alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xin Lin, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of SGB International
      Holdings Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of SGB International Holdings Inc..                                           

Date: July 13, 2009



| | /s/ Xin Lin                               
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Xin Lin                                   
| | President, CEO, CFO and Director          
| | Principal Executive Officer, Principal    
| | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
| | Officer                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SGB
International Holdings Inc. and will be retained by SGB International Holdings
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1463 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 649
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1463


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2005

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                           September 28, 2006

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 2100 Jamieson 
  Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ``Justin W. Williams United 
                     States Attorney's Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--The building and structure described in subsection 
(b) shall be known and designated as the ``Justin W. Williams United 
States Attorney's Building''.
    (b) Description.--The building and structure to be designated under 
subsection (a) is that portion of the Federal building located at 2100 
Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, that is attached to the 
Federal building's main tower structure, described as A-Wing in the 
architectural plans, and currently occupied by the Office of the United 
States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria 
Division.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building and structure described in 
section 1(b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Justin W. 
Williams United States Attorney's Building''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary for appropriate identifying designations to be affixed to the 
building and structure described in section 1(b) and for an appropriate 
plaque reflecting the designation and honoring Justin W. Williams and 
his service to the Nation to be affixed to or displayed in such 
building and structure.
                                                       Calendar No. 649

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1463

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate a portion of the Federal building located at 2100 Jamieson 
  Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ``Justin W. Williams United 
                     States Attorney's Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12000]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Larry F. Ness, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects the notices (FR Doc. 95-11227) published on 
page 22580 of the issue for Monday, May 8, 1995.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis heading, the entry 
for Larry F. Ness, is revised to read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Larry F. Ness, Yankton, South Dakota; to acquire an additional 
26.39 percent, for a total of 45.78 percent, of the voting shares of 
First Dakota Financial Corporation, Yankton, South Dakota, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Dakota National Bank, Yankton, South Dakota.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco heading, the entry 
for John C. Bell, is revised to read as follows:
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. John C. Bell; John C. Bell Family Trust and K&G Trust, all of 
Studio City, California; to acquire an additional 4.68 percent, for a 
total of 13.73 percent, of the voting shares of Western Security 
Bancorp, Burbank, California, and thereby indirectly acquire Western 
Security Bank, N.A., Burbank, California.
    Comments on these applications must be received by May 22, 1995.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 10, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-12000 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
護膚產品安全: 

對苯二酚

含有對苯二酚成分的皮膚美白產品可能會對人體造成傷害。

保持安全!

僅使用由持有執照的醫療服務提供者開處方的含有

對苯二酚的護膚產品。 

在購買或使用非處方護膚產品前 查看產品標籤,看

其是否含有對苯二酚。

糾正膚色不均 

去除黑斑、瑕疵和皺紋

可透過流覽 www.fda.gov/SkinFacts來找到Get 

the Skin Facts! (獲取關於護膚產品的情況說明

書),瞭解護膚產品安全方面的知識。

對苯二酚是皮膚美白產品中的有效

成分,其作用是

可能是永久性的皮膚變色

皮疹

面部腫脹

已有在使用這些產品後出現下列嚴

重副作用的報告:

您 知道

嗎? FDA 並未批准含有對苯二酚的皮膚美白產品

在美國進行非處方銷售
護膚產品安全:

汞

含有汞的皮膚美白產品可能會對人體造成傷害。

可透過流覽 www.fda.gov/SkinFacts來找到Get 

the Skin Facts! (獲取關於護膚產品的情況說明

書),瞭解護膚產品安全方面的知識。

您 知道

嗎?

 FDA 已禁止 在皮膚美白產品中使用汞

使用含汞的護膚產品可能會導致嚴

重的健康問題,例如:

對眼睛、肺和腎臟造成的損害

對消化系統、免疫系統和神經系統

造成的損害

皮疹和感染 

棕灰色皮膚變色

Ingredients: Linalool,

Aqua, Glycerin, Parfum,

Isomethyl Ionone,

Calomel, Xanthan,

Hydrogenated Veg Oil.

汞中毒還可能導致昏迷甚至死亡。 請勿使用或採購 含有這些

成分的產品。

 查看產品成分標籤,看看其是否帶

有表示汞的術語:

氯化亞汞

甘汞 

水銀 

汞 

Hg

撥打 1-(800)-222-1222,

並 立即聯繫您的醫療服務提

供者。

 徹底洗手和身體其他接觸過

汞的部位。

 到您當地的危險廢物中心丟

棄含汞的護膚產品。

如果您或您家人接觸過汞:

Ingredients: Linalool, 

Aqua, Glycerin, Parfum, 

Isomethyl Ionone, 

Calomel, Xanthan,

Hydrogenated Veg Oil.

Ingredients: Lina

Aqua, Glycerin, Pa

Isomethyl Ionone, 

Calomel, Xanthan

Hydrogenated Ve
請務必避免使用貼有手工標籤、非英語標籤或根本沒有標籤的產品。

護膚產品安全:識別不安全產品

含有對苯二酚或汞成分的皮膚美白產品可能會對人體造成傷害。在美國,將這些

產品作為非處方產品來銷售是非法的。在購買之前,請閱讀護膚產品的標籤,以

識別其成分。

可透過流覽 www.fda.gov/SkinFacts來找到Get the Skin 

Facts! (獲取關於護膚產品的情況說明書),瞭解護膚產

品安全方面的知識。獲取關於護膚產品的情況說明書。

皮膚美白皂

膚色均勻露

皮膚美白粉

祛斑霜

化學換膚劑

當心 

FDA 已收到關於 在使用含有對苯二酚或汞的

化妝品和非處方護膚產品後出現嚴重副作用的

報告。在美國銷售這些產品是非法的。

識別

使用如下描述的產品可能就是皮膚美白產品 :

查閱

在購買或使用美白產品之前 要查閱其產品

標籤,看看它是否含有 對苯二酚或汞。

汞在標籤上可能被列為 

用於治療皮膚狀況,例如: 

黑斑

雀斑 

粉刺

皺紋

氯化亞汞

甘汞

水銀

汞,或。

Hg

FDA 建議不要使用這些產品,並鼓勵消費者就治療選項

諮詢醫療服務提供者。
Amendment to Employment Contract of CEO



 Exhibit 10.10 
  
 Allegheny Energy Service Corporation 
 800 Cabin
Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 February 18, 2004 
  
 Paul J. Evanson 
 c/o Allegheny Energy, Inc. 
 800 Cabin Hill Drive 
 Greensburg, PA 15601 
  
 Dear Paul: 
  
 You and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation (“AESC”) for itself and as agent for its parent, Allegheny Energy, Inc. (“AEI”), the
affiliates and subsidiaries of AESC and AEI, and any successors or assigns of any of the foregoing, entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 9, 2003. Pursuant to Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement, you were
entitled to receive a grant of stock options for 1,500,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the AEI Long-Term Incentive Plan on January 2, 2004. However, as you are aware, such grant could not be made without obtaining authorization under the Public
Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935, and such authorization was not obtained until February 10, 2004. 
  
 Accordingly, you, AESC and AEI hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement. Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows: 
  
 “(i) Option
Grant. On the fifth business day following the date that AESC obtains authorization under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (the “Authorization Date”), AESC shall grant the Executive stock options (the
“Options”) for 1,500,000 shares of AEI Common Stock under the Allegheny Energy, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) at a per share exercise price equal to the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock
on the date of grant, as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction Listing in The Wall Street Journal. Such grant shall be evidenced by an award agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit A.” 
  
 2. Amendments to Section 5 (c)(i) of the Agreement. The references to
January 2, 2004 and January 1, 2004 in clauses (1) and (2) of Section 5(c)(i) of the Agreement are hereby amended to refer to the Authorization Date and the 2004 Closing Price is defined to mean the per share closing price of AEI Common Stock on the
Authorization Date as quoted in the NYSE Composite Transaction listing in The Wall Street Journal. 
  










 Mr. Paul J. Evanson 
 January 18, 2004 
 Page 2 
  

 Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by signing the attached copy of this letter in the place indicated. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Allegheny Energy Service Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David B. Hertzog

	 	 	

	 	 	 David B. Hertzog

	 	 	 Vice President & General Counsel

	
	Allegheny Energy, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David B. Hertzog

	 	 	

	 	 	 David B. Hertzog

	 	 	 Vice President & General Counsel



  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	 /s/ Paul J. Evanson

	

	 Paul J. Evanson
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

May 14, 2015 

v No. 320349 

Cass Circuit Court 

KALI MARIE HEFT, LC No. 13-010150-FH 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ. 

SHAPIRO, J. (concurring). 

 I concur in the result only. 

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
Robert Sherman BERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9039.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11474]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

 Mason-Dixon Bancshares, Inc., et al.; Formations of; 
Acquisitions by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than June 5, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261:
    1. Mason-Dixon Bancshares, Inc., Westminster, Maryland; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Bank Maryland Corp., Towson, 
Maryland, and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of Maryland, Towson, 
Maryland.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201--2272:
    1. SNB Corporation, Houston, Texas; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Southern 
National Bank of Texas, Houston, Texas.
    2. SNB Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of SNB 
Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Southern National Bank of Texas, Houston, Texas.
    In connection with this application, SNB Corporation, Houston, 
Texas, also has applied to become a bank holding company.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 4, 1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11474 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
William SMITH, petitioner, v. Alvin FRIEDMAN, et al.

No. 12-1004.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
26328 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / Notices

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET

Cumulative Report on Rescissions and

Deferrals

May 1, 1995.

This report is submitted in fulfillment

of the requirement of Section 1014(e) of

the Congressional Budget and

Impoundment Control Act of 1974

(Public Law 93–344). Section 1014(e)

requires a monthly report listing all

budget authority for the current fiscal

year for which, as of the first day of the

month, a special message had been

transmitted to Congress.

This report gives the status, as of May

1, 1995, of 25 rescission proposals and

seven deferrals contained in four special

messages for FY 1995. These messages

were transmitted to Congress on October

18, and December 13, 1994, and on

February 6, and February 22, 1995.

Rescissions (Attachments A and C)

As of May 1, 1995, 25 rescission

proposals totaling $1,067.8 million had

been transmitted to the Congress.

Congress approved two of the

Administration’s rescission proposals in

P.L. 104–6. A total of $71.6 million of

the rescissions proposed by the

President was rescinded by that

measure. Attachment C shows the status

of the FY 1995 rescission proposals.

Deferrals (Attachments B and D)

As of May 1, 1995, $2,172.1 million

in budget authority was being deferred

from obligation. Attachment D shows

the status of each deferral reported

during FY 1995.

Information from Special Messages

The special messages containing

information on the rescission proposals

and deferrals that are covered by this

cumulative report are printed in the

Federal Register cited below:

59 FR 54066, Thursday, October 27,

1994

59 FR 67108, Wednesday, December 28,

1994

60 FR 8842, Wednesday, February 15,

1995

60 FR 12636, Tuesday, March 7, 1995

Alice M. Rivlin,

Director.

BILLING CODE 3110–01–M
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / Notices 26329
26330 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / Notices 26331
26332 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1994 / Notices 26333

[FR Doc. 95–11960 Filed 5–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110–01–C
THI OF NEW MEXICO AT CASA ARENA BLANCA, LLC, d/b/a Casa Arena Blanca Nursing Home, petitioner, v. Didier L. FIGUEROA, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Dolores Figueroa, Deceased.

No. 12-1029.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
<PAGE>

                                                      SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.2

         The following individuals entered into Split-Dollar Agreements with the
subsidiaries of Park National Corporation ("Park") identified below which are
identical to the Split-Dollar Agreement, dated May 17, 1993, between William T.
McConnell, Chairman of the Board and a Director of Park and of The Park National
Bank ("Park National Bank") and Park National Bank filed as Exhibit 10(f) to
Park's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993
(File No. 0-18772):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Subsidiary of Park
    Name and Positions Held With Park        Date of Split-      which is Party to
 and/or Principal Subsidiaries of Park      Dollar Agreement   Split-Dollar Agreement
-----------------------------------------  ------------------  ----------------------
<S>                                        <C>                 <C>
C. Daniel DeLawder - President, Chief      May 26, 1993        Park National Bank
Executive Officer and a Director of Park
and of Park National Bank; a Director of
The Richland Trust Company; a Director
of Second National Bank

John W. Kozak - Chief Financial Officer    June 2, 1993        Park National Bank
of Park; Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Park National Bank;
a Director of Century National Bank

William A. Phillips - a Director of Park;  May 22, 1998        Century National Bank
Chairman of Board and a Director of
Century National Bank

David L. Trautman - Secretary of Park;     September 23, 1993  Park National Bank
Executive Vice President and a Director
of Park National Bank; Chairman of the
Board and a Director of The First-Knox
National Bank of Mount Vernon; a
Director of United Bank, N.A.
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

CAROLYN MALONEY, c/o ) 

Denny Maloney, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-842-PPS-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Defendants, ALAUNUS 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; and GREGORY 

CONIGLIARO. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Robert M. Baker, IV 

ROBERT M. BAKER, IV #25471-49 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 12 filed 01/09/13 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 9, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

Stutsman & Mulvaney 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

/s/ Robert M. Baker, IV 

 ROBERT M. BAKER, IV 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

Phone: (317) 237-0500 

FAX: (317) 630-2790 

rbaker@lewiswagner.com Q:\NECC\14 - Maloney\Federal Court Action\appearance_rb4_Alaunus.docx

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 12 filed 01/09/13 page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION AT LAFAYETTE

NICOLAS BERNARDO MARTINEZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CAUSE NO. 4:13-CV-015 PS 

vs. )

)

STATE OF INDIANA, REID D. MUATAUGH, )

and DONALD DANIEL, )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Nicolas Bernardo Martinez, a pro se prisoner, is suing Prosecuting Attorney Reid D.

Muataugh because he filed a petition to revoke his probation and requested a bench warrant for

his arrest. He is suing Judge Donald Daniel because he issued a warrant for his arrest, recalled

the warrant, did not bring him to court or release him, and held a hearing without him. 

“A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however

inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by

lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted).

Nevertheless, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the merits of a prisoner

complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such

relief.

Martinez alleges that Prosecuting Attorney Reid D. Muataugh did not investigate his case

and prosecuted him based on false allegations. Nevertheless, “absolute immunity shields

prosecutors even if they act maliciously, unreasonably, without probable cause, or even on the

basis of false testimony or evidence.” Cooper v. Parrish, 203 F.3d 937, 947 (6th Cir. 2000)
(quotation marks and citation omitted). Therefore the claims against Prosecuting Attorney Reid

D. Muataugh must be dismissed. 

Martinez alleges that Judge Donald Daniel violated many of his Constitutional rights as a

criminal defendant. Nevertheless, a judge is entitled to absolute immunity for judicial acts

regarding matters within the court’s jurisdiction, even if the judge’s “exercise of authority is

flawed by the commission of grave procedural errors.” Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 359

(1978). Issuing warrants, scheduling hearings, conducting hearings, and ordering the

confinement and release of inmates are all within the jurisdiction of State trial courts. Therefore,

the claims against Judge Donald Daniel must be dismissed. 

For the foregoing reasons, this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because

the defendants are immune from suit. 

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: March 11, 2013. s/ Philip P. Simon 

PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, petitioner, v. Steven Craig JAMES.

No. 12-11.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Motion of respondent to retax costs granted.