alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:13-CR-3-TLS

)

DASHAWN D. JONES )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 18] filed on February 26, 2013. The Defendant has waived objection to

the Findings and Recommendation, and the Court, being duly advised, adopts the Findings and

Recommendation [ECF No. 18] in its entirety and accepts the recommended disposition. Subject to

this Court’s consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c),

the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the

Defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense. 

Any request for a sentence involving a departure under the United States Sentencing

Guidelines, or for a variance above or below a Guidelines sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

with the exception of matters raised pursuant to §5K1.1 of the Guidelines, shall be communicated to

the probation officer and opposing counsel, in writing, within fourteen (14) days following initial

disclosure of the pre-sentence report. Any sentencing memorandum addressing these or any other

issues, including requests for a departure based on § 5K1.1, shall be filed with the Court no later

than seven (7) days prior to the sentencing hearing. The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence

scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on March 15, 2013. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
USDC IN/ND case 2:11-cv-00489-WCL-PRC   document 1   filed 11/17/11   page 1 of 3

USDC IN/ND case 2:11-cv-00489-WCL-PRC   document 1   filed 11/17/11   page 2 of 3

USDC IN/ND case 2:11-cv-00489-WCL-PRC   document 1   filed 11/17/11   page 3 of 3
UBER AND OTTOMOTTO’S RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER RE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA SEARCHES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

sf-3818209 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) 

AGonzalez@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

KAREN L. DUNN (Pro Hac Vice) 

kdunn@bsfllp.com 

HAMISH P.M. HUME (Pro Hac Vice) 

hhume@bsfllp.com 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

1401 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington DC 20005 

Telephone: 202.237.2727 

Facsimile: 202.237.6131 

WILLIAM CARMODY (Pro Hac Vice) 

bcarmody@susmangodfrey.com 

SHAWN RABIN (Pro Hac Vice) 

srabin@SusmanGodfrey.com 

SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 

1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor 

New York, NY 10019-6023 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

DEEFNDANTS UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

OTTOMOTTO LLC’S RESPONSE TO 

THE COURT’S ORDER REGARDING 

INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA 

SEARCHES OF JURORS 

Judge: The Honorable William Alsup 

Trial Date: October 10, 2017 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1365 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 2
UBER AND OTTOMOTTO’S RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER RE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA SEARCHES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1 

sf-3818209 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

In response to the Court’s August 18, 2017 Order (Dkt. 1262), Defendants Uber 

Technologies, Inc. and Ottomotto LLC (“Defendants”) consent to a ban of social media searches 

of the venire or the empaneled jury until trial is over. 

Defendants also respectfully request that they be permitted one hour for their voir dire of 

potential jurors. 

Dated: August 25, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ Arturo J. González 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1365 Filed 08/25/17 Page 2 of 2
Christopher Dale MONROE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4832

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeffrey W. MOSELEY, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-9134.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 2:13-CV-85-JVB-JEM

)

JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned IP )

address 98.193.122.65, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the document appearing on the docket as Response to

Order to Show Cause [DE 16], filed by Plaintiff on July 17, 2013. On July 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed

Plaintiff’s First Motion for Extension of Time within which It has to Effectuate Service on

Defendant, at [DE 11]. On July 12, 2013, the Court granted an extension of time through August

5, 2013, at [DE 12]. 

However, in its motion, Plaintiff had stated that it was in discussions with Defendant

regarding this litigation. In its Order of May 9, 2013, the Court prohibited Plaintiff from directly

communicating with Defendant. Accordingly, the Court issued a Show Cause Order, at [DE 13],

ordering Plaintiff to explain why it had apparently violated the Order of May 9, 2013. In his

response, Plaintiff states that the language of the initial motion was borrowed from a motion in a

different case in which no protective order prohibits communication with the defendant. Plaintiff

states that it has not been in communication with Defendant, but simply failed to remove the

language indicating otherwise from its motion for an extension of time.

case 2:13-cv-00085-JVB-JEM document 17 filed 07/23/13 page 1 of 2
Accordingly, the Court FINDS that Plaintiff has shown cause why it appeared to have

violated this Court’s protective order.

So ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2013.

s/ John E. Martin 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

cc: All counsel of record

2

case 2:13-cv-00085-JVB-JEM document 17 filed 07/23/13 page 2 of 2
case 2:13-cv-00089-JVB-JEM   document 1-3   filed 03/08/13   page 1 of 2

case 2:13-cv-00089-JVB-JEM   document 1-3   filed 03/08/13   page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
          required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
          on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2007-OA9 (the "Exchange Act
          periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
          to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
          light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
          for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
          assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
          securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
          Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
          have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
          disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
          10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
     provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York,
     as Trustee, and IndyMac Bank, FSB.

Date: March [ ], 2008

      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -------------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
      (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
      Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
----

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/    | Lisa K. Vansickle                                    |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Lisa K. Vansickle                                    |
|   |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |

----
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor Entech Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad Houtkin, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: March 16, 2009 /s/ Brad Houtkin Brad Houtkin President and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00939-JCS (INT)

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable William H. Alsup in the San 

Francisco division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall 

bear the initials WHA immediately after the case number.

All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing 

schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge 

to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior 

briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also 

remain unchanged. 

Dated: March 1, 2017 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 16 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND

OTTOMOTTO LLC’S MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER

DENYING-IN-PART

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 600

Upon consideration of Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Ottomotto LLC’s

(“Defendants”) Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying-In-Part Administrative Motions to

File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 550), and finding that good cause exists, the Court hereby GRANTS

Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 600) and ORDERS that additional portions 

shall be sealed, in accordance with Defendants’ Motion and as indicated below:

1) Marked portions in Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Michelle Yang (Dkt. No. 600-2 at 10-

11, 14-15.1)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2017 

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

 

1 Record citations are to material in the Electronic Case Files (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the 

ECF-generated page numbers at the top of the documents.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 653 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 1
Isal BEHIS, petitioner, v. TEXAS; and Isal Behis, petitioner, v. Texas.

No. 12-8958.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Catalino MORALES, petitioner, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 12M137.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Larry CARTER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 12-9845.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
Kevin Tyrone WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9818.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Bismarck GUTIERREZ, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 12-9342.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Hershel WALKER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4028

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
No dejes que te pase lo mismo que a mí

Me llamo David. Un día, mientras Me sentí mejor, así que regrese a No sabía que tenía gérmenes en mis ... y a los pepinos...

trabajaba, me sentí enfermo y tuve terminar mi turno. Necesitaba el manos. Le pase mis gérmenes a los 

que correr al baño. dinero. Llegó una orden de una tomates...

ensalada y yo olvide lavarme las 

manos o ponerme guantes.

... y a toda la ensalada... ... y también a una niñita llamada Ashlynn que se comió la ensalada que yo prepare. Al otro día, Ashlynn se enfermo 

con retortijones y vómitos. De 

hecho, docenas de personas 

se enfermaron porque yo seguí 

preparando alimentos ese día.

Yo pude haber evitado que esto sucediera. 

Protege a todos. Lava bien tus manos,

usa guantes o utensilios para manejar

la comida y nunca te presentes a 

trabajar si estas enfermo.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2862

_____________________________

JEFF MCGEE BRAGG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

January 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jeff McGee Bragg, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Michael Alexander BROWN, petitioner, v. Kenneth T. McKEE, Warden.

No. 12-8619.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11232]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of reporting requirements submitted for review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Comments should be submitted within 30 days of this publication 
in the Federal Register. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare 
comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency 
Clearance Office before the deadline.

COPIES: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer. Submit comments to the Agency Clearance 
Office and the OMB Reviewer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
Agency Clearance Officer: Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street, S.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20416, Telephone: (202) 205-
6629
OMB Reviewer: Donald Arbuckle, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, D.C. 20503
Title: Lender/EDI Participant Profile
Form No.: SBA Form 1944
Frequency: On Occasion
Description of Respondents: SBA Participating Lenders
Annual Responses: 8,337
Annual Burden: 2,779
Calvin Jenkins,
Assistant Administrator for Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-11232 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11332]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-260-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1995, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 24, to be 
effective June 1, 1995.
    Natural states that the filing is submitted pursuant to Section 21 
of the General Terms and Conditions of Natural's FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth 
Revised Volume No. 1 (Section 21), as a fourth semiannual limited rate 
filing under Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act and the Rules and 
Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) 
promulgated thereunder. The rate adjustments filed for are designed to 
recover Account No. 858 stranded costs incurred by Natural under 
contracts for transportation capacity on other pipelines. Costs for any 
Account No. 858 contracts specifically excluded under Section 21 are 
not reflected in the filing.
    Natural requested specific waivers of Section 21 and the 
Commission's Regulations, including the requirements of Section 154.63, 
to the extent necessary to permit the tariff sheet to become effective 
June 1, 1995.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Natural's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the public reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11332 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) of Kiewit Royalty Trust (the Trust), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Luke H. Paladino, the trust officer of U.S. Bank National
Association, the trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2011



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Luke H. Paladino                      
|Luke H. Paladino, Trust Officer           
|U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
Anthony D. WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.

No. 12-8018.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Todd Michael HANNIGAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8508.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.