alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 20 

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 

Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Syria. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. GAETZ submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 

Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed 

Forces from Syria. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 

3 Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), Congress directs 

4 the President to remove the United States Armed Forces 

5 from Syria by not later than the date that is 15 days after 

6 the date of the adoption of this concurrent resolution. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1379 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1379

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat electric 
  transmission property as 15-year property for depreciation purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Murphy, Mr. 
 Foley, Mr. Herger, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
Peterson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat electric 
  transmission property as 15-year property for depreciation purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION PROPERTY TREATED AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 168(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of certain 
property) is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (v), by 
striking the period at the end of clause (vi) and inserting ``, and'', 
and by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(vii) any section 1245 property (as 
                        defined in section 1245(a)(3)) used in the 
                        transmission at 69 or more kilovolts of 
                        electricity for sale the original use of which 
                        commences with the taxpayer after the date of 
                        the enactment of this clause.''.
    (b) Alternative System.--The table contained in section 
168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to subparagraph (E)(vi) the following:

 
 
 
``(E)(vii).................................................        30''.

    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A. McCollam, the Chief
Financial Officer of Dionex Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:  1.
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and2.
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By: /s/ Craig A. McCollam
Name: Craig A. McCollam
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 9, 2005
In re Application for SEARCH WARRANT.

No. 12-1115.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont denied.
Bobby Wayne HALEY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9968.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Nicole KING, Former Wife, Appellant, v. John BALDWIN, Former Husband, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
SENIOR'S CLUB LLC /SENIORS CLUB ADHC AND PCA CENTER, Mr. T.J. McCoy, Jr. and Mrs Karen McCoy v. STATE of Louisiana, THROUGH the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS, et al.

NO. 2019-CC-0075

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Reconsideration denied.
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 97-1789

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                   AMABLE D. GUERRERO-SORIANO,

                      Defendant, Appellant.



          APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                
                FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
                                
       [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
                                


                             Before
                                
                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                


     Evelyn Quinones Carrasquillo on brief for appellant.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Camille Velez-Rive,
Nelson Perez-Sosa, Assistant United States Attorneys, and Jose A.
Quiles-Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.





May 14, 1998



                                
                                         Per Curiam.  Upon careful review of the briefs and
  record, we conclude that the district court was not required
  to grant defendant safety valve relief under U.S.S.G. �
  5C1.2(5) or an adjustment for his role in the offense under
  U.S.S.G. � 3B1.2(b).  The findings underlying the district
  court's rulings -- that defendant had not truthfully provided
  all his information about the offense, and that he was not
  less culpable than most other participants -- are adequately
  supported by the record and the inferences reasonably to be
  drawn therefrom.
            Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Technologies Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 26, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"),
I, James J. Polakiewicz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ James J. Polakiewicz
------------------------

James J. Polakiewicz
Chief Financial Officer
March 11, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, E. James Collard, President and  Director and Chief Executive Officer of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  August 14, 2003

/s/ E. James Collord

E. James Collord, President and Director

Chief Executive  Officer
exv10w3




Exhibit 10.3





Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

60 Hampshire Street

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139




23 January 2009




Novartis Pharma AG

Forum 1

Novartis Campus

CH-4056 Basel

Switzerland





			
	Attention:	 	Joseph Jimenez

Chief Executive Officer





Gentlemen,



We refer to:





	(a)	 	the Stock Purchase Agreement dated 21 March 2003 between Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(“Idenix”), Novartis Pharma AG (“Novartis”), and certain other parties to that agreement (the
“Purchase Agreement”); and
	 
	(b)	 	the letter from Idenix to Novartis of the same date relating to Novartis’ right regarding the
appointment and removal Idenix’ Chief Financial Officer and other matters (the “Letter”).




We refer also to the Financing (as defined in the Waiver and Consent), and to Novartis’ waiver of
certain rights and grant of certain consents to Idenix under the Amended and Restated Stockholders’
Agreement dated 27 July, 2004 among Idenix, Novartis, and certain other parties to that agreement
(“Stockholders’ Agreement”), solely in connection with the Financing, as set out in a Waiver and
Consent dated as of the date of this letter between Idenix and Novartis (the “Waiver and Consent”).



In partial consideration of Novartis’ Waiver and Consent to the proposed Financing, Idenix and
Novartis agree that:





	1.	 	The IPO (as defined in the Letter) took place in 2004 and the members of Idenix’s board of
directors designated by Novartis approved the IPO.
	 
	2.	 	The reference to “50%” in clause (y) of paragraph 2 of the Letter is hereby amended to “forty
percent (40%)”.
	 
	3.	 	Except as amended by this letter, the Letter, including paragraph 3 which sets out Idenix’
agreement with regard to its practice in connection with the preparation of financial
statements and reports, remains in full force and effect.




This letter is subject to and interpreted in accordance with the substantive laws of the




 









 






2





State of New York.



If the above correctly states the agreement between Idenix and Novartis, please countersign this
letter in the space indicated below, whereupon this letter shall constitute a binding agreement
between Idenix and Novartis.



Yours sincerely,



IDENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Jean-Pierre Sommadossi	 	 
	 	Jean-Pierre Sommadossi, Ph.D.

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 


Acknowledged and agreed as of the date of this letter:



NOVARTIS PHARMA AG




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Neil Johnston	 	 
	 	Name:  Neil Johnston	 	 
	 	Title:  Head of Finance,
Global Business Development & Licensing	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Penny Ho	 	 
	 	Name:  P.A. Ho	 	 
	 	Title:  Senior Legal
Counsel
4th Amendment to Lease and Agreement dtd 10/13/2004



 Exhibit 10.22 
  
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AND AGREEMENT 
  
 This Fourth Amendment to Lease and Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 13,
2003, by and between Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation, successor by merger with Hollywood Park, Inc. (“Landlord”), and Century Gaining Management, Inc. a California corporation (“Tenant”).

  
 A. Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease and
Agreement dated as of September 10, 1999, as amended by (i) that certain First Amendment to Lease and Agreement dated September 6, 2000, (ii) that certain Second Amendment to Lease and Agreement dated as of October 1, 2001, and (iii) that certain
Third Amendment to Lease and Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2002 (together, the “Lease”), whereby Tenant leases from Landlord that certain real property in Inglewood, California upon which Tenant operates The Hollywood
Park-Casino (the “Premises”). 
  
 B. Landlord and
Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth below. 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landord and Tenant agree as follows: 
  
 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Lease.

  
 2. Term. The Term of this Lease shall commence on the
Commencement Date and shall continue until the earlier of (i) December 31, 2004, or (ii) the expiration or earlier termination of the CDC Lease, unless sooner terminated pursuant to any provision hereof or otherwise amended pursuant to future
amendments hereof. 
  
 3. Division of Gambling
Control. The terms of this Amendment shall be subject to approval by the Division of Gambling Control. 
  
 4. Relationship to Lease. This Amendment supercedes any inconsistent provisions contained in the Lease. Except as amended hereby, the Lease remains
in full force and effect. 
  
 5. Further Assurances. Each
of the parties hereto shall execute and deliver such other and further documents and do such other and further acts as may be reasonably required to effectuate the intent of the parties and carry out the terms of this Amendment. 

 
 6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts,
which, when taken together shall be one and the same instrument. 
  
 (remainder of page intentionally left blank) 
  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first above written. 
  

									
	LANDLORD	 	 	 	TENANT
			
	 Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.,
 a Delaware
corporation
	 	 	 	 Century Ga__ing Management, Inc.,
 a
California corporation

					
	 By:
	 	 /s/    John A. Godfrey
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Leo Chu

	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 Its:
	 	 Secretary
	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	 President


  

 - 2 -
Cedric Tyrone BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0732

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11-634V

Filed: November 22, 2013

Not for Publication

*************************************

NICHOLAS GIGLIOTTI, JR. and *

STEPHANIE GIGLIOTTI, as Parents and *

Natural Guardians of Minor, *

NICHOLAS GIGLIOTTI, III, *

*

 Petitioners, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Brian J. McCormick, Jr., Philadelphia, PA, for petitioners.

Glenn A. MacLeod, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On November 22, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioners’ counsel attests that 

petitioners did not incur any costs in pursuit of their petition.

Petitioners submitted their request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During 

informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioners’ application. 

Based on these objections, petitioners amend their application for attorneys’ fees and costs to 

$28,000.00. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to 

be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $28,000.00, representing reimbursement for 

attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners

and Sheller, P.C. in the amount of $28,000.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2013 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
** EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

 I, Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC, the general partner of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section            13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of that section.

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

|   |   |                                      |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Scott D. Sheffield                    |   |
|   | Name:  | Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman of the Board |   |
|   |   | and Chief Executive Officer               |   |
|   |   |                                      |   |
|   | Date:  | March 5, 2009                        |   |
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE INSPECTION

Defendants shall respond to plaintiff Waymo LLC’s discovery letter brief dated April 10

(Dkt. No. 206) by 5:00 P.M. TODAY. The matter will be heard at the end of the technology

tutorial tomorrow, time permitting.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 11, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 209 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 1
Kelvin DANFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9815.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Holdings Acquisition Corp. (the Company) for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Paul K. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                                           
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  | /s/ Paul K. Kelly                                                                                         
|               |  |  |  | Paul K. Kelly                                                                                             
|April 15, 2009 |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)