alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal American FinancialCorp. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Robert A.Waegelein, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: November 9, 2006  | /s/ RICHARD A.  BARASCH   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                         | Richard A. Barasch        |
|                         | *Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date: November 9,  2006 | /s/ ROBERT A. WAEGELEIN   |
|                         | Robert A. Waegelein       |
|                         | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

*A signed originalof this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Thiscertification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theRegistrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.*

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:12-CR-125 JD

)

ZACARIAS CISNEROS (05) )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation upon

a plea of guilty issued on June 20, 2013 [DE 80]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those

findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Zacarias Cisneros’ plea of guilty, and FINDS

the defendant guilty of Count 11 of the Indictment, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: July 17, 2013 

 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO 

Judge

United States District Court
Jeffrey SUNDWALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00238-LHK 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JAMES WEST,

Plaintiff,

v.

PALO ALTO HOUSING CORPORATION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00238-LHK 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

Re: Dkt. No. 6

This is a case involving housing discrimination, fraud, breach of contract, and mail 

tampering that was referred to Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins. Judge Cousins has made a 

Report and Recommendation that the District Judge dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to 

amend. ECF No. 6. The Report and Recommendation was filed and served on February 2, 2017. 

No objections have been filed, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b)(2).

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, the 

Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well-founded in fact and in law and, therefore, 

adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Court hereby DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with 
2

Case No. 17-CV-00238-LHK 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

leave to amend. Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff shall file an amended 

complaint remedying the deficiencies identified in the Report and Recommendation within 14 

days of this order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that remedies the deficiencies 

identified in the Report and Recommendation within 14 days, the Court will dismiss the case with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2017

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge
Winfred Lorenzo HUNT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9972.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 27, 2016

s0120

Order 

Clerk

January 27, 2016

151710

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151710

COA: 325398

Wayne CC: 11-009697

GLORIA LYNN COLUMBERT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 8, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to reconsider whether the requirements set 

forth in MCR 7.105(B) are satisfied in light of the prison account statements received on 

March 16, 2015 and May 28, 2015; five copies of a motion to waive filing fee for the 

defendant’s delayed application for leave to appeal dated January 10, 2015 received some 

time before March 4, 2015; and the register of actions dated May 5, 2015 received on 

May 28, 2015. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Earl K. PRINCE, petitioner, v. CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al.

No. 12-8432.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit (10)(vii)(b)    
    


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 2003-1
    
    TO
    
    GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL COPROATION DEATH BENEFIT ONLY PLAN    
    


        WHEREAS, Great Lakes Chemical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), established the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation Death Benefit Only Plan (the
"Plan"), effective April 1, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS,
all capitalized terms used herein have the meanings set forth in the Plan unless otherwise indicated in this amendment; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company desires to modify certain provisions of the Plan; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company is empowered to amend the Plan pursuant to section 5.2 of the Plan. 


        THEREFORE,
the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of July 18, 2003 (the "Effective Date"), as follows: 



	1.
	Section 1.15
shall be replaced in its entirety with the following language:



	1.15
	"Final
Salary" shall be the lesser of the (i) Participant's Escalated Salary, or (ii) Participant's Base Annual Salary, both measured as of the January 1
immediately preceding the date on which the Participant's employment terminates with any Employer due to death or Retirement.






	2.
	Except
as specifically provided in this Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Plan, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. 




        The
Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer effective as of the Effective Date. 



	

 	
 	

Great Lakes Chemical Corporation
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/ Richard J. Kinsley
	

 	
 	

Title:	

Senior Vice President,

HR & Communications











QuickLinks



Exhibit (10)(vii)(b)


AMENDMENT NO. 2003-1 TO GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL COPROATION DEATH BENEFIT ONLY PLAN
Shawn NEWSOME, petitioner, v. James E. DZURENDA, Interim Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Corrections.

No. 12-10001.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Randy HOLKESVIG, petitioner, v. Peter WELTE, et al.

No. 12-1124.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence Butler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally left Blank)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ Lawrence Butler
-------------------
Lawrence Butler
Chief Executive Officer
September 13, 2004
Gene PATRICK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9675.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EX-35.1
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
Centerline Servicing Inc.,


The undersigned, John Lloyd, Director of Centerline Servicing Inc., (Centerline)
(f/k/a ARCap Servicing, Inc.), the Subservicer, under that Subservicing
Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of September 1, 2007, between Centerline
and Column Financial, Inc., hereby certifies as follows:

1.    a review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under
the Agreement during the calendar year 2007 has been made under the
undersigned's supervision;

2.    to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout such calendar year 2007; and


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as of the 3rd day of March, 2008, I have hereunto signed
my name.


Centerline Servicing Inc.,
a Delaware Corporation



BY: /s/ John Lloyd
John Lloyd, Director
H. Con. Res. 126 Agreed to September 9, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD POSTHUMOUSLY CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL IN 

COMMEMORATION TO SERVICEMEMBERS WHO PERISHED IN AFGHANISTAN ON AUGUST 26, 2021, DURING 

EVACUATION OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND AFGHAN 

ALLIES AT HAMID KARZAI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized 

to be used on September 10, 2024, for a ceremony to award posthumously a Congressional Gold Medal in commemoration to the 

servicemembers who perished in Afghanistan on August 26, 2021, 

during the evacuation of citizens of the United States and Afghan 

allies at Hamid Karzai International Airport. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in 

accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol 

may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Dennis Lee ANDREWS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9227.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Tracy J. WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9053.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Benefitis Continuation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.23 
  
 Summary of Benefits Continuation Arrangement 
 For Summerfield K. Johnston, Jr. 
  
 Effective January 1, 2004, the Board of Directors has agreed to continue providing administrative support services to Mr. Johnston and to extend his participation in the Executive Retiree Medical Plan for as long as
he is a member of the Board.
EXHIBIT
31.1
  OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Andrew
Godfrey, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, of
First Quantum Ventures, Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
  4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
  (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  (c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;


5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weakness in internal controls; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal
controls.





Date:
October 22, 2009


By:  /s/ Andrew
Godfrey
 Andrew
Godfrey
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AXCESS Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-QSB for the period endedMarch 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “***Report***”),I, Allan L. Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary andPrincipal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN L.  FRANK                                                                                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan L.  Frank                                                                                     |
| Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Principal Accounting and  Financial Officer |
|                                                                                                |
| Dated:  May 14, 2004                                                                           |

 

----
Alexander NANCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1375

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Anthony DOMINGUEZ-COLON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-7973.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Willie S. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7764.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   MARCH 31, 2006
<S>                                                              <C>
Income before income taxes...............................             $     49
                                                                      --------

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest on debt.........................................                   73
Estimated interest portion of rents......................                    1
                                                                      --------
Total fixed charges......................................                   74
                                                                      --------
Adjusted income..........................................                  123

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)...................                 1.66x
                                                                      ========
</TABLE>

(1)   The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
      income before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed
      charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental expense as
      representative of interest portion of rentals.
Jacqueline K. RIBES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Wilhelmina MOORE, petitioner, v. WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 12-1097.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant, v. BAY AREA PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2343

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

Darius N, Kandawalla and Sabrina Haurin of Bailey Cavalieri LLC, Columbus, Ohio; and Laura Besvinick of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP, Miami, for Appellant.

William L. Petros and Brett J. Novick of William Petros Law, Coral Gables, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.