alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/Philip Bloom_______________________

Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

 

/s/David Miller________________________

President and Principal Executive Officer

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the

Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Proposed] Order Re: Stipulation to Extend Deadline 

 to File Motion for Preliminary Approval 

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00123-JST/3:17-CV-03850-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

JON VALLIERE, EILEEN FOSTER, ANTONIO 

GARCIA, and SAMANTHA WEST, individually 

and on behalf of all similarly situated current and 

former employees, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING 

COMPANY LLC, TESORO LOGISTICS GP, LLC, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 

 Defendants. 

JINETRA BONNER, individually, on behalf herself 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING 

COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company; and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-00123-JST 

CLASS ACTION 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION 

TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ORDER 

GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 

OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 

Case No. 3:17-CV-03850-JST 
 [Proposed] Order Re: Stipulation to Extend Deadline 

 to File Motion for Preliminary Approval 

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00123-JST/3:17-CV-03850-JST 

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to File the 

Preliminary Approval Motion, and finding good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS that: 

1. The Preliminary Approval Motion shall be filed on or before February 13, 2019, and 

2. The Preliminary Approval Motion shall be heard on April 4, 2019, at 2:00 p.m., [or 

alternatively, on ___________, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.] 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: ___________, 2019 _________________________________ 

 Honorable Jon. S. Tigar 

 United States District Court, 

 Northern District of California 

 

January 9
Case 4:17-cv-00846-DMR Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:17-cv-00846-DMR Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:17-cv-00846-DMR Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:17-cv-00846-DMR Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:17-cv-00846-DMR Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:17-cv-00846-DMR Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 6
EX PARTE Gary BELL

1170047 (2160911)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Brenda S. KOMAR, petitioner, v. Denise CASSESE, et al.

No. 12-1031.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 20 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 20

  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
    Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Syria.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2023

  Mr. Gaetz submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
    Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Syria.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1544(c)), Congress directs the President to remove the United States 
Armed Forces from Syria by not later than the date that is 15 days 
after the date of the adoption of this concurrent resolution.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1384 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to update certain 

procedures applicable to commerce in firearms and remove certain Federal restrictions on interstate firearms transactions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. GINGREY (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire, 

Mr. JINDAL, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, 

Mr. WESTMORELAND, and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

update certain procedures applicable to commerce in firearms and remove certain Federal restrictions on interstate firearms transactions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearm Commerce 

5 Modernization Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1384 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT INTERSTATE FIREARMS 

2 TRANSACTIONS. 

3 (a) FIREARMS DISPOSITIONS.—Section 922(b)(3) of 

4 title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘rifle or shotgun’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘firearm’’; and 

7 (2) in subparagraph (A)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘located,’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘located or temporarily located,’’; and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘both such States’’ and in11 serting ‘‘the State in which the transfer is con12 ducted and the State of residence of the trans13 feree’’. 

14 (b) DEALER LOCATION.—Section 923(j) of such title 

15 is amended— 

16 (1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘, and such 

17 location is in the State which is specified on the li18 cense’’; 

19 (2) by striking ‘‘ ‘curios or relics’ ’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘A li21 censee may conduct firearms transfers and business 

22 in compliance with applicable State and local law 

23 with any person not a licensee at any location at 

24 which the licensee may conduct business under this 

25 chapter.’’. 

Æ
Amendment to the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.6.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC. 
 2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective
May 1, 2007 (the “Plan”) is made by Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) to be effective as of December 31, 2008. 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of certain participants; 
 WHEREAS, the Company
desires to amend certain provisions of the Plan in order to comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has reserved the right to amend the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	The first sentence of Section 1.6(b) shall be amended to add the following proviso to the end thereof to read as follows: 

 “and, provided, further, that no such adjustment shall be required if the Committee determines that such action would cause an Award to fail to
satisfy the conditions of an applicable exception from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) or otherwise would subject a Grantee to an additional tax imposed under Section 409A in respect of an
outstanding Award.” 
  

	2.	The fourth sentence of Section 2.9 shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

 “The Committee shall determine in its sole discretion whether performance shares granted in the form of share units shall be paid in cash, Common
Stock, or a combination of cash and Common Stock, provided such form of payment does not defer the inclusion of income.” 
  

	3.	The following paragraph shall be added as a new Section 3.18 of the Plan: 

 “3.18 Section 409A 
 It is the Company’s intent that the Plan comply with or be exempt
from the requirements of Section 409A. If and to the extent that any payment under the Plan is determined by the Company to constitute “non-qualified deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A and is payable to a Grantee by
reason of the Grantee’s termination of employment or service, as applicable, then (a) such payment shall be made to the Grantee only upon a “separation from service” as defined for purposes of Section 409A and (b) if
the Grantee is a “specified employee” (within the meaning of Section 409A and as determined by the Company) at the time of such termination, such payment shall not be made before the date that is six (6) months after the date of
the Grantee’s separation from service (or earlier death).” 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this
Amendment to the Plan to be duly executed on this 22nd day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
		
	By: 	 	/s/ Arthur L. Buser, Jr.
		 	 Arthur L. Buser, Jr.
 President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        I, Stephen T. McGowan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 29, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.


                                               By:    /s/ Stephen T. McGowan
                                                 -------------------------------

                                               Name:  Stephen T. McGowan
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        490,669
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 2,671
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              27,855
<PP&E>                        8,600,319
<DEPRECIATION>                5,007,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                4,113,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         191,657
<BONDS>                       6,224,229
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    (2,302,230)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,113,656
<SALES>                       661,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              670,192
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 315,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              251,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            309,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (207,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (207,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (207,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (18.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (18.51)
        

</TABLE>
O�ce of Minority Healthand Health Equity

 ?www.fda.gov/healthequity

healthequity@fda.hhs.gov

1-888-INFO-FDA(1-888-463-6332)

@FDAHealthEquity

(CGM).

•

•
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


## 136011 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136011 COA: 279358 Jackson CC: 03-000283-FH ROBERT WAYNE ANNABEL, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
Ra'quan DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Bob FIJNJE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7402.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Herbert ROZIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8964.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN L. FRANKAllan L. Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(H)


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                 THE DIAL CORPORATION 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                      (AMENDED AND RESTATED JULY 27, 2003)

         WHEREAS, The Dial Corporation (the "Company") has entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 14, 2003 by and among the
Company, Henkel KGaA and Henkel Merger Corporation (the "Merger Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, upon consummation of the merger pursuant to the Merger
Agreement (the "Effective Time"), each share of the Company's common stock (a
"Share") will be converted into the right to receive $28.75 in cash, without
interest, subject to any applicable withholding taxes, and the Shares will no
longer be publicly traded; and

         WHEREAS, under Section 9 of The Dial Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan (Amended and Restated July 27, 2003) (the "Plan"), the Company's Board of
Directors has the power to amend the Plan;

         THEREFORE, on December 14, 2003, and effective as of that date, the
Board of Directors has amended the Plan as follows:

1. The first sentence of Section 5(i) of the Plan is hereby amended by deletion
of the initial phrase, "On receipt of written notice of exercise,". The sentence
shall hereafter begin as follows: "The Committee may elect....".

2. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan, from and after the
Effective Time, (i) there shall be no grant of any options or other equity
rights or awards under the Plan, and (ii) all administrative and other rights
and authorities granted under the Plan to the Company, the Board of Directors of
the Company or any committee or designee thereof shall reside with Henkel KGaA.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing was executed as of the 14th day of
December, 2003.

                             THE DIAL CORPORATION



                             /s/ Bernhard J. Welle
                             ----------------------------------------------
                             By: Bernhard J. Welle
                             Its:Executive Vice President-Shared Services
H. R. 1285

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To extend for 3 years changes to requirements for admission of nonimmigrant 

nurses in health professional shortage areas made by the Nursing Relief for 

Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged 

Areas Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

SEC. 2. 3-YEAR EXTENSION FOR CHANGES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR 

ADMISSION OF NONIMMIGRANT NURSES IN HEALTH 

PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS. 

Section 2 of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act 

of 1999 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended—

(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘4-YEAR’’ and 

inserting ‘‘SPECIFIED’’; and 

(2) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows: 

‘‘(e) LIMITING APPLICATION OF NONIMMIGRANT CHANGES TO

SPECIFIED PERIOD.—The amendments made by this section shall 

apply to classification petitions filed for nonimmigrant status only 

during the period—

‘‘(1) beginning on the date that interim or final regulations 

are first promulgated under subsection (d); and 

‘‘(2) ending on the date that is 3 years after the date 

of the enactment of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas 

Reauthorization Act of 2005.’’. 

SEC. 3. EXEMPTION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. 

The requirements of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code 

(commonly referred to as the ‘‘Administrative Procedure Act’’) or 

any other law relating to rulemaking, information collection or 

publication in the Federal Register, shall not apply to any action 

to implement the amendments made by section 2 to the extent 

the Secretary Homeland of Security, the Secretary of Labor, or 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that 
H. R. 1285—2

compliance with any such requirement would impede the expeditious implementation of such amendments.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.