alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Histotechnician

Toxicologic Pathology Associates, Inc (TPA) is seeking candidates for a Histotechnician position. 

TPA, an on-site contractor of the Food and Drug Administration, provides pathology and 

pathology-related services at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) in 

Jefferson, Arkansas.

Positions are available for individuals who have an HT or HTL (ASCP) certification or Associates 

degree and minimum of 3 years’ experience in a histology laboratory. An equivalent 

combination of education and experience may be accepted as a satisfactory substitute for 

certification or Associates degree.

The Histotechnician must possess considerable manual dexterity to be efficient and productive. 

Routine work can be tedious and repetitive. The Histotechnician will perform basic histology 

support functions to include processing, embedding, sectioning formalin-fixed paraffinembedded (FFPE) tissue samples and staining tissue specimens (including special stains)

utilizing tissue processors, embedding centers, microtomes, and stainers. Desirable skills 

include critical thinking and methods development, previous experience with rodent tissue,

organoid and membrane histology preparations, frozen tissue sectioning on a cryostat and 

glycol methacrylate embedding of formalin-fixed tissue and sectioning of plastic blocks with a 

sliding microtome.

Prepares and changes reagents and properly disposes chemical wastes; assists in training 

personnel as needed; completes detailed documentation; assists with maintenance of 

equipment; other duties as assigned. 

Basic computer skills. Learn/know correct anatomic terms. Follow Standard Operating 

Procedures (SOPs), Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs), and department policies/procedures in 

the performance of all duties. Maintain safety through appropriate use of personal protective 

equipment and by observing safe work practices. Good attendance and punctuality are basic 

requirements of the position.

Other related laboratory duties may be requested at the direction of the laboratory supervisor. 

These duties benefit Pathology and are designed to give the Histotechnician an overall 

perspective of the flow of work through the Pathology laboratories. Requirements for the 

position include good hand and eye coordination; capable of reading, understanding, and 

following laboratory procedures; ability to work in a set environment; must have coordination, 

dexterity; adept at problem solving; work with high level of accuracy, ability to follow detailed 

instructions. 

TPA provides a comprehensive benefits package to its employees and a competitive starting 

salary commensurate with experience, expertise and skill set. Employment of successful 

candidates will be contingent upon receipt of a satisfactory drug screening report, obtaining the

necessary government security clearance and may be required to undergo physical 
examination. Drug screening is provided by an off-site third party and is paid for by 

TPA. Interested candidates should submit their resume and contact information to 

kimberly.maynard@fda.hhs.gov.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent

,

v.

MELINDA M ICHELLE STEELE

,

Appellant

. No. 86616

- 8

- I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

C OBURN

, J.

— Melinda Steele appeals from a judgment and sentence following

her conviction of arson in the first degree. However, during the pendency of this appeal,

Steele has passed away.

A case is moot when it involves only abstract propositions or questions, the

substantial questions in the trial court no longer exist, or a court can no longer provide

effective relief. Spokane R s ch

. & Def. Fund v. City of Spokane , 155 Wn.2d 89, 99, 117

P.3d 1117 (2005) (citing Westerman v. Cary , 125 Wn.2d 277, 286, 892 P.2d 1067

(1994))

.86616

- 8

- I / 2

2 No motion for substitution under RAP 3.2 has been filed. Accordingly, this case

is dismissed as moot.

WE CONCUR:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2022

No. 04-21-00476-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M., a Child,

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-11-26159-CV

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. See 

In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing that Anders

procedures apply in parental termination cases). Counsel has informed appellant of his right to 

file his own brief and provided appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate 

record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 

954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 

177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in this appeal, he must do so within twenty days

from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se 

brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after the date appellant’s pro 

se brief is filed in this court.

We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel in this appeal, to be 

HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of January, 2022.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
exhibit10-4.htm


    Exhibit
10.4

    
 

    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Notice
      of Grant of

            	 
      	
              LSI
      CORPORATION

            
	
              Restricted
      Stock Unit Award

            	 
      	
              ID:
      94-2712976

            
	
              Under
      the

            	 
      	
              1621
      BARBER LANE

            
	
              LSI
      Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan

            	 
      	
              MILPITAS,
      CALIFORNIA 95035

            


    

    


    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              GRANTEE
    NAME

            	 
      	
              Award
      Number:

            	 
      
	
              Address

            	 
      	
              Grant
      Date:

            	 
      
	
              Address

            	 
      	
              Number
      of Restricted Stock Units:

            	 
      


    

    


     

    On the
grant date shown above, LSI Corporation granted you the number of restricted
stock units shown above under the LSI Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive
Plan.  If and when it vests, each restricted stock unit entitles you
to receive one share of LSI common stock.  We typically will withhold
some of the shares you would receive when the restricted stock units vest to
satisfy applicable tax or similar withholding obligations.

     

     

    The value
of the shares subject to the award on the Grant Date was
$____________.

     

     

    Your
award will vest according to the vesting schedule shown below. Vesting will
occur only if [any applicable performance requirements indicated below have been
met and] you have not incurred a Termination of Service prior to the vesting
date.

     

    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Shares

            	 
      	
              Vesting
      Date

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      


    

    


     

    By your
signature below, you agree that this award is governed by this Notice of Grant,
the attached Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and the LSI Corporation 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan. You acknowledge that you have received, read and understand this
Notice of Grant, the attached agreement and the plan. You agree to accept as
binding all decisions or interpretations of the Board of Directors of LSI or its
delegate regarding any questions relating to the plan, this Notice of Grant or
the attached agreement.

    


    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              ________________________________________________

            	 
      	 
      
	
              GRANTEE
      NAME

            	 
      	 
      
	
              Date:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

NANCY ISLAS, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-845-WCL-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendants Barry Cadden, Lisa Cadden and Greg Conigliaro 

(“Defendants”), by counsel, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and including March 25, 2013. Defendants’ Answer is currently due 

February 22, 2013. Plaintiff’s counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested 

extension. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendants up to and 

including March 25, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 18 filed 02/14/13 page 1 of 2
2 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49 

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49 

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 14, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

Stutsman & Mulvaney 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

 /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

 KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202-6150 

Telephone: (317) 237-0500 

Facsimile: (317) 630-2790 

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com \\lwfilesrv\DOCS\NECC\13 - Islas\Federal Court Action\2nd_MET.doc

case 3:12-cv-00845-WCL-CAN document 18 filed 02/14/13 page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal American Corp. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Robert A. Waegelein, Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:



|Date: May 12, 2008 |  | /s/RICHARD A. BARASCHRichard A. Barasch Chief Executive
Officer
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  | Robert A. WaegeleinRobert A. Waegelein Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.

---



QuickLinks
#### Avenger Don RIDGEWAY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Randall LEE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-6133.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2004.

Decided May 19, 2004.

Avenger Don Ridgeway, Appellant pro se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*912Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Avenger Don Ridgeway, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent *“a*substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537*U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ridgeway has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11848]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Agency Forms Under Review


Background

    Notice is hereby given of the final approval of a proposed 
information collection by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System (Board) under OMB delegated authority, as per 5 C.F.R. 1320.9 
(OMB Regulations on Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer--Mary M. McLaughlin--Division 
of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Washington, D.C. 20551 (202-452-3829).
OMB Desk Officer--Milo Sunderhauf--Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, Room 3208, Washington, D.C. 20503 (202-395-7340).
    Final approval under OMB delegated authority of the implementation 
of the following report:
    1. Report title: Finance Company Questionnaire.
Agency form number: FR 3033p.
OMB Docket number: 7100-0277.
Frequency: One-time.
Reporters: Domestic finance companies.
Annual reporting hours: 775.
Estimated average hours per response: 0.25.
Number of respondents: 3,100.
Small businesses are affected.
    General description of report: This information collection is 
voluntary [12 U.S.C. Secs. 225(a), 263, and 353-359] and is given 
confidential treatment [5 U.S.C. Y552(b)(4)].
    Abstract: Since 1995 the Federal Reserve has conducted surveys of 
domestic finance companies every five years on consumer and business 
credit and on major assets and liabilities of finance companies. The FR 
3033p is a one-page questionnaire that determines which finance 
companies are in existence and for those that are, information is 
requested about the company's total receivables, areas of 
specialization, and other characteristics.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 9, 1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11848 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
  In
connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
   /s/
      Gysle R. Shellum
                      
                      March
      31, 2009Gysle
      R. ShellumChief
      Financial Officer
                        Petroleum
      Development Corporation
                        Managing
      General Partner
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-OA10
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-OA10


     The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                          Dated: March 14, 2008
----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 1 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 2 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 3 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 4 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 5 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 6 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 7 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 8 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 9 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 10 of 11

case 2:13-cr-00036-RL-APR   document 1    filed 02/15/13   page 11 of 11
Addendum No.1 to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.56 
 ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Addendum No. 1 (the “Addendum”)
to the Employment Agreement that was entered into by and between Kilroy Realty Corporation (the “Company”), Kilroy Realty, L.P. and John B. Kilroy, Jr. (the “Executive”) and became effective on January 1, 2007
(the “Agreement”) is made as of this 12 day of February, 2008 (the “Effective Date”). 
 WHEREAS the
Company and the Executive have agreed to certain terms regarding the provision of life insurance during the Term (as defined in the Agreement) and during the Severance Period (as defined in the Agreement); and 
 WHEREAS the Company and the Executive do not intend by this Addendum to alter or waive the rights and obligations of any party hereto as may exist under
the Agreement, except as expressly specified herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as of the Effective Date as follows: 
 The Executive and the Company agree that Sun Life, policy No. 020151685, effective 06/12/07, with a death benefit of $10,000,000 on the Executive’s
life (the “Life Insurance Policy”) owned by the Marina Drive Trust #13 Dated 10/19/07 will satisfy the Company’s obligation to provide a term or whole life insurance policy in the amount of $10,000,000 for the Executive under
the Agreement. During the Term and, to the extent applicable, during the Severance Period (pro-rated for partial periods), the Company hereby agrees to pay $65,000 per year for the Life Insurance Policy and such additional amounts to Executive such
that Executive will not have any net ordinary income (Federal or State) or employment tax liability with regard to the premium payments on the Life Insurance Policy. Company shall cause said annual payment to be made directly to the Executive via
check on or before the anniversary date of the policy. 
  

									
	KILROY REALTY CORPORATION	 		 	
			
	/s/ Tyler Rose	 		 	/s/ Tamara Porter
	By: 	 	Tyler Rose	 		 	By: 	 	Tamara Porter
	Title: 	 	SVP & Treasurer	 		 	Title: 	 	VP & Corporate Counsel
			
	KILROY REALTY, L.P.	 		 	
			
	/s/ Tyler Rose	 		 	/s/ Tamara Porter
	By: 	 	Tyler Rose	 		 	By: 	 	Tamara Porter
	Title: 	 	SVP & Treasurer	 		 	Title: 	 	VP & Corporate Counsel
			
	JOHN B. KILROY, JR.	 		 	
				
	/s/ John B. Kilroy, Jr.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, petitioner, v. Tony LAVAN, et al.

No. 12-1073.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.