alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /S/ DAVID J. B. SMITHDavid J. B. Smith,Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
Jose Angel TORRES-GUARDADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10250.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Presidential Documents

21697

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 84

Tuesday, May 2, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6793 of April 28, 1995

Small Business Week, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

At the heart of our free enterprise system are the Nation’s 21.5 million

small businesses. They are the engine of our economy, keeping America

competitive in domestic and global markets. These businesses demonstrate

by their achievements and success that the promise of the American Dream

is within the grasp of every one of our citizens.

America’s small business entrepreneurs are risk-takers, venturing into new

and often uncertain territory. As a Nation, we are indebted to these bold

men and women. With unparalleled commitment and determination, they

keep us at the forefront of innovation and help fuel our economy.

During the past decade, more than 600,000 new firms have been created

annually. Indeed, just last year, more small businesses were created than

at any time in our country’s history. Through much of this period, small

businesses generated most of the Nation’s new jobs. Today, they employ

almost 60 percent of the country’s private work force.

Growing numbers of women and minorities are empowering themselves

through small business ownership, taking risks, and pursuing their entrepreneurial ambitions. New programs are teaching business ownership skills

to our youth. And our Administration’s Reinventing Government initiative—

building a government that works better and costs less—will help sustain

this entrepreneurial spirit for generations to come.

As we approach a new era of economic opportunity, our Nation’s small

business owners continue to inspire us by their example. On behalf of

all Americans, I thank these hardworking citizens across the country for

helping to keep the American Dream alive.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 30 through May

6, 1995, as ‘‘Small Business Week.’’ I ask all Americans to join me in

saluting the small business owners of our Nation during this week with

appropriate events and ceremonies.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth

day of April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–10980

Filed 5–1–95; 11:15 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
Kenneth Antonio CULVER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7016.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.
1

Office of Global Policy and Strategy 

OGPS STATEMENT

March 28, 2023

FDA Officials Meet with SENASICA

Today, FDA Deputy Commissioner for Policy Legislation, and International Affairs Andi

Fristedt and other FDA officials met with a delegation from Mexico’s National Service of 

Agro-Alimentary Health, Safety and Quality (SENASICA) led by Francisco Javier 

Calderón Elizalde, the food safety agency’s new Director-in-Chief, at the FDA’s 

headquarters in White Oak, Maryland. Topics discussed at the meeting included the 

new structure of the FDA’s Unified Human Foods Program; the FDA’s and SENASICA’s 

food safety priorities for 2023; and recent achievements and next steps under their 

Food Safety Partnership (FSP) with the Federal Commission for the Protection against 

Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS), another Mexican agency with food safety responsibilities.

The FSP was established in 2020 to protect public health through the prevention of 

foodborne diseases in human foods by using modern approaches and preventive 

practices based on technical and scientific evidence, health surveillance, and 

verification measures. The FSP will be holding a virtual midyear meeting later this week, 

on March 31, to discuss progress made in its four content-specific working groups:

Strategic Priorities, Laboratory Collaboration, Outbreak Response, and Food Safety 

Training.

Other FDA officials participating today included: Donald Prater, Acting Director, Office of 

Food Policy and Response; Michael Rogers, Assistant Commissioner for Human and 

Animal Food Operations, Office of Regulatory Affairs; Julie Moss, Director of the Office 

of International Engagement (OIE), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition 

(CFSAN); Kristi Hampton, Deputy Director of the Office of Global Policy and Strategy 

(OGPS); Katherine Serrano, Director of the Latin America Office (LAO), OGPS 

(remote); Steve Musser, Deputy Director for Scientific Operations, CFSAN; Michelle 

Rodriguez, Deputy Director of LAO, OGPS (remote); Fazila Shakir, Director of 

Regulatory Cooperation & Partnerships Staff, OIE, CFSAN (remote); Vanessa Noelte, 

International Relations Specialist, LAO, OGPS (remote); Nicole Conklin, International 
2

Policy Analyst, Office of Global Operations, OGPS; Franciel Ikeji, International Program 

Analyst, OIE, CFSAN; Colleen Mattingly, International Policy Analyst, OIE, CFSAN.

Accompanying Director-in-Chief Calderón were Leandro David Soriano García, Director 

General of AgriFood, Aquaculture and Fishery Safety, SENASICA; Israel Cueto 

Espinosa, Director of Phytosanitary Regulation, SENASICA; Luis Enrique Martinez 

Senties, Counselor for Agricultural Affairs, Embassy of Mexico; and Brenda Esthela 

Martinez Vergara, Senior Agricultural Specialist, Embassy of Mexico.

###
Clarence M. GREEN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9899.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Antonio Sanchez FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. Norm ROBINSON, Warden.

No. 12-7849.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason Weber, Chief Executive Officer of Alianza Minerals Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 16, 2016





/s/  Jason Weber

Jason Weber,

President and Chief Executive Officer
Joseph P. MINERD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9444.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


ASIAN TRENDS MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asian Trends Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Huang Jian Nan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Huang Jian Nan




Huang Jian Nan


Chief Financial Officer


August 22, 2011




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11755]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Omega Financial Corp.; Formation of, Acquisition by, or Merger of 
Bank Holding Companies

    The company listed in this notice has applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that application or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that 
requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing 
the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
June 5, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105:
    1. Omega Financial Corp., State College, Pennsylvania; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Montour Bank Danville, 
Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11755 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11585]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the following Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public to provide concept review of 
proposed contract or grant solicitations.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Panel: NHLBI SEP on Asthma Prevention.
    Dates of Meeting: May 30, 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 8:00 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II 
Building, Room 10229, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland.
    Agenda: The panel will review the current status of research in 
the designated areas, identify gaps and make recommendations 
regarding opportunities and priorities for future contract or grant 
solicitations.
    Contact Person: Virginia S. Taggart, M.P.H., 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 10218, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 435-0202.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: May 4, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-11585 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

REGINALD ANTHONY FALICE, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1) 

Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: October 19, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Reginald Anthony Falice, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Reginald Anthony Falice seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 

motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. We conclude that Falice’s motion was in 

substance a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 

The order denying the motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Falice has not made 

the requisite showing. The claims Falice raised in his motion challenged the validity of his 

conviction and sentence, and, thus, the motion should have been construed as a successive 

§ 2255 motion.*

 See Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 531-32 (2005); United States v. 

McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 397-99 (4th Cir. 2015). Absent prefiling authorization from this 

* The district court denied relief on Falice’s prior § 2255 motion in 2003. 
3

court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain Falice’s successive § 2255 motion. 

See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3), 2255(h). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Jennifer STONE, et al., petitioners, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

No. 12-937.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

*2023Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Rr ara Wiver @ sik AW ara aga feral aca wad! 21

amet wet @r A ead oF AIR FRET AST aR WR eT are’ amt afar AA

fora cafes one fe a oT Ww orear Fee far ¥ set cre eff far
GT a] AY GTN G aoe W Hey A zeit

Wel

orm & way, #4 A eel @ fees var fea]

get va URaR ot ot soy ga a alefl arer,
fie AAT KET | SeeT A Gite Weihray |

Gir Weifrat FAR aren wee 7a feet or Tes
fear) ¥ ye aver ee W ue anel aif A fee
O wae of dae seu far 4 a ik feat ae
AR E11

wa & dat at area 4 ay oy of, eet ore @ warez fort 4 Rare
art ye et ret) qe freee 20 8 aiffte ort ea Wee F UM B
dar oS 91 SEA oe far fe A ant WH Ta wh aT GR aI

cafe aR wre fox ter eta & at va fea 4 or we
uri wel ae) Hye yp geq GH ai AA S SRO
wre Gre welfrat of vel ae Tad fons AY aoe
W aeochy vary |

ea ah a Yea wt | ufe anu dre &
al Oye Ww et Xe |
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1400 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2005 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties 

for aiming laser pointers at airplanes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 1400 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Aircraft 

3 Cockpits Against Lasers Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST AIMING A LASER POINTER 

5 AT AN AIRCRAFT. 

6 (a) OFFENSE.—Chapter 2 of title 18, United States 

7 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘§ 39. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft 

9 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser 

10 pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction 

11 of the United States, or at the flight path of such an air12 craft, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 

13 more than 5 years, or both. 

14 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘laser pointer’ 

15 means any device designed or used to amplify electro16 magnetic radiation by stimulated emission that emits a 

17 beam designed to be used by the operator as a pointer 

18 or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific posi19 tion, place, item, or object.’’. 

20 (b) AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The 

21 table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 18, 
3 

HR 1400 RDS 

1 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

2 following new item: 

‘‘39. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2005. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS11 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of September 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2007 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form
10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
exhibit10_1.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    Mary
G. Berner

    


    


    The
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc.

    Pleasantville,
New York 10570

    Attention:  Todd
McCarty

    


                                            February
10, 2009

    


    Dear
Todd:

    


    In
connection with the recently announced “Recession Plan” we have instituted at
The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (“RDA”), we’ve told employees that in both
2009 and 2010 we will implement five (5) mandatory unpaid shutdown days
(“Shutdown Days”), creating the effect of one week’s mandatory unpaid vacation
in each of those two years, in the hope of avoiding further
layoffs.

    


    This
letter acknowledges that, notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 1, 2008 between RDA and
me (the “Agreement"), I agree to voluntarily participate in the Shutdown
Days.  Accordingly, for each week in which a Shutdown Day occurs,
there will be a 20% reduction in my paycheck for that week, resulting in 80% of
my weekly salary.  Except with respect to the actual amount of Base
Salary (as defined in the Agreement) received because of the reduction with
respect to the Shutdown Days, no provision in the Agreement with respect to Base
Salary shall be impacted by my participation in the Shutdown Days.  I
further agree that my participation in the Shutdown Days and the resulting
salary reduction shall not constitute “Good Reason” under the terms of the
Agreement.

    


    Please
sign below to indicate your acknowledgment and agreement with the
above.

    


                                       Very truly
yours,

    


                                       /s/ Mary
G. Berner

                                                                              Mary G. Berner

    


    Acknowledged
and Agreed;

    


    The
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc.

    


    


    /s/ Todd
McCarty_______________

    Todd
McCarty

    Senior
Vice President, Global Human Resources
Jabari STEPHENS, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-7812.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.