alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4058 TONY OSIAS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-40-V) Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELGeorge V. Laughrun, II, GOODMAN, CARR, NIXON, LAUGHRUN & LEVINE, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Tony Osias appeals from the sentence imposed by the district courthis plea of guilty to involvement in a crack cocaine conspiracy in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). We affirm. In his plea agreement Osias waived his right to appeal except forclaims of ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct. This waiver was discussed at the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 colloquy and is therefore valid and fully enforceable. United States v. Broughton-Jones , 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir. 1995). Of the claimsOsias raised on appeal, only one is reviewable under the waiver provision. Osias alludes to prosecutorial misconduct in his claim that the trial court erred in not applying the safety valve provision of the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 5C1.2 (Nov. 1994). Osias claims that the prosecutor br eached a stipulation in the plea agreement that there would be no enhancements to the base offense level and that this stipulation precluded the Government from arguing that Osias was a "leader/organizer" in the conspiracy forthe purpose of denying him the benefit of § 5C1.2. This claim is without merit because there was no stipulation but rather an agreement to not recommend further enhancements. Further, § 5C1.2 does not involve enhancements and the Government did not argue for any enhancements. As for Osias's other claims, he has waived the right to appeal. Broughton-Jones , 71 F.3d at 1146. Accordingly, we deny Osias's motion to file a pro se supplemental brief and reply brief and the Government's motion to file a response, and we affirm.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Gregory WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10218.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-31

)

MANUEL HERRERA )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on May 9, 2014, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and counsel

for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of Count 1 as charged in the three-count Superseding Indictment,

and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 9th day of May 2014.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

 James D. Judah (Cal. Bar No. 257112) 

 jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF JAMES 

D. JUDAH 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 22 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that JAMES D. JUDAH, an attorney with the firm of Quinn 

Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, and admitted to practice before this Court, hereby appears as an 

attorney of record for Waymo LLC in the above-captioned matter. 

JAMES D. JUDAH (Cal. Bar No. 257112) 

jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 875-6600 

(415) 875-6700 facsimile 

DATED: March 9, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP 

By: /s/ JAMES D. JUDAH 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

 James D. Judah (Cal. Bar No. 257112) 

 jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 22 Filed 03/09/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11434]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-266-000]


ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Annual System Cashout Report

May 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1995, ANR Pipeline Co. (ANR), tendered 
for filing its annual report of the net revenues attributable to the 
operation of its cashout program.
    ANR states that the instant filing is ANR's first annual System 
Cashout Report since the implementation of Order No. 636, and covers 
the period of November 1, 1993 to December 31, 1994. The Net Cashout 
Activity for the period ending December 31, 1994 is a negative 
$451,147. As provided in Section 15.5(b) of ANR's General Terms and 
Conditions, of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, this 
negative amount will be carried forward and applied to the next 
succeeding redetermination of Net Cashout Activity for the calendar 
year ended December 31, 1995.
    ANR states that all of its Volume No. 1 FERC Gas Tariff customers 
and interested State Commissions have been mailed a copy of this 
filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 
20426 in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before May 11, 1995. Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of the application are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11434 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
John BROOKS, petitioner, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE.

No. 12-1058.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
Tia PISANI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24626-24627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11328]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-262-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1995, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective on June 1, 1995:

Second Revised Sheet No. 106
First Revised Sheet No. 815
First Revised Sheet No. 817
First Revised Sheet No. 826
First Revised Sheet No. 827

    Kern River states that the revised tariff sheets make certain minor 
changes to Kern River's capacity release program. More specifically, 
the revised tariff sheets will apply to Kern River's firm 
transportation Rate Schedule SH-1 the tariff changes filed by Kern 
River as to its other firm transportation rate schedules in Docket No. 
RP95-236-000, pertaining to posting and bidding 
[[Page 24627]] procedures and procedures concerning Prearranged 
Bidders. In addition, the revised tariff sheets will make the changes 
in Kern River's tariff, with respect to all firm transportation rate 
schedules, that are necessary to comply with the Commission's Order No. 
577.
    Kern River states that copies of the filing were served upon Kern 
River's jurisdictional customers and all affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 285.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11328 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Joe Edwin CLEM, petitioner, v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 12-9479.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
James Edward GOFF, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10305.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robin S. McRae, Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  May 14, 2003

/s/ Robin S. McRae

Robin S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and

Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

SUE KELLER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-cv-840-TLS-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and being duly advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS 

Defendants’ Motion. Defendants are hereby granted an extension up to an including March 25, 

2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2013. 

 s/Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

 Magistrate Judge, Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

U.S. Northern District Court 

Distribution: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

Stutsman & Mulvaney 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

Dina M. Cox / Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

Robert M. Baker IV / Janelle P. Kilies 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

case 3:12-cv-00840-TLS-CAN document 21 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 1
Letter Agreemen dated  July 24, 2004 between Chiquita and Cyrus F. Feidheim



 Exhibit 10-v 
  
 [Logo] 
 Chiquita 
 Brands 
 International 

 
 CYRUS F. FREIDHEIM, JR. 
 Chairman of the Board 
 Chief Executive Officer 
  
 CONFIDENTIAL 
  
 July 23, 2003 
  
 Mr. Jeffrey Benjamin 
 Apollo Management, L.P. 
 1301 Avenue of the Americas 
 New York, New York 10019 
  
 Dear Jeff: 
  
 For good order, I believe it would be desirable to put our agreement on CEO comp in the record. 
  
 We are beginning the search now with the target of completing it by year end.
The preference would be for me to remain as Chairman for a period to be determined when we elect a new CEO. 
  
 Compensation arrangements would be: 
  

	 	•	Normal salary and bonus through year end 2003 or beyond if I continue as CEO. 

  


	 	•	30,000 shares of restricted stock in January 2004 with two year vesting. 

  

	 	•	Continued eligibility for awards under the Long Term Incentive Program for the performance years 2004 and 2005. 

  

	 	–	Specifically, on plan performance would result in awards of $1,185K for each year in restricted stock with two year vesting.* The same proportionate awards would be made for over
and under plan performance as for other plan participants. 

  

	 	–	Eligibility would depend on my continuation as director. 

  

	 	•	No other special compensation would be paid for my work as non-executive chairman beyond normal director’s fees. 

  
 250 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 U.S.A. 
 (513) 784-8985 / Fax: (513) 564-2934 
 eMAIL:
cfreidheim@chiquita.com 
  
 * Now one year. At the time this letter was signed,
the Compensation & Organizational Development Committee was considering 2-year vesting of restricted stock awards made under the Long Term Incentive Program. As actually approved by the Committee on August 8, 2003, the restricted stock vests
after one year. 







 Mr. Jeffrey Benjamin 
 July
23, 2003 
 Page Two 
  
 Stock options and restricted stock grants and awards would vest if I were to leave the board at the board’s request, for health reasons or after
January 1, 2004 at the government’s request. Should that occur I would forfeit eligibility for unearned LTIP restricted stock awards. 
  
 Exercise rights on stock options would extend for the normal period for a retirement (i.e., 3 years). 
  

									
	 Approved on behalf of the
 Compensation Committee of the Board:
	 	 	 	 Agreed:

			
	 /s/    JEFFREY D.
BENJAMIN        

	 	 	 	 /s/    CYRUS F. FREIDHEIM,
JR.        


	 Jeffrey D. Benjamin
 Chairman
	 	 	 	Cyrus F. Freidheim, Jr.
			
	 7-24-03

	 	 	 	 7-23-04


	 Date
	 	 	 	Date
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39


                              [Company Letterhead]

January 21, 2004


                                LETTER AGREEMENT

Michael J. Valentine, Trustee
James Valentine Trust
2299 Busse Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007


         In connection with a public offering of the Common Stock of John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (the "Company"), you have indicated a desire to include
in such offering 50,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company owned or
controlled by you, plus an additional number of shares to be determined pursuant
to the underwriters' over-allotment option. All such shares you wish to include
in the public offering are presently held in the form of Class A Common Stock of
the Company ("Class A Stock") and would have to be converted into shares of
Common Stock to be included in the offering.

         By signing this Letter Agreement, you agree that, simultaneously upon
the purchase of the Company Common Stock by the underwriters in connection with
the public offering, you shall convert into shares of Company Common Stock (1)
50,000 shares of Class A Stock, plus (2) the number of shares of your Class A
Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock the underwriters
elect to purchase from you pursuant to their over-allotment option.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you and the Company agree that such conversion
will not in any way be deemed effective (including, without limitation, for
purposes of Part 4 of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation)
unless the underwriters purchase our Common Stock. If the underwriters do not
purchase your shares, none of your Class A Stock shall have been converted
pursuant hereto.

         Under no circumstances shall this Letter Agreement be deemed to
constitute a written notice of conversion under Part 4(f) of the Company's
Restated Certificate of Incorporation.


                                     Very truly yours,

                                     /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE

                                     Michael J. Valentine
                                     John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
                                     Executive Vice President Finance, Chief
                                          Financial Officer and Secretary





                                                     /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                     Michael J. Valentine, Trustee of the James
                                                 Valentine Trust
Marlin L. MANLEY, petitioner, v. Yvonne ROSE.

No. 12-8659.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
DO’s and DON’Ts 

Safe Disposal of Needles and Other Sharps Used At Home, At Work, or While Traveling 

Do 

•	 Immediately	place	used	needles	and	other	sharps	in	a	sharps	

disposal	container	to	reduce	the	risk	of	needle-sticks,	cuts,	or	

punctures	from	loose	sharps.		

•	 Use	an	FDA-cleared	sharps	disposal	container,	if	possible.	

If	an	FDA-cleared	container	isn’t	available,	some	

organizations	and	community	guidelines	recommend	

using	a	heavy-duty	plastic	household	container	(i.e.	

laundry	detergent	container)	as	an	alternative.

•	 Make	sure	that	if	a	household	disposal	container	is	used,	it	has	

the	basic	features	of	a	good	disposal	container.	(See	box	at	

right	for	more	info.)

•	 Be	prepared	—	carry	a	portable	sharps	disposal	container	

for	travel.

•	 Follow	your	community	guidelines	for	getting	rid	of	your	sharps	

disposal	container.

•	 Call	your	local	trash	or	public	health	department	(listed	in	the	

county	and	city	government	section	of	your	phone	book)	to	find	

out	about	sharps	disposal	programs	in	your	area.		

•	 Ask	your	health	care	provider,	veterinarian,	local	hospital			

or	pharmacist	

o	 where	and	how	you	can	obtain	an	FDA-cleared	sharps	

disposal	container,

o	 if	they	can	dispose	of	your	used	needles	and	other	sharps,	or

o	 if	they	know	of	safe	disposal	programs	near	you.

•	 Keep	all	needles	and	other	sharps	and	sharps	disposal	

containers	out	of	reach	of	children	and	pets.

All sharps disposal containers should be: 

•	made	of	a	heavy-duty	plastic;	

•	able	to	close	with	a	tight-fitting,	puncture-proof	lid,	

without	sharps	being	able	to	come	out;

•	upright	and	stable	during	use;

•	leak-resistant;	and	

•	properly	labeled.

Don’t 

•	 Throw	needles	and	other	sharps	into	the	trash.

•	 Flush	needles	and	other	sharps	down	the	toilet.

•	 Put	needles	and	other	sharps	in	your	recycling	bin	— 

they	are	not	recyclable.

•	 Try	to	remove,	bend,	break,	or	recap	needles	used	by	

another	person.	This	can	lead	to	accidental	needle	sticks,	

which	may	cause	serious	infections.		

•	 Attempt	to	remove	the	needle	without	a	needle	clipper	

device	because	the	needles	could	fall,	fly	off,	or	get	lost	

and	injure	someone.

Best Way to Get Rid of Used Needles 

and Other Sharps: 

Step 1: Place	all	needles	and	other	sharps	in	a	sharps	

disposal	container	immediately	after	they	have	

been	used.

Step 2: Dispose	of	used	sharps	disposal	containers	

according	to	your	community	guidelines.	

For	more	information	visit,	www.fda.gov/safesharpsdisposal.

Safe Disposal of Needles and Other Sharps 

www.fda.gov/safesharpsdisposal