alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2021

No. 04-21-00476-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M., A CHILD

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-11-26159-CV

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record is due on November 8, 2021. On November 3, 2021, the court 

reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting until December 1, 2021, to file the 

reporter’s record. We GRANT IN PART the court reporter’s requested extension and ORDER

the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before November 18, 2021. The 

court reporter is reminded that this is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the 

appellant’s parental rights. Consequently, each extension of the deadline to file the reporter’s 

record must not exceed 10 days, see TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); cumulative extensions must not 

exceed 30 days, absent extraordinary circumstances, see id. R. 28.4(b)(2); and this appeal must 

be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed, see TEX.

R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further 

requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-Q of
Dionex Corporation for the quarter ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           21741
<SECURITIES>                                      6902
<RECEIVABLES>                                    30115
<ALLOWANCES>                                       502
<INVENTORY>                                       9396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 76665
<PP&E>                                           45881
<DEPRECIATION>                                   16193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  115815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         36259
<OTHER-SE>                                       44877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    115815
<SALES>                                          73353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 73353
<CGS>                                            23120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    23120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  20583
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6998
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
Schedule to Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 Schedule to Stock Option Agreement Under Huttig Building Products, Inc. 
 1999 Stock Incentive Plan 
  

							
	 Option Holder

	  	Number Of Shares

	    	Exercise Price

	    	Date of Grant


	 Carl A. Liliequist
	  	39,000	    	$4.290 per share	    	January 24, 2000
	 Carl A. Liliequist
	  	29,400	    	$4.340 per share	    	January 22, 2001
	 Thomas S. McHugh
	  	15,000	    	$4.400 per share	    	May 01, 2000
	 Thomas S. McHugh
	  	13,500	    	$4.340 per share	    	January 22, 2001
	 Nick H. Varsam
	  	30,000	    	$4.850 per share	    	June 25, 2001
	 R. S. Evans
	  	100,000	    	$4.290 per share	    	January 24, 2000
	 Barry J. Kulpa
	  	326,000	    	$4.290 per share	    	January 24, 2000
	 Barry J. Kulpa
	  	105,000	    	$4.340 per share	    	January 22, 2001
	 David Dean
	  	6,000	    	$4.290 per share	    	January 24, 2000
Exhibit 10.1



Exhibit 10.1


	
PROVIDENCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
	

Ministry of Energy and Mines, Energy and Minerals Division - Mineral Titles Branch

	

 
	

RECORD OF 4 POST CLAIM

	
 
	

Mineral Tenure Act, Section 27

	

 
	
 

	


Mining Division
	


Tenure No.

	

 
	

 

	


Gold Commissioner
	


Date of Record







APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM


I, Gerald Gallissant, Name of Locator, 783 MacCleave Ave, Penticton, British Columbia, V2A 3C4, (250) 492-2959, Client Number 109141, Agent for Self, hereby apply for a record of a 4 post claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 92J 16W, in the Lillooet Mining Division.



ACCESS


Describe how you gained access to the location; include references to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.


The LCP is located 3900 M west of Rex peak. Access was gained by driving up Marshall lake road for 5km and walking up Hog creek for 1.5km.


GPS Co-ordinates taken of posts: Yes [ ] No [x] If yes, complete information chart on reverse.



TAG INFORMATION


I have securely fastened the metal identification tag embossed "LEGAL CORNER POST" to the legal corner post (or witness post) and impressed this information on the tag: 


 

 

 





	

TAG NO.  237056

	

CLAIM NAME
	

Gold Ledge

	

LOCATOR
	

Gerald Gallissant

	

FMC No.
	

109141

	

AGENT FOR
	

Self

	

DATE COMMENCED
	

December 30, 2003

	

TIME
	

12:04 pm

	

DATE COMPLETED
	

0 meters

	

TIME
	

500 meters





	

NUMBER OF CLAIM UNITS

	

N 
	

6
	

S
	

 
	

E
	

3
	

W





IDENTIFICATION POSTS NOT PLACED were 1N, 2N, 3N, 4N, 5N, 6N, 1E6N, 2E6N, 3E6N, 3E5N, 3E4N, 3E3N, 3E2N, 3E1N, 3E, 2E, 1E because of hazardous conditions and the presence of cliffs.


* If witness post was placed for the legal corner post:

Bearing from witness post to true position of legal corner post is _______ degrees, at a distance of ___________ metres.


Bearing from Indentification post to witness post is _______ degrees, at a distance of _______ metres.


NOTE:   Legal corner post can be witnessed only if it was not feasible to place any posts.




ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 4 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the legal corner post and all other corner posts (and witness and identification post if applicable) are indicated. The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the tags affixed to the applicable post when located this claim, and this information is true and correct. 


 

	

/s/ Gerald Gallissant
	

[FILE STAMP]

	

Signature of Locator
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO FILE UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF THEIR PROPOSED FINDINGS 

OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES 

TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED 

VERSIONS OF THEIR PROPOSED 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

On December 6, 2018, the parties filed public redacted versions of their Proposed Findings 

of Fact and Conclusions of Law. ECF Nos. 966, 967. On December 10, 2018, the Court received 

paper copies of the unredacted versions of the Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. 

The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file the unredacted versions of their Findings of Fact 

and Conclusions of Law to ECF, under seal, by December 11, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 10, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 969 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AXCESS International Inc. (the “***Company***”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I,Allan Griebenow, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/  ALLAN GRIEBENOW                                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan  Griebenow                                                    |   |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer |   |

 

Dated:  August 13, 2010

 

----
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 1 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 2 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 3 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 4 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 5 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 6 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 7 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 8 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 9 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 10 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 11 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 12 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 13 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 14 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 15 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 16 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 17 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 18 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 19 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 20 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 21 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 22 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 23 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 24 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 25 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 26 of 27
case 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEM document 5 filed 04/22/13 page 27 of 27
Case No.: 5:17-cv-00626-EJD

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF 

FLSA COLLECTIVE CLASS

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HECTOR DE LEON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MASTRIA INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00626-EJD 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL 

CERTIFICATION OF FLSA 

COLLECTIVE CLASS

Re: Dkt. No. 31

On January 25, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking conditional class certification 

pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Dkt. No. 31. Defendants opposed. Dkt. No. 

44. In their reply, Plaintiffs responded that they “do not contest Defendants’ request for an order 

denying their motion for FLSA class certification.” Dkt. No. 45.

In light of the apparent agreement between the parties, Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional 

class certification (Dkt. No. 31) is DENIED. This case shall proceed only on the individual claims 

of the named plaintiffs that remain in the case, Hector De Leon and Carlos Cisneros.1 No further 

amended complaint shall be filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2018

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

 

1 Cesar Galvez, the only other originally named plaintiff, has settled his claims with Defendants. 

Dkt. No. 45 at 1 n.1.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12309]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 3188-000]


Joseph M. Keating; Notice of Filing

May 15, 1995.
    Please take notice that on October 18, 1988, Mr. Tom Camp, a member 
of the Commission's staff from Washington, DC, prepared a video tape of 
the project site for the proposed Pyramid Creek Project in the El 
Dorado National Forest, California. The video tape has been filed by 
the staff as a part of the record in the above-captioned proceeding. 
The tape was made on a clear day and depicts the reaches of Pyramid 
Creek along which project facilities would be located, remains of 
certain facilities of a now inoperable hydroelectric project at the 
same site, some of the geologic features of the area, U.S. Highway 50 
where it runs past the proposed project site, an the surrounding 
landscape.
    The video tape is available for viewing upon request by contacting 
the Commission's Public Reference Room in 941 North Capitol Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, telephone (202) 208-1371.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12309 Filed 5-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of All American
Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KA for the year ended May 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), I, Brent Welke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: January 6, 2011

/s/ Brent Welke

Brent WelkeChief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to All American
Gold Corp. and will be retained by All American Gold Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Lisa MADIGAN, et al., Petitioners v. Harvey N. LEVIN.

No. 12-872.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2013.

Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Michael A. Scodro, Counsel of Record, Solicitor General, Jane Elinor Notz, Deputy Solicitor General, Brett E. Legner, Clifford W. Berlow, Matthew P. Becker, Asst. Attorneys General, Chicago, IL, for Petitioners.

Eric Schnapper, University of Washington, School of Law, Seattle, WA, Harvey N. Levin, Chicago, IL, Edward Theobald, Counsel of Record, Chicago, IL, Counsel for Respondent.

Prior report: C.A.11, 692 F.3d 607.

PER CURIAM.

*2The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

*It is so ordered* .
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB of Arbor EnTech Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarterended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), Harvey Houtkin, asChairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report for the fiscal quarter endedOctober 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| December 12,  2003 |   |   | s/Harvey  Houtkin        |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|               |   |   | Harvey  Houtkin          |   |
|               |   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
June 13, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________
02-20733 Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFRED CHARLES HABELMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-02-CV-1328)

_________________________________________________________________ Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alfred Ha belman, p ro se , appeals the 90-day confiscation of

his pilot’s certificate in 2002, pursuant to an enforcement action
brought by the Government. Habelman contested the suspension of

his pilot’s certificate in earlier proceedings; the suspension was

affirmed. H

abelman v. Garvey , No. 98-60710 (5th Cir. 19 July 1999)
(unpublished). Once the Government sued to enforce that judgment,

Habelman complied voluntarily and the district court entered final2

judgment. Habelman’s contentions belong to the original litigation

and cannot be heard by this court when considering the enforcement

at issue. E .g. , In re Gibraltar Resources, Inc. , 210 F.3d 573, 576

(5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YAHOO, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,

Defendant.

Case NO: 5:17-cv-00447 NC 

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

Dkt. No. 77

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that 

no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 

action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 

Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 

case, provided that such motion is filed within 75 days. All scheduled dates are 

VACATED.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 75 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 

Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2023 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00447-NC Document 78 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 406/9 No

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 406 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 619 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 406

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 619 November 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 406/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 406/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 13 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 406/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 406/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

13

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 406/03 | State aid — France — SA.47867 (2017/FC) — Alleged aid to Ryanair at Montpellier airport — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 17 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 406/03

State aid — France — SA.47867 (2017/FC) — Alleged aid to Ryanair at Montpellier airport — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN