alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-22-TLS 

)

JAVIER MADRIGAL )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 41], filed on July 26, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 41] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 5 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on August 16, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11835]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 94

[Public Notice 2201]


Office of Overseas Citizens Services; International Child 
Abduction

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Central Authority for the Hague Abduction Convention 
has been changed from the Office of Citizens Consular Services to the 
Office of Children's Issues.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beth H. Cooper, Office, Office of Policy Review and Interagency 
Liaison, Overseas Citizens Services, tele: (202) 647-3666, fax: (202) 
647-6201.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 94

    Infants and Children, Treaties.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 22 CFR part 94 is amended 
as follows:

PART 94--INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION

    1. The authority citation for 22 CFR Part 94 continues to read as 
follows:


    Authority: Hauge Convention on the Civil Aspects of 
International Child Abduction: The federal ``International Child 
Abduction Remedies Act,'' Pub. L. 100-300.

    2. Section 94.2 is revised to read as follows:


Sec. 94.2  Designation of central authority.

    The Office of Children's Issues in the Bureau of Consular Affairs 
is designated as the U.S. Central Authority to discharge the duties 
which are imposed by the Convention and the International Child 
Abduction Remedies Act upon such authorities.

    Dated: April 28, 1995.
Mary A. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-11835 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11088]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 9000-0017]


Clearance Request for Jewel Bearings and Related Items 
Certificate Requirements

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of request for an extension to an existing OMB clearance 
(9000-0017).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 
(44 U.S.C. 3501), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Secretariat 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to 
review and approve an extension of a currently approved information 
collection requirement concerning Jewel Bearings and Related Items 
Certificate Requirements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Beverly Fayson, Office of Federal Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 501-
4755.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    This request covers recordkeeping and information collection 
requirements regarding the need for and use of jewel bearings and 
related items. The requirements are necessary to ensure contractor 
compliance with contract clauses regarding required usage of 
Government-owned sources of supplies for such items.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 6.75 minutes per completion, including the time 
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate 
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 
suggestions for reducing this burden, to General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat, 18th & F Streets, NW., Room 4037, 
Washington, DC 20405, and to the FAR Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503.

    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows: Respondents, 
13,500; responses per respondent, 20; total annual responses, 270,000; 
preparation hours per response, .1125; and total response burden hours, 
30,375.

OBTAINING COPIES OF PROPOSALS: Requester may obtain copies of OMB 
applications or justifications from the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VRS), Room 4037, Washington, DC 20405, 
telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0017, Jewel 
Bearings and Related Items Certificate Requirements, in all 
correspondence.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.

Beverly Fayson,

FAR Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 95-11088 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         950,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      28,300,100
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,424,591)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,931,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          509,022
<BONDS>                                      8,268,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,154,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,931,532
<SALES>                                        903,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               906,934
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  449,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               287,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,842)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,842)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
骨粗しょう症

骨粗しょう症とは、何で

すか?

骨粗しょう症は、骨が非常に弱くなり、壊

れやすくなる病気です。

どんな人が成りやすいで

すか?

誰でも骨粗しょう症になる可能性がありま

すが、女性は男性よりも骨粗しょう症にな

る可能性が高いです。次の場合は、なりや

すいです。

• 50歳以上

• 煙草を吸う

• 体重が軽い

• 骨粗しょう症または骨折した家族がいる

• 十分な運動をしない

• お酒やビールを飲む(1日3杯以上)

• てんかん薬やステロイドなどの特定の薬を

長期間服用している

骨粗しょう症かどうかは、ど

うすればわかりますか?

線または超音波のいずれかを使用して骨密度を

測定する検査があります。これらのテストは、

痛くありません。あなたがテストを受けるべき

かどうか、あなたのかかりつけの医師に尋ねて

ください。

• DXAスキャンと呼ばれるX線検査では、脊椎、

腰、または手首を検査します。DXAスキャン

は、ごく弱いX線を使用します。

• 超音波を使った比較的新しいテストは、踵を

検査します。

どのような治療があります

か?

骨粗しょう症を治す方法はありません。進行を

遅くする方法は、あります。あなたの骨を健康

に保つための計画を立てるために、あなたのか

かりつけの医師に相談してください。

FDA 婦人保健部

www.fda.gov/womens
このファクトシートは、FDA婦人保健部によって作成されました。

女性の健康に関する他の情報を知るには、以下のURLをアクセスしてください。

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

処方薬

進行を止める処方薬があります。処方薬は、飲み

薬、パッチ、または注射の形で提供されます。薬

の服用を止める前に医師、看護師、または薬剤師

に相談してください。

ビスフォスフォネートは、骨量減少を遅らせるた

めに投与される、一般的な薬です。あなたの医師

は、他の薬を勧めるかもしれません。

• 薬をどのくらいの期間服用すべきか、医師と相

談してください。

• 股関節や太ももに新しい痛みなどの副作用が出

始めた場合は、医師に相談してください。過去

に大腿骨を骨折したことがある人も、これらの

薬を服用することがあります。

• 薬の中には喉を刺激するものがあります。

• 顎の骨に深刻な問題が引き起こされることもあ

ります。

ダイエット・サプリメント

ダイエット・サプリメントは、人々が食事以外に

摂取する製品です。ビタミン、粉末、エネルギ

ー・バー、およびハーブが含まれます。

ダイエット・サプリメントを服用する前に、医師

に相談してください。 これらはあなたが服用し

ている他の処方薬に影響を及ぼし、病気を引き起

こすかもしれません。

ライフスタイルを変える

骨粗しょう症のリスクを下げるためにできる、ラ

イフスタイルの変化があります。

• 肉体的にアクティブな状態を保ちます。 ウォ

ーキングのような体重負荷運動をします。

• 禁煙する。

• お酒の量を減らす。

• カルシウムとビタミンDを十分摂取してくださ

い。あなたの医師はカルシウムとビタミン剤の

服用を勧めるかもしれません。

骨粗しょう症

骨粗しょう症 (JAPANESE)
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

CECILE FOY GSANGER NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS CH RISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

Au gust 14, 2015

Hon. Abel Acosta, Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

201 West 14th St., Room 106

Austin, TX 78701

Re: Cause No. 13

- 11

- 00442

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 07

- 06200

- CRF

- 272

Style: DAVID SAMARIPAS JR. v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

The record in the above cause was this day electronically submitted to the Court

of Criminal Appeals.

Very truly yours,

Cecil e Foy Gsanger, Clerk

DER:ch

cc: Judge Travis B. Bryan III

Hon. Marc Hamlin (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Richard E. Wetzel (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
Montrago Latron DRAKE, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 12-8957.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit, denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHUNG KAO,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. SORIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00873-HSG (PR) 

JUDGMENT

A judgment of dismissal without prejudice is entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

6/19/2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

KACIE KRAUSE and MARCUS HARVEY, )

Individually and on Behalf of KH, a minor, ) 

)

Plaintiffs, )

) 

v. ) 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR

)

KEITH M. RAMSEY, M.D., P.C., et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Plaintiffs filed their personal injury complaint in state court against several healthcare 

provider individuals and entities. The United States Attorney General removed the case to 

federal court because some of the defendants were acting within the scope of their office or 

employment as deemed Public Health Service employees, so the United States stepped into the 

place of those defendants. (Docket Entry 2.) No counsel for any defendant appeared in federal 

court other than counsel for the United States. The United States and the plaintiffs filed a joint 

Stipulation of Dismissal and Joint Motion to Remand (DE 20) on March 14, 2014, pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties stipulated to dismiss defendant United States from the 

case, without prejudice. With the United States dismissed from the case, there is no longer a 

basis for federal jurisdiction, and the principal of comity recommends that state courts adjudicate 

state law. 

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs’ claims against defendant United States of America 

are therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE (DE 20), with each party to bear their 

/// 

/// 

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 21 filed 03/17/14 page 1 of 2
own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. This case against the remaining defendants is now 

REMANDED to Lake Superior Court. (DE 20.) 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: March 17, 2014 

/s/ Philip P. Simon_______ 

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00345-PPS-APR document 21 filed 03/17/14 page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11112]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-942-000]


New England Power Company; Notice of Filing

May 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 24, 1995, New England Power Company, 
tendered for filing a revised Service Agreement between New England 
Power Company and Braintree Electric Light Department for transmission 
service under NEP's FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 3.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before May 15, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11112 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Официален вестник C 8/9 ян

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 8 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 629 януари 2019 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 8

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 629 януари 2019 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Европейски парламент |
| 2019/C 8/01 | Решение | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейски парламент

2019/C 8/01

Решение

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейски парламент

| 9.1.2019 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 8/1

---

РЕШЕНИЕ

(2019/C 8/01)

ГЕНЕРАЛНИЯТ СЕКРЕТАР НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ,

| — | КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД Регламент (ЕИО, Евратом, ЕОВС) No 259/68 на Съвета (1), изменен по-специално с Регламент (ЕС, Евратом) No 1023/2013 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 22 октомври 2013 г. за изменение на Правилника за длъжностните лица на Европейския съюз и на Условията за работа на другите служители на Европейския съюз (2), и по-специално член 30 от този правилник, |
| --- | --- |

—

КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД Регламент (ЕИО, Евратом, ЕОВС) No 259/68 на Съвета (1), изменен по-специално с Регламент (ЕС, Евратом) No 1023/2013 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 22 октомври 2013 г. за изменение на Правилника за длъжностните лица на Европейския съюз и на Условията за работа на другите служители на Европейския съюз (2), и по-специално член 30 от този правилник,

| — | КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД решението на Бюрото на Европейския парламент от 13 януари 2014 г. относно делегирането на правомощията на органа по назначаването и на органа, оправомощен да сключва трудови договори, |
| --- | --- |

—

КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД решението на Бюрото на Европейския парламент от 13 януари 2014 г. относно делегирането на правомощията на органа по назначаването и на органа, оправомощен да сключва трудови договори,

| — | КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД изтичането на 31 декември 2018 г. на следните списъци на Европейския парламент на издържалите конкурс (31 декември 2018 г.):
  AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S, |
| --- | --- |

—

КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД изтичането на 31 декември 2018 г. на следните списъци на Европейския парламент на издържалите конкурс (31 декември 2018 г.):

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S,

| — | КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД становището на съвместната комисия от нейното заседание, състояло се на 24 октомври 2018 г., |
| --- | --- |

—

КАТО ВЗЕ ПРЕДВИД становището на съвместната комисия от нейното заседание, състояло се на 24 октомври 2018 г.,

РЕШИ:

Член единствен

Валидността на списъците на издържалите конкурс:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S,

се удължава до 31 декември 2019 г.

Люксембург, 30 ноември 2018 г.

Klaus WELLE

Генерален секретар

---

(1)  ОВ L 56, 4.3.1968 г., стр. 1.

1

(2)  OB L 287, 29.10.2013 г., стр. 15

2

---
Tonia L. NOBLE, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

No. 12-9730.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until June 10, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
----

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/    | Terrance M. McCarthy                  |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Terrance M. McCarthy                  |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

----
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Mark F. DICKSON.

No. D-2727.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Mark F. Dickson, of Pembroke Pine, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2002 (the Report) of Kiewit Royalty Trust (the Trust), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Susan
K. Rosburg, the trust officer of U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee of the Trust, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

| |  |                                                                                                                 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Susan K.
Rosburg
Susan K. Rosburg
Trust Officer
U.S. Bank National Association
Trustee
Date: August 14, 2002

11
Arman MKRTCHYAN, petitioner, v. FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK.

No. 12-9432.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until June 18, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. John Dennis APEL

12-1038

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1463

___________________________

Marlon Ivan Castaneda-Barrientos

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: September 1, 2015

Filed: September 8, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Salvadoran citizen Marlon Ivan Castaneda-Barrientos petitions for review of

an order ofthe Board ofImmigration Appeals dismissing his appealfromthe decision

of an immigration judge to deny withholding of removal and Convention Against
Torture relief. After careful consideration, we conclude that substantial evidence 1

supportsthe decision. See De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379-82 (8th

Cir. 2013). The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The rulings determining that Castaneda-Barrientos had not timely filed his

1

asylum application orshown circumstances to excuse his untimeliness are not before

us in this petition for review.

-2-
USDC IN/ND case 4:13-cv-00029-JVB-PRC   document 30   filed 02/06/14   page 1 of 2

USDC IN/ND case 4:13-cv-00029-JVB-PRC   document 30   filed 02/06/14   page 2 of 2
E. Haffner FOURNIER, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES

Richard E. Dahlberg and Heather H. Dahlberg, petitioners, v. United States; John E. Kettle, Anne R. Kettle, Raymond W. Weidemann, Joan C. Weidemann, James N. Ivy and Leah Page Ivy, petitioners, v. United States; John Y. Glass, Josephine J. Glass, Thomas R. Lumpkin, Jean P. Lumpkin, James R. Rehak and Joann M. Rehak, petitioners, v. United States; and Lawrence R. McCann, Cecil McCann, James H. Epps, Arbelia Epps, petitioners, v. United States.

No. 12-1105.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.