alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

 

Certification ofChief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arbor EnTech Corporation (the “Company”) forthe fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”),Harvey Houtkin, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2004, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation in the Quarterly Report, and the information in the Report, fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|                           | /s/ Harvey Houtkin      |   |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                           | Harvey Houtkin          |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated:  December 14, 2004 |                    |

 

1

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40283 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MIGUEL ESPARZA

- SALAZAR , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 644

- 1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Miguel Esparza

- Salazar appeals the below

- guidelines sentence of 84 months of imp risonment for his conviction of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(1). After Esparza

- Salazar pleaded guilty and the district court accepted the plea, he and the Government entered a so called “plea agreement” that contained , in part, a sentencing recommendation. The agreement also contained an appeal waiver, which the Government now

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40283 Document: 00514887206 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2019No. 18

- 40283

2 seeks to enforce. Esparza

- Salazar argues that the appeal waiver is ineffect ive because the district court failed to review its terms with him, as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(N). Because the appeal waiver is ineffective, Esparza

- Salazar argues, this court can consider the merits of his appeal. As to t he merits, Esparza

- Salazar argues that the district court improperly sentenced him to more than two years of imprisonment because the § 13 26(b) statutory enhancement is unconstitutional , particularly where, as here, it was not pleaded in the indictment and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Esparza

- Salazar correctly concedes that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the argument for possi ble Supreme Court review. In the interest of judic ial efficiency, we pretermit the non

- jurisdictional appeal waiver issue and proceed to the merits

. See United States v. Story , 439 F.3d 226, 230

- 31 (5th Cir. 2006 ). In Almendarez

- Torres , 523 U.S. at 239

- 47, the Supreme Court held that for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We have held that subsequent Suprem e Court decisions did not overrule Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 7 59 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014 ); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 62 5

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007 ). Because Esparza

- Salazar ’s sole argument on the merits is fore closed, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Case: 18-40283 Document: 00514887206 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/25/2019
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of China Housing and Land  Development,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending March 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated:  May 18, 2006                      By: /s/ Wan Yulong
                                              -----------------------
                                              Wan Yulong
                                              Chief Financial Officer


                                       19
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report) of Kiewit Royalty Trust (the Trust), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Luke H. Paladino, the trust officer of U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee of the Trust,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009                        
|                                          
|/s/ Luke H. Paladino                      
|                                          
|Luke H. Paladino, Trust Officer           
|                                          
|U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
|
Ronald HAMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9945.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.1

MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
  ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS
  ------------------------
     PCAOB REGISTERED

         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
         --------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K of Total Nutraceutical
Solutions of our report dated March 6, 2009 on our audit of the financial
statements of Total Nutraceutical Solutions as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for the year then ended December 31, 2008, for the period from inception on
July 19, 2007 to December 31, 2007, and for the period from inception on
July 19, 2007 through December 31, 2008.

/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered
---------------------------------
    Moore & Associates Chartered
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    March 30, 2009


                  6490 West Desert Inn Road, Las Vegas, NV 89146
                        (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501

<PAGE>
Robert BANUSHI, petitioner, v. Alvin L. PALMER, et al.

No. 12-1052.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Dievlese WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-1325

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SCOTT R. BLEVINS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:13-CV-036-TLS

)

KELLY GOSSELIN, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] and Application

to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] filed on January 15,

2013. The Plaintiff, Scott R. Blevins, proceeding pro se, alleges that Judge Kelly Gosselin of the

Franklin County Superior Court, Family Division, denied him a DNA test and awarded custody

of his child to another person in a case in the State of Vermont. (Compl. 2, ECF No. 1.) In

conclusion, the Plaintiff requests relief in the form of compensatory damages for mental anguish

and an order removing Judge Gosselin from the bench. (Id. 3.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must screen the Plaintiff’s Complaint and dismiss any claims that are

legally frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or ask for

money damages from a defendant who by law cannot be sued for money damages.

Having reviewed the Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court concludes that he cannot proceed

with any of his claims. This Court is not the proper venue for a case against a Vermont residentdefendant whose actions giving rise to the claim occurred in Vermont. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this case must be dismissed unless it should be transferred in

the interests of justice. Here, transferring the case would be futile because Judge Gosselin has

absolute immunity for judicial acts that are within the jurisdiction of the court. See Stump v.
Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978). This is true even if the “exercise of authority is flawed by the

commission of grave procedural errors.” Stump, 435 U.S. at 359. “If a judge errs through

inadvertence or otherwise, a party’s remedy is through appellate process.” Dawson v. Newman,

419 F.3d 656, 661 (7th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Defendant sits in the

Family Division of the Vermont Superior Court in Franklin County. That court has jurisdiction

over child custody cases. Ruling on requests for DNA testing and awarding custody of children

is within the jurisdiction of that court. Consequently, the Defendant has absolute judicial

immunity for her judicial acts and the Plaintiff cannot recover monetary damages from her.

Further, the Court has no authority to remove the Defendant from her position. Therefore,

Defendant’s Complaint must be dismissed. 

For the reasons set forth above, the Court DENIES the Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed

in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] and DISMISSES the Plaintiff’s

Complaint [ECF No. 1] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) & (iii). 

SO ORDERED on February 4, 2013.

 s/Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

2
# L_2018259EN.01004301.xml

| 16.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1522 of 11 October 2018 laying down a common format for national air pollution control programmes under Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 256 of 12 October 2018
  )

On the cover and on page 87:

for:

‘
  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1522 of 11 October 2018 laying down a common format for national air pollution control programmes under Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants
  (notified under document C(2018) 6549)
  ’,

read:

‘
  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1522 of 11 October 2018 laying down a common format for national air pollution control programmes under Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants
  ’

---
Bruno DIPASQUALE, Appellant, v. Lisette DIPASQUALE, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2266 2D17-2267 CONSOLIDATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

Raymond J. Rafool and David R. Hazouri of Rafool, LLC, Miami, for Appellant.

Cynthia B. Hall of Silveri & Ball, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Bruno DiPasquale appeals from the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Lisette DiPasquale and from the order denying his motion to modify the parties' partial marital settlement agreement (PMSA). We affirm without prejudice to Mr. DiPasquale asserting the arguments he has raised in this appeal in a subsequent petition for modification. *Cf.**Dogoda v. Dogoda*, 233 So.3d 484, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("In cases involving an MSA, the effective date of the agreement establishes the date to which a trial court should look in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances was contemplated by the parties.").

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ E. James Collord

By  __________________________________

E.  James Collord

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 15
Употребление приготовленной пищи, которая хранилась более

7 дней, может стать причиной плохого самочувствия клиентов!

Защита людей в любой ситуации.

Используйте или утилизируйте охлажденную 

приготовленную пищу в течение 7 дней!

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection

Срок при температуре 41°F (5°C) в днях
Keeping prepared foods longer than

7 days can make your customers sick!

Protect People Everywhere.

Serve or discard refrigerated,

prepared food within 7 days!

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection

Days at 41oF (5oC)
Antwon PARKER, petitioner, v. David FORTNER, et al.

No. 12-9048.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER REFERRING MOTION

TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

OF WITHHELD DOCUMENTS

TO JUDGE CORLEY

Plaintiff Waymo LLC moves to “compel production of the withheld [due diligence]

report and attachments in addition to all other relevant information, files, and electronic media

currently in the possession of Stroz Friedberg” (Dkt. No. 321). This motion is hereby

REFERRED to and shall be decided by Judge Corley, who is overseeing discovery in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 350 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal American FinancialCorp. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Robert A.Waegelein, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date: November 9, 2005 |   | /s/ RICHARD A.  BARASCH   |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                        |   | Richard A. Barasch        |
|                        |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                        |   |                      |
| Date: November 9, 2005 |   | /s/ ROBERT A.  WAEGELEIN  |
|                        |   | Robert A. Waegelein       |
|                        |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

*A signed originalof this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theRegistrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.*

----
Orlando A. HAYNES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9566.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

S/M REAL ESTATE FUND VII, LTD.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of S/M Real Estate Fund VII,
          Ltd. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
          30, 2003, as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
          hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard E. Hoffmann, Chief Executive Officer
          of the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
          U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                         of 1934; and

                    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
                         presents, in all material respects, the financial
                         condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

                                         S/M REAL ESTATE FUND VII, LTD.

                                     BY: SM7 APARTMENT INVESTORS INC.
                                         General Partner

          Date: November 13, 2003        BY: /s/ Richard E. Hoffmann
                                             -------------------------------
                                         Name: Richard E. Hoffmann
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer,
                                                Director, President and
                                                Treasurer

                                                                              16
UPPER BLACKSTONE WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT DISTRICT, petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

No. 12-797.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Fredrick ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-893

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Protect People Everywhere By Not Working When You Are Sick.

Before you go to work, ask yourself: “Do I feel well today?”
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 Axcess International Announces Dot TM Micro-Wireless Technology for
Business Activity Monitoring  Tiny Wireless Signals Make Everything Manageable
 DALLAS, TX, November 6, 2007




---



##### 



Ô
 TM
  About Axcess International Inc.
 Amphion Innovations plc www.axcessinc.com.
 Media ContactsPublic Relations  Driver Public Relations
    
    Public Relations  Financial DynamicsKenni Driver
    
    Jessy Adams972.978.6455
    
    212.850.5684kenni.driver@driverpr.com
    
    jessy.adams@fd.comFor: Business, IT/Technology, Broadcast,
Entertainment, Mining and Analysts
    
    For: RFID, Sensors, Homeland
Security, Security, Government,
Finance, Healthcare, Oil &
Gas/Chemical, Ports/Logistics,
Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Asset
Management and other verticals




---



##### 



Media Contact  Axcess International
    
    Investor Relations  Darrow AssociatesCarrie Morris
    
    Jordan Darrow972.250.3000
    
    631.367.1866cmorris@axsi.com
    
    jdarrow@darrowir.com
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1271 

To repeal a provision relating to privacy officers in the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2005 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To repeal a provision relating to privacy officers in the 

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PRIVACY OFFICER PROVISION. 

4 Section 522 of the Transportation, Treasury, Inde5 pendent Agencies, and General Government Appropria6 tions Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–447; 118 Stat. 3268; 

7 5 U.S.C. 552a note), is hereby repealed. 

Æ
Ryheim HILL, petitioner, v. Jerome W. WALSH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

No. 11-10983.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 661   Filed 06/19/17   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA   Document 661   Filed 06/19/17   Page 2 of 2