alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-65

)

CAMERON PATTERSON )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Susan Collins, on

March 23, 2015, with the written consents of the Defendant, counsel for the Defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the Defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2015.

/s Susan Collins 

Susan Collins

United States Magistrate Judge

2
Exhibit 10.6


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.


2008 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This
FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”)
to the 2008 Annual Incentive Plan (the “Agreement”)
dated February 15, 2008, is hereby made and entered as of the 20th day of October, 2008 by Cano Petroleum, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).  Terms used in this Amendment with initial
capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, Article VII of the Agreement provides that
the Committee may change or modify the Agreement in a writing; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the definition of
the term “Committee” under the Agreement and to change the date in Section 5.1
of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Section Article VII of
the Agreement, the Agreement is amended as follows:


 


1.             Article I,
the definition of Committee shall be amended in its entirety to read as
follows:


 


“Committee” means all members of the Board that are “non-employee
directors,” as such term is defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and “outside directors,” as such term is
defined in Section 162(m) of the Code, with the minimum number of
members of the Committee being two members.


 


2.                                       Section 5.1
shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


Form and Time of Payment.  Subject to the provisions of Sections 5.2
and 5.3 below and except as otherwise provided herein, a Participant’s
Incentive Compensation for each Performance Period shall be paid as soon as
practicable after the results for such Performance Period have been finalized,
but in no event later than [November 1] of the first fiscal year
immediately following the close of such Performance Period which is within the
short-term deferral period set forth in Section 409A of the Code.  The payment shall be in the form directed by
the Committee and may either be paid in a cash lump sum payment or in
installments.


 


*************


 

















 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee
has authorized the Company to execute this Amendment the day and year first
above written.


 


	
   

  	
  CANO
  PETROLEUM, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  S. Jeffrey Johnson

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman and CEO
www.fda.gov/collegewomen

RESOURCES FOR 

COLLEGE

WOMEN

ON TOPICS INCLUDING:

GENERAL HEALTH AND BEAUTY

MEDICATION SAFETY

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

AND MUCH MORE!
Bahig F. BISHAY, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 12M115.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/  C.S. ParkDr. C.S. ParkChairman and Chief Executive
Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Kerry J. McCullagh, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Contact Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/
      Kerry J. McCullagh
| | ------ | ----------------------------
| | Name:  | KERRY J. McCULLAGH          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and 
| |        | Chief Financial Officer     
| | Date:  | October 5, 2011             

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Perry Joe PATTERSON, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-9133.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
David P. RICHARDS, petitioner, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General.

No. 12-1206.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 123 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Wildomar Service Area Recycled 

Water Distribution Facilities and Alberhill Wastewater Treatment and 

Reclamation Facility Projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, and Mrs. BONO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Wildomar Service Area Recycled 

Water Distribution Facilities and Alberhill Wastewater 

Treatment and Reclamation Facility Projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elsinore Valley Munic5 ipal Water District Wastewater and Recycled Water Fa6 cilities Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 123 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 adding after section 1636 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1637. ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DIS7 TRICT PROJECTS, CALIFORNIA. 

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera9 tion with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, 

10 California, may participate in the design, planning, and 

11 construction of permanent facilities needed to establish re12 cycled water distribution and wastewater treatment and 

13 reclamation facilities that will be used to treat wastewater 

14 and provide recycled water in the Elsinore Valley Munic15 ipal Water District, California. 

16 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

17 of each project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

18 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

19 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

20 under this section shall not be used for operation or main21 tenance of the projects described in subsection (a). 

22 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

23 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

24 $12,500,000.’’. 
3 

•HR 123 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by insert3 ing after the item relating to section 1636 the following: 

‘‘1637. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Projects, California.’’. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

MAQUILLA C HAYES, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) Case No.2:13-CV-35

 ) 

KEYSTONE WESTERN, INC. and )

PAWEL PLAWNY, ) 

 )

Defendants. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On July 22, 2013, the plaintiff, Maquilla C. Hayes’, counsel

filed a motion to withdraw, stating that she had been unable to

contact the plaintiff at her last known address or telephone

number since May 1, 2013. The court set this matter for a status

conference on March 7, 2014, and mailed notice to Hayes at her

last known address. The mail was returned undeliverable and the

court is without a forwarding address or contact information for

the plaintiff. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this matter

be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. 

ENTERED This 14th day of February, 2014

/s/ Andrew P. Rodovich

United States Magistrate Judge 

1
 



✘

 

Если, работая с готовой к употреблению пищей, вы надеваете перчатки или используете 

кухонную посуду, то вы оберегаете безопасность пищи и ваших посетителей.

Оберегайте людей от заболеваний. Работая с готовой к употреблению пищей, всегда 

надевайте перчатки или используйте кухонную посуду.
Juan GONZALES, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-8839.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Isaac L. WALKER, petitioner, v. Ralph C. STITH.

No. 13-6280.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 18, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
|    |                                                                                                            |  |  |  |  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Colony Bankcorp, Inc; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |  |  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
Luis MADRID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

        Combination Products

Combination Products Meetings, Conferences, & Workshops Home
          Combination Products
          Combination Products Meetings, Conferences, & WorkshopsCombination Products Combination Products Meetings, Conferences, & Workshops
  	
        Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintPresentations, articles, and information about combination product meetings.Meetings and presentations from previous years are available in the FDA Archive.Meetings, Conferences and WorkshopsWebinar on the Final Rule on Postmarketing Safety Reporting (PMSR) for Combination Products (Feb. 3, 2017)

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      03/12/2018Combination Products Meetings, Conferences, & Workshops
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Carl J. NICHOLS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-8545.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1460

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostStubenhofer Post Office Building’’. Springfield, Virginia, as the ‘‘Captain Mark al Service located at 6200 Rolling Road in

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1460

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 6200 Rolling Road in Springfield, Virginia,

as the ‘‘Captain Mark Stubenhofer Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1460 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 6200 Rolling Road in Springfield, Virginia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Mark

5 Stubenhofer Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Captain Mark Stubenhofer Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 2005.

Attest:

Clerk.
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 1 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 2 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 3 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 4 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 5 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 6 of 7
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR document 12 filed 03/06/13 page 7 of 7
Richard Louis Arnold PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. Kevin CHAPPELL, Warden.

No. 12-5890.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ricky BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Max ROBESON, et al.

No. 12-9119.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO 

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Kyle Smith (Dkt. No. 90) is DENIED for failing

to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or she is an

active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of

another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out

the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the state of bar

membership — e.g., “the bar of District of Columbia” — is inadequate under the rule because it

fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the

application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 100 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.:





We consent to the use of our report dated March 3, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-174742, No. 333-175002, No. 333-175559, and No. 333-184752) on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-164928 and No. 333-182269) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-164926) on Form S-1, and the registration statement (No. 333-186690) on Form S-4 of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, which report appears in amendment no. 1 to the December 31, 2013 annual report on Form 10-K of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California


March 31, 2014
Edward ORYEM, petitioner, v. William RICHARDSON, et al.

No. 12-8681.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Randy GROUNDS, Acting Warden, petitioner, v. Tio Dinero SESSOMS.

No. 12-804.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Salinas v. Texas,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2174, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).