alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOHNNY CASAIGNE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-285 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 23, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katie Salemi Ashby, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
H. Con. Res. 120 Agreed to July 31, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR A CEREMONY AS PART 

OF THE UNVEILING OF THE STATUE OF JOHNNY CASH. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used on September 24, 2024, for a 

ceremony as part of the unveiling of the statue of Johnny Cash, 

provided by the State of Arkansas. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the ceremony 

described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with 

such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00755 CW

 

ORDER TO FILE STATUS REPORT

(Re: Dkt. Nos. 224, 225)

On October 3, 2022, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs’ motion for an 

order holding Defendant Libre by Nexus, Inc. (LBN) in civil contempt and imposing civil 

contempt sanctions on LBN. Docket Nos. 224. On the same date, the Court issued a separate 

order delineating the civil contempt sanctions that it imposed on LBN. Docket No. 225. The 

Court ordered LBN to pay, within ten business days, the amounts it owes under various terms of 

the settlement agreement, and to provide Plaintiffs, within five business days, business records and 

documents sufficient to show that it has implemented the various discounts and credits required 

under the terms of the settlement agreement. See id. The Court imposed on LBN a fine of $1,000 

per day of continued noncompliance as to each of the subject matters regarding which the Court 

separately ordered LBN to take certain actions. See id. Since the Court issued its October 3, 

2022, orders, there have been no filings in this action by either side. 

//

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 228 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Accordingly, within seven days of the date this order is issued, each side shall file a status 

report addressing the status of LBN’s compliance with the Court’s October 3, 2022, orders and the 

anticipated progress of the litigation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2022

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 228 Filed 11/04/22 Page 2 of 2
James W. BARRETT, petitioner, v. UNIVERSAL MAILING SERVICE, INC., et al.

No. 12-975.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Candy S. BRADISON, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE.

No. 12-1337.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Exhibit 3 

Filed Under Seal 

REDACTED VERSION

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1195-1 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 4
WAYMO & UBER CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4 ---oOo---

5

6 WAYMO LLC,

7 Plaintiff,

8 vs. No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

9 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING,

10 INC.,

11 Defendants.

_____________________________/

12

13 WAYMO & UBER CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

14

15 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CAMERON POETZSCHER

16 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

17 MONDAY, JUNE 19, 2017

18

19

20 BY: ANDREA M. IGNACIO,

21 CSR, RPR, CRR, CCRR, CLR

22 CSR LICENSE NO. 9830

23 JOB NO. 2642012

24

25 Pages 1 - 374

Page 1

Veritext Legal Solutions

866 299-5127

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1195-1 Filed 08/14/17 Page 2 of 4
WAYMO & UBER CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY

1 important to have that control right away? 11:34

2 A I mean, it's the same reason 

11:34

5 In fact, in relation to what I told you about 11:34

6 the deal originally, in late 2015 it was a 11:34

7

11:34

12 Q Why not just hire them as employees of Uber? 11:34

13 A That's essentially what we did; right. 11:34

14 Ultimately, we hired them. 

11:35

22 Q But what was -- was there a value add to 11:35

23 acquiring NewCo, and with it, the engineers, as 11:35

24 opposed to just hiring those engineers -- 11:35

25 MR. JACOBS: Objection -- 11:35

Page 135

Veritext Legal Solutions

866 299-5127

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1195-1 Filed 08/14/17 Page 3 of 4
WAYMO & UBER CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY

1 Q Who is Colin Seeberg? 16:32

2 A I don't know. 16:32

3 Q Who is Don Burnette? 16:32

4 A I know he's an employee of Otto. I recognize 16:32

5 the name. 16:32

6 Q And do you -- other than knowing he is an -- 16:32

7 an employee of Otto, do you know anything else about 16:32

8 him? 16:32

9 A No. 16:32

10 And when I say "employee of Otto," he's now 16:32

11 an employee of Uber, of course, but he was an employee 16:32

12 of Otto. 16:32

13 Q Right. 16:32

14 Was he formerly employed at Waymo? 16:32

15 A I don't know. 16:32

16 Q But for Soren and Colin, you don't know -- 16:32

17 you don't recognize those names as Otto employees? 16:32

18 A No. 16:32

19 Q And you don't recognize those names as 16:32

20 members of the team that Anthony Levandowski brought 16:32

21 to Otto? 16:32

22 A No. 16:32

23 Q And is it correct that, under the terms of 16:32

24 the indemnification agreement, Uber agreed to 16:32

25 indemnify the signatories in the event of certain 16:32

Page 336

Veritext Legal Solutions

866 299-5127

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1195-1 Filed 08/14/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of BG Medicine, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                              
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 17, 2011 |  | /s/ Pieter Muntendam, M.D.                                                                   
|                      |  | Pieter Muntendam, M.D.                                                                       
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)                          
|                      | 
|Dated: March 17, 2011 |  | /s/ Michael W. Rogers                                                                        
|                      |  | Michael W. Rogers                                                                            
|                      |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-33-TLS 

)

GELACIO MARTINEZ )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 26], filed on August 26, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 26] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 3 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later than

seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling

deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on September 11, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
U.S. FDA visits Andhra University, attends BioAsia 2023 in Hyderabad

February 25 (Hyderabad) - A high-level delegation from the U.S. Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) visited the Telugu states on February 23-25. Led by Mark 

Abdoo, the FDA’s Associate Commissioner for Global Policy and Strategy, the 

delegation appeared February 25th at Hyderabad’s BioAsia 2023 Summit, where 

he participated in a panel discussion entitled “India for India and India for the 

World: Where Does Quality Stand?” FDA drug product experts separately 

traveled to Andhra University on February 23-24 for a workshop with 

pharmaceutical industry leaders, scholars, and regulatory officials.    

“Telangana is one of the states with the most FDA-registered drug 

manufacturing facilities and Andhra University plays a key role in India’s 

pharmaceutical ecosystem,” said Associated Commissioner Abdoo. “Industry 

and regulators need to work together to achieve safe and effective medical 

products for global consumption. I believe the conversations I’ve had over the 

last few days has helped identify important ways we can facilitate 

that cooperation.” 

In the United States, the FDA is charged with protecting public health by 

ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, 

biological products, and medical devices. As Associate Commissioner for Global 

Policy and Strategy, Mr. Abdoo is responsible for providing executive oversight, 

strategic leadership and policy direction to FDA’s global policy, operations, 

trade, and diplomacy activities. He was joined by Sarah McMullen, Ph.D., 

director of the FDA’s India Office; and Carmelo Rosa, PsyD., director of the 

Division of International Drug Quality in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation 

and Research. 

-------------------------------END PRESS RELEASE-------------------------------
Israel Louis GOODIN, petitioner, v. Greg McQUIGGIN, Warden.

No. 12-9007.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Bryan GIBSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 24
  RESOLUTION
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
 HAMMOND, LOUISIANA
 MARCH 18, 2010
 
 
 The following resolution was introduced, seconded and unanimously adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., Hammond, Louisiana, held on the 18th day of March 2010, whereby a quorum was present and voting.
 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
 BE IT RESOLVED that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the holding company are, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed to prepare an Annual Report to Stockholders to be mailed to Stockholders of the holding company.
 
 FURTHER RESOLVED that Chief Executive Officer Alton B. Lewis and the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Michele E. LoBianco, be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to execute on behalf of any director or officer of the holding company, the Annual Report on Form 10-K, those persons to act pursuant to powers of attorney granted to them by those directors or officers, and to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
 CERTIFICATE
 
 I hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. at a regular meeting held at its domicile on the 18th day of March 2010, at which a quorum was present and voting and that the same has not been rescinded or revoked.
 
 /s/Michele E. LoBianco
 Michele E. LoBianco
 Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
 Secretary to the Board of Directors
 First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.
 S E A L
 
 /s/Marshall T. Reynolds
 Marshall T.  Reynolds
 Chairman of the Board of Directors
 First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 12

To amend the Education Land Grant Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to pay the costs of environmental reviews with respect to conveyances under that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Education Land Grant Act to require the 

Secretary of Agriculture to pay the costs of environmental reviews with respect to conveyances under that 

Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COSTS OF REVIEWS FOR CONVEYANCES UNDER 

4 EDUCATION LAND GRANT ACT. 

5 Section 202 of the Education Land Grant Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 479a) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 
2

•HR 12 IH 

1 ‘‘(f) COSTS OF REVIEW.—The Secretary shall pay the 

2 costs of all actions required under section 102(2)(C) of 

3 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

4 4332(2)(C)) with respect to any conveyance under this 

5 section.’’.

Æ
Ralph A. FLOWERS, III, petitioner, v. Steven RICH, et al.

No. 12-8893.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
In re Jimmy Roy DAVIDSON, petitioner.

No. 12-10479.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6190

WILLIE MORRIS MCBRIDE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus C. T. NULTY, Superintendent, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-476-3) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Morris McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McBride v. Nulty , No. CA-97- 476-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ADDENDUM DATED OCTOBER 31, 2003 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (BEGLEY)



 EXHIBIT 10.23 
  
 

 
  
 Interoffice Memorandum

  

			
	To:	  	 Personnel File

	From:	  	 Richard F. Begley, CEO

	Date:	  	 October 31, 2003

	Re:	  	 Addendum to Employment Agreement


  

  
 I, Richard F. Begley, (“the Executive”) signed an Employment Agreement (“the Agreement”) with my employer, 454 Life
Sciences Corporation (“the Company”), on or about December 20, 2002. The Agreement provides that it shall be renewed on an annual basis unless either the Company or the Executive notifies the other party of his/her/its intent not to renew
the Agreement on or before October 31 (Section 2A. Term). 
  
 The Executive and
the Company have agreed to modify the terms of that Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 	(Section 2 Term.) 

  
 There shall be no one year term of employment and either the Executive or 454 Life Sciences may terminate employment with or without cause and with or
without notice. 
  

	 	2.	 	(Section 6. Disability or Death) 

  
 The Agreement provides that the Company may terminate the Agreement upon the Executive’s death or disability. 
  

	 	3.	 	(Section 10. Termination) 

  
 The Agreement provides that 454 Life Sciences may terminate the Agreement for performance reasons or for cause. 
  

	 	4.	 	(Section 10E and Section 12A. Benefits Upon Termination) 

  
 If the Company terminates the Executive’s employment because of performance reasons (as defined in Agreement), disability or death, or without cause,
the Executive or his/her estate shall receive benefits. The benefits are: (i) salary continuation at the salary the Executive was receiving at the time of termination; and (ii) the Executive’s continued participation (or in the case of death
the Executive’s family’s continued participation) in any employee health and welfare benefit to which the Executive was a participant prior to his termination on the same basis as the Executive had participated as an employee. The salary
continuation and continued participation in any health and welfare benefit plan shall be for twelve months from the date of termination of the Executive’s employment. Other than under Section 12 in the event of a Change of Control, the
Executive shall not be entitled to more than twelve (12) months of salary continuation and continued participation in any health or welfare benefit plan if the Executive’s employment is terminated for (1) performance reasons; (2) death; (3)
disability; or (4) without cause. 
  
 Unless explicitly changed in this Addendum,
all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

	
	
	/s/    Richard F. Begley
	

	Richard F. Begley


	
	
	/s/    Jonathan M. Rothberg
	

	Jonathan M. Rothberg
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July 19, 2010 | By:  | /s/ Yao-Ting Su                |
|---------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------|
|                |      | Yao-Ting Su Chief Executive Officer |
|                |      |                                |

|   | By:    | /s/ Pi-Chu Lin               |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |   | Pi-Chu LinChief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                              |
Anthony L. OLVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9335.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Deamus Troy CASTERLINE, petitioner, v. William STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-9736.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.