alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
FORM  10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-03-1999
<CASH>                                      107001 
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             87100 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 600821 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       24413 
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         60137 
<LOANS>                                    1598043 
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (28760)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2522429 
<DEPOSITS>                                 2040148 
<SHORT-TERM>                                236725 
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          18118 
<LONG-TERM>                                  50000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                   3282 
<COMMON>                                      4596 
<OTHER-SE>                                  169560 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             2522429 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              32626 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             8004 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              1254 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             41884 
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           14520 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           18428 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        23456 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  663 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              21913 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               8389 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    8389 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5465 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 5.89 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 5.89 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7 
<LOANS-NON>                                   2814 
<LOANS-PAST>                                  1460 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              24844 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             28306 
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  585 
<RECOVERIES>                                   376 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            28760 
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         28760 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      10254 
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
BIAO HUANG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9003.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Salvador Nicola NEGRETE, petitioner, v. Greg LEWIS, Acting Warden.

No. 12-8440.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE RESPONSE TO

OTTO TRUCKING’S REQUEST

FOR PERMISSION TO MOVE

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court is in receipt of defendant Otto Trucking LLC’s request for permission to

move for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 733). Plaintiff Waymo LLC may submit a response not

to exceed THREE PAGES in length (with no attachments) by JUNE 28 AT NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 26, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 735 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 1
Consejos para preparar la fórmula infantil importada

Tipos de fórmula infantil

Lista para alimentar

No añadir agua

Concentrado líquido

Debe mezclarse con una 

cantidad igual de agua

En polvo

Debe mezclarse con agua de 

acuerdo con las instrucciones 

de la etiqueta

¿Sabía que...?

Muchas etiquetas de 

fórmulas infantiles 

extranjeras indican 

que se deben 

esterilizar los 

chupones de los 

biberones.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1

180

210

240

150

120

90

60

30

mL oz

¿Cómo preparar la fórmula infantil en polvo?* 

1 3 5

2 4

Lavarse las manos Medir

Añadir agua limpia Mezclar

Probar la temperatura

*Para obtener instrucciones específicas, siga las instrucciones del fabricante.

Mililitros a onzas líquidas

Mililitros Onzas líquidas

30 mL 1 fl oz

60 mL 2 fl oz

90 mL 3 fl oz

120 mL 4 fl oz

Mililitros Onzas líquidas

150 mL 5 fl oz

180 mL 6 fl oz

210 mL 7 fl oz

240 mL 8 fl oz

Conversiones comunes de grados Celsius a Fahrenheit ( ̊C a  ̊F)

0 °C = 32 °F

Punto de congelación 

del agua

37 °C = 98.6 °F

Temperatura promedio 

del cuerpo humano

100 °C = 212 °F

Punto de ebullición 

del agua

Para obtener más información sobre la fórmula infantil, visite:

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/articulos-en-espanol/formulas-para-bebes-lo-que-se-debe-y-no-se-debe-hacer-para-su-seguridad

Si tiene alguna pregunta, hable con el proveedor de atención médica de su bebé.
Jimmy Lawrence NANCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9562.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
T.J. SUTTON, petitioner, v. Lloyd RAPELJE, Warden.

No. 12-9577.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Robert Donnell DONALDSON, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

No. 12-1044.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2013.

*2855Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Ahmad McCASLIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9881.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Case 3:17-mj-70236-MAG Document 4 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1
Stephen J. TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Richard BROWN, Superintendent, Wabash Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9272.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Jeffrey HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, Warden.

No. 12-8797.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

April 26, 2021

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 

Circuit

95 Seventh Street

San Francisco, CA 94103-1526

Re: California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials

v. Tom Torlakson, et al.

No. 20-1137

(Your No. 19-15607)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The motion of Shree Shakti Mandir of Atlanta, et al. for leave to file a 

brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and 

this petition.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 247 Filed 04/29/21 Page 1 of 1
Samuel ACOSTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9669.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12613-008/00667916_1 Error! Unknown document property name.

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

Annick M. Persinger, California Bar No. 272996

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

1970 Broadway, Suite 1070

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel.: (510) 254-6808

Fax: (202) 973-0950

apersinger@tzlegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, 

GABRIELA PERDOMO ORTIZ, and VICTOR 

HUGO CATALAN MOLIN, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1- 50,

Defendants. .

Case No. 4:17-cv-00755-CW

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

APPEARANCE OF CAMERON R. 

PARTOVI AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that attorney Cameron R. Partovi will no longer employed by the 

law firm of Tycko & Zavareei LLP as of August 14, 2023. Therefore, Mr. Partovi’s appearance is 

hereby withdrawn as counsel of record for Plaintiffs Juan Quintanilla Vasquez, Gabriela Perdomo 

Ortiz, and Victor Hugo Catalan Molin, in the above-captioned matter. Mr. Partovi should be 

removed from the service list. All other attorneys at the law firm of Tycko & Zavareei LLP, who are 

currently listed as counsel of record for Plaintiffs shall remain counsel of record and should not be 

removed from the service list. 

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 263 Filed 08/10/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

DATED: August 10, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Cameron R. Partovi

Annick M. Persinger (CA Bar No. 272996)

apersinger@tzlegal.com

Cameron R. Partovi (CA Bar No. 319589)

cpartovi@tzlegal.com

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

1970 Broadway, Suite 1070

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 254-6808

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 263 Filed 08/10/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) of Kiewit Royalty
Trust (the Trust), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Luke H. Paladino, the trust officer of U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2010



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Luke H. Paladino                      
|Luke H. Paladino, Trust Officer           
|U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal American Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert A. Waegelein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 13, 2003

                                                   /s/ Robert A. Waegelein
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Robert A. Waegelein
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


2009 Executive Officer Annualized Base Salaries


 


The
annualized base salaries for our executive officers for 2009 (effective April 1,
2009 through January 2010) are as follows:


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Annualized

  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  Randall A. Lipps

  	
   

  	
  Chairman,
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  407,000

  	
   

  
	
  Robin G. Seim

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  233,000

  	
   

  
	
  J. Christopher Drew

  	
   

  	
  Senior Vice
  President, Field Operations

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  272,000

  	
   

  
	
  Dan S. Johnston

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President and General Counsel

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  239,000

  	
   

  
	
  John G. Choma

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President, OD, Learning and Performance

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  189,000

  	
   

  
	
  Nhat Ngo

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President, Strategy and Business Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  240,000

  	
   

  
	
  Marga Ortigas-Wedekind

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President, Marketing

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  240,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
     Residential Associates III, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,472,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         4,974,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,751,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,161,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        2,573,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,263,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,161,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               308,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             52,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .12
        


</TABLE>
1 C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE Appellate case name: Jennifer Ann Larkins

- Ruby v. Sealy Independent School District Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 7 46

- CV Trial court case number: 2015V

- 0134 Trial court: 155th District Court of Austin County
A ppellant, Jennifer Ann Larkins

- Ruby , has filed a n otice of a ppeal of the trial court’s judgment signed on August 14 , 201 8

. A clerk’s record filed in this Court on October 22, 2018, includes appellant’s “ Pauper’s Oath ” filed in the trial court

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (b) , (d)

. Th at clerk’s record does not include a ny motion to require appellant to pay costs or any trial court order requiring appellant to pay costs

. See id. 145(f)

. Accordingly, t he Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See T EX . R. C IV . P. 145(a), (c) ; T EX . R. A PP . P. 20.1. The trial court clerk is directed to prepare and file , with this Court and at no cost to appellant, a clerk’s record, containing the items set out in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a) and not included in the clerk’s record filed on October 22, 2018

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (c); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 4

. 5 ( a ), ( b ). The clerk’s record is due to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order
. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35. 3(c)

. Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Russell Lloyd

_______ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: _ November 6, 2018

___
Amendment #15 to the Trust Agreement



 Exhibit 10(p) 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER FIFTEEN 
  
 TO 
  
 GRANTOR TRUST AGREEMENT 

 
 THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 30th day of June, 2003 by and between THE
BANK OF NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK (formerly known as THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK), a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the New York (hereinafter referred to as the “Trustee”). 
  
 W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H  : 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee entered into a Grantor Trust Agreement dated as of November 16, 1993 (as amended from
time to time, the “Agreement”); 
  
 WHEREAS, Article
TWELFTH of the Agreement provides that the Company may amend the Agreement; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Trustee agree as follows, effective June 30, 2002: 
  
 Exhibit I to the Agreement is amended by deleting Exhibit I in its entirety and substituting therefor Exhibit I in the form attached hereto. 

 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed in their respective names by their duly authorized officers under their corporate seals as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 THE BANK OF NEW YORK COMPANY, INC.

					
	 	 	/s/    PATRICIA A. BICKET        	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    BRUCE W. VAN SAUN        
	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	ASST. SECRETARY	 	 	 	 	 	 Bruce W. Van Saun
 Senior Executive Vice President

			
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK

					
	 	 	/s/    BARRY O’CONNOR        	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    GERARD STAFFORD - SMITH        
	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 Name:
 Title:
	 	 Gerard Stafford - Smith
 Vice President


  

 - 1 - 








 Exhibit 10(p) 
 EXHIBIT I 
  

	1.	The Bank of New York Company, Inc. Excess Benefit Plan 

  

	2.	The Bank of New York Company, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 

  

	3.	Severance Agreements between The Bank of New York Company, Inc. and the following persons: 

  

			
	 Individual

	  	Date of Agreement


	 Thomas P. Gibbons
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Leslie V. Godridge
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Alan R. Griffith
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Gerald L. Hassell
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Donald R. Monks
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Robert J. Mueller
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Thomas J. Perna
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Charles E. Rappold II
	  	September 30, 2000
	 Thomas A. Renyi
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Brian G. Rogan
	  	July 11, 2000
	 J. Michael Shepherd
	  	January 22, 2001
	 Bruce W. Van Saun
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Joseph M. Velli
	  	July 11, 2000

  

 -2-
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Edge
Resources, Inc.


Vancouver,
Canada





We hereby
consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 20-F/A-2 of our report
dated September 30, 2009, except for Note 13, which is as of May 25, 2010,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Edge Resources Inc., which
is contained in Registration Statement on Form 20-F/A-2.





We also
consent to the reference to us under the caption “Statements by Experts” in the
Registration Statement.





DALE
MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP





/s/ Dale
Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP





Vancouver,
Canada


June 23,
2010




Exhibit
15.2
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE DI STRI CT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) ROBERT R. PRUNTÉ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-0480 ( PL F) ) UNI VERSAL MUSI C GROUP, I NC., et al., )

) Def endants. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER For the re asons g iven in the Opinion issued this same day , it is hereby ORDERED that [92] defe ndants’ motion to strike is GRANTED in part a nd DENI ED in part; it is

FURTHE R ORDERED that [88] plaintiff’s motion alleg ing dir ect c ontempt of court a nd [94] plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice a re D ENI ED; it is FURTHE R ORDERED that [89] plaintiff’s motion for summary judgme nt is DENI ED; it is FURTHE R ORDERED that [99] defe ndants’ motion for summary judgme nt is GRANTED. Judgment sha ll be enter ed for all of the de fenda

nts on all claims; and it isFURTHE R ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court sha ll remove this case from

the docke t of the Court. This is a final appe alable or der. See F E D . R. A P P . P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED. /s/____________________________ PAULL . FRI EDMAN United States District J udg e DATE: Mar ch 29, 2010

2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24848-24849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11436]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-268-000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Tariff
May 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 2, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 327, First Revised 
Sheet No. 328, First Revised Sheet No. 334 and First Revised Sheet No. 
335, with a proposed effective date of May 4, 1995.
    Tennessee states that the tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with Order No. 577, issued by the Commission in Docket No. 
RM95-5-000, on April 4, 1995.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing has been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a petition to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214. All such petitions or protests should be filed on or 
before May 11, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make [[Page 24849]] protestants parties to this proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file and available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11436 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M