alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1435 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the foreign tax 

credit and the benefits of deferral to companies doing business directly 

or through subsidiaries in Sudan until the Government of Sudan takes 

demonstrable steps to end genocide in Sudan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the 

foreign tax credit and the benefits of deferral to companies doing business directly or through subsidiaries in 

Sudan until the Government of Sudan takes demonstrable steps to end genocide in Sudan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1435 IH 

1 SECTION 1. DENIAL OF FOREIGN TAX CREDIT FOR TAXES 

2 PAID TO SUDAN UNTIL STEPS ARE TAKEN TO 

3 END GENOCIDE. 

4 Section 901(j)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

5 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR SUDAN.—In addi8 tion to any period during which this subsection 

9 would otherwise apply to Sudan, this subsection 

10 shall apply to Sudan during the period— 

11 ‘‘(i) beginning on the date of the en12 actment of this subparagraph, and 

13 ‘‘(ii) ending on the date the Secretary 

14 of State determines and certifies to the 

15 Secretary of the Treasury that the Govern16 ment of Sudan has ceased to support acts 

17 of genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan, 

18 and has taken demonstrable steps to— 

19 ‘‘(I) end acts of genocide in the 

20 Darfur region of Sudan, 

21 ‘‘(II) ensure that the armed 

22 forces of Sudan and any associated 

23 militias are not attacking civilians or 

24 obstructing human rights monitors or 

25 the provision of humanitarian assist26 ance, 
3 

•HR 1435 IH 

1 ‘‘(III) demobilize and disarm mi2 litias supported or created by the Gov3 ernment of Sudan, 

4 ‘‘(IV) allow full and unfettered 

5 access for the provision of humani6 tarian assistance to all regions of 

7 Sudan, including Darfur, and 

8 ‘‘(V) cooperate fully with the Af9 rican Union, the United Nations, and 

10 all other observer, monitoring, and 

11 protection missions mandated to oper12 ate in Sudan.’’. 

Æ
Wilner VAL SAINT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10245.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In The United States District Court 

Northern District Of Indiana

TCYK LLC, )

)

) Case No.: 13-cv-296

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) 

Does 1-8, )

 ) 

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to all remaining Defendants identified in Plaintiff’s Complaint 

that have not already been dismissed. This terminates the matter.

DATED: April 8, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

TCYK LLC

By: s/ Keith A. Vogt 

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Takiguchi & Vogt, LLP 

1415 W. 22nd Street, Tower Floor 

Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 

630.974.5707

Attorney for Plaintiff

case 1:13-cv-00296-JD-RBC document 14 filed 04/08/14 page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-40-TLS 

)

TREY T. JACKSON )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 52], filed on August 16, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 52] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment are hereby

accepted, and the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offenses. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on September 10, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-22-TLS 

)

LIZBETH CORREA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 51], filed on October 17, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 51] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c), the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 6 of the Indictment IS hereby accepted, and

the Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate

order.

SO ORDERED on November 13, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 1:14-CV-67-TLS

)

CYNTHIA J. GERARD, ROBERT E. )

GERARD, and TREASURER, ALLEN )

COUNTY, INDIANA, )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Request to Modify Scheduling Order 

[ECF No. 79], filed on July 12, 2018. At a telephonic trial scheduling conference [ECF No. 75] 

held on May 23, 2018, the Court instructed the Plaintiff to file a response to the Defendants’ 

Motion to Allow Expert Testimony [ECF No. 51] by July 16, 2018, and instructed the 

Defendants to file their reply by July 31, 2018. The Court also set a trial date for December 10, 

2018. The parties now request that the Court extend the deadlines for briefing on the Defendants’ 

Motion to Allow Expert Testimony for forty-five (45) days so that the parties may conduct 

further settlement conferences after the appearance of new counsel for the Defendants. The 

parties do not request modification to any other dates, including the trial date.

The Court, being duly advised, GRANTS the parties’ Joint Request to Modify 

Scheduling Order [ECF No.79]. The Plaintiff’s response to the Defendants’ Motion to Allow 

Expert Testimony is due on August 30, 2018, and the Defendants’ reply is due September 13, 

2018. All other deadlines imposed by the Court at the May 23, 2018, teleconference are 

CONFIRMED, including the trial set for December 10, 2018.
2

SO ORDERED on July 16, 2018.

s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Kevin CHAPPELL, Warden, petitioner, v. Richard Louis Arnold PHILLIPS.

No. 12-544.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in *forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00476

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M ., a Child,

From the 454th Judicial District Court

, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 11

- 26159

- CV Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California

, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing that Anders procedures apply in parental termination cases ). Counsel has informed appellant of h is right to file h is own brief and provided appellant with a form motion for pro se access to th e appellate record

. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State

, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in th is appeal , he must do so within t wenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than t wenty d ays after the date appellant’s pro

se brief is filed in this court.

We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel in th is appeal , to be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Marti nez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of January, 2022

.___________________________________ M ICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-147347) pertaining to the Abraxis BioScience, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, the American BioScience, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Plan I and the American BioScience, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Plan II ofour report dated March 2, 2009, with respect to the consolidated and combined financial statements of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (formerly known as New Abraxis, Inc.) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AbraxisBioScience, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 2, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

SANDRA RHODES, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-cv-841-JVB-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and being duly advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS 

Defendants’ Motion. Defendants are hereby granted an extension up to an including March 25, 

2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2013. 

 s/Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

 Magistrate Judge, Christopher A. Nuechterlein 

U.S. Northern District Court 

Distribution: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

Stutsman & Mulvaney 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

Dina M. Cox / Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

Robert M. Baker IV / Janelle P. Kilies 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 20 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 1
# L_2017174EN.01001301.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/13

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1222

of 26 June 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Kiełbasa biała parzona wielkopolska (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Kiełbasa biała parzona wielkopolska’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Kiełbasa biała parzona wielkopolska’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kiełbasa biała parzona wielkopolska’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kiełbasa biała parzona wielkopolska’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Kiełbasa biała parzona wielkopolska’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. — Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 June 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 73, 9.3.2017, p. 25.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
William RUPERT, et al., petitioners, v. Barbara JONES, et al.

No. 12-1011.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-10-054-CR

JOHN CHARLES MALEY	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On November 17, 2009, appellant John Charles Maley pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance of less than one gram.  In accordance with the plea bargain, the trial court sentenced appellant to three years’ imprisonment.  Appellant later filed a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal, but the trial court’s certification of his right to appeal shows that this case “is a plea-bargain case, and [appellant] has NO right of appeal.”

	On February 9, 2010, we sent a letter to appellant’s counsel informing her of the trial court’s certification and giving appellant, or any party desiring to continue the appeal, until February 19, 2010, to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  We stated that the appeal could be dismissed unless we received such a response.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We have not received any response.

	Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  March 18, 2010
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Eric T. Jones By ____________________________________ Eric T. Jones Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer Date:   August 14, 2007
Milo Vareen DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8317.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Alleyne v. United States,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2151, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).
Marvin Lee FORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9408.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
MICHIGAN, petitioner, v. BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, et al.

No. 12-515.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

  Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C4 (the "Trust"),
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C4

  I, Jeffrey A. Altabef, a Vice President of Credit Suisse First Boston
  Mortgage Securities Corp., the depositor into the above-referenced Trust,
  certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Centerline Servicing Inc., First American Commercial Real Estate Services,
    Inc., Global Realty Outsourcing, Inc., ING Clarion Partners, LLC,
    KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., Midland Loan Services, Inc.,
    National Consumer Cooperative Bank, NCB, FSB, Wachovia Bank, National
    Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Jeffrey A. Altabef
    Signature

    Vice President
    (Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-77 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
Darryl Lamont DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10460.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Aaron TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8866.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.