alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12190]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-491-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 12, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 9, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No 
CP95-491-000, a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.216) for authorization to abandon and remove an above-ground 2-inch 
meter station on Line AM-52, Upshur County, Texas, under the blanket 
certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-384-000 and CP82-384-001, 
pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    NGT states that it proposes to abandon and remove the 2-inch meter 
that provides service to one residential farm tap, a customer of Arkla, 
a division of NorAm Energy Corp. (Arkla). Arkla has consented in 
writing to the removal of the 2-inch meter. NGT indicates that the 
estimated cost to remove the meter is $365 and the funds would be 
generated internally. NGT says that no customers or service will be 
abandoned. NGT states that it will continue to operate an existing 2-
inch regulator to serve that customer, but Arkla will install its own 
meter to measure the gas delivered. The volumes to be delivered through 
the tap will be approximately 1 MMBtu on a peak day and 85 MMBtu 
annually.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-12190 Filed 5-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Charlotte WILEY, petitioner, v. Timothy F. GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury.

No. 12-7838.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  597,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    832,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,517,524
<PP&E>                                      10,792,368
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,224,428)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,098,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,851,346
<BONDS>                                     14,613,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,859,253
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,225,795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,098,230
<SALES>                                      5,519,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,282,958
<CGS>                                        1,095,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,563,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               925,564
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             369,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (670,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (228,014)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (442,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (442,615)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Kristin D. WILKINSON, petitioner, v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE OF the STATE BAR OF TEXAS.

No. 12-7598.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ë Ë

✘

Ë Ë

4
In Re Mack S. McCLOUD, petitioner.

No. 12-9927.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 01, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 01, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0148. DERRICK FRANCOIS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

07SC54762
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

THOMAS LEGG, Jr., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, 

AMERIDOSE, LLC, and ALAUNUS 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC and BARRY 

CADDEN and LISA CADDEN, and 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN

JUDGE: JAMES T. MOODY 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendant Ameridose, LLC (“Defendant”), by counsel, hereby 

move this Court for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up; to and including 

March 25, 2013. Defendant’s Answer is currently due February 22, 2013. Plaintiff’s counsel 

has been consulted and has no objection to the requested extension 

WHEREFORE, Defendant, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendant up to and 

including March 25, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 23 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 2
2 

013260.000012/1629034.1 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 21, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 23 filed 02/21/13 page 2 of 2
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service

Notice of Issuance of a Prospectus for the Operation of a Guided 
Trail Ride Service Within Kalaupapa National Historic Park

    Summary: The National Park Service has issued a Prospectus for a 
Concession Contract for the operation of a guided trail ride service at 
Kalaupapa National Historical Park.
    Supplementary Information: The operation will provide the public 
with an opportunity to take an equestrian, guided trail ride down the 
historic pali trail into the community of Kalaupapa. The historic trail 
transcends a cliff and is approximately 2 miles in length involving the 
negotiation 26 switchbacks. Upon arriving at the bottom of the trail, 
the public will be given a tour of the historic district by a local 
resident.
    To receive a copy of the Prospectus, contact the following either 
by mail or telephone: National Park Service, Concession Program 
Management Division, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 
94107-1327, or call: (415) 744-3981-Teresa Jackson.
    Applications must be received by June 27, 1995, at the above 
address by the close of business day at 4:00 p.m. Western Daylight 
Saving Time.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Stephen G. Crabtree,
Acting Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 95-11798 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26001-26002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12066]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

49 CFR Part 390

[FHWA Docket No. MC-93-17]
RIN 2125-AD14


Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; General; Intermodal 
Transportation

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice; extension of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has received 
petitions from APL Land Transport Services, Inc., ``K'' Line America, 
Inc., and the Intermodal Safe Container Coalition seeking a delay in 
the June 27, 1995, effective date of the FHWA regulations implementing 
the provisions of the Intermodal Safe Container Transportation Act of 
1992 [Pub. L. 102-548, 106 Stat. 3646, partly codified at 49 U.S.C. 
5901-5907 (formerly 49 U.S.C. 501 and 508)]. Because of the 
complexities of both domestic and international intermodal operations, 
the FHWA believes these petitions have merit. The FHWA is, therefore, 
administratively extending the June 27 effective date until September 
27, 1995, to allow the agency sufficient time to consider public 
comment on whether to further extend the effective date until 1996 as 
requested by the petitioners. In the very near future, the FHWA will 
publish a separate rulemaking in the Federal Register seeking comment 
on the petitioners' requests.

[[Page 26002]] DATES: The effective date of June 27, 1995, for the 
final rule published under Docket MC-93-17 on December 29, 1994, (59 FR 
67544) is extended to September 27, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Peter C. Chandler, Office of Motor 
Carrier Research and Standards, HCS-10, (202) 366-5763; or Mr. Charles 
E. Medalen, Office of the Chief Counsel, HCC-20, (202) 366-1354, 
Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

(49 U.S.C. 5901-5907, 31132, 31136, 31502, and 31504; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: May 11, 1995.
Rodney E. Slater,
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-12066 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Frederick William EVERTS, petitioner, v. James A. YATES, Warden.

No. 12-9073.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:13-CR-33

)

GELACIO MARTINEZ )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Roger B. Cosbey,

on August 26, 2013, with the written consents of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and

counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by the defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and

of counsel for defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that the defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and
his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that the defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by the defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and

is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the amended plea agreement between

the parties;

(5) that defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that the defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for the defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty and that the

Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 3 of the three-count Indictment, and

have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and

Recommendation be accepted and the Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled

before Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 26th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey

United States Magistrate Judge

2
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 

Marketing Orders for 

Vuse Solo Power Unit, Vuse Replacement Cartridge Original 4.8% G1, and 

Vuse Replacement Cartridge Original 4.8% G2 

Marketed by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company 

The Center for Tobacco Products of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has carefully considered 

the potential environmental impact of these actions and has concluded that these actions will not have 

significant effects on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, environmental impact 

statements are not required. 

R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company wishes to introduce one electronic nicotine delivery (END) component and 

two closed e-liquids into interstate commerce for commercial distribution in the United States and 

submitted to FDA premarket tobacco product applications to obtain marketing orders under the 

provisions of section 910 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

FDA reviewed the applicant’s environmental assessments (EA), dated October 20, 2020, for the three 

ENDS tobacco products in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 

1500-1508) implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FDA’s NEPA regulations (21 

CFR 25.40). The EAs concluded that the marketing orders would have no significant impact. The 

applicant’s EAs are available to the public upon request. 

The applicant’s EAs evaluated potential environmental effects due to manufacturing, use, and disposal 

of the new products. No increased or new types of environmental impacts due to manufacturing the 

new products are anticipated. FDA does not foresee that use of the new products would result in new or 

different environmental impacts. FDA believes that the disposal of the new products is the same as the 

disposal conditions of other ENDS components and closed e-liquids that are currently marketed in the 

United States. Therefore, FDA does not foresee significant adverse impacts to the environment due to 

the proposed actions from manufacturing, use, and disposal of the new products. 

Digitally signed by Luis G. Valerio -S 

Date: 2021.10.08 09:54:25 -04'00' 

Approved by 

Luis G. Valerio, Jr., Ph.D., ATS 

Associate Director 

Division of Nonclinical Science 

Office of Science 

Center for Tobacco Products 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26402-26403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-12108]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-65, RM-8595]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Billings, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Conway 
Broadcasting requesting the allotment of Channel 242C1 to Billings, 
Montana. Channel 242C1 can be allotted to Billings without a site 
restriction at coordinates 45-46-58 and 108-30-13.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 3, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before July 18, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Lars 
Conway, Conway Broadcasting, 4415 Freemont Ave., South, Minneapolis, 
Minnesota 55409.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-65, adopted May 4, 1995, and 
released May 12, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, 
D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact. [[Page 26403]] 
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-12108 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Terry GRAY, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 13-6709.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 12, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
#### In re David Harold ABBOTT, Debtor, David Harold Abbott, Appellant, v. Mark R. Stewart, Trustee, Appellee.

No. 03-8075.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 3, 2004.

Georg Jensen, Cheyenne, WY, for Appellant.

Mark R. Stewart, Cheyenne, WY, Pro se.

Before EBEL, ANDERSON, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Debtor-appellant appeals the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his motion to order the Trustee to return debtor’s tax refund for 2001, to declare that debtor had successfully completed his plan under Chapter 13, and to enter an order of discharge.

Upon review of the plan and the parties’ submissions, we REVERSE and REMAND the decision of the BAP for substantially the reasons stated in the panel’s dissent. *See Abbott v. Stewart (In re Abbott),*BAP No. WY-02-058, 302 B.R. 112 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. Aug. 25, 2003).

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10565]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No RP95-240-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 25, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 19, 1995, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, 
effective May 19, 1995:

Second Revised Sheet No. 687

    Algonquin states that the purpose of this filing is to facilitate 
the timely filing of Algonquin's annual fuel reimbursement quantity 
deferral allocation, by revising its tariff to reflect a twelve-month 
accumulation period commencing August 1 and extending through July 31.
    Algonquin states that copies of this filing were mailed to all 
affected customers of Algonquin and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before May 2, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10565 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M