alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Aug-31-1997
<CASH>                        1,018,227
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        28,497,544
<DEPRECIATION>                11,167,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                18,460,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         476,655
<BONDS>                       8,329,609
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    9,654,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  18,460,969
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,706,920
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,313,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              813,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            553,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  26,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .30
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10992]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7138

[CO-930-1920-00-4355; COC-51843]


Transfer of Public Land for the Slick Rock Disposal Site; 
Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order permanently transfers 61.25 acres of public land to 
the Department of Energy in accordance with the terms of the Uranium 
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7916 (1988)), as 
amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076, 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 
7916 (1988)), as amended, it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described public 
land is hereby permanently transferred to the Department of Energy, and 
as a result of this transfer, the land is no longer subject to the 
operation of the general land laws, including the mining and the 
mineral leasing laws, for the Slick Rock Disposal Site:

New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 44 N., R. 18 W.,
    Sec. 21, S\1/2\S\1/2\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 28, NE\1/4\NW\1/4\, N\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\NW, N\1/2\S\1/
2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, NE\1/4\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, and N\1/
2\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains approximately 61.25 acres of public 
land in San Miguel County.

    2. The transfer of the above-described land to the Department of 
Energy vests in that Department full management, jurisdiction, 
responsibility, and liability for such land and all activities 
conducted therein, except as provided in paragraph 3.
    3. The Secretary of the Interior shall retain the authority to 
administer any existing claims, rights, and interests in this land 
established before the effective date of the transfer.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 95-10992 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust
(the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Trust.  BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FORSABINE ROYALTY TRUST  By:
    /s/ Ron E. Hooper Ron E. HooperSenior Vice President, Royalty Management Date: May 9, 2007 A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and
will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Heriberto Herbert HUERTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1102.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

RUSSELL THOMAS, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) CIVIL NO. 2:12cv532

)

CITY OF GARY, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge

Paul R. Cherry. For the following reasons, the Report and Recommendation will be ADOPTED.

Discussion

On October 7, 2014, Magistrate Judge Cherry issued his Report and Recommendation

regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions [DE 30]. In this Report, Judge Cherry noted that the

underlying discovery dispute was being resolved and thus drastic sanctions were not appropriate. 

However, Judge Cherry recommended that the court award Plaintiff reasonable costs (including

attorney fees) caused by Defendants’ failures. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(B).

The Defendants filed a response to the Report and Recommendation on October 21,

2014, noting that the underlying discovery problems arose from a breakdown in communication

between replacement counsel and the Defendants, and that the problems were being rectified

with no prejudice to Plaintiff. Defendants accept Judge Cherry’s Recommendation that they bear

the costs incurred by Plaintiffs due to the discovery dispute, and conclude that the Magistrate’s

Findings, Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted by the Court. 
Conclusion

On the basis of the foregoing the court hereby APPROVES and ADOPTS Magistrate

Judge Cherry’s October 7, 2014 Report and Recommendation [DE 39].

 

 Entered: December 29, 2014.

 s/ William C. Lee 

 William C. Lee, Judge

 United States District Court

2
Robert F. TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9680.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
in his capacity as an officer of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: June 26, 2012                                                                        |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|                                                                                            |  |  | 
|/s/ Li Fu                                                                                   |  |  | 
|Li Fu
        Co-Chief Executive Officer
        (principal executive officer)              |  |  | 
|                                                                                            |  |  | 
|                                                                                            |  |  | 
|/s/ Joseph J. Longever                                                                      |  |  | 
|Joseph J. Longever
        Co-Chief Executive Officer
        (principal executive officer) |  |  | 



|                                                                                         |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/ Craig H. Studwell                                                                    |  |  | 
|Craig H. Studwell
        Chief Financial Officer
        (principal accounting officer) |  |  | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Fushi Copperweld, Inc. and will be retained by Fushi Copperweld, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 24, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00412

- CR

Robert MARTINEZ, JR., Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 186th J udicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6698 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant pled nolo contendre to Driving While Intoxicated

- 3D/M (Habitual) and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. The trial court ’ s certification of appellant’s right to appeal states this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal

. ” See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed his notice of appeal, the court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this cou rt. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(e).

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal

, in which he asserts he intends to appeal from a pretrial order granting his appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw. Appellant was later assigned another appointed attorney. T he clerk ’ s record contains a written plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the appellant. The clerk ’ s record does not contain any orders ruling on

any pre

- trial motions.

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the

record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d).

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal has been made part of the appellate record by July 23, 2014

. See Daniels v.

State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

C San Antonio 2003, order); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d ); 37.1.All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification

issue.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Dail CARPENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CNA, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-3165.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 13, 2004.

Don A. Little, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Philip F. Brown, Brenner, Brown, Golian *&*McCaffrey, Columbus, OH, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before GUY, GILMAN, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dail Carpenter appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of plan administrator Continental Casualty Company on his claim for long-term disability benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ERISA). Carpenter argues that (1) in evaluating Continental Casualty’s decision to deny Carpenter long-term disability benefits, the district court should have applied a de novo standard of review, instead of the more deferential arbitrary and capricious standard, and (2) under either standard, *994the district court erred in upholding Continental Casualty’s decision.

Oral argument, the parties’ briefs, and our study of both the appellate record and the applicable law convince us that the district court (1) correctly applied the arbitrary and capricious standard of review, *Leeal v. Continental Casualty Co.,*17 Fed. Appx. 341 (6th Cir.2001), and (2) properly concluded that Continental Casualty reasonably decided to deny Carpenter long-term disability benefits. We accordingly affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s decision and entry setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law.
THAI HONG DOAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11-8643.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Thomas WHITE, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 12-9718.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.
EX PARTE Demarcus WOODARD

CR-17-0249

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
#### Richard K. NADEAU, Claimant-Appellee, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 03-7141.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: April 21, 2004.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Principal Attorney, David M. Cohen, of Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.

*710Robert V. Chisholm, Principal Attorney, Chisholm Chisholm, Providence, RI, for Claimant-Appellee.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All pending motions are moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the "Trust") on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the
Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.



                                   BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
                                   SABINE ROYALTY TRUST

                                   By: /s/ Ron E. Hooper
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ron E. Hooper,
                                       Senior Vice President, Royalty Management

Date: May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Charles M. VANDERSNICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3902

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-JEM   document 1-3   filed 03/14/13   page 1 of 2

case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-JEM   document 1-3   filed 03/14/13   page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.30


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.


1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


This First Amendment to the
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is made this 12th
day of January, 2001, effective January 1, 2001.


 


RECITALS


 


A.           The Board of Directors adopted the Western Gas Resources,
Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).


 


B.            Section 4(d) of the Plan authorizes the Board of
Directors to amend the Plan.


 


C.            The Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan to make
the modifications set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is amended as
follows:


 


I.             Section 9.e. is hereby added in its entirety to read as
follows:


 


e.             Options may be exercised, in whole or in part, by the
surrender (or delivery) to the Company of previously acquired shares of Company
common stock.  This method of exercise
is to include the constructive exchange (or surrendering) of Company stock
already owned (“Payment Shares”) in payment for the shares to be received under
the option exercise in lieu of actually tendering such Company stock to the
Company. If the Payment Shares are held by a registered securities broker for
the optionee in “street name,” the optionee will provide the Company with a
notarized statement attesting to the number of shares owned that are intended
to serve as Payment Shares. If the Company stock certificates are actually held
by the optionee, he shall provide the Company with their certificate numbers.
Upon receipt of a notarized statement regarding ownership of the Payment
Shares, or upon confirmation of ownership of the Payment Shares by reference to
Company records, the Company shall treat the Payment Shares as being
constructively exchanged. The Company shall then issue to the employee a certificate
for a net number of shares: the number of shares subject to the option exercise
less the number of Payment Shares. The exchange price for the Payment Shares
under the respective option exercise will be the Fair Market Value of the
Company common stock as determined in 2.g. above as of the effective date of
the exchange.


 






















 


2.             Except as hereby amended, the Plan
is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Board of Directors and its provisions
shall remain in full force and effect.


 


ADOPTED by the
Board of Directors of Western Gas Resources, Inc. effective as of the date
first set forth above.


 


	
   

  	
  WESTERN GAS
  RESOURCES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By  

  	
  /s/ John C. Walter

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title  

  	
  Executive Vice President
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 23- 0 405 LT Case No

. 16 -20 21

- CF -003597-AXXX

_____________________________ J ERRY G ALLION , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. R. Anthony Salem, Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. March 12, 2024

P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
. L AMBERT , J AY , and E ISNAUGLE , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Kevin WEEKS, petitioner, v. Billy BROWN, Warden.

No. 12-1030.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Dodge County, denied.
Humphrey H. PACHECKER, petitioner, v. THE FLORIDA BAR.

No. 12-9192.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

NOTICE AND SUPPLEMENT

TO ORDER REQUIRING LISTS

OF OPINIONS FOR CASES-INCHIEF AT TRIAL

Lists of trial witnesses submitted pursuant to the “Order Requiring Lists of Opinions for

Cases-in-Chief at Trial” dated June 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 669), should include witnesses expected

to give any testimony that depends on their “scientific, technical, or other specialized

knowledge” within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 702. For example, the lists should

include Google Inc.’s security engineer, Gary Brown, if he is expected to give any testimony

that depends on his knowledge of forensics.

Dated: June 22, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 697 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 1
Laura A. JENNINGS, petitioner, v. Charles Timothy HAGEL, Secretary of Defense.

No. 12-9067.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.