alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wade CUTCHEN, a/k/a Tool Man, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-6258.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 6, 2004.

Wade Cutchen, Appellant pro se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Wade Cutchen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 *873U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cutchen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1339 

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 

2000 to clarify allowable payment terms for sales of agricultural commodities and products to Cuba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on International Relations and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 to clarify allowable payment terms 

for sales of agricultural commodities and products to 

Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1339 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT TERMS FOR 

2 SALES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES 

3 AND PRODUCTS TO CUBA UNDER THE TRADE 

4 SANCTIONS REFORM AND EXPORT ENHANCE5 MENT ACT OF 2000. 

6 Subparagraph (A) of section 908(b)(1) of the Trade 

7 Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 

8 (22 U.S.C. 7207(b)(1)(A)) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(A) Payment of cash in advance, which as 

10 used herein means the payment by the pur11 chaser of an agricultural commodity or product 

12 and the receipt of such payment by the seller 

13 prior to— 

14 ‘‘(i) the transfer of title of such com15 modity or product to the purchaser; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) the release of control of such 

17 commodity or product to the purchaser.’’. 

Æ
David Lee GREEN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-977.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

AMBER RAEDER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-843-PSS-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC, by counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.1, makes the following corporate disclosure: Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC does 

not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of 

Alaunus’s stock.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

Attorneys for Defendants New England 

Compounding Pharmacy Inc.; Alaunus 

Pharmaceutical, LLC; Barry Cadden; Lisa Cadden; 

and Gregory Conigliaro

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 4, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, Indiana 46515

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\17 - Raeder\Federal Court Action\Corporate Disclosure_Alaunus.docx

case 3:12-cv-00843-PPS-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 2 of 2
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 4, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00750

- CR

Larry CASTRO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013 CR0307A

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion to stay disposition is granted. This appeal will not be submitted for

decision by the court before July 4, 2014, unless appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Bernard JEMISON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA.

No. 12-9339.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12250]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

May 11, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. Special Request: 
In order to conduct the focus group study described below in a timely 
manner, the Department of Treasury is requesting Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) review and approval of this information collection by 
May 24, 1995. To obtain a copy of this survey, please write to the IRS 
Clearance Officer at the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545-1432
Project Number: PC:V 95-005-G
Type of Review: Revision
Title: Info/California Kiosks Focus Group Study
Description: The IRS currently has six (6) applications residing on 
kiosks in the state of California. The state effort is known as Info/
California and will involve approximately 100 kiosks distributed around 
the state by the end of May, 1995. The IRS applications are currently 
information only; however, interactive applications are planned as 
well. Info/California is serving as a testbed for our research effort 
in this arena. Results from this project will be useful to guide our 
participation in the National Kiosk Network project (part of the 
National Performance Review).
Respondents: Individuals or households
Estimated Number of Respondents: 60
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:
    Interview--2 hours
    Travel time--1 hour
Frequency of Response: Other
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 210 hours
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-12250 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper Senior Vice President, Royalty Management


Date: August 7, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER RE: PAGE DOCUMENT 

REQUEST

At a discovery hearing on April 27, 2017, the Court heard a dispute regarding Plaintiff’s 

production of documents related to communications regarding the possibility of pursuing legal 

action against Anthony Levandowski or Defendants. According to Plaintiff, Uber agreed that 

Waymo could provide a privilege log entry sufficient to identify the date of the earliest 

communication within Waymo regarding potential suit against Uber or Mr. Levandowski. 

Waymo responded by stating that Waymo became a corporate entity on December 13, 2016 and 

that “communications concerning the possibility of pursuing a legal action against Anthony 

Levandowski or Defendants existed as of that date.” At the April 27, 2017 hearing, the Court 

ordered Plaintiff to identify the earliest responsive communication within Waymo, Google, 

Alphabet or any other related entity as such communication is relevant to the preliminary 

injunction proceedings. Plaintiff responded that day by identifying the earliest date legal action 

was contemplated against Mr. Levandowski, but did not provide any information as to legal action 

against Uber. (Dkt. No. 294.) Uber asks the Court to order Plaintiff to comply. 

While at the April 27, 2017 hearing the Court may have only mentioned legal action 

against Mr. Levandowski, the spirit of the Court’s order was that Plaintiff identify what it agreed 

to identify during the meet and confer, but not limit it to communications within Waymo. Given 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 313 Filed 04/28/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

that Waymo did not exist until December 2016, such a limitation serves no purpose other than to 

deprive Uber of relevant information. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall provide the requested 

information as to Uber as well as Mr. Levandowski.

Further, it appears that Plaintiff’s April 27, 2017 letter brief has not been docketed. 

Plaintiff shall do so forthwith. The parties shall docket all communications with the Court unless 

due to urgency they receive prior permission from the Court’s Clerk to proceed otherwise. 

This Order disposes of Docket No. 294. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 313 Filed 04/28/17 Page 2 of 2
DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, petitioner, v. Barbara BAUMAN, et al.

No. 11-965.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
Ernest Edward WAMPLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9611.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1460 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1460

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   6200 Rolling Road in Springfield, Virginia, as the ``Captain Mark 
                   Stubenhofer Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6200 
Rolling Road in Springfield, Virginia, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Captain Mark Stubenhofer Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain Mark Stubenhofer 
Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
MYMAIL, LIMITED, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 12-983.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
George Michael GRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9550.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Isabel Cortes and Johnny Fernandes, 

Appellants

No. 06-17-00121-CV v.

Sharon Wendl as Attorney in Fact and a/n/f 

for Ada Edna Hardy, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2016-348). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellants, Isabel Cortes and Johnny Fernandes, pay all costs of 

this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 20, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 .00001
<CASH>                                              57
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23498
<ALLOWANCES>                                       361
<INVENTORY>                                      28771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 57782
<PP&E>                                           62679
<DEPRECIATION>                                   43235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   91050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            39720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                       47470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     91050
<SALES>                                          31468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 31468
<CGS>                                            21747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   618
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     68
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 62
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        62
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 25 (Friday, February 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02351]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete service(s) from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: March 9, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 489-1322, or 
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following service(s) are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Service(s)

Service Type: ESD--Tier 1 Call Center Service
Mandatory for: Defense Logistics Agency, DLA Headquarters, Satellite 
Offices (NoVA & DC area), CONUS & OCONUS, Philadelphia, PA
Authorized Source of Supply: Peckham Vocational Industries, Inc., 
Lansing, MI
Contracting Activity: DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, DCSO PHILADELPHIA

Service Type: Janitorial/Custodial
Mandatory for: Bureau of Land Management: Las Vegas District Office, 
Las Vegas, NV
Authorized Source of Supply: Opportunity Village, Las Vegas, NV
Contracting Activity: OFFICE OF POLICY, MANAGEMENT, AND BUDGET, NBC 
ACQUISITION SERVICES DIVISION

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2025-02351 Filed 2-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00292-PRC   document 1   filed 08/26/13   page 1 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00292-PRC   document 1   filed 08/26/13   page 2 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00292-PRC   document 1   filed 08/26/13   page 3 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00292-PRC   document 1   filed 08/26/13   page 4 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00292-PRC   document 1   filed 08/26/13   page 5 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 2:13-cv-00292-PRC   document 1   filed 08/26/13   page 6 of 6
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 10, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 0605

Lower Tribunal No. F07

- 913

________________



### Joel Jules,
Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Ariana Fajardo Orshan , Judge.

Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt , for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Chris tina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State , 60 So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011)

( “ Since ‘ no evidentiary hearing is allowed ’ under [F lorida Rule of Criminal2

Procedure ] 3.800(a), a claim of error that the petitioner can establish only by

relying on facts that are not evident on the face of the record is a claim that

cannot be adjudicated under that rule provision.” ( quoting Brooks v. State

,

969 So. 2d 238, 242 (Fla. 2007))) ; Martinez v. State , 298 So. 3d 1196, 1200

(Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (modification of a sentence after it has begun to be

served does not violate double jeopardy where the defendant agreed to the

modification).