alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Lukas Braunschweiler, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DionexCorporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 9, 2005   /s/ Lukas Braunschweiler    Lukas Braunschweiler  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 31

                                                        [LOGO] imbIndymacBank(R)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance-with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company.

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
Derrick ALLEN, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 12-9278.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

*2010Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
sf-3766989 

Writer’s Direct Contact 

+1 (415) 268.7020 

AGonzalez@mofo.com 

425 MARKET STREET 

SAN FRANCISCO 

CALIFORNIA 94105-2482 

TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000 

FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522 

WWW.MOFO.COM 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

BEIJING , BERLIN , BRUSSELS , 

DENVER , HONG KONG , LONDON , 

LOS ANGELES , NEW YORK , 

NORTHERN VIRGINIA , PALO ALTO , 

SAN DIEGO , SAN FRANCISCO , SHANGHAI ,

SINGAPORE , TOKYO , WASHINGTON , D . C . 

May 9, 2017 

The Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley 

USDC, Northern District of California 

San Francisco Courthouse 

Courtroom F - 15th Floor 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Re: Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-00939 

Dear Magistrate Judge Corley: 

This letter responds to the letter filed yesterday by counsel for Waymo. 

As I told the Special Master and counsel for Waymo yesterday, I had arranged to speak to 

our clients this morning at 11:00 a.m. We will be producing the agreement between Uber 

and Otto, and the exhibits thereto. However, the documents are voluminous (over 200 

pages) and we need to consult with other counsel to determine whether any part may be 

privileged, and which portions will be designated confidential or AEO pursuant to the 

Protective Order in this case. 

We intend to produce the agreement and exhibits on Thursday. 

Sincerely, 

Arturo J. González 

cc: Special Master John Cooper 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 402 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000710507
<NAME>                        First Banks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         126,420
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,525
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               104,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 3,681
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    674,580
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,507
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      2,890,518
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (50,740)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,957,208
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,502,986
<SHORT-TERM>                                    55,049
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             46,557
<LONG-TERM>                                     83,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,175
<COMMON>                                         5,915
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,957,208
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                187,431
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,988
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,400
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               216,819
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             100,920
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,466
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          102,353
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 75,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,577
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      37,577
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   866.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   830.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.31
<LOANS-NON>                                     27,430
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,018
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 32,209
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                46,781
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   12,710
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,544
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               50,740
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            50,740
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
David Brian ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2770

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Rasheed G. SHAKUR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8516.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>



                                                            Exhibit 99

          WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                          FORM 10-QSB MARCH 31, 1999

Supplementary information required pursuant to section 9.4 of the 
partnership agreement:

1. Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months 
   ended March 31, 1999:

         Net Income                                             $    16,000
         Add:  Depreciation and amortization                         45,000
         Less: Equity in income of Local Limited Partnerships        (1,000)
               Cash to reserves                                     (33,000)
                                                                 -----------
         Cash Available for Distribution                         $    27,000
                                                                 ===========
         Distributions allocated to General Partners             $     2,000
                                                                 ===========
         Distributions allocated to Limited Partners             $    25,000
                                                                 ===========

2. Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the 
   General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended 
   March 31, 1999:

    Entity Receiving                  Form of
      Compensation                  Compensation                      Amount
------------------------  ------------------------------------------  ------
General Partners          Interest in Cash Available for Distribution $2,000

WFC Realty Co., Inc.      
(Initial Limited Partner) Interest in Cash Available for Distribution $    5
                          







                        13 of 13
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 31, 2017

Order 

Clerk

March 31, 2017

155178(130)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 155178

v COA: 324885

Wayne CC: 14-000744-01-FC

MARVIN DWAYNE NOBLE, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on March 13, 2017, is accepted 

for filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-20-TLS

)

GLENDA R. BRICKEY )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 24] filed on June 13, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to the

Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 24] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later than

seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling

deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on June 28, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 UNDER 
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly for the periods presented in this quarterly report;
b.      designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
c.      evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.      disclosed in this report any change in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Partnership's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      I have disclosed based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership's auditors and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a.      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Partnership's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data; and
b.      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Robert J. Werra
Robert J. Werra
Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
October 20, 2006
Motion Granted; Order filed December 17, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00431

- CR

____________ TATRON JAFAR WILLIA MS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1431281



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has fi led a motion asking to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v.
State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant’s motion is GRANTED

. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 262nd District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before December 31, 2015 ;that the clerk of that court certify to this court t he date on which delivery of the record to

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days
of that date.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                     [Park National Corporation Letterhead]

                                 March 11, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

                  Re:      Park National Corporation - Annual Report on Form
                           10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation ("Park"), is today
executing and filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K").

         Pursuant to the instructions to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K,
Park hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, copies of
instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of
Park and its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to
the Form 10-K. Such long-term debt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of
Park and it subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION

                                                /s/ John W. Kozak

                                                John W. Kozak
                                                Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40


                              [Company Letterhead]

January 21, 2004


                                LETTER AGREEMENT

Michael J. Valentine, Trustee
Mary Jo Carroll Trust
2299 Busse Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007


         In connection with a public offering of the Common Stock of John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (the "Company"), you have indicated a desire to include
in such offering 50,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company owned or
controlled by you, plus an additional number of shares to be determined pursuant
to the underwriters' over-allotment option. All such shares you wish to include
in the public offering are presently held in the form of Class A Common Stock of
the Company ("Class A Stock") and would have to be converted into shares of
Common Stock to be included in the offering.

         By signing this Letter Agreement, you agree that, simultaneously upon
the purchase of the Company Common Stock by the underwriters in connection with
the public offering, you shall convert into shares of Company Common Stock (1)
50,000 shares of Class A Stock, plus (2) the number of shares of your Class A
Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock the underwriters
elect to purchase from you pursuant to their over-allotment option.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you and the Company agree that such conversion
will not in any way be deemed effective (including, without limitation, for
purposes of Part 4 of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation)
unless the underwriters purchase our Common Stock. If the underwriters do not
purchase your shares, none of your Class A Stock shall have been converted
pursuant hereto.

         Under no circumstances shall this Letter Agreement be deemed to
constitute a written notice of conversion under Part 4(f) of the Company's
Restated Certificate of Incorporation.


                                      Very truly yours,

                                      /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE

                                      Michael J. Valentine
                                      John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
                                      Executive Vice President Finance, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Secretary





                                                    /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Michael J. Valentine, Trustee of the Mary
                                                  Jo Carroll Trust
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11648]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Sisto International Shipping, 560 Lee Drive, Miami Springs, FL 33136, 
Manuel Sisto, Tracy Sisto, (Partnership).
Keith Guidroz, #6 Wisteria Place, Marrero, LA 70072, Sole Peroprietor.

    Dated: May 8, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-11648 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M