alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1339 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1339

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 
     to clarify allowable payment terms for sales of agricultural 
                   commodities and products to Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2005

 Mrs. Emerson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on 
      International Relations and Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 
     to clarify allowable payment terms for sales of agricultural 
                   commodities and products to Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT TERMS FOR SALES OF AGRICULTURAL 
              COMMODITIES AND PRODUCTS TO CUBA UNDER THE TRADE 
              SANCTIONS REFORM AND EXPORT ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2000.

    Subparagraph (A) of section 908(b)(1) of the Trade Sanctions Reform 
and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207(b)(1)(A)) is amended 
to read as follows:
                    ``(A) Payment of cash in advance, which as used 
                herein means the payment by the purchaser of an 
                agricultural commodity or product and the receipt of 
                such payment by the seller prior to--
                            ``(i) the transfer of title of such 
                        commodity or product to the purchaser; and
                            ``(ii) the release of control of such 
                        commodity or product to the purchaser.''.
                                 <all>
```
Ronnie A. SLEMP, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1540

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 24, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 24, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1436. LARRY SELF et al. v. MARIAN M. WILLIAMS.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32





BWI HOLDINGS, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of BWI Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim Can, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: December 21, 2010
By:
/s/ Jim CanName:
Jim CanTitle:
Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan VASQUEZ-MONTES, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-51022.

SUMMARY CALENDAR

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 26, 2004.

*205Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, Margaret M. Embry, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nancy Gosnell Revelette, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge.1

In this appeal, we review the conviction of Defendant — Appellant, Juan VasquezMontes, for possession with intent to distribute and for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 952, and 960. For the following reasons, we uphold the conviction.

Vasquez argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s finding that he knew there was marijuana hidden in the vehicle he was driving when he was arrested trying to enter the United States from Mexico.

Ordinarily, a jury may infer a defendant’s guilty knowledge from his control over a drug-laden vehicle, but when drugs are contained in a hidden compartment, we require additional circumstantial evidence that demonstrates guilty knowledge. *United States v. Villarreal,*324 F.3d 319, 324 (5th Cir.2003). Vasquez’s inconsistent statements to federal agents regarding the purpose of his trip to Mexico are strong evidence of his guilty knowledge. *United States v. Diaz-Carreon,*915 F.2d 951, 954-55 (5th Cir.1990). His implausible explanations for his actions also constitute persuasive circumstantial evidence of his consciousness of guilt. *Id.*at 955. Vasquez was warned that the man recruiting him to drive the car from Mexico to the United States had previously recruited one of Vasquez’s friends for a similar job that led to that man’s arrest and imprisonment. Finally, the value of the marijuana involved in this offense supports the jury’s finding that Vasquez knew there were drugs hidden in the vehicle. *See Villarreal,*324 F.3d at 324.

Vasquez’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence fails because a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. *United States v. Bell,*678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1982), *aff'd on other grounds,*462 U.S. 356, 103 S.Ct. 2398, 76 L.Ed.2d 638 (1983). For the foregoing reasons, we uphold the conviction.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Christopher E. GARNER, petitioner, v. Larry SMALL, Warden.

No. 12-9949.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Yisroel
      Guttfreund, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director
      of
      Watchtower, Inc. (“Watchtower”), certifies, under the standards set forth and
      solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on
      Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Date:
      February 28, 2008


WATCHTOWER,
                  INC.By:
              /s/
                  Yisroel GuttfreundName:
              Yisroel
                  GuttfreundTitle:
              President
                  and Chief Executive Officer,Chairman,
                  and Director(Principal
                  Executive, Financial and Accounting
                  Officer)






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Aaron Lee DURNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4565

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1486 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1486

                 For the relief of Candelaria P. Roxas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2005

 Mr. Hinojosa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Candelaria P. Roxas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CANDELARIA P. ROXAS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Candelaria P. Roxas shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Candelaria P. Roxas enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Candelaria P. Roxas, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Candelaria P. 
Roxas shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Lendora GILCHRIST, petitioner, v. PARTH'S INCORPORATED, dba Comfort Inn, et al.

No. 12-8397.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Travis Hunter BLANK, petitioner, v. Harold EAVENSON, et al.

No. 13-6248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.7


Consent of Independent Auditors





The Board of Directors


Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.:


We consent to the use of our report dated March 28, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Egret Limited as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, incorporated by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-174742, No. 333-175002, No. 333-175559, No. 333-184752, and No. 333-192059) on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-164928, No. 333-182269, and No. 333-197492) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-164926) on Form S-1/A and the registration statement (No. 333-186690) on Form S-4 of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. in reliance upon the report of KPMG, independent auditors, which report appears in amendment no. 1 to the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.





/s/ KPMG


Dublin, Ireland


March 27, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,517
<INVENTORY>                                     52,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,773
<PP&E>                                          41,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,785
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,037
<SALES>                                         82,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,847
<CGS>                                           62,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (685)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (733)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In connection
with the Annual Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
R. Sharp, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.













/s/ Michael R.
Sharp


Michael
R. Sharp


President
and Chief Executive Officer


March 31,
2009
Al-Quan Romain LOYAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12M135.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Motion to for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

LAFAYETTE DIVISION

CURTIS BEAVER )

)

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 4:13-cv-00067-JD-JEM

)

v. ) NOTICE OF STIPULATION OF

) DISMISSAL OF ACTION

FIFTH THIRD BANK, INC. )

)

)

Defendant. )

________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff Curtis Beaver, along with Defendant Fifth Third Bank, hereby provide notice 

that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action 

without prejudice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 20, 2014, 2013 By: __/s/Melissa Wilkes_____________________

WILKES LAW FIRM

Melissa Wilkes

200 Ferry Street, Suite D

Lafayette, IN 47901

mwilkes@wilkes-law.com e-mail

By: __/s/Andrew Recker_____________________

DINSMORE & STOHL LLP

Andrew Recker

255 East Fifth Street, Ste. 1900

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Andrew.recker@dinsmore.com

USDC IN/ND case 4:13-cv-00067-JD-JEM document 15 filed 03/20/14 page 1 of 1
Angela Gayle O'NEAL, petitioner, v. Millicent NEWTON-EMBRY, Warden.

No. 12-9250.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Thomas Neil PICKETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9616.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Carlton Michael GARY, petitioner, v. Carl HUMPHREY, Warden.

No. 12-8511.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −10)

On October 2, 2012, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 89 additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Northern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Indiana and assigned to

Judge Miller.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 2, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert L Miller, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2391

SCHEDULE CTO−10 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 2 12−09519 Thomas E Redmond v. Biomet Orhopedics LLC et al

CAC 5 12−01930 Wilma Samson v. Biomet Orthopedics Inc et al

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 12−02760 Giordano v. Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. et al

ILLINOIS NORTHERN

ILN 1 12−08898 Guarisco v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al

MONTANA

MT 2 12−00079 Ziegler v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted form Winthrop
Residential Associates III, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,792,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,128,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,167,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,932,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,444,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,154,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,932,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,180,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  448,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                644,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            644,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   644,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      23.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.84






</TABLE>