alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 for May Drilling Partnership 1983-1 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711308
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         179
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  65
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               484
<PP&E>                                         7,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   484
<SALES>                                        262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                146
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            146
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  15.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  15.91

        


</TABLE>
Sheryl THOMPSON, Warden, petitioner, v. Nicole HARRIS.

No. 12-885.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Peter Antonio SEALE, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 12-7735.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 22449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11340]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 87 / Friday, May 5, 1995 / 
Presidential Documents 
[[Page 22449]] 
                Presidential Determination No. 95-19 of April 21, 1995

                
Determination Under Section 2(b)(2)(D) of the 
                Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as Amended: People's 
                Republic of China

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to Section 2(b)(2)(D) of the Export-Import 
                Bank Act of 1945, as amended, I determine that it is in 
                the national interest for the Export-Import Bank of the 
                United States to extend a loan in the amount of 
                approximately $278,120,000 to the People's Republic of 
                China in connection with the purchase of U.S. equipment 
                and services for the construction of a power plant in 
                Dandong, Liaoning Province.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress and publish it in the 
                Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1>><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 21, 1995.

[FR Doc. 95-11340
Filed 5-4-95; 9:43 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1221 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1221

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber or plastic footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2005

  Mr. Weller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber or plastic footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.02      Rubber or plastic   Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         footwear provided                                                  31/2009
                         for in subheading
                         6402.30.30.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch Management Services
Inc. Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Nigel Johnson, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: April 13, 2006



By:  /s/ Nigel Johnson
Nigel Johnson
President, Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
Secretary, and a member of the Board of Directors
Stanley Wayne STEPHENS, aka Stanley J. Stevens, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-8762.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

*2000Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mario WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9454.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Gray JORDAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9752.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-2-1999
<CASH>                                            4075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    47753
<ALLOWANCES>                                       512
<INVENTORY>                                      47543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                105986
<PP&E>                                           43753
<DEPRECIATION>                                   36189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  149045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            87363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                       37232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    149045
<SALES>                                          94299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 94299
<CGS>                                            72372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    72372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 23494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  6076
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2310)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
Armando ARGUELLES-CARBALLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9614.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Daniel W. DUMONT, petitioner, v. BASSETT MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

No. 12-7607.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Women in CLINICAL TRIALS

Make a Difference for Yourself and for Women Like You.

Ask your healthcare provider whether a clinical trial is right for you. 

Learn more at www.fda.gov/womeninclinicaltrials

Las Mujeres en ESTUDIOS CLÍNICOS

Usted puede impactar su vida y la de otras mujeres

Pregúntele a su proveedor de atención médica si un estudio 

clínico es adecuado para usted.

Oficina de Salud de la Mujer de la FDA
T.W., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-853.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Dailin Pico RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9199.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
YU SUNG PARK and Vo Duong Tran, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES

No. 12-9325.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Charles SIMON, petitioner, v. KEYSPAN CORPORATION, et al.

No. 12-919.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of EMC
Metals Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report"), the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









Dated: April 30,
2014 	/s/ Edward Dickinson

Edward Dickinson

Principal Financial
Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

KRISTI OBLINGER and WAYNE

OBLINGER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING

PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a NEW

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

BARRY AND LISA CADDEN, and

GREGORY CONIGLIARO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:12-CV-820-RL-CAN

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and being duly advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS

Defendants’ Motion. Defendants are hereby granted an extension up to an including April 19, 2013

to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2013.

S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein

Magistrate Judge, Christopher A. Nuechterlein

U.S. Northern District Court

Distribution:

Douglas D. Small

Edmond W. Foley

FOLEY & SMALL

1002 E Jefferson Blvd

South Bend IN 46617

Dina M. Cox / Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

Robert M. Baker IV / Janelle P. Kilies

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

C:\Users\marylou\AppData\Local\Temp\notes2068C1\ORDER_MET.wpd

case 3:12-cv-00820-RL-CAN document 11 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 1
Olaf Peter JUDA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9795.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

SUE KELLER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No: 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN

-vs- )

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC., ET al. )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record:

I, the undersigned, state that I have read the Standards of Professional Conduct within the 

Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit and the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern 

District of Indiana pursuant to N.D.Ind.L.R. 83.5 (g) and Appendix B of this court and will 

faithfully adhere to them. I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and 

correct.

Please enter my appearance as counsel for plaintiff Sue Keller.

Dated this 15th day of January, 2013.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Douglas A. Mulvaney

Douglas A. Mulvaney, # 10263-20

Stutsman & Mulvaney

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, IN 46515

(574) 266-8500

dmulvaney@smspilawyers.com

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 14 filed 01/15/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 15, 2013, a true and complete copy of the above and 

foregoing was served on: 

Dina M. Cox

Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

Robert M. Baker, IV

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Ste. 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

/s/ Douglas A. Mulvaney

Douglas A. Mulvaney

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 14 filed 01/15/13 page 2 of 2
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

14 , 2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00878

- CV

RELIABLE PUMPS CONSU LTANTS, INC. AKA AND DBA RELIABLE PUMPS CONSULTANTS, A ND RELIABLE PUMPS , Appellant s

V.

TITANS TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1027193

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 11 , 20 13 . On January 6, 2014

, appellant s filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The

motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice s Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000710507 
<NAME>                        First Banks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Sep-30-1998 
<CASH>                                         130,186
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,657
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 3,882
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    635,693
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,519
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,432,484
<ALLOWANCE>                                     60,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,461,294
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,866,764
<SHORT-TERM>                                   105,519
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            107,252
<LONG-TERM>                                    127,402
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,063
<COMMON>                                         5,915
<OTHER-SE>                                     235,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,461,294
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                209,430
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               31,676
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,541
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               243,647
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             114,535
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,045
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          121,602
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,225
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,430
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                103,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,298
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      36,298
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   942.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   910.91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.31
<LOANS-NON>                                     32,400
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,238
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   113
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 27,364
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                53,709
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   (6,037)
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,656
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               60,553
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            60,553
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,163
        


</TABLE>
case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 1 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 2 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 3 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 4 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 5 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 6 of 7

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-PRC   document 1    filed 03/14/13   page 7 of 7
In re Ivory Lee ROBINSON, petitioner.

No. 12-7930.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jose SANCHEZ-REBOLLAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9757.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
James MOBLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9487.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Alvaro Leonel GOMEZ-VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General,* Respondent.

No. 02-74211.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.**

Decided April 23, 2004.

Adolfo Ojeda-Casimiro, Salazar Law Offices, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Jennifer A. Parker, Anthony W. Norwood, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The court sua sponte changes the docket to reflect that John Ashcroft, Attorney General, is the proper respondent.

**

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM***

Alvaro Leonel Gomez-Velasquez (“Velasquez”), a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision to deny his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We dismiss in part and deny in part.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Velasquez failed to file his asylum application within one year of his arrival in the United States as required by statute. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review of the asylum claim.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review denial of withholding of *469removal. Because the evidence does not compel the conclusion that he more likely than not would be persecuted on account of his political opinion if returned to Guatemala, *see Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir.2003), Velasquez is not entitled to withholding of removal.

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the motion for stay of removal was granted, or continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, *nunc pro tunc,*to the filing of the motion for stay of removal, and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.