alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11957]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2634 Maine]


Great Northern Paper, Inc.; Intent to File an Application for a 
New License

May 10, 1995.
    Take notice that Great Northern Paper, Inc., the existing licensee 
for the Great Northern Storage Project, Project No. 2634, filed a 
timely notice of intent to file an application for a new license, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 16.6 of the Commission's Regulations. The original 
license for Project No. 2634 was issued effective April 1, 1962, and 
expires April 30, 2000.
    The project is located on the West Branch Penobscot River and its 
tributaries in Somerset and Piscataquis Counties, Maine. The principal 
works of the Great Northern Project include all of the dams, dikes, 
spillways, waste and sluice gates, reservoirs, fishways, and 
appurtenant facilities associated with the following four developments: 
Canada Falls, Caucomgomoc, Ragged Lake, and Seboomook. The project is 
for storage only and is completely without powerplant generating 
capacity.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.7, the licensee is required henceforth to 
make available certain information to the public. This information is 
now available from the licensee at Great Northern Paper, Inc., 
Millinocket, ME 04462.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.8, 16.9 and 16.10, each application for a new 
license and any competing license applications must be filed with the 
Commission at least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing 
license. All applications for license for this project must be filed by 
April 30, 1998.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11957 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Naree ABDULLAH, petitioner, v. Jerome W. WALSH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

No. 12-7634.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Duane GUTHRIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9301.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE OBJECTIONS TO

SPECIAL MASTER’S

PROPOSED PROTOCOL

The parties shall please file any objection to the special master’s proposed monitoring

and verification protocol (Dkt. No. 462), or a statement of non-opposition thereto, by

TOMORROW AT NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 463 Filed 05/18/17 Page 1 of 1
Eddie SANTANA, petitioner, v. MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION.

No. 12-9376.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 Ma y 5, 2021

Order 

Clerk

May 5, 2021

162559(37)

EARTHCOM, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 162559

v COA: 348504

Ingham CC: 17-000755-CB

JEFFREY CLARK, RODNEY CAIN, 

INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, 

INC., and LISA CLARK,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees to extend the time 

for filing their answer is GRANTED. The answer submitted on May 3, 2021, is accepted 

as timely filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,456,000
<SECURITIES>                                88,461,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,133,400
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,693,400)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,133,400
<PP&E>                                       5,506,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 381,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             285,756,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,793,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,215,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               285,756,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,282,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,003,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               284,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,874,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,029,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   683,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,346,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,346,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
        

</TABLE>
Richard K. SCOTT, petitioner, v. Becky PANCAKE, Warden.

No. 12-9322.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

THOMAS LEGG, JR., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-844-JTM-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF STAY BY REASON OF BANKRUPTCY

 The defendant, New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England 

Compounding Center (“NECC”), hereby notifies the Court that NECC filed a voluntary petition 

under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts (Eastern Division) No. 12-19882-HJB. 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), all actions against NECC are stayed. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Dina M. Cox 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49 

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49 

 Attorneys for Defendant, New England 

Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. 

 

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 8 filed 12/27/12 page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on December 27, 2012 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

/s/ Dina M. Cox 

 DINA M. COX 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

Phone: (317) 237-0500 

FAX: (317) 630-2790 

dcox@lewiswagner.com Q:\NECC\15 - Legg\Federal Court Action\Notice of Stay_Bankruptcy.docx

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 8 filed 12/27/12 page 2 of 2
Physician Fact Sheet: Expanded Access

What is Expanded Access?

Sometimes called “compassionate use”, expanded access is a potential pathway 

for a patient with an immediately life-threatening condition or serious disease or

condition to gain access to an investigational medical product (drug, biologic, or

medical device) for treatment outside of clinical trials when no comparable or

satisfactory alternative therapy options are available.

What are the types of expanded access?

1. Expanded access for individual patients, including for emergency use

2. Expanded access for intermediate-size patient groups

3. Expanded access for widespread treatment use

What is the Licensed Physician’s role in the expanded access process?

• Determine there are no available clinical trials for the patient. 

Information on clinical trials can be found using

FDA’s clinical trials search tool or visiting www.clinicaltrials.gov. 

• Confirm patient’s current disease or condition qualifies for expanded access.

Your patient’s disease or condition is either serious or immediately lifethreatening with no available comparable or satisfactory alternative available 

for the patient.

• Identify the appropriate expanded access request type.

For questions, contact the appropriate FDA organization or Patient Affairs Staff

at 301-796-8460 or patientaffairs@fda.hhs.gov.

• Confirm industry will provide investigational medical product

• Facilitate the process and manage the treatment

You will be responsible for managing the use of the investigational medical

product and the patient's medical care. 

• Provide appropriate reporting back to FDA
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Who should I contact if my patient needs access to an investigational medical 

product on an emergency basis?

For emergency requests after hours and on weekends, your licensed physician 

should contact FDA's Emergency Call Center at 866-300-4374. Otherwise, they 

should contact the specific FDA Office (if known) or FDA Patient Affairs at 301-796-

8460 or patientaffairs@fda.hhs.gov.

What is the process for requesting expanded access for my patient?

Detailed information on the process for requesting expanded access can be found

on the FDA’s Expanded Access: How to Submit a Request (Forms) webpage.

In general, you will need to: 

• Request the investigational medical product from the company 

• If the company agrees to provide the investigational medical product, you 

must:

- submit an application to the FDA for expanded access on your patient’s 

behalf

- obtain review and approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB)

- obtain informed consent from your patient for the use of the investigational

medical product

For more information, visit FDA’s Expanded Access webpage

or contact Patient Affairs Staff 

301-796-8460 or patientaffairs@fda.hhs.gov.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Richard E. Staedtler, Chief Executive Officer of Castle Energy
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

I.       The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the three months ended
         June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

II.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:   August 16, 2005                 /S/RICHARD E. STAEDTLER
      --------------------               ----------------------------
                                         Richard E. Staedtler
                                         Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Castle Energy Corporation and will be retained by Castle
Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

OSG AMERICA L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED

 

I, Myles R. Itkin,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof OSG America L.P.

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and we have:

 

a.               Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.               All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | March 12, 2008            |   | /s/ Myles R. Itkin |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|   |  Myles  R. Itkin          |
|   |  Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
I woke up feeling awful. I had diarrhea and was All I wanted to do was go back to bed, but with I got to work and punched in. I am sure I looked as 

sick at the same time. bills piling up, I couldn’t afford to stay home. bad as I felt. I knew I shouldn’t be here.

Orders were stacking up, so I immediately began Carlos was having a great time with his family. This When the food came, he dug right in and 

to prepare burgers. was his favorite restaurant. finished his burger and part of his sister’s.

That night, Carlos doubled over with a stomach I found out 33 other people got ill from me 

ache. He was so sick. He ended up being taken to handling their food when I was sick. The 

the emergency room. Health Department closed the restaurant. 

I should have done what I knew was right and stayed home. I 

could have prevented all of this. Because the restaurant was 

closed for awhile, I lost income. I was also embarrassed.

Protect People Everywhere. Stay home if you are sick.

I Should Have Stayed Home
Travis Bernard COLVIN, petitioner, v. Angel MEDINA, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9160.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
John NIEMIEC, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 12-8950.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor Entech Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harvey
      Houtkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


**/S/ HARVEY HOUTKIN****Harvey
                Houtkin**
              **Chief
                Executive Officer**
              **December
                5, 2007**
----

|                       |   | Three Months Ended |   |   | Three Months Ended |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|
|                       |   | March 31, 2010     |   |   | March 31, 2009     |   |
|                       |   | Shares             |   |   | EarningsPer Share  |   |   | Shares |   |   | Earnings PerShare |   |
|                       |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   | (in Thousands)     |   |   | (in Thousands)     |   |
|                       |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic Weighted Average     |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shares Outstanding         |   |               | 7,256  |   |               | $      | 0.05 |   |   |   | 7,203 |   |   | $ | 0.11 |   |
|                       |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted                    |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average Shares Outstanding |   |               | 7,256  |   |               |   |   |   |   |   | 7,203 |   |   |   |   |   |
| Common Stock Equivalents   |   |               | 0      |   |               |   |   |   |   |   | 0 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   |               |   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   |               | 7,256  |   |               | $      | 0.05 |   |   |   | 7,203 |   |   | $ | 0.11 |   |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON WAYMO'S 

RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL 

SOURCE CODE

Re: Dkt. No. 2038

In light of Judge Alsup’s ruling today deferring Waymo’s motion to add trade secret 

claims, the briefing schedule on Waymo’s renewed motion to compel Uber’s source code is held 

in abeyance pending trial of the existing trade secret claims. No opposition need be filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 2122 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 1
Thomas COLEMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9628.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William J. Stuart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Synacor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

| Date: June 5, 2017 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /s/ WILLIAM J. STUART                        |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|               |   |   |   |   |   | William J. Stuart                            |
|               |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|               |   |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6119

ROBERT LEONARD HUFFMAN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOUSTON NORRIS, Lt. Watch Commander; ALLEN

SELLERS, Correction Officer; ROBBIE HUGHES,

Correction Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (CA-04-316-3)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Leonard Huffman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Adrian Gibney,

Jr., THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Leonard Huffman, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Huffman v. Norris, No. CA-04-316-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Kenneth DESSAURE, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-8597.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.