24934 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Notices

witnesses. Since the Commission has

made a final determination that the

amendment involves no significant

hazards consideration, if a hearing is

requested, it will not stay the

effectiveness of the amendment. Any

hearing held would take place while the

amendment is in effect.

A request for a hearing or a petition

for leave to intervene must be filed with

the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, Attention:

Docketing and Services Branch, or may

be delivered to the Commission’s Public

Document Room, the Gelman Building,

2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, by

the above date. Where petitions are filed

during the last 10 days of the notice

period, it is requested that the petitioner

promptly so inform the Commission by

a toll-free telephone call to Western

Union at 1-(800) 248-5100 (in Missouri

1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union

operator should be given Datagram

Identification Number N1023 and the

following message addressed to (Project

Director): petitioner’s name and

telephone number, date petition was

mailed, plant name, and publication

date and page number of this Federal

Register notice. A copy of the petition

should also be sent to the Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555, and to the attorney for the

licensee.

Nontimely filings of petitions for

leave to intervene, amended petitions,

supplemental petitions and/or requests

for a hearing will not be entertained

absent a determination by the

Commission, the presiding officer or the

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that

the petition and/or request should be

granted based upon a balancing of the

factors specified in 10 CFR

2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).

Carolina Power & Light Company,

Docket No. 50-261, H. B. Robinson

SteamElectric Plant, Unit No. 2,

Darlington County, South Carolina

Date of application for amendment:

April 13, 1995, as supplemented April

18, 1995.

Brief description of amendment:

Amendment revises TS Section 4.4.3.f,

g, and h to allow the post accident heat

removal system surveillance test

interval to be changed from a 12-month

interval to a refueling outage interval.

Date of issuance: April 19, 1995

Effective date: April 19, 1995

Amendment No.: 163

Facility Operating License No. DPR23. Amendment revises the Technical

Specifications.The Commission’s final

determination of significant hazards

consideration and related evaluation of

the amendment is contained in a Safety

Evaluation dated April 19, 1995.

Local Public Document Room

location: Hartsville Memorial Library,

147 West College Avenue, Hartsville,

South Carolina 29550.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day

of May, 1995.

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Elinor G. Adensam,

Acting Director, Division of Reactor Projects

- III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

[Doc. 95–11367 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–F

[Docket No. 50–160–Ren; ASLBP No. 95–

704–01–Ren]

Georgia Institute of Technology,

Atlanta, GA, Georgia Tech Research

Reactor, (Renewal of Facility License

No. R–97); Notice of Hearing

May 4, 1995.

On September 26, 1994, the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission published in

the Federal Register a notice of

opportunity for hearing with respect to

the proposed renewal of the facility

operating license for the Georgia Tech

Research Reactor, located on the

campus of the Georgia Institute of

Technology in Atlanta, Georgia (59 FR

49088. One request for a hearing and

petition for leave to intervene, filed by

Georgians Against Nuclear Energy

(GANE), was received. On November 18,

1994, an Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board was established to rule upon this

request and to preside over the

proceeding in the event that a hearing

were ordered.

After holding a prehearing conference

in Atlanta, Georgia, the Atomic Safety

and Licensing Board issued a Prehearing

Conference Order (LBP–95–6) on April

26, 1995, granting GANE’s request for a

hearing and petition for leave to

intervene.

Please take notice that a hearing will

be conducted it this proceeding. The

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

designated to preside over the

proceeding consists of Dr. Jerry R. Kline,

Dr. Peter S. Lam, and Charles

Bechhoefer, who will serve as Chairman

of the Board.

During the course of the proceeding,

the Board may hold one or more

prehearing conferences pursuant to 10

CFR 2.752 and, if necessary, an

evidentiary hearing. The public is

invited to attend all these sessions,

except to the extent that information

protected by 10 CFR 2.790 (relevant to

one of the contentions accepted by the

Board) may be discussed.

Supplementing the opportunity

afforded at the first prehearing

conference, during some or all of these

sessions, and in accordance with 10

CFR 2.715(a), any person not a party to

the proceeding will be permitted to

make a limited appearance statement,

either in writing or (depending on time

availability) orally, setting forth his or

her position on the issues. These

statements do not constitute testimony

or evidence in these proceedings but

may assist the Board and/or parties in

the definition of issues being

considered. To the extent that oral

statements are permitted, the number of

persons making such statements and the

time allotted for each may be limited

depending upon the time available at

various sessions. Written statements

may be submitted at any time. Written

statements, and requests to make oral

limited appearance statements, should

be submitted to the Secretary, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555, Attn:

Docketing and Service Branch. A copy

of such statement or request should be

served on the Chairman of this Atomic

Safety and Licensing Board, T3 F23,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555.

Documents relating to this proceeding

are available for public inspection at the

Commission’s Public Document Room,

2120 L St. N.W., Washington, D.C.

20555.

Rockville, MD, May 4, 1995.

For the Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board.

Charles Bechhoefer,

Chairman, Administrative Judge.

[FR Doc. 95–11532 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

[Docket Nos. 70–7001; 70–7002]

United States Enrichment Corporation:

Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant;

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant;

Notice of Cancellation of Comment

Period and Cancellation of Public

Meetings Due to Inadequate

Application for Certification

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) received by letter

dated April 18, 1995, an application

from the United States Enrichment

Corporation (USEC) for the initial

certification of the gaseous diffusion

plants (GDPs) located near Paducah,

Kentucky and Piketon, Ohio. Notice of

receipt of this application along with

notice of comment period and public

meetings was published in The Federal

Register on April 28, 1995 (60 FR

21011). However, NRC’s preliminary
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 1995 / Notices 24935

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4 (1994).

3See letter from Karen Aluise, Assistant Vice

President, BSE, to Jennifer Choi, Attorney, Division

of Market Regulation, SEC, dated March 9, 1995.

Amendment No. 1 corrected Exhibit 2 by

referencing the BEACON subscriber Credits as the

fee being amended and deleting unnecessary

language.

4See letter from Karen Aluise, Assistant Vice

President, BSE, to Jennifer Choi, Attorney, Division

of Market Regulation, SEC, dated March 22, 1995.

Amendment No. 2 corrected Exhibit 2 by moving

the phrase ‘‘all trades accumulate for volume

discounts’’ below the schedule of volume

discounts.

5After the Commission published the proposed

rule change for comment, the Exchange, pursuant

to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act, filed a rule change

further amending the language of the portion of its

fee schedule entitled ‘‘Transaction Fees’’ that relate

to trade recording and comparison charges, which

is the subject of the current filing. See Securities

Exchange Act Release No. 35630 (Apr. 19, 1995) 60

FR 20541 (Apr. 26, 1995) (noticing the filing and

immediate effectiveness of the proposed rule

change). Although the changes made by the filing

did not affect the substance of this proposed rule

change, they did alter the text of the proposed rule

change as attached in Exhibit 2 of the BSE’s filing.

See File No. SR–BSE–95–04.

6The layoff transaction fees refer to the trade

recording and comparison charges incurred by a

firm as a result of executing trades through layoff

terminals on the floor of the Exchange. These

terminals are firm proprietary systems that are

integrated with the order routing system of the New

York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) and route orders

directly to the NYSE. Telephone conversation with

Karen Aluise and Ken Meeden, BSE, and Glen

Barrentine and Jennifer S. Choi, SEC, on May 3,

1995.

review of the application indicates that

the application does not contain enough

information for NRC to determine

compliance with NRC regulation 10 CFR

part 76. Therefore, USEC has been

notified that it must submit a new

application. Note that this

determination does not constitute a

finding that the GDP operations are

unsafe or in noncompliance.

The public comment period from

April 28, 1995 to June 15, 1995, and the

public meetings scheduled for May 23

and May 24, 1995, have been cancelled.

They will be rescheduled at a later date

when USEC submits the new

application.

Copies of the application for

certification (except for classified and

proprietary portions withheld in

accordance with 10 CFR 2.790,

‘‘Availability of Public Records’’), dated

April 18, 1995, will continue to be

available for public inspection and

copying at the Commission’s Public

Document Room (PDR) and Local Public

Document Rooms (LPDR) established for

the gaseous diffusion plants. Upon

receipt, USEC’s new application will

also be made available at the PDR and

respective LPDR’s. Copies of related

correspondence and staff evaluations

(except for portions withheld in

accordance with 10 CFR 2.790) will

continue to be made available at these

locations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Rocio Castaneira, telephone (301)

415–8103; Mr. Carl B. Sawyer,

telephone (301) 415–8174; or Ms. Merri

Horn, telephone (301) 415–8126; Office

of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555.

Dated at Rockville Maryland, this 4th day

of May 1995.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

John W.N. Hickey,

Chief, Enrichment Branch, Division of Fuel

Cycle Safety and Safeguards.′′

[FR Doc. 95–11483 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB

Review

Summary: In accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad

Retirement Board has submitted the

following proposal(s) for the collection

of information to the Office of

Management and Budget for review and

approval.

Summary of Proposal(s):

(1) Collection title: Annual Earnings

Monitoring

(2) Form(s) submitted: RRB Form G–19

(I), (II), (III), (IV), (V)

(3) OMB Number: 3220–0073

(4) Expiration date of current OMB

clearance: June 30, 1995

(5) Type of request: Revision of a

currently approved collection

(6) Respondents: Individuals or

households, Business or other forprofit

(7) Estimated annual number of

respondents: 2,700

(8) Total annual responses: 2,700

(9) Total annual reporting hours: 450

(10) Collection description: The report

obtains information about a

survivor annuitant’s employment

and earnings. Under the RRA, an

annuity can be reduced or not paid,

depending on the amount of

earnings and type of work

performed.

Additional Information or Comments:

Copies of the form and supporting

documents can be obtained from Chuck

Mierzwa, the agency clearance officer

(312–751–3363). Comments regarding

the information collection should be

addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad

Retirement Board, 844 North Rush

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–2092 and

the OMB reviewer, Laura Oliven (202–

395–7316), Office of Management and

Budget, Room 10230, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, D.C.

20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,

Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–11458 Filed 5–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905–01–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34–35669; File No. SR–BSE–

95–04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston

Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting

Approval to Proposed Rule Change

Relating to the Permanent Approval of

BEACON Subscriber Credits

May 3, 1995.

On February 13, 1995, the Boston

Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or

‘‘Exchange’’) submitted to the Securities

and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) or

‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section

19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act

of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4

thereunder,2 a proposed rule change

seeking permanent approval of the

BEACON subscriber credits. On March

13, 1995, the Exchange submitted to the

Commission Amendment No. 1 to the

proposed rule change,3 and on March

23, 1995, the Exchange submitted

Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule

change.4

The proposed rule change, including

Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, was

published for comment in Securities

Exchange Act Release No. 35529 (Mar.

23, 1995), 60 FR 16216 (Mar. 29, 1995).

No comments were received on the

proposal.5

The Exchange seeks to obtain

permanent approval of a portion of its

fee schedule that provides credits of

$.25 per trade to all non-self-directed,

electronically routed, Exchange

executed trades. The aggregate credit

per firm is limited to the total monthly

layoff transaction fees charged to that

firm.6 For purposes of the per trade

credit, ‘‘non-self-directed’’ means

entered by a BEACON subscriber in a

stock in which the routing firm has no

affiliation with or financial interest in

the specialist operation registered in

such stock.

The Commission finds that the

proposed rule change is consistent with

the requirements of the Act and the

rules and regulations thereunder

applicable to a national securities

exchange, and, in particular, with the