alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 246 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 126 

[Report No. 109–154] 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment in the number 

of free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment 

in the number of free roaming horses permitted in Cape 

Lookout National Seashore. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 126 RS 

1 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING 

2 HORSES PERMITTED IN CAPE LOOKOUT NA3 TIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH CAROLINA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first subsection (b) of section 

5 5 of Public Law 89–366 (16 U.S.C. 459g–4) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘100 free 

8 roaming horses’’ and inserting ‘‘not less than 110 

9 free roaming horses, with a target population of be10 tween 120 and 130 free roaming horses,’’; 

11 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

12 (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a 

14 plan to maintain the viability of the herd; or’’; and 

15 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘100’’ and in16 serting ‘‘110’’. 

17 (b) REPEAL OF DUPLICATE SUBSECTION.—Section 5 

18 of Public Law 89–366 is further amended— 

19 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a)’’ after 

20 ‘‘(a)’’; and 

21 (2) by striking the second subsection (b). 

Calendar No. 246 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 126 

[Report No. 109–154] 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adpermitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore. justment in the number of free roaming horses 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Reported without amendment
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Income Properties,Ltd. II (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Roger Charles DAY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1155.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### SWIFT SPINNING MILLS, INC., t/a Marubeni Denim, PlaintiffAppellee, v. B & H APPAREL CORP., Defendant, Mark Stern, Harry Ganapathy, Esther Stern, Eagle Apparel Group, Eagle Clothing Group, Star Eagle, Inc., Greystone One Ten Equities, Ltd., American Trading of East Coast, Inc., Avrom M. Schlussel, Pretty Kids, Inc., XYZ Companies 1-25, said names being fictitious, and John Does 1-50, said names being fictitious, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants.

Nos. 03-7324, 03-7337.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 30, 2004.

Leo Fox, Law Office of Leo Fox, New York, NY, for Appellants.

Ronald A. Berutti, Verde, Steinberg & Pontell, LLC, Fort Lee, NJ, for Appellee.

Present: McLAUGHLIN, SACK, Circuit Judges, and Nina GERSHON, District Judge.*

*

**Of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

*762SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
LB-UBS
Commercial Mortgage Trust
 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
 Series
2007-C6
 Pooling
and Servicing Agreement
 OFFICER'S
CERTIFICATE
 Pursuant
to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), it is hereby certified to the Depositor thereunder that on behalf
of Midland Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"), (i) a review of the Servicer's
activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision; (ii) to the
best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the reporting period or, if there has been a failure to
fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such failure known to
the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are set forth below;
and (iii) the Servicer has not received any notice regarding qualification, or
challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant to the Agreement from the
IRS or any other governmental agency or body.
 Nature
and Status of Failures: None.
    MIDLAND LOAN
      SERVICES, INC/s/
      Steven W. SmithSteven W.
      SmithPresident and
      Chief Operating Officer
    A
Member of the PNC Financial Serices Group
  P.O. Box
419127  Kansas City Missouri 64141-6127
  www.midlandls.com  913 253 900 T   913 253  9001 F
Michael TURNER, petitioner, v. Jorge L. PASTRANA, Warden.

No. 12-10422.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Discover Products Inc.

Discover Card Master Trust I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Discover Products Inc. (DPI), hereby certifies that:



|(a) | A review of the activities of DPI for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2012 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, by
and between DPI and Discover Bank (the Agreement) was made under my supervision.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, DPI has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2012.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 19thday of February 2013.



By:

/s/ James V. PanzarinoJames V. Panzarino,Executive Vice President
James FRANCIS, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY RIVER COAL CORPORATION.

No. 12-9009.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of ECO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEVE CONBOY, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steve Conboy


Steve Conboy


President


Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





October 14, 2014
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE U.S.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Annual Report of Scandium International
Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 30, 2015 | /s/ George Putnam          
|--------------------- | ---------------------------
|                      | George Putnam              
|                      | Principal Executive Officer

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

WALTER ROY YOUNG, d.b.a. Walter R.

Young,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 14-10522

 14-10523

D.C. Nos. 2:12-cr-00837-DGC

 2:13-cr-01653-DGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 13, 2016** 

Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Walter Roy Young appeals his jury-trial

conviction and 18-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm and

ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and the

FILED

APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
revocation of probation and 12-month sentence imposed thereupon. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Young’s counsel has filed a brief

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Young the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10522 & 14-10523
Michael RAIHALA, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 12-10099.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 126 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment in the number 

of free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment 

in the number of free roaming horses permitted in Cape 

Lookout National Seashore. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING 

4 HORSES PERMITTED IN CAPE LOOKOUT NA5 TIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH CAROLINA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first subsection (b) of section 

7 5 of Public Law 89–366 (16 U.S.C. 459g–4) is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘100 free 

10 roaming horses’’ and inserting ‘‘not less than 110 
2 

•HR 126 IH 

1 free roaming horses, with a target population of be2 tween 120 and 130 free roaming horses,’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

4 (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a 

6 plan to maintain the viability of the herd; or’’; and 

7 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘100’’ and in8 serting ‘‘110’’. 

9 (b) REPEAL OF DUPLICATE SUBSECTION.—Section 5 

10 of Public Law 89–366 is further amended— 

11 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a)’’ after 

12 ‘‘(a)’’; and 

13 (2) by striking the second subsection (b). 

Æ
Gerald Blace WEST, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-9171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 12, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Danny A. CLEMEMTS, petitioner, v. Eric R. FRANKLIN, Warden.

No. 12-9185.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.31


                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                          DATED MAY 1, 1999, BETWEEN
                         FIRST HEALTH GROUP CORP. AND
                               PATRICK G. DILLS


 THIS AMENDMENT is entered into this 10th day of January 2002 ("Amendment
 Effective Date") by and between First Health Group Corp. ("Company") and
 Patrick G. Dills ("Employee").

 WHEREAS, Company and Employee have previously entered into a certain
 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1999 ("Agreement"), amended February 1,
 2000; and

 WHEREAS, Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement with respect to
 term and time commitment.

 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the initial covenants and agreements set
 forth herein and in the Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

 1.   Section 2 Term is deleted and replaced with the following:  Term.
 Beginning on the Effective Date of the Agreement, the Initial Term of this
 Agreement will be through December 31, 2003, and will automatically renew,
 unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 6 hereof.

 2.   Section 4 Time Commitment is amended by the addition of the following
 phrase to the second sentence of the Section:  "; provided, however,
 that after March 31, 2003, Employee may request a reduction in his time
 commitment with an appropriate adjustment to compensation, which request
 will be given reasonable consideration by Company."

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment
 to the Employment Agreement, in the State of Illinois, as of the date and
 year first above written.

                                         The Company:
                                         First Health Group Corp.

                                         By:  _______________________
                                         Its: President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                         Employee:

                                         ____________________________
                                         Patrick G. Dills
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6929

BERT JOHN HANSEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BENJAMIN ELLIS, PA-C; VINCENT GORE, M.D.; KATIE HAMLIN, R.N.; PAUL KOLLAND, VCE Shop Manager; JOYCE COTTON, VCE Shop Supervisor; JAMES MALONE, VCE Shop Supervisor; GEORGE HINKLE, Chief Warden of GRCC; MARIE VARGO, S-2 Warden; CLYDE ALDERMAN, Administrative Staff Specialist Senior; TYRONE SLOAN, Lieutenant, HU4-S2 Building Supervisor; KEVIN BONNER, Lieutenant, Yard Crew Supervisor; SCOTTY, Sergeant, Complex Crew Supervisor; JAMES THOMAS; MCGRUE BOOKER, Job Coordinator, Counselor; SHARON JOHNSON, VCE Manager; JOHN AUSBON, Education & Vocation Principal (DCE), Defendants - Appellees,

and NURSES, Greenville Correctional Center; SERGEANT MILLER, HU4-S2 Building Supervisor; PRINCIPAL OSBORNE, a/k/a Osgood, Principal of Schools/Vocational; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER EVERSON; MRS. WOODSON, Grievance Office; MRS. KINSLEY, Grievance Office,
Defendants.- 2 - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00437-REP)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 6, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bert John Hansen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis III, Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Bert John Hansen, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying several motions in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Hansen seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Hansen’s motions for appointment of counsel and to compel the district court to enforce a June 22, 2006 order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Marcus CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8823.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

PARI GOODWIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RENT-A-CENTER,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00062-JVB-RBC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S

CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Plaintiff Pari Goodwin and Defendant Rent-A-Center (collectively referred to as the 

“Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree through their respective undersigned counsel, that the 

above-captioned action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §1 et seq. The parties will resolve this matter pursuant 

to the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims between the Parties, which covers all claims 

alleged in the Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David M. Lutz (with permission)

David M. Lutz

David M. Lutz LLC

4202 W. Jefferson Blvd.

Fort Wayne, IN 46804

Phone: 260.432.3700

Fax: 260.432.3707

Email: dlutz@davidlutzllc.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jane Ann Himsel

Jane Ann Himsel 

Littler Mendelson, PC

111 Monument Circle, Suite 702

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Phone: 317.287.3600

Fax: 317.636.0712

Email: jhimsel@littler.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00062-JVB-RBC document 9 filed 03/20/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed on the 20th day of March, 

2013. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all 

parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may assess this filing through the 

Court’s electronic filing system.

/s/ Jane Ann Himsel__

Firmwide:119152823.1 051536.1349

USDC IN/ND case 1:13-cv-00062-JVB-RBC document 9 filed 03/20/13 page 2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL 

ORDER (DKT. 670) 

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00939-WHA

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND 

OTTOMOTTO LLC’S, MOTION FOR 

RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE 

PRETRIAL ORDER OF 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DKT. 670) 

Trial Date: October 10, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 727-1 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL 

ORDER (DKT. 670) 

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00939-WHA

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Upon consideration of Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Ottomotto LLC’s 

(collectively, “Uber”) Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order (Dkt. 670) pursuant to 

Local Rule 72-2, and having given Plaintiff Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) an opportunity to respond, 

the Court hereby GRANTS Uber’s Motion. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that paragraphs 1, 2, 5, and 6 on pages 8–10 of 

Magistrate Judge Corley’s June 21, 2017 Nondispositive Order Granting Motion to Compel Stroz 

Documents and Denying Motions to Quash (Dkt. 670) are VACATED. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2017 

HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 727-1 Filed 06/23/17 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

                                 AMENDMENT SIX

                       COUNTRYWIDE CREDIT INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                   (AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF MARCH 27, 1996)


       WHEREAS, Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. (the "Company") desires to
amend the Countrywide Credit Industries 1993 Stock Option Plan (As Amended and
Restated as of March 27, 1996) (the "Plan") to provide options to nonemployee
directors of affiliated companies of the Company.

       NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

       1.     Section 2(m) of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following
              sentence at its end:

              "Solely for purposes of options granted under this Plan, "Eligible
              Employee" shall include a Nonemployee Affiliate Director."

       2.     Sections 2(r) through 2(bb) shall be renumbered as 2(s) through
              2(cc) and new Section 2(r) shall be added as follows:

              "Nonemployee Affiliate Director" means any nonemployee director of
              an affiliated company of the Company."

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment Six to be
executed by its duly authorized officer this 19 day of June, 2001.

                                        Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.



                                        By: /s/ Anne McCallion
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Anne McCallion
                                            Managing Director,
                                            Chief Administrative Officer


Attest:


/s/ Jordan Dorchuck
-------------------------------