25760 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices

test data or such other evidence as

NHTSA decides to be adequate.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and

affords interested persons an

opportunity to comment on the petition.

At the close of the comment period,

NHTSA decides, on the basis of the

petition and any comments that it has

received, whether the vehicle is eligible

for importation. The agency then

publishes this determination in the

Federal Register.

G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of

Santa Ana, California (‘‘G&K’’)

(Registered Importer No. R–90–007)

petitioned NHTSA to decide whether

1985 Hobson Horse Trailers are eligible

for importation into the United States.

NHTSA published notice of the petition

on March 15, 1995 (60 FR 14053) to

afford an opportunity for public

comment. NHTSA published a second

notice identifying the correct name of

the vehicle on March 24, 1995 (60 FR

15623). The reader is referred to those

notices for a thorough description of the

petition. No comments were received in

response to the notice of petition. Based

on its review of the information

submitted by the petitioner, NHTSA has

decided to grant the petition.

Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject

Vehicles

The importer of a vehicle admissible

under any final determination must

indicate on the form HS–7

accompanying entry the appropriate

vehicle eligibility number indicating

that the vehicle is eligible for entry.

VCP–08 is the vehicle eligibility number

for entry. VCP–08 is the vehicle

eligibility number assigned to vehicles

admissible under this determination.

Final Determination

Accordingly, on the basis of the

foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that

1985 Hobson Horse Trailers are eligible

for importation into the United States

because they have safety features that

comply with, or are capable of being

altered to comply with, all applicable

Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) and

(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority

at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: May 8, 1995.

Marilynne Jacobs,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–11730 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–M

[Docket No. 95–10; Notice 2]

Decision That Nonconforming 1973

Dodge Colt 2-Door Coupes Are Eligible

for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA

that nonconforming 1973 Dodge Colt 2-

Door Coupes are eligible for

importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

decision by NHTSA that 1973 Dodge

Colt 2-Door Coupes not originally

manufactured to comply with all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards are eligible for importation

into the United States because they are

substantially similar to a vehicle

originally manufactured for importation

into and sale in the United States and

certified by its manufacturer as

complying with the safety standards

(the U.S.-certified version of the 1973

Dodge Colt 2-Door Coupe), and they are

capable of being readily altered to

conform to the standards.

DATES: This decision is effective May

12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle

Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–

5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i) of the

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle

Safety Act (the Act)), a motor vehicle

that was not originally manufactured to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards shall be refused

admission into the United States unless

NHTSA has decided that the motor

vehicle is substantially similar to a

motor vehicle originally manufactured

for importation into and sale in the

United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.

30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act),

and of the same model year as the

model of the motor vehicle to be

compared, and is capable of being

readily altered to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and

affords interested persons an

opportunity to comment on the petition.

At the close of the comment period,

NHTSA decides, on the basis of the

petition and any comments that it has

received, whether the vehicle is eligible

for importation. The agency then

publishes this decision in the Federal

Register.

G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of

Santa Ana, California (Registered

Importer R–90–007) petitioned NHTSA

to decide whether 1973 Dodge Colt 2-

Door Coupe passenger cars are eligible

for importation into the United States.

NHTSA published notice of the petition

on March 14, 1995 (60 FR 13760) to

afford an opportunity for public

comment. The reader is referred to that

notice for a thorough description of the

petition. No comments were received in

response to the notice. Based on its

review of the information submitted by

the petitioner, NHTSA has decided to

grant the petition.

Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject

Vehicles

The importer of a vehicle admissible

under any final decision must indicate

on the form HS–7 accompanying entry

the appropriate vehicle eligibility

number indicating that the vehicle is

eligible for entry. VSP–112 is the

vehicle eligibility number assigned to

vehicles admissible under this decision.

Final Determination

Accordingly, on the basis of the

foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that a

1973 Dodge Colt 2-Door Coupe not

originally manufactured to comply with

all applicable Federal motor vehicle

safety standards is substantially similar

to a 1973 Dodge Colt 2-Door Coupe

originally manufactured for importation

into and sale in the United States and

certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and is

capable of being readily altered to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and

(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority

at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: May 8, 1995.

Marilynne Jacobs,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–11729 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–M

Research and Special Programs

Administration

[Pipeline Safety Advisory Bulletin ADB–95–

01]

Auditing of Drug and Alcohol Plans by

Consortiums or Third Party

Administrators

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs

Administration (RSPA) DOT.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 1995 / Notices 25761

SUMMARY: The information provided

herein is to inform pipeline owners and

operators of situations in which

consortiums or third party

administrators are utilizing operator

authority to require unwarranted

changes to contractor anti-drug and

alcohol misuse prevention plans.

Advisory: The Office of Pipeline

Safety (OPS) is advising pipeline

operators of reports concerning

consortiums and third party

administrators (TPA) that offer the

service of auditing anti-drug and alcohol

misuse prevention plans for the pipeline

industry. Some of these auditing

companies are requiring pipeline

contractors to pay for revisions of their

plans that may not be necessary for

compliance purposes, or will make a

recommendation to the pipeline

operator that the use of these particular

contractors could result in noncompliance. While this may be

appropriate in some cases, OPS has

evaluated several reports of instances

where the contractor’s plans and

procedures were adequate and did not

require revision. OPS recommends that

pipeline operators provide an appeal

process for contractors who believe that

the auditing company’s

recommendation is unjustified.

Background: RSPA regulations, 49

CFR 199.21 and 199.245 require

pipeline operators to ensure that the

requirements of the drug and alcohol

regulations are complied with by

contractors performing an operation,

maintenance, or emergency response

function. To ensure compliance,

operators are required to evaluate the

contractor’s anti-drug and alcohol

misuse prevention plans and

procedures. Many operators utilize

consortiums and TPAs to provide this

service.

In this type of arrangement, the

consortium or TPA will review the

contractor’s plan and may require the

contractor to make certain modifications

to the plan and resubmit it for final

evaluation. The process may be repeated

several times until the consortium or

TPA is satisfied with the plan. Reports

to RSPA indicate that when a contractor

does not make the requested changes,

the consortium or TPA will sometimes

recommend to the pipeline operator that

the contractor not be used.

The consortiums and TPAs generally

have a charge for the initial plan review

and additional fees for subsequent

reviews. Many consortiums and TPAs

offer to correct the plan for the

contractor at an additional charge.

OPS has received several reports of

consortiums and TPAs requiring

changes unnecessary for compliance

purposes to documents that were

created following guidance in the RSPA

model plans (as described below). These

auditing companies are rejecting plans

and stating that they are not adequate.

Upon notification of the rejection of

their plan, some contractors sought the

guidance of OPS to rectify the alleged

non-compliance. OPS review of several

of the cases determined that the plans

had been prepared in accordance with

the RSPA model plans and that no

changes were necessary to comply with

Federal regulations.

OPS has issued guidance material, i.e.

a model anti-drug plan and a model

alcohol misuse prevention plan, for the

use of pipeline operators and their

contractors to meet the requirements of

Parts 199 and 40. These plans, when

appropriately modified for the

individual company, should meet the

minimum Federal requirements for

compliance.

Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 8,

1995.

Cesar De Leon,

Acting Associate Administrator for Pipeline

Safety.

[FR Doc. 95–11728 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–60–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection

Requirements Submitted to OMB for

Review

May 5, 1995.

The Department of Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,

Public Law 96–511. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–1308

Regulation ID Number: PS–260–82 Final

Type of Review: Extension

Title: Election, Revocation,

Termination, and Tax Effect of

Subchapter S Status

Description: Sections 1.1362–1 through

1.1362–7 of the Income Tax

Regulations provide the specific

procedures and requirements

necessary to implement § 1362,

including the filing of various

elections and statements with the

Internal Revenue Service.

Respondents: Individuals or

households, Business or other forprofit, Farms

Estimated Number of Respondents: 133

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Respondent: 4 hours, 20 minutes

Frequency of Response: On occasion

Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 322

hours

Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202)

622–3869, Internal Revenue Service,

Room 5571, 1111 Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20224

OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202)

395–7340, Office of Management and

Budget, Room 10226, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, DC

20503

Lois K. Holland,

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–11738 Filed 5–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

Public Information Collection

Requirements Submitted to OMB for

Review

May 2, 1995.

The Department of Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,

Public Law 96–511. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–0092

Form Number: IRS Form 1041 and

Related Schedules D, J, and K–1

Type of Review: Extension

Title: U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates

and Trusts (1041); Capital Gains and

Losses (Schedule D); Accumulation

Distribution for a Complex Trust

(Schedule J); and Beneficiary’s Share

of Income, Deductions, Credits

(Schedule K–1)

Description: Internal Revenue Code

(IRC) section 6012 requires that an

annual income tax return be filed for

estates and trusts. Data is used to

determine that the estates, trusts, and

beneficiaries filed the proper returns

and paid the correct tax. IRC section

59 requires the fiduciary to recompute

the distributable net income on a

minimum tax basis.