alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. § 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Form 10-Q of Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the Report), Al D. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Hester, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 May 14, 2010
 
 
 /s/ Al D. RossAl D. Ross, President andChief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2010/s/ Terry L. HesterTerry L. Hester, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Juan Carlos CADENA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70884.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 26, 2004.

*483James G. Roche, Law Offices of James L. Rosenberg, Santa Ana, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, John C. Cunningham, Esq., John S. Hogan, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Carlos Cadena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the summary dismissal of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) of his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) to review a final order of removal.

Because Cadena’s brief to this Court does not challenge the BIA’s summary dismissal for failure to file a brief, that issue is not properly before this Court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 28(a); *see also Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996). Rather, Cadena contends that the immigration judge erred in making the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” determination. We lack jurisdiction to review this discretionary determination. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
    2007-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Chase Home Finance LLC as Sub-Servicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC
    f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage
    Funding, Inc. as Servicer, HSBC Mortgage Corporation, USA as Servicer,
    IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Named
    Servicer, National City Mortgage Co. as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, and Wachovia Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45


                              [Company Letterhead]

January 21, 2004


                                LETTER AGREEMENT

Marian Sanfilippo, Trustee
Jasper B. Sanfilippo Irrv Trust Agreement Dated 10/8/96
2299 Busse Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007


        In connection with a public offering of the Common Stock of John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (the "Company"), you have indicated a desire to include
in such offering 111,200 shares of the Common Stock of the Company owned or
controlled by you, plus an additional number of shares to be determined pursuant
to the underwriters' over-allotment option. All such shares you wish to include
in the public offering are presently held in the form of Class A Common Stock of
the Company ("Class A Stock") and would have to be converted into shares of
Common Stock to be included in the offering.

        By signing this Letter Agreement, you agree that, simultaneously upon
the purchase of the Company Common Stock by the underwriters in connection with
the public offering, you shall convert into shares of Company Common Stock (1)
111,200 shares of Class A Stock, plus (2) the number of shares of your Class A
Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock the underwriters
elect to purchase from you pursuant to their over-allotment option.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you and the Company agree that such conversion
will not in any way be deemed effective (including, without limitation, for
purposes of Part 4 of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation)
unless the underwriters purchase our Common Stock. If the underwriters do not
purchase your shares, none of your Class A Stock shall have been converted
pursuant hereto.

        Under no circumstances shall this Letter Agreement be deemed to
constitute a written notice of conversion under Part 4(f) of the Company's
Restated Certificate of Incorporation.


                             Very truly yours,

                             /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE

                             Michael J. Valentine
                             John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
                             Executive Vice President Finance, Chief Financial
                                  Officer and Secretary





                                               /s/ MARIAN SANFILIPPO
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                    Marian Sanfilippo, Trustee of the Jasper B.
                                     Sanfilippo Irrv Trust Agreement Dated
                                                     10/08/96
1 

### STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Misa Amane, Claimant Below, Petitioner

v.) No. 23-322 (JCN: 2021012068)

(ICA No. 22-ICA-304)

Pas Parent, Inc., Employer Below, Respondent



### MEMORANDUM DECISION

Petitioner Misa Amane appeals the April 10, 2023, memorandum decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia (“ICA”). See Amane v. Pas Parent, Inc. , No. 22- ICA-304, 2023 WL 2861727 (W. Va. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2023) (memorandum decision). Respondent Pas Parent, Inc. filed a timely response. 1 The issue on appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the November 15, 2022, decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, which affirmed the claim administrator’s order granting no permanent partial disability.

The claimant asserts that she should be awarded at least 3% permanent partial disability. The employer maintains that the claimant points to no erroneous procedure, no arbitrary or capricious conclusions, and no abuse of discretion or jurisdictional error by the tribunals below.

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty.

Comm’n , No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).

Affirmed.

ISSUED: 

### August 27, 2024

1 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori J. Withrow, and the respondent is represented by counsel Jeffrey M. Carder. 

### FILED August 27, 2024

C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

OF WEST VIRGINIA2

CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead

Justice Elizabeth D. Walker

Justice John A. Hutchison

Justice William R. Wooton Justice C. Haley Bunn
case 2:13-cv-00098-TLS-JEM   document 4   filed 03/14/13   page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ ____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 130802-3 & (159)(160) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR WATER CONSERVATION, R. J. DOYLE, BARBARA DOYLE, JEFFREY R. SAPP and SHELLY M. SAPP, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, SC: 130802-3 v COA: 254202; 256153 Mecosta CC: 01-014563-CE NESTLÉ WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC., Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, and

DONALD PATRICK BO LLMAN and NANCY GALE BOLLMAN, a/k/a PAT BOLLMAN ENTERPRISES, Defendants.

On order of the Chief Justice, th e motion by plaintiffs-appellants for leave to file a responsive brief and the motion by defendant-a ppellee for temporary admission to practice of Adam H. Charnes are considered, and they are GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 3

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 83-4 Filed 09/06/18 Page 7 of 7
Martin G. PLOTKIN, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 12-8930.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:12-CR-88-TLS 

)

PEDRO GARZA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 72], filed on August 8, 2014. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 72] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 5 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on August 29, 2014.

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
case 3:13-cv-00071-JD-CAN   document 29   filed 01/18/14   page 1 of 4

case 3:13-cv-00071-JD-CAN   document 29   filed 01/18/14   page 2 of 4

case 3:13-cv-00071-JD-CAN   document 29   filed 01/18/14   page 3 of 4

case 3:13-cv-00071-JD-CAN   document 29   filed 01/18/14   page 4 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

ROBERT P. FELDMAN, State Bar No. 69602

JENNIFER A. OCHS, State Bar No. 174069 

MAURA L. REES, State Bar No. 191698 

MATTHEW R. REED, State Bar No. 196305 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

rfeldman@wsgr.com; jochs@wsgr.com; 

mrees@wsgr.com; mreed@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA, 

Defendants and Counterclaimants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668-RMW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

*E-FILED - 8/10/05*

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 13 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-1- PALIB1_2701895_1.DOC 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, 

through their undersigned counsel, that the case management conference currently scheduled for 

August 26, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. is continued to September 9, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. 

Dated: August 5, 2005 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley 

Lawrence M. Hadley 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

Dated: August 5, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Reed 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Court Judge 

8/10/05 /S/ RONALD M. WHYTE

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 13 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-2- PALIB1_2701895_1.DOC 

CERTIFICATION

I, Matthew R. Reed, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference. In 

compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Lawrence M. Hadley has concurred 

in this filing. 

Dated: August 5, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Reed 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 13 Filed 08/10/05 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

ROBERT HOLLAND )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Case No. 2:13-CV-00491-RL-JEM

)

CEREBERUS CAPITAL )

MANAGEMENT, L.P., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION FOR STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Cerberus Capital Management, LP, Robert Nardelli, and Stephen Feinberg

(“Cerberus Defendants”), by and through their counsel, respectfully move the Court

to set a status and scheduling conference in order for the parties and the Court to

discuss and consider various pre-trial matters, such as the remaining procedural

schedule to be established in this Case. In support of the instant motion Cerberus

Defendants state as follows:

1. Contemporaneous with the filing of the instant motion, Cerberus

Defendants are filing their motion for oral argument on their Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)

and (b)(2) (Dkt No. 28) and Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to

Dismiss (Dkt No. 29), as well as filing their Reply in Support of Their Motion to

Dismiss Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint.

2. Since the commencement of this case, and during the pendency of

potentially dispositive motions, Plaintiff has filed numerous applications with the

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 66 filed 07/23/14 page 1 of 3
2

Court, the filing of which raise questions regarding, among other things, the

necessity for burdening the Court with responsive papers. A status and scheduling

conference would afford the parties, with the Court’s guidance and input, to

consider and discuss these various pre-trial matters.

WHEREFORE, Cerberus Defendants respectfully request that the Court

issue an Order setting a status and scheduling conference in order for the parties

and the Court to consider and discuss various pre-trial matters.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Mark D. Stuaan

Jason R. Barclay

Mark D. Stuaan

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

11 South Meridian Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Telephone: 317/236-1313

Facsimile: 317/231-7433

E-Mail: jason.barclay@btlaw.com

E-Mail: mark.stuaan@btlaw.com

Howard O. Godnick (pro hac vice entered

6/26/14)

Joshua R. Schonauer (pro hac vice entered

6/26/14)

SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP

919 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Tel. (212) 756-2000

Fax (212) 593-5955

Email: howard.godnick@srz.com

Email: joshua.schonauer@srz.com

Attorneys for Defendants Cerberus Capital

Management, L.P., Stephen Feinberg and

Robert Nardelli

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 66 filed 07/23/14 page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 23rd day of July, 2014, a copy of the foregoing was

filed electronically and has been served on all counsel of record by the Court’s ECF

filing system.

Additionally, a copy of the foregoing was sent to the following pro se Plaintiff

by depositing the same in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid:

Robert Holland

1120 Baker Street

Gary, IN 46404

s/ Mark D. Stuaan

Mark D. Stuaan

INDS01 MVS 1467618v1

case 2:13-cv-00491-RL-JEM document 66 filed 07/23/14 page 3 of 3
NO. SCPW-11-0000012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

EDWARD A. SMITH, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE DERRICK H.M. CHAN, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT

COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(P. NO. 88-0030)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy,

and Circuit Judge McKenna, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of Edward A. Smith's papers received

on February 7, 2011 and filed on February 8, 2011, which are

deemed a motion for reconsideration of the January 18, 2011 order

denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that the

motion for reconsideration is untimely. See HRAP 40(a) ("A

motion for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10

days after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or

ruling unless by special leave additional time is granted during

such period by a judge or justice of the appellate court

involved."). Therefore,

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-11-0000012

10-FEB-2011

02:59 PM
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 10, 2011.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

2
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 12-656.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 for May Drilling  Partnership 1983-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711309
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         186
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379
<PP&E>                                         16,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832
<SALES>                                        418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                268
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            268
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  13.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  13.45
        


</TABLE>