alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:12-CR-129 RM

)

JEREMY DYER )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on January 14, 2013 [Doc. No. 10]. 

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Jeremy Dyer’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty

of Count 1 the Information, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 5, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10780]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Notices
[[Page 21498]]

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meeting

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has scheduled its regular business meetings to take 
place in Arlington, VA on Thursday and Friday, May 11-12, 1995 at the 
times and location noted below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Thursday, May 11, 1995

9:00-12 Noon Vision Statement Work Group (closed meeting)
1:00-5:30 p.m. Rulemaking Priorities and Strategy Work Group (closed 
meeting)

Friday, May 12, 1995

9:00-10:30 p.m. Detectable Warnings Petitions Work Group (closed 
meeting)
10:30-12 Noon Planning and Budget Committee Meeting
1:30-3:30 p.m. Board Meeting

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at: Crystal Gateway Marriott, 1700 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director, (202) 
272-5434 ext. 14 (voice) and (202) 272-5449 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting, the Access Board will 
consider the following agenda items:
    <bullet> Oath of Office by New Board Member.
    <bullet> Recognition of Outgoing Board Members.
    <bullet> Approval of the Minutes of the January 18, 1995 Board 
Meeting.
    <bullet> Executive Director's Report.
    <bullet> Report on Vision Statement Work Group.
    <bullet> Report on Rulemaking Priorities and Strategy Work Group.
    <bullet> Report on Detectable Warnings Petitions Work Group.
    <bullet> Report on Fiscal Year 1995 Budget.
    <bullet> Report on Reprogramming the Fiscal Year 1995 Budget.
    <bullet> Report on Fiscal Year 1996 Budget.
    Some meetings or items may be closed to the public as indicated 
above. All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. Sign 
language interpreters and an assistive listening system are available 
at all meetings.
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-10780 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-M
Randy HOLKESVIG, petitioner, v. Christine Rose MOORE

No. 12-1266.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10326]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Mercantile Bancorporation, Inc.; Acquisition of Company Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
May 12, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. Mercantile Bancorporation Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; to acquire 
Southwest Insurance Agency, Hermitage, Missouri, an operating division 
of Southwest Bancshares, Inc., Bolivar, Missouri, and thereby engage in 
general insurance activities in a town with a population not exceeding 
5,000, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(8)(iii) of the Board's Regulation Y. 
The geographic scope for these activities is the town of Hermitage, 
Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 21, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-10326 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ASHLEY MASON and NELSON MASON,

Appellants,

v.

APARNA SPIRANA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-407

[May 13, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

502020AP000050 and 502019CC006174.

Brian K. Korte and Allegra P. Fung of Korte & Associates, West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Christopher Reinkall and Jordan Rosales of Hall Booth Smith, P.C., 

Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7394
JO ANN DIMOND, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAR OLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-95-3678-2-23AJ) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jo Ann Dimond, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Additionally, we have determined that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dimond v. South Carolina , No. CA-95-3678-2-23AJ (D.S.C. July 19, 1996; Aug. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the Report), Al D. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|November 8, 2006                                                     
|                                                                     
|/s/ Al D. Ross                                                       
|Al D. Ross, President and Chief Executive
Officer                    
|                                                                     
|November 8, 2006                                                     
|                                                                     
|/s/ Terry L. Hester                                                  
|Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 3 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 3

            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2021

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 o'clock 
meridian unless otherwise ordered.
                                 <all>
```
Deric LaVelle MAY, petitioner, v. Grant CULLIVER.

No. 12-9095.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EShed ALSTON, petitioner, v. DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 12-912.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
处理即食食品时佩戴手套或使用器具,可确保食品安全和顾客健康。

 

✘

 

为使顾客免受疾病困扰,处理即食食品时必须始终佩戴手套或使用器具。


```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1301 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1301

To amend the Federal Charter of the Boy Scouts of America in title 36, 
United States Code, to ratify the authority of the Secretary of Defense 
and military installations and units of the Armed Forces to officially 
   sponsor units of the Boy Scouts of America serving dependents of 
members of the Armed Forces and to make facilities of the Department of 
   Defense available for Boy Scout meetings and activities, such as 
                national and world Boy Scout Jamborees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2005

 Mr. Dingell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Charter of the Boy Scouts of America in title 36, 
United States Code, to ratify the authority of the Secretary of Defense 
and military installations and units of the Armed Forces to officially 
   sponsor units of the Boy Scouts of America serving dependents of 
members of the Armed Forces and to make facilities of the Department of 
   Defense available for Boy Scout meetings and activities, such as 
                national and world Boy Scout Jamborees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPONSORSHIP AND SUPPORT FOR BOY SCOUTS 
              OF AMERICA.

    Section 30904 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Federal Support.--The Secretary of Defense, and military 
installations and units of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of 
the Secretary of Defense, may support the corporation by officially 
sponsoring units of the Boy Scouts of America serving dependents of 
members of the Armed Forces and by making facilities of the Department 
of Defense available for the meetings of such Boy Scout units and for 
other Boy Scout activities, such as national and world Boy Scout 
Jamborees.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.         /s/ Stephen J. Boyle       Name: Stephen J. Boyle  Title: Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 8, 2007Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be retained by TD Banknorth Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-26

)

JOHN BENNETT )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on August 6, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charges against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in the two-count Indictment, and have

sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 6th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2