She received, inter alia , a below-Guidelines 262-months’-imprisonment sentence.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 25, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50859 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2024No. 23-50859

2 Maldonado claims only that there is a clerical error in the written judgment’s reference to the statutes of conviction. A clerical error is when “the court intended one thing but by mer ely clerical mistake or oversight did another”. United States v. Buendia-Rangel , 553 F.3d 378, 379 (5th Cir. 2008) (citation omitted). Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, the district court “may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission”. Rule 36 applies “[w]here th e record makes it clear that an issue was actually litigated and decided bu t was incorrectly recorded in or inadvertently omitted from the judgment”. United States v. Cooper , 979 F.3d 1084, 1089 (5th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted). In this instance, the appropriate stat utes of conviction are clear from the description of the offense in the ju dgment. The judgment did not include an incorrect or inapplicable statute. And the record does not show the judgment is inconsistent with the district court’s intent. Therefore, a limited remand to correct a clerical error is not required. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; United States v. Nagin , 810 F.3d 348, 354 (5th Cir. 2016) (affirming judgment “without affecting the distri ct court’s authority to correct any clerical errors”). Nevertheless, the dist rict court may exercise its discretion to clarify its intended judgment, or Ma ldonado may move th e court to do so after her appellate proceedings are complete. See id.

AFFIRMED

. Case: 23-50859 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2024
Vernon DANIELS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9485.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Janice K. BREWER, Governor of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Joseph R. DIAZ, et al.

No. 12-23.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jack Kenneth DAVIS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 13-6866.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
Zachary Apollo KRISTON, petitioner, v. Tony PEROULIS, et al.

No. 12-7757.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Steven DEWITT, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.

No. 12-5835.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),Kambiz Hooshmand, Chief Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) or its staff upon request.     This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.       /s/ Kambiz Hooshmand **Kambiz Hooshmand**    **President and Chief Executive Officer**  Dated:November 9, 2007
Marquis HAYWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3305

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
The STANDING JOINT LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON REAPPORTIONMENT OF the MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE, appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE CONFERENCE OF the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, et al.

No. 12-1132.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Judgment Affirmed.
EX-35.3
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The servicing agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 (as amended, the
"Agreement"), among Washington Mutual Bank, as Servicer and Bank of America,
National Association as Owner the following with respect to Banc of America
Funding Corporation, Series 2007-7 ("BAFC 2007-7") (the "Securitization").


I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (formerly
known as Washington Mutual Bank, FA) (the "Servicer"), certify to the Owner,
the Depositor and the Master Servicer under the Securitization, the following
for the 2007 fiscal year (the "Relevant Year"):


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.



Dated as of March 1, 2008


/s/ H. John Berens
Name: H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
**Report on Assessment of Compliance****with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**1.The undersigned authorized officer of LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the applicable  servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) (4) (xi) and 1122(d) (4) (xii) (the "Regulation AB Servicing Criteria') for residential and commercial mortgage backed  securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment provider on the  underlying collateral (the "Platform"). Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, the servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) are not applicable to the activities the Company performed with respect to the  Platform.2.The Company used the criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) to assess the compliance with the applicable Regulation AB Servicing Criteria. 3.Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may elect to remit tax payments directly to tax agenc ies without having the Company remit those property tax payments through our tax payment service. We refer to these customers as ton-outsourced servicer customers." With respect to these non-outsourced customers and the services the Company delivered pursuant to the servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xi), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing of tax payments submitted through the Company's tax payment service. 4.With respect to servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xii), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to  its  processing of property tax penalty payments. The Company has determined that its servicer customers may also have access to systems that enable those servicers to process penalties through obligor escrow accounts. Management's assessment of compliance does not relate to the actual or potential activities of other parties with access to  obligor escrow accounts. 5.Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company has complied in all material respects with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the Platform taken as a whole. 6.The registered public accounting firm of Grant  Thornton, LLP, has issued an attestation report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Date: February 6, 2008 LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. / s /   R o b e r t   I g e  By:  Name:  Robert Ige Its: Executive Vice President ****
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

VERONICA MARTIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 3:13 CV 64

)

PROGRESSIVE PALOVERDE )

INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. ) 

d/b/a PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Having been advised by defendant’s attorney that the parties have reached a

settlement (DE # 22) but that additional time is needed to finalize the settlement

documents, the undersigned District Judge DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ENTER

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL with prejudice thirty (30) days after this order is docketed.

Each party shall bear its own costs, unless otherwise provided in the settlement documents.

If the parties fail to finalize the settlement documents within the thirty-day period,

they may– before that period expires –move to postpone entry of judgment to a later date.

Due to the settlement of this action, the Court now DENIES AS MOOT all pending

motions, and CANCELS all settings herein. Counsel are reminded that if trial witnesses

have been subpoenaed, COUNSEL MUST NOTIFY ALL WITNESSES that they are not to

appear.

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 24, 2014

s/James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1122]



[[Page 3647]]

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. N-95-3868; FR-3854-N-01]


Notice of Accepted Bid for the Section 221(g)(4) Multifamily 
Project Mortgage Auction

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of Accepted Auction Bid.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Housing Act requires that the Secretary of HUD 
cause Federal Register publication of the accepted bid in a multifamily 
project mortgage auction. Accordingly, this notice announces the name 
of the auction winner and the amount of the accepted bid for the 
auction conducted on October 25, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William S. Richbourg, Direction, Management Control Staff, Office of 
the FHA-Comptroller, Room 5144, 451 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C., 20410, telephone (202) 401-0577. Hearing- or speech-impaired 
individuals may call HUD's TDD number (202) 708-4594. (These telephone 
numbers are not toll-free.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701-
1749aaa-5) (the Act) authorizes and governs the Department's mortgage 
insurance program. On October 25, 1994, the Department conducted the 
first HUD-held multifamily project mortgage auction in ten years. The 
sale involved 206 mortgages that had been assigned to HUD under the 
Section 221(g)(4) assignment option of the Act. All 206 project 
mortgages in the auction were sold to one bidder. In accordance with 
paragraph 11.c. of the September 23, 1994 Announcement, the Department 
is publishing details concerning the accepted bid, as follows:

Winning Bidder: Lehman Brothers, Inc.
Winning Bid: 8.68% average yield

    Dated: January 10, 1995.
Nicolas P. Retsinas,
Assisstant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 95-1122 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-27-M
Exhibit 1 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 124-1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 2
1

From: David Perlson <davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com>

Date: Mar 28, 2017 4:25 PM 

Subject: Waymo - Order Setting In-Chambers Conference 

To: "Gonzalez, Arturo J." <AGonzalez@mofo.com> 

Cc: 

Arturo, on our call this afternoon regarding your request for a conference, you indicated that you could not tell me, as I 

requested, what you intended to raise at the conference. But you did indicate you did not want it on the record. The 

Court’s Order states that a court reporter will be present unless both sides stipulate otherwise by 10 am. I am not sure 

whether your position on whether it should be on the record or not has changed based on the Order, but to the extent 

you are going to be seeking a stipulation, we would need more information on what you intend to disclose at the 

hearing before we could even consider such a stipulation. Given time is short, I figured I would reach out to let you 

know. Regardless, I reiterate our request that you provide this information before the conference so that we know what 

you intend to raise with the Court in advance.

Please let me know if you would to discuss.

David

David Perlson 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Direct: (415) 875-6344 

Main Phone: (415) 875-6600 

Main Fax: (415) 875-6700 

E-mail: davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

Web: www.quinnemanuel.com

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) 

named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and 

confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the 

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, 

dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in 

error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 124-1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                      4,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,110
<PP&E>                                          41,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,112
<SALES>                                          8,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,353
<CGS>                                            5,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    823
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (107)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    158
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Cody DAVIS, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-9216.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jon W. Gacek, certify that:

| | 1) |  | I have reviewed this
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quantum Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2) |  | Based on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  report;
| |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

|Date: February 15, 2013 |                                          
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                       
|                        | /s/
      JON W. GACEK                   
|                        | Jon W. Gacek                             
|                        | President and Chief Executive
    Officer
|                        | (Principal Executive
  Officer)          

---
Marshall H. MURDOCK, petitioner, v. Roland COLSON, Warden.

No. 12-10106.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Abilene VELAZQUEZ-SEDANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10247.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Le Bon Bruce WALKER, petitioner, v. Neil SELDMAN, et al.

No. 12-1130.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Sean D. RALSTON, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8753.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Osprey Ventures, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
James Yiu Yeung Lung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Date: September 9, 2009

/s/    James Yiu
Yeung Lung

James Yiu Yeung Lung Chief
Financial Officer

---